HomeMy WebLinkAbout22.c. Receive FY 2018-19 Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program Annual Report Page 1 of 44
Item 22.c.
,ek CENTRAL SAN
SANITARYCENTRAL CONTRA COSTA , .
October 3, 2019
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM: WINSTON INGRAM, SENIOR HHW TECHNICIAN
DAVID WYATT, HHW PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
REVIEWED BY: LORI SCHECTEL, ENVIRONMENTAL & REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
DIVISION MANAGER
JEAN-MARC PETIT, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERINGAND TECHNICAL
SERVICES
ROGER S. BAILEY, GENERAL MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT
Attached are the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Household Hazardous Waste Annual Report and supporting
presentation.
Strategic Plan Tie-In
GOAL ONE: Provide Exceptional Customer Service
Strategy 1 - Build external customer relationships and awareness, Strategy 3- Maintain a strong reputation in the
community
GOAL TWO: Strive to Meet Regulatory Requirements
Strategy 1 - Strive to achieve 100%permit compliance in air, water, land, and other regulations, Strategy 2- Strive to
minimize the number of sanitary sewer overflows
ATTACHMENTS:
1. FY 2018-19 HHW Annual Report
2. FY 2018-19 HHW Annual Report Presentation
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 171 of 263
Attachment 1
2018/19 �`tcds-p \
CENTRAL SAN
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
COLLECTION PROGRAM
6
ICA
AN N'
d
^v �J
1
UA
R 0 T
1 •-
moi , Av'
r
ober 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 1172��
f
I ��
Page 3 of 44
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT I*�
® MT. VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT MV
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
COLLECTION PROGRAM
2018/19
ANNUAL
REPORT
rA
Flme WHIR!'iYiLM
-
S
The following Central San staff contributed
to the preparation of this report:
Winston Ingram
David Wyatt
Program Contacts:
David Wyatt
Household Hazardous Waste Program Supervisor
(925) 335-7714
dwyatt@centralsan.org
HHW Program Information:
(800) 646-1431
www,centralsan.org
r 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 173 of 263
Page 4 of 44
2018/19 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program
Annual Report
Table of Contents
Page No.
Introduction i
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility (HHWCF) 1
Residential Participation
San Ramon Door-to-Door (DTD) Collection 5
Quantities of Wastes Collected 7
Pollution Prevention (P2) Efforts 10
Wastes Diverted from Sewer and Landfill Disposal 13
Small Business Program 15
Public Education and Outreach 16
Revenue and Expenses 17
Appendices:
Al California Integrated Waste Management Board Form 303
All Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Disposal Charges
AIII Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program History— 1997 to
Present
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 174 of 263
Page 5 of 44
2018/2019 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program
Annual Report
Tables and Figures
Table Description/Title Page No.
RP-1 Residential Participation by Community 3
RP-2 Total participation by Community 4
SR-1 San Ramon DTD Collection 6
WC-1 Estimated of Amount of Waste Collected by Community 9
PP-1 Mercury Collection Summary 10
PP-2 Pollutants of Concern Summary 11
PP-3 Pharmaceutical Collection Summary 12
WD-1 Quantity of Landfill Diverted Waste 14
SB-1 Small Business Participation by Community 15
SB-2 Small Business Appointment Statistics 16
RE-1 HHWCF Summary of Revenue and Expenses 21
RE-2 HHWCF Capital Expenditure Amortization Schedule 22
Figure Page No.
RP-1 HHWCF Participation: Cars per Month 1
RP-2 HHWCF Participation: Average Cars per Day of Week 2
RP-3 HHWCF Participation: Average Cars per Day 2
WC-1 Pounds of Waste per Car 7
WC-2 Waste Disposal per Month 8
WC-3 Breakdown of Waste Shipped by Weight (%) of Major 8
Categories
WC-4 Waste Management Method Breakdown Percentage of Waste 9
Processed by Weight
RE-1 Operating Cost per Car 17
RE-2 Cost per Car Broken Down by Expense 18
RE-3 Operating Cost Per Pound of Waste Collected 18
RE-4 Participation and Expenses 23
RE-5 HHW Program Annual Cost per Household 24
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 175 of 263
Page 6 of 44
INTRODUCTION
This summary report of the HHW program for fiscal year (FY) 2018/19 presents the program
participation levels, an analysis of the hazardous waste delivered to the facility, and the costs
associated with the program. The program's high level of participation and the amount of
hazardous waste collected and properly managed each year, demonstrates the benefits to
both public health and the environment.
BACKGROUND
In 1995, it was recognized and resolved by all central Contra Costa County cities', the Central
Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (Central San),
and co-sponsor Mt. View Sanitary District (MVSD) that mobile HHW collection events were
not efficient or convenient, and that a permanent HHWCF was needed. In 1997, Central San
opened the first permanent HHWCF in Contra Costa County with its service agreement
partners MVSD, and cities of Clayton, Concord, and San Ramon.
P2
Central San's core function is to operate a municipal wastewater collection system and a 53.8
million gallons per day rated treatment plant (Plant). The wastewater collection system covers
145 square miles and includes approximately 1,500 miles of sewer pipes. In FY 2018/19, the
Plant treated nearly 12 billion gallons of wastewater.
MVSD's Plant serves an estimated population of 21,900 with approximately 270 businesses
in its 4.7 square mile service area, which is served by 73 miles of sewer collection system.
MVSD reclaims approximately 450 million gallons of water for 21 acres of wetland habitat
every year. Both Central San's and MVSD's Plants are designed to treat and prevent
biological wastes from entering our waterways, however chemicals must be removed prior to
entering the Plants in order to keep the biological treatment train healthy. This is how HHW
collection benefits Central San and MVSD. P2 at the source ensures that the Plants are
operating at peak efficiency and eliminates chemical wastes from flowing through treatment
processes that are designed specifically for human waste.
i
Clayton, Concord, Danville, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pleasant Hill, San Ramon,Walnut Creek
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 176 of 263
Page 7 of 44
HHWCF RESIDENTIAL PARTICIPATION
The HHW Collection Program is completing its 22nd year of operation. The HHW program
serves all of central Contra Costa County, which is comprised of 192,867 households, with a
population of approximately 527,000. Program participation has increased steadily from the
7.8 percent of households served during the opening year in 1997/98 to 18.4 percent in FY
2018/19.
Figure RP-1 shows HHW program participation on a monthly basis. Participation ranged
between 1,790 cars in December and 3,456 cars in July. The lower participation during the
winter months is attributed to fewer operating days due to the holidays, and seasonal
fluctuations in participation presumably due to more inclement weather.
Figure RP-1
HHWCF Participation
Cars per Month
FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 O FY 2018/19
4,000 —
3,500
n ,
3,000 '
.n ae
m cD m mCMO rr m a) M1p � m m m
u 2,500 m m 1-4m
�ry � r w
O N umj a
LnN lL ry ul • N
y 2,000 N m N m
A N N
7 1,500 O ry
Z ri M1
Ln
1,000
500 — —
0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
1
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 177 of 263
Page 8 of 44
Figure RP-2 presents the average residential participation for each day of operation, Monday
through Saturday. Typical fluctuations in the average cars per day of week were observed.
Figure RP-2
HHWCF Participation
Average Cars per Day of Week
160
133 2016'17 H201718 0 201819 144
140 123
120 115 118 114a 97 96 120
102 1P�
0 100
a
80 —
x
60 —
¢' 40 — -
20 - —
0
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Days of Operation
Figure RP-3 presents a comparison of the average number of cars per operating day since
the HHWCF opened. This data serves as a tool for planning staffing levels through the
different seasons and to promote the facility's services.
Figure RP-3
HHWCF Participation
Average Cars per Day
140 —
120
d loo o•
m 80 n
rn 00
60
d
cm
2 40
d
20 17
0
0�l�ti�'°,��°1���,
'From FY 1447196 toSeptemherof 2001,the H H WCF operated only 3.5 days per week.In Septernkr2001,t h e fad Iity opened five days per week.in fu n e of 2003,
t hefad I ity hega n a si.-dayope.t ingweek.6y opening the add itional day,t h e average nu mherof cars per day was reduced.
