Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19.a. Committee Minutes - Real Estate, Environmental & Planning 04-12-2021 Page 1 of 13 Item 19.a. CENTRALSAN jdf A- hom CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT May 6, 2021 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: KATIE YOUNG, SECRETARYOF THE DISTRICT SUBJECT: APRIL 12, 2021 - REAL ESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING COMMITTEE - CHAIR MCGILLAND MEMBER HOCKETT Attached are minutes of the above Committee meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Minutes of 04-12-21 meeting 2. (Handout) Item 5.b. Revised Presentation from meeting May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 185 of 239 Page 2 of 13 CENTRALSAN CONTRACENTRAL •STA SANITARY DISTRICT 5019 IMHOFF BOARD OF DIRECTORS: TAD J.PILECKI President REGULAR MEETING OF THE DAVID R. WILLIAMS CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA President Pro Tent SANITARY DISTRICT BARBARA D.HRITZEN MARIAHN.LAURITZEN REAL ESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL MICHAEL R.MCGILL & PLANNING COMMITTEE PHONE: (925)228-9500 M I N U T E S FAX. (925)372-0192 www.centralsan.org Monday, April 12, 2021 9:00 a.m. (All attendees participated via videoconference) Committee: Chair Mike McGill Member Barbara Hockett Staff. Roger S. Bailey, General Manager Katie Young, Secretary of the District Steve McDonald, Director of Operations Jean-Marc Petit, Director of Engineering and Technical Services Emily Barnett, Communication Services and Intergovernmental Relations Manager Danea Gemmell, Planning and Development Services Division Manager Melody LaBella, Resource Recovery Program Manager Lori Schectel, Environmental and Regulatory Compliance Division Manager Paul Seitz, Collection System Operations Division Manager (left after Item 5.b.) Lupe Saldana, Administrative Services Supervisor 1. Notice This meeting was held in accordance with the Brown Act as in effect under the State Emergency Services Act, the Governor's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19, and the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20 issued on March 17, 2020 that allowed attendance by Board Members, District staff, and the public to participate and conduct the meeting by teleconference, videoconference, or both. The agenda included instructions for options in which the public could participate in the meeting. May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 186 of 239 Page 3 of 13 Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes April 12, 2021 Page 2 2. Call Meeting to Order Chair McGill called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 3. Public Comments None. 4. Consent Items a. Review draft Position Paper to adopt Resolution No. 2021- authorizing execution of a real property agreement related to 111 EI Centro, Diablo, and authorizing staff to record documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder b. Review draft Position Paper to Adopt Resolution No. 2021- authorizing execution of a real property agreement for the property located at 6 Green Valley Drive in Lafayette, and authorizing staff to record documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder C. Review draft Position Paper to adopt Resolution No. 2021- authorizing execution of three quitclaim deeds for properties located on Autumn Trail Lane and Paulson Lane, Walnut Creek, as listed on Exhibit A to the resolution; and authorizing staff to record documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder d. Review draft Position Paper to adopt Resolution No. 2021- accepting a grant of easement for sanitary sewer and recycled water purposes from the Contra Costa County Flood Control District related to the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor, District Project 4985, and authorize staff to record documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder Regarding Item 4.d., Chair McGill pointed out that the document from Contra Costa County listed Member Williams as the Board President. Ms. Gemmell advised that staff has spoken with the County and they are allowing staff to make the correction on the document. COMMITTEE ACTION: Recommended Board approval. 