HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD MINUTES 11-10-16AC SD
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Nob
YEARS
5079 Imhoff Mau, MGartiliez CA 914553-43'72 N'Y °i,�
Ptotocting health cued 1/u. [.nvironment
MINUTES'
SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
Thursday, November 10, 2016
8:00 a.m. - Board Workshop
Multi -Purpose Room
Qpen Session — Multi -Purpose Room
(Video recorded)
1 ROLL CALL
2016
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TAD J PILECKI
Pres lclr.,:
PAUL H CAUSEY
President Pro Te,i
%!ICH %EL R MCGILL
JA;%IES -1 NEJEDL}
DAVID R WILLI.1,1/5
A special meeting of the Board of Directors was called to order by President Pilecki
at 5:00 a.m. in the Multi -Purpose Room. Secretary of the District Elaine Boehme
called roll:
PRESENT: Members: Causey, McGill (left after Item 5.F.4), Nejedly (left after
item 5. E.), Williams, Pilecki
ABSENT: Members: None
2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
No comments.
3 REQUESTS TO CONSIDER MATTERS OUT OF ORDER
President Pilecki stated that Items D and G would be heard at the end of the
meeting.
4. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. General Manager Roger S. Bailey announced that the District will host a
Business Customer Workshop on November 16, 2016 at the Pleasant Hill
Community Center Perera Pavilion Room from 5:30 to 10:00 a.m. The
informative workshop is for business customers and will include a
presentation on the District's financial outlook, current and future
infrastructure improvements, and the vision for meeting future needs of
customers. Approximately 2000 letters were sent to the District's property
managers and business customers inviting them to attend.
These summary minutes are supplemented by a corresponding video recording available on the District's
website at centralsan. org.
Book 65 — Page 72
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 73
5 BOARD WORKSHOP - Financial Update and Potential Rate Impacts from
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan (CWMP)
Outside Consultants Present for the Workshop:
Bartel Associates, LLC: John Bartel
Carollo Engineers, Inc: Mike Britten
CH2M: Summer Bundy
Katz & Associates: Emily Powell
PFM Asset Management LLC: Lauren Brant and Ellen Clark
PFM Financial Advisors LLC: Sarah Hollenbeck and Nicholas Jones, Sr.
Raftelis Financial Consultants: Sudhir Pardiwala
A. Introduction
Mr. Bailey explained that the workshop was intended to address a number
of policy -related issues that the Board has asked staff to agendize for
discussion. One such item was how to apportion the $2.5 million budgeted
this fiscal year for unfunded liabilities. Another was to discuss options for
utilizing the extra reserve fund balances at the end of Fiscal Year (FY)
2015-16.
Mr. Bailey also said staff would be presenting various financial viability and
rate scenarios, including assumptions used in each scenario, to begin the
dialogue on future rates and to obtain direction from the Board.
Finally, if time permits, he said staff will facilitate discussions regarding:
1) Budgeting and tracking options for the Recycled Water Program, and
specifically whether the Board desires to set up a separate enterprise
fund; and
2) The merits of a two-year versus a one-year budget.
B. Status of Fiscal Year -End 2015-16 Extra Reserve Fund Balance
Finance Manager Thea Vassallo reviewed Item B of the presentation included
with the agenda materials on the status of the fiscal year-end 2015-16 extra
reserve fund balance, during which it was noted that the District has $3.359
million extra year-end reserve fund balance that may be used for other
purposes.
BOARD ACTION: Received the presentation.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 74
C. Review Financial Scenarios for use of the funds toward unfunded liabilities
Available for Questions:
John Bartel, President of Bartel Associates, LLC
Ms. Vassallo reviewed the financial scenarios for use of funds toward
unfunded liabilities.
Lauren Brant, Managing Director of PFM Asset Management LLC, noted that
she and her associate, Ellen Clark, Senior Managing Consultant of PFM
Asset Management LLC, have been consulting with the District with respect
to asset management issues. Her associates from PFM Financial Advisors
LLC, Sarah Hollenbeck (Managing Director) and Nicholas Jones (Senior
Managing Consultant) have been consulting with regard to debt management
issues.
Ms. Brant, Ms. Clark and Ms. Hollenbeck reviewed Item C of the presentation
included with the agenda materials on the options for optimizing allocation of
the $2.5 million budgeted in the current year operations and maintenance
(O&M) budget toward unfunded liabilities and the $3.359 million unrestricted
extra reserve funds remaining at the end of FY 2015-16.
Their recommendation was to allocate all currently available dollars toward
reducing the District's pension unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities (UAAL)
and the unfunded liabilities associated with the District's existing Other Post -
Employment Benefits (OPEB) Trust. Specifically, PFM recommended that
the entire $2.5 million be allocated to the existing OPEB Trust, reducing the
amortization period from 22 to 18 years, which will generate long-term cash
savings (an estimated $15.4 million) and increase the funding status.
