Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.a. (Handout) Priority Legislation Tracking Sheet and attachments Central San 2020 Priority Legislative Tracking Sheet as of 3/4/20 Attachment 1 Item 7. (Handout) Federal/ Industry Position Date of Board State Author Legislation Also Known As Summary Organization(s) Priority Recommended b Decision Board Notes List/Position Staff Direction 1 State Gloria AB 2093 Public records: This bill will require all public agencies to Oppose: California Oppose 02/20/20 Oppose 3/4/20 Letter in opposition sent to author. 2/19/20 D-San Diego writing transmitted maintain all transmitted emails related to Special Districts CSDA requested a Call to Action from member by electronic mail: agency business for at least two years. This Association (CSDA) agencies. 2/5/20 Bill introduced. retention bill is identical to last year's AB 1184 (Gloria) that the Governor vetoed and which the Department of Finance commented "[t]he retention of non-pertinent e-mails and the need to search through those e-mails, particularly for less specific CPRA requests, increases the amount of time needed to complete CPRA requests. This makes compliance with the CPRA more difficult in these instances and produces worse outcomes for persons and entities submitting those requests [emphases added]." 2 State Proposed Bond California's The support letter requests between $750 Support: WateReuse CA No position 02/20/20 Support 2/21/20 On legislative committee call - Revised Measure Climate Bond(s) million and $1 billion in grants and low only WateReuse call to action - requested that interest loans for water recycling funding inclusion of agencies that were not included on letter that had depending on which climate resilience bond recycled already gone out,join future letter.2/18/20 The first moves forward. The support letter also water hearing for the Governor's climate bond is Feb. requests the funding be administered by the requests - 26, WateReuse requested Call to Action by COB Water Board's existing Water not full Feb 20. Recycling Funding program. bond. 3 State Hertzberg SB 1052 Stormwater This bill authorizes municipal wastewater Co-sponsored: California Support 03/05/20 1/23/20 Unanimous decision by CASA Legislative D-Van Nuys Capture and agencies to enter into voluntary agreements Association of Sanitation Committee to move forward with compromise bill Diversion with entities responsible for stormwater Agencies (CASA) and with Hertzberg. 2/18/20 Bill Introduced. Authority management— including municipal, California Coastkeeper industrial, and commercial stormwater Alliance dischargers—to more effectively manage stormwater and dry weather runoff. The bill' supplements the existing authority of all municipal wastewater agencies to enter into projects to divert and treat stormwater and dry weather runoff. Any agreement, project, or use of this authority is completely voluntary for all entities involved. The bill will therefore promote regional interagency cooperation, improve water quality, and make efficient use of publicly owned infrastructure by removing onerous barriers that prevent stormwater capture, treatment and recycling. Central San 2020 Priority Legislative Tracking Sheet as of 3/4/20 Attachment 1 Federal/ Industry Position Date of Board Author Legislation Also Known As Summary Organization(s) Priority Recommended by Board Notes State Decision List/Position Staff Direction 4 State Mullin (Assembly AB 1509 Solid waste: This bill would establish the Lithium-Ion Co-sponsored: California Support 03/05/20 2/19/20 Two year bill that will be carried over to Speaker pro Tem) lithium-ion Battery Recycling Program in the Department Product Stewardship 2020 legislative session. D-San Mateo batteries of Resources Recycling and Recovery. The Council (CPSC), South bill would require a manufacturer to provide a Bayside Waste list of products and amount sold to the state. Management Authority, The bill would define "covered product" to and Californians Against mean a lithium-ion battery sold separately or Waste sold with a product. The bill would require the manufacturer to meet specified collection and recycling rates and establish a stewardship program for these batteries. 5 State Bloom AB 1672 Nonwoven This bill would require, commencing January Co-Sponsored: CASA Support 03/05/20 2/24/20 Spoke to this bill at recent DC CASA D-Santa Monica disposable 1, 2021, certain nonwoven disposal products and National Stewardship conference where staff moderated wipes panel products to be labeled clearly and conspicuously to Action Council (NSAC) discussion with federal legislative staff and . communicate that they should not be flushed, 1/23/20 - Two year bill reintroduced in agreement as specified. The bill would prohibit a covered with wipes industry. entity, from making a representation about the flushable attributes, benefits, performance, or efficacy of those nonwoven disposal products, as provided. The bill would establish enforcement provisions, including authorizing a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 per violation to be imposed on a person who violates the bill's provisions. Central San 2020 Priority Legislative Tracking Sheet as of 3/4/20 Attachment 1 Federal/ Industry Position Date of Board Author Legislation Also Known As Summary Organization(s) Priority Recommended by Board Notes State Decision List/Position Staff Direction 6 State Bloom SB 424 Tobacco This bill would require the manufacturer of a Sponsor: NSAC Support 03/05/20 2/19/20 Bill will return as two year bill. Not yet D-Santa Monica products: single- tobacco product to use materials eligible for reintroduced - note some language may change. use and multiuse recycling under state or local recycling programs, including electronic waste recycling programs, to make any reusable component of the tobacco product, or, alternatively, if certain conditions are met, to collect reusable components that are not eligible for recycling through a take-back or mail-back program, as provided. The bill would define "reusable component" to mean a multiuse cigarette filter or a multiuse electronic cigarette that is designed to work for at least one year with daily use. The bill would require a manufacturer to collect reusable components that are household hazardous waste, and send those components to the appropriate recycler, or to reimburse household hazardous waste collection facilities, for the costs of collecting and recycling those reusable components. Enforcement: administrative penalty, on a manufacturer that is in violation of these provisions. Central San 2020 Priority Legislative Tracking Sheet as of 3/4/20 Attachment 1 Federal/ Industry Position Date of Board Author Legislation Also Known As Summary Organization(s) Priority Recommended by Board Notes State Decision List/Position Staff Direction 7 State Allen SB 54 (paired California Circular SB 54/AB 1080 establish a comprehensive 2/2/19/20 Bill will return as two year bill. Not yet D-Santa Monica bill is AB 1080) Economy and framework to address the pollution and waste reintroduced Skinner Plastic Pollution crisis. Specifically, single-use plastic D-Berkeley Reduction Act packaging and products sold or distributed in Stern California by must be reduced, recycled or D-Canoga Park composted by 75 percent by 2030. All single- Wiener use packaging and products must be D-San Francisco recyclable or compostable on and after 2030. As part of a shift towards a more circular economy, the bills also instructs CalRecycle to develop incentives and policies to encourage in-state manufacturing using recycled material generated in California. CalRecycle will be given authority to adopt regulations to meet these goals, including developing criteria to determine which packaging material qualifies as recyclable or compostable. 