HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 11-15-1979(CC8D 0
Central of Contra Costa
Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER ROGER J. �of.o,M
SUBJECT Generaf Manager—Chief Enaineer
QUITCLAIM EASEMENT - CONCORD AREA
JOB 1265, PARCEL NO. I
NO.
VII. NB - 2
11/1
DATE
November 13. 1979
TYPE OF ACTION
RIGHT OF WAY
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEM
ISS: The owners of Sun Valley Shopping Center (Wells Fargo Bank a
Belloc, as co -trustees of the Nope B. Belloc 'fA" and "B"
the above referenced and Martin
quitclaim. Trusts) have requested
BACKGROUND: The construction of two new
parking
Center will encroach upon the above- referencedeasementures at Sun Valley Shopping
A replacement easement has been granted to this District (New Busin
RECOMMENDATION: A ess, Item le}
Approval, execute Quitclaim Deed and authorize its recording.
INITJ/ITING C,1Ep NEVrEW160 AND RECOMMENDED FPR 80ARD ACTION
/ IV.
r
CLW GEN GR./CHIEF ENG.
WCD
SHEET OF
Central Con0 0
tra Cos
h ar4tary Distract
C
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION P��7�� vIA: ROGER J. o0lAN
suslECT General Managsr_Chiet Engineer
WITHHOLDING OF OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 1979
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYMENTS
T
SUBM1 D 8
�•ELlpYyd Smith, Deferred Comp Committee
NO.
VII. NB - 14a 11/1
DATE
November 14, 1979
TYPE OF ACTION
DEFERRED COMPEN-
SATION PLAN
ISSISSUE' The District's Deferred Compensation Advisor
the Payment of the October and November 19 y Committee has recommended
be withheld, and to transmit these contributions with the conte mended
This action is recommended to realize the More 79 deferred compensation contributions
the recently authorized re favorable fee ischedulesr ndc� ebds 1979.
under
modification to the basic deferred compensation plan which will
be effective in December modification
979.
BACKGROUND: The District Board of Directors authorized acCeAtance of the modification
to the deferred compensation plan at its meeting on October
change is to reduce the plan administrators sales charge an
interest rates for the fixed interest accounts 18, reale An underlying
and bond accounts havingbalances u to 'and to reduce the salesschargethe gforas guaranteed
P $2,SQQ.
The plan administrator, the Hartford Variable Annuity
suggested withholding the October
and are effected in December to obtain the benefits of the er �evis1edtinsLntil ife Insurance
nCe Company
The District intends to place the October and November terms.
modifications
Pool account through the Contra Costa County Treasurer's O
interval. er contributions in an investment
The interest earned will be allocated to employees' accounts
contribution balances before submission to the plan administrator.
Office for the two-month
and added to the
RECO tor.
compensacontributions, and parove ying
the October and No
vember 1979.p ying these contributions with the contribution fo7rDecember
December
I¢tjT TING DEPPT./DIV.
D. Ll d Smith
e ere mproomm
REVIEWED AND
1WNF
FOR BOARD ACTION
WCD
GEN. MGR. CHIEF ENG.
SHEET OF
Central l Contra Costa
Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITIOIN PAPER vlq: ROGER J. _! LAN
SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION FOR p��y. General Manager—chief Engineer
TO BE INCLUDED IN FORTHCOMING DIS TRICTNANNEXATION CPROCEEDINGA�
S
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEM
Pa rce 1
79-30
Owner
JAddress
Area Parcel Nn
Con
Rerraa rkc
N U. ---------
VII. N8 -14b. 11/15/
U~IENovember 14
1979
TYPE OF AC -T on
ANNEXATION
Lead
cord .Joaquin Perez A enc
1450 Franklin Canyon Rd. Owner plans to connect a new
Martinez, CA 94553 warehouse office t City
110-120-41 1n9 to our existing sewermain
of
Con -
which was installed within Con-
.98 Acres Arnold Industrial Place to cord
serve this E other properties
south of Highway 4 as part of
the freeway widening project.
Negative Declaration by the
RECOMMENDATION: Authori2e p A City of Concord on 4-18-79
to the District. 79'30 to be included in the next formal annexation
INI gTIN REVJEN+ED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
CLW WCD
CHOF ENG.
SHEET I OF I
((CSD
Central Contra Costa Sanifir
y District _
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER VIA' ROGER J. bOu►ru
Genera! Manager—Chief Engineer
suB�ECT AUTHORIZATION 1170 R D, G.
