Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.a.1) Annual update on the District’s Recycled Water Programt f 2014 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT far r �f I • f Central Contra�Cos ani 5019 Imhoff Place Martin -4553 tart' Distri Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2014 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report Facility Name: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Water Reuse Program Order:-96-011 Report Due Date: March 15, 2015 _ Period Covered by this Report: January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 I certify under perjury of law that this document and all attachments are prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and i risonment for knowing violations. 7 �� (�w• �3` /3-15' ignature of Official I Date t Roger Bailey '*"6eneral Manager CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 2014 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT INDEX Page No(s). Producer's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water ... ............................... 1 -9 Figure 1: CCCSD Recycled Water System Map ............................ ............................... 10 Table 1: Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2014 .................... ............................... 11 Table 2: Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2014 ........................... ............................... 12 Tables 3 -14: CCCSD Monthly Recycled Water Characteristics — 2014 ................... 13 -24 Recycled Water Customer Annual Site Inspection Reports ..... ............................... 25 -53 RECYCLED WATER PRODUCER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT REPORTING PRODUCER: DATE OF REPORT: ORDER: REPORTING PERIOD: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District March 13, 2015 96 -011 January through December 2014 RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM OVERVIEW This annual report covers Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD) production and distribution of recycled water over the period of January through December 2014. CCCSD has been providing tertiary- treated recycled water for in -plant usage, irrigation customers and a range of commercial uses since 1996. In 2014, CCCSD provided approximately 464 acre -feet (AF), or 151 million gallons (MG), of recycled water to a variety of customers in Pleasant Hill, Concord and Martinez near CCCSD's treatment plant in Martinez. Recycled water was used for landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses and street medians and for commercial applications such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust control, toilet and urinal flushing and washing kennels at the local animal shelter. In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD used approximately 1,158 AF, or 377 MG, of recycled water internally at CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant for process water and landscape irrigation. In 2014, the total volume of recycled water provided by CCCSD to offsite customer locations and for internal uses was approximately 1,622 AF, or 528 MG. Table 1 of this report provides a summary of recycled water usage for calendar year 2014 by reuse application category, as requested by the Regional Board. Table 2 shows the monthly usage of recycled water by customer, excluding CCCSD's internal use at the treatment plant. Figure 1 is a map of our existing recycled water distribution system, which includes the location of each recycled water customer. All sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011 and our recycled water program complied with all applicable tertiary recycled quality standards. Tables 3 through 14 represent the 2014 water quality characteristics. All CCCSD recycled water customer sites were inspected by CCCSD staff and found to be in compliance with recycled water use regulations; copies of those inspection reports can be found at the back of this report. ACTIVE RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS CCCSD continues to seek opportunities and partnerships to cost - effectively expand recycled water use, add new customers, and obtain financial assistance to build additional recycled water facilities. CCCSD's recycled water projects have been on the forefront of the development of new and innovative uses of recycled water. The interior hot water use of recycled water for dog kennel wash -down was the first -of- its -kind in California. CCCSD's expansion into the provision of dual plumbing for interior uses for toilet and urinal flushing as well as the proposed use of recycled water for cooling towers and boiler feed water at local petroleum refineries represent some of recycled water's more advanced uses. The following describes CCCSD's work in 2014 to connect customers to recycled water use. Recycled Water Zone One Project CCCSD has an agreement with CCWD to allow CCCSD to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and light commercial uses in the Zone One Project area, which consists of a specific geographic area in portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill and Concord near the Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD constructed and operates approximately 14 miles of recycled water distribution pipelines in these areas and provides recycled water service to 36 different customer sites. During 2014, CCCSD expanded the use of recycled water by implementing the following dual - plumbing applications: 1. Diablo Valley College (DVC) Commons — DVC completed construction of one of its two new classroom and faculty buildings of approximately 86,000 square feet that will use recycled water for toilet /urinal flushing and landscape irrigation of interior courtyards. In 2012, CCCSD obtained California Department of Public Health (CDPH) approval for the project. DVC completed construction of the first building in 2013 and upon successful completion of a cross - connection test in December 2013 is now using recycled water. The second building was completed in 2014 and connected to CCCSD's recycled water system, after a successful cross connection test. A total of 35 toilets and 9 urinals will use recycled water for flushing with an estimated annual recycled water use of 1 MG per year. The use of recycled water is one of the sustainable design features that contributed to these new buildings achieving a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold Certification. 