8 Federal Senator Udall S. 3263 and Break Free From The bill requires producers of covered Support: CASA, NSAC Support 03/05/20 3/4/20 House Committee on Energy and (D-New Mexico) H.R. 5845 Plastic Pollution products to finance programs to collect and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment and Representative (identical bills) Act process the product waste and implement Climate Change heard issues on nation's recycling Lowenthal (D-CA), cleanup programs with EPA approval. The shortcomings. During the hearing, Rep. Matsui Co-sponsors: Senator bill would create a 10-cent national refund explained that, while not common knowledge, Harris (D-CA) and program for all beverage containers single-use wipes contain plastics and adversely Senator Feinstein (D- regardless of material. Beginning January impact water treatment infrastructure when CA), Representative 2022 it would begin to phase out single-use flushed, which the local water agency must then Thompson (D-CA). plastic products, and impose a fee on foot the bill to repair the impacted infrastructure. carryout bags. It would create a national Rep. Matsui noted that often times these wipes are standard for recycled content, and protect advertised as flushable, which only compounds existing state action. CASA included the problem. She credited CASA members for language that includes wipes as part of the bringing this issue to her staff's attention. 2/25/20 bill. Discussion in DC with elected staff of Congressmember DeSaulnier, McNerny, and Thompson regarding wipes issue included in this bill. 2/19/20 Bill introduced. Central San 2020 Priority Legislative Tracking Sheet as of 3/4/20 Attachment 1 Federal/ Industry Position Date of Board Author Legislation Also Known As Summary Organization(s) Priority Recommended by Board Notes State Decision List/Position Staff Direction 9 State Grayson AB 1484 Mitigation Fee This bill may eliminate the ability for agencies Watch - Staff District staff will be discussing language D-Concord Act: housing to assess connection and capacity fees using gathering further concerns via phone with office staff. 3/4/20 Staff developments a "buy-in"fee methodology, and would information working with CASA on possible amendment instead require connection and capacity fees language. 2/27/20 Bill in print, staff reviewing to be assessed based on the actual costs of language. Staff has requested meeting with new development. The bill is being Legislative Director to discuss gray areas in bills spearheaded by housing advocates that cite related to capacity fees. high development fees as an impediment to new housing. 10 Federal Representative H.R. 1764 National Pollutant 1. First bill would amend the Federal Water H.R. 1764 - CASA H.R. 1764 - 03/05/20 2/25/20 Spoke to staff of congressional districts in Garamendi (D-CA) H.R. 1497 Discharge Permit Pollution Control Act to extend National Support, Support, support of permit extension efforts. Representative Elimination Pollutant Discharge Elimination System H.R. 1497 CASA Support H.R. 1497 Support DeFazio (D-OR) System (NPDES) Permit (NPDES)for up to 10 years. SRF funding and permit if Amend Extension 2. Second bill includes permit extension, extension provisions however also includes bar on administrative only. extensions for any NPDES permit holder that bill would impose. This would take away flexibility from state permitting authorities and disadvantage local agencies. Bill also includes $20 billion that reauthorize and increase the Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund (SRF) over five years. 11 Federal Representative H.R. 1162 WIIN/Title XVI This bill would reauthorize the WIIN/Title XVI CASA: Support, Western Support 03/05/20 2/25/20 Discussed this with congressional offices Napolitano (D-CA) reauthorization program that is set to expire in 2021. The bill Recycled Water Coalition at the CASA DC conference. 2/13/20 Introduced. would permanently authorize the program (WRWC): Support and increase the funding authorization to $500 million from $50 million. AAA Cern tral Contra ra Costa Sanitary District Protecting• . the en vironmentrImhoff Place, Martil7ez, CA 94553-43921- PHONE: (925)228-9500 March 4, 2020 FAX: (925)335-7744 www.centralsan.org ROGER S.BAILEY General Manager The Honorable Todd Gloria KENTONL.ALM Counsel for the District California State Assembly (510)375-4571 State Capitol ICATIE YOUNG Sacramento, CA 95814 Secretary of the District RE: Assembly Bill 2093 (Gloria) —Oppose [As Introduced] Dear Assembly Member Gloria: The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San) is respectfully opposed to your Assembly Bill 2093, which will require all public agencies to maintain all transmitted emails related to agency business for at least two years. Central San, established in 1946, provides wastewater collection and treatment services to nearly 500,000 residents and more than 3,000 businesses in the East San Francisco Bay Area. Within its 145 square mile service area, Central San operates a 54 million gallon-per-day capacity treatment plant, 18 pumping stations, over 1,500 miles of sewer lines, a household hazardous waste collection facility, and provides both commercial and residential recycled water programs. To be clear, this is not a transparency bill, it is a data storage bill. The public will have no greater access to public records under AB 2093, nor will they have less. This bill creates no new disclosures or exemptions of records. This bill only mandates that public agencies retain all emails related to agency business for two years and avoids the constitutionally-required mandate subvention process declaring that the provisions of the bill are in furtherance of the California Public Records Act (CPRA). While this measure is intended to improve public access to government records, in practice it will merely increase the burdens for both public agencies and CPRA requesters. The vast majority of emails consist of auto-replies, spam, and insignificant routine communications of minimal public interest. As the bulk of these emails increases, the burden to search through them and locate responsive records in the event of a CPRA request rises accordingly. Under the CPRA, the requester may be required to bear the cost of this data extraction - and indiscriminately mandating that emails be retained will thus make CPRA requests more expensive, perversely impeding public access. Moreover, for those costs that cannot be passed on to the requester, the public agency has no source for reimbursement, and must divert funds from other public programs. Compelling public agencies to retain masses of routine emails -which neither the sender nor recipient otherwise thought important enough to save - imposes significant burdens on all concerned for minimal public benefit. This point is corroborated by the Department of Finance's analysis of AB 1184 (Gloria, 2019), a bill that is completely identical to AB 2093 that was vetoed by Governor Newsom. In their analysis of AB 1184, the Department of Finance wrote that "[t]he retention of non-pertinent e-mails and the need to search through those e-mails, particularly for less specific CPRA requests, increases the amount of time needed to complete CPRA requests. This makes compliance with the CPRA more difficult in these r :Recycled Paper AB 2093 (Gloria)—Oppose March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 2 instances and produces worse outcomes for persons and entities submitting those requests [emphases added]." To further underscore this point, the Governor's veto message of AB 1184 read "[t]his bill does not strike the appropriate balance between the benefits of greater transparency through the public's access to public records, and the burdens of a dramatic increase in records-retention requirements, including associated personnel and data-management costs to taxpayer." AB 2093 will add millions of dollars in costs annually to the state and local agencies, including school districts. Public agencies will be forced to pay for additional data storage space as well as hire additional staff to sort through the millions of emails that are exempt from disclosure under the CPRA but mandated to be retained under AB 2093 in order to respond to public records act requests. Without the ability to be reimbursed for this costly unfunded mandate, public agencies will be forced to either raise fees and taxes or cut services to the communities they serve. It is for these reasons that the Central San must respectfully oppose AB 2093 (Gloria). Should you have any questions about our position, please feel free to contact us. S' erely, Roger S. Bailey General Manager cc: Raquel Mason, Legislative Assistant, Office of Assembly Member Todd Gloria Dillon Gibbons, Senior Legislative Representative, California Special Districts Association Bill Text- SB-1052 Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies. Page 1 of 3 &Z/0 I.i I IlF_ LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION Home Bill Information California Law I Publications I Other Resources I My Subscriptions My Favorites SB-1052 Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies. (2019-2020) SHARE THIS: I Date Published:02/18/2020 09:00 PM CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—2019-2020 REGULAR SESSION SENATE BILL NO. 1052 Introduced by Senator Hertzberg February 18, 2020 An act to add Chapter 11.5 (commencing with Section 13910) to Division 7 of the Water Code, relating to water quality. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1052,as introduced, Hertzberg. Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies. Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards prescribe waste discharge requirements for the discharge of stormwater by municipalities and industries in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Existing law requires regulated municipalities and industries to obtain a stormwater permit. The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 provides the authority and procedure for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization, reorganization, and sphere of influence changes for cities and districts, as specified. This bill would establish municipal wastewater agencies and would authorize a municipal wastewater agency, among other things, to enter into agreements with entities responsible for stormwater management for the purpose of managing stormwater and dry weather runoff, to acquire, construct, expand, operate, maintain, and provide facilities for specified purposes relating to managing stormwater and dry weather runoff, and to levy taxes, fees, and charges consistent with the municipal wastewater agency's existing authority in order to fund projects undertaken pursuant to the bill. The bill would require the exercise of any new authority granted under the bill to comply with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000. To the extent this requirement would impose new duties on local agency formation commissions, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bilINavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB1052 03/04/20 Bill Text- SB-1052 Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies. Page 2 of 3 Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 11.5 (commencing with Section 13910) is added to Division 7 of the Water Code, to read: CHAPTER 11.5.Municipal Wastewater Agencies 13910.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) Fostering regional cooperative efforts to improve water quality and local sustainable water supply is fundamental for developing California's 21st century water portfolio. (b) Stormwater capture, treatment, and use as a water supply is increasingly viewed as an innovative opportunity to improve water quality where it is viable and economically feasible. (c) Municipal wastewater agencies have existing infrastructure, capacity, and expertise that could be used to assist in meeting the state's water quality and water supply goals when circumstances allow, while allowing wastewater agencies to still meet their primary goals of meeting water quality requirements for wastewater discharge and avoiding sanitary sewer overflows. However, in some circumstances municipal wastewater agencies may need explicit legislative authority before they can pursue certain types of projects. (d) In order to promote regional interagency cooperation, improve the quality of the waters of the state, and make efficient use of publicly owned infrastructure, it would be beneficial if municipal wastewater agencies had the authority to enter into voluntary agreements for stormwater projects in the future, where cost effective and regionally suitable. 13911. (a)A municipal wastewater agency may enter into agreements with entities responsible for stormwater management, including, but not limited to, municipal, industrial, and commercial stormwater dischargers subject to this division,for the purpose of managing stormwater and dry weather runoff. (b)A municipal wastewater agency may acquire, construct, expand, operate, maintain, and provide facilities for any of the following purposes: (1)The diversion of stormwater and dry weather runoff from the stormwater system to the wastewater collection or treatment system. (2)The management and treatment of stormwater and dry weather runoff. (3)The discharge of treated urban runoff and stormwater to the stormwater drainage system or receiving waters. (4)The beneficial reuse of captured urban runoff and stormwater. 13912. (a)A municipal wastewater agency may do any of the following: (1)To the extent permitted by federal law, authorize the discharge of stormwater or dry weather runoff captured at industrial and commercial sites to the wastewater collection or treatment system subject to any requirements that may be imposed by the municipal wastewater agency or public agency that owns and operates the tributary collection system. (2) In order to carry out the powers granted, and the purposes established, under this chapter, exercise any of the powers otherwise granted to it by law, including, but not limited to, enforcing compliance with local, state, and federal water quality requirements through the implementation of the municipal wastewater agency's industrial pretreatment programs and ensuring that the project or program is consistent with local watershed priorities, obligations, and circumstances. (3) Levy taxes,fees, and charges consistent with the municipal wastewater agency's existing authority in order to fund projects undertaken pursuant to this chapter. (b)The exercise of any new authority granted under this chapter is subject to and shall comply with the Cortese- Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Division 3 (commencing with Section 56000) of Title 5 of the Government Code). 13913. (a)An agreement, project, or use of authority authorized under this chapter shall be completely voluntary for all participating entities. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bilINavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB1052 03/04/20 Bill Text- SB-1052 Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies. Page 3 of 3 (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to interfere with any existing programs or projects, authorities, or obligations for municipal wastewater agencies or stormwater dischargers. (c) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter merely to allow local agencies interested in pursuing the types of projects described in this chapter to proceed without additional legislative changes to their authorizing statutes. 13914. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to alter or interfere with any of the following: (a) Existing water rights to water from any source, including any adjudicated rights allocated by a court judgment or order, including any physical solution, rights issued by the state or a state agency, and rights acquired pursuant to any federal or state statute. (b) Existing water rights law. (c)Any rights, remedies, or obligations that may exist pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 1200) or Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 1210) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 2 of this code, Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 1700) of Part 2 of Division 2 of this code, or Chapter 8.5 (commencing with Section 1501) of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code. 13915. For purposes of this chapter,the following definitions apply: (a)"Local agency" includes, but is not limited to, a city, county, special district, joint powers authority, sanitary district, sanitation district,county sanitation district,community services district, and municipal utility district. (b)"Municipal wastewater agency" means a local agency that chooses to exercise any authority granted under this chapter. SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bilINavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB1052 03/04/20 f t f t f f 1 f f WhatYou Need to Know............................................................................................1 A Background: How We Got Here and What's Next.............................................2 BillSummary..................................................................................................................4 SupportingOrganizations ............................................................................................6 SectionBy Section Summary.....................................................................................10 • f f What You Need to Know The American people are fed up with the plastic pollution crisis.They are demanding a bold,comprehensive response. The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act,from U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.),U.S. Representative Alan Lowenthal (D-Calif.) and U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley(D-Ore.),is the national strategy we need to tackle the tidal wave of plastic pollution and chart a new course for the future. Plastic pollution has exploded into a global crisis that threatens our public health,economic security,and the future of our planet.Plastic pollution is everywhere—from the highest mountain peaks to the bottom of our oceans, and even inside our own bodies. Studies suggest that humans swallow a credit card's worth of plastic every week.Exposure to plastic toxins has been linked to cancers,birth defects,and other ailments. The United States disposes or incinerates 32 million tons of plastic waste each year,burdening our local government budgets and overwhelming systems to handle it.334 thousand tons are directly littered. Every year,enough plastic waste—about 8 million tons—escapes into the oceans to cover each foot of coastline in the world in five garbage bags full of trash. Our recycling system is broken: just 8%of plastic waste in the United States is sorted for recycling. The recycling in our blue bins is often landfilled,incinerated,or shipped overseas to countries that are unable to manage this waste. Global plastic production will triple by 2050,accounting for 20%of global oil consumption. Plastic production facilities are super-polluters and a major contributor to climate change:emissions linked to plastic will reach 1.3 billion tons by 2030,equal to 300 coal-fired power plants. The Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act will provide badly-needed national leadership—reducing the amount of wasteful plastic and reforming our broken waste and recycling collection system. It will shift the burden of cleanup to where it belongs: on the corporations that produce this waste: Require big corporations take responsibility for their pollution,requiring producers of plastic products to design, manage,and finance waste and recycling programs. Spur innovation,incentivizing big corporations to make reusable products and items that can actually be recycled. Create a nationwide beverage container refund program,which is successful at the state level. Reduce and ban certain single-use plastic products that are not recyclable. Establish minimum recycled content requirements for beverage containers,packaging,and food-service products. Spur massive investments in U.S.domestic recycling and composting infrastructure,while pressing pause on new plastic facilities until critical environment and health protections are put in place. Let's come together to tackle plastic pollution with the bold action we need—before it's too late. 1 A Background: How We Got Here and What's Next The crisis Annual global production of plastic has reached 335 million tons and continues to rise. Global plastic production is projected to more than triple by 2050,accounting for 20 percent of all global oil consumption. Of the 8.3 billion metric tons of plastic produced in the past 60 years,6.3 billion metric tons have become plastic waste. The United States alone disposes or incinerates 32 million tons of plastic each year. Every year, enough plastic--about 8 million tons—escapes into the ocean that five trash bags would fit on every foot of coastline around the world. In addition to ocean pollution,plastic is contaminating every corner of the world,including miles above us in the rainwater sustaining Rocky Mountain National Park. How we got here While plastic is an important material for building a variety of products like medical devices,lighter cars and other advanced products,plastic producers have steadily designed unnecessary products that have flooded the market.These products have overwhelmed waste management systems, as many of them are not recyclable. Producers are not required to incorporate recycled content into their products and the cost of virgin plastic from cheap natural gas is far lower. Rather than reducing the waste they create or taking responsibility for its management,producers have shifted the responsibility for managing waste to government entities whose budgets are already stretched thin. Meanwhile,industry has promoted pollution reduction strategies that put even more burden on taxpayers instead of taking responsibility themselves—emphasizing their view that the government should invest in recycling infrastructure and accept plastic items in recycling bins that will never be recycled.All of this comes at the expense of U.S. taxpayers. Reforming Our Broken Recycling System We cannot recycle our way out of this crisis or rely solely on the government to clean it all up.According to data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency,the US Census Bureau Trade Data and plastic industry recycling reports,the national recycling rate for plastic waste in the United States is projected to sink from 8.4 percent in 2017 to about 5 percent in in 2019. Consumers have been led to believe that everything they put in their blue bin will be magically turned into a new product somewhere because items are labeled recyclable. The truth is that the recycling in our blue bins is often landfilled,incinerated, or shipped overseas to countries that are unable to manage this waste. Before 2017,the United States was sending 4,000 shipping containers a day full of American waste to China every year.But China has changed its import policies, severely restricting the amount of contaminated and poorly sorted plastics it would accept. China's policy shift means that fewer plastic products have a recycling market.Those materials are now being landfilled,burned,or shipped to other countries who cannot manage the influx of this waste—meaning that most of it ends up burned or contaminating the ocean. 2 How Plastic Fuels Climate Change The oil and gas industries are investing in unprecedented plastic expansion.The industry announced$164 billion in investments for 264 new plastic facilities or expansion projects in the United States alone,many relying on state and local tax incentives. In just five years,these investments could increase global plastic production by a third.As a result,this wave of investment will increase pollution risks to frontline communities—communities closest to these facilities—throughout the plastics supply chain.They will also undermine efforts by cities, countries,and the global community to combat the growing plastics crisis,and exacerbate the growing climate crisis. In 2019 alone,the production and incineration of plastic will add more than 850 million metric tons of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere—equal to the pollution from 189 new 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants. If plastic production and use grow as currently planned,by 2030,these emissions could reach 1.34 billion tons per year—equivalent to the emissions released by more than 295 new 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants. We Must Act Now, and Act Boldly All of this is placing a tremendous strain on our environment and on our budgets.Wildlife