HomeMy WebLinkAboutEngineering & Operations MINUTES 07-13-21 Page 2 of 6
CENTRAL SAN
CONTRACENTRAL • DISTRICT 5019 •
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFDIRECToxs:
TAD J PILECKI
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA President
ILLIAMS
SANITARY DISTRICT DAIDR. tProTem
Tem
President Pro
ENGINEERING & OPERATIONS BARBARA D.HOCKETT
COMMITTEE MARIAH N.LAURITZEN
MICHAEL R.MCGILL
MINUTES PHONE: (925)228-9500
FAX: (925)372-0192
Tuesday, July 13, 2021 www.centralsan.org
11:00 a.m.
(All attendees participated via videoconference)
Committee:
Chair David Williams
Member Mariah Lauritzen
Staff.
Roger S. Bailey, General Manager
Katie Young, Secretary of the District
Philip Leiber, Director of Finance and Administration
Steve McDonald, Director of Operations
Jean-Marc Petit, Director of Engineering and Technical Services
Edgar Lopez, Capital Projects Division Manager
Sasha Mestetsky, Senior Engineer (left after Item 4.a.)
Nancy Molina, Associate Engineer
Amelia Berumen, Assistant to the Secretary of the District
1. Notice
This meeting was held in accordance with the Brown Act as in effect under the
State Emergency Services Act, the Governor's Emergency Declaration related
to COVID-19, and the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20 that allowed
attendance by Board Members, District staff, and the public to participate and
conduct the meeting by teleconference, videoconference, or both. The agenda
included instructions for options in which the public could participate in the
meeting.
August 5, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 233 of 262
Page 3 of 6
Engineering & Operations Committee Minutes
July 13, 2021
Page 2
2. Call Meeting to Order
Chair Williams called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m.
3. Public Comments
No public comments.
4. Agenda Items
a. Review draft Position Paper to authorize the General Manager to execute
two professional engineering services agreements with 1) Towill, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $475,000, and 2) LCC, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed $275,000, each for a three-year term to provide as-needed
surveying services for District projects
Mr. Lopez provided an overview of the draft Position Paper and consultant
proposal process. He stated these services would supplement seasonal
design and construction work to support collection system, treatment
plant, and other capital project needs.
It was noted that these two as-needed contracts have a higher cost ceiling
than the last contract period. This is due to the increased use of 3D-
scanning, which has been a very useful tool, especially with treatment
plant projects. Towill, Inc. would provide the 3D-scanning service, which
equates to the higher cost ceiling contract.
Mr. Lopez stated staff has begun to evaluate whether the continued use of
consultants for these type services is the best way to move forward in the
future. However, at this time staff recommends these two as-needed
surveying services contracts as planned. He explained the services are
already allocated in the project budgets and is just a matter of executing
and using the contracts.
In response to Member Lauritzen's inquiry, there was some discussion on
the use of 3D modeling and how it correlates to the geographic
information system (GIS) modeling and records management. Mr. Lopez
explained that designs are not done in GIS, but the 3D-scanning is used to
develop drawings. Many consultants are using this tool and staff will look
at such capabilities in the future. He explained that the District's GIS group
receives the CAD (computer aided design) project files for integration in
the system.
Chair Williams stated he supported these services to help with peak
workload and considering the addition of staff as a cost-effective approach
August 5, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 234 of 262
Page 4 of 6
Engineering & Operations Committee Minutes
July 13, 2021
Page 3
is good, however, in the meantime, this consultant work is the cost-
effective method.
The Committee recommended approval.
Later in the meeting, Member Lauritzen returned to this topic and asked
staff to provide cost figures on the contracting versus inhouse comparison.
Mr. Bailey replied that in this regard, careful consideration needs to be
taken when comparing staff to consultants relative to the scope and cost
to execute. For example, this scope is executed over several years, and
the firm's staff availability that may be placed on a particular scope during
a seasonal time may be two or more compared to one.
Mr. Petit stated staff is not ready to discuss this topic and that preliminary
evaluations have been conducted, but a peer-to-peer comparison is not
yet complete.
Member Lauritzen said she would be interested in the comparison when
presented but did not want to go through the assumptions at this time.
