HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.a. Accept the Draft 2013 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual ReportCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ' Q,
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: March 6, 2014
Subject: BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2013 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY
AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT
Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div.:
Melody LaBella Engineering /Environmental Services
Provisional Associate Engineer
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
M. Esparza — Laboratory Superintendent
N. Hodges — Provisional Senior Engineer
D. Gemmell — Environmental Services Division Manager R. Bailey
P. Seitz — Collection Systems Operations Div. Manager General Managel
A. Weer— Plant Operations Division Manager
C. Swanson — Director of Operations
ISSUE: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (District) 2013 Recycled Water Quality
and Distribution Annual Report has been prepared for submission to the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Bay Section. This
annual report is presented to the Board of Directors for acceptance prior to submittal to
the RWQCB.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 2013 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution
Annual Report.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject the 2013 Recycled Water Quality and
Distribution Annual Report, which is not recommended.
BACKGROUND: The attached Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report
describes the accomplishments and future expansion plans for the District's Recycled
Water Program in calendar year 2013. The following are highlights from the report:
Recycled Water Production and Distribution — In 2013, the District provided 208 million
gallons of recycled water to customers for landscape irrigation and commercial uses.
The District used approximately 400 million gallons of recycled water internally at our
wastewater treatment plant. The District's recycled water remained in compliance with
applicable tertiary recycled water quality standards in 2013; however, during the writing
of the annual report, staff discovered that two recycled water site inspections were
inadvertently omitted. Annual inspection of our recycled water customer use sites is a
requirement of our 96 -011 Recycled Water Operating Permit. Upon discovering the
missed sites, staff conducted inspections in January 2014 and will inspect the two sites
C:\ Users \danderson\AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content.Outlook \DVCG8C5G \3 -6 -14 Accept ReW
Annual Report PP - Final.doc Page 1 of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: March 6, 2014
Subject: BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2013 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY
AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT
again in 2014. Staff has incorporated new protocols into our program to ensure that no
site inspections are missed in the future.
Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project — 2.3 miles of new distribution pipelines
were constructed in 2013, with customer connections planned for 2014. The project
has the potential to more than double the District's recycled water connections. The
project is partially grant funded by a $1.03 million State Proposition 84 grant and a
$97,000 grant from the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR).
Recycled Water Toilet and Urinal Flushing Projects — Two dual plumbing projects were
implemented that use recycled water for toilet and urinal flushing: the new Diablo Valley
College Commons classroom /faculty buildings and the conversion of the toilets and
urinals in the District's Headquarters Office Building to recycled water. The District
anticipates two additional dual - plumbing projects in 2014, including another building at
the Diablo Valley College and a set of restrooms at the Pleasant Oaks Park, both in
Pleasant Hill.
Refinery Recycled Water Project — The District has partnered with the Contra Costa
Water District (CCWD) to complete a Feasibility Study for the Refinery Project. The
first phase of this study, a Yield Study, was completed in 2013. While the Yield Study
revealed that the true yield of the project is about half of its delivered quantity, the
project is still considered viable. The District continued forward with the Feasibility
Study in 2013 and expects completion in 2014. The USBR is grant funding 50 percent
of the costs of the Feasibility Study.
Diablo Country Club Satellite Recycled Water Project — The District entered into a
Memorandum of Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utility District to evaluate
construction of a satellite recycled water treatment plant to supply irrigation water to the
Club's 18 -hole golf course near Danville. A Feasibility Study was completed in 2012;
further collaborative investigations were conducted in 2013 and the District anticipates
receiving a project application (for CEQA approval) in 2014.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The 2013 Recycled Water Annual Report was
reviewed by the Real Estate, Environmental and Planning Committee at their February
11, 2014 meeting, and was recommended for Board acceptance.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept the 2013 Recycled Water Quality and
Distribution Annual Report.
Attached Supporting Document:
1. 2013 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report
C: \Users \danderson\AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content.Outlook \DVCG8C5G \3 -6 -14 Accept ReW
Annual Report PP - Final.doc Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1
DRAFT
2013 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY
AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT
,,Oed
1k
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report
Facility Name: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Water Reuse Program Order: 96 -011
Report Due Date: March 15, 2014
Period Covered by this Report: January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013
I certify under perjury of law that this document and all attachments are prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Signature of Official
Curtis W. Swanson
Director of Operations
Date
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2013 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION
ANNUALREPORT
INDEX
Page No(s).
Discharger's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water .... ...................................... 1 -8
Figure 1: CCCSD Recycled Water System Map .......................................... ..............................9
Table 1: Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2013 ................................. .............................10
Table 2: Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2013 ........................................ .............................11
Tables 3 -14: CCCSD Monthly Recycled Water Characteristics — 2013 .. ..........................12 -23
Recycled Water Customer Annual Site Inspection Reports ..................... ..........................24 -48
DISCHARGER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT — DRAFT
REPORTING DISCHARGER:
X7_11 *o]aN=110]:��1
ORDER:
REPORTING PERIOD:
RECYCLED WATER
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
February 5, 2014
96 -011
January through December 2013
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Recycled water is an integral part of the mission of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
( CCCSD). CCCSD has been providing recycled water for in -plant usage, irrigation customers
and a range of commercial uses since 1996. In 2013, CCCSD provided approximately 638
acre -feet (AF), or 208 million gallons (MG), of recycled water to a variety of customers in
Pleasant Hill, Concord and Martinez near the Interstate 680 freeway. Recycled water was
used for landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses, and street medians and for
commercial uses such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust control, and washing
kennels at the local animal shelter.
In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD used approximately
1,228 AF, or 400 MG, of recycled water internally at CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant in
Martinez for process water and landscape irrigation. The total volume of recycled water
provided by CCCSD in 2013 for offsite customer locations and internal uses was
approximately 1,866 AF, or 608 MG.
This annual report covers CCCSD's production and distribution of tertiary- treated recycled
water over the period of January through December 2013. Figure 1 is a map showing the
location of each recycled water customer. Table 1 provides a summary of recycled water
usage for calendar year 2013 by reuse application category, as requested by the Regional
Board. Table 2 shows the monthly usage of recycled water by customer. Figure 1 is a map
showing the location of each recycled water customer. Secondary effluent is tertiary treated
through sand /anthracite filtration and chlorine disinfection. Recycled water is stored in a
covered seven million gallon reservoir prior to distribution to customers. Tables 3 through 14
represent the 2013 water quality characteristics. Our 2013 Recycled Water Site Inspection
Reports follow these tables. All sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011.
In 2013, our recycled water program complied with all applicable tertiary recycled water
quality standards. However, in the preparation of this report, staff realized that two of our
recycled water customer site inspections were inadvertently missed in 2013. Upon discovery,
particularly since these sites are currently irrigating due to the lack of rain, staff conducted
inspections of these missed sites and included those completed inspection forms in this
report. Our procedures have been modified to prevent this from happening next year and
these sites will be inspected again later in 2014.
FUTURE EXPANSION
CCCSD continues to seek opportunities and partnerships to expand recycled water use, add
new customers, and obtain financial assistance to build additional recycled water facilities.
CCCSD's recycled water projects have been on the forefront of the development of new and
innovative uses of recycled water. The interior hot water use of recycled water for dog kennel
wash -down was the first -of- its -kind in California. CCCSD's expansion into the provision of
dual plumbing for interior uses for toilet and urinal flushing as well as the proposed use of
recycled water for cooling towers and boiler feed water at local petroleum refineries represent
some of recycled water's most advanced uses. The following describes CCCSD's work in
2013 to expand recycled water use.
Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project
In 2013, CCCSD made progress on the construction of the Concord Recycled Water
Landscape Project, which will provide up to 190 AFY (62 MG /year) of recycled water for
landscape irrigation at businesses and street medians in the Diamond /Meridian Park
Boulevard area of Concord. Construction of the 2.3 miles of the mainline distribution pipeline
was completed in 2013. The bid package for the customer connections for this project is in
progress as of the writing of this report. The project will ultimately add up to 36 new customer
connections and more than double CCCSD's recycled water connections. The customer
connections phase (including installation of meters and connections to customer irrigation
systems) is expected to be completed in 2014.
