HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.a. 2012 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report for 2012' Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
t Environment
2012 RECYCLED WATER
QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION
'�' ANNUAL REPORT
,Oed
q; ��
,Ae
y
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2012 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION
ANNUAL REPORT
INDEX
Page No.
Discharger's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water .......... ..............................1 —8
Figure 1 Recycled Water at Work ................................... ............................... 9-10
Table 1 Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2012 ......................... .............................11
Table 2 Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2012 ................................. .............................12
Figure 2 CCCSD Recycled Water System Map .................................. .............................13
Table 3 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — January .............. .............................14
Table 4 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — February ............. .............................15
Table 5 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — March ................. .............................16
Table 6 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — April ................... .............................17
Table 7 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — May .................... .............................18
Table 8 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — June .................... .............................19
Table 9 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — July .................... .............................20
Table 10 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — August ............... .............................21
Table 11 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — September ......... .............................22
Table 12 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — October .............. .............................23
Table 13 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — November .......... .............................24
Table 14 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — December .......... .............................25
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS
Inspection Site:
Page No.
Buchanan Fields Golf Course, Concord ..................................................... .............................26
CCCSD Headquarters Office Building and Annex Building, Martinez .......... .............................27
CCCSD Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Martinez ............ .............................28
CCCSD Maltby Pump Station, Martinez ...................................................... .............................29
CCCSD Treatment Plant Site, Martinez ..................................................... .............................30
CCCSD Warehouse (4737 Imhoff Place), Martinez ..................................... .............................31
City of Pleasant Hill, Corporation Yard, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill .............. .............................32
City of Pleasant Hill, Medians ( #1 - #4 on Golf Club Road, Old Quarry Road,
Contra Costa Boulevard, Chilpancingo Parkway, Taylor Blvd. /Civic Drive)
Viking Drive Landscaping, and Taylor Blvd. /Ruth Drive Landscaping, Pleasant Hill ................33
City of Pleasant Hill, Pleasant Hill Police Station, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill .............................34
Conco Companies, Martinez ....................................................................... .............................35
Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course, Pleasant Hill ................................ .............................36
Contra Costa County Animal Shelter, Martinez .......................................... .............................37
Contra Costa County Corporation Yard, Martinez ...................................... .............................38
Contra Costa Topsoil, Martinez .................................................................. .............................39
County Quarry, Martinez ............................................................................. .............................40
Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill ............................................................ .............................41
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Demonstration Garden, Pleasant Hill .... .............................42
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Pleasant Hill Middle School, Pleasant Hill .........................43
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools,
PleasantHill ................................................................................................. .............................44
NAPOSUP \Laboratory\Recycled Water \2012 \Index.doc II
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS
Inspection Site:
Page No.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Valley View Middle School and College Park
High School, Pleasant Hill ........................................................................... .............................44
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Chilpancingo Park, Pleasant Hill ..........................45
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Community Center / Frank Salfingere
Park, Pleasant Hill ....................................................................................... .............................46
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Oaks Park, Pleasant Hill ........................47
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Hill Park, Pleasant Hill ...........................48
Stubbs Road Triplexes, Pleasant Hill .......................................................... .............................49
NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2012 \Index.doc III
DISCHARGER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT
REPORTING DISCHARGER:
DATE OF REPORT:
ORDER:
REPORTING PERIOD:
RECYCLED WATER
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
February 5, 2013
96 -011
January through December 2012
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Recycled water is an integral part of the mission of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
( CCCSD), and CCCSD has been operating a successful and growing recycled water program
since 1996. Since that time, CCCSD has been providing recycled water for in -plant usage,
irrigation customers, and a range of commercial uses. In 2012, CCCSD provided
approximately 580 acre -feet (AF), or 190 million gallons (MG), of recycled water to a variety
of customers in Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez near the Interstate 680 freeway.
Recycled water was used for landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses, and street
medians and for commercial uses such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust
control, and washing kennels at the local animal shelter.
In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD used approximately
1,260 AF, or 411 MG, of recycled water internally at CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant in
Martinez for process water and landscape irrigation. The total volume of recycled water
provided by CCCSD in 2012 for offsite customer locations and internal uses was
approximately 1,840 AF, or 601 MG.
This annual report covers CCCSD's production and distribution of tertiary- treated recycled
water over the period of January through December 2012. Figure 1 includes photographs
showing examples of recycled water use sites. Table 1 provides a summary of recycled
water usage for calendar year 2012 by reuse application category. Table 2 shows the
monthly usage of recycled water by customer. Figure 2 is a map showing the location of
each recycled water customer. Tables 3 through 14 represent the water quality
characteristics. The 2012 Recycled Water Site Inspection Reports follow these tables. All
sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011.
Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality
standards, except for October 27, 28 and 30, 2012, when the dissolved oxygen (DO) was
below 1.0 mg /L, which is an aesthetic standard to control odors. However, no odors or
sulfide were detected on these days. Low feed rates to the filter plant or excessive microbial
growth in the forebay or clearwell are believed to be the cause of the low DO. Additionally, in
late 2012, CCCSD revised standard operating procedures (SOP) for forebay and clearwell
management. The revisions include operating the filter plant at higher flow rates for shorter
periods of time. The higher flow rates provide increased agitation as the filtered water
cascades over the overflow structure into the clearwell, providing aeration of the recycled
water.
FUTURE EXPANSION
CCCSD continues to seek opportunities and partnerships to expand recycled water use, add
new customers, and obtain financial assistance to build new recycled water projects.
CCCSD's projects have been on the forefront of the development of new and innovative uses
of recycled water. The interior hot water use of recycled water for kennel wash -down was the
first of its kind in California. CCCSD's expansion into the provision of dual plumbing for
interior uses for toilet and urinal flushing as well as the proposed use of recycled water for
cooling towers and boiler feed water at local petroleum refineries represent some of recycled
water's most advanced uses. The following describes CCCSD's work in 2012 to expand
recycled water use.
Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project
CCCSD developed plans to construct the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project that
will provide up to 190 AFY (62 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation at
businesses and street medians in the Diamond /Meridian Park Boulevard area of Concord.
The project will begin construction in March 2013 and install 2.3 miles of new recycled water
distribution piping for 36 new customer connections. This project will more than double
CCCSD's recycled water connections. The distribution system piping phase is expected to
be completed by the end of 2013, and the customer connections phase (including installation
of meters and connections to customer irrigation systems) is expected to be completed in
2014.
In 2011, the project was awarded a $1,030,000 Proposition 84 Implementation Grant from the
State Department of Water Resources and a $97,000 Title XVI planning grant from the
United States Bureau of Reclamation. CCCSD is currently seeking federal legislative
authorization and appropriation for an additional $1.8 million in Title XVI funding for the
project.
The Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project is covered by the Zone One Project
Agreement with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) discussed below.
Recycled Water Zone One Project
CCCSD has an agreement with CCWD to allow CCCSD to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379
MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and light commercial uses in the Zone
One Project area, which consists of portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Concord near the
Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD constructed and operates approximately 11 miles of
recycled water distribution pipelines in these areas and provides recycled water service to 35
sites. During 2012, CCCSD focused its efforts on expanding the use of recycled water for the
following toilet and urinal flushing (dual plumbing) applications:
1. CCCSD Headquarters Office Building - CCCSD completed the design and obtained
approval from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to convert the toilets
and urinals in CCCSD's 40,000 square foot administration building in Martinez from
2
potable water to recycled water. CCCSD plans to complete the construction work in
2013 as part of a seismic improvements project. A total of 14 toilets and 6 urinals will
use recycled water for flushing with an estimated annual recycled water use of
500,000 gallons per year.
