Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.a. Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual ReportCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: February 24, 2011
subject: ACCEPTANCE OF ANNUAL REPORT
Submitted By Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Bhupinder S. Dhaliwal Plant Operations /Laboratory
Laboratory Superintendent
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
B. Dhaliwal D. Berger M. Orr A. Farrell James . Kelly,
General Manager
ISSUE: central Contra costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD's) 2010 Recycled Water
Quality and Distribution Annual Report has been prepared for submission to the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Bay
Section. This annual report is attached for Board of Directors' information and
acceptance.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution
Annual Report.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
ALTERNATIVES/CONSIDERATIONS: Reject the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and
Distribution Annual Report, which is not recommended.
BACKGROUND:
Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality
standards, except for dissolved oxygen (DO) of less than 1.0 mg /L on August 25 and
October 8, 2010. Excessive microbial growth in the filter media is believed to be the
cause of this episodic low DO. However, we believe that the DO at the points of
application of recycled water most likely was well above 1.0 mg /L because of
turbulence and mixing by the pumps and in the delivery pipes downstream of the
sample point.
Significant accomplishments for this years' Recycled Water Program are described in
the attached 2010 Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Annual Report. The report
was reviewed by the Recycled Water Committee at their February 15, 2011, meeting
and was recommended for Board acceptance.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept the 2010 Recycled Water Quality and
Distribution Annual Report.
NAPOSUPILaboratory\Recycled Water1201 OTosition Paper 201 o.doc
2010
RECYCLED
WATER
QUALITY AND
DISTRIBUTION
ANNUAL
REPORT
` ,,Oed
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2010 RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION
ANNUAL REPORT
INDEX
Page No.
Discharger's Self- Monitoring Program Report — Recycled Water .......... ............................... 1-5
Figure 1
Recycled Water at Work ...................................................
...............................
6-7
Table 1
Summary of Recycled Water Usage — 2010 .......................... ..............................8
Table 2
Monthly Recycled Water Usage — 2010 ..................................
..............................9
Figure 2
CCCSD Recycled Water System Map ..................................
.............................10
Table 3
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— January .............. .............................11
Table 4
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— February ............. .............................12
Table 5
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— March ................. .............................13
Table 6
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— April .................... .............................14
Table 7
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— May .................... .............................15
Table 8
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— June .................... .............................16
Table 9
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— July .................... .............................17
Table 10
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— August ................ .............................18
Table 11
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— September ......... .............................19
Table 12
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— October .............. .............................20
Table 13
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— November .......... .............................21
Table 14
CCCSD Recycled Water Characteristics
— December .......... .............................22
RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORTS
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Buchanan Fields Golf Course, Concord ........................................... .............................23
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
CCCSD Headquarters Office Building and Annex Building, Martinez ............................24
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
CCCSD Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Martinez . .............................25
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
CCCSD Maltby Pump Station, Martinez ........................................... .............................26
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Index.doc
Page No.
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
CCCSD Treatment Plant Site, Martinez ........................................... .............................27
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
CCCSD Warehouse (4737 Imhoff Place), Martinez .......................... .............................28
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
City of Pleasant Hill, Corporation Yard, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill .... .............................29
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
City of Pleasant Hill, Medians ( #1 - #4 on Golf Club Road, Contra Costa Boulevard
and Chilpancingo Parkway) Viking Drive Landscaping, and Taylor Boulevard
Landscaping, Pleasant Hill ................................................................ .............................30
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
City of Pleasant Hill, Pleasant Hill Police Station, Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill ..................31
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Conco Companies, Martinez ............................................................. .............................32
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course, Pleasant Hill ..................... .............................33
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Contra Costa County Animal Shelter, Martinez ................................ .............................34
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Contra Costa County Corporation Yard, Martinez ............................ .............................35
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Contra Costa Topsoil, Martinez ........................................................ .............................36
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
County Quarry, Martinez ................................................................... .............................37
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill ................................................. .............................38
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Demonstration Garden, Pleasant Hill .......................39
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Pleasant Hill Middle School, Pleasant Hill ...............40
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools,
PleasantHill ...................................................................................... .............................41
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Index.doc
Page No.
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Valley View Middle School and College Park
High School, Pleasant Hill ................................................................. .............................42
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Chilpancingo Park, Pleasant Hill ................43
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Community Center / Frank Salfingere
Park, Pleasant Hill ............................................................................. .............................44
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Oaks Park, Pleasant Hill .............45
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District, Pleasant Hill Park, Pleasant Hill .................46
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Site Inspection Report
Stubbs Road Triplexes, Pleasant Hill ................................................ .............................47
RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORTS
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
City of Lafayette Public Works .......................................................... .............................48
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
Contra Costa County Public Works ................................................... .............................49
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
Diablo General Engineering .............................................................. .............................50
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
EvansBrothers ................................................................................. .............................51
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
Roto- Rooter ...................................................................................... .............................52
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
Sundance Landscaping ................................................................... .............................53
CCCSD Annual Recycled Water Hydrant Truck Fill Customer Inspection Report
WyvernFarms ................................................................................... .............................54
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Index.doc
DISCHARGER'S SELF - MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT
RECYCLED WATER
REPORTING DISCHARGER:
DATE OF REPORT:
ORDER:
REPORTING PERIOD:
INTRODUCTION
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
February 15, 2011
96 -011
January through December 2010
The following reports for production and distribution of tertiary- treated recycled water cover
the period of January through December 2010. Figure 1 shows pictures of recycled water
usage. Table 1 gives a summary of recycled water usage for calendar year 2010 for reuse
application categories. Table 2 shows the monthly usage of recycled water by customer.
Figure 2 is a detailed map showing the location of each recycled water customer.
Tables 3 through 14 present the water quality characteristics. The 2010 Recycled Water
Site Inspection Reports follow these tables. Additionally, monthly site inspection visits are
also conducted during meter reading activities to verify conformance with recycled water
use requirements. All sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. 96 -011.
Recycled water remained in compliance with applicable tertiary recycled water quality
standards, except for dissolved oxygen (DO) of less than 1.0 MG /L on August 25, 2010,
and October 8, 2010. Excessive microbial growth in the filter media is believed to be the
cause of this episodic low DO. However, we believe that the DO at the points of
application of recycled water was most likely well above 1.0 MG /L because of turbulence
and mixing by the pumps and in the delivery pipes downstream of the sample point.
Additionally, no sulfide concentration was detected in these samples.
FUTURE EXPANSION
Recycled water is an integral part of the mission of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
( CCCSD), and CCCSD has been operating a successful and growing recycled water
program since 1996. Since that time, we have been providing recycled water for in -plant
usage and to irrigation customers. In 2010 CCCSD provided approximately 480 acre -feet
(AF) (157 million gallons (MG)) of recycled water to a variety of customers in Pleasant Hill,
Concord, and Martinez near the Interstate 680 freeway. Recycled water was used for
landscape irrigation at schools, parks, golf courses, and street medians and for
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc
commercial uses such as truck washing, concrete manufacturing, dust control, and
washing kennels at the local animal shelter. CCCSD also operates a recycled water truck
fill hydrant program to make recycled water available for construction uses in the area.
Recycled water demand in 2010 was less than historical averages (typically about 600 AF
per year (AFY), or 200,000 MG /year) due to a combination of higher than normal rainfall
and cooler temperatures that reduced demand for landscape irrigation.
In addition to supplying recycled water to offsite customers, CCCSD also used
approximately 1,230 AFY (400 MG /year) of recycled water internally at CCCSD's
wastewater treatment plant in Martinez for process water and landscape irrigation.
Therefore, the total volume of recycled water provided by CCCSD in 2010 for offsite
customer locations and internal uses was approximately 1,710 AFY (557 MG /year).
CCCSD continues to look for opportunities and partnerships to expand recycled water use
and obtain financial assistance to build new recycled water projects. While landscape
irrigation projects have historically represented the core of CCCSD's recycled water
program, CCCSD is now focusing efforts on developing a large -scale industrial reuse
project that would use recycled water all year instead of just seasonally, as with landscape
irrigation projects. The following describes CCCSD's work in 2010 to expand recycled
water use.