In 2011, the project was awarded a $1,030,000 Proposition 84 Implementation Grant from the
California Department of Water Resources and a $97,000 Title XVI planning grant from the
US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). CCCSD continues to seek federal legislative
authorization and appropriation for an additional $1.8 million in Title XVI funding for the
project.
The Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project is covered by the Zone One Project
Agreement with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) discussed below.
Recycled Water Zone One Project
CCCSD has an agreement with CCWD to allow CCCSD to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379
MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and light commercial uses in the Zone
One Project area, which consists of portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill and Concord near the
Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD constructed and operates approximately 11 miles of
recycled water distribution pipelines in these areas and provides recycled water service to 35
sites. During 2013, CCCSD focused its efforts on expanding the use of recycled water by
advancing and implementing the following dual - plumbing applications:
1. CCCSD Headquarters Office Building (HOB) — As part a seismic improvements project,
and after successful completion of a cross - connection test, the toilets and urinals on all
2
four floors of CCCSD's HOB were connected to recycled water. A total of 14 toilets and 6
urinals will use an estimated 500,000 gallons of recycled water per year.
2. Diablo Valley College (DVC) Commons — DVC completed construction of one of its two
new classroom and faculty buildings of approximately 86,000 square feet that will use
recycled water for toilet /urinal flushing and landscape irrigation of interior courtyards. In
2012, CCCSD obtained California Department of Public Health (CDPH) approval for the
project. DVC completed construction of the first building in 2013 and upon successful
completion of a cross - connection test in December 2013 is now using recycled water.
The second building is expected to be completed in 2014. A total of 35 toilets and 9
urinals will use recycled water for flushing with an estimated annual recycled water use of
1,000,000 gallons per year. The use of recycled water is one of the sustainable design
features that will enable the new buildings to achieve a Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) Gold Certification when completed.
3. Pleasant Oaks Park Remodel — In 2013, Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, an
existing CCCSD recycled water landscape irrigation customer since 2004, began a major
renovation of their Pleasant Oaks Park, including renovation of their Recreation Building
to include dual plumbing for toilet and urinal flushing with recycled water. In June 2013,
CCCSD received CDPH approval for this new use. As of the writing of this report,
construction is drawing to a close and a cross connection test is anticipated for February
2014.
CCCSD is continuing efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective recycled water
customers in the Zone One project area, particularly those located near existing recycled
water pipelines.
Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project
CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide up
to 22,500 AFY (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell Martinez Refinery and the Tesoro
Refinery for use as cooling tower makeup water and as boiler feedwater. The refineries are
currently supplied by CCWD with untreated Delta water via the Contra Costa Canal, which is
predominantly supplied by the USBR's Central Valley Project (CVP). The refinery project is
particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round demand for recycled water
and it could potentially make use of existing recycled water conveyance and storage facilities
already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to each refinery.
The planning -level cost estimate for the refinery project could be up to $100 million,
depending on whether the full -scale project is implemented. As a result, CCCSD needs
financial assistance and /or project partners to make the project cost - effective. In this regard,
CCCSD is actively pursuing federal grant funding through the federal Water Resources
Development Act (WRDA) and the Title XVI Program and continues to look for possible
sources of state funding.
In 2011, CCCSD was awarded an $180,000 Title XVI planning grant from the USBR to fund
50% of the costs to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation for the
proposed project. The USBR requires the project sponsor to prepare a feasibility study to
3
demonstrate that the proposed project is a viable, well thought -out and long -term source of
water that justifies the expenditure of federal funds for construction of the proposed facilities.
In order to complete the feasibility study, a water supply yield study was completed by RMC
Water and Environment in association with MBK Engineers in May 2013, in partnership with
CCWD. The yield study determined that due to the limitations in the capacity available in the
operation of the CVP, the true yield of the refinery project is just about half of what would be
delivered (for either the 5 or 20 MGD -sized projects). As depicted in the following graphic,
the water freed up from a 20 MGD (22 thousand acre -feet (TAF)) refinery recycled water
project would result in 21 TAF /year in reduced CCWD CVP diversions, 11 TAF /year in
increased delta outflow, 2.6 TAF /year of additional upstream storage for future use, 10
TAF /year in increased exports and a slight reduction (0.7 TAF /year) in CCWD transfer water
used.
Grady
BW
Inreased Delta Outflow ( +» TAF[Year)
1.1 art mi
24
It • v
@r t0 CGS 1
(Rofinerke'5� �#
u
Flttsb q
-4),
ssu�m
60
SanloapP9°t`�
let)
Upstream Storage
Use for Future
Export ( +2.6 TAFIYear)
Oakky
om • RI.M. 1401,21 exelyl • •
Reduced CCWD Transfer Water Used
(-0.7 TAFIYear)
nYPbaJ
La Yaqutra
�Mr Increased
Exports
( +70 TAF'ycar)
The results of the study were reviewed by the USBR and since the project appears to be
viable, CCCSD continued its contract with RMC Water and Environment to prepare a Title
XVI feasibility study. Completion of the feasibility study is anticipated by mid -2014.
Development of Recycled Water Projects on CCCSD Buffer Properties
CCCSD has been exploring options for recycled water projects on vacant buffer land owned
by CCCSD near its waste water treatment facilities in Martinez. These options include using
recycled water for growing agricultural products. Several nearby properties already have
recycled water supply pipelines on or adjacent to them, which reduces implementation costs.
CCCSD is continuing to evaluate a proposal from a local community organization to develop
and operate a demonstration farm /garden on a 33 -acre CCCSD owned parcel adjacent to the
4
treatment plant. This innovative proposal includes areas to grow food crops to donate fresh
produce to school lunch programs and the Food Bank, as well as community gardening plots.
The project would also be used to demonstrate the science and benefits of recycled water
and sustainable gardening and farming practices (e.g., avoiding the use of pesticides and
other toxic products). The proposed farm project could potentially serve as a model for other
wastewater agencies that have available land near their treatment facilities and would like to
increase water recycling.
Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment
The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an
excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a
preferred development plan (Clustered Villages concept) consisting of a mixture of
commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational land uses interspersed between parks
and open space. This mixture of land uses will create opportunities to use recycled water,
not only for landscape irrigation but also for non - potable uses such as toilet flushing and
cooling towers in commercial buildings. Recycled water demand for the new development is
estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build -out.
In 2012, CCCSD completed a Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons Station
redevelopment that evaluated alternatives and costs for new recycled water infrastructure
needed to meet the anticipated demand. The redevelopment of the property and
construction of supporting recycled water infrastructure is not expected to begin for five to ten
years because of additional planning work that must be completed by the City of Concord
and the Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the City of
Concord and /or a developer.
Diablo Country Club Satellite Recycled Water Project
In 2012, CCCSD entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Diablo Country Club
and EBMUD (the water purveyor) to evaluate construction of a satellite recycled water
treatment plant to supply irrigation water to the Club's 18 -hole golf course located near
Danville. CCCSD would provide wastewater from its sewerage collection system and receive
solids returned from the satellite plant. The Diablo Country Club has proposed to finance the
capital and operating costs of the satellite plant and own and operate the facilities. A Satellite
Recycled Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study was completed in 2012 by the Country
Club with assistance from CCCSD and EBMUD. The study found that the best use of
resources to meet long term sustainable water supply needs for the golf course was to utilize
a blend of recycled water, ground water, and potable water for irrigation. Further
investigations into the regulatory, environmental and design requirements continued in 2013.
In 2014, CCCSD anticipates receiving a project application from the County Club for CCCSD
to be the lead agency for the CEQA process for the project.
