HomeMy WebLinkAbout07. (Revised) Board Workshop re 10-yr CIP Update, Proposed FY 17-18 and FY 18-19 CIB, and Rate Scenarios Item 7. (Revised)
(Handout)
10-YR CIP UPDATE, PROPOSED
FY17=18 AND FY 18-19 CIB)
AND RATE SCENARIOS
Board Workshop # 4
January 26, 2017
MPR Conference Room
11am to 4pm
1
ITEM A
INTRODUCTION
By Roger S. Bailey, General Manager
1
Revised 1
WORKSHOP PRESENTATION OUTLINE
A Introduction
B. Review and Summary of Discussions from November 10, 2016 Board
Workshop#3
C. Update on Solids Handling and Energy Alternatives
1 Solids Process Alternative Analysis
2. Energy Improvements
D. Update on 10-Yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
E. Proposed FY17-18 and FY 18-19 Capital Improvement Budgets (CIB)
F. Update on Rate Impact Scenarios and Implementation Schedules
1. Revenue Assumptions
2 Sewer Service Rate Impact Scenarios
3. Recycled Water Rate Impact Scenarios
4 Rate Implementation Schedule
5 Outreach Plan
G. Recap of Recommendations and Closing
ITEM B
REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS
FROM NOVEMBER 10, 2016 BOARD
WORKSHOP #3
By Roger S. Bailey, General Manager
1
Revised 2
RECAP OF DIRECTIONS GIVEN
Financials:
• OPEB
• Utilize the entire$2.5M budgeted toward existing OPEB Trust
• Change the amortization schedule of OPEB from 30-yrs to 18-yrs to be consistent with the
amortization schedule for CCCERA
• Include in the budget$2.5M annually towards OPEB liability
• Use FY 15-16 favorable variance to create a new Section 115 Pension Trust
Recycled Water Accounting:
• instead of setting up a separate recycling water fund,modify and implement a formal recycled water
budget to track details of cost and revenues as part of the annual adopted District budget
Bond Financing:
• Update Board Policy No.BP 017—Fiscal Reserves to address bond financing
• Rates to be used for five year financial window
Rate Scenarios:
■ Rate scenarios to include staggered bonds issued at intervals as recommended by staff
• Pipeline replacement projects should generally be funded by pay-as-you-go revenues
ITEM C
UPDATE ON SOLIDS HANDLING AND
ENERGY ALTERNATIVES
By Jean-Marc Petit,
Director of Engineering and Technical Services
Dan Frost, Senior Engineer Planning and Applied Research
. l
T --9 _
Revised 3
ITEM C1
SOLIDS PROCESS
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
.�s
7 IF
FoUR MAJOR DRIVERS THAT IMPACT
SOLIDS AND ENERGY PROJECTS
DriversDescriptions
1 Aging Infrastructure Maintain performance and reliability of existing
assets to ensure reliable treatment of wastewater
Increase capacity of existing facilities to
2 Capacity accommodate planned growth for the communities
we serve
Reliably comply with regulatory requirements that
3 Regulatory are designed to protect human health and the
environment&Plan for anticipated future
regulatory requirements
Minimize life-cycle costs,maximize benefits,and
4 Sustainability achieve economic stability through optimization,
resiliency,resource recovery,and energy projects
Revised 4
AGING SOLIDS HANDLING
INFRASTRUCTURE -
MULTIPLE HEARTH FURNACES (MHFs)
OU
1
MHF CONSIDERATIONS AND RISKS
1. Condition: MHFs are in good to fair condition
2. Seismic: MHFs and Solids Conditioning Building do not
meet current seismic standards
3. Regulatory Cost Trigger: SSI MACT 129 regulations limit
capital expenditures to 50% of original investment to be
classified as an "existing" multiple hearth incinerator
4. Regulatory Capacity Trigger: Future MHFs Solids
Loading Exceed Capacity Limitations
5. Design Capacity Limitation: Future MHFs Solids Loading
Exceed Design Capacity Limitations
(From June 16,2016 Board Workshop#1)
Revised 5
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED TO ADDRESS
AVERAGE FURNACE FEED CAPACITY
1. Solids Handling Improvement Project Phase 1: (Black and Veatch)
• Reduce Load to Furnace and Delay Capacity Limitation
• Lime Reduction Study to reduce O&M cost and increase capacity
• Improved Storage and Blending will Improve Cake Consistency
• Centrifuge&Cake Pump Replacement will Increase%Dryness
• Investigate Impacts of Increasing Permitted Feed Capacity
• Regulatory Impact Study
• New Source Review(Health Risk Assessment, BACT,TBACT)
• Re-Rate the Design Capacity of the MHF
• Capacity Testing
• Improve Ash Handling
2. Evaluate Options to Split Solids Load to Other Process&Avoid MHF Capacity Issue
• Pilot then consider implementing long-term demonstration of innovative process such
as BioEnergy Projects(e.g.; gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction, or pyrolysis)
EXISTING SOLIDS HANDLING AT 'CENTRAL SAN
USING MULTIPLE HEARTH FURNACES
Air Pollution
Control
Equipment
Primary Sludge
(from Primary Heat for Steam
Clarifiers) DAFs
Thickening Blend Tank Dewatering Centrifuges Steam for glowers
WAS
(from Secondary
Clarifiers)
Multiple Heart Ash
Furnaces
Thickener underflow Centrate Heat for Steam
Landfill Gas
Natural Gas
Co-Gen
Electricity
Natural Gas Generation
—2.7 MW
Revised
SOLIDs ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT
ralids processes
MHFs MAD+SSI MAD+Drying Direct drying pyrolysis
lex,stingy
- leeer.d
Fluidized Bed Thermal Thermaphilic Exi$lin g ,
Reactor Hydrolysis+SSI Anaerobic Indirect drying _ Gasification
Digestion 2026+2035 Process Alternative
ryonk
TPAD+5sl - AG Anaerobic
£nwren&trnb Hydrothermal
Don Not Meet Ofteria Liquefaction
Biological Enhanced supercritical
hydrolysis+SSI anaerobic Water
('HP,etc.) Oxidation
�J
SOLIDS ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT
CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION
* Proven technology
• Can physically fit at Central San's WWTP
• can be integrated with central San's liquid,
solids, and energy processes
* Reliable and improves resiliency
Revised 7
SCREENED SOLIDS TREATMENT
ALTERNATIVES FOR CENTRAL SAN
• Multiple hearth furnaces (existing)
is Fluidized bed incinerator (FBI)
■ Mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD)
■ Thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TPAD)
• Enhanced processes (e.g. CAM B I thermal hydrolysis)
• Innovative BioEnergy: Gasification, Pyrolysis,
Supercritical Water Oxidation, or Hydrothermal
Liquefaction
• Combinations of the above solids handling processes
DEVELOPED A FLEXIBLE PHASED APPROACH TO SOLIDS HANDLING
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
(0-5 Years) (6-10 yrs.) (11-20 yrs.)