2. Pleasant Oaks Park Remodel — In 2013, Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, an existing CCCSD recycled water landscape irrigation customer since 2004, began a major renovation of their Pleasant Oaks Park, including renovation of their Recreation Building to include dual plumbing for toilet and urinal flushing with recycled water. In June 2013, CCCSD received CDPH approval for this new use. Construction was completed in early 2014 and a successful cross connection test was completed in February 2014. With the addition of the toilet and urinal flushing, this park is estimated to use approximately 7 MG of recycled water each year. 4 Concord Recycled Water Project The Concord Recycled Water Project is the largest remaining recycled water project in the Zone One area. Construction of the mainline distribution system was completed in early 2014. The system was charged in Spring 2014 and a recycled water hydrant within the project area was made active for serving our Truck Fill Hydrant Program, which is described on the next page. While CCCSD had planned to use CCWD's maintenance staff under our existing recycled water repair and maintenance contract to perform recycled water customer connections in this project area in 2014, the connections did not move forward due to other CCWD priorities, so CCCSD staff began work in late 2014 to prepare bid documents to connect 10 new customers in this project area in 2015. Construction is anticipated to start in Spring 2015. In December 2014, Chevron Office Park in Concord, the largest irrigation water user in this project area, connected to CCCSD's recycled water system after successful completion of a cross connection test. Chevron is expected to use approximately 15 MG of recycled water each year for landscape irrigation. This project was previously awarded a $1,030,000 Proposition 84 Implementation Grant from the California Department of Water Resources and a $97,000 Title XVI planning grant from the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) in 2011. CCCSD is continuing to seek federal legislative authorization and appropriation for an additional $1.8 million in Title XVI funding for the project through the Western Recycled Water Coalition (discussed later in this report). In 2014, CCCSD distributed 148,232,603 gallons of recycled water to our fixed recycled water customers in the Zone One project area. CCCSD will continue efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective recycled water customers in this project area. Truck Fill Hydrant Program During the last drought in 2009, CCWD recalled its potable hydrant meters to conserve water, and contractors were no longer able to obtain water from potable water hydrants for construction activities and other needs in the northern part of CCCSD's service area. To help address this problem, CCCSD initiated a Truck Fill Hydrant Program (TFHP) to provide recycled water to contractors and public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and other non - potable uses. In 2009, CCCSD installed two purple recycled water hydrants on Marsh Drive in Concord near the Interstate 680 /Highway 4 interchange and provided portable recycled water hydrant meters to contractors and others who could no longer obtain water from potable water hydrants. Customers are trained and issued a Use Permit and a magnetic recycled water notice placard to place on their water truck when hauling recycled water. Meter readings are gathered monthly from these customers via email. Over the last several years, the demand for recycled water from CCCSD's TFHP has been limited due to more normal rainfall conditions and an easing of prior drought restrictions. However, to conserve water supply in 2014, CCWD did limit its issuance of potable hydrant meters and directed contractor applicants seeking water for dust control to CCCSD's TFHP, so our Program saw increased usage last year. In 2014, CCCSD distributed 361,371 gallons of recycled water through this Program. As mentioned above, CCCSD activated a third hydrant meter in the Concord Landscape Project area in 2014, to expand the reach of this Program. CCCSD will continue to make its Truck Fill Hydrant Program available to the community as needed to respond to future drought situations, and will continue to evaluate potential opportunities to install additional recycled water hydrants. Residential Recycled Water Fill Station Program In Fall 2014, CCCSD followed Dublin San Ramon Services District's lead and constructed a Residential Recycled Water Fill Station at our Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility ( HHWCF) in Martinez. After several months of development, the Program quickly received approval in October 2014 by the State Water Board's new Division of Drinking Water, followed by the RWQCB. The Program provides up to 300 gallons per trip of free recycled water to residents within CCCSD's HHWCF service area and to CCCSD employees. Participants are required to complete a use application/ agreement and receive training prior to using the Program. Recycled water distributed through this Program may only be used for hand - watering lawns, landscaping and gardens and may not be introduced into any permanent piping systems that could lead to a cross connection. In 2014, CCCSD distributed 446 gallons through this Program. PLANNING FOR FUTURE RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS Development of Recycled Water Projects on CCCSD Buffer Property CCCSD has been exploring options for recycled water projects on the vacant buffer land owned by CCCSD near our wastewater treatment facilities in Martinez. In 2014, CCCSD issued a lease to the nonprofit organization Aglantis, for use of approximately 15 acres of CCCSD buffer property for growing food crops with CCCSD recycled water, in order to donate fresh produce to school lunch programs and the nearby Contra Costa Food Bank. The project will be used to demonstrate the science and benefits of recycled water and sustainable gardening and farming practices (e.g., avoiding the use of pesticides and other toxic products) and could potentially serve as a model for other wastewater agencies that have available land near their treatment facilities and would like to increase water recycling. The project is currently making its way through the Land Use Permit process. Once irrigation plans are designed, CCCSD will be completing and submitting an Engineering Report for approval of this use by the State Water Board's Division of Drinking Water and the Regional Board. 4 Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide up to 22,500 AFY (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell and Tesoro refineries in Martinez for cooling tower and boiler -feed water. The refineries are currently supplied by CCWD with untreated Delta water via the Contra Costa Canal, which is predominantly supplied by the USBR's Central Valley Project (CVP). The refinery project is particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round demand for recycled water and it could potentially make use of existing recycled water conveyance and storage facilities already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to each refinery. The planning -level cost estimate for the refinery project could be up to $100 million, depending on whether the full -scale project is implemented. As a result, CCCSD needs financial assistance and /or project partners to make the project cost - effective. In 2011, CCCSD was awarded an $180,000 Title XVI planning grant from the USBR to fund 50% of the costs to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation for the proposed project. The USBR requires the project sponsor to prepare a feasibility study to demonstrate that the proposed project is a viable, well thought -out and long- term source of water that justifies the expenditure of federal funds for construction of the proposed facilities. As an initial step in preparing the feasibility study, CCCSD, in partnership with CCWD, hired RMC Water and Environment and MBK Engineers to complete a water supply yield study on the project. The yield study, completed in May 2013, determined that due to the limitations in the capacity available in the operation of the CVP, the true yield of the refinery project is just about half of what would be delivered (for either the 5 or 20 MGD -sized projects). The results of the study were reviewed by the USBR and since the project appears to be viable, CCCSD continued its contract with RMC Water and Environment to prepare a Title XVI feasibility study, which was completed and submitted to the USBR in December 2014. CCCSD is currently awaiting results of CCWD's Future Water Supply Study, anticipated in Summer 2015, to determine if CCWD may be interested in moving forward with a small -scale (3 -5 MGD) Refinery Project to meet its SBX7 -7 requirements for 20% reduction by 2020. CCCSD is currently pursuing Title XVI funding for a 3 -5 MGD Refinery Project through the Western Recycled Water Coalition (discussed later in this report). Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a preferred development plan (clustered villages concept) consisting of a mixture of commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational land uses interspersed between parks and open space. This mixture of land uses will create opportunities to use recycled water, not only for landscape irrigation but also for non - potable uses such as toilet flushing and cooling towers in commercial buildings. The redevelopment of the property and construction of supporting recycled water infrastructure is not expected to begin for five to ten years because of additional planning work that must be completed by the City of Concord and the Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the City of Concord and /or a developer. In 2012, CCCSD completed a Draft Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons Station redevelopment that evaluated alternatives and costs for new recycled water infrastructure needed to meet the anticipated demand. Recycled water demand for the new development is estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build -out. The current vision for serving this development is that CCCSD would wholesale recycled water to CCWD and CCWD would serve the development, so CCWD is currently evaluating grant funding opportunities for the project. Satellite Recycled Water Projects In 2012, CCCSD entered into a non - binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Diablo Country Club (DCC) and EBMUD (the water purveyor) to evaluate construction of a satellite recycled water treatment plant to supply irrigation water to the DCC's 18 -hole golf course located near Danville. CCCSD would provide wastewater from its sewer collection system and receive solids (2 %) returned from the satellite plant. The DCC has proposed to finance the capital and operating costs of the satellite plant and own and operate the facilities. A Satellite Recycled Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study was completed in 2012 by the DCC with assistance from CCCSD and EBMUD. The study found that the best use of resources to meet long term sustainable water supply needs for the golf course was to utilize a blend of recycled water, ground water, and potable water for irrigation. Further investigations into the regulatory, environmental and design requirements continue. In 2014, CCCSD participated in a number of meetings with the DCC's engineering consultant and reviewed a number of submittals related to the diversion structure that will withdraw sewer from CCCSD's collection system and regarding how the plant will operate to ensure no sanitary sewer overflows or maintenance issues will be caused by this facility. Once CCCSD agrees to an allowable sewer withdraw rate and approves the project, CCCSD will be taking the lead on the CEQA process for the project, which is expected to occur in 2015. As this is the first such facility proposed in CCCSD's service area, CCCSD is using this case as an opportunity to create a policy on how future applications for similar facilities will be handled. In December 2014, CCCSD executed a non - binding MOU with the Moraga Country Club (MCC) for a similar facility, with the key difference being that the MCC has proposed withdrawing wastewater from CCCSD's Moraga Pump Station. Once the DCC application and CCCSD's policy on these facilities is completed, CCCSD will turn its attention to the MCC for evaluation. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE Recycled Water Treatment Facilities Due to very steady operation in CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant in 2014, CCCSD's Recycled Water Filter Plant also had a very steady operation in 2014. All recycled water produced by CCCSD in 2014 complied with all applicable tertiary recycled quality standards. In 2014, staff from CCCSD's Plant Operations Division met with staff at the City of Pittsburg's Water Treatment Plant to learn best practices for maintenance and operational strategies for enhancing the performance of dual -media filters, which is what CCCSD operates. Recycled Water Distribution System CCCSD field crews continued operation and maintenance of CCCSD's recycled water distribution system in 2014. When needed, CCCSD relies on CCWD field crews to perform repair work on CCCSD's recycled water distribution system under a maintenance contract that we've had with CCWD since 2004. CCWD's cross - connection control specialists also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections for new recycled water sites and testing and recertification of existing sites where piping modifications have been made. CCCSD Maintenance Crew Leader Hamid Tehrani obtained certification as a cross connection control specialist in 2013 has been certifying CCCSD's cross connection tests since that time. In 2014, CCCSD had one reportable recycled water spill over 2 MG due to a leak in the recycled water distribution system in a marshy area to the north of our treatment plant in Martinez. This pipeline segment serves just two small recycled water users — CONCO (for vehicle washing) and CCCSD's Maltby Wastewater Pump Station (for pump seal water). Upon discovering this recycled water spill on the afternoon of February 18, 2014, CCCSD staff notified the Regional Board by phone, then submitted a follow -up letter to Blair Allen with the Regional Board on March 4, 2014. Mr. Allen had additional questions, so staff prepared a subsequent report that covered what happened, what was done to correct the matter and what was done to minimize future similar problems and submitted it to Mr. Allen on March 14, 2014. 14i &1t911TiI;Izi .7_11 11;;10 CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate recycled water customers about the precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water Site Supervisors. In addition to training new customers before they connect to our system or begin using our recycled water, CCCSD also provides training when there is a turnover in the Recycled Water Site Supervisor. During annual site inspections, CCCSD provides refresher training to customer staff where needed and verifies that each customer has up -to -date training materials, including CCCSD's brochures and guidance documents on the proper use of recycled water. REGIONAL ALLIANCES TO DEVELOP RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS Western Recycled Water Coalition (Formerly Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition) Since 2009, CCCSD has been a member of the Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition, which is a partnership of 22 agencies committed to developing recycled water as a resource for municipal, industrial, commercial and agricultural uses across the San Francisco Bay Area. In 2013, the Coalition expanded to include agencies outside of the Bay Area, so the name was adjusted accordingly to reflect that. The Western Recycled Water Coalition continues a successful regional approach to pursing recycled water funding and was instrumental in helping CCCSD to secure the Title XVI planning grants for the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project and the Refinery Project. As part of CCCSD's support of the Coalition, CCCSD's Graphic Artist designed a 6 -page Coalition brochure to educate congressional leaders about potential recycled water projects and to attract new members. Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Planning In 2013, CCCSD collaborated with other Bay Area agencies to update the Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ( IRWMP), which was originally prepared in 2006. The IRWMP is a nine - county effort to coordinate and improve water supply reliability, protect water quality, manage flood protection, maintain public health standards, protect habitat and watershed resources, and enhance the overall health of the bay. Projects listed in the IRWMP are eligible to apply for state grant money, such as Proposition 84 funding, which is providing grant funding for the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project. CCCSD recycled water projects that are currently being implemented or may be initiated within the next three to five years have been listed in the latest IRWMP update including the Recycled Water Zone One Project; Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project and Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project. SALT AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control (SWRCB) adopted a Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires regions overlying groundwater basins in the State where recycled water use is occurring and planned for the future to develop a salt and nutrient management plan by May 2014. The SWRCB has indicated it plans to develop a streamlined reporting process by which groundwater basins with limited use of the groundwater resources, or basins not likely to have adverse impacts from recycled water irrigation, can prepare simplified salt and nutrient management plans. The specific reporting requirements continue being developed by the SWRCB. As part of the Bay Area IRWMP update process, templates have been developed that will allow Bay Area agencies to prepare their salt and nutrient management plans in an efficient and streamlined manner. Due to the very limited extent that groundwater is used as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, the basins underlying CCCSD's recycled water current and planned service areas would qualify for the streamlined reporting process. For these areas, the deadline for this requirement has been extended to May 2016. LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER There are many institutional and financial impediments that are outside the control of CCCSD in expanding the use of recycled water. On the institutional side, CCCSD must work with the potable water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale recycled water to them or obtain their permission to purvey recycled water. Some potable water purveyors assert they have significant sunk costs in existing facilities and that the California duplication of services law allows them to recoup stranded costs if recycled water is made available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the applicability of this law, the issue can add another institutional barrier and significant additional costs to recycled water projects. In addition, even when institutional issues are overcome, the cost to construct new recycled water treatment and conveyance facilities can be high. For example, recycled water projects often require construction of purple pipelines through congested urban areas or require additional treatment facilities to increase capacity. When all of these costs are added together, the unit cost of recycled water often exceeds the cost of other available, but less- sustainable, water supplies. Although recycled water projects may have substantial additional quantifiable benefits versus conventional alternatives, additional sources of funding are needed to make recycled water projects more competitive with other cheaper water supply alternatives available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state and federal funding for recycled water projects in the past has restricted the growth of CCCSD's recycled water program. Despite these challenges, CCCSD is increasing recycled water use in the Bay Area by developing new recycled water projects where economically and financially viable. M O M O N O N D x X Existing Pipeline O Existing CCWD Pipeline Proposed Extension Mallard O ��b Reservoir L_ O Shell Pipeline Martinez Water Service Area 242 0 Recycled Water Customers e O O (size indicates yearly consumption) 0 : , s Small O O D O o 00 U M Medium L Large D O� Existing Customer 4 COUNTY QUARRY ' O fir' DDD IN PLANT USE BUCHANAN FIELDS TRUCK FILL GOLF COURSE CHILPANCINGO - -- 2 Cte e\ HYDRANT © PARK C,OStB •• C YLOR BLVD/ RUTH r 1 Q Contra - 1�1\ 1 O PLEASANT HILL DRIVE LANDSCAPING MIDDLE SCHOOL 31 eA� 3 � 9 I�H. CORP. YARD �� J� REW ° � — SEQUOIA � jJ CLEARWELL � MIDDLE P.H. PARK SCHOOL PLEASANT HILL DEMO GARDEN (O cccso pI' VIKING DR HEADQUARTERS CONTRA COSTA ; Q, BLVD MEDIANS O F. SALFINGERE PARK IJ L CC TOPSOIL CHILPANCINGO _j �� DVC P.H. POLICE DEPT - SEQUOIA HOB ANNEX BLVD MEDIANS O CAMPUS i � ELEMENTARY GOLF CLUB/ OLD Y�O SCHOOL <� COUNTY CORP. Blum Rd TAYLOR/ CIVIC 'PLEASANT OAKS ` YARD�u��� -- _ ° QUARRY ROAD MEDIANS _ �� J �r_� � � � MEDIANS PARK '`\O �1jun T—CONCO BLUM VIEW ESTATES © /- - I� / ^.� -- - - -� �' TRIPLEXES �, C� -'�_ � (PENDING) CCCSD �/ —° •�� - - \ O` - VALLEY VIEW O WAREHOUSE ■ $ COLLEGE PARK SCHOOLS „ n © O � ■ FRVjC --� %� . Costa U' MALTBY HHWF1L11"'" ■ ♦■ Contr u a�D Dy = -� II PUMP STATION ■ i "� �_ J � SEASON'S ■ ■ ,i Ganal II / CEMETERY ■ O G COUNTY ANIMAL � ■ D SERVICES -'� ■ =� �■ Q ■ W D■ (� C ■ gyp,' CONTRA COSTA' 0 , � �j ■ .� O COUNTRY CLUB.�' P I 1 GOLF COURSE 5 MARTINEZ ✓' /CO� Gib ■ 0 1_. � � ■... ti �4` Blvd 0 4 � ♦♦ ♦ Q ■ ■ Q O 1 ♦ n Q ♦ `' n 'Central Contra Costa !(z Figure Sanitary District o 1,000 2,000 CCCSD Recycled Water System 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Feet 10 SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE Calendar Year: 2014 Reuse Application Category No. of Sites Area Applied Acres Amount Distributed (MG) oho of Total Reuse Flow Landscape Irrigation 29 192 142.1 26.9 Parks 5 22 19.1 3.6 Golf Courses 2 110 81.6 15.4 Green Belts 8 1 1.4 0.3 Schools 4 52 32.6 6.2 Other 10 7 7.4 1.4 Agriculture 0 0 0.0 0.0 Vineyards 0 0 0.0 0.0 Other 0 0 0.0 0.0 Industrial (1) 6 N/A 385.7 73.0 Cooling 0 0 0.0 0.0 Other 6 N/A 385.7 73.0 Environmental Enhancement (2) 0 0 0.0 0.0 Dual Plumbing (3) 1 1 0.4 0.1 Total (4) 36 193 528.2 100 Notes: 1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, truck fill hydrant, and treatment plant site. 2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland /marsh applications, etc. 3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation). 