HomeMy WebLinkAbout17.c. Committee Minutes-Real Estate, Environmental & Planning 02-08-21 Page 1 of 8
Item 17.c.
CENTRALSAN
jdf A- hom
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
February 18, 2021
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM: KATIE YOUNG, SECRETARYOF THE DISTRICT
SUBJECT: FEBRUARY8, 2021 - REAL ESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING
COMMITTEE - CHAIR MCGILLAND MEMBER HOCKETT
Attached are minutes of the above Committee meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes of 02-08-21 meeting
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 120 of 147
Page 2 of 8
CENTRALSAN
CONTRACENTRAL •STA SANITARY DISTRICT 5019 IMHOFF
BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
REGULAR MEETING OF THE TAD J.PILECKI
President
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA DAVID R. WILLIAMS
SANITARY DISTRICT President Pro Tem
REAL ESTATE ENVIRONMENTAL BARBARA°.HOITZ
f MARIAHN LAURITZEN
& PLANNING COMMITTEE MICHAEL R.MCGILL
PHONE: (925)228-9500
M I N U T E S FAX. (925)372-0192
www.centralsan.org
Monday, February 8, 2021
9:00 a.m.
(All attendees participated via videoconference)
Committee:
Chair Mike McGill
Member Barbara Hockett
Staff.
Roger S. Bailey, General Manager (joined during Item 5.b.)
Katie Young, Secretary of the District
Steve McDonald, Director of Operations
Jean-Marc Petit, Director of Engineering and Technical Services
Danea Gemmell, Planning and Development Services Division Manager
Melody LaBella, Resource Recovery Program Manager
Lori Schectel, Environmental and Regularoty Compliance Division Manager
Mary Lou Esparza, Laboratory Superintendent
Rita Cheng, Associate Engineer
David Wyatt, Household Hazardous Waste Supervisor
Amelia Berumen, Senior Administrative Technician
1. Notice
This meeting was held in accordance with the Brown Act as in effect under the
State Emergency Services Act, the Governor's Emergency Declaration related to
COVID-19, and the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20 issued on March 17, 2020
that allowed attendance by Board Members, District staff, and the public to participate
and conduct the meeting by teleconference, videoconference, or both. The agenda
included instructions for options in which the public could participate in the meeting.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 121 of 147
Page 3 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 2
2. Call Meeting to Order
Chair McGill called the meeting to order at 9:01 a.m.
3. Public Comments - None.
4. Consent Items
a. Review draft Position Paper to adopt Resolution No. 2021- authorizing
(1) execution of a real property agreement for property located at 249 Castle
Crest Road in Alamo; and (2) staff to record documents with the Contra Costa
County Recorder
b. Review draft Position Paper to adopt Resolution No. 2021- accepting a
Grant of Easement at 343 Strand Avenue in Pleasant Hill as related to District
Project 390, and authorizing staff to record documents with the Contra Costa
County Recorder
COMMITTEE ACTION: Recommended Board approval.
5. Agenda Items
a. Receive update on satellite water recycling facilities, including a request for a
facility in Rossmoor, and discuss creation of a District policy for consideration
of future satellite recycling facilities
Ms. LaBella presented a comprehensive history overview and technical
discussion of satellite water recycling facilities (S WRFs) as included with the
agenda material.
Mr. Petit discussed the technical challenges that can exist with S WRFs when
the demand for recycled water does not match the available sewer volume
(supply) and, when these facilities are evaluated in remote areas of Central
San's service area, they may not have adequate carrying water to handle the
return of waste activated sludge from the SWRF to Central San's collection
system.
Chair McGill inquired about East Bay Municipal Utility District's (EBMUD)
stance of these types of projects. Ms. LaBella stated that EBMUD is supportive
of SWRFs as long as the golf course or the Country Club is the only recipient
of the recycled water and not distributed to any other EBMUD customers. She
continued that EBMUD may choose to assess an administrative fee to monitor
and permit the recycled water use. Ms. LaBella confirmed Member Hockett's
statement that EBMUD would require adequate backflow prevention devices to
protect the potable water supply, if a SWRF were to be developed at any of
these sites.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 122 of 147
Page 4 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 3
Ms. LaBella explained that a considerable amount of staff time was spent on
the Diablo Country Club (DCC) Project for planning, the CEQA (California
Environmental Quality Act) initial study and reviews, development of various
agreements, including professional engineering services to support staff's
project oversight, and the beginning stages of design-build procurement. Staff
has had no further communication with DCC since 2018 on the progression of
the project.
