Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREAL ESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING MINUTES 12-13-16 8 .d . l )a) o Central Contra Costa Sanitary District SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS: SANITARY DISTRICT TAD J.PILECKI President REAL ESTATE, ENVIRONMENTAL PAULH CAUSEY &PLANNING COMMITTEE President Pro Tem MICHAEL R.MCGILL JAMES A.NEJEDLY M I A��1 l 1 V 1 T E S DAVID R.WILLIAMS �V� PHONE: (925)228-9500 Tuesday, December 13, 2016 FAY: (925)372-0192 3.00 p.m. www.centralsan.org 2nd Floor Conference Room 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, California Committee: Chair Mike McGill Member Jim Nejedly Guests: Joe Scott, President/CEO of CORSolutions (left after Item 3.) Armando Sincalir of CORSolutions (left after Item 3.) Sean Tully, Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development (left after Item 3.) Staff.• General Manager Roger S. Bailey Director of Finance and Administration Phil Leiber (arrived during Item 3.) Director of Engineering and Technical Services Jean-Marc Petit Communication Services & Intergovernmental Relations Manager Emily Barnett Planning & Development Services Division Manager Danea Gemmell Program Manager Melody LaBella Environmental and Regulatory Compliance Division Manager Lori Schectel Senior Engineer Dan Frost Senior Right-of-Way Agent Rick Hernandez (left after Item 3.) Senior Right-of-Way Agent David Kramer (left after Item 3.) Senior Administrative Technician Cindy Granzella 1. Call Meeting to Order Chair McGill called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. 2. Public Comments None. Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 2 3.* Review CORSolutions' organic recycling proposal for Central San Buffer Land Ms. Gemmell introduced the item, and explained that this is a preliminary look at the proposal, as staff and CORSolutions have not yet inquired about permits. Mr. Scott presented the information included in the agenda materials, explaining that his proposal is to lease Central San buffer land for a transfer station that would obtain repurposed organic recycling materials via truck that would be in turn distributed via rail or barge. He also distributed two additional handouts, which are attached. He explained that certain products, such as soil, concrete and asphalt, could be repurposed if there was a means to distribute the product to the users (developers). Often, trucking expenses are very high, and there are also locations that are being developed that trucks cannot reach. Mr. Scott stated that the Interstate 680 corridor along Highway 4 is a prime location as a transportation hub. Mr. Tully explained that the current proposed site is zoned public/semi-public, which would not allow for use by private commercial business, unless there is a finding for public benefit. Other sites may be more compatible. Member Nejedly said he would be open to the idea, but the proposal is still in the early stages. Chair McGill agreed, saying that he is in support of opportunities to generate revenue from the buffer land, and he is in favor of environmentally focused projects. He suggested that Mr. Scott return with a simplified and more defined proposal. COMMITTEE ACTION: Discussed and provided input to staff. 4.* Discussion on concept of gasification Mr. Bailey introduced the item, stating that the Board will soon have to decide on how to move forward with the treatment plant solids handling process. The gasification process could potentially provide an option for energy recovery from processing the solids. Member Nejedly stated that he will be traveling out of state for his work at Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery to tour a facility using this process and will report back with his findings at a future meeting. Ms. LaBella presented information on the concept of gasification and the project drivers and benefits at Delta Diablo (attached). She also explained how this process might benefit Central San, and what the next steps would be. Mr. Petit stated that he would like to run a pilot sooner than later. He would like to begin preparing two Request for Proposals (RFPs) and an implementation plan. The first RFP would be to hire a consultant to assist Central San in defining the project and the second would be to prepare an RFP for the implementation of a gasification project which would Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Minutes December 13, 2016 Page 3 likely follow a Private Public Partnership (P3) model. Chair McGill said he was supportive of preparing an RFP, and Member Nejedly agreed. COMMITTEE ACTION: Discussed and provided input to staff. 