5. Other Agenda Items a. Review Maintenance Access (Manhole) Covers Beautification proposal Ms. Barnett reviewed the presentation included in the agenda material. Member Hockett opined that the project was a fabulous idea. May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 187 of 239 Page 4 of 13 Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes April 12, 2021 Page 3 Chair McGill inquired if staff had considered switching out the manholes where the District has the most overflows. Mr. Seitz stated that staff has not specifically looked at overflow areas, rather have concentrated on the highest visible and walkable areas. Mr. Seitz stated that he estimates completing 50 manhole replacements a month and would most likely be able to do the recommended 1,700 in three years or less. Once those are completed, staff will then look at high overflow areas. In response to a question from Chair McGill regarding advertisement of this program, Ms. Barnett stated that it will be incorporated into the Central San Pipeline newsletter. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the information and provided input to staff. b.* Receive update on Central San's prior efforts to develop an Electric Vehicle Charging Stations project, District Project 8252 Ms. LaBella reviewed the attached updated presentation. Regarding the thirty percent design plan shown on slide 9, Mr. Petit interjected that the most substantial cost, regardless of the level of the charging station selected, will be to bring the electrical power connections and conduits from north of the Pump and Blower Building into the Plant Operations Building parking lot. Ms. LaBella continued the presentation, explaining that the level numbers indicate lowest to highest speed of the recharge and that Level 1 is not recommended. Mr. Bailey commented that he is concerned Level 2 may soon become obsolete. Ms. LaBella explained that the Level 2 recharge speed would still be suitable for employees having eight hours during the workday to recharge. She added that for Level 3 chargers, there is a higher amount of grant funding available and potential for a higher rebate, if Central San qualifies for it. Member Hockett commented that she thinks the District would be remiss to pursue less than Level 3 chargers, noting that in the future there will be more electric vehicles. She asked if staff has considered replacing fleet vehicles with electric vehicles and installing charging stations at the Collection Systems Operations (CSO) building. Ms. LaBella responded that if the Governor's order to halt the sale of gasoline-driven vehicles by 2035 remains in place, that is something that Central San should be moving to and staff could research that option and bring information back to the Committee. May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 188 of 239 Page 5 of 13 Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes April 12, 2021 Page 4 There was a discussion on the amount of time it takes to recharge a battery with the Level 3 charger compared to Level 2. Based on information shared by the electric vehicle owners in the meeting, the volts and amps of a charging station determine the speed of the recharge and the cost. A Level 3 (480-volt charger) will recharge twice as fast as a 240-volt charger which can take 2.5 hours to recharge an electric vehicle battery. Mr. McDonald commented that most of the cost for this project is attributed to the parking lot disposal issue and to bringing the electrical power connections and conduits to the Plant Operations Building parking lot. Chair McGill stated that this project is consistent with Central San's mission and that Level 3 seemed to be the more appropriate choice. Mr. Petit advised that there is flexibility when deciding whether to rent/lease or purchase any Level of the charging stations, and the decisions can be made once the infrastructure was complete, noting that there would be less flexibility on setting the charge for use should the District go with a rent/lease option. Mr. Bailey, in support of Level 3, added that a vendor could lock Central San into Level 2 charging stations and, either way, would need to recover their costs. Chair McGill inquired whether there was any concern with social inequity if only the affluent will benefit. Mr. Bailey shared that a few years ago some employees expressed concern that some were getting free electricity to power their electric vehicles while others had to pay for gas to power their