ATTEND A ONE-WEEK SEMINAR IN SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA ENTITLED T
"THE DESIGN, OPERATIONAL CONTROL, AND TROUBLESHOOTING OF ACTI-
VATED SLUDGE SYSTEMS,"
SuBMITTED BY
PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT
VII. NB -11 IIpbr/
DATE
November 13, 1979
TYPE OF ACTIpN
Employee Education
Issue: The California State Water Resources Control Board is sponsoring
seminar entitled, "The Design, Operational Control, and Troubleshooting of Activated
Sludge Systems," a one-week
to be given at the Water ted
California. Quality Control Institute in San Marcos,
Background: The Water Quality Control Institute has assembled a blue ribbonro
Of outstanding environmental engineering consultants, educators, and researchers for
o
the continuing education of wastewater treatment managers. The g up
all highly applicable to the operation of the Central Contra Costa SanitaroplDistre
Water Pollution Control/Reclamation Plant.
the applicability of the course material, theo
Se attached y rict's
program.) In addition to
pportunity for District managers to
discuss mutual plant operational problems with experts in
from other municipalities will be of value. the field and
Professionals
The registration cost for the seminar is $200 per person. Travel and expenses fo
two is estimated to be $770,
r
Recommendation: Authorization of registration, travel and expenses of$11 0 for D
Niles, Manager, Plant Operations and R. A. Baker, Plant Operations Division Manager,G
to attend the seminar entitled, "The Design, Operational Control, and Troubleshooting
of Activated Sludge Systems," in San Marcos, California during the week of December -
15, 1979. g
10
INITIATING DEPT.Jp_
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
T----F---T-
G,V. MGFWCHIEF ENG.
SHEET of
• ((CSD
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
SOAR® OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER I
IA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager—Chief Engineer
suTJECT AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH
BROWN AND CALDWELL FOR COMPLETION OF THE STAGE 5B PHASE
PROJECT DESIGN
sYOEIKITE rson
ENGINEERING/SPECIAL PROJECTS
DATE
Nov. 13, 1979
Trlk OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION
OF CONTRACT
BACKGROUND: Completion of the Stage 56 Phase I
hydraulic capacity at the water reclamation lana.Tproject u required it provide adequate
35 MGD and the current average dry weather flow is approximately
current permitted capacity is
With the completion of the design will result in campletionaoflincreased hydraulic
Y 32.5 MGD. Proceeding
capacity by summer of 1981. Any delay in design or construction could result in CCCSD
exceeding its permitted capacity.
Design of the Stage 5B Phase I project as described in the facilities Planningd
menn
has never been completed. The design effort b
1977 after the plans and specifications had been Bsubmitted rown and Ctodthe lState Water R sources
Control Board (SWRCB) for review. In the interim since September 1 peed In September
been reviewed b esn has
y both the SWRCB and CCCSD staff. Several items containe77, dhindthegdesign
have been modified or deleted and several other items have been added as a result
operating experience. of
Subsequent to approval of the current scope of work for design by the SWRCB appropriate
contract documents have been negotiated with Brown and Caldwell for completion of the
design work and � Pp opriate
provision of office engineering services during construction. The
contract documents are:
Amendment No. 7 to the January 3 1974 Areement
This document would increase the cost ceiling under the existing agreement for
the completion of all design items not modified by the new contract. This work
is estimated to be 80-85% complete at this time. The amendment does not provide
for any increase in the fixed professional fee: The Increased cost ceilingwill
provide for the escalation of labor and overhead that has occurred since Se
1977. The amount of the increase is 11
555,+1 51.9b. ptember
New A reement for Enqineerinq Services
This document covers the changes to the Stage 5B Phase I Project that are outsl
de
the original scope of Work. The detailed design tasks are listed on Exhibit 1.
This document also covers office engineering services during the construction
phase. The cost ceiling under the new agreement is:
Design $161,
Office Engineering 573 75
124 582.x2
286,1; •57
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
C
' W. C. �D,M
J. Larson C.L.W. A �j' Jy }qE
W.C.D. 1� /l
SHEET I OF 2
POSITION PAPER
Nov. 13, 1979
Page Two
Both contract documents have been reviewed by District Counsel and the SWRCB.
The District Counsel's recommendation is shown on Exhibit 2.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the execution of Amendment No. 7 to the January 3,
197 agreement for Engineering Services with Brown and Caldwell with a cost
ceiling of $55,451.98, and authorize execution of the new agreement for
Engineering Services with Brown and Caldwell with a cost ceiling of $286,156.57,
for completion of the Stage 58 Phase I Project Design and Office Engineering
Services during construction, subject to receipt of State Water Resources
Board approval of the contract documents.