5. Receive update on current Resource Recovery projects Ms. LaBella stated that Item 4 was part of her update on the projects she is currently working on. In addition, she is following up on Central San's Wholesale Recycled Water Opportunities Study recommendations, specifically refineries, Indirect Potable Reuse/Direct Potable Reuse (IPR/DPR)projects, and recycled water for agricultural use. She is also continuing her work with the Diablo Country Club (DCC) Satellite Water Recycling Facility(SWRF), and providing site support for the Recycled Water Program. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update. 6. Update/debrief on meetings of Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA) Ms. Schectel referred to the discussion at the last Committee meeting regarding Rule 11-18, which is proposed to reduce air toxic emissions from existing facilities. She explained that the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) recently held a hearing where she commented that Central San supports the intent of the rule, but not how it is currently written and identified three key issues (timing, scope and cost). Another BAAQMD hearing will be held after the first of the year and she will continue to track rulemaking developments Ms. Schecte/also noted that a white paper is being developed on nutrients, stating a draft is expected to be available in 2017. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the update. 7. Announcements a. Future scheduled meetings: 2017 meetings - to be determined. COMMITTEE ACTION: Received the announcements. 8. Suggestions for future agenda items None. 9. Adjournment— at 4:24 p.m. * Attachment Item 3. (Committee Handout) THE UnDE GROUP Cryogenic Grinding. Fine-Particle Pulverization with Nitrogen or Carbon Dioxide. Before After Plastic,elastic,and heat-sensitive materials have properties that make fine grinding quite difficult,which can create additional process and performance difficulties.with cryogenic size reduction, Linde offers a process which economically pulverizes many different materials with low-temperature gases.This process can provide benefits such as reduced energy costs and increased production rates. Cryogenic gases provide flexibility across a wide range of grinding temperatures.For example,carbon dioxide is traditionally used for cooling in the spice industry. The process usually utilizes fine impact mills,although other types of milling systems can also be applied. Linde has decades of experience in the application of cryogenic grinding in customers'facilities. This expertise includes the selection,implementation,and optimization of suitable cryogenic grinding processes. ............................. .. .. ..................... ........ ..................._._...._.............................. _.._......._............................................... Advantages Increased productivity through optimized particle-size and increased throughput Elimination of caking product within the mill Decreased wear on grinding equipment Improved pouring properties due to finely ground material Increased protection from fire and product oxidation due to inert milling atmosphere Separation of composite materials within the mill ............ _..............................................._................................................................................................................................................-.................. Numerous application Fine-particle size reduction for thermoplastics and elastomers possibilities The aroma from spices as well as heat-sensitive fats are preserved by utilizing low-temperature gases,which mitigate the effects from heat degradation Oxidizable materials,e.g.fine metal powder,are best protected in an inert gas atmosphere The treatment of production residues guarantees high product quality as well as the separation of individual components by recycling the composite ... .......................................................................................................................................................... _...._..._..._._ ....................._......................................_.........._...... Linde offers a full service 7 Consultation on technical application Experimentation and testing within laboratory and production mills Adaptation of present grinding systems for use in controlled temperature grinding Profitability analysis Applications for cryogenic grinding include rubber, plastic,metal,composites, spices, pharmaceuticals,waxes, or other materials. -� Cryogenic Grinding. 