Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.a. Accept 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual ReportCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7-a. POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: March 1, 2012 subject: BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2011 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT Submitted By Initiating Dept. /Div.: Mary Lou Esparza, Plant Operations / Laboratory Laboratory Superintendent REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: c �- &'VA �d- P L J &-, 0 M. Esparza D. Berger M. Orr A. Farrell James ok Kelly Generef Manager ISSUE: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD's) 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report has been prepared for submission to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Bay Section. This annual report is attached for Board of Directors' information and acceptance. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject the 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report, which is not recommended. BACKGROUND: Significant accomplishments for this year's Recycled Water Program are described in the attached 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. In particular, the District was awarded over $1.3 million in federal and state grants for planning and construction of recycled water projects. The District also received two formal commendations from customers in recognition of the District's efforts developing recycled water projects in the community. Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality standards, except for dissolved oxygen (DO) of less than 1.0 mg /L on October 3, 2011. Excessive microbial growth in the forebay or clearwell is believed to be the cause of low DO. The District is reviewing standard operating procedures for forebay and clearwell management, and will train the operators accordingly in 2012. The report was reviewed by the Recycled Water Committee at their February 21, 2012 meeting, and was recommended for Board acceptance. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept the 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Berger \2012 \2011 Recycled Water Annual Report.doc 2011 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT v Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, CA 94553 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report Facility: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) Water Reuse Program Order: 96 -011 Report Due Date: March 15, 2012 Period Covered by this Report: January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments are prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 2.( 2- r� 2 y M Date Signature of Official Margaret P. Orr, P.E. Director of Plant Operations CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 2011 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT INDEX Page No. Discharger's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water ......... ............................... 1 -5 Figure 1 Resolution of Recognition by the Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Buchanan Fields Golf Course, Concord ........................................ ............................... 25 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Headquarters Office Building and Annex Building, Martinez ........................... 26 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Martinez .............................. 27 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Maltby Pump Station, Martinez ......................................... ............................... 28 N:\ ENVRSEC \Admin \Pettersen \Recvcled Water Report 2012 \Index New.doc Board and Certificate of Appreciation from the Pleasant Hill Instructional Garden............................................................................ ............................... 6 -7 Figure 2 Recycled Water at Work ............................................ ............................8 -9 Table 1 Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2011 ....................... ............................... 10 Table 2 Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2011 .............................. ............................... 11 Figure 3 CCCSD Recycled Water System Map ................................ ............................... 12 Table 3 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — January ........... ............................... 13 Table 4 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — February ........... ............................... 14 Table 5 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — March .............. ............................... 15 Table 6 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — April ................. ............................... 16 Table 7 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — May ................. ............................... 17 Table 8 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — June ................. ............................... 18 Table 9 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — July .................. ............................... 19 Table 10 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — August ............. ............................... 20 Table 11 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — September ...... ............................... 21 Table 12 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — October ........... ............................... 22 Table 13 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — November ....... ............................... 23 Table 14 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — December ....... ............................... 24 RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Buchanan Fields Golf Course, Concord ........................................ ............................... 25 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Headquarters Office Building and Annex Building, Martinez ........................... 26 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Martinez .............................. 27 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Maltby Pump Station, Martinez ......................................... ............................... 28 N:\ ENVRSEC \Admin \Pettersen \Recvcled Water Report 2012 \Index New.doc CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Treatment Plant Site, Martinez ........................................ ............................... 29 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Warehouse (4737 Imhoff Place), Martinez ....................... ............................... 30 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Corporation Yard, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill . ............................... 31 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Medians ( #1 - #4 on Golf Club Road, Old Quarry Road, Contra Costa Boulevard, Chilpancingo Parkway, Taylor Blvd. /Civic Drive) Viking Drive Landscaping, and Taylor Blvd. /Ruth Drive Landscaping, Pleasant Hill ..... 32 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Pleasant Hill Police Station, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill .................. 33 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Conco Companies, Martinez .......................................................... ............................... 34 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course, Pleasant Hill .................. ............................... 35 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa County Animal Shelter, Martinez ............................. ............................... 36 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa County Corporation Yard, Martinez ......................... ............................... 