HomeMy WebLinkAbout08. (Handout) Supplemental Information re Poshard Street Appeal Item 8.
(Handout)
Supplemental
Information
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
June 30, 2021
TO: Danea Gemmell, Planning & Development Services Division Manager
CC: Mr. Sean Mullen (via e-mail)
FROM: Thomas Brightbill, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Additional Materials for Poshard Street Fee Appeal (Agenda Item 8)
Mr. Mullen asked if we could provide the City of Pleasant Hill's response on our deed
restriction inquiry to the Board of Directors. I let Mr. Mullen know we were not able to
include the e-mail in the board packet due to timing issues, but that I thought we could
provide it in a supplemental packet. I have attached a copy of Pleasant Hill's response
to this memo.
You and I talked about providing a copy of the floor plan of the proposed structure to the
Board of Directors. I've attached the portion of sheet A4.1 cropped to show the
proposed structure to this memo as well.
encl. City of Pleasant Hill e-mail
Proposed Structure Floor Plan
n:\envrsry\special studies&capacity fee review\capacity fee review\2021\115 poshard st ph(mullen adu)\appeal\board
docs\poshard street appeal add'I items memo 2021-06-30.docx
Thomas Brightbill
From: Sean Mullen <seanthemullen@gmail.com>
Sent: 06 23, 2021 10:55 AM
To: Thomas Brightbill; Bryan McGloin
Subject: Fwd: Fee appeal (and deed restriction) for your project at 115 Poshard Street
Hello Thomas,
Here is the response from the city. The city will not allow an ADU conversion without explicit permission from Central
San, so they do not believe revising the language is warranted.
Given Central San permission is required, it feels like the district is protected in the same manner as if Central San was
listed on the deed restriction.
What do you think?
Sean
---------- Forwarded message---------
From:Andrew Shiflet<Ashiflet@pleasanthillca.org>
Date: Wed,Jun 23, 2021 at 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: Fee appeal (and deed restriction)for your project at 115 Poshard Street
To: Sean Mullen <seanthemullen@gmail.com>
Cc: Building<building@pleasanthillca.org>, Geoff Simmons<gsimmons@pleasanthillca.org>,Troy Fujimoto
<Tfuiimoto@pleasanthillca.org>
Hello Sean,
Your project was reviewed by the City as a non-ADU "Pool House" and a deed restriction was required (per Municipal
Code Section 18.20.095) stating that it would not be converted to a dwelling unit, or modified to include a cooking
facility,without review and approval by the City. Our Chief Building Official, Geoff Simmons, has informed me that the
Building Division's review of a hypothetical conversion ADU would require a letter from Central San prior to approving a
building permit. Since the City's review and approval includes prior written approval from Central San, we will not revise
our Deed Restriction at this time to include any outside agencies.
Regards,
Andrew
Andrew Shiflet
Assistant Planner
City of Pleasant Hill
P.925.671.5211 F.925.682.9327
1
Proposed Structure
(portion of sheet A4.1)
] I
1
_
Y-3" 65MT
N a be HD.HT. 1
c '9
IA C a o
E'
I"aFN
4
CXX NTFR
056 BI-FOLD HINDON
i o b" HD.H7.
bE I'-b' 4'-O"
.. . .......