HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.E. Summary of Capital Improvement PlanITEM E
SUMMARY OF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
B JEAN -MARC PETIT, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES
DAN FROST, SENIOR ENGINEER, PLANNING
‚44ICHAEL BRI I 1EN, SENIOR VP, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.
SUMMER BUNDS, VP, CH2M
THE CWMP ADDRESSES FOUR MAJOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DRIVERS
Drivers
Descriptions
1 Aging Infrastructure
Maintain performance and reliability of existing assets to
ensure reliable collection and treatment of wastewater
2 Capacity
Increase capacity to accommodate planned growth for
the communities we serve
3 Regulatory
Reliably comply with regulatory requirements that are
designed to protect human health and the environment
& plan for anticipated future regulatory requirements
4 Sustainability
Minimize life -cycle costs, maximize benefits, and achieve
economic stability through optimization, resiliency,
resource recovery, and energy projects
COMPREHENSIVE WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN
GOALS AND LOS
Levels of Service (LOS)
CWMP
Goals
Strive to meet regulatory requirements
11111
111111 11111111
1
Always work to comply with local. state and federal regulatory requirements.
Critical facilities will be on-line within prescribed targets after catastrophic events (e.g.,
sudden failures. earthquakes, floods. fire. acts of terrorism.
Work to improve sanitary sewer overflow (550) occurrence rate of no more than 3.5
550s per 100 miles per year.
Be a fiscally sound and effective water sector utility
Develop a cost effective program to maximize recycle water in coordination with water
agencies. The program must have a benefiticosts ratio of at least one or qreater within 15
years
Develop a program that maximizes energy efficiency and self-sufficiencythat has a
benefit/costs ratio of at least one or greater within 5 years.
Develop long-term resource recovery projects that have a benefit/costs ratio of at least
one or greater within 5 years.
Provide exceptional customer service
3
Limit Odors to within the fence line of the treatment plantfacility.
Provide recycled water (e.g.., fesidentialfill stations and commercial hydrants) aligned with
service area customersdemands.
Develop a process for assessing customer satisfaction. expectations for District services. and
desire for general information.
_Develop a public education outreach program that provides.pollution preventidn. education
and is aligned with the customer's desire for general information.
Projects should reduce adverse impacts on the public andthe environmentthrough
sustainable practices that minimize waste. maximize resource recover/. and embrace
innovation.
Respondto emergency calls in less than 20 minutes during Districtworkinq hours and less
than 40 minutes during non -working hours.
MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
CCCSD's TREATMENT
PLANT OF THE FUTURE
'FROM JUNE 16, 2016 BOARD
WORKSHOP #1
PLANT OF THE FUTURE --- SITE PLAN
Future CEC Removal
Reverse Osmosis
Soles/Wind
Energy
Replace Recycled
. Water Support
Systems
MBR Effluent
Pump Station
Refurbish
Existing Filter
Replace Recycled
Water Support
Systems
Replace Recycled
Water Support
Systems
Drainback
Pump Station
Raise Flood Protection Levee
Solar/Wind Energy
Mixed Liquor
Splitter Box
UV Replacement
Blower Building
UV Hydraulic
Improvements
Replace Standby
Effluent Pumps
PST Improvements
Relocate Contaminated Coil
to VVWHBA - South
- New ,IVN Tanks
Blower Building
FOG Receiving Station
Raw Wastewater Diversion
and Drainback Pipe
New Anaerobic Digesters
Bolds Load Out Facility
Replace DAF Support Equipment
----- and Drives.
Fluidized Bed IncineratoriORC Solids
-- Capacity Study/Scrubber Replacement
- Solids Mixing Tank Improvements
Influent Gates Rehabilitation
Ocree.nings Removal and Switchgear
Add Influent Pump and Convert •
------ Motors to Immersible Type
----- Replace Odor Control Facilities
Gilt Improvements
•,*
LEGEND
Capacity
Regulatory
Sustainability
Aging Infrastructure
DRAFT
PLANT OF FUTURE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
COMPRO-1EIVE WA CATER AfASIER PLAN thIMMEM
SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Key Finding 1: Overall infrastructure in good to fair condition but is
aging and requires replacement
• Key Finding 2: Re -Consolidate contaminated soil to Basin A South
for construction of future liquids and solids facilities
• Key Finding 3: Implement wet weather capacity improvements
• Key Finding 4: Continue tracking regulatory changes (BAAQMD,
BACWA Nutrient Watershed permit, NPDES)
• Key Finding 5: Nutrient Removal
Include Level 1 Nutrient Removal within next 10 years of CIP.
