HomeMy WebLinkAbout12.d. BUDGET: Final Draft FY 2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget and 2015 Ten-Year Capital Improvement PlanAi
-Nw-
FY 2015 -16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Introduction
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the CIB .................. ............................... Intro -1
Summary.......................................................... ............................... Intro -3
Project Prioritization ............................................ ............................... Intro -3
Capital Improvement Budget System ...................... ............................... Intro -5
Capital Project Contingency Spending ................ ............................... Intro -5
Table 1: Capital improvement Budget Summary for FY 2015 -16 ...........
Intro -8
Table 2: Treatment Plant Program Budget /Project List ........................
Intro -9
Table 3: Collection System Program Budget /Project List .....................
Intro -11
Table 4: General Improvements Program Budget /Project List ..............
Intro -13
Table 5: Recycled Water Program Budget /Project List ........................
Intro -14
Major Project Emphasis ....................................... ...............................
Intro -15
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan ................. ...............................
Intro -18
Authorization Limits ............................................. ...............................
Intro -19
Table 6: Capital Improvement Program Authorization Limits ...............
Intro -20
Treatment Plant Program:
Introduction.......................................................... ............................... TP -1
Treatment Plant Projects:
Tab 1: Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety ........ ............................... TP -2
Tab 2: One -Time Renovation ............................... ............................... TP -11
Tab 3: Recurring Renovation ................................ ............................... TP -27
Collection System Program:
Introduction............................................................ ............................... CS -1
Collection System Projects:
Tab1: Renovation ............................................. ............................... CS -4
Tab 2: Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety ....... ............................... CS -24
Tab3: Expansion ............................................... ............................... CS -29
Tab 4: Pumping Stations ..................................... ............................... CS -32
General Improvements Program:
Introduction........................................................... ............................... GI -1
General Improvements Projects:
Tab 1: Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition ............. ...............................
GI -2
2015 -16 Equipment Budget
Tab 2: Management Information Systems ............... ...............................
GI -3
I.T. Development Plan
Tab3: Projects .................................................. ...............................
GI -7
Tab 4: Asset Management Plan ............................ ...............................
GI -16
Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary
Recycled Water Program:
Introduction........................................................... ............................... RW -1
Recycled Water Projects .......................................... ............................... RW -2
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the CIB /CIP
AB
Assembly Bill
ADA
Americans with Disabilities Act
ADWF
Average Dry Weather Flow
AFY
Acre -feet per Year
AN
Aeration and Nitrification
ARB
Air Resources Board
ArcSNAP
Sewer Network Analysis Program
ASB
Auxiliary Steam Boiler
AWWF
Average Wet Weather Flow
B &G
Buildings and Grounds
BAAQMD
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
CAA
Clean Air Act
CAD
Contractual Assessment District
CAM
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
CaIOSHA
California Occupational Health and Safety Administration
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CBC
California Building Code
CCCERA
Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association
CCCSD
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
CCTV
Closed Circuit TV
CCWD
Contra Costa Water District
CEC
California Energy Commission
CECs
Constituents of Emerging Concern
CIB
Capital Improvement Budget
CIP
Capital Improvement Plan — covers ten years
CIPP
Cured in Place Pipe
CNWS
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Co -Gen
Cogeneration
CO2
Carbon Dioxide
COP
Certificates of Participation
CS
Collection System
CSO
Collection System Operations
CSOD
Collection System Operations Division
DAF
Dissolved Air Flotation tanks
DI
De- Ionized or Discrete Input
District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
DP
District Project
DTSC
Department of Toxic Substances
DWR
Department of Water Resources
EIR
Environmental Impact Report
Elec
Electrical
EOC
Emergency Operations Center
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
ERP
Enterprise Resource Planning
FCD
Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -1
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the COCIP
Fund
Sewer Construction Fund
FY
Fiscal Year — July 1 through June 30
GDI
Geographic Data Integration
GHG
Greenhouse Gas
GI
General Improvements Program
GIS
Geographic Information Systems
GPS
Global Positioning System
HOB
Headquarters Office Building
HTE
SunGard Program
HVAC
Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning
IEEE
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IFCO
Industrial Furnace Company
1/0
Input and Output
IT
Information Technology
LT
Long Term
M1
Manhole 1
MCC
Motor Control Center
MGD
Million Gallons per Da
MHF
Multiple Hearth Furnace
NACWA
National Association of Clean Water Agencies former) AMSA
NPDES
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NFPA
National Fire Protection Agency
O &M
Operations & Maintenance
PE
Primary Effluent
PLC
Programmable Logic Controller
PG &E
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Ph
Phase
POB
Plant Operations Building
POD
Plant Operation Division
PPE
Personal Protective Equipment
PS
Pumping Station
PTW
Power Tools for Windows software program)
RFP
Request for Proposal
RWQCB
Regional Water Quality Control Board
RUE
Residential Unit Equivalent
RW or ReW
Recycled Water
SCADA
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SCB
Solids Conditioning Building
SCF
Sewer Construction Fund
SSC
Sewer Service Charge
SSMP
Sewer System Master Plan
SSO
Sanitary Sewer Overflow
TP
Treatment Plant
USACE
United States Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
v
volt
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -2
SUMMARY
The District's Capital Improvement Budget shows planned expenditures of $30,790,000 for
Fiscal Year 2015 -16 from the Sewer Construction Fund for planning, design, and
construction of capital projects in four CIB programs. The total proposed funding
authorization required for projects in the CIB for FY 2015 -16 is $51,872,000, including new
budgets and estimated carry -over from FY 2014 -15.
The capital program is designed to meet the following goals:
• Protect public health and the environment,
• Maintain and replace existing assets,
• Embracing a policy of sustainability for the responsible use of existing
resources
• Respond to regulatory and community concerns,
• Accommodate planned future growth.
By adopting the CIB, the Board of Directors authorizes staff to pursue work on specifically
identified projects in the Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements, and
Recycled Water Programs.
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
The projects included in the FY 2015 -16 CIB have been prioritized to ensure the best use
of available, approved funds. Each project was scored using a District - specific
prioritization scoring sheet by each program manager and supported by input from
project managers as well as staff from Engineering and Plant Operation and Maintenance
Departments. Each project was then assigned a priority ranking of Critical, Very High,
High, or Medium depending on the project score.
The prioritization scoring and ranking system for all CIB projects in each of the four
programs use existing prioritization strategies, including guidelines from the Water
Environment Research Foundation (WERF), and prioritization procedure examples from
other agencies.
The prioritization scoring sheet includes the following criteria separated into three
categories (Essential Commitments, Project Benefits, and Operational Reliability):
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -3
Criteria
Max
Points
Essential Commitments
5
Complies with Regulatory Requirements and Mandates
20
Meets Commitment with Outside Agency or Existing Contract
20
Reduces Potential Health or Safety Hazards
20
Implements Board of Director's Policy /Priority
10
Increases Capacity to Meet Projected Build -out
10
Project Benefits
Impacts Project Phasing or Implementation Schedule for Other
Projects
5
Optimizes Capital Expenditures
5
Reduces Operations and Maintenance Costs
5
Reduces Social Impacts
5
Increases Sustainable Use of Natural or Existing Resources
5
Reduces Environmental Impacts
5
Supports Timely Adoption of Technology Improvements
5
Operational Reliability
Consistent with Asset Management Policies
10
Improves Reliability and System Performance
10
Improves Facility-Wide Resiliency
5
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE
140
The prioritization scoring sheet includes sub - criteria and scoring guidelines for assisting
with the assigning of points for each criterion. For each sub - criterion, the prioritization
scoring sheet includes the applicability to triple- bottom -line considerations (social,
environmental, financial) and applicability to the District's Mission and Strategic goals.
To account for the variety of criteria used and that not all criteria are applicable to every
CIB program, each project is assigned one of the following ranking categories
depending on the project's score:
• Critical: Priority rank if score is 65 points or higher.
• Very High: Priority rank if score is 50 points or higher and less than 65 points.
• High: Priority rank if score is 25 points or higher and less than 50 points.
• Medium: Priority rank if score is less than 25 points.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -4
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SYSTEM
The CIB includes detailed information for projects in the first year of the ten -year Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP). Board authorizations are made to add funds to the four programs
prior to the start of the fiscal year.
Under the CIB system, budgets are authorized for project work within the four budget
programs. Budgets are established by program since precise costs for individual projects
are difficult to estimate when CIB preparation often precedes project initiation by a year or
more. Projections of costs for broader categories of project work can more reliably be
made during budget preparation since positive and negative variations in project estimates
are expected to balance in a program summation.
Program authorizations are expected to exceed annual expenditures during any particular
budget year since larger planning studies, engineering designs, and construction contracts
typically span more than one fiscal year and the budgets are authorized in full at the
beginning of each phase of the projects.
As shown in Table 1, by adopting the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB), the
Board authorizes allocations from the Sewer Construction Fund for planning, design, and
construction of capital projects in the four programs. As shown in Table 1, Column "A ",
there is approximately $9.8 million to be carried over from previous Board- authorized -but-
unspent project budgets from FY 2014 -15. The total required new Board authorization for
projects beginning in FY 2015 -16 as indicated in Table 1, Column "B" is $42.1 million.
The total Board authorization for projects that are active in the CIB in FY 2015 -16 is the
sum of these two numbers, or $51.9 million as shown in Table 1, Column "C ". The
estimated FY 2015 -16 expenditure total is $30.8 million (shown in Table 1 Column "D "),
leaving an estimated $21.1 million in authorizations for projects that carry into future years.
These figures will be adjusted when actual FY 2014 -15 expenditures are known and actual
FY 2015 -16 carry over can be determined. At that time, the Board will be informed of the
corrected figures for the four programs in the CIB.
Table 2 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project list for
the treatment plant program. Table 3 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements
Program Budget/ Project list for the collection system program. Table 4 presents the FY
2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project list for the general improvements
program. Table 5 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project
list for the recycled water program.
Capital Project Contingency Spending
Two types of contingency funding of capital projects are provided for: project contingency
and program contingency. Table 6 identifies staff authority to approve funds for project
budget overruns.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -5
The program contingency fund is 10% above the total Estimated Expenditures (new FY
2015 -16 projects or phases) amount approved by the Board when the Capital Budget is
adopted, except for the Collection System Program which is a fixed $900,000. These
amounts are set aside in a separate account and used for new projects that are not in the
CIB, or to fund project budget overruns, and pay for urgent work or emergency work as
needed. A maximum of $100,000 can be allocated by the General Manager to a project
not in the CIB.
The following table identifies revenue sources for the four programs of capital
improvement projects. Capital Program revenue is discussed further in the Finance and
Revenue section of this document.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -6
Capital Improvement Program Revenue Sources
Program
Subfund
Revenue Source
Expansion - Additional capacity to
Capacity Fees
serve new customers
City of Concord
Treatment
Property Taxes()
Plant
Upgrading /Replacement -
City of Concord
Improvement of existing facilities to
�d�
serve current customers
Sewer Service Charge
Debt Financing
Capacity Fees
Expansion - Additional capacity to
Pumped Zone Fees
serve new customers
Developer Fees
Collection
Upgrading /Replacement -
Property Taxes(c)
System(a)
Improvement of existing facilities to
Sewer Service Charge �d�
serve current customers
Debt Financing
General
Property Taxes()
Improvements �b�
Sewer Service Charge�d�
Property Taxes()
City of Concord
Sewer Service Charged)
Recycled Water
--------------- - - - - --
Customer Revenue
Loans(e)
Debt Financing
Grant funds M
(a) Includes pumping station facilities.
(b) Includes improvements to administrative facilities (Headquarters Office Building and CSO yard),
land purchases, vehicles, equipment, and furniture.
(c) Property taxes may be used for any District purpose at the discretion of the Board of Directors within
Proposition 4 limits and Clean Water Grant regulations; however, the uses indicated are
recommended as the most equitable.
(d) A capital improvements increment was added to the annual sewer service charge in 1992 to
supplement ad valorem taxes for upgrading /replacement of District capital facilities.
(e) State Water Reclamation Loan Program
(f ) DWR Prop 84 Funds, Bureau of Reclamation Title 16
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -7
Table 1: Capital Improvement Budget Summary for Fiscal Year 2015 -16
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro- 8
A
B
C
D
Estimated Carry-
Estimated Allocation
Estimated FY
Over from Previous
this FY (All Projects
Total Proposed
2015 -16
FY
including
Authorization
Expenditures
Program
Contingency)
Treatment Plant
$ 2,185,000
$ 13,828,000
$16,013,000
$ 10,410,000
Collection System
$ 5,788,000
$ 24,650,000
$30,438,000
$ 15,950,000
General Improvements
$ 1,540,000
$ 3,113,000
$ 4,653,000
$ 3,980,000
Recycled Water
$ 288,000
$ 480,000
$ 768,000
$ 450,000
Total this Fiscal Year
$9,801,000
$42,071,000
$51,872,000
$ 30,790,000
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro- 8
TABLE 2: FY 15 -16 CIB Treatment Plant Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/19/15
List of Active TP Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Estimated Expenditures
C
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to
date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget
FY 14115
FY15/16
FY 16/17
Future FY
Page
Critical
7265
C
TP Equipment Replacement
$1.412.100
$1.107,400
$304.700
5300.000
SO
$0
$0
TP -27
Critical
7285
C
Primary Treatment Renovation
$14.947.000
$8.219.628
$6.727.372
S6.100.D00
5566.000
50
$0
TP -11
Critical
7292
D
Switchgear Refurbishment - ph 2
5420.000
5119.280
$300.720
550.000
$250.000
SO
SO
TP -12
Critical
1 7297
P
lWet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
5125.000
$964
5124.036
525.000
$100.000
$01
50
TP -13
Critical
7301
P
ITreatment Plant Planning
$2.448,000
51,994,863
$453,137
$350.000
5100,000
$0
$0
TP -2
Critical
7309
C
DAF Tank Renovation
51.050.000
S130.292
5919708
$918.500
SO
$0
$0
TP -14
Critical
7310
D
Piping Renovations- phase 8
5250.000
586.917
5163.083
S163.000
SO
SO
SO
TP -28
Critical
7311
D
TP Safety Enhancement Ph4
5100.000
$39.907
$60.093
5150.000
SO
$0
$0
TP -3
Critical
7311
C
TP Safety Enhancement Ph4'
$500.000
SO
$500.000
$0
$500,000
$0
SO
TP -3
Critical
7312
P
Ash Facility Improvements
540.000
50
$40.000
50
$40,000
50
50
TP -4
Critical
7316
C
SBT Emergency Repairs
S714.450
$27.006
5687.444
S662.444
S25.000
$0
$0
TP -15
Critical
7319
C
Laboratory Upgrades & Repair
S 148.000
50
S 148.000
S 144.D00
54,000
50
$0
TP -29
Critical
7322
P
Fire Protection System Ph2
S40.000
s0
$40.000
S20,000
520,000
SO
SO
TP -5
Critical
7314
C
Urgent Repairs
550.000
s0
S50.000
$20.000
S20.000
s0
$0
TP -30
Very H
7286
P
Centrifuge & Cake Pumps
$200.000
50
$200.000
530,000
$170,000
SO
50
TP -16
Very H
7291
D
Pump & Slower Bldg Seismic Upgrade
S505.000
5357.409
5147.591
S75.000
570.000
SO
SO
TP -17
Very H
7304
C
Instr & Controls PLC Upgrade
5235.000
$96.669
5138,331
$80.000
557,000
50
50
TP -18
Very H
7315
P
Izecjite Annamox Pilot Project
S250.D00
$ 1.671
S248.329
S 100.000
S 140.000
s0
s0
TP -6
Very H
7317
C
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
580.000
s0
S80.000
S15.000
565.000
s0
$0
TP -19
Very H
7320
P
Plant Energy Optimization
590.000
50
$90.000
$35.000
S55,000
50
SO
TP -31
Subtotal:
$23,604,5501
$12,182,006 1
$11,422,5441
$9,237,9441
$2,182,000
$0
$0
List of projects in FY 2015 -16 (Unallocated)
A. Carryover= $2,185,000
Critical
7292
C
Switch ear Refurbishment h 3
S100,000
SO
$0
SO
5100,000
5250,000
$650.000
TP -12
Critical
7297
D
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
5500.000
SO
SO
SO
5500,000
SO
SO
TP -13
Critical
7301
P
Treatment Plant Planning Ph2
5250.000
$0
$0
50
5250,000
$350,000
5300,000
TP -2
Critical
7310
C
Piping Renovations- phase 8
S1.500.000
SO
SO
SO
51.500.000
SO
$0
TP -28
Critical
7324
D
Critical Switch gear
$600.000
$0
$0
s0
S350.000
$250.000
$0
TP -20
Critical
7319
C
Laboratory Upgrades & Repair
S200.000
SO
SO
SO
S200,000
S150,000
S150.000
TP -29
Critical
7322
D
Fire Protection System Ph2
$200.000
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
TP -5
Critical
7326
C
JEquipment Replacement FY15 -FY24
$250.000
50
s0
50
5250.000
5250.000
51.900.000
TP -32
Critical
7343
P
ITP Master Plan
$2.200.000
SO
SO
50
$1.400.000
$800.000
SO
TP -7
Critical
7327
P
Head,,vorks Screening
S250.000
SO
SO
50
5250,000
SO
$0
TP -21
Critical
7327
D
Headworks Screening
S650.DO0
$0
$0
s0
5150.000
$500.000
SO
TP -21
Very H
7330
P
Piping Renovation Phase 9
S100,D00
$0
$0
s0
$ 100.000
s0
$0
TP -33
Very H
7330
D
Piping Renovation Phase 9
S300.000
SO
SO
SO
S300,000
SO
SO
TP -33
Very H
7335
C
TP Security
S100.000
SO
s0
SO
S80,000
$25.000
$300.000
TP -34
Very H
7286
D
Centrifuge & Cake Pumps
$200,000
50
SO
50
5200,000
$400.000
SO
TP -16
Ver H
7291
C
Pump & Blower Bldg Seismic Upgrade
55.000.000
SO
SO
s0
51.000.000
54.000.000
$0
TP -17
Ver H
7304
C
Instr & Controls PLC Upgrade
$100.000
SO
SO
SO
$100.000
$100.000
$400.000
TP -18
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -9
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to
date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget
FY 14/15
FY15/16
FY 16/17
Future FY
Page
Very H
7315
P
Zeolite Annamox - Pilot Program
5100,000
SO
s0
SO
S100,000
S200.000
51.000.000
TP -6
Very H
7320
D
Plant Energy Optimization
$300.000
SO
s0
$0
$300.000
SO
SO
TP -31
Very H
7317
C
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
580.000
s0
s0
s0
S50.000
5100.000
5300.000
TP -19
Very H
7339
P
Plant Control System UO Replacement
5100.000
s0
s0
50
5100.000
5100.000
SO
TP -22
High
7341
P
WC / Grayson Creek Levee Rehab
SO
s0
s0
s0
s0
so
s0
TP -8
Critical
7327
C
Headworks Sceening
56.000.000
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
56.000.000
TP -21
Critical
7322
C
Fire Alarm
5600.000
s0
s0
s0
s0
S600.000
s0
TP -5
Critical
7312
D
Ash Facility Improvements
$280.000
s0
50
s0
s0
$280.000
$O
TP -4
Critical
7312
C
Ash Facility Improvements
51.000.000
SO
50
SO
SO
SO
51,000.000
TP -4
Critical
7297
C
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
$8,400,000
s0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$8,400,000
TP -13
Very H
1 7330
C
Pipinq Renovation Phase
51.000.000
SO
s0
s0
s0
S1.200.000
s0
TP -33
Very H
7286
C
Centrifuge & Cake Pumps Furnace 1
51,200.000
s0
s0
50
s0
S200.000
51.000.000
TP -16
Very H
7286
C
Centrifuge & Cake Pumps Furnace 2
$1,200.000
s0
$0
$0
s0
S200,000
S1.000.000
TP -16
Very H
7320
C
Plant Energy Optimization
51.000.000
SO
s0
SO
SO
S200.000
5800.000
TP -31
Very H
7339
D
Plant Control System 1/0 Replacement
S600.000
s0
s0
SO
s0
$100.000
5500.000
TP -22
Very H
7339
C
Plant Control System 1/0 Replacement
$3,500,000
s0
50
$0
50
$0
$3,500,000
TP -22
Very H
7333
P
TP Safety Im rov 2011 -12 thru 2019 -20
S500.000
SO
SO
SO
SO
$50.000
$50.000
TP -9
Very
7340
P
TP Electrical Cable Repl - LT
$100,000
s0
$0
$0
50
$100,000
$0
TP -35
7332
P
Electrical and Instr Re I
$100.000
SO
s0
$0
50
50
$100.000
TP -36
7328
D
Influent Pump 6 for third wetwell
$500.000
s0
s0
s0
s0
5500.000
SO
N/A
7331
P
Plant Cyber Security
S50.000
s0
$0
$0
s0
$50,000
s0
TP -23
7338
P
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation
$50.000
s0
s0
$0
SO
$50.000
$150.000
TP -10
7341
C
WC / Grayson Creek Levee Rehab
$600.000
SO
s0
s0
s0
$200.000
5400.000
TP -8
7334
P
Coating Renovation
$150.000
s0
$0
$0
$O
$100.000
$50.000
TP -37
Medium
7336
P
JPavement Renovation
5150.000
Sol
Sol
Sol
Sol
Sol
S150,0001
TP -38
Medium
7337
P
Concrete Renovation
$150.000
$0
SO
50
SO
50
$150.000
TP -39
Un ranked
7323
P
Aeration system improvements
SO
SO
s0
So
s0
S100.000
s0
TP -24
Un ranked
7325
P
Disinfection System upgrades
$1,585.000
50
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$1,585,000
TP -25
Un ranked
7329
P
MHF Burner upgrade
$900.000
SO
$O
$0
$0
$100.000
$750.000
TP -26
1 B. Estimated Allocations for FYI $13,080,000 $0 $0 $OI $7,480,000 $11,655,000
2015 -16 TP Program:
Total Proposed Authorization
A +B +Contigency= C
"Pending Award
$16,013,000
Program Contigency 10%: 1 $748,0001 $1,165,500
Estimated Expenditures by FY: 1 $10.410.000 $12.820.500
Estimated FY
2015 -16
Expenditures
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -10
TABLE 3: FY 15 -16 CIB Collection System Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/19/15
List of Active CS Pro'ects Bud et allocated and tracked in Sun uard
Estimated Expenditures
C
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget
FY14/15
FY15/16
FY 16/17
Future FY
Page
Critical
5941
C
PS Equipment Piping Replacement
$640,000
$568,793
$71,207
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
CS -32
Critical
5982
C
Pipeburst Blanket Contract
$828,000
$652,285
$175,715
$150,000
$22,200
$0
$0
CS -4
Critical
5999
C
ICIPP Blanket Contract
$472,000
$113,6191
$358,381
$100,000
$125,000
$125,000
$0
CS -55
Critical
8404
C
Laf Sewer Reno Ph8
$2,735,000
$2,426,698
$308,302
$300,000
$8,000
$0
$0
CS -6
Critical
8406
C
Pump Station Safety Improvs
$611,000
$166,769
$444,231
$442,000
$2,000
$0
$0
CS -33
Critical
8411
C
N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph5
$3,020,000
$626,590
$2,393,410
$1,550,000
$0
$0
$843,000
CS -7
Critical
8412
D
PH Grayson Creek*
$1,250,000
$579,074
$670,926
$600,000
$70,000
$0
$0
CS -29
Critical
8413
C
WC Sewer Reno Ph 10
$3,884,000
$805,818
$3,078,1821
$3,073,180
$0
$0
$0
CS -8
Critical
8415
D
Martinez Ph 4 Sewer Reno
$823,000
$216,739
$606,261
$606,000
$0
$0
$01
CS -*
Critical
8417
C
Survey Monument Install
$150,000
$98,259
$51,741
$50,000
$1,000
$0
$0
CS -10
Critical
8418
C
Col System Modeling
$350,000
$148,398
$201,602
$100,000
$1,600
$0
$0
CS -24
Critical
8419
P
Collection System Planning
$320,000
$100,315
$219,685
$200,000
$19,000
$0
$0
CS -25
Critical
8421
D
Laf Sewer Reno Ph9*
$650,000
$283,0811
$366,919
$366,000
$0
$0
$0
CS -11
Critical
8421
C
Laf Sewer Reno Ph9*
$2,504,200
$0
$2,504,200
$500,000
$2,004,200
$0
$0
CS -11
Critical
8422
P
WC Sewer Reno Ph 11*
$100,000
$88,342
$11,658
$61,658
$0
$0
$01
CS -12
Critical
8423
P
N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6*
$150,000
$92,333
$57,667
$57,000
$0
$0
$0
CS -13
Critical
8424
D
M1 Rehab
$250,000
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
CS -14
Critical
8424
C
M1 Rehab
$2,526,000
$0
$2,526,000
$250,000
$2,276,000
$0
$0
CS -14
Critical
8425
C
Cathodic Protection Ph 1
$559,000
$0
$559,000
$550,000
$9,000
$0
$0
CS -15
Critical
8426
P
Laf Reno Ph 10*
$205,000
$0
$205,000
$210,000
$45,000
$0
$0
CS -18
Critical
8427
P
Arc Flash Study
$100,000
$0
$100,000
$70,000
$30,000
$0
$0
CS -34
Very H
5991
P
PH Sewer Renovation Ph2
$200,000
$133,017
$66,983
$1,000
$66,000
$0
$0
CS -18
Very H
5993
P
Forcemain assessment
$127,000
$96,535
$30,465
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
CS -26
High
5962
P
Mahole Remot Monitor
$325,500
$131,963
$193,537
$5,357
$1,000
$1,000
$138,000
CS -27
NA
8402
na
CADS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CS -30
NA
8420
na
Development Sewerage
$1,720,0001
$1,019,9421
$700,058
$820,000
$0
$0
$01
CS -31
Subtotal:
$24,499,7001
$8,348,5701
$16,151,130
$10,363,195
$4,680,000
$126,0001
$981,000
List of Droiects in FY 2015 -16 fUnallocatedl
A. Carry -aver $5.788.000
Critical
5941
C
PS Equipment Piping Replacement
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$0
CS -32
Critical
8412
C
PH Grayson Creek*
$9,450,000
$0
$0
$0
$3,050,000
$6,400,000
$0
CS -29
Critical
8415
C
Martinez Ph 4 Sewer Reno
$3,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$3,100,000
$0
$0
CS -9
Critical
8417
C
Survey Monument Install FY15 -FY16
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
$0
CS -10
Critical
8418
C
Col System Modeling
$400,000
$0
$D
$0
$400,000
$200,000
$0
CS -24
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -11
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget
FY14/15
FY15116
FY16/17
Future FY
Page
Critical
8419
P
Collection System Planning
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$200,000
$700,000
CS -25
Critical
8423
D
N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
CS -13
Critical
8423
C
N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
CS -13
Critical
8426
D
Laf Reno Ph 10*
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$01
CS -16
Critical
8426
C
Laf Reno Ph 10'
$3,000,000
So
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
CS -16
Critical
8435
P
WC Sewer Reno Ph 12'
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
CS -19
Critical
5982
C
Pipe Bursting Blanket FY15 -FY18
$450,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$200,000
$250,000
CS -4
Critical
8431
P
Collection System Master Plan
$1,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$600,000
$600,000
$0
CS -28
Critical
8430
P
Laf Sewer Reno Ph 11
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
CS -20
Critical
8434
C
Urgent Projects
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$270,000
$0
$0
CS -17
Very H
8436
P
Moraga/ Crossroads PS Project
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$01
CS -35
Very
8429
P
Fairvew Maltby
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$120,000
$400,000
CS -36
Medium
8437
P
Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
CS -21
NA
8420
na
Development Sewerage
$700,000
$0
$0
$0
$700,000
$0
$0
CS -31
NA
8402
na
CADS
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$1,100,000
CS -30
Critical
8422
D
IWC Sewer Reno Ph 11*
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
CS -12
Critical
8422
C
WC Sewer Reno Ph 11`
$3,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,100,000
CS -12
Critical
8435
D
WC Sewer Reno Ph 12*
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
CS -19
Critical
8435
C
WC Sewer Reno Ph12*
$3,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,100,000
CS -19
Critical
8433
P
S. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6'
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
CS -22
Critical
8433
D
S. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6`
$3,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
CS -22
Critical
8430
D
Lafayette Sewer Ph 11*
$350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
CS -20
Critical
8430
C
I Lafayette Sewer Ph 11*
$3,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
CS -20
Very H
5991
D
PH Sewer Renovation Ph2
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
CS -18
Very H
5991
C
PH Sewer Renovation Ph2
$2,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,100,000
CS -18
Very H
8436
C
Moraga/ Crossroads PS Project
$940,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$440,000
CS -355
Medium
8437
D
Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno
Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno
Cathodic Protection Systems Ph2
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
CS -21
Medium
8437
C
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,500,000
CS -21
Medium
8438
P
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
CS -23
NA
8420
1 na
I Development Sewerage
$700,000
$D
$0
$0
$0
$700,000
$700,000
CS -31
NA
8432
1 C
IMisc Pump Stations
$1,230,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,000
$1,150,000
CS -37
B. Estimated Allocations for FY $23,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,370,000 $17,100,000
2015 -16 CS Program:
Fixed Program Contigency: $900,000 $900,000
Estimated Expenditures by FY: $15,950,000 $18,126,000
Total Proposed Authorization Estimated FY
A +B +Contigency =C $30,438,000 2015 -16
" Riverwatch I I Expenditures
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -12
TABLE 4: FY 15 -16 CIB General Improvements Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/15/15
List of Active General Improvements Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Estimated Expenditures
P
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to
date
Prior FY(s)
Remaining
Budget
FY14115
FY15116
FY16117
Future FY
Page
Critical
8227
D
GDI Treatment Plant
$265,000
$222,442
$42.558
$0
$0
$42.500
$0
GI -3
Critical
8232
D
GDI SMMS Replacement
$852,000
$444,919
$407.081
$136,000
$271,000
$0
$0
GI -4
Critical
8236
P
District Easements
$140,000
$58,894
$81,106
$70,000
$11,000
$0
$0
GI -7
Critical
8237
C
Buffer and Rental Improvements
$240.000
$27.048
$212.952
$0
$212,000
$0
$0
GI -8
Critical
8238
P
Asset Management
$700,000
$0
$700.000
$600.000
$100.000
$0
$0
GI -16
Critical
8239
C
POD Office Improv'
$330,000
$0
$330,000
$90.000
$240.000
$0
$0
GI -9
Critical
8240
C
IT Development
$1.000.000
$0
$1,000,000
$700.000
$300.000
$0
$0
GI -5
Critical
8242
C
CMMS Replacement
$198.000
$0
$198,000
$50.000
$148.000
$0
$0
GI -6
Critical
8243
P
Server Room Relocation
$100,000
$0
$100,000
$57,000
$43,000
$0
$0
GI -10
Very H
8515
C
Equip and Vehicles
$617.200
$0
$617,200
$617.200
$0
$0
$0
GI -2
Very H
8207
P
General Security and Access
$60,000
$47,616
$12.384
$0
$0
$12.000
$0
GI -11
Very H
8233
C
CSOD Facility Improvements
$200.000
$161,103
$38,897
$20.000
$13.000
$5.500
$0
GI -12
Very H
8234
1 C
IHOB Improvements
$334=01
$236.2441
$97,756
$60.0001
$10.000
$27,500
$0
GI -13
NA
1 8226
1 C
Seismic HOB
$5.941,0001
$5.847.587
$93,413
$92.000
$1,000
$0
$0
GI -14
NA
1 8230
1 P
lCapital Legal Services
$210.0001
$79.2851
$130.715
$30,0001
$33.0001
$67.500
$0
GI -15
Subtotal:
$11,187,2001
$7,125,1381
$4,062,062
$2,522,2001
$1,382,0001
$155,000
$0
List of Projects in FY 2015 -16 (Unallocated)
A. Carry Over= $1,540,000
Critical
8236
P
District Easements
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$0
GI -7
Critical
8238
P
Asset Management
$600.000
$0
$0
$0
$500.000
$0
$0
GI -16
Critical
8240
C
IT Development
$1,000.000
$0
$0
$0
$1.000.000
$0
$0
GI -5
Critical
8242
C
CMMS Replacement
$477.000
$0
$0
$0
$360.000
$117,000
$0
GI -6
Critical
8243
D
Server Room Relocation
$100.000
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
GI-1T-
Very H
8516
C
Equip and Vehicles FY15 -16
$500.000
$0
$0
$0
$450,000
$0
$0
GI -2
Very H
8234
C
HOB Improvements
$100.000
$0
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$0
GI -13
Very H
8233
C
CSOD Facility Im rovments
$50.000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$46,000
$50.000
GI -12
Very H
8207
P
General Security and Access
$38,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$38.000
$100.000
GI -11
Critical
8227
D
GDI TP 16 -17
$120.000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,000
$40.000
GI -3
Critical
8236
P
District Easements 16-17
$100.000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50.000
GI -7
Critical
8238
P
Asset Management 16 -17
$1.500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$900.000
$600.000
GI -16
Critical
8240
C
IT Development 16 -17
$1.300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1300.000
$0
GI -4
Critical
8243
C
Server Room Relocation
$1.000.000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1.000.000
$0
GI -10
Ve H
8516
C
Equip and Vehicles 16-17
$500.000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$01
GI -2
B. Estimated Allocations
FY 2015 -16 GI Proan
Total Proposed Authorization
A +B +Contingency= C
$2,877,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,362,000 $4,186,00
Program Contigency10 %: $236,000 $419,00
Estimated Expenditures by FY: $ 3.980.000 $ 4.605.00(
$4,653,000 I I Estimated FY
2015 -16
Expenditures
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -13
TABLE 5: FY 15 -16 CIB Recycled Water Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/15/15
List of Active Rew Projects
Bud et allocated and tracked in Sung uard
Estimated Expenditures
Recycled Water Planning
Priority
Project
Number
Current
Phase
Project
Allocated to date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget
FY 14/15
FY15 /i6
FY 16/17
Future FY
Page
Critical
7299
C
Concord Landscape
$3,915,000
$3,697,629
$217,371
$130,000
$87,000
$0
$0
RW -2
Very H
7279
P
Concord Naval Weapons REW
$280,000
$264,855
$15,145
$1,100
$0
$5,000
$0
RW -3
Very H
7300
P
Refinery REW
$385,000
$283,727
$101,273
$50,000
$4,0001
$47,500
$0
RW -4
Very H
7306
D
Zone 1 Recycled Water
$145,000
$35,061
$109,939
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
RW -55
Very H
7306
C
Zone 1 Recycled Water
$75,000
$0
$75,000
$0
$29,000
$46,000
$0
RW -55
Subtotal:
$4,800,000
$4,281,272
$518,728
$231,100
$120,000
$98,500
$0
List of Projects in FY 2015 -16 (Unallocated)
A. Carry Over = $288,000
Critical
7344
P
Recycled Water Planning
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$150,000
$0
RW -6
Critical
7345
P
Filter Plant
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
Rye/ -7
Critical
7344
C
Filter Plant 16 -17
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$50,000
RW -7
Critical
7346
P
Surge Analysis 16 -17
$60,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$65,000
$0
RW -8
IB. Estimated All ratio 6 Rew Program I $450,0001 $0I $0 $0 $300,0001 $365,0001
I Program Contigency 10 %1 $30,0001 $36,5001
Total Proposed Authorization
A +B +Contigency = C
Estimated FY
2015 -16
Expenditures
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -14
MAJOR PROJECT EMPHASIS
Although the CIB is made up of funding estimates for many individual projects, each year
there are several major projects which together account for a majority of total estimated
capital expenditures. In FY 2015 -16 the emphasis will be on 12 large projects, which
together account for $19,486,000 or 63% of the total estimated expenditures. Estimated
FY 2015 -16 expenditures for each of these projects are noted below.