vehicles. Member Hocket agreed that the service should not be free to employees, which is why the stations can accept credit cards. Mr. Bailey advised that during the last discussion with the REEP Committee, one of the Board Members asked if Contra Costa County would be interested in a collaborative effort. Ms. LaBella stated that after speaking with the County, it was determined that if they were to invest in an electric vehicle project, their preference would be at a facility that had more employees in the vicinity and greater potential for usage. Mr. Bailey requested this information be added to the presentation to the full Board. Ms. LaBella recapped the input received from the Committee. The recommendation to the full Board will be to approve implementation of the infrastructure at the Plant Operations building parking lot for Level 3 charging stations that accept credit card payment. Additionally, staff will request input from the full Board whether staff should concurrently research expanding implementation to the CSO site, and the feasibility of transitioning Central San fleet vehicles to electric vehicles over time. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update and provided input to staff. May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 189 of 239 Page 6 of 13 Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes April 12, 2021 Page 5 C. Receive update on the most recent meeting of the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA) Ms. Schectel reviewed the memorandum included in the agenda material. She discussed the initial draft of the Sanitary Sewer System Waste Discharge Requirements. She advised that the Regional Water Board provided a draft version of the Climate Change survey in January and five BACWA members made suggestions to improve the survey questions. Once finalized, the plan is to provide it to all BACWA agencies. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update. 6. Announcements Ms. Barnett stated that an article to promote recycled water usage will be included in the next Pipeline issue. Ms. Young advised that Ms. Saldana would be assisting the Secretary of the District's office with taking minutes during Committee meetings. 7. Suggestions for future agenda items a. Receive list of upcoming agenda items and provide suggestions for any other future agenda items Chair McGill requested the following items: 1. Add a new item to receive an update on advertising or any other efforts to encourage customers to take advantage of recycled water. 2. Schedule specific meeting dates for these Unscheduled items: Future Projects in Process (mobile shower/restroom unit and homeless encampments), Microplastics Update, and Wipes Update. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the list and provided input to staff. 8. Future scheduled meetings Chair McGill stated that the July 19 meeting may need to be rescheduled if it is the same date as the Contra Costa Special Districts Association meeting. Monday, May 3, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Monday, June 14, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Monday, July 19, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. 9. Adjournment— at 10:26 a.m. May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 190 of 239 Page 7 of 13 Item 5.b. (Updated Presentation) p UPDATE ON CENTRAL SAN'S ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS PROJECT Melody LaBella, P.E. Resource Recovery Program Manager Real Estate, Environmental and Planning (REEP) Committee Meeting April 12, 2021 _ 1 1 BACKGROUND • Electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming more prevalent. • Most, if not all, car manufacturers now offer either a plug-in hybrid or full EV option. • There are various incentives (federal tax credit, fuel rebates, etc.) for purchase of EVs. • Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) are being installed at businesses and public areas (e.g.; public parking garages, airports, transportation hubs, etc.). • Businesses/agencies are installing EVCS for both employees and customers. Iz 2 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 191 of 239 1 Page 8 of 13 WHY CONSIDER AN EVCS PROJECT? P° °Ch"V • The transportation sector is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in California. ® ' • California has aggressive goals related to the electrification of the transportation sector. • Contra Costa County is in the top 10 counties in California for highest number of EVs registered. • It is an opportunity for Central San to demonstrate its environmental leadership. 