For Level 2/3 Nutrient Removal, use combination of MLE (Modified
Ludzack-Ettinger) and MBR (Membrane Bioreactor). Likely later in 20 -yr
CIP or beyond.
BACWA
-.."%•(--- BAY AREA
CLEAN WATER
AGFNC1ES
Pilot innovative nutrient removal and advanced treatment technologies.
NUTRIENT LIMITS ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON
BACWA NUTRIENT WORK
Concentrations, mgIL Assumed Timing
Initiate Compliance
Ammonia TN P Design Deadline
Level 1 Optimizat on 2019-20 2024-26
Level 2
2
15
2027
2037
Level 3
2
6
0.3
2037?
2047?
SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
ROADMAP TO ZERO DISCHARGE
• Key Finding 5 (Cont'd)j Reaching Zero
Discharge
For Refinery Recycled Water, use MBR +
Reverse Osmosis + Ultraviolet Disinfection for
"canal" water quality
• Key Finding 6: Need for Developing a Plan for
Replacement of Multiple Hearth Furnaces
(MHF)
Maximize use of existing incinerator facility and
building (replace dewatering system, optimize
sludge blending, reduce lime usage, seismic
improvements)
45
40
35
In 30
25
20
15
►i 10
5
0
Zero Discharge
Lower Walnut
Creek? IPR/DPR?
Others?
+15 MGD Phase 2
Refinery Project
3-5 MGD Phase 1
Refinery Project
Projected Title
22 Demands
Including Naval
Weapons Station
"tr-01._
COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 1 INDUSTRY LEADERS 1 LOCAL COLA ORAi1VE TEAM
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5a6ds Bending Fatii-Oes +'retnetires t*rw'wr,on end Poen
Ooc*.v 56.2016
BLACK&VEATCH
... �., •., . ►earl d ...,. •. •. .
SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Key Finding 6 (Continued): Need for Developing a Plan for
Replacement of Multiple Hearth Furnaces (MHF)
Implement air pollution control improvements for incinerator (wet scrubber,
scrubber sidestream treatment, other air pollution control)
Pilot innovative solids -to -energy technologies (e.g. gasification,
hydrothermal liquefaction). Continue to evaluate long-term solids handling
options -2-5 years.
Plan for 2 Digesters and High Strength Waste Receiving -10 Years
Plan for 2 Additional Digesters and 1 Fluidized Bed Incinerator in -20
Years to Replace Existing Multiple Hearth Furnaces
SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Key Finding 7: Energy Improvements Required on UV Disinfection and
Steam Blower Systems
• UV Replacement:
• Perform Near -Term Electrical Improvements to Address Poor Electrical
Connections
• Replace System in 5-10 years
• Diffuser & Air Piping Replacement:
• Replace to Improve Aeration System Efficiencies
• Replace Existing Air Piping to address Significant Air Losses
• Aeration Blowers & Steam to Electricity:
• Replace Steam with Electric Blowers
• Convert Heat Recovery to Steam System with Heat Recovery to
Electricity System using Organic Rankine Cycle Turbine and Replace
Steam -Driven Blowers with Electric Blowers
ROADMAP TO NET ZERO ENERGY
Key Findings 8: Net Zero Energy Goals
Requires Import of Carbon and Alternative
Renewable Energy Sources
Grid Independence
Energy Neutrality, Net Zero Energy
No Grid or Imported Natural Gas
Energy Efficiency Improvements
Imported Wastes
Alternative Energy
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY FINDINGS
• Incineration alone (Base case or S1) will not reach Net Zero
Energy
• With Anaerobic Digestion S3 or with Anaerobic Digestion
followed by Incineration S2, energy efficiency is maximized
• With High Strength Waste Co -Digestion (S2 or S3), net zero
energy can be achieved for treatment process energy demands
• With High Strength Waste Co -Digestion and Solar, net zero
energy can be achieved for treatment process energy demands
and 5 MGD recycled water wholesale project
• Net Zero Energy and Zero Discharge are competing goals
BOARD VOTED ON A
POLICY ON ENERGY BP. 027
POLICY
It is the policy of the District to encourage and promote an energy management
approach that will pursue:
1. Cost-effective projects for the District's wastewater treatment plant campus and
collection system facilities, and other District -owned buildings and facilities that
achieve the following goals:
a. Develop a cost-effective energy program for the District's wastewater
treatment plant that strives towards Net Zero Energy.