TRUCK FILL HYDRANT PROGRAM
During the last drought in 2009, CCWD recalled its potable hydrant meters to conserve water,
and contractors were no longer able to obtain water from potable water hydrants for
construction activities and other needs. To help address this problem, CCCSD initiated a
truck fill hydrant program in 2009 to provide recycled water to contractors, companies, and
5
public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and other non - potable uses. CCCSD
installed a purple recycled water hydrant in Concord near the Interstate 680 /Highway 4
interchange and provided portable hydrant meters to contractors and others who could no
longer obtain water from potable water hydrants. Over the last several years the demand for
recycled water from CCCSD's truck fill program has been limited due to more normal rainfall
conditions and an easing of prior drought restrictions by local water agencies. In 2013,
CCCSD had no recycled water hydrant sales. However, CCCSD will continue to make its
truck fill program available to the community as needed to respond to future drought
situations.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE
CCWD field crews have performed maintenance and repair work on CCCSD's recycled water
distribution system under contract since 2004. CCWD's cross - connection control specialists
also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections for new recycled water sites and
testing and recertification of existing sites where piping modifications have been made. In
2013, CCCSD Maintenance Crew Leader Hamid Tehrani obtained certification as a cross
connection control specialist and is now qualified to certify CCCSD's cross connection tests.
In 2013, CCCSD Planning staff, in collaboration with Plant Operations staff, continued
investigating optimization options to improve our filter plant performance including updating
our coagulant control systems and evaluating the potential effectiveness of cleaning our
existing filter media.
CUSTOMER TRAINING
CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate recycled water customers
about the precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water
Site Supervisors. During annual site inspections, CCCSD provides refresher training to
customer staff where needed and verifies that each customer has up to date training
materials, including CCCSD's brochures and guidance documents on the proper use of
recycled water. In 2013, CCCSD began updating its customer training program for dual
plumbing systems to reflect recent updates to the plumbing code related to recycled water
use in interior applications, such as toilet and urinal flushing. This update will be completed
and incorporated into all customer guides in 2014.
REGIONAL ALLIANCES TO DEVELOP RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS
Western Recycled Water Coalition (Formerly Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition)
Since 2009, CCCSD has been a member of the Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition, which is
a partnership of 14 agencies committed to developing recycled water as a resource for
municipal, industrial, commercial and agricultural uses across the San Francisco Bay Area.
In 2013, the Coalition expanded to include agencies outside of the Bay Area, so the name
was adjusted accordingly to reflect that. The Western Recycled Water Coalition continues a
successful regional approach to pursing recycled water funding and was instrumental in
helping CCCSD to secure the Title XVI planning grants for the Concord Recycled Water
Landscape Project and the Refinery Project. As part of CCCSD's support of the Coalition in
0
2013, CCCSD's Graphic Artist designed a new 6 -page Coalition brochure to educate
congressional leaders about potential recycled water projects and to attract new members.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Planning
In 2013, CCCSD collaborated with other Bay Area agencies to update the Bay Area
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ( IRWMP), which was originally prepared in
2006. The IRWMP is a nine - county effort to coordinate and improve water supply reliability,
protect water quality, manage flood protection, maintain public health standards, protect
habitat and watershed resources, and enhance the overall health of the bay. Projects listed
in the IRWMP are eligible to apply for state grant money, such as Proposition 84 funding,
which is providing grant funding for the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project.
CCCSD recycled water projects that are currently being implemented or may be initiated
within the next three to five years have been listed in the latest IRWMP update including the
Recycled Water Zone One Project; Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project and Contra
Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project.
6Y_10i_10111011j9: 714► ki► yil_10r_'W=1►yi14►kAaA_1►[0101Ly, W I /_10 Is] 4
On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control (SWRCB) adopted a
Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled
water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires regions overlying groundwater basins in
the State where recycled water use is occurring and planned for the future to develop a salt
and nutrient management plan by May 2014. The SWRCB has indicated it plans to develop
a streamlined reporting process by which groundwater basins with limited use of the
groundwater resources or those basins which are not likely to have adverse impacts from
recycled water irrigation (such as those within CCCSD's service area) can prepare simplified
salt and nutrient management plans. Due to the very limited extent that groundwater is used
as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, it appears that the basins underlying
CCCSD's recycled water current and planned service areas would likely qualify for the
streamlined reporting process. The specific reporting requirements are currently being
developed by the SWRCB. In the meantime, as part of the Bay Area IRWMP update
process, templates are being developed that will allow Bay Area agencies to prepare their
salt and nutrient management plans in an efficient and streamlined manner. These templates
should be available in 2014 and will be used by CCCSD as a basis to develop a site specific
plan for CCCSD's limited use groundwater basins.
LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER
CCCSD's Board of Directors has consistently expressed an interest in maximizing recycled
water opportunities. However, there are many institutional and financial impediments that are
outside the control of CCCSD. On the institutional side, CCCSD must work with the potable
water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale recycled water to them or obtain
their permission to purvey recycled water. Some Northern California potable water purveyors
assert they have significant sunk costs in existing facilities, and contend the California
duplication of services law allows them to recoup stranded costs if recycled water is made
available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the applicability of this law, the
issue can add another institutional barrier and significant additional costs to recycled water
projects. In addition, even when institutional issues are overcome, the cost to construct new
recycled water treatment and conveyance facilities can be high. For example, recycled water
projects often require construction of pipelines through congested urban areas or require
additional treatment facilities to increase capacity. When all of these costs are added
together, the unit cost of recycled water can exceed the cost of other available, but less -
sustainable, water supplies. Although recycled water projects may have substantial
additional quantifiable benefits versus conventional alternatives, additional sources of funding
are needed to make recycled water projects more competitive with other alternatives
available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state and federal funding for
recycled water projects in the past has restricted the growth of CCCSD's recycled water
program. Despite these challenges, CCCSD is increasing recycled water use in the Bay
Area by developing new recycled water projects where economically and financially viable.
R3
Filaure 1
G&_
N Existing Pipeline
�\,� \
Existing CCWD Pipeline
r
Proposed Extension
10�
Mallard
Heservoi . r C, Martinez Water Service Area
sl 0
Recycled Water Customers
242 (size indicates yearly consumption)
_41
s Small
Q M Medium
L Large
F--", 0 00 Existing Customer
4
U C=
C=1
COUNTY
QUARRY IN PLANT USE BUCHANAN FIELDS
TRUCK FILL GOLF COURSE CHILPANCINGO I le
HYDRANT 0 PARK costa __j
TAYLOR BLVD/ RUTH
Contra DRIVE LANDSCAPING PLEA NTIHIL
MIDDI E
Rl_ 0 PH CORP. YARD\ --SEQUOIA
CLEXRWELL q_::wTRw ( ( L_ 11 1� 1� I n
MIDDLE
P.H. PA K SCHOOL PLEASANT HILL
DEMO GARDEN
CCCS VIKING DR
HEADQUARTERS ONTRA COS 1(1�� i
D BLVD MEDIANS 0 F. SALFINGERE PARK 0
CC TOPSOIL CHIL NCINGO DVC JLLil I ' h SEQUO11
HOB ANNEX BLVD MEDIANS CAMPUS PH. POLICE DEPT] F_ ELEMENTARY
GOLF CLUB/ OLD =73 SCHOOL -fLEASANTOAKS
COUNTY CORP. Rd TAYLOR/ CIVIC
YARD Blum QUARRY ROAD MEDIANS MEDIANS PARK
17-
CONCO 0 STUBBS RD
BLUM VIEW ESTATES TRIPLEXES,
(PENDING) CCCSD 4l VALLEY VIEW
WAREHOUSE L COLLEGE PARK SCHOOLS
175 ,, Costa
MALTB v -- I
Y Hl cont"
PUMP STATION SEASON'S Canal
COUNT ANIMAL CEMETERY
>
SERVICES ME k,
a L'u M: CCWD
> 9 iz 91 5L 3
10?
