HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.b. Draft FY 2015-16 CIB & CIPFY 2015-16
Capital Improvement BUDGET
& TEN-YEAR PLAN
FY 2015-16
Capital Improvement BUDGET
& TEN-YEAR PLAN
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
Distribut
e
d
March 7,
2
0
1
5
FY 2015 -16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
T ABLE OF C ONTENTS
Page No.
Introduction
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the CIB …………………………………………. Intro -1
Summary …………………………………………………………………………….. Intro -3
Project Prioritization ………………………………………………………………… Intro -3
Capital Improvement Budget System …………………………………………….. Intro -5
Capi tal Project Contingency Spending ……………………………………….. Intro -5
Table 1: Capital improveme nt Budget Summary for FY 2015 -16 ……….. Intro -7
Table 2 : Treatment Plant Program Budget/Project List …………………… Intro -8
Table 3 : Collection System Program Budget/Project List ………………... Intro -9
Table 4 : General Improvements Program Budget/Project List ………….. Intro -10
Table 5 : Recycled Water Program Budget/Project List …………………… Intro -11
Major Project Emphasis ……………………………………………………………. Intro -12
Authorization Limits ……………………………………………………………….... Intro -15
Table 6 : Capital Improvem ent Program Authorization Limits …………… Int ro-16
Treatment Plant Pro gram :
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………….. TP -1
Treatment Plant Projects:
Tab 1: Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety ……………………………...... TP -2
Tab 2: One -Time Renovation …………………………………………………….. TP -11
Tab 3: Recurring Renovation ……………………………………………………… TP -28
Collection System Pro gram :
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………....... CS -1
Collection System Projects:
Tab 1: Renovation …………………………………………………………………. CS -4
Tab 2: Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety ……………………………….. CS -24
Tab 3: Expansion …………………………………………………………………... CS -29
Tab 4: Pumping Stations ………………………………………………………….. CS -32
General Im provements Pro gram :
Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………… GI -1
General Improvements Projects:
Tab 1: Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition …………………………………….. GI -2
2015 -16 Equipment Budget
Tab 2: Management Information Systems ………………………………………. GI -3
I.T. Development Plan
Tab 3: Projects ……………………………………………………………………... GI -7
Tab 4: Asset Management Plan ………………………………………………….. GI -16
Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary
Recycled Water Pro gram :
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….. RW -1
Recycled Water Projects ………………………………………………………………. RW -2
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the CIB/CIP
AB Assembly Bill
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow
AFY Acre -feet per Year
A/N Aeration and Nitrification
ARB Air Resources Board
ArcSNAP Sewer Network Analysis Program
ASB Auxiliary Steam Boiler
AWWF Average Wet Weather Flow
B&G Buildings and Grounds
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
CAA Clean Air Act
CAD Contractual Assessment District
CAFR Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
CalOSHA California Occupational Health and Safety Administration
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CCCERA Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association
CCCSD Central Con tra Costa Sanitary District
CCTV Closed Circuit TV
CCWD Contra Costa Water District
CEC California Energy Commission
CECs Constituents of Emerging Concern
CIB Capital Improvement Budget
CIP Capital Improvement Plan – covers ten years
CIPP Cured in Place Pipe
CNWS Concord Naval Weapons Station
Co -Gen Cogeneration
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
COP Certificates of Participation
CS Collection System
CSO Collection System Operations
CSOD Collection System Operations Division
DAF Dissolved Air Flotation (tanks)
DI De -Ionized or Discrete Input
District Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
DP District Project
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances
DWR Department of Water Resources
EIR Environmental Impact Report
Elec Electrical
EOC Emergency Operations Center
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
FCD Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -1
Acronyms and Abbreviations in the CIB/CIP
Fund Sewer Construction Fund
FY Fiscal Year – July 1 through June 30
GDI Geographic Data Integration
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GI General Improvements Program
GIS Geographic Information Systems
GPS Global Positioning System
HOB Headquarters Office Building
HTE SunGard Program
HVAC Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IFCO Industrial Furnace Company
I/O Input and Output
IT Information Technology
LT Long Term
M1 Manhole 1
MCC Motor Control Center
MGD Million Gallons per Day
MHF Multiple Hearth Furnace
NACWA National Association of Clean Water Agencies (formerly AMSA)
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NFPA National Fire Protection Agency
O&M Operations & Maintenance
PE Primary Effluent
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
PG&E Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Ph Phase
POB Plant Operations Building
POD Plant Operation Division
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
PS Pumping Station
PTW Power Tools for Windows (software program)
RFP Request for Proposal
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RUE Residential Unit Equivalent
RW or ReW Recycled Water
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SCB Solids Conditioning Building
SCF Sewer Construction Fund
SSC Sewer Service Charge
SSMP Sewer System Master Plan
SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflow
TP Treatment Plant
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
v volt
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -2
SUMMARY
Ce n tral Co n tra Cos ta Sanitary Dist r ict (District) Ca p ital Impro veme nt Bud g et (C IB) shows
pla nn ed ex pendi t ures of $30,790 ,00 0 f or Fis c al Y ear (FY) 201 5-16 fr om the Se w er
Co nstructio n Fu nd for pla n nin g, desi g n, and constructio n o f c a pital projects in fo ur C I B
pro g ra ms. The t ot al proposed fu nding au t hor iz ation re q ui r ed f or projects i n t he C IB f or FY
20 15-16 is $51,775,000 , including new budgets and estimated carry -over from FY 201 4-15 .
Th e c a pital pro gram is desi g ned to me et t he follow ing g oals:
• Prot ect pu bl ic h eal t h a nd t he en vir on me nt,
• M aintain and replace ex isting assets,
• Embracing a policy of sustainability for the responsible use of existing
resources
• Res pon d to re g ulatory a nd commu nity concerns,
• Accommo da t e pl an n ed fut u re g ro wth.
By a dopting t he CI B , t he B oard of Di recto rs aut h or iz es st a ff t o p ursue w ork on sp ec if ically
id e nt ifie d p ro j ects in the T rea tme nt P l ant, Col l ec t ion Syst em , Gen er a l I m pro vem ent s , a nd
Rec y cled Water Pro g ra ms.
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
The projects included in the FY 2015 -16 CIB have been prioritized to ensure the best use
of available, approved funds. Each project was scored using a District -specific
prioritization scoring sheet by each program manager and supported by input from
project managers as well as staff from Engineering and Plant Operation and Maintenance
Departments . Each project was then assigned a priority ranking of Critical , Very High ,
High , or Medium depending on the project score.
The prioritization scoring and ranking system for all CIB projects in each of the four
programs use existing prioritization strategies, including guidelines from the Water
Environment Research Foundation (WERF), and prioritization procedure examples from
other agencies.
The prioritization scoring sheet inc ludes the following criteria separated into three
categories (Essential Commitments, Project Benefits, and Operational Reliability):
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -3
Criteria Max
Points
Essential Commitments
Complies with Regulatory Requirements and Mandates 20
Meets Commitment with Outside Agency or Existing Contract 20
Reduces Potential Health or Safety Hazards 20
Implements Board of Director’s Policy/Priority 10
Increases Capacity to Meet Projected Build -out 10
Project Benefits
Impacts Project Phasing or Implementation Schedule for Other
Projects 5
Optimizes Capital Expenditures 5
Reduces Operations and Maintenance Costs 5
Reduces Social Impacts 5
Increases Sustainable Use of Natural or Existing Resources 5
Reduces Environmental Impacts 5
Supports Timely Adoption of Technology Improvements 5
Operational Reliability
Consistent with Asset Management Policies 10
Improves Reliability and System Performance 10
Improves Facility -Wide Resiliency 5
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE 140
The prioritization scoring sheet includes sub -criteria and scoring guidelines for assisting
with the assigning of points for each criterion. For each sub -criterion, the prioritization
scoring sheet includes the applicability to triple -bottom -line considera tions (social,
environmental, financial) and applicability to the District’s Mission and Strategic goals.
To account for the variety of criteria used and that not all criteria are applicable to every
CIB program, each project is assigned one of the follow ing ranking categories
depending on the project’s score:
• Critical: Priority rank if score is 65 points or higher.
• Very High: Priority rank if score is 50 points or higher and less than 65 points.
• High: Priority rank if score is 25 points or higher and less than 50 points.
• Medium: Priority rank if score is less than 25 points .
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -4
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SYSTEM
The CIB i nclu d es detai led info rmat i on fo r pro j ects in t he first y ear o f t h e Ten-y ear Capital
Im pro vem ent Plan (CIP). B o ard a ut h or iz ations a re ma de to add fu nds to the fo ur pro g ra ms
pr i or to th e sta rt o f t he f iscal y ear.
Un d er t h e CIB syst em , b ud g ets a re au t hor iz ed f or p r oject w ork w ith i n t he fo ur b udg et
pro g ra ms. Bud g ets ar e est abl i sh e d by p ro g ram sin c e p reci s e c osts for indi v id u al pro j ects
are diff icult to estim ate w hen CIB pre parat i on ofte n p re c edes p roject initiation by a y ear or
m or e. Pro j ections of costs fo r br o ader c at eg or ies o f project w ork can m ore rel ia bly b e
mad e d ur i ng b ud g et pr eparat i on sin c e p ositive a n d neg ati v e v ar i ations in p ro j ect esti mates
are ex pec te d to bal a nce in a pro g ram summa tion.
Pro g ram auth or iz atio ns a re ex pec t ed t o exce ed a nn u al e x pe n ditur es d ur i ng a ny particular
b ud g et y ear since lar g er pla n ning studies, eng in e er i ng desig ns, and constructi o n c o ntracts
ty pica lly sp an m ore tha n one f iscal y ear a nd t he b ud g ets are aut h or iz ed in f ull a t t he
beg in n ing o f ea c h phase o f t he p roject s.
As s how n in Ta ble 1, by a dopting t h e FY 20 15-1 6 Ca pital Im pro vem ent B ud g et (C IB ), th e
Board au t hor iz es al l ocations fr om th e Se w er C onstructio n Fu n d f or pla n nin g, desi g n, a nd
constructio n o f c a pital projects in the fo ur pr og ra ms. As shown in Table 1, Column ”A”,
there is a p pro x imat e ly $11.6 milli on to be c ar r ied ov er from prev io u s B o ar d-au t hor ized-but -
un s pent p roject budg ets from FY 20 14-15. The tota l r eq ui r ed n ew Board au th or iz ation for
proje cts b eg in n ing in FY 2015 -16 as indicated in Table 1, Column “B” is $40.2 milli on .
Th e t ota l B oard au t hor iz ation f or proje c ts t h at are activ e in t he CIB in FY 2015-16 is t h e
sum of t hese tw o num bers, or $5 1.7 million as shown in Table 1, Column “C”. Th e
estimated FY 2 01 5-16 expe nditure to t al is $30.8 million (shown in Table 1 Column “D”),
le aving a n estimat ed $20.9 milli on in au t hor iz atio ns fo r proje c ts t h at c ar r y into futu re y ears.
The se fig ures wil l be a djus t ed w hen actu al FY 2014-15 expe ndit u res are k now n a nd actu al
FY 2015-16 carry ov er can b e determ in e d. At that ti m e, t he Board wi ll b e i nf or m ed of t he
corrected fig ures fo r t he fo ur pro g ra m s in the CIB.
Ta ble 2 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project list for
the treatment plant program. Table 3 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements
Program Budget/ Project list for the collection system program. Table 4 presents the FY
2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project list for the general improvements
program. Table 5 presents the FY 2015 -16 Capital Improvements Program Budget/ Project
list for the recycled water program.
Capital Pro j ect C ont ingen cy Spending
Tw o t y pes of c ontin ge ncy fu nding o f capi t al p rojects are pro v id ed fo r: p roject contin g ency
an d p ro g ram c ont in ge nc y . Tabl e 6 id ent if ies sta ff a ut h or i ty to a ppro ve fu nds f o r project
budg et o v er r uns.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -5
The pro g ram co n tin ge ncy fu nd is 10 % above the t ot a l Est imated Expenditures (n ew FY
2015 -16 projects or phases ) a mo unt ap pro v ed by th e B o ard w hen t he C apital Budg et is
a do pted , except for the Collection System Program which is a fixed $9 00,000 . Th ese
am ou nt s are se t aside in a se par a te ac count an d used for n ew p rojects tha t are n ot in th e
CIB , or to fund project budget overruns, and pay for urgent work or emergency work as
needed . A max im um o f $1 00 ,000 can b e alloc at ed by th e G e neral Ma nag er to a p roject
no t in t he CIB.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -6
Table 1: Ca p ital Imp rov ement Bud g et Summa ry for Fi s cal Yea r 2015-16
A B C D
Progr a m
Estimated Ca rr y-
O ver from Pr e vio us
FY
Es t imated Allo c ation
this FY (A ll P roj e cts
including
Contingency )
To t al Propos ed
Auth oriz a tion
Estimated FY
20 15 -16
Expendit ures
Tr eatme nt Pl a nt $ 3,684 ,000 $ 12,257,000 $15,941 ,0 00 $ 10,410 ,000
Collection Syst em $ 6,063 ,000 $ 24,350 ,000 $30,413 ,000 $ 15,950,000
Gen eral Im pro vem ents $ 1,54 0,000 $ 3,113,000 $ 4,653,0 00 $ 3,980 ,000
Recycled Wa t er $ 2 88 ,000 $ 48 0,000 $ 7 68 ,000 $ 450,000
To t al th is Fi sc al Ye ar $11,575 ,000 $40,200 ,000 $51,775,0 00 $ 30,790,000
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro - 7
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -8
TABLE 2: FY 15-16 CIB Treatment Plant Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/04/15 DRAFT
List of Active TP Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Priority Column1 Current
Phase Project Allocated to
date
Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 Future FY Page
Critical 7265 C TP Equipment Replacement $1,412,100 $1,107,400 $304,700 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 TP-27
Critical 7285 C Primary Treatment Renovation $14,947,000 $8,219,628 $6,727,372 $6,100,000 $567,500 $0 $0 TP-10
Critical 7292 D Switchgear Refurbishment - ph 2 $420,000 $119,280 $300,720 $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 TP-11
Critical 7297 P Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement $125,000 $964 $124,036 $25,000 $100,000 $0 $0 TP-12
Critical 7301 P Treatment Plant Planning $2,448,000 $1,994,863 $453,137 $350,000 $100,000 $0 $0 TP-1
Critical 7309 C DAF Tank Renovation $1,050,000 $130,292 $919,708 $918,500 $0 $0 $0 TP-13
Critical 7310 D Piping Renovations - phase 8 $250,000 $86,917 $163,083 $163,000 $0 $0 $0 TP-28
Critical 7310 C Piping Renovations - phase 8* $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 TP-28
Critical 7311 D TP Safety Enhancement Ph4 $100,000 $39,907 $60,093 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 TP-2
Critical 7311 C TP Safety Enhancement Ph4*$500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 TP-2
Critical 7312 P Ash Facility Improvements $40,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 TP-3
Critical 7316 C SBT Emergency Repairs $714,450 $27,006 $687,444 $662,444 $25,000 $0 $0 TP-14
Critical 7319 C Laboratory Upgrades & Repair $148,000 $0 $148,000 $144,000 $4,000 $0 $0 TP-29
Critical 7322 P Fire Protection System Ph2 $40,000 $0 $40,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 TP-4
Critical 7314 C Urgent Repairs $50,000 $0 $50,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 TP-30
Very H 7286 P Centrifuge & Cake Pumps $200,000 $0 $200,000 $30,000 $170,000 $0 $0 TP-15
Very H 7291 D Pump & Blower Bldg Seismic Upgrade $505,000 $357,409 $147,591 $75,000 $70,000 $0 $0 TP-16
Very H 7304 C Instr & Controls PLC Upgrade $235,000 $96,669 $138,331 $80,000 $57,000 $0 $0 TP-17
Very H 7315 P Zeolite Annamox Pilot Project $250,000 $1,671 $248,329 $100,000 $140,000 $0 $0 TP-5
Very H 7317 C Plant Control System Network Upgrades $80,000 $0 $80,000 $15,000 $65,000 $0 $0 TP-18
Very H 7320 P Plant Energy Optimization $90,000 $0 $90,000 $35,000 $55,000 $0 $0 TP-31
Subtotal:$25,104,550 $12,182,006 $12,922,544 $9,237,944 $3,683,500 $0 $0
List of projects in FY 2015-16 (Unallocated)A. Carryover = $3,684,000
Critical 7292 C Switchgear Refurbishment - ph 3 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $250,000 $650,000 TP-11
Critical 7297 D Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 TP-12
Critical 7301 P Treatment Plant Planning Ph2 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $350,000 $300,000 TP-1
Critical 7324 D Critical Switchgear $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $200,000 $0 TP-19
Critical 7319 C Laboratory Upgrades & Repair $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $150,000 $150,000 TP-29
Critical 7322 D Fire Protection System Ph2 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 TP-4
Critical 7326 C Equipment Replacement FY15-FY24 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $250,000 $1,900,000 TP-32
Critical 7343 P TP Master Plan $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $800,000 $0 TP-6
Critical 7327 P Headworks Screening $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 TP-20
Critical 7327 D Headworks Screening $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $500,000 $0 TP-20
Very H 7330 P Piping Renovation Phase 9 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 TP-33
Very H 7330 D Piping Renovation Phase 9 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 TP-33
Very H 7335 C TP Security $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $25,000 $300,000 TP-34
Very H 7286 D Centrifuge & Cake Pumps $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $0 TP-15
Estimated Expenditures
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro-8a
Very H 7291 C Pump & Blower Bldg Seismic Upgrade $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 TP-16
Very H 7304 C Instr & Controls PLC Upgrade $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 TP-17
Very H 7315 P Zeolite Annamox - Pilot Program $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 TP-5
Very H 7320 D Plant Energy Optimization $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 TP-31
Very H 7317 C Plant Control System Network Upgrades $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $300,000 TP-18
Very H 7339 P Plant Control System I/O Replacement $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 TP-21
High 7341 P WC / Grayson Creek Levee Rehab $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 TP-7
Critical 7327 C Headworks Sceening $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 TP-20
Critical 7322 C Fire Alarm $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 TP-4
Critical 7312 D Ash Facility Improvements $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $0 TP-3
Critical 7312 C Ash Facility Improvements $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 TP-3
Critical 7297 C Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement $8,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,400,000 TP-12
Very H 7330 C Piping Renovation Phase 9 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 TP-33
Very H 7286 C Centrifuge & Cake Pumps Furnace 1 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,000,000 TP-15
Very H 7286 C Centrifuge & Cake Pumps Furnace 2 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,000,000 TP-15
Very H 7320 C Plant Energy Optimization $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $800,000 TP-31
Very H 7339 D Plant Control System I/O Replacement $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $500,000 TP-21
Very H 7339 C Plant Control System I/O Replacement $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 TP-21
Very H 7333 P TP Safety Improv 2011-12 thru 2019-20 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 TP-8
Very H 7340 P TP Electrical Cable Repl - LT $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 TP-35
High 7332 P Electrical and Instr Repl $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 TP-36
High 7328 D Influent Pump 6 for third wetwell $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 TP-22
High 7331 P Plant Cyber Security $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 TP-23
High 7338 P Treatment Plant Soil Remediation $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $150,000 TP-9
High 7341 C WC / Grayson Creek Levee Rehab $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $400,000 TP-7
Medium 7334 P Coating Renovation $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $50,000 TP-38
Medium 7336 P Pavement Renovation $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 TP-39
Medium 7337 P Concrete Renovation $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 TP-40
Unranked 7323 P Aeration system improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 TP-24
Unranked 7325 P Disinfection System upgrades $1,585,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $1,585,000 TP-25
Unranked 7329 P MHF Burner upgrade $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $700,000 TP-26
B. Estimated Allocations for
FY 2015-16 TP Program:$11,645,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,115,000 $11,655,000
$611,500 $1,165,500
$10,410,000 $12,820,500
*Pending Award
Total Proposed Authorization
A+B+Contigency= C $15,941,000
Estimated FY
2015-16
Expenditures
D
Program Contigency 10%:
Estimated Expenditures by FY:
TABLE 3: FY 15-16 CIB Collection System Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/04/15 DRAFT
List of Active TP Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Priority Project
Number
Current
Phase Project Allocated to date Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 Future FY Page
Critical 5941 C PS Equipment Piping Replacement $640,000 $568,793 $71,207 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-29
Critical 5982 C Pipeburst Blanket Contract $828,000 $652,285 $175,715 $150,000 $22,200 $0 $0 CS-1
Critical 5999 C CIPP Blanket Contract $472,000 $113,619 $358,381 $100,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 CS-2
Critical 8404 C Laf Sewer Reno Ph8 $2,735,000 $2,426,698 $308,302 $300,000 $8,000 $0 $0 CS-3
Critical 8406 C Pump Station Safety Improvs $611,000 $166,769 $444,231 $442,000 $2,000 $0 $0 CS-30
Critical 8411 C N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph5 $3,020,000 $626,590 $2,393,410 $1,550,000 $0 $0 $843,000 CS-4
Critical 8412 D PH Grayson Creek*$1,250,000 $579,074 $670,926 $600,000 $70,000 $0 $0 CS-26
Critical 8413 C WC Sewer Reno Ph 10 $3,884,000 $805,818 $3,078,182 $3,073,180 $0 $0 $0 CS-5
Critical 8415 D Martinez Ph 4 Sewer Reno $823,000 $216,739 $606,261 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-6
Critical 8417 C Survey Monument Install $150,000 $98,259 $51,741 $50,000 $1,000 $0 $0 CS-7
Critical 8418 C Col System Modeling $350,000 $148,398 $201,602 $100,000 $1,600 $0 $0 CS-21
Critical 8419 P Collection System Planning $320,000 $100,315 $219,685 $200,000 $19,000 $0 $0 CS-22
Critical 8421 D Laf Sewer Reno Ph9*$650,000 $283,081 $366,919 $366,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-8
Critical 8421 C Laf Sewer Reno Ph9*$2,504,200 $0 $2,504,200 $500,000 $2,004,200 $0 $0 CS-8
Critical 8422 P WC Sewer Reno Ph 11*$100,000 $88,342 $11,658 $61,658 $0 $0 $0 CS-9
Critical 8423 P N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6*$150,000 $92,333 $57,667 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-10
Critical 8424 D M1 Rehab $250,000 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-11
Critical 8424 C M1 Rehab $2,526,000 $0 $2,526,000 $250,000 $2,276,000 $0 $0 CS-11
Critical 8425 C Cathodic Protection Ph 1 $559,000 $0 $559,000 $550,000 $9,000 $0 $0 CS-12
Critical 8426 P Laf Reno Ph 10*$205,000 $0 $205,000 $210,000 $45,000 $0 $0 CS-13
Critical 8427 P Arc Flash Study $100,000 $0 $100,000 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 CS-31
Critical 8434 C Urgent Projects**$300,000 $0 $300,000 $25,000 $270,000 $0 $0 CS-14
Very H 5991 P PH Sewer Renovation Ph2 $200,000 $133,017 $66,983 $1,000 $66,000 $0 $0 CS-15
Very H 5993 P Forcemain assessment $127,000 $96,535 $30,465 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-23
High 5962 P Mahole Remot Monitor $325,500 $131,963 $193,537 $5,357 $1,000 $0 $0 CS-24
NA 8402 na CADS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CS-27
NA 8420 na Development Sewerage $1,720,000 $1,019,942 $700,058 $820,000 $0 $0 $0 CS-28
Subtotal:$24,799,700 $8,348,570 $16,451,130 $10,388,195 $4,950,000 $125,000 $843,000
Estimated Expenditures
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro-9
List of projects in FY 2015-16 (Unallocated)
Critical 5941 C PS Equipment Piping Replacement $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 CS-29
Critical 8412 C PH Grayson Creek*$9,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,050,000 $6,400,000 $0 CS-26
Critical 8415 C Martinez Ph 4 Sewer Reno $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 $0 $0 CS-6
Critical 8417 C Survey Monument Install FY15-FY16 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $0 CS-7
Critical 8418 C Col System Modeling $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $200,000 $0 CS-21
Critical 8419 P Collection System Planning $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $200,000 $700,000 CS-22
Critical 8423 D N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 CS-10
Critical 8423 C N. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 CS-10
Critical 8426 D Laf Reno Ph 10*$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 CS-13
Critical 8426 C Laf Reno Ph 10*$3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 CS-13
Critical 8435 P WC Sewer Reno Ph 12*$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 CS-16
Critical 5982 C Pipe Bursting Blanket FY15-FY18 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $200,000 $250,000 CS-1
Critical 8431 P Collection System Master Plan $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $0 CS-25
Critical 8430 P Laf Sewer Reno Ph 11 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 CS-17
Very H 8436 P Moraga/ Crossroads PS Project $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 CS-32
Very H 8429 P Fairvew Maltby $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $120,000 $400,000 CS-33
Medium 8437 P Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 CS-18
NA 8420 na Development Sewerage $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 CS-28
NA 8402 na CADS $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $1,100,000 CS-27
Critical 8422 D WC Sewer Reno Ph 11*$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 CS-17
Critical 8422 C WC Sewer Reno Ph 11*$3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 CS-17
Critical 8435 D WC Sewer Reno Ph12*$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 CS-16
Critical 8435 C WC Sewer Reno Ph12*$3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 CS-16
Critical 8433 P S. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6*$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 CS-19
Critical 8433 D S. Orinda Sewer Reno Ph6*$3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 CS-19
Critical 8430 D Lafayette Sewer Ph 11*$350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 CS-17
Critical 8430 C Lafayette Sewer Ph 11*$3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 CS-17
Very H 5991 D PH Sewer Renovation Ph2 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 CS-15
Very H 5991 C PH Sewer Renovation Ph2 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 CS-15
Very H 8436 C Moraga/ Crossroads PS Project $940,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $440,000
Medium 8437 D Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 CS-18
Medium 8437 C Martinez Ph 5 Sewer Reno $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 CS-18
Medium 8438 P Cathodic Protection Systems Ph2 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 CS-20
NA 8420 na Development Sewerage $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $700,000 CS-28
NA 8432 C Misc Pump Stations $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $1,150,000 CS-34
B. Estimated Allocations for FY
2015-16 CS Program:$23,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,100,000 $17,100,000
$900,000 $900,000
$15,950,000 $18,125,000
* Riverwatch
Total Proposed Authorization
A+B+Contigency =C $30,413,000
Estimated FY
2015-16
Expenditures
D
Fixed Program Contigency:
Estimated Expenditures by FY:
A. Carry-over (~$6,063,000)
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro-9a
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro-10
TABLE 4: FY 15-16 CIB General Improvements Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/04/15 DRAFT
List of Active General Improvements Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Priority Project
Number
Current
Phase Project Allocated to
date Prior FY(s)Remaining
Budget FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 Future FY Page
Critical 8227 D GDI Treatment Plant $265,000 $222,442 $42,558 $0 $0 $42,500 $0 GI-2
Critical 8232 D GDI SMMS Replacement $852,000 $444,919 $407,081 $136,000 $271,000 $0 $0 GI-3
Critical 8236 P District Easements $140,000 $58,894 $81,106 $70,000 $11,000 $0 $0 GI-6
Critical 8237 C Buffer and Rental Improvements*$240,000 $27,048 $212,952 $0 $212,000 $0 $0 GI-7
Critical 8238 P Asset Management $700,000 $0 $700,000 $600,000 $100,000 $0 $0 GI-15
Critical 8239 C POD Office Improv*$330,000 $0 $330,000 $90,000 $240,000 $0 $0 GI-8
Critical 8240 C IT Development $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $700,000 $300,000 $0 $0 GI-4
Critical 8242 C CMMS Replacement $198,000 $0 $198,000 $50,000 $148,000 $0 $0 GI-5
Critical 8243 P Server Room Relocation $100,000 $0 $100,000 $57,000 $43,000 $0 $0 GI-9
Very H 8515 C Equip and Vehicles $617,200 $0 $617,200 $617,200 $0 $0 $0 GI-1
Very H 8207 P General Security and Access $60,000 $47,616 $12,384 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 GI-10
Very H 8233 C CSOD Facility Improvements $200,000 $161,103 $38,897 $20,000 $13,000 $5,500 $0 GI-11
Very H 8234 C HOB Improvements $334,000 $236,244 $97,756 $60,000 $10,000 $27,500 $0 GI-12
NA 8226 C Seismic HOB $5,941,000 $5,847,587 $93,413 $92,000 $1,000 $0 $0 GI-13
NA 8230 P Capital Legal Services $210,000 $79,285 $130,715 $30,000 $33,000 $67,500 $0 GI-14
Subtotal:$11,187,200 $7,125,138 $4,062,062 $2,522,200 $1,382,000 $155,000 $0
List of Projects in FY 2015-16 (Unallocated)
Critical 8236 P District Easements $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 GI-6
Critical 8238 P Asset Management $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 GI-15
Critical 8240 C IT Development $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 GI-4
Critical 8242 C CMMS Replacement $477,000 $0 $0 $0 $360,000 $117,000 $0 GI-5
CritIcal 8243 D Server Room Relocation $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 GI-9
Very H 8516 C Equip and Vehicles FY15-16 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 GI-1
Very H 8234 C HOB Improvements $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 GI-12
Very H 8233 C CSOD Facility Improvments $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,000 $50,000 GI-11
Very H 8207 P General Security and Access $38,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,000 $100,000 GI-10
Critical 8227 D GDI TP 16-17 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $40,000 GI-2
Critical 8236 P District Easements 16-17 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 GI-6
Critical 8238 P Asset Management 16-17 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 $600,000 GI-15
Critical 8240 C IT Development 16-17 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 GI-4
Critical 8243 C Server Room Relocation $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 GI-9
Very H 8516 C Equip and Vehicles 16-17 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 GI-1
B. Estimated Allocations for
FY 2015-16 GI Program:$2,877,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,362,000 $4,186,000
$236,000 $419,000
3,980,000 $ 4,605,000 $
Total Proposed Authorization
A+B+Contingency = C $4,653,000 Estimated FY
2015-16
Expenditures
D
Estimated Expenditures
Program Contigency 10 %:
Estimated Expenditures by FY:
A. Carry Over (~$1,540,000)
TABLE 5: FY 15-16 CIB Recycled Water Program Budget/ Project List
Date: 05/04/15 DRAFT
List of Active Rew Projects (Budget allocated and tracked in Sunguard)
Priority Project
Number
Current
Phase Project Allocated to date Prior FY(s)
Spent
Remaining
Budget FY14/15 FY15/16 FY16/17 Future FY Page
Critical 7299 C Concord Landscape $3,915,000 $3,697,629 $217,371 $130,000 $87,000 $0 $0 RW-1
Very H 7279 P Concord Naval Weapons REW $280,000 $264,855 $15,145 $1,100 $0 $5,000 $0 RW-2
Very H 7300 P Refinery REW $385,000 $283,727 $101,273 $50,000 $4,000 $47,500 $0 RW-3
Very H 7306 D Zone 1 Recycled Water $145,000 $35,061 $109,939 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 RW-4
Very H 7306 C Zone 1 Recycled Water $75,000 $0 $75,000 $0 $29,000 $46,000 $0 RW-4
Subtotal:$4,800,000 $4,281,272 $518,728 $231,100 $120,000 $98,500 $0
List of Projects in FY 2015-16 (Unallocated)
Critical 7344 P Recycled Water Planning $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $150,000 $0 RW-5
Critical 7345 P Filter Plant $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 RW-6
Critical 7344 C Filter Plant 16-17 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $50,000 RW-6
Critical 7346 P Surge Analysis 16-17 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 RW-7
B. Estimated Allocations for FY
2015-16 Rew Program:$450,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $365,000
$30,000 $36,500
$450,000 $500,000
Total Proposed Authorization
A+B+Contigency = C $768,000
Estimated FY
2015-16
Expenditures
D
Estimated Expenditures
Program Contigency 10%
Estimated FY Expenditures:
A. Carry Over ~$288,000
2015-16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -11
MA JOR PR OJE CT EMPHASIS
Althou gh th e CIB is ma de u p of fu nding estim at es fo r m any indi v id u al projects, eac h y ear
th ere are s ev eral maj o r projects w hich t og et h er acco u nt fo r a maj or i ty of tot al estimat e d
capital ex penditure s. I n FY 20 15 -16 the emphasis wil l be on 12 l ar g e p roject s , w hich
tog et h er accou nt fo r $19,48 6,000 or 63% o f t he t ot al estimat e d exp endi t ures. Estimat e d
FY 2015 -16 ex pe n ditu res f or each of t he s e projects a re noted be l ow.
