The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07.a. Receive Fiscal Year 2016-17 Household Hazardous Waste Program Annual ReportPage 1 of 52 Item 7.a. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District October 5, 2017 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM: MATTHEW THOMAS, SENIOR HHW TECHNICIAN DAVID WYATT, HHW SUPERVISOR REVIEWED BY: LORI SCHECTEL, ENVIRONMENTAL & REGULATORY COMPLIANCE DIVISION MANAGER J EAN-MARC PETIT, DI RECTOR OF ENGI NEERI NG AND TECHNI CAL SERVICES ROGER S. BAILEY, GENERAL MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT Attached are the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Household Hazardous Waste Annual Report Summary and supporting presentation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. HHW Summary Report 2. HHW Annual Report Presentation October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 62 of 196 1 e � A 1 4 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAM OCTOBER 2017 'CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT ;001 M VS D MT VIEW �� SANITARY DISTRICT October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Ag a Packet -Page 6 of 196 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT / MT. VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT 2016/2017 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAM NNUA� REPORT The following CCCSD staff contributed to the preparation of this report: Matthew Thomas David Wyatt PROGRAM CONTACTS: David Wyatt Household Hazardous Waste Program Supervisor (925) 335-7714 dwyatt@centralsan.org HHW Program Information: (800) 646-1431 www.centralsan.org Page 3 of 52 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 64 of 196 Page 4 of 52 2016/2017 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program Annual Report Table of Contents Page No. Introduction i HHW Collection Facility Residential Participation 1 San Ramon Door -to -Door Collection 5 Quantities of Wastes Collected 7 Pollution Prevention 10 HHW Diverted from Sewer and Landfill Disposal 13 Small Business Program 15 Public Education/Program Promotion 16 Revenue and Expenses 17 Appendices: Al California Integrated Waste Management Board Form 303 All Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Disposal Charges AIII HHW Program History — 1997 to Present October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 65 of 196 Page 5 of 52 2016/2017 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program Annual Report Tables and Figures Table Description/Title Page No. RP -1 Residential Participation by Community 3 RP -2 Total participation by Community 4 SR -1 San Ramon Door -to -Door Collection 6 WC -1 Estimate of Amount of Waste Collected by Community 9 PP -1 Mercury Collection Summary 10 PP -2 Pollutants of Concern Summary 11 PP -3 Pharmaceutical Collection Summary 12 WD -1 Quantity of Landfill Diverted Waste 14 SB -1 Small Business Participation by Community 15 SB -2 Small Business Program Summary 16 RE -1 HHWCF Summary of Revenue and Expenses 21 RE -2 HHW Facility Capital Expenditure Amortization Schedule 22 Figure Page No. RP -1 HHWCF Participation: Cars per Month 1 RP -2 HHWCF Participation: Average Cars per Day of Week 2 RP -3 HHWCF Participation: Average Cars per Day 2 WC -1 Pounds of Waste per Car 7 WC -2 Waste Disposal per Month 8 WC -3 Breakdown of Waste Shipped by Weight (%) of Major 8 Categories WC -4 Waste Management Method Breakdown % of Waste 9 Processed by Weight RE -1 Operating Cost per Car 18 RE -2 Cost per Car Broken Down by Expense 18 RE -3 Operating Cost Per Pound of Waste Collected 19 RE -4 Participation and Expenses 23 RE -5 HHW Program Estimated Cost per Household 24 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 66 of 196 Page 6 of 52 INTRODUCTION This summary report of the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program for fiscal year (FY) 2016/17 presents the program participation levels, an analysis of the hazardous waste delivered to the facility, and the costs associated with the program. The program's high level of participation and the amount of hazardous waste collected and properly managed each year, demonstrates the benefits to both public health and the environment. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (Central San) core function is to operate a municipal wastewater collection system and a 53.8 -million -gallons -per -day -rated treatment plant. Central San collects, treats, recycles, and disposes of wastewater from approximately 481,000 residents of central Contra Costa County, including all the partners and participants in the HHW Collection Facility (with the exception of those who discharge to Mt. View Sanitary District (MVSD) (see below) and about 14,000 residents in southern San Ramon, whose wastewater flows to Dublin -San Ramon Services District). The wastewater collection area covers 145 square miles and includes approximately 1,500 miles of sewer pipes. In FY 2016/17, the treatment plant treated nearly 12 billion gallons of wastewater. Of that, 600 million gallons of treated effluent were recycled and distributed for landscape irrigation and in -plant uses. The remaining treated effluent is discharged via a deep -water outfall to Suisun Bay. MVSD serves an estimated population of 21,900 with approximately 270 businesses in its 4.7 square mile service area. MVSD owns and operates a 79 -mile sewer collection system with four pump stations and an advanced secondary treatment plant. MVSD reclaims approximately 440 million gallons of water for 21 acres of wetland habitat every year. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 67 of 196 Page 7 of 52 RESIDENTIAL PARTICIPATION The Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Collection Program is completing its 20th year of operation. The HHW Program serves all of the central Contra Costa County, which is comprised of 194,300 households, with a population of approximately 516,000. The number of HHW program service area households grew by over 14 percent over the past 20 years. Program participation has also increased steadily from the 7.8 percent of households served during the opening year in 1997/98 to nearly 17 percent in FY 2016/17. Figure RP -1 shows HHW program participation on a monthly basis. Participation ranged between 1,541 cars in December and 3,257 cars in July. The lower participation during the winter months is attributed to fewer operating days due to the holidays, and seasonal fluctuations in participation presumably due to more inclement weather. Figure RP -1 HHWCF P Cars per Month FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 0 FY 2016/17 31500 31000Ln ,,, I rn •ro rn � �f 0 ' x500 4-Itti tf Vfr" f 0 0N Ln 1000 %Ij rn 6J 1r 500 . Z + Ln 1x000 500 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Alar Apr May Jun 1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 68 of 196 Page 8 of 52 Figure RP -2 presents the average residential participation for each day of operation, Monday through Saturday. Typical fluctuations in the average cars per day of week were observed. 200 150 E 100 50 0 Figure RP -2 HHWCF Participation AvArnap Cars ner ❑aW of Week 2015,16 ■ 2016/17 Monday Tuesday Wednesday ThUrsda Days of Operation 102 104 Friday aturda Figure RP -3 presents a comparison of the average number of cars per operating day since the HHW facility opened. This data serves as a tool for planning staffing levels through the different seasons and to promote the facility's services. Figure RP -3 HHWCF Participation Average Cars per Day 120 1-00 , 0 0 0 40 0 0 e C�C� 'From Fiscal Year 1997/98 to September of 2001, the HHW Facility operated only 3-1/2 days per leek. In September 2001, the facility open 5 clays per .