Y CONTRA COSTA 00 E B M U D
COUNTRY CLUB
GOLF COURSE 8 8
MARTINEZ yo
miss a sis El Blvd C=j'
— Is
n nAP P
Central Contra Costa Z
Sanitary District 0 1,000 2,000 CCCSD Recycled Water System
Protecting Public Health and the Environment Feet
9
Ir-3 --4114i
SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE
Calendar Year: 2013
Reuse Application Category
No. of
Sites
Area
Applied
Acres
Amount
Distributed
(MG)
oho of Total
Reuse Flow
Landscape Irrigation
28
192
197.7
32.5
Parks
5
22
18.0
3.0
Golf Courses
2
110
131.8
21.7
Green Belts
8
1
1.8
0.3
Schools
4
52
37.8
6.2
Other
9
7
8.3
1.4
Agriculture
0
0
0.0
0.0
Vineyards
0
0
0.0
0.0
Other
0
0
0.0
0.0
Industrial (1)
6
N/A
409.9
67.4
Cooling
0
0
0.0
0.0
Other
6
N/A
409.9
67.4
Environmental Enhancement (2)
0
0
0.0
0.0
Dual Plumbing (3)
1
1
0.6
0.1
Total (4)
35
193
608.2
100
Notes:
1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, truck fill hydrant,
and treatment plant site.
2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland /marsh applications, etc.
3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation).
`Ci
Table 2
Monthly Report on Recycled Water -- Calendar Year 2013
CUSTOMERS
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Total for Calendar
All readings in gallons)
2013
Conco
52,988
33,136
35,306
43,317
54,611
54,686
55,202
54,395
46,638
71,920
53,033
47,902
603,135
CC Topsoil
8,153
43,534
58,868
181,689
240,632
221,408
238,762
241,006
216,770
142,419
66,123
24,385
1,683,748
CC County Corp Yard
9,724
748
748
135,388
100,232
160,072
219,164
171,292
165,308
201,960
97,240
748
1,262,624
CC County Animal Shelter
13,677
9,276
8,353
34,739
80,946
65,325
62,829
92,905
83,053
92,318
42,549
3,172
589,142
Pacheco (Seasons) Cemetery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Quarry Products
293,964
436,084
410,652
1,091,332
1,195,304
707,608
676,940
807,840
623,084
730,796
362,032
259,556
7,595,192
Buchanan Fields Golf Course
57,820
382,378
913,084
2,688,462
5,317,906
4,879,952
5,168,530
4,818,990
2,852,947
2,232,705
499,814
450,371
30,262,958
Contra Costa Blvd. - City of PH Median
0
3,740
15,708
14,960
27,676
26,928
28,424
29,920
26,180
23,936
7,480
0
204,952
Chilpancingo Parkway - City of PH Median
6,732
8,976
2,992
5,236
29,920
9,724
24,684
27,676
24,684
26,180
23,188
0
189,992
Chilpancingo Park - PH Park & Rec
1,496
22,440
51,612
80,036
112,200
125,664
128,656
133,144
82,280
53,856
11,968
0
803,352
Medians - Golf Club /Old Quarry Road
Meter No. 1 - Safeway Parking Lot
0
0
748
1,496
8,228
4,488
7,480
5,236
2,992
1,496
0
0
32,164
2 - Church
0
748
3,740
29,920
106,216
80,784
71,060
83,776
28,424
17,204
1,496
0
423,368
3 - Upper GC Road
0
0
1,496
8,228
38,896
26,928
20,196
27,676
13,464
13,464
6,732
0
157,080
4 - DVC tennis courts
0
0
0
18,700
91,256
58,344
30,668
63,580
19,448
7,480
1,496
0
290,972
Diablo Valley College (less Stubbs Rd.)
429,576
903,659
1,148,404
2,247,366
2,466,904
1,932,682
1,785,700
1,553,970
1,659,962
1,317,153
682,774
365,922
16,494,073
Stubbs Road Triplexes
32,164
33,660
44,132
90,508
124,916
98,736
94,248
102,476
88,264
111,452
95,744
69,564
985,864
Taylor /Civic Medians - City of PH
0
23,188
29,172
45,628
78,540
46,376
52,360
77,792
50,864
41,140
23,936
748
469,744
City Landscaping Taylor Blvd /Ruth Dr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
748
18,700
29,920
26,180
5,984
81,532
CC Country Club Golf Course
0
1,525,920
2,737,680
11,504,240
18,946,840
16,553,240
17,361,080
15,569,620
8,983,480
6,728,260
1,249,160
332,860
101,492,380
Viking Drive Landscaping - City of PH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Valley View MS and College Park HS
5,236
159,324
495,176
978,384
1,888,700
1,325,456
1,769,020
778,668
0
0
121,176
12,716
7,533,856
City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard
748
4,488
2,992
18,700
50,116
31,416
45,628
30,668
15,708
11,968
2,244
4,488
219,164
Pleasant Hill Police Department
2,274
42,606
96,492
166,056
308,924
279,752
248,336
284,240
150,348
154,836
68,068
748
1,802,680
Salfingere Park
11,145
97,165
84,599
205,326
392,027
280,500
221,333
328,447
98,212
112,948
33,959
140,026
2,005,687
Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane
240,108
642,532
692,648
1,282,820
1,754,060
1,530,408
1,603,712
1,486,276
976,140
917,048
341,836
154,088
11,621,676
Sequoia Schools
0
258,060
41,140
542,300
976,140
1,032,240
1,013,540
1,013,540
968,660
863,940
306,680
284,240
7,300,480
Pleasant Hill Middle School
0
190,740
228,140
448,800
1,062,160
1,118,260
1,110,780
572,220
561,000
583,440
430,100
179,520
6,485,160
Pleasant Hill Demonstration Garden
18,700
10,472
17,204
25,432
32,912
38,896
46,376
38,148
26,180
35,156
11,968
16,456
317,900
Pleasant Oaks Park
0
243,100
235,620
695,640
512,380
329,120
145,860
97,240
115,940
243,100
478,720
164,560
3,261,280
Hydrant Sales
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal - Recycled Water Sales
1,184,506
5,075,974
7,356,705
22,584,702
35,998,642
31,018,994
32,230,569
28,491,488
17,898,730
14,766,096
5,045,697
2,518,053
204,170,155
HHW Drop -Off Facility
0
83,028
240,108
283,492
439,824
584,936
480,964
429,352
329,120
375,496
102,476
0
3,348,796
Maltby Pumping Station (estimated) **
1,860
1,740
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,800
1,860
21,960
4737 Imhoff Place (warehouse)
0
0
0
748
4,488
6,732
5,984
5,236
2,992
2,992
1,496
0
30,668
4838 Imhoff Place (HOB Annex)
0
3,740
278,256
26,928
66,572
55,352
48,620
56,848
48,620
15,708
3,740
0
604,384
Subtotal - District Remote Sites*
1,860
88,508
520,224
312,968
512,744
648,820
537,428
493,296
382,532
396,056
109,512
1,860
4,005,808
GRAND TOTALS
1,186,366
5,164,482
�]�,876 , 929
22,897,6701
36,511,386
31,667,814
32,767,9971
28,984,7841
18,281,2621
15,162,1521
5,155,2091
2,519,9131
208,175,963
*Does not include use on treatment plant site * *estimate Maltby use 60 gal X #days in month
11
TABLE 3
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JANUARY 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
1/1/2013
3.43
3.4
< 2
1.21
18
1/2/2013
4.52
5.5
< 2
1.37
17
1/3/2013
5.08
4.2
< 2
1.60
24
1/4/2013
4.55
3.8
< 2
1.63
22
1/5/2013
5.69
5.4
< 2
1.56
31
1/6/2013
5.53
5.3
< 2
1.48
23
1/7/2013
5.95
3.5
< 2
1.51
24
1/8/2013
5.56
3.2
< 2
1.50
27
1/9/2013
5.62
2.6
< 2
1.56
18
1/10/2013
5.85
4.6
< 2
1.63
19
1/11/2013
5.58
3.5
< 2
1.58
40
1/12/2013
6.22
3.0
< 2
1.50
21
1/13/2013
6.35
2.7
< 2
1.51
25
1/14/2013
6.06
2.6
< 2
1.69
22
1/15/2013
5.66
3.8
< 2
1.69
35
1/16/2013
6.02
3.3
< 2
1.60
58
1/17/2013
6.20
3.5
< 2
1.61
41
1/18/2013
5.83
2.6
< 2
1.61
40
1/19/2013
5.39
2.2
< 2
1.61
23
1/20/2013
5.73
3.3
< 2
1.57
24
1/21/2013
5.99
3.5
< 2
1.61
37
1/22/2013
5.86
3.2
< 2
1.65
46
1/23/2013
5.58
2.8
< 2
1.62
34
1/24/2013
5.52
2.9
< 2
1.62
26
1/25/2013
5.64
4.2
< 2
1.52
21
1/26/2013
5.78
4.4
< 2
1.50
25
1/27/2013
6.03
4.6
< 2
1.50
31
1/28/2013
5.30
2.8
< 2
1.50
49
1/29/2013
6.03
4.8
< 2
1.46
39
1/30/2013
6.24
4.6
< 2
1.49
46
1/31/2013
6.01