1. Primary Tr e atment R eno v ation
FY 20 15 -16: $560 ,0 00 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $1 4,947,0 00
Estimated completion date: Oct. 2015
T his pr oject wil l r eno v ate o r re place the w at e r a nd air sup ply p ip elines a t t he pr im ary
sedi m en t ation tanks. Th e gri t ha n dl i ng facil ity wil l be re nov at e d, an d t h e sc um
collec tion s ystem wil l be re nov at e d w ith n ew scum s pr ay s, n ew hel i cal scum s kim m ers
and dr iv es, and sta inless ste el s cum h op p ers f or Ta n ks 1 a nd 2. T he scum thi c kening
unit in th e Sol i ds Co n ditio n ing Bu il ding wil l also be re pla ced. Ot h er p r imary ta nk
im pro vem ents include in stall ati o n o f n ew b af fl es, r e placing c hain dr iv es, slu dge fli ght
dr ive shaf ts an d bear ing s, c o nc r ete rep ai rs , up g rading ha nd r ai l in g s, constructing a
n ew le v el control structure, an d t h e o dor co ntrol s ystem wil l be ev alu at ed and m od ifie d
as neces s ar y . Refurbis hmen t o f Pr im ary Ef flu ent (P E) P ump 1 a nd P E Pum p 2 a re
inc luded in t he project.
2. Co mprehensive Wastewater Master Plan
FY 20 15 -16: $2,6 0 0,0 00 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $4,700 ,0 00
Estimated completion date: June 2017
T his project wil l develop a comprehensive master plan for the wastewater treatment
plant and collection system for development of the Capital Improvements Plan and
budgets, including condition assessments, collection system dynamic model, filter
plant, in coordination with asset management.
3. M1 Rehabilitation Project
FY 20 15 -16: $2,276 ,0 00 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $2,776 ,0 00
Estimated completion date: Nov. 2015
T his project wil l r eno v ate a ppro x imat e ly 3,0 00 feet of the M 1transmission line, a 4 2”
diamet e r r ei nfo rced conc r ete pip el i ne lo cat ed o n t he tr eatmen t p l ant si t e.
4. Lafayette Sewer Renovations – Ph a se 9
FY 2 01 5-16: $2,10 0,0 00 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $3,154 ,200
Estimated completion date: Jan. 2016
T his project wil l r eplac e /re ha bi l itate ap pro xim at e ly 8,500 fe et of six- and fifth teen -inch
sew ers i n the Lafayette a rea.
5. M artinez S ewe r Ren ova tions – Ph a se 4
FY 2 01 5-16: $3,100 ,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $3,923,000
Estimated completion date: May 2016
T his project wil l r eplace o r reh abi l ita t e up to 8,0 00 lineal fe et of six and ei ght- inch
sew er mains lo c at e d in the City of Martine z.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -12
6. Information Te c hnol ogy Dev elopment
FY 2015-16: $1,30 0,0 00 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $9,70 0,000
Estimated completion date: July 2024
T his project pro v id es fu nding f or the Dist r ict’s co m pu t er a n d t elec om m uni c ation
techn olo gy n eeds and implementation of the IT Master Plan.
7. Pl ea sant Hill – Gray son Creek Trunk
FY 2015 -16: $3,1 00 ,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $10 ,7 00 ,00 0
Estimated completion date: Jan . 201 7
Th e rec om mende d pro ject in v ol v es inst alli ng a ppro x ima t ely 12,000 fe et of 15-, 18-,
a nd 24 -inch reli e f se w ers a n d div erting the sew age aw ay f rom t h e def ic ie nt sew ers and
for future renovation needs.
8. Piping Renovations - Phase 8
FY 2 01 5-16: $1,5 0 0,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $1,750,000
Estimated completion date: Ma y 2016
This project will improve the process reliability of the treatment plant by renovating
and/or replacing various piping, instrumentation and equipment that has been
identified by engineering, operations and maintenance staff.
9. Pump and Blower Seismic Upgrades
FY 2 01 5-16: $1,20 0,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $5,6 00 ,000
Estimated completion date: June 2017
This project is part of the District’s Seismic improvement plan created in 2009 based
on t he Treatment Plant Seismic Vulnerability Assessment. The project will retrofit the
Pump and Blower Building to be in line with current seismic design standards.
10. A sset M anag e ment Program De v elopment
FY 2 01 5-16: $6 0 0,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $2,700 ,000
Estimated completion date: June 2018
Th e Dist r ict is developing a com pre he nsiv e asset managem ent pro g ram t hat aims to
optimize the lifecycle of all assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a
sustainable manner for customers with an acceptable level of risk. Implementation will
occur over the next three years and will include such tasks as standardizing and
completing the asset register, drafting to consolidate treatment plant As -Built ,
consolidating CCTV databases, and updating the asset management plan. Specialty
tasks utilizing outside assistance include utility locating, developing the reliab ility
centered maintenance program, conducting condition assessment of critical treatment
plant piping, integrating failure -based maintenance strategies, developing program
management standards or software/tools, and reviewing the updated asset
management plan.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -13
11. De v elopment Sew er a ge
FY 2 01 5-16: $7 0 0,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $3,4 81 ,000
Estimated completion date: June 2018
T his project pro v id es fo r a ppr opr i ate ca pi t al i zation of Dist r ict f or c e a ccount labor an d
ot h er ex pen s es fo r pl a nnin g , desi g n, an d c onstruction of dev elo per-instal l ed an d
contribu t ed mai n s ew er faci l ities.
12. Vehic l e & Equip m ent Ac quisition
FY 2 01 5-16: $450,000 Estimated to t al pro je ct co s t: $500,000
Estimated completion date: July 2016
T his project pro v id es fu nding a nd c apital iz ation o f t h e D istr ict’s a nn ual purchase o f
v ehic les a nd m ajor eq uipment.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -14
AUTHORI Z ATION LIMITS
Un d er t h e esta bl ish ed CIB s yst em , t he Dist ric t Boa r d o f D i rectors a n d st a ff hav e w el l-
defin ed a ut h or i ty limits. The Board of Di r ec t ors a ut hor iz es funds f or t he fo ur CIB pro g ra ms
(Tr ea tme nt Pla n t, C ol l ection Syst em , G ene r al Impro veme nts, a nd Recy cled W at er) from
the Se w er Constructi o n F u nd at t he beg in n ing o f each fiscal y ear. T h e Ca p ital
Im pro vem ent P ro g ram Au t hor iz ation L imits a re de t ai l ed in Ta ble 6, w hich f ollows.
Once t he C I B is a ppr ov ed by the B o ard, the Ge neral M a na g er has t he a ut h or i ty to
al l ocate funds t o t h e i n di v id u al projects c o nt ai ned i n t h e CIB up to th e to t al pro g ram
bud g et. I f a p ro j ect is not inc l ud e d in t he C IB , t he Ge neral Ma nag er can al l ocate
contin g ency funds u p t o $1 00 ,00 0 . I f a n indi v id u al e q ui pme nt it em is n ot i nclu ded in th e
CIB, t h e G e neral M an ag er can all oc a te fun ds up to $50 ,000 per i tem. T he Ge neral
M ana g er can al locate fu nds fr om p ro g ram ac counts to cov er project b ud g et ov er r uns, up
to 1 5% o f t he fin al p roject b udg et esta bl ish ed a t t h e t ime of t he co nstruction con tract
aw ard, w ith a max im um o f $1,00 0,0 00 per p r ojec t . Fi n al ly , t h e Gen eral Ma nag er m ay
aw ard c onstructio n c o ntracts less tha n $100,000 and auth or iz e c on sultant ag ree m ents
less t ha n $10 0,00 0.
Th e B oard of Di recto rs a lso has a n ong oing role a fter it a pp rov es t h e CIB a nd the CIP.
Spec if ic B oard ap pro v al is re q ui r ed f or aw ard of constructio n c o ntr a cts o v er $10 0,0 00, f o r
cons ulta n t a g re eme nts o v er $1 00 ,000 and fo r project ov er r uns in excess of 1 5% o f t he
fi nal pro ject b ud g et or o v er $1,00 0,00 0 pe r projec t. In additi o n, a ny all ocation t o a new
p roject n ot incl ude d in t he CIB th at e xceeds $1 00 ,000 must be a ut h or iz ed b y t h e Board.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -15
Table 6: Capital Imp rov ement Program Auth oriz a tion Limits
Ac tion
Ge ner a l M anag er Board of
Dir e ct o rs
A pprove Capital P lan None No limit
A utho r ize Capital P rogram budgets None No limit
A llocate funds to individual proje ct budgets Total pr ogram budget plus
contingency 1
No B oard autho r ization
required
A utho r ize
Consultant
Cont racts
P rofessional Co n sulting Ser vices $100,000 or less Greater than $100,000
Technical Consulting Services. $100,000 or less Greater than $100,000
P rofessional E ng. Services. $100,000 or less Greater than $100,000
A llocate funds fr om pr ogram cont i ngency accounts to
pr ojects not included in the CIB
$100,000 or less per
pr ojec t 2 Greater than $100,000
Individual equipment items and e quipment contingency in
the E quipment B udget
Up to amount specified in
E quipment B udget
including contingen cy
A bove amount specifi ed in
E quipment B udget
including continge n cy
Individual equipment items not in the E quipment B udget $50,000 or less Greater than $50,000
A utho r ize supplemental funds to pr ogram budgets/
contingency accounts Not applicable S ewer Construction F und
balance
A llocate funds for pr oject budget overru ns after awa rd of
construction contract
15% of final pr oject
budget 1,2,3 or up to a
maximum of $1,000,000
per proje ct , whichever is
less
Greater than 15% of final
pr oject budget 3 or above
$1,000,000 per proje ct
A ward construction contrac ts 4 $100,000 or less Greater than $100,000
A utho r ize
construction
change orders
A dditive $100,000 or less Greater than $100,000
Deductive No limit No B oard autho r ization
required
S ubcontractor substitutions A ll substi tutions unless
pr otested by s ubcontractor
S ubstitutions protested by
subcon t ractor
Const r uction pr oject acceptance A ll projects
Info r mational
announcement to the
B oard
Close out pr oject A ll projects Memo provided to the
B oard at end of FY
1 Limi ted by t he re maini ng balanc es of the ap pl icable program and co ntingency acc ou nt 2 Limi ted by the re maining balance of the ap pl icable program contingency ac cou nt
3 Fin al pro j ect budget is es tablished at time of award of co ns truct i on co n tract
4 Bid protests and rejection of all bids must go to Board regardless of dollar amount
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget Intro -16
T REATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
T his s ection inclu des d et ail ed inform ati on fo r t he T re a tme nt Pla nt Prog ra m for the FY
2015 -16 . D et ail ed p roje c t i nfo rmat i on, sche d ules, a nd cash fl ow tables are pres e nt e d
in i n di v id u al p roject s heet s.
OVERV IEW
The T rea tm ent Pla nt P ro g ram co nt i nues w ith asset preser v ation, fut ure r eg ulatory
com pl ia nce, m ajor re nov ation an d one-tim e im pro vem ents, an d s eism ic
stre ngth enin g.
Re gu lat ory Co mpl ia n ce/P la nn i ng /S afety (T ab 1)
T his s ubpro gram incl u des p ro j ects that emphasiz e p repar i ng f or futu re re g ulatio ns
and tre atmen t pl a nt pla nni ng , w hich includes pil ot te sting v ar i ous n ew te c hnolo g ies
and developing the Treatment Plant Master Plan. Wo rk wi ll b e don e t o comply with
new air permit ting re q ui rem ents an d insta ll incin er at o r e m iss i ons improvemen ts. A
long te rm p roj e ct to id ent ify an d r emov e a ny haz ardous ma t er i als at t he T re a tme nt
Pla n t wil l c o ntin u e. I n a dditi on , the Wastewater treatment Master Planning effort will
be started this fiscal year and continue for a total of approximately two years. Safe ty
a nd secur i ty im pro vemen ts wil l continu e under this subprogram .
One-T ime Re no vation (T ab 2)
T his s ubpro gram incl u des two hi g h expend itu re p ro jects. The lar g est proje c t is t h e
completion of the Pr im ary T rea tme nt R e no v ation Pro ject, a t wo-y ear eff o rt t h at has
been r eno v ating th e prim ary f acil ities. Th e s ec ond project, Seismic Up g ra d es f or t he
Pum p a nd Blo w er B uil din g , wil l r etro f it the Pu m p a nd Blo w er Bui l ding to c ur r ent
des ig n stan d ards. Projects commencing to predesign level are the Critical
Switchgear, Wet and Dry Scrubber, Centrifuge replacement, and the Headwork s
Screening project s .
R ec u rri ng Re no vation (T ab 3)
Projects in th is s u bpr og ram a re t ar g et ed at asset p re s er v ation. The m ain p roject in
t his pro g ram is t h e Pip i ng Reno v ations Project -P hase 8, which will improve the
process reliability of the treatment plant by renovating and/or replacing various
piping, instrumentation and equipment. Ot her proje c ts inclu d e Pla nt Ener gy
Opti miz ation, U rg ent R e pai rs, L abora t ory Repai rs a nd Up g rade s , and Pla nt Electr ical
an d Instr um en ta tion.
Expan si on (T ab 4)
Th ere a re no p rojects in t h e E x pansi o n p ro gr am in FY 2015-16.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget TP -1
TP-2
Project Name Project No.7301
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 85
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Planning 1-11/12 4-21/22 $1,994,863 $350,000 $250,000 $350,000 $300,000 $3,244,863
Design --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total --$1,994,863 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $300,000 $3,344,863
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Treatment Plant Planning
Treatment Plant Planning
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Dan Frost
Purpose:To fund ongoing feasibility and planning studies needed to address regulatory initiatives to
maintain permit compliance and optimizations to improve the reliability and performance of
existing treatment plant processes and facilities.
History:As wastewater regulations continue to develop and as new wastewater treatment technologies
becomes available, process modifications may be required in the Treatment Plant. This project
included the Suisun Bay modeling results, Facility Plan & Site Characterization Report and
associated studies submitted to satisfy the District's NPDES permit.
Description:This project will include the District's efforts to support the BACWA Regional Optimization and
Upgrade Study that is being implemented to satisfy the 2014 Nutrient Watershed Permit,
evaluation of treatment plant process modifications and optimizations, and other treatment plant
planning related studies.
TP-3
Project Name Project No.7311
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Planning $39,907 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,907
Design $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $39,907 $150,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $689,907
History:
Description:
Treatment Plant Safety Enhancements Phase 4
Purpose:
Treatment Plant Safety Enhancements Phase 4
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Brad Leidecker
Engineering/Capital Projects
To enhance plant safety through identification of safety concerns, repairs and capital
improvements.
The District and the treatment plant have very pro-active safety programs that are administered
by separate committees. These committees are responsible for addressing safety concerns as
identified by the craftsmen, or to respond to the ever- changing regulatory requirements. Often
this response will require construction of a capital project. The first three phases of this program
addressed various safety repairs and improvements.
This project is currently being bid in FY2014-15 and is scheduled for construction in early
FY2015. The project will include a hazardous waste facility improvements and other safety
related items. In addition, the project will be coordinated with safety improvements identified in
the general improvements program, the costs will be assigned to its perspective program.
TP-4
Project Name Project No.7312
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $0 $280,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
FY Total $0 $0 $40,000 $280,000 $1,000,000 $1,320,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Ash Facility Improvements
Ash Facility Improvements
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Craig Mizutani
Solids Conditioning Building
Purpose:This project will improve ash containment within the Solids Conditioning Building (SCB).
History:The ash system collects the ash at the bottom of the furnaces and conveys it to storage bins
located on the third floor northwest corner of the SCB. A vacuum method is used to transmit the
ash through the SCB where it is collected by filters and storage cyclones prior to disposal. The
filter and storage location is not isolated from other processes within the SCB, so ash may on
occasion spreads through the building, resulting in potentially expensive and difficult
housecleaning.
Description:This project will make improvements to limit the amount of ash dispersed within the SCB and
contain the storage area.
TP-5
Project Name Project No.7322
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000
Planning $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Design $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000
FY Total $0 $20,000 $220,000 $600,000 $0 $840,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Fire Alarm
Fire Alarm
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/ Planning/ Safety
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:To repair, upgrade, or replace the main treatment plant fire alarm system.
History:The majority of the fire alarm system was built in the late 1970's and the control panel was
upgraded in the early 2000's. However, the wiring and devices on the system continue to be
problematic and is in constant need of repair. Repairs to the system has become extremely
complex and difficult, a long term fix is needed.
Description:At this stage, staff will evaluate the existing system and provide recommendations for full
replacement in compliance with the authority having jurisdiction, the local fire department. The
construction budget will be revised during the design stage, if needed.
TP-6
Project Name Project No.7315
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Engineering/Planning and Development Services Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $140,000
Planning 3-13/14 4-22/23 $1,671 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,401,671
Design --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total --$1,671 $100,000 $240,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,541,671
Applied Research & Innovations
Applied Research & Innovations
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Dan Frost
Purpose:To fund applied research and development of key technologies, processes, and innovations.
History:In 2013, the District completed a Nutrient Visioning Plan: Cutting-Edge Nitrogen Removal
Technology Review that identified the zeolite anammox process and four other processes as
preferred cutting-edge nutrient removal technologies recommended for further consideration and
piloting.
Description:This project includes piloting of technologies, processes, and innovations (such as the zeolite-
anammox process or other processes) that have the potential to reduce the District's long-term
capital improvement and operations and maintenance costs, address future regulatory
requirements, and that also supports the District's goal to embrace innovation and to be a leader
in the wastewater industry.
Currently, the District is piloting Phase 1 of the zeolite-anammox process to demonstrate proof of
treatment concept. If the results of Phase 1 are promising, the District may decide to proceed
with Phase 2 of the pilot project. Phase 2, if implemented, would include a larger scale pilot that
would be used to demonstrate process and site-specific viability, generate design criteria, confirm
nutrient removal performance, and estimate capital and operating costs if the zeolite-anammox
process were to be implemented full-scale. Other pilot tests such as screenings, sludge
screenings, or disinfection new technologies, centrifuges, and other treatment process
technologies may be contemplated and initiated under this project.
Treatment Plant
TP-7
Project Name Project No.7343
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 85
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning 1-15/16 4-16/17 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $800,000 $0 $2,200,000
Design --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction --$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total --$0 $0 $1,400,000 $800,000 $0 $2,200,000
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
TP Master Plan
TP Master Plan
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Dan Frost
Purpose:To develop a comprehensive wastewater master plan that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District's wastewater treatment plant.
History:The 2011 Plant of the Future visioning exercises completed as part of District Project 7287 –
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update included recommendations for completing a comprehensive
master plan to determine the needs and direction of the District. While the District has performed
a number of planning and research studies/reports, the last comprehensive treatment plant
master plan was completed in 1987.
Description:The TP Master Plan is one component of the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan. A key
deliverable of the TP Master Plan will be a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the next 20-year
planning horizon that provides the descriptions, rationale and estimated costs for the District’s
treatment plant capital improvement projects and on-going programs in order to address aging
infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, accommodate planned
growth, optimize energy use, and implement the District’s vision for a “plant of the future” that is
consistent with the District's Strategic Plan.
TP-8
Project Name Project No.7341
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 40
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover:$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning 1-15/16 2-15/16 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Design 2-15/16 4-15/16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction 1-16/17 4-17/18 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000
FY Total $0 $0 $15,000 $200,000 $400,000 $615,000
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Walnut Creek/Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation
Walnut Creek/Grayson Creek Levee Rehabilitation
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Dan Frost
Purpose:To reduce the risk of flood damage to the treatment plant through a collaborative project led by
the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FCD).
History:The treatment plant site is bordered by Walnut and Grayson Creeks with levees that were built by
the FCD and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and currently owned and maintained by the
FCD. Overtopping of the levees could disable the treatment plant and result in significant facility
damages, significantly impact the environment due to discharge of untreated sewage, and impair
the local economy. In 2007, the FCD implemented an interim flood control measure to desilt the
lower Walnut Creek channel and raise the western levees of Walnut and Grayson Creeks. Based
on recent modeling, the levees currently provide protection from a 30-year storm. The current
flood protection standard by the California Department of Water Resources is to provide
protection against a 200-year water surface with 3 feet of freeboard and to consider the potential
for sea level rise and climate change.
Description:Due to the layout of treatment facilities as well as the critical nature of them, this project will
maximize the treatment plant’s flood protection level for a 500-year water surface with 3 feet of
freeboard. The FCD will be the lead agency on this project and the District will provide support as
needed for design review and construction coordination.
The FCD and the District have agreed to equally share the estimated project cost of $2.2M. The
FCD is pursuing grant funding for the project to reduce the costs to the FCD and the District. The
District anticipates accepting and storing soil on District buffer property that can be used as levee
material in order to provide in-kind contributions of approximately $0.5M. The District will
continue to evaluate in-kind financial contributions.
TP-9
Project Name Project No.7333
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 60
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $100,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $700,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $1,050,000 $1,100,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements 2016-2026
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements 2016-2026
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Craig Mizutani
Entire treatment plant
Purpose:This project will provide funding for safety projects.
History:The District and the treatment plant have very pro-active safety programs that are administered
by separate committees. These committees are responsible for addressing safety concerns as
identified by the craftsmen, or to respond to the ever- changing regulatory requirements. Often
this response will require construction of a capital project.
Description:Install safety improvements for the treatment plant identified through District safety programs.
TP-10
Project Name Project No.7338
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 35
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $150,000 $200,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $150,000 $200,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation
Treatment Plant Soil Remediation
Treatment Plant Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Craig Mizutani
Treatment Plant area northeast of existing aeration tanks.
Purpose:Relocate or remove and dispose of the contaminated soil in the area northeast of existing
aeration tanks.
History:In the 1960s, spoils from the Shell Refinery were brought onto the plant site. The spoils were
contaminated with organic sludge, lead, sulfate dirt, tars and other contaminants. Approximately
150,000 cubic yards of the contaminated soil is located in the surcharge area. In order to site any
new facilities in this area, the contaminated soil needs to be relocated on site or removed and
disposed of at an appropriate class landfill. A separate project is characterizing and developing
alternatives for relocation or removal of the contaminated soil.
Description:Refine the alternatives, select the appropriate method and relocate or remove and dispose of the
contaminated soils located northeast of the existing aeration tanks.
TP-11
Project Name Project No.7285
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 90
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover -$0 $567,500 $0 $0 $567,500
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction -$6,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,100,000
FY Total $8,219,628 $6,100,000 $567,500 $0 $0 $14,887,128
Purpose:This project will improve the reliability of the Primary Treatment area of the plant.
History:Two of the four primary sedimentation tanks were constructed in the mid-1960s and the other
two tanks were constructed in the mid-1970s as part of the 5A expansion project. Some
components are corroding and nearing the end of their service life.
Description:Renovate or replace the spray water and air supply pipelines at the primary sedimentation tanks.
The primary scum collection system will be renovated with new scum sprays, new helical scum
skimmers and drives, and a stainless steel scum hopper for Tanks 1 and 2. The scum thickening
unit in the Solids Conditioning Building will also be replaced. Other primary tank improvements
include installation of new baffles, replacing chain drives, sludge flight drive shafts and bearings,
concrete repairs, upgrading hand railings, replacing the primary level control valve, replacing the
primary MCCs and PLC panels, and installing new grit washing equipment. Refurbishment of
Primary Effluent (PE) Pump 1 and PE Pump 2 are included in the project. This project is currently
under construction and is anticipated to be completed in FY 2015-16.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Primary Treatment Renovation
Primary Treatment Renovation
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Jason DeGroot
TP-12
Project Name Project No.7292
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $119,280 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $169,280
Construction $0 $0 $100,000 $250,000 $650,000 $1,000,000
FY Total $119,280 $50,000 $350,000 $250,000 $650,000 $1,419,280
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Switchgear Refurbishment, Phase 2
Switchgear Refurbishment, Phase 2
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Mark Cavallero
Purpose:Refurbish electrical switchgear to maintain the electrical reliability of the treatment plant.
History:The electrical switchgear throughout the plant was installed in the 1970s and has been well
maintained using preventative techniques, such as thermographic imaging, to identify potential
problems and correct them prior to failure. Inspections in 2003 and 2004 showed that many of
the trip units on the circuit breakers required replacement. Circuit breakers have been sent out
for Class 1 reconditioning and trip unit replacement on an as-needed basis.
Description:The remaining 480v circuit breakers (approx. 66, Westinghouse/Cutler-Hammer), will be
refurbished over a five-year period. Work also includes replacement of the switchgear and circuit
breakers in Substation 16, as well as 2400v breakers at Substation 52, Substation 40, and air
breakers at Substation 82. The labor and coordination will be performed by District maintenance
staff with support from consultants when electrical design work is needed.
TP-13
Project Name Project No.7297
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Planning $964 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,964
Design $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,400,000 $8,400,000
FY Total $964 $25,000 $600,000 $0 $8,400,000 $9,025,964
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
Wet and Dry Scrubber Replacement
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Clint Shima
Purpose:Replace the wet and dry scrubbers on each Multiple Hearth Furnace (MHF) based on the
recommendations from the November 2005 Solids Handling Facilities Plan Update and the 2008
Black & Veatch Metals Removal Report.
History:The Solids Handling Facilities Plan was updated in 2005. Incinerator Rx and Industrial Furnace
Company (IFCO) determined that the Multiple Hearth Furnaces were in excellent condition and
could last 20 or more years with current O&M practices. Included in the recommendations was
that both the dry cyclone and the wet particulate scrubber were showing signs of wear and could
use updating or replacement. Operations staff has also reported problems with the scrubber
piping.
Description:Replace the wet and dry scrubbers, and their associated piping and equipment on the MHFs.
The project also includes side stream treatment of the scrubber water for the removal of cyanide
if nitrification is required.
TP-14
Project Name Project No.7309
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$918,500 $0 $0 $0 $918,500
FY Total $130,292 $918,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,048,792
Engineering/Capital Projects
DAF Tanks Renovation
DAF Tanks Renovation
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Brad Leidecker
Purpose:To improve the reliability of the sludge thickening process by performing structural and coating
rehabilitation to the dissolved air flotation (DAF) tanks.
History:The District uses three DAF tanks, installed in approximately 1986, to thicken secondary sludge.
In 2013, DAF Tank 1 required emergency repairs as a result of significant metal loss and failure
of the rotating skimmer arms. Following the failure, each of the DAF tanks were sequentially
taken out of service for detailed inspection and condition assessment. While inspection results
showed Tank 1 was in the worst condition, it was recommended all tanks receive coating,
structural and various repairs as a result of corrosion and wear.
Description:The project will primarily include structural and protective coating rehabilitation to DAF Tanks 2
and 3. DAF Tank 1 will receive additional rehabilitation, which was not performed or not
adequately performed during the 2013 emergency repairs. The project will also include electrical,
control and lighting upgrades to plant standards. This project is currently being closed out.
TP-15
Project Name Project No.7316
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 85
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000
Planning $27,006 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,006
Design $0 $130,444 $0 $0 $0 $130,444
Construction $0 $532,000 $0 $0 $0 $532,000
FY Total $27,006 $662,444 $25,000 $0 $0 $714,450
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Sludge Blending Tank Repairs
Sludge Blending Tank Repairs
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Jason DeGroot
Solids Conditioning Building
Purpose:To repair the damaged sludge blending tank.
History:In May 2014, the sludge blending tank experienced a significant failure and delamination to the
upper section of the exterior gunite and pre-stressed rods. An emergency was declared by the
Board to preform emergency repairs on the tank. After the failing gunite was removed, an
inspection determined that the rest of the tank was stable and that the structural repairs could be
put out to bid.
Description:This project will repair the damaged sludge blending tank with the installation of a Carbon Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (FRP) around the exterior of the tank. The FRP will restore the structural
integrity of the failing pre-stressed rods to current earthquake code and extend the useful life of
the tank. This project will be closed out early FY2015-16.
TP-16
Project Name Project No.7286
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $170,000
Planning $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Design $0 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $0 $600,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000
FY Total $0 $30,000 $370,000 $600,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Purpose:The purpose of this project is to improve solids capture and reliability of the sludge dewatering
equipment.
History:The existing centrifuges and cake pumps will have been in service for more than 24 years by
2014. The design life of rotating equipment is generally around 15 years. While routine rotation of
the operational and stand-by centrifuge helps increase the operating lifespan, Operations can
expect more frequent and extensive O&M requirements as the centrifuges and cake pumps
continue to age. Historical plant data has shown that that the solids capture has decreased
throughout the years. In addition, as centrifuge design and materials of construction continue to
develop, the next generation of centrifuges is expected to last longer, cost less to operate, and
produce a drier sludge, which would result in less furnace fuel to burn.
Description:This project will use the information gathered under the Solids Handling Evaluation project as
well as recent pilot test data to make improvements to the dewatering equipment and process for
construction. Additional, related tasks will be included in this project as appropriate. A portion of
this project, centrifuge replacement, is being considered under the Plant Energy Optimization
project being developed by District staff, PG&E, and AECOM.
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Craig Mizutani
TP-17
Project Name Project No.7291
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $357,409 $75,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $482,409
Construction $0 $0 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $5,000,000
FY Total $357,409 $75,000 $1,120,000 $4,000,000 $0 $5,552,409
Pump & Blower Building
Purpose:Improve the seismic safety of the Pump & Blower Building.
History:In January 2008, California adopted the 2007 California Building Code (2007 CBC). Among the
updates in the 2007 CBC were significant changes to seismic design. In 2009 a seismic
evaluation was completed of treatment plant facilities (Martinez Wastewater Treatment Plant
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Selected Facilities, December 2009). Included in the
evaluation are recommendations to bring the Pump & Blower Building in line with current seismic
design standards.
