HomeMy WebLinkAbout02. Consider revisions to Board Policy No. BP 023 - Board Ethics and Conduct Page 1 of 9
Item 2.
CENTRAL SAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AOL POSITION PAPER
MEETING DATE: MARCH 1, 2018
SUBJECT: CONSIDER PROPOSED REVISIONS TO BOARD POLICY NO. BP 023 —
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
FACILITATORS : BRENT IVES AND DISTRICT COUNSEL KENTALM
SUBMITTED BY: INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
KATIE YOUNG, SECRETARY OF THE SECRETARYOF THE DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Roger S. Bailey Kenton L. Alm
General Manager District Counsel
ISSUE
Board approval is required for revisions to Board Policies. Revisions are proposed for BP 023, Board Ethics
and Conduct.
BACKGROUND
The Board held a Self-Evaluation Workshop on February 16, 2017 facilitated by Brent Ives, Principal of
BHI Management Consulting. The primary outcome of the workshop was a desire to more clearly define
the Board Committee process and consider memorializing various Committee protocols.
On April 24, 2017, Mr. Ives met with the Administration Committee to:
1. Develop proposed Committee protocols and guidelines to be incorporated in BP 013 — Standing
Committee Charters; and
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 4 of 22
Page 2 of 9
2. Consider proposed changes to BP 023— Board Ethics and Conduct.
It was recommended that changes to the Ethics and Conduct Policy be considered after the changes to
the Standing Committee Charters were finalized.
On July 6, 2017, the Board adopted an updated BP 013, now entitled "Standing Committee Protocols,
Guidelines and Charters."
Since that time, Mr. Ives has been working with the Administration Committee, District Counsel and staff to
address proposed changes to BP 023 — Board Ethics and Conduct, which changes are being presented to
the full Board for discussion at this meeting. The most substantial changes relate to:
• Expanding the Ex Parte Communications section;
• Clarifying policy direction and instructions for the General Manager;
• Providing parameters for Board Member requests for information from staff requiring more than a
minimal amount of staff time;
• Adding a provision for annual Board self-evaluations; and
• Expanding the Violation of Policy section in terms of how violations may be addressed.
A strikeout version of the policy indicating the proposed changes is attached. Mr. Ives and District Counsel
Kent Alm will be present at the meeting to facilitate the discussion.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSIDERATIONS
The Board may provide other direction to staff.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS
None.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Administration Committee reviewed the Policy on April 24, 2017 and provided input to Mr. Ives and
staff, which input has been taken into consideration in developing the proposed changes.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION
Review and approve the recommended changes to Board Policy No. BP 023 — Board Ethics and Conduct.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. BP 023 - Board Ethics and Conduct (showing proposed changes in strikeout)
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 5 of 22
Page 3 of 9
Central Contra Costa
Number: BP 023 Sanitary District
Authority: Board of Directors DRAFT No. 3
Effective: July 7, 2016
As of 1:45 pm 1-10-18 -
Revised: [insert date] "--
Reviewed:
Initiating Dept./Div.: Board of Directors/ www.centralsan.org
Secretary of the District
BOARD POLICY
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
PURPOSE
To promote and maintain high standards of personal and professional conduct of
Central San Board Members that reflect the mission, vision, values and goals of the
District and the communities it serves.
POLICY
Responsibilities of Public Office
Board Members are dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government
by responsible elected officials, including:
• Upholding the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State
of California and carry out the laws of the nation, the state and local
governmental agencies;
• Complying with applicable laws and policies regulating their conduct, including
open government, conflict of interest, and financial disclosure laws;
• Being accountable to the constituents as a top priority through impartial and
independent decision making in light of the needs of the people they serve;
• Creating policies and provide fiscal oversight; and
• Appointing and evaluating the General Manager, Secretary of the District, and
District Counsel.
A. Board Ethics
The Members of the Board of Directors shall conduct themselves in accordance with the
following ethical standards:
N:IADMINSUPIADMINIDIST-SECIPolicies&Procedures Board&Administrativel_BOARD POLICIES(BP)-APPROVEDIBP 023
Board Ethics and Conduct-STRIKEOUT Draft 3(KA&BI rev 1-10-18).docx
(as of 10-18-17 12:10 p.m.)
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 6 of 22
Page 4 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 2of7
1. Act in the Public Interest: Recognizing that stewardship of the public
interest must be their primary concern, Board Members will work for the
common good of the people and not for any private or personal interest.
They will assure fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and
transactions coming before the Board of Directors.
2. Decisions Based on Merit: Board Members shall base their decisions
on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on
unrelated considerations or personal interests. Board Members shall
listen to and consider all evidence and information presented on a matter
and refrain from reaching any final conclusion until the completion of the
hearing or the discussion of the matter.
3. Conflict of Interest: Board Members shall avoid conflicts of interest.
Board Members shall comply with the District's Conflict of Interest Code,
the provisions of the Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations and
other applicable laws.