4.7
< 2
1.32
41
Minimum
3.43
2.2
< 2
1.21
17
Maximum
6.35
5.5
< 2
1.69
58
Average
5.64
3.7
< 2
1.54
31
12
TABLE 4
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
FEBRUARY 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
2/1/2013
5.76
3.6
< 2
1.32
49
2/2/2013
5.60
6.0
< 2
1.36
40
2/3/2013
6.18
5.7
< 2
1.26
52
2/4/2013
6.65
5.8
< 2
1.17
51
2/5/2013
5.77
5.2
< 2
1.17
53
2/6/2013
6.09
6.3
< 2
1.24
73
2/7/2013
6.14
5.1
< 2
1.37
49
2/8/2013
5.66
4.5
< 2
1.47
51
2/9/2013
5.66
5.0
< 2
1.47
41
2/10/2013
5.66
4.8
< 2
1.49
46
2/11/2013
6.61
6.4
< 2
1.37
40
2/12/2013
6.06
5.5
< 2
1.21
50
2/13/2013
5.94
4.6
< 2
1.24
82
2/14/2013
5.68
5.4
< 2
1.24
65
2/15/2013
5.88
5.4
< 2
1.32
269
2/16/2013
6.30
5.6
< 2
1.55
124
2/17/2013
6.10
5.5
< 2
1.24
58
2/18/2013
5.99
5.4
< 2
1.50
52
2/19/2013
5.67
6.2
< 2
1.57
51
2/20/2013
4.78
5.0
< 2
1.57
52
2/21/2013
4.88
3.4
< 2
1.56
52
2/22/2013
5.88
4.8
< 2
1.38
59
2/23/2013
5.70
5.0
< 2
1.32
165
2/24/2013
6.29
6.4
< 2
1.30
52
2/25/2013
5.37
5.0
< 2
1.31
60
2/26/2013
5.38
4.6
< 2
1.42
71
2/27/2013
5.99
5.7
< 2
1.31
93
2/28/2013
1 6.19
1 6.4
1 < 2
1 1.42
1 122
Minimum
4.78
3.4
< 2
1.17
40
Maximum
6.65
6.4
< 2
1.57
269
Average
5.85
5.3
< 2
1.36
72
13
TABLE 5
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARATERISTICS
MARCH 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
3/1/2013
6.21
5.8
< 2
1.56
376
3/2/2013
6.04
6.0
< 2
1.41
282
3/3/2013
6.20
3.2
< 2
1.37
101
3/4/2013
6.03
3.6
< 2
1.42
136
3/5/2013
6.02
4.8
< 2
1.40
330
3/6/2013
6.26
4.6
< 2
1.52
367
3/7/2013
6.19
5.3
< 2
1.35
120
3/8/2013
5.99
4.7
< 2
1.19
115
3/9/2013
6.15
4.6
< 2
1.14
103
3/10/2013
6.32
4.0
< 2
1.20
135
3/11/2013
5.75
3.8
< 2
1.20
94
3/12/2013
6.16
5.2
< 2
1.20
282
3/13/2013
6.44
7.2
< 2
1.22
341
3/14/2013
6.59
5.7
< 2
1.26
195
3/15/2013
6.42
4.8
< 2
1.20
402
3/16/2013
6.33
5.2
< 2
1.18
202
3/17/2013
6.06
5.2
< 2
1.15
147
3/18/2013
6.46
5.2
< 2
1.16
157
3/19/2013
6.31
6.2
< 2
1.07
384
3/20/2013
5.99
5.4
< 2
1.12
314
3/21/2013
6.07
4.6
< 2
1.49
131
3/22/2013
5.56
3.6
< 2
1.50
210
3/23/2013
6.36
6.2
< 2
1.50
158
3/24/2013
6.15
5.8
< 2
1.35
226
3/25/2013
6.02
7.3
< 2
1.40
243
3/26/2013
6.25
6.3
< 2
1.26
468
3/27/2013
5.98
4.9
< 2
1.32
411
3/28/2013
5.48
4.7
< 2
1.29
303
3/29/2013
6.20
6.1
< 2
1.29
149
3/30/2013
5.55
5.0
< 2
1.43
407
3/31/2013
5.71
4.8
< 2
1.41
191
Minimum
5.48
3.2
< 2
1.07
94
Maximum
6.59
7.3
< 2
1.56
468
Average
6.10
5.2
< 2
1.31
241
14
TABLE 6
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
APRIL 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
4/1/2013
5.65
4.8
< 2
1.48
118
4/2/2013
5.53
3.5
< 2
1.48
61
4/3/2013
6.51
6.2
< 2
1.50
100
4/4/2013
5.84
5.2
< 2
1.31
103
4/5/2013
6.01
4.9
< 2
1.25
95
4/6/2013
5.96
4.4
< 2
1.42
84
4/7/2013
5.76
3.2
< 2
1.43
84
4/8/2013
5.64
4.0
< 2
1.39
92
4/9/2013
5.86
4.8
< 2
1.33
117
4/10/2013
5.80
4.1
< 2
1.30
289
4/11/2013
5.56
3.5
< 2
1.33
196
4/12/2013
6.09
5.5
= 2
1.31
561
4/13/2013
6.21
7.8
< 2
1.26
505
4/14/2013
5.90
5.5
< 2
1.42
362
4/15/2013
5.90
4.4
< 2
1.28
283
4/16/2013
5.70
3.9
< 2
1.39
541
4/17/2013
6.20
4.4
< 2
1.36
481
4/18/2013
5.97
4.5
< 2
1.29
598
4/19/2013
5.87
3.8
< 2
1.14
442
4/20/2013
5.85
4.6
< 2
1.16
604
4/21/2013
5.89
5.1
< 2
1.24
428
4/22/2013
5.81
4.6
< 2
1.39
530
4/23/2013
5.81
4.7
< 2
1.42
611
4/24/2013
5.40
4.5
< 2
1.34
656
4/25/2013
5.58
3.8
< 2
1.34
609
4/26/2013
6.33
4.9
< 2
1.33
624
4/27/2013
5.98
5.0
< 2
1.33
693
4/28/2013
6.04
5.9
< 2
1.49
1122
4/29/2013
1 5.95
1 6.0
1 < 2
1 1.35
1 387
4/30/2013
6.23
4.3
< 2
1.54
489
Minimum
5.40
3.2
< 2
1.14
61
Maximum
6.51
7.8
= 2
1.54
1122
Average
5.89
4.7
< 2
1.35
396
15
TABLE 7
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
MAY 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
5/1/2013
5.95
4.4
< 2
1.57
781
5/2/2013
5.78
4.5
< 2
1.66
1064
5/3/2013
5.79
4.4
< 2
1.64
557
5/4/2013
5.69
4.4
< 2
1.62
772
5/5/2013
5.77
5.2
< 2
1.44
911
5/6/2013
5.76
3.4
< 2
1.60
484
5/7/2013
5.45
3.3
< 2
1.48
647
5/8/2013
5.71
5.1
< 2
1.32
681
5/9/2013
5.49
3.9
< 2
1.47
754
5/10/2013
5.67
5.0
< 2
1.53
676
5/11/2013
5.71
5.1
< 2
1.73
747
5/12/2013
5.61
6.3
< 2
1.70
1133
5/13/2013
5.63
5.1
< 2
1.43
439
5/14/2013
5.45
4.3
< 2
1.45
829
5/15/2013
5.43
4.5
< 2
1.45
749
5/16/2013
5.36
3.9
< 2
1.33
810
5/17/2013
5.34
3.4
< 2
1.20
590
5/18/2013
5.11
3.5
< 2
1.16
763
5/19/2013
5.26
4.2
< 2
1.06
567
5/20/2013
5.32
4.5
< 2
0.91
1148
5/21/2013
5.46
5.1
< 2
0.99
628
5/22/2013
5.15
3.9
< 2
1.12
745
5/23/2013
5.28
3.5
< 2
1.17
807
5/24/2013
5.21
3.4
< 2
1.32
660
5/25/2013
5.40
5.3
< 2
1.58
775
5/26/2013
5.53
7.8
< 2
1.56
1309
5/27/2013
5.63
6.0
< 2
1.57
522
5/28/2013
5.63
6.3
< 2
1.36
585
5/29/2013
5.02
4.9
< 2
1.37
644
5/30/2013
5.47
4.8
< 2
1.29
584
5/31/2013
5.49
4.8
< 2
1.29
616
Minimum
5.02
3.3
< 2
0.91
439
Maximum
5.95
7.8
< 2
1.73
1309
Average
5.50
4.6
< 2
1.40
741
16
TABLE 8
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JUNE 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
6/1/2013
5.71
5.5
< 2
1.11
853
6/2/2013
5.79
7.1
< 2
1.01
805
6/3/2013
5.92
5.3
< 2
0.95
1326
6/4/2013
5.39
7.4
< 2
0.81
398
6/5/2013
5.67
4.1
< 2
1.09
595
6/6/2013
5.60
7.2
< 2
0.97
744
6/7/2013
5.32
5.3
< 2
0.89
707
6/8/2013
5.85
5.7
< 2
0.88
785
6/9/2013
5.63
5.5
< 2
0.90
1220
6/10/2013
6.31
5.2
< 2
0.94
471
6/11/2013
5.31
4.5
< 2
0.90
716
6/12/2013
5.39
5.2
< 2
0.82
835
6/13/2013
5.26
3.8
< 2
0.79
813
6/14/2013
5.67
5.5
< 2
1.01
672
6/15/2013
5.98
5.8
< 2
1.23
959
6/16/2013
5.26
5.8
< 2
1.27
1378
6/17/2013
5.21
4.3
< 2
1.38
504
6/18/2013
5.19
5.3
< 2
1.42
734
6/19/2013
5.23
3.9
< 2
1.22
794
6/20/2013
5.02
4.2
< 2
1.41
1142
6/21/2013
5.28
5.3
< 2
1.33
766
6/22/2013
5.40
5.3
< 2
1.31
1180
6/23/2013
5.37
5.4
< 2
1.39
546
6/24/2013
5.03
2.7
< 2
1.44
1334
6/25/2013
5.17
3.8
< 2
1.41
292
6/26/2013
4.98
3.6
< 2
1.47
290
6/27/2013
4.82
3.5
< 2
1.51
320
6/28/2013
5.67
5.4
< 2
1.34
714
6/29/2013
1 5.20
1 4.8
1 < 2
1 1.19
1 788
6/30/2013
5.15
3.3
< 2
1.28
522
Minimum
4.82
2.7
< 2
0.79
290
Maximum
6.31
7.4
< 2
1.51
1378
Average
5.43
5.0
< 2
1.16
773
17
TABLE 9
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JULY 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
7/1/2013
5.19
3.7
< 2
1.47
849
7/2/2013
5.21
4.3
< 2
1.36
1425
7/3/2013
5.61
5.1
< 2
1.31
634
7/4/2013
5.37
5.4
< 2
1.36
1189
7/5/2013
5.19
3.8
< 2
1.35
493
7/6/2013
4.84
4.1
< 2
1.51
761
7/7/2013
5.02
5.3
< 2
1.42
985
7/8/2013
5.15
4.7
< 2
1.42
467
7/9/2013
4.90
4.8
< 2
1.50
704
7/10/2013
4.97
6.3
< 2
1.52
1495
7/11/2013
5.04
3.7
< 2
1.43
518
7/12/2013
4.85
3.5
< 2
1.47
850
7/13/2013
4.81
3.5
< 2
1.50
738
7/14/2013
5.24
3.4
< 2
1.51
608
7/15/2013
5.04
2.1
< 2
1.46
1341
7/16/2013
5.10
4.6
< 2
1.40
530
7/17/2013
5.99
4.5
< 2
1.56
819
7/18/2013
5.41
4.6
< 2
1.57
789
7/19/2013
5.59
5.9
< 2
1.44
1132
7/20/2013
5.63
4.2
< 2
1.47
726
7/21/2013
5.73
4.5
< 2
1.55
973
7/22/2013
5.75
3.5
< 2
1.44
520
7/23/2013
5.43
5.6
< 2
1.34
1121
7/24/2013
5.42
4.9
< 2
1.33
782
7/25/2013
5.41
4.3
< 2
1.24
745
7/26/2013
5.34
4.1
< 2
1.21
808
7/27/2013
5.35
