Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.b. Receive FY 2019-20 Risk Management Annual Report Page 1 of 45 Item 10.b. CENTRALSAN jdf A- hom CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT November 5, 2020 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: SHARI DEUTSCH, RISK MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR REVIEWED BY: PHILIP LEIBER, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ROGER S. BAILEY, GENERAL MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 RISK MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT Attached is the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Risk Management Annual Report and presentation. Strategic Plan Tie-In GOAL TWO: Environmental Stewardship Strategy 1—Achieve 100% compliance in all regulations GOAL THREE: Fiscal Responsibility Strategy 1—Maintain financial stability and sustainability GOAL FIVE:Infrastructure Reliability Strategy 3—Protect personnel and assets from threats and emergencies GOAL SEVEN:Agility andAdaptability Strategy 2—Plan ahead for scenarios of direct adverse impacts ATTACHMENTS: 1. FY 2019-20 Risk Management Annual Report 2. Presentation November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 72 of 150 Page of CENTRAL SANCENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT Risk Annual Report --ft� Fiscal Year 2019m2O - - ---� -�_ -�"°'cE�.'.�= -V_ �� ice". _ _ ��� `-y ���•■�� �..�— '"'C'�+_� November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 73 of 150 _i�L-- Page 3 of 45 INTRODUCTION I am pleased to present the Risk Management Division Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 Annual Report. Risk Management's role is to protect Central San from unexpected loss or damage, and to minimize the impact of adverse events that occur. This requires Risk Management staff to be proactive and to maintain a constant state of readiness. The following report details some of the ways we've met that challenge. Risk Management also plays a role in helping Central San meet its strategic goals. Each section of this report references the FY 2018-20 Strategic Plan goals that it supports. Further, Risk Management also coordinates the Enterprise Risk Management effort that became an ongoing process in 2020 In addition to the items discussed in this report, Risk Management does a number of things to protect Central San that aren't as apparent. Examples of these services include pre-bid risk assessments of capital projects, insurance and indemnity reviews for both capital and operational contracts, coordination with excess insurers for both underwriting and claims management, evaluation of insurance and other risk financing measures to manage the risks of new programs and providing litigation support to District Counsel as needed. Our ability to manage risk at Central San has, and will always, depend on our ongoing partnership with management and staff. These partnerships help us to identify new and emerging risks, to improve how Central San accepts and transfers risk, and to control and reduce risks to our employees and our operations. Thank you all for your continued support and commitment to these efforts. Shari Deutsch Risk Management Administrator Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 1 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 74 of 150 Page 4 of 45 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 Insurance and Risk Financing --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 Workers' Compensation Claims --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 LiabilityClaims ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17 OtherRisks and Exposures -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 Enterprise Risk Management ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 Security -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 27 EmergencyManagement --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------28 Total Cost of Risk 33 StrategicPlan Metrics---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------35 Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 2 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 75 of 150 Page 5 of 45 Executive Summary Workers' Compensation: In FY 2019-20, Central San incurred six medical-only claims, and four indemnity claims compared to 11 medical-only claims and two indemnity claims in FY 2018-19. Other significant results include the following: • Strains and sprains remain the most common types of injuries that result in Workers' Compensation claims; • Slips, trips, and falls remain the most common causes of injury; • Adverse loss development for injuries occurring in FY 2017-18 has resulted in an increased Experience Modifier (ExMod), which will increase premium costs until claims from that year are removed from the ExMod calculation. Overflow Claims: Central San has seen a reduction in overflow claims from a high of 27 in FY 2001-02 to generally less than 10 claims per year since FY 2010-11. In FY 2019-20 there were 7 overflow claims, one fewer than the preceding year. The incurred cost of these newer claims is higher because we still have open reserves for claims that have not yet settled. As a result, the average cost per overflow claim falls just above our benchmark of $25,000 average cost per overflow claim. Overflow Claims i i i2019-20 Number 9 4 8 7 Total Cost $123,993 $102,557 $155,545 $184,110 Average Cost $13,777 $25,639 $19,443 $26,158 Other Liability Claims: Claims in this category increased in both frequency and severity, raising the average cost per claim from $4,245 in FY 2018-19 to $10,117 in FY 2019-20. This is discussed in more detail later in this report. Property Losses: Central San incurred 5 property losses in FY 2019-20 but recovered money from other parties on four of them, leaving a net loss of $2,696. The following table summarizes claims costs for FY 2019-20 as compared to the preceding year. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 3 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 76 of 150 Page 6 of 45 Claim . Cost IFY 2018-19 Cost IFY 2019-20 - Liability—Auto $7,470 $1,000 Liability- Overflows $155,545 $184,110 Liability— Plumbing $3,134 $244 Liability—Other $38,205 $91,056 Property $3,584 $8,600 Auto Physical Damage $11,912 $10,516 Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): establishes a more systematic and organization- wide process to identify, evaluate, mitigate and monitor risk. The ERM team developed a strategic risk register, prioritized those risks and identified potential mitigations to reduce or control those risks. Risk Management presented the initial results to the Board in January 2020. The ERM team now meets twice per year to review and update the risk register and mitigations. Results of these meetings are presented to the Board shortly thereafter. Security: Staff continued to work toward implementation of the Security Master Plan and, with the assistance of the Security Committee, made additional improvements to security systems, procedures and practices. Emergency Management: Central San responded to four emergency events in FY 2019-20: power shutoffs, fire, earthquake, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Staff response to all events was timely and effective, demonstrating the importance of continuous training, even when emergencies (used to) occur infrequently. Total Cost of Risk: The Total Cost of Risk (TCOR) is a risk management industry benchmark that allows an organization to evaluate the cost of its Risk Management program over time. TCOR includes the cost of Central San's Safety program, as well as Risk Management program administration, claims, and insurance premiums. This total is reduced by any revenue accrued by the Self-Insurance Fund. The TCOR for FY 2019-20 was $3,018,588, an increase of over $360,000 from the previous year. This increase was the result of higher insurance premiums. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 4 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 77 of 150 Page 7 of 45 Insurance and Risk Financing Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Liability Insurance Coverage Central San purchases commercial liability insurance for Workers' Compensation, Employers' Liability, Excess General Liability, Pollution Legal Liability, Employment Practices Liability, and Fiduciary Liability. Workers' Compensation: Central San participates in the California Sanitation Risk Management Authority (CSRMA) Workers' Compensation insurance pool, a joint powers authority comprised of over 50 sanitary districts within California. Risk Management staff serves as Central San's representative on the Authority's Board of Directors. Insurance Premium Cost - $776,996. Excess General Liability: This policy covers claims in excess of Central San's $500,000 retention up to $15 million. Coverage includes defense and indemnification for inverse condemnation. Insurance Premium Cost - $366,308. Pollution Legal Liability: This policy covers claims and losses arising from the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste. It applies only to the Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility and non-owned disposal sites. It does not cover claims alleging pollution conditions arising from the operation or maintenance of the collections system. Insurance Premium Cost - $67,854. Employment Practices Liability: This is a gap policy that reduces the self-insured retention for employment-related claims from $500,000 to $35,000 per occurrence. The policy is limited to $500,000 in coverage as the Excess General Liability policy will respond to claims that exceed this amount. Insurance Premium Cost - $16,751. Fiduciary Liability: This policy protects Central San from claims filed by participants in District-maintained retirement and other post-employment benefit funds. Insurance Premium Cost - $4,223. Property Insurance Coverage Central San purchases property insurance, and crime insurance. Property Insurance: Central San is self-insured for damage to its property and facilities up to $250,000 per occurrence. Insurance coverage for losses in excess of this retention is purchased through the Alliant Property Insurance Program (APIP), a group purchasing program administered by Alliant Insurance Services. The APIP policy includes Boiler and Machinery coverage, and Cyber Liability coverage. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 5 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 78 of 150 Page 8 of 45 This program includes Identity Theft coverage for all Central San employees. Insurance Premium Cost - $181 ,000. Crime Insurance: This policy covers losses caused by employee theft, forgery or alteration, funds transfer fraud and certain types of computer fraud. It does not cover cyber-attacks or loss of data. Insurance Premium Cost - $1,869. All Central San insurance policies renew on July 1 of each year. Self Insurance Fund Central San has at least partially self-insured most of its liability and some of its property risks since July 1, 1986, when the Board approved the establishment of the Self- Insurance Fund (SIF). In 1994, the Government Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 10 (GASB-10) which established requirements on how public agencies must fund their self- insured risks. To comply with GASB-10, Central San segregated reserves for certain types of liability risks into a sub-fund that must be actuarially reviewed at least every two years. The next actuarial study will use loss data through June 30, 2020. In 2014, the Board established a reserve policy to maintain reserves for losses covered by excess liability insurance of at least three times the amount of Central San's self- insured retention. With the current retention of $500,000, this reserve is $1.5 million. Retained losses and claims expenses are paid from this fund during the year. The fund is replenished annually after the Board adopts the Self Insurance Fund budget via transfer from the Operations and Maintenance Fund. During October 2020, the Board directed $0.1 million from FY 2019-20 O&M variances to replenish this fund to the policy required level in advance of the budget process. The Board also wanted to reserve funds for catastrophic losses or emergency response and sought to simplify reserving for all risks that do not require GASB-10 compliance by consolidating other liability claim reserves and property loss reserves into a single fund. In order to meet these goals, the balance of the SIF has been consolidated into a single sub-fund with a $5 million reserve. Other claims and program expenses are paid from this fund during the year. The fund is replenished annually after the Board adopts the Self Insurance Fund budget via transfer from the Operations and Maintenance Fund. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 6 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 79 of 150 Page 9 of 45 Workers' Compensation Claims Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Claim Types Workers' Compensation claims are classified as either Medical Only (MO) or Indemnity (IND) claims. MO claims are those where employees only need medical treatment to cure or relieve their injuries. In these circumstances injured employees did not lose any time from work and fully recovered. IND claims are those where injured employees received ongoing medical treatment and: • were taken off work by their treating physician, • were given permanent physical restrictions and/or, • suffered some permanent disability or physical limitation as a result of their injury. Summary of Recent Claims The following table shows the distribution of Workers' Compensation claims for FY 2019-20, and the two prior years. The Claim Count column indicates the number of claims occurring during the year. The Claim Costs column shows the total cost of those claims to date. FY i i Claim Claim Claim Claim Claim Claim Count Costs Count Costs Count Costs Medical Only 8 $187,175 11 $27,072 6 $30,053 Indemnity 4 $472,025 2 1 $98,046 4 $134,290 Total 12 $659,200 13 $125,117 10 $164,342 Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 7 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 80 of 150 Page 10 of 45 The following tables detail these totals by functional group. Claims Frequency (number of claims filed per FY) MO IND MO IND MO IN FY 2017-18 FY i ADM - - - 1 - - CSO 7 3 5 - - 2 ENG 1 - 3 - 1 - POD - 1 3 1 5 2 Total 8 4 11 2 6 4 Claims Severity (incurred costs for all claims per FY) MO IND MO IND MO IND ADM - IF - - $51,027 - - CSO $79,398 $276,221 $4,431 - - $5,038 ENG $107,777 - $2,001 - $1,162 - POD - $195,804 $20,639 $47,019 $28,891 $129,251 Total $187,175 $472,025 $27,027 $98,046 $30,053 $134,290 Trends and Analysis Since Central San has very few Workers' Compensation claims in any single year. It is also difficult to identify loss trends with such a small data set. As a result, the following analysis incorporates Workers' Compensation claims data from the last five years. Medical Only NO) Claims: The chart below shows the total number and cost of MO claims by functional group for the last five years. The following table shows the average cost per MO claim for each group during that same period. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 8 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 81 of 150 Page 11 of 45 Medical Only Claims - Last 5 Years $180,000 - 35 $160,000 - 30 $140,000 - 25 $120,000 $100,000 20 $80,000 15 $60,000 13 10 $40,000 $20,000 5 2 $- 0 ADM CSO ENG POD ENG includes HHWCF and Environmental Compliance • ADM CSO ENG POD 5 Yr • $1,761 $3,790 $20,079 $4,092 Collection System Operations (CSO) has the highest number of MO claims (30) over this period but also had relatively low average cost per MO claim. Overall, CSO has more frequent, but generally less serious, injuries than other groups. CSO is also the most active participant in Central San's Return to Work Program, which is discussed later in this section. CSO's active participation allows their employees to recover and to return to work faster, which improves recovery time and reduces the cost of these claims. Indemnity (IND) Claims: The following chart shows the total number and cost of Indemnity claims by functional group for the last five years. The costs include medical expenses and other payments made by the program (i.e. temporary disability payments to employees while off work). The following table shows the average cost per IND claim for each group during that same period. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 9 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 82 of 150 Page 12 of 45 Indemnity Claims - Last 5 Years $700,000 9 $600,000 8 $500,000 6 6 $400,000 — 5 $300,000 4 3 $200,000 i 2 $100,000 1 1 $- 0 ADM CSO ENG POD • ADM CSO ENG POD • 1. $51,027 $47,918 - $82,037 These results further illustrate the limitations of a small data set when looking for trends. The single Administration (ADM) claim was relatively minor when compared to the overall population of IND claims. During this same time, CSO had six claims averaging over $18,619 each while POD had eight IND claims at an average cost of over $11,307 each. Staff in POD has worked hard to increase the number of Temporary Modified duties opportunities among its work groups. POD Management and Risk Management are hopeful this will lead to a reduction in the average cost per IND claim over time. When all IND claims over the last five years are consolidated, the average cost per claim remains just under $14,000. In contrast, the consolidated average cost of a MO claim over the last five years is just over $1,200. Improving Outcomes In FY 2019-20 Central San implemented two new tools designed to improve outcomes for injured employees. On-Call Nurse: Central San implemented a Nurse First Call Program which allows a nurse to triage non-emergency injuries over the phone before medical treatment can be provided. Employees now get direction from an objective medical professional Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 10 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 83 of 150 Page 13 of 45 regarding their immediate and ongoing treatment needs. This service also routes detailed injury information to the clinic to inform subsequent treatment. Medical Provider Network (MPN): Central San joined a MPN to provide employees greater access to medical specialists. After seeing a doctor at the clinic, an injured employee can follow up with any doctor in the network rather than wait for a referral to be approved. Treatment modalities are still subject to review as defined by law but doctors in the MPN should be well versed in the procedural aspects of Workers' Compensation. Over time, these programs may also reduce overall claims costs but for now we are confident that faster treatment and a wider selection of providers will improve services to injured employees. Cost Drivers Even with a small data set, it is clear that IND claims are significantly more expensive than MO claims, as shown in the following chart. Total Incurred Cost Last 5 Years - Medical Only vs. Indemnity $700,000 $600,000 - $656,300 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $51,027 $287,505 ---- $200,000 __$200,000 $100,000 $- $113,707 $160,629 ADM CSO ENG $53,192 POD This illustrates the differential costs between MO and IND claims. IND claims account for 75% of total claim costs yet only make up 22% of claims filed. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 11 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 84 of 150 Page 14 of 45 The above chart highlights the differential claims cost between MO and IND claims. Since IND claims usually include time away from work, there are additional costs associated with these injuries that cannot be captured by claims data. These include lost productivity, overtime for other staff needed to fill in while an injured employee is off work, paid time off to attend medical appointments, and supplemental benefit costs including salary continuation provided to augment temporary disability payments. Expert opinions vary on the scope of these soft costs but estimates range from three to five times the claims cost. Considering that indemnity claim costs for the last five years exceeded $990,000, this equates to $3 million to $5 million in soft costs incurred by Central San. Since IND claims are so costly, Risk Management, Safety and Human Resources staff work collaboratively with injured employees and their supervisors to reduce the amount of time employees lose from work, to ensure employees receive ongoing and proper medical treatment, and to help employees recover as soon as possible. In many cases, these efforts prevent MO claims from becoming IND claims. Indemnity Claims Classification As noted above, IND claims constitute the most severe injuries and are the primary cost driver in Workers' Compensation. Safety staff works with managers and supervisors to identify the root causes of injuries and accidents to reduce the frequency and severity of injuries to employees. These loss control activities are addressed more fully in the Safety Annual Report provided after the end of each calendar year. The following charts provide an overview of the most severe IND claims by injury type, cause, and affected body parts. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 12 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 85 of 150 Page 15 of 45 Most Common Types of Injury By Year 2019-20 2018-19 Pain 2017-18 ■Strain/Sprain ■Irritation/Burn 2016-17 ■Cut/Bruise 2015-16 0 2 4 6 8 10 Strains and sprains remain the most common type of IND claim. Selected IND Claims by Type of Injury Last 5 Yrs & Last 10 Yrs Other Cut/Bruise _ ■Last 10 Yrs Fracture Last 5 Yrs Strain/Sprain 0 5 10 15 20 The high frequency of strain/sprain injuries is more evident over the 10-year time span. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 13 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 86 of 150 Page 16 of 45 Selected IND Claims by Cause of Injury Last 5 Yrs & Last 10 Yrs Slip/Trip/Fall/Jump Repetitive Motion ■Last 10 Yrs Pushing/Pulling ■Last 5 Yrs Lifing/Reaching 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Repetitive Motion used to be the most frequent cause of IND claims over the last 10 years, but there has only been one such claim in the last five years. Pushing / Pulling is now the most common causes of injury. Selected IND Claims by Injured Body Part Last 5 Yrs & Last 10 Yrs Shoulder - ■Last 10 Yrs Knee ■Last 5 Yrs Arm - Back 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 As with the preceding charts, data from the last five years demonstrates some improvement, with no new shoulder or knee injuries. Backs are still the most commonly injured body part, and 80% of back injuries affect the lower back. Return to Work In 2007, Risk Management implemented a Return to Work Program to facilitate employees' recovery from work-related injuries and to help reduce the number and cost Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 14 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 87 of 150 Page 17 of 45 of IND claims. In many cases, Central San's ability to provide temporary modified duty (TMD) can prevent a MO claim from becoming an IND claim. This makes the Return to Work Program an essential component of both employees' recovery and cost control. The program incorporates use of the interactive process which is required for compliance with the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA). It is not easy to compare Return to Work metrics from year to year as each potential TMD assignment depends on the nature of each employee's physical restrictions, and Central San's ability to offer TMD within those restrictions. In FY 2019-20, Central San provided TMD assignments to over 90% of employees who were allowed to return to some form of modified duty. Experience Modification Factor (ExMod) One of several factors used to calculate Central San's annual Workers' Compensation premium is the Experience Modification factor (ExMod). CSRMA calculates each pool member's ExMod by comparing its loss data from the preceding three prior years to the entire pool's combined loss data for that same period. Members' ExMods are then adjusted to align a portion of the members' premium with its' relative loss experience. Because the pool determines members' ExMod using a rolling three-year period of loss data, no member is penalized for poor performance (higher than average claims frequency or severity) in a single year indefinitely. Workers' Comp ExMod - Last 10 Years 1.20 1.00 1.06 0.90 0.80 0.74 0.74 .71 0.60 0.67 0.61 0.40 — 0.20 — 0.00 — 11 12 13 .1� 15 .16 �'.11 .1$ .19 .213 ,L�10' 2p11 2012' 2013 2p1� Zp15 ,Lp1 ,Lp1� ,Lp1$ ,Lp19 Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 15 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 88 of 150 Page 18 of 45 As mentioned earlier in this report, Workers' Compensation claims costs for FY 2017-18 were much higher than other years. Because of the rolling three year loss calculation, claims costs from that bad year are now included in our formula, resulting in a significant increase in our ExMod. Since these costs will also be included in upcoming ExMod calculations, staff anticipates similar ExMods for the next two years. Overall Performance Regardless of future ExMod impacts, staff continues to embrace Central San's proactive approach to safety. Risk Management staff remains focused on active case management, and other staff, supervisors and managers continue to participate in the Return To Work Program. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 16 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 89 of 150 Page 19 of 45 Liability Claims Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Claims Philosophy Central San's focus on customer service informs its claims management process. Claimants are contacted immediately, their claims are investigated thoroughly, and when damages are found to be Central San's responsibility, claims are settled promptly and fairly. This approach has resulted in satisfied claimants and in reduced cost. Liability Claim Types We categorize self-insured liability claims into four types; Auto Liability, Plumbing Reimbursements, Sanitary Sewer Overflows, and Other Liability claims. These claims are all paid from the Self Insurance Fund and would be covered by Central San's excess liability insurance if the losses exceeded the self-insured retention. Claim costs include emergency response expenses, settlements, legal expenses and reserves for open claims. It does not include staff time to adjust and settle claims. Auto Liability Claims Auto Liability claims are those filed by third parties for damages they believe Central San personnel caused while operating its vehicles. This includes claims for injuries to persons or damage to others' property. These claims do not include costs to repair or replace damaged Central San vehicles from such events. Repairs to these vehicles are paid from a different Self-Insured Fund and discussed under the Auto Physical Damage section of this report. The chart below shows the total number and cost of Auto Liability claims for the last five years. There were only two minor Auto Liability claims in FY 2019-20. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 17 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 90 of 150 Page 20 of 45 Auto Liability Claims $10,000 3 $9,000 $8'777 $8,385 $8,000 $7,470 $7,000 - 2 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 1 $2,000 $1,000 $1,000 $ -M 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Avg $ per $4,388 $4,192 $0 $3,735 $500 Claim Plumbing Reimbursement Claims Plumbing reimbursements are small claims usually made by homeowners after they have called a plumber for service, only to learn that the problem was in Central San's main sewer line. In most cases, CSO staff provide the homeowner with a claim form while they are on site. This facilitates a simple reimbursement process where Risk Management receives the claim, confirms the call out and the findings, then processes reasonable reimbursements. Plumbing reimbursements do not include reimbursement requests arising out of an overflow or any event where sewage escaped from the collection system. These circumstances involve additional expenses and are often included as part of a larger claim. Claims arising from these situations are considered overflow claims, which are discussed in the following section. The chart below shows the total number and cost of plumbing reimbursement claims for the last five years, followed by a table showing the average cost per plumbing reimbursement claim for each of those years. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 18 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 91 of 150 Page 21 of 45 Plumbing Reimbursements $3,500 8 $3,000 7 $2,500 6 $2,000 5 4 $1,500 3 $1,000 2 $500 1 $- 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 � Total Cost Number Year FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Avg ,o per $379 $449 $495 $1,045 $224 L Claim The unusually high amount in FY 2018-19 resulted from a single claim with multiple plumbing bills over a period of time before the problem was identified. Sanitary Sewer Overflow Claims Sanitary Sewer Overflow claims are filed by customers who claims their property has been damaged by a sewer overflow. CSO staff respond to the overflow and contact Risk Management when they become aware of an overflow that causes property damage. This allows Risk Management staff to: • respond immediately to begin coordination of emergency clean up and remediation as needed; • provide for affected customers' immediate needs; • work with the customers to define damages; • help customers prepare their claims; and • settle the claims in a timely and reasonable manner. This process has evolved into a partnership between CSO and Risk Management staff that benefits both Central San and the customer. The following chart shows the total number and cost of overflow claims for the last five years, followed by a table showing the average cost per overflow claim for each year. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 19 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 92 of 150 Page 22 of 45 Overflow Claims $350,000 12 � $304,518 $300,000 10 $250,000 8 $200,000 $183,110 6 $150,000 $100,000 4 $50,000 2 $- 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 � Total Cost Number FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 $16,904 $13,777 $25,639 $19,443 $26,546 Staff benchmarks sanitary sewer overflow claims costs against the average cost per overflow claim incurred by the CSRMA general liability insurance pool. Although Central San does not participate in this pool, its loss data presents a relevant benchmark for comparison. As of the last available data, CSRMA's average cost per overflow claim hovers around $20,000. Central San has outperformed this benchmark three of the last five years. Thanks to the partnership with CSO and the ongoing support of management and the Board, Risk Management staff often resolves sanitary sewer overflow claims at a lower cost than that of Central San's peers. Large overflow claims occur infrequently but any overflow claim can develop into a significant loss, even when addressed in a timely, thoughtful and professional manner. Other Liability Claims Other liability claims include losses arising from Central San's operations that don't readily fit in the preceding categories. Examples of these claims include damage to homeowners' property caused by sewer cleaning activities, damages alleged to arise from field work, damage to other utilities' infrastructure from maintenance or construction activities and other claims where the damaged party believes Central San caused their loss. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 20 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 93 of 150 Page 23 of 45 All such claims are investigated and, if found to be Central San's responsibility, promptly settled for reasonable amounts. Claims found not to be Central San's responsibility are either denied or tendered to the at-fault party. Because these claims defy any ready classification, claims within this group fluctuate in frequency and severity over time. A claim filed today might settle for $500 while one filed tomorrow could exceed the self-insured retention. This makes annual comparisons difficult. We group these claims into a catch-all Other Liability Claims category. There is little similarity among the claims in this group, but occasionally litigated or complex claims that take longer to settle and may incur reserves and legal expenses. The chart below shows the total number and cost of these other liability claims for the last five years, followed by a table showing the average cost per claim for each year. Other Liability Claims $250,000 10 9 $200,000 8 7 $150,000 6 5 $100,000 4 3 $50,000 2 1 $- 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 � Total Cost Number FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 $1,085 $10,535 $968 $4,245 $10,117 Claim Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 21 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 94 of 150 Page 24 of 45 Liability Claims Overall The following chart combines the preceding liability claim types and compares claim costs by fiscal year and type of liability claim over the last five years. Cost of Liability Claims by Type $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 ■AL ■OL ■PL ■SSO From this perspective, plumbing reimbursements and auto liability claims comprise a very small portion of Central San's claim costs. Overflow claims have a more noticeable impact but the annual aggregate cost appears somewhat stable. As indicated earlier, other liability claims, shown above as 'OL', fluctuate widely in both frequency and severity from year to year. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 22 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 95 of 150 Page 25 of 45 Other Risks and Exposures Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Goal 5: Maintain a Reliable Infrastructure Property Losses Central San is self-insured for damage to its property and facilities up to $250,000 per occurrence. Insurance coverage for losses in excess of this retention is purchased through the Alliant Property Insurance Program (APIP), a group purchasing program administered by Alliant Insurance Services. The APIP policy includes Boiler and Machinery and Cyber Liability coverage. There were 5 small property losses in FY 2019-20 totaling $2,696. As the chart below shows, the FY 2019-20 total cost for property losses exceeds this amount. The balance of expenses allocated here arise from the supplemental cleaning and sanitizing services required to maintain essential functions during the COVID-19 quarantine and beyond. This was done for convenience as Central San plans to submit a request for Public Assistance to FEMA in FY 2020-21. The total supplemental cleaning and sanitizing cost through June 30, 2020 was $41,312, with spending on such activities anticipated to continue into FY 2020-21. Self-Insured Property Losses $50,000 $44,008 7 $45,000 6 $40,000 $35,000 5 $30,000 4 $25,000 $20,000 3 $15,000 2 $10,000 $5,000 1 $- 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 � Total Cost Number Earthquake and Flood Risks The APIP policy does not include coverage for damages arising out of flood or earthquake. Risk Management staff periodically evaluate the cost of insuring these risks through the commercial insurance market. This evaluation considers recent hazard modeling results and Central San's implementation of mitigation projects that Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 23 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 96 of 150 Page 26 of 45 reduce the potential impact of earthquake and flood damage against available insurance coverage and pricing. In March and June 2017, staff presented the Administration Committee with an analysis of earthquake insurance pricing, and the results of FEMA's 2017 update to HAZUS, its hazard model using multiple earthquake and flood scenarios. After some discussion, the Committee decided against purchasing flood or earthquake insurance at that time. Staff will continue to monitor hazard models and the insurance market and report back to the Committee when more favorable options emerge. As a result, Central San is essentially self-insured for flood and earthquake risks. To finance this risk, the Board approved and funded a $5 million catastrophic loss fund within the Self-Insurance Fund (SIF) to pay for emergency repairs after a natural disaster. Central San has not suffered any catastrophic losses to date. Auto Physical Damage Central San is self-insured for Auto Physical Damage. Damage to other parties' vehicles is insured by the Excess Liability policy, but the cost to repair or replace Central San vehicles is not. If a Central San vehicle is damaged by a third party, the SIF pays for repairs and Risk Management staff pursues cost recovery from the at-fault party. When damage is caused by Central San staff, the SIF pays repair costs in excess of$1,000. All vehicle repairs are coordinated through Central San's Vehicle Shop. The following chart shows the number and cost of Auto Physical Damage losses for the last five years. Auto Physical Damage Losses $30,000 6 $25,000 5 $27,129 $20,000 4 $15,000 3 $10,000 2 $10,516 $5,000 1 $_ ■ 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 � Total Cost Number Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 24 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 97 of 150 Page 27 of 45 Five vehicles were damaged during FY 2019-20. Although total repair costs were not excessive, all five accidents were determined to be the fault of the driver. Household Hazardous Waste Claims Central San purchases a separate Pollution Legal Liability insurance policy to cover losses arising out of the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste. No claims have been filed since the Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility opened in 1997. Pollution Risks Central San has chosen to self-insure pollution-related risks other than those arising from providing the Household Hazardous Waste Facility. Coverage for such pollution losses is either not available or extremely expensive. Claims costs arising from an alleged pollution condition would be paid from the SIF's Catastrophic Loss Fund. No pollution claims have been filed in over ten years. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 25 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 98 of 150 Page 28 of 45 Enterprise Risk Management Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Introduced in 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations Treadway Commissions (COSO), Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a process used to identify, assess, and respond to strategic risks that may affect an organization's ability to meet its goals and objectives. Utilities and very large public agencies began implementing ERM over a decade ago. Since then, smaller public entities have gradually implemented some form of ERM. They had enough success with the process that use of ERM has become a best practice in public sector risk management. ERM requires that agencies continuously identify their risks, rank and prioritize those risks for oversight, mitigation or elimination, and periodically report progress to key stakeholders. Central San's ERM team includes the Executive Team, Risk Manager and Internal Auditor. This group meets at least twice per year to review risk rankings, to review mitigations and risk reduction priorities, and to identify any new risks or opportunities that may affect Central San's ability to meet its objectives. Staff presents the results of the meeting to the Board twice per year. The first report of the year is a brief status report regarding the top risks as defined and ranked by the ERM Team. The second report discusses developments on all strategic risks since the preceding year. The following chart is Central San's top strategic risk ranking as of June 2020, where the axis represents assigned points (out of ten) for four factors including frequency, severity, speed of onset and remaining mitigation work to be performed. Top Strategic Risks - June 2020 40 - 30 20 10 0 A". '�e\�` °��cr�e`�`\J Q�°a���. \°yyo a�\`� �\�`•� �Pyye�. °thQ�� `a��et eot�\O �� � rJ5 ,�` c°o °k a` 0 45 Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 26 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 99 of 150 Page 29 of 45 Security Goal 5: Maintain a Reliable Infrastructure Strategy 3 — Protect District Personnel and Assets from Threats and Emergencies Risk Management is responsible for the physical security of Central San's facilities. Day-to-day security operations includes oversight of, and coordination with, the security guards, issuance of badges and keys to staff and the maintenance and support of the electronic security systems including security cameras, panic buttons, burglar alarms and related software. Risk Management staff partners with other work groups to accomplish a variety of tasks and projects to secure Central San property, and protect its employees and the public from security breaches. Major security initiatives this year included: • Worked with a consultant to assist in implementing recommendations from the Security Master Plan; • Re-keyed various locks throughout the treatment plant; • Added access control devices throughout the facilities; • Added additional security guard hours due to increased plant activity; • Implemented video analytic software to allow for remote monitoring and improved review of recorded activities where necessary. The Information Technology Division has implemented software and tools to identify and control unauthorized access to Central San's networks, and has developed an education and training program to increase employee awareness and reporting of potential threats. Risk Management staff is also working on longer term projects including updates to information security protocols, electronic security systems, and facility hardening measures to protect employees and further restrict access to Central San facilities from unauthorized parties. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 27 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 100 of 150 Page 30 of 45 Emergency Management Goal 5: Maintain a Reliable Infrastructure Strategy 3 — Protect District Personnel and Assets from Threats and Emergencies This section of the Annual Report is usually dedicated to an overview of Central San's Emergency Management Program components with updates regarding activities and accomplishments occurring over the fiscal year. However, during FY 2019-20 staff responded to a number of real emergencies, each of which illustrate elements of the program in real life. A brief discussion of each event and staff's response follows. Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS): In order to limit injury and damage from wildfires caused by electrical system infrastructure, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) activated its PSPS program. Although Central San did not receive its first notice of potential power shutoff until October 2019, staff had been planning for this eventuality since late spring of 2019. By the end of October PG&E had shut down power in areas with essential Central San assets three times. Given advance planning and readiness efforts, Central San continued essential operations without interruption. Pleasant Hill Earthquake: A 4.5 magnitude earthquake occurred at 10:33 pm on October 14, 2019. The epicenter was less than five miles away from Central San's main campus, resulting in significant shaking. Operations staff conducted damage assessments of the treatment plant and collections systems. The Public Information Officer kept major stakeholders up to date as events developed and others documented the actions and decisions taken during the response. While the earthquake caused only minimal damage to Central San facilities, off-site emergency response personnel self- activated and were on the job within 4 minutes of the earthquake. EOC Activation: On October 27, 2019 a fire broke out in Lafayette and threatened collection system assets stored at the Walnut Creek facility. As the fire expanded during sustained heavy winds, the General Manager activated the EOC. Staff for required EOC positions were contacted and the EOC was operational within 30 minutes. Responding staff monitored weather and fire boundaries and prepared to evacuate essential assets if needed while the communications team monitored traditional and social media. Once the fire was contained the EOC was deactivated. While Central San staff conducts EOC activation exercises annually, this was the first actual activation of the EOC in over 15 years. COVID-19 Pandemic: Once COVID-19 reached California, Central San had only a few days to implement changes to work sites in order to comply with new public health orders. This included implementing a work from home program for most engineering and administrative personnel. Human Resources took responsibility for communicating changes to payroll reporting, available leaves and other benefits available to employees as their circumstances dictated. IT staff facilitated most of the Work From Home effort, Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 28 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 101 of 150 Page 31 of 45 rapidly acquiring more laptops, installing software and proper security features on them, and then issuing them to staff by appointment. Shortly after the County Department of Public Health issued the quarantine order, the Board proclaimed a local emergency and management activated a virtual EOC. Risk Management staff reviewed the pandemic response segment of the Continuity of Operations plan with the Virtual EOC team, then updated and presented it as a standalone Pandemic Response Plan one week after the quarantine began. Central San is considered essential infrastructure and some personnel involved in direct operations were unable to work from home. Purchasing staff located and purchased additional personal protective equipment (PPE), Operations managers made changes to work schedules, and Safety staff developed and implemented procedures to maintain social distancing and employed other administrative and engineering controls required to maintain a safe working environment. These actions have and will continue beyond FY 2019-20. Since earthquake and fire are known hazards in central Contra Costa County, Central San regularly trains on emergencies arising from these events. Power shutoffs are not as common but the PSPS events were effectively managed until power was restored. Had restoration taken longer, additional actions would have been required. Pandemics were not high on most entities radar until late in 2019 and even then, very few people had sufficient experience to meaningfully improve a standard plan. We continue to update the Pandemic Response Plan, anticipating its use during a future public health hazard. These events tested Central San's emergency responders. After the three events in October 2019, management conducted an after action debriefing with the responding teams to identify what worked well, what needed improvement and what could be done to facilitate future responses. From Readiness to Resilience Readiness - a condition where most personnel are sufficiently trained and equipped to respond to most kinds of emergencies. (FEMA) Resilience - the capacity of people, organizations or systems to adapt to changing conditions and to withstand, and rapidly recover from, disruption arising from emergencies. (FEMA) Resilience is demonstrated by a seamless blend of continuity operations and emergency operations from the onset of an emergency to its conclusion. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 29 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 102 of 150 Page 32 of 45 Management and staff responses to the FY 2019-20 emergencies indicated that Central San has evolved from being ready to respond to an emergency to an organization that operates in a steady state of resilience. Program Components The following sections detail the elements of Central San's Emergency Management Program. This framework lays the groundwork that can produce employees who can respond to an emergency in under 4 minutes, who can mobilize quickly to protect the organization's assets, and who can modify the working conditions of the entire staff in under two weeks. Plan Development and Maintenance Risk Management is responsible for developing, maintaining and continuously improving the Emergency Operations Plan, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, and the Continuity of Operations Plan. Emergency Operations Plan: The California Emergency Services Act requires all public entities to prepare and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) that complies with the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). Risk Management released and the Board adopted a major EOP update in 2010 to reflect changes in the EOC staffing structure and to comply with the federal National Incident Management System (NIMS). Since then, Risk Management staff reviews the EOP at least annually and posts needed updates to the intranet. Hard copies of the EOP are kept in the primary and backup Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs). Additional hard copies of the plan are stored in the emergency supplies cache. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan: FEMA requires local governments to update their plans every five years as a prerequisite to seek grants under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program. Central San's first plan was adopted in 2011 , and accepted by FEMA in 2012. FEMA acceptance is valid for five years. After that, an updated plan must be submitted to maintain program compliance. In keeping with its commitment to coordinate emergency planning and responses with other agencies, Central San joined with 35 other agencies to prepare a multi- jurisdictional update to the 2012 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Staff served on the Steering Committee managing this process. The Board adopted Central San's portion of the updated plan on March 1, 2018. The update was submitted to FEMA for review and was approved on April 19, 2018. Continuity of Operations Plan: Staff spent considerable time in FY 2018-19 working on a major update to the Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP). Staff completed the update by the end of 2019. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 30 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 103 of 150 Page 33 of 45 Emergency Action Plan: The Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is required by CalOSHA and details the specific responsibilities and procedures to follow if Central San staff need to evacuate or shelter in place. Since the EAP is part of the Safety Directive catalog, responsibility for EAP maintenance, testing and exercises resides with the Safety Division. Training and Exercises Risk Management usually offers training classes and conducts exercises for emergency response staff throughout the year. The annual EOC activation exercise was scheduled for mid-October 2019 but was cancelled to allow key staff to prepare for and respond to the anticipated PG&E's Public Safety Power Shutdowns (PSPS). The exercise was rescheduled for March 2020 but the onset of COVID-19 effectively scuttled that attempt, as staff focused instead on an effective response to an actual emergency. Supplies and Equipment Primary and Backup EOC: The Multi-Purpose Room is Central San's primary Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The Crew Room at the CSO facility in Walnut Creek serves as Central San's backup EOC. Both locations are designed as 'warm' sites, meaning that all needed supplies and equipment are stored on site, but must be set up before the EOC becomes operational. These facilities must be continuously stocked with the necessary supplies and equipment to enable immediate set up and operation of the EOC. Risk Management staff conducts inventory audits of each location to ensure that the necessary items were available on site, secured as needed and maintained in an operable condition, including replacement of any outdated or non-operational items. During these audits, staff also tests the analog phones, satellite television service and the satellite internet service to ensure continued operability. Communications: Contra Costa and Alameda Counties are partners in the East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCSA), a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that developed and maintains an interoperable radio communications infrastructure using the national P25 standard. Central San became a member of the Authority in 2014. In FY 2019-20 CSO started replaced their old emergency radios with new P25 compliant radios. During FY 2019-20 staff acquired four Iridium GO! Devices which connect regular smart phones to communications satellites, effectively converting smart cell phones into satellite phones. Operations staff has been testing these devices. If they perform as expected, we will acquire more to deploy at various locations. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 31 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 104 of 150 Page 34 of 45 Central San maintains Handheld Amateur (HAM) radios at both the Walnut Creek and Martinez campuses. In FY 2019-20 two additional employees passed the Amateur Radio Technician License test, bringing the number of SanHAMs up to four. Coordination with Other Agencies As a single-service agency, Central San must coordinate its emergency response with first responders in other local governments within its service area. All local governments in the County report incidents, damage and resource requests to the Operational Area EOC. The Operational Area EOC is housed at the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services (OES). The County EOC analyzes and forwards local status reports and unfilled resource requests to the regional, state and federal emergency management coordinators. Risk Management staff continues to serve on the Operational Area Council, a group of emergency managers from within the County who meet quarterly to share information and best practices, coordinate multi-agency drills and training opportunities, and facilitate coordinated area emergency planning. The Council is sponsored by the Contra Costa County Sheriff's OES. As the Operational Area point of contact, County OES also works with state and federal agencies to collaborate on projects of regional or national concern. Operational Area Council members are encouraged to participate in these larger group meetings. Central San is also a member of the California Water and Wastewater Agency Response Network (CaIWARN), which coordinates the distribution of members' specialized equipment and trained personnel to other member agencies to help with disaster and emergency response. In the early days of the COVID-19 quarantine, Central San requested and received 500 cloth face masks from a cache acquired by CaIWARN. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 32 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 105 of 150 Page 35 of 45 Total Cost of Risk Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility The Total Cost of Risk (TCOR) is a risk management industry benchmark that allows an organization to evaluate the cost of its Risk Management program over time. TCOR includes the cost of Central San's Safety program, as well as Risk Management program administration, claims and insurance premiums. This total is reduced by any revenue accrued by the Self-Insurance Fund. FY 2019-20 TCOR is $3,018,588, an increase of $369,000 (12%) from the preceding year, resulting from increased insurance premiums. The following chart shows Central San's TCOR for the last 10 years. The year with the highest TCOR is shown in yellow while the year with the lowest TCOR is shown in green. TCOR Totals and Trend* $4,500,000 $4,269,743 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,018,588 $3,000,000 $2,525,257 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- titi ti� ti� ti� tih ti� ti1 til 1� ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 ,ti0 ,y0 ,Lp ,Lp ,ti0 * Totals have been adjusted for inflation Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 33 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 106 of 150 Page 36 of 45 TCOR is the sum of the five categories of expenses: personnel, insurance, claims, risk management program costs and safety program costs. The following chart illustrates these costs by category for the last 10 years. TCOR Categories by Fiscal Year $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 yy yL ti'' ti� ti� ti� til yg ti� ti0 ■Personnel ■Insurance ■Claims ■RM Program Safety Expenses Note 1: Chart does not include lost productivity or other soft costs arising from claims. Note 2: TCOR segment totals have not been adjusted for inflation. Totals for four of the five categories are determined at the end of each fiscal year. However, claims costs often include reserves for open claims occurring in specific fiscal years. This may result in some fluctuation of the total claims costs over time as losses develop or claims resolve favorably. Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 34 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 107 of 150 Page 37 of 45 Strategic Plan Metrics Central San's Strategic Plan includes six goals with associated strategies, initiatives and metrics to track performance toward achieving these goals. Risk Management is responsible for metrics under three of the goals. The tables below summarize Risk Management's FY 2019-20 performance for the metrics associated with these goals. Goal 1: Provide Exceptional Customer Service and Maintain an Excellent Reputation in the Community Strategy: Maintain a strong reputation in the community Metric Success Measure —rYear End Result Continue participation in Provide and receive Mutual Aid Received 500 O CalWARN to/from sister agencies Cloth Masks Goal 3: Be a Fiscally Sound and Effective Water Sector Utility Strategy: Evaluate and implement risk management practices to minimize loss. WSuccess Measure Year End Result Develop and present Establish framework rank risks Enterprise Risk Management and present results to Board Completed (ERM) Framework to Board Provide Return to Work Provide Temporary Modified Duty Program to at least 95% of employees 100% injured on the job Manage the Cost of Overflow Average cost per claim Claims < $25,000 $26,564 Goal 5: Maintain a Reliable Infrastructure Strategy: Enhance Capability to Mitigate, Prepare, Respond and Recover from Emergencies Success Measure Year End Result Ensure the currency of Expanded Pandemic Section of Ongoing O Emergency Plans Continuity of Operations Plan Evaluate and implement Implement the Security Master O security improvements to Plan Ongoing meet new or evolving threats Risk Management Division Annual Report FY 2019-20 35 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 108 of 150 Page 38 of 45 ATTACHMENT 2 h RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT Board of Directors November 5, 2020 Shari Deutsch Risk Management Administrator 4 1 WORKERS' COMPENSATION Medical Only Claims-Last 5 Years 5-year average cost per MO claim $180,000 35 $160,000 ,�, 30 •�� $140,000 25 I $1,761 $3,790 $20,079 $4,092 $120,000 $100,000 ' 20 $80,000 15 Engineering average is high from a large $60,000 1a $ao,o00 10 claim in 17/18. $20,000 s 5-year combined average is$6,246 per MO z $- o ADM cso ENG POD 5-year average cost per IND claim Indemnity Claims-Last 5 Years I• $700,000 9 $600,000 — 8 $51,207 $47,918 $82,037 7 $500,000 6 6 $400,000 5 POD average is high from large claims $300,000 4 in 15/16 and 17/18. $200,000 3 1 2 5-year combined average is$66,322 $100,000 1 per IND $_ o 't''`om• ADM cso ENG POD I 2 1 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 109 of 150 Page 39 of 45 WORKERS' COMPENSATION Total Incurred Cost Last 5 Years-Medical Only vs.Indemnity $700,000 $600,000 $656,300 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $51,027 $287,505 $200,000 $100,000 $- $113,707 $160,629 ADM CSO ENG $53,192 POD • The combined average cost per IND claim is 962%higher than the combined average cost of a MO claims. Shows need to prevent MO claims from becoming IND claims. 1 3 Selected IND Claims by Type of Injury Selected IND Claims by Cause of Injury Last 5 Yrs&Last 10 Yrs Last 5 Yrs&Last 10 Yrs Other Slip/rrip/Fall/Jump Cut/Bruise Repetitive Motion •Last 30 Yrs ■Last 30 Yrs Fradure •Last 5 Yrs Pushing/Pulling •Last s Yrs Strain/Sprain Lifing/11—hing 0 5 1'. 0 2 4 6 8 • Red v Orange bars—over time,no reduction Selected IND Claims by Injured Body Part in the frequency of strain/sprain injuries Last 5 Yrs&Last 10 Yrs • Green v Blue bars—overtime,major Shoulder reduction in repetitive motion injuries,but 'L..10Yrs an increase in frequency of pushing/pulling Knee ■La.5Yr: claims. At. t Purple v Pink bars—the back(specifically the BacK low back)is the most commonly injured 0 2 4 6 B 10 12 body part. These are also the most expensive claims. 4 2 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 110 of 150 Page 40 of 45 LIABILITY CLAIMS Auto Liability Claims Other Liability Claims $10,000 - 3 $250,000 10 $8,000 2 $200,000 a $6,000 2 $150,000 6 $4,000 1 $100,000 - 4 $2,000 1 $50,000 — 2 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 —Total Cost —Number —Total Cos[ —Number Plumbing Reimbursements Frequency since FY 2015-16 is much $3,500 s lower than prior years. $3,000 7 $2,500 6 Increases in number and cost of $2,000 5 other liability claims. There is no 4 pattern or repetition among those $1,500 3 claims—makes trending difficult. $1,000 2 $500 1 Significant reduction in the number $ ° of plumbing reimbursements 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 p g —Total Cost —Number I 5 OVERFLOW CLAIMS Overflow Claims $350,000 12 $304,518 $300,000 30 $250,000 — 8 $200,000 — $183,110 6 $150,000 4 $ 0,000 $5 1 $50,000 — 2 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 —Total Cost —Number M!, 16,904 $13,771 $25,639 $19,443 $26,546 IT AMU 6 3 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 111 of 150 Page 41 of 45 LIABILITY CLAIMS TYPES COMBINED Cost of Liability Claims by Type $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $ 0,000 $5 - $50,000 5- 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 MAL MOL ■PL Esso • Other Liability and Overflow claims drive claims expenses. • The cost of Other Liability varies with the number and type of claims occurring with each fiscal year. • Low frequency of Auto Liability claims may validate safe driving programs. ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT Top Strategic Risks-June 2020 40 30 20 10 o 4,, `101 s • Scores are based on four criteria: Frequency, Severity, Speed of Onset, Mitigation Required • Maximum score is 40 • Top Risks defined as those that score above 20 19111141 L1r,,1tj!tjL*- - � 8 4 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 112 of 150 Page 42 of 45 SECURITY Implemented video analytics software Increased volume of work and contractors on the treatment plant warranted addition of another security guard. Made progress on scoping and planning for implemented recommendations from the Security Assessment EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT October 2019 Public Safety Power Shutoffs Earthquake in Pleasant Hill Fire in Lafayette —Activated EOC 10 5 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 113 of 150 Page 43 of 45 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT March 2020 — COVID-19 • Quarantine effective March 16, 2020 • Ops maintained essential functions while most office personnel worked from homes. • HR initiated contact tracing and other required responses per County Public Health Orders • Opportunity to expand the pandemic response section of the Continuity Plan. „4 11 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Test Only L Central San Alnrt cnoreply@g erhridge.net> ')RCpky «] ReplyUF i Fore d To •Shod De tsch rn I0109/20 09A6 AM Qi You ferwerded tFq message an J,1fi)!009'SL M plush Alert t G more edd m The folbwing Is an important message from Central San: Please click here to acknowledge recelpt of this message This Is a test ofthe Central San Emergency NotHlcatlon System.No action is required at this time. I 12 6 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 114 of 150 Page 44 of 45 WHAT IS "TOTAL COST OF RISK"? Elements of Total Cost of Risk(rCoR) Insurance premiums TIM firs[amf—1 m♦ylly u,W.•prl t_vmpp"of T M COQ.of fask Is msmhr p iu %.Thy I.,Ck.d S it.,an.w,m a Rrm swer.de w.k,su.anco covpmgp and Inokws'wmmluloru. Retained losses Tla nest elprrrarr[is ra 1.I losses-Tlw rs.u.le.wf I—w•.I.w Is[te:,rn ,,[e,f i»unry[hu[a fru.......x 'out IN podiml'for losses Incurred.These are cash Thal are below a<ompony's deductlble.An—m➢le Is a small mlahap such as dry eManing s ellent's soil due to spllmgg fawn an employee- Casts to protect employees/customers from injury rhe next a-Rahla casts may not Iro as easy to track lout are 5014 Important cpm pon,M captured In the ,OoR Cs[ollMion.ThL•gt•nrC 41-cosla..e�114 fo prvtrcl your smploreaa or customary from mj.,r— I:—1 1ps are L re[y 1-nih.,a[e.Th.cay[s tih,-lrl he[r:u Iwd:.s,,:,rl of dre TCuR for your buel[.ess InlerralN. Costs to engage firms for help with risk&insurance issues The next component is re, a slow.[Mth prefe"onal fir—to help'l handle,In-mme or other risk aasocfeted Issues.These wwlld include[osis loran atlomey to respo to a complalnl or to roM a con—Cl's nUrnam,•re-Tln•srx s.,Al ps.i W it.,TC.R cnlr.in[h.0 s.nl sm ronslrinmf rxaiveuat rak Coalrot co. . - I TCOR COMPONENTS TCOR Categories by Fiscal Year $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 — $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 ,�O' ,yti Sti SA' ,1P' Sh 16' 11' ,s0 Sg ti ti� 1� ti� ti� ti0 ti� ry� ti0 ti� •Personnel •Insurance ■Claims ■RM Program •Safety Expenses Segments have not been adjusted for inflation. w.a 14 7 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 115 of 150 Page 45 of 45 PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER TCOR Totals and Trend* $4,500,000 $4,269,743 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,018,588 Jj2,525,257 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 'Yti 1�' 'Y3 1b 'Yy 16 'Y^ ti0 19 ti� ryO,yO' vO,y1 ryO,y'L vO,y3 ryO,yP vO,yh �O,yCi O11 O,yO O,yO ti ti ti • All costs adjusted for inflation. • TCOR does not include productivity loss or other soft costs arising from losses. Yellow bar is the highest TCOR in 10 yrs.Green bar is the lowest TCOR in 10 yrs. 1 16 8 November 5, 2020 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 116 of 150