-.reek. In June of 2009 the facility began a sire -day operat! ng week. By opening the additional day, the average number of cars per clay,.oras reduced. 2 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 69 of 196 Page 9 of 52 Table RP -1 Residential Participation by Community Fiscal Year 2016/17 Community 1 Number of Households HHW Facility Participation % of Community Served Clayton 41017 838 20.9% Concord 447991 77332 16.3% Danville 151398 21352 15.3% Lafayette 91418 2,453 26.0% Martinez / MVSD 141583 6,017 41.3% Moraga 57643 832 14.7% Orinda 61808 1,230 18.1% Pleasant Hill 137884 37252 23.4% San Ramon 271332 846 3.1% 7.1% L ban Ramon - DTD 277332 11085 4.0% Walnut Creek 32,645 5,493 16.8% 3 Unincorporated 197650 17783 9.1% Subtotal 1941369 321428 16.7% 4 Out of Service Area N/A 206 N/A Total 194,369 32,634 N/A Central San estimate based on January 2016 California Department of Finance data and data provided by MVSD and the City of San Ramon. 2 Central San does not sponsor the City of San Ramon's Door -to -Door (DTD) Collection program, but it should be noted that the number of participants that were served by the program should be included with the number of participants that used the HHW Facility in order to obtain an overall HHW participation rate. The DTD program includes a -waste pickups. 3 Hazardous waste from outside of the service area was accepted and processed for one of two reasons: 1) employees from Central San and MVSD who live outside of the service area are also eligible for HHW program participation, or 2) household hazardous waste generated outside the service area that is deemed unsafe for further transport is accepted and processed as a safe and responsible business practice. 4 The number of cars outside of the service area was not included in the participation percentage. 3 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 70 of 196 Page 10 of 52 Table RP -2 Percentage of Households in Service Area and Participation by Community Fiscal Year 2016/17 Community Number of Households % of Households in Service Area HHW Facility Participation % of Total Served Clayton 47017 2.1% 838 2.6% Concord 441991 23.1% 71332 22.6% Danville 151398 7.9% 21352 7.3% Lafayette 91418 4.8% 21453 7.6% Martinez / MVSD 141583 7.5% 61017 18.6% Moraga 51643 2.9% 832 2.6% Orinda 67808 3.5% 11230 3.8% Pleasant Hill 13,884 7.1% 37252 10.0% San Ramon 277332 14.1% 846 2.6% Walnut Creek 32,645 16.8% 57493 16.9% Unincorporated 2 191650 10.1% 11783 5.5% Subtotal 1947369 100% 321428 16.7% 3 Out of Service Area N/A N/A 206 0.5% Total 1947369 N/A 327634 N/A Central San estimate based on January 2016 California Department of Finance data and data provided by MVSD and the City of San Ramon. 2 Hazardous waste from outside of the service area was accepted and processed for one of two reasons: 1) employees from Central San and MVSD who live outside of the service area are also eligible for HHW program participation, or 2) household hazardous waste generated outside the service area that is deemed unsafe for further transport is accepted and processed as a safe and responsible business practice. 3 The number of cars outside of the service area was not included in the participation percentage. 4 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 71 of 196 Page 11 of 52 SAN RAMON DOOR-TO-DOOR COLLECTION PROGRAM Since 2011, when the City of San Ramon elected to sponsor their own Door -to -Door (DTD) HHW collection program, we have tracked their usage with the HHW facility's in order to show overall participation and proper waste management within the Central San. Table SR -1 below describes the participation, waste volumes, and cost that San Ramon reported, compared to HHW facility's usage figures for San Ramon. San Ramon reported that their DTD program served 1,085 participants and collected a total of 97,385 pounds of waste (45,351 pounds were electronic waste) at a cost of $183,600 in FY 2016/17. Since e -waste is not accepted by Central San's program, it was subtracted in the table, however all the participants will be assumed to have had both e -waste and HHW picked up. The costs will also remain, as those are fixed costs for each resident. 5 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 72 of 196 Page 12 of 52 Table SR -1 San Ramon's HHW Facility Participation with San Ramon's Door -to -Door Program HHW Collection Method FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Central San HHW Facility 982 846 City of San Ramon Door -to -Door Program 15073 15085 Total participants 2,055 1,931 Percent difference in participation from previous 6/o o less year HHW Facility Pounds per participant Pounds of Waste Collected from San Ramon FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Central San HHW Facility 62,952 55,018 City of San Ramon Door -to -Door Program 555481 525034 Total pounds 118,433 107,052 Percent difference in pounds of waste collected from previous year I 10% 0 /o less Cost of HHW Collection Method FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Central San HHW Facility $49,685 $51,313 City of San Ramon's portion of HHW Facility cost $21,019 $18,059 City of San Ramon Door -to -Door Program $171,600 $183,600 Total Cost $242,304 $252,972 HHW Facility Pounds per participant 64 55 HHW Facility Cost per participant $72 $82 HHW Facility Cost per pound of waste collected $1.13 $1.24 DTD Pour --ids per participa m 5 48 DTD Cost per participant $160 $169 DTD Cost per pound of waste collected $3.09 $3.53 X October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 73 of 196 Page 13 of 52 QUANTITIES OF WASTES COLLECTED The HHW Collection Program disposed or recycled 1,730,274 pounds of waste during FY 2016/17. This is about 2,500 pounds more than last year. With the addition of the 404,681 pounds of HHW collected, separated, and given to the public for reuse, 2,134,955 pounds of hazardous waste was collected and processed through the HHW Collection Facility (see Table WC -1). An average of about 65 pounds of HHW per car was dropped off by 33,037 customers (32,634 residents, 303 small business appointments, and 100 retail partnership drop offs). The wastes were transported from the HHW Collection Facility for reuse, recycling, fuel blending, incineration, treatment, or landfill. Data specific to the Reuse Room or other waste management activities is presented on pages 13 and 9 respectively. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) requires a Form 303 report each fiscal year (July through June) summarizing the amount, the types of hazardous waste processed and a breakdown of the waste management method for each type of hazardous waste collected. It is included in Appendix I. The average weight of hazardous waste collected per car was nearly unchanged from last year at 64.6 pounds. See Figure WC -1. 90 0 L 70 00 40 30 C 20 10 CL0 Figure WC -1 Pounds of Waste per Car 78 77 77 0 63 64 65 $ 00 X& X� \ � \ \' XZ '\Q1 1� "P xol� \N "I 6� (�b NQ) Figure WC -2 presents the quantity of wastes transported off-site each month for disposal. 