2
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 178 of 263
Page 9 of 44
Table RP-1
Residential Participation by Community
Fiscal Year 2018/19
Community ' Number of HHWCF % of Community
Households Participation Served
Clayton 4,041 895 22.1%
Concord 44,367 7,974 18.0%
Danville 15,670 2,604 16.6%
Lafayette 9,591 2,604 27.2%
Martinez / MVSD 14,522 6,281 43.3%
Moraga 5,594 979 17.5%
Orinda 6,827 1,423 20.8%
Pleasant Hill 13,685 3,462 25.3%
San Ramon 27,671 1,180 4.3%
0
2 San Ramon - DTD 27,671 0
Walnut Creek 31,424 6,046 19.2%
3 Unincorporated 19,109 2,008 10.5%
Subtotal 192,591 35,456 18.4%
4 Out of Service Area N/A 191 N/A
Total 192,591 35,647 N/A
1 Central San estimate based on January 2019 California Department of Finance data and data provided by MVSD and the
City of San Ramon.
2 Central San does not sponsor the City of San Ramon's Door-to-Door(DTD)Collection program, but it should be noted that
the number of participants that were served by the program should be included with the number of participants that used the
HHWCF in order to obtain an overall HHW participation rate. The DTD program includes e-waste pickups. Unfortunately,
San Ramon was unable to provide participation data prior to completing this report.
3 Hazardous waste from outside of the service area was accepted and processed for one of two reasons: 1)employees from
Central San and MVSD who live outside of the service area are also eligible for HHW program participation,or 2)household
hazardous waste generated outside the service area that is deemed unsafe for further transport is accepted and processed
as a safe and responsible business practice.
4 The number of cars outside of the service area was not included in the participation percentage.
3
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 179 of 263
Page 10 of 44
Table RP-2
Percentage of Households in Service Area
and Participation by Community
Fiscal Year 2018/19
% of
Community Number of Households HHWCF % of Total
Households in Service Participation Served
Area
Clayton 4,041 2.1% 895 2.5%
Concord 44,367 23.0% 7,974 22.5%
Danville 15,670 8.1% 2,604 7.3%
Lafayette 9,591 5.0% 2,604 7.3%
Martinez / MVSD 14,522 7.5% 6,281 17.7%
Moraga 5,594 2.9% 979 2.8%
Orinda 6,827 3.5% 1,423 4.0%
Pleasant Hill 13,685 7.1% 3,462 9.8%
San Ramon 27,761 14.4% 1,180 3.3%
Walnut Creek 31,424 16.3% 6,046 17.1%
Unincorporated 2 19,109 9.9% 2,008 5.7%
Subtotal 192,591 100% 35,456 100%
3 Out of Service Area N/A N/A 191 0.5%
Total 192,591 N/A 36,647 N/A
1 Central San estimate based on January 2019 California Department of Finance data and data provided by MVSD and the City of
San Ramon.
2 Hazardous waste from outside of the service area was accepted and processed for one of two reasons:1)employees from Central
San and MVSD who live outside of the service area are also eligible for HHW program participation, or 2)household hazardous
waste generated outside the service area that is deemed unsafe for further transport is accepted and processed as a safe and
responsible business practice.
3 The number of cars outside of the service area was not included in the participation percentage.
4
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 180 of 263
Page 11 of 44
SAN RAMON DTD COLLECTION PROGRAM
Since 2011, when the City of San Ramon elected to sponsor their own DTD HHW collection
program, we have tracked their usage with the HHWCF's in order to show overall participation
and proper waste management within the Central San service area. Table SR-1 below
describes the participation, waste volumes, and cost that San Ramon reported, compared to
HHWCF's usage figures for San Ramon.
San Ramon's DTD program was discontinued in November 2018, when their service
contractor abruptly canceled the collection service for San Ramon residents. With no longer
having a disposal option through the City, San Ramon residential participation at the HHWCF
increased by 35 percent or 305 cars.
Unfortunately, San Ramon was unable to provide their DTD participation and cost data in
time to add to this report. Table SR-1 below was left in the report to show and compare FY
2017/18 and 2018/19 service levels in San Ramon at the HHWCF.
5
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 181 of 263
Page 12 of 44
Table SR-1
San Ramon's HHWCF Participation with
San Ramon's DTD Program
HHW Collection Method FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19
Central San HHWCF 875 1,180
City of San Ramon DTD Program * 1,226 N/A ***
Total participants 2,101 N/A ***
Percent difference in participation from previous (N/A) % more
year
Pounds of Waste Collected from San Ramon FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19
Central San HHWCF 56,378 72,868
City of San Ramon DTD Program 62,023 N/A ***
Total pounds 118,401 7]7N/A ***
Percent difference in pounds of waste collected from (N/A) % less
previous year
Cost of HHW Collection Method FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19
Central San HHWCF $47,724 $70,207
City of San Ramon's portion of HHWCF cost $19,651 $22,335
City of San Ramon DTD Program $232,200 N/A ***
Total Cost $299,575 N/A ***
HHWCF Pounds per participant 64 61
HHWCF Cost per participant $77 $78
HHWCF Cost per pound of waste collected $1.21 $1.27
DTD Pounds per participant ** 51 N/A **
DTD Cost per participant $189 N/A ***
DTD Cost per pound of waste collected $3.74 N/A **
* Number of DTD participants includes a-waste only pickups.
**Includes e-waste.
***Information not available.
6
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 182 of 263
Page 13 of 44
QUANTITIES OF WASTES COLLECTED
The HHW Collection Program disposed or recycled 1,826,862 pounds of waste during FY
2018/19. This is about 57,000 pounds less than last year. With the addition of the 384,161
pounds of HHW collected, separated, and given to the public for reuse, 2,211,023 pounds of
hazardous waste was collected and processed through the HHWCF (see Table WC-1). An
average of about 61 pounds of HHW per car was dropped off by 36,108 customers (35,647
residents, 348 small business appointments, and 113 retail partnership drop offs). The wastes
were transported from the HHWCF for reuse, recycling, fuel blending, incineration, treatment,
or landfill. Data specific to the Reuse Room or other waste management activities is
presented on pages 8 through 13.
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) requires a
Form 303 report each FY (July through June) summarizing the amount, the types of
hazardous waste processed and a breakdown of the waste management method for each
type of hazardous waste collected. It is included in Appendix I.
The average weight of hazardous waste collected per car was slightly lower than last year
at 61 pounds, as shown in Figure WC-1.
Figure WC-1
Pounds of Waste per Car
90 80
78 77 77
80
70 67 67 68 67 69 66 63 64 64
61
v 60
m
m 50
V
40
c 30
20
a 10
0 -
�'� 'o°°�°�°��°�°�,�qy°��ti�,�°�ti�,����',tiy��'�ti3�ti�,�°�ti 'b
Figure
Figure WC-2 presents the quantity of wastes transported off-site each month for disposal.
7
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 183 of 263
Page 14 of 44
Figure WC-2
Waste Disposal per Month
2016/17 2017/18 E2018/19
250,000 —
200,000 —
a m m •• a' �
ysj 150,000 -
�
100,000
N W • r-I N
IL
w W
o �
rn
50,000
0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Figure WC-3 presents a breakdown of hazardous wastes processed by type of waste. The
transportation classifications on the shipping documents were used as the primary means
for segregation into waste type.
Figure WC-3
Breakdown of Waste Shipped
by Weight (%) of Major Categories
FY 2018/2019
0 5%
4% 3� ■Flammables
1% 23%
0 Latex Paint
7% u Motor Oil/Oil Filters
3% 0 Aerosols
3% O Car Batteries
2% o Fluorescent Lamps
0 Poisons
9% 0 Pharmecuticals
GI Household Batteries
0 Corrosives
41% V Others
1
8
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 184 of 263
Page 15 of 44
Figure WC-4 Figure WC-4
presents the Waste Management Method Breakdown
distribution of Percentage of Waste Processed by Weight
hazardous Fiscal Year 2018/19
wastes 2.6%
8.7
17.4
processed by
management
method.
tiny\ 0.1%
V Reuse
0 Landfill
w Fuel Blend
17.1% o Recycle
V Incineration
N Tre atme nt
54.0%
Table WC-1 presents the estimated distribution of HHW collected by community.