PFM also recommended that the entire $3.359 million be allocated toward
establishing a new internal Revenue Code Section 115 Pension Trust for the
UAAL associated with Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement
Association (CCCERA). This would help mitigate budgetary issues from
volatility associated with CCCERA's required pension contributions, and
potential future legislative changes such as occurred under Public
Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (F'EPRA). A Section 115 Pension
Trust would also reduce the pension UAAL on the District's balance sheet
and provide greater flexibility over a broader universe of investment options.
Ms. Brant pointed out that, ultimately, the purpose of such a pension trust is
to provide the District with more flexibility and greater control over asset
allocation than would occur if the funds were paid to CCCERA.
The issue of potentially becoming fully funded or superfunded in terms of the
CCCERA pension obligations was discussed. Mr. Bartel stated that the
District would have less rate relief on any excess funds that were within
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 75
CCCERA's control as compared to a Section 115 Pension Trust. Even if it
were to be 110 percent funded, he said the District would continue to receive
an annual bill for pension contributions and there is a high degree of
likelihood that the District would not be able to access the excess funds.
Once overfunded, he said the District would likely continue to be overfunded
because there is no pension holiday.
Mr. Bartel left the meeting at 1 0: 00 a.m.
Member McGill asked Ms. Brant why PFM preferred the recommendations
set forth on page 30 of the PFM presentation included with the agenda
materials. She responded that any contribution to the existing OPEB Trust
and/or a new Section 115 Pension Trust would lead to a meaningful increase
in funding status and will create the most in terms of cost savings.
Shortening the OPEB Trust amortization period will result in the greatest long-
term savings. Improving funding status without having to make additional
voluntary payments to CCCERA will provide the District with the greatest
flexibility.
Ms. Brant also reviewed the cost considerations of setting up and
administering a Section 115 Pension Trust, noting that a multi-employer trust
would be the most cost effective for the District.
The participants took a brief break, after which Mr. Bailey said staff was
seeking direction from the Board with regard to the PFM recommendation for
allocating the funds that have been the subject of this discussion.
President Pilecki said he was supportive of allocating the entire $2.5 million
budgeted amount to the OPEB Trust to reduce the amortization period from
22 to 18 years. Member Williams agreed, stating that doing so would mean
the public will pay less in the long run. There was unanimous consensus
among the Board Members in this regard.
The discussion then turned to the PFM recommendation to create a new
Section 115 Pension Trust to be initially funded by the $3.359 million extra
reserve funds at the end of Fiscal Year 2015-16.
Member Causey suggested splitting the funds, with $ 1 million going toward
CCCERA unfunded pension liabilities, and the balance going into a Section
115 Pension Trust. He also suggested that consideration be given to
establishing a pension "fund" versus a trust. Ms. Brant commented that such
a fund would be considered a reserve fund, but would not reduce the District's
UAAL on the balance sheet, nor would it enjoy the favorable investment
options available under a pension trust.
L
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 101 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 76
Member Williams noted that a Section 115 Pension Trust allows the District to
find the sweet spot between risk and return over the long haul that is in the
best interest of ratepayers.
Member Nejedly said he has long favored having more control over the
District's pension assets because the actuarial assumptions utilized by
CCCERA have changed so many times over the years. He said he was open
to seeing an analysis of the suggestion by Member Causey of splitting the
funds between CCCERA and a Pension Trust. Either way, he was supportive
of creating a Section 115 Pension Trust.
Member Williams said he was supportive of establishing a Section 115
Pension Trust with the entire $3.359 million available funds. Member McGill
and President Pilecki agreed. Members Causey and Nejedly were also
supportive of establishing a Section 115 Pension Trust, but preferred to see
an analysis of splitting the funds between CCCERA ($1 million) and a new
pension trust ($2.359 million).
The Board gave the following direction to staff on the items shown below:
1) How to utilize the $2.5 million for UAAL budgeted in this fiscal year.
BOARD ACTION: Unanimously directed staff to present the
Board with an action item at a future meeting to utilize the entire
$2.5 million budgeted for this fiscal year toward the unfunded
liabilities in the existing OPEB Trust.
2) How to utilize the favorable fund balance of $3.359 million from
FY 2015-16.
BOARD ACTION: A majority of the Board Members directed staff
to present the Board with an action item at a future meeting to
establish a new Internal Revenue Code Section 115 Pension Trust
to be initially funded by the $3.359 million extra reserve fund
balance at the end of FY 2015-16.
D. Recycled Water Accounting -- Consider continuing current method of tracking
as line item or establishing a separate fund for recycled water
Available for Questions:
Sudhir Pardiwala, Raftelis Financial Consultants (RFC)
Due to time constraints, this item was deferred to a future meeting.