37 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa Topsoil, Martinez ..................................................... ............................... 38 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CountyQuarry, Martinez ................................................................ ............................... 39 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill .............................................. ............................... 40 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Demonstration Garden, Pleasant Hill ...................... 41 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Pleasant Hill Middle School, Pleasant Hill .............. 42 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools, PleasantHill ................................................................................... ............................... 43 N:\ ENVRSEC \Admin \Pettersen \Recvcled Water Report 2012 \Index New.doc CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Valley View Middle School and College Park High School, Pleasant Hill .............................................................. ............................... 44 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Chilpancingo Park, Pleasant Hill ............... 45 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park, Pleasant Hill .......................................................................... ............................... 46 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Oaks Park, Pleasant Hill ............ 47 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Hill Park, Pleasant Hill ................ 48 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Stubbs Road Triplexes, Pleasant Hill ................ ............................... RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORTS CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report City of Lafayette Public Works ....................................................... ............................... 50 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Contra Costa County Public Works ................................................ ............................... 51 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report DiabloGeneral Engineering ........................................................... ............................... 52 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report EvansBrothers ............................................................................... ............................... 53 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Roto- Rooter .................................................................................... ............................... 54 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report SundanceLandscaping ................................................................. ............................... 55 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report WyvernFarms ................................................................................ ............................... 56 N:\ ENVRSEC \Admin \Pettersen \Recvcled Water Report 2012 \Index New.doc iii DISCHARGER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT RECYCLED WATER REPORTING DISCHARGER: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District DATE OF REPORT: February 14, 2012. RESOLUTION: 96 -011 REPORTING PERIOD: January through December 2011 RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM OVERVIEW Recycled water is an integral part of the mission of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ( CCCSD), and CCCSD has been operating a successful and growing recycled water program since 1996. Since that time, CCCSD has been providing recycled water for in -plant usage, irrigation customers, and commercial uses. In 2011, CCCSD provided approximately 510 acre -feet (AF) (or 167 million gallons (MG)) of recycled water to a variety of customers in Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez near the Interstate 680 freeway. Recycled water was used for landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses, and street medians and for commercial uses such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust control, and washing kennels at the local animal shelter. CCCSD also operates a recycled water truck fill hydrant program to make recycled water available for construction uses in the area. In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD also used approximately 1,260 AF /year (AFY), or 410 MG /year, of recycled water internally at CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant in Martinez for process water and landscape irrigation. The total volume of recycled water provided by CCCSD in 2011 for offsite customer locations and internal uses was approximately 1,770 AFY (577 MG /year). This annual report covers CCCSD's production and distribution of tertiary- treated recycled water over the period of January through December 2011. Figure 1 presents formal commendations received from CCCSD recycled water customers in 2011. Figure 2 includes a number of photographs showing pictures of recycled water use sites. Table 1 gives a summary of recycled water usage for calendar year 2011 for reuse application categories. Table 2 shows the monthly usage of recycled water by customer. Figure 3 is a detailed map showing the location of each recycled water customer. Tables 3 through 14 present the water quality characteristics. The 2011 Recycled Water Site Inspection Reports follow these tables. All sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011. Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality standards, except for October 3, 2011, when the dissolved oxygen (DO) was below 1.0 mg /L. Excessive microbial growth in the forebay or clearwell is believed to be the cause of low DO. N: \ENVRSEC\Admin \Pettersen \Recycled Water Report 2012 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2011 Revision 2- 10- 12.doc CCCSD is reviewing standard operating procedures for forebay and clearwell management and will train the operators accordingly in 2012. Coliform grab samples collected on May 26, 27, 28, and 29 were invalid due to contamination detected in the laboratory dilution water used for sample preparation. The chemist who made this error has since retired. As is standard, the chemists will receive training on the standard operating procedures in 2012, and we do not anticipate this error occurring again. FUTURE EXPANSION CCCSD continues to seek opportunities and partnerships to expand recycled water use and obtain financial assistance to build new recycled water projects. In 2011, CCCSD was awarded over $1.3 million in state and federal grant funding for recycled water projects. While landscape irrigation projects have historically represented the core of CCCSD's Recycled Water Program, CCCSD continues to pursue development of a large -scale industrial reuse project at two nearby petroleum refineries that would use recycled water all year instead of just seasonally, as with landscape irrigation projects. The following describes CCCSD's work in 2011 to expand recycled water use. Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide up to 22,500 AFY (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell Martinez Refinery and the Tesoro Refinery for use as cooling tower makeup water and as boiler feedwater. The refinery project is particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round demand, and it could potentially make use of existing conveyance and storage facilities that are already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to each refinery. However, because the project would be costly (up to $100M), CCCSD needs financial assistance and /or project partners to make the project cost- effective. In this regard, CCCSD is actively pursing federal grant funding through the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) and the federal Title XVI program and continues to look for possible sources of state funding. In 2011, CCCSD was awarded an $180,000 Title XVI planning grant from the United States Bureau of Reclamation to fund 50% of the costs to prepare a feasibility study and environmental documentation for the proposed project. The Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) has agreed to participate and share the local costs. The feasibility study will be completed in 2013. CCCSD has conducted significant outreach efforts in 2011 to inform and educate federal, state, and local elected officials about the importance of this project and has obtained an extensive list of project supporters. Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project In 2012, CCCSD plans to begin construction of the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project (formerly the A -Line Project) that will provide up to 190 AFY (62 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation at businesses and street medians in the Diamond /Meridian Park Boulevard area of Concord. The project includes construction of about 2.5 miles of new recycled water distribution piping and approximately 34 customer connections and is expected to be completed in 2013. The project is covered by the Zone One Project Agreement with CCWD discussed in the next paragraph. The total cost for this project is N: \ENVRSEC\Admin \Pettersen \Recycled Water Report 2012 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2011 Revision 2- 10- 12.doc estimated to be $4.2 million. In 2011, the project was awarded a $1,030,000 Proposition 84 Implementation Grant from the State Department of Water Resources and a $97,000 Title XVI planning grant from the United States Bureau of Reclamation. CCCSD is currently seeking federal legislative authorization and appropriation for an additional $1 million in Title XVI funding. In 2011, CCCSD completed all environmental documentation to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which allows CCCSD to qualify for Title XVI construction funding, if it becomes available. Recycled Water Zone One Project CCCSD has an agreement with CCWD to allow CCCSD to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and light commercial uses in the Zone One Project area, which consists of portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Concord near the Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD constructed and operates approximately 11 miles of recycled water distribution pipelines in these areas, and is working to connect new, cost - effective recycled water customers located near existing distribution pipelines. In 2011, CCCSD connected several additional roadway medians in Pleasant Hill to recycled water on Taylor Blvd, Civic Drive, and Old Quarry Road. These turf-style medians were previously irrigated with potable water. CCCSD is continuing efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective landscape irrigation customers in the Zone One project area. CCCSD was formally recognized by two of our recycled water customers in 2011 with commendations acknowledging CCCSD's efforts to expand recycled water use in the community. These commendations (shown in Figure 1) were presented to CCCSD by the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Board of Directors and the Pleasant Hill Instruction Garden. Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a preferred development plan (Clustered Villages concept) consisting of a mixture of commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational uses interspersed between parks and open space. This mixture of uses will create opportunities to use recycled water, not only for landscape irrigation but, also for non - potable uses such as toilet flushing and cooling towers in commercial buildings. Recycled water demand for the new development is estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build out. In 2011, CCCSD completed a Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons Station redevelopment that evaluated alternatives and costs for new recycled water infrastructure needed to meet the anticipated demand. The redevelopment of the property and construction of supporting infrastructure is not expected to begin for another five to ten years, because of additional environmental documentation and planning work that must be completed by the City of Concord and Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the City of Concord and /or a developer. 3 N: \ENVRSECWdmin \Pettersen \Recycled Water Report 2012 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2011 Revision 2- 10- 12.doc Diablo Country Club Satellite Recycled Water Project The Diablo Country Club has approached CCCSD and the East Bay Municipal Utility District ( EBMUD) about constructing a satellite recycled water treatment plant to supply irrigation water to their golf course located near Danville. CCCSD would provide wastewater from its sewerage collection system and receive solids returned from the satellite plant. The Diablo Country Club has proposed to finance the capital and operating costs of the satellite plant and own and operate the facilities. CCCSD and EBMUD (the existing water purveyor) are coordinating with the Country Club to complete a feasibility study of the proposed project. TRUCK FILL HYDRANT PROGRAM CCCSD operates a Truck Fill Hydrant Program to make recycled water available to contractors, companies, and public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and other non- potable uses. Demand for recycled water from CCCSD's truck fill program was limited in 2011 due to higher than normal rainfall and easing of prior drought restrictions by local water agencies. Only 7,000 gallons were used in 2011 compared to about one million gallons distributed during the last drought period in 2009. CCCSD will continue to make recycled water available through the Truck Fill Hydrant Program as an ongoing resource to the community to help promote recycled water and provide a reliable water supply for future droughts. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE CCWD field crews have performed maintenance and repair work on CCCSD's recycled water distribution system under contract since 2004. CCWD cross - connection control specialists also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections for new recycled water sites and testing and recertification of existing sites where piping modifications have been made. CCCSD completed a filter maintenance project in 2011 that replaced worn media at the top of the filter beds and added additional media to replace media lost during routine backwashing. CCCSD is also completing a polymer and filter backwashing optimization study. In 2011, CCCSD completed a condition assessment and cathodic protection survey of CCCSD's 42 inch diameter industrial recycled water pipeline, which would be used by CCCSD in the future to supply recycled water to the refineries. Minor repairs were made to the cathodic protection system based on the findings of the corrosion protection survey. CUSTOMER TRAINING CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate customers about the precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water Site Supervisors. During annual site inspections, CCCSD provides refresher training to customer staff where needed and verifies that each customer has up to date training materials, including CCCSD's brochures and guidance documents on the proper use of recycled water. 