The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08. (Handout) Proposed 2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget and PlanItem 8 Proposed loqw 2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget and Plan Edgar J. Lopez Prov. Capital Projects Division Manager Engineering and Operations Committee Meeting December 09, 2014 11 central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting Public Health and the Environment Kick -off FY 2015 -16 Financial Planning • Today's meeting reviews proposed Program Expenditures for the Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) Fiscal Year 2015 -16 and next nine years • Review programs and selected 2015 -16 projects — Treatment Plant Program — Collection Systems Program — General Improvements Program — Future Recycled Water Development Program Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Drivers • Replacement and Rehabilitation (R &R), Aging Assets • Regulatory • Sustainability /Energy /Optimization • Capacity Expansion 20-Yr i g Picture o l d ' Oou w r sv /bme rvu I eb o yi • 14uotaR m' H�m< mart ngetnoA rar.oa/ au ¢enew new a</owt a 0 o ei �S+ c =uen - to A e y e - J Total Wernln... a .`. Z P O f _- % �:� � -,...- rlrEle,l NOr 1 Bed Gq¢tl NCUtrJI ralmlalign IMb MI<r -9 FII• Song NnnN Qft e:q•s/ a �_- ...____ I< ,law- rwn• snrn- ___yUOarJ n <r�grun<nl Nunarr All /. treatment plans lmprov¢m¢nlf - - - '- -- - - - - -- — _ —. ___ ___ —_ __ - Ab.attm .'•O➢bY Omer ON}I Urr. COs: fb +� -0ab Cpi -QJ -. -- ...__. _... _. —. _47�t - -_- LI — _ —. ___ ___ —_ __ - Ab.attm .'•O➢bY Omer ON}I Urr. COs: fb +� -0ab Cpi -QJ -. -- ...__. _... _. —. _47�t - -_- Ten Year Plan Is a Responsible One That Funds.... • Treatment Plant ($200 M) — R &R projects $ 97 M — Regulatory $ 66 M — Sustainability/ Energy/ Optimization $ 11 M — Capacity/ Expansion $ 26 M • Collection System ($191 M) — R &R $ 130 M — Capacity/ Expansion $ 32 M — Pumping Stations $ 12 M — CAD's and Developer Sewers $ 14 M • General Improvements & Future Recycled Water ($25 M) — IT Development $ 9 M —Asset Management $ 4 M Proposed 10 -YEAR CIP Proposed Ten -Year Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures R &R 2015 -16 2016 -17 2017 -18 2018 -19 2019 -20 2020 -21 2021 -22 2022 -23 2023 -24 2024 -25 Total Treatment Plant $7,240,000 $7,490,000 $6,790,000 $2.040,OOC $49,295,000 Pumping Stations $400,000 $900,000 $1,150,000 R &R $7,980,000 $8,965,000 $6,900,000 $8,740,000 $9,653,400 $7,016,550 $6,079,050 $7,760,000 $15,460,000 $18,060,000 $96,614,000 Regulatory $1,000,000 $4,825,000 11,175,000 $7,720,000 $2,340,000 $2,640,000 $1,400,000 $4,500,000 $6,000,000 $24,400,00C $66,000,000 Sustainability/ Energy $2,930,000 $2,330,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $1,000,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $11,460,000 Capacity Expansion/ Planning $1,250,000 $1,500,000 $510,000 $510,000 $510,000 $510,000 $1,210,000 $1,200,000 $8,500,000 $10.350,000 $26,050,000 Subtotal $13,160,000 $17,620,000 19,585,000 $18,420,000 $13,503,400 $10,416,550 $8,939,050 $13,710,000 $30,460,000 $54,310,00 $200,124,000 Collection System IT Development $1,367,000 $1,925,000 $1,935,000 $225,000 $1,235,000 $425,000 1 $225,000 R &R $9,000,000 $12,500,000 12,750,000 $13,000,000 $13,250,000 $13,500,000 $13,750,000 $14,000,000 $14,250,000 $14,500,OOC $130,500,000 Capacity/ Planning/ CADS $7,050,000 $3,525,000 $2,440,000 $1,440,000 $1,940,000 $9,340,000 $7,240,000 $7,490,000 $6,790,000 $2.040,OOC $49,295,000 Pumping Stations $400,000 $900,000 $1,150,000 $2,180,000 $500,000 $700,000 $1,600,000 $2,100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,00 $11,530,000 Subtotal 16,450,000 $16,925,000 16,340,000 $16,620,000 $15,690,000 $23,540,000 $22,590,000 $23,590,000 $22,040,000 $17,540,OOC $191,325,000 General Improvements AM/ Vehicle &Equip $2,261,000 $1,420,000 $1,240,000 $1,150,000 $1,100,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,OOC $9,671,000 Buildings/ Property $260,000 $385,000 $905,000 $370,000 $320,000 $320,000 $320,000 $320,000 $340,000 $370,OOC $3,910,000 IT Development $1,367,000 $1,925,000 $1,935,000 $225,000 $1,235,000 $425,000 $235,000 $225,000 $235,000 $1,225,OOC $9,032,000 Other $145,000 $145,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,OOC $850,000 Subtotal $4,033,000 $3,875,000 $4,150,000 $1,815,000 $2,725,000 $1,315,000 $1,125,000 $1,115,000 $1,145,000 $2,165,00 $23,463,000 Future Recycled Water Capacity/ Planning $250,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,00 $1,600,000 Total F33,893,000 $38,570,000 40,225,000 $37,005,000 $32,068,400 $35,421,550 $32,804,050 $38,565,000 $53,795,000 $74,165,OOOI $416,512,000 Proposed FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget FY Y 2015 -16 CIB Program Expenditures Treatment Plant $ 13.16 million ( 39 %) Collection System $ 16.45 million (48 %) General Improvements $ 4.03 million ( 12 %) Future Recycled Water Development $ 0.25 million ( 1%) Estimated Budget: $ 33.89 million (100 %) Collection Capital Program Overview • District's Stated Goals • Asset Management -Sewer Renovation Plan • CCTV Program &Results • Renovation Program Requirements FY 15 -16 Collection System Programs and Selected Projects District's Goals District's 2012 SSIVIP: • Responsibly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the wastewater collection system and adhere to the components of the SSMP - • Provide adequate capacity to convey design peak flows • Minimize the frequency of SSOs Sewer system Management Plan Strategic Plan: Central contrat costa • Reducing SSOs; target is less than 3.5 Sanitary SSOs per 100 miles of pipe October 2012 • Continue CCTV program; target is to televise 175 miles of pipe per year Replacement Value of District Recycled Water, Treatment $77,609,035 Plant, $712,814,807 CCCSD Assets General Collection System, $3,141,709,030 $ 3.97 Billions in Total Assets Force Main, Pumping $55,633,530_ Station, $60,712,736 Equip & CS Structures, Vehicles, $191,400,315 $1,250,000 90% Sewer Main, $2,832,712,449 Collection System Installation Profile by Pipe Material 350 300 250 200 N 50 100 50 1910 -1919 1920 -1929 1930 -1939 1940 -1949 1950 -1959 1960 -1969 1970 -1979 1980 -1989 1990 -1999 2000 -2009 2010- present ■ VC ■ AC MRC ■ Meta Ilic n Plastic CCTV Program The purpose of the CCTV program is to determine the actual condition of the pipes so that... — CSOD can optimize maintenance strategies, spot repairs; and — ENG can optimize replacement... to lower the District's risk exposure of an overflow or failure. Pipe Evaluation Flow Chart TV Severe No Pipe Segment Problem Yes I CSO Type Engineering I Increases = Of Replaces/Rehabs Maintenance Problem v Line = I a I Fix I CSO n Pdnt Repair I Risk for overflow I � � � � � EVALUATION: • Prior overflows Score Score Yes • Location Pipe >5000 • Maintenance frequency Segments • Age/pipe typeAength • Flow /capacity • See Attachment 11 No Good Pipe: Routine maintenance & TV Prioritize Pipe segments based on score and evaluation Capital Budget & Plan Replace/Rehab