HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.a. (Handout) PowerPoint - Cost of Service StudyItem No. 11.a.
Comprehensive Wastewater
Cost of Service Study
June 4, 2015
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Cost of Service Study
Conducted by a Consultant
Raftelis Financial Consultants
zw
R�ARY p� 00-p CQ37
g�,Ya'...irsr Corr
M CD_
MandoO)
To match the costs of
providing service to
customer classes and to
design rates to equitably
recover costs.
6/4/2015
N
Why do a Cost of Service Study?
• Cost of Service is the fundamental
benchmark used for establishing public
utility rates in the United States
• Ensure fair and equitable rates for user
groups
• Ensure compliance with Proposition 218
and recent court decisions
MEMO a-
6/4/2015
3
Cost of Service Process
• Determine revenue requirements from rates
MAI • Conduct mass balance based on customer loadings
• Example: Collection, Treatment, Customer, General, etc.
• Allocate functional costs to cost components
• Example: Flow, BOD, TSS, Customer, and General
W7-Develop unit costs
• Allocate costs to customer class based on unit costs
MI
6/4/2015
4
1
1
Steps Taken to Control O &M Costs
• Proposed O &M Budget is flat
• Staffing Needs Assessment
• Strategic purchase of natural gas
• Use of landfill gas
• Savings on chemicals purchased through
Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC)
6/4/2015
5
Steps Taken to Control Pension Costs
• Full share of employee contribution
expenses by the end 2017 contract.
• District was the only one of 17 CCCERA
employers to file briefs with the court in
defense of newly - passed pension reform.
• $15M in additional payments towards
UAAL by FY 2016 -17.
• Pension contributions decreased by
$5.8M in FY 2015 -16.
Historic Capital Improvement Program
Infrastructure Investments Totaled over $300 Million
54, M E
E
540 M � E
E
E E E
SnM E ° ° E E
S•rM
•t1
5.M
$1'1M
51M
56 A,
0107 0701 0101 0405 0660 0607 6706 6601 6410 1611 1111 11 1) 1) H
FWw"
6/4/2015
0
Capital Improvement Program
Looking Forward
• We are a large, capital- intensive
operation requiring long -term planning for
significant future infrastructure
replacement:
— Comprehensive Master Plan
— Condition Assessments
— Asset Management
sdl�C��
Projected Infrastructure Investments
Twenty Year Capital Improvement Program May Exceed $1.5 Billion
$413 million
•RRR ■Capacity [apanslon ."gVatory • Sustanaba.ry/OptJrrk n
6/4/2015
7
O &M and Capital Assumptions
• Updated CCCERA five year contribution
rate projections
— AB 197 impacts included
— Two additional UAAL contributions of $2.5M
• FY 2016 -2025 ten -year CIP total of $413
million (unescalated)
• Pay -as- you -go capital funding
CD_ W.,
Reserve Policy
• 5 months of next year's O &M expenses
• 100% of next year's debt service
• 50% of next year's capital expenses
• $6,500,000 in self- insurance and
emergency reserves
Reserve Targets met by Fiscal Year 2020
6/4/2015
NO
Revenue
Requirements
1�
FY
2015 -16 Revenue
Requirements
Debt
..
Sewer Service Charge
70,390,000 8,110,000 0
78,500,000 64%
City of Concord
13,700,000 3,15Q000 0
16,85Q000 14%
Recycled Water
0 257,000 0
257,000 0%
Property Tax
0 1Q060,000 3,779,654
13,839,654 11%
Capacity Fees
0 6,634,000 0
6,634,000 5%
All Other
3,402,300 556,500 42,676
4,001,476 3%
Draw from Funds Available
0 2,022,500 0
2,022,500 2%
TOTAL REVENUE
87,492,300 30,790,000 3,822,330
122,104,630 100%
FY 201516 Budget
Final Pass Revenue
- -,
6/4/2015
E
Cost of Service
Analysis
"OCD_
Existing Customer Profile
Accounts Sewer Service Charge Revenue
;3ens:a!
