Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05. PG&E SST Feasibility AssessmentL CD Central Contra Costa Sanitary District PG &E & AECOM Sustainable Solutions Turnkey (SST) Feasibility Assessment Energy Projects — Update Presented by: Craig Mizutani Edgar Lopez Jean -Marc Petit October 27, 2014 SST Program Basics ALCOM INx • PG &E partnered with AECOM to administer program • Program goal is to identify and implement projects that save electricity, gas, and water • Program has roots in similar Federal program • Projects are implemented via design build process with streamlined bid process • Up to S1 million can be financed through PG &E AECOM INlYatl October 22, 2013 Staff requested to investigate energy efficiency during 10/22/2014 PFA Budget & Finance Committee meeting June 5, 2013 Initial meeting with PG &E SST team • Design Build • AECOM Consultant • Unique equipment and contractor selection Decided not to pursue SST November 14, 2013 • Performed Walk Through industrial facility audit • Auditor & Account Representative recommended SST program December 10, 2013 Introduction to SST & Case Study SLO - PG &E, AECOM, City of SLO March 10, 2014 SST Presentation to CCCSD June 5, 2014 SST Program Kickoff Meeting with CCCSD 10/22/2014 PFA a Qualification (Complete) Program Feasib Assess (Current Staff Approval to ... e 10I1W14 t p 1 Investment Grade ility i Assessment (IGA) / ment Project Phase) Implementation Proposal is Project Procure Funding & LAP.r.ept.nce .tApproval/ Finalize SOW Implementation / Construction Contract (Board) i Project Project Performance Commissioning & Assurance/ M &V (as Turnover required by a contract) 5 A_COM 4� program Review • PG &E's Sustainable Solutions Turnkey (SST) Program • CPUC Mandate to reduce energy consumption & CO2 • Design -Build Integrated Energy Savings Projects • Financed all /in -part from "Utility" and O &M Savings • Combine Electricity, Gas & Water • WERF Research — "Zero Net Energy" A_COM 6 10/22/2014 3 A Deliberate Approach • Progressive series of meetings to confirm suitability of SST Program for CCCSD (outcomes, legal, 4217) CCCSD, PG &E and AECOM agree to proceed with Feasibility Assessment and Phase I Project proposal: o Project goal = "simple, strategic, financially sound" o Leverage PG &E On -Bill Financing (0 %), OW savings, utility incentives and appropriate CCCSD. funds o Feasibility Assessment Report: 4 — 6 weeks from NTP o Work through FA Report delivered at no -cost to CCCSD Em Staff and PG &E /AECOM reviewed Energy Conservation Measure (ECM) selection criteria for SST feasibility assessment • Reviewed of ECM selection criteria • Reviewed "filtered" list of ECMs • Established a short list of potential ECMs Next step: • Feasibility assessment deliverables 8 A=COM 10/22/2014 Project Background (continued) • Target ECM Criteria: o Total Installed Costs for all target ECM's - $1 M - $1.5M ($1 M limit on PG &E on -bill financing) o "Reasonable" level of Data Analysis required to proceed to Preliminary Design o Retain current Design Intent/ no significant re- design o High economic value / impact o Neutral or Additive RE: future Master Plan 9 A=COM Fl 10 ECM Selection CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANIYN^•0WRE* ErlFJIOY f�VNO E dUFr �LrtA t1. . �1 • Staff provided "Energy Saving Ideas — Draft, ���--- «--- �� --- -- March 12, 2014" ,w......w.,.��.�• • "Filtered" against Project Criteria and our energy experience • "Short- List" of potential ECM's presented to CCCSD Team • CCCSD requested review of criteria and ECMs We Are Here • Confirmed ECMs proceed to Feasibility Assessment based on feedback from CCCSD Stakeholders • As appropriate — E & O Board Subcommittee (10/27) • Kick -off Feasibility Assessment to confirm ECM's for Phase I Implementation A=COM 10/22/2014 5 �10 cu �J !q� W a+� x a�_11 wwr} p e ✓� �-..� `ice! _ - CD _ flasibYi 4uavnlnt Criteria eppeAawa/eetlWabel . eurbb More FJhupCWDWb ncnnlloN ® • ® O la.'tbanen.rp dlatlaa.a:o.ntl I • • - I IWaan,� yalea.sunePasen aasml ® • - owmpawapl p�espaenPvp: pbranp pe+w.wtl.w anmp, at.maKUO.e[..asew[ees . s.,leaa++wwb A A • A :w Cnarea 4�al.Neen.ljmlK I • DbNno I1la7e OPNA (SMft MeatwiMtXkM h • • • • Mae C'ACa.iW Mbp:..dlPa • 0-1h, EMlnoeO PfinwyTrnepm[(CB'i) • • I • npvyaele W tnveaoa..Pw lei kGW:ff% sanereK: OownYaa bunprt /atn[Wrt -hl VPo't, • • • nlra.etl latnalpKMO'a/ • Ce h.gear4Cab.P.,vuOv.d. Solar.vwr4 Project • • © n.{n wE.NiIPI.la�W,.Klra+dtae , I • • • • • nml b.m.,«,lnb clwa • - - • A A Ol.aMelPwle OPwalal bpttlawabnK backrfn • • • A • Coutl w:uM Naas 4lwet Wi.ene[WVa'Oa�OfY %Y A • • A - Pl+[aiir!�.u+[[tl Pnman Tec..n[ICUn I • I • • • NMp<exN psmc bale. pals -- • A N!lJapu4t fslb Mp baalaruaepin P.a/u[ee.b b.lW • • A • la.[.ara �.��wp- .reesw¢wpu.raba My A 0 • • A A alWIaOG, t[eMMN�I{T waspinSwl ncewKalMK and [aroahe also a. sa[nm A - • • A w:ro.Pa.^a�n- x.+a..e Drre.s;ansM.la. a.. r•o:. l c..w. :oawr.t[o,e. • • • • cl,l:n,s[,.l o:[a.ro ulPaet: I • • w wrx.:,eae aoaa <enrr ® A A • 1 v �s•, Kt with Pilot Project Obie hives: oa h Partitl fit • llPl an �rt OlitQip r a A :ow&wp soul blen6,WW wzrt3 More FJhupCWDWb ncnnlloN ® ® � (� Row W W Syc oo"dw - - gowroacaCRr6pp %(V%O's) MSh"- I bPerabin owin¢ ory Woow DbNno I1la7e OPNA (SMft MeatwiMtXkM h • • 0-1h, EMlnoeO PfinwyTrnepm[(CB'i) • • • kGW:ff% sanereK: OownYaa bunprt /atn[Wrt -hl VPo't, • • • Ce h.gear4Cab.P.,vuOv.d. Solar.vwr4 Project • • © • • • l o .Osploortiabr4 • • • • 11 F I " Ft p ith Not Flop. Q IosR Cj Fw wm ® r aR 10/22/2014 n 13 Text Steps & Feasibility Assessmen'L Review ECM Selection Criteria: CCCSD Team, PG &E & October 13 AECOM Confirm & Submit Materials for Energy & Operations TBD Board Committee Workshop Energy & Operations Board Committee Workshop October 27 Feasibility Assessment Kick Off October 28 Feasibility Assessment Report Deliverable 4 — 6 Weeks 10/22/2014 10/22/2014