and sea creatures are suffering and dying from ingesting plastic products or getting entangled in them. Plastic,which does not biodegrade,is breaking down into microplastics that are contaminating our food,water and air.A growing body of research is finding plastic and associated toxins throughout the food web,including in our blood, feces,and tissues. Exposure to these toxins has been linked to cancers,birth defects,impaired immunity, endocrine disruption,and other ailments.With local governments spending billions of dollars to manage plastic waste and prevent it from entering our rivers, streams,oceans and landscapes,citizens are being hit by the impacts of plastic pollution from all ends. The time has come to truly address this massive crisis. Countries are working together across the world to reduce plastic production and handle their waste efficiently. Here in the United States, state and local governments are implementing policies to reduce unnecessary plastic products and shift responsibility to producers for managing their waste.Many businesses are already leading the way with investments in reusable packaging and increased recycled content of their products. It's time for national leadership and a comprehensive strategy to steer the country in the right direction. The Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act is the bold action we need to tackle this crisis head-on. CONTACTS: Senator Udall: Ion athan—BI ack6Itomudal1.sen ate.gov Representative Lowenthal: Shane.Trimmer(a�mail�ov 3 r i Bill Summary The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act will: Require Product Producers to Take Responsibility for Collecting and Recycling Waste: The bill requires producers of covered products (packaging,containers, food service products and paper) to design,manage,and finance programs to collect and process product waste that would normally burden state and local governments. The legislation will encourage producers to cooperate with those who produce similar products through Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO) to take responsibility for their waste and implement cleanup programs with Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) approval. Producers will invest in U.S. domestic recycling and composting infrastructure, cover the costs of waste management and clean-up,and promote awareness-raising measures to reduce waste. Create Nationwide Beyera2e Container Refunds: The legislation will incentivize consumers to recycle by creating a 10-cent national refund program for all beverage containers,regardless of material,to be refunded to customers when they return containers. Any unclaimed refunds will go to beverage producers to supplement investments in nationwide collection and recycling infrastructure.This legislation encourages states that have already implemented similar initiatives to continue their current systems if they match the federal requirements. Source Reduction and Phase-Out Top Polluting Products: Beginning in January 2022, some of the most common single-use plastic products that pollute our environment,cannot be recycled,and have readily-available alternatives will be source reduced and phased out from sale and distribution.The prohibitions will apply to lightweight plastic carryout bags, food and drinkware from expanded polystyrene,plastic stirrers and plastic utensils. Straws will only be available upon request. Carryout Barr Fee: The legislation would impose a fee on the distribution of carryout bags. The bill allows retailers who implement a reusable bag credit program to retain the fee to finance the program. Fees collected from retailers without a bag credit program will fund public access to reusable bags as well as litter clean up and recycling infrastructure. 4 Create a Minimum Recycled Content Requirement: The bill requires plastic beverage containers to include an increasing percentage of recycled content in their products before entering the market. Informed by a feasibility study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology,the EPA will also phase in new requirements for producers to manufacture containers from recycled content.The recycled content requirements will steadily increase over time. Standardize Recycling and Composting: The EPA will develop standardized recycling and composting labels for products and receptacles to encourage proper sorting and disposal of items that can be recycled or composted. Review Effects of Plastic Tobacco Filters,Electronic Cigarettes and Derelict Fishing, Gears Following studies on the environmental impacts of plastic tobacco filters, electronic cigarette parts and derelict fishing gear,the relevant agencies will propose measures to reduce those environmental impacts. Prevent Plastic Waste from Being Shinned to Developing Countries that Cannot Manage It: The United States has exported plastic waste, scrap,and pairings to developing countries with the claim that the material would be recycled. However,the majority of this material has instead fueled the global plastic pollution crisis by overburdening countries with already strained waste management systems. The bill prevents the export of plastic waste, scrap and pairings to countries that are not part of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD),many of whom have been a major source of ocean plastic pollution due to their inability to manage the waste.The bill also requires that the United States receive consent from countries receiving the waste before it is exported. Protect Existing State Action: The bill protects the ability of state and local governments to enact more stringent standards, requirements,and additional product bans. Temporarily Pause New Plastic Facilities: The legislation gives environmental agencies the valuable time needed to investigate the cumulative impacts of new and expanded plastic-producing facilities on the air,water, climate,and communities before issuing new permits to increase plastic production.The legislation would also update EPA regulations to eliminate factory-produced plastic pollution in waterways and direct the EPA to update existing Clean Air and Clean Water Act emission and discharge standards to ensure that plastic- producing facilities integrate the latest technology to prevent further pollution. 5 ► a Supporting Organizations Organizations That Support This Bill Include: American Bird Conservancy American Sustainable Business Council Association of University Centers on Disabilities Beyond Plastic Captain Planet Foundation Center for Biological Diversity Center for International Environmental Law Conservation Law Foundation Container Recycling Institute Earthjustice Environment America Environment and Human Health Inc. Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) Green America GreenLatinos Greenpeace League of Conservation Voters National Stewardship Action Council National Wildlife Federation Natural Resources Defense Council Ocean Conservancy Oceana Plastic Pollution Coalition Recycle Across America Sierra Club Surfrider Turner Foundation U.S. Green Chamber U.S.Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) World Wildlife Fund Find a letter endorsing the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act of 2020 signed by over 500 organizations here. 6 Environmental Advocates Hail Udall and Lowenthal's Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act as Bold Action to Release Our Environment from the Chokehold of Plastic Pollution "The plastics industry has polluted our environment,refused to give consumers plastic-free choices,and is instead ramping up plastic production, so it's now time for federal action. Sen.Udall and Rep.Lowenthal's Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act will reduce the single-use plastics flowing into our ocean,choking marine life and even getting into our food.Reversing the damage we've done to the only planet we have will require unprecedented efforts,and the United States has a responsibility to lead that charge." — Ted Danson, actor, activist and Oceana board member "Single-use plastics are propping up the fossil fuel industry,polluting our waters,and creating enormous amounts of waste all which contribute to our climate crisis. Senator Udall,Representative Lowenthal,and their colleagues are laying the groundwork for an ambitious new path for Congress to tackle this massive problem and we stand with the broad coalition of stakeholders supporting this initiative." — Gina McCarthy,President and CEO,Natural Resources Defense Council "Senator Udall and Congressman Lowenthal have crafted a comprehensive,ambitious piece of legislation that proposes bold solutions–from banning unnecessary single-use plastics to implementing extended producer responsibility to incentivizing recycling–to turn the tide on ocean plastics.The health of our ocean and the economies,communities and wildlife that depend on it are at stake.This bill shows visionary leadership in meeting the ocean plastics challenge head-on,and Ocean Conservancy is proud to endorse it." — Janis Searles Jones, CEO of Ocean Conservancy "We commend Sen.Tom Udall and Rep.Lowenthal for the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act. Our overreliance on plastics is bad for our health,air quality,the climate,local waterways,and the oceans,and particularly for those low-wealth communities and communities of color who bear the brunt of air,water,and climate pollution from their fossil fueled production.Nothing we use for a minute should pollute our environment for hundreds of years.It's time for us to reduce the use of plastics,increase recycling,and maximize the use of recycled materials." — Mattben,Davis,Legislative Director for the League of Conservation Voters "This legislation is a game-changer because it comprehensively tackles the issue of single-use plastics. For too long, corporations have diverted blame for the plastic pollution crisis they have created.They have told us that if we just recycle more or participate in beach cleanups that we can turn this around.That has not worked. It is time to end our reliance on single-use plastics and prevent petrochemical companies from locking us into decades of additional plastic production." — Kate Melges, Greenpeace USA Plastics Campaigner "Plastic pollution is a public health crisis impacting frontline communities of color along every part of the production chain.We applaud the leadership of Congressman Lowenthal and Senator Udall to ensure that we prioritize the health of our air,water,climate and communities and investigate the impacts of new and expanded plastic-producing facilities." — Jessica Loya,Director of Policy&Programs, GreenLalinos. "Our planet is inundated with plastic pollution,and yet we continue to make more plastic each year,harming our environment and ourselves.Finally,we have a Federal bill that offers real solutions,drawing from successful ordinances across the globe.This bill addresses our problem at the source, by reducing the amount of disposable plastic we use,and encouraging a shift towards better and reusable materials.At this moment,it is exactly what we need." Alex Truelove, Zero Waste Director, U.S. Public Interest Research Group 7 "The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act will provide the capital and incentives we need to reduce unnecessary waste and work toward a truly circular economy," "We need solutions that provide equity to consumers,stop the unchecked leakage of waste,and capture the true value of recycled content.This legislation sets a new level of ambition that will help drive those solutions." — Roberta Elias, director of policy for the World tiVildlife Fund "The Center for International Environmental Law(CIEL)is proud to support the most ambitious proposal to deal with plastic pollution ever introduced in the United States.Plastic is a crisis not only for our oceans,but also for our health,our communities,and our climate.Impacts occur at every stage of the plastic life cycle,from production and manufacturing,to use,disposal,and contamination in the environment.The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act addresses the whole life cycle of plastic and provides a comprehensive approach to the crisis of plastic proliferation.By avoiding false solutions this legislation provides the United States with a roadmap to a more just and sustainable future.We commend Senator Udall and Representative Lowenthal for their leadership on this critical issue." — Steven Feit, Climate and Energy Program, Center for International Environmental Law "The Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD)is aware of the ways that our global environmental challenges may disproportionally affect people with disabilities.At the same time,we are aware the changes in production and practice could impact access to items that have made our communities more accessible and are in some cases part of what makes life itself possible. We appreciate the commitment of Senator Udall and Representative Lowenthal to work closely with the disability community as they lead efforts to address plastic pollution. AUCD support's the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act of 2020 and its commitment to address the pressing global climate challenges while protecting the rights to community for people with disabilities." — Rylin Rodgers,Policy Director,Association of University Centers on Disabilities "We commend Sen.Udall and Rep.Lowenthal on their commitment to source reduction of plastic pollution in the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act.The bill draws upon successful policies from across the U.S. and around the world to create one very comprehensive bill that focuses on source reduction of certain problematic plastic products, such as bags, straws,and foam.It also emphasizes important bigger picture ideas,namely Extended Producer Responsibility(EPR) and a pause on new permits for plastic production facilities. We appreciate the inclusive process that they undertook in drafting this bill,gathering input from subject matter experts,including Surfrider Foundation,and circulating drafts for comment." — Jennie Romer, Legal Associate for The Surfrider Foundations Plastic Pollution Initiative "This is the single most important bill ever introduced in Congress on plastic pollution.Unlike other bills,it advances the most logical and cost-effective approaches to tackling the urgent problems posed by plastic pollution. By promoting policies that will reduce the amount of plastics being produced and littered,the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act will address the problem at the source rather than a soggy band-aid approach that attempts to capture the pollution after it has entered our treasured rivers and ocean." — Judith Enck,former EPA Regional Administrator and founder ofBeyond Plastics. "It's high time the United States demands more than just recycling commitments to counter what has become one of the greatest threats to our oceans.The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act would finally tackle the plastic pollution crisis at its source by reducing the amount of single-use plastic produced in the first place,and encouraging a corporate and societal shift to refillable and reusable alternatives.Without federal action,the plastics industry will continue to pump skyrocketing amounts of single-use plastic into the market,leaving taxpayers and local governments with the impossible task of cleaning up the mess.We applaud Sen.Udall and Rep.Lowenthal on their leadership in protecting our oceans and our future by addressing the plastics crisis with real solutions that our country,and our world, so desperately need now,before it's too late." — Jacqueline Savit!