Attachments
.dWIL 0
((ab 0
Central contra costa Sanitary Distric+
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER I
VIA_ ROGER J. DOLAN
SUBJECT General Manager—Chief Engineer
AUGMENTATION OF DISTRICT FUNDS FOR PROJECT 5A -I
(C-06-0696-010 - Step 3) GRANT ADMINISTRATION
SUBMITTED BY
ENGINEERING, Construction Division - K. Barker
ND VI. OB -2, 11/15/79
DATE
November 1, 1979
I YPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZATION OF
ADDITIONAL FUNDS
ISSUE: Additional funding is necessary to continue grant administration
for this project until June 30, 1980.
BACKGROUND: The Construction Division is administrating the grant for
construction of the 5A -I project. The prime contractor (Peterson -Simpson)
has been terminated. Requests for Proposals are being prepared in order
to obtain the services of another Engineer and Construction Management
Firm to complete the 5A -I Project. In addition,
the n Di
is performing construction management on the emergency owork uand owindvision
UP of the Peterson -Simpson and Brown and Caldwell contracts. Expenditures
have now exceeded the previous cumulative authorizations of $961,910.
Therefore, a supplemental authorization is required.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize an additional $125,000 for Grant Administration
and Emergency Construction Management on Project 5A -I (C-06-0696) for
a total to date of $1,086,910.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
ole�
�O
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
c..
W
GEN. MGR, CHIEF ENG.
SHEET 1 OF I
0 VI. 0
November 93
, 1979 I1/I!
MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF TH
VIA: E BOARD OF pIRECTORS
Roger J. Dolan, General Manager -Chief Engineer
SUBJECT; FINANCIAL PLANNING
ISS: To adjust District financing to the Proposition 13 and d the "Spirit of I3" world.
with su Enclosed is the latest revision
pplemental notes. You recently received the 178-79 Fiscal Y
which provided the base for a number of critical � ) of the District Financial Plan
to the conclusions and recommendations of figures in the Plan. Year District Audit
Prepared in 1974 bundersigneda special Reference is made
Board. That exception (increasing and implemented _ Planning and exception
subject of thiswith one major exception financing bytthe
memo. fixture charges) and other revenue adjustments are the
Ad'ustment No, I _Reduce or
No -
capital reserve fur -d, eliminate property tax revenue
capitalQ0es for 1 fund.
The District's share of the now being added e the
A decision to reduce or elnd iminate nate Presumably world increase moderately in subsequent _
Auditor each year well in advance revenue must be communicated to the Count
then have a notation l Tax reduction by
30 preceding the tax Y
amount of the credit which will be subtractedtfrom the tax bill. Sanitary Each tax bill will
y District and the
AB -8 (Chapter 6-100
indicates that this reduction may
jurisdiction, but we must be certain that the Count Y be done on an annual basis b
that the tax revenue can be restored if future circumstances w Y each
Y agrees with this interpretation, so
The reasons for this recommendation are arrant its need.
have already paid their share o f (1) that the vast majority
reserve for the 5g_ plant facilities capital costs including an
taxpayers
plant, and 2 I expansion, the first stage of 5B_II
() and that new connections should finance new facilities. y t adequate
as the second and third stages of 5B_ 'and improvements to the present
should be financed b II which will benefit both old and newcustomerssuch
is not available. y bonds after approval by the electorate, if substantial
grant funding
A(31'ustr-nent Na. 2 - Increase fixture charge
increased since 1973. This revenue is intended rates.
for facility re charges have not peen
Construction Cost Index has
the SF Bay Area. gone from 2236 in December y construction. The ENR
rates Although these funds are invested bn high return securities
have been significantly lower than construction costs 73 to over 3520 in 1979 for
study of future plant facilities and their costs is needed. > interest
Percentage increases. Anew
Ad'ustment No. 3 _
and return future watershed a ceiling
charges from
g $6,000,000 on the "Reserve for future trunk sewers"
Construction Fund, District financed watersheds to the Sewer
Since 1959 when the first
established, various watershed trunk sewer
$5,OQO,QQO watersheds have been advanced pannilan n as adopted and Board
from the Sewer Construction Fuad andcredits(over 1 policy
allowed to watershed trunk installers. g and construction funds {over
$ ,5Q0,Q00) have been
0
As funds were advanced, they were identified as expenditures watershed and as charges res for each individual
1--lowever, the funds advanced from the l5ewer Co Construction fu
Y were credited to each watershed.
