Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04.b. (Handout) Updated Presentation
Item 4.b. (Handout) Updated Presentation �r CAPITAL PROJECTS UPDATE AND OVERVIEW wA � ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JANUARY 99, 2029 Jean-Marc Petit, P.E. Director of Engineering and Technical Services p Pumping sFeoons [—'service area Pittsburg s.rnr srstvm — rile—plor Line Iz 24•) { aRiaB2 Trunk Line[2 19"44'] F—M ain ' Y Ou[fail w.- N C "�� Concord Clayton r ........�..�. riretla��— ' reek �` rr, •, : --,.;� •� _ gar =41 1 J� .cob b � f ., . Califomia ban n r' DETAIL AREA 2 1 eS 9erkeley �ori naa ' ffT 0 Oakland Oaan,on N - • a- jCCCSDPulna5Wlon. - � �AlF'.�.Ce�`sa�Mia�.�yraeNu Pumping Stations ' 3 CENTRAL SAN MARTINEZ PLANT SITE dt . a . -Mal = 4- - �► a 2 CENTRAL SAN'S RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM (RETAIL AND WHOLESALE) • Central San also owns and - = operates a recycled water distribution system called "Zone 1 • In 2020, Central San sold 213.9 million gallons of recycled water V., • Wastewater Treatment Plant uses about 1.5 million gallons per day of recycled water • Auto Truck Fill Station • Residential Fill Station 15 DETAIL A.Y...ltl�hn AREA r..N 14 miles of pipe -------— — CENTRAL SAN � .�1 cccso Reereba NRler srelem _ 1 6 3 LOOKING AT limaCENTRAL SANCOMPREHENSIVEJ COMPLETEDWASTEWATER MASTER PLAN THIS PROJECT COORDINATED SEVERAL MAJOR MASTER PLANNING EFFORTS Dynamic Collection Treatment Collection � System Master Plant Master Recycled System �% plan Plan Water Model / Comprehensive 1 Wastewater Master Plan (CWMP) �� SD CWMP MAJOR DRIVERS =0000� Descriptions 1 Aging Infrastructure Maintain performance and reliability of existing assets to ensure reliable treatment of wastewater Increase capacity and redundancy of existing facilities to 2 Capacity accommodate wastewater flows(wet weather)and loads. Projects that would be required to accommodate planned growth are not included in the CIP Reliably comply with regulatory requirements that are designed 3 Regulatory to protect human health and the environment&Plan for anticipated future regulatory requirements Minimize life-cycle costs,maximize benefits,and achieve 4 Sustainability economic stability through optimization,resiliency,resource recovery,and energy projects 1 9 CWMP EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES Public Outreach Summary Technical Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 77 _ Technical Executive Summary COMPREHENSIVE WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN ' 10 5 • .ALSLCENTRAL SAN CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan Share this page v Since 1946,Central Son hos provided safe and reliable wastewater 000 CENTRAL$AN collection and treatment for residents in central Contra Costa County. Today we serve nearly