Mr. Petit stated that in preparation for this presentation, he had spoken with
Bert Michalczyk, who serves as DCC's Project Coordinator. Mr. Michalczyk
informed him that DCC has a new Board that is interested in continuing the
project and that DCC is working with the County on a rezoning request for
various improvements, including the SWRF project. DCC is seeking the
County to be CEQA Lead Agency on the project. Thus, there appears to be a
renewed sense of interest from DCC in moving forward with the project.
Recently, staff received a new SWRF inquiry from Golden Rain Foundation,
which is the operator of the Rossmoor Community in Walnut Creek. They
would like Central San to allow wastewater diversion for a SWRF to produce
recycled water to irrigate their two golf courses, with the City of Walnut Creek
taking the CEQA lead. EBMUD is currently drafting a four-way Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) that includes Central San, City of Walnut Creek,
EBMUD, and the Golden Rain Foundation. Staff discussed the potential
impacts to the collection system, compliance with Proposition 218, and conflict
with Central San's recycled water goals.
The question was posed to the Committee whether the Board should consider
limiting the number of SWRF projects, such as only allowing a single
demonstration project first to evaluate its impacts before allowing others to
move forward. Staff also inquired whether Central San should assess a fee for
its valuable wastewater resource.
Chair McGill acknowledged that these projects have taken significant staff time
and legal effort, and then progress is stalled.
Member Hockett stated she sees a lot of inequities with these types of projects
and has an ethical issue with the common philosophy of affluent areas being
able to pay-to-play. She continued that she would rather see none of the
SWRF projects happen and instead see the Refinery Recycled Water
Exchange Project completed that would benefit many people rather than just
for the wealthy. It was noted that throughout this presentation, the incredible
challenges and lack of water in the pipes was repeated. With that, she opined
that SWRFs pose risk and an increase in liability and stress on the system.
Furthermore, Member Hockett offered that a serious conversation is needed
about the equity of recycled water use in the service area and who will benefit.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 123 of 147
Page 5 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 4
Chair McGill agreed with Member Hockett's point of pay-to-play and recalled a
newspaper article on the DCC facility addressing that very point. He opined
that the Water Exchange Project may not have to deal with such perception
issues.
Chair McGill inquired about the Wholesale Recycled Water Opportunities
Study conducted for Central San by RMC (now Woodard and Curran) that
evaluated the current amount of available wastewater at that time, future
needs, commitments, and options. He asked whether that study should be
revisited to compare to where the District is now. Ms. LaBella stated the report
was finalized in 2016 and, other than an update to the potential end partners,
the water demands have not changed significantly. The Committee agreed
that an overview of the report would be beneficial to receive. Member Hockett
added that information is always welcome, but not to lose sight of her earlier
point regarding equity versus inequity.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the information and requested staff
provide an overview of the 2016 Wholesale Recycled Water
Opportunities study at a future meeting.
b. Receive Quarterly Permit Counter Activity Report
Ms. Gemmell stated that although this report is about the quarterly timeframe,
it also provides a one-year comparison. She noted that numbers have almost
doubled, and the process has become longer during the pandemic since the
means of communicating with the public have changed.
Additionally, since the County has been doing contactless plan reviews, staff
has noticed an uptick in the number of plans forwarded to Central San that
would not have otherwise been received. This has been a good thing as it has
provided an opportunity to find situations that need to be remedied (e.g.,
accessory dwelling units (ADU) proposed to be built on top of a District
easement).
She advised that this report will be slightly modified beginning with next
quarter's update. Staff intends to eliminate the public benefit piece and instead
focus on the permit side for trending analysis. This will assist with the onerous
task staff must undertake to track each email, phone call, etc.
Member Hockett concurred with the change, stating that it is well known how
busy the Permit Counter is and how much work is completed. Chair McGill
added that, in the past, some Board Members were anxious about staffing
levels; however, he had no issue with this change to the report. Additionally,
he has heard that people have appreciated being able to continue the process
during this time, even if remotely.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 124 of 147
Page 6 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 5
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the report.