b. Identify and implement energy efficiency improvement projects to reduce
costs and overall energy usage.
c. Increase opportunities that recover renewable energy from wastewater,
wastewater solids, and biogas.
d. Capture and convert waste heat from treatment processes into energy.
e. Import high strength wastes to increase on-site renewable energy
generation.
f. Increase use of renewable energy, such as solar and/or wind power.
g.
Improve the District's operational reliability and stabilize operating energy
costs.
2. Cost-effective projects for the District's wastewater treatment plant campus that
reduce direct and indirect anthropogenic GHG emissions.
3. Active management of GHG emissions to comply with AB32 and other regional,
state, and federal GHG requirements.
ELECTRIC COMPARISON OF SOLIDS ALTERNATIVES
ricity Required By Source (kW)
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
PG&E
NG
o
Current
et
+.4
PG&E PG&E
Projected
!SOLIDS i
Baseline
(MHFs)
SOLIDS
Alt 51
(FB1s)
!SOLIDS
Alt 52 Alt 53
(AD/FBI) (AD)
Aer..EVIL
From June 16, 2016 Board workshop#1
ENERGY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
• Finalize Solar PV Installation at CSO and HHW Facilities
• Reduce NG & GHGs with Cogen upgrades (0-2 years)
• Reduce furnace fuel usage and Replace older solids equipment with higher efficiency units:
Centrifuges and wet scrubbers (0-3 years)
• Continue evaluating alternative solids to energy projects:
b Current discussions with PHG Energy for 3 MVV P3 Agreement using Gasification &
Supplemental Wood Waste (0-3 years)
DOE Proposal - Hydrothermal Processing Pilot with WE&RF & Genifuel (0-3 years)
• Pilot innovative, low-energy nutrient removal technologies:
Current discussions with Nereda for aerobic granular sludge pilot
Current discussions with GE for membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) pilot
• Replace steam system with ORC and install electric blowers and high efficiency diffusers (3-
6 years)
• Replace UV disinfection system (5-10 years)
• Start long-range plan to add digestion with high strength waste co -digestion (-10 years)
• Replace furnaces with fluidized bed incinerator & reduce LFG, NG & GHGs (15+ years)
• Add renewable energy (solar and/or wind) when larger electrical demand is required fr
nutrient removal and/or recycled water facilities
RECOMMENDED SEWER REHABILITATION &
REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
FROM OCTOBER 6, 2016 BOARD
WORKSHOP #2
100 -YEAR SEWER REHABILITATION &
REPLACEMENT FORECAST
Period Cost (W) Mileage
80,000,000
70,000,000
60 000 000
td)
50,000,000
L)0
76
40,000,000
▪ 30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000 III I
0-5 Years
5-10 Years
10-20 Years
20-30 Years
$180
$441.