Description:Make seismic improvements to the Pump & Blower Building.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Pump & Blower Building Seismic Upgrades
Pump & Blower Building Seismic Upgrades
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Jason DeGroot
TP-18
Project Name Project No.7304
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $57,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $96,669 $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,669
Construction $0 $80,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 $680,000
FY Total $96,669 $80,000 $157,000 $100,000 $400,000 $833,669
Plant Operations/Operations
PLC System Upgrades
PLC System Upgrades
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Chuck Burnash
Purpose:Upgrade Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system to current technology for increased
performance and improved compatibility.
History:The first PLCs were installed in the treatment plant in 1986. The number of PLCs has increased
from the original 2 to more than 30. Programming software for the newer PLCs no longer runs
efficiently on the older programming units.
Description:This project will continue to upgrade the treatment plant’s PLC system by:
• Providing and upgrading hardware and software necessary to maintain the PLC application.
• Replacing older computers with newer ones capable of running current software.
• Upgrading older PLC models to maintain compatibility with new equipment.
TP-19
Project Name Project No.7317
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0 $65,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $15,000 $50,000 $100,000 $300,000 $465,000
FY Total $0 $15,000 $115,000 $100,000 $300,000 $530,000
Operations/ Plant Operations
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
Plant Control System Network Upgrades
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Nate Morales
Throughout Treatment Plant
Purpose:Upgrade the Plant Control System Ethernet Network to Industrial Ethernet standards.
History:In 2006 the District’s plant installed a new Ethernet based supervisory control and data
acquisition (SCADA) system.
At the time the SCADA system was installed Ethernet was limited to the servers only and was
redundant. Over time the Ethernet system expanded to the entire plant but the redundancy was
not maintained. Currently, the primary path for plant data traffic runs over the Ethernet system
that is neither redundant nor sufficiently reliable to meet control system standards.
Description:Industrial Ethernet defines a set of standards for redundancy and reliability that are required for
failsafe operation. This project will install and configure industrial type network switches, and
install fiber optic lines to meet the standards for Industrial Ethernet for the plant control system.
Additionally software shall be installed to allow remote programming and maintenance.
TP-20
Project Name Project No.7324
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $400,000 $200,000 $0 $600,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
FY Total $0 $0 $400,000 $200,000 $1,500,000 $2,100,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Critical Switchgear
Critical Switchgear
Treatment Plant Program
One Time Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Refurbish and replace critial switchgear and associated equipment that provides electrical
service to main areas of the Treatment Plant.
History:The switchgear serving the Headworks (Substation 16) was installed in the early 1990's and is
comprised of equipment that had a short production run. The ABB equipment is obsolete and
spare parts have become rare. Recent issues with the circuit breakers have revealed that they
will only become harder to service. The CDM final report recommended replacing the swtichgear
in its entirety to assure reliable service from the influent pumps for the plant.
Description:The switchgear serving the Headworks (Substation 16) will be replaced. Work includes removal
of the existing switchgear and modifications of the building and support facilities as necessary
for the installation. The work will be performed by an outside contractor with support from District
Staff and consultants.
TP-21
Project Name Project No.7327
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000
Design $0 $0 $150,000 $500,000 $0 $650,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
FY Total $0 $0 $400,000 $500,000 $6,000,000 $6,900,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Headworks Screening Upgrade
Headworks Screening Upgrade
Treatment Plant Program
One Time Renovation
Brad Leidecker
Purpose:To separate and remove screenings and plastics from wastewater and/or sludge.
History:The treatment plant’s current screenings operation utilizes coarse bar screens at the headworks
to separate screenings. The screenings then are processed by grinders and reintroduce
immediately downstream of the screens. This operation does not remove any of the plastics in
the wastewater which has contributed to fouling of numerous liquid and solids stream processes
and are suspected to potentially contribute to the upcoming HCL furnace emission regulations.
Removal of screenings will protect downstream treatment plant facilities, extend equipment life
and reduce maintenance of equipment.
Description:The project will investigate the current headworks screening operation and recommend the most
strategic and cost effective improvements. Following this phase, the project will include design
and construction of improvements to implement the recommendations.
TP-22
Project Name Project No.7339
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $200,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $500,000 $600,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000
FY Total $0 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $4,000,000 $4,300,000
Operations/ Plant Operations
Plant Control System I/O Replacement
Plant Control System I/O Replacement
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Nate Morales
Purpose:Upgrade the Treatment Plant Programmable Logic Controller Input and Output (I/O) cards and
associated hardware with current technology to maintain reliable operation and vendor support.
History:The first treatment plant I/O was installed in 1986. The number of I/O cards in use has increased
from relatively few to nearly 1,800. Approximately 1,100 of these are currently obsolete.
Replacement units cannot be purchased from the manufacturer nor are they fully supported. The
District maintains an inventory of over 100 spare I/O cards to replace units as they fail.
Description:This project will replace and update the treatment plant’s obsolete I/O cards along with their
mounting racks, communication modules, and power supplies with modern, fully supported
products.
TP-23
Project Name Project No.7328
Program Phase
Sub-Program Priority Rank
Project Manager Ranking Score
Dept/Division Concord %
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
Influent Pump for Third Wetwell
Influent Pump for Third Wetwell
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Purpose:
History:
Description:
TP-24
Project Name Project No.7331
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 35
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $450,000 $500,000
Operations/ Plant Operations
Plant Cyber Security Evaluation Study
Plant Cyber Security Evaluation Study
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Nate Morales
Entire Treatment Plant
Purpose:Protect the plant from potential electronic breaches through the plant control system, electrical
distribution system, and/or equipment.
History:In 2008, NACWA informed its members of the newly-identified risk for major service interruption
through cyber vulnerabilities. The Water Sector Coordinating Council and the Department of
Homeland Security developed a security sensitive Mitigation Plan, which included identification of
all Programmable Language Controllers and Variable Frequency Drives for the plant’s electrical
and instrumentation systems; installation of electronic locks and intrusion alarms at Substation
82; installation of additional cameras to monitor the treatment plant; testing the integrity of the
existing firewall; and obtaining a Cisco switch for electrical substation security. Some
recommendations have already been implemented. This project will address the remaining, more
costly measures.
Description:The project will evaluate the plant control system and electrical distribution system for
vulnerabilities to electronic breaches. If vulnerabilities are identified, then solutions will be
identified, evaluated, and implemented to address these vulnerabilities.
TP-25
Project Name Project No.7323
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Unranked
Project Manager Ranking Score TBD
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Aeration System Improvements
Aeration System Improvements
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Clint Shima
Purpose:To renovate the existing aeration system to ensure it will meet the treatment plant's aeration air
demands when the steam powered turbine blowers are out of service.
History:The electric blower serves as a back up to the two steam-powered turbine blowers. The electric
blower has enough capacity to meet the treatment plant's needs during the winter months.
However, during the summer months, the treatment plant's air demand increases and the electric
blowers doo not have enough capacity to meet the demand. The existing blowers are in good
shape because they were rebuilt in the early 2000's (steam blowers) or because of low run times
as back-up system (electric blowers).
Description:This project will continue to evaluate the capacity needed by the electric blower. Further refine
the most efficient use of the steam and electric blowers. The following work will be considered:
• Replace guide vanes on the electric blower
• Install new impeller and high efficiently blower
• Consider installing smaller blowers at the Primary facilities
This project will also assess the old controls and electrical equipment on this system. Upon
further investigation, this project will be budgeted for total project costs.
TP-26
Project Name Project No.7325
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Unranked
Project Manager Ranking Score TBD
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $1,585,000 $1,735,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $1,585,000 $1,735,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Disinfection System Upgrades
Disinfection System Upgrades
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Reduce utility and maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve performance of the
ultraviolet (UV) disinfection systems
History:The District's UV disinfection system was installed in 1996 to eliminate the use of Chlorine for
disinfection. The system was expanded in 2007, utilizing the same low-pressure UV technology
as the original installation. The equipment has been well maintained and parts continue to be
available via a third party reseller since the original manufacturer is no longer in business.
However, newer systems offer considerable benefits in the form of reduced maintenance and
power costs. In addition, although parts are available, they may become more difficult to obtain
as the existing systems are replaced with new technology.
Description:This project will replace the existing UV disinfection system with a new system. State-of-the-art
systems feature lower energy consumption and significantly reduced maintenance (labor) costs
due to the ease of lamp cleaning.
TP-27
Project Name Project No.7329
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Unranked
Project Manager Ranking Score TBD
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $700,000 $850,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $700,000 $850,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
MHF Burner Upgrade
MHF Burner Upgrade
Treatment Plant Program
One-Time Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Improve the operational flexibility of the existing multiple hearth furnaces to meet compliance
parameters. Improve utilization of Landfill gas, reduce energy consumption.
History:The furnaces were constructed during the early 1970s and made operational in 1985. They were
originally designed to burned comingled solid waste and sludge; however, they have historically
only burned sludge. As a result, some of the burners are not optimally sized for the furnace
loading. This results in difficulty maintaining proper temperatures in the furnace. In addition, the
existing burners do not allow optimization of landfill gas use. In addition, some of the burners,
mounts, piping and associated equipment are reaching the end of their useful lives and need to
be replaced. The fuel gas piping to the burners has developed leaks that require continued
attention in order to meet BAAQMS leak guidelines.
Description:The original gas fuel system piping will be replaced using welded joints, and a new
diesel fuel system will be added as an additional fuel source (to allow furnace operations during
an emergency. The project will include replacement of 2 to 4 of the top hearth burners (8
MMBtu/hr) with smaller low NOx/High mix burners (2 MMBtu/hr). To provide better temperature
control to comply with 129 regulations. Modernizing the control system to economize fuel
consumption and realize cost savings.
TP-28
Project Name Project No.7265
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 80
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $1,107,400 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,400
FY Total $1,107,400 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,400
Engineering/Capital Projects
Equipment Replacement Program
Equipment Replacement Program
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Edgar Lopez
Purpose:Reduce maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve operations through replacement or
reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn-out, maintenance intensive equipment, or
equipment that is no longer supported by its manufacturer.
History:The initial work on this project assembled a list of current equipment; verified equipment name,
number, and size; acquired design records; and estimated equipment life and replacement cost.
Several major pieces of equipment are reaching the end of their service life and require
replacement/upgrading or reconditioning. The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project
documented recent projects/ replacement schedules and will be used to provide
recommendations for additional renewal and replacement needs.
Description:Following are examples of equipment included in this project:
Filter Plant Polymer Pumps
Influent Pump Wear Rings
Scum Tank Assy.
3WLP 12" Strainer
Waste Steam Exchanger Shell
Headworks A/C
Grease Separator
This project is scheduled to be closed in FY 15-16 and another project will be opened to
replacement needs of the treatment plant.
TP-29
Project Name Project No.7310
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Planning $86,917 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,917
Design $0 $163,000 $0 $0 $0 $163,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $86,917 $163,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,749,917
Engineering/Capital Projects
Piping Renovations, Phase 8
Piping Renovations, Phase 8
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Brad Leidecker
Purpose:To improve the reliability of the piping systems above and below ground in the treatment
plant by inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
History:During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment plant.
These pipes carry the processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility services
between the various sections of the plant. These pipes have been in place for more than 40
years. Some of these pipes are leaking due to corrosion. The first seven phases of this program
renovated or replaced various piping systems.
Description:This phase of the Treatment Plant Piping Renovations Project will include previously identified
piping renovations and replacement work not yet included in a construction project.
TP-30
Project Name Project No.7319
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $4,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $144,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $594,000
FY Total $0 $144,000 $154,000 $150,000 $150,000 $598,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Laboratory Upgrades and Repair
Laboratory Upgrades and Repair
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Repair, replace, and/or upgrade the treatment plant laboratory equipment. The laboratory is a
critical component to regulatory reporting and the equipment used in this facility is specialized
and requires climate control.
History:The District’s laboratory was built in 2001 and operates several critical systems to maintain the
facilities required to conduct testing. Such systems include hot water storage and distribution,
compressed air, temperature control (heating and cooling), chiller, ventilation, hoods, vacuum
system, and DI water. As these systems age, repairs and/or replacements/upgrades will be
needed so that the laboratory remains operational.
Description:This is a multi-year program to repair and upgrade the laboratory. Project work identified to date
includes the following:
• Hot water heat exchangers and tanks are corroded.
• HVAC control systems are obsolete and outdated.
• DI tank may need replacement/ upgrade.
TP-31
Project Name Project No.7314
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 80
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
FY Total $0 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Urgent Repairs Blanket Contract
Urgent Repairs Blanket Contract
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Treatment Plant Program
Purpose:Provide staff the capability to perform immediate electrical, mechanical, and other miscellaneous
repairs within the treatment plant.
History:Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District’s Plant
Maintenance staff, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the budget
process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that will allow the
District to use a contractor for urgent construction work.
Description:Urgent treatment plant projects which require immediate repairs or replacement may arise
anytime during the current fiscal year. These projects may be triggered by:
• Equipment or process piping failure
• Comply with regulatory or code issues
• Impacts operational procedures or process
• Safety hazards
Budget for this work will be paid for using Program Contingency.
TP-32
Project Name Project No.7320
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $55,000
Planning $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Design $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $800,000 $1,000,000
FY Total $0 $35,000 $355,000 $200,000 $800,000 $1,390,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Plant Energy Optimization
Plant Energy Optimization
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Increase energy efficiency and decrease greenhouse gas emissions for the treatment plant.
History:The implementation of AB 32 causes energy consumers to evaluate their energy use and
develop carbon offsetting efficiencies to comply with new regulations. A number of potential
energy efficiency projects are being refined. Many of these concepts are from the 2010 HDR
report “AB 32 Compliance and Energy Optimization Evaluation.” These project concepts require
further evaluation and an understanding of potential implementation issues before
implementation can move forward.
Description:Evaluate proposed energy optimization projects. Many projects include rebates from PG&E.
Staff will coordinate work with PG&E in order to obtain rebates and improve the payback of
implemented projects. Current proposals to be evaluated include installing variable frequency
drives on the furnace’s combustion air blowers. As other energy efficiency proposals are made
they will be included in this evaluation project.
TP-33
Project Name Project No.7326
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 80
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $300,000 $250,000 $1,900,000 $2,450,000
FY Total $0 $0 $300,000 $250,000 $1,900,000 $2,450,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Equipment Replacement
Equipment Replacement
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Reduce maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve operations through replacement or
reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn-out, maintenance intensive equipment, or
equipment that is no longer supported by its manufacturer.
History:The initial work on this project assembled a list of current equipment; verified equipment name,
number, and size; acquired design records; and estimated equipment life and replacement cost.
Several major pieces of equipment are reaching the end of their service life and require
replacement/upgrading or reconditioning. The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project
is documenting recent projects and will be used to provide recommendations for additional
renewal and replacement needs.
Description:The following are examples of equipment included in the project: 3WHP pumps, Influent Pump
Wear Rings, 3WLP Pump impellers/parts, Steam system traps/accessories/piping, Headworks
A/C, MCB A/C, Sub 40 A/C, and other equipment identified through asset management,
maintenance, and operations groups.
TP-34
Project Name Project No.7330
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Design $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $1,200,000
FY Total $0 $0 $400,000 $1,200,000 $0 $1,600,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Piping Renovation, Phase 9
Piping Renovation, Phase 9
Treatment Plant Program
Reoccuring Renovation
Brad Leidecker
Purpose:To improve the reliability of the piping systems above and below ground in the treatment plant by
inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
History:During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment plant.
These pipes carry processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility services between
the various sections of the plant and have been in place for more than 40 years. Some of these
pipes are leaking due to corrosion. The first eight phases of this program renovated or replaced
various piping systems.
Description:This phase of the Treatment Plant Piping Renovations Project will include previously identified
piping renovations and replacement work not yet included in a construction project.
TP-35
Project Name Project No.7335
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $100,000 $25,000 $300,000 $425,000
FY Total $0 $0 $100,000 $25,000 $300,000 $425,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Treatment Plant Program
Reoccuring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Reduce the District’s exposure to liability and property loss; meet reliability/safety standards and
reduce operations and maintenance expenses.
History:The District has experienced loss of property in the past and improvements to the security
system are being identified and refined. Also, the current national security situation may require
additional security measures for essential public services.
Description:This project will identify and implement projects to improve the security of District personnel and
property. This project could include, but is not limited to, installation of alarm systems at critical
sites on District property, additional gates in the perimeter security fencing, upgrading plant
security cameras, signage, and improving general area lighting.
TP-36
Project Name Project No.7340
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $1,400,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $1,900,000 $2,000,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Electrical Cable Replacement
Electrical Cable Replacement
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Entire treatment plant
Purpose:The purpose of this project is to identify deficiencies in the existing electrical system and replace
cables prior to failure.
History:Treatment Plant operation is dependent on the electrical power system including the collection of
feeders from the main substations to the local area substations. Loss or failure of these power
conveyances would disrupt the plant’s electrical system.
Description:This project will evaluate the treatment plant’s electrical feeders, and replace deficient cables due
to age, undersize or functional obsolescence.
TP-37
Project Name Project No.7332
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 45
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Electrical/Instrumentation Replacement Program
Electrical/Instrumentation Replacement Program
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Entire Treatment Plant
Purpose:Identify deficiencies in the existing electrical and instrumentation system components and
replace them prior to failure.
History:The electrical/instrumentation system throughout the plant was installed in the mid- 1970s, with
significant upgrades from several major projects. However, the majority of equipment is 35 years
old.
Description:Replace antiquated and poor-performing field instrumentation and electrical equipment and
systems. Appropriate upgrading will also be included to meet the latest governing codes such as
the National Electric Code.
TP-38
Project Name Project No.7334
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Medium
Project Manager Ranking Score 20
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $50,000 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $4,050,000 $4,150,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Coating Renovation
Coating Renovation
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Extend the useful life and minimize corrosion of select treatment plant equipment,
piping, and surfaces through the application of coatings.
History:The original treatment plant was built in the late 1940s. Since then, there have been multiple
additions and expansions. Much of the process infrastructure has received limited coating or
repainting. Prior phases of this project applied coatings to many components at the plant.
During the summer of 2009, KTA-Tator, Inc. performed an evaluation of the protective coatings
on the components around the treatment plant. The work was part of the Treatment Plant
Protective Coatings, Phase 4 (DP 7247) project.
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project (DP 7269) is documenting recent renewal
and replacement projects and will ultimately provide recommendations for future renewal and/or
replacement of equipment and facilities at the treatment plant.
Description:Recommendations from both projects listed above will be used to plan future phases of the long-
term protective coating program.
TP-39
Project Name Project No.7336
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Medium
Project Manager Ranking Score 15
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Pavement Renovation
Pavement Renovation
Treatment Plant Program
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Renovate pavement throughout the treatment plant to maximize service life and maintain safe
conditions.
History:In 2009, the TP Asset Management project funded several condition assessments in the plant
including one for asphalt pavement by Fugro West, which identified future renovations.
Description:Renovate asphalt pavement as identified in multiple phases based on the condition assessment
and changing condition of the pavement over time.
TP-40
Project Name Project No.7337
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Medium
Project Manager Ranking Score 15
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
Engineering/ Capital Projects
Concrete Renovation
Concrete Renovation
Treatment Plant Renovation
Recurring Renovation
Craig Mizutani
Purpose:Renovate concrete throughout the treatment plant.
History:In 2009, the TP Asset Management project funded several condition assessments in the plant
including one for concrete structures by Villalobos & Associates. Defects identified included
cracking, corrosion, and spalling. The defects were prioritized for repair.
Description:Renovate concrete structures where urgent repairs were identified in the condition assessment.
This work will be incorporated into concurrent capital projects as appropriate. Future phases will
address the remaining repairs and any additional ones that are identified.
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
The m ajor p oints o f e m phasis fo r t h e Col lectio n S ystem Pro g ram in FY 2 01 5-16 a re:
• Collection System Master Plan to update the collection system hydraulic
hydrodynamic model;
• Re nov ate sew ers as th ey re a ch t h e e nd of the ir usef ul l iv es to av oid
structu ral f ail ure, r e duce dr y-w eat h er o verf lo w s, and co ntrol maint ena nce
c os ts;
• Ex pand s ew er a n d pum ping facil ities to accommod ate app rov ed g ro w th in
the D istri ct's serv ice a rea;
• Up g ra d e Dist r ict s ewer s to relie v e c ap acity co nstraints and for future
renovations;
• Im pro v e t he reli a bi l ity of pum ping stati ons; a nd
• Res pon d to re g ulatory re q ui rem ents relat e d t o s a ni t ary sew er ov er flow s (SSOs).
Th e p ro cess fo r project ident ific ation, pri or i ti z ation, and sche dul i ng inc lu d es seven
m ajor co mpon ents:
• Res u lts from t he Dist r ict's TV ins p ection p ro g ram t hat i de ntify lin e s in ne ed
o f rehabi l itat i on or r epla ceme nt;
• CSO maint e na n c e re c ords includ i ng ov er f lo ws a nd sto ppa ges;
• Th e Pum ping St ati on Inv ent o ry Update (20 11 ), w hich id e nt if ied
necessary reliabi l ity im pro vements;
• Collection system facil ity p la ns, w hich id e nt ify ca pacity limitat i ons in th e
six t h rou g h t en in c h lin es;
• Co o rdin ati on w ith c a pi t al impro vem ent p ro g ra ms f or pa v ing a nd pip eli ne
projects of ot her a ge ncies/u til i ties; and
• Reduce impacts to customers/ residents.
T his process al low s st a ff t o est abl ish pr i or i ties a nd sche dules fo r th e indi v id u al
el eme nts of th e s yste m t ha t are incorpor ate d i nto the ca pital b ud g et a nd pla n.
Assessment to ols, such as CC TV inspe c tion, are u til iz ed to confi rm t h e n eed f or
pro j ec t s. Aft er priorities and s c he d ules are s e t, p rojects proce e d t o desig n a nd
co nstruct i on. At e ach step o f t h e p rocess, t he lev el of accuracy in p roject sc ope ,
sche dule and cost im pro v es. The Collection System Pr og ram is c om pr i sed of t he
follow ing su bpro g ra ms.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -1
Renov ati on (T ab 1)
Th ere a re more t h an 1,5 00 miles of sew er in t h e Dist r ict's Collection System . Se w ers
an d ass ocia te d facil ities have fix ed usef ul l ives. Wh en a sew er n e ars the end o f its
usefu l l ife, m ai nte na nce c os ts, i nfil trat i on/i nf low rates, an d t h e t hr e at o f struct ur al
de g radati o n inc re ase. Proper managem ent o f t h e Dist r ict's Col l ecti on System re q ui res
a p ro g ram fo r t he r enov ation of sew ers that hav e re ache d t h e e nd o f t h eir usef ul l ives.
In th e FY 2015-16 Ca p ital B udget , t h e lar gest reno v ation projects focus on multiple
sit es in Pleasant Hill, Or i nda, Lafay ett e and Martine z.
Th e FY 20 01 -02 CIB i n itiated a Dist r ic t-w ide TV inspe c tion pro g ram t o hel p id e nt if y
a nd pr i or i ti z e re nov ation ne eds. In FY 2013-1 4, th e T V in s pecti o n p ro gram fo cu sed o n
hig h m ain ten ance an d probl em areas in Or ind a, La fay ette, and Wal nut Creek.
Be g in n ing in FY 2 014 -15 , t he TV In specti o n p ro g ram was mov ed from t he c api t al
pro g ram t o t h e O p erati ons a nd Ma i nt e nan c e (O&M ) b udg et.
U rg ent projects m ay arise d ur i ng a f is c al y ear or in t h e closing mo n th s of t he pr i or
f iscal y ear. These projects, w hich cannot a fford th e lo ng er ti m el i ne to be inc o rpora t ed
in th e y ea r-lo ng b ud g et pro c ess, are i nclu d ed in th i s c ateg ory o f project s.
Sm al l er c ol l ection system projects are initi ate d thr oug h t h e ong oing coll ection s yste m
pla n ning process. Th is p la n ning activ ity eval uat es cap acity of sew ers s m al l er t h an
12 -inc h es in diam et er on a case-by-case bas is w hen tr igg ered by o ne o f t he follow in g:
• Ca p acit y-related overf lo ws
• Structural fail ure in a pi pe
• M ainte n ance rec o rds i ndica t e a pers iste nt p r obl em
By agreement with California River Watch, repairs of defective sewer pipes within two
hundred feet of creeks are given higher priority .
Re gu lat ory Co mpl ia n ce/P la nn i ng /S afety (T ab 2)
Th e C ol l ection System Mas t er will also start this fiscal year to ac commo da t e t h e
ch an ging g eneral and spec if ic pl ans o f t h e C ounty an d t he mu nic ip al i ties t h at are
serv ed w here hig her densities o f de v elo pme nt are being w id e ly a dopt e d. Th e
Collection System Master plan will review our large and complex collection system,
force mains, and the nineteen (19) pump stations and determine the timely
reconstruction and replacement of the collection system as needed. As part of the
Maste r Plan effort, the hydraulic (dynamic) model will be updated to determine
improvements that may be required to provide adequate capacity within the sewer
system.
A P um ping Sta ti o n In v ent o ry d oc ume nt is pe r io d ically u pda t ed t o in c lu d e i nform ation
as projects are com pl eted and will be coordinated with the Master Plan effort.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -2
Expansion (Tab 3)
De sig n o f t h e trunk sew er impro vem ents alo ng th e Pleasant Hill Gra y son C reek and
Cor r id o r started in FY 2012-13 an d wil l continue this fiscal year , w ith maj or project
constructio n to ta ke place in 2016-17. This project will be coordinated with the
Collection System Master Plan before it is advertised to bid to verify sc ope, size,
timing and cost estimate. The su bpro g ram incl u des De v elo pme nt Se w era g e f or 2015-
16 and potential C ontrac t ual As sessmen t D i str i ct project s.
Pumping Stations (Tab 4)
Th e Pum ping St ati ons subpro g ram foc uses o n reliabi l it y , s af ety and
operat i onal impro veme nts . Pump station condition assessments will be
conducted under the Collection System Master plan and will help confirm near
term and recommend future projects in this subprogram. Projects this year will
be minor equipment replacement, or safety improvements, and implementing
any recommendations from the Arc Flash study.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget CS -3
CS-4
Project Name Project No.5982
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $652,285 $150,000 $225,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,477,285
FY Total $652,285 $150,000 $225,000 $200,000 $250,000 $1,477,285
Collection System Operation
Pipeburst Blanket Contract
Pipeburst Blanket Contract
Collection System Program
Renovation
Alex Rozul
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:Urgent pipeline projects which require immediate repairs may arise anytime during current fiscal
year.
History:Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District's Collection
System Operations Department, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the
year-long budget process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that
will allow the District to use a contractor to perform urgent pipebursting work.
Description:Project work may be triggered by one of the following situations:
• imminent threat of pipe break or collapse
• potential for an overflow
• structural failure in a pipe
Budget for this urgent work will be paid for using Program Contingency funds as needed.
CS-5
Project Name Project No.5999
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $113,619 $100,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $463,619
FY Total $113,619 $100,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $463,619
Collection System Operation
CIPP Blanket Contract
CIPP Blanket Contract
Collection System Program
Renovation
Alex Rozul
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:Urgent pipeline projects which require immediate repairs may arise anytime during current fiscal
year.
History:Projects included in this category are those that cannot be completed by the District's Collection
System Operations Department, and cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the
year-long budget process. This project will include bidding and executing a blanket contract that
will allow the District to use a contractor to perform urgent CIPP lining work.
Description:These projects may be triggered by one of the following situations:
• imminent threat of pipe break or collapse
• potential for an overflow
• structural failure in a pipe.
Budget for this urgent work will be paid for using Program Contingency funds as needed.
CS-6
Project Name Project No.8404
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $8,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$300,000 $0 $0 $0 -
FY Total $2,426,698 $300,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $2,734,698
Engineering/Capital Projects
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 8
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 8
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
City of Lafayette
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The Lafayette Sewer renovations is part of the ongoing Collection System Sewer Renovation
Program.
Description:The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 8 project replaced/rehabilitated approximately 8,300
feet of 6 and 8-inch sewer pipe predominately in the South Peardale area. This project is in the
closeout phase.
CS-7
Project Name Project No.8411
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $400,000 $443,000 $0 $843,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$1,550,000 $0 $0 $0 -
FY Total $626,590 $1,550,000 $400,000 $443,000 $0 $3,019,590
Engineering/Capital Projects
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5
Collection System Program
Renovation
Mark Wenslawski
Locations mainly in the city of Orinda service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5 project replaced/rehabilitated 7,370 feet of sewer
line located in the public right of way and easements. This project is in the closeout phase.
CS-8
Project Name Project No.8413
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$3,073,180 $0 $0 $0 -
FY Total $805,818 $3,073,180 $0 $0 $0 $3,878,998
Engineering/Capital Projects
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
Locations are mainly in the city of Walnut Creek service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 10 project will replace/rehabilitate approximately 8,500
feet of 6 and 8-inch sewer in the public right of way and easements throughout the City of Walnut
Creek. Design of this project started in FY 2012-13 with construction scheduled for FY 2014-15.
This project is in the closeout phase.
CS-9
Project Name Project No.8415
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $216,739 $0 $0 $0 $0 $216,739
Design 3/12-13 4/14-15 $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $606,000
Construction 4/14-15 4/15-16 $0 $0 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $3,100,000
FY Total $216,739 $606,000 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $3,922,739
Engineering/Capital Projects
Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4
Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4
Collection System Program
Renovation
Michael Penny
Locations mainly in the city of Martinez service area.
Purpose:Replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways, easements, and near creeks. As a result of
easement acquisitions between the City of Martinez and the District, costs for easements are
included within this project.
CS-10
Project Name Project No.8417
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $98,259 $40,000 $40,000 $50,000 $250,000 $478,259
FY Total $98,259 $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 $488,259
Engineering/Capital Projects
Survey Monument Installation Project
Survey Monument Installation Project
Collection System Program
Renovation
Greg St. John
Throughout Service Area
Purpose:This project will provide resources necessary to fulfill Survey's professional and legal obligation to
reference and replace survey monuments that are destroyed during the construction process.
History:Sewer renovation projects frequently remove survey monuments either because the monument
lies directly in the path of the new sewer or in the pavement restoration zone. The survey
monument installations will be throughout the District service area wherever sewer renovation
projects have been completed. Survey monuments must be replaced according to California law
(§8771 Business and Professions Code).
Description:The current project scope of work consists of the installation of survey monuments that were
removed during sewer renovation. This project will allow Survey staff to work with a contractor to
restore the required survey monuments.
CS-11
Project Name Project No.8421
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $2,004,200 $0 $0 $2,004,200
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $283,081 $366,000 $0 $0 $0 $649,081
Construction $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
FY Total $283,081 $866,000 $2,004,200 $0 $0 $3,153,281
Engineering/Capital Projects
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
Locations mainly in the city of Lafayette service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers near creeks, to control future maintenance
requirements and costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall
entering the collection system, and to improve the level of service provided to the
residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 9 project will replace or rehabilitate approximately
8,500 LF of small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
CS-12
Project Name Project No.8422
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $88,342 $61,658 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 $3,100,000
FY Total $88,342 $61,658 $0 $500,000 $3,100,000 $3,750,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 11
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 11
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
Locations are mainly in the City of Walnut Creek service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 11 project will replace or rehabilitate small
diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
CS-13
Project Name Project No.8423
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $92,333 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 $149,333
Design $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000
FY Total $92,333 $57,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 $0 $3,649,333
Engineering/Capital Projects
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6
North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6
Collection System Program
Renovation
Mark Wenslawski
Locations mainly in the city of Orinda service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 6 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
CS-14
Project Name Project No.8424
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $2,276,000 $0 $0 $2,276,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Construction $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
FY Total $0 $500,000 $2,276,000 $0 $0 $2,776,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
M1 CIPP Rehabilitation Project
M1 CIPP Rehabilitation Project
Collection System Program
Renovation
Mark Wenslawski
CCCSD Treatment Plant Site
Purpose:To ensure reliability of the Martinez Transmission line by protecting against corrosion in the M1
line.