1. Primary Treatment Renovation
FY 2015 -16: $560,000 Estimated total project cost: $14,947,000
Estimated completion date: Oct. 2015
This project will renovate or replace the water and air supply pipelines at the primary
sedimentation tanks. The grit handling facility will be renovated, and the scum
collection system will be renovated with new scum sprays, new helical scum skimmers
and drives, and stainless steel scum hoppers for Tanks 1 and 2. The scum thickening
unit in the Solids Conditioning Building will also be replaced. Other primary tank
improvements include installation of new baffles, replacing chain drives, sludge flight
drive shafts and bearings, concrete repairs, upgrading hand railings, constructing a
new level control structure, and the odor control system will be evaluated and modified
as necessary. Refurbishment of Primary Effluent (PE) Pump 1 and PE Pump 2 are
included in the project.
2. M1 Rehabilitation Project
FY 2015 -16: $2,276,000 Estimated total project cost: $2,776,000
Estimated completion date: Nov. 2015
This project will renovate approximately 3,000 feet of the M1 transmission line, a 42"
diameter reinforced concrete pipeline located on the treatment plant site.
3. Lafayette Sewer Renovations — Phase 9
FY 2015 -16: $2,100,000 Estimated total project cost: $3,154,200
Estimated completion date: Jan. 2016
This project will replace /rehabilitate approximately 8,500 feet of six- and fifth teen -inch
sewers in the Lafayette area.
4. Martinez Sewer Renovations — Phase 4
FY 2015 -16: $3,100,000 Estimated total project cost: $3,923,000
Estimated completion date: May 2016
This project will replace or rehabilitate up to 8,000 lineal feet of six and eight- inch
sewer mains located in the City of Martinez.
5. Information Technology Development
FY 2015 -16: $1,300,000 Estimated total project cost: $9,700,000
Estimated completion date: July 2024
This project provides funding for the District's computer and telecommunication
technology needs and implementation of the IT Master Plan.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -15
6. Pleasant Hill — Grayson Creek Trunk
FY 2015 -16: $3,100,000 Estimated total project cost: $10,700,000
Estimated completion date: Jan. 2017
The recommended project involves installing approximately 12,000 feet of 15 -, 18 -,
and 24 -inch relief sewers and diverting the sewage away from the deficient sewers and
for future renovation needs.
7. Piping Renovations - Phase 8
FY 2015 -16: $1,500,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,750,000
Estimated completion date: May 2016
This project will improve the process reliability of the treatment plant by renovating
and /or replacing various piping, instrumentation and equipment that has been
identified by engineering, operations and maintenance staff.
8. Pump and Blower Seismic Upgrades
FY 2015 -16: $1,200,000 Estimated total project cost: $5,600,000
Estimated completion date: June 2017
This project is part of the District's Seismic improvement plan created in 2009 based
on the Treatment Plant Seismic Vulnerability Assessment. The project will retrofit the
Pump and Blower Building to be in line with current seismic design standards.
9. Asset Management Program Development
FY 2015 -16: $600,000 Estimated total project cost: $2,700,000
Estimated completion date: June 2018
The District is developing a comprehensive asset management program that aims to
optimize the lifecycle of all assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a
sustainable manner for customers with an acceptable level of risk. Implementation will
occur over the next three years and will include such tasks as standardizing and
completing the asset register, drafting to consolidate treatment plant As- Built,
consolidating CCTV databases, and updating the asset management plan. Specialty
tasks utilizing outside assistance include utility locating, developing the reliability
centered maintenance program, conducting condition assessment of critical treatment
plant piping, integrating failure -based maintenance strategies, developing program
management standards or software /tools, and reviewing the updated asset
management plan.
10. Development Sewerage
FY 2015 -16: $700,000 Estimated total project cost: $3,481,000
Estimated completion date: June 2018
This project provides for appropriate capitalization of District force account labor and
other expenses for planning, design, and construction of developer - installed and
contributed main sewer facilities.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -16
11.Vehicle & Equipment Acquisition
FY 2015 -16: $450,000 Estimated total project cost: $500,000
Estimated completion date: July 2016
This project provides funding and capitalization of the District's annual purchase of
vehicles and major equipment.
12. Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan
FY 2015 -16: $2,600,000 Estimated total project cost: $5,250,600
Estimated completion date: June 2017
This project will develop a comprehensive master plan for the wastewater treatment
plant and collection system for development of the Capital Improvements Plan and
budgets, including condition assessments, collection system dynamic model, filter
plant, in coordination with asset management.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -17
The CWMP will be funded by several capital improvement projects listed in the FY15/16
CIB, spanning across the Treatment Plant, Collection System, and Recycled Water
programs. The table below outlines those projects, their relationship to the CWMP and the
amount of budget that will support all master planning efforts.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -18
Budget Attributed to the CWMP
Project
No.
program
Project Name
Relationship to the CWMP
(Including Project Contingencies)
FY15/16
FY16/17
Total
Funds staff time for the
7301
TP
TP Planning
Treatment Plant Master Plan
$265,000
$265,000
$530,000
portion of the CWMP
Funds consultant agreement for
7343
TP
TP Master Plan
the Treatment Plant Master Plan
$11400,000
$800,000
$2,200,000
portion of the CWMP. Includes
project contingency.
Funds consultant agreement for
the recycled water task in the
7345
ReW
Filter Plant
Treatment Plant Master Plan
$200,000
$150,000
$350,000
portion of the CWMP. Includes
project contingency.
Funds consultant agreement for
developing the collection system
8418
CS
CS Modeling
model as part of the Collection
$401,600
$200,000
$601,600
Upgrade
System Master Plan portion of
the CWMP. Includes project
contingency.
Funds staff time for the
8419
CS
CS Planning
Collection System Master Plan
$169,000
$200,000
$369,000
portion of the CWMP
Funds consultant agreement for
8431
CS
CS Master Plan
the Collection System Master
$600,000
$600,000
$1,200,000
Plan portion of the CWMP.
Includes project contingency.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -18
AUTHORIZATION LIMITS
Under the established CIB system, the District Board of Directors and staff have well -
defined authority limits. The Board of Directors authorizes funds for the four CIB programs
(Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements, and Recycled Water) from
the Sewer Construction Fund at the beginning of each fiscal year. The Capital
Improvement Program Authorization Limits are detailed in Table 6, which follows.
Once the CIB is approved by the Board, the General Manager has the authority to
allocate funds to the individual projects contained in the CIB up to the total program
budget. If a project is not included in the CIB, the General Manager can allocate
contingency funds up to $100,000. If an individual equipment item is not included in the
CIB, the General Manager can allocate funds up to $50,000 per item. The General
Manager can allocate funds from program accounts to cover project budget overruns, up
to 15% of the final project budget established at the time of the construction contract
award, with a maximum of $1,000,000 per project. Finally, the General Manager may
award construction contracts less than $100,000 and authorize consultant agreements
less than $100,000.
The Board of Directors also has an ongoing role after it approves the CIB and the CIP.
Specific Board approval is required for award of construction contracts over $100,000, for
consultant agreements over $100,000 and for project overruns in excess of 15% of the
final project budget or over $1,000,000 per project. In addition, any allocation to a new
project not included in the CIB that exceeds $100,000 must be authorized by the Board.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -19
Table 6: Capital Improvement Program Authorization Limits
1 Limited by the remaining balances of the applicable program and contingency account
2 Limited by the remaining balance of the applicable program contingency account
3 Final project budget is established at time of award of construction contract
4 Bid protests and rejection of all bids must go to Board regardless of dollar amount
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -20
Board of
Action
General Manager
Directors
Approve Capital Plan
None
No limit
Authorize Capital Program budgets
None
No limit
Allocate funds to individual project budgets
Total program budget plus
No Board authorization
contingency
required
Professional Consulting Services
$100,000 or less
Greater than $100,000
Authorize
Consultant
Technical Consulting Services.
$100,000 or less
Greater than $100,000
Contracts
Professional Eng. Services.
$100,000 or less
Greater than $100,000
Allocate funds from program contingency accounts to
$100,000 or less per
Greater than $100,000
projects not included in the CIB
project2
Individual equipment items and equipment contingency in
Up to amount specified in
Above amount specified in
the Equipment Budget
Equipment Budget
Equipment Budget
including contingency
including contingency
Individual equipment items not in the Equipment Budget
$50,000 or less
Greater than $50,000
Authorize supplemental funds to program budgets/
Not applicable
Sewer Construction Fund
contingency accounts
balance
15% of final project
Allocate funds for project budget overruns after award of
budget',2,3 or up to a
Greater than 15% of final
construction contract
maximum of $1,000,000
project budget3 or above
per project, whichever is
$1,000,000 per project
less
Award construction contracts4
$100,000 or less
Greater than $100,000
Authorize
Additive
$100,000 or less
Greater than $100,000
construction
change orders
Deductive
No limit
No Board authorization
required
Subcontractor substitutions
All substitutions unless
Substitutions protested by
protested by subcontractor
subcontractor
Informational
Construction project acceptance
All projects
announcement to the
Board
Close out project
All projects
Memo provided to the
Board at end of FY
1 Limited by the remaining balances of the applicable program and contingency account
2 Limited by the remaining balance of the applicable program contingency account
3 Final project budget is established at time of award of construction contract
4 Bid protests and rejection of all bids must go to Board regardless of dollar amount
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -20
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
This section includes detailed information for the Treatment Plant Program for the FY
2015 -16. Detailed project information, schedules, and cash flow tables are presented
in individual project sheets.
OVERVIEW
The Treatment Plant Program continues with asset preservation, future regulatory
compliance, major renovation and one -time improvements, and seismic
strengthening.
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety (Tab 1)
This subprogram includes projects that emphasize preparing for future regulations
and treatment plant planning, which includes pilot testing various new technologies
and developing the Treatment Plant Master Plan. Work will be done to comply with
new air permitting requirements and install incinerator emissions improvements. A
long term project to identify and remove any hazardous materials at the Treatment
Plant will continue. In addition, the wastewater treatment master planning effort will
be started this fiscal year and continue for a total of approximately two years. Safety
and security improvements will continue under this subprogram.
One -Time Renovation (Tab 2)
This subprogram includes two high expenditure projects. The largest project is the
completion of the Primary Treatment Renovation Project, a two -year effort that has
been renovating the primary facilities. The second project, Seismic Upgrades for the
Pump and Blower Building, will retrofit the building to current design standards.
Projects commencing to predesign level are the Critical Switchgear, Wet and Dry
Scrubber, Centrifuge replacement, and the Headworks Screening projects.
Recurring Renovation (Tab 3)
Projects in this subprogram are targeted at asset preservation. The main project in
this program is the Piping Renovations Project -Phase 8, which will improve the
process reliability of the treatment plant by renovating and /or replacing various
piping, instrumentation and equipment. Other projects include Plant Energy
Optimization, Urgent Repairs, Laboratory Repairs and Upgrades, and Plant Electrical
and Instrumentation.
Expansion (Tab 4)
There are no projects in the Expansion program in FY 2015 -16.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget TP -1
Treatment Plant Planning
Project Name
Treatment Plant Planning
Project No.
7301
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Dan Frost
Ranking Score
85
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To fund ongoing feasibility and planning studies needed to address regulatory initiatives to
maintain permit compliance and optimizations to improve the reliability and performance of
existing treatment plant processes and facilities.
History:
As wastewater regulations continue to develop and as new wastewater treatment technologies
becomes available, process modifications may be required in the Treatment Plant. This project
included the Suisun Bay modeling results, Facility Plan & Site Characterization Report and
associated studies submitted to satisfy the District's NPDES permit.
Description:
This project will include the District's efforts to support the BACWA Regional Optimization and
Upgrade Study that is being implemented to satisfy the 2014 Nutrient Watershed Permit,
evaluation of treatment plant process modifications and optimizations, and other treatment plant
planning related studies.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$100,000
1 -11/12
4 -21/22
$1,994,863
$350,000
$250,000
$350,000
$300,000
$3,244,863
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$1,994,863
$350,000
$350,000
$350,000
$300,000
$3,344,863
TP -2
Treatment Plant Safety Enhancements Phase 4
Project Name
Treatment Plant Safety Enhancements Phase 4
Project No.
7311
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To enhance plant safety through identification of safety concerns, repairs and capital
improvements.
History:
The District and the treatment plant have very pro- active safety programs that are administered
by separate committees. These committees are responsible for addressing safety concerns as
identified by the craftsmen, or to respond to the ever- changing regulatory requirements. Often
this response will require construction of a capital project. The first three phases of this program
addressed various safety repairs and improvements.
Description:
This project is currently being bid in FY 2014 -15 and is scheduled for construction in early FY
2015. The project will include a hazardous waste facility improvements and other safety related
items. In addition, the project will be coordinated with safety improvements identified in the
general improvements program, the costs will be assigned to its perspective program.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FYs
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FYs
Total
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
$39,907
$0
$0
$0
$0
$39,907
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$39,907
$150,000
$500,000
$0
$0
$689,907
TP -3
Ash Facility Improvements
Project Name
Ash Facility Improvements
Project No.
7312
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
This project will improve ash containment within the Solids Conditioning Building (SCB).
History:
The ash system collects the ash at the bottom of the furnaces and conveys it to storage bins
located on the third floor northwest corner of the SCB. A vacuum method is used to transmit the
ash through the SCB where it is collected by filters and storage cyclones prior to disposal. The
filter and storage location is not isolated from other processes within the SCB, so ash may on
occasion spreads through the building, resulting in potentially expensive and difficult
housecleaning.
Description:
This project will make improvements to limit the amount of ash dispersed within the SCB and
contain the storage area.
Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$40,000
$0
$0
$40,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$280,000
$0
$280,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$40,000
$280,000
$1,000,000
$1,320,000
TP -4
Fire Protection Phase 2
Project Name
Fire Protection Phase 2
Project No.
7322
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance/ Planning/ Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To repair, upgrade, or replace the main treatment plant fire alarm system.
History:
The majority of the fire alarm system was built in the late 1970s and the control panel was
upgraded in the early 2000s. However, the wiring and devices on the system continue to be
problematic and is in constant need of repair. Repairs to the system has become extremely
complex and difficult, therfore a long term fix is needed.
Description:
At this stage, staff will evaluate the existing system and provide recommendations for full
replacement in compliance with the authority having jurisdiction, the local fire department. The
construction budget will be revised during the design stage, if needed.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$600,000
$0
$600,000
$0
$20,000
$220,000
$600,000
$0
$840,000
TP -5
Applied Research & Innovations
Project Name
Applied Research & Innovations
Project No.
7315
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Dan Frost
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To fund applied research and development of key technologies, processes, and innovations.
History:
In 2013, the District completed a Nutrient Visioning Plan: Cutting -Edge Nitrogen Removal
Technology Review that identified the zeolite anammox process and four other processes as
preferred cutting -edge nutrient removal technologies recommended for further consideration and
piloting.
Description:
This project includes piloting of technologies, processes, and innovations (such as the zeolite-
anammox process or other processes) that have the potential to reduce the District's long -term
capital improvement and operations and maintenance costs, address future regulatory
requirements, and that also supports the District's goal to embrace innovation and to be a leader
in the wastewater industry.
Currently, the District is piloting Phase 1 of the zeolite - anammox process to demonstrate proof of
treatment concept. If the results of Phase 1 are promising, the District may decide to proceed
with Phase 2 of the pilot project. Phase 2, if implemented, would include a larger scale pilot that
would be used to demonstrate process and site - specific viability, generate design criteria, confirm
nutrient removal performance, and estimate capital and operating costs if the zeolite - anammox
process were to be implemented full - scale. Other pilot tests such as screenings, sludge
screenings, or disinfection new technologies, centrifuges, and other treatment process
technologies may be contemplated and initiated under this project.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
$0
$0
$140,000
$0
$0
$140,000
Carryover
3 -13/14
4 -22/23
$1,671
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$1,000,000
$1,401,671
Planning
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
-
$1,671
$100,000
$240,000
$200,000
$1,000,000
$1,541,671
TP -6
TP Master Plan
Project Name
TP Master Plan
Project No.
7343
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Dan Frost
Ranking Score
85
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
JConcord %
1 100%
Purpose:
To develop a comprehensive wastewater master plan that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District's wastewater treatment plant.
History:
The 2011 Plant of the Future visioning exercises completed as part of District Project 7287 —
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update included recommendations for completing a comprehensive
master plan to determine the needs and direction of the District. While the District has performed
a number of planning and research studies /reports, the last comprehensive treatment plant
master plan was completed in 1987.
Description:
The TP Master Plan is one component of the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan. A key
deliverable of the TP Master Plan will be a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the next 20 -year
planning horizon that provides the descriptions, rationale and estimated costs for the District's
treatment plant capital improvement projects and on -going programs in order to address aging
infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, accommodate planned
growth, optimize energy use, and implement the District's vision for a "plant of the future" that is
consistent with the District's Strategic Plan.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Carryover
1 -15/16
4 -16/17
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$800,000
$0
$2,200,000
Planning
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
-
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$800,000
$0
$2,200,000
TP -7
Walnut Creek /Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation
Project Name
Walnut Creek /Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation
Project No.
7341
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Dan Frost
Ranking Score
40
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To reduce the risk of flood damage to the treatment plant through a collaborative project led by
the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FCD).
History:
The treatment plant site is bordered by Walnut and Grayson Creeks with levees that were built by
the FCD and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and currently owned and maintained by the
FCD. Overtopping of the levees could disable the treatment plant and result in significant facility
damages, significantly impact the environment due to discharge of untreated sewage, and impair
the local economy. In 2007, the FCD implemented an interim flood control measure to desilt the
lower Walnut Creek channel and raise the western levees of Walnut and Grayson Creeks. Based
on recent modeling, the levees currently provide protection from a 30 -year storm. The current
flood protection standard by the California Department of Water Resources is to provide
protection against a 200 -year water surface with 3 feet of freeboard and to consider the potential
for sea level rise and climate change.
Description:
Due to the layout of treatment facilities as well as the critical nature of them, this project will
maximize the treatment plant's flood protection level for a 500 -year water surface with 3 feet of
freeboard. The FCD will be the lead agency on this project and the District will provide support as
needed for design review and construction coordination.
The FCD and the District have agreed to equally share the estimated project cost of $2.2M. The
FCD is pursuing grant funding for the project to reduce the costs to the FCD and the District. The
District anticipates accepting and storing soil on District buffer property that can be used as levee
material in order to provide in -kind contributions of approximately $0.5M. The District will
continue to evaluate in -kind financial contributions.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover:
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 -15/16
2 -15/16
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
2 -15/16
4 -15/16
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
1 -16/17
4 -17/18
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
TP -8
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements 2016 -2026
Project Name
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements 2016 -2026
Project No.
7333
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
60
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
This project will provide funding for safety projects.
History:
The District and the treatment plant have very pro- active safety programs that are administered
by separate committees. These committees are responsible for addressing safety concerns as
identified by the craftsmen, or to respond to the ever- changing regulatory requirements. Often
this response will require construction of a capital project.
Description:
Install safety improvements for the treatment plant identified through District safety programs.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$300,000
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$700,000
1 $700,000
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$1,050,000
1 $1,100,000
TP -9
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation
Project Name
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation
Project No.
7338
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
35
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Relocate or remove and dispose of the contaminated soil in the area northeast of existing
aeration tanks.
History:
In the 1960s, spoils from the Shell Refinery were brought onto the plant site. The spoils were
contaminated with organic sludge, lead, sulfate dirt, tars and other contaminants. Approximately
150,000 cubic yards of the contaminated soil is located in the surcharge area. In order to site any
new facilities in this area, the contaminated soil needs to be relocated on site or removed and
disposed of at an appropriate class landfill. A separate project is characterizing and developing
alternatives for relocation or removal of the contaminated soil.
Description:
Refine the alternatives, select the appropriate method and relocate or remove and dispose of the
contaminated soils located northeast of the existing aeration tanks.
Location:
Treatment Plant area northeast of existing aeration tanks.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$150,000
$200,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$150,000
$200,000
TP -10
Primary Treatment Renovation
Project Name
Primary Treatment Renovation
Project No.
7285
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Jason DeGroot
Ranking Score
90
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
This project will improve the reliability of the Primary Treatment area of the plant.
History:
Two of the four primary sedimentation tanks were constructed in the mid -1960s and the other
two tanks were constructed in the mid -1970s as part of the 5A expansion project. Some
components are corroding and nearing the end of their service life.
Description:
Renovate or replace the spray water and air supply pipelines at the primary sedimentation tanks.
The primary scum collection system will be renovated with new scum sprays, new helical scum
skimmers and drives, and a stainless steel scum hopper for Tanks 1 and 2. The scum thickening
unit in the Solids Conditioning Building will also be replaced. Other primary tank improvements
include installation of new baffles, replacing chain drives, sludge flight drive shafts and bearings,
concrete repairs, upgrading hand railings, replacing the primary level control valve, replacing the
primary MCCs and PLC panels, and installing new grit washing equipment. Refurbishment of
Primary Effluent (PE) Pump 1 and PE Pump 2 are included in the project. This project is currently
under construction and is anticipated to be completed in FY 2015 -16.
Location:
Primary Tanks, SCB, and Pump & Blower Building
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$566,000
$0
$0
$566,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$6,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$6,100,000
$8,219,628
$6,100,000
$566,000
$0
$0
$14,885,628
TP -11
Switchgear Refurbishment, Phase 2
Project Name
Switchgear Refurbishment, Phase 2
Project No.
7292
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Mark Cavallero
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Operations/ Plant Maintenance
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Refurbish electrical switchgear to maintain the electrical reliability of the treatment plant.
History:
The electrical switchgear throughout the plant was installed in the 1970s and has been well
maintained using preventative techniques, such as thermographic imaging, to identify potential
problems and correct them prior to failure. Inspections in 2003 and 2004 showed that many of
the trip units on the circuit breakers required replacement. Circuit breakers have been sent out
for Class 1 reconditioning and trip unit replacement on an as- needed basis.
Description:
The remaining 480v circuit breakers (approx. 66, Westinghouse /Cutler- Hammer), will be
refurbished over a five -year period. Work also includes replacement of the 2400v breakers at
Substation 52, Substation 40, and air breakers at Substation 82. The labor and coordination will
be performed by District maintenance staff with support from consultants when electrical design
work is needed.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$119,280
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$169,280
$0
$0
$100,000
$250,000
$650,000
$1,000,000
$119,280
$50,000
$350,000
$250,000
$650,000
$1,419,280
TP -12
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
Project Name
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
Project No.