�, Chief Policy Officer of Oceana 8 "We are pleased to support the Udall/Lowenthal bill because it provides much-needed reforms to our recycling system,and more importantly,it's the first federal bill that focuses on reducing plastic,not just managing it.We can no longer continue with a`business-as-usual'approach to plastic that relies a recycling system that dumps and burns our trash in communities of color both at home and abroad.While US policy focuses on a never-ending expansion of oil and gas for products we don't need,Europe has already passed bold policy to shrink their plastic footprints and China just announced it will ban single use plastics in 2020. It's not just time for the US to catch up, it's an opportunity for the U.S.to reclaim leadership.This bill is a step in the right direction." Denise Patel, US&Canada Program Director, GlobalAlliance for Incinerator Alternatives(GAIA) "Environment and Human Health,Inc. (EHHI)is a science-based nonprofit organization of physicians and public health professionals dedicated to reducing environmental harms to human health.Because of the growing body of scientific research that shows that plastics are having an impact on human health,EHHI strongly supports the Udall/Lowenthal Plastic Pollution Bill.Two groups of chemicals in plastics are of special concern:phthalates and bisphenols.These chemicals are used respectively to soften plastics and to harden them.Both chemicals cause health problems,including:endocrine disruption,diabetes,cancer,obesity,ADHD and heart problems,and they can do this at low doses.As with other chemicals,they may present an increased risk to infants and children. Because of these harms,and because this legislation will reduce national use of plastic,EHHI strongly supports the Udall/Lowenthal Plastic Pollution Bill." — Patricia Taylor,Director of the Plastics Project,Environment and Human Health,Inc. "If you want to stop a bathtub from overflowing,you have to turn off the tap. Right now,our rivers and oceans are filling with plastic waste,and whales,sea turtles and other marine wildlife are suffering,if not dying,as a result. The Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act outlines the first comprehensive federal plan to turn off the `plastic pollution tap.'We need this kind of groundbreaking legislation to put wildlife over waste." — Steve Blackledge, Senior Director, Conservation America Campaign,Environment America "This bill would bring meaningful change for our communities and our ocean by reducing single-use plastics at the source—before they make their way into waterways and harm marine wildlife—and considering environmental justice in the legislation." — Dr.Erin Meyer, Director of Conservation Programs and Partnerships,Seattle Aquarium "It's exciting that the conversation about plastics is moving beyond what consumers can do and is starting to address the problem at its source,which means including plastic producers as part of the solution." — Vikki Spruill,President and CEO,Nezv England Aquarium "This legislation takes a common-sense approach to a serious problem,the improper disposal and inadequate labeling of single-use wet wipes.Providing consumers with basic information on how to dispose of single-use wipes made with plastic and synthetic content is a reasonable solution for managing this unique and challenging source of plastic pollution and protecting our clean water infrastructure. We applaud Representative Lowenthal and Senator Udall on taking decisive action to address plastic pollution at its source,and look forward to working with his office to ensure proper labeling of wet wipes as this legislation progresses." — Adam Link,Executive Director, California Association of Sanitation Agencies "We are hearing from everyone,especially our youth,that we have to stop kicking the can down the road.We need to address these two big issues now:plastic pollution and the recycling crisis." — Heather Trim,Executive Director of Zero Waste Washington 9 Section By Section Summary SEC. 2. PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCTS AND PACKAGING Subtitle K—Producer Responsibility for Products and Packaain2 PART I—PRODUCTS IN THE MARKETPLACE • SEC. 12101. EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY. Extended producer responsibility(EPR) is a policy highlighting a product producer's responsibility for the post-consumer management of its products and its packaging. This includes (1) shifting financial and management responsibility,with government oversight,upstream to the producer and away from the public sector;and (2) providing incentives to producers to incorporate environmental considerations into the design of their products and packaging. Battery take- back programs are a commonly known form of EPR. Producers with annual revenues greater than$1 million or who produce more than 1 ton of covered products will be required to design,manage,and finance programs to collect and process waste that would normally burden state and local governments. Producers will cover the costs of waste management and clean-up,as well as awareness raising measures for covered products,which include packaging,containers,paper,and food-service products,regardless of the recyclability,compostability,and type of material (including plastic,paper,glass,metal,etc.). • SEC. 12102. PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY ORGANIZATIONS. The legislation will encourage producers to cooperate with other producers of similar products to take responsibility for their waste and implement cleanup programs with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approval.This will be done through Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO). PROs will provide efficiencies and economies of scale by coordinating producers of similar products to design and finance their programs together. PROs will be non-profit entities that are financed by fees on the participating producers. Fees will be assessed depending on producer company size and how wasteful and difficult to clean up their products are. PROs will be the responsible entities for management and cleanup costs,as well as any administrative costs of oversight from the EPA.Multiple PROs will be coordinated by the EPA or a coordinating body so that state and local governments do not interact with several different entities. Advisory committees made up from a wide variety of interested stakeholders will advise the PRO on the impacts and effectiveness of their programs. 10 • SEC. 12103.COVERED PRODUCT MANAGEMENT Producer Responsibility Organizations will replace local government responsibility for the collection and management of covered product waste,recycling and composting. • SEC. 12104. NATIONAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER PROGRAM Producers of beverages sold in beverage containers of any material,including plastic,metal and glass,will be required to include a minimum 10 cent refund price on each beverage container. Retailers will be charged this refund value as a deposit by the producer and will pass the charge onto consumers. Each time a beverage container is returned,the refund value will be refunded.Any unclaimed or unreturned deposits will be kept by the responsible beverage Producer Responsibility Organization to supplement recycling programs. States that have existing beverage container programs already in effect before the date of enactment of this act,will be able to continue their program or join the federal program. • SEC. 12105. PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP PLANS. Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO)will be required to develop EPA-approved Product Stewardship Plans that will be good for five years before they have to be renewed.The Product Stewardship Plan will detail how each PRO will meet the minimum required performance targets for covered products. The targets are set out as follows: Product T All covered products 65%reused or 80%reused or except for paper recycled recycled Beverage Containers 75%recycled 90%recycled and Paper Industrially 50%composted 70%composted composted covered products • SEC. 12106. OUTREACH AND EDUCATION. Producer Responsibility Organizations will have to conduct outreach and education to inform consumers about proper end-of-life management of covered products and beverage containers,the location and availability of curbside and drop-off collection opportunities,how to prevent litter,and recycling and composting instructions. • SEC. 12107. REPORTING. Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO)will be required to make publicly available reporting on the effectiveness of their programs,including: the amount of products being sold in the United States;the management of those products,including recycling rates;data on the final destination of products; collection service vendors and locations;and others. 11 The EPA will be required to audit collection and recycling to account for waste from free riders and other entities who are not a part of a PRO. EPA will also prepare reports describing the impacts of these programs on state and local governments, including costs incurred and reductions in state and local taxes that result from a reduction in costs due to PRO services. PART II—REDUCTION OF SINGLE-USE PRODUCTS • SEC. 12201. PROHIBITION ON SINGLE-USE PLASTIC CARRYOUT BAGS. Beginning on January 1,2022,covered retail and service establishments will be prohibited from providing plastic carry-out bags. Exclusions will be made for bags used within an establishment to package bulk items, such as fruit, vegetables,and other similar items. Other exclusions will be permitted for garbage and pet waste bags. All other non-plastic carryout bags will be taxed in section 3. • SEC. 12202. REDUCTION OF OTHER SINGLE-USE PRODUCTS. Beginning on January 1,2022,covered retail and service establishments will be prohibited from providing plastic utensils. Plastic straws and alternatives to plastic utensils,including compostable utensils,will be available only upon request. Also beginning on January 1,2022,the Administrator will prohibit the following items: ■ Expanded polystyrene (commonly known as plastic foam) for use in food service products, disposable consumer coolers,and shipping packaging. (There will be an exclusion for medical coolers.); ■ Single-use mini-shampoo, soap and lotion provided by hotels and motels; and ■ Non-compostable produce stickers. • SEC. 12203. STUDY AND ACTION ON PLASTIC TOBACCO FILTERS AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES. Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment,the Administrator,in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, shall conduct a study on the environmental impacts and effectiveness of plastic tobacco filters and electronic cigarettes. Upon completion,the Administrator shall report to Congress the findings and detail steps that the EPA will take to reduce litter and the environmental impacts of these products. PART III—RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING • SEC. 12301. RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING COLLECTION. The Administrator,in consultation with Producer Responsibility Organizations,State&local governments,and affected stakeholders, shall issue guidance to standardize recycling and composting collection across communities and States. 12 • SEC. 12302. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF PRODUCTS CONTAINING RECYCLED CONTENT. Post-consumer recycled content will be incorporated into new plastic beverage bottles on the following schedule: Date Post-Co ec cled Content Requirement 2025 25% 2030 30% 2035 50% 2040 80% For other covered products and beverage containers from other materials,the Administrator will coordinate with the National Institutes of Standards and Technology and other relevant federal agencies to study technical and safe minimum post-consumer recycled content standards and publish a report. Following the report,the Administrator will take action to implement minimum standards for those products and beverage containers. • SEC. 12303.DESIGNING FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. Producers will be required to design their products to minimize the impacts of extraction,manufacture, use and end-of-life management. • SEC. 12304.PRODUCT LABELING. Producers will be required to include labels on their products that are easy to read and indicate whether the product is recyclable,not recyclable,compostable,or reusable. Products that are not recyclable shall not include confusing symbols, such as the universal chasing arrow symbol. • SEC. 12305. RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING RECEPTACLE LABELING. The EPA will develop guidelines for a national standardized recycling and composting labeling system for Producer Responsibility Organizations to use in public places on recycling and composting receptacles. • SEC. 12306.PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN EXPORTS OF WASTE. Plastic waste,plastic pairings and plastic scrap will be prohibited from being exported to any country not a member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD).Any plastic waste,plastic pairings and plastic scrap that is exported to an OECD country must have prior informed consent and may not include contamination levels,that disrupt the ability to recycle those wastes or hazardous or toxic substances. PART IV—LOCAL GOVERNMENT EFFORTS • SEC. 12401.PROTECTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Nothing in this Act will prevent a local government from imposing stronger requirements,including higher bag fees or higher reuse/recycling/composting/collection targets. 13 • SEC. 12402. CLEAN COMMUNITIES PROGRAM. The EPA will create program known as the`Clean Communities Program',under which the Administrator shall leverage smart technology and social media to provide technical assistance to units of local government in cost-effectively identifying concentrated areas of pollution in that unit of local government and implementing source reduction solutions. PART V—FISHING GEAR • SEC. 12501. STUDY AND ACTION ON DERELICT FISHING GEAR. Two years after the date of the enactment of this Act,the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall submit to Congress a report that includes an analysis of the scale of fishing gear losses by domestic and foreign fisheries, an evaluation of the ecological,human health, and maritime safety impacts of derelict fishing gear, and how those impacts vary,and recommendations on management measures. On submission of the report, the Under Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register for public comment the report and a description of the actions the Under Secretary intends to take during the 1-year period after the date of publication to reduce litter from,and the environmental impacts of,derelict fishing gear. SEC.3. IMPOSITION OF TAX ON CARRYOUT BAGS Subchapter D—Carrvout Bats • SEC. 4056.IMPOSITION OF TAX All retailers,including those who sell food and consumer goods,will be required to charge a 10-cent tax on any carry-out bag. States or local governments that implement or have implemented a similar charge, may seek a waiver. Retailers may keep 4 cents of the tax to offset the cost of more expensive carryout bags. Retailers who offer a carryout bag credit program (sec. 643 1)will be allowed to retain the entire 10 cent tax. Funds collected from the tax will be deposited in the Recycling and Litter Cleanup Trust Fund (sec. 9512) • SEC. 6431. CARRYOUT BAG CREDIT PROGRAM. Retailers who offer a 5-cent credit program to customers for each reusable bag they bring to the store will be allowed to retain the entire 10 cent tax. Retailers must prominently advertise their program at the check-out and at all entrances. • SEC. 9512.RECYCLING AND LITTER CLEANUP TRUST FUND. The fund will be created and funded from the carryout bag tax. Funds will be distributed to make grants for distributing reusable carryout bags and for recycling,reuse and composting infrastructure investment grants. The Comptroller General of the United States will conduct a study on the effectiveness of the carryout bag programs and report back to Congress. 14 SEC.4. CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER,AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE • A temporary pause of up to three years will be put on the permitting of new and expanded industrial facilities that create new plastic or convert plastic into chemical feedstocks for new products or fuel. • The EPA will use the pause period to update needed regulations on these facilities to ensure minimal air and water discharges. Some of these regulations need updating while others are not in existence, such as prohibiting the discharge of plastic pellets from facilities directly into bodies of water. • EPA action should be informed by a required study on environmental and health impacts of the facilities as well as best available technologies and practices. 15