2. Diablo Valley College (DVC) Commons — DVC is completing construction of two new
classroom and faculty buildings of approximately 86,000 square feet that will use
recycled water for toilet /urinal flushing and landscape irrigation of interior courtyards.
In 2012, CCCSD obtained CDPH approval for the project, and DVC completed
construction of the first building, which is expected to begin using recycled water in
early 2013. The second building is expected to be completed in 2014. A total of 35
toilets and 9 urinals will use recycled water for flushing with an estimated annual
recycled water use of 1,000,000 gallons per year. The use of recycled water is one of
the sustainable design features that will enable the new buildings to achieve a
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold Certification when
completed.
CCCSD is continuing efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective recycled water
customers in the Zone One project area, particularly those located near existing recycled
water pipelines.
Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project
CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide up
to 22,500 AFY (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell Martinez Refinery and the Tesoro
Refinery for use as cooling tower makeup water and as boiler feedwater. The refineries are
currently supplied by CCWD with untreated Delta water via the Contra Costa Canal, which is
predominantly supplied by the US Bureau of Reclamation's (USBR) Central Valley Project
(CVP). The refinery project is particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round
demand for recycled water, and it could potentially make use of existing recycled water
conveyance and storage facilities that are already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to
each refinery.
The costs of the refinery project could be up to $100 million, depending on whether the entire
full scale project is implemented. As a result, CCCSD needs financial assistance and /or
project partners to make the project cost - effective. In this regard, CCCSD is actively
pursuing federal grant funding through the federal Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA) and the Title XVI Program and continues to look for possible sources of state
funding.
In 2011, CCCSD was awarded an $180,000 Title XVI planning grant from the USBR to fund
50% of the costs to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation for the
proposed project. The USBR requires the project sponsor to prepare a feasibility study to
demonstrate that the proposed project is a viable, well thought -out, and long term source of
water that justifies the expenditure of federal funds for construction of the proposed facilities.
CCWD has agreed to participate and share local agency cost contributions for the feasibility
study.
3
In order to complete the feasibility study, the actual water supply yield and benefits of the
project must first be determined. In 2012, CCCSD and CCWD began work on a yield study
that will determine the following:
1. How much water the project actually creates (i.e., how much Delta water is freed up
by the project)
2. How the water could potentially be used by CCWD or marketed.
3. Who could benefit from the freed up water (or conserved water) and whether a
phased approach may be appropriate.
The yield study is expected to be completed in 2013, and the results of the study will be
reviewed by the USBR. If the findings of the yield study indicate that the project appears to
be viable, then CCCSD plans to proceed with completion of the Title XVI feasibility study and
environmental documentation.
Development of Recycled Water Projects on CCCSD Buffer Properties
CCCSD has been exploring options for recycled water projects on vacant buffer land owned
by CCCSD near its waste water treatment facilities in Martinez. These options include using
recycled water for growing agricultural products as well as the development of a soccer field
complex. Several nearby properties already have recycled water supply pipelines on or
adjacent to them, which reduces implementation costs. For example, CCCSD is currently
evaluating a proposal from a local community organization to develop and operate a
demonstration farm /garden on a 33 acre CCCSD owned parcel adjacent to the treatment
plant. This innovative proposal includes areas to grow food crops to donate fresh produce to
school lunch programs and the Food Bank, as well as community gardening plots. The
project would also be used to demonstrate the science and benefits of recycled water and
sustainable gardening and farming practices (e.g., avoiding the use of pesticides and other
toxic products). The proposed farm project could potentially serve as a model for other
wastewater agencies that have available land near their treatment facilities and would like to
increase water recycling.
Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment
The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an
excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a
preferred development plan (Clustered Villages concept) consisting of a mixture of
commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational land uses interspersed between parks
and open space. This mixture of land uses will create opportunities to use recycled water,
not only for landscape irrigation but also for non - potable uses such as toilet flushing and
cooling towers in commercial buildings. Recycled water demand for the new development is
estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build -out.
In 2012, CCCSD completed a Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons Station
redevelopment that evaluated alternatives and costs for new recycled water infrastructure
needed to meet the anticipated demand. The redevelopment of the property and
construction of supporting recycled water infrastructure is not expected to begin for at least
five to ten years because of additional planning work that must be completed by the City of
9
Concord and the Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the
City of Concord and /or a developer.
Diablo Country Club Satellite Recycled Water Project
In 2012, CCCSD entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Diablo Country Club
and EBMUD (the water purveyor) to evaluate construction of a satellite recycled water
treatment plant to supply irrigation water to the Club's 18 hole golf course located near
Danville. CCCSD would provide wastewater from its sewerage collection system and receive
solids returned from the satellite plant. The Diablo Country Club has proposed to finance the
capital and operating costs of the satellite plant and own and operate the facilities. A Satellite
Recycled Water Treatment Plant Feasibility Study was completed in 2012 by the Country
Club with assistance from CCCSD and EBMUD. The study found that the best use of
resources to meet long term sustainable water supply needs for the golf course was to utilize
a blend of recycled water, ground water, and potable water for irrigation. Further
investigations into the regulatory, environmental, and design requirements will be completed
in 2013.
TRUCK FILL HYDRANT PROGRAM
During the last drought in 2009, CCWD recalled its potable hydrant meters to conserve water,
and contractors were no longer able to obtain water from potable water hydrants for
construction activities and other needs. To help address this problem, CCCSD initiated a
truck fill hydrant program in 2009 to provide recycled water to contractors, companies, and
public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and other non - potable uses. CCCSD
installed a purple recycled water hydrant in Concord near the Interstate 680 /Highway 4
interchange and provided portable hydrant meters to contractors and others who could no
longer obtain water from potable water hydrants. Over the last several years the demand for
recycled water from CCCSD's truck fill program has been limited due to more normal rainfall
conditions and an easing of prior drought restrictions by local water agencies. CCCSD plans
to make its truck fill program available to the community as needed to respond to future
drought situations.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE
CCWD field crews have performed maintenance and repair work on CCCSD's recycled water
distribution system under contract since 2004. CCWD's cross - connection control specialists
also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections for new recycled water sites and
testing and recertification of existing sites where piping modifications have been made.
In 2012, CCCSD completed installation of a new in -line coagulant mixing system at the filter
plant to improve filter performance. In 2013, CCCSD plans to continue its efforts to optimize
filter plant performance including updating coagulant control systems and
cleaning /refurbishing filter media as appropriate.
CUSTOMER TRAINING
CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate recycled water customers
about the precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water
5
Site Supervisors. During annual site inspections, CCCSD provides refresher training to
customer staff where needed and verifies that each customer has up to date training
materials, including CCCSD's brochures and guidance documents on the proper use of
recycled water. In 2013, CCCSD will be updating its customer training program for dual
plumbing systems to reflect recent updates to the plumbing code related to recycled water
use in interior applications, such as toilet and urinal flushing.
REGIONAL ALLIANCES TO DEVELOP RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS
Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition
Since 2009, CCCSD has been a member of the Bay Area Recycled Water Coalition, which is
a partnership of 14 agencies committed to developing recycled water as a resource for
municipal, industrial, commercial and agricultural uses across the San Francisco Bay Area.
