HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.d. (Handout) Revised Presentation of Update on PFAS Item 4.d. (Handout)
Revised Presentation
I� UPDATE ON
PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL
- SUBSTANCES (PFAS)
Melody LaBella, P.E.
Resource Recovery Program Manager
., REEP Committee Meeting
September 16, 2019
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
What are PFAS?
Why the Concern?
Sources to the Water Environment
Common Uses
Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels
Potential Impacts to Our Industry
2016 Regional Monitoring Program Study
State Board's Phased Investigation Plan
Next Steps for Central San
Questions
1
WHAT ARE PFAS?
PFAS are a broad class of fluorine-rich
specialty chemicals that have been o q
manufactured and used in a variety of
industries around the globe, including in the
United States, since the 1940s.
Some possess thermal stability, non-reactivity, and
surfactant properties.
The carbon-fluorine bonds are some of the strongest
known to science, which means PFAS show extremely
high persistence.
' 3
WHY THE CONCERN?
Well-studied perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) have been shown to be highly toxic.
Other PFAS have received little to no testing, but their structural
similarities suggest they are likely to trigger similar concerns for
human and ecological health.
PFAS have been linked to increased cancer risk, elevated
cholesterol levels, and decreased fertility. 2
PFAS are being found in drinking water supplies.
Sedlak, M.,Sutton R.,Wong A.,Lin, Diana.2018. Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances(PFASs)in San Francisco
Bay:Synthesis and Strategy. RMP Contribution No.867.San Francisco Estuary Institute,Richmond CA.
Z US Department of Health and Human Services,Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.2018."Draft
Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls." y I
2
WHY THE CONCERN?
Nearly 5,000 PFAS are used in
consumer, commercial, and
industrial applications.
Including personal care products and
food packaging
Cheo th ••IVI,V 0. =
Denmark just became the first country
to ban PFAS 'forever chemicals' from
food packaging
Uy—ice,CHH
O Wee+ee o:as wn Er.Vb seo,er'--4,
CFNTRAI SAN
� 5
SOURCES OF PFAS TO THE WATER ENVIRONMENT
Military bases and airports IV
Due to aqueous film-forming
foams used for fire fighting
r
PFAS production facilities
Air deposition
Landfills
Treated wastewater effluent
3
COMMON USES
Lv
I '
• y
PP07ECT;VE COATINGS
..
CFNTRAI SAN1
2016 REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM STUDY
BY SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE
50
40
e
= 30
0
Y
[0
L
Y
20
u
O
V
10
���`h ti���c���QO��¢QOSpP Q��QP QQOQP QQ�P Q�Q�P Q��.�P Q4�QP Q��P QQ�P QQ�h QQ��S Q�py
■Palo Alto ❑SJ/Santa Clara ❑EBMUD ❑EBDA ■Central Contra Costa 5 San Mateo
8
4
CALIFORNIA DRINKING WATER
NOTIFICATION AND RESPONSE LEVELS
In August 2019, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (OEHHA) recommended notification levels (NLs) for
PFOA and PFOS be set at the lowest reliable detection limit in
drinking water to protect against cancer and non-cancer effects.
The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) Division
of Drinking Water matched OEHHA's recommendations.
NLs of 6.5 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOS and 5.1 ppt for PFOA
Response level at 70 ppt (discontinue source or provide treatment)
F
CENTRAL SAN
STATE BOARD'S PHASED INVESTIGATION PLAN
Phase I involves over 1 ,500 airports, landfills, and
drinking water wells across the state.
Phase II will cover refineries, bulk terminals, non-
airport fire training areas, and urban fire areas.
Phase III will cover secondary manufacturers,
wastewater treatment plants, and domestic wells.
5
STATE LEGISLATION
AB 756 (Garcia): Public Water Systems PFAS, signed into law
on July 31 , 2019 and effective on January 1 , 2020, expands the
State Board's authority to order public water systems to monitor
for PFAS.
If any such monitoring results in a confirmed PFAS detection,
the water system must report it in its annual consumer
confidence report.
If detected levels of PFAS exceed the 70 ppt response level, the
water system must take the water source out of use or provide
public notification within 30 days of the confirmed detection.
CENTRAL SAN
FEDERAL LEGISLATION
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
S. 1790 (Inhofe): passed Senate in June 2019
HR. 2500 (Smith): passed House in July 2019
House did not go through regular order and consider
PFAS legislation in Committee.
Several significant PFAS provisions were added as
amendments to the House's NDAA bill just before it
was voted on and passed.
6
FEDERAL LEGISLATION
Two HR. 2500 amendments are of concern to wastewater:
One amendment would add all PFAS to the Clean Water Act
(CWA) toxic pollutants list and require EPA to develop CWA
effluent limitations and pretreatment standards for PFAS by
January 1 , 2022.
The other amendment would trigger liability for all PFAS
chemicals under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act as hazardous substances,
which could create liability for POTWs that receive PFAS-
containing influent and ultimately dispose of PFAS-containing
.'' biosolids.
G
CENTRAL SAN
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO OUR INDUSTRY
Potable reuse
Biosolids disposal
Land application or landfill
Future regulations (?)
Negligible removal of PFAS through conventional
wastewater treatment
Revere osmosis (RO) is effective at removal, but
concentrates PFAS in the RO membrane reject
PFAS thermal destruction range = 600 to 3,600 °F
NEXT STEPS FOR CENTRAL SAN
Supporting CASA's efforts to work with the State Board
to help shape the Phase III investigation plan for
wastewater treatment plants
Potential participation in Water Research Foundation's
studies on the fate and transport of PFAS through
wastewater treatment and sewage sludge incineration
Learning more about PFAS
' is
CENTRAL SAN
CENTRAL SAN'S PFAS TASK FORCE
Engineering Regulatory Communications/
Jean-Marc Petit Lori Schectel Legislation
Melody LaBella Lab Emily Barnett
Dan Frost Mary Lou Esparza
Pretreatment
Colleen Henry
Jeff Skinner
Air
Randy Schmidt
Rita Cheng
CFNTPAISAN
8
QUESTIONS?
: r
171
CENTRAL SAN
. :
9