MHFs
MHFs MHFs MHFs Construct Phase FBIi
Design Phase 1 Solids Construct Phase 1 Desi n Phase z Solids place
Yes g 3 Solids Handling Yes Re
Handling Facilities Yes Solids Handling Handling Facilities Yes Facilities MHF with
Improvement Project Facilities Improvement Project- Improvement FBI
Improvement Project Add two Anaerobic
No Digesters and Evaluate a Project'Two
-- Di esters
No High Strength Waste
Innovative BioEnergy �HSW)Program No NO Abandon
New Alternative Solids Yes Incineration
and Energy Technology Innovative BioEnergy and convert
Project Evaluation(e g.; Construct Phase 1 Yesto TPAD and
Innovative
Gasification)? Project In
BioEnergy a HSW
Yes BioEnergy ii program
Construct Phase z -110. Construct Phase 3
No BioEnergy Project i
BioEnergy
No
COGEN COGEN No
Implement -COGEN COGEN
COGEN COGEN
Cogen Renew 5 Year Solar Turbine Maintenance with a 5-Year Mfr. Renew S Year Solar Turbine
Improvement Yes Agreement Yes Maintenance Yes Mai nten ance Agreement
Project Agreement - —�
Revised
REVISED PHASED APPROACH TO SOLIDS HANDLING
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
(0-5 Years) (6-10 yrs.) (11-20 yrs.)
MHFs
MHFs MHFs MHFs C truct Pha -3 FBI
Design Phase 1 Solids Construct Phase 1 �gn Phase 2 So' Soli an Re
Handling Facilities YDS Solids Handling Hag Facil'' g M h
Faciliti
Improvement Project Facilities Improv a roject Impr m F
Improvement Project No Add two erobcc Pr ct-Two
Diges s an valuate a igesters
Hi trength to - --
Innovative BioEnergy .gram Abandon
New Alternative Solids Yes Xno
and Energy Technology Innovative BioEnergy Project Evaluation le g; Construct Phase 1 yes Gasification)? BioEnergy Project Innovative BioEnergy Innovative Construct Phase 2Yes BioEnergy
�-
� Construct Phase 3
BioEnergy Project BioEnergy
Nv
UM
COGEN >ha
Implement COGEN RN
Cogen , Renew 5 Year Solar war Mfr NTurbine Maintenance Renew 5 Ye .lar Turbine
Improvement Yes Agreement Mn Mainten a ement
Project Ant
ITEM C2
ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS
DAN FROST, SENIOR ENGINEER
PLANNING AND APPLIED RESEARCH
i
�vz
ate.
FU.-
-;-z
-;-._, Emil
Revised
BOARD VOTED ON A POLICY ON ENERGY BP. 027
ter*wtw"cosw
Number SP 027 SQ7►p
AUMW Eftctw A40
a own"
rao"DWADW � �►itQrreta7lses
awl
BOARD POUCY
ERERGT
f a Drae:e`ray easw+cY a tit err tea act O 7d
Dalen WMUMJta n3V*n PM carpus mlrtsnn sgntas bCO"POM t3alrs�t
arw cora M%&M**orM4 WWWW urd blab"To t W%w il++dfwe ani.c'b 1t
VWNPS M rr%a pw pmw aid ones b"bf wolp offiamc7 Rd
M awoo O +a'4taarnianaterWuttnp dRercrsae7naapersc
�e�+r yss I�+F eRaeseart io saAw rrt Iw fry 7¢!�a QrFYstts
FLLNM=
i.W alp% For nt Dwws wab mu ttrnrrt stn cymw hd Ln
[jwvp n&4ree4 a'A resltsaMr rratnwd VWt cwrph bg UM a
pfoov i*f4wp pw4wwo MMPI M r%w B 011ft Wfto 0
Grp (wifteV UZ Dcpwet=M of FrM"
P etAMSM r*T Et*OW dtcOt n M brM Of MWOMMY 0"a area
ftm wwwapt w"M x""M amch as rod acrd rot-pww goo t-A
fWOODW ar 2M►rWWA kWM Cl b0ft i!?hn*8Ywtry MUM art
CO MMMM ltlgrr"1ClIM bocw rw(arse cm4ruww +ar M an R5r
SIM(Rahranct us K�Lwrftwwm 0106K20 A91MV(OP t4
s L3Xt aMU Any 9M DOW or a erste rte-rex-Mate rtrand
93064M n st,a a KNOMOM trartrtnrr UMPA'
i Gidi eawalals rrsit wa Laney F n a ww
RMA d laareas Adwft s of as t o mien COMA"pransfra cps rlaw Luca+
aRKtF1 a1 rraW aer+.rats lRata WPW V*f PAy
CURRENT ENERGY PROFILE
MAE ENERGYSOU PROFILE
' PM
2000 MMBTU/Day
Mdsmatft
� f.
