No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.a. Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual ReportCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 24, 2011 subject: ACCEPTANCE OF ANNUAL REPORT Submitted By Initiating Dept. /Div.: Bhupinder S. Dhaliwal Plant Operations /Laboratory Laboratory Superintendent REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: B. Dhaliwal D. Berger M. Orr A. Farrell James . Kelly, General Manager ISSUE: central Contra costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD's) 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report has been prepared for submission to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Bay Section. This annual report is attached for Board of Directors' information and acceptance. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None ALTERNATIVES/CONSIDERATIONS: Reject the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report, which is not recommended. BACKGROUND: Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality standards, except for dissolved oxygen (DO) of less than 1.0 mg /L on August 25 and October 8, 2010. Excessive microbial growth in the filter media is believed to be the cause of this episodic low DO. However, we believe that the DO at the points of application of recycled water most likely was well above 1.0 mg /L because of turbulence and mixing by the pumps and in the delivery pipes downstream of the sample point. Significant accomplishments for this years' Recycled Water Program are described in the attached 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. The report was reviewed by the Recycled Water Committee at their February 15, 2011, meeting and was recommended for Board acceptance. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. NAPOSUPILaboratory\Recycled Water1201 OTosition Paper 201 o.doc 2010 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT ` ,,Oed Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, CA CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 2010 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION ANNUAL REPORT INDEX Page No. Discharger's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water .......... ............................... 1-5 Figure 1 Recycled Water at Work ................................................... ............................... 6-7 Table 1 Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2010 .......................... ..............................8 Table 2 Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2010 .................................. ..............................9 Figure 2 CCCSD Recycled Water System Map .................................. .............................10 Table 3 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — January .............. .............................11 Table 4 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — February ............. .............................12 Table 5 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — March ................. .............................13 Table 6 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — April .................... .............................14 Table 7 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — May .................... .............................15 Table 8 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — June .................... .............................16 Table 9 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — July .................... .............................17 Table 10 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — August ................ .............................18 Table 11 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — September ......... .............................19 Table 12 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — October .............. .............................20 Table 13 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — November .......... .............................21 Table 14 CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics — December .......... .............................22 RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Buchanan Fields Golf Course, Concord ........................................... .............................23 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Headquarters Office Building and Annex Building, Martinez ............................24 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Martinez . .............................25 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Maltby Pump Station, Martinez ........................................... .............................26 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Index.doc Page No. CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Treatment Plant Site, Martinez ........................................... .............................27 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report CCCSD Warehouse (4737 Imhoff Place), Martinez .......................... .............................28 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Corporation Yard, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill .... .............................29 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Medians ( #1 - #4 on Golf Club Road, Contra Costa Boulevard and Chilpancingo Parkway) Viking Drive Landscaping, and Taylor Boulevard Landscaping, Pleasant Hill ................................................................ .............................30 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report City of Pleasant Hill, Pleasant Hill Police Station, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill ..................31 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Conco Companies, Martinez ............................................................. .............................32 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course, Pleasant Hill ..................... .............................33 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa County Animal Shelter, Martinez ................................ .............................34 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa County Corporation Yard, Martinez ............................ .............................35 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Contra Costa Topsoil, Martinez ........................................................ .............................36 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report County Quarry, Martinez ................................................................... .............................37 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill ................................................. .............................38 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Demonstration Garden, Pleasant Hill .......................39 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Pleasant Hill Middle School, Pleasant Hill ...............40 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools, PleasantHill ...................................................................................... .............................41 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Index.doc Page No. CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Valley View Middle School and College Park High School, Pleasant Hill ................................................................. .............................42 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Chilpancingo Park, Pleasant Hill ................43 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park, Pleasant Hill ............................................................................. .............................44 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Oaks Park, Pleasant Hill .............45 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Hill Park, Pleasant Hill .................46 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report Stubbs Road Triplexes, Pleasant Hill ................................................ .............................47 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORTS CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report City of Lafayette Public Works .......................................................... .............................48 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Contra Costa County Public Works ................................................... .............................49 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Diablo General Engineering .............................................................. .............................50 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report EvansBrothers ................................................................................. .............................51 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Roto- Rooter ...................................................................................... .............................52 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report Sundance Landscaping ................................................................... .............................53 CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report WyvernFarms ................................................................................... .............................54 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Index.doc DISCHARGER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT RECYCLED WATER REPORTING DISCHARGER: DATE OF REPORT: ORDER: REPORTING PERIOD: INTRODUCTION Central Contra Costa Sanitary District February 15, 2011 96 -011 January through December 2010 The following reports for production and distribution of tertiary- treated recycled water cover the period of January through December 2010. Figure 1 shows pictures of recycled water usage. Table 1 gives a summary of recycled water usage for calendar year 2010 for reuse application categories. Table 2 shows the monthly usage of recycled water by customer. Figure 2 is a detailed map showing the location of each recycled water customer. Tables 3 through 14 present the water quality characteristics. The 2010 Recycled Water Site Inspection Reports follow these tables. Additionally, monthly site inspection visits are also conducted during meter reading activities to verify conformance with recycled water use requirements. All sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011. Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality standards, except for dissolved oxygen (DO) of less than 1.0 MG /L on August 25, 2010, and October 8, 2010. Excessive microbial growth in the filter media is believed to be the cause of this episodic low DO. However, we believe that the DO at the points of application of recycled water was most likely well above 1.0 MG /L because of turbulence and mixing by the pumps and in the delivery pipes downstream of the sample point. Additionally, no sulfide concentration was detected in these samples. FUTURE EXPANSION Recycled water is an integral part of the mission of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ( CCCSD), and CCCSD has been operating a successful and growing recycled water program since 1996. Since that time, we have been providing recycled water for in -plant usage and to irrigation customers. In 2010 CCCSD provided approximately 480 acre -feet (AF) (157 million gallons (MG)) of recycled water to a variety of customers in Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez near the Interstate 680 freeway. Recycled water was used for landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses, and street medians and for N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc commercial uses such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust control, and washing kennels at the local animal shelter. CCCSD also operates a recycled water truck fill hydrant program to make recycled water available for construction uses in the area. Recycled water demand in 2010 was less than historical averages (typically about 600 AF per year (AFY), or 200,000 MG /year) due to a combination of higher than normal rainfall and cooler temperatures that reduced demand for landscape irrigation. In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD also used approximately 1,230 AFY (400 MG /year) of recycled water internally at CCCSD's wastewater treatment plant in Martinez for process water and landscape irrigation. Therefore, the total volume of recycled water provided by CCCSD in 2010 for offsite customer locations and internal uses was approximately 1,710 AFY (557 MG /year). CCCSD continues to look for opportunities and partnerships to expand recycled water use and obtain financial assistance to build new recycled water projects. While landscape irrigation projects have historically represented the core of CCCSD's recycled water program, CCCSD is now focusing efforts on developing a large -scale industrial reuse project that would use recycled water all year instead of just seasonally, as with landscape irrigation projects. The following describes CCCSD's work in 2010 to expand recycled water use. Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide up to 22,500 (AFY) (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell Martinez Refinery and the Tesoro Refinery for use as cooling tower makeup water and as boiler feedwater. The refinery project is particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round demand, and it could potentially make use of existing conveyance and storage facilities that are already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to each refinery. However, because the project would be costly (up to $100M) CCCSD needs financial assistance and /or project partners to make the project cost - effective. In this regard, CCCSD is pursing federal funding through the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), which could provide funding for up to 75% of project costs. In parallel, CCCSD is also pursing federal Title XVI funding, which could provide up to 25% funding if WRDA funding is not available. The project would likely be constructed in phases to reduce the impact to ratepayers by spreading out the costs over a longer period. Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project CCCSD is considering constructing the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project (formerly the A -Line Project) to provide up to 190 AFY (62 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation at businesses and landscape medians in the Diamond /Meridian Park Boulevard area of Concord if some financial assistance can be acquired. CCCSD has been pursuing federal funding assistance for this project through the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Title XVI Program. In May 2010, the USBR approved CCCSD's Title XVI Feasibility Study and determined the project met federal feasibility guidelines. CCCSD expects to complete the remaining environmental documentation to comply with WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements in 2011, which is required for projects receiving federal funding. In order to obtain Title XVI funding, CCCSD needs to obtain federal legislative authorization and appropriation, which may be difficult due to the economic climate. CCCSD has also applied for Proposition 84 grant funding, which could provide approximately $1 M in funding. The Department of Water Resources is expected to make decisions in June 2011 on Proposition 84 grant award recipients, and these funds could potentially be available in Fiscal Year 2011/12. Recvcled Water Zone One Proiect CCCSD has an agreement with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) to allow CCCSD to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and light commercial uses in the Zone One Project area, which consists of portions of Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Concord near the Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD constructed and operates approximately 11 miles of recycled water distribution pipelines in these areas, and is working to connect new, cost - effective recycled water customers located near existing distribution pipelines. In 2010, CCCSD completed the design and construction of three new landscape irrigation connections and began recycled water service to the following sites: 1. Pleasant Hill Police Department 2. Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane 3. Taylor Blvd Landscaping, City of Pleasant Hill These three sites will add an estimated combined recycled water demand of about 43 AFY, or 14 MG /year. CCCSD is continuing efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective landscape irrigation customers in the Zone One project area and plans to connect several new sites in 2011. Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use by CCCSD. In 2009, the City of Concord selected a preferred development plan (Clustered Villages concept) consisting of a mixture of commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational uses interspersed between parks and open space. This mixture of uses will create opportunities to use recycled water, not only for landscape irrigation but, also for non - potable uses such as toilet flushing and cooling towers in commercial buildings. Recycled water demand for the new development is estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build out. In 2010, CCCSD began work on a Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons Station redevelopment to determine the infrastructure and associated costs needed to meet the anticipated demand. The facilities plan is expected to be completed in 2011. The actual redevelopment of the property and construction of supporting infrastructure is WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc not expected to begin for another five to ten years because of additional environmental documentation and planning work that must be completed by the City of Concord and Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the City of Concord and /or developers. In parallel with preparation of the facilities plan, CCCSD is developing recycled water standard specifications and details for use by developers for construction of recycled water distribution systems, such as those planned for the Naval Weapons Station redevelopment project. This document is expected to be completed in 2011. TRUCK FILL HYDRANT PROGRAM CCCSD operates a Truck Fill Hydrant Program to make recycled water available to contractors, companies, and public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and other non - potable uses. In 2010, CCCSD saw a significantly reduced demand for recycled water from its truck fill program due to higher than normal rainfall and easing of prior drought restrictions by local water agencies. Only about 10,000 gallons were used in 2010 compared to about one million gallons distributed in 2009 during the drought. CCCSD will continue to make recycled water available through its Truck Fill Hydrant Program as an ongoing resource to the community to help promote recycled water and provide a reliable water supply for future droughts. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) field crews have performed maintenance and repair work on CCCSD's recycled water distribution system under contract since 2004. CCWD cross - connection control specialists also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections for new recycled water sites and testing and recertification of existing sites where piping modifications have been made. In 2010, CCCSD completed a comprehensive update to its Recycled Water Pipeline O &M Manual to include information on new customers and appurtenances added over the last several years along with a new section on cathodic protection system maintenance and corrosion control. The Recycled Water Pipeline O &M Manual will be updated as necessary to keep procedures and information current. In 2010, CCCSD completed a filter media evaluation for the CCCSD Recycled Water Filter Plant and determined that it would be appropriate to replace the top three inches of media with new media while doing routine maintenance to replace media lost during backwashing. This work is scheduled to be completed in 2011. CUSTOMER TRAINING CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate customers about the precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water Site Supervisors. In 2010, CCCSD completed a Recycled Water Tree Guide as a resource for recycled water customers. The guide includes information to help recycled water N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc landscape irrigation customers achieve optimal results when irrigating with recycled water, such as soil type factors that need to be considered when selecting plants and trees; optimal irrigation length and frequency when using recycled water; and a list of trees that tend to work well in local climate and soil conditions when irrigated with recycled water. SALT AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control (SWRCB) adopted a Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires each agency using recycled water for urban irrigation to develop a salt and nutrient management plan by May 2014. However, CCCSD understands that the SWRCB plans to develop a waiver process by which groundwater basins that are not likely to have adverse impacts from recycled water irrigation (such as those within CCCSD's service area) can be exempted from the need to prepare salt and nutrient management plans. Due to the very limited extent that groundwater is used as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, it appears that CCCSD's recycled water program would likely qualify for the waiver process as currently envisioned by the SWRCB. LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER The Board of Directors of CCCSD has consistently expressed an interest in maximizing recycled water opportunities. However, there are many institutional and financial impediments that are outside the control of CCCSD. On the institutional side, CCCSD must work with the potable water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale recycled water to them or obtain their permission to purvey recycled water. Often the potable water purveyor asserts it has significant sunk costs in existing facilities, and contends the California duplication of services law allows it to recoup stranded costs if recycled water is made available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the applicability of this law, the issue can add a significant additional cost to many recycled water projects. In addition, the cost to construct new recycled water treatment and conveyance facilities is very high. For example, recycled water projects typically require construction of additional treatment facilities and pipelines through congested urban areas, which makes expansion costly. When all of these costs are added together, the unit cost of recycled water often exceeds the cost of other available water supplies. Therefore, additional sources of funding are needed to make recycled water project costs competitive with other alternatives available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state and federal funding for recycled water projects has restricted the growth of CCCSD's recycled water program and other recycled water programs statewide. WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc U. ry LU < LU ry 00 Lij LL -i C) C) LU ry U. r- r LU L.L n LL H Q ry w H D W J U U w ry Y ry O 3: TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE Calendar Year: 2010 Reuse Application Category No. of Sites Area Applied Acres Amount Distributed (MG) % of Total Reuse Flow Landscape Irrigation 27 191 148.8 95 Parks 5 22 7.8 5 Golf Courses 2 110 93.1 59 Green Belts 8 1 0.5 0 Schools 4 52 40.4 26 Other 8 6 7.1 5 Agriculture 0 0 0.0 0 Vineyards 0 0 0.0 0 Other 0 0 0.0 0 Industrial (') 5 N/A 7.0 4 Cooling 0 0 0.0 0 Other 5 N/A 7.0 4 Environmental Enhancement (2) 0 0 0.0 0 Dual Plumbing (3) 1 1 0.8 1 Total (4) 33 192 156.6 100 Notes: 1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, and truck fill hydrant 2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland /marsh applications, etc. 3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation) 4. An additional approximately 400 MG was used by CCCSD at the treatment plant for process water & landscape irrigation. ��� (f) (D O O Nt N N O 00 N V M t I% I.- (f) O O M I� P%- N Cl) Cl) O— O N O N Cl) (D (() 1. Z r r Cl) O Nt O O O N (D O N 00 (D 00 Nt (n O N 0 0 00 Nt 00 X 0 0 (D O O M O O (D N 00 r 00 O O O 0 O — 00 M 0 00 M Nt M 0 O 00 Nt O N — M O 00 (D O (f) 00 O N— I� � O�� Nt O I�t N O O� N N— N O Nt O (f) N I� (f) (D � 00 Nt O I• M P%- 00 I- 00 N N N � . (f) . . � . N . P%- . 00 . I- . (f) . O . Nt . P%- . 00 . N . P%- ., r . N . . . (O ., N ., � (D � O — O � — Cl) Cl) N O O N (f) O (n (D O — M 0 (D Cl) O O L) N I- 00 (n Nt 00 N (D Cl) et O O Cl) I�t M et r r (n I�t 00 (D O N O 00 00 Nt Nt O N Nt P%- 00 I� O O Nt It 00 Co O O O O O r N O O (D I� I� Nt O M � 00 00 Nt N 00 B O O 00 Co (D I�t � N E O N O co O N U (f) 00 Il N V M I'- N O N O co 00 � O W N co (D co O O r 00 � M U) IP%- N N 00 O co M (n -4 . O . O . N . I� . M . . O . O . V . V . V . ., N O . . P- ., 00 ., O CL � (f) 0 0 (n I�t N O — N�I�t N O— 00 Il- O — — 0 00 O Nt le M LU — N Il- O O N (n N N (D Il- O N M ti N N N M O N 0 N O 0 N 0 Nt O O N I- O O Nt O N 00 0 0 0 O O M O O 00 Nt N U) Nt 0 0 0 O— (f) (n M co (D O O co (D Nt Nt 0 0 Cl) 00 — N O (D N O Nt O M O O N O O co Il- O N � N Nt Il- (f) co 00 O Il- O O M O� N Nt 00 — M I- O (D le O I� O I�t P- O (f) Cl) 00 N (D Nt (D 00 (D (O N N N 00 O (f) I cD C7 N � CO 00 O 00 — O 00 (f) I�t 00 — I�t (f) O O — P- I• N Cl) (D le (D � O M Cl) N N O O (f) 00 co M N a M N O N M N N 0 0I�t 00 OI�t N 00 00 (D 00 (D O (D 0 0 0 0 (f) O O O O O -e Nt O O N (D O 0 M (D 0 N O (n Nt 00 — O M M O Il- O O O r (f) Nt Nt 00 Nt O W N (D O I� I� (f) .. (f) .. — .. O .. Nt O .. O� M .. P- .. P- .. O— .. .. O .. O .. Cl) .. Nt Nt 00 .. (n .. � O— .. .. N .. N (() Nt 00 .. O .. M 0) O N O CO (D (n (D (n N (n Cl) (D 00 N N Il- � O Cl) (f) O N 0 0 O O O J M N— O Il- (f) Cl) Cl) N N O (f) Il- (f) Cl) Cl) N O 00 N Cl) O 00 (n K) le N N Il- Cl) O N Cl) N N O �I�t O O (f) co I- (n M P- N tD (D M M O co Nt 00 O Nt co N O N Nt Nt N Nt N N O O (D N (D Il- 0 0 Nt 0 0 O N O O O co I• N (D (D 00 O Il- LO (f) 00 00 Il- O Nt (f) (D Cl) Cl) (n O O N O O r I- O � 0 N O I- — M (D (D O Nt 0 0 Nt Nt 0 0 Cl) Cl) Nt N Nt P- — N— a) (f) Co Cl) co 1. N O O (f) (n �� (f) (n O M MI�t Cl) � (f) 00 (D Il- M� Nt M O O OCT N Z O O— M — O 0 I- � (f) N Nt 00 N O— O NI�t � 00 r N N (D N CO (n (n Cl) N Cl) Il- 00 I O N L O O N N I�t OI�t (D O N (D 00 O Nt O Nt N (D (D 00 O O N O co O O O N O O N 0 0 0 00 (() N 00 N O MI�t (D O Nt M M O 0 Nt Cl) N (f) Il- 00 0 O N O N (n (D Il- 00 r — O r (f) r 0 O N Il- N O M � Cl) N I-- N LO 00 (D N Nt (() (D 00 O (() r } (n 0 O NI�t N N (D (f) I�t O N O co I- (D O 00 I- (f) m M I N N I�t CO O (f) Nt (D M (D O Cl) O N Nt N O (D (D O a (D O N (D (n N N Nt � O r (f) (D ti N N O O O N N N Cl) 00 (D OI�t N 0 0 0 O O 00 N O S 0 0I�t (D co O O N O O O O O O 0 I� co Il- Nt (f) (D N Nt O (f) 00 N O N 00 Cl) N O 00 O 0 00 Nt M� Nt 00 Nt � O O O 00 Il- Nt (f) N Nt � O Cl) N 00 co O N O (D M N� (f) LO N I- (D (D Cl) N T ((D M d N Cl) (f) le le Q r r N�t O O O N— 0 0I�t O 00 I�t O NI�t O O N N O co O O (D O O M (D O O 00 (n N Cl) 00 (D �t Nt Cl) 00 O I- (f) Cl) 00 �� Nt O 00 O O Nt O 00 (n 00 N (n O Il- N O O � � Nt Nt (f) Nt � O� O U) Nt 00 Il- T- (D a/ (n N 00 N N N (f) N I- O I- M 00 M— M I� CO N 00 Cl) O N Nt Cl) r r 00 N O Nt Cl) 0 0 0 O O 00 O 00 O O 00 O O O O O O O O x 0 0 0 0 O r O O E CO O co � O 00 �� O 00 ti O P P­ Cl) O � (f) Nt � � O 0 (D w P O (D O Cl) N co m O N W N N LL , �t O M O O O r 0 0 0 O O 00 O (n Nt O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O 0 r �I�t O N 00 Nt 00 00 (n O 00 N (D w O OI�t p- O � 00 Il- O O O (f) Nt N Co co Cl) N Cl) Z O � - P- co a N co (D � J � u CC TOPSOIL _ RE� �J wEu COUNTY COPS �N.rs1 YARD BLUM ESTATES VIEW / ESTATES y� � e" (PENDING) SEASON'S — CEMETERY / COUNTY ANIMAL— TREATMENT/ f SERVICES HHW�S �� PLANT F S CCCSD WAREHOUSE HOB ANNEX IN PLANT USE p \I R F< 7�, J L, r �, -, 0 - �n Q)" , ( — CONTRA COSTA BLVD MEDIANS 5 k CONTRA COSTA CHILPANCINGO� COUNTRY CLUB BLVD MEDIANS , GOLF COURSE-, �_ S CHILPANCINGO GOLF CLUB PARK• ROAD MEDIANS `"f \\ c\ �\7 / \ \�1 `\� `-��\ ., `✓ , , iii � i � i r— ;TUBB RD / " REw TRIPLEXES i � r � DVC CAMPUS VIKING ` VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE COLLEGE PARK SCHOOLS P.H. S CORP. �YARD� A r — TRUCK FILL HYDRANT ;\ r GOLF 2000. 