13 3 WHY CONSIDER AN EVCS PROJECT? �°=�tFLO • Aligns with Central San's mission to protect the i environment • Providing EV charging infrastructure promotes EVs, which reduces mobile sources of air pollution, in addition to hazardous chemicals • Would achieve a higher tier participation in the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program • Would provide a benefit to employees driving EVs • Could provide a public service to EV drivers CFNTPAISAN l4 4 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 192 of 239 2 Page 9 of 13 NEW SLIDE WHY CONSIDER AN EVCS PROJECT? • California Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of � 2015 (SB 350) Established a 2030 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and c requires the state to increase the efficiency of travel (transportation accounts for >50% of statewide GHG emissions) Orders the California Public Utilities Commission to direct the six investor-owned electric utilities to file applications for programs that "accelerate widespread transportation electrification" California Executive Order B-48-18 Sets ambitious target of 250,000 EV chargers to support 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) on California roads by 2025 and 5 million ZEVs by 2030 California Executive Order N-79-20 Directs the state to require that, by 2035, all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California be zero-emission vehicles ' 5 5 WHY IS STAFF EVALUATING AN EVCS PROJECT? An employee submitted a suggestion to Central San's Employee Suggestion Program. Seven Central San employees drive EVs. Staff was approached by ChargePoint, one of the EVCS vendors. Staff became aware of grant funding programs available for the installation of EVCS. CFNTPAI SAN 16 6 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 193 of 239 3 Page 10 of 13 PROJECT BACKGROUND After presenting to the REEP Committee and obtaining Board approval in June 2019 to explore a project to install EVCS, staff completed the following actions: Completed and submitted a grant application to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in June 2019 Created a contingency capital project (District Project 8252) and issued a task order to TJC and Associates, Inc. to complete a 30% pre-design and cost estimate for EVCS installation in the Plant Operations Department (POD) parking lot CENTRAL SAN 1 � LOCATION EVALUATED IN POD PARKING LOT � ,w• Ck�al , , Co 1� •l�At �X a A 0 200 Feet ProposedPN Charging Staticu CFNTPAISAN1 g May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 194 of 239 4 Page 11 of 13 I 'ti i. �_ VeN��{g __ - -� a„'®"vara"•s l rI(YbBr"°�r 4.Rw Eli 1iE.rev - mwmrrw efre.°.a - � '••1nurRr m 0.at I 5� __ piucngqlsuiuoN. ,��a � Nt @SS kl � ��15 alNo N1 �• '0 � _ m_ .m....a. WUMRcqux4Wi 6®\at¢6 • CAM TI N AuudMhmh�tro®uwmmN6v.nwas �:As v<Nas mNL[p® ALL 6 19 aWALMY tY SltIiFO®WIRM OIYgWWf Aott4 IWIKF NA1 Im"'.H.eICPYOiYb N IL 4 !� ••m•,^,•• I A4 NNF?1r0.'�lWN 8lAf6 Prmv ELECTRIC VEHICLECHAROING STATION wwr ° rear nee 1D0® TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FIGUREI-CONCEPTUAL SITE LAYOUT ruL Cc 6� uPp CENTRAL CONTRA CO— CAUTIONrn= V �- 6AN mrt�R O[*STRYGT I KimYLL Nuwb «., I GENERAL PUN f 17 I� - r,. - xe�s `.•a•"•Y1°",• DMhAil at lyd.e 9 Table 1-electric Vehicle charging stations comparison 0 Alternatives ALTERNATIVE OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST'•' PROS CONS APPL]C►TION CONSIDERATIONS 1-All Leva11 CM1arging Level 2 Chargers:, $48'000 • Level 2—are—,p ble • Future expansim is limited m •Charge Ti meJXiles p rpb:'lll~38 miles rph;A—dvmg Stations Oud bankWirino: t 78,000 with rtrost EVs w Nf rib Lerrainers: el 2 dEV aide (-Z­[hrs.for 80%,harge—plebe.