NG
11500 32%
m
V
ou
1,000 Noto
a`
e
WI
SDO
SOUns
doe(
Revised 10
ELECTRICAL PRODUCTION REQUIRED
TO MEET DEMAND
9=
i 7= Need to continue to evaluate
alternatives to minimize
y dependence on electricity and
imported fossil fuel to lower our
operating cost and meet the
Ener Policy BP 027
s 9Y Y
W
1AW NG
5011Q5
0
Current Projected Baseline
(MHFs)
ENERGY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
• Solar PV Installation at CSD and HHW Facilities on line
• Reduce NG usage&lower GHGs with Cogen Upgrades(0-2 Years)
• Reduce Furnace Fuel Usage by Replacing Older Solids Equipment with Higher
Efficiency Units:Blend tank mixing,Afterburners,Centrifuges/Cake Pumps,
and Vliet Scrubbers(0-3 Years)
PG&E Study to reduce power loads(e.g.;convert to LED lighting) '
• Evaluate and Start Implementing Alternative Solids to Energy Projects:
• Current Discussions to Use Gasification(0-3 Years) -
0
• DDE Project Approved-Hydrothermal Processing Pilot with WE&RF&
Genifuel(0-3 Years)
• Pilot Innovative,Low-energy Nutrient Removal Technologies: Solar PV Information Kiosk at HHW Facilities
• Current Discussions with Nereda for Aerobic Granular Sludge Pilot
• Current Discussions with GE for Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor
(MABR)Pilot
• Replace Steam System with DRC, Install Electric Blowers and High Efficiency
Diffusers(3-6 Years)
• Replace UV Disinfection System(5-10 Years)
• Add Renewable Energy(Solar and/or Wind)and evaluate solar with batteries
(e.g.;Tesla batteries)
r
Revised 11
MULTIPLE STRATEGIES AVAILABLE TO REACH
NET ZERO ENERGY GOAL
• Energy Efficiency Improvements(VFDs, LED Lighting, electric high
efficiency blowers, new air diffusers, SRT control for activated sludge,
more efficient processes, more instrumentations and controls)
• Anaerobic digesters can play a key role by allowing imported carbon
energy source (e.g. FOG, food waste, other high strength wastes)
• Biogas from co-digestion is typically the most economical way of
offsetting other power costs
• Alternative energy(solar,wind)can help offset imported natural gas or
grid power
• For Central San, alternatives are compared against the cost of producing
power on-site with natural gas and/or the cost of imported grid power
• Initiate an investigation on how to implement alternative solids to energy
processes(e.g.; gasification, pyrolysis) under Phase 1 (0-5 years)
any
ITEM D
UPDATE ON 10-YR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
BY JEAN-MARC PETIT, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
DAN FROST, SENIOR ENGINEER, PLANNING AND APPLIED RESEARCH
Revised 12
PRELIMINARY 1 OwYEAR CIP
$873M OF IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED
(WITH DIGESTERS STARTING IN FY 24=25)
1417]9 IM s ".u(j7( ftu l Fyz3rr4 FMAI Fn ?
7014 207J 2074 4m 7026 2077
516.0"950 526,707219 U0.102 2U S49411.LM S46161119 SSG-S:3212 $51635.746 $23.375.212 $34949903 537392.32S
mproremenm Pfua 293(0*ster4•Fes 50 s0 SO 50 50 50 so 520.190,"9 520.190.449 320 190,"9
-'5� 511,492.120 517 UWA1.3 335 732 312 537,499,645 339 439.6m $36.754.521 116.29),113 341.739.196 541.915 174 $45 703.02S
A 5464000 5"0000 $1.209445 55.770.993 $5.770.993 S12SJM $1,646,920 59.099.060 5125.000 5125.000
S4 277,030 S2911.96S S]4SS 774 $1.943 276 S3 297500 54172.500 31.797,500 52.197.500 51.797.500 52.570,000
$1500.000 Sl 500.000 S2=000 SIM.= 52.000.000 S2 o00 o00 57.000.000 52,000.000 S2 000.000 52.004000
517.7F4J10 I J*tLV,U $92,111."g 574,325,074 1 596,447,911 I%",S79,233 j 141,2Pilel S9'h,101,41t L 5101.641,06 1 5107.940.791
[In 2016 Dollars}
$120,080,000 _
$�.�.� 'moi
530404,ON
$60AN,wo
$40AW.000
$20010,000
so
rdN N I"+ fV N N
1_► 0_0 Cn 4':1 H H N'S Ir_7
r}1 r4 N N N ry'd N N NNy
■General Improvements Recycled Water
Solids ImprovemenU Please Zllti3 I Resters t FBI) Treatment Piant
Collection System
501"i
PRELIMINARY 'I0-YEAR CIP
8'121 OF IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED
(DELAYED DIGESTERS To 2028-2035)
Fr17eu F VIS FVIIr3l FYAM FMAJ RUM Frun4 FVW2 RIM Fri 7
2614 2019 26x6 2021 2u2 2623 2624 eon 2026 2x27
514.044.950 514.707,119 SS0.S027" WALLIN 546.141519 SS6.521212 551.63S.744 $27175.212 574,949.903 $37392.325
s Imp""w4nb1 FIu44 747 IDPn4n•FBrI 50 50 Sc 50 S0 50 50 50 SO S0
516.492,320 $17140026 S35.7S2.312 $37999.695 $39.439460 S36.7S9321 536193,113 $41,739.19S41.99S,174 S4S,n3.025
5460.000 5540.000 31209445 55,770.993 S5,774993 5125= S1,646.920 59099.010 $125.000 5125.000
54777.050 52.911,%5 53.455.776 SL943.276 $3.297,$00 54.172.500 51.797,500 SL791.500 SL797.$W S2.S7=
3.54400- 51.500000 52 01x140= 52.000.000 52.000.000 $10W.000 52,000.000 S2 O.W0 57,000.000 Stow.=
542,77;120 348931,272 512,931,191 Z%An,674 13i.M.S71 S91mul S9iri73.tal $was" SM937,377 S27.710"
(In 2016 Dollars)
[$120AW,000
$141,000,000
S30A=.0D0
i
$60AM4000
Sa0A11,000
SMIM1.000
S4 A -
.pi aw 1ptil e l H` NV
N N N
t_r 0�6 G :: eq en qq &A zir
N y�y rr yy N NN fyyV rw yN N
LL i4. LCL hi 1i LL iL 1i ti. LCL
Collection System Treatment Plant I
Soilds Irnprovements Phase 2&3 f Resters t FBI) Recycled Water i
■General hnprvvements
Revised 13
PRELIMINARY 5wYEAR CIP ($369n5M
FY17 18 FY18 19 FY19 20 FY20 21 FY21 22
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
rc atmtnt Plant $18,044,950 $18,707,219 $50,502,244 $48,611,109 $46,181,619
Solids Improvements Phase 2&3!Digesters+FBI) $0 $0 $0 $0 50
lectianSystem $18,492,120 $17,180,028 $35,752,312 $37,999,695 $39,439,860
ecycled Water $460,000 $540,000 $1,209,665 $5,770,993 $5,770,993