History:A study was completed in 2004 that identified multiple portions of the Martinez Transmission line
as having corrosion issues. The study recommended renovation by CIPP lining. In 2014 the
District completed the first phase of lining. This project is the second phase of lining identified by
the study.
Description:This project will renovate approximately 3,100 feet of M1, a 42” diameter reinforced concrete
pipeline located on the treatment plant site.
CS-15
Project Name Project No.8425
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %20%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $9,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $550,000
FY Total $0 $550,000 $9,000 $0 $0 $559,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 1
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 1
Collection System Program
Renovation
Michael Penny
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:This project will repair, update, and upgrade underground facilities, including the pumping
stations and buried metallic piping, by replacing existing spent facilities and installing new
systems where required.
History:A comprehensive cathodic protection survey of the collection system, pumping stations and
treatment plant was prepared in 2008 and was updated in 2012. Based on the results of the
survey, the Cathodic Protection System Replacement project developed the scope and initial
design concepts for this project.
Description:This project will include required maintenance, replacement, and/or addition of cathodic
protection systems to those sites identified as high or moderate priority in the 2012 survey
update. Work includes installation of new anode beds, vent piping, test stations, and induced
current cathodic protection systems on the treatment plant site, eight pump stations, and six
force mains. Miscellaneous corrosion related repairs will be included in the scope of this project.
CS-16
Project Name Project No.8426
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000
Planning $0 $210,000 $0 $0 $0 $210,000
Design $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000
FY Total $0 $210,000 $545,000 $3,000,000 $0 $3,755,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10
Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
Locations primarily in the City of Lafayette service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers near creeks, to control future maintenance
requirements and costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall
entering the collection system, and to improve the level of service provided to the
residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 10 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
CS-17
Project Name Project No.8434
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 75
Dept/Division Concord %TBD
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $270,000 $0 $0 $270,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
FY Total $0 $25,000 $270,000 $0 $0 $295,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Collection System Urgent Projects
Collection System Urgent Projects
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
Throughout the District.
Purpose:This project will restore and protect sewers damaged or threatened during winter storms. In
addition, the program will address structurally deficient sewers identified by CSO.
History:During major storm events, sewers at various locations may be damaged or threatened. In some
cases, landslides or soil erosion may undermine the sewers. The repair and restoration of these
sewers is typically time sensitive. In addition, the District has embarked on an extensive
investigation of the condition of its sewer system. Occasionally, sewers in very poor condition are
identified and cannot wait for incorporation into the CIB/CIP. Such situations will be addressed
under this program
Description:A standby contractor will be selected by the District team and be used for urgent or emergency
needs for the collection system, recycled water, and pump station forcemains. Funding will be
used with the program contigency accounts as needed.
CS-18
Project Name Project No.5991
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 60
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $66,000
Planning $133,017 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $134,017
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000
FY Total $133,017 $1,000 $66,000 $0 $2,350,000 $2,550,017
Engineering/Capital Projects
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
City of Pleasant Hill
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
This project will be coordinated with the Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek trunk sewer project, which
is in the Expansion subprogram.
CS-19
Project Name Project No.8435
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 $3,100,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $3,100,000 $3,750,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 12
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 12
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
Locations are mainly in the City of Walnut Creek service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
CS-20
Project Name Project No.8430
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
FY Total $0 $0 $150,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 $3,650,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Lafayette Sewer Renovation, Phase 11
Lafayette Sewer Renovation, Phase 11
Collection System Program
Renovation
Nancy Molina
Locations are mainly in the City of Lafayette service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
CS-21
Project Name Project No.8437
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 30
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000
FY Total $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $3,000,000 $3,150,000
Martinez
Purpose:Replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:The Martinez Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter
sewer pipe located in the public right of ways and easements.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Martinez Sewer Renovation Phase 5
Martinez Sewer Renovation Phase 5
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
CS-22
Project Name Project No.8433
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $3,500,000 $3,650,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
South Orinda Sewer Renovation, Phase 6
South Orinda Sewer Renovation, Phase 6
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
Locations are mainly in the City of Orinda service area.
Purpose:To replace or renovate small-diameter sewers to control future maintenance requirements and
costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the quantity of rainfall entering the collection
system, and to improve the level of service provided to the residents/ratepayers.
History:The District's over 1,500-mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and/or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small diameter sewers
in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry-weather collection system overflows.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Description:This project will replace or rehabilitate small diameter sewer pipe located in the public right of
ways and easements.
CS-23
Project Name Project No.8438
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Medium
Project Manager Ranking Score 20
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:This project will repair, update, and upgrade underground facilities, including the pumping
stations and buried metallic piping, by replacing existing spent facilities and installing new
systems where required.
History:A comprehensive cathodic protection survey of the collection system, pumping stations and
treatment plant was prepared in 2008 and was updated in 2012. Future updates are scheduled to
be completed by end of FY 2015-16. Based on the results of the survey, the Cathodic Protection
System Replacement project developed the scope and initial design concepts for this project.
Description:This project will include required maintenance, replacement, and/or addition of cathodic
protection systems to those sites identified as high or moderate priority in the 2012 survey update
and potential future items.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 2
Cathodic Protection Systems - Phase 2
Collection System Program
Renovation
Sasha Mestetsky
CS-24
Project Name Project No.8418
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover -$0 $1,600 $0 $0 $1,600
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $200,000
Construction -$100,000 $300,000 $200,000 $0 $600,000
FY Total $148,398 $200,000 $401,600 $200,000 $0 $949,998
Engineering/Planning and Environmental Services
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Collection System Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Justin Waples
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:Migrate from a proprietary steady state hydraulic model to a commercially available dynamic
hydraulic model.
History:Staff commenced initial steps to migrate towards a dynamic model. District intends to have
consultant implement the new dynamic model as part of the upcoming Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan Project.
Description:Collection System hydraulic model provides the foundation for managing the capacity needs of
the District's sewers. The existing steady state model is not suited to Master Planning capacity
studies, and the programming language used for the foundation of the model is no longer
supported by the vendor. A commercially available dynamic model is needed.
CS-25
Project Name Project No.8419
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $19,000
Planning $100,315 $200,000 $150,000 $200,000 $700,000 $1,350,315
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $100,315 $200,000 $169,000 $200,000 $700,000 $1,369,315
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Collection System Planning
Collection System Planning
Collection System Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Justin Waples
Throughout the collection system.
Purpose:To identify, evaluate, and schedule short and long-term sewer improvement projects and to
provide design flow rates for major facility plans.
History:Staff performs on-going Collection System Planning and project priority analyses to ensure that
District goals for collection system performance are met.
Description:Collection System Planning studies provide the basis for improvements to the District's sewer
system and flow rates for facility plans. Studies focus on Local Capacity Studies, Collection
System Database Management, Flow Rates for Facility Plans, and Special Studies. This project
also provides funding for small scale flow monitoring studies and technology trials and
assessments and pilot studies.
CS-26
Project Name Project No.5993
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $96,535 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $97,535
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $96,535 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $97,535
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Force Main Assessment
Force Main Assessment
Collection System Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Justin Waples
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:To assess and document the condition of force mains.
History:The District owns or operates 19 pumping stations (PS), which pump flow into a series of force
mains.
In 2013, the District developed a Force Main Asset Management Plan. This documented the
force main inventory, estimated the replacement cost, identified condition assessment methods
and failure modes, determined the consequence of failure of the force mains, and the likelihood
of failure based on existing information. This was used to determine the risk of the assets which
will be used as triggers for further condition assessments and prioritization of capital projects for
rehabilitation or replacement.
Description:The District will inspect the condition of force mains, with consultant assistance if necessary. The
District may conduct a feasibility study for installing launching platforms and cleaning junctions at
pump stations and force mains, and conduct preliminary investigations on the integrity and
remaining service lives of force mains.
CS-27
Project Name Project No.5962
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank High
Project Manager Ranking Score 35
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $131,963 $5,357 $1,000 $0 $0 $138,320
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $131,963 $5,357 $1,000 $0 $0 $138,320
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Collection System Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Justin Waples
Throughout the service area
Purpose:To monitor the most critical collection system manholes.
History:The District has approximately 30,000 active manhole structures throughout the service area.
Some of these manholes are in remote areas where an overflow may not be detected for weeks,
or in environmentally sensitive areas where an overflow would cause significant harm to creeks
or reservoirs.
Description:This project will include the identification and modification of manholes with the installation of
remote level monitoring products. The remote monitoring product will alert dispatch or on-call
crew members via cell phone of a potential overflow or stoppage event. The early notification will
allow crews to respond more quickly, reducing impacts to the environment, potential fines, and
District liability.
CS-28
Project Name Project No.8431
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $1,200,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $0 $1,200,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Collection System Master Plan
Collection System Master Plan
Collection System Program
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
Sasha Mestetsky
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:To develop a comprehensive wastewater master plan that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District's wastewater treatment plant.
History:The 2011 Plant of the Future visioning exercises completed as part of District Project 7287 –
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update included recommendations for completing a comprehensive
master plan to determine the needs and direction of the District. While the District has performed
a number of planning and research studies/reports, the last treatment plant master plan was
completed in 1987.
Description:The TP Master Plan is one component of the Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan. A key
deliverable of the TP Master Plan will be a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the next 20-year
planning horizon that provides the descriptions, rationale and estimated costs for the District’s
treatment plant capital improvement projects and on-going programs in order to address aging
infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, accommodate planned
growth, optimize energy use, and implement the District’s vision for a “plant of the future” that is
consistent with the District's Strategic Plan.
CS-29
Project Name Project No.8412
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$600,000 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Construction -$0 $3,050,000 $6,400,000 $0 $9,450,000
FY Total $579,074 $600,000 $3,120,000 $6,400,000 $0 $10,699,074
Engineering/Capital Projects
Pleasant Hill – Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer
Pleasant Hill – Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer
Collection System Program
Expansion
Nancy Molina
City of Pleasant Hill
Purpose:To achieve the Collection System Program goal of reducing sanitary sewer overflows by adding a
new trunk sewer for diversion of flows. This new trunk sewer will give Staff the ability to
implement the necessary renovation work in the City of Pleasant Hill.
History:The Pleasant Hill-Grayson Creek Trunk Sewer project was recommended in the Collection
System Master Plan 2010 update due to a series of capacity-deficient sewers that were identified
in the City of Pleasant Hill. District staff have been designing the project since 2012.
Description:The project involves installing sewer pipeline of various diameter relief sewers and diverting the
sewage away from the existing capacity-deficient sewers and connect to the existing 36-inch
trunk sewer that runs along Ardith Drive. The new relief sewer alignment is within city streets in
both the City of Pleasant Hill and the City of Martinez. Due to the City of Pleasant Hill proposed
paving projects, the District may need to include additional sewer lines along Pleasant Hill Road
in order to avoid work in the proposed paving areas. This project may be coordinated with the
Pleasant Hill Corridor project included in the CIP to avoid significant paving reconstruction on
Pleasant Hill Road.
CS-30
Project Name Project No.8402
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank N/A
Project Manager Ranking Score N/A
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $1,100,000 $1,300,000
FY Total $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $1,100,000 $1,300,000
Engineering/Planning and Environmental Services
Contractual Assessment Districts
Contractual Assessment Districts
Collection System Program
Expansion
Russell Leavitt
To be determined. CADs are currently being considered in neighborhoods in Alamo and Danville.
Purpose:The District developed a Contractual Assessment District (CAD) Program to provide a financing
mechanism for the extension of public sewers into areas which are currently served by septic
tanks.
History:In certain instances, the cost to extend public sewers into an area serviced by septic tanks can
be an extreme financial burden for one owner or even a small group of owners. The District
developed the CAD Program to address this burden. The CAD process provides a means to
finance the cost of sewer improvements over time at a fixed interest rate. The CAD assessments
are placed on the customers’ property tax bills each year until the entire amount is repaid to the
District.
Description:A number of CADs will likely be proposed during the budget year. Funding for the CAD's will be
paid for under the Program Contingency account.
CS-31
Project Name Project No.8420
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank N/A
Project Manager Ranking Score N/A
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning ------
Design ------
Construction ------
FY Total $1,019,942 $820,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $3,939,942
Engineering/Planning and Environmental Services
2015-16 Development Sewerage
2015-16 Development Sewerage
Collection System Program
Expansion
Tom Godsey
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:This project provides for appropriate capitalization of District force account labor and other
expenses for planning, design, and construction of developer installed and contributed main
sewer facilities.
History:This is a cost neutral project paid for by Development fees.
Description:The District requires property owners to pay for the main sewers needed to serve their property.
Where sewers are designed and installed by developers or other private parties, District
planning, plan review, right-of-way, inspection and record drawing/mapping effort is required to
ensure that contributed sewers meet the District's Standard Specifications for Design and
Construction. These activities are capitalized under this project. A portion of the revenue
collected for plan review, right-of-way, and inspection is credited to the Sewer Construction Fund
and offsets some of the expenditures made under this capital project.
CS-32
Project Name Project No.5941
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction $568,793 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $818,793
FY Total $568,793 $50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $818,793
Collection System Operations
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement
Collection System Program
Pump Station
Neil Meyer
All pumping stations
Purpose:The purpose of this project is to replace or recondition failed and obsolete pumps, piping, valves,
and other equipment; to provide for proper emergency response at District pumping stations; to
purchase major spare assemblies for various pieces of pumping stations equipment; and to meet
new regulatory requirements.
History:This project has been an ongoing replacement of old equipment and piping at the Pump Stations.
Selection of equipment is done by the Operations staff , Engineering, and in coordination with the
ongoing Asset Management Program.
Description:The scope of work for this project includes, as examples, the following:
• Addition of control and isolation valves for shutdown and protection of the stations;
• Revisions to control strategies and equipment response times;
• Possible protections for pumping stations and equipment, if flooded;
• Investigation and installation of “pump around” capabilities;
• Development of emergency response procedures and purchasing equipment;
• Reconditioning of major pieces of equipment to original factory specifications;
• Purchase of large-dollar spare assemblies for major PS equipment;
• Other work or equipment requirements that might be defined by regulators.
CS-33
Project Name Project No.8406
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$442,000 $0 $0 $0 -
FY Total $166,769 $442,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $610,769
Engineering/Capital Projects
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements
Collection System Program
Pump Station
Brad Leidecker
Throughout the service area.
Purpose:The project will improve the safety and security of select pumping stations by adding or replacing
surveillance, fire alarm and intrusion alarm systems.
History:One of the many responsibilities of the District’s safety programs is to address and support
solutions for safety and security concerns identified by operations or maintenance personnel.
District pumping station operations staff has identified safety and security concerns at critical
pumping stations. These stations have obsolete, inoperable or nonexistent video surveillance,
fire alarm and intrusion alarm systems. A lack of pumping station security, particularly at remote
stations, results in liability exposure to the District. Many of the existing fire alarm systems do not
meet current fire code and are integrated with the intrusion alarm systems.
Description:This project added new or replaced existing video surveillance, fire alarm and/or intrusion alarm
systems at the highest priority pumping stations. This project is in the closeout phase.
CS-34
Project Name Project No.8427
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 85
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30,000
Planning $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $100,000
History:
Description:
Pumping Station Arc Flash Study
Purpose:
Throughout the service area.
Pumping Station Arc Flash Study
Collection System Program
Pump Station
Jason DeGroot
Engineering/Capital Projects
Evaluate all pumping station electrical systems, provide an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis Study per
the current NFPA 70E Standard for Electrical Safety, and related codes.
The lifeline of the pumping stations electrical system is the feeders from PG&E to the main
switchgear and breakers. Most of the pumping stations are equipped with backup generators,
including automatic transfer when PGE power is not available. Loss or failure of these power
conveyances or transfer switches would disrupt the pumping station electrical system and more
importantly, pose a safety hazard to Operations staff.
The scope of work will include the following:
• Short –Circuit, Protective coordination, Load-Flow and Arc Flash Analysis Study per
requirements outlined in the current version of NFPA 70E.
• The arc flash analysis shall be performed according to the IEEE standard 1584.
• The Study shall be done using SKM Systems Analysis Power Tools for Windows (PTW)
software program.
• Arc–flash labeling of the electrical equipment.
CS-35
Project Name Project No.8436
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $440,000 $940,000
FY Total $0 $0 $150,000 $500,000 $440,000 $1,090,000
Moraga and Crossroads Pumping Stations in Moraga and Orinda.
Purpose:To evaluate the Moraga and Crossroads Pump stations for replacement or rehabilliation needs.
History:Both Pump stations have been modified in the last several years. However, the stations continue
to be backed up by the original generators. In addition, the Moraga station does not have
grinders.
Description:This project is being initiated at the request of the Operations group to evaluate the electrical/
standy by generators at these facilities. In addition, grinders are being considered at the Moraga
station.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Moraga/Crossroads PS Project
Moraga/Crossroads PS Project
Collection System Program
Pumping Stations
Sasha Mestetsky
CS-36
Project Name Project No.8429
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $150,000 $120,000 $400,000 $670,000
FY Total $0 $0 $150,000 $120,000 $400,000 $670,000
Engineering/Capital Projects
Fairview Matby Pump Stations Upgrades
Fairview Matby Pump Stations Upgrades
Collection System Program
Pumping Stations
Sasha Mestetsky
Fairview and Matby Pumping Stations in Martinez
Purpose:To replace or rehabilitate the Fairview and Matby Pump Stations as determined by ongoing
condition assessments.
History:There are several improvements and some electrical equipment replacement required at these
stations. A project has been created to handle the evaluation of these stations and to replace
several critical equipment. Last year, the Matby station had a Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS)
failure that staff has evaluated and several recommendations are proposed to these station.
Fairview s built similar to Matby.
Description:This project will replace the Automatic Transfer switch at Fairview and evaluate the overall
condition. The project will also build any recommendations provided by the Arc Flash report at
these locations.
CS-37
Project Name Project No.8432
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Unranked
Project Manager Ranking Score N/A
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 ---
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $1,150,000 $1,230,000
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $1,150,000 $1,230,000
History:
Description:
Other Pump Stations Projects
Purpose:
Other Pump Stations Projects
Collection System Program
Pumping Stations
Sasha Mestetsky
Engineering/Capital Projects
This project is a placeholder for the scope provided under several Pump Station program
projects.
This project contains project scope from the Miscellaneous Forcemain Improvements, Pump
Station Hazard Identification and Remediation, and the PS Master Plan from the FY14-15 CIB.
This project will evaluate and install, if practical, the ability to inspect, assess and clean the
forcemains. Also, help identify any hazardous condition that require immediate abatement and
document any improvements for future projects.
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
Th e G e neral Impro vemen ts Pro g ram is pr im ar i ly co ncerned w ith t h e
p ro p ert y , ad mi nistrati v e b ui l din g s, management information systems, asset
management, a n d eq ui pme nt/ vehicle n ee ds of t he Dist r ict.
Vehicles and E qu ip me nt Ac qu isition (Tab 1)
Th e V ehic les a nd Eq uip me nt s ubpro gram com pr ises t he i tems b udg et e d a nd
purc h ased un d er the annu al D istri ct E q uipment Budg et, w hich is included in th is
d oc ume nt. The Ca p ital Im pro vem ent B ud g et incl u des an al low ance for t h e eq ui pme nt
b ud g et. Spec if ic e q uip me nt i tems are a ppro v ed thr oug h t h e a nn u al b udg et pro cess.
Manag eme nt Infor mat ion Sy stem s (Tab 2)
Th e Ma nagem ent Info rmati o n S ystem s s u bp rog ram ref lects th e im p orta nce o f IT in
th e d ai ly o peration of th e Dist r ict. Th e Di s trict has dev elo pe d an IT Mast e r Plan
w hich en v is i ons i mplem enti ng specif ic impro veme nts and exte nds several y ears i nto
the fut ure. An al low ance to mee t a nticip at ed f utu re inform ati o n t ec h nolo gy n eeds
has be e n inclu d ed in th e t en-y ear Capi t al Im pro vem ent Pla n . F u nding f or upg rades
of t he Dist r ict’s Geographic Data Integration syst em s and Enterprise Resource
Planning software platform are incl u ded in th e CI B.
General Improvements P roj ect s (Tab 3)
This su bpro g ram inc l udes improvem ents t o t he H e ad q uar te rs Of fic e B ui l ding,
Collection System Operations building a nd ot h er pro pe rties, CIB legal expenses,
eas eme nt a nd ri ght-of-way acq uis i tion, and pro jects relat e d t o Dist r ict p roperty
impro veme nts.
As se t Manag em ent Program (Tab 4)
T he District has invested significant resources in its assets and the purpose of the
Asset Ma nageme nt Program, which includes Treatmen t Pl a nt, Col l ecti o n S ystem,
Ge neral Impro veme nt s , a n d Rec y cled W at er assets, is to optimize the lifecycle of
these assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a sustainable manner for
customers with an acceptable level of risk.
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget GI-1
GI-2
Project Name Project No.8516
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %TBD
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $617,200 $450,000 $500,000 $0 $1,567,200
FY Total $0 $617,200 $450,000 $500,000 $0 $1,567,200
District-wide
Purpose:To provide the District with safe and cost-effective vehicles and equipment.
History:A project is developed on a yearly basis to procure required equipment and vehicles throughout
the District.
Description:This is the District’s 2015-16 capital project for purchase of vehicles and equipment.
Administrative/Finance and Accounting
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition – 2015-16
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition – 2015-16
General Improvements Program
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition
Amal Lyon
1127B-2/15
2015-2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET 2015-2016 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
GI-3
Project Name Project No.8227
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $222,444 $0 $42,558 $120,000 $40,000 $425,002
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $222,444 $0 $42,558 $120,000 $40,000 $425,002
Treatment Plant
Purpose:Support the asset management program by providing an effective means of accessing treatment
plant asset data through an interactive map linked to multiple datasets.
History:The successful implementation of the collection system geographic data intergration (GDI)
indicates that a similar web interface for the treatment plant would provide efficient access to
asset data. A pilot treatment plant GDI was developed and is currently used by staff.
Description:Implement a geographically based asset management tool for the treatment plant. The
Treatment Plant GDI will be modeled after the collection system GDI; mirroring the graphic
interface and functionality but accessing and delivering treatment plant related data sets.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
GDI Treatment Plant
GDI Treatment Plant
General Improvements Program
Management Information Systems
Carolyn Knight
GI-4
Project Name Project No.8232
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %50%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design 6/27/2011 6/30/2016 $444,919 $136,000 $271,000 $0 $0 $851,919
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $444,919 $136,000 $271,000 $0 $0 $851,919
District-wide
Purpose:Support the asset management program by implementing a new geographic information system
to efficiently integrate data to improve productivity and provide a standardized data structure
resulting in improved spatial data management.
History:The District’s geographic data integration (GDI) was developed to minimize duplicate databases
and present valuable information to staff for evaluating assets. GDI was built using various
software platforms to integrate information from disparate data sources. Some of the software
that is used for GDI’s functionality is no longer supported by the vendors.
ESRI software was chosen to replace the existing software because it is the mapping industry
leader and a versatile, expandable solution. Using ESRI software will decrease the need to
develop customized code because it integrates easily with other software and provides a variety
of software tools to disseminate information.
Description:GDI will be updated by migrating existing datasets into the new ESRI software platform. Spatial
database information will be evaluated to standardize and consolidate data in order to minimize
duplication across workgroups. Work flow processes and procedures will be documented to
develop clear roles and responsibilities. Detailed specifications will be developed for hardware
requirements, as well as any necessary customization for software functionality and
maintenance.
Evaluation of web interface tools will be completed to define the optimal solution(s) for presenting
information to District staff. Following the evaluation, appropriate tools will be procured and
implemented.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
GDI-SMMS Replacement
GDI-SMMS Replacement
General Improvements Program
Management Information Systems
Carolyn Knight
GI-5
Project Name Project No.8240
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %50%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $700,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 $9,500,000
FY Total $0 $700,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 $9,800,000
District-wide
Purpose:An Information Technology Development Plan was developed by Information Technology staff to
centralize efforts and funding in the development of computer and telecommunication technology
within the District.
History:The District budgets IT on a yearly basis. The IT Master plan was approved in 2015 and its
implementation is within the CIB and 10 year plan.
Description:This project is the implementation of the IT Master Plan, please see the following document for
specific work planned this fiscal year.
Administration
Information Technology Development
Information Technology Development
General Improvements Program
Management Information Systems
David Heath
GI-6
Project Name Project No.8242
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %50%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $148,000 $0 $0 $148,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design 11/19/2014 6/30/2015 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Construction 7/1/2015 6/30/2017 $0 $0 $360,000 $117,000 $0 $477,000
FY Total $0 $50,000 $508,000 $117,000 $0 $675,000
District-wide
Purpose:Support the asset management program by replacing the computerized maintenance
management system (CMMS) for both the collection system and treatment plant.
History:District Project 8232, GDI-SMMS Replacement, replaced the unsupported geographic
information system (GIS) software versions with a new fully-supported ESRI platform. The
migration to ESRI will be completed by June 2015.
The current CMMS for the collation system is no longer vendor-supported. Additionally,
consolidating all assets into one state-of-the-art, supported system will more effectively manage
the lifecycle cost of owning and operating these assets in support of the District’s mission. This
project also supports Strategic Goal No. 6, Strategy 1, through a specific key performance
indicator in the Plan.
Description:This project will continue consolidating software systems by procuring, migrating data,
configuring and implementing an effective CMMS solution that encompasses all District assets
(collection, distribution, treatment, pump station, fleet, etc.) and efficiently integrates with the GIS.
The collection system will be migrated and configured first, followed by the treatment plant and
pumping station assets.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
CMMS Replacement
CMMS Replacement
General Improvements Program
Management Information Systems
Dana Lawson
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PLAN
20 15-20 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………....1
Proposed Budget Summary ………………………………………………………...2
Proposed Project s Narrative ……………..............................................................3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Information Technology Development CIB Plan provides direction and flexibility to
meet the District ’s future information technology needs. Each year, District staff submits
project recommendations, requests and write -ups to the Information Technology
Administrator. The Management team gives their final review of the proposed CIB and
IT projects, providing revisions and recommendations prior to appearing before the
Capital Projects Committee for review and the Board of Directors for final approval.
T he Information Technology Development CIB Plan is developed to provide funding for
IT projects in one or more of the following areas:
• PC hardware and software
• D istrict and specialized networks, systems and software applications
• Network infrastructure, security and reliability
• Data storage, backups and disaster recovery
• Internet and Intranet development
• W ireless access
• Telecommunications improvements
• Information T echnology customer service and support
• Cost savings, power conservation & green alternatives
The District’s Information Technology (IT) Master Plan centralizes efforts in the
development of technology within the District. Input for the Master Plan was ga thered
through survey results, management business needs, project lists, and interviews with
IT staff, along with management and departments’ focus groups. The Information
Technology Development CIB was created to provide funding for these projects.
- 1 -
PROP OSED 2015 -2016 IT CIB BUDGET SUMMARY
Project Description In Thousands
1. IT Infrastructure Replacement : End User - Replace approx. 40
PCs and L aptops
$80
2. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Data Center - Replace approx.
3 switches and other core IT infrastruc ture
$20
3. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other – Purchase approx. 12
tablets for CSO
$36
4. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other – Purchase approx. 9
Laptops for EOC
$18
5. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other – Upgrade P la nt security
camera s, hardware, softwa re , installation
$25
6. IT Division Move and New Personnel Additions: Office
Furniture , Wiring , and new personnel needs
$7 0
7. District Server Backup : Enable Cloud Storage capability for
District data (3rd leg of “stool”)
$50
8. Technical Infrastructure Room Up grades : Board Room ,
Conference and Training Room s
$60
9. Email Archiving Solution : Preservation and detailed search
capabilities re: email
$1 5
10. Consultant Services and I T Infrastructure :
Records Management Project
$200
11. Consultant Services and IT Infrastruc ture:
Time and Attendance Project
$175
12. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
Collaboration Software Project
$1 50
13. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
Dental Permits Project
$5 0
14. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
Desktop Virtuali zation
$70
15. Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure:
Telecommunications Audit
$1 5
Total Proposed IT CIB Budget $1 ,0 34
- 2 -
PROPOSED 2015 -2016 IT CIB BUDGET NARRATIVE
1. IT Infrastructure Replacement: End User - Replace approx. 4 0 PCs and L aptops
i. Standard desktops: $1.5k * (30) = $45k
ii. Enhanced desktops:$6.4k * (3) = 19
iii. Laptops: $2k * (8) = 16
$80k
This budget item will replace end -of -life personal computers and laptops.
2. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Data Center - Replace approx. 3 switches and
other core IT infrastructure:
i. Switches: $6.5k * (3) = $20k
This budget item will r eplace end -of -life data center infrastructure.
3. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other – Purchase approx. 12 tablets for CMMS +
other users:
i. Tablets: $3k * (12) = $36k
A tablet task force is anticipated to be established by the IT Steering
Committee to help determine the best tablet(s) for use and support at the
District. A determination will need to be made as to whether ruggedized
tablets, a standard tablet encased in a ruggedized case, or a standard
tablet will meet end -user needs. Costs for different solutions, especially
the ruggedized version, may significantly change budgeting projections.
Additionally, minimizing the different vendor products supported should
also be a consideration as it will have a direct impact on maintenance and
support time and effort.
4. IT Infrastructure Replaceme nt: Other – Purchase approx. 9 l aptops for EOC :
i. Laptops : $2k * (9) = $18k
This budget item will replace end -of -life laptops. These laptops are
dep loyed solely at and for EOC use.
5. IT Infrastructure Replacement: Other – Upgrade Plant security camera hardware
and software
i. New security surveillance system: $25k * (1) = $25k
The project will deploy and integrate a new security system at key Plant
locations.
6. IT Division Move and New Personnel Additions: Office Furniture, Wiring, and new
personnel needs:
i. New IT personnel infrastructure: $70k * (1) = $70k
- 3 -
Accommodate 5 newly hired IT positions in a centralized locat ion and their
specific needs. Examples include furniture, wiring, racks, window black -
out capabilities, etc.
7. District Server Backup : Enable Cloud Storage capability for District data (3rd leg
of “stool”)
i. Cloud -based data backup: $1.5k/Tb * (30) = $45k
ii. O ther misc. costs: $5k * (1) = $5
$50k
This capability will provide the District its 3 rd layer of data recovery. It will
also provide an out of the area, independent recovery option , if a worst
ca se scenario affects the Bay Area and the District specifically. Some
data may continue to be storage in an offsite facility , e.g. Recall.