7297
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Clint Shima
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Replace the wet and dry scrubbers on each Multiple Hearth Furnace (MHF).
History:
The Solids Handling Facilities Plan was updated in 2005. Incinerator Rx and Industrial Furnace
Company (IFCO) determined that the MHFs were in excellent condition and could last 20 or more
years with current O &M practices. Included in the recommendations was that both the dry
cyclone and the wet particulate scrubber were showing signs of wear and could use updating or
replacement. Operations staff has also reported problems with the scrubber piping.
Description:
Replace the wet and dry scrubbers, and their associated piping and equipment on the MHFs.
The project also includes side stream treatment of the scrubber water for the removal of cyanide
if nitrification is required.
Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$964
$25,000
$0
$0
$0
$25,964
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,400,000
$8,400,000
$964
$25,000
$600,000
$0
$8,400,000
$9,025,964
TP -13
DAF Tanks Renovation
Project Name
DAF Tanks Renovation
Project No.
7309
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To improve the reliability of the sludge thickening process by performing structural and coating
rehabilitation to the dissolved air flotation (DAF) tanks.
History:
The District uses three DAF tanks, installed in approximately 1986, to thicken secondary sludge.
In 2013, DAF Tank 1 required emergency repairs as a result of significant metal loss and failure
of the rotating skimmer arms. Following the failure, each of the DAF tanks were sequentially
taken out of service for detailed inspection and condition assessment. While inspection results
showed Tank 1 was in the worst condition, it was recommended all tanks receive coating,
structural and various repairs as a result of corrosion and wear.
Description:
The project will primarily include structural and protective coating rehabilitation to DAF Tanks 2
and 3. DAF Tank 1 will receive additional rehabilitation, which was not performed or not
adequately performed during the 2013 emergency repairs. The project will also include electrical,
control and lighting upgrades to plant standards. This project is currently being closed out.
Location:
DAFT Facility
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
$918,500
$0
$0
$0
$918,500
$130,292
$918,500
$0
$0
$0
$1,048,792
TP -14
Sludge Blending Tank Repairs
Project Name
Sludge Blending Tank Repairs
Project No.
7316
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Jason DeGroot
Ranking Score
85
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To repair the damaged sludge blending tank.
History:
In May 2014, the sludge blending tank experienced a significant failure and delamination to the
upper section of the exterior gunite and pre- stressed rods. An emergency was declared by the
Board to preform emergency repairs on the tank. After the failing gunite was removed, an
inspection determined that the rest of the tank was stable and that the structural repairs could be
put out to bid.
Description:
This project will repair the damaged sludge blending tank with the installation of a Carbon Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (FRP) around the exterior of the tank. The FRP will restore the structural
integrity of the failing pre- stressed rods to current earthquake code and extend the useful life of
the tank. This project will be closed out in early FY 2015 -16.
Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$25,000
$0
$0
$25,000
$27,006
$0
$0
$0
$0
$27,006
$0
$130,444
$0
$0
$0
$130,444
$0
$532,000
$0
$0
$0
$532,000
$27,006
$662,444
$25,000
$0
$0
$714,450
TP -15
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades
Project Name
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades
Project No.
7286
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to improve solids capture and reliability of the sludge dewatering
equipment.
History:
The existing centrifuges and cake pumps will have been in service for more than 25 years. The
design life of rotating equipment is generally around 15 years. While routine rotation of the
operational and stand -by centrifuge helps increase the operating lifespan, Operations can expect
more frequent and extensive O &M requirements as the centrifuges and cake pumps continue to
age. Historical plant data has shown that that the solids capture has decreased throughout the
years. In addition, as centrifuge design and materials of construction continue to develop, the
next generation of centrifuges is expected to last longer, cost less to operate, and produce a drier
sludge, which would result in less furnace fuel to burn.
Description:
This project will use the information gathered under the Solids Handling Evaluation project as
well as recent pilot test data to make improvements to the dewatering equipment and process for
construction. Additional, related tasks will be included in this project as appropriate. A portion of
this project, centrifuge replacement, is being considered under the Plant Energy Optimization
project being developed by District staff, PG &E, and AECOM.
Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$170,000
$0
$0
$170,000
$0
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$30,000
Planning
$0
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$0
$600,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$30,000
$370,000
$600,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
TP -16
Pump & Blower Building Seismic Upgrades
Project Name
Pump & Blower Building Seismic Upgrades
Project No.
7291
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Jason DeGroot
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Improve the seismic safety of the Pump & Blower Building.
History:
In January 2008, California adopted the 2007 California Building Code (2007 CBC). Among the
updates in the 2007 CBC were significant changes to seismic design. In 2009 a seismic
evaluation was completed of treatment plant facilities (Martinez Wastewater Treatment Plant
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Selected Facilities, December 2009). Included in the
evaluation are recommendations to bring the Pump & Blower Building in line with current seismic
design standards.
Description:
Make seismic improvements to the Pump & Blower Building.
Location:
Pump & Blower Building
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$357,409
$75,000
$50,000
$0
$0
$482,409
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$4,000,000
$0
$5,000,000
$357,409
$75,000
$1,120,000
$4,000,000
$0
$5,552,409
TP -17
PLC System Upgrades
Project Name
PLC System Upgrades
Project No.
7304
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Chuck Burnash
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Plant Operations /Operations
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Upgrade Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system to current technology for increased
performance and improved compatibility.
History:
The first PLCs were installed in the treatment plant in 1986. The number of PLCs has increased
from the original 2 to more than 30. Programming software for the newer PLCs no longer runs
efficiently on the older programming units.
Description:
This project will continue to upgrade the treatment plant's PLC system by:
• Providing and upgrading hardware and software necessary to maintain the PLC application.
• Replacing older computers with newer ones capable of running current software.
• Upgrading older PLC models to maintain compatibility with new equipment.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$57,000
$0
$0
$57,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$96,669
$0
$0
$0
$0
$96,669
$0
$80,000
$100,000
$100,000
$400,000
$680,000
$96,669
$80,000
$157,000
$100,000
$400,000
$833,669
TP -18
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
Project Name
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
Project No.
7317
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Nate Morales
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Operations/ Plant Operations
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Upgrade the Plant Control System Ethernet Network to Industrial Ethernet standards.
History:
In 2006 the District's plant installed a new Ethernet based supervisory control and data
acquisition ( SCADA) system.
At the time the SCADA system was installed Ethernet was limited to the servers only and was
redundant. Over time the Ethernet system expanded to the entire plant but the redundancy was
not maintained. Currently, the primary path for plant data traffic runs over the Ethernet system
that is neither redundant nor sufficiently reliable to meet control system standards.
Description:
Industrial Ethernet defines a set of standards for redundancy and reliability that are required for
failsafe operation. This project will install and configure industrial type network switches, and
install fiber optic lines to meet the standards for Industrial Ethernet for the plant control system.
Additionally software shall be installed to allow remote programming and maintenance.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$65,000
$0
$0
$65,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,000
$50,000
$100,000
$300,000
$465,000
$0
$15,000
$115,000
$100,000
$300,000
$530,000
TP -19
Critical Switchgear
Project Name
Critical Switchgear
Project No.
7324
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Refurbish and replace critial switchgear and associated equipment that provides electrical
service to main areas of the Treatment Plant.
History:
The switchgear serving the Headworks (Substation 16) was installed in the early 1990s and is
comprised of equipment that had a short production run. The ABB equipment is obsolete and
spare parts have become rare. Recent issues with the circuit breakers have revealed that they
will only become harder to service. The CDM final report recommended replacing the swtichgear
in its entirety to assure reliable service from the influent pumps for the plant.
Description:
The switchgear serving the Headworks (Substation 16) will be replaced. Work includes removal
of the existing switchgear and modifications of the building and support facilities as necessary
for the installation. The work will be performed by an outside contractor with support from District
Staff and consultants.
Location:
Headworks Facility
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$350,000
$250,000
$0
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
$350,000
$250,000
$1,500,000
$2,100,000
TP -20
Headworks Screening Upgrade
Project Name
Headworks Screening Upgrade
Project No.
7327
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To separate and remove screenings and plastics from wastewater and /or sludge.
History:
The treatment plant's current screenings operation utilizes coarse bar screens at the headworks
to separate screenings. The screenings then are processed by grinders and reintroduce
immediately downstream of the screens. This operation does not remove any of the plastics in
the wastewater which has contributed to fouling of numerous liquid and solids stream processes
and are suspected to potentially contribute to the upcoming HCL furnace emission regulations.
Removal of screenings will protect downstream treatment plant facilities, extend equipment life
and reduce maintenance of equipment.
Description:
The project will investigate the current headworks screening operation and recommend the most
strategic and cost effective improvements. Following this phase, the project will include design
and construction of improvements to implement the recommendations.
Location:
Headworks Facility
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$500,000
$0
$650,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
$0
$0
$400,000
$500,000
$6,000,000
$6,900,000
TP -21
Plant Control System 1/0 Replacement
Project Name
Plant Control System 1/0 Replacement
Project No.
7339
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Nate Morales
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Operations/ Plant Operations
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Upgrade the Treatment Plant Programmable Logic Controller Input and Output (1 /0) cards and
associated hardware with current technology to maintain reliable operation and vendor support.
History:
The first treatment plant 1/0 was installed in 1986. The number of 1/0 cards in use has increased
from relatively few to nearly 1,800. Approximately 1,100 of these are currently obsolete.
Replacement units cannot be purchased from the manufacturer nor are they fully supported. The
District maintains an inventory of over 100 spare 1/0 cards to replace units as they fail.
Description:
This project will replace and update the treatment plant's obsolete 1/0 cards along with their
mounting racks, communication modules, and power supplies with modern, fully supported
products.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$0
$200,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$500,000
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$4,000,000
$4,300,000
TP -22
Plant Cyber Security Evaluation Study
Project Name
Plant Cyber Security Evaluation Study
Project No.
7331
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Nate Morales
Ranking Score
35
Dept /Division
Operations/ Plant Operations
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Protect the plant from potential electronic breaches through the plant control system, electrical
distribution system, and /or equipment.
History:
In 2008, NACWA informed its members of the newly- identified risk for major service interruption
through cyber vulnerabilities. The Water Sector Coordinating Council and the Department of
Homeland Security developed a security sensitive Mitigation Plan, which included identification of
all Programmable Language Controllers and Variable Frequency Drives for the plant's electrical
and instrumentation systems; installation of electronic locks and intrusion alarms at Substation
82; installation of additional cameras to monitor the treatment plant; testing the integrity of the
existing firewall; and obtaining a Cisco switch for electrical substation security. Some
recommendations have already been implemented. This project will address the remaining, more
costly measures.
Description:
The project will evaluate the plant control system and electrical distribution system for
vulnerabilities to electronic breaches. If vulnerabilities are identified, then solutions will be
identified, evaluated, and implemented to address these vulnerabilities.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$50,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$350,000
$350,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$450,000
$500,000
TP -23
Aeration System Improvements
Project Name
Aeration System Improvements
Project No.
7323
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Unranked
Project Manager
Clint Shima
Ranking Score
TBD
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To renovate the existing aeration system to ensure it will meet the treatment plant's aeration air
demands when the steam powered turbine blowers are out of service.
History:
The electric blower serves as a back up to the two steam - powered turbine blowers. The electric
blower has enough capacity to meet the treatment plant's needs during the winter months.
However, during the summer months, the treatment plant's air demand increases and the electric
blowers doo not have enough capacity to meet the demand. The existing blowers are in good
shape because they were rebuilt in the early 2000s (steam blowers) or because of low run times
as back -up system (electric blowers).
Description:
This project will continue to evaluate the capacity needed by the electric blower. Further refine
the most efficient use of the steam and electric blowers. The following work will be considered:
• Replace guide vanes on the electric blower
• Install new impeller and high efficiently blower
• Consider installing smaller blowers at the Primary facilities
This project will also assess the old controls and electrical equipment on this system. Upon
further investigation, this project will be budgeted for total project costs.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Secondary Tanks and Pump & Blower building
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$100,000
Planning
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$100,000
TP -24
Disinfection System Upgrades
Project Name
Disinfection System Upgrades
Project No.
7325
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Unranked
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
TBD
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Reduce utility and maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve performance of the
ultraviolet (UV) disinfection systems
History:
The District's UV disinfection system was installed in 1996 to eliminate the use of Chlorine for
disinfection. The system was expanded in 2007, utilizing the same low- pressure UV technology
as the original installation. The equipment has been well maintained and parts continue to be
available via a third party reseller since the original manufacturer is no longer in business.
However, newer systems offer considerable benefits in the form of reduced maintenance and
power costs. In addition, although parts are available, they may become more difficult to obtain
as the existing systems are replaced with new technology.
Description:
This project will replace the existing UV disinfection system with a new system. State -of- the -art
systems feature lower energy consumption and significantly reduced maintenance (labor) costs
due to the ease of lamp cleaning.
Location:
UV Facility
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$1,585,000
$1,735,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$1,585,000
$1,735,000
TP -25
MHF Burner Upgrade
Project Name
MHF Burner Upgrade
Project No.
7329
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
One -Time Renovation
Priority Rank
Unranked
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
TBD
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Improve the operational flexibility of the existing multiple hearth furnaces to meet compliance
parameters. Improve utilization of Landfill gas, reduce energy consumption.
History:
The furnaces were constructed during the early 1970s and made operational in 1985. They were
originally designed to burned comingled solid waste and sludge; however, they have historically
only burned sludge. As a result, some of the burners are not optimally sized for the furnace
loading. This results in difficulty maintaining proper temperatures in the furnace. In addition, the
existing burners do not allow optimization of landfill gas use. In addition, some of the burners,
mounts, piping and associated equipment are reaching the end of their useful lives and need to
be replaced. The fuel gas piping to the burners has developed leaks that require continued
attention in order to meet BAAQMD leak guidelines.
Description:
The original gas fuel system piping will be replaced using welded joints, and a new
diesel fuel system will be added as an additional fuel source (to allow furnace operations during
an emergency. The project will include replacement of 2 to 4 of the top hearth burners (8
MMBtu /hr) with smaller low NOx /High mix burners (2 MMBtu /hr). To provide better temperature
control to comply with 129 regulations. Modernizing the control system to economize fuel
consumption and realize cost savings.
Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$750,000
$850,000
Planning
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$750,000
$850,000
TP -26
Equipment Replacement Program
Project Name
Equipment Replacement Program
Project No.
7265
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Edgar Lopez
Ranking Score
80
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Reduce maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve operations through replacement or
reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn -out, maintenance intensive equipment, or
equipment that is no longer supported by its manufacturer.
History:
The initial work on this project assembled a list of current equipment; verified equipment name,
number, and size; acquired design records; and estimated equipment life and replacement cost.
Several major pieces of equipment are reaching the end of their service life and require
replacement/upgrading or reconditioning. The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project
documented recent projects/ replacement schedules and will be used to provide
recommendations for additional renewal and replacement needs.
Description:
Following are examples of equipment included in this project:
Filter Plant Polymer Pumps
Influent Pump Wear Rings
Scum Tank Assy.
3WLP 12" Strainer
Waste Steam Exchanger Shell
Headworks A/C
Grease Separator
This project is scheduled to be closed in FY 15 -16 and a similar project with new scope will be
initiated.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
$1,107,400
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,407,400
Construction
FY Total
$1,107,400
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,407,400
TP -27
Piping Renovations, Phase 8
Project Name
Piping Renovations, Phase 8
Project No.
7310
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To improve the reliability of the piping systems above and below ground in the treatment
plant by inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
History:
During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment plant.
These pipes carry the processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility services
between the various sections of the plant. These pipes have been in place for more than 40
years. Some of these pipes are leaking due to corrosion. The first seven phases of this program
renovated or replaced various piping systems.
Description:
This phase of the Treatment Plant Piping Renovations Project will include previously identified
piping renovations and replacement work not yet included in a construction project.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$86,917
$0
$0
$0
$0
$86,917
$0
$163,000
$0
$0
$0
$163,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$86,917
$163,000
$1,500,000
$0
$0
$1,749,917
TP -28
Laboratory Upgrades and Repair
Project Name
Laboratory Upgrades and Repair
Project No.
7319
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Repair, replace, and /or upgrade the treatment plant laboratory equipment. The laboratory is a
critical component to regulatory reporting and the equipment used in this facility is specialized
and requires climate control.
History:
The District's laboratory was built in 2001 and operates several critical systems to maintain the
facilities required to conduct testing. Such systems include hot water storage and distribution,
compressed air, temperature control (heating and cooling), chiller, ventilation, hoods, vacuum
system, and DI water. As these systems age, repairs and /or replacements /upgrades will be
needed so that the laboratory remains operational.
Description:
This is a multi -year program to repair and upgrade the laboratory. Project work identified to date
includes the following:
• Hot water heat exchangers and tanks are corroded.
• HVAC control systems are obsolete and outdated.
• DI tank may need replacement/ upgrade.
Location:
Laboratory
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$4,000
$0
$0
$4,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$144,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$594,000
$0
$144,000
$154,000
$150,000
$150,000
$598,000
TP -29
Urgent Repairs Blanket Contract
Project Name
Urgent Repairs Blanket Contract
Project No.
7314
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
80
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Provide staff the capability to perform immediate electrical, mechanical, and other miscellaneous
repairs within the treatment plant.
History:
Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District's Plant
Maintenance staff, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the budget
process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that will allow the
District to use a contractor for urgent construction work.
Description:
Urgent treatment plant projects which require immediate repairs or replacement may arise
anytime during the current fiscal year. These projects may be triggered by:
• Equipment or process piping failure
• Comply with regulatory or code issues
• Impacts operational procedures or process
• Safety hazards
Budget for this work will be paid for using Program Contingency.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$20,000
$20,000
$0
$0
$40,000
TP -30
Plant Energy Optimization
Project Name
Plant Energy Optimization
Project No.
7320
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Increase energy efficiency and decrease greenhouse gas emissions for the treatment plant.
History:
The implementation of AB 32 causes energy consumers to evaluate their energy use and
develop carbon offsetting efficiencies to comply with new regulations. A number of potential
energy efficiency projects are being refined. Many of these concepts are from the 2010 HDR
report "AB 32 Compliance and Energy Optimization Evaluation." These project concepts require
further evaluation and an understanding of potential implementation issues before
implementation can move forward.
Description:
Evaluate proposed energy optimization projects. Many projects include rebates from PG &E.
Staff will coordinate work with PG &E in order to obtain rebates and improve the payback of
implemented projects. Current proposals to be evaluated include installing variable frequency
drives on the furnace's combustion air blowers. As other energy efficiency proposals are made
they will be included in this evaluation project.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$55,000
$0
$0
$55,000
$0
$35,000
$0
$0
$0
$35,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$0
$35,000
$355,000
$200,000
$800,000
$1,390,000
TP -31
Equipment Replacement
Project Name
Equipment Replacement
Project No.
7326
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
80
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Reduce maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve operations through replacement or
reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn -out, maintenance intensive equipment, or
equipment that is no longer supported by its manufacturer.
History:
The initial work on this project assembled a list of current equipment; verified equipment name,
number, and size; acquired design records; and estimated equipment life and replacement cost.
Several major pieces of equipment are reaching the end of their service life and require
replacement/upgrading or reconditioning. This project will be coordinated with the Asset
Management program.
Description:
The following are examples of equipment included in the project: 3WHP pumps, Influent Pump
Wear Rings, 3WLP Pump impellers /parts, Steam system traps /accessories /piping, Headworks
A/C, MCB A/C, Sub 40 A/C, and other equipment identified through asset management,
maintenance, and operations groups.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$1,900,000
$2,400,000
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$1,900,000
$2,400,000
TP -32
Piping Renovation, Phase 9
Project Name
Piping Renovation, Phase 9
Project No.
7330
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To improve the reliability of the piping systems above and below ground in the treatment plant by
inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
History:
During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment plant.
These pipes carry processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility services between
the various sections of the plant and have been in place for more than 40 years. Some of these
pipes are leaking due to corrosion. The first eight phases of this program renovated or replaced
various piping systems.
Description:
This phase of the Treatment Plant Piping Renovations Project will include previously identified
piping renovations and replacement work not yet included in a construction project.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,200,000
$0
$1,200,000
$0
$0
$400,000
$1,200,000
$0
$1,600,000
TP -33
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Project Name
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Project No.
7335
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Reduce the District's exposure to liability and property loss; meet reliability /safety standards and
reduce operations and maintenance expenses.
History:
The District has experienced loss of property in the past and improvements to the security
system are being identified and refined. Also, the current national security situation may require
additional security measures for essential public services.
Description:
This project will identify and implement projects to improve the security of District personnel and
property. This project could include, but is not limited to, installation of alarm systems at critical
sites on District property, additional gates in the perimeter security fencing, upgrading plant
security cameras, signage, and improving general area lighting.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,000
$25,000
$300,000
$405,000
$0
$0
$80,000
$25,000
$300,000
$405,000
TP -34
Electrical Cable Replacement
Project Name
Electrical Cable Replacement
Project No.
7340
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to identify deficiencies in the existing electrical system and replace
cables prior to failure.
History:
Treatment Plant operation is dependent on the electrical power system including the collection of
feeders from the main substations to the local area substations. Loss or failure of these power
conveyances would disrupt the plant's electrical system.
Description:
This project will evaluate the treatment plant's electrical feeders, and replace deficient cables due
to age, undersize or functional obsolescence.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$100,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$1,900,000
$2,000,000
TP -35
Electrical /Instrumentation Replacement Program
Project Name
Electrical /Instrumentation Replacement Program
Project No.
7332
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
45
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Identify deficiencies in the existing electrical and instrumentation system components and
replace them prior to failure.
History:
The electrical /instrumentation system throughout the plant was installed in the mid- 1970s, with
significant upgrades from several major projects. However, the majority of equipment is 35 years
old.
Description:
Replace antiquated and poor - performing field instrumentation and electrical equipment and
systems. Appropriate upgrading will also be included to meet the latest governing codes such as
the National Electric Code.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
TP -36
Coating Renovation
Project Name
Coating Renovation
Project No.
7334
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Medium
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
20
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Extend the useful life and minimize corrosion of select treatment plant equipment,
piping, and surfaces through the application of coatings.
History:
The original treatment plant was built in the late 1940s. Since then, there have been multiple
additions and expansions. Much of the process infrastructure has received limited coating or
repainting. Prior phases of this project applied coatings to many components at the plant.
During the summer of 2009, KTA- Tator, Inc. performed an evaluation of the protective coatings
on the components around the treatment plant. The work was part of the Treatment Plant
Protective Coatings, Phase 4 (DP 7247) project.
The Asset Management program is documenting recent renewal and replacement projects and
will ultimately provide recommendations for future renewal and /or replacement of equipment and
facilities at the treatment plant.
Description:
Recommendations from both projects listed above will be used to plan future phases of the long-
term protective coating program.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$50,000
$150,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$4,050,000
1 $4,150,000
TP -37
Pavement Renovation
Project Name
Pavement Renovation
Project No.
7336
Program
Treatment Plant Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Medium
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
15
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Renovate pavement throughout the treatment plant to maximize service life and maintain safe
conditions.
History:
In 2009, the TP Asset Management project funded several condition assessments in the plant
including one for asphalt pavement by Fugro West, which identified future renovations.
Description:
Renovate asphalt pavement as identified in multiple phases based on the condition assessment
and changing condition of the pavement over time.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
TP -38
Concrete Renovation
Project Name
Concrete Renovation
Project No.
7337
Program
Treatment Plant Renovation
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Recurring Renovation
Priority Rank
Medium
Project Manager
Craig Mizutani
Ranking Score
15
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Renovate concrete throughout the treatment plant.
History:
In 2009, the TP Asset Management project funded several condition assessments in the plant
including one for concrete structures by Villalobos & Associates. Defects identified included
cracking, corrosion, and spalling. The defects were prioritized for repair.
Description:
Renovate concrete structures where urgent repairs were identified in the condition assessment.
This work will be incorporated into concurrent capital projects as appropriate. Future phases will
address the remaining repairs and any additional ones that are identified.
Location:
Entire Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$800,000
1 $800,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,200,000
1 $1,200,000
TP -39
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The major points of emphasis for the Collection System Program in FY 2015 -16 are:
• Collection System Master Plan to update the collection system hydraulic
hydrodynamic model;
• Renovate sewers as they reach the end of their useful lives to avoid
structural failure, reduce dry- weather overflows, and control maintenance
costs;
• Expand sewer and pumping facilities to accommodate approved growth in
the District's service area;
• Upgrade District sewers to relieve capacity constraints and for future
renovations;
• Improve the reliability of pumping stations; and
• Respond to regulatory requirements related to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).
The process for project identification, prioritization, and scheduling includes seven
major components:
• Results from the District's TV inspection program that identify lines in need
of rehabilitation or replacement, including the Riverwatch agreement;
• CSO maintenance records including overflows and stoppages;
• The Pumping Station Inventory Update (2011), which identified
necessary reliability improvements;
• Collection system facility plans, which identify capacity limitations in the
six through ten inch lines;
• Coordination with capital improvement programs for paving and pipeline
projects of other agencies /utilities; and
• Reduce impacts to customers/ residents.
This process allows staff to establish priorities and schedules for the individual
elements of the system that are incorporated into the capital budget and plan.
Assessment tools, such as CCTV inspection, are utilized to confirm the need for
projects. After priorities and schedules are set, projects proceed to design and
construction. At each step of the process, the level of accuracy in project scope,
schedule and cost improves. The Collection System Program is comprised of the
following subprograms.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -1
Renovation (Tab 1)
There are more than 1,500 miles of sewer in the District's collection system. Sewers
and associated facilities have fixed useful lives. When a sewer nears the end of its
useful life, maintenance costs, infiltration /inflow rates, and the threat of structural
degradation increase. Proper management of the District's collection system requires
a program for the renovation of sewers that have reached the end of their useful lives.
In the FY 2015 -16 CIB, the largest renovation projects focus on multiple sites in
Pleasant Hill, Orinda, Lafayette and Martinez.
The FY 2001 -02 CIB initiated a District -wide TV inspection program to help identify
and prioritize renovation needs. In FY 2013 -14, the TV inspection program focused on
high maintenance and problem areas in Orinda, Lafayette, and Walnut Creek.
Beginning in FY 2014 -15, the TV Inspection program was moved from the capital
program to the Operations and Maintenance (O &M) budget.
Urgent projects may arise during a fiscal year or in the closing months of the prior
fiscal year. These projects, which cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated
in the year -long budget process, are included in this category of projects.
Smaller collection system projects are initiated through the ongoing collection system
planning process. This planning activity evaluates capacity of sewers smaller than
12- inches in diameter on a case -by -case basis when triggered by one of the following:
Capacity - related overflows
Structural failure in a pipe
• Maintenance records indicate a persistent problem
By agreement with California River Watch, repairs of defective sewer pipes within two
hundred feet of creeks are given higher priority.
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety (Tab 2)
The Collection System Master Plan will also start this fiscal year to accommodate the
changing general and specific plans of the County and the municipalities that are
served where higher densities of development are being widely adopted. The
Collection System Master plan will review our large and complex collection system,
force mains, and the nineteen (19) pump stations and determine the timely
reconstruction and replacement of the collection system as needed. As part of the
Master Plan effort, the hydraulic (dynamic) model will be updated to determine
improvements that may be required to provide adequate capacity within the sewer
system.
A Pumping Station Inventory document is periodically updated to include information
as projects are completed and will be coordinated with the Master Plan effort. Asset
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -2
Management Plan information is being used to update the Pumping Station Inventory.
Expansion (Tab 3)
Design of the trunk sewer improvements along the Pleasant Hill Grayson Creek and
Corridor started in FY 2012 -13 and will continue this fiscal year, with major project
construction to take place in 2016 -17. This project will be coordinated with the
Collection System Master Plan before it is advertised to bid to verify scope, size,
timing and cost estimate. The subprogram includes Development Sewerage for 2015-
16 and potential Contractual Assessment District projects.
Pumping Stations (Tab 4)
The Pumping Stations subprogram focuses on reliability, safety and
operational improvements. Pump station condition assessments will be
conducted under the Collection System Master Plan and will help confirm near
term and recommend future projects in this subprogram. Projects this year will
be minor equipment replacement, or safety improvements, and implementing
any recommendations from the Arc Flash study.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -3
Pipeburst Blanket Contract
Project Name
Pipeburst Blanket Contract
Project No.
5982
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Alex Rozul
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Operations/ Collection System Operations Division
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Urgent pipeline projects which require immediate repairs may arise anytime during the current
fiscal year.
History:
Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District's Collection
System Operations Division, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the year-
long budget process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that will
allow the District to use a contractor to perform urgent pipebursting work.
Description:
Project work may be triggered by one of the following situations:
• imminent threat of pipe break or collapse
• potential for an overflow
• structural failure in a pipe
Budget for this urgent work will be paid for using Program Contingency funds as needed.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$652,285
$150,000
$225,000
$200,000
$250,000
$1,477,285
$652,285
$150,000
$225,000
$200,000
$250,000
$1,477,285
CS -4
CIPP Blanket Contract
Project Name
CIPP Blanket Contract
Project No.
5999
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Alex Rozul
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Operations/ Collection System Operations Division
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Urgent pipeline projects which require immediate repairs may arise anytime during current fiscal
year.