Table WC-1
Estimated Amount of Waste Collected by Community
Percent of Estimate amount of Waste
Community Number of Cars Total Cars Collected by Community
(rounded) (pounds)
Clayton 897 2.5% 54,927
Concord 8,095 22.4% 494,686
Danville 2,613 7.2% 160,003
Lafayette 2,624 7.3% 160,677
Martinez / Mt. View 6,412 17.8% 392,630
Moraga 984 2.7% 60,254
Orinda 1,430 4.0% 87,564
Pleasant Hill 3,483 9.6% 213,277
San Ramon 1,190 3.3% 72,868
Walnut Creek 6,143 17.0% 376,158
Unincorporated 2,046 5.7% 125,284
Subtotal 35,917 99.5% 2,199,327
Out of Service Area 191 0.5% 11,696
Total 36,1081 1 100.0% 1 2,211,023
I The total number of cars includes 35,647 cars from the permanent facility, 113 Retail partnership drop-offs,and 348
business appointments.
z The total weight collected includes disposed and reused from the permanent facility(residents, businesses,and retail).
9
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 185 of 263
Page 16 of 44
POLLUTION PREVENTION (P2) EFFORTS
Central San's P2 program has evolved over the years to become an important component of
our mission, which specifically includes P2 and reflects the growing importance of P2 for
regulatory compliance. Central San is required to monitor and prevent certain pollutants from
entering the influent wastewater. The HHW program helps prevent wastes from reaching the
sewer, and tracks the amount of waste that was diverted.
Mercury Collection Program
The HHW program facilitates Central San's promotion of proper mercury disposal by
accepting all types of mercury, including: elemental mercury, mercury-containing devices
(e.g., fluorescent bulbs, batteries, mercury switches, and mercury thermometers), and
mercury-containing compounds (paints and pesticides containing mercury).
Since the beginning of the mercury thermometer exchange program in 1999, more than 7,000
mercury thermometers have been collected and exchanged for non-mercury types.
Table PP-1 describes the types of mercury-containing wastes that are tracked by HHW staff.
This system closely estimates the quantities of mercury contained in fluorescent lamps,
thermometers, thermostats, switches and button-cell batteries. Nearly 36 pounds of
elemental mercury contained in these types of wastes was collected through the HHW
program in FY 2018/19.
Table PP-1
FY 2018/19 Mercury Collection Summary
Number Estimated Total
Mercury-Containing Devices of Items Units Quantity of Mercury Pounds
Hg
Thermostats (3 Grams/unit) 76 Each 228 Grams 0.50
Thermometers (1 Grams/unit) 557 Each 557 Grams 1.23
Elemental Hg (Lbs.) N/A N/A N/A 31.6
Switches 2 Each 2 Grams 0.005
Mercury Batteries 155 Pounds 484,375 Milligrams 1.07
Fluorescent Lamps 408,880 Feet 848,426 Milligrams 1.87
Total Hg in Pounds 35.82
Paints, pesticides & other 4 Container Unknown 4.25
compounds containing mercury
10
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 186 of 263
Page 17 of 44
Other Pollutants
Some other pollutants of concern, such as legacy pesticides, are tracked separately in order
to provide a more accurate report of collected compounds. Table PP-2 shows which
pollutants of concern are tracked and the quantity collected in FY 2018/19.
Table PP-2
FY 2018/19 Pollutants of Concern Summary
Compound Total Pounds
Tributyltin 414
Diazinon 1,973
Chlorpyrifos 1,955
Carbaryl 3,520
Copper 3,864
Pentachlorophenol/2,4,5-T/Trichlorophenol 409
Lindane 177
Chlordane 570
DDT (DDE) 44
Dieldrin 24
Lead Compounds 318
Pyrithroids (pesticides) 14,898
Fats, Oils and Greases (FOG) 38,550
PCBs (Light ballasts) 1,400
Total 68,918
Pharmaceutical Collection Program
Another way the HHW program contributes to Central San's P2 program is by collecting
unwanted or expired pharmaceuticals from residents. Pharmaceuticals can be a threat to our
bay, rivers, and creeks as some of the compounds they contain cannot be entirely treated or
removed by wastewater Plants. Pharmaceuticals can enter the sewer system by either
excretion from the body or by customers dumping them down the drain. Since we cannot
prevent unmetabolized medications from entering the Plant, we established a collection and
disposal program for unwanted pharmaceuticals.
Central San operates 13 collection sites in all 11 cities and towns in our service area. Table
PP-3 describes the amount of pharmaceuticals collected by each site and the cost of
collection and disposal.
11
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 187 of 263
Page 18 of 44
Table PP-3
FY 2018/19 Pharmaceutical Collection Summary
Total
Collection Bins Total Average *Average
Sites (18- Pounds Lbs./Bin Total Cost Cost/Lb.
gallon)
Alamo 15 600 40 $1,500 $2.50
Clayton 10 405 41 $750 $1.85
Concord 43 1,582 37 $3,225 $2.04
Danville 48 1,677 35 $3,600 $2.15
Lafayette 17 557 33 $1,275 $2.29
Martinez 15 604 40 $1,125 $1.86
Moraga 20 908 45 $1,500 $1.65
Orinda 19 941 50 $1,425 $1.51
Pleasant Hill 37 1,593 43 $2,775 $1.74
San Ramon 49 1,901 39 $3,675 $1.93
Sherriff FOB 21 735 35 $1,575 $2.14
CCC Hospital 5 198 40 $375 $1.89
Walnut Creek 82 2,885 35 $6,150 $2.13
Total 381 14,586 39 $28,950 $ 1.98
"The variation in the average cost per pound is caused by the amount of packaging (jars, paper, cardboard,
etc.) included in the collection bins. Bags for consolidating pills are offered at most collection sites, but are
not often used. The fullness of the container when it is picked up, also affects the cost/Ib.
Since the pharmaceutical program began in 2009, over 134,700 pounds of unwanted or
expired medications have been collected and properly disposed by incineration. In FY
2018/19, more than 14,500 pounds of unwanted prescribed, non-prescribed, and over-the-
counter medications were collected at a cost of$28,950.
12
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 188 of 263
Page 19 of 44
WASTES DIVERTED FROM SEWER AND LANDFILL DISPOSAL
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires diversion of
HHW from the municipal solid waste stream. AB 939 established a waste management
hierarchy to minimize the amount of HHW sent to landfills through reduction, reuse, recycling,
treatment, or incineration (fuel blending or destructive incineration), and diverts a minimum of
50 percent of solid waste from being landfilled. The emphasis is on reduction, reuse, and
recycling whenever possible.
As a water quality agency, diverting hazardous waste from the sewers and storm drains is
equally important. Although Central San's HHW program is not required to comply with the
requirements of AB 939, Central San's waste management strategy mirrors AB 939,
prioritizing reduction, reuse, recycling, and fuel blending, in that order, to the greatest extent
feasible. All of which divert these wastes from being landfilled. The HHW program's progress
toward sewer and landfill diversion for FY 2018/19 is outlined below.
Reused
The amount of reusable products given away accounted for roughly 17.4 percent of the total
amount of waste collected by the HHW program. Over 20,000 Reuse Program participants
were given over 384,000 pounds of free reusable products during FY 2018/19. The estimated
cost savings from the Reuse Program is $119,168, which includes roughly $26,600 of
compensation from PaintCare for each gallon of reusable PaintCare product given away.
Recycled
The types of waste recycled at off-site facilities include latex paint, used motor oil/filters,
antifreeze, car batteries, propane cylinders, fluorescent lamps, lead (scrap metal), mercury,
household batteries, printer cartridges, and even home-generated cooking oil. Many of these
recyclable waste streams are rebated or free for recycling.
