HomeMy WebLinkAbout00. BOARD AGENDA 11-23-19481
RECORD OF A DISCUSSION MEETING
The following persons were present at a discussion meetin,
previously arraned for this date:
BOARD MEMBERS SMITTEN, TOLAND, WEILL AND WADS WORTH .
MR. WM. H. BRAILSFORD, ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT
CLYDE C. KENNEDY, DISTRICT ENGINEER
RICHARD R. KENNEDY, DEPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER
R. ROBERT W. HARRISON, ATTORNEY, PRESENT AT INVITATION BY C. C. KENNEDY.
President Wadsworth desired to establish the status of the
meeting. At the previous meeting there had been a motion that Ahe
Board meet with Clyde C. Kennedy to discuss his contract, the date
was set as November 23, 1948, and Member Smitten asked that the
meeting be held as an open meeting. The motion to adjourn the
previous meeting did not state that adjournment would be to November
23, therefore it was decided that this meeting was to be a discussion
meeting only.
Hr. Brailsford reported to the Board that he had met with Clyde
C. Kennedy regarding the desire of the Board to make a change on
Local Improvement District Proceedings. Mr, Kennedy proposed that he
would complete his part of the contract which he had started, including
the sewage disposal plant, the main trunk sewers, and the local im
provement districts started or author, zFd up to and including Local
Improvement District No. 12. When this work was completed, Mr. Kennedy
would sever his connection with the District and the District could
carry on in any manner it saw fit. Mr. Kennedy offered an alternative
to this plan, whioh would be termination of the contract at the
present moment. Mr. Kennedy would submit to arbitration for determining
the amount of compensation due for work done to date.
Mr. Brailsford further stated, regarding the reimbursable items
under Section III of the contract, that under the Improvement Act of
1911, Mr. Kennedy has to issue a certificate in each local improvement
district, certifying that the work has been done in each ease, ' and
he would only issue the certificate based on information from employees
solely responsible to him. There could be no severance of contract.
Mr. Clyde C. Kennedy informed the Board that he had asked Hr.
Harrison to appear and answer all questions regarding his contract.
He stated that Mr. Brailsford had presented the matter fairly, and
a majority of the Board, at a regular meeting, could declare the
position open if they wished. He said he was wiling to have the
contract severed, but under the terms of the contract, he would have
to be paid for the amount of work now under way.
Mr. Brailsford asked Mr. Kennedy how much it would mount to and
Mr. Kennedy replied that it would have to be calculated, but in round
figures about $100,000.
-2 -
Mr. Harrison summarized the contract, stating that the primary
objective was to accomplish construction of a sewage treatment plant
and a sewer system. That local improvement districts were a part
of a sewer system, and the contract contemplates that assessment
districts shall be a means of accompli ehing the ultimate objective.
This is confided to the Engineer. The Engineer has to give the
final certificate and would not be willing to issue it unless the
wort had been done by employees under him in whom he had confidence.
Mr, Toland enquired if Mr. Kennedy would be 'tiling to have the
District take over the employees to do the engineering work under
a supervisor in Mr. Kennedy's employ, in order to save the 25% and 5o%
overhead and supervision, and Mr. K nnedy advised the Board that they
could save 25% by taking over the payroll, but he was entitled to $O,
and the employees would have to be under his direction.
Mr. Smitten offered figures to show that under the same hours
and the same payroll that Mr. Kennedy bas carried for the past seven
months, the District would have spent an additional $10,482.13 for
the same period of time. He would like to see figures showing how
and where the District could effect a saving.
r Toland - remarked that the equipment could be owned and operated
by the District at less cost than the rentals and 25% overhead that
was now being paid to Mr. Kennedy. Be stated that the contract should
be revised, that when it was drawn up two years ago by Mr. Kennedy
circumstances were not the same.
Mr. Kennedy reminded the Board that he did not draw up the contract,
that it had been drawn up by Mir.. Tuttle, a former Board member.
When asked by Mr. Wadsworth if he thought the Distriot needed a manager,
Mr. Kennedy replied that the District had nothing in the field to be
managed as yet, but if they wanted an office manager there was no
reason they shouldn't have one.
Mr. Harrison informed the Board that if the contract is modified
by agreement there would be no objection to having the district do
the future local improvement district work.
Mr. Kennedy stated that he had given his word that he will withdraw
when the started work is completed if that is the will of the Boards
and that he will not interfere if the District goes ahead with other
work. But that the District should chem and make sure they had
enough funds to start an engineering office of their own.
Mr. Harrison said Mr. Kennedy would submit figures to the Board
showing how much of the fund shall be set aside for the construction
of the work started.