4 N: \ENVRSEC\Admin \Pettersen \Recycled Water Report 2012 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2011 Revision 2- 10- 12.doc SALT AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control (SWRCB) adopted a Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires each agency using recycled water for urban irrigation to develop a salt and nutrient management plan by May 2014. However, CCCSD understands that the SWRCB plans to develop a waiver process by which groundwater basins that are not likely to have adverse impacts from recycled water irrigation (such as those within CCCSD's service area) can be exempted from the need to prepare salt and nutrient management plans. Due to the very limited extent that groundwater is used as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, it appears that CCCSD's recycled water program would likely qualify for the waiver process as currently envisioned by the SWRCB. LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER The Board of Directors of CCCSD has consistently expressed an interest in maximizing recycled water opportunities. However, there are many institutional and financial impediments that are outside the control of CCCSD. On the institutional side, CCCSD must work with the potable water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale recycled water to them or obtain their permission to purvey recycled water. Often the potable water purveyor asserts it has significant sunk costs in existing facilities, and contends the California duplication of services law allows it to recoup stranded costs if recycled water is made available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the applicability of this law, the issue can add a significant additional cost to many recycled water projects. In addition, the cost to construct new recycled water treatment and conveyance facilities is very high. For example, recycled water projects typically require construction of additional treatment facilities and pipelines through congested urban areas, which makes expansion costly. When all of these costs are added together, the unit cost of recycled water often exceeds the cost of other available, but less - sustainable, water supplies. Therefore, additional sources of funding are needed to make recycled water project costs competitive with other alternatives available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state and federal funding for recycled water projects has restricted the growth of CCCSD's recycled water program and other recycled water programs statewide. Despite these challenges, CCCSD is committed to increasing recycled water use in the Bay Area by developing new recycled water projects where financially viable. N7 N: \ENVRSEC\Admin\Pettersen \Recycled Water Report 2012 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2011 Revision 2- 10- 12,doc FIGURE 1 - COMMENDATIONS r-4 ..,� Recreant N_f: Board of Directors Recreation 6e Park District P op c. Parks & Progr.ims Sincc "951 147 Gregory nt?i Plc, o c H CA 94523 Resolution - -►.,.� www plcdSanth.'irtc corn PLEASMT $III. WREAMON & PA" DISTRICT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,, STi4T£ OF CALWOMM BOARD OF DMECTO$S IN THE MATTER OF RMUMON 2011-01 -1 sA RECOGNITION OF CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT OUTSTANDIN6 EFFORTS ON THE RECYCLED WATER PROJECT AT PLEASANT MILL PARK THE PLEASANT HILL RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DOES FIND: WEIEREAS, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District is an agency that provides wastewater for the Contra Costa community and recycled water for landscape use; and Over a year ago, Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District began the process of bringing recycled water to Pleasant Hill Park and through the cooperative efforts of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District providing necessary funding for irrigation design services, the Recreation & Park District was able to make water system infrastructure changes to allow for the connection to the recycled water system; and WIEREAS, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District was terrific to work with, the project went smoothly and the Recreation & Park District was able to accomplish the project of bringing recycled water to Pleasant Hill Park. This accomplishment will help conserve California's limited water resources and will provide a drought- proof, environmentally - friendly and sustainable water supply for our park; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLAD that the Board of Directors and staff of the Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District hereby recognize Central Contra Costa Sanitary District for their outstanding contributions and efforts towards the successful completion of the recycled water project at Pleasant Hill Park. PASM AM ADO FM on January 13, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Bonato, Donaghu, Glover, Shepard, Sterrett NOES:�- S� I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was approved by the vote indicated herein above at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors on January 13, 2011. -k a Robert B. Berggren, Clerk of the Board Pleasant Hill Instructional Garden C� Living Landscape: A California wildlife Habitat, Garden PK ►� P.O. Box 23454, Pleasant Hill, Ca. 94523 http; / /phio.webs.com— Email: hec arden@ rodi .net p 9 p 9Y '..� i Central Contra Costa Sanitary District _ Thank you for your generous contribution in support of the garden, enabling our water feature, and for bringing recycled water to the garden. Pleasant Hill Instructional Garden, Board of Directors Date October 30, 201 1 Teacher, Mt. Diablo Adult Education; President, PHIG Date —h4' October 30, 201 1 '11 C m m 0 m v D 0 Z cn OD FIGURE 2 RECYCLED WATER AT WORK cD L711 N� FIGURE 2 RECYCLED WATER AT WORK TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE Calendar Year: 2011 Reuse Application Category No. of Sites Area Applied (Acres) Amount Distributed MG % of Total Reuse Flow Landscape Irrigation 28 192 158.8 28 Parks 5 22 15.7 3 Golf Courses 2 110 93.9 16 Green Belts 8 1 1.1 0 Schools 4 52 42.3 7 Other 9 7 5.8 1 Agriculture 0 0 0.0 0 Vineyards 0 0 0.0 0 Other 0 0 0.0 0 Industrial (1) 6 NIA 417.4 72 Cooling 0 0 0.0 0 Other 5 N/A 7.4 1 Environmental Enhancement (2) 0 0 0.0 0 Dual Plumbing (3) 1 1 0.9 0 Total (4) 35 193 577.1 100 Notes: 1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, truck fill hydrant, and treatment plant site. 2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland/marsh applications, etc. 3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation). 10 Table 2 Monthly Report on Recycled Water -- Calendar Year 2011 CUSTOMERS 1% Total for JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Calendar (All readings in gallons) 2011 Conco 27,010 23,031 18,408 18,371 44,139 49,099 56,683 122,650 120,076 62,638 40,661 36,293 619,060 CC Topsoil 25,507 3,216 17,503 90,957 127,534 145,561 187,898 219,837 166,729 66,273 56,848 34,558 1,142,420 CC County Corp Yard 4,488 2,992 1,496 5,236 41,888 31,416 35,156 125,664 121,924 2,992 4,488 4,488 382,228 CC County Animal Shelter 13,900 7,700 9,200 18,500 58,200 140,400 195,900 189,400 156,800 55,500 13,247 14,487 873,234 Pacheco (Seasons) Cemetery* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 County Quarry Products 246,092 143,616 133,144 426,360 677,688 653,752 561,748 952,952 706,112 468,996 392,700 311,916 5,675,076 Buchanan Fields Golf Course 59,616 18,550 50,041 2,063,882 3,484,034 4,193,961 4,050,944 5,339,448 3,330,994 1,194,257 175,331 842,697 24,803,755 Contra Costa Blvd. - City of PH Median 0 0 0 7,480 20,944 30,668 20,944 38,148 27,676 14,212 1,496 0 161,568 Chilpancingo Parkway - City of PH Median 21,692 748 0 36,232 21,464 20,716 21,876 22,212 19,968 12,588 11,740 5,244 194,480 Chilpancingo Park - PH Park & Rec 0 0 0 68,068 87,516 90,508 70,312 118,184 83,776 35,156 9,724 13,464 576,708 Medians - Golf Club /Old Quarry Road Meter No. 1 - Safeway Parking Lot 1,496 1,496 0 748 748 748 1,496 0 4,488 748 0 0 11,968 2 - Church 0 1,496 0 11,968 71,060 25,432 30,668 100,232 26,180 11,220 748 0 279,004 3 - Upper GC Road 748 0 0 12,716 17,204 23,188 18,700 32,912 17,952 9,724 3,740 0 136,884 4 - DVC tennis courts 0 0 0 9,724 24,684 18,700 25,432 44,132 18,700 16,456 4,488 0 162,316 Diablo Valley College (less Stubbs Rd.) 696,388 735,733 398,609 2,197,026 3,097,094 3,308,703 3,161,646 4,061,116 2,985,118 1,408,933 910,615 734,461 23,695,443 Stubbs Road Triplexes 748 748 1,496 36,652 80,036 109,956 69,564 134,640 90,508 72,556 90,508 45,628 733,040 Taylor Blvd /Civic Drive Medians - City of PH 0 0. 