Cost will be a variable based on overall storage requirements and
throughput requirements. Network storage costs var y widely from $1k/Tb
to thousands of dollars per Tb.
8. Technical Infrastructure Room Upgrades: Board Room, Conference , and
Training Rooms
i. Upgrade/Standardize Conference Room Capabilities:
$7.5 k * (4) = $30k
ii. Upgrade Board Conference Room: $25k * (1) = 25
iii. Misc.: $1k * (5) = $5
$60k
These upgrades will provide primary District conference rooms with
standard ized capabilities:
i. Projector and screen
ii. Conference room phone with extra microphones, if applicable
The Board Room will also have additional work done:
i. Video recording
ii. Indexing of minutes to video recording
iii. Upgrading of audio equipment
iv. Computer replacement and other misc. items.
9. Email Archiving Solution: Ability to efficiently preserve a nd search email
i. Email Archiving Appliance and Deployment: $15k * (1) = $15k
An email archiving solution will allow the District better control of the
growth of the current email database and allow the database(s) to be
searched more granularly, e.g. by to pic, user, etc.
It also will provide the District the ability to produce emails in a more
efficient manner in the event of an e -discovery process.
Email archiving can also provide an additional option in the need to
recover email.
- 4 -
10. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Records Project Management
i. Records Management Project Consulting Services:
$150k * (1) = $150k
ii. IT Infrastructure: e.g. WORM drive 50k * (1) = 50
$200k
The Records Management project is being led by the Secretary of the
District and the consultant firm ECS Imaging.
It will allow the District to meet legal requirements and provide a single
trusted source document for the District to rely on. It will also provide a
m ore efficient process to manage documents and by utilizing the
capabilities of more sophisticated software in the form of workflow.
Quotes for different services have been received.
11. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Time and Attendance Sof tware
i. Time and Attendance Consulting Services:
$125 k * (1) = $125k
ii. IT Infrastructure: Software Module(s) 50k * (1) = 50
$175k
Time and Attendance software will allow the District to eliminate much of
the labor and manual paper processes associated with the time keeping
process. Many employees have identified these capabilities as a key time
saver.
The ability for employees to directly change information, see balances and
receive information e lectronically will be a significant enhancement to the
District’s technical capabilities.
Additional functionality may be added for HRIS capabilities and
Purchasing.
Initial contact has been made with vendors to understand the current
technical functionali ty of Time Keeping and HRIS functionality and how
these systems would interact with the District’s current ERP.
12. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Collaboration Software Project
i. Consultant Services: $115k * (1) = $115k
ii. IT In frastructure: $35 k * (1) = 35
$ 150k
A new collaboration solution for the District will allow more information to
be shared easier. The District can start with one area it wants to
automate, or automate better, e.g. its Intranet , and then add additional
func tionality in the future.
The cost of the solution will be determined to a large degree upon what
and how much the District decides to automate and how many people are
going to use it.
- 5 -
13. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Dental Permits Project
i. C onsultant Services: $40k * (1) = $40k
ii. IT Infrastructure: $10k * (1) = 10k
$50k
The Dental Permits project will allow the District to more easily meet a
new Federal Requirement for capturing relevant information from Dental
offices.
It requires more information to be gathered which necessitates a technical
solution to more efficiently meet this requirement.
The Project is being led by the Engineering and Technical Services
Department.
This project may also provide an on -line payment option .
14. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Desktop Virtualization
i. Consultant Services: $45k * (1) = $45k
ii. IT Infrastructure: $25k * (1) = 25 k
$70k
This project will begin to transition the District away from personnel
computers on their desks to a “virtual” desktop running on a centralized
server.
It will help enable the District to streamline computer management and
costs while allowing end -users the mobility and freedom to access their
desktops’ anywhere, from any device.
i. Depending on the type of client chosen, savings may range from ½
to 1/3 of a typical desktop.
15. IT Consultant Services and IT Infrastructure: Telecommunications Audit
i. Telecom Audit: $15k * (1) = $15k
The Telecommunications Audit by an external entity will provide the
District a ssurance that all circuits currently being paid for are in use and
necessary as well as identify areas for future cost savings.
- 6 -
GI-7
Project Name Project No.8236
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %TBD
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000
Planning $58,894 $70,000 $1,000 $50,000 50,000 $229,894
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $58,894 $70,000 $12,000 $50,000 $50,000 $240,894
Purpose:To perfect or acquire new property land rights for existing or new sanitary sewers that are located
on private properties and are not associated with a current capital project for sewer renovation
work.
History:As capital projects are designed, sanitary sewer easements may have to be acquired through
budgets for those specific projects. This project provides funds for the acquisition of easements
for projects where specific funds are not identified in the Capital Improvement Budget.
Description:Easements that may be acquired through this project are:
• Locations where easements need to be purchased for existing sewers
• Sewers that need upgraded easement rights or access rights
• Sewers relocated through other public agency projects
• Outfall Easement Upgrade Project
• Recycled Water Program
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
District Easement Acquisition
District Easement Acquisition
General Improvements Program
Projects
Thomas Brightbill
GI-8
Project Name Project No.8237
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $212,000 $0 $0 $212,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $27,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,048
FY Total $27,048 $0 $212,000 $0 $0 $239,048
Martinez
Purpose:Protect and enhance the District’s property through additions, improvements, replacements, and
extraordinary repairs.
History:The District owns various properties surrounding the Treatment Plant, including the Imhoff
Triangle, the Kiewit parcel, 4849 Imhoff and 4737 Imhoff, and others. The Kiewit parcel has
served as a buffer zone for the Treatment Plant and has been the site of a clean fill operation for
several years. The Imhoff properties also serve as a buffer between the Treatment Plant and
nearby neighborhoods, and are used as rental property and to house some District work groups
and equipment.
Description:This project will fund needed improvements to the buffer and rental properties, and the
surrounding parking lots and grounds, relating to Safety items.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Buffer and Rental Property Improvements
Buffer and Rental Property Improvements
General Improvements Program
Projects
Thomas Brightbill
GI-9
Project Name Project No.8239
Program Phase D
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $240,000 $0 $0 $240,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction -$90,000 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
FY Total $0 $90,000 $240,000 $0 $0 $330,000
Purpose:The project purpose is to make improvements to the interior and exterior of the Plant Operations
Department (POD) Administration building.
History:The POD Administration building is over 30 years old. There is an ongoing need to renovate or
reconfigure office and workstation space to match employee needs and duties, to replace
outdated or worn out furniture, meet ADA requirements, and to incorporate new office
technologies.
Replacement of carpeting and repainting has been completed. Modular furniture has been
replaced in several cubicles.
Description:This multi-year project will provide an allowance to renovate and upgrade the interior and exterior
of the POD Administration offices and the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located in the
Multi-Purpose Room. Anticipated projects include installation of cabinetry for storage of EOC
equipment and sidewalk modifications for ADA access.
Engineering/ Capital Projects
POD Office Improvements
POD Office Improvements
General Improvements Program
Projects
Brad Leidecker
GI-10
Project Name Project No.8243
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %50%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $43,000 $0 $0 $43,000
Planning $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 $57,000
Design $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $100,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
FY Total $0 $57,000 $93,000 $1,050,000 $0 $1,200,000
Treatment Plant
Purpose:Relocate all computer/server/network equipment and related apprentices from the current
location in the basement of POD to a new location
History:In FY 2014-15, the project was initiated after a major IT server failure at the main network facility.
The existing room is a decommissioned laboratory facility which is vulnerable to several process
and other water pipelines.
Description:New project. At this time, this project will evaluate alternatives and possible locations to relocate
the District's main server equipment and consider future IT requirements. Upon the results of this
evaluation, staff will prioritize and update the costs and future schedule for any capital
improvements recommended.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Server Room Relocation
Server Room Relocation
General Improvements
Projects
Jason DeGroot
GI-11
Project Name Project No.8207
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %TBD
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $12,000
Planning $47,616 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,616
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $38,000 $100,000 $50,000 $188,000
FY Total $47,616 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $50,000 $247,616
Purpose:Improve safety for employees and the general public; meet safety standards; reduce the District's
exposure to liability; reduce loss of District's property; and reduce Operations and Maintenance
expenses.
History:The District has experienced property losses in the past. Improvements to the security system
are continually identified and refined. It is possible that additional security measures for essential
public service facilities may be required at some point.
Description:This project potentially includes upgrading alarm systems, adding card readers, adding gates in
the perimeter fencing, adding security cameras, improving lighting, fencing and or signage.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
General Security and Access
General Security and Access
General Improvements Program
Projects
Thomas Brightbill
GI-12
Project Name Project No.8233
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 55
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $13,000 $5,500 $0 $18,500
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction $161,103 $20,000 $0 $46,000 $50,000 $277,103
FY Total $161,103 $20,000 $13,000 $51,500 $50,000 $295,603
1250 Springbrook Road, Walnut Creek.
Purpose:Improve the safety, reliability, and maintainability of the Collection System Operations
Department facilities in Walnut Creek, including the vehicle maintenance shop.
History:This is a multi-year program to construct capital improvements to the CSOD site in Walnut
Creek. Projects will include improvements to the vehicle maintenance shop, which was not
included in the CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility project.
Description:Minor improvements are budgeted for FY 2015-16. Work includes improving drainage at
Materials Loading Facility.
Collection System Operation
CSOD Facility Improvements
CSOD Facility Improvements
General Improvements Program
Projects
Alex Rozul
GI-13
Project Name Project No.8234
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $10,000 $27,500 $0 $37,500
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $236,244 $60,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $396,244
FY Total $236,244 $60,000 $110,000 $27,500 $0 $433,744
Headquarters Office Building.
Purpose:Improve the safety, serviceability, maintainability, usability, and appearance of the interior and
exterior of the Headquarters Office Building (HOB).
History:The HOB was originally built by 1983 and seismically retrofitted in 2014. Although several interior
improvements have been recently completed, this project provides for necessary improvements
and for future modifications to the building.
Description:This project will provide for office space improvements in the lower level and for the third floor of
the building to accommodate relocating the IT division and newly adopted positions. Work will
include new partitions, modifying existing partitions, and offices as needed. Security
improvements will be coordinated with this project and be added to the scope.
Engineering/Capital Projects
HOB Improvements
HOB Improvements
General Improvements Program
Projects
Edgar Lopez
GI-14
Project Name Project No.8226
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 80
Dept/Division Concord %0%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction -$92,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $5,847,587 $92,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,939,587
Purpose:Upgrade the Headquarters Office Building (HOB) to current seismic safety standards.
History:Since the construction of the HOB in the mid-1980s, a great deal has been learned from the
Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes and earthquake code requirements have changed. In
2008 Complete Project Solutions, Inc. (CPS) completed an analysis of HOB identifying significant
seismic deficiencies based on current design standards.
CPS’ analysis of HOB revealed issues with the building columns and the steel moment frames.
While no building constructed with steel moment frames has collapsed in the United States, there
are unique aspects to the HOB that warrant additional concern. Combining the unique aspects of
the HOB and the lack of meeting current design standards indicate that HOB may not provide
basic life safety to occupants.
Description:Seismically retrofit HOB to provide up to an enhanced life safety level of structural performance.
Work will be coordinated with HOB Improvements for carpeting, painting, and other office space
enhancements. This project has been accepted and be closing in FY 15-16.
Engineering/Capital Projects
Seismic Improvements for HOB
Seismic Improvements for HOB
General Improvements Program
Projects
Edgar Lopez
GI-15
Project Name Project No.8230
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank N/A
Project Manager Ranking Score N/A
Dept/Division Concord %TBD
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $33,000 $67,500 $0 $100,500
Planning $79,285 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $109,285
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $79,285 $30,000 $33,000 $67,500 $0 $209,785
District-wide
Purpose:Streamline the processing of legal bills.
History:In the past, legal expenses were charged to individual capital projects. This process required
extra staff time each month to review legal bills and get approvals from several different project
managers.
Description:Capital legal service expenses are no longer charged to individual capital projects. Instead, legal
expenses are charged to one capital account with four charge numbers for the four programs.
This reduces the amount of time all parties must spend processing the legal bill.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Capital Legal Services
Capital Legal Services
General Improvements Program
Projects
Russell Leavitt
GI-16
Project Name Project No.8238
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 70
Dept/Division Concord %50%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Planning 8/1/2014 6/30/2018 $0 $600,000 $500,000 $900,000 $600,000 $2,600,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $600,000 $600,000 $900,000 $600,000 $2,700,000
District-wide
Purpose:Develop a comprehensive asset management program to optimize the lifecycle of the District's
assets to deliver high quality and reliable services in a sustainable manner for customers with an
acceptable level of risk
History:This project builds on the previous Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan, Force Main
Assessment, various master plans and the sewer renovation program.
In FY 14-15, a consultant was contracted to develop a multi-year implementation plan; Board
Policy 15 was adopted regarding asset management; began standardizing codes and cleaning
the plant’s asset registrar, assisted with the version upgrade to the plant’s CMMS as well as
improving its functionality, updated the pumping station assets; began drafting procedures and
data standards; and coordinated access to O&M manuals, shop drawings, reports, etc. through
TP GDI.
Description:The final version of the Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary Report was published
in March 2015. The elements identified were assigned by staff to existing projects where
applicable, included in maintenance efforts as continuous improvement efforts, and the
remaining elements will be completed in this project.
Implementation will require District staff time over the next three years to accomplish such tasks
as standardizing and completing the asset register, drafting to consolidate treatment plant As-
Builts, consolidating CCTV databases, and updating the asset management plan. Specialty tasks
that will be managed by District staff but also require outside assistance include utility locating,
developing the reliability centered maintenance program, conducting condition assessment of
critical TP piping, and may also include integrating failure-based maintenance strategies,
developing program management standards or software/tools, and reviewing the asset
management plan.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Asset Management Program Development
Asset Management Program Development
General Improvements Program
Asset Management Plan
Dana Lawson
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
April 6, 2015
File: 8238.25.5 .1
TO: ROGER S. BAILEY, GENERAL MANAGER
ANN SASAKI, DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
JEAN -MARC PETIT, DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES
F ROM: DANA LAWSON, S ENIOR ENGINEER
SUBJECT: ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (AMIP)
T he final version of the Asset Management Implementation Plan Summary Report was
published in March 2015; a copy is attached. T he objective of the first phase of the
District’s asset management program was to develop a comprehensive implementation
plan by evaluating the current asset management practices, assisting the District in
developing Board Policy 015 to set the District’s asset management goal, and then
developing elements to close the gaps between current practices and the goal. The goal
stated in that policy is to optimize the lifecycle of our assets in order to deliver high
quality, reliable services in a sustainable manner with an acceptable level of risk.
This memo describes which of the AMIP elements listed in the report are assigned to
District Project (DP) 8238, “A sset Management Program Development ”. The remaining
AMIP elements are currently being performed by maintenance staff as continuous
improvement objectives and through other capital projects such as the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan (i.e., condition a ssessment).
The implementation of the AMIP will be accomplished over the next three years, instead
of the five years suggested in the summary report. Implementation will require District
staff time to accomplish such tasks as standardizing and completing the asset register,
d rafting to c onsolidate t reatment p lant As -Buil ts , c onsolidat ing CCTV d atabases , and
updating the asset management plan.
Specialty tasks that will be managed by District staff but also require outside assistance
include utility locating, developing the reliability centered maintenance program,
conducting c ondition assessment of critical treatment plant piping , and may also include
integrating f ailure -based maintenance strategies, developing program management
standards or software/tools, and review ing the asset management plan .
Based on this updated approach, with a compressed schedule and assignment of AMIP
elements as discussed above, the report ’s original estimate of $4.6 M has been revi sed
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
to $2.1M. The chart below compares the AMIP report’s budget and schedule to the
revised budget and compressed schedule for DP 8238.
A more detailed breakdown of the remaining budget for DP 8238 over the next three
fiscal years is shown below with a description of outside services. Maintenance staff
time is not reflected in this table as the work related to Asset Management would be
part of their day to day routine task.
FY Total Engineering
Staff Time
Outside
Services Description of Outside Services
15 -16 $ 600,000 $ 350,000 $ 250,000 Utility locating, reliability centered maintenance
pilot
16 -17 $ 900,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 Condition assessment of critical TP piping
17 -18 $ 600,000 $ 400,000 $ 200,000
Failure -based maintenance strategies,
program management standards or
software/tools, review of asset management
plan
Totals $2,100,000 $1,350,000 $ 750,000
As a result, staff has amended several of the tables and figures to reflect the
assignment of plan elements to DP 8238 and compressed schedule.
1. Amended Table 1 Recommended AMIP Plan Elements: The amended table
shows the assignment of plan elements to other projects and to the Asset
Management Program Development.
2. Amended Figure 5 Three -Y ear Schedule : The amended figure shows the revised
schedule, now compressed from a five -year schedule to a three -year schedule .
3. Amended Table 2 Estimated Labor Costs by Plan Element and Calendar
Quarter: The amended table shows the cost to the Asset Management Program
$-
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
$1.4
14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Fiscal Year (FY)
DP 8238
AMIP Report
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Development to reflect the revised schedule. In addition, after assigning various
plan elements to other appropriate projects and operating budgets, DP 8238 has
an estimated total budget of $2.7M covering Fiscal Years 2014/15 through
2017/18.
4. Amended T able 3 Estimated Labor Hours and Costs by Plan Element and Fiscal
Year : The amended table sho ws the revised hours and cost to the Asset
Management Program Development to reflect the revised schedule for the three
fiscal years estimated to complete the project.
5. Amended Figure 6 Estimated Level of Effort: This amended figure depicts the
level of effort by quarter over the next three fiscal years.
DL/sdh
ecc : D. Gemmell, D. Heath, N. Meyer, P. Seitz, A. Weer, E. Lopez, S. Mestetsky, C. Mizutani,
N. Hodges, T. Brightbill, T. Godsey
Attachment s
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
Amended Table 1 Recommended AMIP Plan Elements
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
ID Element Name Planned
Start
Duration
(months)
Related Projects Already Underway
A Cost of Service and Staffing Needs Assessment Active 12
B CMMS Replacement, District Project 8242
Active 18 -24 2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
4 Business Process Mapping*
5 Knowledge Management Strategy
C1 IT Master Plan, District Project 8195 Active 12
C2 Financial ERP Replacement, District Project 8240 2015 -Q3 24 -36 4 Business Process Mapping*
C3 Electronic Content Management Evaluation, District Project 8240 Active 12 -18 5 Knowledge Management Strategy
D Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan, District Project 7315
2015 -Q3 24
6a Failure Modes and Condition Assessment Protocol
6b Condition Assessment of Pump Station / Treatment Plant Assets
7 Business Risk Exposure
7a Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and Apply to Assets
7b Risk Assessment
9 Asset Valuations
12 Strategic Forecasting
13 Capital Improvement Program Business Case Evaluations
Asset Management Plan Elements (DP 8238)
1 AM Organization, Policies and Key Strategies 2015 -Q1 9 (1)
2 Asset Register
2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards 2015 -Q1 3
2b Complete Asset Register - Pump Station & Treatment Plant Assets 2015 -Q1 3
2c Complete Utility Locating and Drafting to Consolidate Treatment
Plant Piping As -Builts 2015 -Q3 18
2d Complete Asset Register for Treatment Plant Piping 2016 -Q3 6
3 Plant Maintenance Strategy
3a Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot Program 2015 -Q3 24
3b Expand Reliability Centered Maintenance Program (pending 3a)* optional, in -house
6 Condition Assessments
6c Condition Assessment of Critical Treatment Plant Piping 2017 -Q1 6
6d Consolidate CCTV Databases 2016 -Q1 3
8 Failure -Based Maintenance Strategies* 2017 -Q3 6
10 Program and Project Management Standards* 2017 -Q1 6
11 Asset Commissioning and Handover* 2017 -Q1 6
14 Update Asset Management Plan 2017 -Q3 9
Notes:
(1) Element 1 is estimated to last nine months for the initial effort, followed by quarterly meetings and
some activity by the asset management steering committee for the duration of the AMIP.
(2) *optional, as -needed
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
No. Plan Element Planned
Start
Duration
(mos)
2015 2016 2017 2018
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Related Projects - Underway and/or Prerequisite to the Asset Management Implementation Plan
A Cost of Service & Staffing Needs Assessment Active 12
B CMMS Replacement, DP 8242
2015 -Q1 21
2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards
4 Business Process Mapping
5 Knowledge Management Strategy
C1 IT Master Plan, DP 7195 Active 12
C2 ERP Replacement, DP 8240 2016 -Q1 30
4 Business Process Mapping
C3 Electronic Content Management, DP 8240 Active 24
5 Knowledge Management Strategy
D Comprehensive TP & CS Master Plan
2015 -Q3 24
6a Failure Modes & Condition Asmt Protocol
6b Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets
7 Business Risk Exposure
7a Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and
Apply to Assets
7b Risk Assessment
9 Asset Valuations
12 Strategic Forecasting
13 Capital Improvement Program Business Case
Evaluations
Asset Management Plan Elements
1 AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies 2015 -Q1 9
2 Asse t Register
2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards incorporated in B
2b Complete Asset Register for Pump Station and
Treatment Plant Assets 2015 -Q1 9
2c Com plete Utility Locating, Drafting to Consolidate
Plant Piping As -Builts 2015 -Q3 18
2d Complete Asset Register for Plant Piping 2016 -Q3 6
3 P lant Maint Strategy
3a Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot 2015 -Q3 24
3b Expand RCM Program (pending 3a)* optional, in -house
6 Condition Assessments
6c Condition Asmt of Critical Treatment Plant Piping 2017 -Q1 12
6d Consolidate CCTV Databases 2016 -Q1 6
8 F ailure -Based Maintenance Strategies* 2017 -Q3 6
10 Program and Project Management Standards* 2017 -Q1 6
11 Asset Commissioning and Handover* 2017 -Q1 6
14 Update Asset Management Plan 2017 -Q3 9
Number of Active Elements by Quarter >> 3 2 4 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1
*optional , as -needed
ASSET MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
THREE -YEAR SCHEDULE
AMENDED FIGURE 5
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
AMENDED TABLE 2 Estimated Labor Costs by Plan Element and Calendar Quarter
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
No. Plan Element
Planned
Start
Duration
(mos)
Total
Hours
(est)
Total Cost
(est)
2015 2016 2017 2018
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
1 AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies 2015 -Q1 9 1,200 $212,700 $73,500 $73,500 $65,700
2 Asset Register
2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards incorporated in B 50 $8,750 $8,750
2b Complete Asset Register for Pump
Station and Treatment Plant Assets 2015 -Q1 9 42 4 $74,380 $35,000 $35,000 $4,380
2c Complete Utility Locating, Drafting
to Consolidate Plant Piping As -Builts 2015 -Q3 18 2,240 $408,800 $61,320 $61,320 $61,320 $102,200 $61,320 $61,320
2d Complete Asset Register for Plant
Piping 2016 -Q3 6 808 $147,460 $66,430 $81,030
3 Plant Maint Strategy
3a Reliability Centered Maintenance
Pilot 2015 -Q3 24 1,850 $337,250 $8,750 $36,500 $45,625 $45,625 $45,625 $45,625 $36,500 $36,500 $36,500
3b Expand RCM Program (p ending 3a)* optional, in -house
4 Business Process Mapping incorporated in B,
C2, as needed
5 Knowledge Management Strategy incorporated in B, C3
6 Condition Assessments
6a Failure Modes & Condition Asmt
Protocol incorporated in D
6b Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets incorporated in D
6c Condition Asmt of Critical
Treatment Plant Piping 2017 -Q1 12 1,280 $233,600 $58,400 $58,400 $58,400 $58,400
6d Consolidate CCTV Databases 2016 -Q1 6 320 $58,400 $29,200 $29,200
7 Business Risk Exposure
7a Develop Consequence of Failure
Criteria and Apply to Assets incorporated in D
7b Risk Assessment incorporated in D
8 Failure -Based Maintenance
Strategies* 2017 -Q3 6 1,160 $211,700 $95,265 $116,435
9 Asset Valuations incorporated in D
10 Program and Project Management
Standards* 2017 -Q1 6 992 $181,041 $81,578 $99,463
11 Asset Commissioning and Handover* 2017 -Q1 6 896 $163,521 $73,548 $89,973
12 Strategic Forecasting incorporated in D
13 Capital Improvement Program
Business Case Evaluations incorporated in D
14 Update Asset Management Plan 2017 -Q3 9 1,528 $278,861 $83,585 $97,638 $97,638 $0
*optional, as -needed Totals 12,748 $2,316,463 $117,250 $1 17,250 $167,900 $106,945 $136,145 $177,025 $173,375 $178,850 $250,026 $284,336 $237,250 $272,473 $97,638 $0
Future Fiscal Year Budget Estimates (rounded to $100k) $600,000 $900,000 $600,000
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
Attachment
AMENDED TABLE 3 Estimated Labor Hours and Costs by Plan Element and Fiscal Year
Asset Management Implementation Plan
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
No. Plan Element
Total Hours
(est) Total Cost (est)
FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18
Est Hours Est Cost Est Hours Est Cost Est Hours Est Cost Est Hours Est Cost
1 AM Org, Policies and Key Strategies 1,200 $212,700 840 $147,000 360 $65,700 2 Asset Register 2a Asset Hierarchy and Data Standards incorporated in B 50 $8,750
2b Complete Asset Register for Pump Station and Treatment
Plant Assets 424 $74,380 400 $70,000 24 $4,380
2c Complete Utility Locating, Drafting to Consolidate Plant
Piping As -Builts 2,240 $408,800 1,568 $286,160 672 $122,640
2d Complete Asset Register for Plant Piping 808 $147,460 808 $147,460 3 Plant Maint Strategy 3a Reliability Centered Maintenance Pilot 1,850 $337,250 50 $8,750 950 $173,375 850 $155,125 3b Expand RCM Program (pending 3a) optional, in -house 4 Business Process Mapping incorporated in B, C2, as needed 5 Knowledge Management Strategy incorporated in B, C3 6 Condition Assessments 6a Failure Modes & Condition Asmt Protocol incorporated in D 6b Condition Asmt of TP & PS Assets incorporated in D 6c Condition Asmt of Critical Treatment Plant Piping 1,280 $233,600 640 $116,800 640 $116,800
6d Consolidate CCTV Databases 320 $58,400 320 $58,400 7 Business Risk Exposure
7a Develop Consequence of Failure Criteria and Apply to
Assets incorporated in D
7b Risk Assessment incorporated in D 8 Failure -Based Maintenance Strategies 1,160 $211,700 1,160 $211,700
9 Asset Valuations incorporated in D 10 Program/Project Management Stds 992 $181,041 992 $181,041 11 Asset Commissioning and Handover 896 $163,521 896 $163,521 12 Strategic Forecasting incorporated in D 13 Capital Improvement Program Business Case Evaluations incorporated in D 14 Update Asset Management Plan 1,528 $278,861 1,528 $278,861
Totals (rounded to $100k) 12,748 $2,316,463 -- $600,000*** 3,222 $600,000 4,858 $900,000 3,328 $600,000
*optional, as -needed
**Plant Maintenance Staff time will be charged to O&M, o nly consultant and PM cost shown
***Includes work already completed this Fiscal Year but not included in the Carollo estimates
N:\TreatPlant \8238 - AM Prog Dev \26 Reports \5 Consultant Reports \1 Carollo \Transmittal Memo to staff.docx
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
Th e Dist r ict c urr ently d el iv ers a b out 200 millio n g al l ons p er y ear of recy cled w at e r
to 3 5 cust om ers l oc ated w ithin t he Zo n e 1 s er v ice area f or l a ndsc a pe i rr ig ation
a nd co mm erc i al u ses. Th e se c ustom ers are lo cat ed al ong the In t ersta te 680
c or r id o r in Ple asa nt H ill , Co ncor d, a nd Martine z. T he Dist r ict a lso u ses a bo ut
4 00 milli on g al l ons per y ear at t he tre atme nt pl a nt fo r pro cess w at e r a n d District
property la ndsca pe i rri gation. T he Re g io n al W at er Q ual ity Control B oard
(RWQ CB) enc o ura g es t h e Dist r ict to ex pa n d its rec y cled w at e r pro gram, and
activ ities must be re p orted annu al ly to the RWQ CB. T he D i str i ct contin u es to
pu rsue a num ber o f proj e cts as descri bed in t he follow ing pages.
The m ajor emp hasis o f t h e R ec y cled W at er P ro g ram f or t he ne xt f iscal y ear
wi ll b e supporting the recycled water elements included in the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan Project and connecting individual customer sites
within the Co n cord La ndscap e P r oject. The Dist r ict will also c o ntin u e e fforts
to a dd n ew cost- eff ecti v e c ustom ers i n t he Dist r ict’s Zone 1 s er v ice area,
p ursue outsi de fu nding assistanc e (su c h as fe deral a nd s t ate g rants for all
District recycled water projects), and work with water supply agencies to
develop recycled water supply alternatives. An alternative supply opportunity
may include a small -scale refinery project to serve 0.5 MGD to Shell Refinery
out of our existing treatment facilities. Expansion of the District’s residential
customer recycle water fill station as well as adding hydrants to distribute
recycled water for commercial use are also potential components .
2015 -16 Capital Improvement Budget ReW -1
RW-2
Project Name Project No.7299
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Design -$0 $0 $0 $0 -
Construction -$130,000 $87,000 $0 $0 -
FY Total $3,697,629 $130,000 $87,000 $0 $0 $3,914,629
Purpose:
History:
Description:
Extend the recycled water distribution system from the Buchanan Fields Golf Course to the
Diamond/Meridian Park Boulevard area of Concord and connect the landscape irrigation demand
at businesses and roadway medians. Completion of this project will provide up to 190 acre-feet
per year (AFY) of recycled water for landscape irrigation customers.
Construction of the distribution system was completed in early 2014. Work included installation of
the mainline pipe and service laterals to each property that agreed to accept recycled water.
Because of substantial coordination issues between various agencies with jurisdiction and
property owners, the connection phase was planned to be done as a separate capital project.
Chevron, the single largest user, was connected during FY2014/2015.
The customer connection phase began in FY2014/2015. While there are as many as 34
potential connections to be made there are various technical and regulatory challenges
preventing the connection of all potential customers. The current connection project was bid and
awarded as DP 7299A and includes approximately 14 connections. As for the remaining
customer connections, staff will work with applicable regulatory agencies to determine the
feasibility of future customer connections.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Concord Landscape Project
Concord Landscape Project
Recycled Water Program
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-3
Project Name Project No.7279
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very H
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
Planning $264,855 $1,100 $0 $0 $0 $265,955
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $264,855 $1,100 $0 $5,000 $0 $270,955
Purpose:Identify recycled water infrastructure necessary to serve the proposed development being
planned at the Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS) site as part of the Concord Community
Reuse Project.
History:The planned redevelopment of the CNWS property provides an excellent opportunity to expand
recycled water use in the District’s service area. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a
preferred development plan and in 2010, the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
completed. It includes recycled water demand scenarios of up to 2,749 AFY for landscape
irrigation. In 2012, the District completed a Recycled Water Facilities plan for the CNWS
Redevelopment that identified the conceptual recycled water infrastructure necessary to serve
the irrigation demands identified in the EIR. Additionally, a will-service letter was submitted to the
developers indicating the District's willingness to provide recycled water.