History:
Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District's Collection
System Operations Division, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the year-
long budget process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that will
allow the District to use a contractor to perform urgent CIPP lining work.
Description:
These projects may be triggered by one of the following situations:
• imminent threat of pipe break or collapse
• potential for an overflow
• structural failure in a pipe.
Budget for this urgent work will be paid for using Program Contingency funds as needed.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$113,619
$100,000
$125,000
$125,000
$0
$463,619
$113,619
$100,000
$125,000
$125,000
$0
$463,619
CS -5
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 8
Project Name
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 8
Project No.
8404
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The Lafayette Sewer renovations is part of the ongoing Collection System Sewer Renovation
Program.
Description:
The Phase 8 project replaced /rehabilitated approximately 8,300 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe
predominately in the South Peardale area. This project is in the closeout phase.
Location:
City of Lafayette
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$8,000
$0
$0
$8,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$2,426,698
$300,000
$8,000
$0
$0
$2,734,698
CS -6
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5
Project Name
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5
Project No.
8411
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Mark Wenslawski
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
lConcord %
1 0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5 project replaced /rehabilitated 7,370 feet of sewer
line located in the public right of way and easements. This project is in the closeout phase.
Location:
Locations mainly in the city of Orinda service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$400,000
$443,000
$0
$843,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
Planning
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
-
$1,550,000
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$626,590
$1,550,000
$400,000
$443,000
$0
$3,019,590
CS -7
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10
Project Name
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10
Project No.
8413
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10 project will replace /rehabilitate approximately 8,500
feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer in the public right of way and easements throughout the City of Walnut
Creek. Design of this project started in FY 2012 -13 with construction scheduled for FY 2014 -15.
This project is in the closeout phase.
Location:
Locations are mainly in the city of Walnut Creek service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
Planning
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
-
$3,073,180
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$805,818
$3,073,180
$0
$0
$0
$3,878,998
CS -8
Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4
Project Name
Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4
Project No.
8415
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Michael Penny
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways, easements, and near creeks. As a result of
easement acquisitions between the City of Martinez and the District, costs for easements are
included within this project.
Location:
Locations mainly in the city of Martinez service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$216,739
$0
$0
$0
$0
$216,739
Planning
3/12 -13
4/14 -15
$0
$606,000
$0
$0
$0
$606,000
Design
4/14 -15
4/15 -16
$0
$0
$3,100,000
$0
$0
$3,100,000
Construction
FY Total
$216,739
$606,000
$3,100,000
$0
$0
$3,922,739
CS -9
Survey Monument Installation Project
Project Name
Survey Monument Installation Project
Project No.
8417
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Greg St. John
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
This project will provide resources necessary to fulfill Survey's professional and legal obligation to
reference and replace survey monuments that are destroyed during the construction process.
History:
Sewer renovation projects frequently remove survey monuments either because the monument
lies directly in the path of the new sewer or in the pavement restoration zone. The survey
monument installations will be throughout the District service area wherever sewer renovation
projects have been completed. Survey monuments must be replaced according to California law
( §8771 Business and Professions Code).
Description:
The current project scope of work consists of the installation of survey monuments that were
removed during sewer renovation. This project will allow Survey staff to work with a contractor to
restore the required survey monuments.
Location:
Throughout Service Area
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$10,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$98,259
$40,000
$40,000
$50,000
$250,000
$478,259
$98,259
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$250,000
$488,259
CS -10
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9
Project Name
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9
Project No.
8421
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers near creeks, to control future maintenance
requirements and costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall
entering the collection system, and to improve the level of service provided to the
residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9 project will replace or rehabilitate approximately
8,500 LF of small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
Location:
Locations mainly in the city of Lafayette service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$2,004,200
$0
$0
$2,004,200
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
$283,081
$366,000
$0
$0
$0
$649,081
Design
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
Construction
FY Total
$283,081
$866,000
$2,004,200
$0
$0
$3,153,281
CS -11
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 11
Project Name
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 11
Project No.
8422
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 11 project will replace or rehabilitate small
diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
Location:
Locations are mainly in the City of Walnut Creek service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$88,342
$61,658
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,100,000
$3,100,000
Construction
FY Total
$88,342
$61,658
$0
$500,000
$3,100,000
$3,750,000
CS -12
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6
Project Name
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6
Project No.
8423
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Mark Wenslawski
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
Location:
Locations mainly in the city of Orinda service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$92,333
$57,000
$0
$0
$0
$149,333
Planning
Design
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
$3,000,000
Construction
FY Total
$92,333
$57,000
$500,000
$3,000,000
$0
$3,649,333
CS -13
M1 CIPP Rehabilitation Project
Project Name
M1 CIPP Rehabilitation Project
Project No.
8424
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Mark Wenslawski
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To ensure reliability of the Martinez Transmission line by protecting against corrosion in the M1
line.
History:
A study was completed in 2004 that identified multiple portions of the Martinez Transmission line
as having corrosion issues. The study recommended renovation by CIPP lining. In 2014 the
District completed the first phase of lining. This project is the second phase of lining identified by
the study.
Description:
This project will renovate approximately 3,100 feet of M1, a 42" diameter reinforced concrete
pipeline located on the treatment plant site.
Location:
CCCSD Treatment Plant Site
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$2,276,000
$0
$0
$2,276,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$500,000
$2,276,000
$0
$0
$2,776,000
CS -14
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 1
Project Name
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 1
Project No.
8425
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Michael Penny
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
2000
Purpose:
This project will repair, update, and upgrade underground facilities, including the pumping
stations and buried metallic piping, by replacing existing spent facilities and installing new
systems where required.
History:
A comprehensive cathodic protection survey of the collection system, pumping stations and
treatment plant was prepared in 2008 and was updated in 2012. Based on the results of the
survey, the Cathodic Protection System Replacement project developed the scope and initial
design concepts for this project.
Description:
This project will include required maintenance, replacement, and /or addition of cathodic
protection systems to those sites identified as high or moderate priority in the 2012 survey
update. Work includes installation of new anode beds, vent piping, test stations, and induced
current cathodic protection systems on the treatment plant site, eight pump stations, and six
force mains. Miscellaneous corrosion related repairs will be included in the scope of this project.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$9,000
$0
$0
$9,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$550,000
$0
$0
$0
$550,000
$0
$550,000
$9,000
$0
$0
$559,000
CS -15
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10
Project Name
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10
Project No.
8426
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers near creeks, to control future maintenance
requirements and costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall
entering the collection system, and to improve the level of service provided to the
residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
Location:
Locations primarily in the City of Lafayette service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$45,000
$0
$0
$45,000
$0
$210,000
$0
$0
$0
$210,000
Planning
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$0
$3,000,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$210,000
$545,000
$3,000,000
$0
$3,755,000
CS -16
Collection System Urgent Projects
Project Name
Collection System Urgent Projects
Project No.
8434
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
75
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
TBD
Purpose:
This project will restore and protect sewers damaged or threatened during winter storms. In
addition, the program will address structurally deficient sewers identified by CSO.
History:
During major storm events, sewers at various locations may be damaged or threatened. In some
cases, landslides or soil erosion may undermine the sewers. The repair and restoration of these
sewers is typically time sensitive. In addition, the District has embarked on an extensive
investigation of the condition of its sewer system. Occasionally, sewers in very poor condition are
identified and cannot wait for incorporation into the CIB /CIP. Such situations will be addressed
under this program
Description:
A standby contractor will be selected by the District team and be used for urgent or emergency
needs for the collection system, recycled water, and pump station forcemains. Funding will be
used with the program contigency accounts as needed.
Location:
Throughout the District.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$270,000
$0
$0
$270,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$25,000
$0
$0
$0
$25,000
$0
$25,000
$270,000
$0
$0
$295,000
CS -17
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2
Project Name
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2
Project No.
5991
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
60
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
The Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
This project will be coordinated with the Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek trunk sewer project, which
is in the Expansion subprogram.
Location:
City of Pleasant Hill
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$66,000
$0
$0
$66,000
$133,017
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
$134,017
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
Construction
FY Total
$133,017
$1,000
$66,000
$0
$2,350,000
$2,550,017
CS -18
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 12
Project Name
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 12
Project No.
8435
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
Location:
Locations are mainly in the City of Walnut Creek service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$150,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,100,000
$3,100,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$650,000
$3,100,000
$3,750,000
CS -19
Lafayette Sewer Renovation, Phase 11
Project Name
Lafayette Sewer Renovation, Phase 11
Project No.
8430
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
Location:
Locations are mainly in the City of Lafayette service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$150,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$150,000
$500,000
$3,000,000
$3,650,000
CS -20
Martinez Sewer Renovation Phase 5
Project Name
Martinez Sewer Renovation Phase 5
Project No.
8437
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
30
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
Location:
Martinez
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$150,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$3,000,000
$3,150,000
CS -21
South Orinda Sewer Renovation, Phase 6
Project Name
South Orinda Sewer Renovation, Phase 6
Project No.
8433
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents /ratepayers.
History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:
This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
Location:
Locations are mainly in the City of Orinda service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$150,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$500,000
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$3,500,000
$3,650,000
CS -22
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 2
Project Name
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 2
Project No.
8438
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Renovation
Priority Rank
Medium
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
20
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
This project will repair, update, and upgrade underground facilities, including the pumping
stations and buried metallic piping, by replacing existing spent facilities and installing new
systems where required.
History:
A comprehensive cathodic protection survey of the collection system, pumping stations and
treatment plant was prepared in 2008 and was updated in 2012. Future updates are scheduled to
be completed by end of FY 2015 -16. Based on the results of the survey, the Cathodic Protection
System Replacement project developed the scope and initial design concepts for this project.
Description:
This project will include required maintenance, replacement, and /or addition of cathodic
protection systems to those sites identified as high or moderate priority in the 2012 survey update
and potential future items.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$50,000
CS -23
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Project Name
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Project No.
8418
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Justin Waples
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Environmental Services
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Migrate from a proprietary steady state hydraulic model to a commercially available dynamic
hydraulic model.
History:
Staff commenced initial steps to migrate towards a dynamic model. District intends to have
consultant implement the new dynamic model as part of the upcoming Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan Project.
Description:
Collection System hydraulic model provides the foundation for managing the capacity needs of
the District's sewers. The existing steady state model is not suited to Master Planning capacity
studies, and the programming language used for the foundation of the model is no longer
supported by the vendor. A commercially available dynamic model is needed.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
-
$0
$1,600
$0
$0
$1,600
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$100,000
$100,000
$0
$0
$200,000
-
$100,000
$300,000
$200,000
$0
$600,000
$148,398
$200,000
$401,600
$200,000
$0
$949,998
CS -24
Collection System Planning
Project Name
Collection System Planning
Project No.
8419
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Justin Waples
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To identify, evaluate, and schedule short and long -term sewer improvement projects and to
provide design flow rates for major facility plans.
History:
Staff performs on -going Collection System Planning and project priority analyses to ensure that
District goals for collection system performance are met.
Description:
Collection System Planning studies provide the basis for improvements to the District's sewer
system and flow rates for facility plans. Studies focus on Local Capacity Studies, Collection
System Database Management, Flow Rates for Facility Plans, and Special Studies. This project
also provides funding for small scale flow monitoring studies and technology trials and
assessments and pilot studies.
Location:
Throughout the collection system.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$19,000
$0
$0
$19,000
$100,315
$200,000
$150,000
$200,000
$700,000
$1,350,315
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,315
$200,000
$169,000
$200,000
$700,000
$1,369,315
CS -25
Force Main Assessment
Project Name
Force Main Assessment
Project No.
5993
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Justin Waples
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To assess and document the condition of force mains.
History:
The District owns or operates 19 pumping stations (PS), which pump flow into a series of force
mains.
In 2013, the District developed a Force Main Asset Management Plan. This documented the
force main inventory, estimated the replacement cost, identified condition assessment methods
and failure modes, determined the consequence of failure of the force mains, and the likelihood
of failure based on existing information. This was used to determine the risk of the assets which
will be used as triggers for further condition assessments and prioritization of capital projects for
rehabilitation or replacement.
Description:
The District will inspect the condition of force mains, with consultant assistance if necessary. The
District may conduct a feasibility study for installing launching platforms and cleaning junctions at
pump stations and force mains, and conduct preliminary investigations on the integrity and
remaining service lives of force mains.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$96,535
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
$97,535
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$96,535
$1,000
$0
$0
$0
$97,535
CS -26
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Project Name
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Project No.
5962
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
High
Project Manager
Justin Waples
Ranking Score
35
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To monitor the most critical collection system manholes.
History:
The District has approximately 30,000 active manhole structures throughout the service area.
Some of these manholes are in remote areas where an overflow may not be detected for weeks,
or in environmentally sensitive areas where an overflow would cause significant harm to creeks
or reservoirs.
Description:
This project will include the identification and modification of manholes with the installation of
remote level monitoring products. The remote monitoring product will alert dispatch or on -call
crew members via cell phone of a potential overflow or stoppage event. The early notification will
allow crews to respond more quickly, reducing impacts to the environment, potential fines, and
District liability.
Location:
Throughout the service area
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$131,963
$5,357
$1,000
$0
$0
$138,320
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$131,963
$5,357
$1,000
$0
$0
$138,320
CS -27
Collection System Master Plan
Project Name
Collection System Master Plan
Project No.
8431
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
To develop a comprehensive wastewater master plan that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District's wastewater treatment plant.
History:
The 2011 Plant of the Future visioning exercises completed as part of District Project 7287 —
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update included recommendations for completing a comprehensive
master plan to determine the needs and direction of the District. While the District has performed
a number of planning and research studies /reports, the last treatment plant master plan was
completed in 1987.
Description:
The TP Master Plan is one component of the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan. A key
deliverable of the TP Master Plan will be a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the next 20 -year
planning horizon that provides the descriptions, rationale and estimated costs for the District's
treatment plant capital improvement projects and on -going programs in order to address aging
infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, accommodate planned
growth, optimize energy use, and implement the District's vision for a "plant of the future" that is
consistent with the District's Strategic Plan.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$600,000
$600,000
$0
$1,200,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$600,000
$600,000
$0
$1,200,000
CS -28
Pleasant Hill — Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer
Project Name
Pleasant Hill — Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer
Project No.
8412
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Expansion
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nancy Molina
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To achieve the Collection System Program goal of reducing sanitary sewer overflows by adding a
new trunk sewer for diversion of flows. This new trunk sewer will give Staff the ability to
implement the necessary renovation work in the City of Pleasant Hill.
History:
The Pleasant Hill- Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer project was recommended in the Collection
System Master Plan 2010 update due to a series of capacity- deficient sewers that were identified
in the City of Pleasant Hill. District staff have been designing the project since 2012.
Description:
The project involves installing sewer pipeline of various diameter relief sewers and diverting the
sewage away from the existing capacity- deficient sewers and connect to the existing 36 -inch
trunk sewer that runs along Ardith Drive. The new relief sewer alignment is within city streets in
both the City of Pleasant Hill and the City of Martinez. Due to the City of Pleasant Hill proposed
paving projects, the District may need to include additional sewer lines along Pleasant Hill Road
in order to avoid work in the proposed paving areas. This project may be coordinated with the
Pleasant Hill Corridor project included in the CIP to avoid significant paving reconstruction on
Pleasant Hill Road.
Location:
City of Pleasant Hill
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$70,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
-
$600,000
$0
$0
$0
$600,000
Design
-
$0
$3,050,000
$6,400,000
$0
$9,450,000
Construction
FY Total
$579,074
$600,000
$3,120,000
$6,400,000
$0
$10,699,074
CS -29
Contractual Assessment Districts
Project Name
Contractual Assessment Districts
Project No.
8402
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Expansion
Priority Rank
N/A
Project Manager
Russell Leavitt
Ranking Score
N/A
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Environmental Services
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
The District developed a Contractual Assessment District (CAD) Program to provide a financing
mechanism for the extension of public sewers into areas which are currently served by septic
tanks.
History:
In certain instances, the cost to extend public sewers into an area serviced by septic tanks can
be an extreme financial burden for one owner or even a small group of owners. The District
developed the CAD Program to address this burden. The CAD process provides a means to
finance the cost of sewer improvements over time at a fixed interest rate. The CAD assessments
are placed on the customers' property tax bills each year until the entire amount is repaid to the
District.
Description:
A number of CADs will likely be proposed during the budget year. Funding for the CADs will be
paid for under the Program Contingency account.
Location:
To be determined. CADs are currently being considered in neighborhoods in Alamo and Danville.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$1,100,000
$1,300,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$100,000
$1,100,000
$1,300,000
CS -30
2015 -16 Development Sewerage
Project Name
2015 -16 Development Sewerage
Project No.
8420
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Expansion
Priority Rank
N/A
Project Manager
Tom Godsey
Ranking Score
N/A
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Environmental Services
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
This project provides for appropriate capitalization of District force account labor and other
expenses for planning, design, and construction of developer installed and contributed main
sewer facilities.
History:
This is a cost neutral project paid for by Development fees.
Description:
The District requires property owners to pay for the main sewers needed to serve their property.
Where sewers are designed and installed by developers or other private parties, District
planning, plan review, right -of -way, inspection and record drawing /mapping effort is required to
ensure that contributed sewers meet the District's Standard Specifications for Design and
Construction. These activities are capitalized under this project. A portion of the revenue
collected for plan review, right -of -way, and inspection is credited to the Sewer Construction Fund
and offsets some of the expenditures made under this capital project.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$1,019,942
$820,000
$700,000
$700,000
$700,000
$3,939,942
CS -31
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement
Project Name
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement
Project No.
5941
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Pump Station
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Neil Meyer
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Collection System Operations
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to replace or recondition failed and obsolete pumps, piping, valves,
and other equipment; to provide for proper emergency response at District pumping stations; to
purchase major spare assemblies for various pieces of pumping stations equipment; and to meet
new regulatory requirements.
History:
This project has been an ongoing replacement of old equipment and piping at the Pump Stations.
Selection of equipment is done by the Operations staff, Engineering, and in coordination with the
ongoing Asset Management Program.
Description:
The scope of work for this project includes, as examples, the following:
• Addition of control and isolation valves for shutdown and protection of the stations;
• Revisions to control strategies and equipment response times;
• Possible protections for pumping stations and equipment, if flooded;
• Investigation and installation of "pump around" capabilities;
• Development of emergency response procedures and purchasing equipment;
• Reconditioning of major pieces of equipment to original factory specifications;
• Purchase of large- dollar spare assemblies for major PS equipment;
• Other work or equipment requirements that might be defined by regulators.
Location:
All pumping stations
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
Planning
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
Design
$568,793
$50,000
$100,000
$100,000
$0
$818,793
Construction
FY Total
$568,793
$50,000
$100,000
$100,000
$0
$818,793
CS -32
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements
Project Name
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements
Project No.
8406
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Pump Station
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
The project will improve the safety and security of select pumping stations by adding or replacing
surveillance, fire alarm and intrusion alarm systems.
History:
One of the many responsibilities of the District's safety programs is to address and support
solutions for safety and security concerns identified by operations or maintenance personnel.
District pumping station operations staff has identified safety and security concerns at critical
pumping stations. These stations have obsolete, inoperable or nonexistent video surveillance,
fire alarm and intrusion alarm systems. A lack of pumping station security, particularly at remote
stations, results in liability exposure to the District. Many of the existing fire alarm systems do not
meet current fire code and are integrated with the intrusion alarm systems.
Description:
This project added new or replaced existing video surveillance, fire alarm and /or intrusion alarm
systems at the highest priority pumping stations. This project is in the closeout phase.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$2,000
$0
$0
$2,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$442,000
$0
$0
$0
$166,769
$442,000
$2,000
$0
$0
$610,769
CS -33
Pumping Station Arc Flash Study
Project Name
Pumping Station Arc Flash Study
Project No.
8427
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Pump Station
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Jason DeGroot
Ranking Score
85
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Evaluate all pumping station electrical systems, provide an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis Study per
the current NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety, and related codes.
History:
The lifeline of the pumping stations electrical system is the feeders from PG &E to the main
switchgear and breakers. Most of the pumping stations are equipped with backup generators,
including automatic transfer when PG &E power is not available. Loss or failure of these power
conveyances or transfer switches would disrupt the pumping station electrical system and more
importantly, pose a safety hazard to Operations staff.
Description:
The scope of work will include the following:
• Short — Circuit, Protective coordination, Load -Flow and Arc Flash Analysis Study per
requirements outlined in the current version of NFPA 70E.
• The arc flash analysis shall be performed according to the IEEE standard 1584.
• The Study shall be done using SKM Systems Analysis Power Tools for Windows (PTW)
software program.
• Arc —flash labeling of the electrical equipment.
Location:
Throughout the service area.
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$30,000
$0
$0
$30,000
$0
$70,000
$0
$0
$0
$70,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$0
$70,000
$30,000
$0
$0
$100,000
CS -34
Moraga /Crossroads PS Project
Project Name
Moraga /Crossroads PS Project
Project No.
8436
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Pumping Stations
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To evaluate the Moraga and Crossroads Pump stations for replacement or rehabilliation needs.
History:
Both Pump stations have been modified in the last several years. However, the stations continue
to be backed up by the original generators. In addition, the Moraga station does not have
grinders.
Description:
This project is being initiated at the request of the Operations staff to evaluate the electrical/
standby generators at these facilities. In addition, grinders are being considered at the Moraga
station.
Location:
Moraga and Crossroads Pumping Stations in Moraga and Orinda.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$440,000
1 $940,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$500,000
$440,000
1 $1,090,000
CS -35
Fairview Maltby Pump Stations Upgrades
Project Name
Fairview Maltby Pump Stations Upgrades
Project No.
8429
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Pumping Stations
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
To replace or rehabilitate the Fairview and Maltby Pump Stations as determined by ongoing
condition assessments.
History:
There are several improvements and some electrical equipment replacement required at these
stations. A project has been created to handle the evaluation of these stations and to replace
several critical equipment. Last year, the Maltby station had a Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS)
failure that staff has evaluated and several recommendations are proposed to these station.
Fairview is built similar to Maltby.
Description:
This project will replace the Automatic Transfer switch at Fairview and evaluate the overall
condition. The project will also build any recommendations provided by the Arc Flash report at
these locations.
Location:
Fairview and Maltby Pumping Stations in Martinez
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$120,000
$400,000
$670,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$120,000
$400,000
$670,000
CS -36
Other Pump Stations Projects
Project Name
Other Pump Stations Projects
Project No.
8432
Program
Collection System Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Pumping Stations
Priority Rank
Unranked
Project Manager
Sasha Mestetsky
Ranking Score
N/A
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
This project is a placeholder for the scope provided under several Pump Station program
projects.
History:
This is a continuation of projects identified at all the pump stations, including the Miscellaneous
Forcemain Improvements, Pump Station Hazard Identification and Remediation, and the PS
Master Plan from the FY 14 -15 CIB.
Description:
This project will evaluate and install, if practical, the ability to inspect, assess and clean the
forcemains. Also, help identify any hazardous condition that require immediate abatement and
document any improvements for future projects.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,000
$1,150,000
$1,230,000
$0
$0
$0
$80,000
$1,150,000
$1,230,000
CS -37
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The General Improvements Program is primarily concerned with the
property, administrative buildings, management information systems, asset
management, and equipment/ vehicle needs of the District.
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition (Tab 1)
The Vehicles and Equipment subprogram comprises the items budgeted and
purchased under the annual District Equipment Budget, which is included in this
document. The Capital Improvement Budget includes an allowance for the equipment
budget. Specific equipment items are approved through the annual budget process.
Management Information Systems (Tab 2)
The Management Information Systems subprogram reflects the importance of IT in
the daily operation of the District. The District has developed an IT Master Plan
which envisions implementing specific improvements and extends several years into
the future. An allowance to meet anticipated future information technology needs
has been included in the ten -year Capital Improvement Plan. Funding for upgrades
of the District's Geographic Data Integration systems and Enterprise Resource
Planning software platform are included in the CIB.
General Improvements Projects (Tab 3)
This subprogram includes improvements to the Headquarters Office Building,
Collection System Operations building and other properties, CIB legal expenses,
easement and right -of -way acquisition, and projects related to District property
improvements.
Asset Management Program (Tab 4)
The District has invested significant resources in its assets and the purpose of the
Asset Management Program, which includes Treatment Plant, Collection System,
General Improvements, and Recycled Water assets, is to optimize the lifecycle of
these assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a sustainable manner for
customers with an acceptable level of risk.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget GI -1
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2015 -16
Project Name
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2015 -16
Project No.
8516
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Amal Lyon
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Administrative /Finance and Accounting
Concord %
TBD
Purpose:
To provide the District with safe and cost - effective vehicles and equipment.
History:
A project is developed on a yearly basis to procure required equipment and vehicles throughout
the District.
Description:
This is the District's 2015 -16 capital project for purchase of vehicles and equipment.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$617,200
$450,000
$500,000
$0
$1,567,200
$0
$617,200
$450,000
$500,000
$0
$1,567,200
GI -2
' Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
EQUIPMENT BUDGET
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2015 - 2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
Introduction /Routine Procedures: The following tables show items anticipated to be
purchased via the 2015 - 2016 Equipment Budget. In addition to the specific purchases,
a $50,500 contingency is budgeted for unanticipated needs. When the contingency
budget is utilized, a memo is sent to the General Manager who can approve purchases
up to $50,500. Equipment purchased over $50,500 will be submitted for Board approval
as a part of the Capital Improvement Budget.
Equipment Item Overrun: When the actual cost of an equipment budget item is more
than the budgeted amount, the following guidelines should be observed:
• If the overrun does not exceed $5,000 or 10 %, whichever is greater, and
there are sufficient funds in the department's Equipment Budget line account
to cover the overrun, then the purchase can proceed. An informational memo
should be sent to the General Manager in these cases, to keep him /her aware
of budget variances. When Purchasing receives their copy of the memo, the
purchase may proceed.
• If the overrun exceeds the above criteria, a contingency memo, or position
paper will be required. If the dollar overrun is less than $50,500, the
additional funds may be requested through contingency. If the dollar overrun
is more than $50,500, a position paper is required.
Substitutions: Occasionally, the need to substitute a functionally different equipment
item for a previously authorized Equipment Budgeted item arises. The following
procedure should be followed in these instances:
• Situation One: Where a substitution is necessary, but the total does not
exceed the authorized Equipment Budgeted amount, a memo will be sent to
the General Manager detailing the need for the substitution.
• Situation Two: If the substitution or an unanticipated cost increase will result
in the purchase exceeding the authorized Equipment Budgeted amount, a
contingency memo (up to $50,500) should be sent to the General Manager
outlining the need for substitution and /or the additional amount from
contingency that is required for purchase.
In both situations, if the substitution is warranted, the General Manager will
approve the memo, and Purchasing can then proceed with the procurement
process after their copy of the memo is received. Changes to authorized
Equipment Budgeted purchases exceeding $50,500 additional cost must be
requested by a position paper to the Board.
N:\ACCOUNTING \GMTEMP1 \Equipment BudgetTY 2016\2015 -2016 cover page.docx S Recycled Paper
Summarized below is a comparison of the 2015 -2016 Equipment Budget with the approved budgets of the four prior years:
Contingency as a % of Total Budget 11.22% 7.37% 11.28% 10.45% 6.67%
** Board approved transfer of $400,000 from Collection System program contingency to the equipment
budget to fund purchase of a Vactor truck.
2015 -2016
2014 -2015
2013 -2014
2012 -2013
2011 -2012
Administrative
0
0
8,000
0
0
Engineering
24,000
9,000
0
0
34,867
Collection System Operations
12,000
32,500
74,000
97,050
0
Plant Operations
219,500
365,700
56,400
273,604
185,063
Subtotal
255,500
407,200
138,400
370,654
219,930
Vehicles
New
0
0
0
0
0
Replacement
144,000
135,000
407,000
486,000
619,000
Rodding Truck ordered April 2012
241,000
Rodding Truck April 2015 (move 14/15 CS contingency to GI
program) **
400,000
Subtotal
144,000
535,000
648,000
486,000
619,000
Equipment Request Total
399,500
942,200
786,400
856,654
838,930
Contingency
50,500
75,000
100,000
100,000
60,000
District Total
$450,000
$1,017,200
$886,400
$956,654
$898,930
Contingency as a % of Total Budget 11.22% 7.37% 11.28% 10.45% 6.67%
** Board approved transfer of $400,000 from Collection System program contingency to the equipment
budget to fund purchase of a Vactor truck.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2015— 2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Quantity
Item Description
Replacement
Productivity
Office
Productivity
Field
Safety
Total
CAPITAL PROJECTS
GPS Receiver with Software
24,000
24,000
And accssories
Engineering Total
24,000
24,000
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2015 — 2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT
Quantity
Item Description
Replacement
Productivity
Office
Productivity
Field
Safety
Total
FIELD OPERATIONS
1
Brake Lathe
12,000
12,000
Subtotal
CSO Total
12,000
12,000
N:WC000NTING \GMTEMP1 \Equipment Budget\FY 2016 \CSO FY1516.docx
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2015— 2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT
Quantity
Item Description
Replacement
Productivity
Office
Productivity
Field
Safety
Total
OPERATIONS
1
Gas Chromatograph — Mass Spectrometer
with Data System
134,000
134,000
Subtotal
134,000
134,000
MAINTENANCE
1
Infrared Camera
8,700
8,7GO
1
Cogeneration Analyzer
25,000
25,000
1
Vibration Spectrum Analyzer
8,400
8,400
1
Portable Pump
43,400
43,400
Subtotal
77,100
8,400
85,500
POD Total
211,100
8,400
219,500
N:Wccounting \GMTEMPI \Equipment Budget\FY 2016 \POD FY1516 revised.docx
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2015 — 2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
VEHICLES
Quantity
Item Description
Replacement
Productivity
Office
Productivity
Field
Safety
Total
FLEET SERVICES
1
Electric Truck
27,000
27,000
1
Mid -Size 4 X 4 Truck w /shell
37,000
37,000
2
Half -ton 4 X 4 Truck
80,000
80,000
8
Vehicle Total
144,000
144,000
GDI Treatment Plant
Project Name
GDI Treatment Plant
Project No.