7 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 74 of 196 Figure WC -2 Waste Disposal per Month 2014/15 2015/16 0 2016/17 250,000 00,000 I $ C Q0 Q0 0 s -I 00 a• •; 150,0]0 Lo Q0 yjI Lam. LO t • Ln SV -Y ■ jam+ LA 100,000 `t 50,000 Q0 00 Tt C) 00 Page 14 of 52 it �' mom_ V JUI ALJg Sep Oct Nov Dec Jars Feb Mar Apr May JU11 Figure WC -3 presents a breakdown of hazardous wastes processed by type of waste. The transportation classifications on the shipping documents were used as the primary means for segregation into waste type. Figure WC -3 Breakdown of Waste Disposed by Weight (".,/'0) of Major Categories Fiscal Year 2016/2017 6% 7 3 3 0 FIarrima ales IW Latex Paint 6d Motor Oil Oil Filters W Aerosols W Car Batteries Fluorescent Leaps LJ Poisorls Li Pha rmecutica is J Household Batteries Li Corrosives LJ Others 8 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 75 of 196 Figure WC -4 presents the distribution of hazardous wastes processed by management method. Figure W-4 Waste Management Method Breakdown Percentage of Waste Processed by Weight Fiscal Year 2016'17 2.6% Page 15 of 52 0.10 W Re Use W Landfill j Fuel Blend Recycle 16.0 W Incineration 1A Tre atme nt Table WC -1 presents the distribution of HHW collected through the permanent facility by community. Table WC -1 Estimated Amount of Waste Collected bv Community Community Number of Cars Percent of Total Cars (rounded) Estimate amount of Waste Collected by Community (pounds) Clayton 838 2.5% 54,154 Concord 77435 22.5% 480,473 Danville 2,358 7.1% 1527381 Lafayette 2,471 7.5% 159,684 Martinez / Mt. View 6,131 18.6% 396,205 Moraga 840 2.5% 54,283 Orinda 1,235 3.7% 79,810 Pleasant Hill 3,275 9.9% 211,641 San Ramon 853 2.6% 55,124 Walnut Creek 5,585 16.9% 3607920 Unincorporated 1,810 5.5% 116,968 Subtotal 32,831 99.4% 27121,643 Out of Service Area 206 0.6% 13,312 Total 33,03711100.0% 211343955 2 i he total number of cars includes :32,634 cars trom the permanent tacility, 1 UU Ketail partnership drop-otts, and 3U3 business appointments. 2 The total weight collected includes disposed and reused from the permanent facility (residents, businesses, and retail). 0 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 76 of 196 Page 16 of 52 POLLUTION PREVENTION EFFORTS Central San's Pollution Prevention (P2) Program has evolved over the years to become an important component of our mission, which specifically includes P2 and reflects the growing importance of P2 for regulatory compliance. Central San is required to monitor and prevent certain pollutants from entering the influent wastewater. The HHW Program helps prevent wastes from reaching the sewer, and tracks the amount of waste that was diverted. Mercury Collection Program The HHW program facilitates Central San's promotion of proper mercury (Hg) disposal by accepting elemental mercury, mercury -containing devices (e.g., fluorescent bulbs, batteries, mercury switches, and mercury thermometers), and mercury -containing compounds (paints and pesticides containing mercury). Since the beginning of the mercury thermometer exchange program in 1999, nearly 6,200 mercury thermometers have been collected and exchanged for non -mercury types. Table PP -1 describes the types of mercury -containing wastes that are tracked by HHW staff. This system closely estimates the quantities of mercury contained in fluorescent lamps, thermometers, thermostats, switches and button -cell batteries. Over 58 pounds (Lbs.) of mercury contained in these types of wastes was collected through the HHW program in FY 2016/17. Table PP -1 FY 2016/17 Mercury Collection Summary Mercury -Containing Devices Number of Items Units Estimated Quantityof Mercury y Total Pounds Hg Thermostats (3 Grams/unit) 125 Ea 375 Grams 0.83 Thermometers (1 Grams/unit) 757 Ea 757 Grams 1.66 Elemental H (Lbs.) N/A N/A N/A 53.81 Switches 18 Ea 6 Grams 0.04 ercur Batteries 66 Lbs. 206,250 Milli rams 0.45uorescent E'v' Lamps 3961196 Feet 822,107 Milligrams 1.80 Total Hg in Pounds 58.59 Paints, pesticides & other compounds containing mercury 1 Container 2.5 Lbs. 2.5 10 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 77 of 196 Page 17 of 52 Other Pollutants Some other pollutants of concern, such as legacy pesticides, are tracked separately in order to provide a more accurate report of collected compounds. Table PP -2 shows which pollutants of concern are tracked and the quantity collected in FY 2016/17. Table PP -2 FY 2016/17 Pollutants of Concern Summary Compound Total Pounds Tributyltin 859 Diazinon 1733 Chlorpyrifos 17638 Carbaryl 2,594 Copper 3,529 Pentachlorophenol / 27415-T / Trichlorophenol 593 Lindane 163 Chlordane 498 DDT (DDE) 61 Dieldrin 13 Lead Compounds 348 Pyrithroids (pesticides) 11,261 Fats, Oils and Greases (FOG) 30764 PCB's (Light ballast's) 2,100 Total 56,154 Pharmaceutical Collection Program Another way the HHW Program contributes to Central San's P2 program is by collecting unused, unwanted, and expired pharmaceuticals from residents. Pharmaceuticals can be a threat to our bay, rivers, and creeks as some of the compounds they contain cannot be entirely treated or removed by wastewater treatment plants. Pharmaceuticals can enter the sewer system by either excretion from the body or by customers dumping them down the drain. Since we cannot prevent unmetabolized medications from entering the treatment plant, we established a collection and disposal program for unwanted pharmaceuticals. Central San operates 13 collection sites in all 11 cities and towns in our service area. Table PP -3 describes the amount of pharmaceuticals collected by each site and the cost of collection and disposal. 11 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 78 of 196 Page 18 of 52 Table PP -3 FY 2016/17 Pharmaceutical Collection Summary Collection Sites Total Bins (18- gallon) Total Pounds Average Lbs./Bin Total Cost *Average Cost/Lb. Alamo 9 502 56 $ 711 $ 1.42 Clayton 13 611 47 869 1.42 Concord 57 27521 44 41474 1.77 Danville 43 11871 44 37397 1.82 Lafayette 19 534 28 17501 2.81 Martinez 20 612 31 11580 2.58 Moraga 23 11142 50 11817 1.59 Orinda 12 609 51 948 1.56 Pleasant Hill 39 1, 904 49 31081 1.62 San Ramon 35 1,570 45 27765 1.76 Sherriff FOB 34 979 29 21686 2.74 CCC Hospital 14 339 24 11106 3.26 Walnut Creek 83 31530 43 67557 1.86 Total 401 **161724 42 $31,492 $ 1.88 *The variation in the average cost per pound is caused by the amount of packaging (jars, paper, cardboard, etc.) included in the collection bins. Bags for consolidating pills are offered at most collection sites, but are not often used. The fullness of the container when it is picked up, also affects the cost/Ib. ** Slightly higher by 1 pound due to rounding. Since the pharmaceutical program began in 2009, over 102,500 pounds of unwanted or expired medications have been collected and properly disposed by incineration. In FY 2016/17, more than 16,700 pounds of unwanted prescribed, non -prescribed, and over-the- counter medications were collected at a cost of $31,492. 