$724
4.11 I I I I I 8
42
184
281
30-50 Years $1,156 403
50-75 Years $575
206
75-100 Years $808 276
IPlV,
1 ; ,11
n1.,iz1-!144,1a•-21
CO r-1 • 0 en ‘,.0 N ul CO r-4 vzt N. 0 rr, LD Cr) N ul 00 TIP 0 rn cr) (-84 tr) CO - TIt"
r-1 N Nm re) rei re) git .7t• Lf) 00 00 00 Ch Cr) CA CA 0 0 0 v-1 ri
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0
NNNNNNN r4 N r4 NNNN rJ NNNN ('N (NI r4NNNNNNN• NNNN
Forecast Year
SEWER REHABILITATION & REPLACEMENT
RATE
• Current Rate: -0.3% per year
• Strategic Plan: 1% per year
Pitartinez CWMP: -0.5 to 2%/year
N
is
Legend
Q ("tty Bcrundarlcs Rlnewal Period -- Replace S0 wars
CCCSO Service Arab Rr 4�ce OO a Fears Ropier.. 50-75 Years
ti0503 501 - - Sepksce 06-10 Years - Repiacs3 75"180 years
Maio, highways 1eplace 10-20 years Replace 1CC'Years
Repbce 20-30 Veal
Elm : D.E..7.1.}ferei. f rid
PIPELINE RENEWAL PERIOD •
FIGURE 4
'cnt CENTRAL CONTRA EMS.SANRARY DISTRICT
C .4700 Cof.1.C7N,FN'SYSTE,N.�ItS:ERwriH
Timeframe
Miles/Year
%/Year
0-5
5-10
10-20
20-30
30-50
50-75
75-100
7.6
8.4
18.4
z8.4
20.2
8.2
11.1
0.5
0.6
1.2
1.9
1.4
0.6
0.7
MODEL RESULTS & RECOMMENDED WET
WEATHER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
MODEL RESULTS FOR 10 -YEAR, 5 -FT
FREEBOARD CRITERIA
• --5 miles of improvements required
compared to -12 miles in 2010
Capacity Master Plan
• Project areas compared to 2010
Capacity Master Plan:
Portions of 8 projects still required
4 projects eliminated
Several new project areas
identified
• No dry weather flow capacity
deficiencies
• No overflows predicted for 20 -Year
Event when deficient pipes are
corrected
• Pump stations have sufficient
reliable capacity
Legend
CCCSD modeled sewers
Initially proposed projects
PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN CIP
Projects identified but not included in 20 -year CIP
(Referred to as Future Unfunded in this Presentation)
• Nutrient Removal BACWA Levels 2/3: Possibly beyond 20 years
• Refinery Recycled Water Projects - 20 MGD
• Potable Reuse Projects - Additional -10 MGD
• Advanced Treatment/Contaminants of Emerging Concern
Removal
• Renewable Energy Projects
• Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS) Recycled Water
Facilities Improvements
• CNWS Collection System Improvements
• CNWS Recycled Water Distribution System
NEXT STEPS
• Draft Master Plan Executive Summary to staff in
Decem ger 2016
• Board Workshop #4 on January 26, 2017
• Final Draft Master P an Report & Executive
Summary in Apri 2017
PRELIMINARY
UPDATED CIP COSTS
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$ 40,000,0
$20,000,000
20 -YEAR CIP FORECAST
0
iJ
JI
•
1_
1.
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Total Spending (not
including Future
Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
Co ection System
Recycled Water
• General Improvements
• Future Unfunded
$1.8B of improvements identified for 20 -year CIP
(Future Unfunded Not Included) (In 2016 $)
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
so
20 -YEAR CIP FORECAST
III Total Spending (not
including Future
Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
• Collection System
Recycled Water
eneral Improvements
Future Unfunded
Elevated Sewer Re
acement Funding
1 1_d
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
so
20 -YEAR CIP FORECAST
Higher CIP Costs Primarily Due to
Major Treatment Plant Projects
Total Spending (not
including Future
Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Collection System
Recycled Water
Ill General Improvements
ti Future Unfunded
PRELIMINARY 1O -YEAR CIP
$867M OF IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
General Improvements
CIP Program Contingency
otal CIP (not incl. Future Unfunded)
Future Unfunded
.1 11.111
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