half a million residents and over 3 000 businesses in 145 square miles.Our servires include supplying This item appears in .17t EXECUTIVE SUMMARY recycled water for parks and golf courses,providing holh commercial Plans&Reports s r� and residential recycled water pickup programs,operating a household hazardous wasle collection facility and running a —� sophisticated water quality lahoratory.Gur core mission is to protect L; _ pu6lic Health and IHe environment,and our customers can count on us for vital services 24 Hours o day,every day. +�-- — 1b Download Executive Summary _ R Download TecHnical Summary COLLECTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 6 DESCRIPTION OF SEWER SYSTEM • 145 square mile service area v • Large collection system • Over 1,540 miles of gravity sewers • 37,000 pipe segments Asset Value=>$2.9 Billion • 31,000 manholes Pla • Pipe Diameters: 4" — 102" $8261M • Oldest Pipe: 1913 (108 years old) Clay $888 M • Pipe Materials: Concrete, Clay, Plastic, and Metal MetallicO Concrete • 18 Pumping Stations $162 M, 974M Million(M) C�I .1113 70.00 E Ch. 60.00 ■SP �Lined-DIP *DIP CAS 50.00 ■ABS ■HDPE ■PVC ■PC „ a0oo C •CMLC ■CML y ■Lined-RCN 30.00 ■RCP ■Lined-AC :AC lined-VCP 20.00 ■VCP 1960-PreserR ..�...� � ■VCP Pre-1960 10.00 �1 hI I I Age{as of 20 161 ~~ _ / 14 7 SEWER REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW i System is Aging - Optimized Rehabilitation & Pipe Conditions Range from Good to �_'}.r; _ Replacement Forecast Very Bad Condition �Y ��� Forecasted CIP: • 64%of pipes are ~` — —$99M in 5 years <50 years old — —$720M in 20 years • CCTV'd 90%of pipes: Forecast will be • 2%-"Very Bad" updated routinely for Developed Data - CIP updates Supported Risk Model o InfoMaster®to i Confirm Sewer Needs Uses ESRI backbone 3� Uses LOF and COF to calculate risk i LOF based on Central laid Ili�ll�lbl hu. n l6,lIIII�_ �.II .Il.=_, ,. i ,, ,., San CCTV and cleaning -- data 15 CALCULATING RISK FOR COLLECTION SYSTEM ASSETS ,r P b isk roba ility rConsequence �F'Busline:IR � of Failure of Failure lExposure (POF) (COF) L (BRE) L�— —�A L— —�A 'A :HighVelocities •Capacity Bottlenecks •Blockages/Overflows Risk Class Example Capital Action Age Hospitals,Schools,Etc. E :Age •Industry High Standard Priority in CIP/Biannual Soil Type Population Density Operational Frequency ®•Railroads/Fault Lines ®•Street Paying Medium Low Priority in CIP/1 In 5 Years Operational Frequency Pipe Failure History Traffic Disruption :Pipe •Community Relations Law 1 in to Years Operational Frequency -Proximity to creeks and Negligible Waitfor a problem to arise •Various techniques water bodies ' 16 8 RISK-BASED, LONG-TERM COLLECTION SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIZATION Period I Cost($M) L Mileage 30-20 Yeas $441 184 20-30Years $724 261 — _ \ 30-50Yea,s $1,156 50-75 Years $575 75-100Years $808 - _� r l 1 � �- � ... 