0 0 0 0 19,448 60,588 62,832 7,480 2,992 4,488 157,828 City Landscaping Taylor Blvd /Ruth Drive 0 0 0 0 1,496 2,244 2,992 1,496 748 0 0 0 8,976 CC Country Club Golf Course 0 0 0 5,800,740 9,548,220 12,360,700 7,857,740 19,406,860 8,919,900 2,412,300 1,133,220 1,630,640 69,070,320 Viking Drive Landscaping - City of PH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley View MS and College Park HS 3,740 7,480 26,180 844,492 1,622,412 1,445,884 1,005,312 1,718,904 1,231,956 316,404 171,292 106,964 8,501,020 City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard 2,992 2,992 2,992 13,464 7,480 10,472 14,212 18,700 17,204 9,724 6,732 8,976 115,940 Pleasant Hill Police Department 0 0 2,244 87,516 329,120 276,012 171,292 399,432 162,316 74,800 17,952 7,480 1,528,164 Pleasant Hill Community Center and Frank Salfingere Park 0 75 3,142 156,257 337,049 303,090 165,906 419,852 46,226 80,036 249,084 65,450 1,826,167 Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane 68,816 4,488 1,496 374,748 1,610,444 1,193,060 807,840 1,605,956 879,648 293,964 240,856 189,992 7,271,308 Sequoia Schools 0 3,740 0 7,480 1,107,040 273,020 302,940 1,858,780 927,520 344,080 317,900 0 5,142,500 Pleasant Hill Middle School 134,640 67,320 3,740 119,680 927,520 534,820 403,920 1,129,480 931,260 138,380 306,680 265,540 4,962,980 Pleasant Hill Demonstration Garden 5,236 4,488 5,236 7,480 13,464 25,432 11,220 21,692 15,708 12,716 8,976 17,204 148,852 Pleasant Oaks Park 86,020 3,740 29,920 467,500 1,021,020 830,280 575,960 1,282,820 755,480 172,040 271,524 412,896 5,909,200 Hydrant Sales 0 0 0 0 3,300 1,700 0 1,100 0 900 0 0 7,000 Subtotal - Recycled Water Sales 1,399,129 1,033,649 704,847 12,883,276 24,382,799 26,099,522 19,847,749 391427,188 21,827,800 7,295,072 4,443,543 4,752,866 164,097,439 HHW Drop -Off Facility 2,244 2,244 26,180 288,728 409,904 517,616 385,968 664,224 284,988 68,068 82,280 41,140 2,773,584 Maltby Pumping Station 1,860 1,680 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,860 1,860 21,960 4737 Imhoff Place (warehouse) 0 0 0 748 2,244 748 748 2,244 3,740 2,992 2,244 0 15,708 4838 Imhoff Place (HOB Annex) 748 0 1,496 11,968 29,920 47,872 32,912 44,132 33,660 7,480 9,724 5,984 225,896 Subtotal - District Remote Sites*i 4,852 3,924 29,536 303,244 443,928 568,036 421,488 712,460 324,188 80,400 96,108 48,984 3,037,148 GRAND TOTALS 1,403,981 1,037,573 734,383 13,186,520 24,826,727 26,667,558 20,269,237 40,139,648 22,151,988 7,375,472 4,539,651 4,801,850 167,134,587 *Not in operation during this reporting period * *Does not include use on treatment plant site of approximately 410 million gallons per year ill FIGURE 3 MALTBY PUMP STATION IN 1 R�tytr.LL CC TOPSOIL N6W C4rN COUNTY CORP. YARD BLUM VIEW _ ESTATES � j f, I (PENDING) eW II, � II iP OP } SEASON'S It ` II �� % ,� i �f�l CEMETERY COUNTY ANIMAL REATMENT SERVICES HHWF PLANT CCCSD WAREHOUSE At HOB ANNEX IN PLANT USE ; FREEWAY 4 r• ����,�, ►, II � 111 i <<O 4VF CONTRA COSTA--4,,' `1 BLVD MEDIANS �✓'�r CHILPANCINGO CONTRA COSTA BLVD MEDIANS COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE GOLF CLUB / OLD QUARRY ROAD MEDIANS CHILPANCINGO PARK-,*,, �y / COUNTY QUARRY k r- TRUCK FILL HYDRANT CONCORD LANDSCAPE — PROJECT AREA CHANAN FIELDS 3OLF COURSE �O� %` I l Oil . IONI ! e• � STUBBS RD 1111w �y9 TRIPLEXES ~� • CAMPUS N ,9 VIKING �i VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE) F COLLEGE PARK SCHOOLS ` P.H. C)v- CORP. YARD d l P.H. POLICE TAYLOR BLVD /RUTH DRIVE w TAYLOR /CIVIC DEPT LANDSCAPING, MEDIANS BLVD F.SALFINGERE �I I y�0 I PARK 00 I(I�� I I II 1 I I 1, I I 1� It o fj ll II► n ;>oon 4000 010 00 11 t �000, .40 CCCSD RECYCLED m l��l 1j li �P. ".PARK n 0 , E0. RV I LN WATER SYSTEM o .1 1I ELEM NOTARY SEQUOIA ' I r MIDDLE h SCHOOL SCHOOL 1 %, I I P i PL:L I NE LEGEND PLEASANT HILL' DEMO GARDEN' C�! ■� EXISTING ;� I' I i1 I u \\ r) ��. PLANNED EXTENSION II PLEASANT ,i T-►� cv .l �1 \ y II I r 1 CCWD /EBMUD BOUNDARY Ii PARK PLEALLNT (APPROXIMATE.) I (� JI MIDDLE SCHOOL II r EXISTING CUSTOMER t II LOCATIONS OAK p ARK BLVD CONCORD LANDSCAPE AREA 000� I( LO-JAN-LUIL w; ,),) K; Nspclmops% mappinq \recwo\ooara_new_Incuo_Muu,agn i 410 01 =,1 I i TABLE 3 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JANUARY 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU I Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 01/01/11 1.3 5.2 5.9 <2 19 01/02/11 1.4 2.8 6.3 <2 17 01/03/11 1.7 2.5 8.3 <2 27 01/04/11 1.4 5.1 8.5 <2 19 01/05/11 1.4 2.6 8.3 <2 24 01/06/11 1.7 5.1 7.1 <2 18 01/07/11 1.6 5.5 8.5 <2 26 01/08/11 1.5 4.6 6.3 <2 17 01/09/11 1.5 3.0 5.9 <2 20 01/10/11 1.4 3.1 6.3 <2 19 01/11/11 1.5 2.6 8.2 <2 23 01/12/11 1.6 3.0 8.4 <2 174 01/13/11 1.4 2.7 8.3 <2 192 01/14/11 1.5 2.6 8.6 <2 59 01/15/11 1.6 5.8 6.6 <2 26 01/16/11 1.8 3.0 6.0 <2 18 01/17/11 1.8 3.9 6.8 <2 19 01/18/11 1.5 3.0 6.2 <2 21 01/19/11 1.6 4.2 8.3 <2 33 01/20/11 1.6 2.7 8.3 <2 25 01/21/11 1.5 3.7 7.7 <2 34 01/22/11 1.4 2.7 5.4 <2 28 01/23/11 1.3 2.2 5.6 <2 36 01/24/11 1.5 5.4 8.1 <2 25 01/25/11 1.6 5.1 8.2 <2 23 01/26/11 1.5 5.6 8.2 13 56 01/27/11 1.5 5.3 7.9 <2 47 01/28/11 1.6 2.4 6.0 <2 42 01 /29/11 1.6 2.7 5.8 <2 25 01/30/11 1.3 4.5 7.2 <2 27 01/31/11 1 1.5 1 4.2 7.9 <2 25 Minimum 1.3 2.2 5.4 <2 17 Maximum 1.8 5.8 8.6 13 192 Average 1.5 3.8 7.3 <2 38 13 TABLE 4 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS FEBRUARY 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 02/01/11 1.7 4.9 7.6 <2 21 02/02/11 1.6 4.8 7.7 <2 45 02/03/11 1.3 4.4 8.1 <2 26 02/04/11 1.3 2.6 8.3 <2 63 02/05/11 1.5 2.4 5.1 <2 48 02/06/11 1.7 5.5 6.3 <2 64 02/07/11 1.6 3.2 5.0 <2 22 02/08/11 1.5 7.0 6.5 <2 72 02/09/11 1.5 2.9 6.0 <2 74 02/10/11 1.5 3.4 5.8 <2 140 02/11/11 1.5 5.6 5.9 <2 159 02/12/11 1.5 5.0 5.5 <2 142 02/13/11 1.6 3.8 6.1 <2 105 02/14/11 1.6 3.6 6.6 <2 65 02/15/11 1.6 4.4 8.0 <2 98 02/16/11 1.5 4.8 8.1 <2 75 02/17/11 1.5 4.8 8.0 <2 76 02/18/11 1.5 4.3 8.1 <2 107 02/19/11 1.4 5.2 6.5 <2 70 02/20/11 1.5 4.6 6.7 <2 87 02/21/11 1.6 4.2 6.6 <2 37 02/22/11 1.6 4.6 8.6 <2 37 02/23/11 1.6 4.2 8.6 <2 50 02/24/11 1.6 5.8 8.4 <2 53 02/25/11 1.5 5.0 6.4 <2 65 02/26/11 1.5 4.2 6.6 <2 54 02/27/11 1.5 3.6 6.5 <2 48 02/28/11 1.6 3.6 6.5 <2 37 Minimum 1.3 2.4 5.0 <2 21 Maximum 1.7 7.0 8.6 <2 159 Average 1.5 4.4 6.9 <2 69 14 TABLE 5 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS MARCH 2011 Day I Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L I Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL I Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 03/01/11 1.6 3.2 8.1 <2 23 03/02/11 1.6 3.2 5.9 <2 34 03/03/11 1.4 4.2 6.2 <2 36 03/04/11 1.3 3.5 7.2 <2 53 03/05/11 1.4 3.3 7.3 <2 66 03/06/11 1.5 2.6 7.0 <2 63 03/07/11 1.7 3.3 6.1 <2 29 03/08/11 1.7 4.2 6.7 <2 34 03/09/11 1.6 4.2 6.5 <2 49 03/10/11 1.6 5.4 6.4 <2 38 03/11/11 1.5 3.9 8.0 <2 70 03/12/11 1.4 4.6 6.3 <2 63 03/13/11 1.4 5.6 6.9 <2 56 03/14/11 1.4 4.2 7.1 <2 33 03/15/11 1.4 3.2 8.3 <2 20 03/16/11 1.4 3.8 6.2 <2 29 03/17/11 1.4 4.4 6.4 <2 25 03/18/11 1.5 5.7 8.5 <2 29 03/19/11 1.5 6.0 7.6 <2 25 03/20/11 1.5 5.6 6.8 <2 28 03/21/11 1.6 5.2 6.8 <2 20 03/22/11 1.6 3.8 8.4 <2 24 03/23/11 1.5 5.3 8.5 <2 21 03/24/11 1.6 4.5 6.6 <2 29 03/25/11 1.8 5.2 8.5 <2 36 03/26/11 1.6 4.6 7.5 <2 29 03/27/11 1.5 3.6 6.8 <2 23 03/28/11 1.5 3.8 7.5 <2 27 03/29/11 1.5 3.3 5.7 <2 22 03/30/11 1.6 2.4 8.0 <2 22 03/31/11 1.4 3.0 j 8.1 <2 37 Minimum 1.3 2.4 5.7 <2 20 Maximum 1.8 6.0 8.5 <2 70 Average 1.5 4.2 7.2 <2 35 15 TABLE 6 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS APRIL 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 04/01/11 1.6 2.6 8.2 <2 39 04/02/11 1.6 2.9 6.1 <2 46 04/03/11 1.6 2.2 6.3 <2 46 04/04/11 1.7 4.0 6.2 <2 34 04/05/11 2.0 3.2 7.9 <2 59 04/06/11 1.5 3.4 7.8 <2 68 04/07/11 1.4 3.6 7.9 <2 117 04/08/11 1.3 3.4 7.9 <2 91 04/09/11 1.4 4.0 6.4 <2 83 04/10/11 1.4 4.8 7.0 <2 70 04/11/11 1.4 4.4 7.3 <2 31 04/12/11 