Description:As CNWS redevelopment plans move forward, the Recycled Water Facilities Plan will form the
basis of future work, and will be validated against recommendations from the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan. Staff will work with CNWS Project proponents and other agencies to
confirm required facilities, recycled water usage, and how the costs will be apportioned to the
appropriate parties.
Engineering/Planning & Development Services
Concord Naval Weapons Station Recycled Water Planning
Concord Naval Weapons Station Recycled Water Planning
Recycled Water Program
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-4
Project Name Project No.7300
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very High
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $283,727 $50,000 $4,000 $47,500 $0 $385,227
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $283,727 $50,000 $4,000 $47,500 $0 $385,227
Purpose:Determine the feasibility of providing recycled water to the Shell and/or Tesoro refineries in
Martinez.
History:Staff has worked with Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) and refinery staff to determine if and
how recycled water might fit into future water supply scenarios. The two refineries use a
combined total of approximately 22,500 acre feet per year (AFY) of Delta water of which some
portion could be replaced with recycled water. In 2011, CCCSD was awarded a grant from the
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation. The
feasibility study closeout report was submitted March 2014. Staff has pursued a variety of federal
and state funding sources in an effort to improve the economics of a potential project. Some
infrastructure required for this project already exists, but new treatment facilities are needed to
meet refinery water quality requirements.
Description:Work with CCWD to develop a project to serve the refineries. Such a project could range from
0.5MGD to complete replacement of the refineries' Delta water. Continue pursuit of funding
options in coordination with CCWD for the development of a larger-scale refinery project that
may include the construction of new recycled water treatment facilities including nitrification,
filtration, and disinfection facilities and possibly denitrification facilities. Depending on the volume
of recycled water served, the total estimated project cost can range from $31 to $100 million. At
this time, budget is only included for project planning activities and to pursue funding and project
partners.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Refinery Recycled Water Project
Refinery Recycled Water Project
Recycled Water Program
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-5
Project Name Project No.7306
Program Phase C
Sub-Program Priority Rank Very H
Project Manager Ranking Score 50
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase:Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $35,061 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,061
Design $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Construction $0 $0 $29,000 $46,000 $500,000 $575,000
FY Total $35,061 $50,000 $29,000 $46,000 $500,000 $660,061
Purpose:
History:
Description:
In 2001, the District completed the Zone 1 Implementation Plan that provided estimated
connection costs and revenues for customers identified in the CCWD Zone 1 Project Agreement.
Depending on the extent of use, demand for recycled water in Zone 1 for landscape irrigation and
commercial uses could be up to 400 million gallons per year. New customers will continue to be
added to the system where technically and economically feasible. The District is focusing on
connecting cost-effective landscape irrigation sites near existing recycled water distribution
pipelines.
Provide recycled water for landscape irrigation and other identified uses in the Zone 1 Project
area, which includes Pleasant Hill and portions of Concord and Martinez.
This project provides funds for the planning, design, and construction of recycled water facilities
for landscape irrigation customers and other identified uses in the Zone 1 Project area.
Subsequent phases of this project continue in future fiscal years.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Zone 1 Recycled Water – Phase 1C
Zone 1 Recycled Water – Phase 1C
Recycled Water Program
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-6
Project Name Project No.7344
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $100,000 $150,000 $0 $250,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $100,000 $150,000 $0 $250,000
Purpose:
History:
Description:This project will continue efforts to increase the demand for recycled water. Perform planning
studies for the District’s recycled water program to address implementation issues such as
funding, regulations, treatment technologies, developing policies (i.e. satellite recycled water
facilities), public education, and gaining political support from public agencies.
The District has worked with local water purveyors over the years to develop partnerships and
identify opportunities to expand recycled water use. Recent planning efforts have focused on the
refinery recycled water project; the use of recycled water on buffer properties near the treatment
plant; the use of satellite treatment facilities to provide recycled water to landscape irrigation
customers in remote areas; other recycled water projects outside the District's existing Zone 1
Project Area; and work to comply with State Water Resources Control Board requirements for
salt and nutrient management plans.
Develop and implement a comprehensive long-term Recycled Water Program that provides
recycled water for landscape irrigation, industrial reuse, and other applications.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Recycled Water Planning
Recycled Water Planning
Recycled Water Program
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-7
Project Name Project No.7345
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000
FY Total $0 $0 $200,000 $150,000 $0 $350,000
Purpose:
History:
Description:
This project will evaluate existing recycled water facilities at the treatment plant, and evaluate
alternatives related to zero-discharge.
The Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan will provide a framework for the future
management of the District's collection system and treatment plant. Included in this effort is an
evaluation of the recycled water facilities.
This project provides the funding for the Comprehensive Master Plan consultant to conduct the
evaluations and other work related to recycled water facilities.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Filter Plant
Filter Plant
Recycled Water Planning
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
RW-8
Project Name Project No.7346
Program Phase P
Sub-Program Priority Rank Critical
Project Manager Ranking Score 65
Dept/Division Concord %100%
Location:
Schedule & Budget
Phase: Start Q/FY End Q/FY Prior FY's FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Future FY's Total
Carryover $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planning $0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $65,000
Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY Total $0 $0 $0 $65,000 $0 $65,000
Purpose:
History:
Description:
Conduct a surge analysis of the recycled water distribution system.
The distribution system has experienced a number of pipeline breaks over the last few years.
Analysis of the circumstances surrounding many of these issues has been a concern with
pressure fluctuations.
This project will analyze the distribution system including pumping to determine if any
improvements are needed to ensure the long-term integrity of the recycled water pipeline system.
Engineering/Planning and Development Services
Surge Analysis
Surge Analysis
Recycled Water Planning
Urban Landscaping
Nathan Hodges
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan
201 5 CA PI TAL I MPR O VEME NT PLAN
TEN YEARS EN DING JUNE 30, 202 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Purpose CIP -2
Ca p ital I m pro v e m ent P ro g ram Objecti v es CIP -2
Drivers CIP -3
Spec i f ic Pro j ects i n t h e T e n -Y ear Pl a n CIP -4
Su m m ary CIP -4
Pro g ra m s
T re a tment Pla n t Pro g ram CIP -5
Collection S y st e m Pr o g ram CIP -11
G e neral Impro v e m e nts Pro g ram CIP -18
Rec y cled W a t e r Pro g ram CIP -20
Ca p ital I m pro v e m ent E x penditures CIP -2 1
Table 1: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures – Summary by
Program
CIP -2 2
Table 2: FY 2015 CIB and CIP CIP -23
Table 3: Ten -year Program Estimated Expenditures – Collection System CIP -25
Comprehensive Master Plan CIP -28
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-2
2015 CA PI TAL IMPR OV EMENT PL A N
T EN YEARS E ND ING J UN E 30, 2025
P UR POSE
The Ce ntral Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) is responsible for the collection,
treatment, a nd disposal of wastew at er for a populatio n of approximately 4 71 ,000 in central
C ontra Cost a County. The District h as developed a ten-y ear Ca pital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for the Distr ict’s ca pital facilities a nd financi ng needs. The CIP is up da t ed every year.
S pec ifically , t he plan id e nt ifies and pri or i ti zes capital projects needed to ac com pl ish th e
District's missio n. It also incl ud es cost estimates for propos ed project work and projectio ns
for the v ar ious sources of rev en u e need ed t o meet the cash flow re q ui rements o f the CIP.
Th e principal purpose of the CIP is to provide the District's Board of Directors with th e
inf ormation ne ed e d to formula te long-rang e p ol icy re garding:
Pr i or i ty and Schedule – id e nt ify, pri or i ti ze, and schedule the proje ct s necessary to
ac com pl ish th e Distr ict’s missi on.
Financing – plan su ff ic i ent financial resources for com pl etion of t he projects
proposed in the CIP.
The f ol lowing discussion p ro v id es: 1) a ge ne ral description o f t he pl an; and 2) a discussion of
p otential, un b ud g et ed future projects.
Capital Im prov eme nt Pr ogr am Objectiv es
The District h as identified four pr incipal o bj ectiv es for its C apital Improvement Prog ra m:
1. Support the Distr ict’s missi on t o protect pu bl ic h eal t h a nd the en vir on me nt by:
- Collecting a nd treating wastew at er
- Embracing a policy of sustainability for the responsible use of existing resources
- Promoting environmental stewardship
2. Accommo da te future g ro w th in the s er vice area as approv ed by the city a nd
county p la nning ag enc ies responsible for land use pol icy decisions.
3. Respond to issues of community concern by:
- M ana ging the cost o f operating a nd m ai nta in i ng faci lities
- Reducing objection ab l e odors
- Cooper ating wit h oth er p ubl ic agencies t o avoid du pl ication o f effort and
improve service d el ivery
- Reducing power consumptio n throug h e ner gy ma na ge m ent
4. Asset Management
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-3
Drivers
Ca pital improvement projects are identified by four major drivers: Replacement and
Rehabilitation, Regulatory, Sustainability/Energy/Optimization, and Capacity Expansion.
Below is a br ie f discussio n o f each dr iv er .
Replacement and Rehabilitation
This category focuses on projects related to aging infrastructure and the replacement
requirements of the District. The District operates and maintains approximately $3.5 billion of
assets, and several projects in each program have been initiated or in progress to meet the
replacement or rehabilitation of the District’s infrastructure.
Regulatory
This category focuses on projects that aim to ensure that the District remains in full regulatory
and safety compliance with all applicable regulations.
Sustainability/En ergy/Optimization
This category focuses on projects that optimize existing processes, or energy efficiency, and
sustainability of the treatment plant or collection system and other facilities.
Capacity Expansion
The capacity exp an sion projects are developed to u pg rade and improv e existing facilities to
m eet increasing flow d ue t o in-fill, n ew development, a nd wet w eat her.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-4
S PE CIF IC PR OJ E CT S IN TH E TEN-YEAR PL AN
The CIP is broken do wn into fo ur categories: 1) Replacement and Rehabilitation,
2) Regulatory, 3) Sustainability/Energy/Optimization, and 4) Capacity Expansion .
A s projects develop and are prioritized, they are grouped in to the four prog ra ms as
shown in the CIB: Treatment Plant, Collection System , Ge neral Improvements,
and Recycled Water. A br ie f descr iptio n o f each p ro gram a nd a list of projec ts f or
the te n years of this pl an are prov id ed in the C apital Plan sections fo r e ach of the
four prog ra ms.
SUMMARY
This CIP assumes that funds will be av ai lable to support the plan. These funds come
from a ll the sources of rev enue as discussed in the Finance and Revenue section. The
only two discretionary s ources of re venue a re th e sale of bonds o r adjustm en t of the
c api tal component of t he Se wer Service Charg e. This document is for planning
purposes o nl y . Th e District Board h as not v ot ed to sell bonds to fu nd this plann ed
prog ra m. The plan is fun ded on a ye ar-by-year basis when the Capital Improvem ent
B udg et (CIB) for the up coming fiscal year (FY) is form al ly a ut h or iz ed a nd ad o pt ed by th e
Board. Ch anges in capital revenue forecasts or changes in recomm en ded expenditures
m ay result in chang es to this ten-year pla n.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-5
TR EATMENT PL ANT PR OGR AM
The Treatment Plant P ro gram includes p ro jects tha t wil l meet ch an ging re gulatory
man da tes, address re c ur ring re novation needs, an d upgrade the wastew at er treatment
plan t in ar eas suc h as hydraulic/process a nd solids ha ndl ing. T he emphasis of the
T re atment Plant Program will be o n t he re no vation ne eds of th e aging inf ra structure o f
our complex treatme nt facility a nd on me eting incr ea singly stringent regulatory
re q ui rem en ts. The Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan will be started in FY 20 15 -
16 and continue up to two years. This master plan effort will help the District coordinate
and evaluate past studies and planning work and provide new condition assessments to
produce a future CIP. The information presented in the FY 2015 CIP will be coordinated
with the Master Plan effort and revised for future projects.
Ca pacity improvements will be prim ar i ly focused on those projects ne eded fo r t he s ol ids
handl i ng p ro cesses a nd to handle w et w eat h er flows. One larg e potential re gulatory
project facing the District in the nex t t en to twenty years: the Nutrient Remov al proj ect.
Staff will continue to evaluate treatment alternatives and pilot programs in anticipation of
possible regulatory changes and to help identify improvements and process capabilities.
These projects will include Zeolite-Anammox, screening removal, and solids
handling/dewatering.
This section is a listing of t he projects in th e ten-year CIP that pertain to the District's
wastew at er treatme nt plan t. T he CIP is bas e d on the recognition th at plant facilities
re qu ir e ongoing re novations a nd re p la cement. Environme nt a l regulations wi ll becom e
more stringent, a nd the District is on a g radual but steady pace towards build-out over
the next 20 ye ars. Major emphasis is on m ai ntaining existing assets, improving
processes when cost effective, an d e nsuri ng re gulatory c ompl i ance.
Replacement and Rehabilitation
Th e goals of this category are t o p ro vide fo r ongoing or future renovation activities.
This category p ro vides ca pi t al funds fo r replacem ent or rehabilitati on of aging
treatment p la n t i nf ra structure. T he projects in this category include Equipment
Re placement, Piping Renovations and Replacement, Electrical a nd Instrumentation
Re placement, and Electrical Switchgear Project.
Regulatory
Th e goals of the Regul at o ry a nd Safety projects are to ensure tha t e xisting and futu re
facilities meet safe ty and reg ul ato ry re q ui rements. Thes e p ro jects cover a wide v ar iety
of subjects to improve facilities for safety reasons, to re duc e emissions of poll ut ants t o
the envir on men t, a nd to m eet futu re re gulatory re q ui reme nt s . Budget ed projects to
address regulatory re q ui rem en ts include such projects as the wet and dry scrubber
replacement , headworks screening removal, multiple hearth furnaces (MHF)
i mprovements (emissions req ui rements), outfall improvements, and so il re mediatio n.
S ustainability/Energy/Optimization
The goals of the Sustainability/Energy/Optimization projects are to continue upgrading
and improving the treatment plants existing infrastructure and systems to optimize for
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-6
energy use, lower maintenance costs, and prevent major failures at the treatment plant.
Projects in this category include seismic improvements, centrifuge and cake pump
upgrades, plant energy optimization, and aeration system improvements.
Capacity Expansion
Th e goals of th e exp an sion projects are to u pg rade and improv e existing facilities to
meet increasing flow d ue t o in-fill, n ew development, a nd wet w eat her. Tw o wet
w eat her capacity issues will be addressed: completion of the addition of increas ed
primary treatment capacity , a n d t he installation o f n ew bar screens .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-7
Treatment P l ant Replacement and Rehabilitation P r o j ects - 2 0 1 5 C a pital Impro v ement Pl a n:
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
Piping Reno v ations
and Repla c e m ent
Pro g ram
20 1 5
through
20 2 5
Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T his project w i l l impro v e t h e reliabi l ity o f tre at m e n t pl a nt piping
s y st em s abo v e a n d b elow g round b y inspe c tion, re n o v ation, a n d
re p l ac e m e nt w here re q ui r ed. The A sset M a n a g e m e nt Plan w i l l
ultimat e ly b e used to pro v ide rec o m m e n d at i ons f o r a d ditio n al r en e w al
and re p la c e m ent n eeds o f o t her m ajor piping s y st em s.
T re a tme n t Pla n t
E q uip m e nt
Re p lac e m e nt
20 1 5
through
20 2 5
Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
I n v esti g ate a n d re p l a c e p l a nt e q ui p m e nt t o r e duce m a i nt e nan c e c o s ts,
increase reli a bi l it y , and i m pro v e tre a tme n t o p erations t h rou g h
r epla c e m e nt or r eco n ditio n ing o f t e c hnolo g ically o bsole t e, w or n out,
m a i nt e nan c e -intensi v e e q ui p m en t , o r e q uip m e nt t hat is n o l on g er
su p port e d b y its m a nu f a c t u rer.
P l ant Electr i cal and
I n str u m e n t a ti o n
Re p lac e m e nt
20 1 5
through
20 2 5
Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T h e p ro j ect w i l l id e nti f y d e f ic i e ncies in t he el e ctr i cal, c o ntrol and
instrume n t a tion s y st e m s in t he T r e a t m e nt P l ant and rect i f y the se
iss u es.
T re a tme n t Pla n t
P r ot e cti v e Coating
Re n o v ation
20 1 7
through
20 2 5
Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T h e A sset M a n a g e m e nt Plan Project is doc u m e nting t h e c o nd i tion o f
D i s trict f aci l ities and e q uipment a n d w i l l b e used to re c o m m e nd
n e ed e d c o a ting p roject s .
Treatment P l ant Re g ulat o r y a nd Safe t y Pro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Capit a l Imp r o v ement Pl a n:
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
N i tri f ication 20 2 3 Aerati o n Bas i ns a nd
C l ar i f iers
T h e Dist r ict may b e r eq ui r ed to r e m o v e amm onia f r o m e f f l u ent f l ow in
the f u t u re. T his w i l l r e q uire e it h er an e x pansi o n o f t h e a erati o n t a nks
a nd clar i f iers or use o f o t h e r tech n olo g ies a n d si g ni f i c ant c apital
e x pend i t u res.
Dis i nf e cti o n
20 2 4 U l tra v iolet
D i sin f e c ti on
De p e n ding o n f u t ure r eg ulatory re q ui r e m ents and neces s ary
m od i f i c ations to t h e tr e a t m e n t pl a nt , an a l t ernat i v e d is i n f e ct i on m e t hod
may b e re q ui r ed.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-8
New Sol i ds Handl i ng
Facil i ties
(M HF/D i g est e rs)
20 2 3 Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T h ere a re a n u m ber o f pot e ntial r e g ula t ory c h an g es t h at m ay b e
impl e m e n t e d w ithin t h e n e x t t e n y ears. T he s e c h an g es m ay inclu d e
re q ui r e m e n ts t h at w i l l necessi t ate r e plac e m e nt o f t h e e x isting Multiple
He a rt h Furna c es w ith Fluidi z ed Bed I ncin e r a t ors , or c o n s truction o f
Anae r obic D i g est e rs or u se o f o t h er a v ai l able t e ch n olo g y f or tr e a t m e nt
a nd disp o sal o f sl u d g e. T h ese a nticip a t ed c h a n g es in s o l ids h a ndl i ng
w i ll re q ui r e si g ni f ica n t c api t al e x pendi t ures in t h e ne x t f i fte e n y ears.
T P S a f e ty
I m pro v e m ents
Pro g ram
o ngoing Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
I m pro v e m ents w i l l be m a d e t o e nh a nce and pro v ide a s a f e
w ork i ng en v i r on m e n t t h r ou g h o ut t h e tr e a t m e n t pl a nt.
Fu t ure Re g ula t ory
Projects 20 2 1 Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
Pot e ntial n ew re g ulatio n s t h at i m pact o p erati o n o f t h e trea t m ent pla n t
w i l l e m er g e in the f u t u re. St u dies w i l l be u nder t a ken a nd projects
c ons t ructed to a ddress t he s e issu e s.
Pr i m ary T rea t m e nt
Co v ers 20 22 Pr i m ary Sed B asins Pr i m ary tanks m ay n e e d to be c o v ered to me e t re g ulatio n s a n d re d u c e
odors.
T re a tme n t Pla n t
Ha z ard Ident i f i c ation
and Re m ediat i on ,
Ph ase 2
20 2 0
Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T his project w i l l id e nt i fy a nd remedia t e h a z ardous m a t e r i als w ithin t he
t re a tme n t p la n t. T his w i ll m ini m i z e the e x posure o f t h e Dist r ict’s
e m p l o y ees to ha z ard o us mat e r i als d ur i ng the c o urse o f t heir w ork.
T re a tme n t Pla n t Soil
Re m e diati o n , Ph ase 2 20 2 3
Area e ast o f
e x isting a eration
t a nks
T h e s o il e ast o f t he e x i sting a erati o n t a nks is cont a m i n at e d. T o
e x pand t h e aerati o n t anks in p r eparat i on f o r pl a nt c on v ers i on f or
nit r i f i c atio n , the cont a m i n at e d s o il w i l l ha v e to be either tr e a t ed o n site
o r r e m o v ed and disp o s e d a t a n a p prop r iate -class l a n d f i l l.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-9
Treatment P l ant Sustainability/Energy/Optimization P ro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Cap i tal Impro v ement Pl a n :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
SCB Sei s m ic
I m pro v e m ents 20 2 2 Sol i ds Co n ditio n ing
Bui l ding
Desi g n a nd c onstru c t s eismic i m pro v e m e nts b ased up o n t he
reco m m e nd a tions pro v id e d in w ork d o ne un d er the T r e a t m e nt Pl a nt
Seismic E v alu a tion Project . T he i m pro v e m ents w i l l m eet re q ui r e m ents
o f t h e la t est b ui l ding c o de s . T i m in g /n e ed f o r this pro j ect w i ll b e
c o ordi n at e d w ith t h e rec om m e n dat i o n s f r om t h e New Sol i ds Ha n dl i ng
p rojec t .
Furnace Burner 20 1 9 Sol i ds Co n ditio n ing
Bui l ding
M odi f i c ations w i l l be ma d e to ensure c o m pl i a nce w i th e m er g ing
re g ulatio n s. This proj e ct w i l l impro v e o perati o nal f le x ibil i ty o f t h e
m ultiple h e arth f u rna c e s b y a dding a u x i l iary f u el del i v er y , piping
a nd burners, and t h e a bi l ity to c o -f i r e na t ural a nd l an d f i l l g ases f o r
t h e f u rnace s .
W a r e h ou s e
Seismic U p g ra d e 20 1 9 W a r e h ou s e/
Mec h anic a l Shop
T his project w i l l desi g n a nd c o n s truct s e i s m ic impro v e m e nts bas e d o n
t h e re c o m m e n d ations pro v id e d in w ork d o n e un d er the T rea t m e nt P l ant
Seismic E v alu a tion Project. T he i m pro v e m ents w i l l m eet re q ui r e m ents
o f t h e la t est b ui l ding c o de s .
Alternati v e E n er g y
Facil i ties , Ph ase 2 20 2 2 Enti r e T re a tme n t
Pla n t
T his project inc l udes e v alu a tion a nd r e plac e m e n t o f t h e D i str i ct’s
co g enerati o n u nit w ith a n e w , m ore e ffic i ent p o w er g eneration u nit o r
u se o f a n a l t ernati v e e n er g y s o urce.
Aerati o n S y st e m
Re n o v ation ,
Ph ase 2
20 1 9
Pu m p and Blo w er
B u i l di n g and Pr i m ary
T a nks a r e a
T his project w i l l desi g n a nd c o n s truct s m all e l ectr i c b lo w ers f or t h e g r i t
cha m bers a nd w i l l opt i m i z e u se o f e x isting steam b lo w ers a n d mo d i f y
the e x isting e lectr i c b lo w er. A dding n it r i f i c ati o n a n d/o r nutrie n t
r e m o v al to t h e tr e a t m e n t pro c e ss w i l l ha v e a major i m pact on t he
aerat i on s y st e m a n d w i l l need t o b e e v alu a t e d.
Seco n dary Process
I m pro v e m ents ,
Ph ase 2
20 2 0 Aerati o n Bas i ns
a nd C l ar i f iers
T his project w i l l r eplace a n d m od i f y e x isting p iping a nd c o m po n ents o f
t h e s eco n dary p rocess to e x t e n d t he l i f e o f t h e s y st e m a nd a d d
f le x ibil i ty to t h e s e l ect o r c h a n ne l .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-10
Treatment P l ant Sustainability/Energy/Optimization P ro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Cap i tal Impro v ement Pl a n :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
La b orat o ry Seismic
Up g rade 20 2 4 La b orat o ry
T his project w i l l desi g n a nd c o n s truct s e i s m i c impro v e m e nts bas e d o n t h e
re c o m m e n d ations pro v id e d in w ork d o n e un d er the T rea t m e nt P l ant
Seismic E v alu a tion Proje ct . T he i m pro v e m ents w i l l m eet re q ui r e m ents o f
t h e la t est b ui l ding c o de s .
Treatment P l ant Capacity Exp a nsion P ro j ects - 201 5 Capital Impro v e ment Pl a n :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
Bar Scre e n f o r
T hi r d W e t W e ll 20 2 5 He a d w orks
T his project w i l l install n ew b ar sc r e e n s o n th e thi r d w et w ell in the
he a d w orks f aci l ities. I nst a l l ing n ew a ut o m a tic b ar sc r e e n s o n t h e th i r d
w et w ell w i l l prot e ct pl a nt tre a tme n t f aci l ities, i n a d dition to pro v iding p la n t
opera t ors a d ditio n al f l e x ibil i t y in ro u ting inco m ing p la n t f lo w s.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-11
CO LL E CT ION SYSTEM PR OGR AM
The Collection System Program includes projects n ee d ed to re no vat e aging sewers
and to s er v e n ew de velopment in the District's service area. S pec ific n ea r-term a nd
lo ng-term goals incl ud e upgrading the system where necessary to address capacity
ne eds, improving the r el i abi lity of the District 's pumping stations, and implementing
projects t o address renovation needs. Th e C ol lection System Master Plan and
hydraulic model analysis ha v e bee n us ed to i dent ify an d pri or i ti ze the collectio n
s ystem projects.
Since its inception in FY 2 00 2-03 , the District -Wide TV Inspection program has been
used to identify line segments in ne ed of renovation. T he TV ins pec tion results,
couple d with CSO mai nt enance records and hydraulic a nal ysis, are used to pr i or i ti z e
lines in n eed of renovation. The areas of concern a re the n group ed g eo graphically and
bid as District projects. The TV inspec ti o n p ro g ram helps CSO t o better prioritize and
plan maintenance activities and h as been mov ed t o the Opera ti ons an d Maintenance
budget to reflect t he on going and Distr ic t-wi de nature o f t he p ro g ra m.
The Collection System Master Pl an is u pd ate d p er io dically Distr ic t-wide and is rev is ite d
on a ro u ti n e basis when changes in developmen t patterns occur. This plan do cuments
th e sewers which will need to be upsized to increase capacity ov er approximate ly the
ne xt 30 years. As this capacity is needed, these lines are a dd e d t o t he capital prog ra m.
The Collection System Program also p ro v id es f or pum pi ng station and force main
improvements to increase station capacity, provide em er gency power, and upgrade old
eq ui pme nt to increase capacity and improve reliabil it y.
The Collection System Program includes projects to p ro v ide re nov at i on o f t he collectio n
s ystem infrastructure a nd to serv e n ew developm ent in the Distr ict’s ser vice area.
Projects also p ro vide improvements to pumpi ng stations and f or ce mains. These
improvements provide capacity a nd re novation to re du ce the likeliho od of sewag e
ov er f lo ws d ur i ng d ry a nd wet w eat her.
Renovation
The renovation sub-program goal is t o address recurring re novation n ee ds. I n prior
years, renovation ne eds were identifi ed by CSOD through their critical li ne segments
list. This information is now a ug mented by a c om pr ehensiv e TV inspectio n program o f
th e entire collection system that is n ow fund ed through the Distr ict’s O p er ation s a nd
Maintenance budget. This inform at ion is being utilized to develop improv ed estimates
of the short- and l ong -term recu rr ing re novation needs. The Distr ict’s col lection s ystem
c ontains pipe reaches o f ma ny mat er ial types, sizes, ages, and ot her installation
conditions th at must be evaluat ed and replaced o n a n a ppr o pr iate cycle. This cycle is
de termine d by the conditio n of th e pip e.
Regulatory Compliance/Planning/Safety
For the past f ew years, the District has anticip at ed more string ent r eg ulations with
respect t o t he opera ti o n and maintenance o f the collection system to re duce ov er f lo ws.
The local Reg io n al Water Quali ty Control Bo ard staff implem en t ed such a p ro gram i n
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-12
20 05, a nd the St a te Bo ard implem en t ed a similar req ui rement i n 2006. Both re gulatory
bodies re q ui r e each collection system agency to hav e p re pared a Se wer Syste m
M ana gement Plan (S SMP). Th ey re q ui re caref ul re view a nd documentation of the
Distri ct’s c ontinuing evalua ti o n a nd planning for the c ol lection system in t he areas o f
capacity ma na ge men t, o per ation, and main te nan c e.
Deteriorating private sewer laterals are known to be a significant source of inflow and
infiltration (I/I) throughout the wastewater industry. Addressing this issue will require
substantial capital and extensive coordination. The District has been actively
participating in discussions related to the reduction of private property I/I on the local
and state levels. It is anticipated that more stringent regulations to address
deteriorated private sewer laterals will be imposed in the not-too-distant future.
Expansion
As part of t he upcoming Collection System Ma ster Plan Update, the Distr ict’s sewer
s ystem hydraulic mode l w ill be updated; capacity def ic iencies will be id e nt ified and
pr i or i ti z ed. L ar ge-c a pa city projects that are currently plann ed over th e nex t t e n years
include trunk sewer improvements in locations in Pl easant Hi ll, a lo ng La nc aster Road
an d th e Walnut Boulevard c or r id or in Wa ln ut Creek, Moraga W ay in Or in da , in
San Ramon (Schedule C Inte rc e pt or), and trunk sewers al ong Alhambra Avenue in
Martinez. Developer sewers and ot h er projects throu gh out the District relieve and
expand capacity-limited pipe sections.
Pumping Stations
Si g ni ficant fu nds ha ve be en investe d in th e pumpi ng stati ons over the last several
y ears, and by now all major pumping st a tions in the service area hav e b een improv ed
and /or renov at e d.
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-13
Collection S y stem R e n o v ation Pro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Ca p ital Imp r o v ement Pl an :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
M t. Dia b lo B oule v ard
M ain Impro v e m e nts 20 2 2 Mt. D i a blo
Bl v d.
Re h abi l ita t e o r r e place s e w ers w ithin t h e Mt. D i ablo Bl v d . c o r r id o r
in W a l nut C re ek, as i d ent i f i e d in t he Do w nt o w n W a l nut C re ek
Facil i ties Pla n .
Collection S y st e m
Re n o v ation Pro g ram on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
S y st em atical l y re p lace or r eno v ate s m all -diamet e r se w ers to
m ini m i z e o v er f l o w s, l im it t h e q u a ntity o f rai n f a ll e n t er i ng the c ol l ection
s y st em , co n trol f u t u re m ain t e n ance re q ui r e m ents and c o sts, a n d
impro v e the le v el o f s e rv i ce p ro v id e d (as m e a sured b y st o ppa g es,
pr i v ate p roperty d a m ag e, impa c t e d tr a f f ic, e n try o nto p r i v ate p r o per ty )
to t h e resi d ents/r a t e pa y ers. T he on g oing T V i nspect i on p r o g ram w i l l
be t he m ajor s ource o f t h ese f u t ure p r ojects.
Co n c r ete Pi p e
Re n o v ation on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m I d e n t i f y , e v alu a te , a nd sche d ule r e m ed i ation f o r co n c r e t e p i p es .
Collection S y st e m
U rg ent Projects on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
I d e n t i f y a nd res t ore s e w ers d am a g ed or thr e at e n ed by storms o r
f o u n d t o b e struc t ural l y d e f ic i e nt by CSO.
North Main T runk
I mpro v e m e nts 20 1 9
N. M ain f r o m Ci v ic
D r . and Car lb ack
A v e.