8227
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Management Information Systems
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Carolyn Knight
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Support the asset management program by providing an effective means of accessing treatment
plant asset data through an interactive map linked to multiple datasets.
History:
The successful implementation of the collection system GDI indicates that a similar web interface
for the treatment plant would provide efficient access to asset data. A pilot treatment plant GDI
was developed and is currently used by staff.
Description:
Implement a geographically based asset management tool for the treatment plant. The
Treatment Plant GDI will be modeled after the collection system GDI; mirroring the graphic
interface and functionality but accessing and delivering treatment plant related data sets.
Location:
Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
10/13/2008
6/30/2018
$222,444
$0
$42,558
$120,000
$40,000
$425,002
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$222,444
$0
$42,558
$120,000
$40,000
$425,002
GI -3
GDI -SMMS Replacement
Project Name
GDI -SMMS Replacement
Project No.
8232
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Management Information Systems
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Carolyn Knight
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
50%
Purpose:
Support the asset management program by implementing a new geographic information system
to efficiently integrate data to improve productivity and provide a standardized data structure
resulting in improved spatial data management.
History:
The District's GDI was developed to minimize duplicate databases and present valuable
information to staff for evaluating assets. GDI was built using various software platforms to
integrate information from disparate data sources. Some of the software that is used for GDI's
functionality is no longer supported by the vendors.
ESRI software was chosen to replace the existing software because it is the mapping industry
leader and a versatile, expandable solution. Using ESRI software will decrease the need to
develop customized code because it integrates easily with other software and provides a variety
of software tools to disseminate information.
Description:
GDI will be updated by migrating existing datasets into the new ESRI software platform. Spatial
database information will be evaluated to standardize and consolidate data in order to minimize
duplication across workgroups. Work flow processes and procedures will be documented to
develop clear roles and responsibilities. Detailed specifications will be developed for hardware
requirements, as well as any necessary customization for software functionality and
maintenance.
Evaluation of web interface tools will be completed to define the optimal solution(s) for presenting
information to District staff. Following the evaluation, appropriate tools will be procured and
implemented.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
6/27/2011
6/30/2016
$444,919
$136,000
$271,000
$0
$0
$851,919
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$444,919
$136,000
$271,000
$0
$0
$851,919
GI -4
Information Technology Development
Project Name
Information Technology Development
Project No.
8240
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Management Information Systems
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
David Heath
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Administration
I Concord %
50%
Purpose:
To replace and upgrade IT infrastructure and software as needed.
History:
An Information Technology Development Plan was developed to centralize efforts and funding in
the development of computer and telecommunication technology within the District. The District
budgets IT on a yearly basis. The IT Master plan was approved in 2015 and its implementation is
within the CIB and 10 year plan.
Description:
This project is the implementation of the IT Master Plan, please see the following document for
specific work planned this fiscal year.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$700,000
$1,000,000
$1,300,000
$6,500,000
$9,500,000
$0
$700,000
$1,300,000
$1,300,000
$6,500,000
$9,800,000
GI -5
CMMS Replacement
Project Name
CMMS Replacement
Project No.
8242
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Management Information Systems
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Dana Lawson
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
50%
Purpose:
Support the asset management program by replacing the computerized maintenance
management system (CMMS) for both the collection system and treatment plant.
History:
District Project 8232, GDI -SMMS Replacement, replaced the unsupported GIS software versions
with a new fully - supported ESRI platform. The migration to ESRI will be completed by June
2015.
The current CMMS for the collection system is no longer vendor - supported. Additionally,
consolidating all assets into one state -of- the -art, supported system will more effectively manage
the lifecycle cost of owning and operating these assets in support of the District's mission. This
project also supports Strategic Goal No. 6, Strategy 1, through a specific key performance
indicator in the Plan.
Description:
This project will continue consolidating software systems by procuring, migrating data,
configuring and implementing an effective CMMS solution that encompasses all District assets
(collection, distribution, treatment, pump station, fleet, etc.) and efficiently integrates with the GIS.
The collection system will be migrated and configured first, followed by the treatment plant and
pumping station assets.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$148,000
$0
$0
$148,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Planning
11/19/2014
6/30/2015
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
Design
7/1/2015
6/30/2017
$0
$0
$360,000
$117,000
$0
$477,000
Construction
FY Total
$0
$50,000
$508,000
$117,000
$0
$675,000
GI -6
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PLAN
2015 -2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ..................................... ..............................1
Proposed Budget Summary .................................... ..............................2
Proposed Projects Narrative ............................................... ..............................3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Information Technology Development CIB Plan provides direction and flexibility to
meet the District's future information technology needs. Each year, District staff submits
project recommendations, requests and write -ups to the Information Technology
Administrator. The Management team gives their final review of the proposed CIB and
IT projects, providing revisions and recommendations prior to appearing before the
Capital Projects Committee for review and the Board of Directors for final approval.
The Information Technology Development CIB Plan is developed to provide funding for
IT projects in one or more of the following areas:
• PC hardware and software
• District and specialized networks, systems and software applications
• Network infrastructure, security and reliability
• Data storage, backups and disaster recovery
• Internet and Intranet development
• Wireless access
• Telecommunications improvements
• Information Technology customer service and support
• Cost savings, power conservation & green alternatives
The District's Information Technology (IT) Master Plan centralizes efforts in the
development of technology within the District. Input for the Master Plan was gathered
through survey results, management business needs, project lists, and interviews with
IT staff, along with management and departments' focus groups. The Information
Technology Development CIB was created to provide funding for these projects.
- 1 -
PROPOSED 2015 -2016 IT CIB BUDGET SUMMARY
Project Description
In Thousands
1. IT Infrastructure Replacement: End User - Replace approx. 40
$80
PCs and Laptops
2. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Data Center - Replace approx.
$20
3 switches and other core IT infrastructure
3. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other — Purchase approx. 12
$36
tablets for CSO
4. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other— Purchase approx. 9
$18
Laptops for EOC
5. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other — Upgrade Plant security
$25
cameras, hardware, software, installation
6. IT Division Move and New Personnel Additions: Office
$70
Furniture, Wiring, and new personnel needs
7. District Server Backup: Enable Cloud Storage capability for
$50
District data (3rd leg of "stool ")
8. Technical Infrastructure Room Upgrades: Board Room,
$60
Conference and Training Rooms
9. Email Archiving Solution: Preservation and detailed search
$15
capabilities re: email
10. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$200
Records Management Project
11. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$175
Time and Attendance Project
12. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$150
Collaboration Software Project
13. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$50
Dental Permits Project
14. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$70
Desktop Virtualization
15. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
$15
Telecommunications Audit
Total Proposed IT CIB Budget
$1,034
-2-
PROPOSED 2015 -2016 IT CIB BUDGET NARRATIVE
1. IT Infrastructure Replacement: End User - Replace approx. 40 PCs and Laptops
i. Standard desktops: $1.5k * (30) _ $45k
ii. Enhanced desktops:$6.4k * (3) = 19
iii. Laptops: $2k * (8) = 16
$80k
This budget item will replace end -of -life personal computers and laptops.
2. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Data Center - Replace approx. 3 switches and
other core IT infrastructure:
i. Switches: $6.5k * (3) _ $20k
This budget item will replace end -of -life data center infrastructure.
3. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other— Purchase approx. 12 tablets for CMMS +
other users:
i. Tablets: $3k * (12) _ $36k
A tablet task force is anticipated to be established by the IT Steering
Committee to help determine the best tablet(s) for use and support at the
District. A determination will need to be made as to whether ruggedized
tablets, a standard tablet encased in a ruggedized case, or a standard
tablet will meet end -user needs. Costs for different solutions, especially
the ruggedized version, may significantly change budgeting projections.
Additionally, minimizing the different vendor products supported should
also be a consideration as it will have a direct impact on maintenance and
support time and effort.
4. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other — Purchase approx. 9 laptops for EOC:
i. Laptops: $2k * (9) _ $18k
This budget item will replace end -of -life laptops. These laptops are
deployed solely at and for EOC use.
5. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other — Upgrade Plant security camera hardware
and software
i. New security surveillance system: $25k * (1) _ $25k
➢ The project will deploy and integrate a new security system at key Plant
locations.
6. IT Division Move and New Personnel Additions: Office Furniture, Wiring, and new
personnel needs:
i. New IT personnel infrastructure: $70k * (1) _ $70k
-3-
➢ Accommodate 5 newly hired IT positions in a centralized location and their
specific needs. Examples include furniture, wiring, racks, window black-
out capabilities, etc.
7. District Server Backup: Enable Cloud Storage capability for District data (3rd leg
of "stool ")
i. Cloud -based data backup: $1.5k /Tb * (30) _ $45k
ii. Other misc. costs: $5k * (1) _ $5
$50k
➢ This capability will provide the District its 3rd layer of data recovery. It will
also provide an out of the area, independent recovery option, if a worst
case scenario affects the Bay Area and the District specifically. Some
data may continue to be storage in an offsite facility, e.g. Recall.
Cost will be a variable based on overall storage requirements and
throughput requirements. Network storage costs vary widely from $1 k /Tb
to thousands of dollars per Tb.
8. Technical Infrastructure Room Upgrades: Board Room, Conference, and
Training Rooms
i. Upgrade /Standardize Conference Room Capabilities:
$7.5k * (4) _ $30k
ii. Upgrade Board Conference Room: $25k * (1) = 25
iii. Misc.: $1 k * (5) _ $55
$60k
➢ These upgrades will provide primary District conference rooms with
standardized capabilities:
i. Projector and screen
ii. Conference room phone with extra microphones, if applicable
➢ The Board Room will also have additional work done:
i. Video recording
ii. Indexing of minutes to video recording
iii. Upgrading of audio equipment
iv. Computer replacement and other misc. items.
9. Email Archiving Solution: Ability to efficiently preserve and search email
i. Email Archiving Appliance and Deployment: $15k * (1) _ $15k
➢ An email archiving solution will allow the District better control of the
growth of the current email database and allow the database(s) to be
searched more granularly, e.g. by topic, user, etc.
➢ It also will provide the District the ability to produce emails in a more
efficient manner in the event of an e- discovery process.
➢ Email archiving can also provide an additional option in the need to
recover email.
10. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Records Project Management
i. Records Management Project Consulting Services:
$150k * (1) _ $150k
ii. IT Infrastructure: e.g. WORM drive 50k * (1) = 50
$200k
The Records Management project is being led by the Secretary of the
District and the consultant firm ECS Imaging.
➢ It will allow the District to meet legal requirements and provide a single
trusted source document for the District to rely on. It will also provide a
more efficient process to manage documents and by utilizing the
capabilities of more sophisticated software in the form of workflow.
➢ Quotes for different services have been received.
11. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Time and Attendance Software
Time and Attendance Consulting Services:
$125k * (1) _ $125k
IT Infrastructure: Software Module(s) 50k * (1) = 50
$175k
Time and Attendance software will allow the District to eliminate much of
the labor and manual paper processes associated with the time keeping
process. Many employees have identified these capabilities as a key time
saver.
➢ The ability for employees to directly change information, see balances and
receive information electronically will be a significant enhancement to the
District's technical capabilities.
➢ Additional functionality may be added for HRIS capabilities and
Purchasing.
Initial contact has been made with vendors to understand the current
technical functionality of Time Keeping and HRIS functionality and how
these systems would interact with the District's current ERP.
12. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Collaboration Software Project
i. Consultant Services: $115k * (1) _ $115k
ii. IT Infrastructure: $35k * (1) = 35
$ 150k
➢ A new collaboration solution for the District will allow more information to
be shared easier. The District can start with one area it wants to
automate, or automate better, e.g. its Intranet, and then add additional
functionality in the future.
➢ The cost of the solution will be determined to a large degree upon what
and how much the District decides to automate and how many people are
going to use it.
-5-
13. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Dental Permits Project
i. Consultant Services: $40k * (1) = $40k
ii. IT Infrastructure: $10k * (1) = 10k
$50k
The Dental Permits project will allow the District to more easily meet a
new Federal Requirement for capturing relevant information from Dental
offices.
➢ It requires more information to be gathered which necessitates a technical
solution to more efficiently meet this requirement.
➢ The Project is being led by the Engineering and Technical Services
Department.
➢ This project may also provide an on -line payment option.
14. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Desktop Virtualization
i. Consultant Services: $45k * (1) = $45k
ii. IT Infrastructure: $25k * (1) = 25k
$70k
This project will begin to transition the District away from personnel
computers on their desks to a "virtual" desktop running on a centralized
server.
It will help enable the District to streamline computer management and
costs while allowing end -users the mobility and freedom to access their
desktops' anywhere, from any device.
i. Depending on the type of client chosen, savings may range from 1/2
to 1/3 of a typical desktop.
15. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Telecommunications Audit
i. Telecom Audit: $15k * (1) = $15k
The Telecommunications Audit by an external entity will provide the
District assurance that all circuits currently being paid for are in use and
necessary as well as identify areas for future cost savings.
M
District Easement Acquisition
Project Name
District Easement Acquisition
Project No.
8236
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Thomas Brightbill
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
TBD
Purpose:
To improve or acquire new property land rights for existing or new sanitary sewers that are
located on private properties and are not associated with a current capital project for sewer
renovation work.
History:
As capital projects are designed, sanitary sewer easements may have to be acquired through
budgets for those specific projects. This project provides funds for the acquisition of easements
for projects where specific funds are not identified in the Capital Improvement Budget.
Description:
Easements that may be acquired through this project are:
• Locations where easements need to be purchased for existing sewers
• Sewers that need upgraded easement rights or access rights
• Sewers relocated through other public agency projects
• Outfall Easement Upgrade Project
• Recycled Water Program
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$11,000
$0
$0
$11,000
$58,894
$70,000
$1,000
$50,000
50,000
$229,894
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$58,894
$70,000
$12,000
$50,000
$50,000
$240,894
GI -7
Buffer and Rental Property Improvements
Project Name
Buffer and Rental Property Improvements
Project No.
8237
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Thomas Brightbill
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Protect and enhance the District's property through additions, improvements, replacements, and
extraordinary repairs.
History:
The District owns various properties surrounding the Treatment Plant, including the Imhoff
Triangle, the Kiewit parcel, 4849 Imhoff and 4737 Imhoff, and others. The Kiewit parcel has
served as a buffer zone for the Treatment Plant and has been the site of a clean fill operation for
several years. The Imhoff properties also serve as a buffer between the Treatment Plant and
nearby neighborhoods, and are used as rental property and to house some District work groups
and equipment.
Description:
This project will fund needed improvements to the buffer and rental properties, and the
surrounding parking lots and grounds, relating to Safety items.
Location:
Martinez
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$212,000
$0
$0
$212,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$27,048
$0
$0
$0
$0
$27,048
$27,048
$0
$212,000
$0
$0
$239,048
GI -8
POD Office Improvements
Project Name
POD Office Improvements
Project No.
8239
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
D
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Brad Leidecker
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering/ Capital Projects
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
The project purpose is to make improvements to the interior and exterior of the Plant Operations
Department Administration building.
History:
The building is over 30 years old. There is an ongoing need to renovate or reconfigure office and
workstation space to match employee needs and duties, to replace outdated or worn out
furniture, meet ADA requirements, and to incorporate new office technologies.
Replacement of carpeting and repainting has been completed. Modular furniture has been
replaced in several cubicles.
Description:
This multi -year project will provide an allowance to renovate and upgrade the interior and exterior
of the POD Administration offices and the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located in the
Multi- Purpose Room. Anticipated projects include installation of cabinetry for storage of EOC
equipment and sidewalk modifications for ADA access.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$240,000
$0
$0
$240,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$90,000
$0
$0
$0
$90,000
$0
$90,000
$240,000
$0
$0
$330,000
GI -9
Server Room Relocation
Project Name
Server Room Relocation
Project No.
8243
Program
General Improvements
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Jason DeGroot
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
I Concord %
50%
Purpose:
Relocate all computer /server /network equipment and related equipment from its current location
in the POD basement to a suitable location.
History:
In FY 2014 -15, the project was initiated after a major IT server failure at the main network facility.
The existing room is a decommissioned laboratory facility which is vulnerable to several process
and other water pipelines.
Description:
At this time, this project will evaluate alternatives and possible locations to relocate the District's
main server equipment and consider future IT requirements. Upon the results of this evaluation,
staff will prioritize and update the costs and future schedule for any capital improvements
recommended.
Location:
Treatment Plant
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$43,000
$0
$0
$43,000
$0
$57,000
$0
$0
$0
$57,000
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$57,000
$93,000
$1,050,000
$0
$1,200,000
GI -10
General Security and Access
Project Name
General Security and Access
Project No.
8207
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Thomas Brightbill
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
TBD
Purpose:
Improve safety for employees and the general public; meet safety standards; reduce the District's
exposure to liability; reduce loss of District's property; and reduce Operations and Maintenance
expenses.
History:
The District has experienced property losses in the past. Improvements to the security system
are continually identified and refined. It is possible that additional security measures for essential
public service facilities may be required at some point.
Description:
This project potentially includes upgrading alarm systems, adding card readers, adding gates in
the perimeter fencing, adding security cameras, improving lighting, fencing and or signage.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$12,000
$0
$0
$12,000
$47,616
$0
$0
$0
$0
$47,616
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$38,000
$100,000
$50,000
$188,000
$47,616
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$50,000
$247,616
GI -11
CSOD Facility Improvements
Project Name
CSOD Facility Improvements
Project No.
8233
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Alex Rozul
Ranking Score
55
Dept /Division
Operations/ Collection System Operations Division
I Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Improve the safety, reliability, and maintainability of the Collection System Operations
Department facilities in Walnut Creek, including the vehicle maintenance shop.
History:
This is a multi -year program to construct capital improvements to the CSOD site in Walnut
Creek. Projects will include improvements to the vehicle maintenance shop, which was not
included in the CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility project.
Description:
Minor improvements are budgeted for FY 2015 -16. Work includes improving drainage at
Materials Loading Facility.
Location:
1250 Springbrook Road, Walnut Creek.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$13,000
$5,500
$0
$18,500
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$161,103
$20,000
$0
$46,000
$50,000
$277,103
$161,103
$20,000
$13,000
$51,500
$50,000
$295,603
GI -12
HOB Improvements
Project Name
HOB Improvements
Project No.
8234
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Edgar Lopez
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Improve the safety, serviceability, maintainability, usability, and appearance of the interior and
exterior of the Headquarters Office Building (HOB).
History:
The HOB was originally built by 1983 and seismically retrofitted in 2014. Although several interior
improvements have been recently completed, this project provides for necessary improvements
and for future modifications to the building.
Description:
This project will provide for office space improvements in the lower level and for the third floor of
the building to accommodate relocating the IT division and newly adopted positions. Work will
include new partitions, modifying existing partitions, and offices as needed. Security
improvements will be coordinated with this project and be added to the scope.
Location:
Headquarters Office Building.
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$10,000
$27,500
$0
$37,500
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236,244
$60,000
$100,000
$0
$0
$396,244
$236,244
$60,000
$110,000
$27,500
$0
$433,744
GI -13
Seismic Improvements for HOB
Project Name
Seismic Improvements for HOB
Project No.
8226
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Edgar Lopez
Ranking Score
80
Dept /Division
Engineering /Capital Projects
Concord %
0%
Purpose:
Upgrade the Headquarters Office Building (HOB) to current seismic safety standards.
History:
Since the construction of the HOB in the mid- 1980s, a great deal has been learned from the
Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes and earthquake code requirements have changed. In
2008 Complete Project Solutions, Inc. (CPS) completed an analysis of HOB identifying significant
seismic deficiencies based on current design standards.
CPS' analysis of HOB revealed issues with the building columns and the steel moment frames.
While no building constructed with steel moment frames has collapsed in the United States, there
are unique aspects to the HOB that warrant additional concern. Combining the unique aspects of
the HOB and the lack of meeting current design standards indicate that HOB may not provide
basic life safety to occupants.
Description:
Seismically retrofit HOB to provide up to an enhanced life safety level of structural performance.
Work will be coordinated with HOB Improvements for carpeting, painting, and other office space
enhancements. This project has been accepted and be closing in FY 15 -16.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$1,000
$0
$0
$1,000
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$92,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,847,587
$92,000
$0
$0
$0
$5,939,587
GI -14
Capital Legal Services
Project Name
Capital Legal Services
Project No.
8230
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Projects
Priority Rank
N/A
Project Manager
Russell Leavitt
Ranking Score
N/A
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
TBD
Purpose:
Streamline the processing of legal bills.
History:
In the past, legal expenses were charged to individual capital projects. This process required
extra staff time each month to review legal bills and get approvals from several different project
managers.
Description:
Capital legal service expenses are no longer charged to individual capital projects. Instead, legal
expenses are charged to one capital account with four charge numbers for the four programs.
This reduces the amount of time all parties must spend processing the legal bill.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$33,000
$67,500
$0
$100,500
$79,285
$30,000
$0
$0
$0
$109,285
Design
Construction
FY Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$79,285
$30,000
$33,000
$67,500
$0
$209,785
GI -15
Asset Management Program Development
Project Name
Asset Management Program Development
Project No.
8238
Program
General Improvements Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Asset Management Plan
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Dana Lawson
Ranking Score
70
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
50%
Purpose:
Develop a comprehensive asset management program to optimize the lifecycle of the District's
assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a sustainable manner for customers with an
acceptable level of risk.
History:
This project builds on the previous Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan, Force Main
Assessment, various master plans and the sewer renovation program.
In FY 14 -15, a consultant was contracted to develop a multi -year implementation plan; Board
Policy 15 was adopted regarding asset management; began standardizing codes and cleaning
the plant's asset registrar, assisted with the version upgrade to the plant's CMMS as well as
improving its functionality, updated the pumping station assets; began drafting procedures and
data standards; and coordinated access to O &M manuals, shop drawings, reports, etc. through
TP GDI.
Description:
The final version of the Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary Report was published
in March 2015. The elements identified were assigned by staff to existing projects where
applicable, included in maintenance efforts as continuous improvement efforts, and the
remaining elements will be completed in this project.
Implementation will require District staff time over the next three years to accomplish such tasks
as standardizing and completing the asset register, drafting to consolidate treatment plant As-
Builts, consolidating CCTV databases, and updating the asset management plan. Specialty tasks
that will be managed by District staff but also require outside assistance include utility locating,
developing the reliability centered maintenance program, conducting condition assessment of
critical TP piping, and may also include integrating failure -based maintenance strategies,
developing program management standards or software /tools, and reviewing the asset
management plan.
Location:
District -wide
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$100,000
$0
$0
$100,000
8/1/2014
6/30/2018
$0
$600,000
$500,000
$900,000
$600,000
$2,600,000
Planning
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$0
$600,000
$600,000
$900,000
$600,000
$2,700,000
GI -16
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
April 6, 2015
File: 8238.25.5.1
TO: ROGER S. BAILEY, GENERAL MANAGER
ANN SASAKI, DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
JEAN -MARC PETIT, DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OFENGINEERING AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES
FROM: DANA LAWSON, SENIOR ENGINEER +
SUBJECT: ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (AMIP)
The final version of the Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary Report was
published in March 2015; a copy is attached. The objective of the first phase of the
District's asset management program was to develop a comprehensive implementation
plan by evaluating the current asset management practices, assisting the District in
developing Board Policy 015 to set the District's asset management goal, and then
developing elements to close the gaps between current practices and the goal. The goal
stated in that policy is to optimize the lifecycle of our assets in order to deliver high
quality, reliable services in a sustainable manner with an acceptable level of risk.
This memo describes which of the AMIP elements listed in the report are assigned to
District Project (DP) 8238, "Asset Management Program Development ". The remaining
AMIP elements are currently being performed by maintenance staff as continuous
improvement objectives and through other capital projects such as the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan (i.e., condition assessment).
The implementation of the AMIP will be accomplished over the next three years, instead
of the five years suggested in the summary report. Implementation will require District
staff time to accomplish such tasks as standardizing and completing the asset register,
drafting to consolidate treatment plant As- Builts, consolidating CCTV databases, and
updating the asset management plan.
Specialty tasks that will be managed by District staff but also require outside assistance
include utility locating, developing the reliability centered maintenance program,
conducting condition assessment of critical treatment plant piping, and may also include
integrating failure -based maintenance strategies, developing program management
standards or software /tools, and reviewing the asset management plan.
Based on this updated approach, with a compressed schedule and assignment of AMIP
elements as discussed above, the report's original estimate of $4.6M has been revised
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
to $2.1 M. The chart below compares the AMIP report's budget and schedule to the
revised budget and compressed schedule for DP 8238.
N $1.4
c
0
$1.2
$1.0
$0.8
$0.6
$0.4
$0.2
14 -15 15 -16 16 -17 17 -18 18 -19 19 -20
Fiscal Year (FY)
A more detailed breakdown of the remaining budget for DP 8238 over the next three
fiscal years is shown below with a description of outside services. Maintenance staff
time is not reflected in this table as the work related to Asset Management would be
part of their day to day routine task.
FY
Total
Engineering
Staff Time
Outside
Services
Description of Outside Services
15 -16
$ 600,000
$ 350,000
$ 250,000
Utility locating, reliability centered maintenance
pilot
16 -17
$ 900,000
$ 600,000
$ 300,000
Condition assessment of critical TP piping
Failure -based maintenance strategies,
17 -18
$ 600,000
$ 400,000
$ 200,000
program management standards or
software /tools, review of asset management
plan
Totals
$2,100,000
$1,350,000
$ 750,000
As a result, staff has amended several of the tables and figures to reflect the
assignment of plan elements to DP 8238 and compressed schedule.
1. Amended Table 1 Recommended AMIP Plan Elements: The amended table
shows the assignment of plan elements to other projects and to the Asset
Management Program Development.
2. Amended Figure 5 Three -Year Schedule: The amended figure shows the revised
schedule, now compressed from a five -year schedule to a three -year schedule.
3. Amended Table 2 Estimated Labor Costs by Plan Element and Calendar
Quarter: The amended table shows the cost to the Asset Management Program
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Development to reflect the revised schedule. In addition, after assigning various
plan elements to other appropriate projects and operating budgets, DP 8238 has
an estimated total budget of $2.7M covering Fiscal Years 2014/15 through
2017/18.
4. Amended Table 3 Estimated Labor Hours and Costs by Plan Element and Fiscal
Year: The amended table shows the revised hours and cost to the Asset
Management Program Development to reflect the revised schedule for the three
fiscal years estimated to complete the project.
5. Amended Figure 6 Estimated Level of Effort: This amended figure depicts the
level of effort by quarter over the next three fiscal years.
D L /sd h
ecc: D. Gemmell, D. Heath, N. Meyer, P. Seitz, A. Weer, E. Lopez, S. Mestetsky, C. Mizutani,
N. Hodges, T. Brightbill, T. Godsey
Attachments
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
Amended Table 1 Recommended AMIP Plan Elements
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
ID
Element Name
Planned
Start
Duration
(months)
Related Projects Already Underway
A
Cost of Service and Staffing Needs Assessment
Active
12
B
CMMS Replacement, District Project 8242
Active
18 -24
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
4
Business Process Mapping*
5
Knowledge Management Strategy
C1
IT Master Plan, District Project 8195
Active
12
C2
Financial ERP Replacement, District Project 8240
2015 -Q3
24 -36
4
Business Process Mapping*
C3
Electronic Content Management Evaluation, District Project 8240
Active
12 -18
5
Knowledge Management Strategy
D
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan, District Project 7315
2015 -Q3
24
6a
Failure Modes and Condition Assessment Protocol
6b
Condition Assessment of Pump Station / Treatment Plant Assets
7
Business Risk Exposure
7a
Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and Apply to Assets
7b
Risk Assessment
9
Asset Valuations
12
Strategic Forecasting
13
Capital Improvement Program Business Case Evaluations
Asset Management Plan Elements (DP 8238)
1
AM Organization, Policies and Key Strategies
2015 -Q1
9
2
Asset Register
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
2015 -Q1
3
2b
Complete Asset Register - Pump Station & Treatment Plant Assets
2015 -Q1
3
2c
Complete Utility Locating and Drafting to Consolidate Treatment
Plant Piping As- Builts
2015 -Q3
18
2d
Complete Asset Register for Treatment Plant Piping
2016 -Q3
6
3
Plant Maintenance Strategy
3a
Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot Program
2015 -Q3
24
3b
Expand Reliability Centered Maintenance Program (pending 3a)*
optional, in -house
6
Condition Assessments
6c
Condition Assessment of Critical Treatment Plant Piping
2017 -Q1
6
6d
Consolidate CCTV Databases
2016 -Q1
3
8
Failure -Based Maintenance Strategies*
2017 -Q3
6
10
Program and Project Management Standards*
2017 -Q1
6
11
Asset Commissioning and Handover*
2017 -Q1
6
14
Update Asset Management Plan
2017 -Q3
9
Notes:
(1) Element 1 is estimated to last nine months for the initial effort, followed by quarterly meetings and
some activity by the asset management steering committee for the duration of the AMIP.