Contra Costa County Refinery Recycled Water Project
CCCSD continued efforts to develop a refinery recycled water project that would provide
up to 22,500 (AFY) (20 MG /day) of recycled water to the Shell Martinez Refinery and the
Tesoro Refinery for use as cooling tower makeup water and as boiler feedwater. The
refinery project is particularly attractive because it represents a large year -round demand,
and it could potentially make use of existing conveyance and storage facilities that are
already in place from CCCSD's treatment plant to each refinery. However, because the
project would be costly (up to $100M) CCCSD needs financial assistance and /or project
partners to make the project cost - effective. In this regard, CCCSD is pursing federal
funding through the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), which could provide
funding for up to 75% of project costs. In parallel, CCCSD is also pursing federal Title
XVI funding, which could provide up to 25% funding if WRDA funding is not available. The
project would likely be constructed in phases to reduce the impact to ratepayers by
spreading out the costs over a longer period.
Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project
CCCSD is considering constructing the Concord Recycled Water Landscape Project
(formerly the A -Line Project) to provide up to 190 AFY (62 MG /year) of recycled water for
landscape irrigation at businesses and landscape medians in the Diamond /Meridian Park
Boulevard area of Concord if some financial assistance can be acquired. CCCSD has
been pursuing federal funding assistance for this project through the United States Bureau
of Reclamation (USBR) Title XVI Program. In May 2010, the USBR approved CCCSD's
Title XVI Feasibility Study and determined the project met federal feasibility guidelines.
CCCSD expects to complete the remaining environmental documentation to comply with
WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements in 2011, which is required for
projects receiving federal funding. In order to obtain Title XVI funding, CCCSD needs to
obtain federal legislative authorization and appropriation, which may be difficult due to the
economic climate. CCCSD has also applied for Proposition 84 grant funding, which could
provide approximately $1 M in funding. The Department of Water Resources is expected
to make decisions in June 2011 on Proposition 84 grant award recipients, and these funds
could potentially be available in Fiscal Year 2011/12.
Recvcled Water Zone One Proiect
CCCSD has an agreement with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) to allow CCCSD
to supply up to 1,162 AFY (379 MG /year) of recycled water for landscape irrigation and
light commercial uses in the Zone One Project area, which consists of portions of
Martinez, Pleasant Hill, and Concord near the Interstate 680 freeway. CCCSD
constructed and operates approximately 11 miles of recycled water distribution pipelines in
these areas, and is working to connect new, cost - effective recycled water customers
located near existing distribution pipelines.
In 2010, CCCSD completed the design and construction of three new landscape irrigation
connections and began recycled water service to the following sites:
1. Pleasant Hill Police Department
2. Pleasant Hill Park, Gregory Lane
3. Taylor Blvd Landscaping, City of Pleasant Hill
These three sites will add an estimated combined recycled water demand of about 43
AFY, or 14 MG /year.
CCCSD is continuing efforts to identify and connect additional cost - effective landscape
irrigation customers in the Zone One project area and plans to connect several new sites
in 2011.
Concord Naval Weapons Station Redevelopment
The planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station property provides an
excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use by CCCSD. In 2009, the City of
Concord selected a preferred development plan (Clustered Villages concept) consisting of
a mixture of commercial, residential, institutional, and recreational uses interspersed
between parks and open space. This mixture of uses will create opportunities to use
recycled water, not only for landscape irrigation but, also for non - potable uses such as
toilet flushing and cooling towers in commercial buildings. Recycled water demand for the
new development is estimated to be approximately 2,800 AFY (900 MG /year) at build out.
In 2010, CCCSD began work on a Recycled Water Facilities Plan for the Naval Weapons
Station redevelopment to determine the infrastructure and associated costs needed to
meet the anticipated demand. The facilities plan is expected to be completed in 2011.
The actual redevelopment of the property and construction of supporting infrastructure is
WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc
not expected to begin for another five to ten years because of additional environmental
documentation and planning work that must be completed by the City of Concord and
Navy before property ownership can be transferred from the Navy to the City of Concord
and /or developers.
In parallel with preparation of the facilities plan, CCCSD is developing recycled water
standard specifications and details for use by developers for construction of recycled water
distribution systems, such as those planned for the Naval Weapons Station redevelopment
project. This document is expected to be completed in 2011.
TRUCK FILL HYDRANT PROGRAM
CCCSD operates a Truck Fill Hydrant Program to make recycled water available to
contractors, companies, and public agencies for dust control, compaction, irrigation and
other non - potable uses. In 2010, CCCSD saw a significantly reduced demand for recycled
water from its truck fill program due to higher than normal rainfall and easing of prior
drought restrictions by local water agencies. Only about 10,000 gallons were used in
2010 compared to about one million gallons distributed in 2009 during the drought.
CCCSD will continue to make recycled water available through its Truck Fill Hydrant
Program as an ongoing resource to the community to help promote recycled water and
provide a reliable water supply for future droughts.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE UPDATE
Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) field crews have performed maintenance and repair
work on CCCSD's recycled water distribution system under contract since 2004. CCWD
cross - connection control specialists also assist CCCSD with cross - connection inspections
for new recycled water sites and testing and recertification of existing sites where piping
modifications have been made.
In 2010, CCCSD completed a comprehensive update to its Recycled Water Pipeline O &M
Manual to include information on new customers and appurtenances added over the last
several years along with a new section on cathodic protection system maintenance and
corrosion control. The Recycled Water Pipeline O &M Manual will be updated as
necessary to keep procedures and information current.
In 2010, CCCSD completed a filter media evaluation for the CCCSD Recycled Water Filter
Plant and determined that it would be appropriate to replace the top three inches of media
with new media while doing routine maintenance to replace media lost during
backwashing. This work is scheduled to be completed in 2011.
CUSTOMER TRAINING
CCCSD has an ongoing customer training program to educate customers about the
precautions and appropriate uses of recycled water and train new Recycled Water Site
Supervisors. In 2010, CCCSD completed a Recycled Water Tree Guide as a resource for
recycled water customers. The guide includes information to help recycled water
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc
landscape irrigation customers achieve optimal results when irrigating with recycled water,
such as soil type factors that need to be considered when selecting plants and trees;
optimal irrigation length and frequency when using recycled water; and a list of trees that
tend to work well in local climate and soil conditions when irrigated with recycled water.
SALT AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE
On February 3, 2009, the California State Water Resources Control (SWRCB) adopted a
Statewide Recycled Water Policy establishing uniform requirements for the use of recycled
water. Among other provisions, the Policy requires each agency using recycled water for
urban irrigation to develop a salt and nutrient management plan by May 2014. However,
CCCSD understands that the SWRCB plans to develop a waiver process by which
groundwater basins that are not likely to have adverse impacts from recycled water
irrigation (such as those within CCCSD's service area) can be exempted from the need to
prepare salt and nutrient management plans. Due to the very limited extent that
groundwater is used as a potable water supply in CCCSD's service area, it appears that
CCCSD's recycled water program would likely qualify for the waiver process as currently
envisioned by the SWRCB.
LIMITS TO EXPANSION OF RECYCLED WATER
The Board of Directors of CCCSD has consistently expressed an interest in maximizing
recycled water opportunities. However, there are many institutional and financial
impediments that are outside the control of CCCSD. On the institutional side, CCCSD
must work with the potable water purveyors in our service area and either wholesale
recycled water to them or obtain their permission to purvey recycled water. Often the
potable water purveyor asserts it has significant sunk costs in existing facilities, and
contends the California duplication of services law allows it to recoup stranded costs if
recycled water is made available. Although recycled water producers may dispute the
applicability of this law, the issue can add a significant additional cost to many recycled
water projects. In addition, the cost to construct new recycled water treatment and
conveyance facilities is very high. For example, recycled water projects typically require
construction of additional treatment facilities and pipelines through congested urban areas,
which makes expansion costly. When all of these costs are added together, the unit cost
of recycled water often exceeds the cost of other available water supplies. Therefore,
additional sources of funding are needed to make recycled water project costs competitive
with other alternatives available to local water purveyors. The limited availability of state
and federal funding for recycled water projects has restricted the growth of CCCSD's
recycled water program and other recycled water programs statewide.
WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Recycled Water Annual Report 2010 #2.doc
U.
ry
LU
<
LU
ry
00
Lij
LL
-i
C)
C)
LU
ry
U.
r-
r
LU
L.L
n
LL
H
Q
ry
w
H
D
W
J
U
U
w
ry
Y
ry
O
3:
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RECYCLED WATER USAGE
Calendar Year: 2010
Reuse Application Category
No. of
Sites
Area
Applied
Acres
Amount
Distributed
(MG)
% of Total
Reuse Flow
Landscape Irrigation
27
191
148.8
95
Parks
5
22
7.8
5
Golf Courses
2
110
93.1
59
Green Belts
8
1
0.5
0
Schools
4
52
40.4
26
Other
8
6
7.1
5
Agriculture
0
0
0.0
0
Vineyards
0
0
0.0
0
Other
0
0
0.0
0
Industrial (')
5
N/A
7.0
4
Cooling
0
0
0.0
0
Other
5
N/A
7.0
4
Environmental Enhancement (2)
0
0
0.0
0
Dual Plumbing (3)
1
1
0.8
1
Total (4)
33
192
156.6
100
Notes:
1. Industrial recycled water use: concrete manufacturing, dust control, construction water, truck washing, and truck fill hydrant
2. Environmental Enhancement includes wildlife habitat, wetland /marsh applications, etc.
3. Dual Plumbing: Animal Shelter (interior use and landscape irrigation)
4. An additional approximately 400 MG was used by CCCSD at the treatment plant for process water & landscape irrigation.
���
(f)
(D
O
O
Nt
N
N
O
00
N
V
M
t
I%
I.-
(f)
O
O
M
I�
P%-
N
Cl)
Cl)
O—
O
N
O
N
Cl)
(D
(()
1.
Z
r
r
Cl)
O
Nt
O
O
O
N
(D
O
N
00
(D
00
Nt
(n
O
N
0
0
00
Nt
00
X 0
0
(D
O
O
M
O
O
(D
N
00
r
00
O
O
O
0
O
—
00
M
0
00
M
Nt
M
0
O
00
Nt
O
N
—
M
O
00
(D
O
(f)
00
O
N—
I�
�
O��
Nt
O
I�t
N
O
O�
N
N—
N
O
Nt
O
(f)
N
I�
(f)
(D
�
00
Nt
O
I•
M
P%-
00
I-
00
N
N
N
�
.
(f)
.
.
�
.
N
.
P%-
.
00
.
I-
.
(f)
.
O
.
Nt
.
P%-
.
00
.
N
.
P%-
.,
r
.
N
.
.
.
(O
.,
N
.,
�
(D
�
O
—
O �
—
Cl)
Cl)
N
O
O
N
(f)
O
(n
(D
O
—
M
0
(D
Cl)
O
O
L)
N
I-
00
(n
Nt
00
N
(D
Cl)
et
O
O
Cl)
I�t
M
et
r
r
(n
I�t
00
(D
O
N
O
00
00
Nt
Nt
O
N
Nt
P%-
00
I�
O
O
Nt
It
00
Co
O
O
O
O
O
r
N
O
O
(D
I�
I�
Nt
O
M
�
00
00
Nt
N
00
B
O
O
00
Co
(D
I�t
�
N
E
O
N
O
co
O
N
U
(f)
00
Il
N
V
M
I'-
N
O
N
O
co
00
�
O
W
N
co
(D
co
O
O
r
00
�
M
U)
IP%-
N
N
00
O
co
M
(n
-4
.
O
.
O
.
N
.
I�
.
M .
.
O .
O .
V .
V .
V .
.,
N
O .
.
P-
.,
00
.,
O
CL
�
(f)
0
0
(n
I�t
N
O
—
N�I�t
N
O—
00
Il-
O
—
—
0
00
O
Nt
le
M
LU
—
N
Il-
O
O
N
(n
N
N
(D
Il-
O
N
M
ti
N
N
N
M
O
N
0
N
O
0
N
0
Nt
O
O
N
I-
O
O
Nt
O
N
00
0
0
0
O
O
M
O
O
00
Nt
N
U)
Nt
0
0
0
O—
(f)
(n
M
co
(D
O
O
co
(D
Nt
Nt
0
0
Cl)
00
—
N
O
(D
N
O
Nt
O
M
O
O
N
O
O
co
Il-
O
N
�
N
Nt
Il-
(f)
co
00
O
Il-
O
O
M
O�
N
Nt
00
—
M
I-
O
(D
le
O
I�
O
I�t
P-
O
(f)
Cl)
00
N
(D
Nt
(D
00
(D
(O
N
N
N
00
O
(f)
I
cD
C7
N
�
CO
00
O
00
—
O
00
(f)
I�t
00
—
I�t
(f)
O
O
—
P-
I•
N
Cl)
(D
le
(D
�
O
M
Cl)
N
N
O
O
(f)
00
co
M
N
a
M
N
O
N
M
N
N
0
0I�t
00
OI�t
N
00
00
(D
00
(D
O
(D
0
0
0
0
(f)
O
O
O
O
O
-e
Nt
O
O
N
(D
O
0
M
(D
0
N
O
(n
Nt
00
—
O
M
M
O
Il-
O
O
O
r
(f)
Nt
Nt
00
Nt
O
W
N
(D
O
I�
I�
(f)
..
(f)
..
—
..
O
..
Nt
O
..
O�
M
..
P-
..
P-
..
O—
..
..
O
..
O
..
Cl)
..
Nt
Nt
00
..
(n
..
�
O—
..
..
N
..
N
(()
Nt
00
..
O
..
M
0)
O
N
O
CO
(D
(n
(D
(n
N
(n
Cl)
(D
00
N
N
Il-
�
O
Cl)
(f)
O
N
0
0
O
O
O
J
M
N—
O
Il-
(f)
Cl)
Cl)
N
N
O
(f)
Il-
(f)
Cl)
Cl)
N
O
00
N
Cl)
O
00
(n
K)
le
N
N
Il-
Cl)
O
N
Cl)
N
N
O
�I�t
O
O
(f)
co
I-
(n
M
P-
N
tD
(D
M
M
O
co
Nt
00
O
Nt
co
N
O
N
Nt
Nt
N
Nt
N
N
O
O
(D
N
(D
Il-
0
0
Nt
0
0
O
N
O
O
O
co
I•
N
(D
(D
00
O
Il-
LO
(f)
00
00
Il-
O
Nt
(f)
(D
Cl)
Cl)
(n
O
O
N
O
O
r
I-
O
�
0
N
O
I-
—
M
(D
(D
O
Nt
0
0
Nt
Nt
0
0
Cl)
Cl)
Nt
N
Nt
P-
—
N—
a)
(f)
Co
Cl)
co
1.
N
O
O
(f)
(n
��
(f)
(n
O
M
MI�t
Cl)
�
(f)
00
(D
Il-
M�
Nt
M
O
O
OCT
N
Z
O
O—
M
—
O
0
I-
�
(f)
N
Nt
00
N
O—
O
NI�t
�
00
r
N
N
(D
N
CO
(n
(n
Cl)
N
Cl)
Il-
00
I
O
N
L
O
O
N
N
I�t
OI�t
(D
O
N
(D
00
O
Nt
O
Nt
N
(D
(D
00
O
O
N
O
co
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
0
0
0
00
(()
N
00
N
O
MI�t
(D
O
Nt
M
M
O
0
Nt
Cl)
N
(f)
Il-
00
0
O
N
O
N
(n
(D
Il-
00
r
—
O
r
(f)
r
0
O
N
Il-
N
O
M
�
Cl)
N
I--
N
LO
00
(D
N
Nt
(()
(D
00
O
(()
r
}
(n
0
O
NI�t
N
N
(D
(f)
I�t
O
N
O
co
I-
(D
O
00
I-
(f)
m
M
I
N
N
I�t
CO
O
(f)
Nt
(D
M
(D
O
Cl)
O
N
Nt
N
O
(D
(D
O
a
(D
O
N
(D
(n
N
N
Nt
�
O
r
(f)
(D
ti
N
N
O
O
O
N
N
N
Cl)
00
(D
OI�t
N
0
0
0
O
O
00
N
O
S
0
0I�t
(D
co
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
I�
co
Il-
Nt
(f)
(D
N
Nt
O
(f)
00
N
O
N
00
Cl)
N
O
00
O
0
00
Nt
M�
Nt
00
Nt
�
O
O
O
00
Il-
Nt
(f)
N
Nt
�
O
Cl)
N
00
co
O
N
O
(D
M
N�
(f)
LO
N
I-
(D
(D
Cl)
N
T
((D
M
d
N
Cl)
(f)
le
le
Q r
r
N�t
O
O
O
N—
0
0I�t
O
00
I�t
O
NI�t
O
O
N
N
O
co
O
O
(D
O
O
M
(D
O
O
00
(n
N
Cl)
00
(D
�t
Nt
Cl)
00
O
I-
(f)
Cl)
00
��
Nt
O
00
O
O
Nt
O
00
(n
00
N
(n
O
Il-
N
O
O
�
�
Nt
Nt
(f)
Nt
�
O�
O
U)
Nt
00
Il-
T-
(D
a/
(n
N
00
N
N
N
(f)
N
I-
O
I-
M
00
M—
M
I�
CO
N
00
Cl)
O
N
Nt
Cl)
r
r
00
N
O
Nt
Cl)
0
0
0
O
O
00
O
00
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
x
0
0
0
0
O
r
O
O
E
CO
O
co
�
O
00
��
O
00
ti
O
P
P
Cl)
O
�
(f)
Nt
�
�
O
0
(D
w
P
O
(D
O
Cl)
N
co
m
O
N
W
N
N
LL
, �t
O
M
O
O
O
r
0
0
0
O
O
00
O
(n
Nt
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
r
�I�t
O
N
00
Nt
00
00
(n
O
00
N
(D
w
O
OI�t
p-
O
�
00
Il-
O
O
O
(f)
Nt
N
Co
co
Cl)
N
Cl)
Z
O
�
-
P-
co
a
N
co
(D
�
J
�
u
CC TOPSOIL _ RE� �J wEu
COUNTY COPS �N.rs1
YARD
BLUM ESTATES
VIEW /
ESTATES y� �
e"
(PENDING)
SEASON'S —
CEMETERY /
COUNTY ANIMAL— TREATMENT/
f SERVICES HHW�S �� PLANT
F
S
CCCSD WAREHOUSE
HOB ANNEX
IN PLANT USE p
\I
R F< 7�, J L, r �, -, 0 - �n Q)" , ( —
CONTRA COSTA
BLVD MEDIANS 5 k
CONTRA COSTA CHILPANCINGO�
COUNTRY CLUB BLVD MEDIANS ,
GOLF COURSE-, �_ S
CHILPANCINGO
GOLF CLUB
PARK•
ROAD MEDIANS
`"f \\ c\ �\7 / \ \�1 `\� `-��\ ., `✓ , , iii � i � i
r—
;TUBB RD / " REw
TRIPLEXES
i �
r � DVC
CAMPUS
VIKING
` VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE
COLLEGE PARK
SCHOOLS
P.H.
S CORP.
�YARD�
A
r — TRUCK FILL
HYDRANT
;\
r GOLF
2000. 4000
SID
co
FEET
)RECYCLED
ER SYSTEM
o
�
cl
VV
I � 4
;TUBB RD / " REw
TRIPLEXES
i �
r � DVC
CAMPUS
VIKING
` VALLEY VIEW & DRIVE
COLLEGE PARK
SCHOOLS
P.H.
S CORP.
�YARD�
A
r — TRUCK FILL
HYDRANT
F Z" \\
�-TR TAYLO
LANDSCE
\I�I�
r
- J� P.H. PAI
� I i -
SEQUOIA SEO
ELEMENTARY /r MIDDLE
SCHOOL M SCHOOL
--] F
n
r GOLF
BUCHANAN FIELDS
COURSE
SID
co
-4 " — 1I
F Z" \\
�-TR TAYLO
LANDSCE
\I�I�
r
- J� P.H. PAI
� I i -
SEQUOIA SEO
ELEMENTARY /r MIDDLE
SCHOOL M SCHOOL
--] F
TABLE 3
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JANUARY 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 ml
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
01/01/10
1.5
3.9
6.0
<2
27
01/02/10
1.4
4.0
5.3
<2
40
01/03/10
1.4
4.8
5.6
<2
22
01/04/10
1.4
4.6
6.3
<2
27
01/05/10
1.5
2.9
6.4
<2
23
01/06/10
X
3.4
8.2
<2
40
01/07/10
X
4.0
8.2
<2
32
01/08/10
X
4.1
7.0
<2
42
01/09/10
X
5.6
8.2
<2
67
01/10/10
1.5
4.3
8.2
<2
63
01/11/10
1.3
4.6
6.6
<2
70
01/12/10
X
4.4
5.8
<2
23
01/13/10
1.8
3.4
6.7
<2
22
01/14/10
1.4
4.0
7.7
<2
22
01/15/10
1.1
3.6
7.8
<2
24
01/16/10
1.3
6.8
6.7
<2
28
01/17/10
1.4
3.5
5.9
<2
21
01/18/10
1.4
4.2
6.3
<2
23
01/19/10
1.3
3.8
6.0
<2
20
01/20/10
1.2
4.5
6.2
<2
39
01/21/10
1.2
4.2
6.9
<2
19
01/22/10
1.5
4.4
7.2
<2
22
01/23/10
1.6
4.3
6.8
<2
42
01/24/10
1.5
3.6
7.0
<2
22
01/25/10
1.6
3.7
7.8
<2
20
01/26/10
1.6
3.6
7.0
<2
20
01/27/10
X
2.6
8.3
<2
37
01/28/10
X
3.1
8.6
<2
23
01/29/10
1.0
4.1
8.3
<2
23
01/30/10
1.6
3.1
8.6
<2
40
01/31/10
1.9
4.5
8.4
<2
21
Minimum
1.0
2.6
5.3
<2
19
Maximum
1.8
6.1
8.7
<2
70
Average
1.4
4.0
7.2
<2
31
X = No filtered effluent to the clearwell due to low 11
winter time usage
WPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 3 - January.doc
TABLE 4
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
FEBRUARY 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
02/01/10
1.6
3.0
7.8
<2
21
02/02/10
1.6
8.1
4.0
<2
27
02/03/10
1.7
3.2
6.9
<2
22
02/04/10
1.7
3.0
7.9
<2
22
02/05/10
1.5
4.2
6.9
<2
22
02/06/10
1.4
3.6
6.3
<2
24
02/07/10
1.5
3.4
6.5
<2
21
02/08/10
1.6
3.6
5.8
<2
21
02/09/10
1.5
3.7
6.1
<2
20
02/10/10
1.3
4.1
6.4
<2
21
02/11/10
1.3
4.4
8.0
<2
20
02/12/10
1.4
3.9
5.8
<2
19
02/13/10
1.4
4.0
6.5
<2
27
02/14/10
1.9
4.8
7.2
<2
21
02/15/10
2.8
3.3
6.4
<2
21
02/16/10
2.5
3.4
6.6
<2
20
02/17/10
1.3
4.0
7.8
<2
22
02/18/10
1.4
4.0
8.2
<2
25
02/19/10
1.4
3.5
8.3
<2
24
02/20/10
1.2
3.3
6.7
<2
26
02/21/10
2.3
4.5
6.8
<2
20
02/22/10
2.5
7.1
6.7
<2
20
02/23/10
1.5
3.3
8.4
<2
20
02/24/10
1.5
3.4
6.3
<2
20
02/25/10
1.4
2.7
8.1
<2
24
02/26/10
1.4
6.0
8.5
<2
23
02/27/10
1.4
2.8
6.5
<2
25
02/28/10
1.4
5.4
6.2
<2
20
Minimum
1.2
2.7
4.0
<2
19
Maximum
2.8
8.1
8.5
<2
27
Average
1.6
4.1
6.9
<2
22
12
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 4 - February.doc
TABLE 5
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
MARCH 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
03/01/10
1.6
4.7
5.1
<2
20
03/02/10
1.6
3.8
6.7
<2
23
03/03/10
1.7
6.0
5.8
<2
20
03/04/10
1.6
5.7
6.0
<2
19
03/05/10
1.6
3.2
6.2
<2
28
03/06/10
1.6
2.8
5.8
<2
26
03/07/10
1.5
4.1
5.6
<2
20
03/08/10
1.6
2.4
5.5
<2
20
03/09/10
1.5
3.8
5.6
<2
22
03/10/10
1.6
3.7
6.3
<2
20
03/11/10
1.6
4.2
8.5
<2
20
03/12/10
1.6
3.3
5.2
<2
22
03/13/10
1.6
3.5
5.4
<2
26
03/14/10
1.5
4.0
5.4
<2
20
03/15/10
1.3
3.0
5.6
<2
21
03/16/10
1.6
3.8
5.5
<2
24
03/17/10
1.8
2.8
5.7
<2
24
03/18/10
1.8
3.8
8.0
<2
31
03/19/10
1.7
3.8
8.0
<2
57
03/20/10
1.6
3.8
6.1
<2
70
03/21/10
1.5
5.4
6.3
<2
46
03/22/10
1.5
5.3
6.2
<2
34
03/23/10
2.0
1.8
6.2
<2
35
03/24/10
1.6
2.6
5.8
<2
49
03/25/10
1.5
3.8
5.7
<2
65
03/26/10
1.5
5.1
6.1
<2
81
03/27/10
1.4
4.5
5.7
<2
41
03/28/10
1.4
4.5
6.3
<2
31
03/29/10
1.5
6.1
6.2
<2
27
03/30/10
1.5
3.1
6.5
<2
63
03/31/10
1.5
2.5
6.2
<2
287
Minimum
1.3
1.8
5.1
<2
19
Maximum
2.0
6.1
8.5
<2
287
Average
1.6
3.9
6.1
<2
42
13
NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 5 - March.doc
TABLE 6
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
APRIL 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
04/01/10
1.5
7.2
6.8
<2
80
04/02/10
1.4
3.7
6.3
<2
62
04/03/10
1.4
7
5.7
<2
101
04/04/10
1.4
3.7
6.1
<2
47
04/05/10
1.5
3.8
5.0
<2
27
04/06/10
1.5
2.5
5.6
<2
25
04/07/10
1.5
3.4
5.3
<2
44
04/08/10
1.5
4.8
5.9
<2
60
04/09/10
1.5
1.5
7.9
<2
93
04/10/10
1.4
4.8
6.1
<2
167
04/11/10
1.6
5.8
6.6
<2
69
04/12/10
1.5
3.6
6.1
<2
21
04/13/10
1.5
2.6
7.8
<2
28
04/14/10
1.5
5.7
8.3
<2
45
04/15/10
1.4
2.9
8.0
<2
34
04/16/10
1.4
3.0
7.9
<2
42
04/17/10
1.4
3
5.9
<2
82
04/18/10
1.6
5.2
6.5
<2
50
04/19/10
1.6
3.2
6.5
<2
47
04/20/10
1.6
3.6
6.8
<2
69
04/21/10
1.6
3.2
6.0
<2
40
04/22/10
1.7
2.4
6.2
<2
47
04/23/10
1.7
7.4
6.2
<2
39
04/24/10
1.7
2.8
6.8
<2
40
04/25/10
1.5
2.3
7.5
<2
33
04/26/10
1.8
2.6
7.6
<2
31
04/27/10
1.5
2.2
7.5
<2
46
04/28/10
1.5
4.2
5.00
<2
54
04/29/10
1.4
6.2
6.0
<2
38
04/30/10
1.4
2.2
7.8
<2
48
Minimum
1.4
1.5
5.0
<2
21
Maximum
1.7
7.4
8.3
<2
167
Average
1.5
3.9
6.6
<2
54
14
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 6 - April.doc
TABLE 7
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
MAY 2010
Da
Turbidity
NTU
Em/
Dissolved
Oxygen
m /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
05/01/10
1.5
4.1
6.0
<2
101
05/02/10
1.5
4.2
7.6
<2
74
05/03/10
1.4
5.0
7.0
<2
68
05/04/10
1.4
2.9
5.7
<2
137
05/05/10
1.4
4.7
6.2
<2
374
05/06/10
1.4
5.0
6.1
<2
420
05/07/10
1.5
4.9
6.3
<2
362
05/08/10
1.6
3.4
5.8
<2
306
05/09/10
1.6
3.3
6.4
<2
189
05/10/10
1.4
3.9
6.1
<2
357
05/11/10
1.4
4.5
6.4
<2
297
05/12/10
1.4
4.4
5.8
<2
86
05/13/10
1.5
3.8
6.1
<2
359
05/14/10
1.5
3.3
5.8
<2
490
05/15/10
1.5
4.5
6.2
<2
522
05/16/10
1.6
2.9
6.1
<2
496
05/17/10
1.5
2.5
5.6
<2
117
05/18/10
1.6
2.6
5.5
<2
399
05/19/10
1.6
2.1
5.8
<2
320
05/20/10
1.5
3.8
5.8
<2
224
05/21/10
1.5
4.2
5.7
<2
436
05/22/10
1.5
3.7
7.0
<2
342
05/23/10
1.3
4.2
7.6
<2
393
05/24/10
1.3
3.5
5.2
<2
433
05/25/10
1.5
3.1
6.0
<2
530
05/26/10
1.5
3.5
7.8
<2
410
05/27/10
1.5
3.1
7.7
<2
224
05/28/10
1.5
4.8
6.3
<2
76
05/29/10
1.5
4.1
5.8
<2
87
05/30/10
1.5
3.6
6.3
<2
186
05/31/10
1.5
4.7
5.8
<2
536
Minimum
1.3
2.1
5.2
<2
69
Maximum
1.6
5.0
7.8
<2
536
Average
1.5
3.8
6.2
<2
301
15
NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 7 - May.doc
TABLE 8
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JUNE 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
06/01/10
1.6
4.0
5.9
<2
528
06/02/10
1.7
2.2
6.3
<2
542
06/03/10
1.5
2.0
6.3
<2
479
06/04/10
1.4
2.7
6.2
<2
323
06/05/10
1.5
2.8
5.6
<2
685
06/06/10
1.5
4.4
6.3
<2
462
06/07/10
1.4
3.6
7.0
<2
430
06/08/10
1.5
3.2
7.2
<2
664
06/09/10
1.5
3.2
6.2
<2
668
06/10/10
1.6
3.1
5.9
<2
588
06/11/10
1.5
3.3
5.5
<2
459
06/12/10
1.6
4.1
5.3
<2
691
06/13/10
1.5
4.5
6.0
<2
791
06/14/10
1.5
3.4
5.7
<2
842
06/15/10
1.6
3.2
5.8
<2
819
06/16/10
1.7
2.9
5.4
<2
792
06/17/10
1.7
3.2
5.6
<2
697
06/18/10
1.5
3.0
5.8
<2
692
06/19/10
1.4
3.5
5.8
13
979
06/20/10
1.5
2.8
6.3
<2
729
06/21/10
1.5
3.5
6.1
<2
387
06/22/10
1.4
4.9
5.8
<2
944
06/23/10
1.4
4.0
5.9
<2
820
06/24/10
1.5
4.2
7.1
<2
768
06/25/10
1.6
3.1
5.9
<2
628
06/26/10
1.3
2.3
5.8
<2
674
06/27/10
1.3
3.2
6.1
<2
523
06/28/10
1.5
5.0
5.9
<2
655
06/29/10
1.6
4.2
5.9
<2
1319
06/30/10
1 1.6
1 5.0
1 6.3
1 <2
1 606
Minimum
1.3
2.0
5.3
< 2
323
Maximum
1.7
5.0
7.2
13
1319
Average
1.5
3.5
6.0
<2
673
16
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 8 - June.doc
TABLE 9
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
JULY 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
07/01/10
1.4
2.4
7.1
<2
748
07/02/10
1.4
2.0
6.0
<2
777
07/03/10
1.2
4.9
6.6
<2
809
07/04/10
1.3
4.5
6.2
<2
742
07/05/10
1.4
5.7
6.4
<2
1266
07/06/10
1.4
3.8
6.1
<2
442
07/07/10
1.4
3.4
6.2
<2
614
07/08/10
1.5
3.1
6.2
<2
727
07/09/10
1.5
3.2
6.0
<2
783
07/10/10
1.4
3.4
6.2
<2
817
07/11/10
1.4
2.7
6.1
<2
687
07/12/10
1.2
2.7
6.0
<2
587
07/13/10
1.1
2.8
7.4
<2
936
07/14/10
1.1
2.6
7.3
<2
832
07/15/10
1.3
2.7
6.3
<2
797
07/16/10
1.5
2.3
5.1
<2
953
07/17/10
1.6
3.8
5.4
<2
826
07/18/10
1.4
4.4
5.6
<2
987
07/19/10
1.3
4.4
5.4
<2
454
07/20/10
1.2
3.0
7.2
<2
1014
07/21/10
1.3
4.0
6.7
<2
764
07/22/10
1.4
2.0
3.8
<2
583
07/23/10
1.4
3.4
3.2
<2
755
07/24/10
1.4
2.0
3.9
<2
1063
07/25/10
1.5
4.4
3.5
<2
637
07/26/10
1.4
2.4
1.9
<2
596
07/27/10
1.3
4.4
6.2
<2
1022
07/28/10
1.4
2.1
6.2
<2
676
07/29/10
1.4
2.0
6.3
<2
554
07/30/10
1.5
3.0
4.2
<2
658
07/31/10
1.5
2.1
2.2
<2
930
Minimum
1.1
2.0
1.9
<2
442
Maximum
1.6
5.7
7.4
<2
1266
Average
1.4
3.2
5.6
<2
775
17
NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 9 - July.doc
TABLE 10
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
AUGUST 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
08/01/10
1.4
3.8
3.6
<2
522
08/02/10
1.5
2.1
1.7
<2
634
08/03/10
1.6
0.6
3.1
<2
753
08/04/10
1.6
1.6
6.5
<2
997
08/05/10
1.7
6.0
5.7
<2
705
08/06/10
1.7
2.8
6.8
<2
773
08/07/10
1.6
3.4
6.1
<2
825
08/08/10
1.5
5.9
2.4
<2
762
08/09/10
1.5
2.7
2.1
<2
696
08/10/10
1.4
2.4
5.8
<2
812
08/11/10
1.4
2.2
6.1
<2
814
08/12/10
1.5
3.0
3.6
<2
726
08/13/10
1.8
2.8
5.4
<2
747
08/14/10
1.7
2.7
3.3
<2
833
08/15/10
1.7
4.0
6.0
<2
806
08/16/10
1.6
4.4
2.0
<2
702
08/17/10
1.4
4.4
3.4
<2
667
08/18/10
1.5
3.6
2.6
<2
785
08/19/10
1.3
2.8
1.9
<2
571
08/20/10
1.3
3.4
5.7
<2
531
08/21/10
1.2
3.0
2.0
<2
780
08/22/10
1.3
3.0
1.7
<2
641
08/23/10
1.4
4.6
3.2
<2
584
08/24/10
1.5
3.8
1.6
<2
866
08/25/10
1.5
6.2
0.8
<2
828
08/26/10
1.5
2.4
1.8
<2
772
08/27/10
1.5
3.9
3.4
<2
798
08/28/10
1.6
4.4
5.3
<2
778
08/29/10
1.5
5.8
2.1
<2
550
08/30/10
1.5
2.4
1.3
<2
574
08/31/10
1.3
4.2
3.4
<2
796
Minimum
1.2
0.6
0.8
<2
522
Maximum
1.8
6.2
6.8
<2
997
Average
1.5
3.5
3.6
<2
730
18
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water \2010 \Tables \Table 10 - August.doc
TABLE 11
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
SEPTEMBER 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
090 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
09/01/10
1.1
4.2
3.1
<2
747
09/02/10
1.3
3.8
2.8
<2
698
09/03/10
1.4
2.7
2.2
<2
622
09/04/10
1.5
2.4
1.1
<2
749
09/05/10
1.5
6.6
4.1
<2
1025
09/06/10
1.6
5.6
5.1
<2
494
09/07/10
1.7
2.7
2.4
<2
419
09/08/10
1.6
4.4
2.2
<2
777
09/09/10
1.6
3.5
2.2
<2
689
09/10/10
1.4
2.6
2.0
<2
578
09/11/10
1.5
3.0
2.0
<2
628
09/12/10
1.5
8.6
3.8
<2
628
09/13/10
1.4
3.6
1.4
<2
441
09/14/10
1.5
4.2
5.2
<2
732
09/15/10
1.5
4.3
6.3
<2
539
09/16/10
1.4
4.2
5.8
<2
437
09/17/10
1.3
4.8
6.2
<2
646
09/18/10
1.2
3.4
3.3
<2
697
09/19/10
1.4
5.5
3.0
<2
386
09/20/10
1.4
3.4
2.1
<2
475
09/21/10
1.4
4.3
6.2
<2
527
09/22/10
1.5
3.9
2.4
<2
441
09/23/10
1.4
2.5
2.3
<2
372
09/24/10
1.3
3.2
2.8
<2
407
09/25/10
1.2
3.6
3.4
<2
510
09/26/10
1.4
4.4
4.5
<2
544
09/27/10
1.4
4.7
3.7
<2
359
09/28/10
1.3
5.1
3.6
<2
883
09/29/10
1.4
3.2
3.5
<2
495
09/30/10
1.4
4.6
3.2
<2
639
Minimum
1.1
2.4
1.1
<2
359
Maximum
1.7
8.6
6.3
<2
1025
Average
1.4
4.1
3.4
<2
587
19
NAPOSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 11 - September.doc
TABLE 12
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
OCTOBER 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
10/01/10
1.2
4.1
2.5
<2
574
10/02/10
1.4
4.0
3.7
<2
595
10/03/10
1.4
3.2
4.7
<2
316
10/04/10
1.3
3.4
5.3
<2
288
10/05/10
1.3
3.4
1.2
<2
405
10/06/10
1.5
3.6
2.3
<2
478
10/07/10
1.5
0.6
1.5
<2
583
10/08/10
1.6
5.6
0.9
<2
385
10/09/10
1.6
4.9
2.2
<2
316
10/10/10
1.5
5.1
2.7
<2
325
10/11/10
1.5
3.4
4.6
<2
418
10/12/10
1.6
3.8
6.0
<2
575
10/13/10
1.5
3.3
4.5
<2
613
10/14/10
1.3
5.2
4.1
<2
266
10/15/10
1.3
3.2
6.4
<2
548
10/16/10
1.5
4.4
2.8
<2
494
10/17/10
1.6
3.7
2.4
<2
207
10/18/10
1.5
5.4
1.8
<2
306
10/19/10
1.5
2.4
2.6
<2
202
10/20/10
1.6
3.2
5.8
<2
449
10/21/10
1.5
7.2
6.3
<2
170
10/22/10
1.5
5.5
4.9
<2
176
10/23/10
1.5
2.8
2.9
<2
93
10/24/10
1.4
3.9
4.4
<2
67
10/25/10
1.4
6.4
6.2
<2
68
10/26/10
1.7
3.0
5.8
<2
51
10/27/10
1.5
3.4
6.2
<2
57
10/28/10
1.5
3.4
5.6
<2
57
10/29/10
1.6
4.6
6.3
<2
82
10/30/10
1.4
6.4
5.6
<2
73
10/31/10
1.4
4.3
2.0
<2
74
Minimum
1.2
0.9
0.9
<2
51
Maximum
1.7
7.2
6.4
<2
613
Average
1.5
4.1
4.0
<2
300
20
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 12 - October.doc
TABLE 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
NOVEMBER 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
11/01/10
1.6
3.4
5.6
<2
21
11/02/10
1.5
4.2
6.8
<2
84
11/03/10
1.6
7.2
6.5
<2
148
11/04/10
1.6
3.0
5.7
<2
80
11/05/10
1.7
2.0
3.2
<2
123
11/07/10
1.5
3.1
3.6
<2
122
11/07/10
1.6
3.6
3.0
<2
96
11/08/10
1.6
3.7
2.7
<2
75
11/09/10
1.7
4.2
5.8
<2
62
11/10/10
1.6
3.1
6.4
<2
90
11/11/10
1.5
2.3
3.1
<2
184
11/12/10
1.5
1.6
4.0
<2
226
11/13/10
1.5
2.3
1.5
<2
214
11/14/10
1.6
2.2
3.6
<2
223
11/15/10
1.7
3.8
2.3
<2
227
11/16/10
1.5
5.6
6.9
<2
356
11/17/10
1.5
3.9
5.7
<2
390
11/18/10
1.5
4.8
6.1
<2
207
11/19/10
1.6
0.1
6.0
<2
81
11/20/10
1.6
3.4
3.1
<2
168
11/21/10
1.6
4.0
2.0
<2
158
11/22/10
1.6
4.4
4.9
<2
147
11/23/10
1.6
4.4
6.9
<2
136
11/24/10
1.7
0.6
6.4
<2
143
11/25/10
1.5
3.4
2.8
<2
167
11/26/10
1.3
3.3
2.4
<2
146
11/27/10
1.3
4.3
2.0
<2
164
11/28/10
1.4
4.2
3.4
<2
160
11/29/10
1.5
5.0
2.0
<2
167
11/30/10
1.5
4.6
6.7
<2
185
Minimum
1.3
0.1
1.5
<2
21
Maximum
1.7
7.2
6.9
<2
390
Average
1.6
3.5
4.4
<2
158
21
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 13 - November.doc
TABLE 14
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER CHARACTERISTICS
DECEMBER 2010
Day
Turbidity
NTU
Chlorine
Residual
mg /L
Dissolved
Oxygen
mg /L
Total
Coliform
MPN per
100 mL
Daily
Average
Recycle Flow
GPM
12/01/10
1.3
4.4
7.1
<2
153
12/02/10
1.3
4.1
2.6
<2
160
12/03/10
1.3
4.0
1.8
<2
157
12/04/10
1.4
3.4
2.4
<2
66
12/05/10
1.5
3.6
4.8
<2
21
12/06/10
1.6
2.3
4.0
<2
25
12/07/10
1.4
2.8
6.8
<2
23
12/08/10
1.2
3.8
6.6
<2
23
12/09/10
1.3
3.4
6.0
<2
42
12/10/10
1.5
2.6
6.4
<2
31
12/11/10
1.6
2.7
2.8
<2
22
12/12/10
2.0
3.9
4.2
<2
18
12/13/10
1.6
4.6
7.4
<2
19
12/14/10
1.5
4.9
7.5
<2
26
12/15/10
1.4
3.3
7.9
<2
25
12/16/10
1.4
4.0
7.8
<2
22
12/17/10
1.3
3.6
8.0
<2
27
12/18/10
1.4
3.3
5.4
<2
26
12/19/10
1.6
6.2
5.7
<2
20
12/20/10
1.5
4.4
5.2
<2
19
12/21/10
1.4
4.0
6.3
<2
19
12/22/10
1.6
4.3
7.7
<2
27
12/23/10
1.5
5.3
6.6
<2
20
12/24/10
1.4
5.6
5.8
<2
20
12/25/10
1.4
5.4
5.7
<2
19
12/26/10
1.6
4.8
6.5
<2
23
12/27/10
1.5
4.4
5.7
<2
19
12/28/10
1.4
4.3
8.0
<2
23
12/29/10
1.6
5.1
8.0
<2
24
12/30/10
1.6
4.9
5.3
<2
24
12/31/10
1.6
5.4
5.6
<2
23
Minimum
1.2
2.3
1.8
<2
18
Maximum
2.0
6.2
8.0
<2
160
Average
1.5
4.2
5.9
<2
38
22
N: \POSUP \Laboratory \Recycled Water\2010 \Tables \Table 14 - December.doc
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Buchanan Fields Golf Course
Location of Site: 1091 Concord Ave, Concord.
