HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-19-73 AGENDA BACKUPVII. NEW BUSINESS
2.
April 16, 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VIA: G. A. Horstkotte, Jr., General Manager -Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: "Agreement relating to Real Property"
PROBLEM: Donald L. Rhodes, owner of Parcel "C" 3 P.M. 37 desires
to build a carport over our easement (4246 O.R. 81) near Creekside Lane
in Pleasant Hill.
BACKGROUND-. The District has allowed construction over our easements
in the past subject to their signing our standard form "Agreement Re-
lating to Real Property".
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
000,
Jack L. Best
Office Engineer
JLB:ms
Recommendation approved:
G Horstkotte, Jr.0
Ge'eral Manager -Chief Engineer
VII. NEW BUSINESS
5.
April 16, 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VIA: G. A. Horstkotte, Jr., General Manager -Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Annual Audit
1. PROBLEM: The selection of an Auditor for this fiscal year's
accounts should be made sufficiently in advance of the end of
the fiscal year to permit early scheduling of the District work.
Also, the cost of the audit must be reflected in the 1973-74
Budget.
2. RECOMMENDATION: Board instruction to management on the method
of selection of the auditor.
Respectfully submitted,
W. C. Dalton
Deputy
General Manager -Chief Engineer
WCD: jv
Recommendation Approved:
. a, & ��P, �,,
G . Horstkotte, Jr.�
General Manager -Chief Engineer
VII. NEW BUS
3
April 12, 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
VIA: G. A. Horstkotte, Jr., General Manager -Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: Environmental Evaluation & Report for Project 2100,
Rudgear Road
PROBLEM: This project, which is a trunk sewer to serve Watershed 29 South
being financed primarily with private capital, requires an Environmental
Assessment and Declaration. This District is the lead agency and staff
study shows the project will not have a significant environmental effect.
BACKGROUND: We have reviewed this project with the City of Walnut Creek
and have submitted a preliminary environmental statement to the County.
With the adoption of Ordinance 89, we will follow the procedures therein.
RECOMMENDATION: (1) Acceptance of staff determinations; (2) Adoption
of Resolution Making Negative Declaration and providing for Notice;
(3) Set review for approval or disapproval for second meeting in May.
Respectfully submitted,
bke�__
W. C. Dalton
Deputy
General Manager -Chief Engineer
Recommendation Approved:
G . Horstkotte, Jr.�
General Manager -Chief Engineer
WCD:jh
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY 0=ST71CI
The Dis rict.'s staff, having undertaken and comgleted an
initial- 'tz.c?y at Lhis project I n accordance ith Section 16-6o3
f the District's 'auidelines entitled "Local_. Guide-linea img*emmen-t-
the Cali ornia EnviroTmeental Quality Act 'af: z 970, as- Amended,',
.-Or V e purpose of ascertaining TWhether the proposed project Ilia
have 3 ef-fect on the en-virom ent, has "�caChe� the tF0llo'';--
ng conclusions:
k -L. L e Project could not have a� significant e�iect on t7,o an_
Vironmer_t; therefore a neg3tiJe declaration should bbe pre-
pared.
�. i. 2.. The project could have a Significant effect- on the o_;vi ron
merit--; therefore, an E 1_R -:3 i I be 'tegu -e .
; e :April 11, .1973Loc - Qt.Q�
7'Z1t j.O7 _2:eCG P3_ son