The Coalition has enjoyed broad support and will be expanding in 2013 to include agencies
outside of the Bay Area, such as the Central Valley, which will strengthen the regional
alliance. The Coalition has developed a successful regional approach to pursing recycled
water funding and was instrumental in helping CCCSD to secure the Title XVI planning grants
for the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project and the Refinery Project.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Planning
In 2012, CCCSD collaborated with other Bay Area agencies to update the Bay Area
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ( IRWMP), which was prepared in 2006. The
IRWMP is a nine - county effort to coordinate and improve water supply reliability, protect
water quality, manage flood protection, maintain public health standards, protect habitat and
watershed resources, and enhance the overall health of the bay. Projects listed in the
IRWMP are eligible to apply for state grant money, such as Proposition 84 funding, which is
providing grant funding for the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project. CCCSD
recycled water projects that are currently being implemented or may be initiated within the
next three to five years have been listed in the latest IRWMP update including the Recycled
Water Zone One Project; Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project; and Contra Costa
County Refinery Recycled Water Project.
SALT AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE
On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control ( SWRCB) adopted a
Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled
water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires regions overlying groundwater basins in
the State where recycled water use is occurring and planned for the future to develop a salt
and nutrient management plan by May 2014. The SWRCB has indicated it plans to develop
a streamlined reporting process by which groundwater basins with limited use of the
groundwater resources or those basins which are not likely to have adverse impacts from
recycled water irrigation (such as those within CCCSD's service area) can prepare simplified
salt and nutrient management plans. Due to the very limited extent that groundwater is used
as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, it appears that the basins underlying
CCCSD's recycled water current and planned service areas would likely qualify for the
streamlined reporting process. The specific reporting requirements are currently being
N
developed by the SWRCB. In the meantime, as part of the Bay Area IRWMP update
process, templates are being developed that will allow Bay Area agencies to prepare their
salt and nutrient management plans in an efficient and streamlined manner. These templates
should be available in 2013 and will be used by CCCSD as a basis to develop a site specific
plan for CCCSD's limited use groundwater basins.
LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER
The Board of Directors of CCCSD has consistently expressed an interest in maximizing
recycled water opportunities. However, there are many institutional and financial
impediments that are outside the control of CCCSD. On the institutional side, CCCSD must
work with the potable water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale recycled
water to them or obtain their permission to purvey recycled water. Some Northern California
potable water purveyors assert they have significant sunk costs in existing facilities, and
contend the California duplication of services law allows them to recoup stranded costs if
recycled water is made available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the
applicability of this law, the issue can add another institutional barrier and significant
additional costs to recycled water projects. In addition, even when institutional issues are
overcome, the cost to construct new recycled water treatment and conveyance facilities can
be high. For example, recycled water projects often require construction of pipelines through
congested urban areas, or require additional treatment facilities to increase capacity. When
all of these costs are added together, the unit cost of recycled water can exceed the cost of
other available, but less- sustainable, water supplies. Although recycled water projects may
have substantial additional quantifiable benefits versus conventional alternatives, additional
sources of funding are needed to make recycled water projects more competitive with other
alternatives available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state and federal
funding for recycled water projects in the past has restricted the growth of CCCSD's recycled
water program. Despite these challenges, CCCSD is increasing recycled water use in the
Bay Area by developing new recycled water projects where economically and financially
viable.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2012 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report
Facility: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD)
Water Reuse Program Order: 96 -011
Report Due Date: March 15, 2013
Period Covered by this Report:_ January 1, 2012 to December 31 2012
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments are prepared under
my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there
a . nificant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
nd im nsonment for ing violations.
`-
-
2/67-//-z
Signatur6-of Official
Douglas J. Craig, P.E.
Interim Director of Plant Operations
f:]
Date
CONSERVING OUR RESOURCES
FIGURE 1
RECYCLED WATER
AT WORK
I
-47
10
RES'lli-A00M
FIGURE 1
RECYCLED WATER AT WORK
Ir_ 44ASI
SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE
Calendar Year: 2012
Reuse Application Category
No. of
Sites
Area
Applied
Acres
Amount
Distributed
(MG)
% of Total
Reuse Flow
Landscape Irrigation
28
192
181.3
30.2
Parks
5
22
17.6
2.9
Golf Courses
2
110
110.2
18.3
Green Belts
8
1
1.6
0.3
Schools
4
52
45.7
7.6
Other
9
7
6.1
1.0
Agriculture
0
0
0.0
0.0
Vineyards
0
0
0.0
0.0
Other
0
0
0.0
0.0
Industrial (1)
6
N/A
418.7
69.7
Cooling
0
0
0.0
0.0
Other
6
N/A
418.7
69.7
Environmental Enhancement (2)
0
0
0.0
0.0
Dual Plumbing (3)
1
1
0.7
0.1
Total (4)
35
193
600.7
100
Notes:
1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, truck fill hydrant,
and treatment plant site.
2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland /marsh applications, etc.
3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation).
Table 2
Monthly Report on Recycled Water -- Calendar Year 2012
CUSTOMERS
Total for
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Calendar
(All readings in gallons)
2012
Conco
36,241
36,465
32,635
43,489
46,286
41,334
49,016
66,961
49,854
33,929
54,065
34,460
524,737
CC Topsoil
43,833
29,172
37,400
71,958
160,970
185,953
219,089
239,285
186,701
80,934
25,582
150
1,281,025
CC County Corp Yard
8,976
2,992
2,244
3,740
77,792
151,844
127,160
100,232
200,464
192,984
53,856
12,716
935,000
CC County Animal Shelter
21,300
17,400
25,246
69,450
48,000
114,039
107,069
89,156
88,203
92,370
55,197
13,396
740,827
Pacheco (Seasons) Cemetery`
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
County Quarry Products
250,580
166,804
207,944
270,028
724,064
764,456
857,956
993,344
727,056
514,624
260,304
124,168
5,861,328
Buchanan Fields Golf Course
425,986
67,544
95,819
425,238
4,702,377
5,357,849
5,865,218
5,734,467
3,075,103
1,229,562
56,848
14,062
27,050,074
Contra Costa Blvd. - City of PH Median
0
5,236
4,488
2,992
29,172
27,676
32,164
35,156
27,676
10,472
0
0
175,032
Chilpancingo Parkway - City of PH Median
17,204
11,220
0
2,992
9,724
8,228
17,204
17,952
6,732
748
0
2,992
94,996
Chilpancingo Park - PH Park & Rec
14,960
9,724
0
47,124
142,868
132,396
115,940
150,348
85,272
53,856
0
0
752,488
Medians - Golf Club /Old Quarry Road
Meter No. 1 - Safeway Parking Lot
748
0
0
0
2,992
6,732
7,480
1,496
2,244
748
0
0
22,440
2 - Church
2,992
0
0
6,732
28,424
45,628
74,052
117,436
58,344
42,636
25,432
0
401,676
3 - Upper GC Road
0
0
0
6,732
14,960
35,156
39,644
44,880
21,692
12,716
4,488
0
180,268
4 - DVC tennis courts
0
0
0
2,992
20,944
47,124
92,004
104,720
19,448
23,188
8,976
0
319,396
Diablo Valley College (less Stubbs Rd.)