'Aw1 17 100-YEAR SEWER REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT FORECAST Period Cost($M) Mileage 0-5 Years $99 38 :50-75 0 Years $180 a0,ao0,0o020 Years $441 184 70,000,000 30 Years $724 281 60,000,000 50 Years $1,156 403 50,000,000 Years $575 206 a0,o00000 75-100 Years $808 276 a 3 30,000,000 11111 201000,000 P 10,000,000 VIII 11 I�IIIIIII���IIII���� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Forecast Year ' 18 9 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ' 19 .1911 TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS OVERVIEW Sa N ' 20 10 MAJOR TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS OVERVIEW BY PHASE AND DRIVERS Q/ ..p1 pYa$pM�]Ounraa (1�QQQ. PCCS"Wml1pv00ana.n l w42 Q ..v'm'v8l'taw Brag 8.nmvVpveOl � i■ LreLnw,IPpet l)wgw,t W{a.a �i / Ewen Np waemer..rn,.Pray.Z t � ;MNviWdf4uaar8mnaa�u N •U14wr PuKp$,e[m lraaeOl YnprpynWy6 Z ] 3/ MlN NpywMme•Ptag7nr0 1 • r.MNw:oelyd comrro lww=+yaw t � l • TP&MKr Errdro.+w�re•kgo�a�m tl 1 • flmlCwrlrvl3ys,um l'V RwMor"w. (DWe Arwyd MreuiwwO RrpMpwMlPipgem l • •Eaapnr�WPl�wm ! � ;/ f4ge.d wer.pe,m,lan Sr�rn Aww.a�ara Q• / Ka Pipupan s1Pa.m.pneKa x+p e pp ps• nen,cancra Steawn nn.nl ulgaa Praww 1 da z Qa •Paw �^•�•� p • a Osm cnn[ra Uayasla•nae.txE2 1 :wbw uo*kCyw Cq.!lrr.r Mr+O N wv Yl.rhpr Pa.•WOO~ • UV Gad—upa.a.e PI:rw9 Exv —hgat 1� ,,7- n:Rem S—My hrawm . D NVAd0-5«aniclgpWs D ■PI -Ww 0--u—UP7� d NLb-wr UPvw. l • /Imme,ne ee Wes�nna° n•e upvaesa l / :�sd:ca,emeneq n,M.y P.wr Frpl.c.eran[ s .CarWIHpMAe'�e[e Q N UV Hr-4.k--nruxvwnts QQ N SK-A"'ir+s�MntlltdMioY[pwmxma 04, / Ca down Aaeeaewn el Mw F01— pQ. wwlP Mw npl.emrm 1 /PIe�[(1➢ar.,wn_a 1.a D lnpwv . (D]N !� �P N-wty b-fun.2 1 • ■F.n.r fl Mr.— • !` IMn�,p FenlyFpexwn.nta•Tea.3 1 • MWrelarr so E-P upws s• //iurwvvM1-wr;a 1 NN9%ea llmdryieaW Fnprmwmn[s ©. 8.arar,pa+er l.Pwrnnnt N flint opoww Bray S.—Wy'� s/ BAH wparr+ar'4 1 2 • A.enwga$N Pa Flukeeim 1 3 • 10.1rrr>tW✓rpd lB+Dwa.COroI1f �i49'^71Mywvlture QPhase l[Ota Syean] 1 2 • •Ur CWwtw•W&Kbo L ,C�Ouwy PMm 21s to 10 revs d'Q• rnee„wnPe VAE'AMv�. ■R.qulnarp Opu� OW2G S Bum�rye�Iay ` P r / 21 MAJOR TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS OVERVIEW BY PHASE AND DRIVERS (D. .weaa+s Saw.rie Wtiea Owe P1.Cew"woredpl na.nrwg2 nw, Q //PPmp$@pa+rBr?nq S.arwv uPvedv t i/ itielrt Port UV"t� Q/ Eweu+p waw,•Prae.Z t ;NN+oprad Warren B r"n ]�N /M4wu Pwrp$,erin EYma-d YnprprMWw 1 ] e ("Mel Nvibpri l -ft—7.: 1 • 1•Ma�eterdCM *Mraee,aK /5�]l�//1�� / TNW,,Err�uur --Prumce.' o 11 1 • pwtCpreml Sy-"OWgMDr"rw CKDOO rWutl Miec:iwaru Fpboenwnt PW 1 • •EaPp'a.'