C. Receive annual update on Regulatory Compliance
Ms. Schectel provided a concise overview of the presentation included in the
agenda materials, which touched on a variety of updates and provided a
glimpse into the numerous regulations that Central San observes. The
following highlights particular items of note from the discussion:
• Clean Air Act, Section 129 (slide 3) — Staff has been in discussion with
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the minimum
operating limits associated with the existing scrubbers and upcoming
Solids Handling Facility Improvements Project. The existing scrubbers
cannot handle the incinerator heat and the new regulation has bypass
prohibitions. The new scrubbers will be able to adequately address
current challenges and assist with meeting Section 129 regulations. Ms.
Schectel added that there were two bypass events reported in 2020;
however, BAAQMD (Bay Area Air Quality Management District)has not
issued any notices of violation.
• Criteria Pollutant and Air Toxics Emissions Reporting Regulations
(CTR) (slide 7)— The proposed amendments to the CTR for annual
emission reporting supports a mandate for hot spots in disadvantaged
communities for toxic air emissions. This will streamline reporting
programs to support the public's right-to-know. Ms. Cheng advised that
there is no immediate impact and Central San will continue its annual
reporting to the air district. She added that Central San's goal is to
participate in the statewide program which is a two-step process. More
information will be available in the coming years.
• Senate Bill (SB) 1383 regarding organic waste emissions (slide 8) —
The bill requires a 50% reduction of 2014 organic waste material by
2020 and 25% by 2025. Staff is awaiting CalRecycle to publish their
report findings to see how it will impact Central San. With incineration
material being considered a landfill disposal, staff is working to quantify
greenhouse gas emissions. Ms. Cheng stated there is no immediate
impact as it is more of an accounting issue??. The concern of
incinerated material is about grit and screenings being disposed at local
landfills.
• SB 212, Pharmaceutical Takebacks (slide 11) — This newly effective bill
put the responsibility of drug and sharps (needles) takebacks onto the
manufacturers, which have placed several such sites throughout the
county. It is considered a great move in the right direction to have
options for such disposal, especially since some Central San sites have
been less accessible during the pandemic. Member Hockett noted that
the Alamo Sheriff station has a sharps drop-off, and that diabetic
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 125 of 147
Page 7 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 6
syringes can be picked up curbside. Mr. Wyatt confirmed that
manufacturers will have to provide suitable boxes and/or provide mail-
back options. Member Hockett said that she was glad to see how the
program has grown over the years.
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Updates -
o Staff is preparing for the permit renewal application submittal this fall
and expects another successful renewal once this permit expires
next year.
o Test of Significant Toxicity (TST) will be required for chronic toxicity
rather than acute toxicity as part of the new permit.
• Cannabis Grow Operations (slide 18)- Staff is keeping watch for any
such operations and preparing should an operations discharger come
about. Thus far, there has been one inquiry for a discharge from an
indoor grow operation to Concord's collection system and Central San
which would be permitted as a Class 3 Industrial User should it move
forward.
As it pertains to Title 22, Chair McGill asked about any changes to Title 22
related to recycled water. Ms. Gemmell stated that Central San is working
under permit and has implemented quarterly inspections and self-certification
as part of the program that just started. She stated staff will provide an update
as more data becomes available.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update.
d. Receive update on the most recent meeting of the Bay Area Clean Water
Agencies (BACWA)
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update.
6. Announcements - None
7. Suggestions for future agenda items
a. Receive list of upcoming agenda items and provide suggestions for any other
future agenda items
In addition to the request mentioned in Item 5.a., the Committee requested an
update on the technical aspects of the disposable wipes'legislation and its
impact to Central San.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the list and provided input to staff.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 126 of 147
Page 8 of 8
Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes
February 8, 2021
Page 7
8. Future scheduled meetings
Monday, February 22, 2021 at 9:00 a.m.
Monday, March 8, 2021 at 9:00 a.m.
Monday, April 12, 2021 at 9:00 a.m.
9. Adjournment— at 10:49 a.m.
February 18, 2021 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 127 of 147