731,619
448,800
432,120
1,068,518
3,392,629
3,902,316
3,961,632
4,173,316
3,451,796
1,888,700
505,798
189,020
24,146,263
Stubbs Road Triplexes
17,952
11,968
14,212
55,352
110,704
90,508
124,916
127,160
86,020
59,840
67,320
20,944
786,896
Taylor Blvd /Civic Drive Medians - City of PH
7,480
0
0
0
41,888
72,556
80,784
83,028
62,084
73,304
25,432
0
446,556
City Landscaping Taylor Blvd /Ruth Drive
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CC Country Club Golf Course
1,092,080
205,700
0
2,632,960
15,483,600
15,588,320
16,852,440
18,232,500
9,780,100
3,309,900
0
0
83,177,600
Viking Drive Landscaping - City of PH
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Valley View MS and College Park HS
109,208
47,872
69,564
178,772
1,517,692
1,798,940
1,564,068
1,528,164
1,096,568
647,768
94,248
23,188
8,676,052
City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard
3,740
1,496
2,244
4,488
20,944
28,424
52,360
50,116
19,448
10,472
5,984
2,244
201,960
Pleasant Hill Police Department
24,684
33,660
26,180
66,572
228,140
265,540
323,884
255,068
211,684
98,736
2,244
0
1,536,392
Pleasant Hill Community Center and Frank
Salfingere Park
103,374
50,116
31,790
90,209
395,617
376,094
386,417
345,950
328,372
83,252
14,287
224
2,205,702
Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane
131,648
98,736
105,468
319,396
1,401,752
1,227,468
1,202,784
1,453,364
1,367,344
561,000
361,284
33,660
8,263,904
Sequoia Schools
216,920
157,080
157,080
7,480
1,028,500
1,103,300
938,740
1,107,040
890,120
811,580
153,340
0
6,571,180
Pleasant Hill Middle School
93,500
56,100
22,440
11,220
635,800
1,196,800
1,926,100
957,440
811,580
482,460
134,640
0
6,328,080
Pleasant Hill Demonstration Garden
8,976
2,244
5,984
5,984
17,204
18,700
36,652
72,556
33,660
20,196
748
0
222,904
Pleasant Oaks Park
183,260
138,380
97,240
374,000
1,021,020
953,700
932,008
1,469,072
579,700
374,000
59,840
0
6,182,220
Hydrant Sales
0
0
1
0
171
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
172
Subtotal - Recycled Water Sales
3,547,260
1,598,709
1,370,099
5,768,417
31,304,234
33,541,082
35,986,781
37,550,208
23,267,264
10,709,976
1,969,912
471,224
187,085,168
HHW Drop -Off Facility
19,448
22,440
35,156
46,376
392,700
318,648
439,824
638,044
228,140
160,820
23,188
0
2,324,784
Maltby Pumping Station
1,860
1,740
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,860
1,800
1,860
1,800
1,860
21,960
4737 Imhoff Place (warehouse)
0
0
0
0
0
0
19,448
17,204
2,244
2,244
748
0
41,888
4838 Imhoff Place (HOB Annex)
2,992
0
0
2,244
41,140
38,148
53,856
58,344
32,164
33,660
6,732
0
269,280
Subtotal - District Remote Sites**l
24,3001
24,180
37,016
50,420
435,700
358,596
514,988
715,452
264,348
198,584
32,468
1,860
2,657,912
GRAND TOTALS
3,571,5601
1,622,889
1,407,115
5,818,837
31,739,934
33,899,678
36,501,769
38,265,660
23,531,612
10,908,560
2,002,380
473,084
189,743,080
*Not in operation during this reporting period
* *Does not include use on treatment plant site of approximately 411 million gallons per year
12
Figure 2
MALTBY
PUMP
STATION
N
O \
✓ m
A
4 "REW �
r�
\ 10 "AEW
i
CC TOPSOIL Ro c EnawEU r'
COUNTY CORP. (N, COU TY 0
YARD QUAR Y �\ _
BLUM VIEW —� ies
ESTATES
(PENDING) 2,PEV+ gpiN O
SEASON'S —�
CEMETERY �O •
COUNTY ANIMA L /� TREATMENT
SERVICES HHWFJ PLANT
CCCSD WAREHOUSE�� • ��
HOB ANNEX
Nay ))) III
IN PLANT USE;
J Uv
��— TRUCK FILL
HYDRANT
9
II � _ GF
v
11 �
000
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTRY CLUB
GOLF COURSE
JTRA COSTA-,,,-
D MEDIANS
PANCINGO m'
BLVD MEDIANS
GOLF CLUB /
"OLD QUARRY ROAD
MEDIANS CHILPANCINGC
PAR
8" REW
STUBBS RD—' •
TRIPLEXES �
CAMPUS
VIKING
,`VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE
U ,, COLLEGE PARK
SCHOOLS
P.H.
CORP.
\ • YARD
P.H.POLICE
TAYLOR /CIVIC DEPT
1 l MEDIANS
B� l
F. SALFINGERE� /`
�Q PARK
CONCORD
LANDSCAPE
PROJECT
AREA
DI I! IJAAIAAI nog nc
n
0
O ♦ 9'Q
�'p♦
TAYLOR BLVD /RUTH DRIB
LANDSCAPING
�
N
a
0 2000 4000 a D 0
FEET Ej
CCCSD RECYCLED m �C P.H. PARK
GREGORY LN�'
WATER SYSTEM o L
IA
H LE E RY i MSEQU
IDDLE
c� S SCHQOL
PIPELINE LEGEND
C PL ANT IL III
� EXISTING O GA E
��. PLANNED EXTENSION P Q S II�o
C M
APPROBMATBOUNDARY R M L E III ��
�J �0
S ® LOCATIONSCUSTOMER ' I\
CONCORD LANDSCAPE AREA
a
26- JAN -2012 10 :33 K:A spclmaps\ mappinq ArecwcAboard_new_ineO6_MOD.dgn 13
\vI„
` i,
qv" ,<
L06011
/
TABLE 3
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JANUARY 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE NTU Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
1/1/2012
<2
6.24
4.40
1.61
59
1/2/2012
<2
3.32
3.80
1.75
85
1/3/2012
<2
2.89
3.80
1.60
149
1/4/2012,
<2
3.29
4.00
1.33
182
1/5/2012
<2
2.08
3.80
1.22
439
1/16/2012
<2
3.77
3.20
1.48
89
1/7/2012
<2
4.64
3.20
1.56
96
1/8/2012
<2
3.55
3.90
1.59
43
1/9/2012
<2
6.15
3.80
1.67
70
1/10/2012
<2
5.95
4.20
1.55
254
1/11/2012
<2
7.10
4.00
1.27
87
1/12/2012
<2
6.59
4.00
1.46
228
1/13/2012
<2
6.64