4.0
< 2
1.22
740
7/28/2013
5.17
4.3
< 2
1.32
1079
7/29/2013
5.32
3.7
< 2
1.25
759
7/30/2013
5.26
2.9
< 2
1.34
643
7/31/2013
5.23
4.4
< 2
1.20
811
Minimum
4.81
2.1
< 2
1.20
467
Maximum
5.99
6.3
< 2
1.57
1495
Average
5.28
4.3
< 2
1.40
840
IV
TABLE 10
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
AUGUST 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
8/1/2013
5.19
4.9
< 2
1.14
1201
8/2/2013
5.58
5.6
< 2
1.09
1296
8/3/2013
5.67
5.3
< 2
1.09
1518
8/4/2013
5.60
6.2
< 2
1.15
1836
8/5/2013
5.62
6.1
< 2
1.13
960
8/6/2013
5.54
4.6
< 2
1.22
1222
8/7/2013
5.46
4.1
< 2
1.25
1059
8/8/2013
5.66
6.0
< 2
1.22
684
8/9/2013
5.30
4.8
< 2
1.08
765
8/10/2013
5.20
3.8
< 2
1.05
803
8/11/2013
5.40
3.3
< 2
1.10
523
8/12/2013
5.05
16.8
< 2
1.27
1276
8/13/2013
5.56
7.4
< 2
1.51
432
8/14/2013
5.67
6.4
< 2
1.51
763
8/15/2013
5.50
5.2
< 2
1.37
757
8/16/2013
5.35
5.2
< 2
1.37
747
8/17/2013
5.79
5.2
< 2
1.53
928
8/18/2013
5.56
4.4
< 2
1.49
1056
8/19/2013
5.41
3.8
< 2
1.53
509
8/20/2013
5.43
3.0
< 2
1.69
826
8/21/2013
5.46
3.9
< 2
1.53
802
8/22/2013
5.35
3.8
< 2
1.50
716
8/23/2013
5.54
4.4
< 2
1.59
831
8/24/2013
5.30
3.6
< 2
1.62
766
8/25/2013
5.20
3.5
< 2
1.47
593
8/26/2013
5.66
3.9
< 2
1.40
922
8/27/2013
5.58
4.0
< 2
1.58
735
8/28/2013
5.42
3.3
< 2
1.56
790
8/29/2013
5.76
4.5
< 2
1.54
687
8/30/2013
5.35
4.0
< 2
1.44
741
8/31/2013
5.86
4.0
< 2
1.54
830
Minimum
5.05
3.0
< 2
1.05
432
Maximum
5.86
16.8
< 2
1.69
1836
Average
5.48
5.0
< 2
1.37
889
19
TABLE 11
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
SEPTEMBER 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
9/1/2013
5.44
3.4
< 2
1.47
596
9/2/2013
5.50
3.7
< 2
1.47
530
9/3/2013
5.56
4.0
< 2
1.52
1111
9/4/2013
5.55
3.5
< 2
1.46
579
9/5/2013
5.40
4.0
< 2
1.33
691
9/6/2013
5.44
4.8
< 2
1.26
768
9/7/2013
5.38
4.0
< 2
1.31
800
9/8/2013
5.66
4.4
< 2
1.45
568
9/9/2013
5.51
3.8
< 2
1.48
1004
9/10/2013
5.57
6.2
< 2
1.49
726
9/11/2013
6.74
5.0
< 2
1.30
689
9/12/2013
5.23
5.1
< 2
1.19
671
9/13/2013
5.44
4.9
< 2
1.25
697
9/14/2013
5.39
4.2
< 2
1.31
714
9/15/2013
5.14
4.1
< 2
1.48
542
9/16/2013
5.08
4.2
< 2
1.51
461
9/17/2013
4.96
3.9
< 2
1.21
636
9/18/2013
5.10
3.3
< 2
0.96
748
9/19/2013
5.33
3.0
< 2
1.01
546
9/20/2013
6.25
4.2
< 2
0.97
323
9/21/2013
5.43
5.6
< 2
0.83
676
9/22/2013
5.24
4.4
< 2
1.00
295
9/23/2013
4.95
4.1
< 2
1.15
191
9/24/2013
5.14
4.6
< 2
1.33
237
9/25/2013
6.00
4.9
< 2
1.19
537
9/26/2013
5.16
3.5
< 2
1.20
301
9/27/2013
5.07
4.5
< 2
1.42
572
9/28/2013
5.11
4.0
< 2
1.60
370
9/29/2013
1 5.33
1 6.3
1 < 2
1 1.58
1 619
9/30/2013
6.04
4.6
< 2
1.44
359
Minimum
4.95
3.0
< 2
0.83
191
Maximum
6.74
6.3
< 2
1.60
1111
Average
5.44
4.3
< 2
1.31
585
20
TABLE 12
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
OCTOBER 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
10/1/2013
5.38
3.7
< 2
1.30
555
10/2/2013
5.29
2.1
< 2
1.17
560
10/3/2013
5.12
4.3
< 2
1.11
368
10/4/2013
4.85
3.9
< 2
1.05
641
10/5/2013
5.25
3.4
< 2
1.02
554
10/6/2013
5.14
5.5
< 2
0.93
464
10/7/2013
5.20
4.5
< 2
0.82
293
10/8/2013
5.40
3.5
< 2
0.80
643
10/9/2013
5.23
3.0
< 2
0.80
654
10/10/2013
4.81
2.9
< 2
0.80
405
10/11/2013
5.24
3.2
< 2
0.89
521
10/12/2013
5.36
6.0
< 2
1.02
556
10/13/2013
5.29
6.6
< 2
0.99
288
10/14/2013
4.86
3.1
< 2
0.93
238
10/15/2013
5.16
5.4
< 2
0.99
544
10/16/2013
5.77
4.9
< 2
1.11
289
10/17/2013
5.35
6.1
< 2
1.18
401
10/18/2013
5.20
4.5
< 2
1.39
356
10/19/2013
5.70
4.4
< 2
1.08
639
10/20/2013
5.52
4.0
< 2
1.29
367
10/21/2013
5.70
3.2
< 2
1.14
308
10/22/2013
5.69
3.1
< 2
1.37
432
10/23/2013
4.82
4.8
< 2
1.40
309
10/24/2013
5.71
3.6
< 2
1.40
310
10/25/2013
5.83
3.5
< 2
1.41
178
10/26/2013
5.26
5.6
< 2
1.41
273
10/27/2013
5.35
5.2
< 2
1.38
363
10/28/2013
5.11
4.5
< 2
1.41
261
10/29/2013
5.52
1.3
< 2
1.42
360
10/30/2013
5.52
4.6
< 2
1.36
249
10/31/2013
5.36
4.1
< 2
1.34
331
Minimum
4.81
1.3
< 2
0.80
178
Maximum
5.83
6.6
< 2
1.42
654
Average
5.32
4.1
< 2
1.15
410
21
TABLE 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
NOVEMBER 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
11/1/2013
5.59
4.3
< 2
1.30
187
11/2/2013
4.77
5.3
< 2
1.30
213
11/3/2013
5.41
6.1
< 2
1.31
150
11/4/2013
5.98
5.7
< 2
1.44
183
11/5/2013
5.49
7.8
< 2
1.52
418
11/6/2013
5.91
3.0
< 2
1.48
193
11/7/2013
5.93
6.5
< 2
1.42
413
11/8/2013
5.32
5.7
< 2
1.26
168
11/9/2013
5.19
5.6
< 2
1.21
265
11/10/2013
5.41
6.1
< 2
1.15
244
11/11/2013
5.21
3.0
< 2
1.15
234
11/12/2013
4.83
4.6
< 2
1.15
466
11/13/2013
5.61
1.3
< 2
1.24
133
11/14/2013
5.46
3.0
< 2
1.35
107
11/15/2013
7.2
4.1
< 2
1.35
194
11/16/2013
5.42
6.0
< 2
1.16
416
11/17/2013
5.07
5.5
< 2
1.13
81
11/18/2013
4.72
3.6
< 2
1.13
72
11/19/2013
4.98
4.8
< 2
1.14
143
11/20/2013
4.97
3.7
< 2
1.15
67
11/21/2013
5.55
1.4
< 2
1.16
54
11/22/2013
5.43
3.7
< 2
1.14
69
11/23/2013
4.66
1.3
< 2
1.14
72
11/24/2013
5.53
5.1
< 2
1.14
40
11/25/2013
6.01
6.8
< 2
0.97
63
11/26/2013
5.22
4.9
< 2
1.16
103
11/27/2013
5.78
4.8
< 2
1.23
153
11/28/2013
5.71
4.9
< 2
1.33
178
11/29/2013
1 5.4
1 4.1
1 < 2
1 1.30
1 162
11/30/2013
5.59
3.9
< 2
1.30
164
Minimum
4.66
1.3
< 2
0.97
40
Maximum
7.20
7.8
< 2
1.52
466
Average
5.45
4.5
< 2
1.24
180
22
TABLE 14
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
DECEMBER 2013
Date
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg /L)
Total
Chlorine
Residual
Total Coliform,
MPN /100ml
Hatch On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity (NTU)
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
(GPM)
12/1/2013
4.92
3.6
< 2
1.30
61
12/2/2013
6.26
4.9
< 2
1.33
75
12/3/2013
5.63
4.1
< 2
1.43
118
12/4/2013
5.55
4.5
< 2
1.35
92
12/5/2013
5.49
4.5
< 2
1.35
92
12/6/2013
6.23
4.5
< 2
1.35
98
12/7/2013
5.24
2.9
< 2
1.39
83
12/8/2013
5.5
6.8
< 2
1.28
39
12/9/2013
6.09
6.7
< 2
1.20
123
12/10/2013
5.32
5.4
< 2
1.20
44
12/11/2013
5.24
3.7
< 2
1.20
36
12/12/2013
5.48
4.8
< 2
1.20
32
12/13/2013
8.27
3.3
< 2
1.13
49
12/14/2013
5.84
6.4
< 2
1.12
114
12/15/2013
5.78
6.3
< 2
1.25
59
12/16/2013
6.18
5.5
< 2
1.25
58
12/17/2013
5.47
4.2
< 2
1.25
82
12/18/2013
5.92
5.4
< 2
1.26
66
12/19/2013
5.73
5.3
< 2
1.55
75
12/20/2013
5.91
5.2
< 2
1.81
145
12/21/2013
6.18
5.0
< 2
1.94
124
12/22/2013
5.77
4.1
< 2
1.81
145
12/23/2013
5.79
3.2
< 2
1.94
80
12/24/2013
5.86
6.2
< 2
1.91
86
12/25/2013
5.33
5.4
< 2
1.64
71
12/26/2013
6.08
5.8
< 2
1.64
86
12/27/2013
5.65
6.1
< 2
1.60
168
12/28/2013
5.33
4.6
< 2
1.60
267
12/29/2013
5.52
5.9
< 2
1.57
74
12/30/2013
5.59
5.8
< 2
1.34
63
12/31/2013
5.98
6.8
< 2
1.13
92
Minimum
4.92
2.9
< 2
1.12
32
Maximum
8.27
6.8
< 2
1.94
267
Average
5.78
5.0
< 2
1.43
90
23
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User- Buchanan Fields Golf Course
Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave., Concord, CA 94520
Inspection Date: 10/24/13
Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course irrigation
Weather conditions: Cool, clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
❑
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
❑
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: - - -- Date: 10/24/13