Fuel Blended (Waste Derived Fuel)
In FY 2018/19, a total of 379,050 pounds of oil-based paint and other flammable liquids
(gasoline, paint thinners, etc.)was blended with other flammable hazardous wastes and used
as a fuel source to make Portland cement. While fuel blending is lower in the waste
management hierarchy than recycling, it is still a beneficial use that avoids using fossil fuels
and prevents destructive incineration, treatment, or Class I landfill disposal. Table WD-1
shows the waste streams and quantities of wastes diverted from landfill.
13
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 189 of 263
Page 20 of 44
Table WD-1
Quantity of Landfill Diverted Waste
Material Type Quantity Recycled
(Lbs.)
Motor Oil and Oil Filters 172,868
Antifreeze 39,197
Car Batteries 51,123
Fluorescent Lamps 51,529
Compressed Gas Cylinders (Propane and Fire Extinguishers) 31,186
Scrap Metal (lead, brass, and copper) 457
Printer Cartridges 1,134
Mercury and Mercury Products 135
Household Batteries 66,366
Latex Paint 742,000
Cooking Oil 38,550
Smoke Detectors 53
Total recycled waste 1,194,598
Reused HHW 384,161
Total recycled and reused 1,578,759
Percent of HHW reused or recycled 71.4%
Fuel Blended
Oil Based Paint 245,000
Other Flammable Liquids 134,050
Total fuel blended waste 379,050
Percent of Waste Fuel Blended 17.1%
Total landfill diverted waste 1,957,809
Percent of waste diverted from landfill 88.6%
Total waste throughput, including reused, recycled, and 2,211,023
disposed
14
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 190 of 263
Page 21 of 44
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM
An important component of the HHW program is the collection of hazardous wastes from
small businesses that qualify as "Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators" (CESQG)
under Federal and State hazardous waste management laws. This program is intended to
offer small businesses a cost effective and convenient hazardous waste disposal option.
Program statistics are included below in tables SB-1 and SB-2.
Revenue collected from small businesses is for hazardous waste disposal or recycling only
and includes an administration fee of $20 per appointment. Small business participation has
been known to fluctuate from year to year as does the revenue collected. See Appendix III
for the current CESQG disposal charges.
CESQG outreach pieces are ongoing, advertising in local chamber of commerce publications,
Central San's Pipeline newsletter, MVSD's Mt. View Monitor newsletter, business trade fairs,
and word of mouth by Central San's Environmental Compliance Inspectors, as well as Contra
Costa County Hazmat Program Inspectors, as they complete their field work auditing the
operations of eligible businesses.
Table SB-1
SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION BY COMMUNITY
Community Fiscal Year 2018/19 Previous Year
Clayton 2 2
Concord 119 137
Danville 9 6
Lafayette 20 23
Martinez/ Mt. View 72 70
Moraga 5 7
Orinda 6 5
Pleasant Hill 21 27
San Ramon 10 8
Walnut Creek 57 49
Unincorporated 27 19
Outside of service area 0 0
TOTAL 348 353
15
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 191 of 263
Page 22 of 44
Table SB-2
SMALL BUSINESS APPOINTMENT STATISTICS
Number of Number of Estimated Revenue
Fiscal Businesses New Number of Pounds of per Revenue
Year Served Businesses Appointments Waste Pound Collected
Served Collected of Waste
05/06 128 55 252 40,841 $0.54 $22,054
06/07 161 94 373 81,777 $0.45 $37,008
07/08 191 104 386 59,966 $0.57 $34,324
08/09 148 75 416 72,728 $0.46 $33,236
09/10 178 82 439 73,045 $0.43 $29,290
10/11 206 77 485 72,991 $0.43 $31,157
11/12 171 68 378 53,486 $0.54 $30,696
12/13 134 53 291 42,838 $0.58 $24,707
13/14 129 40 255 35,620 $0.64 $22,900
14/15 141 48 287 42,876 $0.63 $27,126
15/16 149 67 339 55,370 $0.61 $33,884
16/17 158 51 303 44,436 $0.63 $28,054
17/18 149 63 353 55,287 $0.64 $35,566
18/19 181 62 348 57,898 $0.68 $39,126
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
HHW program participation has steadily grown since the first year of operation. It is publicized
in each issue of the Central San Pipeline newsletter, which is mailed twice a year to more
than 156,000 Central San residential and business customers. Additionally, MVSD, the
Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority, and cities and organizations in the service area,
have used social media and newsletters to provide public education and promotion of the
HHW program and its associated Pharmaceutical Disposal Program. With this promotional
strategy, about seven percent of the total residential participants during FY 2018/19 were
first-time customers, and the remaining 93 percent were repeat customers.
16
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 192 of 263
Page 23 of 44
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
The HHW program expenses for FY 2018/19 totaled $2,809,380, which is an increase of
about 2.1 percent over last year. The increase in overall cost can be attributed to a 1.4 percent
increase in overall participation when compared to last year. Both increases caused the
operating cost per car to increase from $77 in FY 2017/18 to $78 in FY 2018/19. Figure RE-
1 below, describes the operating cost per car (participant) since the inception of the program.
Figure RE-2 on the following page breaks down that cost by the five major expense
categories: labor, waste, materials, capital, and other.
Figure RE-1
Operating Cast per Car
$100
9D � N M o
$0 ill 00 rI%
letLD
$70 [4
ifl
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
W M O rl ry m Ln 0 r-- W M O r-� m Ln �0 r-, W M
eo M o m Ln co 6s o r'J m Ln 0 r, W
17
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 193 of 263
Page 24 of 44
Figure RE-2
Cast per Car Broken Down by Expense W Labor
District staff and
$$.�5 contractstaff
$3.47
N Materials
Materials and
su pplies(PPE,
Contai ners,etc.)
$14.07 u Waste
Transportation
and recycling
and Jordisposal
$4$.66
N Other
$3.35 Utilities,
Insurance,mist.
The CDst(Carfor W Capital
Fiscal Year 2018119 Amortized capital
is 577.80 expenditures
Figure RE-3 describes the operating cost per pound of waste collected.
Figure RE-3
Operating Cost per Pound of Waste Collected
$1.60
$1.40
$1.20 ri
rr 14
�_ UO N N fJ
$1.00 rn
rn r,
Ln vv -kA
CL Cr i
$0.80LC
a o
G $0.60 Ci
0
t�
$0.40
$0.20
$0.00
�(Sy oma,°ti o�,°�611° d)d" 0I-1°��0�1°�o�,\°��,1ti�tio1~y1�1\ \ti3 �� 1� "A .1% ti�
18
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 194 of 263
Page 25 of 44
Revenue and No Cost Waste Management
Revenue for the HHWCF included payments from other jurisdictions under service
agreements (MVSD, City of Concord, City of Clayton, and City of San Ramon) and charges
to small businesses under the CESQG program. Also, staff is diligent in seeking low cost/no
cost management or revenue generating alternatives while keeping safe and proper disposal
in mind. Many of the wastes that are collected by the HHWCF have market value or require
manufacturers to manage and pay the cost of their recycling, also known as Extended
Producer Responsibility (EPR).
The list below describes the revenue generating or no cost waste streams, how much was
collected, if Central San was paid for recycling, and the cost if Central San had to dispose of
the waste without compensation or EPR assistance.
Waste Stream Waste Revenue Cost If Disposed
Volume in Lbs.
Scrap metal 457 $110 $0
Mercury Thermostats 39 $0 $185
EPR
Printer cartridges 1,134 $1,155 $306
Rechargeable battery 9,112 $2,077 $6,574
recycling (EPR)
Cardboard 10,800 $0 $0
Cooking oil 38,550 $288 $10,750
Lead acid batteries (auto) 51,123 $13,758 $0
Non-PaintCare reuse 217,389 $0 $58,695
PaintCare reuse EPR 166,772 $22,064 $63,322
Latex and oil based paint 842,150 $0 $315,784
(PaintCare)
Total 1,337,526 $39,451 $455,616
Based on this list, Central San saved more than $455,000 in disposal and materials costs
and received over $39,000 in compensation for certain reclaimable wastes. In total, over
1,337,000 pounds or about 61% of the amount of waste collected by the HHW program was
managed at no cost to Central San.