(2) *optional, as- needed
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
)ptional, as-needed
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
THREE-YEAR SCHEDULE
AMENDED FIGURE 5
N:\TreatPlant\8238 - AM Prog Dev\26 Reports\5 Consultant Reports\1 Carollo\Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Planned
2015 2016 2017 2018
No.
Plan Element
Duration
Start
(mos)
Q1 Q2
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Q3 WWQ4 Q4= _i QZ
Q3 Q4
Related Projects - Underway and/or Prerequisite to the Asset Management Implementation Plan
A
Cost of Service & Staffing Needs Assessment
Active
B
CIVIMS Replacement, DP 8242
...............................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................
............................... ...............................
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
2015-Q1 21
...............................................................
................................................................ .............. ........................................
............................... ...................... .... . .. . .. . .. . ............. ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
4
Business Process Mapping
...............................................................
................................................................ ...............................................................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
5
Knowledge Management Strategy
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
C1
IT Master Plan, DP 7195
Active 12
.....
.
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............ .. .. .. .. .. ...............................................................
............................... ...............................
C2
ERP Replacement, DP 8240
...............................
...............................................................
............................... ...............................
2016 41 30
...............................................................
............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
4
Business Process Mapping
.............................. ....... ...... .......... ...............................
......... ................. ............................... ................. .............. ...................
............................... ..............
....................
C3
Electronic Content Management, DP 8240
5
—
Knowledge Management Strategy
Active 24
.
...............................................................
................................ ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................................................................................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
...............................................................
D
Comprehensive TP & CS Master Plan
6a
Failure Modes & Condition Asmt Protocol
............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
........................... ............................... ...
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................ ...............................
............................... ...............................
.......... ...............................
6b
Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets
............................... ...............................
............................... .................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
7
Business Risk Exposure
Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and
............................. ...............................
........................... ........................... ..............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
.......... ...............................
7a
Apply to Assets
2015-Q3 24
a
7b
Risk Assessment
............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... .............. ........ ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
................................ ...............................
9
Asset Valuations
.........................................
...............................................................
............................... ............................... .............. ..... ...............................
............................................................... ............................... ...... . .. . .. . .. . ...........
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
.... .............. ............................... ; .................... .......... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................ ............................... ............................... ...............................
...............................................................
...............................................................
12
Strategic Forecasting
...............................................................
................................................................ ...............................................................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................................................... ................................................................
...............................................................
Capital Improvement Program Business Case
13
Evaluations
Asset
Management Plan Elements
1
AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies
2015-Q1
........................ .................... ...............................
.............................. ........................ ...............................
............................... .......
.......................... ..................................................................... ...............................
...............................................................
2
Asset Register
...........
................................................................ ............................... ...............................
............................................................................................... ...............................
............................... ...................... ...............................
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
incorporated in B
. ............................... ........................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
2b
Complete Asset Register for Pump Station and
2015-Ql
Treatment Plant Assets
............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
Complete Utility Locating, Drafting to Consolidate
2c
Plant Piping As-Builts
2015-Q3
18
.
...............................................................
................ .......... ............ ............
M
............ ............ ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
2d
Complete Asset Register for Plant Piping
2016-Q3
6
3
Plant Maint Strategy
.
...............................................................
............................. ............................... .............. ......... -
............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
3a
Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot
2015-Q3 24
...............................................................
...... .. ....... .. .. .. ............ ....... .. ...... .. .. ..
...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. ........ .. ..........
3b
Expand RCM Program (pending 3a)*
optional, in-house
.......................................................
................................................................ .............. ...............................................
...................................................................................................................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
6
Condition Assessments
................................................................
6c
Condition Asmt of Critical Treatment Plant Piping
2017-Q1
.
12
...............................................................
...............................................................
................................................................ ...............................................................
............................... ...............................
................................................................
.................. .............................................
...............................................................
............................... ...............................
...............................................................
6d
Consolidate CCTV Databases
2016-Q1
6
8
Failure-Based Maintenance Strategies*
2017-Q3
.
6
......... ............. .......
..... ...............................
...............................................................................................................................
............................................... .......
............. .....................
10
Program and Project Management Standards*
2017-Q1
.
6
.
............................... ...............................
............................... ...............................
............................... ................................ .............. ........................................
............................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
.............................................. . .. ............
............................... ...............................
............ ..................................
............................... ............................ ............................... ...............................
...............................................................
.......................
11
Asset Commissioning and Handover*
2017-Q1
6
............................... ...............................
............................... ................................. ............................... ...............................
...............................................................
....................
............................... ...............................
14
, Update Asset Management Plan
2017-Q3
9
Number of Active Elements
by Quarter >>
3 2
4 2 3 3
3 3 4 4
3 3 IL
)ptional, as-needed
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
THREE-YEAR SCHEDULE
AMENDED FIGURE 5
N:\TreatPlant\8238 - AM Prog Dev\26 Reports\5 Consultant Reports\1 Carollo\Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
AMENDED TABLE 2 Estimated Labor Costs by Plan Element and Calendar Quarter
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
1 .........
AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies
........ ........ ......... ......... .........
2015 -Q1 9
.. ........ ........
1,200
.........
$212,700
$73,500: $73,500
....
$65,700
......... ....... ...._
.. .........
................................. _
......
2
Asset Register
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
€ incorporated in B
50
$8,750
$8,750
...............................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2b
Complete Asset Register for Pump
2015 -Q1 9
...............................
Station and Treatment Plant Assets
424:
$74,380
$35,000 $35,000
$4,380
2c
Complete Utility Locating, Drafting
........ ......... ........ ........
2015 -Q3 18
.........
to Consolidate Plant Piping As- Builts
.
2,240
$408,800
$61,320: $61,320 _ $61,320. $102,200
$61,320 _ $61,320 .........................................................................................................................................................................
...............................
2d
Complete Asset Register for Plant
2016-Q3 i 6
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Piping
808
$147,460
$66,430: $81,030 . .
. . . ...............................
3
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Plant Maint Strategy
...............................
3a
Reliability Centered Maintenance
2015-Q3 24
................................................................................................................
Pilot ...............................
............ _..........................................................................................................
1,850
$337,250
$8,750
................................. .................................
$36,500 $45,625 $45,625 $45,625
................................. ................................. ................................. .................................
$45,625 $36,500 $36,500:
................................. ................................. .............................. ........................................................
$36,500
.......... ................................... ................................. .................................
3b
.........
Expand RCM Program (pending 3a)*
....... ......... ......... ........ ..........
optional, in- house
.. ......... . ........
.. ......
......................................
......... ............
......... ......... ................ ......_
............ .........
................
................................. ................................... ........ .......
4
Business Process Mapping
incorporated in B,
.........
........ ......... ......... ......... .........
C2, as needed
..... ......... ........
........ ........
.........
........ .. ................ .................................
.. .........
...... .........
......._ .. ......... ........ .......
Knowledge Management Strategy g g
incorporated in B, C3
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
6
Condition Assessments
...............................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
6a
Failure Modes & Condition Asmt
incorporated in D
...............................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
protocol
...............................
6b
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets
incorporated in D
...............................
Condition Asmt of Critical
,
6c
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Treatment Plant Piping
2017 -Q1 12
1,280
$233,600
$58,400:
$58,400
$58,400 ! $58,400 ...............................
6d
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Consolidate CCTV Databases
2016 -Q1 6
320
$58,400
$29,200 $29,200
...............................
7
Business Risk Exposure
................................. .................................. ..................................
...................................................::..::..::..:..........................................
.................................................................... ................................. ...................................................................
.................................. ......... ............................... .......
...........................
................................. ........................... ...........::..::..:....:..::..::..::........................................
7a
Develop Consequence of Failure
.
incorporated in D
Criteria and Apply to Assets
......... ........ :..._
.,. ,. ,......
...
......... ..... .............. ......_
..
.................................
......._ .. ......... ........ .......
7b
Risk Assessment
...... ........ ........ ......._ .........
incorporated in D ........
.........
........ .........
...........
8
Failure -Based Maintenance
2017 -Q3 € 6
.........
Strategies*
........ ........ ...._.... .._.._ .........
....... ......... ........ .......
1,160:
.........
$211,700
........ .........
................................. _ ...
......... ....... ...._
.. .........
...... ........
$95,265: $116,435 .
......... .. ......... ......
9
Asset Valuations
incorporated in D
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10
Program and Project Management
2017 -Q1 6
...............................
Standards*
992
$181,041
$81,578 €
$99,463
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
11
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Asset Commissioning and Handover*
2017 -Q1 6
896
$163,521
. .
$73,548:
$89,973
. . . ...............................
...............................
12
Strategic Forecasting
incorporated in D
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
13
Capital Improvement Program
incorporated in D
...............................
Business Case Evaluations
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
14
Update Asset Management Plan
2017 -Q3 9
1,528
$278,861
...............................
$83,585 $97,638 $97,638: $0
*optional, as- needed
Totals
12,748
$2,316,463 1
$117,250: $117,250
$167,900 $106,945: $136,145 $177,025
$173,375: $178,850 $250,026:
$284,336
$237,250 $272,473 $97,638: $0
Future Fiscal
Year Budget Estimates
(rounded to $100k)
$600,000
$900,000
$600,000
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
AMENDED TABLE 3 Estimated Labor Hours and Costs by Plan Element and Fiscal Year
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
No
1
pw� tjo"��
AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies
..
(est) Total Cost
1,200
. e st
840 $147,000
Est Hours Est Cost
360 $65,700
e m st
Est Hours Est Cost
2
Asset Register
_+_$212,700
2a
Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
incorporated in B
50
$8,750
2b
Complete Asset Register for Pump Station and Treatment
Plant Assets
424
$74,380
400
$70,000
24
$4,380
2c
Complete Utility Locating, Drafting to Consolidate Plant
Piping As- Builts
2,240
$408,800
1,568
$286,160
672
$122,640
2d
Complete Asset Register for Plant Piping
808
$147,460
808
$147,460
3
Plant Maint Strategy
3a
Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot
1,850
$337,250
50
$8,750
950
$173,375
850
$155,125
3b
Expand RCM Program (pending 3a)
optional, in -house
4
Business Process Mapping
incorporated in B, C2, as needed
5
Knowledge Management Strategy
incorporated in B, C3
6
Condition Assessments
6a
Failure Modes & Condition Asmt Protocol
incorporated in D
6b
Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets
incorporated in D
6c
Condition Asmt of Critical Treatment Plant Piping
1,280
$233,600
640
$116,800
640
$116,800
6d
Consolidate CCTV Databases
320
$58,400
320
$58,400
7
Business Risk Exposure
7a
Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and Apply to
Assets
incorporated in D
7b
Risk Assessment
incorporated in D
8
Failure -Based Maintenance Strategies
1,160 1 $211,700
1,160
$211,700
9
Asset Valuations
incorporated in D
10
Program /Project Management Stds
992
$181,041
992
$181,041
11
Asset Commissioning and Handover
896
1 $163,521
896
$163,521
12
Strategic Forecasting
incorporated in D
13
Capital Improvement Program Business Case Evaluations
incorporated in D
14
Update Asset Management Plan
1,528
$278,861
1,528
$278,861
Totals (rounded to $100k)
12,748
$2,316,463
--
$600,000 * **
3,222
$600,000
4,858
$900,000
3,328
$600,000
*optional, as- needed
"Plant Maintenance Staff time will be charged to O &M, only consultant and PM cost shown
'Includes work already completed this Fiscal Year but not included in the Carollo estimates
N: \TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The District currently delivers about 200 million gallons per year of recycled water
to 35 customers located within the Zone 1 service area for landscape irrigation
and commercial uses. These customers are located along the Interstate 680
corridor in Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez. The District also uses about
400 million gallons per year at the treatment plant for process water and District
property landscape irrigation. The Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) encourages the District to expand its recycled water program, and
activities must be reported annually to the RWQCB. The District continues to
pursue a number of projects as described in the following pages.
The major emphasis of the Recycled Water Program for the next fiscal year
will be supporting the recycled water elements included in the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan Project and connecting individual customer sites
within the Concord Landscape Project. The District will also continue efforts
to add new cost- effective customers in the District's Zone 1 service area,
pursue outside funding assistance (such as federal and state grants for all
District recycled water projects), and work with water supply agencies to
develop recycled water supply alternatives. An alternative supply opportunity
may include a small -scale refinery project to serve 0.5 MGD to Shell Refinery
out of our existing treatment facilities. Expansion of the District's residential
customer recycle water fill station as well as adding hydrants to distribute
recycled water for commercial use are also potential components.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget ReW -1
Concord Landscape Project
Project Name
Concord Landscape Project
Project No.
7299
Program
Recycled Water Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Extend the recycled water distribution system from the Buchanan Fields Golf Course to the
Diamond /Meridian Park Boulevard area of Concord and connect the landscape irrigation demand
at businesses and roadway medians. Completion of this project will provide up to 190 acre -feet
per year (AFY) of recycled water for landscape irrigation customers.
History:
Construction of the distribution system was completed in early 2014. Work included installation of
the mainline pipe and service laterals to each property that agreed to accept recycled water.
Because of substantial coordination issues between various agencies with jurisdiction and
property owners, the connection phase was planned to be done as a separate capital project.
Chevron, the single largest user, was connected during FY 2014/2015.
Description:
The customer connection phase began in FY 2014/2015. While there are as many as 34
potential connections to be made there are various technical and regulatory challenges
preventing the connection of all potential customers. The current connection project was bid and
awarded as DP 7299A and includes approximately 14 connections. As for the remaining
customer connections, staff will work with applicable regulatory agencies to determine the
feasibility of future customer connections.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
-
Planning
-
$0
$0
$0
$0
Design
-
$130,000
$87,000
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$3,697,629
$130,000
$87,000
$0
$0
$3,914,629
RW -2
Concord Naval Weapons Station Recycled Water Planning
Project Name
Concord Naval Weapons Station Recycled Water Planning
Project No.
7279
Program
Recycled Water Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Very H
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning & Development Services
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Identify recycled water infrastructure necessary to serve the proposed development being
planned at the Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS) site as part of the Concord Community
Reuse Project.
History:
The planned redevelopment of the CNWS property provides an excellent opportunity to expand
recycled water use in the District's service area. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a
preferred development plan and in 2010, the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
completed. It includes recycled water demand scenarios of up to 2,749 AFY for landscape
irrigation. In 2012, the District completed a Recycled Water Facilities plan for the CNWS
Redevelopment that identified the conceptual recycled water infrastructure necessary to serve
the irrigation demands identified in the EIR. Additionally, a will - service letter was submitted to the
developers indicating the District's willingness to provide recycled water.
Description:
As CNWS redevelopment plans move forward, the Recycled Water Facilities Plan will form the
basis of future work, and will be validated against recommendations from the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan. Staff will work with CNWS Project proponents and other agencies to
confirm required facilities, recycled water usage, and how the costs will be apportioned to the
appropriate parties.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$264,855
$1,100
$0
$0
$0
$265,955
Planning
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$264,855
$1,100
$0
$5,000
$0
$270,955
RW -3
Refinery Recycled Water Project
Project Name
Refinery Recycled Water Project
Project No.
7300
Program
Recycled Water Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Very High
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Determine the feasibility of providing recycled water to the Shell and /or Tesoro refineries in
Martinez.
History:
Staff has worked with Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) and refinery staff to determine if and
how recycled water might fit into future water supply scenarios. The two refineries use a
combined total of approximately 22,500 acre feet per year (AFY) of Delta water of which some
portion could be replaced with recycled water. In 2011, CCCSD was awarded a grant from the
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation. The
feasibility study closeout report was submitted March 2014. Staff has pursued a variety of federal
and state funding sources in an effort to improve the economics of a potential project. Some
infrastructure required for this project already exists, but new treatment facilities are needed to
meet refinery water quality requirements.
Description:
Work with CCWD to develop a project to serve the refineries. Such a project could range from
0.5 MGD to complete replacement of the refineries' Delta water. Continue pursuit of funding
options in coordination with CCWD for the development of a larger -scale refinery project that
may include the construction of new recycled water treatment facilities including nitrification,
filtration, and disinfection facilities and possibly denitrification facilities. Depending on the volume
of recycled water served, the total estimated project cost can range from $31 to $100 million. At
this time, budget is only included for project planning activities and to pursue funding and project
partners.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
Phase:
Carryover
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$283,727
$50,000
$4,000
$47,500
$0
$385,227
Planning
Design
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Construction
FY Total
$283,727
$50,000
$4,000
$47,500
$0
$385,227
RW -4
Zone 1 Recycled Water— Phase 1C
Project Name
Zone 1 Recycled Water — Phase 1 C
Project No.
7306
Program
Recycled Water Program
Phase
C
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Very H
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
50
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Provide recycled water for landscape irrigation and other identified uses in the Zone 1 Project
area, which includes Pleasant Hill and portions of Concord and Martinez.
History:
In 2001, the District completed the Zone 1 Implementation Plan that provided estimated
connection costs and revenues for customers identified in the CCWD Zone 1 Project Agreement.
Depending on the extent of use, demand for recycled water in Zone 1 for landscape irrigation and
commercial uses could be up to 400 million gallons per year. New customers will continue to be
added to the system where technically and economically feasible. The District is focusing on
connecting cost - effective landscape irrigation sites near existing recycled water distribution
pipelines.
Description:
This project provides funds for the planning, design, and construction of recycled water facilities
for landscape irrigation customers and other identified uses in the Zone 1 Project area.
Subsequent phases of this project continue in future fiscal years.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$35,061
$0
$0
$0
$0
$35,061
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$0
$29,000
$46,000
$500,000
$575,000
$35,061
$50,000
$29,000
$46,000
$500,000
$660,061
RW -5
Recycled Water Planning
Project Name
Recycled Water Planning
Project No.
7344
Program
Recycled Water Program
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
I Concord %
100%
Purpose:
Develop and implement a comprehensive long -term Recycled Water Program that provides
recycled water for landscape irrigation, industrial reuse, and other applications.
History:
The District has worked with local water purveyors over the years to develop partnerships and
identify opportunities to expand recycled water use. Recent planning efforts have focused on the
refinery recycled water project; the use of recycled water on buffer properties near the treatment
plant; the use of satellite treatment facilities to provide recycled water to landscape irrigation
customers in remote areas; other recycled water projects outside the District's existing Zone 1
Project Area; and work to comply with State Water Resources Control Board requirements for
salt and nutrient management plans.
Description:
This project will continue efforts to increase the demand for recycled water. Perform planning
studies for the District's recycled water program to address implementation issues such as
funding, regulations, treatment technologies, developing policies (i.e. satellite recycled water
facilities), public education, and gaining political support from public agencies.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$150,000
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000
$150,000
$0
$250,000
RW -6
Filter Plant
Project Name
Filter Plant
Project No.
7345
Program
Recycled Water Planning
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
JConcord %
1 100%
Purpose:
This project will evaluate existing recycled water facilities at the treatment plant, and evaluate
alternatives related to zero - discharge.
History:
The Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan will provide a framework for the future
management of the District's collection system and treatment plant. Included in this effort is an
evaluation of the recycled water facilities.
Description:
This project provides the funding for the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan consultant to
conduct the evaluations and other work related to recycled water facilities.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$0
$150,000
$0
$0
$200,000
$150,000
$0
$350,000
RW -7
Surge Analysis
Project Name
Surge Analysis
Project No.
7346
Program
Recycled Water Planning
Phase
P
Sub - Program
Urban Landscaping
Priority Rank
Critical
Project Manager
Nathan Hodges
Ranking Score
65
Dept /Division
Engineering /Planning and Development Services
JConcord %
1 100%
Purpose:
Conduct a surge analysis of the recycled water distribution system.
History:
The distribution system has experienced a number of pipeline breaks over the last few years.
Analysis of the circumstances surrounding many of these issues has been a concern with
pressure fluctuations.
Description:
This project will analyze the distribution system including pumping to determine if any
improvements are needed to ensure the long -term integrity of the recycled water pipeline system.
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:
Carryover
Planning
Design
Construction
FY Total
Start Q /FY
End Q /FY
Prior FY's
FY 14 -15
FY 15 -16
FY 16 -17
Future FY's
Total
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$65,000
$0
$65,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$65,000
$0
$65,000
RW -8
2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TEN YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Purpose
CIP -2
Capital Improvement Program Objectives
CIP -2
Drivers
CIP -3
Specific Projects in the Ten -Year Plan
CIP -4
Summary
CIP -4
Programs
Treatment Plant Program
CIP -5
Collection System Program
CIP -11
General Improvements Program
CIP -18
Recycled Water Program
CIP -20
Capital Improvement Expenditures
CIP -21
Table 1: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures — Summary by CIP -22
Program
Table 2: FY 2015 CIB and CIP CIP -23
Table 3: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures — Collection System CIP -25
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan CIP -28
2015 Capital Improvement Plan
2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TEN YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2025
PURPOSE
The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) is responsible for the collection,
treatment, and disposal of wastewater for a population of approximately 471,000 in central
Contra Costa County. The District has developed a ten -year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for the District's capital facilities and financing needs. The CIP is updated every year.
Specifically, the plan identifies and prioritizes capital projects needed to accomplish the
District's mission. It also includes cost estimates for proposed project work and projections
for the various sources of revenue needed to meet the cash flow requirements of the CIP.
The principal purpose of the CIP is to provide the District's Board of Directors with the
information needed to formulate long -range policy regarding:
• Priority and Schedule — identify, prioritize, and schedule the projects necessary to
accomplish the District's mission.
Financing — plan sufficient financial resources for completion of the projects
proposed in the CIP.
The following discussion provides: 1) a general description of the plan; and 2) a discussion of
potential, unbudgeted future projects.
Capital Improvement Program Objectives
The District has identified four principal objectives for its Capital Improvement Program:
Support the District's mission to protect public health and the environment by:
- Collecting and treating wastewater
- Embracing a policy of sustainability for the responsible use of existing resources
- Promoting environmental stewardship
2. Accommodate future growth in the service area as approved by the city and
county planning agencies responsible for land use policy decisions.
3. Respond to issues of community concern by:
- Managing the cost of operating and maintaining facilities
- Reducing objectionable odors
- Cooperating with other public agencies to avoid duplication of effort and
improve service delivery
- Reducing power consumption through energy management
4. Asset Management
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -2
Drivers
Capital improvement projects are identified by four major drivers: Replacement and
Rehabilitation, Regulatory, Sustainability /Energy /Optimization, and Capacity Expansion.
Below is a brief discussion of each driver.
Replacement and Rehabilitation
This category focuses on projects related to aging infrastructure and the replacement
requirements of the District. The District operates and maintains approximately $3.5 billion of
assets, and several projects in each program have been initiated or in progress to meet the
replacement or rehabilitation of the District's infrastructure.
Regulatory
This category focuses on projects that aim to ensure that the District remains in full regulatory
and safety compliance with all applicable regulations.
Sustainability /Energy /Optimization
This category focuses on projects that optimize existing processes, or energy efficiency, and
sustainability of the treatment plant or collection system and other facilities.
Capacity Expansion
The capacity expansion projects are developed to upgrade and improve existing facilities to
meet increasing flow due to in -fill, new development, and wet weather.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -3
SPECIFIC PROJECTS IN THE TEN -YEAR PLAN
The CIP is broken down into four categories: 1) Replacement and Rehabilitation,
2) Regulatory, 3) Sustainability /Energy /Optimization, and 4) Capacity Expansion.
As projects develop and are prioritized, they are grouped into the four programs as
shown in the CIB: Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements,
and Recycled Water. A brief description of each program and a list of projects for
the ten years of this plan are provided in the Capital Plan sections for each of the
four programs.
SUMMARY
This CIP assumes that funds will be available to support the plan. These funds come
from all the sources of revenue as discussed in the Finance and Revenue section. The
only two discretionary sources of revenue are the sale of bonds or adjustment of the
capital component of the Sewer Service Charge. This document is for planning
purposes only. The District Board has not voted to sell bonds to fund this planned
program. The plan is funded on a year -by -year basis when the Capital Improvement
Budget (CIB) for the upcoming fiscal year (FY) is formally authorized and adopted by the
Board. Changes in capital revenue forecasts or changes in recommended expenditures
may result in changes to this ten -year plan.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -4
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
The Treatment Plant Program includes projects that will meet changing regulatory
mandates, address recurring renovation needs, and upgrade the wastewater treatment
plant in areas such as hydraulic /process and solids handling. The emphasis of the
Treatment Plant Program will be on the renovation needs of the aging infrastructure of
our complex treatment facility and on meeting increasingly stringent regulatory
requirements. The Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan will be started in FY 2015-
16 and continue up to two years. This master plan effort will help the District coordinate
and evaluate past studies and planning work and provide new condition assessments to
produce a future CIP. The information presented in the FY 2015 CIP will be coordinated
with the Master Plan effort and revised for future projects.
Capacity improvements will be primarily focused on those projects needed for the solids
handling processes and to handle wet weather flows. One large potential regulatory
project facing the District in the next ten to twenty years: the Nutrient Removal project.
Staff will continue to evaluate treatment alternatives and pilot programs in anticipation of
possible regulatory changes and to help identify improvements and process capabilities.
These projects will include Zeolite - Anammox, screening removal, and solids
hand ling /dewatering.
This section is a listing of the projects in the ten -year CIP that pertain to the District's
wastewater treatment plant. The CIP is based on the recognition that plant facilities
require ongoing renovations and replacement. Environmental regulations will become
more stringent, and the District is on a gradual but steady pace towards build -out over
the next 20 years. Major emphasis is on maintaining existing assets, improving
processes when cost effective, and ensuring regulatory compliance.
Replacement and Rehabilitation
The goals of this category are to provide for ongoing or future renovation activities.
This category provides capital funds for replacement or rehabilitation of aging
treatment plant infrastructure. The projects in this category include Equipment
Replacement, Piping Renovations and Replacement, Electrical and Instrumentation
Replacement, and Electrical Switchgear Project.
Regulatory
The goals of the Regulatory and Safety projects are to ensure that existing and future
facilities meet safety and regulatory requirements. These projects cover a wide variety
of subjects to improve facilities for safety reasons, to reduce emissions of pollutants to
the environment, and to meet future regulatory requirements. Budgeted projects to
address regulatory requirements include such projects as the Wet and Dry Scrubber
Replacement, Headworks Screening Removal, Multiple Hearth Furnaces (MHF)
Improvements (emissions requirements), Outfall Improvements, and Soil Remediation.
Sustainability /Energy /Optimization
The goals of the Sustainability /Energy /Optimization projects are to continue upgrading
and improving the treatment plant's existing infrastructure and systems to optimize for
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -5
energy use, lower maintenance costs, and prevent major failures. Projects in this category
include Seismic Improvements, Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades, Plant Energy
Optimization, and Aeration System Improvements.
Capacity Expansion
The goals of the expansion projects are to upgrade and improve existing facilities to
meet increasing flow due to in -fill, new development, and wet weather. Two wet
weather capacity issues will be addressed: increased primary treatment capacity and
the installation of new bar screens.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -6
Treatment Plant Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
This project will improve the reliability of treatment plant piping
Piping Renovations
2015
Entire Treatment
systems above and below ground by inspection, renovation, and
and Replacement
through
Plant
replacement where required. The Asset Management Plan will
Program
2025
ultimately be used to provide recommendations for additional renewal
Disinfection
2024
Ultraviolet
and replacement needs of other major piping systems.
Disinfection
Investigate and replace plant equipment to reduce maintenance costs,
Treatment Plant
2015
Entire Treatment
increase reliability, and improve treatment operations through
Equipment
through
Plant
replacement or reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn out,
Replacement
2025
maintenance - intensive equipment, or equipment that is no longer
supported by its manufacturer.
Plant Electrical and
Instrumentation
2015
Entire Treatment
The project will identify and correct deficiencies in the electrical,
Replacement
through
Plant
control and instrumentation systems in the Treatment Plant.
2025
Treatment Plant
2017
Entire Treatment
The Asset Management Plan Project documented the condition of
Protective Coating
through
Plant
District facilities and equipment and will be used to recommend
Renovation
2025
needed coating projects.
Treatment Plant Regulatory and Safety Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
The District may be required to remove ammonia from effluent flow in
Nitrification
2023
Aeration Basins and
the future. This will require either an expansion of the aeration tanks
Clarifiers
and clarifiers or use of other technologies and significant capital
expenditures.