12 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 79 of 196 Page 19 of 52 WASTES DIVERTED FROM SEWER AND LANDFILL DISPOSAL The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) requires diversion of HHW from the municipal solid waste stream. AB 939 established a waste management hierarchy to minimize the amount of HHW sent to landfills through reduction, reuse, recycling, treatment, or incineration (fuel blending or destructive incineration), and diverts a minimum of 50 percent of solid waste from being landfilled. The emphasis is on reduction, reuse, and recycling whenever possible. As a water quality agency, diverting hazardous waste from the sewers and storm drains is equally important. Although Central San's HHW Program is not required to comply with the requirements of AB939, Central San's waste management strategy mirrors AB 939, prioritizing reduction, reuse, recycling, and fuel blending, in that order, to the greatest extent feasible. All of which divert these wastes from being landfilled. The HHW program's progress toward sewer and landfill diversion for FY 2016/17 is outlined below. Reused The amount of reusable products given away accounted for roughly 19 percent of the total amount of waste collected by the HHW Program. Over 20,000 Reuse Program participants were given over 404,000 pounds of free reusable products during FY 2016/17. The estimated cost savings from the Reuse Program is $137,600, which includes roughly $30,000 of compensation from PaintCare for each gallon of reusable PaintCare product given away. Recycled The types of waste recycled at off-site facilities include latex paint, used motor oil/filters, antifreeze, car batteries, propane cylinders, fluorescent lamps, lead (scrap metal), mercury, household batteries, printer cartridges, and even home -generated cooking oil. Many of these recyclable waste streams are rebated or free for recycling. Fuel Blended (Waste Derived Fuel) In FY 2016/17, a total of 342,351 pounds of oil-based paint and other flammable liquids (gasoline, paint thinners, etc.) was blended with other flammable hazardous wastes and used as a fuel source to make Portland cement. While fuel blending is lower in the waste management hierarchy than recycling, it is still a beneficial use that avoids using fossil fuels and prevents destructive incineration, treatment, or Class I landfill disposal. Table WD -1 on the next page shows the waste streams and quantities of wastes diverted from landfill. 13 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 80 of 196 Page 20 of 52 Table WD -1 Quantity of Landfill Diverted Waste Material Type Quantity Recycled (Lbs.) Motor oil and oil filters 1647000 Antifreeze 38,008 Car batteries 55,291 Fluorescent lamps 51,486 Compressed Gas Cylinders (Propane and Fire Extinguishers) 26,436 Scrap metal (lead, brass, and copper) 224 Printer cartridges 746 Mercury and Mercury Products 144 Household batteries 607358 Latex Paint 7241900 Cooking Oil 307764 Total recycled waste 191529357 Reused H HW 4041681 Total recycled and reused 195579038 Percent of H HW reused or recycled 72.9% Fuel Blended Oil based paint 2321900 Other flammable liquids 1091451 Total fuel blended waste 3429351 Percent of waste fuel blended 16.0% Total landfill diverted waste 198999639 Percent of waste diverted from landfill 88.9% Total waste throughput, including reused, recycled, and disposed 2,134,955 14 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 81 of 196 Page 21 of 52 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM An important component of the HHW Collection Program is the collection of hazardous wastes from small businesses that qualify as "Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators" (CESQG) under Federal and State hazardous waste management laws. This program is intended to offer small businesses a cost-effective and convenient hazardous waste disposal option. Program statistics are included below in tables SB -1 and SB -2. Revenue collected from small businesses is for hazardous waste disposal or recycling only and an administration fee of $20 per appointment. Small business participation has been known to fluctuate from year to year as does the revenue collected. See Appendix III for the current CESQG disposal charges. CESQG outreach pieces are on-going advertising in local chamber of commerce publications, Central San's Pipeline newsletter, MVSD's Mt. View Monitor newsletter, business trade fairs, and word of mouth by Central San's Source Control Inspectors, as well as Contra Costa County Hazmat Program inspectors, as they complete their field work auditing the operations of eligible businesses. Table SB -1 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION BY COMMUNITY Community Fiscal Year 2016/17 Previous Year Clayton 0 8 Concord 103 120 Danville 6 4 Lafayette 18 14 Martinez/ Mt. View 60 63 Moraga 8 6 Orinda 5 10 Pleasant Hill 23 16 San Ramon 7 6 Walnut Creek 58 63 Unincorporated 15 28 Outside of service area 0 1 TOTAL 303 339 * In FY 2012/13, retail partner visits were removed from total appointment figures for the Small Business program. 15 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 82 of 196 Page 22 of 52 Table SB -2 SMALL BUSINESS APPOINTMENT STATISTICS Fiscal Year Number of Businesses ed Served Number of New Businesses Se ed Served Number of Appointments Estimated Pounds of Waste Collected o ected Revenue per Pound f o Waste Revenue Collected 05/06 128 55 252 40, 841 $0.54 $22)054 06/07 161 94 373 81777 $0.45 $37)008 07/08 191 104 386 59, 966 $0.57 $34)324 08/09 148 75 416 72728 $0.46 $33,236 09/10 178 82 439 73,045 $0.43 $29,290 10/11 206 77 485 72,991 $0.43 $31,157 11/12 171 68 378 53,486 $0.54 $30,696 12/13 134 53 291 42, 838 $0.58 $24707 13/14 129 40 255 35, 620 $0.64 $22)900 14/15 141 48 287 42,876 $0.63 $27,126 15/16 149 67 339 55, 370 $0.61 $337884 16/17 158 51 303 44,436 $0.63 $28,090 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH HHW program participation has steadily grown since the first year of operation. It is publicized in each issue of the Central San Pipeline newsletter, which is mailed twice a year to more than 156,000 Central San residential and business customers. Additionally, MVSD, the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority, and cities and organizations in the service area, have used their newsletters to provide public education and promotion of the HHW program and its associated Pharmaceutical Disposal Program. With this promotional strategy, about 7 percent of the total residential participants during FY 2016/17 were first-time customers, and the remaining 93 percent were repeat customers. 16 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 83 of 196 Page 23 of 52 FY 2016/17 REVENUE AND EXPENSES The HHW Program expenses for FY 2016/17 totaled $2,651,168, which is an increase of about 9.7 percent over last year. With the increase in overall cost the cost per car also increased from $72 in FY 2015/16 to $80 in FY 2016/17. This increase in expenses can be attributed to the following: Central San Staff • An HHW Technician I was hired in July 2016, filling the position of an HHW Technician II that was promoted to Senior HHW Technician. The Senior HHW Technician position became vacant when he transferred to the Environmental Compliance Section permanently after completing a two-year provisional assignment for that Section. Staffing losses temporarily reduced the department's overall expenses in the last two years for salaries, benefits, and overhead. When the position was filled, those expenses began to return. • A Technician II level staffer has been on extended leave since January 2015. Temporary staff have been used to offset some of the loss in productivity, but their salaries are less and do not include benefits or overhead. If the HHW program was fully staffed in FY 2016/17, the cost would have been approximately $100,000 more than reported. Billing • Due to an inadvertent billing issue, a waste service invoice for $62,505 for June 2016 was not accrued in time for FY 2015/16. The invoice was paid in FY 2016/17, which artificially increased the FY 2016/17 expenses by $62,505. Table RE -1 presents a full summary of revenue and expenses for the HHW Collection Facility for FY 2016/17. Figure RE -1 below, describes the operating cost per car (participant), and Figure RE -2 breaks down that cost by the five major expense categories: labor, waste, materials, capital, and other. Also below is Figure RE -3, which describes the operating cost per pound of waste collected. 