4.40
1.44
458
1/14/2012
<2
4.98
6.00
1.14
426
1/15/2012
<2
5.53
4.65
1.28
96
1/16/2012
<2
5.55
3.50
1.31
119
1/17/2012
<2
6.20
6.50
1.28
68
1/18/2012
<2
5.52
3.00
1.24
68
1/19/2012
<2
6.69
4.60
1.40
85
1/20/2012
<2
7.03
4.80
1.40
57
1/21/2012
<2
5.98
4.60
1.47
51
1/22/2012
<2
5.80
4.50
1.84
48
1/23/2012
<2
6.50
4.55
1.77
52
1/24/2012
<2
7.63
4.50
1.78
29
1/25/2012,
<2
7.70
3.80
1.59
40
1/26/2012
<2
7.06
4.00
1.48
49
1/27/2012
<2
5.94
4.40
1.36
39
1/28/2012
<2
6.38
4.80
1.42
56
1 /29/2012
<2
6.39
4.20
1.25
41
1 /30/2012
<2
7.38
4.00
1.37
50
1 /31 /2012
<2
6.72
3.60
1.25
50
Minimum
<2
2.08
3.00
1.14
29
Maximum
<2
7.70
6.50
1.84
458
Average
<2
5.72
4.21
1.46
118
14
TABLE 4
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
FEBRUARY 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE NTU Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
2/1/2012
<2
6.69
3.50
1.34
52
2/2/2012
<2
7.50
3.60
1.42
73
2/3/2012
<2
7.01
3.20
1.35
97
2/4/2012
<2
5.86
3.00
1.45
99
2/5/2012
<2
5.98
3.60
1.60
55
2/6/2012
<2
6.59
3.30
1.67
66
2/7/2012
<2
6.45
3.40
1.82
62
2/8/2012
<2
6.73
3.80
1.83
43
2/9/2012
<2
6.36
3.40
1.69
56
2/10/2012
<2
6.38
2.60
1.65
50
2/11 /2012
<2
6.04
5.60
1.71
75
2/12/2012
<2
5.95
4.70
1.63
43
2/13/2012
<2
6.26
5.10
1.50
51
2/14/2012
<2
6.82
5.30
1.46
45
2/15/2012
<2
7.05
4.40
1.40
31
2/16/2012
<2
6.78
5.00
1.48
40
2/17/2012
<2
7.13
4.00
1.44
30
2/18/2012
<2
4.90
4.20
1.57
53
2/19/2012
<2
5.48
4.10
1.51
37
2/20/2012
<2
5.26
3.70
1.59
45
2/21/2012,
<2
7.20
4.60
1.80
47
2/22/2012
<2
6.80
3.90
1.68
60
2/23/2012
<2
7.14
3.20
1.68
83
2/24/2012
<2
7.43
4.20
1.47
67
2/25/2012
<2
5.94
5.00
1.35
226
2/26/2012
<2
6.17
2.50
1.36
55
2/27/2012
<2
7.49
2.00
1.62
60
2/28/2012
<2
7.11
3.00
1.52
94
2/29/2012
<2
6.48
3.50
1.53
51
Minimum
<2
4.90
2.00
1.34
30
Maximum
<2
7.50
5.60
1.83
226
Average
<2
6.52
3.84
1.56
64
15
TABLE 5
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
MARCH 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
3/1/2012
<2
6.01
3.00
1.43
36
3/2/2012
<2
5.96
2.80
1.36
42
313/2012
<2
5.26
3.40
1.43
40
3/4/2012
<2
5.81
3.60
1.52
53
3/5/2012
<2
7.48
2.20
1.58
46
316/2012
<2
6.74
4.40
1.56
69
3/7/2012
<2
6.80
3.00
1.51
39
3/8/2012
<2
6.23
2.60
1.54
109
3/9/2012
<2
5.70
3.40
1.57
64
3/10/2012
<2
5.46
3.00
1.54
82
3/11 12012
<2
6.26
3.60
1.50
67
3/12/2012
<2
7.30
2.80
1.32
53
3/13/2012
<2
5.72
3.40
1.47
104
3/14/2012
<2
6.62
3.20
1.49
44
3/15/2012
<2
5.47
3.40
1.46*
45
3/16/2012
<2
7.54
3.20
1.11
28
3/17/2012
<2
5.84
5.40
1.46
49
3/1812012
<2
6.08
4.70
1.34
37
3/1912012
<2
5.30
3.80
1.15
36
3/20/2012
<2
5.15
3.75
1.26
30
3/21/2012
<2
5.19
2.40
1.30
388
3/2212012
<2
5.46
2.60
1.39
556
3/23/2012
<2
6.93
3.60
1.47
119
3/24/2012
<2
5.61
3.60
1.52
48
3/25/2012
<2
6.43
4.20
1.55
22
3/26/2012
<2
7.40
4.00
1.57
19
3/27/2012
<2
7.03
3.30
1.56
34
3/28/2012
<2
7.00
4.00
1.46
27
3/29/2012
<2
5.48
3.60
1.50
27
3/30/2012
<2
6.35
3.40
1.42
28
3/31/20121
<2
5.29
1 3.80
1.46
28
Minimum
<2
5.15
2.20
1.11
19
Maximum
<2
7.54
5.40
1.58
556
Aver. a
<2
6.17
3.49
1.45
79
* = There were no turbidity readings between 1 pm to 8pm due to computer system
maintenance. However, grab samples collected during the day indicated that turbidity was in
compliance.
16
TABLE 6
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
APRIL 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
4/1/2012
<2
5.86
3.90
1.56
18
4/2/2012
<2
7.28
3.80
1.67
18
4/3/2012
<2
8.10
3.00
1.74
25
4/4/2012
<2
6.98
3.40
1.56
30
4/5/2012
<2
6.73
3.40
1.65
58
4/6/2012
<2
5.69
3.50
1.80
43
4/7/2012
<2
5.39
3.00
1.73
52
4/8/2012
<2
5.76
3.30
1.63
52
4/9/2012
<2
5.42
4.20
1.28
31
4/10/2012
<2
6.54
3.10
1.19
63
4/11/2012
<2
7.20
4.40
1.15
51
4/12/2012
<2
6.29
3.40
1.10
51
4/13/2012
<2
6.83
3.40
0.83
29
4/14/2012
<2
5.76
4.00
1.09
29
4/15/2012
<2
6.22
3.80
1.56
25
4/16/2012
<2
6.74
2.30
1.44
26
4/17/2012
<2
6.80
2.40
1.41
47
4/18/2012
<2
6.64
3.40
1.52
64
4/19/2012
<2
5.91
3.40
1.55
95
4/20/2012
<2
7.02
4.00
1.52
106
4/21/2012
<2
6.48
7.20
1.33
260
4/22/2012
<2
6.48
2.90
1.22
188
4/23/2012
<2
6.20
3.90
1.00
432
4/24/2012
<2
6.85
4.60
1.45
323
4/25/2012
<2
6.56
4.60
1.64
121
4/26/2012
<2
6.82
3.40
1.37
358
4/27/2012
<2
5.42
3.80
1.47
93
4/28/2012
<2
6.32
4.20
1.43
413
4/29/2012
<2
6.23
2.90
1.59
78
4/30/2012
<2
5.40
3.10
1.60
461
Minimum
<2
5.39
2.30
0.83
18
Maximum
<2
8.10
7.20
1.80
461
Average
<2
6.42
3.65
1.43
125
IN
TABLE 7
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
MAY 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line Meter Daily
AVE NTU Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
5/1/2012
<2
5.62
2.40
1.67
210
5/2/2012
<2
5.32
4.30
1.75
539
5/3/2012
<2
6.36
2.60
1.65
292
5/4/2012
<2
7.14
3.00
1.4
484
5/5/2012
<2
5.96
2.00
1.42
322
5/6/2012
<2
5.22
3.00
1.35
263
5/7/2012
<2
5.24
2.70
1.41
683
5/8/2012
<2
6.60
3.00
1.43
579
5/9/2012
<2
6.10
2.80
1.61
810
5/10/2012
<2
4.92
2.00
1.4
629
5/11/2012
<2
5.42
4.10