Disinfection
2024
Ultraviolet
Depending on future regulatory requirements and necessary
Disinfection
modifications to the treatment plant, an alternative disinfection method
may be required.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -7
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -8
There are a number of potential regulatory changes that may be
implemented within the next ten years. These changes may include
New Solids Handling
Entire Treatment
requirements that will necessitate replacement of the existing multiple
Facilities
2023
Plant
hearth furnaces with fluidized bed incinerators, or construction of
(MHF /Digesters)
anaerobic digesters or use of other available technology for treatment
and disposal of sludge. These anticipated changes in solids handling
will require significant capital expenditures in the next fifteen years.
TP Safety
Entire Treatment
Improvements will be made to enhance and provide a safe
Improvements
ongoing
Plant
working environment throughout the treatment plant.
Program
Future Regulatory
Entire Treatment
Potential new regulations that impact operation of the treatment plant
Projects
2021
Plant
will emerge in the future. Studies will be undertaken and projects
constructed to address these issues.
Primary Treatment
2022
Primary Sed Basins
Primary tanks may need to be covered to meet regulations and reduce
Covers
odors.
Treatment Plant
This project will identify and remediate hazardous materials within the
Hazard Identification
2020
Entire Treatment
treatment plant. This will minimize the exposure of the District's
and Remediation,
Plant
employees to hazardous materials during the course of their work.
Phase 2
Area east of
The soil east of the existing aeration tanks is contaminated. To
Treatment Plant Soil
2023
existing aeration
expand the aeration tanks in preparation for plant conversion for
Remediation, Phase 2
tanks
nitrification, the contaminated soil will have to be either treated on site
or removed and disposed at an appropriate -class landfill.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -8
Treatment Plant Sustainability /Energy /Optimization Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
Design and construct seismic improvements based upon the
recommendations provided in work done under the Treatment Plant
SCB Seismic
2022
Solids Conditioning
Seismic Evaluation Project. The improvements will meet requirements
Improvements
Building
of the latest building codes. Timing /need for this project will be
coordinated with the recommendations from the New Solids Handling
project.
Modifications will be made to ensure compliance with emerging
Furnace Burner
2019
Solids Conditioning
regulations. This project will improve operational flexibility of the
Building
multiple hearth furnaces by adding auxiliary fuel delivery, piping
and burners, and the ability to co -fire natural and landfill gases.
This project will design and construct seismic improvements based on
Warehouse
2019
Warehouse/
the recommendations in the Treatment Plant Seismic Evaluation
Seismic Upgrade
Mechanical Shop
Project. The improvements will meet requirements of the latest
building codes.
Alternative Energy
Entire Treatment
This project includes evaluation and replacement of the District's
Facilities, Phase 2
2022
Plant
cogeneration unit with a new, more efficient power generation unit or
use of an alternative energy source.
This project will design and construct small electric blowers for the grit
Aeration System
Pump and Blower
chambers and will optimize use of existing steam blowers and modify
Renovation,
2019
Building and Primary
the existing electric blower. Adding nitrification and /or nutrient
Phase 2
Tanks area
removal to the treatment process will have a major impact on the
aeration system and will need to be evaluated.
Secondary Process
Aeration Basins
This project will replace and modify existing piping and components of
Improvements,
2020
and Clarifiers
the secondary process to extend the life of the system and add
Phase 2
flexibility to the selector channel.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -9
Treatment Plant Sustainability /Energy /Optimization Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
Laboratory Seismic
This project will design and construct seismic improvements based on the
Upgrade
2024
Laboratory
recommendations from the Treatment Plant Seismic Evaluation Project.
Third Wet Well
The improvements will meet requirements of the latest building codes.
Treatment Plant Capacity Expansion Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
This project will install new bar screens on the third wet well in the
Bar Screen for
2025
Headworks
headworks facilities. Installing new automatic bar screens on the third
Third Wet Well
wet well will protect plant treatment facilities, in addition to providing plant
operators additional flexibility in routing incoming plant flows.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -10
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Collection System Program includes projects needed to renovate aging sewers
and to serve new development in the District's service area. Specific near -term and
long -term goals include addressing capacity needs, improving the reliability of the
District's pumping stations, and implementing projects to address renovation needs.
The Collection System Master Plan and hydraulic model analysis have been used to
identify and prioritize the collection system projects.
Since its inception in FY 2002 -03, the District -Wide TV Inspection program has been
used to identify line segments in need of renovation. The TV inspection results,
coupled with CSO maintenance records and hydraulic analysis, are used to prioritize
lines in need of renovation. The areas of concern are then grouped geographically and
bid as District projects. The TV inspection program helps CSO to better prioritize and
plan maintenance activities and has been moved to the Operations and Maintenance
budget to reflect the ongoing and District -wide nature of the program.
The Collection System Master Plan is updated periodically District -wide and is revisited
on a routine basis when changes in development patterns occur. This plan documents
the sewers which will need to be upsized to increase capacity over approximately the
next 30 years. As this capacity is needed, these lines are added to the capital program.
The Collection System Program also provides for pumping station and force main
improvements to increase station capacity, provide emergency power, and upgrade old
equipment to increase capacity and improve reliability.
The Collection System Program includes projects to provide renovation of the collection
system infrastructure and to serve new development in the District's service area.
Projects also provide improvements to pumping stations and force mains. These
improvements provide capacity and renovation to reduce the likelihood of sewage
overflows during dry and wet weather.
Renovation
The renovation subprogram goal is to address recurring renovation needs. In prior
years, renovation needs were identified by CSOD through their critical line segments
list. This information is now augmented by a comprehensive TV inspection program of
the entire collection system that is now funded through the District's Operations and
Maintenance budget. This information is used to develop improved estimates of the
short- and long -term renovation needs. The District's collection system contains pipe
reaches of many material types, sizes, ages, and other installation conditions that must
be evaluated and replaced on an appropriate cycle. This cycle is determined by the
condition of the pipe and overall risk to the District.
Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
For the past few years, the District has anticipated more stringent regulations with
respect to the operation and maintenance of the collection system to reduce overflows.
The local Regional Water Quality Control Board staff implemented such a program in
2005, and the State Board implemented a similar requirement in 2006. Both regulatory
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -11
bodies require each collection system agency to have prepared a Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP). They require careful review and documentation of the
District's continuing evaluation and planning for the collection system in the areas of
capacity management, operation, and maintenance.
Deteriorating private sewer laterals are known to be a significant source of inflow and
infiltration (1 /1) throughout the wastewater industry. Addressing this issue will require
substantial capital and extensive coordination. The District has been actively
participating in discussions related to the reduction of private property 1/1 on the local
and state levels. It is anticipated that more stringent regulations to address
deteriorated private sewer laterals will be imposed in the not - too - distant future.
Expansion
As part of the upcoming Collection System Master Plan Update, the District's sewer
system hydraulic model will be updated; capacity deficiencies will be identified and
prioritized. Large- capacity projects that are currently planned over the next ten years
include trunk sewer improvements in locations in Pleasant Hill, along Lancaster Road
and the Walnut Boulevard corridor in Walnut Creek, Moraga Way in Orinda, in
San Ramon (Schedule C Interceptor), and trunk sewers along Alhambra Avenue in
Martinez. Developer sewers and other projects throughout the District relieve and
expand capacity - limited pipe sections.
Pumping Stations
Significant funds have been invested in the pumping stations over the last several
years, and by now all major pumping stations in the service area have been improved
and /or renovated.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -12
Collection System Renovation Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
Mt. Diablo Boulevard
Mt. Diablo
Rehabilitate or replace sewers within the Mt. Diablo Blvd. corridor
Main Improvements
2022
Blvd.
in Walnut Creek, as identified in the Downtown Walnut Creek
Facilities Plan.
Systematically replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to
minimize overflows, limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
Collection System
Throughout the
system, control future maintenance requirements and costs, and
Renovation Program
ongoing
collection system
improve the level of service provided (as measured by stoppages,
private property damage, impacted traffic, entry onto private property)
to the residents /ratepayers. The ongoing TV inspection program will
be the major source of these future projects.
Concrete Pipe
ongoing
Throughout the
Identify, evaluate, and schedule remediation for concrete pipes.
Renovation
collection system
Collection System
Throughout the
Identify and restore sewers damaged or threatened by storms or
Urgent Projects
oin
ongg
collection system
found to be structurally deficient by CSO.
North Main Trunk
N. Main from Civic
Rehabilitate or replace sewers along North Main between Civic Drive
Improvements
2019
Dr. and Carlback
and Carlback Avenue in Walnut Creek, as identified in the Downtown
Ave.
Walnut Creek Facilities Plan.
Locust Street
Locust Street in
Rehabilitate or replace sewers within the Locust Street corridor in
Improvements
2019
Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek, as identified in the Downtown Walnut Creek Facilities
Plan.
A -line Relief -
A -line near
Twenty million gallons of relief capacity for the existing A -Line near
39 -Inch Rehab
2021
Treatment Plant
the treatment plant could be achieved by rehabilitating the old
39 -inch Trunk No. 1.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -13
Collection System Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
Manhole Remote
Throughout the
Identification and modification of manholes with the installation of remote
Level Monitoring
ongoing
collection system
level monitoring products to alert dispatch or on -call crew members via
Trunk Sewer
Throughout the
cell phone of a potential overflow or stoppage.
Collection System
ongoing
Throughout the
Identifies, evaluates, and schedules short- and long -term sewer
Planning
ongoing
collection system
capacity projects and provides design -flow rates for major facility.
Lancaster Road,
Lancaster Road
plans.
The Collection System Master Plan Update (2010) identified capacity deficiencies in the following trunk sewers. The expansion
projects to correct these deficiencies are defined below. However, this Plan will be reevaluated under the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan in the Collection Systems.
Collection System Expansion Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Location
Description
Contractual
Assessment
Throughout the
Provides a financing mechanism for the extension of public sewers into
Districts
ongoing
service area.
areas which are currently served by septic tanks.
Trunk Sewer
Throughout the
Systematically upsize and increase the capacity of trunk sewers to
Expansion Program
ongoing
collection system
prevent sewer overflows and accommodate planned growth as identified
in the Collection System Master Plan.
Lancaster Road,
Lancaster Road
Replace approximately 5,100 feet of the existing trunk sewer with 15- to
Walnut Creek,
2019
and Meadow
18 -inch lines.
TR 13 -600
Road
Moraga Way,
In El Camino
Orinda TR10-
2022
Moraga, Del Rey
Replace approximately 3,400 feet of existing main and trunk sewers with
200/300
School, Moraga
12- to 18 -inch lines.
Way, Orinda
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -14
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -15
Pleasant Hill Road
Pleasant Hill Road
2017-
between Mercury
Replace approximately 2,800 feet of the existing trunk sewer with an
Corridor
Way and near
18 -inch line.
Virginia Hills Drive
Walnut Boulevard,
In Walnut
Walnut Creek, TR
2023
Blvd. from
Replace approximately 7,000 feet of the existing trunk sewer with 18- to
29 -200, Phase 1
Homestead Ave.
24 -inch lines.
to Norlyn Drive
In Alhambra
Martinez Alhambra
2018
Ave. from
Replace approximately 5,700 feet of the existing trunk sewer with 18- to
Avenue Trunks
Highway 4 to
24 -inch lines.
C St.
Lafayette — Happy
2020
In Happy Valley
Rd. from Baker
Replace approximately 3,200 feet of the existing trunk sewer with 15- to
Valley Road
to Franklin
18 -inch lines.
In Palmer Rd.
Walnut Creek —
2023
between Sylvan
Replace approximately 1,000 feet of the existing trunk sewer with 15 -inch
Palmer Road
Rd. and
line.
Hawthorne Dr.
From Galaxy Way
A -line Relief
to Willow Pass
Interceptor,
2024
Rd. along the
Approximately 4,000 feet of new 72 -inch line.
Phase 2B
bank of Walnut
Creek
Development
p
Provides for capitalization of District labor and other expenses for
Sewerage
ongoing
Throughout the
planning, design, and construction of developer - installed and contributed
collection system
main sewer facilities.
Diablo Road,
Easement south of
Danville, Trunk 35-
2024
ighbridge Ln.
H H north of
Replace approximately 600 feet of existing trunk sewer with 33 -inch line.
400, Phase 1
Green Valley
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -15
Lafayette Lower
Project Title
Pleasant Hill Rd.
Description
Pleasant Hill Road
2024
from Old Tunnel
Replace approximately 3,500 feet of existing trunk sewer with 21 -inch
Trunk
rehabilitation, and install a third force main for reliability.
Road to north of
line.
Evaluate the condition of the existing force mains and implement any needed
Station Force Mains
Olympic Blvd.
rehabilitation.
Nelson Avenue
2022
Easement from
Mains
Sewer
2024
Bates Ave. to
Replace approximately 1,700 feet of existing trunk sewer with 18 -inch
Replacement
Concord Industrial Pumping
Nelson Ave.
line.
Station Replacement
in Concord
San Ramon
Evaluate elimination of the Clyde and Bates Avenue Pumping Stations.
San Ramon
Schedule C
2024
between Norris
Replace approximately two miles of 36 -inch gravity sewer.
Interceptor, Phase 2
Canyon Dr. and
PS Equipment and
ongoing
Replace or recondition failed and obsolete pumps, piping, valves, electrical,
St. John Court
Collection System Pumping Stations Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan:
Project Title
Year
Description
Lower Orinda Pumping Station
2018
Evaluate the condition of the existing force mains, implement any needed
Force Mains
rehabilitation, and install a third force main for reliability.
Orinda Crossroads Pumping
2019
Evaluate the condition of the existing force mains and implement any needed
Station Force Mains
rehabilitation.
Moraga Pumping Station Force
2022
Evaluate the condition of the existing force mains and implement any needed
Mains
rehabilitation.
Evaluate the flows from the North Concord service area and additional flows that
Concord Industrial Pumping
2022
may come from the development of the Concord Naval Weapons Station. This
Station Replacement
information will be utilized to install a new station in the same or different location.
Evaluate elimination of the Clyde and Bates Avenue Pumping Stations.
Evaluate the potential to eliminate the Clyde Pumping Station as the Concord Naval
Clyde Parallel Force Main
2023
Weapons Station is developed. If the station cannot be eliminated, a new parallel
force main will be constructed to ensure reliable operation of the pumping station.
PS Equipment and
ongoing
Replace or recondition failed and obsolete pumps, piping, valves, electrical,
Piping Replacement
instrumentation, and other support equipment.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -16
Pump Station Safety
ongoing
Investigate the presence of hazardous materials requiring abatement and perform
Improvements Program
remediation efforts to reduce the potential for exposure.
Buchanan North Pumping
2020
In case the Buchanan North PS is not replaced by a gravity sewer, it will need to be
Station Upgrades
renovated.
Bates Boulevard Pumping
Station Upgrades
2021
Evaluate and implement needed improvements.
Moraga Pumping Station
2017
Evaluate and install a grinder to eliminate rag and disposable wipe clogging issues.
Grinder
Moraga Diesel Replacement
2024
Evaluate condition and complete rehabilitation or replacement of the existing diesel
engine in order to allow adequate runtime and comply with emission requirements.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -17
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
This program addresses the property and equipment needs of the District. Specific
projects include property acquisition, improvements to the District's buildings and other
District properties, information system and data management upgrades (computer
hardware and software), and other miscellaneous equipment, including vehicles. This
program also includes an Asset Management Program subprogram.
This General Improvements Program is dedicated to funding the property, equipment,
office and corporation yard improvements, map production, and information technology
needs of the District. The General Improvements Program also provides funding for
activities associated with the capital program, such as capital project legal expenses and
preparation of the CIB /CIP each year.
The focus of the General Improvements Program over the next ten years will be the
equipment budget, improvements in the District's management information systems,
seismic upgrades to various District buildings, and the continued development of an
Asset Management Program. While consistent investment in our treatment and
collection systems has occurred over the last 30 years, the District office and other
buildings have not had consistent capital improvements. With most of these buildings
over 25 years of age, the CIP includes more projects for renovations of the interiors and
exteriors of the buildings, such as upgrading kitchen and lunch rooms, painting or
sealing walls, replacing ceiling tiles, upgrading lighting fixtures, and replacing worn or
outdated flooring and furniture, as well as bringing the buildings up to current seismic
standards.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -18
General Improvements Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan
Project Title
Year
Description
Improvements to the CSO Vehicle Maintenance
Building and the attached office structure were not
included in the new CSOD Facility Project and will
CSO Vehicle
be undertaken separately. This project will
Maintenance
2018
evaluate alternatives for repair or replacement of
Building
the office building structure attached to the vehicle
maintenance structure. Originally built in 1972, the
office building has experienced significant
differential settlement in the floor slab in recent
years that needs to be addressed.
HOB Improvements
Provide capital improvements to the HOB facilities
— Lon Term
Long
ongoing
(interior and exterior) in Martinez.
This project includes installing alarm systems,
General Security and
adding gates in the perimeter security fencing,
Access
ongoing
upgrading security cameras, improving general
area lighting, installing fencing and signage.
This project is developing a comprehensive
Asset Management
asset management program to optimize the
Plan
ongoing
lifecycle of the District's assets to deliver high
quality and reliable services in a sustainable
manner with an acceptable level of risk.
This project centralizes the District's effort and
Information Technology
funding in the development of computer and
Development
ongoing
telecommunication technology within the
District.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -19
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
The District will continue to expand its urban landscaping projects in a cost - effective way
by linking recycled water pipeline projects with sewer construction projects. Major projects
include identifying the infrastructure needed to supply recycled water to the Concord
Naval Weapons Station and construction of the Concord Landscape project. This project
is not currently budgeted except for small expenditures to cover planning activities.
The Recycled Water Program includes projects to meet the District's goal of developing
additional cost - effective recycled water customers.
Capital expenditures over the next ten years are primarily focused on planning to develop
a large -scale industrial reuse project (such as the refineries or power plant use) and
construction of the Concord Landscape Project, which was awarded state and federal
grant funding. Budget is also included for completing the remaining connections to
landscape irrigation customers in the Zone 1 Project Area located in Pleasant Hill,
Concord, and Martinez near the 1 -680 freeway, and for planning work associated with
providing recycled water to the proposed development at the Concord Naval Weapons
Station site. No budget is currently provided for implementation of a large -scale industrial
reuse project; however, budget is included for planning work and for continuing efforts to
obtain outside funding assistance.
Recycled Water Projects - 2015 Capital Improvement Plan
Project Title
Year
Description
Recycled Water
This project will investigate and implement
Treatment Facilities
2015
improvements to the District's Recycled
Improvements
Water Treatment Facilities.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -20
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES
This plan covers the ten -year period from FY 2015 -16 through FY 2024 -25. The plan
includes projected expenditures totaling $ 413,398,950 (2015 dollars).
In addition to providing the basis for policy decisions concerning the District's long -range
Capital Improvement Program and management of the Sewer Construction Fund, the CIP
also serves as the framework for fee analysis and is the basis for the FY 2015 -16 CIB (the
first year of the CIP).
A summary of the ten years of planned expenditures by program, without inflation, is
contained in Table 1.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -21
Table 1: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures
Summary by Program (In 2015 Dollars)
Future Recycled Water Development Planning
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
unescalated
Existing Filter Plant and ReW R &R
$ 350,000
$ 250,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 2,150,000
Liquids Treatment Process
$ 2,063,000
$ 5,250,000
$ 7,170,000
$ 4,140,000
$ 6,090,000
$ 2,000,550
$ 700,000
$ 2,700,000
$ 15,730,000
$ 26,844,500
$ 72,688,050
Solids Handling Process Treatment
$ 1,000,000
$ 2,230,000
$ 6,700,000
$ 5,500,000
$ 400,000
$ -
$ 100,000
$ 4,575,000
$ 9,275,000
$ 17,175,500
$ 46,955,500
General Treatment Plant Improvements and Planning
$ 7,347,000
$ 5,340,000
$ 4,880,000
$ 8,075,000
$ 7,813,400
$ 8,166,000
$ 7,789,000
$ 6,085,000
$ 4,890,000
$ 9,890,000
$ 70,275,400
Total 10 -Year for Treatment Plant Program
$ 10,410,000
$ 12,820,000
$ 18,750,000
$ 17,715,000
$ 14,303,400
$ 10,166,550
$ 8,589,000
$ 13,360,000
$ 29,895,000
$ 53,910,000
$ 189,918,950
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
Collection System R &R
$ 10,550,000
$ 9,075,000
$ 12,150,000
$ 14,625,000
$ 13,200,000
$ 13,400,000
$ 13,650,000
$ 14,000,000
$ 14,250,000
$ 14,500,000
$ 129,400,000
Pump Stations
$ 400,000
$ 850,000
$ 1,150,000
$ 2,180,000
$ 500,000
$ 700,000
$ 1,600,000
$ 2,100,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 11,480,000
General CS Improvements and Planning
$ 4,200,000
$ 7,400,000
$ 3,350,000
$ 640,000
$ 640,000
$ 8,250,000
$ 4,250,000
$ 6,190,000
$ 5,490,000
$ 740,000
$ 41,150,000
CADS Development
$ 800,000
$ 800,000
$ 800,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 11,300,000
Total 10 -Year for Collection System Program
$ 15,950,000
$ 18,125,000
$ 17,450,000
$ 18,645,000
$ 15,540,000
$ 23,650,000
$ 20,800,000
$ 23,590,000
$ 22,040,000
$ 17,540,000
$ 193,330,000
Future Recycled Water Development Planning
$ 100,000
$ 250,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
1 $ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 2,800,000
Existing Filter Plant and ReW R &R
$ 350,000
$ 250,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 2,150,000
Total 10 -Year for Recycled Water Program
$ 450,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 4,950,000
CIP -22
Vehicles & Equip Acquisition
$
500,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
550,000
$
5,450,000
Buildings /District Property
$
732,000
$
1,385,000
$
370,000
$
925,000
$
370,000
$
320,000
$
320,000
$
320,000
$
340,000
$
370,000
$
5,452,000
Capital Legal Services
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
70,000
$
700,000
Asset Management Program Development
$
1,378,000
$
1,100,000
$
700,000
$
650,000
$
550,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
4,378,000
Information Tech Devt
$
1,300,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,835,000
$
500,000
$
1,235,000
$
425,000
$
400,000
$
400,000
$
400,000
$
1,225,000
$
9,220,000
Total 10 -Year for General Improvements Program
$
3,980,000
$
4,605,000
$
3,525,000
$
2,695,000
$
2,775,000
$
1,365,000
$
1,340,000
$
1,340,000
$
1,360,000
$
2,215,000
$
25,200,000
Total 10 -Year CIP for all four Programs
$
30,790,000
$
36,050,000
$
40,225,000
$
39,555,000
$
33,118,400
$
35,681,550
$
31,229,000
$
38,790,000
$
53,795,000
$
74,165,000
$
413,398,950
CIP -22
Table 2: FY 2015 Capital Improvement Plan
15 -May -15
CIP -23
FY 1
- tl':. 7n 0 I 1
1
2024/25
Total
Driver Unit Operation Project Title
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9
30
Treatment Plant Improvements
Liquids Treatment Process
Secondary Improvements
Near -Term Optimization, Ammonia Reduction; Secondary Process Improvements Ph 2, Replace or Line Buried
Regulatory
Secondary Treatment
Aeration Header (72" & 78 ")
-
-
765,000
2,590,000
2,000,550
-
-
-
-
5,355,550
(Demo Plenums, Replace Diffusers)
Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation (Rehab Drives, RAS /WAS, Hydraulic Improvements, Gates, Scum Equipment &
R &R
Secondary Treatment
Piping)
_
_
-
-
_
-
500,000
1,000,000
2,785,500
4,285,500
Sustainability /Optimization
Secondary Treatment
Aeration Steam Turbines Replacement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,900,000
3,400,000
R &R
Primary Sedimentation
Primary Treatment Renovation
563,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
563,000
Primary Treatment Renovation Phase 2
R &R
Primary Sedimentation
(rails, gates, miscellaneous mechanical, E &IC)
-
-
150,000
1,000,000
2,250,000
-
-
-
-
3,400,000
Capacity Expansion
Primary Sedimentation
Influent Pump No. 6 for Third Wetwell
-
500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
Capacity Expansion
Soils Remediation
500,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
12,500,000
Regulatory
Primary Sedimentation
Screenings Removal (Include 1/4" Barscreens for all wet wells and screenings washer /compactors, conveyance)
400,000
500,000
6,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
6,900,000
Sustainability /Optimization
Primary Sedimentation
Aeration System Renovation Ph 2
-
100,000
500,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
-
-
-
-
2,850,000
(Electric Blower for Grit, Optimize Steam Blowers)
Sustainability /Optimization
Secondary Treatment
Pump & Blower Bldg Seismic Upgrade
1,100,000
4,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,100,000
R &R
UV Disinfection
Disinfection System & Support Replacement
-
150,000
520,000
1,375,000
-
-
-
-
-
2,045,000
Regulatory
Disinfection
Disinfection System Upgrade for CEC
-
-
-
-
-
700,000
1,200,000
7,730,000
16,159,000
25,789,000
Liquid Treatment Improvements Total Project Cost
2,063,000
5,250,000
7,170,000
4,140,000
6,090,000
2,000,550
700,000
2,700,000
15,730,000
26,844,500
72,688,050
Solids Handling Process Treatment
Rehab Existing Solids Handling/Treatment
-
Regulatory
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Wet Scrubber Replacement (Includes provisions for reducing mercury recycling to headworks. Note: no
500,000
-
4,000,000
4,400,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
8,900,000
dry scrubber replacement in this estimate)
DAF Rehab (Rehab /Replace Pressurization System, TWAS pumps, Polymer System, Process Piping, Main
R &R
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Gear /Bearings)
R &R
Sludge Handling/incineration
Near -Term Centrifuge & Cake Pump Upgrades Including Cake Solids Improvements Using Waste Heat
400,000
1,800,000
1,000,000
200,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,400,000
(e.g. Therma- Flite) or Chemicals (e.g. Ferric Sulfate)
R &R
Sludge Handling/incineration
MHF Burner Upgrade
-
150,000
700,000
900,000
400,000
-
-
-
-
-
2,150,000
Safety/ Regulatory
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Ash Facility Improvements
100,000
280,000
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
400,000
800,000
2,580,000
New Solids Handling and TreatmentFacilities (Fluidized Bed, Digester Complex)
Regulatory
Sludge Handling /Incineration
(Including Replacement of Sludge Blending, Emergency Sludge Storage, Carbide Lime System, Demo
-
-
-
-
-
100,000
4,575,000
8,875,000
16,375,500
29,925,500
Abandoned Digester, Dewatering Polymer System, Waste Heat Boilers, Auxiliary Boilers, Solids Handling
Building /Seismic)
Solids Treatment Improvements Total Project Cost
1,000,000
2,230,000
6,700,000
5,500,000
400,000
-
100,000
4,575,000
9,275,000
17,175,500
46,955,500
Other
Asset Replacement Program (Includes Equipment Replacement, Piping Rnovations, Plant Elec.,lnst,
R &R
All
Cable,Concrete /Pavement/ Coatings, Lab Upgrades and Repair and Urgent Blanket Contract
2,772,000
1,790,000
1,800,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,500,000
2,600,000
2,800,000
3,000,000
3,000,000
25,062,000
R &R /Safety
Fire Alarm Rehab
200,000
600,000
800,000
Safety/ Regulatory
All
Safety Enhancement Phase 4
450,000
450,000
R &R
Final Effluent Pumping
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurb - ph 2
-
-
270,000
360,000
130,000
-
760,000
R &R
Final Effluent Pumping
Final Effluent Pump Rehabilitation (1 @75MGD, 25 ftTDH)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
800,000
800,000
Sustainability /Optimization
SCB Siesmic Emergency Plan
-
-
R &R
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Co -Gen Replacement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
5,000,000
5,500,000
R &R
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Rehab Standby Diesel Engine /Generators (2 @2000kW each)
-
600,000
1,365,000
-
1,965,000
Regulatory
Sludge Handling/incineration
Replace Portable Diesel Pumps
-
-
-
250,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
250,000
Sustainability /Optimization
General
Plant Energy Optimization (PG &E SST Project)
360,000
200,000
400,000
400,000
-
-
-
1,360,000
Outfall Improvements Phase 7 (Gaskets & Manways Rehab, Valves Rehab, Address Potential Outfall Easement
Regulatory
Final Effluent Pumping
Issues)
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
700,000
1,900,000
100,000
-
-
-
2,900,000
Regulatory
Final Effluent Pumping
Outfall Improvements Phase 8 (Gaskets & Manways & Valves Rehab)
-
-
-
-
-
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
-
200,000
R &R
Planning /Legal
Water Systems Condition Assessment (1W, 2W, 3W)
100,000
-
-
-
-
100,000
R &R
General
Odor Control Improvements
-
-
-
-
500,000
1,500,000
2,049,000
-
-
-
4,049,000
R &R
Sludge Handling /Incineration
Water Systems Improvements (1W, 2W, 3W) - Pumps, Storage, Piping
-
-
-
-