4000 SID co FEET )RECYCLED ER SYSTEM o � cl VV I � 4 ;TUBB RD / " REw TRIPLEXES i � r � DVC CAMPUS VIKING ` VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE COLLEGE PARK SCHOOLS P.H. S CORP. �YARD� A r — TRUCK FILL HYDRANT F Z" \\ �-TR TAYLO LANDSCE \I�I� r - J� P.H. PAI � I i - SEQUOIA SEO ELEMENTARY /r MIDDLE SCHOOL M SCHOOL --] F n r GOLF BUCHANAN FIELDS COURSE SID co -4 " — 1I F Z" \\ �-TR TAYLO LANDSCE \I�I� r - J� P.H. PAI � I i - SEQUOIA SEO ELEMENTARY /r MIDDLE SCHOOL M SCHOOL --] F TABLE 3 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JANUARY 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 ml Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 01/01/10 1.5 3.9 6.0 <2 27 01/02/10 1.4 4.0 5.3 <2 40 01/03/10 1.4 4.8 5.6 <2 22 01/04/10 1.4 4.6 6.3 <2 27 01/05/10 1.5 2.9 6.4 <2 23 01/06/10 X 3.4 8.2 <2 40 01/07/10 X 4.0 8.2 <2 32 01/08/10 X 4.1 7.0 <2 42 01/09/10 X 5.6 8.2 <2 67 01/10/10 1.5 4.3 8.2 <2 63 01/11/10 1.3 4.6 6.6 <2 70 01/12/10 X 4.4 5.8 <2 23 01/13/10 1.8 3.4 6.7 <2 22 01/14/10 1.4 4.0 7.7 <2 22 01/15/10 1.1 3.6 7.8 <2 24 01/16/10 1.3 6.8 6.7 <2 28 01/17/10 1.4 3.5 5.9 <2 21 01/18/10 1.4 4.2 6.3 <2 23 01/19/10 1.3 3.8 6.0 <2 20 01/20/10 1.2 4.5 6.2 <2 39 01/21/10 1.2 4.2 6.9 <2 19 01/22/10 1.5 4.4 7.2 <2 22 01/23/10 1.6 4.3 6.8 <2 42 01/24/10 1.5 3.6 7.0 <2 22 01/25/10 1.6 3.7 7.8 <2 20 01/26/10 1.6 3.6 7.0 <2 20 01/27/10 X 2.6 8.3 <2 37 01/28/10 X 3.1 8.6 <2 23 01/29/10 1.0 4.1 8.3 <2 23 01/30/10 1.6 3.1 8.6 <2 40 01/31/10 1.9 4.5 8.4 <2 21 Minimum 1.0 2.6 5.3 <2 19 Maximum 1.8 6.1 8.7 <2 70 Average 1.4 4.0 7.2 <2 31 X = No filtered effluent to the clearwell due to low 11 winter time usage WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 3 - January.doc TABLE 4 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS FEBRUARY 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 02/01/10 1.6 3.0 7.8 <2 21 02/02/10 1.6 8.1 4.0 <2 27 02/03/10 1.7 3.2 6.9 <2 22 02/04/10 1.7 3.0 7.9 <2 22 02/05/10 1.5 4.2 6.9 <2 22 02/06/10 1.4 3.6 6.3 <2 24 02/07/10 1.5 3.4 6.5 <2 21 02/08/10 1.6 3.6 5.8 <2 21 02/09/10 1.5 3.7 6.1 <2 20 02/10/10 1.3 4.1 6.4 <2 21 02/11/10 1.3 4.4 8.0 <2 20 02/12/10 1.4 3.9 5.8 <2 19 02/13/10 1.4 4.0 6.5 <2 27 02/14/10 1.9 4.8 7.2 <2 21 02/15/10 2.8 3.3 6.4 <2 21 02/16/10 2.5 3.4 6.6 <2 20 02/17/10 1.3 4.0 7.8 <2 22 02/18/10 1.4 4.0 8.2 <2 25 02/19/10 1.4 3.5 8.3 <2 24 02/20/10 1.2 3.3 6.7 <2 26 02/21/10 2.3 4.5 6.8 <2 20 02/22/10 2.5 7.1 6.7 <2 20 02/23/10 1.5 3.3 8.4 <2 20 02/24/10 1.5 3.4 6.3 <2 20 02/25/10 1.4 2.7 8.1 <2 24 02/26/10 1.4 6.0 8.5 <2 23 02/27/10 1.4 2.8 6.5 <2 25 02/28/10 1.4 5.4 6.2 <2 20 Minimum 1.2 2.7 4.0 <2 19 Maximum 2.8 8.1 8.5 <2 27 Average 1.6 4.1 6.9 <2 22 12 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 4 - February.doc TABLE 5 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS MARCH 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 03/01/10 1.6 4.7 5.1 <2 20 03/02/10 1.6 3.8 6.7 <2 23 03/03/10 1.7 6.0 5.8 <2 20 03/04/10 1.6 5.7 6.0 <2 19 03/05/10 1.6 3.2 6.2 <2 28 03/06/10 1.6 2.8 5.8 <2 26 03/07/10 1.5 4.1 5.6 <2 20 03/08/10 1.6 2.4 5.5 <2 20 03/09/10 1.5 3.8 5.6 <2 22 03/10/10 1.6 3.7 6.3 <2 20 03/11/10 1.6 4.2 8.5 <2 20 03/12/10 1.6 3.3 5.2 <2 22 03/13/10 1.6 3.5 5.4 <2 26 03/14/10 1.5 4.0 5.4 <2 20 03/15/10 1.3 3.0 5.6 <2 21 03/16/10 1.6 3.8 5.5 <2 24 03/17/10 1.8 2.8 5.7 <2 24 03/18/10 1.8 3.8 8.0 <2 31 03/19/10 1.7 3.8 8.0 <2 57 03/20/10 1.6 3.8 6.1 <2 70 03/21/10 1.5 5.4 6.3 <2 46 03/22/10 1.5 5.3 6.2 <2 34 03/23/10 2.0 1.8 6.2 <2 35 03/24/10 1.6 2.6 5.8 <2 49 03/25/10 1.5 3.8 5.7 <2 65 03/26/10 1.5 5.1 6.1 <2 81 03/27/10 1.4 4.5 5.7 <2 41 03/28/10 1.4 4.5 6.3 <2 31 03/29/10 1.5 6.1 6.2 <2 27 03/30/10 1.5 3.1 6.5 <2 63 03/31/10 1.5 2.5 6.2 <2 287 Minimum 1.3 1.8 5.1 <2 19 Maximum 2.0 6.1 8.5 <2 287 Average 1.6 3.9 6.1 <2 42 13 NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 5 - March.doc TABLE 6 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS APRIL 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 04/01/10 1.5 7.2 6.8 <2 80 04/02/10 1.4 3.7 6.3 <2 62 04/03/10 1.4 7 5.7 <2 101 04/04/10 1.4 3.7 6.1 <2 47 04/05/10 1.5 3.8 5.0 <2 27 04/06/10 1.5 2.5 5.6 <2 25 04/07/10 1.5 3.4 5.3 <2 44 04/08/10 1.5 4.8 5.9 <2 60 04/09/10 1.5 1.5 7.9 <2 93 04/10/10 1.4 4.8 6.1 <2 167 04/11/10 1.6 5.8 6.6 <2 69 04/12/10 1.5 3.6 6.1 <2 21 04/13/10 1.5 2.6 7.8 <2 28 04/14/10 1.5 5.7 8.3 <2 45 04/15/10 1.4 2.9 8.0 <2 34 04/16/10 1.4 3.0 7.9 <2 42 04/17/10 1.4 3 5.9 <2 82 04/18/10 1.6 5.2 6.5 <2 50 04/19/10 1.6 3.2 6.5 <2 47 04/20/10 1.6 3.6 6.8 <2 69 04/21/10 1.6 3.2 6.0 <2 40 04/22/10 1.7 2.4 6.2 <2 47 04/23/10 1.7 7.4 6.2 <2 39 04/24/10 1.7 2.8 6.8 <2 40 04/25/10 1.5 2.3 7.5 <2 33 04/26/10 1.8 2.6 7.6 <2 31 04/27/10 1.5 2.2 7.5 <2 46 04/28/10 1.5 4.2 5.00 <2 54 04/29/10 1.4 6.2 6.0 <2 38 04/30/10 1.4 2.2 7.8 <2 48 Minimum 1.4 1.5 5.0 <2 21 Maximum 1.7 7.4 8.3 <2 167 Average 1.5 3.9 6.6 <2 54 14 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 6 - April.doc TABLE 7 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS MAY 2010 Da Turbidity NTU Em/ Dissolved Oxygen m /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 05/01/10 1.5 4.1 6.0 <2 101 05/02/10 1.5 4.2 7.6 <2 74 05/03/10 1.4 5.0 7.0 <2 68 05/04/10 1.4 2.9 5.7 <2 137 05/05/10 1.4 4.7 6.2 <2 374 05/06/10 1.4 5.0 6.1 <2 420 05/07/10 1.5 4.9 6.3 <2 362 05/08/10 1.6 3.4 5.8 <2 306 05/09/10 1.6 3.3 6.4 <2 189 05/10/10 1.4 3.9 6.1 <2 357 05/11/10 1.4 4.5 6.4 <2 297 05/12/10 1.4 4.4 5.8 <2 86 05/13/10 1.5 3.8 6.1 <2 359 05/14/10 1.5 3.3 5.8 <2 490 05/15/10 1.5 4.5 6.2 <2 522 05/16/10 1.6 2.9 6.1 <2 496 05/17/10 1.5 2.5 5.6 <2 117 05/18/10 1.6 2.6 5.5 <2 399 05/19/10 1.6 2.1 5.8 <2 320 05/20/10 1.5 3.8 5.8 <2 224 05/21/10 1.5 4.2 5.7 <2 436 05/22/10 1.5 3.7 7.0 <2 342 05/23/10 1.3 4.2 7.6 <2 393 05/24/10 1.3 3.5 5.2 <2 433 05/25/10 1.5 3.1 6.0 <2 530 05/26/10 1.5 3.5 7.8 <2 410 05/27/10 1.5 3.1 7.7 <2 224 05/28/10 1.5 4.8 6.3 <2 76 05/29/10 1.5 4.1 5.8 <2 87 05/30/10 1.5 3.6 6.3 <2 186 05/31/10 1.5 4.7 5.8 <2 536 Minimum 1.3 2.1 5.2 <2 69 Maximum 1.6 5.0 7.8 <2 536 Average 1.5 3.8 6.2 <2 301 15 NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 7 - May.doc TABLE 8 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JUNE 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 06/01/10 1.6 4.0 5.9 <2 528 06/02/10 1.7 2.2 6.3 <2 542 06/03/10 1.5 2.0 6.3 <2 479 06/04/10 1.4 2.7 6.2 <2 323 06/05/10 1.5 2.8 5.6 <2 685 06/06/10 1.5 4.4 6.3 <2 462 06/07/10 1.4 3.6 7.0 <2 430 06/08/10 1.5 3.2 7.2 <2 664 06/09/10 1.5 3.2 6.2 <2 668 06/10/10 1.6 3.1 5.9 <2 588 06/11/10 1.5 3.3 5.5 <2 459 06/12/10 1.6 4.1 5.3 <2 691 06/13/10 1.5 4.5 6.0 <2 791 06/14/10 1.5 3.4 5.7 <2 842 06/15/10 1.6 3.2 5.8 <2 819 06/16/10 1.7 2.9 5.4 <2 792 06/17/10 1.7 3.2 5.6 <2 697 06/18/10 1.5 3.0 5.8 <2 692 06/19/10 1.4 3.5 5.8 13 979 06/20/10 1.5 2.8 6.3 <2 729 06/21/10 1.5 3.5 6.1 <2 387 06/22/10 1.4 4.9 5.8 <2 944 06/23/10 1.4 4.0 5.9 <2 820 06/24/10 1.5 4.2 7.1 <2 768 06/25/10 1.6 3.1 5.9 <2 628 06/26/10 1.3 2.3 5.8 <2 674 06/27/10 1.3 3.2 6.1 <2 523 06/28/10 1.5 5.0 5.9 <2 655 06/29/10 1.6 4.2 5.9 <2 1319 06/30/10 1 1.6 1 5.0 1 6.3 1 <2 1 606 Minimum 1.3 2.0 5.3 < 2 323 Maximum 1.7 5.0 7.2 13 1319 Average 1.5 3.5 6.0 <2 673 16 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 8 - June.doc TABLE 9 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS JULY 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 07/01/10 1.4 2.4 7.1 <2 748 07/02/10 1.4 2.0 6.0 <2 777 07/03/10 1.2 4.9 6.6 <2 809 07/04/10 1.3 4.5 6.2 <2 742 07/05/10 1.4 5.7 6.4 <2 1266 07/06/10 1.4 3.8 6.1 <2 442 07/07/10 1.4 3.4 6.2 <2 614 07/08/10 1.5 3.1 6.2 <2 727 07/09/10 1.5 3.2 6.0 <2 783 07/10/10 1.4 3.4 6.2 <2 817 07/11/10 1.4 2.7 6.1 <2 687 07/12/10 1.2 2.7 6.0 <2 587 07/13/10 1.1 2.8 7.4 <2 936 07/14/10 1.1 2.6 7.3 <2 832 07/15/10 1.3 2.7 6.3 <2 797 07/16/10 1.5 2.3 5.1 <2 953 07/17/10 1.6 3.8 5.4 <2 826 07/18/10 1.4 4.4 5.6 <2 987 07/19/10 1.3 4.4 5.4 <2 454 07/20/10 1.2 3.0 7.2 <2 1014 07/21/10 1.3 4.0 6.7 <2 764 07/22/10 1.4 2.0 3.8 <2 583 07/23/10 1.4 3.4 3.2 <2 755 07/24/10 1.4 2.0 3.9 <2 1063 07/25/10 1.5 4.4 3.5 <2 637 07/26/10 1.4 2.4 1.9 <2 596 07/27/10 1.3 4.4 6.2 <2 1022 07/28/10 1.4 2.1 6.2 <2 676 07/29/10 1.4 2.0 6.3 <2 554 07/30/10 1.5 3.0 4.2 <2 658 07/31/10 1.5 2.1 2.2 <2 930 Minimum 1.1 2.0 1.9 <2 442 Maximum 1.6 5.7 7.4 <2 1266 Average 1.4 3.2 5.6 <2 775 17 NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 9 - July.doc TABLE 10 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS AUGUST 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 08/01/10 1.4 3.8 3.6 <2 522 08/02/10 1.5 2.1 1.7 <2 634 08/03/10 1.6 0.6 3.1 <2 753 08/04/10 1.6 1.6 6.5 <2 997 08/05/10 1.7 6.0 5.7 <2 705 08/06/10 1.7 2.8 6.8 <2 773 08/07/10 1.6 3.4 6.1 <2 825 08/08/10 1.5 5.9 2.4 <2 762 08/09/10 1.5 2.7 2.1 <2 696 08/10/10 1.4 2.4 5.8 <2 812 08/11/10 1.4 2.2 6.1 <2 814 08/12/10 1.5 3.0 3.6 <2 726 08/13/10 1.8 2.8 5.4 <2 747 08/14/10 1.7 2.7 3.3 <2 833 08/15/10 1.7 4.0 6.0 <2 806 08/16/10 1.6 4.4 2.0 <2 702 08/17/10 1.4 4.4 3.4 <2 667 08/18/10 1.5 3.6 2.6 <2 785 08/19/10 1.3 2.8 1.9 <2 571 08/20/10 1.3 3.4 5.7 <2 531 08/21/10 1.2 3.0 2.0 <2 780 08/22/10 1.3 3.0 1.7 <2 641 08/23/10 1.4 4.6 3.2 <2 584 08/24/10 1.5 3.8 1.6 <2 866 08/25/10 1.5 6.2 0.8 <2 828 08/26/10 1.5 2.4 1.8 <2 772 08/27/10 1.5 3.9 3.4 <2 798 08/28/10 1.6 4.4 5.3 <2 778 08/29/10 1.5 5.8 2.1 <2 550 08/30/10 1.5 2.4 1.3 <2 574 08/31/10 1.3 4.2 3.4 <2 796 Minimum 1.2 0.6 0.8 <2 522 Maximum 1.8 6.2 6.8 <2 997 Average 1.5 3.5 3.6 <2 730 18 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 10 - August.doc TABLE 11 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS SEPTEMBER 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 090 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 09/01/10 1.1 4.2 3.1 <2 747 09/02/10 1.3 3.8 2.8 <2 698 09/03/10 1.4 2.7 2.2 <2 622 09/04/10 1.5 2.4 1.1 <2 749 09/05/10 1.5 6.6 4.1 <2 1025 09/06/10 1.6 5.6 5.1 <2 494 09/07/10 1.7 2.7 2.4 <2 419 09/08/10 1.6 4.4 2.2 <2 777 09/09/10 1.6 3.5 2.2 <2 689 09/10/10 1.4 2.6 2.0 <2 578 09/11/10 1.5 3.0 2.0 <2 628 09/12/10 1.5 8.6 3.8 <2 628 09/13/10 1.4 3.6 1.4 <2 441 09/14/10 1.5 4.2 5.2 <2 732 09/15/10 1.5 4.3 6.3 <2 539 09/16/10 1.4 4.2 5.8 <2 437 09/17/10 1.3 4.8 6.2 <2 646 09/18/10 1.2 3.4 3.3 <2 697 09/19/10 1.4 5.5 3.0 <2 386 09/20/10 1.4 3.4 2.1 <2 475 09/21/10 1.4 4.3 6.2 <2 527 09/22/10 1.5 3.9 2.4 <2 441 09/23/10 1.4 2.5 2.3 <2 372 09/24/10 1.3 3.2 2.8 <2 407 09/25/10 1.2 3.6 3.4 <2 510 09/26/10 1.4 4.4 4.5 <2 544 09/27/10 1.4 4.7 3.7 <2 359 09/28/10 1.3 5.1 3.6 <2 883 09/29/10 1.4 3.2 3.5 <2 495 09/30/10 1.4 4.6 3.2 <2 639 Minimum 1.1 2.4 1.1 <2 359 Maximum 1.7 8.6 6.3 <2 1025 Average 1.4 4.1 3.4 <2 587 19 NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 11 - September.doc TABLE 12 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS OCTOBER 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 10/01/10 1.2 4.1 2.5 <2 574 10/02/10 1.4 4.0 3.7 <2 595 10/03/10 1.4 3.2 4.7 <2 316 10/04/10 1.3 3.4 5.3 <2 288 10/05/10 1.3 3.4 1.2 <2 405 10/06/10 1.5 3.6 2.3 <2 478 10/07/10 1.5 0.6 1.5 <2 583 10/08/10 1.6 5.6 0.9 <2 385 10/09/10 1.6 4.9 2.2 <2 316 10/10/10 1.5 5.1 2.7 <2 325 10/11/10 1.5 3.4 4.6 <2 418 10/12/10 1.6 3.8 6.0 <2 575 10/13/10 1.5 3.3 4.5 <2 613 10/14/10 1.3 5.2 4.1 <2 266 10/15/10 1.3 3.2 6.4 <2 548 10/16/10 1.5 4.4 2.8 <2 494 10/17/10 1.6 3.7 2.4 <2 207 10/18/10 1.5 5.4 1.8 <2 306 10/19/10 1.5 2.4 2.6 <2 202 10/20/10 1.6 3.2 5.8 <2 449 10/21/10 1.5 7.2 6.3 <2 170 10/22/10 1.5 5.5 4.9 <2 176 10/23/10 1.5 2.8 2.9 <2 93 10/24/10 1.4 3.9 4.4 <2 67 10/25/10 1.4 6.4 6.2 <2 68 10/26/10 1.7 3.0 5.8 <2 51 10/27/10 1.5 3.4 6.2 <2 57 10/28/10 1.5 3.4 5.6 <2 57 10/29/10 1.6 4.6 6.3 <2 82 10/30/10 1.4 6.4 5.6 <2 73 10/31/10 1.4 4.3 2.0 <2 74 Minimum 1.2 0.9 0.9 <2 51 Maximum 1.7 7.2 6.4 <2 613 Average 1.5 4.1 4.0 <2 300 20 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 12 - October.doc TABLE 13 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS NOVEMBER 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 11/01/10 1.6 3.4 5.6 <2 21 11/02/10 1.5 4.2 6.8 <2 84 11/03/10 1.6 7.2 6.5 <2 148 11/04/10 1.6 3.0 5.7 <2 80 11/05/10 1.7 2.0 3.2 <2 123 11/07/10 1.5 3.1 3.6 <2 122 11/07/10 1.6 3.6 3.0 <2 96 11/08/10 1.6 3.7 2.7 <2 75 11/09/10 1.7 4.2 5.8 <2 62 11/10/10 1.6 3.1 6.4 <2 90 11/11/10 1.5 2.3 3.1 <2 184 11/12/10 1.5 1.6 4.0 <2 226 11/13/10 1.5 2.3 1.5 <2 214 11/14/10 1.6 2.2 3.6 <2 223 11/15/10 1.7 3.8 2.3 <2 227 11/16/10 1.5 5.6 6.9 <2 356 11/17/10 1.5 3.9 5.7 <2 390 11/18/10 1.5 4.8 6.1 <2 207 11/19/10 1.6 0.1 6.0 <2 81 11/20/10 1.6 3.4 3.1 <2 168 11/21/10 1.6 4.0 2.0 <2 158 11/22/10 1.6 4.4 4.9 <2 147 11/23/10 1.6 4.4 6.9 <2 136 11/24/10 1.7 0.6 6.4 <2 143 11/25/10 1.5 3.4 2.8 <2 167 11/26/10 1.3 3.3 2.4 <2 146 11/27/10 1.3 4.3 2.0 <2 164 11/28/10 1.4 4.2 3.4 <2 160 11/29/10 1.5 5.0 2.0 <2 167 11/30/10 1.5 4.6 6.7 <2 185 Minimum 1.3 0.1 1.5 <2 21 Maximum 1.7 7.2 6.9 <2 390 Average 1.6 3.5 4.4 <2 158 21 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 13 - November.doc TABLE 14 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS DECEMBER 2010 Day Turbidity NTU Chlorine Residual mg /L Dissolved Oxygen mg /L Total Coliform MPN per 100 mL Daily Average Recycle Flow GPM 12/01/10 1.3 4.4 7.1 <2 153 12/02/10 1.3 4.1 2.6 <2 160 12/03/10 1.3 4.0 1.8 <2 157 12/04/10 1.4 3.4 2.4 <2 66 12/05/10 1.5 3.6 4.8 <2 21 12/06/10 1.6 2.3 4.0 <2 25 12/07/10 1.4 2.8 6.8 <2 23 12/08/10 1.2 3.8 6.6 <2 23 12/09/10 1.3 3.4 6.0 <2 42 12/10/10 1.5 2.6 6.4 <2 31 12/11/10 1.6 2.7 2.8 <2 22 12/12/10 2.0 3.9 4.2 <2 18 12/13/10 1.6 4.6 7.4 <2 19 12/14/10 1.5 4.9 7.5 <2 26 12/15/10 1.4 3.3 7.9 <2 25 12/16/10 1.4 4.0 7.8 <2 22 12/17/10 1.3 3.6 8.0 <2 27 12/18/10 1.4 3.3 5.4 <2 26 12/19/10 1.6 6.2 5.7 <2 20 12/20/10 1.5 4.4 5.2 <2 19 12/21/10 1.4 4.0 6.3 <2 19 12/22/10 1.6 4.3 7.7 <2 27 12/23/10 1.5 5.3 6.6 <2 20 12/24/10 1.4 5.6 5.8 <2 20 12/25/10 1.4 5.4 5.7 <2 19 12/26/10 1.6 4.8 6.5 <2 23 12/27/10 1.5 4.4 5.7 <2 19 12/28/10 1.4 4.3 8.0 <2 23 12/29/10 1.6 5.1 8.0 <2 24 12/30/10 1.6 4.9 5.3 <2 24 12/31/10 1.6 5.4 5.6 <2 23 Minimum 1.2 2.3 1.8 <2 18 Maximum 2.0 6.2 8.0 <2 160 Average 1.5 4.2 5.9 <2 38 22 N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 14 - December.doc Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Buchanan Fields Golf Course Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave, Concord. Inspection Date: 9/29/2010 Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course irrigation Weather conditions: Sunnv. hot (95 dearees Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided an updated use permit identifying Leopoldo Lopez as the customer representative Inspector's Signature: 'haul) 6 Date: q Z � ) / J 23 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Headquarters office blg (HOB) and Annex bid, 5019 Imhoff Place, Mtz Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Mick Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: J&4'o tf 1�� Date: 24 J/ // 7 ho ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez Inspection Date 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner) Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: District will replace five valve box covers with purple recycled water covers. Inspector's Signature: �tY Date: 25 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Steven Considine (Field Operations Superintendent) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal water for pumps and wash down hose Weather conditions: Clear. cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: YI �� 2 Z2Q� Date: 26 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner) Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, cold Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage Yes No N/A /1 ■ ■ E ■ ■ ■ ■ // ■ .1 ■ E ■ ■ ■ Z ■ ■ .1 ■ W EIRMI MM �00 ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: _p Inspector's Signature: ✓ ✓C C 1�Q 74 17 t_L1a' Z4-LZ__., Date: 27 // // 7 A -) ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place, Martinez Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner) Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: 1 4 Inspector's Signature: n &1-1 Ldt�Z.