Amortization of Capital Expenditures
Amortization of Capital Expenditures is derived from the capital costs to build the collection
facility and all capital improvements amortized over 30 years. No capital expenditures were
added to the facility in FY 2018/19. Table RE-2 shows the amortization schedule of all capital
expenditures since the HHWCF construction was completed in 1997.
19
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 195 of 263
Page 26 of 44
Table and Figures
• Table RE-1 presents a full summary of revenue and expenses for the HHW program for
FY 2018/19.
• Figure RE-3 shows the HHW program participation and the expenses related to the
program for each of the 21 years of operation.
• Figure RE-4 lists the estimated average cost per household for each year the HHW
program has been in operation.
20
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 196 of 263
Page 27 of 44
Table RE-1
HHWCF
2018/19 Summary of Revenue and Expenses
Revenue FY 2017/2018 FY 2018/2019
Central San Sewer Service Charges: $ 1,816,279 $ 1,863,588
Service Agreements with other jurisdictions: FY 2017/2018 FY 2018/2019
Mt. View Sanitary District $ 125,548 $ 123,183
City of Concord 630,637 645,297
City of Clayton 56,667 58,846
City of San Ramon 19,651 22,300
$ 832,503 $ 849,626 $ 849,626
Sale of collected materials and CESQG Charges: $ 82,591 $ 76,655
Transfer portion of revenue to Self-Insurance for Insurance Policy: $ 19,671 $ 19,511
TOTAL REVENUE $ 2,751,051 $ 2,809,380
Expenses
FY 2017/2018 FY 2018/2019
Salaries, benefits, and overhead (HHW Staff) $ 1,588,242 $ 1,652,518
Environmental liability premiums 64,500 64,500
Utilities 11,748 10,439
Repairs and maintenance 29,852 31,470
Transportation and disposal 510,363 508,116
Professional, technical, and legal services 113,428 104,464
Materials and supplies 114,759 120,869
Other expenses 20,118 18,963
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $ 2,453,010 $ 2,511,339
Amortization of Capital Expenditures 298,041 298,041
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 2,751,051 $ 2,809,380
21
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 197 of 263
Page 28 of 44
Table RE-2
HHWCF Capital Expenditure Amortization Schedule
1998 - 2042
Original Improvement Projects- District Project(DP)
Years Fiscal Year Construction DP 8180 DP 8197& DP 8209& DP 8216 DP 7256 Total
Ending 8204 7229
$ 1,900,000 $ 427,368 $ 32,492 $ 319,393 $ 1,422,353 $ 3,085 $ 4,104,691
1 1998 $ 138,035 138,035
2 1999 138,035 138,035
3 2000 138,035 138,035
4 2001 138,035 138,035
5 2002 138,035 138,035
6 2003 138,035 138,035
7 2004 138,035 $ 31,048 169,083
8 2005 138,035 31,048 $ 2,361 171,444
9 2006 138,035 31,048 2,361 171,444
10 2007 138,035 31,048 2,361 $ 23,204 194,648
11 2008 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 194,483
12 2009 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 194,483
13 2010 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 194,483
14 2011 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 $ 103,334 297,817
15 2012 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 297,817
16 2013 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 $ 224 298,042
17 2014 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
18 2015 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
19 2016 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
20 2017 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
21 2018 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
22 2019 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
23 2020 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
24 2021 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
25 2022 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
26 2023 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
27 2024 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
28 2025 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
29 2026 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
30 2027 138,035 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 298,041
2028 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2029 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2030 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2031 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2032 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2033 31,048 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 160,006
2034 2,361 23,039 103,334 224 128,958
2035 23,039 103,334 224 126,597
2036 23,039 103,334 224 126,597
2037 103,334 224 103,558
2038 103,334 224 103,558
2039 103,334 224 103,558
2040 103,334 224 103,558
2041 224 224
2042 224 224
$ 4,141,050 $ 931,449 $ 70,830 $ 691,341 $ 3,100,020 $ 6,272 $ 8,940,961
Rate=6%amortized over 30 years
22
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 198 of 263
Figure RE-4
Participation and Expenses
$3,000,000
36,000
$2,500,000 I � � �
30,000
fl
$2,000,000 M
24,000 >
C -
x
W
$1,500,000 I
18,000 2.
0
$1,000,000
12,000
$500,000 6,000
Lj
$a a
9758 98.59 99.80 00,U1 61A2 62A3 ❑394 04.•6E DEAR D8.•67 D7.BS 08,09 D9.1D 1DA1 11112 12113 13.74 14.•1E 15M6 1&77 17.78 15119
Operating Expenses $905,676 S1.059.0 51,127,2 $1,161,9 $1273,5 1$1,375,6 1$1,328,7 I$1,396,5 51,549,6 I S1,635,5 S1,,8 4.S I$2,167,5 I 5221&7,7 S2,445,3 1$2,521,9 $2,754,6 $2,554,9 52,529,5 52,417,8 52,851,1 I 52,751,1 $2,509,
Capital Expenditures $135,635$135,635$135,6351$138.0 35$135,6351$138.0 35$109,653$171,444$171.4441$194.64,91$194,645 $194.6481$194.6481$297.6531$297.8 17 1$298,641 1$298,641 1$298,641 1$298,641 1$298,641 1$298,641 1$298,64
Participants Served 9,536 14,619 1 15,849 1 17,437 1 19,410 1 22,555 1 23277 1 23ASS 1 24,244 1 28,526 I 25,373 I 25,686 1 29,573 1 29,928 I 29,803 1 29,567 1 36,746 1 32,345 I 33,488 I 33,637 I 35,846 1 38,165
23
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 199 of 263
Figure RE-5
HHW Program Annual Cost per Household
2o18n9111-04
$14,59
2017118 - S4 2.67 $14.21
2016117 - - $12.11 $13.64
2015116 - $10.90 1 $12A3
2014115
2013114 - �1.88 $13.45
2012113 - $12.96 1 $14,53
2011112 $14.78 $13.35
2010111 311.41 $12.99
2009110 �j R u Wd- $40.78 ' X11.79
2008109 , SIU.29 i $11.31
2007108 , 58.81 $9.84
53.65
2006107 a U.62
$8,38
2005106 M $7.43
■ 57.66
2004105 <., •. -- $6.72
200aM4 ���x KU $7.31
O Capital Porti on
2002103 a $6,87 $7,64
2001102 is.35 $7.12WOperations Portion
2000101 i $5.75 $6.52
1999100 55.71 $6.50
1998199 $6.09
1997198 S4 44 55.24
$0.00 5 2. :.50 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 $14.00 516.00
Annual Cost per Household
24
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 200 of 263
APPENDIX -
F303 R . '
FORMOL
r.
lb
t
*.lire
_ f
f►l R
4
i
1 fir ,
ti
A
f
AMON. Ah
Page 32 of 44
Section F.Waste Volumes:
Enter the number ofpounda of material in the waste stream collected within the area into the cell corresponding to the program type used to collect the material.The spreadsheet will calculate the total amounts for you.Also enter the
Instructions: estimated number ofpounds of the collected material in the cell corresponding to the management method used to dispose or divert the material.Definitions of the"Management Methods"are presented in Title 14,18751.2.1(c).The
spreadsheet will calculate the total pounds disposed or diverted for you.Note:Quantities reported under"Load Check"and other collection categories should not be double counted under"Pernanent Facility."