fund but were finally categorized by the Auditors as
connections". fund were not returned to that
In 197fl, the total collected from a1�1P watersheds serve for future trunk line
expended, including credits, for the first time.
exceeded the total
One of the end results of the secondary
constructing over $sults of 0 e f y watershed Planning
$6,000,000 reserve fund separate from the Sewer Construct t program, other than
needed system improvements, was to establish a
derived from expenditures from the Sewer Construction Fund and
transferring it in total to the Sewer Construction Fund, but rod Fund. This fund was
in the future if could be eliminated by
necessary. My recommendation is to keep this reserve at can e done at any time
secondary watershed trunk projects, but direct the revenue frorn water
collections to the Sewer Construction Fund, 'use it far future
shed trunk charge
RECOMMENDATION: These
special stud proposals and recommendations should be the subject of a
y by a consulting firm expert in municipal financing Problem
financial practices and policies, and I would suggest that such a F s. We have a
retainer arrangement with Bartle -Wells and they are somewhat familiar with District
them as a starting point, study be discussed with
W. C. Dal ton
Deputy General Manager
WCD: jf Deputy Chief Engineer
October 5, 1979
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
FINANCIAL PLAN
Notes to supplement Financial Plan dated October 5, 1979. Refer to line numbers an
left margin of chart. For additional information on planning, the 1978-79 and earlier
Annual Audits, the Capital Fund Cash Flow Projection dated October 5, 1979, and the
Concord-CCCSD contract tabulations are available.
Under wastewater capital improvements, Treatment Plant, the grant % for projects
as listed is net to allow for ineligible items. Treatment. Plant includes all reclamation and
energy recovery works.
1. Grant Project complete. The 197980 work is for re -grading and restoration for
areas used for supernatant ponding, sludge disposal, and construction borrow
and fill. The 1980-82 work is for levee reinforcement, controls, structures, and
general upgrading.
2. Project incomplete and estimate includes completion and litigation allowances.
3. Project complete. Estimate includes retention adjustment litigation allow-
ances.
4. Stage 5B, Phase I project to bring secondary treatment capability to 40 MGD.
EIR/EIS hearing was held September 30, 1976 for entire 5B project. Phase I has
been split into work which can be done immediately {$600,000} and the balance
for capacity which requires final design with construction to start in 1980.
5. Stage 56, Phase II is the solid waste energy recover
for natural gas or fuel oil in the existing sewage solids conditionintitroce RDF
involves a front-end solid waste processing plant, RDF storage and trap porta-
tion, and modifications to furnaces.
6. Stage 5B, Phase III is the second stage of the solid waste energy recovery
project which will include expansion of the front-end solid waste plant and of
the solids process at the plant. For the purposes of this projection, it was
assumed that the project would not be built unless subsidized by grants. The
third stage for full energy and production is too dependent upon stages 1 and 2
to be included and may require a local bond issue if proven economic.
7. Stage 6 project is planned to expand the treatment plant capacity to the next
logical stage. Although grant funds are anticipated for this project, there is a
Possibility that State and Federal laws may be changed. Under present
regulations, planning must begin when 75% of capacity is reached. Projections
indicate that this expansion must be -in service in the mid -1980'x. Without
grants, voter approval for funding may be necessary.
8. Miscellaneous plant improvement projects include alterations to the plant site
as well as interval upgrading of various plant elements.
9• Outfall reconstruction is being treated as a capital project. Other repairs and
improvements need resolution and may equal any litigation recovery.
10. Line G (Watershed 33) is the major trunk line problem facing the District and
planning is under way. Uncertainties about population distribution and density
in the service area making it advisable to delay construction and pipe sizing as
long as practical. It may be necessary to construct certain segments in advance
Of actual need in order to balance capacity.
11. Main trunks are those included in the 1956 Master Plan.
12. Provision for advancement of funds for secondary watershed trunk construction
is made in the next few years. Funding can be made from the accumulated
Reserve which is now $6,000,000. Recoveries from previous advances and
collections of watershed charges should be selectivly or wholly classified as
Sewer Construction Fund Revenue and transferred as collected, or annually.
13. Pumping station expenditures for increased pumping capacities in the Martinez
interceptor system are involved in Line 12. The Moraga and Orinda stations
need further capacity evaluation.
14. Funding is provided for structure sealing and system improvement to improve
operation of the collection system and to reduce maintenance costs and
infiltration/inflow and for replacement or paralleling of inadequate sewers in
Line 16.