BOARD ACTION: item postponed to a future meeting.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 77
E. Summary of Capital Improvement Plan
1) Presentation of latest update of the 10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) from the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan (CWMP),
including an overview of the 20 -Year CIP.
Available for Questions:
Dan Frost, Senior Engineer
Mike Britten, Senior Vice President Carollo Engineers
Summer Bunde, Vice President CH2M
At 11:05 a.m. Director of Engineering & Technical Services Jean -Marc
Petit reviewed the presentation included with the agenda material,
which included a review of the CWMP goals and levels of service, as
well as overviews of key findings from the first two CWMP workshops.
With regard to the slide regarding energy improvement projects,
Member Causey asked why solar and wind projects were not included
as a contingency against loss of power if something were to happen
with the cogeneration system. In the interest of time, President Pilecki
suggested that this topic be put on the parking lot for discussion at a
future meeting.
Continuing his presentation, Mr. Petit said the CWMP has identified
$1.8 billion of capital improvement projects in the next 20 years. In the
10 -year window, he said the CWMP has identified a total of $867 million
of capital improvement projects versus $413 million that were identified
prior to the CWMP. This is the level of required funding that was used
for the rate impact scenarios to be discussed under item 5.F.3).
The current approved budget includes approximately $41 million in the
next fiscal year, and another $40 million the following year. The CWMP
identified another $16.5 million of projects over the next two years.
President Pilecki asked if the District's engineering staff was prepared
to handle the increase in projected capital projects over the next two
fiscal years. Mr. Bailey noted that consultants will be hired to assist
with the additional workload. Mr. Petit added that staff is working on
establishing and developing a program management system to
implement all these projects on time and on budget.
Member Williams said he is a strong proponent of good asset
management, including conducting analyses such that the end of an
asset's useful life can be estimated to potentially get the longest
possible life out of each asset. Mr. Petit confirmed that is exactly how
staff assesses the useful life of assets under the District's asset
management program.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 78
it was noted that the staff recommendation for this item was to fund the
capital program as presented at this meeting, including the additional
projects such as pump stations and filter rehabilitation projects.
BOARD ACTION: Received the presentation and provided
direction to staff.
Member Nejedly left the meeting at 12:30 p.m.
F. Financial Viability
Available for Questions:
Sudhir Pardiwala, Raftelis Financial Consultants
1) Bond Financing
This matter was taken out of order, after Item 5.F.4). (Neither Member
Nejedly nor McGill were present for this presentation.)
Given that much of the information regarding bond financing had been
discussed earlier in the workshop, Ms. Hollenbeck briefly reviewed the
presentation included with the agenda material.
BOARD ACTION: Received the presentation.
2) Revenue Requirements
Planning and Development Services Division Manager Danea
Gemmell reviewed the assumptions used in the financial rate model
based on the Cost of Service Study conducted by Raftelis in May
2015. She also reviewed revenue requirements related to the CWMP
as well as a comparison chart with other wastewater agencies of their
sewer service charge rates from five years ago and now.
In response to a request from President Pilecki, staff will bring
additional information to a future meeting regarding the varying
amounts of ad valorem tax revenue received by the various agencies
shown in the comparison chart.
BOARD ACTION: Received the presentation.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meetinglworkshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 79
3) Rate Impact Scenarios
Ms. Gemmell reviewed the District's four scenarios for funding the
proposed Capital Improvement Budget for the 10 -year period FY 2017-
18 to FY 2026-27.
Mr. Bailey said it is recommended that the District consider bond
financing for longer term, less frequent and non-recurring projects, but
continue to fund pipeline replacement projects in the Collection System
Program on a pay-as-you-go basis. Ms. Gemmell said that all four rate
impact scenarios were designed with staggered bonds issuances
totaling $477 million coming forward in fiscal years 2, 5 and 8
(FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22, and FY 2024-25). She proceeded to review
each scenario followed by a "Scenario 2.1" that had not been included
with the agenda materials. Scenario 2.1 illustrated (1) two additional
$2.5 million payments toward unfunded liabilities in each of the next
two fiscal years, and (2) elimination of the 1 percent wage assumption
required by the current bargaining group memoranda of understanding.
A lengthy discussion took place during which Ms. Gemmell and other
members of staff responded to questions from Board Members.
Member Williams said that failing to address unfunded liabilities is
kicking the can down the road. He said he was in favor of including
$2.5 million payments in all 10 years of the plan and to consider
augmenting that with any future extra reserve fund balances. Member
Causey concurred.
President Pilecki expressed concern about the potential for exceeding
85 percent pension funding levels, stating that any monies that would
exceed that level should go into the Section 115 Pension Trust. He
also expressed reservation about the impact on rates of including $2.5
million payments in all 10 years.