17 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 84 of 196 Figure RE -1 Operating Cost per Car $100 $93 $93 $90 $84 $87 $80 $82 $83 $80 74 $80 $76 $76 $78 $ $73 $68 $71 $72 $70 -- $67 64 $66 - $ $61 L $60 U L- CD $50 Ln U U $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 Figure RE -2 Cost per Car Broken Down by Expense ;qj $14.47 $3 $9.02 $49.66 id Labor District staff and contract staff ® Materials Materials and supplies (PPE, Containers, etc.) I Waste Transportation and recycling and /or disposal L-IOther Utilities, Insurance, misc. The CosVCar for Fiscal Year 2016117 I Capital is $80.25 Amortized capita expenditures Page 24 of 52 18 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 85 of 196 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 Figure RE -3 Operating Cost per Pound of Waste Collected Page 25 of 52 ,A\C I e \'11) \-Iz� t'3�� tP �R '�� 'Al� '000 'C�� N�� 1)� t�� tX� <0 <p <0 e <"Z�* <0 <p <0 <p <0 <0 e <�&; <4�� <�� <4�� <�&; <4�� Revenue and No Cost Waste Management Revenue for the HHW Collection Facility included payments from other jurisdictions under service agreements (Mt. View Sanitary District, City of Concord, City of Clayton, and City of San Ramon) and charges to small businesses under the CESQG program. Also, staff is diligent in seeking low cost/no cost management or revenue generating alternatives while keeping safe and proper disposal in mind. Many of the wastes that are collected by the HHW facility have market value or require manufacturers to manage and pay the cost of their recycling, also known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). The list below describes the revenue generating or no cost waste streams, how much was collected, if Central San was paid for recycling, and the cost if Central San had to dispose of the waste without compensation or EPR assistance. 19 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 86 of 196 M 00 N r-, r4 00 0 M M 0� o r -i -Ln x Q0 o _U11.0 00 -o i-n 00 o C5 Page 25 of 52 ,A\C I e \'11) \-Iz� t'3�� tP �R '�� 'Al� '000 'C�� N�� 1)� t�� tX� <0 <p <0 e <"Z�* <0 <p <0 <p <0 <0 e <�&; <4�� <�� <4�� <�&; <4�� Revenue and No Cost Waste Management Revenue for the HHW Collection Facility included payments from other jurisdictions under service agreements (Mt. View Sanitary District, City of Concord, City of Clayton, and City of San Ramon) and charges to small businesses under the CESQG program. Also, staff is diligent in seeking low cost/no cost management or revenue generating alternatives while keeping safe and proper disposal in mind. Many of the wastes that are collected by the HHW facility have market value or require manufacturers to manage and pay the cost of their recycling, also known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). The list below describes the revenue generating or no cost waste streams, how much was collected, if Central San was paid for recycling, and the cost if Central San had to dispose of the waste without compensation or EPR assistance. 19 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 86 of 196 Page 26 of 52 Waste Stream Waste Revenue Cost If Disposed Volume in Lbs. p Scrap metal 224 $ 55 $ 0 Mercury Thermostats 19 0 110 (EPR) Printer cartridges 746 543 0 Rechargeable battery 5 959 1 473 3 873 recycling (EPR) ' Cardboard 12,000 0 0 Cooking oil 30764 538 8,845 Antif reeze 387008 0 6797 Lead acid batteries 51 217 9 620 0 (auto) ' Non-PaintCare reuse 217,010 0 73783 PaintCare reuse (EPR) 1877671 30,027 63,808 Latex and oil based paint 821 9500 279, 463 (PaintCare) Total 13365,568 $423256 $4363679 Based on this list, Central San saved more than $436,000 in disposal costs. Of that total, over $42,000 came as compensation for certain reclaimable wastes. In total, over 1,365,000 pounds or 79% of the amount of waste disposed of by the HHW program was managed at no cost to Central San. Amortization of Capital Expenditures Amortization of Capital Expenditures is derived from the capital costs to build the collection facility and all capital improvements amortized over 30 years. No capital expenditures were added to the facility in FY 2016/17. Table RE -2 shows the amortization schedule of all capital expenditures since the HHW Facility construction was completed in 1997. Table and Figures • Table RE -1 presents a full summary of revenue and expenses for the HHW Program for FY 2016/17. • Figure RE -3 shows the HHW Program participation and the expenses related to the Program for each of the 20 years of operation. • Figure RE -4 lists the estimated average cost per household for each year the HHW Program has been in operation. 20 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 87 of 196 Page 27 of 52 Table RE -1 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility 2016/17 Summary of Revenue and Expenses Revenue FY 2015/2016 FY 2016/2017 Central San Sewer Service Charges: $116691672 $ Service Agreements with other jurisdictions: FY 2015/2016 FY 2016/2017 Mt. View Sanitary District $ 101,974 $ 115,533 City of Concord 5657316 611,407 City of Clayton 491603 54,544 City of San Ramon 21,019 18,059 S 737, 912 $ 799, 542 $ 7997542 Sale of collected materials and CESQG Charges: $ 701438 $ 691643 Transfer portion of revenue to Self -Insurance for Insurance Policy: $ 21,945 $ 21,674 TOTAL REVENUE Expenses Salaries, benefits, and overhead (HHW Staff) Environmental liability premiums Utilities Repairs and maintenance Transportation and disposal Professional, technical, and legal services Materials and supplies Other expenses TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES Amortization of Capital Expenditures TOTALEXPENSES $ 22417,677 $ 226512168 $ 113057290 $1)4951188 711319 711319 121552 131811 241720 20, 685 4131388 4771924 185703 1451490 841426 1111888 22.238 16.821 $ 29119,636 $293539126 298,041 298,041 $ 2,417,677 2.651.168 21 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 88 of 196 Page 28 of 52 Table RE -2 HHW Facility Capital Expenditure Amortization Schedule 1998 thru 2042 Original Improvement Projects -District Project (DP) Years Fiscal Year Construction DP 8180 DP 8197 & DP 8209 & DP 8216 DP 7256 Total Ending 8204 7229 $ 179007000 $ 4277368 $ 327492 $ 3197393 $ 174227353 $ 37085 $ 471047691 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 1387035 1381035 1387035 1387035 1387035 138, 035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 1387035 138,035 1387035 138,035 138, 035 1387035 138, 035 138,035 138,035 1387035 138,035 1387035 138,035 1387035 138,035 1381035 $ 311048 311048 $ 2, 361 311048 21361 311048 2, 361 311048 21361 311048 21361 311048 21361 311048 2, 361 311048 21361 317048 21361 311048 2, 361 317048 21361 311048 2, 361 311048 21361 311048 2, 361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 317048 21361 311048 21361 311048 2, 361 311048 21361 317048 2, 361 311048 21361 311048 2, 361 2,361 23,204 237039 23,039 237039 23,039 237039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 23,039 237039 23,039 237039 23,039 237039 23,039 nn n1in 1037334 