15. No Local Improvement District work is planned in the future unless public
health problems develop in certain fringe areas. A reversion to bonds under
1911 or 1913 State Improvement Acts would eliminate District funding involve-
ment (aside from preliminary engineering and planning). Other agencies such as
CAL TRANS or the County require work on a reimbursable basis, but it is
usually handled within one fiscal year.
16. Funding for minor improvements to the collection system by District forces.
The proposed office is included, 1979-80 thru 1980-81.
17. These are the fixed bond service obligations of the District, and the G.Q. issues
are covered by a special tax rate.
18. The Martinez bonds have been redeemed.
19. It may be necessary to borrow on a short-term basis to provide cashflow funding
if grant funding is no longer available, or if reserves are temporarily exhausted.
19 A. Repayment of Federal funds by and for industrial users. This section of the
Federal regulations has been suspended for further study by Congress.
20. Sewage collection costs are estimated to cover inflation and growth.
21. Sewage treatment costs were previously based on estimates from Brown and
Caldwell. For this projection, the present year's budget is increased annually to
cover inflation and growth.
22. Provisions are made for increased future maintenance of the outfall.
23- Engineering costs are increased with inflation and growth. A greater proportion
of engineering costs are job and capital related and this will increase, It would
be advantageous to advance such costs from the Sewer Construction Fund as a
budget transfer in the future.
24- Administration was increased for inflation and growth.
25. General, which includes employee benefits and other basic District overhead
items, has been merged with "Administration with the intention to distribute
more overhead costs to the generating Department or Division in the future.
26• The Environmental Quality Charges (sewer service charges) are based on
Present State and Federal regulations. The total amount must generally equal
the Operation and Maintenance and replacement costs of the District. In our
case, this would be the total O & M expenditure less the payment by Concord
for its share of treatment, disposal and overhead costs of the District, less
other normal operating revenues.
27- The Special Service Charges were phased out with the implementation of the
full sewer service charge in 1977-78 (Line 26) and the industrial cost recovery
revenue is substituted thereafter on this line.
28. The major revenue under Service Contracts will be payment by Concord for
operational costs for treatment and disposal of their sewage under the Concord-
CCCSD Contract of 1974.
29- Property taxes for O & M (Running Expense) were phased out when the full
service charge became effective.
30- O & M Revenues & Recoveries reflect charges for services performed such as
inspection, permit issuance, franchises, pipe connections and repairs, etc., and
interest earned on Running Expense short term investments.
31. Reclaimed water revenue is based on Water District contract guarantees only.
32• "MIscellaneous" reflects payments for repair, relocation, and reconstruction
work performed for other agencies on a reimbursable basis, and carry-over
funds from the previous fiscal year(s).
33. Contract Capital Payments are the payments by the City of Concord for its
share of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District net expenditures for commonly
used facilities.
34. Fixture charge revenue is geared to growth of system and to new Sewer Service
Charge Units at increased fixture charge rates, if necessary.
35. Annexation charge revenue Is largely dependent on properties already within
the District which will develop and pay charges at old rates.
36- Refer to Lines 17 and 49.
37. Property tax revenue for capital improvements can be phased out as adequate
capital reserves are accumulated. Other sources of revenue such as increased
fixture charges and watershed trunk sewer charges, can be substituted.
r--
38, The overall watershed program showed a surplus for the first time in 1976_7
See Lines 12 and 37. �.
39. It has been assumed that the District will continue its money man, emen
program and keen reserves invested. 9 t
40• Grants received and anticipated. More detail is included in the S.C. cash flow
Projection,
41. Withdrawals from and additions to {
represent the actual difference between total expenditures aCapital to al R� Funds
42. thru 47. Except for 43., this section of the Flan is awaiting new State Water
Control Board instructions. Lines 43. A., 43. B,) 44,, 45. & 46Reomrthe
District's annual audit. , ae
4$. Accumulated total net cost of treatment and disposal facilities tD
taxpayers. oistric t
49, Assessed Valuation projections were Proposition
based on the growth factor and Pro
13 limitations. p
50. By law, Assessed Value (Line 48.) and fixed bond service costs (Line 17
establish this rate. . )
51, The adoption of a sewer service charge, effective for the 1976-77 fiscalear,
eliminated the tax rate for O & M or Running Expense. y
52, This pian shows the elimination of the balance of the Running Expense tax rate
used for capitalization.
53. Addition of Bond, O & M and Capital tax rates.
54. Plant flow, f,r average dry weather condition in million gallons per da y are
based on Concord flow and anticipated rate of growth for service area with no
allowance for wet industry or substantial change in water use patterns (based on
ABAG projections which are being re-evaluated).