$4,277,050 $2,911,965 $3,455,778 $1,943,278 $3,297,500
$1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000 ODO
$42,774,120 540,839,212 $92,919,998 $96,325,074 596,689,971
$100010MO (in 2016 Dollars)
$80,000,000
560.000.000
$40.000,0a0
$0
N
f"
r-]Collection System Treatment Plant
Solids Improvements Phase 2&3(Digesters+FBI) Recycled Water
■General Improvements i
PRELIMINARY 2=YEAR CIP
F1171M M1119
2018 2014
Trpaftmment Pint $I8.0 $15.7 Similar to
Solids Improvements Phase 2&3{Di tern FBI) $0 $0 currently
0k,dion tem approved
Recycled Weter $0.5 $0.54 budget
$4.3 $Z.g
P Program Coming - - W $1S
IOdal�.°��r Fn�l.�-tltDre unt '�
(Rounded In rvl X016 Dollars
S60,000,000 =
Collection System
r?Treatment Plant
W,000,000 11111111IM W Recycled Water
■General tmprovements
20.000,000
S0
FY17/18 FY18/19
A,wLk
Revised 14
r
MAJOR PROJECTS RECOMMENDED IN
MASTER PLAN FOR NEXT 2 FISCAL YEARS
TREATMENT PLANT COLLECTION SYSTEM RECYCLED WATER
• Screenings Removal Sewer R n vati n ' Filter Plant Upgrade
• Pump&Blowerrp oiects:
Seismic Upgrade Pleasant Hill
• Piping Renovation Ph.2
Phase 9 • Walnut Creek GENERAL
• Solids Handling Ph.11 and 12
Improvements • Lafayette— IMPROVEMENTS
Headworks/Preair/ Ph.11 and 17 Asset Management
Primary Gates and • S,Orinda— Information
Concrete Renovation Ph.6 and 7 'tech nology
• UV Electrical • Martinez--Ph.5 Buildings
Improvements Pump Stations: Improvements
• Odor Control Moraga/Cross Roads, 'vehicles Replacement
Replacement Martinez,Fairview Equipment
Alternative Energy and and Maltby Replacement
BEoenergy Project
Evaluation
ITEM E
PROPOSED FY 17= 1 8 AND FY '18= 1 9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS
SIC
BY EDGAR J. LOPEZ, CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION MANAGER
Y•
Y
„
Revised 15
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET
FOR FY 2017-1 8 ANS 2018-1 9
Program Adopted FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18119
Budget
Collection System $17,925,105 $181492,000 $1711801000
Treatment Plant $13.125,000 $18,045,000 $18,707,000
General Improvements $3,808,651 $41277,000 $2,912,000
Recycled Water $5001000 $460,000 $540,000
CIB Contingency $114501000 $1,500,000 $195001000
Totals: $36,808,756 X42,7749000 $40,8399000
Carry forward from past FY's: $3,084,886
Amended Total Budget:1 39,893,642
FY 2017-1 8 COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM MAJOR
PROJECTS
Sewer Renovation:
(Approx. 7 Miles) h -
• Walnut Creek Phase 11 (9,700 ft.)
• Lafayette Phase 11 (8,500 ft.)
• Martinez Phase 5 (8,700 ft.) ,�--
• S. Orinda Phase 6 (8,500 ft.)
• Designs for WC, Orinda, Lafayette, and Pleasant Hill
• Urgent projects, Cured in Place Pipe and Pipebursting Contracts
(1,600 ft.)
New to the Program:
• Large Diameter & Forcemain Inspection, North Jackson
Contractual Assessment District(CAD), more sewer renovation
design
dim
Revised 16
FY 2017-1 8 COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM MAJOR
PROJECTS
Pumping Stations:
• Martinez, Fairview,
Maltby, Moraga, and �
Orinda Crossroads
Improvements Design � 1
s �
1
PROPOSED COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM PROJECT
BUDGETS
Projects FY 17118 FY 18/19
Walnut Creek Phase 11 $2,865,000 $0
Lafayette Phase 11 � $31100,000 I $0
Y
Martinez Phase 5 $312751000 $0
South Orinda Phase 6 $1,500,000 $2.150,000
Development Sewerage and CAD $1,400,000 $110001000
Pump Stations(Martinez, Fairview, Maltby.
Mora a&Crossroads, and Equipment)
$1,017,000 $1,946,000
Sewer Renovation Projects(12 total) $4,760,000 $111509,000
4 Planning projects $575,000 $575,000
Totals: $18,492,000 51791809000
Revised 17
FY 2017-18 TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
MAJOR PROJECTS
1
FY 2017-18 TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
NEW PROJECTS
~ Mechanical & Concrete
Renovations
Outfall Improvements Phase 7
� Treatment Plant Security
Improvements
o Odor Control Improvements
Plant Operations Building _
Improvements
Aeration and Energy Upgrades
Solids Conditioning Building Roof
Replacement
a Alternative BioEnergy Project
Revised 18
PROPOSED TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
PROJECT BUDGETS
Projects FY 17/18 FY 18119
Headworks Screening Upgrade � $5,720,000 $0
Pump and Blower Building Seismic ' $21358.000 $0
Piping Renovations Phase 9 $111751000 $2841000
Solids Handling Facility Improvements � $2,625,000 $8,200,00
Applied Research and Planning $900,000 $900,000
Projects
All other Infrastructure and
replacement projects $2,267,000 ! $142.000
Odor Control Improvements(New) $4501000 $118661000
All other New projects $2,550,000 $7,315,000
Totals: $18,0459000 $18,707,000
-.,AWL_
PROPOSED GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT
BUDGETS
Projects FY 17/18 FY 18/19
IT Masterplan Improvements $730,000 $8301000
Server Room Relocation $1,000,000 $2801000
Asset Management $9501000 $5001000
District Vehicle Replacement and New $8001000 $800,000
Equipment Program
Buildings(MPR,4737, and Others) $550,000 $3001000
All other projects(4 total) $247,000 $202,000
Totals: x49277,000 $22912,000
Revised 19
PROPOSED RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
PROJECT BUDGETS
Projects FY 17118 FY 18/19
Zone 1 Recycled Water $301000 $40,000
a
Filter Plant Upgrades $3301000 $500,000
Surge Analysis $100,000 I —$0
Totals: $4607000 $5409000 i
ITEm F
UPDATE ON RATE IMPACT SCENARIOS
AND RATE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES
By Danea Gemmell, Planning and Development
Division Manager
J.