11 Table 2 Monthly Report on Recycled Water -- Calendar Year 2014 CUSTOMERS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Total for (All readings in gallons) Calendar 2014 CONCO 0 73,521 50,849 48,523 400,083 81,162 84,657 78,508 128,903 68,292 57,289 41,828 1,113,615 CC Topsoil 0 48,096 48,770 114,519 215,424 198,669 198,594 186,402 0 297,779 0 45,329 1,353,581 CC County Corp Yard 55,352 8,976 748 19,448 83,028 97,988 204,204 131,648 51,612 93,500 64,328 2,244 813,076 CC County Animal Shelter 5,228 3,384 2,934 4,661 46,992 47,918 59,588 61,500 64,097 69,584 60,753 20,694 447,333 Pacheco (Seasons) Cemetery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Quarry Products 414,392 123,420 359,040 486,200 338,844 1,078,616 795,124 703,120 727,056 635,052 225,896 67,320 5,954,080 Buchanan Golf Course 549,481 34,184 519,636 2,150,949 3,982,427 4,553,824 5,013,246 3,682,928 2,845,093 1,628,396 641,410 86,544 25,688,115 Contra Costa Blvd. - City of PH Median 1,496 0 0 13,464 31,416 29,920 37,400 32,164 33,660 32,164 5,984 0 217,668 Chilpancingo Parkway- City of PH Median 14,960 22,440 32,912 18,700 19,448 29,172 46,376 56,848 21,692 21,692 17,204 0 301,444 Chilpancingo Park - PH Park & Rec 0 0 748 0 11,968 15,708 39,644 35,904 38,896 38,148 27,676 0 208,692 Medians - Golf Club /Old Quarry Road Meter No. 1 - Safeway Parking Lot 0 0 748 1,496 2,992 2,244 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,480 2 - Church 0 0 7,480 10,472 51,612 52,360 82,280 51,612 48,620 37,400 0 0 341,836 3 - Upper GC Road 0 0 7,480 33,660 19,448 26,928 24,684 14,960 12,716 10,472 0 0 150,348 4- DVC tennis courts 0 0 748 6,732 24,684 35,904 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,068 Diablo Valley College (less Stubbs Rd.) 394,869 76,146 314,534 926,847 1,912,412 1,539,032 790,943 471,674 2,535,555 844,268 342,584 128,207 10,277,071 Stubbs Road Triplexes 120,428 85,272 111,452 119,680 129,404 162,368 201,205 137,123 163,528 127,908 86,020 60,588 1,504,976 Taylor /Civic Medians - City of PH 0 0 13,464 19,448 33,660 49,368 44,132 32,164 34,408 30,668 11,968 748 270,028 City Landscaping Taylor Blvd /Ruth Dr 22,440 5,236 10,472 8,228 22,440 24,684 31,416 33,660 32,912 28,424 3,740 0 223,652 CC Country Club Golf Course 2,214,080 0 1,499,740 5,105,100 7,266,820 6,391,660 6,227,100 10,995,600 5,568,860 8,482,320 2,135,540 0 55,886,820 Viking Drive Landscaping - City of PH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley View MS and College Park HS 317,152 11,220 106,216 468,996 1,286,560 1,831,104 1,472,064 1,335,928 1,130,228 638,792 40,392 7,480 8,646,132 City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard 6,732 3,740 3,740 7,480 32,164 44,880 43,384 27,676 33,660 30,668 15,708 748 250,580 Pleasant Hill Police Department 17,204 748 6,732 220,660 346,324 254,320 308,169 210,188 294,712 154,836 47,124 0 1,861,017 Pleasant Hill Community Center and Frank Salfingere Park 23,712 86,244 32,463 146,010 314,983 496,971 453,295 435,785 233,675 211,235 6,882 0 2,441,255 Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane 496,672 145,112 359,788 970,904 1,570,800 1,256,640 1,503,480 1,111,528 1,166,880 827,288 383,724 53,856 9,846,672 Sequoia Schools 115,940 63,580 71,060 564,740 714,340 845,240 819,060 822,800 1,069,640 875,160 127,160 59,840 6,148,560 Pleasant Hill Middle School 392,700 93,500 299,200 680,680 916,300 927,520 1,088,340 1,080,860 1,095,820 790,636 166,804 29,920 7,562,280 Pleasant Hill Demonstration Garden 8,228 5,984 6,732 14,960 14,960 14,960 14,960 14,960 0 0 0 0 95,744 Pleasant Oaks Park 321,640 18,700 239,360 534,820 1,077,120 1,125,740 1,230,460 792,880 703,120 407,660 100,980 0 6,552,480 Hydrant Sales 0 0 0 0 20,002 169,459 17,803 39,146 100,764 6,783 6,223 1,191 361,371 Subtotal - Recycled Water Sales 5,492,706 909,504 4,107,045 12,697,376 20,886,654 21,384,360 20,831,607 22,577,565 18,136,107 16,389,125 4,575,389 606,537 148,593,974 HHW Drop -Off Facility 35,156 65,076 28,424 115,940 331,364 284,988 436,832 415,888 0 575,960 26,180 0 2,315,362 Maltby Pumping Station (estimated) ** 1,860 1,680 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,800 1,860 21,900 4737 Imhoff Place (warehouse) 0 2,244 8,976 5,984 7,480 5,236 4,488 4,488 0 9,724 2,244 0 50,864 4838 Imhoff Place (HOB Annex) 76,296 6,732 17,204 12,716 22,440 36,652 41,140 33,660 0 74,052 9,724 8,228 338,844 Residential ReW Fill Station 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 425 0 446 Subtotal - District Remote Sites* 113,312 75,732 56,464 136,440 363,144 328,676 484,3201 455,896 1,8001 661,617 40,373 10,0881 2,727,416 GRAND TOTALS 5,606,0181 985,2361 4,163,5091 12,833,816 21,249,798 21,713,0361 21,315,9271 23,033,4611 18,137,9071 17,050,7421 4,615,7621 616,6251 151,321,836 *Does not include use on treatment plant site 12 TABLE 3 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JANUARY 2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 1/1/2014 N D 2 6.20 6.49 0.89 69 1/2/2014 ND (2 ) 4.60 5.82 0.84 97 1/3/2014 ND 2 4.20 5.61 0.84 195 1/4/2014 ND 2 6.40 6.22 0.85 189 1/5/2014 ND (2) 5.80 5.68 0.9 177 1/6/2014 ND (2 ) 3.80 6.29 1.05 97 1/7/2014 ND 2 6.30 6.04 0.93 360 1/8/2014 ND (2 ) 5.70 6.16 0.88 78 1/9/2014 ND (2 ) 6.10 6.25 0.85 81 1/10/2014 ND (2) 4.30 5.99 0.85 79 1/11/2014 N D 2 2.60 5.69 0.85 93 1/12/2014 ND 2 6.20 5.96 0.91 63 1/13/2014 ND 2) 4.80 5.61 0.98 46 1/14/2014 ND (2 ) 4.50 5.91 0.97 166 1/15/2014 ND 2 5.90 6.13 0.98 408 1/16/2014 ND (2) 5.50 6.32 0.93 68 1/17/2014 ND (2) 6.20 6.41 0.93 63 1/18/2014 ND (2) 5.60 5.92 0.93 118 1/19/2014 ND (2 ) 4.60 5.72 0.93 58 1/20/2014 ND (2) 4.80 6.06 1.07 38 1/21/2014 N D (2) 4.80 5.92 1.17 117 1/22/2014 ND (2) 6.10 5.82 1.08 331 1/23/2014 ND 2 5.60 5.91 1.06 94 1/24/2014 ND (2) 3.10 5.42 1.06 169 1/25/2014 ND (2) 5.60 5.70 1.14 343 1/26/2014 ND (2) 5.60 5.74 1.25 106 1/27/2014 ND (2) 5.40 6.24 1.39 86 1/28/2014 ND (2) 5.70 6.06 1.69 468 1/29/2014 ND (2) 4.60 6.13 1.65 165 1/30/2014 ND (2) 4.60 5.99 1.62 113 1/31/2014 N D (2) 3.60 5.42 1.62 100 Minimum ND (2) 2.60 5.42 0.84 38 Maximum ND (2) 6.40 6.49 1.69 468 Average ND (2) 5.12 5.96 1.07 150 13 TABLE 4 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS FEBRUARY 2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 2/1/2014 ND 2 6.20 6.87 1.43 110 2/2/2014 ND 2 5.30 5.84 1.36 79 2/3/2014 ND 2 4.90 6.00 1.27 58 2/4/2014 ND 2 4.50 5.62 1.25 125 2/5/2014 ND 2 3.60 5.24 1.40 74 2/6/2014 ND (2) 3.45 4.65 1.28 70 2/7/2014 ND (2) 6.20 6.29 1.23 58 2/8/2014 ND 2 5.00 5.04 1.31 43 2/9/2014 ND 2 5.10 5.63 1.85 35 2/10/2014 ND (2 ) 5.30 5.63 2.26 35 2/11/2014 ND (2) 4.85 5.74 3.26 67 2/12/2014 ND 2 3.15 5.80 4.52 37 2/13/2014 ND 2 5.10 5.79 1.44 47 2/14/2014 ND (2) 6.15 5.86 1.66 41 2/15/2014 ND (2) 5.55 5.91 1.94 54 2/16/2014 ND 2 6.25 6.09 1.99 34 2/17/2014 ND (2) 5.20 5.69 1.97 37 2/18/2014 ND (2) 4.20 5.41 1.93 71 2/19/2014 ND (2) 5.90 5.81 1.96 47 2/20/2014 ND 2 5.40 5.85 1.97 62 2/21/2014 ND (2) 6.30 5.95 1.53 66 2/22/2014 ND (2) 5.40 5.91 1.58 65 2/23/2014 ND (2) 5.15 5.94 1.56 54 2/24/2014 ND (2) 4.90 5.83 1.63 47 2/25/2014 ND (2) 3.80 5.43 1.66 87 2/26/2014 ND (2) 3.95 5.49 1.25 48 2/27/2014 ND (2) 5.90 5.93 1.36 40 2/28/2014 ND (2 ) 1 5.30 1 6.10 1 1.10 1 35 Minimum ND (2) 3.15 4.65 1.10 34 Maximum ND (2) 6.30 6.87 4.52 125 Average ND (2) 5.07 5.76 1.75 58 14 TABLE[$ CENTRAL:CONTRAEEOSTASAN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DWATERIEHARATERISTICS MARCH2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 3/1/2014 ND (2) 4.80 5.88 1.12 43 3/2/2014 ND (2) 4.10 5.35 1.12 37 3/3/2014 ND (2) 3.50 4.80 