Member McGill suggested that for purposes of budgeting, the guide
should be making additional $2.5 million payments every year until 85
percent funding level is achieved. Beyond that, the Board can decide
how to use any extra funds. Finally, he said he was comfortable with
up to a four-year rate increase, but was not supportive of a five-year
increase. He was also not in favor of any years with a zero increase.
President Pilecki said he liked the idea of a two-year increase, and
then evaluating a possible five-year increase the following year.
District Counsel Kent Alm noted that whether or not an increase is for
two or five years, the ordinance may be written such that a review of
L
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meeting/Workshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 80
the increase is conducted each year without the need for a Proposition
218 Notice.
President Pilecki inquired how the District's bond ceiling would be
affected by every $100 rate increase. Ms. Brant said she could
provide that information at a future date.
Member Causey said he was in favor of directing staff to proceed with
projections for a five-year rate increase, which could be reviewed each
year as indicated by Mr. Alm.
It was the consensus of the Board Members present that staff should
proceed with projections for Scenarios 2 and 3.
Mr. Bailey then asked for the Board's input with regard to the number
of years staff should use for rate increases. In response to a question
from Member Williams, Mr. Bailey said staff's main goal in proposing a
five-year rate increase is to be able to show bonding agencies how the
District plans to recover costs. Mr. Williams asked if it is common for
agencies to seek five-year rate increases. Mr. Aim said it is fairly
common, noting that the underlying information and data must be
current and reasonable to justify the rates over the five-year period.
Member McGill said he would be willing to consider a two-year
increase followed by a four-year increase.
Member Williams said he was comfortable seeking an initial two-year
increase and would be open to considering longer periods after that,
but he was not in favor of any years with zero increase.
Mr. Bailey said it was not necessary for the Board Members to decide
on the number of years for rate increases in order for staff to run the
projections. He said he believed that the Board had provided ample
guidance for staff to move forward.
BOARD ACTION: It was the consensus of the Board Members
present during the discussion (Member Nejedly absent) to direct
staff to proceed with preparing 1O -year financial/rate projections
based on:
1. Rate Impact Scenarios 2 and 3,
2. Additional annual payments of $2.5 million toward
unfunded liabilities in each of the next 10 years (with no
specificity as to their allocation to CCCERA, the existing
OPEB Trust or a new Section 115 Pension Trust),
4
)
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meetinglworkshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 81
3. Pay-as-you-go funding for pipeline replacement projects,
and
4. Staggered bonds issued at the intervals recommended by
staff.
The Board Members further expressed support for:
1. Updating Board Policy No. BP 017 - Fiscal Reserves with
respect to capital improvements when using bond
financing, and
2. Meeting reserve target levels by FY 2017-18.
Rate Implementation Schedule
Ms. Gemmell quickly reviewed the Rate Implementation Schedule
included with the agenda material.
BOARD ACTION: It was the consensus of the Board Members
present during the discussion (Member Nejedly absent) to direct
staff to accelerate the 2017 rate hearing from June to April.
Member McGill left the meeting at 2:01 p.m.
At this point in the meeting, the Board returned to Item No. 5.F.1).
G. Discussion: One -Year versus Two -Year Budget
Due to time constraints, this item was deferred to a future meeting.
BOARD ACTION: Item postponed to a future meeting.
H. Recap of Recommendations and Closing
Mr. Bailey said the earlier discussion had provided staff with the direction it
needs to move forward with preparing projections for upcoming rate
discussions. He also noted that the following list of parking lot items had
been compiled during the workshop:
1. Funding for vehicle replacement.
2. Separate benefits, UAAL and other items in O&M budget
3. Could the District pledge real property as assets to be used to secure a
bond to increase bond agency rating scores?
4. What is superfunding of CCCERA? When is the District projected to
reach that level? Could those funds be accessible in the future if
funding levels reach or exceed superfunding?
•
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
November 10, 2016 Special Board Meetinglworkshop Minutes - Book 65 -Page 82
5. What should be done with future $2.5 million payments toward
unfunded liabilities?
6. Consider solar for alternative energy under a P3 agreement model.
7. Add ad valorem taxes to the sewer construction fund as well as
additional revenues when comparing rates between agencies.
8. Review and comment on DC Water century bonds. Could they be
considered for the District?
9. Discuss status and availability of Water Infrastructure Finance and
Innovation Act (WIFIA) funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
10. How would the District's bond ceiling be affected by every $100 rate
increase?
11. What are the true costs of issuing a Proposition 218 Notice, including
staff time?
BOARD ACTION: None.
. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
None.
7. REQUESTS_FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.
B. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m. in recognition of those veterans present at
the meeting and in honor of Veterans Day tomorrow.
COUNTERSIGNED:
CE&,e"cr2,
TJ. PileciS)--
c
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Elaine R. Boehme, CMC
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California