4. Gifts and Favors: Board Members shall not take any special advantage
of opportunities for personal gain by virtue of their Board membership.
They shall refrain from accepting gifts or benefits which are inconsistent
with Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations.
5. Use of Public Resources: Board Members shall not use public
resources for private gain or for personal purposes not authorized by law.
6. Advocacy: Board Members shall represent the official policies or
positions of the Board of Directors to the best of their ability when
designated as delegates for this purpose. When presenting their
individual opinions and positions, Board Members shall explicitly state
they do not represent the Board of Directors or the District, nor will they
allow the inference that they do.
7. Open and Public Meetings: Board Members shall adhere to the rules
restricting Board decision making to properly noticed public meetings
consistent with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act found at section
54950 and following of the California Government Code.
8. Confidentiality: Board Members shall not disclose to unauthorized
persons any information that legally qualifies as confidential without
approval of the Board of Directors. This includes information that (1) has
been received for, or during, a closed session of the Board; (2) is
protected from disclosure under the attorney-client or other evidentiary
privilege; or (3) is not disclosable under the Public Records Act. Matters
that legally qualify as confidential are to be protected by Board Members
unless made public by the entire Board.
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 7 of 22
Page 5 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 3 of 7
In the event of a breach of the duty of confidentiality, Board Members
should make a confidential inquiry or complaint first to the General
Manager and District Counsel. Should the Board Member be unable to
resolve the issue at this level, he or she may contact the Contra Costa
County District Attorney or grand jury concerning a perceived violation of
the law. Such inquiries or complaints may include disclosing facts to the
District Counsel, District Attorney or grand jury necessary to establish the
alleged illegality of a District action. Prior to disclosing confidential
information, however, a Board Member must first bring the matter to the
attention of the full Board, in a lawful and appropriate manner. This
provides an opportunity for the Board to address the alleged violation of
the law. Coils ire to adhere to those g uideliRes may result in o variety of
Board aGtiens for remedy (see CeGtinn 13.6. Vnelotion of PNOAV)
B. Board Conduct Guidelines
The Board Conduct Guidelines are designed to describe the manner in which Board
Members should treat one another, District staff, constituents, and others they come
into contact with while representing the District.
1. Board Members' Conduct with Each Other in Public Meetings. Board
Members are often individuals with a wide variety of backgrounds,
personalities, values, opinions and goals. Despite this diversity, all have
chosen to serve the public in order to preserve and protect public health
and the environment. In all cases, this common goal should be
professionally acknowledged and respected even though individuals may
not agree on every issue.
a. Respect the Role of the Board President in Maintaining Order
It is the responsibility of the Board President to keep the comments of
Board Members on track during public meetings. Board Members should
respect efforts by the President to focus discussion on current agenda
items and reasonably manage the discussion process. If there is
disagreement about the agenda or the President's actions, those
objections should be voiced politely and with reason, following procedures
outlined in the adopted Rosenberg's Rules of Order parliamentary
procedure.
b. Practice Civility and Decorum in Discussions and Debate
Difficult questions, tough challenges to a particular point of view, and
criticism of ideas and information are legitimate elements of debate by a
free democracy in action. Free debate does not require, nor justify, public
officials making belligerent, personal, impertinent, abusive, or disparaging
comments. Board Members should be respectful of other Board
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 8 of 22
Page 6 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 4 of 7
members' right to promote differing positions. Mattem that legally qua-lify
as Gonfidential are to be preteGted by Board Members unless made pi blit'+
by the entire Boa rd-.
C. Demonstrate Effective Problem-Solving Approaches
Board Members have a public stage and have the responsibility to show
how individuals with disparate points of view can find common ground and
seek a compromise that benefits the community as a whole. Board
Members shall prepare themselves for meetings, listen attentively to all
public discussions, and focus on the business at hand. Board Members
should be mindful of the time taken in making their comments and accept
that each Board Member should be afforded adequate time for comments.
d. Ex Parte Communications
Ex parte nommuninations ore �i
defined as nommninatiens made outside
the Board setts ig iisprresseentiRg ^nly ene side er ene epini
en regarding
and past, GurFent oF future matter f Dist G hsnBoard Members
shall publicly announce to the Board any ex parte communications which
may have occurred that relate+ag to matters under consideration at that
Board meeting or at future meetings. Ex parte communications are
communications made outside the Board setting where not all the Board
Members or the public receive the information provided. Board Members
shall also announce to the full Board when they have made public
statements or presentations outside of a Board meeting concerning
matters of District business.
When presenting their individual opinions and positions publicly, Board
Members shall explicitly state they do not represent the Board of Directors
or the District, nor w41-should any such inference be allowed to be drawn.