Material Type Pounds Collected by Program Type Pounds Disposed/Diverted by Management Method
i 2s
.oro °
i tj Oro 41 a�o C,
'01�lo
�° rob r
1.Flammable and
Poison Flammable solids/liquids 86,250 86,250 4,937 81,313 86,250
Bulked flammable liquids 49,050 49,050 49,050 49,050
Oil-base paints 245,000 245,000 245,000 245,000
Poisons 132,702 132,702 132,702 132,702
Reactive and explosive 61 61 61 61
subtotal 513,063 - +-4 . 0 0 0 0 513,063 137,700 375,363 0 0 0 0 0 513,063
2.Acid Inorganic and organic acid 19,676 19,676 19,676 19,676
3.Base Inorganic and organic base 29,250 29,250 29,250 29,250
Neutral oxidizers,Organic
ro
pexides,Oxidizing acid,and
�,I.O.idi.cr Oxidizing base 9,438 9,438 94 9,344 9,438
5.PCB-
comainimg PCB-contannen aint 0 0
Other PCB waste(includes
ballasts) 700 700 700 700
subtotal 700 0 0 0 0 tO 0 700 700 0 0 0 0 0 0 700
6.Reclaimable Antifreeze 39,197 39,197 39,197 39,197
Auto type batteries(motor
vehicles) 51,123 51,123 51,123 51,123
Latex aint 742,000 742,000 742,000 742,000
Motor oil/oilroducts 165,868 165,868 165,868 165,868
Used oil filters(reeyclables
only) 75000 7,000 7,000 7,000
subtotal 1 15005,188 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1,005,188 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,005,188 0 1 0 1,005,188
7.Asbestos Asbestos 2,700 F 2,700 0 0 2,700 0 0 0 0 2,700
Mercury containing automatic
8.Universal switches/thermometers/and
Waste(UW)* novelties 96 96 96 96
Mercury containing
thermostats ■TRC 39 39 39 39
Mercury containing waste
(other)Thermostats 0 0
Lams 51,643 51,643 51,643 51,643
Rechaz cable batteries 9,196 9,196 9,196 9,196
Other batteries 57,170 57,170 57,170 57,170
subtotal 118,144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118,144 0 0 0 0 118,144 0 0 1187144
Electronic Waste
(UW) Covered Electronic Devices 0 0
Universal Waste Electronic
Devices 0 0
subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Aerosol
Containers(UW) Aerosol containers 0 0
Other UW (name) 0 0
all UW subtotal 118,144 0 0 0 ±- 0 0 0 118,144 0 0 0 0 118,144 0 0 118,144
*To be considered Universal Waste,all waste in this category except for batteries,must be managed by recycling.Energy recovery or Rel incineration is not considered recycling.Ifthe waste cannot be managed by recycling,it
is not universal waste and must be managed as a hazardous waste.The completed Disposed/Diverted Management Methods section will show whether or not wastes were managed as a universal waste.
9.Other HHW Home-generated sharps 25 25 25 25
Pharmaceutical Waste 14,586 14,586 14,586 14,586
Compressed gas cylinders 31,186 31,186 5,339 25,848 31,186
Non-PCB Ballast 712 712 712 712
Non-UW aerosol containers
(corosive,flammable, o son) 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000
Other:Cart.,Cooking oil,
Reuse,Smoke detect40,194 40,194 405
194 3847161 424,355
subtotal 128,703 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128,703 62,637 0 25 0 66,042 384,161 0 512,864
10.Grand Total 1,826,862 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,826,862 201,131 375,363 2,725 58,270 1,189,374 384,161 0 2,211,023
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 202 of 263
i
a
t
APPENDIX 11 :
CESQG
CHARGES
ILA
.rt
LJkkk
`�
lra.}u+3ry
ANE ... .r All P
i
46 -
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 203 of 263
SCHEDULE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE HANDLING
AND DISPOSAL CHARGES FOR CONDITIONALLY
EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
(Revision date 11/5/99)
Per Per Per Per Other
Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit
(Packaging Method) Container' Container' Container' Container' Charges
Antifreeze (Bulked) Uncontaminated for recycle $1.40/gal
Latex Paint (Bulked) Latex based paints, stains $2.50/gal
Motor Oil (Bulked) Uncontaminated for recycle $0.28/gal.
Aerosols Spray Paints $1.65 $3.30
Hazard Class 2 Insecticides
(Loosepack) Aerosol Cleaners
Flammable/ Paint Related Solvents $0.50 $1.00 $3.40 $20.50 $2.50/gal.2
Combustible Material: Oil- Thinners
Materials: Fuels Based
Blending Paint/Stains
Hazard Class 3.0 Varnishes
(Loosepack)
(Bulked option for some
wastes)2
Adhesives Glues $0.50 $1.00 $3.75 $30.00 $2.50/gal.2
Alcohol Ink/Toners
Brush Wash Polishes
Diesel White Gas
Epoxy Resins Methanol
Gasoline/Fuels Roof Tar
Grease Sealers
All-1
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 204 of 263
Per Per Per Per Other
Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit
(Packaging Method) Container' Container' Container' Container' Charges
Corrosives, Oxidizers, Acetic Acid Ferric Chloride $1.20 $2.40 $9.50 $47.50
Acids, Bases: Ammonia Formic Acid
Neutralization/ Citric Acid Hydrochloric
Treatment Corrosives Acid
Hazard Class B Potassium Hydrofluoric
(Labpack) Hydroxide Acid
Sodium Hypochlorite
Hydroxide Caustics
Poisons, Toxic Insecticides Herbicides $1.70 $3.40 $13.50 $67.50
Materials: Pesticides Toxic Lab
Incineration Flammable Chemicals
Hazard Class 6, 3(6) Pesticides
(Labpack)
Contaminated Solids, Non-RCRA Hazardous Wastes $0.65 $1.30 $5.25 $26.50
Other Hazardous Fertilizers
Materials: Landfill Absorbents
Hazard Class 9,
Non-RCRA
(Labpack or Loosepack)
Reactives Cyanides Sulfides $2.50 $5.00 $20.00 $99.00
Hazard Class 4 Dangerous Bromine
(Labpack) when wet Spontaneously
combustible
Asbestos Double bagged friable asbestos $120 per
(Loosepack) wastes cubic yard
All-2
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 205 of 263
Per Per Per Per Other
Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit
(Packaging Method) Container' Container' Container' Container' Charges
Household Batteries Alkaline Nickel Cadmium $0.10
Hazard Class 8, 9 Lithium Silver Oxide each
(Loosepack)
Oil Filters Automotive and truck/tractor filters $1.00
(Loosepack) each
Vehicle Batteries Unbroken/non leaking lead-acid No
(Not packaged) batteries Charge
Fluorescent Tubes $0.15/ft.
(Loosepack)
Propane Cylinders 5 gallon "BBQ" style $5.00
(Loosepack)
Propane Cylinders Smaller than 5 gallon cylinders $1.40 $2.75 $11.00
(Loosepack)
' Prices are based on container size regardless of how full; containers of other than the specified sizes will be charged at an
interpolated or prorated price.
2 This rate will be available when the bulking of flammable liquids can be performed at the facility. Flammable liquids that cannot be
bulked will be charged the rate based on the container size.
Note: Each CESQG shall be charged an Administration Fee of $20.00 for each drop off in addition to the above handling and
disposal charges.
(Ord. 229 Exh. A(part), 2004: Ord. 212 § 1 Exh. A, 1999: Ord. 206 Exh. A, 1999
All-3
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 206 of 263
APPENDIX III :
HHW PROGRAM
HISTORY -
1997 TO PRESENT
rar
ate_
owl
vw 11
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 207 of 263
�ORROSiyE
i
Page 38 of 44
Celebrated the 10-year anniversary Surpassed 2,000,000 pounds
of the HHW Facility. collected mark. Added two new Ace Hardware
stores to the Pollution
Filled four vacant positions(HHW Added two new Ace Hardware Completed DP8216 HHWCF Sollutions Program.One store
Supervisor,2-Senior Tech and an stores in Walnut Creek to the Improvements Project which in Alamo and another in Compensation for PaintCare
HHW Tech 1/11)and added an HHW Pollution Solutions program. included seismic upgrades, Blackhawk. reusable products began as of
Completed District Project Tech 1/II to make six staff members operational enhancements, August 2014.Payment was
Participation increased partly 7229.The project focused on Began the Pharmaceutical improved ADA access and PaintCare began March 19th retroactive to March 2013.
due to the introduction of the safety enhancements at the Started new Waste Services Collection Program pilot in safety,and enlarged staff contracted though PSC.No Payment for all architectural
propane tank over-pressure treatment plant and HHW Contract with PSC. Feb.'09.Collected over areas. charge for the recycling of latex and oil based paint given
device effecting all bbq style Facility. 1,500 pounds of medications architectural latex and oil away through the Reuse
propane tanks.The facility Purchased floor scale.Began from three sites(Walnut Creek Revised the number of based paint.A savings of over Program.Over$19,000 in
received over 1,400 tanks Began tracking Pollutants of weighing all reusable products prior City Hall,Sheriff Field households in the HHW $95,000 in three and a half revenue annually.