1.4
648
5/12/2012
<2
5.47
4.60
1.45
778
5/13/2012
<2
5.35
4.00
1.42
698
5/14/2012
<2
5.37
3.10
1.16
334
5/15/2012
<2
5.15
2.20
1.19
651
5/16/2012
<2
6.17
3.10
1.5
705
5/17/2012
<2
4.01
2.10
1.49
646
5/18/2012
<2
2.38
3.30
1.35
661
5/19/2012
<2
2.04
5.00
1.23
762
5/20/2012
<2
2.98
4.20
1.33
497
5/21/2012
<2
3.35
3.60
1.47
724
5/22/2012
<2
3.99
4.10
1.24
868
5/23/2012
<2
2.01
3.45
1.22
724
5/24/2012
<2
6.36
4.40
1.29
727
5/25/2012
<2
2.45
3.60
1.53
701
5/26/2012
<2
1.90
3.20
1.38
907
5/27/2012
<2
2.85
6.10
1.33
721
5/28/2012
<2
2.48
4.50
1.44
726
5/29/2012
<2
5.28
3.40
1.48
463
5/30/2012
<2
5.82
6.40
1.47
782
5/31 /2012
<2
6.42
5.01
1.59
673
Minimum
<2
1.90
2.00
1.16
210
Maximum
<2
7.14
6.40
1.75
907
Average
<2
4.70
3.59
1.42
620
18
TABLE 8
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JUNE 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE NTU Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
6/1/2012
<2
2.56
3.20
1.43
631
6/2/2012
<2
3.60
3.20
1.41
840
6/3/2012
<2
2.71
3.60
1.48
832
6/4/2012
<2
2.47
3.40
1.46
699
6/5/2012
<2
5.49
3.20
1.44
633
6/6/2012
<2
5.26
2.20
1.49
752
6/7/2012
<2
5.37
2.20
1.42
778
6/8/2012
<2
3.48
3.50
1.44
676
6/9/2012
<2
2.05
4.20
1.47
787
6/10/2012
<2
3.24
4.10
1.57
789
6/11/2012
<2
2.81
7.00
1.58
725
6/12/2012
<2
4.87
4.60
1.42
789
6/13/2012
<2
5.46
4.40
1.33
885
6/14/2012
<2
2.80
4.60
1.44
1047
6/15/2012
<2
2.10
2.80
1.42
809
6/16/2012
<2
4.56
3.40
1.38
899
6/17/2012
<2
2.62
3.30
1.42
1035
6/18/2012
<2
5.01
3.40
1.47
1205
6/19/2012
<2
3.12
2.90
1.51
745
6/20/2012
<2
2.26
3.20
1.45
698
6/21/2012
<2
1.55
2.10
1.18
814
6/22/2012
<2
3.67
3.80
1.11
902
6/23/2012
<2
3.85
5.00
1.11
860
6/24/2012
<2
2.56
4.40
0.96
645
6/25/2012
<2
2.58
3.45
0.87
1057
6/26/2012
<2
3.45
3.80
0.88
839
6/27/2012
<2
2.63
4.20
1.01
828
6/28/2012
<2
1.84
3.40
1.08
838
6/29/2012
<2
5.50
3.40
1.05
698
6/30/2012
<2
2.12
2.40
1.23
948
Minimum
<2
1.55
2.10
0.87
631
Maximum
<2
5.50
7.00
1.58
1205
Average
<2
3.39
3.61
1.32
823
m
TABLE 9
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JULY 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
7/1/2012
<2
2.45
6.7
1.35
1136
7/2/2012
<2
2.55
4.2
1.23
542
7/3/2012
<2
4.22
5.2
1.17
797
7/4/2012
<2
1.95
2.8
1.23
803
7/5/2012
<2
2.14
4.1
1.38
554
7/6/2012
<2
4.25
2.2
1.44
1226
7/7/2012
<2
2.68
7
1.41
845
7/8/2012
<2
2.47
4.8
1.46
740
7/9/2012
<2
2.73
3.8
1.44
754
7/10/2012
<2
2.67
2.2
1.45
828
7/11/2012
<2
5.42
7
1.28
831
7/12/2012
<2
2.59
3
1.05
756
7/13/2012
<2
2.37
4.6
1.06
739
7/14/2012
<2
2.78
3.2
1.02
827
7/15/2012
<2
2.77
3.4
1.04
862
7/16/2012
<2
3.33
3.8
1.1
700
7/17/2012
2
2.53
3.5
1.13
1106
7/18/2012
<2
2.99
5.1
1.2
1404
7/19/2012
<2
2.36
3.1
1.31
698
7/20/2012
<2
1.07
2.9
1.33
781
7/21/2012
<2
1.29
4.7
1.38
843
7/22/2012
<2
2.1
3.8
1.42
536
7/23/2012
<2
6.25
5.5
1.42
884
7/24/2012
<2
2.1
3.35
1.6
567
7/25/2012
<2
2.24
3
1.53
993
7/26/2012
<2
1.84
3.75
1.39
776
7/27/2012
<2
2.31
5.7
1.36
1280
7/28/2012
<2
2.58
5.2
1.48
740
7/29/2012
<2
2.21
5
1.64
582
7/30/2012
<2
2.57
4.15
1.45
673
7/31 /2012
<2
2.01
5.8
1.33
1496
Minimum
<2
1.07
2.20
1.02
536
Maximum
2
6.25
7.00
1.64
1496
Average
<2
2.70
4.28
1.33
848
20
TABLE 10
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
AUGUST 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE NTU Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
8/1/2012
<2
1.99
3.45
1.52
600
8/2/2012
<2
1.83
3.70
1.6
796
8/3/2012
<2
1.70
3.15
1.47
874
8/4/2012
<2
2.33
9.00
1.45
921
8/5/2012
<2
3.28
5.30
1.36
854
8/6/2012
<2
5.92
3.20
1.51
531
8/7/2012
<2
2.94
5.32
1.49
938
8/8/2012
<2
3.42
3.75
1.47
857
8/9/2012
<2
2.72
3.40
1.42
780
8/10/2012
<2
2.70
4.45
1.36
782
8/11/2012
<2
2.79
5.00
1.37
1333
8/12/2012
<2
2.70
3.40
1.49
466
8/13/2012
<2
1.82
3.00
1.55
1038
8/14/2012
<2
1.74
3.20
1.59
816
8/15/2012
<2
2.14
3.40
1.53
830
8/16/2012
<2
1.98
2.30
1.57
750
8/17/2012
<2
2.35
4.60
1.62
762
8/18/2012
<2
3.47
7.60
1.67
759
8/19/2012
<2
2.49
3.50
1.52
512
8/20/2012
<2
3.45
4.45
1.47
1302
8/21/2012
<2
3.02
3.45
1.45
482
8/22/2012
<2
2.60
4.00
1.47
703
8/23/2012
<2
1.88
3.95
1.33
650
8/24/2012
<2
1.91
2.75
1.31
748
8/25/2012
<2
2.19
2.40
1.43
737
8/26/2012
<2
1.96
6.10
1.37
782
8/27/2012
<2
2.01
2.60
1.42
639
8/28/2012
<2
3.37
3.70
1.54
834
8/29/2012
<2
3.64
5.85
1.57
768
8/30/2012
<2
2.79
4.80
1.58
377
8/31/20121
<2
1 2.30
1 6.10
1.48
1301
Minimum
<2
1.70
2.30
1.31
377
Maximum
<2
5.92
9.00
1.67
1333
Average
<2
2.63
4.22
1.48
791
21
TABLE 11
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
SEPTEMBER 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On-Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
NTU
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
9/1/2012
<2
2.30
6.20
1.54
443
9/2/2012
<2
3.27
6.60
1.39
604
9/3/2012
<2
2.29
4.40
1.37
584
9/4/2012
<2
3.70
4.10
1.39
1295
9/5/2012
<2
2.30
3.30
1.44
412
9/6/2012
<2
1.81
2.60
1.41
674
9/7/2012
<2
1.80
4.10
1.37
639
9/8/2012
<2
3.23
4.00
1.27
540
9/9/2012
<2
2.00
4.90
1.74
535
9/10/2012
<2
5.78
3.30
1.79
678
9/11/2012
<2
3.08
3.50
1.62
696
9/12/2012
<2
3.93
3.75
1.41
670
9/13/2012
<2
1.72
3.00
1.32
651
9/14/2012
<2
4.49
4.20
1.25
406
9/15/2012
<2
3.02
5.80
1.26
547
9116/2012
<2
2.72
4.00
1.19
465
9/17/2012
<2
2.83
3.05
1.14
706
9/18/2012
<2
4.13
6.20
1.19
648
9/19/2012
<2
3.37
4.50
1.46
664
9/20/2012
<2
3.13
3.15
1.46
617
9/21/2012
<2
3.96
5.60
1.3
642
9/22/2012
<2
1.68
4.30
1.27
597
9/23/2012
<2
2.33
5.80
1.26
571
9/24/2012
<2
3.24
6.10
1.35
732
9/25/2012
<2
2.89
3.00
1.42
651
9/26/2012
<2
2.83
3.80
1.32
723
9/27/2012
<2
2.16
4.25
1.28
520
9/28/2012
<2
2.09
4.75
1.05
382
9/29/2012
<2
1.70
5.00
1.06
619
9/30/2012
<2
1.40
5.20
1.29
433
Minimum
<2
1.40
2.60
1.05
382
Maximum
<2
5.78
6.60
1.79
1295
Average
<2
2.84
4.42
1.35
611
22
TABLE 12
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
OCTOBER 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily AVE
Turbidity NTU
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
10/1/2012
<2
3.02
4.00
1.47
365
10/2/2012
<2
3.68
7.10
1.4
575
10/3/2012
<2
4.57
4.30
1.29
1092
10/4/2012
<2
4.21
2.80
1.34
483
10/5/2012
<2
2.07
5.40
1.21
269
10/6/2012
<2
1.21
4.00
1.33
722
10/7/2012
<2
1.28
5.90
1.25
448
10/8/2012
<2
2.29
4.00
1.16
304
10/9/2012
<2
2.84
4.10
1.15
681
10/10/2012
<2
2.88
9.40
1.18
368
10/11/2012
<2
1.82
1.50
1.09
392
10/12/2012
<2
1.26
2.90
1.22
195
10/13/2012
<2
1.72
6.20
1.19
515
10/14/2012
<2
1.81
7.00
1.14
403
10/15/2012
<2
3.03
3.60
1.22
251
10/16/2012
<2
1.30
5.75
1.26
455
10/17/2012
<2
3.24
3.25
1.24
368
10/18/2012
<2
2.88
4.85
1.27
442
10/19/2012
<2
1.68
4.60
1.21
274
10/20/2012
<2
2.38
4.20
1.35
743
10/21/2012
<2
1.61
3.80
1.43
242
10/22/2012
<2
3.14
3.10
1.44
171
10/23/2012
<2
1.55
4.10
1.27
50
10/24/2012
<2
1.52
4.10
0.85
78
10/25/2012
<2
1.37
3.90
1.1
35
10/26/2012
<2
3.66
3.40
1.49
53
10/27/2012
<2
0.9 '
4.40
1.46
88
10/28/2012
<2
0.94 '
3.80
1.57
154
10/29/2012
<2
1.14
2.85
1.7
103
10/30/2012
<2
0.92 '
4.70
1.58
114
10/31/2012
<2
2.95
2.40
1.47
147
Minimum
<2
0.90
1.50
0.85
35
Maximum
<2
4.57
9.40
1.70
743
Avera a
<2
2.22
4.37
1.30
300
* = Sulfide Not Detected
23
TABLE 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
NOVEMBER 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On -Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
11/1/2012
<2
4.08
3.80
1.42
74
11/2/2012
<2
2.13
3.80
1.43
66
11/3/2012
<2
1.67
6.40
1.49
41
11/4/2012
<2
1.09
4.40
1.55
61
11/5/2012
<2
1.42
2.60
1.40
66
11/6/2012
<2
3.21
5.40
1.29
68
11/7/2012
<2
3.15
3.90
1.23
72
11/8/2012
<2
2.29
3.50
1.29
91
11/9/2012
<2
1.39
4.00
1.26
91
11/10/2012
<2
1.80
3.60
1.19
56
11/11/2012
<2
3.19
3.70
1.16
71
11/12/2012
2
2.45
4.85
0.83
65
11/13/2012
<2
2.60
3.30
0.90
57
11/14/2012
<2
2.74
3.00
0.94
107
11/15/2012
<2
2.54
3.35
0.92
80
11/16/2012
<2
3.92
4.20
0.78
49
11/17/2012
<2
4.26
5.40
0.80
72
11/18/2012
<2
3.36
4.80
0.82
54
11/19/2012
<2
3.08
4.45
0.83
40
11/20/2012
<2
2.88
4.50
0.88
31
11/21/2012
<2
2.75
5.80
0.97
39
11/22/2012
<2
3.12
4.70
0.99
27
11/23/2012
<2
2.74
4.10
0.96
30
11/24/2012
<2
2.31
4.90
0.97
38
11/25/2012
<2
1.63
5.20
1.03
51
11/26/2012
<2
1.70
4.80
1.00
37
11/27/2012
<2
1.25
6.30
1.07
33
11/28/2012
<2
2.55
8.20
1.21
56
11/29/2012
<2
2.26
3.20
1.20
30
11/30/2012
<2
1.45
3.00
1.10
41
Minimum
<2
1.09
2.60
0.78
27
Maximum
2
4.26
8.20
1.55
107
Average
<2
2.50
4.44
1.10
56
24
TABLE 14
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
DECEMBER 2012
Date
Total Coliform
MPN per 100
ml
Dissolved
Oxygen mg /L
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Hach On-Line
Meter Daily
AVE Turbidity
NTU
Daily Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
12/1/2012
<2
1.65
4.40
0.96
27
12/2/2012
<2
1.48
3.90
1.05
31
12/3/2012
<2
1.15
5.30
1.08
19
12/4/2012
<2
2.04
4.70
1.17
30
12/5/2012
<2
2.69
3.10
0.9
38
12/6/2012
<2
2.84
3.40
1.06
23
12/7/2012
<2
1.84
3.30
1.19
32
12/8/2012
<2
2.14
3.00
1.21
26
12/9/2012
<2
1.24
3.40
1.14
28
12/10/2012
<2
2.44
3.00
1.09
18
12/11/2012
<2
1.36
2.20
1.09
23
12/12/2012
<2
1.51
3.80
1.07
34
12/13/2012
<2
2.20
4.20
0.97
20
12/14/2012
<2
2.48
3.30
1.11
38
12/15/2012
<2
1.49
3.80
1.26
27
12/16/2012
<2
1.12
5.20
1.26
24
12/17/2012
<2
1.56
3.60
1.26
20
12/18/2012
<2
3.32
4.60
1.23
25
12/19/2012
<2
4.25
4.20
1.46
31
12/20/2012
<2
2.61
3.40
1.46
28
12/21/2012
<2
2.10
3.20
1.43
40
12/22/2012
<2
2.74
5.40
1.04
25
12/23/2012
<2
3.16
4.30
1.05
24
12/24/2012
<2
3.31
5.10
1.4
21
12/25/2012
<2
4.12
3.40
1.46
26
12/26/2012
<2
3.28
4.20
1.27
39
12/27/2012
<2
3.20
4.00
1.28
33
12/28/2012
<2
3.02
4.00
1.3
20
12/29/2012
<2
3.59
4.30
1.31
18
12/30/2012
<2
3.61
5.20
1.14
18
12/31/2012
<2
4.36
4.00
1.21
18
Minimum
<2
1.12
2.20
0.90
18
Maximum
<2
4.36
5.40
1.46
40
Average
<2
2.51
3.96
1.19
27
25
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Buchanan Fields Golf Course
Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave, Concord.