Fix Solution Maintain CSO Increases Maintenance CCTV Program Between 2002 -10, the entire system was televised (condition assessment) — 83 miles identified for detailed evaluation (score >5,000 points) • Re- inspection is currently underway • CCTV scores are a major indicator of pipes in need of renovation R Root C Lat Conn Tahlc J - TV Inspection Bating.schcdule Defect classification Light CCTV J TELEVISION INSPECTION RATING SCHEDULE M Medium Alters or distorts normal flow DEFECT CLASSIFICATION TABLE In Pipeline S CLASS CODE DIVISION CODE TYPE ADDITIONAL DESCRIPnQN ,RATING Sediment L Lateral LATERAL T Tapped-in Alters or distorts normal flow Scoring TYPE P Protruding L Light Minor 1� Olfficult or impossible to pass - obstruction 0 M Medium Difficult to pass S Severe flow restriction or im"ssibIg_U nass 260 500 g; A Alignment B Broken S Spiral 100 STRUCTURAL Any observance, flow Is undisturbed M Multiple 300 Medium Longitudinal 500 H Holes; Brks Small Piece Missing 100 S Sag F Fractured Pipe broken, not slgnHicantly deformed 100 Flow below bottom of lens, depth increase D Deformed Pipe is out of round 500 less than 10% of pipe diameter L Collapsed Pipe Is caved In, cannot pass 1000 (► tfIt Hill Flow level below lop of lens, depth increase M Missing Wall sections missing - cavities 750 Way ( 0 Open L Light Less than pipe wall thickness 20 F Offset M Medium Greater then pipe wall thickness 250 S Severe Difficult or impossible to pass 500 greater than 25% of pipe diameter Infiltration C C Cracked R Radial 300 Evidence of infiltration B Broken S Spiral 100 L Light Water seeps Into line M Multiple 400 R Root C Lat Conn L Light Any observance, flow is undisturbed J At Joint M Medium Alters or distorts normal flow P In Pipeline S Severe Difficult or Impossible to pass D Debris S Sediment Light Any observance, flow is undisturbed G Cheese Medium Alters or distorts normal flow L Scalinq Severe Olfficult or impossible to pass - obstruction 0 Other Describe "Other" in comments A Alignment H Horizontal Light Any observance, flow Is undisturbed Medium Alters or distorts normal flow Severe Difficult or impossible to pass S Sag light Flow below bottom of lens, depth increase less than 10% of pipe diameter Medium Flow level below lop of lens, depth increase from 10% to 25 °E of pipe diameter Severe Camera Is under water or depth increase greater than 25% of pipe diameter Infiltration C Lai Conn. K Evidence of infiltration J At Joint L Light Water seeps Into line P in Pipeline M Medium Water drips in line S Severe Water runs or spouts into line C Corrosion C Lat. Conn. L Light Surface is visibly rough P In Pipeline M Medium Aaoregate is cleariv exposed S Severe Rebar exposed or gone F ¢nil Natives anti is visihin and holes 130 230 330 110 210 500 10 200 500 10 250 500 15 220 320 520 15 50 250 500 CCTV Reports M.slv_MINC—.—Ib M PAGE' 1 ATTACHMENT #1 INSPECTION REPORT X > 4,000 POINTS DATE- WORK/ WEAT/1ER OPERATOR SF. COON NR SECTION NAME I!_Y% p .unnY• Wy A1.1WN _ _NO PRESENT. _____ VE78ClE. ___ CAMERA PRESET. _f21 _ CLEANED RATE. T—kS 1 C:..1 No NOW STREET. UPN.PPY V.O-Rd IE) MM II' 1102 M/1 71OlMl2 CITY ufty . MAP Al2 Ltl/ 710 M!) LOCALE EN«nMI TAPE It MNIC—PRJ RS I OLGTN N)R INSPECT REASON Obbkl Project PIPE SIZE S. MATERIAL VCP IT LOTH )R SECTION TYPE. SMM—.m LINING' AREA RSRVO REMARK'... 