Revised 20
F1
REVENUE AssuMPTIONS
k.
FINANCIAL FATE MODEL AssumPTIONS
Basis of Model Cost of Service Study Raftelis May 2015
Updated CSM Budget
• Based on current employee contracts per MCUs
Number of employees per latest Staffing Plan
i Retirement(CCCERA data)
Medical per current employee contract
Additional Annual payment of$2 5M for unfunded 11abiIity in the next ten years
One time payment from FY 15-16 net favorable variance of$3 359M used for unfunded liability in new Trust
Fund
Capital Budget:
• Yl.CPI
• Current 10-Yr CI P $413M for Baseline
i
Updated 10-Yr C I P $873M for based on CWM P
w Use Reserves Targets per Board Policy(revised for working capital)
• Debt Service Coverage included for Bonds
• Bonds assume 30-yr terns
Interest Rate 4 51x�first five years 5':.°thereafter
No double digit rate increases
No rate volatility over next ten years
Revised 21
BP=017 RESERVE POLICY
PROPOSED REVISION
• BP-o1 7 set Targets for each of the District's Reserve Funds..
1. O&M Fend Reserves:
- Working Capital Reserves Target: Five Months of Gross Operating Expense
at start of each FY.
2. sewer Construction Fund (Capital improvement) Reserves:
"'corking Capital Rpr-nLrves: 5011_ ^f art-,,jai Capital Budge+ n+�&+ rt of each l
Revision: to cover 50% cash (Pay-as-You-go) component of GIP annual
budget at start of each FY.
. zDeIr-insurance r una »e..
--Three times the annual deductiut: kuuijuimy bac at $0 5M) or $1.5M and $5M
in self insurance fund.
REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
VarianceFY 2017-18
FY 116-17 Projections f rorn '.
Budget •
Model) Budget
Operations and 1 1 $9214621784 $2,651,866 3.0%Maintenance
$89,8 0,9 8
Sewer 36,808,756 42 774 120 5p965,364 16.2%
Construction
Debt Service 3,790,807 31790,340 (467) 0.0%
Self-Insurance 948.000 995,400 471400 5.0%
Jotal Budget $131,358,481 $8,664,163����
Revised 22
l
F2
UPDATED SEINER SERVICE RATE
IMPACT SCENARIOS
I
i
4
d
k
J
CIP FUNDING SOURCES
�1,Qoo
r
$900 $873M $873M Ca.star Pr9stam
Tr"Utom Picot
$800 n Reevdod w.w
a Centl�nry
$700 .. o+►.,r.,d
o° 51x 463x. a c4a.cd,�""
�i $6
Revenue Sources
SSW
3% ■Par Go
$400 z%
3'K
5300
$200
$100
so
4-
10-Year Capital Program Revenue Sources
�10
Revised 23
CIB SCENARIOS
10=YR CFY 17=18 To FY 26=27
■ O: • t-Yr CIP Payment Methods Description of ■
Cost of FY 14 15 O&M Current Pay as you Go NOne Cost of Service Study Raftelis Financial
Service Study 10 yr CIP Method Consultants May 2015
(COS) ($413M)
Updated Updated O&M Current Pay as-you•G-- Nz;nim Updated COS using most recent O&M data
Bac Line Budget 10 yr CIP Methc.d
(COS) ($413M)
Scenario 1 Updated O&M New Pay as you Gc Nen(- Add CWMP additional$454M CIP,or a
Pay,G0 Budget 10-yr CIP Method total of$867M for new 10 yr and add$2 5
+$2.5M ($873M) M for ten years for pension liability
Scenario 2 Updated O&M New Pay-a3-you-Go $482M In Bonds in 3 Same as Scenario 1 but issue three bonds
Partial Bond Budget 10 yr CIP Method w/Partial issuance: and pay go methods to pay for new 10 yr
Funding +$2.5M ($873M) Bond Funding 1. FY18-19:$110M CIP and add$2 5 M for ten years for
(3 Bonds) 2. FY21-22:$178M pension liability
3- FY24-25:$194M
Scenario 2.1 Updated O&M New Pay as you Gu $S13M in Bonds in 4 Same as scenario 2 0 but issue 4 bonds
Partial Bond Budget 10 yr CIP Method w/Partial issuance: instead of 3
Funding +$2.5M ($873M) Bond Funding 1. FY18-19:$60M
(4 Bonds) 2- FY20-21:$100M
3. FYZZ-23:$1xSM
4- FY 24-25:$228M
SUMMARY OSCENARIOS
AnMW Rate Increases
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 14
1D-Year
PemFen ftling
ficanar ear ap
um ription 10 Yuahiuty 2417,18 201949 7019.20 ZM-21 21Mi 22 2022-23 2023+24 2024-ZS 2025.26 ZCZS;27 Rate and
Pmts TOW
nsi36oni 'li increase
dar Year 2015-16
enario used
Cost of or Rate Setting(June $28 � iZ6Zl $rl 527 $234 lx 53 $747
Service 415) I $4t2
Percentage Increase ISM 5,330€ 4.97X 3.3% 3�3% 3 5,4 7-5% 35% 3-57. 3-5X 48.571E
pdated January Data
nciuding Wages, $28 $29 $28 $21 $21 $22 $23 524L $3e $25 $748
Updated Basekine etirement&Medic am $ata
ates
Perrenraae Increase 5 oN 5.40X 5 00% 3.5 4.5%6 3.5 r. 3 51& 3 5.1k 3 59 1AX AMIN
Revised 24
SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS
"721Rate 1nctooses
L ! e S 6 7 I 3 Le
s�ettartesft"mod
If V-W CIO � .,.,t
Ip tkm 2R17-U sda -p:3.20 262st;i ?Q7.22 2OZI•23 M3�r 34244S MS•21 2026.27 ..