1037334 1037334 1031334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1031334 1037334 1031334 1037334 1031334 1037334 1031334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1037334 1381035 138,035 1387035 138,035 1381035 138,035 1697083 171,444 171,444 194,648 194,483 194,483 194,483 297,817 297,817 224 2981042 224 2981041 224 2981041 224 2981041 224 2981041 224 2981041 224 2981041 224 2987041 224 2981041 224 2987041 224 2981041 224 2987041 224 2981041 224 2987041 224 2981041 224 1601006 224 1601006 224 1601006 224 1607006 224 1601006 224 1601006 224 1281958 224 1267597 224 1267597 224 1031558 224 1037558 224 1037558 224 1037558 224 224 224 224 $ 4,141, 050 $ 9317449 $ 70, 830 $ 6911341 $ 3,100, 020 $ 61272 $ 819407961 Rate = 6% amortized over 30 years 22 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 89 of 196 Figure RE -4 Participation nnn nnn 361000 241000 23 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 90 of 196 181000 121000 Figure RE -5 HHW Program Estimated Cost per Household 01 .1 Cz nn 24 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 91 of 196 1957000 1907000 1857000 z 1807000 M 0 Ih s 0 r. Cn 1757000 � 0 Cn 1707000 1657000 1607000 APPENDIX $ $ Page 31 of 52 October 5, 2017 Regula [ Board Meeting Agends Packet - Page 92 of 196 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 93 of 196 Page 32 of 52 Section F. Waste Volumes: Instructions: Enter the number of pounds of material in the waste stream collected within the area into the cell corresponding to the program type used to collect the material. The spreadsheet will calculate the total amounts for you. Also enter the estimated number of pounds of the collected material in the cell corresponding to the management method used to dispose or divert the material. Definitions of the "Management Methods" are presented in Title 14, 18751.2.1 (c). The spreadsheet will calculate the total pounds disposed or diverted for you. Note: Quantities reported under "Load Check" and other collection categories should not be double counted under 'Permanent Facility." Material Type Pounds Collected by Program Type Pounds Disposed / Diverted by Management Method �� o ,o'er ti�0 w~ � �b 4 4�° .q�L 0 4 fi �~ � 'Q�~ �� O� � w�� •�ofi ,�� y`: ,¢fi y�� o `�fi b�� '�"�� ~� �� b Kofi fib`' A �: •o� �� do 1. Flammable and Poison Flammable solids / liquids 65,500 0 65,500 3,750 61,750 65,500 Bulked flammable liquids 47,700 47,700 47,700 47,700 Oil - base paints 232,900 0 232,900 1 232,900 27,725 260,625 Poisons 123,052 0 123,052 123,052 123,052 Reactive and explosive 144 0 144 144 144 subtotal 469,296 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 469,296 126,946 342,350 0 0 0 27,725 0 497,021 12. Acid I Inorganic and organic acid 20,024 0 1 1 1 20,024 20,024 20 024 13. Base I Inorganic and organic base 27,250 0 1 1 1 27,250 27,250 27 250 4. Oxidizer Neutral oxidizers, Organic peroxides, Oxidizing acid, and Oxidizing base 8,823 0 8,823 88 8,735 8,823 5. PCB - containing PCB - containing paint 0 0 Other PCB waste (includes ballasts) 2,100 0 2,100 2,100 2,100 subtotal 2,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,100 2100 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,100 6. Reclaimable Antifreeze 38,008 0 38,008 38,008 38,008 Auto type batteries (motor vehicles) 55,291 0 55,291 55,291 55,291 Latex paint 724,900 0 724,900 724,900 159,946 1 884,846 Motor oil/oil products 156,800 0 156,800 156,800 156,800 Used oil filters (recyclables only) 7,200 0 7 200 7,200 7,200 subtotal 982,199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 982,199 0 0 0 0 982,199 159,946 0 1,142,145 17. Asbestos Asbestos 1 1,800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1,800 ][--0 0 1,800 0 0 0 0 1 800 8. Universal Waste (UW) Mercury containing automatic switches / thermometers / and novelties Mercury containing thermostats ■ TRC 103 41 0 103 0 103 103 41 Mercury containing waste (other) 0 0 Lamps 51,486 0 51,486 51,486 51,486 Rechargeable batteries 51959 0 5,959 5,959 5,959 Other batteries 37,769 0 16630 54,399 54,399 54,399 subtotal 95,358 0 0 0 0 0 16630 0 111,988 0 0 0 0 111,947 0 0 111,988 Electronic Waste (UW) Covered Electronic Devices 0 0 Universal Waste Electronic Devices 0 0 subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aerosol Containers (UW) Aerosol containers 0 0 Other UW (name) 0 0 all UW subtotal 95,358 0 0 0 0 0 16630 0 111,988 0 0 0 0 111,947 0 0 111,988 * To be considered Universal Waste, all waste in this category except for batteries, must be managed by recycling. Energy recovery or fuel recycling, it is not universal waste and must be managed as a hazardous waste. The completed Disposed/Diverted Management Methods section incineration is not considered recycling. If the waste cannot be managed by will show whether or not wastes were managed as a universal waste. 9. Other HHW Home - generated sharps 35 35 35 35 Pharmaceutical Waste 66 16723 16,789 16,789 16,789 Compressed gas cylinders 26,436 0 1 26,436 4,526 1 21,911 1 26,436 Treated wood 0 0 Non - UW aerosol containers (corrosive, flammable, poison) 31,800 0 1 1 1 31,800 31,800 1 1 31,800 Other: Print cart., Lead, Cooking oil 31,734 31,734 1 31,734 217,010 1 248,744 subtotal 90,071 0 0 0 0 0 0 16723 106,794 53,115 0 35 0 53,645 217,010 0 323,804 10. Grand I Total 1,696,921 0 0 0 0 0 16630 16723 1,730,274 182,248 342,350 1,835 56,009 1,147,791 404,681 0 2,134,955 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 93 of 196 APPENDIX 11.0 CESOG CHARGES Page 33 of 52 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 94 of 196 SCHEDULE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL CHARGES FOR CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS (Revision date 11/5/99) AI -1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 95 of 196 Per Per Per Per Other Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit (Packaging Method) Container' Container' Container' Container' Charges Antifreeze (Bulked) Uncontaminated for recycle $1.40/gal Latex Paint (Bulked) Latex based paints, stains $2.50/gal Motor Oil (Bulked) Uncontaminated for recycle $0.28/gal. Aerosols Spray Paints $1.65 $3.30 Hazard Class 2 Insecticides (Loosepack) Aerosol Cleaners Flammable/ Paint Related Solvents $0.50 $1.00 $3.40 $20.50 $2.50/gal.2 Combustible Material: Oil- Thinners Materials: Fuels Based Blending Paint/Stains Hazard Class 3.0 Varnishes (Loosepack) (Bulked option for some wastes)2 Adhesives Glues $0.50 $1.00 $3.75 $30.00 $2.50/gal.2 Alcohol Ink/Toners Brush Wash Polishes Diesel White Gas Epoxy Resins Methanol Gasoline/Fuels Roof Tar Grease Sealers AI -1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 95 of 196 All -1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 96 of 196 Per Per Per Per Other Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit (Packaging Method) Container Container' Container' Container' Charges Corrosives, Oxidizers, Acetic Acid Ferric Chloride $1.20 $2.40 $9.50 $47.50 Acids, Bases: Ammonia Formic Acid Neutralization/ Citric Acid Hydrochloric Treatment Corrosives Acid Hazard Class B Potassium Hydrofluoric (Labpack) Hydroxide Acid Sodium Hypochlorite Hydroxide Caustics Poisons, Toxic Insecticides Herbicides $1.70 $3.40 $13.50 $67.50 Materials: Pesticides Toxic Lab Incineration Flammable Chemicals Hazard Class 6, 3(6) Pesticides (Labpack) Contaminated Solids, Non-RCRA Hazardous Wastes $0.65 $1.30 $5.25 $26.50 Other Hazardous Fertilizers Materials: Landfill Absorbents Hazard Class 9, Non-RCRA (Labpack or Loosepack) Reactives Cyanides Sulfides $2.50 $5.00 $20.00 $99.00 Hazard Class 4 Dangerous Bromine (Labpack) when wet Spontaneously combustible Asbestos Double bagged friable asbestos $120 per (Loosepack) wastes cubic yard All -1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 96 of 196 1 Prices are based on container size regardless of how full; containers of other than the specified sizes will be charged at an interpolated or prorated price. 