Inspection Date: 9/29/2010
Customer Representative Present: Leopoldo Lopez, Maintenance Superintendent
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course irrigation
Weather conditions: Sunnv. hot (95 dearees
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided an updated use permit identifying Leopoldo Lopez as the customer representative
Inspector's Signature: 'haul) 6 Date: q Z � ) / J
23
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Headquarters office blg (HOB) and Annex bid, 5019 Imhoff Place, Mtz
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Mick Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: J&4'o tf 1�� Date:
24
J/ // 7 ho
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, 4797 Imhoff PI, Martinez
Inspection Date
11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
District will replace five valve box covers with purple recycled water covers.
Inspector's Signature: �tY Date:
25
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Maltby Pumping Station
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Steven Considine (Field Operations Superintendent)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Seal water for pumps and wash down hose
Weather conditions: Clear. cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's
Signature: YI �� 2 Z2Q� Date:
26
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Treatment Plant Site, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, cold
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
Yes
No
N/A
/1
■
■
E
■
■
■
■
//
■
.1
■
E
■
■
■
Z
■
■
.1
■
W EIRMI MM
�00
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
_p
Inspector's Signature: ✓ ✓C C 1�Q 74 17 t_L1a' Z4-LZ__., Date:
27
// // 7 A -)
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Location of Site: Warehouse, 4737 Imhoff Place, Martinez
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Mike Occhicone ( Occhicone Landscaping, owner)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
1 4
Inspector's Signature: n &1-1 Ldt�Z.(_- Date. 0
23
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Corporation Yard
Inspection Date: 11/22/2010
Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa (Maintenance Manager)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck fill station for landscape median irrigation
Weather conditions: Overcast, cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's
Signature: �l�l , 1 , 7 f 67 ZZ-L44 Date:
29
® Recycled Paper
Central Contra
Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site Medians #1 -4 on Golf Club Rd, Contra Costa Blvd, Chilpanchingo Pkwy,
Viking Dr landscaping, and Taylor Blvd landscaping
Inspection Date 11/22/2010
Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa (Maintenance Manager)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Overcast, cold
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
❑
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Taylor Blvd landscaping site meter installation and start up August 26, 2010
Inspector's Signature: Date:
,/zzho
30 ® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: City of Pleasant Hill
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Police Department — 330 Civic Drive
Inspection Date: March 26 2010
Customer Representative Present: Bob Costa
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, —65'F
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1 .
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
Cl*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
❑
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑ *
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑ *
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
1:1
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
❑*
®
❑
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up
actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
This site began service on March 26 2010 following successful completion of cross
connection testing with the Contra Costa Water District.
Inspector's Signature: A f�yl Date: 3 1161 1 0
1V %J1 I T 1�1 I
31
Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Conco Companies
Location of Site: 5141 Commercial Circle. Concord
Inspection Date: 9/29/2010
Customer Representative Present: Jim Brammeier
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Truck washing, Mixing agent, Dust control
Weather conditions: Sunny, hot (95 degrees)
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
®*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
❑
❑*
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
3. Transport vehicle recycled water tanks not signed. CCCSD provided customer with
magnetic signs. Customer signed vehicles as they returned to facility and directed staff to
have them in place whenever carrying recycled water.
Additional notes:
, I g
Inspector's Signature: C �f ) j C1f 7 � t �r� '�Z -�' Date: ' 9 /Z �/y
32 ® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Country Club Golf Course
Location of Site: 801 Golf Club Circle, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 10/15/2010
Customer Representative Present: John Martin
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Golf course and clubhouse landscape irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided six new recycled water signs for wall at new landscaped area next to parking lot.
Inspector's Signature: & Date:
33
iC /f's 110
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County
Location of Site: Animal Shelter, Martinez
Inspection Date: 10/8/2010
Customer Representative Present: Greg Mattox for Mary Tennyson, (Operations Manager)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and dog kennel wash down
Weather conditions: Sunnv and warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
Yes
No
N/A
M/
■
■
/1
■
■
■
■
►1
■
F�
■
Z
■
■
■
//
■
■
Z
■
►. ■ ■
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided replacement recycled water signs for gate to the animal exercise area and for fence
at the recycled water manifold enclosure.
Inspector's Signature: 466,4 (�,, Z� t.��Cz�t� Date:
34
® Recycled Paper
Central Contra
Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa County
Location of Site: Corporation Yard, Martinez
Inspection Date: 12/3/2010
Customer Representative Present: Roland Hindsman
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
®
❑*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow
-up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided replacement recycled water sign for service location at back of property.
Inspector's Signature 1.7 (0 IL, L ua6,�'cZ__ Date: 12
35
Recycled Paper
11, central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Contra Costa Topsoil
Location of Site: Waterbird Way, Martinez
Inspection Date: 10/8/2010
Customer Representative Present: Tonja Einevell (Operations Manager)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Dust Control
Weather conditions: Sunny and warm
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
Yes
No
N/A
/1
■
■
Z
■
■
►1
■
■
■
.1
■
■
■
.1
■
//
■
■
//
■
■ ■ �/
■ a M ■ ■
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided 2'd magnetic sign for haul vehicle passenger door. Customer shortened fill hose to
required length at CCCSD inspector's direction.
Inspector's Signature: ,�L, f Y! 1- 61 [ t6 di-lL,C Date: /0 A?
✓L[�t 1
3 6 Recycled Paper
Central Contra
Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: County Quarry
Location of Site: 5501 Imhoff Drive, Martinez
Inspection Date: 10/8/2010
Customer Representative Present: Chris Grey (Operations Manager)
Application of Recycled Water at Site: process water for base rock manufacturing, concrete
batch plant and dust control. Minimal irrigation use along south and west fence lines.
Weather conditions: Overcast
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
NIA
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
®*
❑
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
3. Provided magnetic signs required for 2 nd haul truck and water fill tank.
Additional notes:
Provided additional recycled water si nape for facility interior. Customer replaced two faded
recycled water tags at hose locations.
Inspector's Signature: Date:
37 ® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Diablo Valley College
Location of Site: 321 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 11/18/2010
Customer Representative Present: Joe Morgado
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation and water pond feature
Weather conditions: Sunnv. mild.
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
®
❑*
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
CCCSD provided bi- linqual do's and don't sign for crewroom.