rior Year 2015-16
enario used
Cost of or Rate Setting 11une $28 $28 $28 $Zl $21 $22 $23 $24 $24 $25 $747
Service 0151
$413
I
_
Percentage Increase _ _ S57% 5 35% 4 97% 3 51L 354. 3 5- 35* 35%- 3 S% 35% 48.5%
'pdated January Data s
ncluding Wages, $28 $29 $28 $Zl $21 $22 $23 $Z4 $24 $25 $748
Updated Baseline etirement&Medical
ate$
$413
Percents a Increase 5.60% 5 40� 5 00NI 35N 15% 35% 3.5% 3.55 35N 3.5% 40.7%
pdated data,$873 j
10 MP,add pension
Pay Go ayment5 $95 $113 $134 $160 $35 $36 $38 $39 S44 S42 $1,236
$E73 � $2.5
Percentage Increase J8 9,, ll 9-. 129.1 lag" 354 351. 3.5'• 3 3%� 3 5'f 354 145#*w
I
SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS
An�wl Iia1e tntreeses
z s • s 6 7 1 e ly
ssswwie >�wraw, .w...i
uw.rv► rw►a �,1r
2477•®I to i6 1+•40 3ar�•,}; uqz 299.-I "Z:t24 AZ41 5 MS-Ps I112447 �--
fe►Year 2015-16 Scenario
ed
5e r+rke
cost r Rate Setting(lune 2015) $22 $22 57s $21 $21 $22 $23 114 $r4 SI5 $743'
$419
Pff"ente1w Increase 5.5771 535% 4AN 3.5� 3.374 3.514 35.4 15,% 35% 3154 48 5!i
pdated January Data
ncluding Wages,
Updated Baseline
etirementi Medical Rater $22 $29 $24 $21 $21 $22 $23 $24 $24 $25 $742
$413
Prrcent a Increase 5.5074 S40% 5.006 3.5!s 3.5% is,, 3.5'- 3.5% 3.3%. 3.5m 4&IX
pdated data,$873 CWMR, _
1.D odd pension payments $95 $113 $134 $160 535 53® $31 $39 $40 $42 51,236
Pay-Go $873 $25
Pertenta 0fterr" 18 f% 1/.3'74 18.971 7l Sm 3.5,, 3.5% 3.S"4. 33, 3.54 3.519 145.1%
pdated data,$173 CWMP.
dd pension payments
2.0 Partial Deist Funding from
Partial Bend Issuance eremher workshop $38 $41 S44 5 44 $40 $43 $45 $44 S51 S54 $956
(3 Bends( $4?3 6"
Percentage.iacrease 7.674 76% 71r.%i 7 F54 6.0% 6.0% 6.074 6.071 6.0% 6.07E sal+:
Debt Issue mi�bns,! $170 5178 .5194 �
Revised 25
SUMMARY OSCENARIOS
Anrwal Rate Increases
1 3 + 5 a 7 a e u
Isom
A1111111110110.4 rew
ft-Am Wbbw art a.a
1p 2Q N31 i l 2til-A 2+23.24 20.2445 2125-2) Idt6-27 w....
riot Year 2015-16 Scenario
sed
Coit of r Rate Setting(June x015) $29 $23 $28 $21 $23 623 $12 $24 $24 S25 $747
Service $413
Perctnta elncrease 5 5771 5.35'1 40% 3.5% Asu J-Ju 3.59 7 SN is" 35,1 435.,
pdated January Data
Updated Baisl ine lartial
clud n8 Wages.
etlrement A Medkal Rates $28 $29 $23 $21 S21 $32 $23 S24 $24 $L $,'41$413
Percents r Increase 5.60% 340% 5.006 3.S% 3 5!f 9$% 3 s% 3s% 3 SN 3 5'•F 49 N
pdated data,$873 CWMP,
1.0 dd pension payments $93 $213 $134 $1" 635 S#8 $33 $39 $40 $42 51,23E
Pay-Go $673 oil Pmenta a Increase Is 9+4 lit 9% 189% is 97i 3.5!41 J 33'.. 3-S-,, 3.5.% 3.s%� I45 FN
pdated data,$373 CWMP. -
dd pension payments
2.0 Debt Funding from
Partial Band Issuance Yovember workshop Sag $41 Sao ,48 $40 $;3 $4S $ff SS] $54 $956
13 Bands) $E73 Sit.b
Percentage Increase 79% 76', 7ISfa 71sV i9,.0% 6.071 6.0% 6-09 6.6% aft 90.17
Debt Issue rMINIOR4 $120 5171 $134 $482
pdated data,$973 CWMP,
21 dd pension payments,
Partial Bond Issuance [educe O&M spending
t4 Bonds ardal Debt Funding(inMal
yearbend) $13 $33 $40 $43 54D $42 544 $47 $50 $53 $935
$973 82$
Percentage Increase ?am 70% 709 70%, f.09 6.07E 60% sox 6.119 6.09 l5 9'�
Debt Issue r"11111crisy 560 5100 S125 S228 13
SEVER SERVICE [LARGE RATES
FOR 27 BAY AREA AGENCIES
2016-11 AVR per SSC p lus
SSC= Rano Connection AVR
Santa Rosa 51239 27 SL239
Petaluma $1.119 26 51119
Rodeo Sant District 5962 _ _25 566 S1028__
Berk ele EBMUD for treatment) SON 24 $82p
Crockett Community Services Distr ct $743 23 5212 5945
Richmond $722 22 _ S723
Daidand I f i UD for treatments 5717 21 5717
Benicia 5678 20 $678
Brentwood 5"3 19 S6fi3
Ironhouse Sanitaty District 5636 IS S13 $671
20I6.27Meen Rate cy 5 $606 515M ;
sen eaf F!207�n AstehrcneateJUL
Novato Sanita-li District 5573 17 $64 5637
Nib.p a Sanitation District S555 16 S555
Mountain View Sanitary District SS" 15 S27 5573
Livermore $50 14 _ =5540
CenftW Son PrWesed FY2027--18 Rate Wrease174 Lqu 61113 _
Pittsbu-j IDDSD for treatment) 5530 13 _ S22 5452
Stele SDI EBMUD for treatment- S521 12 S24 5545
Valle o 5320 I i 5520
t'ew2r*fSen $503 10 $73 S576
Concord CCCSD for treatment) 5302 9 5502
P easw"n $464 8 — 54"
Ansi DDSD for treat ment-i SW 7 528 $SID
Posr t'DDSD for treal menti $473 6 S67 SSQ
WeWes�nrt Wastewat er District S468 5 S24 $492
Fairf lei d Sul sun San tart'District $436 ,s $436
Dublin%an Ramon Senrces District 5382 3 S18 S4D0
Union Saiita Dist dtt _ 5380 2 $380
[Oro Lama SLn tary,Disgrict 5221 lowest $221
Its Annaaa Sewer SeMcaChargeperMrgit Farm)yIlar,sdern.s atsrat
Revised 26
F3
UPDATED RECYCLED WATER RATE
IMPACT SCENARIOS
,z
Y
i
FY 2016=17 RECYCLED WATER
REVENUE AND ExPENSES
•- ■ '�
CCCSD Plant Industrial Use $0 $467,255 $219,885 $687,139 $687,139 $0
Zane 1 $496.345 $0 $291,147($158,830) $628,662 $909,834 ($281,173)
Residential Fill $0 $326,083 $153,451 $479,534 $479,534 $0
Satellite 2 4.575 $1 $-0 $234,575 234.575 LO
Total $730,920 $793,337 $664,482($158,830)$2,029,909$2,311,08Z ($281,173)
FY rAdopted
Zone-1,Former Potable 53.48per1000j_allons
Zane 1 Former Canal:Wel$1.61pt r 1000 p-aons_ �-
Revised 27
i
FY 2017'=18 EC C LEC WATER RATE SCENARIOS
Annwl Rat.l:>creases
AD mm�.