2 This rate will be available when the bulking of flammable liquids can be performed at the facility. Flammable liquids that cannot be bulked will be charged the rate based on the container size. Note: Each CESQG shall be charged an Administration Fee of $20.00 for each drop off in addition to the above handling and disposal charges. (Ord. 229 Exh. A (part), 2004: Ord. 212 § 1 Exh. A, 1999: Ord. 206 Exh. A, 1999 All -2 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 97 of 196 Per Per Per Per Other Waste Category Example Waste Materials Pint Quart 1 Gallon 5 Gallon Unit (Packaging Method) Container' Container Container' Container' Charges Household Batteries Alkaline Nickel Cadmium $0.10 Hazard Class 8, 9 Lithium Silver Oxide each (Loosepack) Oil Filters Automotive and truck/tractor filters $1.00 (Loosepack) each Vehicle Batteries Unbroken/non leaking lead -acid No (Not packaged) batteries Charge Fluorescent Tubes $0.15/ft. (Loosepack) Propane Cylinders 5 gallon "BBQ" style $5.00 (Loosepack) Propane Cylinders Smaller than 5 gallon cylinders $1.40 $2.75 $11.00 (Loosepack) 1 Prices are based on container size regardless of how full; containers of other than the specified sizes will be charged at an interpolated or prorated price. 2 This rate will be available when the bulking of flammable liquids can be performed at the facility. Flammable liquids that cannot be bulked will be charged the rate based on the container size. Note: Each CESQG shall be charged an Administration Fee of $20.00 for each drop off in addition to the above handling and disposal charges. (Ord. 229 Exh. A (part), 2004: Ord. 212 § 1 Exh. A, 1999: Ord. 206 Exh. A, 1999 All -2 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 97 of 196 F APPENDIX III: . PW PROGRAM HISTORY - 1997 To PRESENT Page 37 of 52 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet -Page 98 of 1 � Page 38 of 52 20 YEAR PROGRAM SUMMARY On October 25, 1997, the doors of the first permanent household hazardous waste collection facility in Contra Costa County were opened. The HHW service area at the time consisted of about 170,000 homes and roughly 403,000 residents. Today, the service area covers over 194,000 homes and more than 516,000 residents. Below is data from the past twenty years in operation. Showing residential and mobile event participation, small business participation, waste volumes, and costs to operate the program. The following are accomplishments made during the past twenty years of operation: AWARD WINNING HHW COLLECTION PROGRAM ► First permanent HHW collection facility in Contra Costa County. ► Received CaIEPA's "Best New Program" award in 1998. ► Received CaIEPA's "Program Excellence" award in 2003. ► Received CaIEPA's "Pickled Skunk Brain" award in 1998. ► Received CaIEPA's Lighter Side "Most Picturesque" award in 2003. ► Received NAHMMA's Hometown Hero's award in 2012. ► Received numerous NAHMMA "Golden Bung" awards for most unique wastes received. IMPROVED CUSTOMER SERVICE AND EFFICIENCY ► Expanded residential drop-off hours from 24 hours per week to 42 hours per week. ► Expanded business drop-off hours from one day to six days per week. ► Changed the operating days from Wednesday through Sunday, to Monday through Saturday. ► Expanded and modified the facility a couple times to improve safety, efficiency, and service. ► Increased staffing from three to six regular employees. ► Implemented a mercury thermometer exchange program. ► Held two successful mercury thermometer exchange events. ► Numerous HHW facilities around the state have modeled after ours. EXCELLENT COMPLIANCE RECORD ► No hazardous materials violations. ► No hazardous waste releases to the environment. ► No major injuries. A111-1 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 99 of 196 Page 39 of 52 HHW PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ► Served 502,564 participants. ► Increased residential participation from 7.8% to 16.8%. SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM ► Served 5,189 small business appointments, to an average of 103 businesses per year. ► Collected more than 840,000 pounds of waste from businesses. PHARAMACEUTICAL COLLECTION PROGRAM (SINCE 2009) ► 13 Collection sites, one in each community we serve. ► More than 102,000 pounds of unwanted or expired medications collected. ► The cost of the program since it began in 2009 is $225,351. HAZARDOUS WASTES COLLECTED ► Collected approximately 36 million pounds of hazardous waste. ► More than doubled the amount of hazardous waste collected; from 902,000 pounds in fiscal year 1997/98 to over 2.1 million pounds in fiscal year 2016/17. ► Collected 2,766 pounds of elemental mercury. ► Recycled or reused 23.4 million pounds of waste (64.7% of total). ✓ Recycled approximately 16 million pounds of hazardous waste (44% of total). ✓ Gave away 7.5 million pounds of reusable products (20.7% of total). ► 9.2 million pounds (25.5% of total) were used as a waste derived tertiary fuel source for manufacturing Portland cement. ► 32.6 million pounds (90.2% of total) was used as intended (reuse), recycled to make more of the same product or something close, or used as a beneficial fuel source. TWENTY-YEAR STATISTICS Residential Participation During its first year in operation, approximately 9,500 Central San households were served by the facility and three mobile events. In 2016/17, over 33,000 households were served without mobile events, and more than 500,000 users of the HHW program in the last 20 years. This level of usage is proof that our customers are true environmental stewards. The following figure shows the 20 years of participation and the rate of participation compared to all service area households. Al 11-2 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 100 of 196 357000 0 307000 M •�v 25,000 i M a 207000 O L 157000 E Z 107000 51000 I HHW Drop-off Participation Number of Participants vs. Percent of Service Area Households � t 4 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 # of Participants * % of Households Al 11-3 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 101 of 196 24% 22% M 20% 0 18% O 16% ~' �D 14% C� 12% 10% 8% O 6% ' O MMMMMM 4% CL 2% 0% Page 41 of 52 HHWCF Participation, Waste Volume and Cost Summary -1997/98 to 2016/17 1 OSA is "Out of Service Area" 2 Includes all residential, mobile event and CESQG participation 3 Cost of HHW Program by Community represents the estimated cost for each community based on participation and overall costs. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 102 of 196 AREAS SERVICED CLAY CON DAN LAF MAR MOR ORI P.H. SRM WLC UNIN OSA Total Number of Households in 1997 by Community 3,184 42,819 13,160 9,087 16,241 5,611 6,445 13,060 14,813 29,037 16,558 -- 170,015 Number of Households in 2017 by Community 4,017 44,991 15,398 9,418 14,583 5,643 6,808 13,884 27,332 32,645 19,650 --- 194,369 Total HHW P,uU,a m Participants '97 to 17 2 111486 120,359 37,951 39,177 79,902 16,064 22,389 42,991 19,652 85,412 24,836 2,079 502,564 Percentage of Total Participants 2.29% 23.95% 7.55% 7.80% 15.90% 3.20% 4.45% 8.55% 3.91% 17.00% 4.94% 0.41% 100.00% Total Pounds of Waste by Community 826,618 8,661,926 2,7311235 2,819,467 5,750,340 11156,084 1,611,278 3,093,951 1,414,304 6,146,881 11787,383 149,620 36,168,230 Cost of HHW Program by Community 3 $872,776 $9,145,612 $2,883,749 $2,976,908 $6,071,442 $1,220,641 $1,701,253 $3,266,719 $1,493,279 $6,490,126 $1,887,191 $157,975 $ 38,187,884 1 OSA is "Out of Service Area" 2 Includes all residential, mobile event and CESQG participation 3 Cost of HHW Program by Community represents the estimated cost for each community based on participation and overall costs. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 102 of 196 Page 42 of 52 HHW Program Participation by Community The number of HHW service area households has grown in the past twenty years by more than 14.3 percent. HHW participation by each community during the past twenty years has also increased greatly, from as little as 118 percent in Moraga to as much as 364 percent in Martinez. C`ICy or Corcord Do. rville Lc fa yette MCrtrez Morcga rirda Plea art Hill San Rc�,rror Walnut Creek Urircorpor2ted Number of Participants Barged in FY 1997/98 compared to FY 2016/17 21000 3,000 4,000 5,000 X0 9 FY 1997/98 U Fig 2016/17 HHW Program Participation, Waste Volumes, and Costs The following table describes (over the last twenty years): • The number of households in each community in FY 1997/98 and FY 2016/17 • The total number of participants from each community • Each community's percentage of total participants • Total amount of waste collected from each community • The estimated programs cost per community • The average cost per participant (car) Al 11-4 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 103 of 196 8+00 Page 43 of 52 Waste Volumes The amount of waste collected by the HHW Program during the first year in operation topped 900,000 pounds. Twenty years later more than 2.1 million pounds of hazardous waste was collected from residents and small businesses. Over the last ten years, the average amount of waste collected has been just over 2 million pounds, so there has been sort of a maintenance level in the amount of waste collected each year. The pie chart to the right provides a visual representation of the management methods used to recycle or dispose of the wastes. Waste Management Method 20 Fears of Operation Recycled Landfill 44.0% 0.3% Neutralization I Treatment 2.1% Recycled/Reused 64.7% Fuel Incineration Destructive Incineration Reused 36,168,230 Pounds Collected The following table describes in detail, the amount of each waste stream collected during the past twenty years and the management method. Al 11-6 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 104 of 196 Page 44 of 52 rimmWW"', 417 MWAKI 11[ Material Type Pounds Collected by Year Pounds Disposed Diverted by Management Method VA, Flammable and Flammable solids liquids and Oil-based paint Poison .' Inorganicandorganicacid Oxidizers, Organic peroxides, PCB containing Auto type batteries Motor oil/oil products Used oil filters .,, ,, ..,, ..,, .:,, :.,, . „ . „ : ,,, . ,,, , ,,, , ,,, saaa�a Reclaimable Other: print cart., lead, cooking oil, sharps , . , �� , ,: ®-, .,. �� ., ..,�� , ,�� sexes Mercury containing thermostats thermometer / s switches/ :. .. .. , Fluorescent Lamps ��sesee Household Batteries rs Compressed gas cylindeseems .,,��•„��,,. ,,��seee PharmaceuticalWaste �� .,�� .�,�,, ..asses,,.. Aerosolcontainers 10. Grand Total October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 105 of 196 o9/is/i7 Ao -WAR Nv- HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2016-1 7 20TH YEAR IN OPERATION David Wyatt October 5, 2017 OVERVIEW • Residential Participation • Waste Management • small Business Program r, gyrating Costs Year Stats October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 106 of 196 1 o9/is/i7 PARTICIPANTS AND % PARTICIPATION OVERALL DISTRICT PARTICIPATION WAS 16.7% 8,000 7,000 6,000 C CL 'v 5,000 ca a 4,000 / ■ O 3,000 E Z 2,000 7.1% M um Participation Goal 1,000 .::..............:•. 0 CLA CON DAN LAF MAR MOR ORI P.H. S.R. S.R. DTD W.C. UNI mmmg# of Participants 838 7,332 2,352 2,453 6,017 832 1,230 3,252 846 1,085 5,493 1,783 — —% Participation 20.9% 16.3% 15.3% 26.0% 41.3% 14.7% 18.1% 23.4% 3.1% 4.0% 16.8% 9.1% *Based on the number of households from District Statistics for 2017 **Does not include "Out of service area" participants CITY 44% 40% 36% 32% 0 28% 24% 20% O 16% 12% 8% POUNDS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTED 2,200,000 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 107 of 196 2 o9/is/i7 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM SUMMARY NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS 400 1 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 TOTAL OPERATING COST PER CAR $0 "�- F i ' - FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 FY15/16 FY15/16 FY16/17 FY16/17 *Cost per car if the HHWCF was fully staffed during fiscal year's 2015116 and 2016117. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 108 of 196 3 o9/is/i7 HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS • Awards • Improved Customer Service • Excellent Compliance Record HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Participation * 502,564 participants served • Overall residential participation rate grew from 7.8% to 16.8% HHW service area increased by 14% or 24,350 additional homes since 1997 -. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 109 of 196 4 o9/is/i7 HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Waste Management 36,168,230 Pounds Collected HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Waste Management Of the 36 million pounds of waste collected: More than 2,750 pounds of elemental mercury And another 470,000 pounds of mercury containing fluorescent lamps 1.8 million pounds of poisons ger 42,000 car batteries 53,000 pounds of household batteries October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 110 of 196 5 o9/is/i7 HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Latex Paint — 9,302,331 pounds Enough to paint the exterior of every home in Danville and Martinez (29,981 homes with 30 gallons). HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Motor Oil — 422,549 gallons or 1,690,196 quarts Enough for 218,700 auto oil changes or 34% of the autos in Contra Costa County (835,183 autos in 2016 per CA DMV). October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 111 of 196 6 o9/is/i7 HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Fluorescent Lamps — 470,686 pounds Equal to approximately 713 miles of lamps. End to end, this would stretch from Martinez to Salt Lake City, Utah (711 miles). -n i I: .' j: d 0 -.► ° I Shasta-Trin Soh L e City National Forest I ° Frova Rena NEVADA I UTAH I Sacra to I I San Fran isco 0 I San Jose O St Georgi. R M. Fresno 7kc��f 0 flo�fl 1I31�c . HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS Reuse - 7,479,961 pounds At 60,000 pounds per truck, this would re -fill 125 semi -trucks with products that were already delivered once to a big -box or home improvement store. October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 112 of 196 7 HHW 20 YEAR HIGHLIGHTS And, on average, we received one visit from the Bomb Squad each year, without incident. QUESTIONS? o9/is/i7 October 5, 2017 Regular Board Meeting Agenda Packet - Page 113 of 196 8