3
114,745 Total Accounts
D
6/4/2015
10
Proposed Customer Profile
Accounts Sewer Service Charge Revenue
Non
Residential
3r�
MFR
17% lop IV
114,745 Total Accounts
Based Customer Loadings Developed
Through Cost of Service Study D
Proposed
New Multi- family Rates
• US Census data for the District shows
lower density for multi - family structures
• Based on census data and a mass
balance analysis, adopt lower rate for
multi - family, mobile homes, 2nd units, and
condos
E-A Me -1
6/4/2015
11
Cost of Service
Results for Schools
Elementary Schools
Intermediate Schools
High Schools
Table 4.2
Cost of Service Report
5 gallons per student
perschoolday
5.3 gallons per student
perschoolday
5.6 gallons per student
per school day
5 gallons per student
per school day
10 gallons per student
perschoolday
15 gallons per student
perschoolday
Cost of Service
Results for Non - Residential
Standard Commercial 150 165 150 165
Hotels /Motels 150 165 310 120
Automotive 150 165 180 280
Supermarkets 150 165 700 360
Table 4 -1
Cost of Service Report
�dOPCD_
6/4/2015
12
M
Recommended
Adjustment Schedule
Fiscal Year Revenue Adjustments
2016 7.24%*
2017 7.30%
2018 5.57%
2019 5.35%
2020 4.97%
weighted average of all user groups
Table 1 .1
Cost of Somme Report
13
Current and
Proposed
Rates
4YbndalMnuY [lama IvrReddennY Urvl ERmuaknr:
Rare Group YR
Slntle iamilY P•<IIinU
N)Im $mJm
S5.»
[RMmninium, MUlll famlr Motile Names
LAW N63m 5aR)m
SS RI
[•mmprdYMemlMUaWaI leer N[I
are Group XD
XN
Rasenea
$111) 51131 S13x2
are Group XF
5661
NC) X)1 XH
S)l3
Rare Gaup•i
$)% Sle.)e 111.7
5)05
R<auunnra
X 31 X 11 X H
5611
Narela /Ibni�
NC) XW XN
—1
Rme Group FN
ammlre
N[) Ss.la Ss
Xas
SuMala CwnmerYY
N[) NN N%
Xll
IMurtaY
Rare Group Yl
1171
to suer na. larncl
SIX Slal
are Wpup YF
B00 Inerlmal6.
%i sLlia 5I 35
s II
fla.11
I.
5!67 sS SN)
Sla.1R
MIVa UV loe -
ateer XA
Xa;
N%
55 31
Rare Group YR
NRJ
X X
S5.»
Wre fueup XC
ss IS
SS RI
56.11
are Group XD
XN
5631
X.fi)
are Group XF
5661
XN
S)l3
Rare Gaup•i
Xax
5)05
f)X
Y
Rare D
5611
5)a)
Xal
—1
Rme Group FN
5)n
51.
Xas
Rare Group Yl
$)6a
Xll
X.91
Rare Group Yl
1171
X9)
s1069
are Wpup YF
$9 aR
X61
fla.11
Are Group Xl
59)9
Sla.1R
slag;
Role Graua FM
MIs
$ ID_Sa
SII }6
Rare Group XN
slasl
5w)6
SIIN
Role Group YD
Slo)a
SID%
$1169
ImYUaeMI tar nail
Cnwrnea
Nm
NN
N%
sUieala lDarRare nnuMq UrvvenllRl
• 11
1.31
14
Stltppla lFlememaryl larawaenrl
SS fi}
55»
X.19
SNatlallnrermMlatel lurDUaeml
X.96
511.
51}16 I!�`
SNeaIalNiln Ynmll 1o<r atuaenll
X1)
516.91
5X If
J
ztY 9mue R•ppn Mnimum annuY[ra
NX
Sotto
SSN _
I
Sewer Service Charge Comparison
With Other Agencies
2615.16
Rd vdanm, ssephi.
