Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.f. Secure services of arbitrator re Scott Kahlor grievanceCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS �+ . POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: March 15, 2012 Subject: DIRECT STAFF TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF AN ARBITRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISTRICT'S GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE — SCOTT KAHLOR GRIEVANCE Submitted By Initiating Dept. /Div.: Christopher Ko, Human Resources Administration /Human Resources Manager Division REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: u�� �,Av - #&- a�� C. KoR. Musgraves A. Farrell James M. Kelly, General Manager ISSUE: When a grievance has been appealed to the Board level, the Board must employ a neutral third party to hear the matter and recommend action to the Board in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the District and the CCCSD Employees' Association, Public Employees' Union, Local One, Article III, Section 2.5. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to secure the services of an arbitrator in accordance with the District's grievance appeal procedures. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The District and the Union share the cost of the arbitrator and court reporter for grievances. An estimated cost of these services is $3,000 per day, or $1,500 per party. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None. BACKGROUND: Local One has filed a grievance against the District for denying Construction Inspector Scott Kahlor the opportunity to participate in the oral board for Maintenance Supervisor. Although Human Resources staff determined that Mr. Kahlor met the minimum qualifications for the position, he was not determined to be among the most qualified group of candidates, and therefore, was not invited to the oral board interview. The General Manager appointed Director of Administration, Randall M. Musgraves, as the Hearing Officer. The Step Three Hearing was held on January 27, 2012. At this hearing, the Union stated that its interpretation of Article III, Section 10.1 is that if an employee meets the minimum qualifications, he /she must be invited to the oral board. The District disagreed and argued that the issue raised in this grievance has already been the subject of previous grievances brought by Local One. In each case, the District's procedures regarding the open /promotional process have been upheld, and the grievances denied. The District's practice is that a screening committee will C:\ Users \danderson\AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \DVCG8C5G \Position Paper Kahlor 03- 15- 12.doc POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: March 15, 2012 Subject DIRECT STAFF TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF AN ARBITRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISTRICT'S GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE - SCOTT KAHLOR GRIEVANCE evaluate the qualifications of each candidate who has met the minimum requirements for this position. The highest- ranking candidates will be invited to participate in the examination process. Applicants meeting the minimum qualifications are not guaranteed advancement to the examination, and the decision of the screening committee is final. Mr. Musgraves concluded that the District has the right to determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotion under Article I, Section 2.2 — District Rights of the MOU, and has demonstrated a 21 -year of consistent practice in its application for internal candidates and all positions filled under the open competitive process defined in Article III, Section 10.1. This matter has been reviewed by the Human Resources Committee at its meeting on March 8, 2012. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Direct staff to secure the services of an arbitrator in accordance with the District's grievance appeal procedures. C:\ Users\ danderson \AppData \Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \DVCG8C5G\Position Paper Kahlor 03- 15- 12.doc