Dougherty Valley trunkline during the year. Concern for Treatment Plant to giving them to the public. Operations Building,Contra Program service area back to months.PaintCare does not
installed.San Ramon and Pollution Prevention Costa County Regional 1997 to reflect an error in how require us to bulk paint,which Sr,Technician provisionally in
continues to annex Dougherty Started new Waste Services Program Completed DP 8209 which improved Medical Center)at a cost of the figure was calculated each also saves a considerable Source Control for entire year.
Valley. contract with PSC. and expanded the Latex Bulking about$6,300. year amount of money in labor and Technician II on leave for six
First complete year of Collected 1,497,277 lbs of Area. materials. months.
operation.Collected 898,431 Collected 1,353,017 lbs of Collected 1,601,699 lbs of Collected 1,913,307 lbs of Collected 2,008,995 lbs of
waste from 23,098
lbs.of waste from 14,105 waste from 17,471 waste from 22,585 CESQG's
and Collected 1,895,523 lbs of waste waste from 28,686 waste from 29,926 Collected 2,014,598 lbs of Collected 2,038,084 lbs of
mobile event cars
households,CESQG's and households,CESQG's and households,CESQG's and households, ars at
cost of from 26,820 households,CESQG's households,CESQG's and households,CESQG's and waste from 29,507 households waste from 32,348 households
mobile events at a cost of mobile event cars at a cost of mobile event cars at a cost of and mobile event cars at a cost of mobile event cars at a cost of mobile event cars at a cost of and CESQG's at a cost of and CESQG's at a cost of
$1,197,065 $1,300,014 $1,513,079 $1,567,9499 a c $1,635,862 $2.167,543 $2,445,362 $2,754,072 $2,529,844
L
_
Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats: Stats:
Capital$138,035 Capital$138,035 Capital$138,035 Capital$171,444 Capital$194,648 Capital$194,648 Capital$297,817 Capital$298,041 Capital$298,041 C
N Cost/car=$85 Cost/car=$74 Cost/car=$67 Cost/car=$68 Cost/car=$61 Cost/car=$76 Cost/car=$82 Cost/car=$93 Cost/car=$78 <
O Lbs./car=64 Lbs./car=77 Lbs./car=71 Lbs./car=65 Lbs./car=71 Lbs./car=67 Lbs./car=68 Lbs./car=68 Lbs./car=63
} Cost/lb.=$1.33 Cost1lb.=$0.96 Cost/lb.=$0.95 Cost/lb.=$1.05 Cost/lb.=$0.86 Cost/lb.=$1.13 Cost/lb.=$1.23 Cost/lb.=$1.37 Cost/lb.=$1.24 O
l", Cost/home=$6.89 Cost/home=$7.29 Cost/home=$8.40 Cost/home=$8.60 Cost/home=$8.64 Cost/home=$11.31 Cost/home=$12.76 Cost/home=$14.54 Cost/home=$13.25
Service area=173,865 Service area=178,170 Service area=180,046 Service area=182,424 Service area=189,131 Service area=191,677 Service area=191,677 Service area=189,481 Service area=190,900 Q
3 mobile events=441 cars 3 mobile events=1,258 cars 3 mobile events=2,506 cars 1 mobile event=373 cars 1 mobile event=352 cars 1 mobile event=606 cars 1 mobile event=644 cars 0 mobile event=0 cars 0 mobile event=0 cars Q
98/99 00/01 02/03 04/05 06/07 08/09 10/11 12/13 14/15 =
N I I I I I L
= 97/98 99/00 01/02 03/04 05/06 07/08 09/10 11/12 13/14 0
Started the Mercury Celebrated 5-year anniversary Completed DP 8180,the addition of In January 2006,the universal waste Started the School Mercury Minimization In Jul 2010,added Monday to the Celebrated the 15-year Added new pharmaceutical 10
Facility opened in September rY Y rY P ry ry Y Y y
1997. Collected 745,101 lbs Thermometer Exchange of the HHW Facility the 3,100 sq ft.flammable bulking rules for fluorescent lamps and batteries Program,which included a thermometer operating schedule.Now open anniversary of the HHW Facility collection sites in Alamo and
Q Program. and storage area. sunsetted banning these items from exchange and amnesty for disposal fees Monday through Saturday from gam- Lafayette. V
- of waste from 9,382 g g being disposed of in the trash,which for elemental mercury containing devices 4 m. �
households and CESQG's at In September 2001,changed rY 9 P Started new waste services O
a cost of$1,043,711 with P P operating y approved resulted in an increase in participation, and mercury compounds. Businesses b appointment an da o First year to exceed 30,000
Surpassed 1,000,000 pounds the o eratin hours Tuesday March -The Board a roved a rY P Y PP Y Y• contract with PSC,LLC with 20/o
s and batteries and lamps customers. N
District staff of three during collected mark. thru Saturday from 9am-4pm. $20 administration fee to all increase in costs.
2 the eight months of operation. Businesses by appointment CESQG transactions in order to Introduced"PS"Pollution Solutions at Opened eight additional
9 P March 2006,District staff levels were four Bill's Ace Hardware Stores. pharmaceutical collection sites i First full year of PaintCare. No J
= Collected 1,215,180 lbs of any day. recoup costs without increasing down to two from five,due to health Restructured the HHW Services (n
waste from 15,808 fees. (Clayton,Concord,Danville, charge for the recycling of
Operating hours: issues. Agreement with the City of San
Department of Transportation(DOT) Martinez,Moraga,Orinda,Pleasant architectural latex and oil
Wednesday(businesses only) households,CESQG's and In October 2001,hired one Ramon to pay monthly on a usage
and Thursdaythru Saturday mercury requires all battery terminals be taped Hill and San Ramon)and collected based paint.Compensated
y mobile event cars at a cost of additional Senior Technician Held first mercu thermometer Waste Services Contract with PSC was basis,which allowed them to
before shipping.This created an over 7,200 pounds at a cost of about $20,ble for PaintCare
264,134 lbs.of
from gam to 4pm,and Sunday $1,265,267 and one additional Technician exchange event at Byron Park extended an additional year due to lack sponsor aDoor-to-Door HHW
I/11 Senior Home in Walnut Creek. of District staff. excessive amount of work for staff until $20,000. reusable PaintCare products
1 pm to 4pm collection program for City
Stats: Jan 2010. and avoided more than
residents.
Stats: Capital$138,035 Collected 1,406,573 lbs of February-Began closely tracking Revised the average lbs./item estimate DOT repealed its order requiring $340,000 in transportation and
Cost/car=$80 waste from 19,410 pollutants of concern including for reusable items from 2 to 6 pounds Began partnership with Bill's Ace terminals of alkaline batteries 9V or disposal costs.
Capital$138,035 P 9 Hardware to collect fluorescent lams Discontinued temporary HHW
Lbs./car=77 households,CESQG's and Mercury,legacy each. P less must be taped,which is about
Cost/car=$111 ry, g y pesticides,etc. and household batteries from the public collection events due to San Sr.Technician provisionally in
p 85%of the batteries collected. P Y
Lbs./car=79 Cost/lb.=$1.04 mobile event cars at a cost of Ramon's door-to-door program. Source Control for 7-1/2
Cost/home=$7.28 $1,411,877 Collected 1,487,274 lbs of waste Held mercury thermometer exchange
Cost/lb._$1.40 event in Rossmoor.520 participants Collected 1,944,394 lbs of waste from Collected 1,925,636 lbs of waste months.