® Recycled Paper
24
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Headquarters Office Bldg. (HOB) and Annex, Imhoff Place,
Martinez
Inspection Date: 12/12/13
Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cold / Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
❑
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
❑
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
❑
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: G -- - Date: 12/12/13
® Recycled Paper
25
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez
Inspection Date: 12/12/13
Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cold / Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: P 1� ---- -- --_ Date: 12/12/13
® Recycled Paper
26
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station
Inspection Date: 12/10/13
Customer Representative Present: Leo Gonzalez, Pump Stations Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal water
Weather conditions: Clear / Cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
❑
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
❑
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
g
Inspector's Signature- Date: 12/10/13
® Recycled Paper
27
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 12/12/13
Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cold / Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: Date: 12/12/13
Recycled Paper
28
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 12/12/13
Customer Representative Present: David Culbertson, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cold / Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
FI ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: i Date: 12/12/13
eRecycled Paper
29
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard
Location of Site: 310 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Inspection Date: 11/04/13
Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore, Maintenance Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill for irrigation / street sweeping
Weather conditions: Clear / Cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑ ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
❑ ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
❑ ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Added two tags to truck fill valve location.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 11/04/13
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User- City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Medians #1 -4 on Golf Club Rd Old Quarr Rd Contra Costa
Blvd
Chil ancin o Pkw a or Blvd/Civic r Viking rlandscaping, an to
or BlvEmuth
rlandscaping
Inspection Date: 10/24/13
Customer Representative Present: Barry Milliken, Lead Gardener
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
Z
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑*
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Stake broken at golf club median at overflow parking. (done)
Bolts loose on Safeway meter Chilpancingo. (done)
Inspector's Signature: I
31
Date- 10/24/13
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Station (330 Civic Drive)
Inspection Date- 12/06/13
Customer Representative Present: None
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
❑
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Customer representative not available during site inspection, however no deficiencies were
noted.
Inspector's Signature: t -- Date: 12/06/13
SRecycled Pappr
32
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: CONCO Companies
Location of Site: 5030 Imhoff Drive, Martinez, CA 94553
Inspection Date: 11/05/13
Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust control / Vehicle wash
Weather conditions: Clear / Cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
❑ ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
5 magnetic signs needed for vehicles hauling recycled water. (delivered)
Inspector's Signature: + - - - Date: 11/05/13
SRecycled Paper
33
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course
Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 12/06/13
Customer Representative Present: John Martin, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course and clubhouse landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Replacement permit provided.
Inspector's Signature: I _._ Date: 12/06/13
eRecycled Paper
34
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County Animal Services Department
Location of Site: 4800 Imhoff Place. Martinez, CA 94553
Inspection Date: 11/14/13
Customer Representative Present: Jennifer Ray, Center Operations Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Kennel Wash / Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
❑
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑*
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Added / replaced signs.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 11/14/13
IT Recycled Paper
35
IL Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County
Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez
Inspection Date: 1/31/2014
Customer Representative Present- Roland Hindsman, GSD Facility Services Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions- Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Additional signs and tags distributed. Discussed additional potential recycled water uses on-
site. Will continue to explore options.
Inspector's Signature: ,'. _ _ Date: 1/31/14
j
36
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil
Location of Site: 5030 Imhoff Drive. Martinez, CA 94553
Inspection Date: 11/05/13
Customer Representative Present: Carlene Einevoll
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust control
Weather conditions: Clear / Cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
❑
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑*
❑
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
❑
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
Inspector's Signature: t )__— --�._` Date: 11/05/13
® Recycled Paper
37
11 Central Contra Costa Sanita►y District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: County Quarry
Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez, CA 94553
Inspection Date: 11/05/13
Customer Representative Present: Mike Grillo
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control, process water, irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
IT
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Replaced several hose bibb tags.
Inspector's Signature: i Date: 11/05/13
® Recycled Paper
38
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College
Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Inspection Date: 12/10/13
Customer Representative Present: Joe Morgado (Troy Ricard), Lead Gardener
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Cold
Standard Observations:
Yes No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
® ❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
® ❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ❑
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
® ❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑* ®
❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
® ❑*
❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑* ®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑* ®
❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑* ®
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Joe Morgado will be retiring next week. Troy Ricard was also in attendance and is the new
point of contact. Guy Grace continues as Recycled Water Site Supervisor.
Inspector's Signature: Date
39
12/10/13
SRecycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 1/09/14
Customer Representative Present: None (Site Supervisor Monika Olsen contacted b
phone on 11/20/2013)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation
Weather conditions: Sunnv / clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑*
❑
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Customer representative was not available for the inspection, but full access was available
and no deficiencies were noted.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 1/09/14
Recycled Paper
40
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Middle School
Inspection Date: 11/01/13
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
® ❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
® ❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ❑ ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
® ❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑* ® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑ ❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
® ❑* ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑* ® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑* ® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
Inspector's Signature
41
Date: 11/01/13
Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools
Inspection Date: 11/01/13
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
® ❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
® ❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ❑ ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
® ❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑* ® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑ ❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
® ❑* ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑* ® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑* ® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Replaced sign at rear of Sequoia Middle school field, bridge entrance.
Added sign to Sequoia batting cage, east side of field.
Inspector's Signature:
42
Date: 11/01/13
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Valley View Middle School and College Park High School
Inspection Date: 11/01/13
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
®
❑
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑*
❑
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
®
IT
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
®
❑
11.
Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
®
❑
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Heavy H2O at C.P. field (Irrigation system adjusted to correct)
Inspector's Signature:
43
Date: 11/01/13
eRecycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Chilpancingo Park
Inspection Date: 11/20/13
Customer Representative Present: Tom BradleV, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cool / Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑ ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
Z ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
Inspector's Signature- Date- 11/20/13
44
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Frank Salfingere Park
Inspection Date: 11/20/13
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cool / Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
T Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
Inspector's Signature: c' Date: 11/20/13
® Recycled Paper
45
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Park
Inspection Date: 11/20/13
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cool / Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
❑
❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑* ❑
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑ ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑*
® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
®
❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑*
❑ ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑*
® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspection not possible, as park is undergoing a major renovation.
Inspector's Signature: _ Date: 11/20/13
KE
ME
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park (147 Gregory Lane)
Inspection Date: 11/20/13
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Cool / Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
® ❑* ❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
® ❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
® ❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑* ® ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑ ❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑* ® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑* ® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑* ® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
No deficiencies noted.
Inspector's Signature -- Date: 11/20/13
® Recycled Paper
47
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2013 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes
Location of Site: 700 -780 Stubbs Road Buildings 1 -7, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 12/06/13
Customer Representative Present: None
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear / Cold
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
❑ ❑*
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
❑ ❑* ❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ® ❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
® ❑* ❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ® ❑
7. Is recycled water spray, mist or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
❑* ❑ ❑
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray, mist or runoff?
❑ ❑* ❑
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑* ® ❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
❑* ® ❑
11. Has appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
❑* ® ❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Customer representatives were not available during this inspection, however no deficiencies
were noted. Will connect with customer representatives for 2014 inspections.
Inspector's Signature:
Date: 12/06/13
48 Recycled Paper