1:402 POSITION CODE OBSERVATION MPEG PH 000 0 VnPS bWft M 6Vw **Sn,.W+bob 0008:11 1240 40 0 M&A" Cmcks. Iron 01 to 05 o'do[A 000810 IID2Nljr •� 2020 500 dP. 8=MOe o'dxk 0007.11 2030 800 PP. B ok M 03 o do& 0007.22 )320 300 C.a.daM Cr.c2 N WK 1— OT W 03.'Dock 0002.11 1210 300 CVculftw" 0.0.1).Vl h-12o 12.'dock 00.0051 5210 100 wM co—ton MArods1gN,010.'cock 001013 i>s.b 6S 000 Cba.a.r.MW Cr.rk, Dom 12 to 12 o'do* 00.10 N +'7 72.10 300 CYandr.dW Cl,* M'K tan 121012.'dock 001132 7010 100 C.c —gws uFr *, lam 01 to 050,ckU 001700 ys 130 rood lgM OO ILIt 27.)0 130 room pM 001225 0020 130 roM FON 0012 N 0700 YJO CVtvd.r.MM Cr.0 M I.IN, ho," or to I I o'd"k 00 121) 0300 110 don. gww.ON 6an 07 0 11 o'doc2 00 1215 11270 ISO a.dc n<a.KKYm. M02.'dock 001102 104.. b 17180 300 C— I.W4.1 Crack M I..A Iron, 12 012 o'dmx 00' 1110 13140 130 rod." 001507 IAN 160 s«V,c. con . .0 lo011.011. 10. dock 0015 1 / 121., b 13050 120 rout. •Oh1 001528 13970 130 r..t..y1 001537 ,1250 I30 rod. yN COIS40 15120 150 .OSm ) .A. a2N 001554 151.10 170 rout." 0012.01 15730 130 rods WA 001605 M.slv_MINC—.—Ib M PAGE' 1 CS Renovation Program • Pipes are selected and prioritized for renovation based on risk M • CCTV Score • History of SSOs or Plugs • Maintenance History • Capacity • Environmental (e.g. creeks) • Social (e.g. traffic, zoning) • Potential Volume of SSO (diameter) Pipe Renovation Progress (6, 8 & 10" Mains) 2006/07 8.1 Miles 2007/08 5.6 Miles 2008/09 6.3 Miles 2009/10 7.5 Miles 2010/11 2.6 Miles 2011/12 6.8 Miles 2012/13 5.3 Miles 2013/14 4.5 Miles 2014/15 3.3 Miles 2015/16 3.2 Miles (estimated) (Grayson Creek Trunks not included) Renovation Program Impact on Number of SSOs Running 12 -Month Overflow Totals 2003 to present 200 180 Feb 2003: 167 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 51 20 0 rV N N N N N N N N N N N N mr m me m m me m me m m mr me > > > > > > > > > > > > 12- Month Total at Month -End Collection System (CS) Renovation Program FY 15 -16 FY 2015 -16 COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENSE R &R Lafayette 10, Martinez 4, M1 CIPP $ 9,000,000 Lining, and others Capacity /R &R Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek $ 511001000 Trunk Pumping Stations Pumping Station equipment, piping $ 4007000 replacement and Safety Improvements Developer services Cost Neutral $ 700,000 Contractual Cost Neutral $ 5001000 Assessment Districts Capacity/ Planning Planning and CS Modeling $ 750,000 Estimated Total $ 16,4507000 Major Renovation Projects • Lafayette, Ph. 9 - 9,000' of 8 to 15" • Martinez, Ph. 4 - 8,500'of 8 to 127' • Per River Watch Agreement: ✓ Lines within 200' of creeks are weighted 20% higher to account for increased risks ✓ Pipes w/ adjusted scores: — >20,000 must be renovated by 1/1/17 — 10,000 to 20,000 must be renovated by 1/l/20 M1 CIPP Lining 4 CIPP lining of corroded 3,000'of 42 -inch RCP located at Treatment Plant n CS Capacity Program _. Pleasant Hill Note: Master Plan will be - 1' leasant Hill /Grayson Creek 'al' updated and projects C C4 -A C4 -F verified after dynamic � 1', I -- IF o01 C4 -0 C4 -B hydraulic model completed ` Lafayette - f CS -A Pleasant Hill Road (Co leted in FY 2011 /12)`- 4--C --Nt t �D4 -E �_. r7 13D4-13 D4 - ��.. ,..1 2 -A D3 -A D4 -D y D4 -A ,'� �• ES -A Walnut Creek- P4- / E3 -C E3-A C Walnut Blvd E3-13 E4 B•�_� S E4 -A 175-A F3 -A F3 B F3 -C`1 Moraga Moraga Way "',, E:]. L - - -- G3 -4 .05 -A �I .eg en d He -A San Ramon - apacity Deficiency Group Percent Full Pipe Capacity San Ramon Schedule C •� 1 (2040 Development, 5 -year Event) O / �J 2 No Slope or Invert Elev f 3 —100% 145-A A �- - >100% to < =130% 11/" 4 —• >130% Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek Trunk • Install 12,000' of 18 to 24" in Pleasant Hill • Renovation /hydraulic capacity — Abandon several deficient sewer lines —Will provide relief for other capacity - deficient sewers • Coordinating with City of Pleasant Hill pavement reconstruction project and other Agencies. 