Inspection Date: 08 -24 -12
Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
N/A
•
■
■
•
■
■
■
■
/1
■
/1
■
Z
■
■
■
.1
■
■
■
.1
■ ■ /1
■ .1 ■
■ .1 = ■
/1 ■ ■
■ .1 ■
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided an updated laminated recycled water use permit. Installed new purple locating
stake at meter box. Located and uncovered meter isolation valve.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 08 -24 -12
® Recycled Paper
26
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5079 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 945534392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Headquarters Office Bldg. (HOB) and Annex, Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 09 -11 -12
Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: Date: 09 -11 -12
N(, ,,,1ed Pan, 27
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez
Inspection Date: 09 -11 -12
Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
El
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: 1 6 — Date: 09 -11 -12
® Recycled Paper
28
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station
Inspection Date: 08 -23 -12
Customer Representative Present: Leo Gonzales, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal water for pumps and wash down hose
Weather conditions: sunny
Standard Observations:
Yes No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
® ❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
® ❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑ ❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑* ®
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑ ❑*
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑* ®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑* ®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑ ❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑* ®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑* ❑
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑* ®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: l " . Date: 08 -23 -12
® Recycled Paper
29
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 09 -11 -12
Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: � Date
09 -11 -12
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 09 -11 -12
Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5
6
7
9.
10
11
12.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
N/A
E
■
■
E
■
■
■
■
.1
■
.1
■
E
■
■
■
.1
■
■
Z
■
I■■■�►�',
■ .1 ■I
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: ( Date: 09 -11 -12
31
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site
Inspection Date
ration Yard
7/31/12
Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore, Maintenance Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill station for landscape median irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken.
Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Added recycled water sign to inside of fence adjacent to Valley View Middle School.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 7/31/12
® R,cyded Paper
32
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Medians ( #1 -4 on Golf Club Rd, Old Quarry Rd, Contra Costa Blvd,
Chilpancingo Pkwy, Taylor Blvd /Civic Dr); Viking Dr landscaping, and Taylor Blvd /Ruth Dr
landscaping
Inspection Date: 9/6/2012
Customer Representative Present: Barry Milliken, Lead Gardener
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Installed recycled water sign for median at east end of Golf Club Rd. near 7 -11 store.
Inspector's Signature: _ Date: 9/6/2012
® Recycled Paper
33
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Station (330 Civic Drive)
Inspection Date: 12 -10 -12
Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore, Maintenance Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: , Date: 12 -10 -12
® Recycled Paper
34
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5079 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Conco Companies
Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez
Inspection Date: 08 -23 -12
Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck washing, Mixing agent, Dust control
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
Z
■
■
►1
■
■
■
■
//
■
/1
■
■
■
Z
■
.1
■
■
■
.1
M ■ A
■
0 ■ .1 ■
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided customer with various new recycled water signs /tags for replacement of old ones.
No vehicles are currently haulina recvcled water.
Inspector's Signature: I °�
Date: 08 -23 -12
® Recycled Paper
35
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course
Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Rd, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 8/31/2012
Customer Representative Present: John Martin, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course and clubhouse landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: sunnv
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Installed new recycled water signage at pond equipment.
Inspector's Signature Date: 8/31/2012
® Recycled Paper
36
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County
Location of Site: Animal Shelter, Martinez
Inspection Date: 9/6/2012
Customer Representative Present Mary Tennyson, Operations Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and dog kennel wash down
Weather conditions: sunny
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
®
❑*
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: i °0 Date: 9/6/2012
® Recycled Paper
37
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County
Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez
Inspection Date: 9/30/2012
Customer Representative Present: Roland Hindsman, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
N/A
/1
■
■
E
■
■
/1
■
■
■
.1
■
E
■
■
■
/1
■
■
.1
■
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: I Date: 9/30/12
® Recycled Paper
38
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil
Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez
Inspection Date: 7/09/12
Customer Representative Present: Shane Einevoll, Operations Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control
Weather conditions: Sunny and warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
N/A
•
■
■
•
■
■
/1
■
■
■
Z
■
■
■
.1
■
.1
■
■
.1
■
■ ■ �1
■ eI ■
■ ■ �I
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Replaced recycled water sign on K -rail at entrance to site.
Inspector's Signature: I
Date: 7/09/12
® Recycled Paper
39
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553. -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: County Quarry
Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez
Inspection Date: 08 -27 -12
Customer Representative Present: Chris Gray, Operations Manager
Application of Recycled Water at Site: process water for base rock manufacturing, concrete
batch plant and dust control. Minimal irrigation use along south and west fence lines.
Weather conditions: sunny
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
IT
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided new recycled water signage at several locations.
Inspector's Signature
Date: 08 -27 -12
® Recycled Paper
40
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 50191mhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College
Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 8/31/2012
Customer Representative Present: Joe Morgado , Lead Gardener
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and water pond feature
Weather conditions: Sunny
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
®
❑*
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Issued new laminated recycled use permit and new recycled water Do's and Don'ts signage.
Inspector's Signature
Date: 8/31/2012
® Recycled Paper
41
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5079 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 8/31/2012
Customer Representative Present: Monica Olson, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, mild
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Adjusted site pressure and installed new recycled water tag on irrigation valve.
Inspector's Signature:
Date: 8/31/2012
® aew�:ed raue�
42
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5079 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Middle School
Inspection Date: 08 -21 -12
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: - —`\ Date: 08 -21 -12
® Recycled Paper
43
L Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools
Inspection Date: 08 -21 -12
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided two additional recycled water signs at middle school.
Inspector's Signature: I —' \_ Date: 08 -21 -12
® Recycled Paper
44
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Valley View Middle and College Park High Schools
Inspection Date: 08 -21 -12
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow
-up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided additional recycled water sign for baseball field backstop at middle school.
Inspector's Signature: Date: 08 -21 -12
45 ® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Chilpancincio Park
Inspection Date
09 -13 -12
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: I ___ Date: 09 -13 -12
® Recycled Paper
46
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park
Inspection Date: 09 -13 -12
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
/1
■
■
*
■
■
■
■
/1
■
/1
■
//
■
■
■
.1
■
■
.1
■
1 .1 ■
10=06411
K1 ■ ■
■ .1 ■
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: ( ,` Date: 09 -13 -12
® Recycled Paper
47
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Park
Inspection Date
09 -13 -12
Customer Representative Present: Tom Bradley, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunny, warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
Yes
No
N/A
/1
■
■
/.
■
■
■
■
/1
■
//
■
/1
■
■
■
Z
■
■
Z
■
■ ■ .1
a ■ Re. 1 ■
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: I Date: 09 -13 -12
® Recycled Paper
48
L Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park (147 Gregory Lane)
Inspection Date: 12 -10 -12
Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith, Park Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunnv. warm
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
®
❑*
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: Date: 12 -10 -12
Recycled Paper
49
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2012 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes
Location of Site: 700 -780 Stubbs Road Buildings 1 -7, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 8/31/2012
Customer Representative Present: #1 Doug Brown, #2 +3 Jean Edwards, #4 +5 Jim Freethy,
#6 Jeanne Papir, #7 Audrey Han (owners)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: sunnv, mild
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Installed new recycled water signage in two landscape areas
Inspector's Signature: � Date
8/31/2012
® Recycled Paper