HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.a.3) GM Written Announcements/40(.3)
Board Meeting of July 23, 2015
Written Announcements:
PROJECT UPDATES
a) Public Bidding for Diesel Fuel Tank Repairs, District Project 6170
The Diesel Fuel Tank Repairs project, District Project 6170, will make internal weld
repairs to the District's two 200,000 - gallon diesel fuel storage tanks. Repairs were
identified using the American Petroleum Institute (API) 653 Above Ground Storage Tank
Inspection standard.
This project will be advertised in August with bid opening in late August. The cost
estimate is $70,000, which is within the General Manager's authority to award.
PURCHASING
b) Contracts Signed by General Manager during Second Quarter
2015
The Board has asked to receive quarterly reports of the professional consulting
agreements entered into by staff that fall within the increased staff authority limits that
became effective December 15, 2011. On that date, the limit on staff authority for
professional consulting services agreements was raised by the Board from $50,000 to
$100,000. This is a report of all professional agreements entered into by staff which fall
within the new staff authority limits (over $50,000 and less than $100,000) and
amendments that cause agreements to fall within this dollar range.
Listed below are all such agreements /amendments entered into during the second
quarter of 2015 (4/1/15 6/30/15):
5/6/15
041924
Y
Bienati
Added $15,000 /
$54,000
Consulting
Management
Group
Academy and
Executive Team
Follow Up
6/3/15
041556
Y
KWR
Added $25,000 /
$75,000
District -wide Right of
Way Consulting
6/24/15
043089
N
RMC Water
Wholesale Recycled
$75,000
and
Water Opportunities
Environmental
Study
Written Announcements'
July 23, 2015
Page 2 of 2
All other contracts that are not considered "professional services," such as maintenance
services, equipment, chemicals, and supplies, do not require Board approval regardless
of dollar amount. The Board approves the annual budget which includes the expenses
that come from these contracts, so these contracts are not included in this report as they
have historically been within staff authority.
SOLAR POWER
c) Response Letter to the California Public Utilities Commission
CPUC
On February 19, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the General Manager to execute
three power purchase agreements with SunEdison for solar power at the District's
Collection System Operations (SCO) Building, Vehicle Maintenance Shop, and
Household Hazardous Waste Facility.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) will be considering an item on July 23,
2015 changing the rate structure for solar systems, greater than 75kw in size, which
would affect the CSO Building project. If approved the projected savings may be greatly
diminished. The District sent the letter (attached) to the CPUC and Governor Brown's
Office to explain the impacts of the Proposed Decision and urge the CPUC to protect
PG &Es rate structure for solar projects that are currently under consideration or under
contract.
PUBLIC HEARING FOR DELIQUENT CHARGES
d) Public hearing date for delinquent charges has been set for
August 6
A public hearing has been set administratively for August 6 to receive comments on
delinquent charges for 2500 Annalisa Drive in Concord. Staff has been attempting to
collect approximately $103,000 in unpaid capacity fees from the property owner for over
two years. The charges arise from an expansion and change in use of the building from
an electrical contractor's office and light industrial space to a sorbet and ice cream
manufacturing business known as Caffe Classico. The property owner and founder of the
business did not seek a District permit for the changes, which would have necessitated
payment of the capacity fees based on the change in use. This matter will be discussed
at the July 27 Finance Committee meeting.
Wmi -
I
ATTACHMENT 1
PHONE: (925) 228-9500
FAX.- (925) 228-4624
wMv.centralson,org
ROGER S. MIX)'
General umwger
San Francisco, CA 94102 Sccrefat�� oflhe Distriv
Sent via email to - MP!. @gpuc, gg._qov
NE: PROPOSED DECISION TO PG&E'S CURRENT GENERAL RATE CASE (A.13-04-0121
Dear President Picker,
We appreciate your continued efforts to serve the public by protecting consumers and ensuring
the provision of safe, reliable utility service and infrastructure at reasonable rates, and your
commitment to environmental enhancement and a healthy California economy. We recently
became aware of a proposed California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) decision to PG&E's
current General Rate Case (A.13 -04 -012) that requires further attention. This proposed
decision would financially harm many public agencies, schools, and medium-sized businesses
by restricting new customers on PG&E's A-6 rate to only small-sized businesses effective
July 23, 2015.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, a public agency in Martinez, California, responsible for
collecting and treating wastewater from approximately a half million residents in central Contra
Costa County, recently collaborated with 18 other government agencies in the Regional
Renewable Energy Procurement Project (R-REP). This is the nation's largest procurement of
distributed solar systems for public facilities, which recently received recognition from the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy.
As a result of R-REP, these 18 agencies have so far contracted for solar systems at 46 public
facilities for a total of 12.6 megawatts of power, with additional sites to be contracted in the
future. With the elimination or significant changes to A-6, many of the financial benefits for
which the R-REP agencies budgeted would disappear. These planned projects may no longer
be financially viable, and may no longer be valid in cases where energy cost savings are
required to comply with public contracting rules. Without A-6, there would be an estimated loss
of $300,000 in net savings to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and our planned projects
may no longer be financially viable.
N:VEnvrSec\Admin%Bailey120151Letter\CCCSD A6 Rate Change Letter.docx I$ hcycw paps
Re: Proposed Decision to PG&E's Current General Rate Case (A.1 -g4 -012)
July 16, 2015
Page 2 of 2
Regulatory uncertainty increases costs for customers, and for public agencies, this affects tax-
paying citizens. With the recent Net Energy Metering ruling, Governor Brown and the CPUC
have shown that expected financial returns for solar customers are worth protecting. This
proposed decision would reverse that signal for projects that are under consideration or under
contract, such as ours. The CPUC should be striving to assure customers that dramatic
changes are only made with sufficient lead times to respect the development timelines
involved in major energy investments.
As the assigned commissioner in this proceeding, we urge You to allow customers to take
service under Schedule A-6 until a new rate is designed for medium-sized commercial solar
customers, We also urge you to protect the structure of Schedule A-6 (no demand charges,
high Peak to Off-Peak cost ratio) to ensure that the solar investments we have made and plan
to make in the immediate future are protected and can serve to reduce utility expenses for
local government agencies and schools, while also maintaining a strong and sustainable clean
energy industry in our state,
S Ln
cerely,
Roger S. Bailey
General Manager
cc: Nancy McFadden
N: EnvrSec dm in Baileyk2Ol5NLetter\CCCSO A6 Rate Change Letter.docx