Re h abi l ita t e o r r e place s e w ers along North M ain b et w een Ci v ic D r i ve
and C ar l back A v en u e i n W a l nut Creek, as id e nt i f ied i n t h e Do w nt o w n
W a l n ut C r eek F aci l ities Pla n .
Locust Str e et
I m pro v e m ents 20 1 9 Locust Str e et in
W a l n ut C r eek
Re h abi l ita t e o r r e place s e w ers w ithin t h e Lo c ust Str e et c or r id o r in
W a l n ut C r eek, a s i d en t i f i e d in t he Do w nt o w n W a l n ut C r eek F aci l ities
Pla n .
A -l i ne Rel i e f -
39 -Inch Re h ab 20 2 1 A -l i ne n e ar
T re a tme n t Pla n t
T w enty m i l l i on g al l ons o f reli e f c apacity f or t h e e x isting A -Line n ear
t h e t r e atme n t p la n t c o uld b e a ch i e v ed b y re h abi l itating t h e o ld
3 9 -inch T runk N o . 1 .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-14
Collection S y stem R e gulat o r y Com p lianc e /Pl a nning/S afe t y Proj e cts - 2 0 1 5 Ca p ital Impro v ement Pl a n :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
M anhole Re m ote
Le v el Monitor i ng on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
I d e n t i f ication a n d m o di f ic a tion o f m a nho l es w i th t h e ins t al l ation o f r e m o t e
le v el m onitor i ng pr o d u cts to alert d is p atch o r o n -call crew m e m bers v ia
cell p h o ne o f a p o t e n tial o v er f low o r sto p pa g e.
Collection S y st e m
Pla n ning
on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
I d e n t i f ies, e v alu a t e s, a nd sc h edu l e s s h ort - a nd lo n g -t e rm s e w er
ca p a c ity projects a nd pro v ide s d esi g n -f l ow rates f or m a jor f a ci l ity .
p la n s.
The Collection System Master Plan Update (2 0 10) identified capaci ty def ic iencies in the following trunk sewers. Th e ex pans io n
projects to correct thes e def ic iencies are defin ed below. However, this Plan will be reevaluated under the Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan in the Collection Systems.
Collection S y stem Expan s ion Pro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Ca p ital Imp r o v ement Pl an :
Pro j ect Title Y ear Loc a tion De s cription
Co n tract u al
Assessment
D i str i cts
on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
ser v ice area.
Pro v id e s a f i n a n ci n g m e c han is m f o r th e e x te n si o n o f p ub li c s e w e r s i n t o
a r ea s w h ic h a r e c u rr e n t ly ser v ed b y s e ptic ta n ks.
T runk Se w er
E x pansion P r o g ram on g oing T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
S y st em atical l y u psi z e a nd i nc r ease t h e c a p a city o f tr u nk s e w ers to
pre v ent se w er o v er f l o w s a nd a cc o m m o d ate pla n n ed g ro w th a s id e nt i f ied
in t h e C o l l ection S y st e m Mas t er Pla n .
Lan c ast e r R o ad,
W a l n ut C r eek,
T R 13 -6 0 0
20 1 9
Lan c ast e r R o ad
and M e a d ow
Ro a d
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 5 ,1 00 f e et o f t h e e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 5 - to
18 -inch li n es .
M ora g a W a y ,
Or i nda T R1 0 -
200 /300
20 22
In El C a m ino
M ora g a, Del Rey
School, Mora g a
W a y , Or i nda
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 3 ,4 00 f e et o f e x isting m ain a n d trunk s e w ers w ith
12 - t o 1 8 -inch lin e s .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-15
Ple a s a nt H i ll Road
Cor r id o r 2017 -
Ple a s a nt H i ll Road
bet w een Mercury
W a y and n e ar
Vi rg inia Hi l ls D ri v e
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 2 ,8 00 f e et o f t h e e x isting trunk s e w er w ith a n
1 8 -inch line .
W a l n ut Boulevard ,
W a l n ut C r eek, T R
29 -2 0 0 , P h as e 1
20 23
In W a ln u t
Blv d . f r o m
Ho m es t e a d A v e.
t o Nor l y n D r i v e
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 7 ,0 00 f e et o f t h e e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 8 - to
24 -inch li n es .
M artinez Alh a m bra
A v enue T runks 20 1 8
In Al h a m bra
Ave. f r o m
H i g h w a y 4 to
C St.
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 5 ,7 00 f e et o f t h e e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 8 - to
24 -inch li n es .
L a f a y et t e – H appy
Val l ey Road 20 2 0
In Ha p py Val l ey
Rd. f r o m Baker
to Fra n kl i n
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 3 ,2 0 0 f e et o f t he e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 5 - to
18 -inch li n es .
W a l n ut C r eek –
Pal m er Road 20 2 3
In Pa l m er Rd.
bet w een S y l v an
Rd. and
Ha w t h orne Dr.
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 1 ,0 00 f e et o f t h e e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 5 -inch
l i ne .
A -l i ne Rel i e f
Int e rc e pt o r ,
P hase 2B
20 2 4
F r om Ga l a x y W ay
to W i l l ow Pass
Rd. alo n g t h e
bank o f W a l n ut
C r eek
Appro x ima t ely 4 ,0 00 f e et o f new 7 2 -inch line .
De v elo pm e nt
Se w era g e on g oing
T hr o u g hout t h e
col l ection s y st e m
Pro v id e s for ca p i t al i z ation o f D i str i ct la b or a nd o t h er e x penses f or
pla n nin g , desi g n, a nd constructi o n o f d e v elo p er -instal l e d a nd c ontr i but e d
m ain s e w er f aci l itie s .
D i ablo Ro a d,
Da n v i l le, T runk 3 5 -
400 , P h ase 1
20 2 4
Eas e m e nt s o uth o f
H i g hbr i d g e L n .
to north o f
Gr e en Val l ey
Creek
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 6 00 f e et o f e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 3 3 -inch lin e .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-16
L a f a y et t e L o w er
Ple a s a nt H i ll Road
T runk
20 2 4
Ple a s a nt H i ll Rd.
f r o m O l d T u n nel
Ro a d t o n orth o f
Ol y m pic Bl v d.
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 3 ,5 00 f e et o f e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 2 1 -inch
l i ne.
Nelson A v en u e
Se w er
Re p lac e m e nt
20 2 4
Eas e m e nt f r o m
Bat e s A v e . to
Nelson A v e .
in Co n cord
Re p lace app r o x imat e ly 1 ,7 00 f e et o f e x isting trunk s e w er w ith 1 8 -inch
l i ne.
San R a m on
Sche d ule C
I n t e rc e pt o r , Phase 2
20 2 4
San R a m on
bet w een Nor r is
Ca n y on D r . a n d
St. John C ourt
Re p lace app r o x im a t e ly t w o m i l es o f 3 6 -inch g ra v i t y s e w er.
Collection S y stem P u mping Stations Pro je cts - 20 1 5 Capit a l Impro v ement Pl an :
Pro j ect Title Y ear De s cription
Lo w er Or i nda P u m ping St a ti o n
Force Mains 20 1 8 E v alu a te t he c ondit i on o f t h e e x isting force m ain s , i m pl e m e n t a ny n ee d ed
rehabi l itat i on , and i nst a l l a thi r d f o rce m ain f or rel i abi l it y .
Or i nda Crossro a ds Pu m ping
St a ti o n Force M ains 20 1 9 E v alu a te t he c ondit i on o f t h e e x isting force m ains a nd i m pl e m e nt an y n eeded
rehabi l itat i on.
M ora g a Pu m ping S t at i on F o rce
M ains 20 2 2 E v alu a te t he c ondit i on o f t h e e x isting force m ains a nd i m pl e m e nt an y n eeded
rehabi l itat i on.
Co n cord I n d ustr i al P u m ping
St a ti o n Rep l ac e m e n t 20 2 2
E v alu a te t he f l o w s f r o m t he Nor t h Con c ord s er v ice area a n d a dditi o nal f lo w s that
m ay c o m e f r o m the d e v elo pm e n t o f t h e Con c ord Na v al W ea p o ns S t ation. T his
infor m ation w i l l be u til i z ed to ins t all a n ew station in t h e s a m e or d i fferent lo c ati o n.
E v alu a te e l i m in a t i on o f t h e Cl y de a nd Ba t es A v enue P u m p i ng St a t i o ns.
C l y de Paral l el Force Main 20 2 3
E v aluate t he po t ential t o e l i m i n ate t h e Cl y de Pu m ping St a tion as th e Con c ord Na v al
W eapo ns S t ation is d e v elo p ed. I f t he s t ati o n can n ot b e e l i m in a t ed, a n ew p aral l el
f o rce m ain w i l l be c o n s tructed to e n s ure rel i a ble o p erati o n o f t h e p u m ping statio n .
PS E q u i p me n t and
Pipi n g Re p lac e m e nt on g oing Re p lace or r eco n dition fai l ed and o b s ole t e p u m ps, pipin g , v al v es, electr i cal,
instrume n t a tion, a n d o t her su p port e q uipment .
20 15 Ca pital Improvement Plan CIP-17
Pu m p S t ati o n Sa f ety
I m pro v e m ents Pro g ram on g oing I n v esti g ate t h e p re s e n ce o f ha z ardous mater i als re q ui r ing a bat e m en t a n d p erform
re m e diation e fforts t o re d u c e t h e p ot e ntial f o r e x posure .
Buch a n a n North P umping
S tation U p g rades 20 2 0 In c a s e t h e B uch a n a n North PS is not re p la c ed b y a g ra v ity s e w er, i t w i l l need to be
reno v at e d.
Bat e s Boulevard P umping
S tation Up g ra d es 20 2 1 E v alu a te a nd i m pl e m e nt n ee d ed i m pro v e m e n ts.
M ora g a Pu m ping S t at i on
Gr i nder 20 1 7 E v alu a te a nd i nst a ll a g r i nder to e l i m i nate rag a nd d isp o s able w ipe clo gg i n g issues.
M ora g a Dies e l Re p la c e m e nt 20 2 4 E v alu a te c o nditi o n a nd c o m plete re h a bi l itati o n o r r ep l ac e m e n t o f t h e e x isting d ies e l
en g ine in order t o a l l o w a de q uate r u ntime an d c o m ply w ith em iss i on re q ui r e m e nts.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-18
GE N ER AL IMPROVEME NT S PROGRAM
This program address es th e property a nd equipment needs of t he District. Specific
projects inclu de property acquisition, improvemen ts to the Distri ct’s b ui ldings an d o ther
District properties, information system and da ta manageme nt up grades (compute r
hardware a nd softw ar e), and ot her miscellaneous eq ui pment, includi ng vehicles. This
p rogram also inclu des a n Asset Manageme nt Pr ogram s ubprogram.
This General Improvements Program is dedicated to funding the property , e quipment ,
office and corporati on yard improvements, map production, and inform at i on technology
n eeds o f t he District. Th e General Improvements Program also prov id es funding for
activities associated with the capital program, such as capital project legal ex pen s es and
pr epar a ti o n of the CIB/CIP eac h ye a r.
The focus of the General Improvements Program over the ne x t t en years will be the
equipme nt bud get , i mpro vements in the Distr ict’s ma na gem ent information syst em s ,
seismic upgrades t o v ar ious District b ui ldings, a nd the continued developme nt of a n
Asset Ma nagement Prog ra m. While consistent inv es tment in our treatment and
c ol lection syst em s h as occurr ed over the last 30 years, the District office an d oth er
bui ldings hav e n ot had consistent ca pi t al improvements. With most o f t hese bui ldings
over 25 years of ag e, the CIP includes more projects fo r renovati on s of the interiors an d
exteriors of t he bui ldings, such as upgrading kitchen and lunch rooms, painting o r
s eal i ng w al ls, replacing ceiling ti l es, upgrading li ghting fixtures, and replacing worn o r
outdated f lo ori ng a nd furniture, as we ll as bringing the buildings up to c ur r ent seismic
standards.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-19
G e ner a l Impro v emen t s Pro j ects - 2 0 1 5 Capital Impro v ement Pl a n
Pro j ect Title
Y ear
De s cription
CSO V e hic l e
Main t en a nce
Bui l ding
20 1 8
I m pro v e m ents to t h e CSO V e hic l e Main t e n a n ce
Bui l ding a nd t h e a t t ach e d o f f i c e struct u re w ere n o t
inc l ud e d in t he new CSOD Faci l ity Project and w i l l
be u nder t ak e n separa t el y . T his proj e ct w i l l
e v a l uate a l t erna t i v es f or r e p air o r r epla c e m e nt o f
t he o f f ice bui l ding struc t ure at t ac h ed t o t he v ehi c le
m a i nt e nan c e struc tu re. Or ig in a l l y b ui l t in 1 9 72, t h e
o f f ice b ui l ding has e x per i en c ed si g ni f ica n t
d i f f e r ential s ettl e m e n t in t he f l o or s l ab i n rec e nt
y e a rs t h at ne e ds t o b e a d d ressed.
HOB I m pro v e m e nts
– Long T e r m ongoing Pro v ide c a pital i m pro v e m e nts t o t he H O B f a c i l ities
(i nt e r i or a n d e x t e r i or) in Martine z .
G e neral Secur i ty a n d
Access on g oing
T his project inc l udes i n st a l l ing a larm s y st em s ,
a dd i ng g at e s in t he p e r i m et e r se c ur i ty f e ncin g ,
u p g rading s e c ur i ty c am eras, i m pro v ing g eneral
area li g htin g , instal l ing f e ncing a n d si g na g e.
Asset Management
Plan ongoing
This project is developing a comprehensive
asset management program to optimize the
lifecycle of the District’s assets to deliver high
quality and reliable services in a sustainable
manner with an acceptable level of risk.
Information Technology
Development ongoing
This project centralizes the District’s effort and
funding in the development of computer and
telecommunication technology within the
District.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-20
RECY CL ED WATER PR OGR AM
The District will continue to ex pand its urb an la nds caping projects in a cost-effectiv e w ay
by linking recycled w at er pipeli ne projects with sewer construction projects . Major projects
incl u de identifying the inf ra structure ne e ded to supply recycled w at er to the Concord
Na v al Wea po ns Station and construction of the Concord Landsc ape project . This project
is not c ur rently b ud g et ed except for small expenditures to cover planning activities.
T he Recycled Water P ro gram includes projects to meet the Distr ict’s goal of developing
additional cost-effective recycled w at er customers.
Ca pital ex pe nditures over the nex t t e n years are prim ar i ly focuse d o n planning to de velop
a large-scale industrial reuse project (suc h a s the refin er ies or po wer plant use) a nd
constructio n of the C oncord Lan ds cape Project, which w as awarded stat e a nd federal
grant fu nd ing . B udget is also includ ed for com pl eting the remaini ng c onnections to
landscape ir ri gation customers in the Zo ne 1 Project Area located in Pl easant Hill ,
Co ncord, a nd Martinez near th e I-68 0 freeway, and for pl an ning work associated with
p ro viding recycled w at er to the proposed de velopment at the Concord Nav al Weapons
St a ti o n sit e. No bud ge t is currently p ro v id ed for implementa ti o n of a l ar ge-scale industrial
r euse p ro ject; ho wever, budget is incl ud ed for planning work and for continuing efforts to
o btain outside funding assistanc e.
Re c y cl e d W ater Pro j ects - 20 1 5 Capit a l Impro v ement Pl a n
Pro j ect Title Y ear De s cription
Rec y cled W a t e r
T r e a t m e n t Facil i ties
I m pro v e m e nt s
2015
This project will investigate and implement
improvements to the District’s Recycled
Water Treatment Facilities.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-21
CA PI TAL I MP RO VE MENT E XPE NDITUR ES
This plan covers the te n-year peri od from FY 20 15-16 through FY 20 24 -2 5. The plan
includes projected exp endi tures totali ng $ 416,680,000 (2015 dol l ar s ).
In addition to p ro viding the basis for policy decisions concerning the District's long-rang e
Cap ital Improvement Program and ma na gem ent of t he Se wer Construction Fun d, the CIP
also serves as the framework for f ee an al ysis and is the basis for the FY 2015-16 CIB (the
first year o f t he CIP ).
A summary of the te n years of pla nn e d expenditures by p ro g ra m , without inflation, is
co ntained i n Table 1.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-22
Table 1: Ten-year Program Estimated Expenditures
Summary by Program
FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25Total Project Cost
Driver 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Unescalated
Treatment Plant Improvements Program
Liquids Treatment Process 2,063,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 7,170,000 $ 4,140,000 $ 6,090,000 $ 2,000,550 $ 700,000 $ 2,700,000 $ 15,730,000 $ 26,844,500 $ 72,688,050 $
Solids Handling Process Treatment 1,000,000 $ 2,230,000 $ 6,700,000 $ 5,500,000 $ 400,000 $ -$ 100,000 $ 4,575,000 $ 9,275,000 $ 17,175,500 $ 46,955,500 $
General Treatment Plant Improvements and Planning 7,347,000 $ 5,340,000 $ 4,880,000 $ 8,075,000 $ 7,813,400 $ 8,166,000 $ 7,789,000 $ 6,085,000 $ 4,890,000 $ 9,890,000 $ 69,475,400 $
Total 10-Year Cip for Treatment Plant Program 10,410,000 $ 12,820,000 $ 18,750,000 $ 17,715,000 $ 14,303,400 $ 10,166,550 $ 8,589,000 $ 13,360,000 $ 29,895,000 $ 53,910,000 $ 189,118,950 $
Collection System Improvements Program
Collection System R&R -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Pump Stations 400,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 2,180,000 $ 500,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 11,480,000 $
General CS Improvements and Planning 4,200,000 $ 7,400,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 240,000 $ 640,000 $ 8,040,000 $ 5,940,000 $ 6,190,000 $ 5,490,000 $ 740,000 $ 42,230,000 $
CADS Development 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 11,300,000 $
Total 10-Year Cip for Treatment Plant Program 15,950,000 $ 18,125,000 $ 17,450,000 $ 18,245,000 $ 15,540,000 $ 23,440,000 $ 22,490,000 $ 23,590,000 $ 22,040,000 $ 17,540,000 $ 194,410,000 $
Recycle Water Program
Future Recycled Water Development Planning 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,800,000 $
Existing Filter Plant and ReW R&R 350,000 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,150,000 $
Total 10-Year CIP for ReW Program 450,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 4,950,000 $
General Improvements Program
Vehicles & Equip Acquisition 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 5,450,000 $
Buildings/District Property 732,000.00 $ 1,385,000.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 925,000.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 320,000.00 $ 320,000.00 $ 320,000.00 $ 340,000.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 4,857,000.00 $
Capital Legal Services 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 700,000.00 $
Asset Management Program Development 1,378,000.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 700,000.00 $ 650,000.00 $ 550,000.00 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,378,000.00 $
Information Tech Devt 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,835,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,235,000 $ 425,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,225,000 $ 9,220,000 $
Total 10-Year CIP for GI Program 3,980,000 $ 4,605,000 $ 3,525,000 $ 2,695,000 $ 2,775,000 $ 1,365,000 $ 1,340,000 $ 1,340,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 2,215,000 $ 25,200,000 $
Total Ten-Year CIP 2015-2025
Total 10-Year CIP for all four Programs 30,790,000 $ 36,050,000 $ 40,225,000 $ 39,155,000 $ 33,118,400 $ 35,471,550 $ 32,919,000 $ 38,790,000 $ 53,795,000 $ 74,165,000 $ 413,678,950 $
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-23
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
FY 2015/16FY 2016/17FY 2017/18FY 2018/19FY 2019/20FY 2020/21FY 2021/22FY 2022/23FY 2023/24FY 2024/25 Total
Driver Unit Operation Project Title 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Treatment Plant Improvements
Secondary Improvements -
Regulatory Secondary Treatment
Near-Term Optimization, Ammonia Reduction; Secondary Process Improvements Ph 2, Replace or Line
Buried Aeration Header (72" & 78")
(Demo Plenums, Replace Diffusers)
- - 765,000 2,590,000 2,000,550 - - - - 5,355,550
R&R Secondary Treatment Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation (Rehab Drives, RAS/WAS, Hydraulic Improvements, Gates, Scum
Equipment & Piping)- - - - - - - 500,000 1,000,000 2,785,500 4,285,500
Sustainability/OptimizationSecondary Treatment Aeration Steam Turbines Replacement - - - - - - - 500,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 3,400,000
R&R Primary Sedimentation Primary Treatment Renovation 563,000 - - - - - - - - - 563,000
R&R Primary Sedimentation Primary Treatment Renovation Phase 2
(rails, gates, miscellaneous mechanical, E&IC)- - 150,000 1,000,000 2,250,000 - - - - 3,400,000
Capacity ExpansionPrimary Sedimentation Influent Pump No. 6 for Third Wetwell - 500,000 - - - - - - - - 500,000
Capacity Expansion Soils Remediation 500,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 12,500,000
Regulatory Primary Sedimentation Screenings Removal (Include 1/4" Barscreens for all wet wells and screenings washer/compactors,
conveyance)400,000 500,000 6,000,000 - - - - - 6,900,000
Sustainability/OptimizationPrimary Sedimentation Aeration System Renovation Ph 2
(Electric Blower for Grit, Optimize Steam Blowers)- 100,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 - - - - 2,850,000
Sustainability/OptimizationSecondary Treatment Pump & Blower Bldg Seismic Upgrade 1,100,000 4,000,000 - - - - - - - - 5,100,000
R&R UV Disinfection Disinfection System & Support Replacement - 150,000 520,000 1,375,000 - - - - - 2,045,000
Regulatory Disinfection Disinfection System Upgrade for CEC - - - - - 700,000 1,200,000 7,730,000 16,159,000 25,789,000
Liquid Treatment Improvements Total Project Cost 2,063,000 5,250,000 7,170,000 4,140,000 6,090,000 2,000,550 700,000 2,700,000 15,730,000 26,844,500 72,688,050
Solids Handling Process Treatment
Rehab Existing Solids Handling/Treatment -
Regulatory Sludge Handling/Incineration Wet Scrubber Replacement (Includes provisions for reducing mercury recycling to headworks. Note: no dry
scrubber replacement in this estimate)500,000 - 4,000,000 4,400,000 - - - - - - 8,900,000
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration DAF Rehab (Rehab/Replace Pressurization System, TWAS pumps, Polymer System, Process Piping, Main
Gear/Bearings)- - - - - - - - - - -
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration Near-Term Centrifuge & Cake Pump Upgrades Including Cake Solids Improvements Using Waste Heat (e.g.