.WPl�w�wx i T 3 ee,d.d We[� DO—. flinweior� d• / ii.Pipgwan SlParn•Pherp x,e e 1 s Cenrd F.P la.i7 upgeGi ir.1 eM? l • • Weaxae•PK s 9 a • Osprcen[rd uPyeee� Z.1 e-,d a 1 /W*w D"&0 C-syw Cq.l t. It✓4 //Wp['Vl.eh.r Flnw AM�ngx:nnr UV M rf.c[wn U .dri T N ■PrmrS Exemxn rq., 1� /Trxtriwn:Rem Secvmr IRp'o.wmsn,s ]O N wer.n,:e Sewc Wp�eaes Q ■RnFWra knn,,,an wn llp�ean � N le6weary Came Uq•eeaa 1 /MnnWrve P•gy Demerere[nn 2 ••�LYeaeMry�a Sp;rr.e Upped.a l I'll ren:ca,aeon f w rwnr rwpm..ran 2 Dlae.w�i im ruvamanr Q M uv lfrd'eWsl�Prgr.mam: pp Q N so<wor-r•raee,�.n,q„rewM r.Pro•,wr.m 71'QO/ MrPEC.C.AFapMaemee, {x]1 N .se,del�.,�,pnearq,�prwwnwm-�.»z 1 ! .frtr!lnr lnprawm.n[a • !°Araa lfarrip waty bpm/w, 'ft.- 1 • MWrelan rd Eryrgr Vpva4a �• //iPrM lrtpyrwnwSi 1 NN9%aa Meyry Pppryy[maar.a*'� ©. B.ew,ar,Ckr+wr l.Pwn,r+tt Completed or "eel (�+ °°`i"p"""w� 1 x • A+oerP$pi Pi p.kaear� MNaaINCLure ongoing 1 T • *Nw�W.rrtd lBacw+AlnW 1f �j0'9'rg QPhase l[0 m5yean] 1 � • •ur[r dwweWPawwr�t ■ower QPn,:e2rSealo-y..rd Projects OQ• T.eM IPMM$CA[41MppW adP a.,ulatwry pP,K3ffow2a since 2017 rwmmnr r ' 22 11 RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2017-2037 10.RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN i�x m�n,m�sesc Mrlr.a z.calrNon sr...mlKss.,u.ai s.R r.w....�ucMniM! r.ss.e sr»pcP w,.nm.w..,M.�«r sws axuM mn a ..I.•r..l.w Rrcw.�.. ■C.pec,rrn Syalnn ■Ra.yrl.nw ■Nnnal Imrarrrmrnia CVS�� ■ I 1 23 Tt�.'N itrOPAR111If�W R Rm•i11t V!f Vim! CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN conb.nem e,.�pc� - 10 Yt•_na CIP 20Yrnn CIPS "i�aa�iaa`o` �iiv�oa"`oo"o "�ize�mo `v"r�o"co 12 SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASING INFRASTRUCTUREINVESTMENT ($IN MILLIONS) Prior 10 Years Next 10 Years Average of 30.6 million Average of$86.7 million $120, ono $100, mo $80 w.o $60, $40, __ Sb.e as $20, Son woe/03 FY06/09 FY09/10m0/11 FY11/12 FYIV13FY13/14 FY14/15 FYss/16 FY16/17 Fv17/18 rvWu FYWm niWa rviya FYWn nnlm rvm/a nss/m niyn rvn/m 00n1n 0ca- 1-g4-m.+rA � imwmF 0cu��46 �mammnm •Average Spending Increases by 2.8 times prospectively versus prior 10 years ' 25 PROPOSED; - •0 3. New Total extended to FY 2029-30(Rolling 10 Years &escalated 3%) with Updated Cash Flow In million 2020 Dollars Ten Year CIP 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY19-20 FY20.21 FY21.22 FY22.23 FY23.24 FY24.25 FY25.26 FY26.27 FY27.28 FY28.29 FY2930 Collections tem $27.1 $40.2 $40.8 $36.0 $39.2 $35.3 $29.6 $34.8 $27.3 $27.1 $25.1 $32.3 $52.8 $57.3 $62.7 $55.3 $45.5 $37.6 $43.0 $36.7 $36.9 $3.9 $2.5 $2.1 $2.1 $2.0 $1.9 $1.8 $1.8 $1.8 $2.5 Rec c Wale, $9.1 $11.7 $11.5 $0.3 $5.3 $11.3 $13.3 $1.3 $0.3 $0.3 Cone enc $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 TOTAL FY2020-21 $88,0 $110.4 $109.5 $106.8 $100.4 $90.8 $90.1 $75.9 $68.4 $67.3 $907.5 Proposed CIP 590.0 5zsn Sne c+19/N trio/�i vzx/iz vzz/z3 vzz/ze vz�/za x19/39 cvz9/3o i F c c Oconi�ngeny Oxentletl water ■General ni�_ ..,iis ■i...� i o �.'.'.,.speem '0090-0126 CENTRALSAN 13 Questions r27 14