1.4 3.4 8.2 <2 93 04/13/11 1.4 3.5 5.9 <2 573 04/14/11 1.5 4.1 6.6 <2 271 04/15/11 1.4 4.0 8.2 <2 186 04/16/11 1.5 4.8 7.9 <2 414 04/17/11 1.4 4.5 6.9 <2 337 04/18/11 1.4 3.8 6.8 <2 271 04/19/11 1.5 4.5 7.1 <2 441 04/20/11 1.6 6.5 6.5 <2 360 04/21/11 1.6 4.2 5.8 <2 402 04/22/11 1.5 3.8 6.3 <2 342 04/23/11 1.4 4.2 6.9 <2 498 04/24/11 1.4 4.2 6.5 <2 200 04/25/11 1.5 4.2 6.6 <2 185 04/26/11 1.5 3.7 8.0 <2 126 04/27/11 1.5 3.4 6.8 <2 457 04/28/11 1.4 7.0 6.9 <2 590 04/29/11 1.4 5.5 7.1 <2 573 04/30/11 1.4 6.2 7.8 <2 466 Minimum 1.3 2.2 5.8 <2 31 Maximum 2.0 7.0 8.2 <2 590 Average 1.5 4.1 7.1 <2 249 16 TABLE 7 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS MAY 2011 Day I Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU I Chlorine Residual m /L I Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 1 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 05/01/11 1.4 5.2 7.1 <2 411 05/02/11 1.3 5.1 6.1 <2 382 05/03/11 1.4 3.8 6.4 <2 645 05/04/11 1.4 4.8 7.4 <2 732 05/05/11 1.4 5.8 6.4 <2 687 05/06/11 1.4 4.9 7.5 <2 740 05/07/11 1.3 3.4 6.8 <2 603 05/08/11 1.3 4.2 6.4 <2 558 05/09/11 1.4 3.0 7.3 <2 463 05/10/11 1.4 3.0 7.6 <2 721 05/11/11 1.4 3.8 6.7 <2 762 05/12/11 1.4 4.3 7.5 <2 666 05/13/11 1.4 2.7 7.3 <2 595 05/14/11 1.2 3.7 6.2 <2 670 05/15/11 1.2 4.3 6.3 <2 497 05/16/11 1.1 4.0 7.8 <2 405 05/17/11 1.2 3.3 7.9 <2 490 05/18/11 1.3 4.1 7.7 <2 250 05/19/11 1.2 4.7 7.5 <2 180 05/20/11 1.2 1.5 7.7 <2 312 05/21/11 0.8 6.2 63 <2 579 05/22/11 1.1 4.8 6.2 <2 450 05/23/11 1.1 4.1 7.3 <2 400 05/24/11 1.2 2.5 7.7 <2 676 05/25/11 1.4 4.9 7.7 <2 555 05/26/11 1.4 5.4 6.6 * 524 05/27/11 1.3 4.0 7.8 * 644 05/28/11 1.4 4.6 6.3 519 05/29/11 1.5 4.1 6.3 * 605 05/30/11 1.5 4.2 6.7 <2 547 05/31/11 1.2 4.4 7.8 <2 587 Minimum 0.8 1.5 6.1 <2 180 Maximum 1.5 6.2 7.9 <2 762 Average 1.3 4.1 7.1 <2 544 * Coliform samples invalid due to contamination detected in laboratory dilution water used for sample preparation. 17 TABLE 8 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JUNE 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 ML. Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 06/01/11 1.2 6.0 7.5 <2 623 06/02/11 1.4 5.4 7.4 <2 157 06/03/11 1.2 4.4 5.9 <2 146 06/04/11 1.0 3.4 6.7 2 172 06/05/11 1.0 3.6 6.3 <2 139 06/06/11 1.1 5.2 8.1 <2 146 06/07/11 1.2 4.1 7.9 <2 122 06/08/11 1.2 1.4 7.6 <2 162 06/09/11 1.1 4.0 7.0 <2 443 06110/11 1.2 3.5 6.0 <2 222 06/11/11 1.2 5.6 6.4 <2 365 06/12/11 1.3 5.7 6.0 <2 370 06/13/11 1.3 3.6 6.2 <2 514 06/14/11 1.3 3.5 7.2 <2 630 06/15/11 1.1 4.4 7.5 <2 746 06/16/11 1.3 4.8 7.0 <2 693 06/17/11 1.4 4.3 6.9 <2 729 06/18/11 1.3 4.2 6.8 <2 790 06/19/11 1.2 4.5 5.8 <2 483 06/20/11 1.3 4.3 5.9 <2 548 06/21/11 1.1 4.0 6.2 <2 1050 06/22/11 1.2 4.6 6.2 <2 463 06/23/11 1.3 4.0 6.0 <2 817 06/24/11 1.3 3.8 5.8 <2 754 06/25/11 1.4 4.6 6.0 <2 1260 06/26/11 1.4 6.4 6.0 <2 422 06/27/11 1.2 4.0 7.0 <2 479 06/28/11 1.0 2.6 6.9 <2 690 06/29/11 1.0 2.8 7.1 <2 515 06/30/11 1.1 2.9 7.6 <2 192 Minimum 1.0 1.4 5.8 <2 122 Maximum 1.4 6.4 8.1 2 1260 Average 1.2 4.2 6.7 <2 495 18 TABLE 9 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JULY 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU I Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 07/01/11 1.1 4.0 7.2 <2 620 07/02/11 1.2 4.4 8.3 <2 628 07/03/11 1.3 2.6 6.6 <2 340 07/04/11 1.3 2.4 6.1 <2 473 07/05/11 1.2 2.7 5.4 <2 607 07/06/11 1.1 3.6 7.1 <2 832 07/07/11 1.2 3.6 5.8 <2 789 07/08/11 1.3 3.4 6.9 <2 780 07/09/11 1.3 3.2 6.9 <2 850 07/10/11 1.4 2.7 5.4 <2 761 07/11/11 1.3 2.9 6.2 <2 540 07/12/11 1.4 2.7 5.4 <2 698 07/13/11 1.3 2.5 6.0 <2 646 07/14/11 1.2 2.4 5.2 <2 744 07/15/11 1.2 2.4 3.7 <2 786 07/16/11 1.3 3.6 5.6 <2 819 07/17/11 1.1 3.0 3.7 <2 509 07/18/11 0.9 2.2 6.0 <2 446 07/19/11 1.0 3.4 5.2 <2 901 07/20/11 1.3 4.2 5.6 <2 767 07/21/11 1.0 4.3 4.0 <2 701 07/22/11 1.2 4.0 5.6 <2 822 07/23/1 1.2 3.4 4.0 <2 857 07/24/11 1.2 5.1 4.1 <2 830 07/25/11 1.2 3.9 6.6 <2 395 07/26/1 1.5 4.2 6.0 <2 1090 07/27/11 1.5 2.2 2.1 <2 704 07/28/11 1.1 4.0 3.3 <2 734 07/29/11 0.9 3.8 2.7 <2 637 07/30/11 1.4 3.8 1.8 <2 939 07/31/11 1.4 5.2 2.2 <2 525 Minimum 0.9 2.2 1.8 <2 340 Maximum 1.5 9.0 8.3 <2 1090 Average 1.2 3.6 5.2 <2 702 19 TABLE 10 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS AUGUST 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU I Chlorine Residual m /L I Dissolved Oxygen m /L 1 Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 08/01/11 1.5 3.4 1.6 <2 646 08/02/11 1.6 3.0 2.0 <2 812 08/03/11 1.5 4.6 3.5 <2 830 08/04/11 1.2 4.2 5.6 <2 805 08/05/11 1.3 2.4 6.7 <2 734 08/06/11 1.3 4.0 3.0 <2 820 08/07/11 1.4 3.2 4.5 <2 710 08/08/11 1.6 3.5 7.1 <2 682 08/09/11 1.7 3.6 5.8 <2 890 08/10/11 1.4 4.6 6.5 <2 913 08/11/11 1.5 3.3 4.1 <2 875 08/12/11 1.5 2.4 4.9 <2 735 08/13/11 1.2 5.0 2.6 <2 1050 08/14/11 1.4 6.0 5.2 <2 705 08/15/11 1.2 4.6 5.9 <2 736 08/16/11 1.5 2.4 6.4 <2 865 08/17/11 1.4 2.4 6.2 <2 798 08/18/11 1.5 4.6 4.9 <2 888 08/19/11 1.5 3.4 3.6 <2 770 08/20/11 1.3 2.8 3.2 <2 639 08/21/11 1.4 5.6 2.3 <2 555 08/22/11 1.4 3.2 2.4 <2 486 08/23/11 1.4 3.8 5.8 <2 1050 08/24/11 1.4 3.8 6.4 <2 829 08/25/11 1.3 2.7 5.9 <2 749 08/26/11 1.3 3.0 4.9 <2 782 08/27/11 1.5 2.4 5.3 <2 761 08/28/11 1.3 7.2 3.0 <2 544 08/29/11 1.1 3.2 5.9 <2 497 08/30/11 1.0 3.0 5.9 <2 671 08/31/11 1.3 1.1 5.3 <2 759 Minimum 1.0 1.1 1.6 <2 486 Maximum 1.7 7.2 7.1 <2 1050 Average 1.4 3.6 4.7 <2 761 20 TABLE 11 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS SEPTEMBER 2011 Day I Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L 1 Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 09/01/11 1.4 0.4 6.0 <2 714 09/02/11 1.3 0.4 2.9 <2 760 09/03/11 1.0 3.2 5.8 <2 771 09/04/11 0.9 3.3 3.3 <2 575 09/05/11 0.8 5.2 3.4 <2 803 09/06/11 0.9 1.1 6.3 <2 633 09/07/11 1.0 2.8 3.1 <2 639 09/08/11 1.0 3.2 2.7 <2 678 09/09/11 0.9 3.4 3.0 <2 578 09/10/11 1.0 4.0 1.5 <2 622 09/11/11 1.0 4.4 1.8 <2 393 09/12/11 1.0 2.6 2.7 <2 457 09/13/11 0.9 3.2 2.0 <2 722 09/14/11 1.0 3.7 2.0 <2 787 09/15/11 1.0 2.8 2.3 <2 641 09/16/11 1.0 3.2 2.3 <2 270 09/17/11 1.0 6.4 1.6 <2 658 09/18/11 1.0 3.6 3.8 <2 499 09/19/11 1.0 2.5 6.5 <2 419 09/20/11 1.0 3.8 5.9 <2 695 09/21/11 1.1 3.2 6.0 <2 781 09/22/11 1.1 1.6 6.2 <2 968 09/23/11 1.2 3.3 1.9 <2 617 09/24/11 1.0 1.8 2.1 <2 730 09/25/11 1.1 4.0 2.4 <2 449 09/26/11 1.2 2.3 3.5 2 363 09/27/11 1.2 4.0 1.6 <2 688 09/28/11 1.4 2.8 2.6 <2 377 09/29/11 1.2 2.4 2.8 <2 610 09/30/11 1.1 2.4 1.3 <2 620 Minimum 0.8 0.4 1.3 <2 270 Maximum 1.4 6.4 6.5 2 968 Average 1.1 3.0 3.3 <2 617 21 TABLE 12 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS OCTOBER 2011 Day I Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU I Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 10/01/11 1.2 3.1 2.4 <2 366 10/02/11 1.3 2.2 3.7 <2 390 10/03/11 1.3 2.1 0.7 <2 205 10/04/11 1.3 4.4 3.4 <2 360 10/05/11 1.5 4.5 3.9 <2 75 10/06/11 1.5 4.5 3.7 <2 56 10/07/11 1.4 3.0 1.1 <2 57 10/08/11 1.3 5.0 3.5 <2 43 10/09/11 1.3 3.4 3.9 <2 35 10/10/11 1.2 2.1 5.3 <2 51 10/11/11 1.2 4.7 3.2 <2 51 10/12/11 1.3 2.2 6.0 <2 135 10/13/11 1.3 3.4 5.4 <2 167 10/14/11 1.1 0.7 6.4 <2 271 10/15/11 1.1 5.6 3.0 <2 480 10/16/11 1.2 2.0 3.7 <2 318 10/17/11 1.2 0.1 6.3 <2 150 10/18/11 1.2 1.8 5.8 <2 476 10/19/11 1.1 2.8 4.4 <2 555 10/20/11 1.1 3.5 4.1 <2 145 10/21/11 1.1 5.8 4.6 <2 214 10/22/11 1.1 3.1 3.1 <2 209 10/23/11 1.2 6.7 4.0 <2 234 10/24/11 1.3 3.3 4.9 <2 209 10/25/11 1.2 2.7 4.0 <2 263 10/26/11 1.2 2.4 4.2 <2 133 10/27/11 1.2 4.7 5.3 <2 316 10/28/11 1.1 4.6 1.7 <2 196 10/29/11 1.1 4.2 2.4 <2 388 10/30/11 1.0 3.8 2.9 <2 196 10/31/11 1.1 6.4 1.8 <2 159 Minimum 1.0 0.1 0.7 <2 35 Maximum 1.5 6.7 6.4 <2 555 Average 1.2 3.5 3.8 <2 223 22 TABLE 13 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS NOVEMBER 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L I Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 11/01/11 1.2 10.4 3.3 <2 733 11/02/11 1.3 5.4 3.4 <2 218 11/03/11 1.3 4.3 2.6 <2 201 11/04/11 1.1 2.2 2.8 <2 129 11/05/11 1.2 4.4 1.6 <2 383 11/07/11 1.3 4.4 1.9 <2 117 11/07/11 1.3 6.3 3.1 <2 84 11/08/11 1.3 5.2 2.5 <2 61 11/09/11 1.4 6.1 4.0 <2 67 11/10/11 1.5 6.6 2.7 <2 104 11/11/11 1.5 2.8 4.5 <2 100 11/12/11 1.6 5.2 1.9 <2 102 11/13/11 1.4 4.6 2.5 <2 94 11/14/11 1.7 4.8 1.9 <2 85 11/15/11 1.8 6.9 2.4 <2 73 11/16/11 1.7 4.0 2.0 <2 78 11/17/11 1.6 4.0 2.5 <2 291 11/18/11 1.4 3.4 3.6 <2 87 11/19/11 1.5 5.7 3.1 <2 72 11/20/11 1.2 3.7 1.1 <2 98 11/21/11 1.5 1.8 2.4 <2 63 11/22/11 1.6 2.8 2.8 <2 61 11/23/11 1.5 2.8 3.2 <2 33 11/24/11 1.5 4.1 1.7 <2 38 11/25/11 1.4 4.2 2.6 <2 36 11/26/11 1.4 3.7 4.3 <2 50 11/27/11 1.4 5.2 2.2 <2 60 11/28/11 1.6 4.1 2.8 <2 61 11/29/11 1.7 3.8 2.4 <2 54 11/30/11 1.7 3.0 2.6 <2 31 Minimum 1.1 1.8 1.1 <2 31 Maximum 1.8 10.4 4.5 <2 733 Average 1.5 4.5 2.7 <2 122 23 TABLE 14 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS DECEMBER 2011 Day Hach On- Line Meter Daily AVE Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual m /L Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 12/01/11 1.6 1.7 2.3 <2 49 12/02/11 1.8 1.9 2.5 <2 73 12/03/11 1.8 4.4 1.6 <2 82 12/04/11 1.8 3.9 2.6 <2 57 12/05/11 1.7 3.3 1.9 <2 47 12/06/11 1.6 4.9 2.9 <2 122 12/07/11 1.4 4.5 3.2 <2 131 12/08/11 1.4 4.0 3.0 <2 238 12/09/11 1.3 2.9 3.1 <2 117 12/10/11 1.2 2.6 1.3 <2 86 12/11 /11 1.2 3.2 2.1 <2 46 12/12/11 1.4 3.3 3.1 <2 49 12/13/11 1.4 5.0 2.6 <2 61 12/14/11 1.4 3.3 4.2 <2 66 12/15/11 1.6 3.2 5.7 <2 223 12/16/11 1.7 3.5 3.2 <2 51 12/17/11 1.6 2.0 5.2 <2 58 12/18/11 1.6 3.7 4.5 <2 53 12/19/11 1.4 2.9 6.4 <2 52 12/20/11 1.6 3.5 7.2 <2 207 12/21/11 1.4 3.4 5.1 <2 77 12/22/11 1.2 3.5 4.5 <2 66 12/23/11 1.2 1.9 7.8 <2 82 12/24/11 1.3 4.2 7.7 <2 373 12/25/11 1.4 4.0 3.0 <2 79 12/26/11 1.4 4.5 1.7 <2 95 12/27/11 1.5 3.1 1.4 <2 56 12/28/11 1.5 3.8 1.8 <2 113 12/29/11 1.5 3.8 2.0 <2 94 12/30/11 1.5 3.6 3.4 <2 161 12/31/11 1.5 4.4 3.1 <2 305 Minimum 1.2 1.7 1.3 <2 46 Maximum 1.8 5.0 7.8 <2 373 Average 1.5 3.5 3.6 <2 109 24 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Buchanan Fields Golf Course Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave, Concord. Inspection Date: 8/26/2011 Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: r,/ 4 Inspector's Signature: V/1 /i( Date: 8/26/11 25 Central Contra Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site:_ Headquarters office blq (HOB) and Annex bld 5019 Imhoff Place Mtz Inspection Date: 8/26/2011 Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site:_ Landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ✓ .l 1 I (�1-1,t [�r%h�C, Date: 8/26/11 26 Central Contra Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez Inspection Date: 8/29/2011 Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 8/29/2011 27 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station Inspection Date: 8/30/2011 Customer Representative Present: Steven Considine (Field Operations Superintendent) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal water for pumps and wash down hose Weather conditions: sunny Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* EJ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Replaced signage on building exterior. Provided recycled water tags for pump room piping system. Inspector's Signature: ,t t 21 (, r r , ,: ((i ; Date M, 8/30/11 `1 J� Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 8/26/2011 Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, warm _ Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? N * ® ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? Z ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Added signage at two locations of the POD parking lot and one at pond access gate. Permit updated to reflect new customer representative for New Image Landscaping. Inspector's Signature: (�i�Ft�l �i?� i c (CLll1L� Date: 8/26/11 29 J, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 8/26/2011 Customer Representative Present: Alfredo Romero, New Image Landscaping Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes 0 // ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ E1* ■ ■ // E1* ■ ■ // ■ ■ /1 ■ M MO'AVIN All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: '� (. ((, t( �� �i` ; t r (GC (i Date: 8/26/11 30 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Corporation Ya Inspection Date: 8/23/11 Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore (Maintenance Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill station for landscape median irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided customer valve box tags and safety tailgate literature Inspector's Signature: !l ( (Ctf rl (( I t t (I-((' _L Date: 8/23/11 31 Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Medians ( #1 -4 on Golf Club Rd, Old Quarry Rd, Contra Costa Blvd, Chilpanchingo Pkwy Taylor Blvd /Civic Dr); Viking Dr landscaping, and Taylor Blvd /Ruth Dr landscaping Inspection Date: 8/23/2011 Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore (Maintenance Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunny, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided signage for Taylor Blvd medians. Updated permit to identify new customer contact above. � � Inspector's Signature: _.1 (L 41,,1 6/7,Ctt ft_2 Date: 8/23/11 32 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Station (330 Civic Drive) Inspection Date: 8/23/2011 Customer Representative Present: Michael Moore (Maintenance Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv, warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes No /1 E1* ■ // E1* ■ ■ E1* ■ /1 ■ /1 E1* ■ ■ ►1 ■ ■ /1 ■ 0101_0 // M /1 ■ ■ /1 ■ E ■ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk (*) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: �( (L ��f �GIL t CGS lIL , Date: 8/23/2011 33 ® Recycled I'ap -r Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Conco Companies Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez Inspection Date: 8/24/2011 Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck washing, Mixing agent, Dust control Weather conditions: sunnv, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ®* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? / ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: #3: Provided recycled water notification stickers for aluminum water tanks in the truck fleet Additional notes: Provided customer with replacement tags for the truck wash site. Inspector's Signature: ��� Date 34 8/24/11 Z=� Central Contra Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Rd, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 8/24/2011 Customer Representative Present: John Martin Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course and clubhouse landscape irrigation Weather conditions: sunny Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided customer recycle water stickers for chemical tanks and 6 large signs for the grounds Inspector's Signature: Date. 8/24/11 35 ® 1 Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Count Location of Site: Animal Shelter, Martinez Inspection Date 8/24/2011 Customer Representative Present: Greg Mattox for Mary Tennyson, (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and dog kennel wash down Weather conditions: sunny Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3 4 5 6 7 9. 10 11 12. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? Is there an apparent odor nuisance? Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes No N/A /1 ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ ■ ■ // ■ // ■ // ■ ■ ■ // ■ ■ // ■ /1 ■ ©m ■ NEI ■ =WE- All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes- Provided replacement recycled water signs gate to the animal exercise area and for fence at the recycled water manifold enclosure. Inspector's Signature: _:J I _f j, q i 1 C(i < < C��1.� Date 36 8/24/11 �0 LCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez Inspection Date: 9/30/2011 Customer Representative Present: Roland Hindsman Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunny, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 9/30/11 37 `w Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez Inspection Date: 8/24/2011 Customer Representative Present: Shane Einevell (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control Weather conditions: Sunnv and warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes No ►/ ■ ■ // ■ ■ ►1 ■ ■ ■ // ■ ■ ■ /1 ■ // ■ ■ // ■ ■ ►1 ■ 1 IMV // ■ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Updated permit identifying new customer representative shown above Inspector's Signature: % "� �_ ,� i 1 rL i.'tiL c c �t 1 �. Date: 8/24/11 W., Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: County Quarry Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez Inspection Date: 9/26/2011 Customer Representative Present: Chris Grey (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: process water for base rock manufacturing, concrete batch plant and dust control. Minimal irrigation use along south and west fence lines. Weather conditions: Cloudv Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ®* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: # 3: Provided signage for unsigned 2nd water truck Additional notes: Provided additional recycled water tags and signage for replacement purposes Inspector's Signature: t-t.c cC t.c-L Date: 9/26/11 39 ® Recycled Paper 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date 8/30/2011 Customer Representative Present: Joe Morgado Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and water pond feature Weather conditions: Sunn Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ® ❑* ❑ contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: l « ) ) 6 > > c cC' Date 40 8/30/11 l Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 9/16/2011 Customer Representative Present: Monica Olson, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, mild Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes • ►/ ■ ■ Z/ E1* ■ ■ ■ 1:1* /1 ■ // E1* ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ // ■ ■ a ■ MGM ■ ■ ■ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided customer with two signs to be installed at east side of demo garden facing street approach. Inspector's Signature: Date 41 9/16/11 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Middle School Inspection Date: 9/15/2011 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunny, warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? M ■ /1 All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: LIc �dUI't—e-� Date: 9/15/11 42 ® Recycled Paler /1 ■ ■ M ■ /1 All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: LIc �dUI't—e-� Date: 9/15/11 42 ® Recycled Paler Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools Inspection Date: 9/15/2011 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Sunny, warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes • 1 /1 E1* ■ /1 E1* ■ ■ E1* /1 ■ /1 ■ /1 E1* ■ 1:1* /1 ■ 1:1* /1 ■ oil ■ M011 All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided additional signage (2) for school yard field user awareness. Inspector's Signature: RTT(1 Date: 9/15/2011 43 ® Recycled Paprr 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Valley View Middle and College Park High Schools Inspection Date: 9/15/2011 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv. warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? E ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: - i �'� c 4h /t c Date: 9/15/11 44 Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: _Chilpancingo Park Inspection Date: 8/23/2011 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv. warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ✓/I / �( l i < < <a °t (lt•� Date: 8/23/11 45 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park Inspection Date: 8/23/2011 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site:_ Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Customer installed recycle water sign on north side of gazebo facing lawn. Inspector's Signature: �-( /r, �,�t �c 0 Date: 8/23/2011 46 ® Recycled Paper Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Park Inspection Date: 8/23/11 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv. warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? Yes No N/A /1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ /,1 ■ // ■ /1 ■ ■ ■ // ■ ■ /1 ■ ❑ ❑* IZ ■ /1 0 WE 11MON All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ✓J (� 7c� J L C 1� to Date: 8/23/11 47 ® Recycled Paper 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park (147 Gregory Lane) Inspection Date: 8/23/2011 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunnv, warm Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ❑ ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Some of the irrigation piping system has been secured and isolated in support of on -going construction activities. Added two recycle water signs for fence at enclosed grass lawn area at the community pool Inspector's Signature: �,�1(r�� %) ��'� i < < <�� l E Date: 8/23/2011 MIP 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 700 -780 Stubbs Road Buildings 1 -7, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 9/2/2011 Customer Representative Present: #1 Doug Brown, #2 +3 Jean Edwards, #4 +5 Jim Freethy, #6 Jeanne Papir, #7 Audrey Han Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: sunny, mild Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Pl �(� j <<` f C���t Date 49 07PJ11Ii J� Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: City of Lafayette Public Works Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 9/9/2011 Customer Representative Present: Ed Murdock Date Customer Began Service: 10/6//2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Ll Inspector's Signature: i'[ (L 1 Date 9/9/11 `A� 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Contra Costa County Public Works Use Description: Compaction, Dust Control, Street Sweeping Inspection Date: 9/13/2011 Customer Representative Present: Marcellino Abundis Date Customer Began Service: 1/14/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Added recycled water sign near entrance to Public Works building Inspector's Signature: , J L14 /11 l!Clll I c,C Date: 9/13/11 51 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Diablo General Engineering Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 9/12/2011 Customer Representative Present: Ryan Truax Date Customer Began Service: 10/14/2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: J (L /'l (r"71 r (C( -G2l—e_ Date: 9/12/11 52 `A, 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Evans Brothers Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 9/12/2011 Customer Representative Present: Mike Nisen Date Customer Began Service: 5/13/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ❑ ®* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Permit lost Provided customer with two permit copies. One for office and one for transport vehicle. Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: .-< 53 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Roto- Rooter Use Description: Sanitary sewer cleaning Inspection Date: 9/9/2011 Customer Representative Present: Rodney Schaul Date Customer Began Service: 9/11/2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: J O fc 1- do .,e— Date 54 9/9/11 ® Recycled hrwr Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Sundance Landscaping Use Description: Construction / irrigation Inspection Date: 9/12/11 Customer Representative Present: Steve Trout Date Customer Began Service: 8/27/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ❑" ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature-.— -J ( (. ��(( �'1 r -cL'�l t� Date 55 9/12/1 `A, Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2011 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Wyvern Farms Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 9/9/2011 Customer Representative Present: Chuck Lewis Date Customer Began Service: 8/27/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: - IJC(.LIL�� C ��1. ?- t(!��i2� Date 56 9/9/11 ®'