55. This line reflects water pollution treatment capabilities as planned to meet
projected plant flows.
56. ' The total annual flow is shown as recorded to date and projected at 400 ADWF.
57. Population served is based on 1970 and 1975 census figures and ABAG
projections, which are subject to modification periodically.
58, The Sewer Service Charge units are the estimated units of all types with
commercial and industrial connections as equivalents of living units in pterms of
dollars.
59, The annual base Service Charge was estimated by balancing the Service Charge
Units total and the annual Environmental Quality Charge total, which is fixed
by the O & M total and the Concord Contract.
60. The growth rate of the District was assumed to decrease and stabilize as shown.
o
61. Inflation was assumed to follow the target assessed value estimates for revenue
needs of AB.8 to 1982-83 and then to decrease to 6% which has been fixed by
the national administration as an acceptable level.
W. C. Dalton
Deputy General Manager
Deputy Chief Engineer
WCD:jf
Q 0
(C(SD Central Contra Costa Sanitary arY Costrfct
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER ROGER J. DOWN
General Manager—Chief Engineer
sus�ecr EXECUTE CONSENT TO DEDICATION TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
SUBD 5723 - JOB 3226
SUBMITTED Y
�ay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEM
"Yr• ,
••i• I10-3 1 1/15/7!
DATE
Nov. 13, 1979
TYPE OF ACTION
RIGHT OF WAY
ISSUE: The extension of Tim Court into new Subd. 5723 runs along a
Portion of an existing District easement. Tim Court will be dedicated
to the County when the subdivision map is filed.
BACKGROUND: The County requires a Consent to Dedication whenever a new
road is dedicated to the County for public use if said road encroaches
upon an existing easement.
This is our standard consent document, the District retains prior ri hts.
RECOMMENDATIONApproval, : A g
, execute document and authorize its recording
RE the County,
R$VIEtiI/ED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INIT�ITING�DEPT DIV,
CLW WCD
GEXMGR./CHIEF ENG.
SHEET OF
SCD
Cent0 0
ral Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER V14` ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager—Chief Engineer
SU6JECT App ROVE DETACHMENT OF .45 ACRES AT THE WESTERN CORNER
OF SHELL AVENUE AND HARBOR VIEW DRIVE IN THE MARTINEZ AREA
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEM
NO.
VII. NB -4
11/15/79
DATE
Nov. 13, 1979
r re yr ACTION
DETACHMENT
ISSUE: The subject property is located on this District's common boundary with
Mt. View Sanitary District. The property will be split into two parcels; both
can gravity serve Into Mt. View Sanitary District. They would have to pump into
our system.
BACKGROUND: This District and Mt. View Sanitary District have an understanding
that any properties along or between our boundaries shall be included within the
boundary of the District that can provide the property with gravity sewer service.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve detachment of the subject property and concurrent
annexation to Mt. View Sanitary District. Request that Mt. View Sanitary District
initiate a Boundary Reorganization procedure with the Local Agency Formation
Commission.
INIT TINS, DEP /DIV. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
-C LW WCD
7Z;Z�:
SHEET 1 OF 1
�I
_JOE
CentaCon
Contra Costa ((CSD 0
tary District
MWP-
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO.
POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
SUCT General Manager—Chief Engineer
BJE
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 79-29 (ONE PARCEL) ALAMO AREA,
TO BE INCLUDED IN FORTHCOMING DISTRICT ANNEXATION PRO-
CEEDINGS
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEM
Vit. NB -5 11/15/79
DATE
Nov. 13, 1979
ANNEXATION
Parcel Owner
Address
No. Area Parcel No. Lead
Remarks
79-29 ALAMOA envy
H. w. Smith Const. Co. Owner to build one single family
San Leandro, CA
District
1524 - 150th Ave
home on this parcel.
197-070-14 District to prepare a "Notice of
Exemption"
-58 Acres
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 79-29 to be included in the next formal anne
RE the District.
ration
INIT1TING tREVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED pOR BOARD ACTION
� �V.
f ex
CLW we D
MGR./CHIEF ENG.
SHEET OF
((CSD
�' ( a
Centra Contra Costa Sanitary ®istrQ*-,*
BOAR® OF DIRECTORS
POSITIOW PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager—Chief Engineer
MWIZATION TO SIGN PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC/CENTRAL CONTRA
COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT AGREEMENT FOR ALTERNATE ELECTRIC SOURC
T.P. GM190196 AND THE ADVANCE PAYMENT OF $17,529 TO
SU9MITTEO BY
PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT C IC G S AND ELECTRI
NO.