} other EI c riml Arr,eria industry rnll more toward Safety:Waver rdtaoe i120 N and lower cvrent present in tine • Initial:Three Leve12 (7 nslormer,120/208 V PanNAaard,MCC -hid-that ran use I]C fast chargers Mms): E 52,000 • Lev J 2��are rnaa dvrging(Level 3) penin,Irk;possibly lower eler 1 hoard than.6,4 CNiVsbvduml Infra,trixtirre for"mpdek d.Mr m the parking lot Atf.,,h arc flash muLd be higher • Provisions for up to six (Equipment Pad,Charging Statim Pads, presently being sdd Bk_electrical equi--L •Vehicular/Plug CompatibillN:Wvd 2 chasers are compatible fu Wre Level 2 chargers Pestrrping Paring Lot): $26,000 Smallest eledriwl load on the f Ripe Ib-ansforrry-s vritl•rmst EYs in Nwfh America;level 2 drarger wnas vritl,]I]]2 to nine cM1a 51r6tatal: tl%.000 .M - A,transformer, MCC:smallest feeder sire duo,whldn is the most common plug,and is wnrpatihle wide all (aP r9ers drargerrend board and:core EVs in North Amertw Total] Rom-,Taxes,&33%Contingx,cy:' .Lorrest cost we'Jk; quiiesa new $143'000 wr•uete slab W install •dial Pad Cha,g int:level 2 dnarger wn du two vehid. tnn� Total Gust: amu Lanrwn dy at 6.6 kW,higFr-,x rpugut 1339.000 Canoe33 S 2-AR Level 3 CM1arging level 3 Chargers:, 5139,800 __expansim allows option Only compatible vehides ran rn rge TinMJMilea M rph:• Stations diel ba.L�Wdnq: $125,000 for Level 2 chargers if desired nnre Level 3 do__;Level 2 100-200 mh;Fastest chargers I^'15-45 cons for 80%drarue OLher 9ectrial EVs caned dwnge with Level • Initial:Three Leve13 Requires least amount of spew w Pletion for most­hid-) (-080 V D58,MCC Mads), $1],00 3 charging stations cher CwiIJSMrt A Inims rix tEauipment Ter a edriwl equipment(only Hi her voha 480 Y d more current Min the rgers me dosure for the 600'0 Level 3 compatible"are ' Maty' g ge{ ]an prase Pod.O L.Q: Station Pads,Reship00 068) •least common on the road oohing lot;this picsents more of an elemiral heard in the • Provisions for up to Parking LptJ: 5 26,000 parking lot than Level 2 diargers at 12O V pi8ently threefWure level, 9nhtota: $387,008 . Vehi[ul ear/PIuBC Atlbfllty:Level 3c ha L,er only chargrs(up Co six XomMs,Taxes.&33%Contirgenev:° •Lainedderhiwlload on the patble with vehicles that support OC fast deeming;Leve13 chargers Total] 5 224,000 MCC:adds an additional 600'0 charger ai ppaG up tp cava cmnedar types per strtion(CHAdehlO, of elecmral loading on MCC 351(SAE]1]72 Combo}and CC52(IEC 61651-23)pl­ ­pt­ g Cance ptual Total Cost: .Highest-A 531,000 dial Pod Charging:Unavaila de 3-Hybrid L. 12 and 3 Leve(2 b 3 Chargers:, ;73,00 •5uppo�both Leal 2 and • Biggest equipment footpnM •Charge Time/MII-of rph:1 Charging Stations Ord hankjwninq: t 89,00 Level 3 WV (ME.transfonma,d,,,., Level 2'.10-30 mils rph;slov,gt drainers I^'2-4 his.for 80% Other 0x 1: panel boand]and conk wsght; One Laeel 3 cher . Future expamm�mpabihty for dnarge completion) igen (T dnSfdrrh2r,ass,Izfl/208 v PaneffMdrC, requiins a new convete slab either Lend 2 or Level 3. HCCModsl 158.000 dino flexibility for minstall transfomra Lerel 3� .pi2.rph;Fa;�#drargers(^IS-45 mins for80% • Two Level 2 chargers (E4.,budural Infrastmch,re drarge completion for most rehides) (Equipment Pad,CharprrAp SGfNn Peres, meeting innh,re EV trends Provisions for six hnture ReStrrpirl4 P gr L ), $31,000 .Safety:Higher mltage(-080 h and more current presem in the parking lot;tins presents more of an deetiiwl hazard in the Lerel 2 chargers and{or yynbLalal: $ 251,00 parking lot than only Level 2 diaM at EW V Level3charger(9 pinnaces,Taxes,&33%Cantrc)erry:' chargers total] $185,000 •WhionlarJPluq C.mp—Hity:11,rM ravailability for Al vehicles Cpnwptual Tool Cori: •Dual Poft ChaminR i Level 2 drainer can cher ine hen vehicles $436,000 simultaneously at 6.6-kW,high-powero p LQIFS M',T 4FgpWEo fncluncom�r..e msrasnxaTes 10 CaaL lA6MASInIK"fMtFy exAlARpf.H1meNG CUMwTE NTTRICJfArtLnlW-tM WSrS A1ID alxH!uNt�]!Im fA[To.� 10 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 195 of 239 5 Page 12 of 13 PROJECT STATUS Staff provided an update at the December 2019 REEP Committee meeting. There was not interest in continuing to pursue an EVCS project at that time. The Committee requested comprehensive consideration of various environmental projects. EVCS Showers for the homeless in Martinez Recreational Vehicle (RV) Receiving Station AMIJ, CENTRAL SAN 11 POTENTIAL NEXT STEPS Return to the Board to provide an update and gauge current level of support for developing an EVCS project Evaluate an option to install EVCS inside the Treatment Plant and return to the REEP Committee Halt any further evaluation of an EVCS Project 1 12 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 196 of 239 6 Page 13 of 13 QUESTIONS/INPUT f 13 May 6, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 197 of 239