2. Board Members' Conduct with the Public in Public Meetings
a. Public Attendance at Meetings
Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic
process. The Board President has the responsibility to ensure that the
public is treated appropriately and consistently in meetings. No signs of
partiality, prejudice or disrespect should be evident on the part of
individual Board Members toward an individual participating in a public
forum. Every effort should be made to be fair and impartial in listening to
public testimony. Asking for clarification is appropriate, but Board
Members should avoid debate and argument with the public. The ward
President has the respensihilit y to ensure that the pu bliG is treater)
appropriately anal nonsistently in meetinos
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 9 of 22
Page 7 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 5of7
b. Avoidance of Discriminatory Speech or Actions
Board Members shall avoid statements or comments that suggest any
intent to differentiate or discriminate in District actions or policy between
persons or classes of the public on the basis of on race, religion, color,
creed, age, marital status, national origin, ancestry, gender, sexual
orientation, medical condition or disability or other protected classes.
3. Board Members' Conduct with Staff: The District's success in
accomplishing its mission can best be accomplished as a result of the
Board regularly providing direction and management staff carrying out that
direction.
a. Board/General Manager Relationship
The Board sets policy and the General Manager is responsible for
execution of that policy. The Board, as a whole, provides policy direction
and instructions to the General Manager on matters within the authority of
the Board only by majority vote of the Board during duly convened Board
meetings. These instructions and direction include the goals and
objectives outlined in the Strategic Plan as well as the General Manager's
annual performance goals.
b. Requests for Information from Staff
Most requests for information from or direction to staff should come from
the Board or a Board Committee. There are times when individual Board
Members seek additional information from staff. Good management
requires that the General Manager monitors and directs the work of staff
rather than individual Board Members. If a request comes from an
individual Board Member, the request should generally start with the
General Manager. The General Manager should be able to obtain the
answers or involve the right person in the discussion as needed.
Requests from individual Board Members for information, such as studies
or assessments that require more than a minimal amount of staff time,
shall be placed on a Board agenda for approval by a majority of the Board.
If the request is made during a Board meeting, the Board President shall
ask the General Manager for an assessment of the staff time necessary to
support the request and the full Board shall indicate if it wishes to proceed
with obtaining the requested information.
The Secretary of the District is often able to assist Board Members with
obtaining District records and other scheduling or administrative type
matters.
C. No Solicitation of Political Support from Staff
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 10 of 22
Page 8 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 6 of 7
Elected officials should not solicit any type of political support from staff.
Staff may as private citizens support political candidates of their choice,
but all such activities should be done away from the District workplace
during non-work hours.
d. Positive Work Environment
Board Members shall support the maintenance of a positive and
constructive work place environment for District employees and shall
recognize their special role in dealings with employees to avoid the
perception of inappropriate direction to staff.
4. Board Members Serving as Committee Members: Board Members
serving as Committee Members shall follow the conduct guidelines set
forth above, and shall adhere to Board Policy No. BP 013 — Standing
Committee Protocols, Guidelines and Charters.
5. Board Self-Evaluation: The Board shall conduct a public self-evaluation
workshop annually, with even years being full evaluations ,%focusing on
broad topical performance questions and odd years focusing on specific
topics identified in even-year evaluations.
6. Violation of Policy: A perceived violation of this policy by a Board
Member should be referred to the Board President for evaluation and
consideration of any appropriate action warranted. In the case of a
perceived violation by the Board President, the matter should be referred
to the President Pro Tem. Typically, reports, complaints or concerns of
perceived violations should be shared by the Board President or President
Pro Tem with the entire Board. The Board President or President Pro
Tem shall seek the assistance of the General Manager and District
Counsel with regard to the process for addressing a report or complaint of
a perceived violation.
A violation of this policy may be addressed by remedies available in law,
including but not limited to:
a. Informal discussion with the Board President or President Pro Tem;
b. Professional counseling/coaching for the individual Board Member,
upon recommendation of a majority of the Board;
C. An expression of admonition or disapproval of the conduct and/or
censure of the Board Member. This could take place in accordance
with the following path:
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 11 of 22
Page 9 of 9
Number: BP 023
BOARD ETHICS AND CONDUCT
Page 7 of 7
(1) An verbal admonition (not a written action) carried out by the
Board President or President Pro Tem in a public meeting with
approval of a majority of the Board Members; and
(2) A formal censure in the form of a resolution, which may include
actions up to and including removal from all committee
assignments and any outside form of representation of the
District;
d. Injunctive relief; or
e. Referral of the violation to the Contra Costa County District Attorney
and/or grand jury for investigation.
Nothing herein, however, shall be construed to prohibit a Board Member of his
or her First Amendment right to free speech, nor the Board's right to express
their collective disapproval.
Formal Board actions to address violations shall be taken in the public portion
of a properly noticed Board meeting.
[Original retained by the Secretary of the District]
March 1, 2018 Special Board Meeting Agenda Packet- Page 12 of 22