VII. NS -6 11/15/7!
OATS
November 8, 1979
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF
AGREEMENT
Issue: The provision of a standby electric
power source l i
Reclamation Plant will require a signed agreement betweenfPaclfor icwGasrandlEut on control,
tral Contra Costa Sanitary District. en -
Back round: The Water Pollution Control/Reclamation facility presently has only one
source of electric power for the operation of the Plant. A standby power system has
been approved by the State for funding and is presently being designed.
In order to provide electric power to the standby
between Pacific Gas and Electric and the Sanitary Distriictewillstemhave to bereement executed.
This agreement provided 1.8 mva of electric power on a "when available basis"
(having a reserved capacity would have costa
required to a pproximately $20,000 per mo.) we are
P Y $17,529 in advance for Pacific Gas and Electric costs, and we will be
committed to a total monthly cost of $460, of which $253.77 may be discontinued at a
later date.
This agreement meets the requirement of providing a second
independent of the primary power source, which will Power source completely
failure of the treatment Plant's provide emergency power during a
primary power source.
Recommendation: Authorization to sign Pacific Gas and Electric/Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District agreement, Treatment Plant GM190196 and make the required advance
Payment of $17,529 to Pacific Gas and Electric.
INITIATING d£PT./bIV. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
i
J. J. C. C. W.
SHEET
OF
F ENG.
a
October 2, 1979
MMORANDUM FOR: HONORABLE MEMBE]RS OF THE BOARD OF DIRF�G'i�Ogs
FROM: Roger J. Dolan, General Manager --Chief Engineer
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SIGHT PAC* C GALS AMID ELECTRIC/CENTRAL
03N'.rRA COSTA. SANITARY DISTRICT Ate' FjjR ALTMW=
ELECTRIC SOURCE COMMA T, T.P. GM 190196 and THE ADVANCE
PAYMENT OF $17,529 its PACIFIC GAS AND E &.r= MC
Issue: rhe provision of a standby electric
Pollution Control power source for the Water
Pacific Gas and Electric/C7entral Contra lCo�, require a, sib a��t between
Sanitary
District.
Back-- ground: The Water Pollution Contml/Reclamaticn, facility
bias orily one source of electricpy
power for the operation of the Plant. A
SAY r system has been approved by the State for funding and is
presently bung designed.
In order to provide electric power to the
em
Rent between Pacific Gas and Electric and the Ssystem, an ace-
to be executed. Y District will have
This agreement provides 1.8 mva of electric power on a "when available basis„
(having a reserved capacity would have cost an additional $
are required to pay $17,529 in advance for Pacific Gas and Electric oasts,
and we will. he c=Mitted to a Natal monthly cost of $460, of which: $253.77
ray be discontinued at a later date.
This agreercent meets the .requirement of Providing a second power source
cmletely independent of the primary power source, which will provide
sow cy Power during a failure of the Treatment Plant's primary Powe
Ream mandation: Authorization to sign Pacific Gas and Electric/Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District agreement, Treatment Plant Q4190196, and
Rake the required advance payment of $17,529 to Pacific Gas and Electric.
Roger J. Dolan
RJD:bc General Manager -thief Erugineer
Reviewed by:
J. J. Ca niato
Distric Legal Counsel
it ( t T C' G'. w
0 (D
'((j5D Central Contra Costa SanitaryDistrict
r�ct
BOARD OF DIRECTORS I
POSITION PAPER VIA' ROGER J. DOLAN
1 Genera! Manager—Chief Engineer
suerEcz AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
FMC ASSOCIATES FOR REPAIRS TO THE SOLIDS
CONDITIONING BUILDING
SUBMITTED BY John Larson - ENGINEERING/SPECIAL PROJECTS
N U.
VII. NB -8 11/15/7!
------------
UA i E
Nov. 13, 1979
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF
CONTRACT
BACKGROUND: The boiler room explosion on September 24, 1979, caused significant
damage to the solids conditioning building and its various systems. Temporary
repairs allowing interim operation of the auxiliary boilers were completed on
November 7, 1979, and the rental boilers have been removed.
Detailed engineering and architectural work is required to return the solids
conditioning building to its original condition. Design of repairs to the
various mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation systems is estimated to
require 2060 man hours of engineering and drafting. Design of architectural
and structural repairs is estimated to require 440 manhours of effort. This
level of effort is beyond the capacity of the Engineering Department.
