HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.a. (Handout) Presentation from meeting Item 4.a.
(Handout)
BIDDING OF THE
CONTRACTOR STAGING IMPROVEMENTS
DISTRICT PROJECT 7375
Engineering & Operations Meeting
April 7, 2021
�1 Edgar J. Lopez, P.E.
Capital Projects Division Manager
PROJECT LOCATION
1
\ EONw
I vfJ\11AL.M1\ GORiRAGNRSTn&RG iYPRpv[LERTS
PROJECT
OE4iMC�PROJECT I]i5
2
1
CAPPED PROPERTY
PLAW
RaWf DR
0 4r
8
a LJt'
newnon
TANK t ` IEGM
SOUTH
CAPPED PPOPOM 7
r 3
CENTRALSAN
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Staging area utilities, access, trailers, and restrooms;
Contractor receiving, storage, and parking areas;
New entrance from Imhoff Drive, emergency access,
and new security guard facility;
Improved roadways, fencing, and automated gates;
Separate construction from daily District operations;
Recreational Vehicle (RV) Receiving Station, if
approved; and
Security and Safety Improvements:
Site lighting
Fencing and signage
Security cameras and badging system
2
BID SUMMARY
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $4.000.000
NO. BIDDER BID PRICE
1 Carone&Company, Inc. $3,819,700-
2 McGuire&Hester $4,001,000 I
3 O.C.Jones&Sans,Inc. $4,249,500
4 NTK Construction,Inc. $4,506,700
5 Aztec Consultants,Inc. $4,731,390
Bid non-responsive.
s
BID ITEM 5 AND 6 COMPARISON
Bid Item 5 Bid Item 6
Extended Cost Extended Cost
Aztec Consultants,Inc. $458,000 $56,000
McGuire&Hester $285,000 $12,000
NTK Construction,Inc. $325,000 $44,000
O.C.Jones 9 Sons.Inc. $270.000 320,000
AVERAGE From Bids $334,750 $33,000
Engineers Eshmate $325,000 $35,000
Ca ro ne&Company,Inc. $112,500 $137,000
• These items are for disposal of contaminated soils
in the "Capped Property" and pose the most
significant risks to the cost of the project.
6
CENTRAILSAN
3
PROTEST
Carone & Company (Carone), the apparent low bidder,
made significant errors in their bid and has
acknowledged the mistakes.
Staff can not recommend waiving the errors and
therefore, determined Carone's bid to be non-
responsive.
Carone has protested McGuire & Hester's (M&H) bid,
claiming the bid as unbalanced and would honor the
original Carone bid total.
Staff evaluated Carone's bid protest and does not find
the M&H bid to be so unbalanced as to cause it to be
non-responsive. Therefore, staff recommends that M&H
bid is responsive.
CENTRALSAN
BOARD ALTERNATIVES
The following alternatives are not recommended by staff:
Reconsider Carone's bid and/or declare them a
responsive bidder.
Reject all bids, postpone, and/or rebid the project.
Reject the additive bid item for the RV Receiving
Station.
� 8
4
RECOMMENDED COMMITTEE ACTIONS
• Receive the information and forward it to the Board for
determination and award at the April 15, 2021 Board
Meeting.
ZIA 9
CENTRALSAN
QUESTIONS?
110
5