50
(FUTURE UNFUNDED NOT INCLUDED)
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
$18.2 $18.4 551.2 551.3 545.6 $55.4 $44.8 $43.8 $55.0 $64.8
518.4 $17.4 $31.6 536.7 539.1 $36.8 $37.7 541.8 542,0 $45.2
$0.5 $0.4 $1.4 $5.8 $5.8 $0.1 $L6 $9.1 $0.1 $0.1
$4.2 $2.8 $3.2 $1.7 $3.2 54.1 $1.7 $2.7 $1.7 $2.5
51.5 $1.5 $2.0 52.0 $2.0 $2.0 $2.0 $2.0 $2.0 $2.0
$42.7 $40.5 589.4 597.5 595.7 598.4 587.9 599,4 5100.8 5114.5
$6.3 $6.0 $6.0 $36.2 $36.2 $36.2 $0.8 51.4 $6.5 $6.5
(Rounded in $M 2016 Dollars)
FT ddll
3
111111
all
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
m Total Spending (not
including Future Unfunded)
▪ Treatment Plant
▪ Collection System
Recycled Water
a General Improvements
• Future Unfunded
PRELIMINARY 5 -YEAR CIP ($366M)
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
General Improvements
CIP Program Contingency
incl. Future Unfunded)
Future Unfunded
$140,000,000
$120,000,000
$100,000,000
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
so
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
$18.2 $18.4 $51.2 $51.3 $45.6
$18.4 $17.4 $31.6 $36.7 $39.1
$a5 $a4 $1.4 $5.8 $5.8
$4.2 $2.8 $3.2 $1.7 $3.2
$1.5 $1.5 $2.0 $2.0 $2.0
$42.7 $40.5 $89.4 $97.5 $95.7
$6.3 $6.0 $6.0 $36.2 $36.2
(Rounded in $M 2016 Dollars)
Total Spending (not
including Future Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
• General Improvements
Future Unfunded
PRELIMINARY 2 -YEAR CIP ($83M)
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
so
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
General Improvements
CIP Program Contingency
Future Unfunded
2018
$18.2
$18.4
$0.5
$4.2
$1.5
$42.7
$6.3
2019
$18.4
$17.4
$0.4.
$2.8
$1.5
$40.5
$6.0
Similar to
currently
approved
budget
(Rounded in $M 2016 Dollars)
Total Spending (Not
including Future
Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
• General improvements
Future Unfunded
MASTER PLAN IDENTIFIED EARLIER
IMPLEMENTATION OF SOME PROJECTS IN
FIRST 2 YEARS ($IOOM
2018 2019
• Filter Plant Improvements
Treatment Plant $18.2 $18.4 ' (+ $1.3M )
Collection System $21.2 $29.7 • Moraga/Orinda Crossroads
Recycled Water $0.8 $1.3 Pump Stations (+$2.3M)
General Improvements $4. 2 $2.8 • Fairview/Maltby Pump Stations
CIP Program Contingency $1.5 $1.5 (+$12.9M)
dotal Spending (Not Including Future Unfunded _ _ $45.9 $53.7 • Increase of $16.5M over next
Fultune Unfunded $6.3 $6.0 two years. (Construction projects
(Rounded in $M 2016 Dollars) to continue in following FYs)
$00,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
2018
I iii wi I I
2019
ffil Total Spending (not including
Future Unfunded)
Treatment Plant
Collection System
Recycled Water
s General Improvements
Future Unfunded
•
MAJOR PROJECTS RECOMMENDED IN
MASTER PLAN FOR NEXT 2 FISCAL YEARS
TREATMENT PLANT
• SCREENINGS
REMOVAL
• PUMP & BLOWER
SEISMIC UPGRADE
• PIPING RENOVATION
PHASE 9
• SOLIDS HANDLING
IMPROVEMENTS
• HEADWORKS/PREAIR/
PRIMARY GATES AND
CONCRETE
RENOVATION
• UV ELECTRICAL
IMPROVEMENTS
• ODOR CONTROL
REPLACEMENT
COLLECTION SYSTEPAt
• PLEASANT HILL - PH. 2
SEWER RENOV.
• WALNUT CREEK -
PH.11 SEWER RENOV.
• LAFAYETTE - PH.11
SEWER RENOV.
• S. ORINDA - PH.6
SEWER RENOV.
• WALNUT CREEK -
PH.12 SEWER RENOV.
• MARTINEZ - PH.5
SEWER RENOV.
• MORAGA/CROSSRDS
PUMP STATION (*)
• FA1RVIEW/MALTBY
PUMP STATION DRY
PIT REPLACEMENT (*)
RECYCLED WATER
• FILTER PLANT (*)
GENERAL
IMPRQVEMENTS.
• ASSET MANAGEMENT
• INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
• BUILDINGS
• VEHICLES
* Projects
recommended to
start in the two FYs
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ITEM E
• CWMP 10 -Yr CIP: Fund 10 -yr CIP as
recommended by CWMP
• Includes starting Filter Rehabilitation (design),
and Pumping Stations Upgrades (design) in
FY17-18