330,000
330,000
-
-
-
660,000
R &R
General
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
50,000
80,000
80,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
210,000
R &R
General
Plant Control System 1/0 Replacement
100,000
50,000
400,000
1,680,000
2,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
4,230,000
R &R
General
PLC Sys Upgrades
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
1,000,000
R &R
General
TP Electrical Cable Repl
-
100,000
100,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
240,000
1,880,000
R &R
General
Switchgear Replacement - ph 2 (Class 1 Re- Condition Existing Breakers - Westinghouse, Eaton, etc)
350,000
250,000
250,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
850,000
R &R
General
Critical Switchgear Replacement (Substation 16 Replacement)
400,000
200,000
500,000
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
2,100,000
R &R
General
TP Facilities Renov Pgm (Bldgs, Roofs, Roads, Security, HVAC, Drainage)
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
2,000,000
Sustainability /Optimization
General
POB Seismic Upgrade
-
-
100,000
520,000
700,000
-
-
-
-
-
1,320,000
Sustainability /Optimization
General
Warehouse Seismic Upgrade
-
-
-
150,000
400,000
400,000
-
-
-
-
950,000
Sustainability /Optimization
General
Laboratory Seismic Upgrade
-
-
-
100,000
200,000
100,000
250,000
-
650,000
R &R
General
TP Hazard Identification & Remediation
100,000
-
-
200,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
900,000
CIP -23
Table 2: FY 2015 Capital Improvement Plan
15 -May -15
Driver
Essaw-
Unit Operation
OW
Project Title
FY i
1
i
2
•
3
4
5
6
a
7
i
8
9
2024/25
30
Total
R &R
R &R
R &R
R &R
R &R
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
R &R
R &R
General
General
General
General
General
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
WC/ Grayson Creek Levee Rehab
TP Safety Improvements Program
Treatment Plant Security Upgrades
Lab Upgrades and Equipment Replacement
Plant Cyber Security
Treatment Plant Planning
Treatment Plant Master Plan & Master Plan Updates
Pilot Program - Innovation and Research
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation Studies
Wet Weather Facilities Condition Assessment (Structures /Piping)
Odor Control Facilities Condition Assessment
15,000
50,000
60,000
200,000
250,000
1,400,000
240,000
200,000
50,000
5,000
150,000
15,000
350,000
800,000
150,000
-
400,000
-
50,000
50,000
250,000
-
150,000
-
-
-
100,000
100,000
250,000
-
150,000
50,000
130,000
5,000
-
50,000
250,000
-
150,000
10,000
-
13,400
-
50,000
16,000
250,000
-
150,000
10,000
-
-
-
50,000
-
-
250,000
400,000
150,000
10,000
-
-
50,000
50,000
-
250,000
500,000
150,000
-
-
-
50,000
-
250,000
-
150,000
-
-
-
50,000
-
250,000
-
150,000
-
-
615,000
500,000
165,000
350,000
181,000
2,600,000
3,100,000
1,590,000
80,000
130,000
18,400
General Treatment Plant Improvements Total Project Cost
7,347,000
5,340,000
4,880,000
8,075,000
7,813,400
8,166,000
7,789,000
6,085,000
4,890,000
9,890,000
70,275,400
10,410,000
12,820,000
18,750,000
17,715,000
14,303,400
10,166,550
8,589,000
13,360,000
29,895,000
53,910,000
189,918,950
Collection System Improvements
$ 10,550,000
$ 9,075,000
$ 12,150,000
$ 14,625,000
$ 13,200,000
$ 13,400,000
$
13,650,000
$ 14,000,000
$ 14,250,000
$ 14,500,000
$ 129,400,000
R &R
Collection System
Collection System Repair & Rehabilitation Projects
All
Pump Stations
400,000
850,000
1,150,000
2,180,000
500,000
700,000
1,600,000
2,100,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
11,480,000
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
Regulatory
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
Collection System
Coll Sys Modeling Upgrade (Configure /Calibrate Dynamic Model & Flow Monitoring)
Comprehensive Collection System Master Plan Updates
Collection System Planning
Collection System Capacity Projects based on Reliable Capacity for Existing Customers
400,000
600,000
150,000
200,000
600,000
200,000
250,000
500,000
-
-
200,000
-
-
200,000
-
-
200,000
-
200,000
-
350,000
200,000
-
350,000
250,000
300,000
-
300,000
1,150,000
1,900,000
2,400,000
35,700,000
$ 3,050,000
$ 6,400,000
$ 2,600,000
$ 440,000
$ 440,000
$ 8,050,000
$ 4,050,000
$ 5,640,000
$ 4,890,000
$ 140,000
Planning
Collection System
Collection System Planning and Other Improvements
4,200,000
7,400,000
3,350,000
640,000
640,000
8,250,000
4,250,000
6,190,000
5,490,000
740,000
41,150,000
Capacity Expansion
CAD and Development Sewerage
800,0021
800,0001
800,0001
1,200,0001
1,200,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
11,300,000
15,950,000
18,125,000
17,450,000
18,645,000
1 15,540,000
23,650,000
20,800,000
23,590,000
22,040,000
17,540,000
193,330,000
Recycled Water
Future ReW Dvelopment
Recycled Water Development Planning & Other
Recycled Water Distribution Surge Analysis
100,000
-
185,000
65,000
400,000
400,000
-
400,000
-
250,000
-
250,000
-
250,000
-
250,000
-
250,000
-
2,735,000
65,000
Capacity Expansion
Capacity Expansion
Planning /Legal
Planning /Legal
ReW Planning
Subtotal Future Recycled Water Development Planning
$ 100,000
$ 250,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 250,000
$
250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 2,800,000
Maintain Existing Infrasturture
Buildings /District Property
Planning /Legal
Existing ReW Facility
Existing ReW Facility
Existing ReW Facility
Existing ReW Facility
Replace Decorative Pond w/ Low Water Use Landscaping
Recycled Water Distribution System Condition Assessments
Recycled Water Distribution System - Maltby Replacement
Recycled Water Distribution System Renovations Program
Recycled Water Treatment Facility Improvements (Replace Filter Media, Rehab /Replace Underdrains, Replace
Backwash Troughs /Headers /Rotary Washers, Other Filter Internals)
Concord Landscape Project
-
-
200,000
150,000
250,000
50,000
-
-
100,000
60,000
-
-
100,000
-
-
-
100,000
-
-
250,000
-
-
250,000
-
-
-
100,000
150,000
-
-
-
100,000
150,000
-
-
100,000
150,000
-
110,000
-
-
300,000
1,700,000
150,000
Sustainability /Optimization
R &R
R &R
R &R
R &R
R &R
ReW
Subtotal Existing Filter Plant and ReW R &R
$ 350,000
$ 250,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 250,000
$
250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 2,150,000
$ 450,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$
500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 4,950,000
R &R
Vehicles & Equipment
Vehicles & Equip Acquisition
$ 500,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$
550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 5,450,000
R &R
Sustainability /Optimization
Sustainability /Optimization
R &R
Sustainability /Safety
Capacity Expansion
Buildings /District Property
Buildings /District Property
Buildings /District Property
Buildings /District Property
Buildings /District Property
1 Buildings /District Property
District Properties (CSOD,HOB, POB,Warehouse, Annex,)
CSO Vehicle Maint Bldg
Server Room Relocation
Buffer and Rental Property Improvements
General Security /Safety Improvements
District Easements
407,000
-
100,000
225,000
-
-
230,000
-
1,000,000
30,000
50,000
1 75,000
180,000
20,000
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
180,000
575,000
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
200,000
-
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
150,000
-
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
1
150,000
-
-
30,000
65,000
75,000
150,000
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
60,000
-
150,000
30,000
25,000
1 75,000
200,000
-
-
30,000
65,000
1 75,000
1,907,000
595,000
1,250,000
495,000
530,000
1 675,000
Buildings /District Property
$ 732,000
$ 1,385,000
$ 370,000
$ 925,000
$ 370,000
$ 320,000
$
320,000
$ 320,000
$ 340,000
$ 370,000
$ 5,452,000
Capacity Expansion
Planning /Legal
Capital Legal Services
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$
70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 70,000
$ 700,000
Sustainability /Optimization
Sustainability /Optimization
R &R
Asset Manage
Asset Manage
Planning /Legal
CMMS
GDI -SMMS Replacement
Asset Management Program Development
508,000
270,000
600,000
120,000
80,000
900,000
-
700,000
-
650,000
-
550,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
628,000
350,000
3,400,000
Asset Management Program Development
$ 1,378,000
$ 1,100,000
$ 700,000
$ 650,000
$ 550,000
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 4,378,000
Sustainability /Optimization
IT- Software
Information Tech Devt
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,835,000
$ 500,000
$ 1,235,000
$ 425,000
$
400,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 1,225,000
$ 9,220,000
$ 3,980,000
$ 4,605,000
$ 3,525,000
$ 2,695,000
$ 2,775,000
$ 1,365,000
$
1,340,000
$ 1,340,000
$ 1,360,000
$ 2,215,000
$ 25,200,000
30,790,000
36,050,000
40,225,000
39,555,000
33,118,400
35,681,550
31,229,000
38,790,000
53,795,000
74,165,000
413,398,950
CIP -24
Table 3: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures - Collection System Program
2015 CIP
inflation Factor 0% 11. 2015 Dollars River Watch Proiects
Program and Sub - Program
1 - Renovation and Rehabilitation
Estimated Expenditures in the Capital Plan
2015 -16 2016 -17
2017 -18
2018 -19
2019 -20
2020.21
2021.22
2022 -23
2023 -24
2024 -25
CIP
(10 -Year) Total
5991
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 2
$ 66,000
$ 15,000
$
50,000
$ 2,750,000
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$ 2,881,000
5982
Pi eburst Blanket Contract
$ 260,000
$ 275,000
$
200,000
$ 200,000
$ 75,000
$
75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 1,385,000
5999
CIPP Blanket Contract
$ 125,000
$ 150,000
$
150,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$
75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
$ 950,000
8410
Cathodic Prot Sys Rep[ - 12 -13 thru 21 -22
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$
-
$ -
$ 50,000
$
-
$ -
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 450,000
8415
Martinez Sewer Renovations Phase 4
$ 3,100,000
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 3,100,000
8417
Survey Monument Installation LT
$ 50,000
$ 75,000
$
50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$
50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 525,000
pCS40
Coll Sys Urgent Pro' - 2013 -14 thru 22 -25
$ 275,000
$ 200,000
$
100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$
100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 1,275,000
8421
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 9
$ 2,524,000
$ 10,000
$
-
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,534,000
8423
North Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 6
$ 600,000
$ 3,100,000
$
-
$ -
$ -
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,700,000
pCS16
Collection System Renovation Program
$ -
$ 100,000
$
200,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 500,000
none
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 10
$ 550,000
$ 3,100,000
$
250,000
$ -
$ -
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,900,000
8424
M -1 CIPP Lining Project
$ 2,500,000
$ 200,000
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 2,700,000
8422
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 11
$ 150,000
$ 500,000
$
3,100,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,750,000
none
Martinez Phase 5
$ 150,000
$ -
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 150,000
none
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 12
$ -
$ 150,000
$
500,000
$ 3,200,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,850,000
none
Diablo Renovations - ph 3
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ 300,000
$
2,800,000
$
$
$
$
$ 3,100,000
none
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 11
$ 150,000
$ 500,000
$
3,100,000
$
$ -
$
-
$
$
$
$
$ 3,750,000
none
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 6
$ -
$ 650,000
$
3,000,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,650,000
none
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 12
$
$ -
$
150,000
$ 500,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 650,000
none
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 13
$
$
$
650,000
$ 3,000,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,650,000
none
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 7
$
$
$
650,000
$ 3,000,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,650,000
pCS32
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 3
$
$
$
-
$ -
$ 300,000
$
2,800,000
$
$
$
$
$ 3,100,000
none
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 8
$
$
$
$ 300,000
$ 2,000,000
$
1,000,000
$
$
$
$
$ 3,300,000
none
Martinez Sewer Renovations - ph 5
$
$
$
$ 250,000
$ 3,100,000
$
-
$
$
$
$
$ 3,350,000
none
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 4
$
$
$
$ 300,000
$ 2,800,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,100,000
none
North Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 7
$
$
$
$ 300,000
$ 2,700,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 3,000,000
none
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 14
$
$
$
$ 500,000
$ 1,200,000
$
1,800,000
$
$
$
$
$ 3,500,000
CS23
Walnut Creek Civic Center Main Im rovs
$
$
$
$ -
$ 350,000
$
3,500,000
$
$
$
$
$ 3,850,000
none
Locust Street Improvements
$
$
$
$
$ -
$
300,000
$ 2,800,000
$ -
$
$
$ 3,100,000
none
North Main Trunk Improvements
$
$
$
$
$
$
100,000
$ 600,000
$ 3,100,000
$
$
$ 3,800,000
none
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 15
$
$
$
$
$
$
260,000
$ 2,600,000
$ -
$
$
$ 2,860,000
none
A -Line Relief -39 Inch Rehab
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$ -
$ 200,000
$ 2,600,000
$ 3,100,000
$ 5,900,000
pCS06
Mount Diablo Blvd Main Improvements
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$ -
$ 200,000
$ 3,000,000
$ 3,000,000
$ 6,200,000
none
Collection System Renovation Program - LT
$
$
$
$
$
$
540,000
$ 7,350,000
$ 10,100,000
$ 8,250,000
$ 8,000,000
$ 34,240,000
none
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 13
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$ -
$ -
none
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
$
none
lWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 16
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
pCS99
lWatershed 44 Creek Xing Stabilization
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
$
Subtotal Renovation
$ 10,550,000
$ 9,075,000
$
12,150,000
$ 14,625,000
$ 13,200,000
$
13,400,000
$ 13,650,000
$ 14,000,000
$ 14,250,000
$ 14,500,000
$ 129,400,000
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -25
Table 3: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures - Collection System Program
2015 CIP
Inflation Factor 0% 11. 2015 Dollars River Watch Projects
Program and Sub - Program Estimated Expenditures in the Capital Plan CIP
1 2015 -16 1 2016 -17 1 2017 -18 1 2018 -19 1 2019 -20 1 2020.21 1 2021.22 1 2022 -23 1 2023 -24 1 2024 -25 1 (10 -Year) Total I
2 - Reg. Compliance /Planning
5962
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
$ -
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5993
Forcemain Assessment
Trunk Sewer Expansion Program
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
8418
Coll Sys Modeling Upgr 12 -13 thru 17 -18
$ 400,000
$ 200,000
$ 250,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 300,000
$ 1,150,000
8419
Coll Sys Planning - FY2013 -14 to 2022 -23
$ 750,000
$ 800,000
$ 500,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 150,000
$ 500,000
$
$ -
$ 3,150,000
none
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring - LT
$
$ -
pCS08
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 350,000
none
Collect Sys Planning - FY 23 -24 to 32 -33
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 550,000
$ 250,000
$ 800,000
2,500,000
Subtotal Regulatory Compliance and Safety
1,150,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 750,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 550,000
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
$ 5,450,000
$
-
$
$
$
$
$ -
pCS20
Moraga Way Orinda, Tr 10- 200/300
$
$
$
3 - Expansion
pC533
Trunk Sewer Expansion Program
$ -
$ -
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 140,000
$ 140,000
8412
Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek Trunk
$ 3,050,000
$ 6,400,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
$ 9,450,000
none
Martinez Alhambra Avenue Trunks
$ -
$ -
$
$ 40,000
$ 200,000
$
2,500,000
$ 250,000
$
$
$
$ 2,990,000
pCS08
Lancaster Rd WC, Tr 13 -600
$
$
$
$ -
$ 200,000
$
2,500,000
$ -
$
$
$
$ 2,700,000
none
Lafayette - Happy Valley Road Sewer
$
$
$
$
$ 40,000
$
2,500,000
$
$
$
$
$ 2,540,000
pCS18
Trunk Sewer Expansion Program - LT
$
$
$
$
$ -
$
-
$
$
$
$
$ -
pCS20
Moraga Way Orinda, Tr 10- 200/300
$
$
$
$
$
$
400,000
$ 2,800,000
$
$
$
$ 3,200,000
pCS38
Pleasant Hill Road Corridor
$
$
$ 2,600,000
$ 400,000
$
$
-
$ -
$
$
$
$ 3,000,000
none
A- Line -Phase 2B
$
$
$ -
$ -
$
$
-
$ 100,000
$ 1,600,000
$
$ 1,700,000
pCS10
Walnut Creek - Palmer Road
$
$
$
$
$
$
150,000
$ 500,000
$ 2,300,000
$ -
$
$ 2,950,000
none
WC- Walnut Blvd Corr -Trunk 29 -200
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$ 500,000
$ 2,300,000
$ -
$
$ 2,800,000
none
Diablo Rd Dan, Tr 35 -400 Phase 1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
$ 150,000
$ 320,000
$
$ 470,000
none
Lafayette Lower Pleasant Hill Road Trunk
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ -
$ 270,000
$
$ 270,000
none
Danville - Diablo Road Corridor
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 100,000
$ 500,000
$
$ 600,000
none
Nelson Ave Sewer Repl
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 90,000
$ 600,000
$
$ 690,000
pCS09
San Ramon Sched C Interceptor - ph 2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 600,000
$ 1,600,000
$
$ 2,200,000
Subtotal Expansions
$ 3,050,000
$ 6,400,000
$ 2,600,000
$ 440,000
$ 440,000
$
8,050,000
$ 4,050,000
$ 5,640,000
$ 4,890,000
$ 140,000
$ 35,700,000
3 - Expansion (CAD and Developpers Sewerage
8402
Contractual Assessment Districts
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,300,000
none
CAD: Contractual Assessment Districts - LT
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
$ 400,000
$ 2,400,000
8420
Devt Sewerage - 2013 -14 thru 17 -18
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,100,000
pCS17
Devt Sewerage 2018 -19 thru 2022 -23
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$
800,000
$ 800,000
$ 800,000
$ -
$ -
$ 3,800,000
none
Devt Sewerage 2023 -24 thru 27 -28
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ 800,000
$ 900,000
$ 1,700,000
Subtotal Expansions Related to CASD and Deveop Swg
$ 800,000
$ 800,000
$ 800,000
$ 1,200,000
$ 1,200,000
$
1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 1,300,000
$ 11,300,000
Subtotal All Expansions
$ 5,000,000
$ 8,200,000
$ 4,150,000
$ 1,840,000
$ 1,840,000
$
9,550,000
$ 5,550,000
$ 7,490,000
$ 6,790,000
$ 2,040,000
$ 47,000,000
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -26
Table 3: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures — Collection System Program
2015 CIP
Inflation Factor 0% 11. 2015 Dollars
Program and Sub - Program Estimated Expenditures in the Capital Plan
2015 -16 1 2016 -17 1 2017 -18 2018 -19
4 - Pump Stations
5941 PS Equip & Piping Repl
8406 Pump Station Security Improvements
8408 Pumping Stations Master Plan
)CS31
Pump Station Hazard Identification
)CS34
Misc. Force Main Improvements
)CS29
Fairview / Maltby Upgrades
)CS28
Flush Kleen Pumping Station Improv
)CS36
Pumping Station Arc Flash Stdy
none
Pump Station Safety Improv - LT
8414
Moraga/ Crossroads Pumping Stations
)CS24
Lower Orinda PS Force Main
none
PS Equip & Piping Repl - LT
none
Buchanan North PS Upgrades
none
Bates Blvd PS Upgrades
none
Moraga Pumping Station Force Main
none
Clyde Parallel Force Main
none
Moraga Diesel Repl
none
Concord Industrial Pumping Station
)CS39
Orinda Crossroads PS Force Main
Subtotal Pumping Station
TOTAL Collection System Program Total
River Watch Projects
2019 -20 1 2020.21 1 2021.22 1 2022 -23 1 2023 -24
CIP
10 -Year) Total
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -27
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2015 -16, the District plans to undertake a Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan project. This project will develop a Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan (CWMP) that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District's collection system, wastewater
treatment plant, and recycled water facilities.
The majority of the District's existing treatment plant facilities were constructed in the
late 1970s and early 1980s following the passing of the Clean Water Act and some of
the collection system facilities and piping were constructed in the early 1900's. The
District recognizes the need to address aging infrastructure and, as a result, is
developing an Asset Management Plan. Due to potential changes in future State
and /or Federal water, air, and solids regulations, there is a need to develop a
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan that coordinates regulatory- driven changes
with aging infrastructure needs and other capacity - related and optimization
improvements. Potential regulatory changes include:
• Changes to existing final effluent limits and new final effluent limits for nutrients,
selenium, contaminants of emerging concern, and others;
• Changes to California /National Toxics Rules, 303 (d) listed pollutants and
micropollutants, and new virus -based disinfection criterion;
• Reductions in greenhouse gas emission cap and trade program thresholds;
• Compliance with Federal 129 sewage sludge incineration rules, changes to air
emission limits, and biosolids handling /management and disposal regulations;
• Indirect and direct potable reuse requirements; and
• Collection system regulatory requirements.
A key deliverable of the CWMP will be a recommended Capital Improvement Plan for
the next 20 -year planning horizon. The recommended CIP will include descriptions,
rationales, and estimated costs for collection system and wastewater treatment plant
capital improvement projects and on -going programs in order to address aging
infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, accommodate
planned growth, optimize energy use, and implement the District's vision for a "plant
of the future" that is consistent with the District's Strategic Plan. For example, the
CWMP will be a critical tool used by the District to implement the following strategies
from the District's Strategic Plan (FY 2014/2016):
Meet Regulatory Requirements for the Good of the Community and Environment
by striving to achieve 100% permit compliance in air, water, land and other
regulations and by striving to reduce the number of sanitary sewer overflows by
continuing Best Management Practices.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -28
Be a Leader in the Wastewater Industry by using sustainable practices that
minimize waste, maximize resources, protect the ratepayer, improve the
community, and embrace innovation.
• Maintain Reliable Wastewater Infrastructure by updating the Capital Improvement
Program through prioritization, risk analysis, while focusing on the sustainability of
customer service, environmental needs, and economic demands.
The CWMP is critical for maintaining a high level of service, establishing long -term
fiscally responsible policies for our customers, and providing a clear direction for the
District. To accomplish this, the CWMP will:
1. Confirm CIP projects, costs, and site layouts for future facilities.
2. Identify linkages among the major capital improvement projects and repair and
replacement strategies such that the projects can be re- sorted and re- scheduled
as changes in planning assumptions and needs occur.
3. Identify triggers for implementing applied research (if applicable), preliminary
design, design, and construction of the recommended capital improvement
projects in order to determine efficient "just -in- time" project implementation.
4. Identify policies, programs, and guidelines to address overall program
implementation including project prioritizations, implementation costs, project
delivery methods, potential funding sources, and an estimated schedule for
implementing plan elements.
5. Confirm and incorporate operations, maintenance, and energy management
strategies.
6. Accelerate and coordinate condition assessments with implementation of the
asset management plan and confirm long -term repair and replacement
strategies.
Potential future projects are not currently included in the District's CIP. The District's
CIP will be updated annually as projects are clarified and coordinated with the
District's CWMP.
2015 Capital Improvement Plan CIP -29
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGEWCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Finance and Revenue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures
Revenue Sources
Page No.
Finance -1
Finance -1
Table 1: Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures Finance -3
Funding Principles Finance -4
CIB /CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGEWCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Revenue and Finance
Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures
The District's Capital Program is maintained in the Sewer Construction Fund (SCF).
Revenue from several sources and capital projects are tracked and accounted for
within the Fund. Debt financing for projects is accounted for in the Debt Service Fund.
In order to ensure that adequate funds are available, each year the expected revenues
are reviewed and compared with planned expenditures and a determination is made
whether additional revenues or debt financing are needed.
Revenue Sources
Capital Improvement revenue sources include the following:
Ad Valorem (Property) Tax Revenue
Property Tax is used to fund Debt Service first, and the remainder is used for capital
projects. The State of California has reduced our share of property tax over the years
and most recently the State borrowed a portion of our property tax funds. Proposition
1A, passed by the California voters in November 2004, allowed the State of California
to divert property tax revenues from local government for two years, 2004 -05 and
2005 -06. Effective 2006 -07, Proposition 1A dictates that no additional property tax
diversion will occur. The State can, however, borrow a portion of the tax revenue
twice in the next ten years, but must pay it back, with interest, within three years.
Sewer Service Charge Revenue (SSC)
SSC are the one revenue source that is completely within the discretion of the District
Board of Directors. Therefore, each year staff evaluates the District's finances and
recommends a SSC rate it determines to be prudent to sustain the Capital
Improvement Program without the need for large SSC rate increases or substantial
debt financing in the future. If an increase in the SSC rate is proposed, the Board of
Directors conducts a public hearing, and considers all available information in coming
to a final decision on setting the SSC rate.
The capital component of the Sewer Service Charge (SSC) has traditionally been used
to supplement all other sources of revenue as needed to fund the capital program.
When the District lost 40% of the property tax revenue in 1992 -93 it compensated by
adding a capital project component to the SSC. Since then, the capital component of
CIB /CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -1
the SSC has varied each year, depending on the capital revenue available from other
sources and the planned expenditures.
Capacity Fee and Pumped Zone Fee Revenue
A capacity fee is paid by each new connector to the District. This fee represents the
cost of buying into the existing assets of the District and is intended to equalize the
investment in District assets among current and new users. Capacity fee revenue
projections from new connections have been adjusted to reflect changes in the housing
market, which is difficult to predict and can have a substantial impact on the available
revenues for the capital program. When the housing market cools, revenue from
capacity fees and pumped zone fees is reduced, and has to be made up by additional
revenue from sewer service charges. Capacity fees are the most volatile revenues as
they are directly impacted by development within the Districts service area.
Reimbursements
A major source of revenue to the SCF is reimbursements from others, which consist
primarily of reimbursements from the City of Concord, served by the District under
contract. The District calculates the amount of the reimbursement according to the
written agreement, and it is based on the percentage of the District's flow attributable to
Concord dischargers. This revenue category also includes proceeds from the sale of
recycled water and revenue from permit fees and associated fees collected at the
District's Permit Counter.
Interest on Investments
A projection of the rate of return on the invested Sewer Construction Funds Available is
needed to predict interest revenues in the future. The investment strategy of the District
is designed to attain a market - average rate of return while exercising a minimum of risk.
The District's current allowed areas of investment are the Local Agency Investment
Fund of the State of California United States, Treasury Bills and Notes, Commercial
Paper and CD's. Currently the weighted average of the portfolio is less than 1 %.
The following chart includes estimated revenue for each category for FY 2015 -16 along
with planned capital expenditures and estimated Sewer Construction Funds Available.
COMP Finance and Revenue Finance -2
Table 1: SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of projected FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvement Program revenue and
expenditures is presented below:
Revenues
Capacity Fees
$ 6,184,000
Pumped Zone Fees
450,000
Interest
187,000
Ad Valorem Taxes
10,060,000
Sewer Service Charges
8,110,000
Reimbursements from Others:
City of Concord
3,150,000
Recycled Water Sales
257,000
Developer Fees, Charges, Other
369,500
Total Revenues *
$ 28,767,500
Expenditures
Treatment Plant Program $ 10,410,000
Collection System Program 15,950,000
General Improvements Program 3,980,000
Recycled Water Program 450,000
Total Expenditures $ 30,790,000
A summary of Sewer Construction Funds Available Impact is Presented Below:
Projected Revenues
Projected Expenditures
Draw From Funds Available
$ 28, 767, 500
(30,790,000)
$ (2,022,500)
More specific information regarding expenditure categories is included in the Capital
Improvement Plan.
* Revenue is first recorded in the O &M budget until O &M costs are offset. Any additional revenue will be
recorded in the Sewer Construction Fund.
CIB /CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -3
Debt Financing
The District has on occasion used debt financing to fund projects. A separate Debt
Fund has been established to collect revenue and repay debt; therefore, debt
repayment is not reflected in Capital Program cash flow projections.
History: In December of 1994, $25,000,000 in long -term (20 years) debt financing was
completed to fund several large projects including the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor
and Outfall Improvement projects. The 1994 debt was refunded with 1998 refunding
Revenue Bonds to achieve significant savings in debt service costs through lower
interest rates. In 1998 -1999 the District received a total of $2,916,872 in loans for the
recycled water program from the State of California. In 2002, an additional $16,600,000
million in long -term (20 years) debt financing was completed to allow escalation of
schedules for several major projects needed to serve the Dougherty Valley in San
Ramon. In 2009, the District issued $54,125,000 in Certificates of Participation (COP)
which retired the 1998 and 2002 debt to take advantage of favorable bond interest rates,
and included $30 million in debt which was issued to fund some large, needed one -time
projects.
FUNDING PRINCIPLES
The District has developed and maintained a capacity fee system, which equitably
divides the cost obligations of the capital program between the existing customers of
District facilities and new customers of these facilities. Under this "fair share"
approach, existing customers, primarily through property taxes and a capital
component of the annual SSC, and new users through capacity fees based on a
proportional "buy -in" to the current value of all existing capital assets, fund facilities
upgrade, renovation and replacement costs as well as expansion projects needed to
accommodate growth.
The Board of Directors has generally preferred a pay -as- you -go financing approach,
raising sewer service charge rates as needed to fund the capital program.
Occasionally, the District has bond - financed capital projects, particularly when such
projects are large, one- time expenditures that will benefit current and future
ratepayers.
Going forward, the two discretionary sources of capital revenue for the District
Board are sewer service charge and bond financing. Thus, any reduction in capital
revenue from other sources, such as capacity fees, would have to be made up by
an increase in the sewer service charge, by a like reduction in expenditures on the
capital program, or by borrowing.
CIB /CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -4