HomeMy WebLinkAbout04. V&A Consulting Engineers Flow Monitoring ContractCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS '
POSITION PAPER - .
1
Board Meeting Date: DECEMBER 18, 2014 '
Subject. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $214,000
WITH V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS UNDER THE COLLECTION
SYSTEM MODELING UPGRADE, DISTRICT PROJECT 8418
Submitted By. Initiating Dept /Div.:
Justin J. Waples, Assistant Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services Div.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
N. Hodges — Provisional Senior Engineer
D. Gemmell — Environmental Services Division Manager Roger S. Bailey
JM. Petit — Director of Engineering General Manager
ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager to
execute a technical services agreement more than $100,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a Technical
Engineering Services Agreement with V&A Consulting Engineers with a cost ceiling not
to exceed $214,000.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total anticipated cost for flow monitoring by V&A
Consulting Engineers is $214,000. There are sufficient funds in the Collection System
Program Fiscal Year 2014/15 CIB to accommodate the work.
PROJECT PRIORITY: Critical Level in the Collection System Improvement Program,
see Exhibit A.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: An alternative would be to not undertake flow
monitoring to calibrate the new hydraulic modeling platform at this time and postpone
the model implementation.
BACKGROUND: The State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2006 -0003
Statewide Wastewater Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewers requires each
wastewater collection system agency to have the ability to adequately assess current
and future capacity requirements for its collection system.
Collection System Hydraulic Model
The District's collection system hydraulic model is used frequently to predict flows in
sewers, analyze impacts of point discharges into the sewer, investigate impacts of
proposed and future development within the service area and provides crucial
information for strategic planning, asset management and Capital Project design.
Page 1 of 4
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: DECEMBER 18, 2014
Subject. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $214,000
WITH V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS UNDER THE COLLECTION
SYSTEM MODELING UPGRADE, DISTRICT PROJECT 8418
The District's first collection system model, known as SNAP, was implemented in 1985
after completion of the 1985 Collection System Master Plan and flow monitoring. By
2003 SNAP's underlying programming technology was beginning to be phased out. At
that time the model's user interface migrated to a GIS system and become known as
ArcSNAP (the model currently in use by the District). ArcSNAP is a proprietary model
that was custom built for the District. The ArcSNAP programming technology and GIS
interface are no longer supported by their respective developers.
The District began considering a model upgrade in 2012 to transition from ArcSNAP, a
steady state modeling platform, to a commercially available dynamic modeling tool. A
dynamic model will more accurately simulate the hydraulic complexities of the Districts
collection system, and will bring the District up to current hydraulic modeling standards
used in the wastewater industry. Most public agencies including the City of San Jose,
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and Sacramento Regional Sewer District,
and many others, have converted to dynamic modeling technology.
Following a review of available commercial dynamic model packages, the District
selected InfoWorks® in 2013. InfoWorksO was found to be widely used in our industry,
well supported, and compatible with other software systems commonly used as well as
software systems being considered by the District. The new dynamic modeling software
(InfoWorks) uses the complete St Venant equation to simulate time varying flows,
backwater, reverse flows, storage and surcharge conditions. Transitioning to an
industry standard hydraulic model permits a wide range of engineering consulting firms
to access and use our model. This increases the competitive landscape when the
District performs collection system master planning work.
Flow Monitorinq
According to District records, system wide flow monitoring has been conducted twice
over the past 30 years: 1) in 1985, and 2) in early 2005. The first flow monitoring (1985)
was the foundation for what became the District's steady state hydraulic model and the
input for SNAP. The second flow monitoring (2005), conducted 20 years after the initial
flow monitoring, was focused on the relationship of pipe deterioration to infiltration (1 /1),
particularly for sewers constructed between 1985 and 2004, as opposed to a system
wide flow calibration.
This position paper presents the third phase of flow monitoring of our collection system,
ten years following the last data collection, and essentially 30 years following the last
major effort associated with data for use as an input to a hydraulic model.
Since the 2005 flow monitoring activity, the District has constructed or renovated 34
miles of pipe, the existing pipes are now 10 years older, the service area population has
Page 2 of 4
--
POSITION PAPER
Board meeting Date: DECEMBER 18, 2014
Subject AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $214,000
WITH V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS UNDER THE COLLECTION
SYSTEM MODELING UPGRADE, DISTRICT PROJECT 8418
increased by 26,000 people, and existing and anticipated land use projections have
changed. Although the 2005 flow monitoring locations are coincident at some locations
to the currently proposed 2014 flow monitoring, they were not focused on capturing the
larger trunk sewers and the older sections of the collection system.
The flow monitoring planned for this winter is necessary to assess the hydraulic
behavior of the present collection system infrastructure in order to calibrate the new
dynamic model. The existing 2005 flow monitoring data will be reviewed for use in
complimenting the 2014 flow monitoring data.
Consultant Selection
District staff requested flow monitoring proposals from five firms. Three proposals were
received. After reviewing the detailed proposals and holding interviews with the project
teams, the team proposed by V&A Consulting Engineers has the most expertize,
equipment, and best approach for the scope of work based on their experience with
projects of a similar nature, the most cost effective (lowest cost proposal), and their
staffs project experience. Therefore, staff recommends V&A Consulting Engineers for
this flow monitoring work.