lOYear
StMaele Fa�ln4 �
2 17 2 •U Zt# �U 20 f-7� 021•21 ZOZl-23 MU.23 2OU-24 M24-23 HHS-26 2 NIZ7 rtW
one 1-Former Potable
$/1.000 sammsy $343 $354 $369 $3.40 $392 $4.01 $4 U $422 $441 $454 $4.62
Perrsntog@ Increase 30% 3.0% 3 0% 3.0% 30%. 31% 30% 3.11% 3.0% 3 Oa* 34.416
31%CPI Adjustment
one 1 Rate-Format
anal/Well[5/1,0001alm"I U.s1 S166 $171 $1]'s $51,1 54.01) gig? #1.f2 $1.04 $210 52.1E
PerrentoRelrrrrrase 3 L-,- 3&L 3 v, _ 3 d■: i 3t1� 3.0% SON 3.VM 3.09 3 o% NAM
FY 2017=18 RWATER RATE SCENARIOS
A-Mal Rats inersases
7n.Ysar
6s.swa►;e Endb2
2016+17 2217• 1011+19 1013--M 2020-U 129.1.22 2021.23 2CM24 2112445 202:5-06 2=q7 76W
Ems 1-Farmer Potable
S/1,000 plans) $343 $351 $3.69 $310 $3.92 $4.03 $4.16 $4.23 $4.41 54.54 $4.62
Percentage Increase 3.0% 3.0x 3.0% 3.01A 3.0% 1.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 30% 344%
3L CPl Adjustment
one 1 Rate-Former
anal/W*H($/1.0002allans) $161 $166 $1-71 $176 $1.21 $1.37 51.92 51.92 52.04 $210 52.16
Prrcerta a Increase 3 am 309 3.07E 3 079 3.07 3.019 3.09 3.0% 30% 3 0% 344%
rm
1-Foer Potable
$/1,200 Plsasj $342 S3 51 $3.69 $3.10 $392 '$4.03 $416 $4.21 $4.41 $454 $4.64
Mach Some Rats in Ton hmentagelncrmse 3.0% 3.0% 3.8% 3.0%, 39% 3.o% 30% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 34.4%
Years one 1 Rate-Former
anal/Well RS/1,000canons) $161 SL79 $191 $2.20 $2.44 $2.71 $3.01 $3.34 $371 $412 $4.57
Percentage Increase 11 0% 11.0% 11 a% 11.0% 110% II.079 UM 1I ON U09 1109 1/3.979
Revised 28
FY 2017= 1 8 RECYCLED WATER FATE SCENARIOS
Annual Rain Inmates
se Veer
ss enarb C+�b+2
2016.17 2017.12 2013-19 2913-20 ZWO-21 ZDZI,Z2 m2I.23 I]-]A 201&25 WZ5-IL 7Q6.27 YEW
Zone 1-Former Potable
$/1,000 soleus) $342 $3.52 S369 $390 S3 NI $4 a 3 $416 $423 $4.41 $4.54 $4.69
Percentage Increase 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 3.0% 3 01,� 3 D_N 3.0% 3.0% 344%
3-,CPI Adjustment
one 1 Rate-Former
anal/Well($/1,000 Salons) $1.01 $l fa $1.71 $176 $1.81 $l V 51 2 $191 $214 $I 10 S216
Percentage increase 3 r- J 0% 3.0% 3 0lk. J V4 30% _ 3.San: 3 UN 3014 3 V, 3446.
one 1-Former Potable
$/1,000 talons) $343 $3.51 $369 $390 $392 $4.03 $416 $4-23 $441 $4.54 $4.61
Reach Same Rate in Ten hrcentagelncrease 30% 30% 30% 30% 3.4% 311% 3 r.9 30% 3.0% 30% 344%
Years one!Rate Farmer
anal/Well 1$/1,000Salons) $161 $1 79 $298 $220 $244 $2.71 53.01 $334 $371 $412 $4.57
hrceRtale Increase I!.M* 110% I11K 11.04 I1.&N II a% III" II am 11.0m 1109 jai 9.%
one 1-Former Potable
$/1,000 talons) $3 U $351 $369 53.20 $3 92 $4 a3 $416 $4 I9 $4.41 $4S4 $4.63
Match CCWD Increase for Percentage Increase 3.0% 3.0,s 30% 30% 3 0ti 3 ar%% 3.0% 30% 3.0% 10-� 34.4
Former Canal/Wif I one 1 Rata-Farmer
anal/Well($/1,000 plans) $161 $171 $111 $192 $203 $7 15 $2 to $242 $7 57 $272 $2.38
hrcentagelncrease 6.071 6.09 6 ON 60% 61ti 6.0% 6.0% 60% 6.09 6.07E 79!sr
FY 2017=1 8 RECYCLED WATER RATE SCENA.RIOS
Mewl Rate lexrraees
1tl,Yrar
ra 2016.17 U17,111 JfiW12 20MR1 M1,41 20UIR 20i2-I3 2923;24 2024+5 2025.26 TON-7 l
+m 1-Former Poti6le
S/1,000 talions) $343 $3.52 $369 $3 20 $3.92 $4.03 $416 $4.23 $4.41 $4.54 $4.63
PPercentagelncrease 30% 30% 3.0% 3.0% 30% 3.0% 30% 3.0% 3 0% 30% 344%
3%-,CPI Adjustment
one 1 Rate-Former
anal/Well($/1,000tatlansl $1.61 51.66 $171 $176 5111 SL87 $192 $1.93 $2.04 52 10 $L16
PerconfaV eIncrease 3 am 30% 3.0% 309 309 3.09 30% 3.0% jam Jam 344%
one i-Former Potable
$/1,000 plane) $348 $352 $3.69 $310 $392 $4.03 '$4.16 $4.23 $441 $454 $4.62
Reach Same Rate in Ton hrrenlogeltxreose 3.0% 3.0% 30% 3.0% 3.0% 3111% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 34.41%
Years
ne 1 Rate Former
anal/Wall 1$/1,000 plans) $161 $179 51.91 SL20 $244 $7.71 $3.01 $334 $371 $412 $4.57
Percents elmmase ILIUM M 0% II.O% 1J.0% 11.0% 1109 11 09 110% I10% 1109 I839'
1-farmer Portable
$/1.000 plans) $3 46 $352 $399 33.20 $392 $403 $416 $4 23 54.41 $454 $4.66
Match CCWD Increase for Percentogelncreow 3.0% 30% 30% 3.0% 30% Lim 30% 3D% 3.0% 3.0% 34.4%
Former Canal/Well ane i Rate•Farmer