Mr. Lopez replied that staff would present an update when the comparison
is ready and to receive Committee input on whether staff should move
forward to request implementation.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Recommended Board approval.
b. Review draft Position Paper to award a construction contract in the
amount of$9,594,300 to Auburn Constructors, LLC, the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder for the Electric Blower Improvements, District
Project 100015 and Treatment Plant Piping Renovations, Phase 10,
District Project 7369; find these projects are exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act; and authorize the General Manager to:
• Amend two existing agreements with 1) HDR, Inc. in the amount of
$450,000, increasing the cost ceiling to $3,920,000, and 2) Lee & Ro,
Inc. in the amount of $300,000, increasing the cost ceiling to
$800,000;
• Execute a professional engineering services agreement in an amount
not to exceed $800,000 with Carollo Engineers, Inc. to provide
construction management services; and
• Execute the Contract Documents subject to submittal requirements
and include up to a 15-percent contingency
Mr. Lopez explained the two projects shared locations on the treatment
plant site and the timing of the projects lined up to combine as one bid for
cost effectiveness. In response to Chair Williams'inquiry of one package
with two consultants, Mr. Lopez compared this bid process to the recent
August 5, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 235 of 262
Page 5 of 6
Engineering & Operations Committee Minutes
July 13, 2021
Page 4
Mechanical and Concrete Renovations Project. The "front-end"document
combined the projects accordingly, however, the technical specifications
and plans were segregated for each project's particular needs and/or
scope. For example, some scope within shared task items or locations
were different and particular specifications were required (e.g., electric
blowers and piping components).
He noted that the Treatment Plant Piping Renovations, Phase 10 project
utilizes a legacy name and perhaps the title would change in the future as
more than simply piping is part of the project scope. The renovations also
include other apparatuses, such as variable frequency drives, hypochlorite
system, return-activated sludge equipment, or other renovations required
during a particular phase.
Mr. Lopez and Mr. Petit discussed the drivers associated with these
projects; the main driver as being proactive to address additional potential
process failures and a lack of available redundancy. Although discharge
permit limits were not exceeded in a recent failure, some processes were
disrupted for a few hours; thus, having such redundancies are critical to
continue critical processes. Mr. Lopez explained that the system upgrades
as part of these projects will provide a full redundancy (i.e., multiple
blowers rather than one) and that future alternatives were considered;
therefore, no assets would be lost.
Mr. McDonald explained that the incident mentioned occurred during a
swing shift and with problems with the blowers at the time; and, had the
District not had the cogeneration system, it would have been difficult to
carry the plant. He stated staff is currently reviewing sources of power and
looking at the system to add additional head space.
Chair Williams asked staff's opinion on the bid being much lower than the
engineer's estimate. Mr. Lopez explained that the combined estimates
were elevated with current market conditions, but were capped at
$14 million. However, the three bidding contractors happened to already
be on site working on other projects. Accordingly, the normal mobilization
cost factor was greatly minimalized, and other work onsite would continue
while waiting for equipment, suppliers, etc.
Mr. Petit said such cases are difficult to factor into an estimate and this
estimate was the best opinion of cost at the time; however, it was
apparent the contractors also saw the benefit of the two projects being
combined for efficiency. He concluded that the overall award is under the
budget estimated for both projects combined. Mr. Lopez concurred that it
would be under$19 million to complete both projects.
August 5, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 236 of 262
Page 6 of 6
Engineering & Operations Committee Minutes
July 13, 2021
Page 5
As it pertained to the new contract with Carollo Engineers (Carollo) for
construction management (CM) services and a future agreement with
MWH Constructors, Inc. (MWH), Mr. Lopez replied to Chair Williams that
the services selections were done by a competitive process and that CM
services for this project were included in the proposal description. Staff is
currently focusing on this project and it was clarified that such CM services
are needed for other treatment plant projects; therefore, staff will return to
the Board to increase Carollo's contract and execute a second as-needed
contract with MWH at a future meeting.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Recommended Board approval.
5. Announcements — None.
6. Suggestions for Future Agenda Items
a. Receive list of upcoming agenda items and provide suggestions for any
other future agenda items
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the list.
7. Future Scheduled Meetings
Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.
Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.
8. Adjournment— at 11:40 a.m.
August 5, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 237 of 262