Therma-Flite) or Chemicals (e.g. Ferric Sulfate)400,000 1,800,000 1,000,000 200,000 - - - - - - 3,400,000
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration MHF Burner Upgrade - 150,000 700,000 900,000 400,000 - - - - - 2,150,000
Safety/ RegulatorySludge Handling/Incineration Ash Facility Improvements 100,000 280,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 400,000 800,000 2,580,000
Regulatory Sludge Handling/Incineration
New Solids Handling and TreatmentFacilities (Fluidized Bed, Digester Complex)
(Including Replacement of Sludge Blending, Emergency Sludge Storage, Carbide Lime System, Demo
Abandoned Digester, Dewatering Polymer System, Waste Heat Boilers, Auxiliary Boilers, Solids Handling
Building/Seismic)
- - - - - - 100,000 4,575,000 8,875,000 16,375,500 29,925,500
Solids Treatment Improvements Total Project Cost 1,000,000 2,230,000 6,700,000 5,500,000 400,000 - 100,000 4,575,000 9,275,000 17,175,500 46,955,500
Other
R&R All Asset Replacement Program (Includes Equipment Replacement, Piping Rnovations, Plant Elec.,Inst,
Cable,Concrete/Pavement/ Coatings, Lab Upgrades and Repair and Urgent Blanket Contract 2,772,000 1,790,000 1,800,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,500,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 25,062,000
R&R/ Safety Fire Alarm Rehab 200,000 600,000 800,000
Safety/ RegulatoryAll Safety Enhancement Phase 4 450,000
R&R Final Effluent Pumping Standby Effluent Pumps Refurb - ph 2 - - - - 270,000 360,000 130,000 - - 760,000
R&R Final Effluent Pumping Final Effluent Pump Rehabilitation (1@75MGD, 25 ft TDH)- - - - - - - - - 800,000 800,000
Sustainability/Optimization SCB Siesmic Emergency Plan - -
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration Co-Gen Replacement - - - - - - - 500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration Rehab Standby Diesel Engine/Generators (2@2000kW each)- - - - - - 600,000 1,365,000 - 1,965,000
Regulatory Sludge Handling/Incineration Replace Portable Diesel Pumps - - - 250,000 - - - - - - 250,000
Sustainability/OptimizationGeneral Plant Energy Optimization (PG&E SST Project)360,000 200,000 400,000 400,000 - - - - - - 1,360,000
Regulatory Final Effluent Pumping Outfall Improvements Phase 7 (Gaskets & Manways Rehab, Valves Rehab, Address Potential Outfall
Easement Issues)50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 700,000 1,900,000 100,000 - - - 2,900,000
Regulatory Final Effluent Pumping Outfall Improvements Phase 8 (Gaskets & Manways & Valves Rehab)- - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 200,000
R&R Planning/Legal Water Systems Condition Assessment (1W, 2W, 3W)- - - 100,000 - - - - - 100,000
R&R General Odor Control Improvements - - - - 500,000 1,500,000 2,049,000 - - - 4,049,000
R&R Sludge Handling/Incineration Water Systems Improvements (1W, 2W, 3W) - Pumps, Storage, Piping - - - - 330,000 330,000 - - - 660,000
R&R General Plant Control System Network Upgrades 50,000 80,000 80,000 - - - - - - - 210,000
R&R General Plant Control System I/O Replacement 100,000 50,000 400,000 1,680,000 2,000,000 - - - - - 4,230,000
R&R General PLC Sys Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,000,000
R&R General TP Electrical Cable Repl - 100,000 100,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,880,000
R&R General Switchgear Replacement - ph 2 (Class 1 Re-Condition Existing Breakers - Westinghouse, Eaton, etc)350,000 250,000 250,000 - - - - - - - 850,000
R&R General Critical Switchgear Replacement (Substation 16 Replacement)400,000 200,000 500,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - 2,100,000
R&R General TP Facilities Renov Pgm (Bldgs, Roofs, Roads, Security, HVAC, Drainage)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,000,000
03-May-15
FY 2015 CIB and CIP
Liquids Treatment Process
Table 2
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-24
Sustainability/OptimizationGeneral POB Seismic Upgrade - - 100,000 520,000 700,000 - - - - - 1,320,000
Sustainability/OptimizationGeneral Warehouse Seismic Upgrade - - - 150,000 400,000 400,000 - - - - 950,000
Sustainability/OptimizationGeneral Laboratory Seismic Upgrade - - - - - 100,000 200,000 100,000 250,000 - 650,000
R&R General TP Hazard Identification & Remediation 100,000 - - 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 900,000
R&R General WC / Grayson Creek Levee Rehab 15,000 200,000 400,000 - - - - - - - 615,000
R&R General TP Safety Improvements Program 50,000 50,000 - 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 500,000
R&R General Treatment Plant Security Upgrades 60,000 5,000 50,000 - 50,000 165,000
R&R General Lab Upgrades and Equipment Replacement 200,000 150,000
R&R General Plant Cyber Security 15,000 50,000 100,000 - 16,000 - - - - 181,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Treatment Plant Planning 250,000 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,600,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Treatment Plant Master Plan & Master Plan Updates 1,400,000 800,000 - - - - 400,000 500,000 - - 3,100,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Pilot Program - Innovation and Research 240,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,590,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Treatment Plant Soil Remediation Studies - 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - - - 80,000
R&R Planning/Legal Wet Weather Facilities Condition Assessment (Structures/Piping)- - 130,000 - - - - - - 130,000
R&R Planning/Legal Odor Control Facilities Condition Assessment - - - 5,000 13,400 - - - - - 18,400
General Treatment Plant Improvements Total Project Cost 7,347,000 5,340,000 4,880,000 8,075,000 7,813,400 8,166,000 7,789,000 6,085,000 4,890,000 9,890,000 69,475,400
10,410,000 12,820,000 18,750,000 17,715,000 14,303,400 10,166,550 8,589,000 13,360,000 29,895,000 53,910,000 189,118,950
R&R Collection System Collection System Repair & Rehabilitation Projects 10,550,000 $ 9,075,000 $ 12,150,000 $ 14,625,000 $ 13,200,000 $ 13,400,000 $ 13,650,000 $ 14,000,000 $ 14,250,000 $ 14,500,000 $ 129,400,000 $
All Pump Stations 400,000 850,000 1,150,000 2,180,000 500,000 700,000 1,600,000 2,100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 11,480,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Coll Sys Modeling Upgrade (Configure/Calibrate Dynamic Model & Flow Monitoring)400,000 200,000 250,000 - - - - - - 300,000 1,150,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Comprehensive Collection System Master Plan Updates 600,000 600,000 - - - 350,000 350,000 - 1,900,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Collection System Planning 150,000 200,000 500,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 2,400,000
Regulatory Collection System Collection System Capacity Projects based on Reliable Capacity for Existing Customers 3,050,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 40,000 $ 440,000 $ 7,840,000 $ 5,740,000 $ 5,640,000 $ 4,890,000 $ 140,000 $ 36,780,000
Planning Collection System Collection System Planning and Other Improvements 4,200,000 7,400,000 3,350,000 240,000 640,000 8,040,000 5,940,000 6,190,000 5,490,000 740,000 42,230,000
Capacity Expansion CAD and Development Sewerage 800,000 800,000 800,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 11,300,000
15,950,000 18,125,000 17,450,000 18,245,000 15,540,000 23,440,000 22,490,000 23,590,000 22,040,000 17,540,000 194,410,000
Recycled Water
Future ReW Dvelopment
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Recycled Water Development Planning & Other 100,000 185,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,735,000
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Recycled Water Distribution Surge Analysis - 65,000 - - - - - - - 65,000
ReW Planning Subtotal Future Recycled Water Development Planning 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,800,000 $
Maintain Existing Infrasturture
Sustainability/OptimizationBuildings/District Property Replace Decorative Pond w/ Low Water Use Landscaping - 50,000 60,000 - - - - - - 110,000
R&R Planning/Legal Recycled Water Distribution System Condition Assessments - - - - - - - - -
R&R Existing ReW Facility Recycled Water Distribution System - Maltby Replacement - - - - - - - - -
R&R Existing ReW Facility Recycled Water Distribution System Renovations Program - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000
R&R Existing ReW Facility Recycled Water Treatment Facility Improvements (Replace Filter Media, Rehab/Replace Underdrains,
Replace Backwash Troughs/Headers/Rotary Washers, Other Filter Internals)200,000 250,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,700,000
R&R Existing ReW Facility Concord Landscape Project 150,000 - - - - - - - - - 150,000
ReW Subtotal Existing Filter Plant and ReW R&R 350,000 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,150,000 $
450,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 4,950,000 $
General Improvements
R&R Vehicles & Equipment Vehicles & Equip Acquisition 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 5,450,000 $
R&R Buildings/District Property District Properties (CSOD,HOB, POB,Warehouse, Annex, ) 407,000 230,000 180,000 180,000 200,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 60,000 200,000 1,907,000
Sustainability/OptimizationBuildings/District Property CSO Vehicle Maint Bldg - - 20,000 575,000 - - - - - -
Sustainability/OptimizationBuildings/District Property Server Room Relocation 100,000 1,000,000 - - - - - 150,000 - 1,250,000
R&R Buildings/District Property Buffer and Rental Property Improvements 225,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 495,000
Sustainability/SafetyBuildings/District Property General Security/Safety Improvements - 50,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 25,000 65,000 530,000
Capacity ExpansionBuildings/District Property District Easements - 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 675,000
Buildings/District Property 732,000 $ 1,385,000 $ 370,000 $ 925,000 $ 370,000 $ 320,000 $ 320,000 $ 320,000 $ 340,000 $ 370,000 $ 4,857,000 $
Capacity ExpansionPlanning/Legal Capital Legal Services 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 700,000 $
Sustainability/OptimizationAsset Manage CMMS 508,000 120,000 628,000
Sustainability/OptimizationAsset Manage GDI-SMMS Replacement 270,000 80,000 - - - - - - - - 350,000
R&R Planning/Legal Asset Management Program Development 600,000 900,000 700,000 650,000 550,000 - - - - - 3,400,000
Asset Management Program Development 1,378,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 700,000 $ 650,000 $ 550,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,378,000 $
Sustainability/OptimizationIT-Software Information Tech Devt 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,835,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,235,000 $ 425,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,225,000 $ 9,220,000 $
- - - - - -
3,980,000 $ 4,605,000 $ 3,525,000 $ 2,695,000 $ 2,775,000 $ 1,365,000 $ 1,340,000 $ 1,340,000 $ 1,360,000 $ 2,215,000 $ 25,200,000 $
30,790,000 36,050,000 40,225,000 39,155,000 33,118,400 35,471,550 32,919,000 38,790,000 53,795,000 74,165,000 413,678,950
Collection System Improvements
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-25
Ten-year Program Estimated Expenditures – Collection System
2015 Program
Inflation Factor 0%over 2014 Numbers River Watch Projects
Program and Sub-Program Estimated Expenditures in the Capital Plan CIP
Collection System 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 (10-Year) Total
1 - Renovation and Rehabilitation
5991 Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 2 66,000 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ 2,750,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,881,000 $
5982 Pipeburst Blanket Contract 260,000 $ 275,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 1,385,000 $
5999 CIPP Blanket Contract 125,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 950,000 $
8410 Cathodic Prot Sys Repl - 12-13 thru 21-22 50,000 $ 50,000 $ -$ -$ 50,000 $ -$ -$ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 450,000 $
8415 Martinez Sewer Renovations Phase 4 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
8417 Survey Monument Installation LT 50,000 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 525,000 $
pCS40Coll Sys Urgent Proj - 2013-14 thru 22-25 275,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,275,000 $
8421 Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 9 2,524,000 $ 10,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,534,000 $
pCS22Concrete Pipe Renovation Program -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
8423 North Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 6 600,000 $ 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,700,000 $
pCS16Collection System Renovation Program -$ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000 $
noneLafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 10 550,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 250,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,900,000 $
8424 M-1 CIPP Lining Project 2,500,000 $ 200,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,700,000 $
8422 Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 11 150,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000 $
noneMartinez Phase 5 150,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000 $
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 12 -$ 150,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,200,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,850,000 $
noneDiablo Renovations - ph 3 -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,800,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
noneLafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 11 150,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000 $
noneRiver Watch Projects -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
noneSouth Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 6 -$ 650,000 $ 3,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,650,000 $
noneLafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 12 -$ -$ 150,000 $ 500,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 650,000 $
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 13 -$ -$ 650,000 $ 3,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,650,000 $
noneSouth Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 7 -$ -$ 650,000 $ 3,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,650,000 $
pCS32Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 3 -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,800,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
noneSouth Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 8 -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,300,000 $
noneMartinez Sewer Renovations - ph 5 -$ -$ -$ 250,000 $ 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,350,000 $
nonePleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - ph 4 -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,800,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
noneNorth Orinda Sewer Renovations - ph 7 -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,700,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,000,000 $
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 14 -$ -$ -$ 500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,800,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000 $
pCS23Walnut Creek Civic Center Main Improvs -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000 $ 3,500,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,850,000 $
noneLocust Street Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000 $ 2,800,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
noneNorth Main Trunk Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000 $ 600,000 $ 3,100,000 $ -$ -$ 3,800,000 $
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 15 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000 $ 2,600,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 2,860,000 $
noneA-Line Relief-39 Inch Rehab -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,100,000 $ 5,900,000 $
pCS06Mount Diablo Blvd Main Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 6,200,000 $
noneCollection System Renovation Program - LT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 540,000 $ 7,350,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 8,250,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 34,240,000 $
none Lafayette Sewer Renovations - ph 13 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 17 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
noneWalnut Creek Sewer Renovations - ph 16 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
pCS99Watershed 44 Creek Xing Stabilization -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Subtotal Renovation10,550,000 $ 9,075,000 $ 12,150,000 $ 14,625,000 $ 13,200,000 $ 13,400,000 $ 13,650,000 $ 14,000,000 $ 14,250,000 $ 14,500,000 $ 129,400,000 $
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-26
2 - Reg. Compliance/Planning/Safety
5962 Manhole Remote Level Monitoring -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5993 Forcemain Assessment -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
8418 Coll Sys Modeling Upgr 12-13 thru 17-18 400,000 $ 200,000 $ 250,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 850,000 $
8419 Coll Sys Planning - FY2013-14 to 2022-23 750,000 $ 800,000 $ 450,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 500,000 $ -$ -$ 3,100,000 $
none Manhole Remote Level Monitoring - LT 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 550,000 $
none Collect Sys Planning - FY 23-24 to 32-33 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,000,000 $
Subtotal Regulatory Compliance and Safety 1,150,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 750,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 550,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 5,500,000.00 $
3 - Expansion
pCS33Trunk Sewer Expansion Program -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000 $ 140,000 $
8412 Pleasant Hill - Grayson Creek Trunk 3,050,000 $ 6,400,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,450,000 $
none Martinez Alhambra Avenue Trunks -$ -$ -$ 40,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 50,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 2,290,000 $
pCS08Lancaster Rd WC, Tr 13-600 -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $ 2,000,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000 $
none Lafayette - Happy Valley Road Sewer -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000 $ 2,400,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,440,000 $
pCS18Trunk Sewer Expansion Program - LT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
pCS20Moraga Way Orinda, Tr 10-200/300 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000 $ 2,400,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 2,900,000 $
pCS38Pleasant Hill Road Corridor -$ -$ 2,600,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,600,000 $
none A-Line-Phase 2B -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,600,000 $ -$ 1,750,000 $
pCS10Walnut Creek - Palmer Road -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000 $ 320,000 $ 2,300,000 $ -$ -$ 2,760,000 $
none WC-Walnut Blvd Corr-Trunk 29-200 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 320,000 $ 2,300,000 $ -$ -$ 2,620,000 $
none Diablo Rd Dan, Tr 35-400 Phase 1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000 $ 320,000 $ -$ 470,000 $
none Lafayette Lower Pleasant Hill Road Trunk -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 270,000 $ -$ 270,000 $
none Danville-Diablo Road Corridor -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ -$ 600,000 $
none Nelson Ave Sewer Repl -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000 $ 600,000 $ -$ 690,000 $
pCS09San Ramon Sched C Interceptor - ph 2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ -$ 2,200,000 $
Subtotal Expansions3,050,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 40,000 $ 440,000 $ 7,040,000 $ 3,140,000 $ 5,640,000 $ 4,890,000 $ 140,000 $ 33,380,000 $
3,150,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 100,000 $ 40,000 $ 440,000 $ 7,840,000 $ 5,740,000 $ 5,640,000 $ 4,890,000 $ 140,000 $ 34,480,000 $
3 - Expansion (CAD and Developpers Sewerage
8402 Contractual Assessment Districts 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,000 $
none CAD: Contractual Assessment Districts - LT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,400,000 $
8420 Devt Sewerage - 2013-14 thru 17-18 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,100,000 $
pCS17 Devt Sewerage 2018-19 thru 2022-23 -$ -$ -$ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ -$ -$ 3,800,000 $
noneDevt Sewerage 2023-24 thru 27-28 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,700,000 $
Subtotal Expansions Related to CASD and Deveop Swg800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 11,300,000 $
Subtotal All Expansions5,000,000 $ 8,250,000 $ 4,150,000 $ 1,440,000 $ 1,840,000 $ 8,540,000 $ 4,640,000 $ 7,490,000 $ 6,790,000 $ 2,040,000 $ 44,680,000 $
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-27
4 - Pump Stations
5941 PS Equip & Piping Repl 100,000 $ 100,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $
8406 Pump Station Security Improvements -$ -$ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ -$ -$ 120,000 $
8408 Pumping Stations Master Plan -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
pCS31Pump Station Hazard Identification -$ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 90,000 $
pCS34Misc. Force Main Improvements -$ 20,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000 $
pCS29Fairview / Maltby Upgrades 150,000 $ 120,000 $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 670,000 $
pCS28Flush Kleen Pumping Station Improv -$ -$ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000 $
pCS36Pumping Station Arc Flash Stdy -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
nonePump Station Safety Improv - LT -$ 50,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 530,000 $
8414 Moraga/ Crossroads Pumping Stations 150,000 $ 500,000 $ 440,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,090,000 $
pCS24Lower Orinda PS Force Main -$ -$ 415,000 $ 1,200,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,615,000 $
nonePS Equip & Piping Repl - LT -$ -$ 75,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 635,000 $
noneBuchanan North PS Upgrades -$ -$ -$ 100,000 $ 260,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 360,000 $
noneBates Blvd PS Upgrades -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000 $ 260,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 320,000 $
noneMoraga Pumping Station Force Main -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000 $ 1,320,000 $ 1,150,000 $ -$ -$ 2,730,000 $
noneClyde Parallel Force Main -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000 $ 800,000 $ -$ -$ 900,000 $
noneMoraga Diesel Repl -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 900,000 $
noneConcord Industrial Pumping Station -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $
pCS39Orinda Crossroads PS Force Main -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $
Subtotal Pumping Station400,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 2,180,000 $ 500,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 11,380,000 $
TOTAL Collection System Program Total 15,950,000 $ 18,125,000 $ 17,400,000 $ 18,245,000 $ 15,540,000 $ 22,640,000 $ 19,890,000 $ 23,590,000 $ 22,040,000 $ 17,540,000 $ 190,960,000 $
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-28
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2015-16, the District plans to undertake a Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan project. This project will develop a Comprehensive
Wastewater Master Plan (CWMP) that determines the future direction, capital
improvement needs, and priorities for the District’s collection system, wastewat er
treatment plant, and recycled water facilities.
The majority of the District’s existing treatment plant facilities were constructed in the
late 1970s and early 1980s following the passing of the Clean Water Act and some of
the collection system facilit ies and piping were constructed in the early 1900’s. The
District recognizes the need to address aging infrastructure and, as a result, is
developing an Asset Management Plan. Due to potential changes in future State
and/or Federal water, air, and solids regulations, there is a need to develop a
Comprehensive Wastewater Master Plan that coordinates regulatory-driven changes
with aging infrastructure needs and other capacity-related and optimization
improvements. Potential regulatory changes include:
Changes to existing final effluent limits and new final effluent limits for nutrients,
selenium, contaminants of emerging concern, and others;
Changes to California/National Toxics Rules, 303 (d) listed pollutants and
micropollutants, and new virus-based disinfection criterion;
Reductions in greenhouse gas emission cap and trade program thresholds;
Compliance with Federal 129 sewage sludge incineration rules, changes to air
emission limits, and biosolids handling/management and disposal regulations;
Indirect and direct potable reuse requirements; and
Collection system regulatory requirements.
A key deliverable of the CWMP will be a recommended Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for the next 20-year planning horizon. The recommended CIP will include
descriptions, rationales, and estimated costs for collection system and wastewater
treatment plant capital improvement projects and on-going programs in order to
address aging infrastructure, meet existing and anticipated regulatory requirements,
accommodate planned gro wth, optimize energy use, and implement the District’s
vision for a “plant of the future” that is consistent with the District's Strategic Plan. For
example, the CWMP will be a critical tool used by the District to implement the
following strategies from t he District’s Strategic Plan (FY2014/2016):
Meet Regulatory Requirements for the Good of the Community and Environment
by striving to achieve 100% permit compliance in air, water, land and other
regulations and by striving to reduce the number of sanitary sewer overflows by
continuing Best Management Practices.
20 15 Capital Improvement Plan CIP-29
Be a Leader in the Wastewater Industry by using sustainable practices that
minimize waste, maximize resources, protect the ratepayer, improve the
community, and embrace innovation.
Maintain Reliable Wastewater Infrastructure by updating the Capital Improvement
Program through prioritization, risk analysis, while focusing on the sustainability of
customer service, environmental needs, and economic demands.
The CWMP is critical for maintaining a high level of service, establishing long-term
fiscally responsible policies for our customers, and providing a clear direction for the
District. To accomplish this, the CWMP will:
1. Confirm CIP projects, costs, and site layouts for future facilities.
2. Identify linkages among the major capital improvement projects and repair and
replacement strategies such that the projects can be re-sorted and re-scheduled
as changes in planning assumptions and needs occur.
3. Identify triggers for implementing applied research (if applicable), preliminary
design, design, and construction of the recommended capital improvement
projects in order to determine efficient “just -in -time” project implementation.
4. Identify policies, programs, and guidelines to address overall program
implementation including project prioritizations, implementation costs, project
delivery methods, potential funding sources, and an estimated schedule for
implementing plan elements.
5. Confirm and incorporate operations, maintenance, and energy management
strategies.
6. Accelerate and coordinate condition assessments with implementation of the
asset management plan and confirm long-term repair and replacement
strategies.
Potential future projects are not currently included in the District’s CIP. The District’s
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will be updated annually as projects are clarified and
coordinated with the District’s CWMP.
C APITAL I MPROVEMENT B UDGET /C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN
Finance and Revenue
TA BLE OF CON T ENTS
Page No.
Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures
Finance -1
R eve nu e S ou rces
Finance -1
Table 1: Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures Finance -3
Table 2 : Capital Imp r o v e m ent Program R e v enue Sources
Finance -4
F unding Principles Finance -6
Sewer Construction Fund Ten -Year Projections Finance -6
Table 3: Te n -Y ear C a pital Impro v ement Pl a n Recommen d ed S c enario
Finance -7
Table 4: A ssump t io n s Used to C a l culate Cash Fl o w T abl e s
Finance -8
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue
C APITAL I MPROVEMENT B UDGET /C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN
Finance and Revenue
S ewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures
Th e District’s Capital Program is funded from the Sew er Constructi o n Fu nd (SCF).
Revenue from several sources is placed in the SCF, and, as projects are initiated,
funds are moved from the SCF to each of four program accounts to cover project
expenditures. I n ord er to e nsure t hat adeq ua te fu nds are av ai l able, each y ear t he
ex pect e d r ev enues are re view ed and com par e d w ith p la nn ed ex pend itu res a nd a
d et erm in ati on is mad e w het h er a d ditio n al rev en u es a re ne ed e d.
Reve nu e S ou rces
Ca p ital Im pro vem ent re v enue s o urces incl ud e t he f ol low in g:
Ad Valorem (Property ) Ta x Re v en ue
Be g in n ing in FY 1992-93, t he St at e o f Cal ifor nia re d uced Dist rict's h ist oric pro perty tax
re v enues by 4 0% to he lp me et t he stat e's edu catio n al fun ding o bl igat io n s. As a re s ult,
property tax re v enue t hat w ould hav e be en r ecei v ed in t h e 1 1 y ea rs fr om FY 19 92-93
t hrou g h FY 2 00 2-0 3 w as re d uc e d by ab out $3 8,00 0,0 00. Th e 4 0% d ec r ea s e in
property tax is n ow co nsid e red perma nent a nd is n ot c onsid er ed in a ny p rojecti ons of
fu tu re property tax re v enues. Proposit i on 1 A, pass e d by the C al ifo rnia v ot e rs i n
No vem ber 20 0 4, al low ed the St at e o f C al ifo rnia t o div ert pro pe rty tax rev enues from
l ocal gov ern ment f or two y ears, 2004 -05 a nd 2005-06. E ffecti v e 2006-07, P r oposit io n
1 A d ic t at es t hat no ad ditio n al property tax div ers i on wi ll o ccur. T he St at e c an,
ho wev er, bor r ow a p ortion of t he ta x re v enue t w ice in t h e nex t t e n y ears, b ut must p ay
it back, w ith int ere st, w ithin t h ree y ears.
Sew er Se r vi c e Char g e Re v enue (SSC)
A maj or so urc e of re ven ue is sew er ser v ice char g es (SSC ). SSC are t he o ne re v enue
so urce t h at is compl et e ly w ithin t h e d isc r etion o f t h e Dist r ict Board of Di recto rs.
Th er ef or e , e ach y ear sta ff ev alu ates the Dist r ict's f in ances a nd re co mmen ds a SSC
ra t e it det ermin es to be pr u dent to sustai n t h e C a pital Im pro vem ent Pr og ram w ithout
th e ne ed f or lar g e S SC ra t e inc r ea ses o r su bst an tial d e bt fin ancing in th e fut ure. I f an
increase in th e SSC r a te is pro pos e d, t he Bo ard of Di r ec t ors co ndu cts a p ubl ic
h ear ing , and c onsi d ers all a v ai l able i nform ation in c om ing to a fin al decis ion o n s etting
th e S SC rat e.
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -1
The ca pital c ompon ent of t he Se w er S erv ice Ch arge (SSC) has tr ad itio n al ly b een us e d
to suppl eme nt all oth er s ources o f re v enue as n ee d ed to fu nd the ca pi t al pro g ra m.
Wh en th e D istri ct lost 4 0% of t he property tax re v enue in 1992-93 it compensat ed by
ad ding a ca pital project c ompon ent to t he S SC. Since then, the capital com po n ent o f
t he S SC has v ar i ed eac h y ear, d e pe n ding on t he c a pital rev en u e a v ai l able f rom o t her
so urces a n d t he pla n ned ex pendit u re s.
Capacity F ee and Pumped Zone Fee Re ven ue
A c ap acity fe e is paid by e ach n ew co nnec to r to t h e Dist r ict. T his f ee re presen ts t h e
cost o f bu y ing into th e ex isting assets o f t he Dist r ict and is intended to equalize the
investment in District assets among current and new users . Capacity f ee re v enue
p roje c tions from n ew co nnect i ons hav e b een adjus t ed to r ef lect c hang es in t he ho u sing
m arket, w hich is dif fic ult t o pre dict an d c an hav e a su bs t ant i al im p act o n t he a v ai l able
re v enues for th e c apital pro g ra m. When the housing market cools, revenue from
capacity fees and pumped zone fees is reduced, and has to be made up by additional
revenue from sewer service charges . I n recent y ears, ev id ence su gg ests t h at th ere m ay
b e a per m an e nt shi ft un der w ay in the nat u re o f t he ho using m arket from lar g e
dev elo pmen ts to smal l er i nfil l projects. Capacity fees are the most volatile revenues as
they are directly impacted by development within the Districts service area.
Reimbursements
A major source of revenue to the SCF is re im burs eme nts from oth ers, w hich consist
prim ar i ly of re im bur sem ents fr om t h e City of Co ncord, serv ed by the Dist r ict und er
con tra c t. The District calculates the amount of the reimbursement according to the
written agreement, and it is based on the percentage of the District’s flow attributable to
Concord dischargers. This revenue category also includes proceeds from the sale of
recycled water and revenue from permit fees and associated fees collected at the
District’s Permit Counter.
Interest on In v estm ents
A p roject i on o f t he ra te of re t urn o n t he in v es t ed Sew er Construction Funds Av ai l able is
ne e ded to predict i nt er est re v enues in t he fut ure. Th e in v estment st rat egy of t he Dist r ict
is desi g ned t o a ttain a m arke t-av era g e rate o f r et u rn w hi l e e xerc i sing a m in imum of risk.
Th e D istri ct's cur r ent areas of in v estment are Uni t ed S t at es T reasury Bi l ls and Not es ,
Com m erc i al P a per, CD’s and t he Local A ge ncy In vestm ent Fu n d o f t he St ate of
Cal ifor ni a . Th e w ei g ht e d av era ge of in t erest o n in vestme nts f or the sew er co nst ruction
in v estment por tf ol io for 2 01 4-15 w as 0.2 5% and is p roje cte d t o b e 0.30 % in 2015-16. It
is a nticip ate d t h at i nt e rest rates wil l beg in to cli m b ag ain in t he futu re.
Th e following chart includes estimated revenue for each category for FY 2015 -16.
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -2
Revenues
Capacity Fees 6,184,000 $
Pumped Zone Fees 450,000
Interest 187,000
Ad Valorem Taxes 10,060,000
Sewer Service Charges 8,110,000
Reimbursements from Others:
City of Concord 3,150,000
Recycled Water Sales 257,000
Developer Fees, Charges, Other 369,500
Total Revenues *28,767,500 $
Expenditures
Treatment Plant Program 10,410,000 $
Collection System Program 15,950,000
General Improvements Program 3,980,000
Recycled Water Program 450,000
Total Expenditures 30,790,000 $
A summary of Sewer Construction Funds Available Impact is Presented Below:
Projected Revenues 28,767,500 $
Projected Expenditures (30,790,000)
Draw From Funds Available (2,022,500)$
More specific information regarding expenditure categories is included in the Capital
Improvement Plan.
* Revenue is first recorded in the O&M budget until O&M costs are offset. Any additional revenue will be
recorded in the Sewer Construction Fund.
Table 1: SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of projected FY 2015-16 Capital Improvement Program revenue and
expenditures is presented below:
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -3
Table 2 identifies re v enue so ur c es f or th e f o ur pro g ra ms o f capi t al impro vem ent
pr ojec ts.
Table 2: Capital Imp rovem ent Program R ev enue Sources
Pro g ram
Su b f u nd
R e v enue S ource
T re a tme n t
Pla nt
Expan s ion - Addit i on a l capacity to
ser v e n ew c u st om ers
◦ Ca p acity Fees
◦ C i ty o f Con c ord
Up g rading/Repla cem ent -
I m pro vem ent o f e x isting facil ities t o
ser v e c urr ent cus tom ers
◦ Property Ta x e s (c)
◦ Ci ty of Con c ord
◦ Se w er S erv ice Ch arge (d)
◦ De b t Fin a ncing
Collection
S ystem (a)
Expan s ion - Addit i on a l c a pacity to
ser v e n ew cust om ers
◦ Ca p acity Fees
◦ Pu m ped Zo n e F e es
◦ De v elo p er Fe e s
Up g rading/Repla c e m ent -
I m pro vem ent o f e x isting facil ities t o
ser v e c u r r ent cus t o m ers
◦ Property Ta x e s (c)
◦ Se w er S erv ice Ch arge (d)
◦ De b t Fin a ncing
G e neral
I m pro vem ents (b)
-------------------- ◦ Property Ta x e s (c)
◦ Se w er S erv ice Ch arge (d)
Rec y cled Water
---------------------
◦ Property Ta x e s (c)
◦ Ci ty of Con c ord
◦ Se w er S erv ice Ch arge (d)
◦ Custo m er Re v enue
◦ Loan s (e)
◦ De b t Fin a ncing
◦ Gra n t f u nds (f)
(a) In clu d es pum ping st ati o n f acil ities.
(b) In clu d es im prove men ts to adm inistrative faci l ities (He ad quarters Office Bui l ding and CSO
yard), la n d p ur c hase s, veh i cles, eq uipme n t, a nd f urnit u re.
(c) Property t axes may be used for a ny Dist r ict p ur p ose at t he d isc r et i on of t he B oard of Di rectors
with in Pro p osition 4 li m its a nd Cle a n Wa t er Gra n t r egu l ations; how ever, t he uses in dicat ed a re
reco mm end e d as th e most equi t able.
(d) A ca pi t al im prove men ts inc rem ent was adde d to th e an nual s ewer serv i ce c h arge in 19 92 to
supplem e nt ad v alorem ta x es for u pgr a din g/r epla ceme nt of Dist r ict ca pital facil itie s.
(e) St a te W at er Rec lam ation L oan Program
(f ) DWR Prop 84 Funds, Bur e au of Recla ma tion Ti tle 16
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -4
Debt Financing
Th e Dist r ict h as on occ asion used de bt fin anc i ng to fu nd projects. In Dec em ber o f 1 9 94,
$25 ,00 0 ,00 0 in l on g-te rm (20 y ears) de bt fina ncing w as c om ple t ed to fu nd sev eral
lar g e projects incl u ding the Ple asa nt H i ll Rel ief I nt ercept or and O ut f all Im pro vemen t
proje c ts. Th e 1 994 de bt w as r efund ed w ith 19 98 r efun ding Re v enue B onds t o
achiev e si g ni f ica n t sa v in g s in d ebt ser v ice costs t hrou g h lo w er interest ra tes. In
19 98-1 999 the Dist r ict recei v ed a tota l o f $2,9 16,8 72 in lo a ns f or the rec y cled w at e r
pro gram from t he St at e of Cali f orn i a. I n 2002 , an a ddit i onal $1 6,60 0,00 0 milli on in
lo ng-te rm (20 y ears) debt fin anci n g w as c om ple t ed t o allow e scalation o f sch edu les
f or se v eral major p rojects n ee d ed to s er v e t h e D oug herty Val l ey in S a n R amon . I n
200 9, th e Dist r ict issu e d $54,1 25 ,000 in Certi f ica tes o f P artic i pation (COP) w hich
reti r ed t he 19 9 8 a nd 20 02 debt to ta ke adv an tag e o f fav orable bo nd i nt er est rat es ,
a nd inc l ud ed $30 milli on i n d ebt w hich w as issued to fu nd so me lar g e, n eed ed one-
ti me proj ects. A sep arate De bt F und h as b een esta bl i shed to col l ect re v enue an d
re pay deb t; th er ef or e , de bt re paym ent is n ot reflected in Ca pit al Pro g ram cash f low
p rojectio ns.
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -5
F UNDING PR IN C IP LES
Th e Dist r ict h as dev el o ped and main t ain ed a cap acity f ee syst em , w hich e q uit a bly
div id e s t h e cost o bl ig ations o f t he c a pital p rog ram betw een the ex isting cust om ers of
Dist r ict facil ities a n d n ew cust om ers of t he se facil iti es. Un d er this “f air sh are”
app r oach, ex isting custom ers, pr im ar i ly throu g h p ro p erty ta xes a nd a capi t al
comp on en t of t he an nual SS C , and new u sers thr ough ca pacity fees b ased o n a
proporti o nal “buy-i n” to t he c ur r ent v alue of a ll e x isting ca pital a ssets, fu nd facil ities
upg rade, reno v ati o n a nd replac emen t costs as w ell as ex pansion p ro jects n ee d ed t o
accommod ate g ro wth.
Th e B oard of Di recto rs has gen eral ly p ref err ed a pa y-as -you-g o f in a ncing a ppr o ac h,
raisi n g se w er service char g e rates as n ee d ed to fu nd the c api t al pro g ra m.
Occa sio n al ly , t h e D istri ct has bond-finan ced c a pital p rojects, pa rticularly w hen s uch
projects a re lar g e, o ne- ti me ex pendi t ures th at wi ll b en ef it c ur r ent and fut u re
rat e pa y ers.
Go ing f or w ard, t he tw o d isc r etio n ary so urces of ca pital re v en ue f or t he Dist r ict
Bo ard a re se w er service char ge and bo nd fin ancin g. Th u s, any re d ucti on in c apital
rev en ue fro m ot h er sources, such as ca pacity fe es, w ould hav e to b e ma d e u p by
a n inc re ase in th e se w er service char g e, by a like reduct i on in ex penditures on t he
cap ital pro g ra m, or by bor row in g.
SEW ER CONS TRUCT ION FUN D TEN YEAR PROJECTIONS
Each year a t en -y ear f inancial projection is prepared that contains all District revenue
and expenses. Table 3 on the following page contains the ten -year cash flow
project ion for the CIP and assumes that sewer service charge rates will be raised as
needed to fun d the plan. Table 4 contains the bas ic assumptions used to develop the
cash flow projections.
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -6
Table 3: Ten-Y ear C a pital Impro vement Pla n Recommen d ed S c enario C a sh Fl ow Projection
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND 15-1616-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-2222-2323-2424-25
INCOME
INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 187 $ 177 $ 264 $ 351 $ 500 $ 806 $ 1,288 $ 1,997 $ 2,761 $ 3,301 $
FACILITIES CAPACITY FEE 6,184 6,484 6,788 7,096 7,407 7,722 8,077 8,250 8,250 8,250
PUMPED ZONE FEE 450 582 609 497 187 195 181 185 202 220
AD VALOREM TAXES 10,060 10,208 10,402 10,904 11,280 11,729 12,222 12,721 13,240 14,954
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 8,110 13,519 19,407 21,697 24,855 26,703 28,746 30,301 32,908 38,840
REIMBURSEMENTS FROM OTHERS:
CITY OF CONCORD 3,150 5,491 7,651 6,888 4,921 3,856 3,411 5,382 12,307 22,701
BOND PROCEEDS - - - - - - - - - -
DEVELOPER FEES AND CHARGES, ALL OTHER 627 642 657 673 689 706 723 741 759 777
Subtotal 28,768$ 37,103$ 45,778$ 48,106$ 49,839$ 51,717$ 54,648$ 59,577 $ 70,427 $ 89,043 $
EXPENDITURES
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM 10,410 $ 16,440 $ 23,112 $ 21,231 $ 14,973 $ 11,670 $ 10,256 $ 16,431 $ 38,142 $ 70,406 $
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM 15,95016,41217,86619,245 17,659 27,289 26,974 29,013 27,920 22,886
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 3,9803,8474,4592,136 3,067 1,524 1,343 1,371 1,450 2,825
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM 450453530557 394 580 597 615 633 652
Subtotal 30,790 $ 3 7,152$ 45,967$ 43,169$ 36,093$ 41,063$ 39,170$ 47,430 $ 68,145 $ 96,769 $
NET INCREASE (DECREASE)(2,023)$ (49)$ (189)$ 4,937$ 13,746$ 10,654$ 15,478$ 12,147 $ 2,282 $ (7,726)$
TEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -7
Table 4: A ssump t io n s Used to Cal culate Cash Fl ow T abl es
Fiscal Year 2015-162016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-25
Interest %0.50%0.50%0.75%1.00%1.25%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%
Inflation %0.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%
# of New Connections 975 995 1,015 1,035 1,055 1,075 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100
Ad Valorem Tax Escalation*1.0%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%
Total Sewer Service Charge (SSC)474 $ 508 $ 533 $ 558 $ 582 $ 604 $ 625 $ 646 $ 666 $ 686 $
SSC Capital Component 49 $ 82 $ 117 $ 130 $ 148 $ 158 $ 169 $ 177 $ 191 $ 224 $
Sewer Service Charge
*Debt Service is funded first, any remaining property tax funds Capital.
Table 4: Assumptions Used to Calculate Cash Flow
Assumes sufficient SSC rate increases to fully fund the capital component needed.
CIB/CIP Finance and Revenue Finance -8