2 of 2 Process example Cryogenic grinding of spices is a method of pulverizing the material at low temperatures. Traditional grinding for grinding spices processes generate heat that can degrade or reduce the volatility of a spice's heat sensitive constituents such as aroma and flavor. The spices are frozen with cryogen such as liquid nitrogen(LIN/N2)or carbon dioxide(CO2)as they are ground into a fine powder. This process preserves the quality of aroma and flavor within the product without damaging or altering the chemical composition of the spices. Spices are fed through a hopper to a conveyor system. While moving along the conveyor,the spices are sprayed with the appropriate amount of cryogen.The material is then moved to a stainless steel auger that transports, grinds,and mixes the product and cryogen for an efficient cooling process.The cryogen absorbs the heat and is vaporized to a gaseous state,which is then expelled from the system through an exhaust system. The results are high quality spices at controlled partial sizes with no evaporation of essential values and negligible loss of volatile components. Cryogenic grinding data (e.g. pepper) Particle Size 700 pm Production Rate 1654 Ib/h Nitrogen Consumption 0.25 Ib/Ib pepper Driving Power 35 kW(47 hp) Process example for A dosing wheel meters the plastic pellets,e.g.polyethylene or polyamide,into the mill.The grinding heat would grinding thermoplastics normally melt the thermoplastics,preventing the possibility of fine-particle grinding.However,cryogenic gases prevent this by embrittling the material in a cooling conveying screw.The cryogenically ground plastic and the gas are collected in a bin.The pulverized product is then further processed through a cellular wheel sluice. The mill gas is purified with a filter and is released.The remaining gas is recycled back into the mill for heat integration. The results are finely ground thermoplastics that maintain the quality of the processing equipment by preventing melted material from impeding the system. Cryogenic grinding data (e.g. polyamide) Particle Size 80 prn Production Rate 772 Ib/h Nitrogen Consumption 1.25 Ib/Ib polyamide Driving Power 21 kW(28 hp) Metering device Dosing wheel Val Gas regulator 1 1 t Blower ❑ Cooling screw t Fine impact ® Filter mill Cryogenic gas supply Cell wheel 1 Ground product Linde North America,Inc. 575 Mountain Ave.,Murray Hill, NJ 07974 USA Phone+1.800.755-9277,sales.lg.us@linde.com,www.lindeus.com Linde North America Inc.is a member of The Linde Group.Linde is a trading name used by companies within the Linde Group.The Linde logo is a trademark of The Linde Group.0 The Linde Group 2013. Item 3. (Committee Handout) 000 • - ����.ia��Ushi 0/ k x eO F� Item 4. (Committee Handout) GASIFICATION CONCEPT y Melody LaBella, P.E. Resource Recovery Program Manager Real Estate, Environmental & Planning Committee Meeting December 13, 2016 Ddh Aabb andM[AnbtoRaourre Recareryprcpwa a ihnteBhpnnnwrhlp ro dwe[xood w[hJton Iardfr/b nMlorcongwrnngf nWss nudcw:uur Yr and dosdNt Po wlruWe dwn enwyy m:dJm'ribms ueliaug grx�mnon Po produce rwaxnbtr shmicry,blxhnr,omd rxlrPoa rHwrguafia:regas faoPynw. WHY GASIFRC MON' PROCESSEMW • �tee[�.m'o eeh:Bm Amt.4n :,9 QnShR>f and Air AAa Ag mI d, Ckm n S-kndexds • FliFhly do ieut With Deer W. cometnou ofvohuk matmN • Produce b-Lh .a&gh- ce[bmraluc-added sod ameedmew • ,—pp-AD mmereygpoum'e tiny lu -AD 111-14z.e high-ee p tntr<omem ie 'b k Delta Diablo J Energy 1 PROJECT DRIVERS — DELTA DIABLO • Diversification of biosolids disposal • Reduced volume of biosolids requiring long-distance hauling to Solano/Merced Counties • Reduced liability associated with the uncertainty of land application PROJECT BENEFITS — DELTA DIABLO • Securing reliable, nearby disposal for a portion of their biosolids • Community partner • Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (reduced truck traffic) • Production of renewable energy • Potential (minor) revenue source associated with biochar 2 HOW GASIFICATION FITS IN AT DELTA DIABLO -WOODEAST COUPTrYBIOENERGYPROJEcr FOODIPJASTE/8105OLIDS TO ENERGY Vit;.Duhl.Rcrn 11- MM .,m Delta .,.. d12bl4Y AddMftk Anaerobic Digesters �yya` A L� MSW t IWer Ar ion) - , Gasification �°Aa Biasollds 'f e I, � Bio 011 sGb Pyrolysis Aenewabh[lettrldry .iochar ioc u 1 PROJECT DRIVERS — CENTRAL SAN • Single solids handling method • Little flexibility or redundancy • Permitted capacity of multiple hearth furnaces • Growing regulatory pressures on air emissions • High anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint due to CoGen • Declining landfill gas supply 3 PROJECT BENEFITS - CENTRAL SAN • Onsite source of renewable energy • Would allow elimination of Cogen • Dramatically reduce natural gas purchases • Dramatically reduce anthropogenic GHGs • Would eliminate potential for exceeding current threshold for participation in Cap & Trade Program for GHGs • Diversify solids handling • Reduce loading on the furnaces HOW GASIFICATION FITS IN AT CENTRAL SAN Wood Waste Gasification y 9 3 [{n NULTIPLEHEARTH INCINERATION Renewahle Electricity Oiochar LOGE%EA0.TION 4 HOW CENTRAL SAN'S STEAM DEMAND IS CURRENTLY MET Waste Heat Boilers Co-generation 41°ia 43% Auxiliary Boilers 16% WHAT'S NEXT? • Continue meeting with Delta Diablo • Draft RFP for solicitation? Implementation Plan & develop RFP • CEQA • Truck traffic • Jurisdiction • Access • Title V (BAAQMD Air Permit) 5 QUESTIONS? 6