Agmey SIC
Ift— Rd,Rlarvm
Santa Rosa $1,212
WA 51.212
- _
Petaklma $1,075
WA $1075
Rodeo Sankary Diseict $962
_
$57
Berkeley JEBMUD brtrealmen0 $769
_51019
WA $769
Oakland {EBMUDbrrearnero $698
WA 5698
Crockett Santry District $698
$219 ' $917
Benicia $665
WA $665
Brentwood $643
WA $643
_
konhouse Sanitary Risurt $637
$10 $647
Richmond $633
WA $633
2015.16 Mean Rate of Agencies Surveyed $571
WA $571
Novato $552
$64 —f616
VaMOp $520
WA $520
Mountain View Sankary District $516
$27 $543
Pittsburg lDDSD brtreaunenq 5491
_
519 5510
LNemuore $489
WA $489
br1 e-anem: $489
$20 $509
A&= 20Y16 Rate $471
S79 $550
Napa Sanitation Distinct $470
WA $470
Pleasanton 5448
WA 5448
t •1 9
S78 516
Antioch lDDSObrtreatrnent) $426
S2U $446
Bay Point JDDSD br treatment) $421
$62 5483
West County Wasbwaier District $407
$20 $427
Concord �CCCSDb_rtreatneny $402
WA $402
Fairfield IFSSD) $393
WA $393
Dublin San Ramon Sernces District $373
$13 ' $386
Union Sanitary District $357
WA 5357
D
pdated May 27 2015 Om Loma Sanitary Distrct $206
WA $206
6/4/2015
14
Residential Annual
Wastewater Bill Impacts
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Effective Effective July 1, 2015 July 1, 4
Current July 1, 2015 July 1, ,. Increase Increase
Single Family Residence $439 $471 $503 $32 $32
Multi - Family Residence $439 $463 $487 $24 $24
Tab la 1.3 rL
Cost of Service Report
Typical
Non - Residential
Annual Wastewater
Bill
Impacts
Average
Annual Usage July 1. 2014
Customer Class Average Bill
Hotels /Motels 5,959 $24,252
July 1, 2015 July 1, 2016 July
Average Bi I I Average Bill DifferenteDiff.
$48,027 $51,483
1, 2015 Ju
$23,775
2016 July 1, 2015 J.lyl,2016 ii
ence Difference Difference
$3,456 98.0% 7.2%
Supermarkets 2,932 $11,931
$25,534 $27,381
$13,602
$1,847 114.0% 7.2%
Standard Commercial 722 $2,937
$3,348 $3,593
$411
$245 14.0% 7.3%
Restaurants 799 $6,647
$6,958 $7,462
$312
5503 4.7% 7.2%
Automotive 294 $1.197
$1,571 $1,686
$374
$115 31.2% 7.3%
Tablet -4
Cost of Service Report
_,14 7
7 ��
6/4/2015
15
School
Wastewater
Schools (Daycare, Preschool, University) (per HCF)
Schools (Elementary) (per student)
Schools (Intermediate) (perstudent)
Schools (High School) (per student)
Table 1.2 (portion(
Cost of Servke Report
Annual
Bill Impacts
Current Proposed Proposed
Effective Effective Effective
July 1, 2014 July 1, 2015 July 1, 2016
r
A CD_
School Rates
• CCCSD unable to use "winter quarter"
estimates of water consumption due to
student breaks
• Cost of Service study recommended
increasing per- student wastewater flow
rates
• CCCSD will review actual water
consumption and adjust bill based on
lower use, if applicable
c
a.
6/4/2015
16
Customer Outreach
• Mailed April 15, 2015:
• 106,519 Sewer Notices
• 313 Letters to Impacted
Customer Classes
• 251 Recycled Water Notices
• Spring 2015 Cover of
Pipeline Newsletter
advertised Rate
Hearing
• Acalanes USD
• Athenian School
• Bentley School
• De La Salle High
School
• Martinez School
District
• Mt. Diablo USD
• San Ramon Valley
USD
• No response from
10 remaining
Schools /District
• 8 properly noticed
regularly scheduled
Public Board
Meetings
• 2 offsite Public
Board Workshops
(6- hours)
• 10 Total Meetings
6/4/2015
17
Recycled Water Retail Rates
Potable Water $3.28/1,000 gal $3.38/1,000 gal $3.48/1,000 gal
Customers
Canal (Raw) $1.56 /1,000 gal $1.61 /1,000 gal $1.66/1,000 gal
Water Customers
Raftelis Financial Consultant has done an assessment and determined
that recycled water retail rates do not exceed cost of service.
_l�`D
Recycled Water - Wholesale
• Raftelis Financial Consultant has reviewed
our recycled water program and has
established wholesale rate
• Proposed wholesale rate of $308 /AF will
be reviewed by the REEP Committee on
June 5, 2015
6/4/2015
18
6/4/2015
19