(_- Date. 0 23 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Corporation Yard Inspection Date: 11/22/2010 Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa (Maintenance Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill station for landscape median irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast, cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: �l�l , 1 , 7 f 67 ZZ-L44 Date: 29 ® Recycled Paper Central Contra Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site Medians #1 -4 on Golf Club Rd, Contra Costa Blvd, Chilpanchingo Pkwy, Viking Dr landscaping, and Taylor Blvd landscaping Inspection Date 11/22/2010 Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa (Maintenance Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast, cold Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ❑ ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Taylor Blvd landscaping site meter installation and start up August 26, 2010 Inspector's Signature: Date: ,/zzho 30 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Department — 330 Civic Drive Inspection Date: March 26 2010 Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, —65'F Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1 . Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® Cl* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ❑ ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* ❑ contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑ * ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑ * ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® 1:1 ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation ❑* ® ❑ system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: This site began service on March 26 2010 following successful completion of cross connection testing with the Contra Costa Water District. Inspector's Signature: A f�yl Date: 3 1161 1 0 1V %J1 I T 1�1 I 31 Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Conco Companies Location of Site: 5141 Commercial Circle. Concord Inspection Date: 9/29/2010 Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck washing, Mixing agent, Dust control Weather conditions: Sunny, hot (95 degrees) Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ®* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ❑ ❑* 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: 3. Transport vehicle recycled water tanks not signed. CCCSD provided customer with magnetic signs. Customer signed vehicles as they returned to facility and directed staff to have them in place whenever carrying recycled water. Additional notes: , I g Inspector's Signature: C �f ) j C1f 7 � t �r� '�Z -�' Date: ' 9 /Z �/y 32 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Circle, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 10/15/2010 Customer Representative Present: John Martin Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course and clubhouse landscape irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided six new recycled water signs for wall at new landscaped area next to parking lot. Inspector's Signature: & Date: 33 iC /f's 110 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County Location of Site: Animal Shelter, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/8/2010 Customer Representative Present: Greg Mattox for Mary Tennyson, (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and dog kennel wash down Weather conditions: Sunnv and warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage Yes No N/A M/ ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ►1 ■ F� ■ Z ■ ■ ■ // ■ ■ Z ■ ►. ■ ■ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided replacement recycled water signs for gate to the animal exercise area and for fence at the recycled water manifold enclosure. Inspector's Signature: 466,4 (�,, Z� t.��Cz�t� Date: 34 ® Recycled Paper Central Contra Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez Inspection Date: 12/3/2010 Customer Representative Present: Roland Hindsman Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Overcast Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ® ❑* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided replacement recycled water sign for service location at back of property. Inspector's Signature 1.7 (0 IL, L ua6,�'cZ__ Date: 12 35 Recycled Paper 11, central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/8/2010 Customer Representative Present: Tonja Einevell (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control Weather conditions: Sunny and warm Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage Yes No N/A /1 ■ ■ Z ■ ■ ►1 ■ ■ ■ .1 ■ ■ ■ .1 ■ // ■ ■ // ■ ■ ■ �/ ■ a M ■ ■ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided 2'd magnetic sign for haul vehicle passenger door. Customer shortened fill hose to required length at CCCSD inspector's direction. Inspector's Signature: ,�L, f Y! 1- 61 [ t6 di-lL,C Date: /0 A? ✓L[�t 1 3 6 Recycled Paper Central Contra Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: County Quarry Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez Inspection Date: 10/8/2010 Customer Representative Present: Chris Grey (Operations Manager) Application of Recycled Water at Site: process water for base rock manufacturing, concrete batch plant and dust control. Minimal irrigation use along south and west fence lines. Weather conditions: Overcast Standard Observations: Yes No NIA 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ®* ❑ 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: 3. Provided magnetic signs required for 2 nd haul truck and water fill tank. Additional notes: Provided additional recycled water si nape for facility interior. Customer replaced two faded recycled water tags at hose locations. Inspector's Signature: Date: 37 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 11/18/2010 Customer Representative Present: Joe Morgado Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and water pond feature Weather conditions: Sunnv. mild. Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ® ❑* ❑ contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: CCCSD provided bi- linqual do's and don't sign for crewroom. Inspector's Signature: ' ,Q1� "q (f, ,a� 2 Date 1 ® Recycled Paper Central Contra Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date: 11/29/2010 Customer Representative Present: Monica Olson, Site Supervisor Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear. cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ® ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date 39 ///2-1 Ile) ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Plesant Hill Middle School Inspection Date 11/23/2010 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: overcast. drizzle Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 6 ( Date 40 i/ /Z_ A) ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools Inspection Date: 11/23/2010 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: overcast. drizzle Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ZLEjj 6/1- t I_C' 6 4t e— Date: r� b, 3 //o 41 ® Recycled Paper 11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District Location of Site: Valley View Middle and College Park High Schools Inspection Date: 11/23/2010 Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: overcast, drizzle Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 4 a,aw 63v1,c_C6XL, Date. // /Z _S)/6 42 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Chilpancingo Park Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear. cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ✓l t_ (�C yJ 6 ���� Date: j / // 7 / 43 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear. cool Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided recycled water stickers for control boxes and signs for the west parking lot entry and the community center approach locations. Inspector's Signature: Date: 7 ,// C1 44 ® Recycled Paper J� Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Park Inspection Date: 11/17/2010 Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear. cool Standard Observations: 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storaqe ._ ft o , E ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ ■ ■ .1 ■ // ■ Z ■ ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ /1 ■ ■ ■ // ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: F. R STAF1fi'i i-i Provided recycle water sign for parking lot entrance to upper ball field. Inspector's Signature: Date: j / // 7 / /L , 45 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park — 147 Gregory Lane Inspection Date: November 16 2010 Customer Representative Present: Lynn Spatz Todd Smith Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, —55 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1 . Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ❑ ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® [1* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑ * ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ❑ ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ® ❑ * ❑ contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation ❑* ® ❑ system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: This site beaan service on November 16, 2010, followin successful completion of cross connection testing with the Contra Costa Water District. Customer has adjusted sprinkler heads and relocated sprinklers so that spray does not contact drinking fountains picnic tables, and food preparation areas. Inspector's Signature: Date: 46 Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes Location of Site: 700 -780 Stubbs Road Buildings 1 -7, Pleasant Hill Inspection Date 4/7/2010 Customer Representative Present: #1 Doug Brown, #2 +3 Jean Edwards, #4 +5 Jim FreethV #6 Jeanne Papir, #7 Audrey Han Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation Weather conditions: Clear, mild Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection? ® ❑* ❑ 2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately? ❑ ❑* 4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance? ❑* ® ❑ 5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public? ® ❑* ❑ 6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas? ❑* ® ❑ 7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings, ❑* ® ❑ designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities? 8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against ❑ ❑* contact with recycled water spray or runoff? 9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles? ❑* ® ❑ 10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage ❑* ❑ ponds or impoundments? 11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑ piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided stickers for building irrigation control boxes and do's / don't signs to place adjacent to control boxes. Inspector's Signature: "L4 Date: �// 4 7 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: City of Lafayette Public Works Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 12/10/2010 Customer Representative Present: Phil Nishkian Date Customer Began Service: 10/6//2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided bi- linqual do's and don'ts sign for crew room Inspector's Signature: Date. 48 /Z /l o //D ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Contra Costa County Public Works Use Description: Compaction, Dust Control, Street Sweeping Inspection Date: 12/13/2010 Customer Representative Present: Marcellino Abundis Date Customer Began Service: 1/14/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: Date: 49 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Diablo General Engineering Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 12/9/2010 Customer Representative Present: Ryan Truax Date Customer Began Service: 10/14/2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: ��r` ��ti��� Date: 50 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Pro tecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Evans Brothers Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 12/10/2010 Customer Representative Present: Mike Nisen Date Customer Began Service: 5/13/2009 Standard Observations: 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? Yes No N/A ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ /1 ■ a 0 ■ ® ❑* ❑ 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided customer with magnetic signs for trucks and do's and don'ts sign for crew room Inspector's Signature: Date: 51 ® Recycled Paper J�L Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Roto- Rooter Use Description: Sanitary_ sewer cleaning Inspection Date: 12/13/2010 Customer Representative Present: Rodney Schaul Date Customer Began Service: 9/11/2008 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Provided three do's and don't signs for crew room and transport vehicles Inspector's Signature: - ���� (1`'1����J2� Date: 52 ® Recycled Paper Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Sundance Landscaping Use Description: Construction / irrigation Inspection Date: 12/16/2010 Customer Representative Present: Steve Trout Date Customer Began Service: 8/27/2009 Standard Observations: Yes No N/A 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each ® ❑* ❑ vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? ® ❑* ❑ 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled ® ❑* ❑ water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved ® ❑* ❑ backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑ authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑ 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑ regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: Inspector's Signature: 53 Date: ��/ / <<' // U ® Recycled Paper Central Contra Costa sanitary District 2009 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Wyvern Farms Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction Inspection Date: 12/10/2010 Customer Representative Present: Date Customer Began Service Chuck Lewis /2009 Standard Observations: 1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each vehicle transporting recycled water? 2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current? 3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled water notification signage or placards? 4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved backflow preventer? 5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit? 6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? 7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines? Yes No N/A ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ ® ❑* ❑ All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number: Additional notes: inspector's Signature p g �� l�z��� Date: 54 / R / / C ho ® Recycled Paper