A scope of work has been discussed with FMC Associates, designers on the steam
line repairs. They have the engineering/architectural capability of completing
this work in a timely manner. Because of the difficulty in defining a detailed
scope of work, a cost times a multiplier contract with a cost ceiling appears
to be the most appropriate type of contract.
In addition to designing the required repairs to the solids conditioning building,
FMC Associates will provide the design for a new sludge thickener odor control
.facility. Of necessity, the new design should consider all odor sources in the
vicinity. Because of previous odor problems experienced with using the floor
drain system for centrate disposal, the scope of work, should be expanded to
include evaluation and design of an alternative centrate disposal system.
The estimated cost ceiling for engineering is:
Solids conditioning building repairs
66,
Centrate Disposal System Modifications $000
$1100,,000
Total $76,000
Engineering work for the centrate disposal system may be performed by FMC
Associates, or another engineering firm. Funding for the solids conditioning
building repair work would come out of the boiler room explosion account
previously established. A new sewer construction account is needed for
design of the centrate disposal system.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./Div.
r
J.L. C.L.W.W.C.A. r G M R/CH F ENG.
SHEET 1 OF 2
f
POSITION PAPER
Nov. 13, 079
°age Two
I RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the execution of a contract with FMC Associates for
design of repairs to the solids conditioning building with a cost ceiling of
$66,000. Authorize the execution of a contract for evaluation and design of a
centrate disposal system with a cost ceiling of $10,000.
((CSD
0
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager—Chief Engineer
SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION OF $15,000 FOR SURVEY & DESIGN OF DSP 3023
A RELOCATION OF SEWERS TO ACCOMMODATE THE MODIFICATION OF THE
OAK PARK BLVD AND GEARY ROAD INTERSECTIONS WITH INTERSTATE 680
STATE UTILITIES AGREEMENT 106.75.)
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy - ENGINEERING/COLLECTION SYSTEMS
No.
VII. NB -9 11/15/79
DATE Nov. 13, 1979
I YPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZATION OF $15,000
FOR SURVEY & DESIGN OF
DSP 3023
BACKGROUND: The State has directed this District to submit relocation plans
by December 17, 1979, for sewer in conflict with the State's proposed modifi-
cation to the subject intersections. The cost of the work to be borne by the
State. The preliminary estimate for the sewer relocation project is $60,570.00.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize $15,000 for survey and design of DSP 3023, a
relocation of sewers to accommodate the State, UT 106.75.0.
V.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INIT
;T�2
DEPT. DI
CLW WCD
MGR./CHIEF ENG.
SHEET OF
K
N
(((SD Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO.
Bids1 . is- 71
POSITION PAPER
vIA. ROGER J. DOLAN
DATE Novemb er i 4, 1979
General Manager—Chief Engineer
SUBJECT
TYPE OF ACTION
REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT VEHICLE
BIDS
Acceptance of Bids
1979-1980 DISTRICT BUDGET - TOTAL: $68,865.82
Authorize Purchase
SUBMITTED BY
Robert H. Hinkson, Manager, Collection
System Operations
ISSUE: Bids were received November 7, 1979 for
ten (10) vehicles authorized in the
1979-1980 District budget.
BACKGROUND:
SPEC. NO. TYPE
NET PRICE
BIDDER
A 1 1/2 Ton Pickup
$ 5,622.40
Anderson GMC
B 2 Small Pickup (4 Speed)
11,130.98
Don Young Ford
C 2 Small Pickup (Automatic)
12,210.00
Don Young Ford
D 2 3/4 Ton Pickup
14,120.82
Anderson GMC
E 1 Sub/Compact
5,308.90
Sun Valley Ford
F 1 1-1/2 Ton Cab/Chassis
14,217.65
Sun Valley Ford
G 1 Compact Sedan
6,255.07
Sun Valley Ford
Total Aggregate Bid:
$68,865.82
1 1 Compact Sedan
6,166.01
$75,031-83
*Purchased in August, 1979
In order to expedite delivery and to reduce
costs we have
chosen to independently
contract for the painting of the District colors
on some of the units for $750.00.
We will have the utility beds for the 3/4 ton units
reconditioned at $600.00 each
($1,200.00 total). The dump box for the 1-1/2 ton chassis will be purchased and
installed by Transport Supply for $4,441.00.
The total expenditure will be $81,422.83.
This will be slightly below the budget
figure of $81,600.00.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize acceptance, and award
vehicle bids
in the amount of
$68,865.82.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
ITIATING DEPT./QIV.
EN R./C IEF ENG.
SHEET l OF 1