680 'Nil Op Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Phase 4 Sewer Mains Creeks Pumping Stations (PS) Program Program includes: • 19 Stations • Force mains • R &R Projects Prioritization based on: • Equipment Replacement • Safety Improvements • Corrosion Protection • PS Inventory (AMP) • Condition Assessments (AMP) 2011 Update Coo F `_ Clyde 4 Central Contra Costa Sanitary itino[ District Pacheco Map of rd Service P..Pln atxlon Area Pleasan June 30. 2011 HIII Clayton ®florapa O CCCSD Pumping Stations 'Walnut wfW IpeWm a 461,000 peeps. Creek Orinda Lafayette P..Pln atxlon 2.1 11 L—Ul- Alamo sI... tFlO RM.al' 0Oe.,Ken6•at MGD ®florapa 11 IiYH BA Orhai H"C.l W e QJy Danville 10 O da Gr .,-ft occw. .r%Me BUtlrq Inxrtwf NHWCOWM fa0R1' San Ramon vsuewse, caeowWdtmewwam CCCSD Pumping Stations wfW IpeWm a 461,000 peeps. W.rtcwxer a.W.4 and lt"cd*Aa1 P..Pln atxlon I M.U- 11 L—Ul- a175.400nUaerlt in CalcUa.Ila C %Okatyro wtl sI... tFlO RM.al' 0Oe.,Ken6•at MGD 11 IiYH BA Orhai H"C.l W e QJy 7 MM/ 10 O da Gr .,-ft occw. .r%Me BUtlrq Inxrtwf NHWCOWM fa0R1' . 8ee eM 01.16C.fe 4 c," S. Ca d Yqufnel 14 W R&IM pIH. aae t0�6"#d CSOO.Pa14nM Mmew 15 Mx g. 6 6adlarun FW ram 1s San R—n IS W. /n CCC50'f CMed- *Manor.*.. Ote.eenl•IOIA00 • i. 811cenrlUlf.Mt Saar MR10Rall'e1WreQ DroxineM lMwa maMarwrcel latal.a fy a Sow Hdw V Wp1 «R J1 Meer cnmW�xnAOaNNIp •OeetarMn t01MA O.AwOa 16 Larwr YNOH 170111 10 flM q.en 1B UPWYM.r(1012) PS Program Cathodic Program Prioritized based on: • Cathodic Protection Master Plan • Current CP Annual Survey (updated every other year) • Projects identified I I •Y, .b �. �4 r Treatment Plant Program .. -.'�.. fie.. - -`�:•itx�r � _ FY 2015 -16 TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM CATEGORY PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENSE Planning Treatment Plant Planning and Comprehensive Master Plan $ 1,200,000 R &R Primary Treatment Renovation $ 11400,000 Sustainability Pump & Blower Seismic Upgrade $ 21400,000 R &R Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades $ 118007000 Regulatory Headwork Screenings $ 9007000 R &R Piping Renovation Phase 8 $ 11500,000 All Other $ 319607000 Estimated Total: $ 1371607000 Seismic Retrofit Program (10 Year Plan) Concord Fault Proximity to District Facilities Seismic Retrofit Program Project 2015 10 -YR CIP CONSTRUCTION Pump & Blower $ 319001000 Yr. 2 -FY 2015 -16 POB Office Area $ 134001000 Yr. 5 - FY 2018 -19 TP Warehouse $ 950,000 Yr. 6 - FY 2019 -20 Laboratory $ 3501000 Yr. 10 - FY 2023 -24 SCB1 $ 112001000 Yr. 10 - FY 2023 -24 Estimated Total: $ 73800,000 1 Seismic Retrofit of SCB was estimated at $8 Million for construction; does not include bracing furnaces. Budgeted outside 10 year plan in anticipation of potential changes by TP Master Plan. 0 0 Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades Replace old, at the end of useful life, equipment Parts for existing centrifuges becoming obsolete • Increase percent solids, means less MHF Fuel r 0 Screenings Facility Upgrade Predesign Study — Determine Best Options — Pilot New Screens — Screenings Washer /Compactors — Reduce Plastics to Process — BOD /TSS reduction y Aw- ` y' 4; rF r Screenings Facility Upgrade New fine screens Screening washer /compactor Conveyance /disposal System .I6, I I Treatment Plant Planning • Treatment Plant Master Plan (MP) — Comprehensive Treatment Plant MP — Formal RFQ /RFP for Qualified Consultant — Condition Assessments — Review of all existing District reports — Experts in Incineration/ Solids Handling — Detailed CI P • Pilot Plant Program — Continue Zeolite Annamox Pilot — Dewatering — Screenings Plant Energy Optimization PG &E SST program • Feasibility Analysis • Investment Grade Analysis • Potential Construction Projects focused on: —UV — Lighting — Motors —HVAC REPAYiil SAVINGS EQUIPMENT TP- Recycled Water Facilities • Filter Rehabilitation • Existing Equipment replacement as needed TP- All Other Includes: • Cogen Rotating assembly - $ 600k • Equipment Replacement - $ 300K • Critical Switchgear Project - $500k • Fire Alarm Project - $300k • SST Project - $500k • Urgent Repair - $150k • TP Recycled Water - $250k FY 2015 -16 GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS Vehicles and Equipment $ 800,000 Information Technology $ 113673000 Asset Management Program $ 7501000 GIS, GDI, CMMS Replacements $ 8111000 All Other $ 3057000 Estimated Total: $ 4,033,000 Asset Management Program Development, DP 8238 Plan Elements to Initiate in FY 15/16: • AM Steering Committee 11 0 0 C.n�w.w�M 11 CIY1MCOn1ll CO \ll. \Iptlll p \I\ F MMNJ I l \{It YIMIMYIN WIIIWwII�QVn 1I��bII WyYlwe lllal I ��CN�y Asset Hierarchy & Data Standards �� MWI Complete Asset Register (incl. TP piping Business Process Mapping Failure Modes &Condition Assessment Protocol See Handout Budqet: $750k FY 15 -16 �� SI CMMS Replacement, DP 8242 Sc o e: This project will consolidate software systems into one comprehensive CMMS solution for both collections and plant and that efficiently integrates with GI.1 Budget: $500k FY 15 -16 Schedule: Task Tentative Schedule RFP for Implementation Services Feb — May 2015 Phase 1 - Integration Design Jul — Sep 2015 Phase 2 — CSO Migration & Configuration Oct 2015 — Mar 2016 Phase 3 — TP Migration & Configuration Jul — Dec 2016 GIS -GDI Replacement, DP 8238 Status: GIS migration from Geomedia to ESRI software will be complete Spring 2015 Next: Update web mapping solutions (this replaces the GDI portal software) Budget: $271k FY 15 -16 ES L r S ESG Data J a 3 m District and Developer Jobs Mapping GeoMedia Collection system plan and profile drawings AutoCAD SQL Server 2005 ESG -SQL \WEB GIS FME (attributes) ESG Data Bo �y �e A aPg�phjca/ vs$b�i SMMS WORKFLOW SEE ADDITIONAL DIAGRAM IBM ASl400 Server SOL Server 2005 SOL Server 2005 Qiserie EO J2 sQl-oi HTE Accela CCCSDLF6 (Laserfiche) NEX l' ColdFuslon (Reports) MapGulde (Spatial) 0 GDI Web Server (Windows 2003 ServerAlS 6 .0) k. GDI FY 2015 -16 FUTURE RECYCLED WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENSE Martinez Refineries and other REW Future Expansion Planning work $ 150,000 Concord Landscape — Customer Connections $ 1001000 Estimated Total: $ 250,000 Martinez Refinery Project Construction Unbudgeted/ Conducting 0.5MGD Use with CCWD Board Role in Capital Program is Ongoing • Set Initial Capital Funding Levels in December • Confirm Capital Funding Levels in Jan /February as part of overall District Ten Year Financial Plan • Board Workshop Focused on CIB /CIP Projects April • Authorize CIB /Program Budgets and O &M Budget in June • Authorize Supplemental Program Funds when needed • Award Construction Projects > $100,000 • Authorize Construction Change Orders >$100,000 • Authorize Consultant Contracts > $100,000 Questions or Comments?