1.12 36 3/4/2014 ND (2) 4.60 5.83 1.06 57 3/5/2014 ND (2) 4.45 5.37 1.02 34 3/6/2014 ND (2) 3.90 5.08 1.08 35 3/7/2014 ND (2) 5.75 5.14 1.01 35 3/8/2014 ND (2) 2.60 5.21 1.01 44 3/9/2014 ND (2) 5.30 5.15 0.75 40 3/10/2014 ND (2) 1.95 4.97 0.66 45 3/11/2014 ND (2) 4.35 5.27 0.66 70 3/12/2014 ND (2) 8.60 5.96 0.68 51 3/13/2014 ND (2) 5.15 4.92 0.70 79 3/14/2014 ND (2) 5.35 5.16 0.66 73 3/15/2014 ND (2) 3.80 5.12 0.66 88 3/16/2014 ND (2) 4.65 5.06 0.66 85 3/17/2014 ND (2) 3.80 5.17 0.66 78 3/18/2014 ND (2) 5.95 5.46 0.71 127 3/19/2014 ND (2) 4.15 5.13 0.87 136 3/20/2014 ND (2) 3.90 5.13 0.93 312 3/21/2014 ND (2) 4.50 5.35 0.84 288 3/22/2014 ND (2) 6.10 5.09 0.83 513 3/23/2014 ND (2) 8.45 5.15 0.86 288 3/24/2014 ND (2) 4.75 5.33 1.03 208 3/25/2014 ND (2) 6.35 4.81 1.19 502 3/26/2014 ND (2) 4.45 4.07 1.24 105 3/27/2014 ND (2) 4.80 3.35 1.29 103 3/28/2014 ND (2) 4.60 3.43 1.33 52 3/29/2014 ND (2) 2.10 1.99 1.42 80 3/30/2014 ND (2) 6.10 2.00 1.46 70 3/31/2014 ND (2) 4.15 1.71 1.36 65 Minimum ND (2) 1.95 1.71 0.66 34 Maximum ND (2) 8.60 5.96 1.46 513 Average ND (2) 4.74 4.76 0.97 122 15 TABLES CENTRAL:CONTRAnCOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DUATERIEHARACTERISTICS APRIL2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 4/1/2014 ND 2 4.65 1.33 1.64 70 4/2/2014 ND 2 6.70 3.46 1.40 68 4/3/2014 ND (2 ) 5.65 3.56 1.48 72 4/4/2014 ND 2 4.40 3.39 1.27 41 4/5/2014 ND 2 4.20 4.23 1.40 92 4/6/2014 ND (2) 4.60 3.69 1.44 95 4/7/2014 ND (2 ) 1.90 2.87 1.48 51 4/8/2014 ND 2 4.80 3.06 1.17 67 4/9/2014 ND 2 4.75 3.37 1.06 78 4/10/2014 ND (2) 4.25 3.43 1.12 73 4/11/2014 ND 2) 4.25 3.20 1.15 81 4/12/2014 ND 2 4.40 4.19 1.29 180 4/13/2014 ND 2 6.00 3.27 1.20 114 4/14/2014 ND (2) 4.15 2.58 1.23 120 4/15/2014 ND (2) 2.45 1.76 1.34 286 4/16/2014 ND 2) 3.65 4.04 1.61 610 4/17/2014 ND (2) 4.75 3.59 1.33 279 4/18/2014 ND (2) 4.25 3.80 1.24 550 4/19/2014 ND (2) 3.30 2.64 1.22 683 4/20/2014 ND 2 4.50 1.43 1.22 454 4/21/2014 ND (2) 4.10 4.37 1.59 422 4/22/2014 ND (2) 4.05 2.91 1.71 579 4/23/2014 ND (2) 0.45 1.21 1.69 332 4/24/2014 ND 2) 5.75 4.17 1.17 600 4/25/2014 ND (2) 6.50 3.64 1.15 772 4/26/2014 ND (2) 5.20 2.19 1.12 308 4/27/2014 ND (2) 7.50 2.98 0.92 254 4/28/2014 ND (2) 1 3.50 3.55 1.34 256 4/29/2014 ND (2) 5.10 2.68 1.27 284 4/30/2014 ND (2) 4.15 3.82 1.37 340 Minimum ND (2) 0.45 1.21 0.92 41 Maximum ND (2) 7.50 4.37 1.71 772 Average ND (2) 4.46 3.15 1.32 274 16 TABLETY CENTRAL:CONTRAnCOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DPINATERXHARACTERISTICS MAY2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 5/1/2014 ND (2) 3.25 3.83 1.31 508 5/2/2014 ND (2) 2.65 3.30 1.33 630 5/3/2014 ND (2) 6.60 5.31 1.49 634 5/4/2014 ND (2) 5.30 3.08 1.66 382 5/5/2014 ND (2) 2.75 2.56 1.55 401 5/6/2014 ND (2) 4.50 1.90 1.67 732 5/7/2014 ND (2) 5.80 1.49 1.67 550 5/8/2014 ND (2) 5.50 4.20 1.75 477 5/9/2014 ND (2) 6.15 4.57 1.39 636 5/10/2014 ND (2) 9.50 4.58 1.59 479 5/11/2014 ND (2) 4.60 4.10 1.62 337 5/12/2014 2 3.00 1.67 1.59 296 5/13/2014 ND (2) 5.55 3.49 1.54 664 5/14/2014 ND (2) 5.30 4.32 1.71 606 5/15/2014 ND (2) 5.70 4.61 1.14 800 5/16/2014 ND (2) 4.50 3.77 0.76 655 5/17/2014 ND (2) 5.40 3.67 0.91 688 5/18/2014 ND (2) 3.15 1.62 1.97 479 5/19/2014 4 2.35 1.48 2.04 402 5/20/2014 ND (2) 5.45 2.47 1.80 504 5/21/2014 ND (2) 3.50 3.77 1.99 425 5/22/2014 ND (2) 5.90 2.66 1.49 743 5/23/2014 ND (2) 4.70 1.30 1.89 329 5/24/2014 ND (2) 4.20 4.50 0.46 760 5/25/2014 ND (2) 6.60 4.31 1.71 472 5/26/2014 ND (2) 5.15 3.22 2.03 409 5/27/2014 ND (2) 2.40 2.85 2.21 379 5/28/2014 ND (2) 3.80 2.66 0.82 829 5/29/2014 ND (2) 2.75 2.49 1.41 741 5/30/2014 ND (2) 6.75 2.27 1.33 567 5/31/2014 ND (2) 7.70 2.30 2.19 584 Minimum ND (2) 2.35 1.30 0.46 296 Maximum 4 9.50 5.31 2.21 829 Average < 2.7 4.85 3.17 1.55 552 17 TABLES CENTRAL:CONTRAnCOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DUATERIEHARACTERISTICS J U N E2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 6/1/2014 ND 2 6.95 1.48 1.96 535 6/2/2014 ND 2 2.70 2.42 1.90 434 6/3/2014 ND (2) 6.20 4.44 2.40 773 6/4/2014 ND 2 6.00 4.74 2.58 500 6/5/2014 ND 2 5.30 4.24 1.06 776 6/6/2014 ND 2 3.90 4.11 2.92 445 6/7/2014 ND (2) 6.30 5.26 0.86 502 6/8/2014 ND 2 6.85 4.03 1.80 698 6/9/2014 ND 2) 7.00 4.05 0.74 441 6/10/2014 ND (2) 7.00 4.28 1.24 862 6/11/2014 ND 2) 3.30 3.25 1.31 535 6/12/2014 ND 2 3.60 2.57 2.59 816 6/13/2014 ND 2 6.70 4.20 0.96 488 6/14/2014 ND (2) 6.70 5.27 2.01 1018 6/15/2014 ND 2) 5.75 4.56 2.00 552 6/16/2014 ND 2 11.30 4.81 1.57 454 6/17/2014 ND (2) 7.55 5.38 1.77 861 6/18/2014 2 7.15 5.81 1.71 467 6/19/2014 ND (2) 7.80 5.69 1.61 739 6/20/2014 ND (2 ) 7.15 5.73 1.48 522 6/21/2014 ND (2) 5.70 5.75 1.03 909 6/22/2014 ND (2) 6.10 5.34 1.35 551 6/23/2014 ND (2) 2.95 5.20 1.02 447 6/24/2014 ND 2 5.25 6.02 1.84 820 6/25/2014 ND (2) 6.50 5.63 1.90 773 6/26/2014 ND (2) 6.05 5.63 1.77 507 6/27/2014 ND (2) 6.20 5.72 1.94 858 6/28/2014 ND (2) 7.80 6.36 1.97 857 6/29/2014 ND (2) 5.50 5.92 1.88 624 6/30/2014 ND (2) 7.25 6.01 1.25 467 Minimum ND (2) 2.70 1.48 0.74 434 Maximum 2 11.30 6.36 2.92 1018 Average ND (2) 6.15 4.74 1.68 641 TABLES CENTRALMONTRAnCOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DWATERKHARACTERISTICS J U LY2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 7/1/2014 ND 2 7.15 5.70 1.54 803 7/2/2014 ND 2 5.50 5.25 1.38 504 7/3/2014 ND 2 5.10 5.46 1.45 857 7/4/2014 ND 2) 5.50 5.60 1.13 447 7/5/2014 ND (2) 5.65 5.69 1.48 680 7/6/2014 ND (2 ) 4.25 5.66 1.38 455 7/7/2014 ND 2 4.75 5.74 1.33 823 7/8/2014 ND 2 4.55 5.75 1.38 655 7/9/2014 ND (2) 3.85 5.68 1.45 474 7/10/2014 ND 2) 4.30 5.96 1.52 765 7/11/2014 ND 2 4.80 5.30 1.54 436 7/12/2014 ND 2 3.20 5.19 1.53 484 7/13/2014 ND (2) 5.85 5.79 1.85 502 7/14/2014 ND (2) 8.00 5.69 1.48 413 7/15/2014 ND 2 8.25 5.70 1.51 1167 7/16/2014 ND (2) 5.10 5.70 1.53 483 7/17/2014 ND (2) 5.20 5.55 1.56 452 7/18/2014 ND (2) 4.80 5.68 1.68 445 7/19/2014 ND 2 9.20 5.76 1.59 826 7/20/2014 ND (2) 4.25 5.65 1.70 505 7/21/2014 ND (2) 5.20 5.60 1.56 476 7/22/2014 ND (2) 6.60 5.59 1.24 749 7/23/2014 ND (2 ) 6.45 5.50 1.51 417 7/24/2014 ND (2) 6.45 5.50 1.43 460 7/25/2014 ND (2) 4.15 5.63 1.42 484 7/26/2014 ND (2) 7.50 6.05 1.05 887 7/27/2014 ND 2 6.70 6.12 1.80 463 7/28/2014 ND (2) 5.40 5.96 1.65 775 7/29/2014 ND (2) 1 4.90 5.68 1 2.18 478 7/30/2014 ND (2) 5.70 6.99 2.27 822 7/31/2014 ND (2) 4.70 5.54 2.06 445 Minimum ND (2) 3.20 5.19 1.05 413 Maximum ND (2) 9.20 6.99 2.27 1167 Average ND (2) 5.58 5.70 1.55 601 19 TABLE[10 CENTRALMONTRAXOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DUATERIEHARACTERISTICS AU G U ST12014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 8/1/2014 ND 2 3.60 5.51 2.09 439 8/2/2014 ND 2 5.40 6.92 2.28 1024 8/3/2014 ND 2 7.40 5.56 2.14 457 8/4/2014 ND 2) 5.55 5.53 1.88 344 8/5/2014 ND (2) 5.80 5.42 1.77 449 8/6/2014 ND (2 ) 3.45 5.17 1.70 388 8/7/2014 ND 2 4.35 5.08 1.68 663 8/8/2014 ND 2 7.25 5.66 1.69 408 8/9/2014 ND (2) 6.30 5.79 1.96 507 8/10/2014 ND (2) 6.35 5.90 1.96 724 8/11/2014 ND 2 6.80 5.71 1.70 362 8/12/2014 ND 2 6.15 5.71 1.51 1212 8/13/2014 ND (2) 6.35 5.65 1.56 469 8/14/2014 ND (2) 5.45 5.67 1.56 469 8/15/2014 ND 2 6.50 5.96 1.62 1109 8/16/2014 ND (2) 7.40 5.87 1.71 534 8/17/2014 ND (2) 5.50 5.89 1.66 493 8/18/2014 ND (2) 4.60 5.63 1.31 368 8/19/2014 ND 2 6.20 5.67 1.44 785 8/20/2014 ND (2) 5.50 5.53 1.42 480 8/21/2014 ND (2) 6.15 5.37 1.33 1379 8/22/2014 ND (2) 5.55 5.60 3.37 460 8/23/2014 ND 2 8.10 5.68 1.70 503 8/24/2014 ND (2) 6.40 5.71 1.37 332 8/25/2014 ND (2) 4.95 5.94 1.16 