Staff has negotiated an agreement with V&A Consulting for flow monitoring in an
amount not to exceed $214,000. The work includes a base scope of work for flow
monitoring at 36 sites for a period of 9 weeks at a cost of $160,000. In the event that
the region does not experience sizable winter storms during the nominal 9 week
monitoring period, an additional 4 week contingency has been planned for and included
in the budget, at a cost of $54,000. The wet weather flow monitoring activity is
expected to begin February 2015.
Staff will determine if a second year of flow monitoring (Winter 2016) will be required.
The budget for this potential second phase is estimated at $379,000 for an addition 70
sites and will be included in V&A's contract as an optional task, to only be exercised
with Board approval. If this second phase is deemed necessary, staff will bring this to
the Board for approval next year.
In addition to the $214,000 for flow monitoring requested in this position paper, staff
estimates an additional $554,000 to complete the implementation of the InfoWorks
dynamic hydraulic model scheduled over the next 24 months. Including the amount
spent to date, the project can be completed within the CIB Total Project Cost of
$951,100. The Collection System Modeling Upgrade, District Project No. 8418 is
included in the FY 2014 -15 Capital Improvement Budget on page CS -28 with a total
project cost of $951,100. Staff has conducted an allocation analysis of the FY 2014 -15
Page 3 of 4
--
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: DECEMBER 18, 2014
Subject. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $214,000
WITH V&A CONSULTING ENGINEERS UNDER THE COLLECTION
SYSTEM MODELING UPGRADE, DISTRICT PROJECT 8418
Collection System Program budget and concluded that adequate funds are available,
as shown below:
FY 2014 -15 Collection System (CS) Program Allocation Budget:
Authorized Estimated Allocations for Projects $ 18,139,000
Supplemental Board Authorizations: $ 0
Allocations Returned from Closeouts: $ 0
Total Board Authorized Allocations: $ 18,139,000
FY 2014 -15 Allocations to Date for CS Program: $ 5,472,000
This Allocation for DP 8418: $ 214.000
Remaining Unallocated Budget for CS Program: $ 12,453,000
The Board of Directors concluded in the April 3, 2014 Board meeting that this project is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CCCSD CEQA
Guideline Section 15306 as the project involves data collection that will not result in a
serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Engineering & Operations Committee
reviewed this project at its meeting on December 9, 2014, and recommended
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a
technical services agreement in the amount of $214,000 with V&A Consulting Engineers
under the Collection System Modeling Upgrade, District Project 8418.
Page 4 of 4
--
0
FY14I15 Collection System Program • Project Priority Ranking
C r Code for C IB Proaram Cate cries:
Remotion
Reg CornoancelPlanni g+Safety
Expansion
Pumping Station
Priority Category
Pro ect Number
ect
5999
CIPP Ranket CMd
8405
CIPP P*d- FY 201314
5976
Diablo Sewer Rerovabn - Ph 2
none
I-Ashe Sewer Renovations - Ph 10
8404
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - Ph 8
8421
LoWte Sews Renovations - Ph 0
8415
Martinez Sewer Renovators - Ph 4
8411
North Qnrrda Sewer Renovations - Ph 5
8423
North (Mnda Sewer Renovators - Ph 6
5982
Mnt Blanket Contract
8413
IWAnut Creek sewer Renovalios - Ph 10
pCA
PuTM Station Arc Flash
8425
CadWc Protedion System - Ph 1
8418_
Cdledon Systern "
8412
Pleasant Hi*ayson Creek Trunk
VERY HIGH
1
Celle n Renovation NpT
VERY HIGH
8422
WaIW Creek sewer Renovation - Ph 11
VERY HIGH
8424
CIPP/b - Ph1
HIGH
pC54
Cdk bm SyVern U t
HIGH
8406
Purnp Station ITp
HIGH
8419
Cdlecton System Ptannyl
HIGH
5991
j Pleasant H81 sewer Renovations - Ph 2
HIGH
8408
Pu!M Station Master Plan
HIGH
5993
FmrnamAssessnrert
HIGH
5962
Markle Remote level
HIGH
5941
PS & Roaceinent
MEDIUM
8410
CadWc Protection System Repl Program
MEDIUM
pCSM
ft. Force Main Impygment
MEDIUM
P2
Cw* Pipe Renovation Nrarn
MEDIUM
pgl
Pump Station Hazard ID
MEDIUM
pCS33
Trunk Sewer Expansion Nrarn
NIA
8417
Survey Monumern fnstallatbn PW
WA
8402
Cantradual Assessment Districts
NIA
8420
-
NA Progt Not Ranked PWI: is aprtated essenta service
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
-Alm 11 entral Contra Costa
Sanitary District District Project 8418 Exhibit A
Protecting Public Health and the Environment Project Priority
12/5/2014
Dynamic Model Implementation
Schedule
Flow & Rainfall Complete Pipe Network, Load
Monitoring Data, Validate Network
Jan -Mar Is Apr -Jun July-Sept Oct -Dec
Update Design Criteria,
Develop Procedures,
Train Staff on Model
Model Calibration and
Commissioning
Dynamic Model Implementation
Budget
Expenditures to Date $183,000
(Oct 2014P
Flow Monitoring
Winter 2015 $214,000
Consultant & Staff Costs $554,000
To Complete Implementation
Total Project Cost $951,000