anal/Well($/1,000 Salons) $161 $171 $1 21 $L97 $7.03 $LIS $2 Z9 $2 42 $2.57 $2.72 $2.38
Perrenta a Incrrose A.N 6.07E 6.0% 609 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.09 6.09 6.09 79.111
Ewm 1-Fenner Potable --
M1100 talons) $3.43 53.52 '$369 $310 S392 $4.03 $416 $422 $441 $4.54 $4.63
Match Central San Increase Percentagehrc"M 3.0+► 3A+L 3.0% 3." 33196 3&e L 31% 3 0% 3111% 30% 34.4%
for Former Canal/Well
af■1 Rate-Former
nal/Wel(5/1,000 plans) +31.01 $172 $114 $197 $211 51.26 $2 42 $2.59 $277 52% $3.17
Percentog a Increose U% 70% 7 aw 709 7 0% 70% 70% 70% 70% 7 094 .96.77E
I�
W7=
Revised 29
F4
UPDATED RATE
IMPLEMENTATION 'SCHEDULE
06
2017 RATE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Board of Directors- Rate Scenario Assumptions Nov. 10,2016
Board of Directors -Revenue Requirements Jan. 26, 2017
Board of Directors-Follow Up Rate Discussion Feb. 2, 2017
Board of Directors-Set Maximum Rate to Publish Feb. 16,2017
Proposition 218 Notice Mailed March 6, 2017
Board of Directors Public Hearing April 20,2017
• Sewer Service and Recycled Water
Board of Directors Public Hearing June 1, 2017
• Adopt O&M and Capital Budgets
• Adopt Development Fees&Charges
FY 2017-18 Sewer Rates Effective July 1, 2017
Board of Directors—Sewer Service on Property Tax July 20,2017
Sewer Charges Submitted to County Assessor Aug. 10,2017
Revised 30
SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS FOR.. 5 YR. RATE INCREASES
T Aenllei RaM i�tresses
1 2 3 4 S
S+Yeu
£ttd{n;
Penson Rate and
scwmia 10 Year Cita Lability Pints. Tow
ID jmnronsrmK11onsj_ 2017.12 2013.14 2019.20 2020.21 202.1-22 %increase
Prior Year 2015-16 Scenario used
Cost of or Rate Setting 1iw1e 24151 $29 $28 $39 $21 SII $629
Service
Percentage Increase 3 SN 5 35'4 417 3 Sib 3 5't i 2511,
Updated Baseline1pdated January Data Including
ages Retirement 14 Medical Rates $23 525 523 $21 $2.1 Sa34
$413
Perrentoot Increase 3 60'�- S 40�s S.M'st 3.3N 3.5 25 i
pdated data,5973 CWMP,add
L r} pe vision payments 54S $113 $134 $160 515 $1.444
Rate $873 $25
Percentage Increase Il BN is 9k 189% is 9+. 3!* I06 9'+
pdated data,$373 CWMP,add
nom payments
2.0 artial Debt Funding from November
Partial Bond Issuance workshop $33 $41 44 f 4A $40 $715
(3 Bands) $373 f7 s
Perren loge Increase 76+d 76% 6 a'+ 42194
Debt Issue fmifiWsJ S11 a $171 USE
I
dated data,$373 CWMP,add
21 ensign payments.reduce O&M
Partial Band Issuance pending
(4 Bondsl artial Debt Fund ng(initial 2 year
nd) $35 $33 544 $43 $44
$373 $z s
Percentage Increase 7 oe. 70's 7 amn 7 Vas i&b 38 9%
Debtlssue mlJUams 560 5100 S1ia
t
BENEFITS of A Two YEAR RATE
• Flexibility to address any recommendations after capacity fee
study and mixed use sewer service rate structure
Additional time to outreach with ratepayers on proposed future
increases
Demonstrate ability to deliver increased capital budget program
Ability to phase in higher capital reimbursement from Concord
Time for Board to Adopt a Debt Policy
AnIQ 1
Revised 31
i
F5
OUTREACH PLAN
ti
�s
k.
s
t
Two RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER WORKSHOPS SCHEDULED FOR
OUTREACH
fri-valley Area Area
Wednesday,February 8,7017 Wednesday,February 15,2017
I6:30pm to 8:30pm 6:30pm to 8:30pm
k
°Danville Veteran's Memorial Building ❑rinda Community Center
400 Hartz Avenue,Danville 28 Orinda Way,Qrinda
` .OIL,
Revised 32
QUESTIONS OR FEEDBACK?
- 1
RECOMMEND BOARD ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING:
A. Accelerate the public rate hearing on the annual Sewer
Service Charge and Recycled Water Charge to April 20,
2017
B. Allow the use of Bonds for financing large (less frequent
and non-recurring) infrastructure projects for purposes of
preparing budget and rate scenarios
C. Establish whether the rate schedule will be for one year,
two years, or a longer period
D. For the purposes of preparing Proposition 218 Notice,
select preferred rate scenario for:
1) Sewer Service Rate Scenario (scenario 1.0, 2.0, or 2.1); and
2) Recycled Water Charge
AWL.]
Revised 33