Inspector's Signature: ' ,Q1� "q (f, ,a� 2 Date
1
® Recycled Paper
Central Contra
Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Demonstration Garden, Santa Barbara Way, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date: 11/29/2010
Customer Representative Present: Monica Olson, Site Supervisor
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear. cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
®
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: Date
39
///2-1 Ile)
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Plesant Hill Middle School
Inspection Date
11/23/2010
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: overcast. drizzle
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: 6 ( Date
40
i/ /Z_ A)
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Sequoia Elementary and Middle Schools
Inspection Date: 11/23/2010
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: overcast. drizzle
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of
follow
-up actions
taken.
Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's
Signature: ZLEjj 6/1- t I_C' 6 4t e— Date:
r� b, 3 //o
41
® Recycled Paper
11 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Mount Diablo Unified School District
Location of Site: Valley View Middle and College Park High Schools
Inspection Date: 11/23/2010
Customer Representative Present: Charles Wolfkill
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: overcast, drizzle
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All
check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: 4 a,aw 63v1,c_C6XL, Date. // /Z _S)/6
42
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Chilpancingo Park
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear. cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: ✓l t_ (�C yJ 6 ���� Date: j / // 7 /
43
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Community Center / Frank Salfingere Park
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear. cool
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided recycled water stickers for control boxes and signs for the west parking lot entry
and the community center approach locations.
Inspector's Signature:
Date: 7 ,// C1
44 ® Recycled Paper
J� Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Oaks Park
Inspection Date: 11/17/2010
Customer Representative Present: Todd Smith
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear. cool
Standard Observations:
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storaqe
._
ft o
,
E
■
■
/1
■
■
■
■
.1
■
//
■
Z
■
■
■
/1
■
■
/1
■
■ ■ //
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system ❑* ® ❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
F. R STAF1fi'i i-i
Provided recycle water sign for parking lot entrance to upper ball field.
Inspector's Signature: Date: j / // 7 / /L ,
45
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District
Location of Site: Pleasant Hill Park — 147 Gregory Lane
Inspection Date: November 16 2010
Customer Representative Present: Lynn Spatz Todd Smith
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, —55
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1 .
Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
❑
❑*
❑
2.
Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
[1*
❑
3.
Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4.
Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑ *
®
❑
5.
Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6.
Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7.
Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
❑
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8.
If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
®
❑ *
❑
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9.
Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10.
Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11.
Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12.
Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation
❑*
®
❑
system piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up
actions taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
This site beaan service on November 16, 2010, followin successful completion of cross
connection testing with the Contra Costa Water District. Customer has adjusted
sprinkler heads and relocated sprinklers so that spray does not contact drinking
fountains picnic tables, and food preparation areas.
Inspector's Signature: Date:
46 Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water User: Stubbs Road Triplexes
Location of Site: 700 -780 Stubbs Road Buildings 1 -7, Pleasant Hill
Inspection Date
4/7/2010
Customer Representative Present: #1 Doug Brown, #2 +3 Jean Edwards, #4 +5 Jim FreethV
#6 Jeanne Papir, #7 Audrey Han
Application of Recycled Water at Site: Landscape Irrigation
Weather conditions: Clear, mild
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is customer's Recycled Water Use Permit available for inspection?
®
❑*
❑
2. Are appropriate recycled -water signs posted in use areas?
®
❑*
❑
3. Are vehicles hauling recycled water labeled appropriately?
❑
❑*
4. Is there an apparent odor nuisance?
❑*
®
❑
5. Is irrigation system operated to avoid contact with the public?
®
❑*
❑
6. Evidence of ponding or excessive runoff in use areas?
❑*
®
❑
7. Is recycled water spray or runoff entering dwellings,
❑*
®
❑
designated outdoor eating areas or food - handling facilities?
8. If drinking fountains are present, are they protected against
❑
❑*
contact with recycled water spray or runoff?
9. Broken or leaking pipes or spray nozzles?
❑*
®
❑
10. Evidence of overflows, leaks, erosion of dikes, etc. of storage
❑*
❑
ponds or impoundments?
11. Have appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
12. Have modifications been made to the plumbing or irrigation system
❑*
®
❑
piping that could potentially lead to a cross connection?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided stickers for building irrigation control boxes and do's / don't signs to place adjacent
to control boxes.
Inspector's Signature: "L4 Date: �//
4 7 ® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Protecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: City of Lafayette Public Works
Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction
Inspection Date: 12/10/2010
Customer Representative Present: Phil Nishkian
Date Customer Began Service: 10/6//2008
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
® ❑* ❑
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
® ❑* ❑
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
® ❑* ❑
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
® ❑* ❑
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
® ❑* ❑
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use
® ❑* ❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided bi- linqual do's and don'ts sign for crew room
Inspector's Signature: Date.
48
/Z /l o //D
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Contra Costa County Public Works
Use Description: Compaction, Dust Control, Street Sweeping
Inspection Date: 12/13/2010
Customer Representative Present: Marcellino Abundis
Date Customer Began Service: 1/14/2009
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
® ❑* ❑
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
® ❑* ❑
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
® ❑* ❑
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
® ❑* ❑
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
® ❑* ❑
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
® ❑* ❑
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use
® ❑* ❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: Date:
49
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Diablo General Engineering
Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction
Inspection Date: 12/9/2010
Customer Representative Present: Ryan Truax
Date Customer Began Service: 10/14/2008
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
®
❑*
❑
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
®
❑*
❑
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
®
❑*
❑
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
®
❑*
❑
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
®
❑*
❑
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use
®
❑*
❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature: ��r` ��ti��� Date:
50
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Pro tecting public health and the environment 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 4392
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer:
Evans Brothers
Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction
Inspection Date: 12/10/2010
Customer Representative Present: Mike Nisen
Date Customer Began Service: 5/13/2009
Standard Observations:
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
Yes
No
N/A
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
/1 ■ a 0 ■
® ❑* ❑
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided customer with magnetic signs for trucks and do's and don'ts sign for crew room
Inspector's Signature: Date:
51
® Recycled Paper
J�L Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Roto- Rooter
Use Description: Sanitary_ sewer cleaning
Inspection Date: 12/13/2010
Customer Representative Present: Rodney Schaul
Date Customer Began Service: 9/11/2008
Standard Observations:
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
®
❑*
❑
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2.
Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
®
❑*
❑
3.
Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
®
❑*
❑
water notification signage or placards?
4.
Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
®
❑*
❑
backflow preventer?
5.
Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
®
❑*
❑
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6.
Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
®
❑*
❑
7.
Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use
®
❑*
❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Provided three do's and don't signs for crew room and transport vehicles
Inspector's Signature: - ���� (1`'1����J2� Date:
52
® Recycled Paper
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
2010 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Sundance Landscaping
Use Description: Construction / irrigation
Inspection Date: 12/16/2010
Customer Representative Present: Steve Trout
Date Customer Began Service: 8/27/2009
Standard Observations:
Yes No N/A
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
® ❑* ❑
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
® ❑* ❑
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
® ❑* ❑
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
® ❑* ❑
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses ® ❑* ❑
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water? ® ❑* ❑
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use ® ❑* ❑
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
Inspector's Signature:
53
Date: ��/ / <<' // U
® Recycled Paper
Central Contra Costa sanitary District
2009 RECYCLED WATER HYDRANT TRUCK FILL CUSTOMER INSPECTION REPORT
Recycled Water Truck Fill Customer: Wyvern Farms
Use Description: Dust Control and Compaction
Inspection Date: 12/10/2010
Customer Representative Present:
Date Customer Began Service
Chuck Lewis
/2009
Standard Observations:
1. Is a copy of customer's Recycled Water Use Permit located in each
vehicle transporting recycled water?
2. Is the information on the Recycled Water Use Permit current?
3. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have appropriate recycled
water notification signage or placards?
4. Do all vehicles hauling recycled water have an air gap or approved
backflow preventer?
5. Is the customer using recycled water only for the type of uses
authorized in their Recycled Water Use Permit?
6. Have the appropriate staff been trained on the use of recycled water?
7. Is the customer using recycled water in conformance with all use
regulations and CCCSD's Truck Fill Program Usage Guidelines?
Yes No N/A
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
® ❑* ❑
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
®
❑*
❑
All check marks in a box marked with an asterisk ( *) require explanation of follow -up actions
taken. Describe below, and indicate corresponding observation number:
Additional notes:
inspector's Signature p g �� l�z��� Date:
54
/ R / / C ho
® Recycled Paper