Cost/home=$6.04 Service area=173,865 from 23,277 households,CESQG's 28,373 households,CESQG's and Collected 1,978,591 lbs of waste
Service area=172,856 3 mobile events=634 cars Stats: and mobile event cars at a cost of Collected 1,944,394 lbs of waste from mobile event cars at a cost of$1,864.868 from mobile households, a cost of
from 29,603 households and Collected 2,039,511 lbs of
3 mobile events=188 cars Capital$138,035 $1,495,823 24,244 households,CESQG's and mobile and mobile event cars at a cost of CESQG's at a cost of$2,521,932 waste from 30,740 households
Cost/car=$73 event cars at a cost of$1,721,126 Stats: $2,266,709 and CESQG's at a cost of
Lbs./car=72 Stats: Capital$194,648 Stats: Stats: $2,554,972
Cost/lb._$1.00 Capital$169,083 Stats: CosUcar=$66 Capital$297,817
Cost/home=$7.86 Cost/car=$64 Capital$171,444 Lbs./car=67 Capital$194,648 Cost/car=$87 Stats:
Service area=178,926 Lbs./car=64 Cost/car=$71 CosUlb.=$0.96 Cost/car=$76 Lbs./car=67 Capital$298,041
3 mobile events=1,775 cars Cost/lb.=$1.01 Lbs./car=80 Cost/home=$9.84 Lbs./car=65 Cost/lb.=$1.27 Cost/car=$83
Cost/home=$8.24
Cost/lb.=$0.89 Service area=189,540 Cost/lb. Cost/home $13.35 1b.=$1.18 Lbs./car=66
= =
Service area=181,588 Cost/home $11.79 home=$9.25 1 mobile events=463 cars Service area=188,865 Cost/lb._$1.25
2 mobile events=969 cars Service area=185,418 Service area=192,292 0 mobile events=0 cars CosUhome=$13.45
2 mobile events=845 cars 1 mobile events=464 cars Service area=189,970
0 mobile event=0 cars
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 208 of 263
Page 39 of 44
Increased the size of the
Retail Program by adding
Orinda True Value
Hardware.Now have eight
sites.
Negotiated a waste services
County passed Safe Drug contract with a new
Disposal Ordinance in contractor,NRC,National
December 2016 Response Corporation.
Filled HHW Techncian 1 17-1/2 year Technician II
position.Understaffed by one retired in 4/2018
Techncian I since 1/2015
Collected 2,211,023 lbs of
Collected 2,134,955 lbs of waste from 36,108
waste from 33,037 households,CESQG's and
households and CESQG's Retail drop-offs at a cost of
at a cost of$2,651,168 $2,809,380
M
O
Stats: Stats:
N Capital$298,041 Capital$298,041 C
Cost/car=$80 Cost/car=$78
O Lbs./car=65 Lbs./car=61
} Cost/Ib.=$1.24 Cost/lb.=$1.27
10 Cost/home=$13.64 Cost/home=$14.59 (C)Service area=194,369 Service area=192,591 C)
CV 0 mobile events=0 cars 0 mobile events=0 cars Q
16/17 18/19 20/21 22/23 24/25 26/27 28/29 30/31 32/33
o I I I I I N
= 15/16 17/18 19/20 21/22 23/24 25/26 27/28 29/30 31/32 0
0 Celebrated 20th anniversary N
Revised agreement with during the week of October
O PaintCare to increase 16-21.During this period
i compensation for eligible over 900 cars were served.
CL reusable products.Over
67%visitor increase over 0
> $29,000 in revenue annually. previous year.Seven-fold
increase in new users N
= Filled Sr.Techncian position compared to previous year O
W
= with Techncian II. 5 to
W
Understaffed by Two Increased Outreach
Techncian ll's.One position 576 commercial spots
is vacant,the other on leave 28.8%customer base reach
since 1/2015 55 on-air radio commercials
55 digital online streaming
Collected 2,132,463 lbs of commercials.
waste from 33,468 Small Prizes:
households and CESQG's Welcome magnet and plant
at a cost of$2,417,677 in bamboo pot.Daily raffle.
First time user prizes.20th
Stats: car prize.
Capital$298,041
Cost/car=$72 Collected 2,275,549 lbs of
Lbs./car=64 waste from 35,640
Cost/lb.=$1.13 households and CESQG's
Cost/home=$12.43 at a cost of$2,751,051
Service area=194,462
0 mobile events=0 cars Stats:
Capital$298,041
Cost/car=$77
Lbs./car=64
Cost/lb.=$1.21
Cost/home=$14.21
Service area=193,597
0 mobile events=0 cars
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 209 of 263
Page 40 of 44
Attachment 2
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2018/19
�- Winston Ingram
October 3, 2019
OVERVIEW
• Residential Participation
• Waste Management
• Small Business Program
• Operating Costs
1 ,z
CENTRALSAN
1
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 210 of 263
Page 41 of 44
PARTICIPANTS AND PERCENT PARTICIPATION
OVERALL DISTRICT PARTICIPATION WAS 18.4%,As 35,456 RESIDENTIAL PARTICIPANTS
WERE SERVED
8,000 44%
40%
7,000
36
N
6,000 32%
R
>Z
.2 5,000 28% N
z /
/ za%
a
4,000 _ -a
o zo% o;
'y 3,000 / 16% 7
a
3 12%
2,000
z
s%
1,000 Mini Partici Ion GE
4%
0 CLA CON DAN LAF MAR MOR ORI P.H. S.R. W.C. UNI 0�
#of Participants 895 7,974 2,604 2,604 6,281 979 1,423 3,462 1,180 6,046 2,008
—�—%Participation 22.1% 18.0% 16.6% 27.2% 43.3% 17.5% 20.8% 25.3% 4.3% 19.2% 10.5%
'Based on the number of households from District Statistics for 2019
"Does not include"Out of service area"participants. CITY
3
CENTRALSAN
POUNDS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTED
2,200,000 -
2,100,000
O 2,000,000 -
1,900,000
1,800,000
FY14115 FY15116 FY16117 FYI 7118 FY18/19
2,038,084 2,132,463 2,134,955 2,275,549 2,211,023
CENTRALSAN
2
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 211 of 263
Page 42 of 44
REUSE ROOM EFFECTIVENESS
SERVED OVER 20,000 CUSTOMERS AND GAVE AWAY
OVER 17 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL WASTE COLLECTED
500,000 30.0%
450,000 25.0
0)
7
400,000 — 20.0% N
O 0
(D
O350,000 15.0% =
0 O
C 300,000 10.0%
7 N
a- (D
250,000 5.0% --,
O
v
200,000 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16117 FY17/18 FY18/19 0.0%
[Pounds of Reuse 433,187 464,255 432,326 410,025 404,000 391,641 384,161
4--%of Waste Total 21.5% 22.8% 21.2% 19.2% 19% 17.2% 17.4%
5
CENTRALSAN
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM SUMMARY
NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS
500
450
400
350 353 348
300
291 303
255
250
200
150
100
50
0
FY12113 FY13114 FY14/15 FYI 5/16 FY16117 FYI 7118 FYI 8/19
6
CENTRAL SAN
3
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 212 of 263
Page 43 of 44
REVENUE GENERATING OR NO COST
WASTE STREAMS
Waste Strea Waste Volume in lbs. e Cost IF Disposed
Scrap Metal(Lead,brass and aluminum) 457 $110 $0
Mercury Thermostats 39 $0 $185
Printer cartridges 1,134 $1,155 $0
Rechargeable batteries 9,112 $2,077 $6,574
Cardboard 10,800 $0 $0
Cooking oil 38,550 $288 $10,750
Lead acid batteries(automotive) 51,123 $13,758 $0
Non-PaintCare reuse 217,389 $0 $58,695
PaintCare reuse 166,772 $22,064 $63,322
PaintCare latex and oil based paint 842,150 $0 $315,784
Total 1,337,526 $39,451 $455,616
Total Waste Collected 2,275,549 --- ---
The District was paid over$39,000 for roughly 61%of the waste that was collected.
The remaining 39%of waste cost the District$508,116 to dispose of.
I �
CENTRALSAN
TOTAL OPERATING COST PER CAR
$120
$100
$80 $78 $78 $80 $78
$60
$40
$20
$0
FY14/15 FY15/16 FY15/16 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19
'!8
CENTRALSAN
4
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 213 of 263
Page 44 of 44
QUESTIONS?
OL9
5
October 3, 2019 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 214 of 263