474 8/26/2014 ND (2) 4.50 5.75 1.06 752 8/27/2014 ND 2 6.50 5.85 1.17 460 8/28/2014 ND (2) 6.80 5.93 1.30 485 8/29/2014 ND (2) 6.35 5.99 1.16 800 8/30/2014 ND (2) 1 7.80 6.01 1.17 809 8/31/2014 ND (2) 5.70 6.38 1.38 407 Minimum ND (2) 3.45 5.08 1.06 332 Maximum ND (2) 8.10 6.92 3.37 1379 Average ND (2) 5.96 5.74 1.64 598 20 TABLE[11 CENTRAL :CONTRAXOSTA3ANITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DPINATERIEHARACTERISTICS SEPTEMBER2014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 9/1/2014 ND (2) 5.40 5.90 1.59 623 9/2/2014 ND (2) 5.25 5.58 2.14 557 9/3/2014 ND (2) 6.30 5.77 1.98 732 9/4/2014 ND (2) 5.00 5.58 1.75 432 9/5/2014 ND (2) 4.30 5.50 0.58 833 9/6/2014 ND (2) 7.80 5.66 1.69 807 9/7/2014 ND (2) 5.90 6.00 1.55 431 9/8/2014 ND (2) 7.45 5.70 1.44 695 9/9/2014 ND (2) 6.80 5.33 1.29 523 9/10/2014 ND (2) 5.80 5.03 1.26 696 9/11/2014 ND (2) 7.10 6.00 1.23 635 9/12/2014 ND (2) 6.65 6.15 1.27 1109 9/13/2014 ND (2) 5.60 5.95 1.34 531 9/14/2014 ND (2) 5.30 5.77 1.33 1093 9/15/2014 ND (2) 8.40 5.68 1.23 362 9/16/2014 ND (2) 8.00 5.50 1.30 469 9/17/2014 ND (2) 8.15 5.50 1.13 1090 9/18/2014 ND (2) 8.75 5.56 1.46 427 9/19/2014 ND (2) 6.40 5.92 1.54 487 9/20/2014 ND (2) 7.60 5.62 1.56 820 9/21/2014 ND (2) 5.60 5.67 1.50 502 9/22/2014 ND (2) 5.45 5.24 1.44 578 9/23/2014 ND (2) 6.95 5.52 1.73 549 9/24/2014 ND (2) 7.20 5.76 1.81 434 9/25/2014 ND (2) 5.70 5.62 1.52 696 9/26/2014 ND (2) 5.90 5.59 1.66 249 9/27/2014 ND (2) 6.80 5.69 1.45 441 9/28/2014 ND (2) 5.25 5.05 1.06 223 9/29/2014 ND (2) 8.00 5.80 1.77 897 9/30/2014 ND (2) 6.20 5.38 1.50 449 Minimum ND (2) 4.30 5.03 0.58 223 Maximum ND (2) 8.75 6.15 2.14 1109 Average ND (2) 6.50 5.63 1.47 612 21 TABLEA2 CENTRAL MONTRAMOSTAISANITARY3)ISTRICT RECYCLE DWATERIEHARACTERISTICS OCTOBER12014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 10/1/2014 ND 2 5.60 5.52 1.56 582 10/2/2014 ND 2 6.35 5.68 1.20 313 10/3/2014 ND 2 4.80 5.20 1.19 1103 10/4/2014 ND 2 6.75 5.67 1.27 393 10/5/2014 ND 2 6.05 5.55 1.20 358 10/6/2014 ND 2 8.30 5.85 1.29 1221 10/7/2014 ND 2) 6.75 5.75 2.51 444 10/8/2014 ND 2 6.95 5.79 1.72 370 10/9/2014 ND 2 4.90 6.24 1.63 347 10/10/2014 ND 2 3.70 5.35 1.65 665 10/11/2014 ND 2 7.90 5.80 1.97 673 10/12/2014 ND 2 5.80 5.65 0.89 270 10/13/2014 ND 2 7.00 5.75 1.95 514 10/14/2014 ND 2 6.95 5.87 1.84 876 10/15/2014 ND 2 7.10 5.90 1.78 295 10/16/2014 ND 2 4.10 5.57 1.75 239 10/17/2014 ND 2 8.70 5.69 1.10 692 10/18/2014 ND 2 5.90 5.20 2.06 489 10/19/2014 ND 2 6.55 6.18 1.41 865 10/20/2014 ND 2 7.80 5.86 1.55 1020 10/21/2014 ND 2 3.70 5.69 1.38 275 10/22/2014 ND 2 5.65 5.74 1.31 250 10/23/2014 ND 2) 5.05 5.57 1.24 228 10/24/2014 ND 2 3.45 5.44 1.20 485 10/25/2014 ND 2 4.50 6.23 1.27 289 10/26/2014 ND 2 5.15 5.86 1.34 297 10/27/2014 ND 2 4.10 5.37 1.80 187 10/28/2014 ND 2 2.65 5.11 1.72 134 10/29/2014 ND 2 5.40 5.14 1.93 903 10/30/2014 ND 2 6.70 5.37 1.50 258 10/31/2014 ND 2 5.60 5.37 1.44 231 Minimum ND (2) 2.65 5.11 0.89 134 Maximum ND (2) 8.70 6.24 2.51 1221 Average ND (2) 5.80 5.64 1.54 492 22 TABLEA3 CENTRAL MONTRAMOSTAISANITARY3)ISTRICT RECYCLE DWATERIEHARACTERISTICS NOVEMBER12014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 11/1/2014 ND (2) 3.80 4.76 1.50 174 11/2/2014 ND (2) 4.40 5.41 1.43 136 11/3/2014 ND (2) 4.10 5.19 1.64 142 11/4/2014 ND (2) 4.15 5.49 1.72 178 11/5/2014 ND (2) 4.40 5.01 1.71 687 11/6/2014 ND (2) 4.75 4.68 1.43 176 11/7/2014 ND (2) 5.10 5.49 1.41 311 11/8/2014 ND (2) 4.80 5.44 1.61 260 11/9/2014 ND (2) 2.75 5.98 1.56 240 11/10/2014 ND (2) 3.25 5.08 1.56 249 11/11/2014 ND (2) 4.70 4.73 1.65 584 11/12/2014 ND (2) 4.20 4.47 1.52 213 11/13/2014 ND (2) 5.30 5.08 1.30 152 11/14/2014 ND (2) 4.25 5.40 1.47 139 11/15/2014 ND (2) 3.10 4.37 1.45 102 11/16/2014 ND (2) 4.30 3.36 1.45 295 11/17/2014 ND (2) 6.00 3.72 1.44 104 11/18/2014 ND (2) 4.40 3.83 1.66 121 11/19/2014 ND (2) 6.30 3.19 1.60 555 11/20/2014 ND (2) 4.00 2.11 1.52 122 11/21/2014 ND (2) 4.10 2.38 1.52 109 11/22/2014 ND (2) 4.90 6.05 1.53 95 11/23/2014 ND (2) 6.00 3.58 1.22 104 11/24/2014 ND (2) 5.65 3.67 1.25 90 11/25/2014 ND (2) 5.15 3.51 1.06 119 11/26/2014 ND (2) 4.10 2.31 1.03 112 11/27/2014 ND (2) 2.70 5.60 1.03 91 11/28/2014 ND (2) 5.90 3.87 1.05 98 11/29/2014 ND (2) 3.30 2.42 1.18 89 11/30/2014 ND 2 4.50 2.97 1.49 102 Minimum ND (2) 2.70 2.11 1.03 89 Maximum ND (2) 6.30 6.05 1.72 687 Average ND (2) 4.48 4.31 1.43 198 23 TABLECZ14 CENTRALMONTRAXOSTA3AN ITARYMISTRICT RECYCLE DPINATERIEHARACTERISTICS DECEMBER12014 Date Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Chlorine Residual Dissolved Oxygen mg/L. Hach On -Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 12/1/2014 ND (2) 4.6 4.32 1.33 102 12/2/2014 ND (2) 4.1 2.58 1.33 84 12/3/2014 ND (2) 3.3 1.67 1.33 91 12/4/2014 ND (2) 4.3 3.36 1.28 80 12/5/2014 ND (2) 3.9 4.08 1.36 97 12/6/2014 ND (2) 3.0 2.84 1.44 81 12/7/2014 ND (2) 3.5 3.41 1.63 86 12/8/2014 ND (2) 3.8 3.95 1.75 76 12/9/2014 ND (2) 4.4 3.83 1.73 96 12/10/2014 ND (2) 3.5 2.87 1.73 87 12/11/2014 ND (2) 5.6 4.41 1.74 81 12/12/2014 ND (2) 4.4 2.73 1.61 126 12/13/2014 ND (2) 4.2 2.99 1.46 71 12/14/2014 ND (2) 4.3 3.3 1.35 80 12/15/2014 ND (2) 3.9 2.29 1.33 71 12/16/2014 ND (2) 3.7 1.88 1.33 71 12/17/2014 ND (2) 9.2 5.28 1.33 76 12/18/2014 ND (2) 4.3 4.18 1.24 71 12/19/2014 ND (2) 5.1 4.81 1.17 79 12/20/2014 ND (2) 5.2 5.2 1.25 74 12/21/2014 ND (2) 3.6 5.8 1.25 84 12/22/2014 ND (2) 3.5 5.05 1.22 75 12/23/2014 ND (2) 4.3 5.54 1.19 78 12/24/2014 ND (2) 4.7 5.45 1.19 90 12/25/2014 ND (2) 3.3 4.63 1.19 83 12/26/2014 ND (2) 2.9 7.58 1.19 83 12/27/2014 ND (2) 5.7 5.46 1.1 83 12/28/2014 ND (2) 4.7 5.46 0.84 93 12/29/2014 ND (2) 5.7 5.93 1.08 175 12/30/2014 ND (2) 4.1 5.59 1.1 80 12/31/2014 N D 2 3.5 6.33 1.1 80 Minimum ND (2) 2.9 1.7 0.8 71 Maximum ND (2) 9.2 7.6 1.8 175 Average ND (2) 4.3 4.3 1.3 87 24 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Buchanan Field Golf Course Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave., Concord, CA 94520 Inspection Date: 9/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf Course Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ® ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 2 -2'. ' of 25 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Headquarters Office Bldg. (HOB) and Annex, Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/9/14 Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 26 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/9/14 Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: _ �, _ _ _ Date: 27 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station Inspection Date: 9/15/14 Customer Representative Present: Leo Gonzalez, Pump Stations Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal Water Weather conditions: Clear / Warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature _� �_ Date Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/9/14 Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: _i Date: 29 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place,Martinez Inspection Date: 10/9/14 Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: r,' -01 /q 30 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard Location of Site: 310 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Inspection Date: 10/07/14 Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore, Maintenance Manager Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill for Irrigation / Street Sweeping Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑" ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 31 Date: Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Chilnancinao Pk d.. Contra Costa B Inspection Date: 10/15/14 Customer Representative Present: Barry Milliken, Lead Gardener Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® IT ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature 32 Date: /0' l • /'Z Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Station (330 Civic Drive) Inspection Date: 11/12/14 Customer Representative Present: Larry Davis Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear /Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑'' ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: _ _ Date: 33 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: CONCO Companies Location of Site: 5030 Imhoff Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 Inspection Date: 9/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control, Vehicle Wash Weather conditions: Clear/Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 34 Date: I -z"/' 1'4 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: John Martin, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf Course and Clubhouse Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ❑ ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ❑ ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ❑ ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ❑ ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ❑ ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ❑ ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ❑ ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ❑ ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ❑ ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: /& f ,/- j,� 35 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County Animal Services Department Location of Site: 4800 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 Inspection Date: 10/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Jennifer Ray, Center Operations Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Kennel Wash / Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear /Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature:_ Date: 36 central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Count Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Roland Hindsman, GSD Facility Services Manager Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® IT ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 37 Date: Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil Location of Site: 5030 Imhoff Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 Inspection Date: 9/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Carlene Einevoll Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control Weather conditions: Clear/ Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: /> 1' -1 -/'� Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: County Quar Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 Inspection Date: 10/27/14 Customer Representative Present: Chris Grey Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control, Process Water, Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 39 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® Customer Representative Present: Troy Ricard, Lead Gardener Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool ❑* Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. if drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ® ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ,N Date: /e Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mt. Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Bar!y Milliken, Lead Gardener Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: / ^- %'{ /Y 41 Central Contra Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Middle School Inspection Date: 10/27/14 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear /Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ®* ❑ ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 42 Date: Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools Inspection Date: 10/27/14 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ® ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: /° - -27- / Y 43 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Valley View Middle School and College Park High School Inspection Date: 10/27/14 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ® ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ,. Date: d 7. Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Chilpancinqo Park Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature 45 Date: /,­ /`Y• i C/ Central Sanitary Dlstria 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Frank Salfingere Park Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: , Date: io 'y"V Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ® ❑* ❑ 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature:_ Date' 47 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park (147 Gregory Lane) Inspection Date: 10/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast / Cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 772, 776, & 780 Stubbs Road Building 7, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 12/8/14 Customer Representative Present: Christina Gherdea Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: _ Date: `, Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 760, 764, & 768 Stubbs Road Building 6, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 9/24/14 Customer Representative Present: Jeanne Papir Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 50 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 736, 740, 744, 748, 752, & 756 Stubbs Road Buildings 4 &5, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 11/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Jim Freethly Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature - Date: /�•� 51 Central Contra Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 712, 716, 720, 724, 728, & 732 Stubbs Road Buildings 2 &3, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 12/8/14 Customer Representative Present: Jean Edwards Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? N ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? N ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* N 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* N ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? N ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* N ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* N 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* N ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* N ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? N ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* N ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature- Date: 1.2 P• 52 Central Sanitary District 2014 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 700, 704, & 708 Stubbs Road Building 1, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 11/14/14 Customer Representative Present: Doug Brown Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? ❑* ® ❑ 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff? ❑ ❑* 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? ❑* ® ❑ 11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? ❑* ® ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature:_ 53 Date: ii. i'i. ) I