HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.b. Review draft Position Paper to authorize the General Manager to execute a professional engineering services agreement in an amount not to exceed $150,000 with Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. to provide on-call services for the Planning and Development Divis Page 1 of 3
Item 3.b.
CENTRAL SAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
DRAFT
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2019
SUBJECT: REVIEW DRAFT POSITION PAPER TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
AGREEMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $150,000 WITH HAZEN
AND SAWYER, P.C. TO PROVIDE ON-CALL SERVICES FOR THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM
SUBMITTED BY: INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
DANEA GEMMELL, PLANNING AND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION PDS-PLANNING AND APPLIED RESEARCH
MANAGER
REVIEWED BY: JEAN-MARC PETIT, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL
SERVICES
ISSUE
The Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager to execute agreements in an
amount greater than $100,000.
BACKGROUND
Optimization of Current and Past Practice Using On-call Agreements for Specialized
Expertise. Until now, the Planning and Development Services Division has contracted with many
consulting firms through on-call agreements, but has procured those services on a case-by-case basis
as tasks and needs are identified, sometimes, with multiple agreements with the same consultant but for
different types of services. The purpose of the on-call agreement process is to optimize procurement
and management of on-call services through a consolidated list of pre-qualified consulting firms that can
provide specialized expertise and professional experience for a number of small-to medium-sized
tasks (typically over$1,000 and less than $100,000 per task order)which enables staff to address
ongoing needs. These on-call agreements are for specialized expertise and are separate from the
individual consulting agreements typically issued by the Capital Projects Division for evaluating and
designing large capital improvement projects. As documented in the Capital Improvement Budget,
capital expenditures are expected to increase from $45 million in Fiscal Year(FY) 2018-19, to $66
million in FY 2019-20, to $97 million in FY 2020-21, and to $106 million in FY 2021-22. As workload
increases, need for specialty expertise and support is essential to complete these critical projects and
tasks. The Board's approval of on-call agreements authorizes Central San staff to assign work to pre-
qualified firms through the issuance of a task order which defines their respective scope of work, project
September 16, 2019 REEP Committee Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 8 of 32
Page 2 of 3
cost, and delivery schedule. Task orders will be negotiated, approved, released, and tracked following a
similar task order release process used for capital project on-call agreements.
Consultant Selection: Staff prepared and posted a Request for Qualifications on PlanetBids and the
Central San website. On May 24, 2019, 12 Statements of Qualifications were received and evaluated for
the Planning and Applied Research section and Special Projects and Asset Management section.After
evaluating the firms based on qualifications, past experience, past performance, availability, and an oral
interview, staff selected Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. (Hazen and Sawyer)for an on-call agreement as the firm
best suited for Central San's anticipated needs to support the Planning and Applied Research section for
the following example scope areas:
• District Project 7363 -Treatment Plant Planning (Specifically, Treatment Plant Performance
Troubleshooting): Central San's existing biological secondary treatment process routinely experiences
fluctuations in performance, and occasionally, rapid consultant support is beneficial for troubleshooting
performance issues. Being a live, biological process, there are many factors that can influence
performance and it is beneficial to maintain a consultant expert that is familiar with the process and its
performance history. Paul Pitt of Hazen and Sawyer has provided this troubleshooting support through
similar on-call agreements and has helped Central San staff by evaluating secondary treatment samples,
identifying organism types, and providing process modification and response recommendations.As
Central San works to optimize its secondary process, it's beneficial to maintain a local, on-call expert that
can respond to biological process inquiries and respond to troubleshooting requests.
• Microbiology & Microscopic Evaluation Training and Support: In addition to evaluating and
troubleshooting biological processes, Hazen and Sawyer and Paul Pitt offer training for staff to better
understand the range of microbiology that can exist within Central San's system, the process
parameters that help to control and select for different microbiology, and to train staff on proper
microscope and staining techniques that are required to identify organisms present in the wastewater.
I n general, the expertise that Hazen and Sawyer offers will be utilized to support staff with performance
troubleshooting and response to process upsets, and for microbiology evaluation and training. The
services provided will benefit Central San's Engineering, Operations, and Laboratory staff. Hazen and
Sawyer and Paul Pitt have previously provided service under similar on-call arrangements for Central San
and for other agencies such as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. Staff have been very
satisfied with Hazen and Sawyer and Paul Pitt's experience and recommendations.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSIDERATIONS
Staff evaluated several alternatives for the Board to consider:
Alternative 1: Execute Two-year On-call Agreement. This alternative reduces the agreement limits to cover
the next two years of anticipated projects and tasks. Staff could return to the Board for approval to amend the
agreement for a third year of support. This alternative is not recommended because it requires more
administration than the recommended action and could limit the flexibility to assign task orders in Year 2 that are
anticipated to continue into Year 3.
Alternative 2: Do Not Approve the Agreement. This alternative would be for the Board to direct staff
not to execute the agreement as proposed. Instead, staff could continue current and past practice to
administer multiple agreements as-needed within staff authority limits. This is not recommended because it
requires more administration time to solicit, execute, and manage multiple agreements.Additionally, this
alternative would result in multiple agreements with the same consulting firm as tasks arise in order to keep
projects on track and maintain the current high level of service.
September 16, 2019 REEP Committee Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 9 of 32
Page 3 of 3
Alternative 3: Hire Additional Staff. This alternative would be for the Board to direct staff to hire one full-
time equivalent to augment staff's ability to complete the anticipated projects and tasks. This is not
recommended because the support needs may be infrequent and can be addressed as the tasks and
needs arise. The work also requires specialty expertise that is best provided from a limited number of
industry leaders that perform similar tasks on a frequent basis across multiple projects and customers,
where Central San benefits from that extensive wide-spread experience.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
The amount for this on-call agreement is $50,000 per year for a three-year total contract amount of
$150,000. Hazen and Sawyer have been informed and understand that this on-call agreement is not a
guarantee of work.
This selection process and award of an agreement provides a go-to firm when support is required. This
allows Central San staff to expedite the process of completing work and addressing tasks as needed, and
to respond to needs in an efficient and responsive manner. Ongoing and additional specialty support
needs are anticipated to address upcoming projects and tasks.
The services provided are paid for and included in the Board-approved Budget. No additional funding for
this on-call agreement is required.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee reviewed this matter at the meeting on September
16, 2019, and recommended
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION
Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with Hazen and Sawyer,
P.C. with a cost ceiling of $150,000 for a three-year term, to provide on-call services for the Planning and
Development Services Division.
Strategic Plan Tie-In
GOAL TWO: Strive to Meet Regulatory Requirements
Strategy 1 - Strive to achieve 100%permit compliance in air, water, land, and other regulations
GOAL FOUR: Develop and retain a highly trained and innovative workforce
Strategy 1 - Ensure adequate staffing and training to meet current and future operational levels
GOAL FIVE: Maintain a Reliable Infrastructure
Strategy 1 - Manage assets optimally throughout their lifecycle
September 16, 2019 REEP Committee Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 10 of 32