Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/04/2009 AGENDA BACKUP*entral Contra Costa Sanity District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
t - POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
No.: 3.d. Consent Calendar
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FOR AN EASEMENT ON THE LANDS COMMONLY
REFERRED TO AS BUCHANAN FIELDS GOLF COURSE (APNS: 125 - 010 -022 &
125- 010 -023)
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div,:
Stephanie R. Gronlund, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
S. Gro nd C. Swanson A. Far I
K. Alm
James M.�ly,
General Manage
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept or quitclaim
easements and to record the documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution accepting a grant of easement and authorizing
staff to record the document with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $47,000 to be paid to the County as full compensation for the
acquisition of the perpetual easement upon recording of said Grant of Easement Deed.
District to also compensate Contra Costa County in the amount of $3,400 for use of a
temporary construction easement and $66,000 for replacement of on -site wells and trees
removed during the construction of the sewer through the golf course.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None. The A -Line Relief Interceptor has already
been installed in the easement under a Right of Entry Agreement with Contra Costa
County.
BACKGROUND: In July of 2007, the District made
an offer to Contra Costa County to purchase an
easement across Buchanan Fields Golf Course for
the 96 -inch A -Line Relief Interceptor Phase 2A
Project. Due to its protracted review process, the
County issued a Right of Entry to the District in
October 2007, so as to not delay construction of
the Interceptor. Negotiation of easement language
and access rights has delayed the acceptance of
the grant of easement until now.
IN
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Gronlund\2009 \PP GOE Acceptance Aline Buchanan Final 06.04.09.doc Page t of 2
• •
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FOR AN EASEMENT ON THE LANDS COMMONLY
REFERRED TO AS BUCHANAN FIELDS GOLF COURSE (APNS: 125 - 010 -022 &
125- 010 -023)
Acceptance and recording of this grant of easement will provide the District with a
perpetual easement for the 96 -inch sewer recently constructed with the District A -Line
Relief Interceptor and Concord Interceptor Sewer Project (DP 5980), and will also provide
a perpetual easement for a future 10 -inch recycled water line in the property owned by
Contra Costa County and is commonly referred to as Buchanan Fields Golf Course.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolution accepting a grant of easement
from Contra Costa County on the lands commonly referred to as Buchanan Fields Golf
Course, and authorize staff to record the documents with the Contra Costa County
Recorder.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Gronlund\2009 \PP GOE Acceptance ALine Buchanan Final 06.04.09.doc Page 2 of 2
•
4.a. Hearings
PUBLIC HEARING
TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON PLACING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2009 -10 CAPACITY USE CHARGES,
2009 -10 ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, AND
DELINQUENT CHARGES
ON THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLL
SUGGESTED AGENDA
JUNE 4, 2009
Request staff report.
2. Public hearing on placing Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capacity Use Charges, 2009 -10
Assessments for Contractual Assessment Districts, and Delinquent Charges on
the Contra Costa County Tax Roll:
A. Open public hearing
B. Receive public comment
C. Close public hearing
3. Consider adoption of resolution directing that the 2009 -10 capacity use charges,
the 2009 -10 assessments for contractual assessment districts, and delinquent
charges be collected on the Contra Costa County tax roll.
IN \ENVRSEC \Position PapersWilliert20091Agenda PH 2009 -10 Cap Fee Chges Final 6- 04- 09.doc
0 0
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009 No.: 4.a. Hearings
Type of Action: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING; ADOPT RESOLUTION
Subject. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON AND
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THAT THE 2009 -10
CAPACITY USE CHARGES, THE 2009 -10 ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, AND DELINQUENT CHARGES BE COLLECTED ON
THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX ROLL
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Earlene Millier, Engineering Assistant III Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOAVTION: r
. Millier K. ar or C. Swanson A. Farrell K. Alm ames M Kelly,
General Manager
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors passed by four affirmative votes is
needed to place charges on the Contra Costa County tax roll.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution directing that the 2009 -10 Capacity Use
Charges, the 2009 -10 assessments for the Contractual Assessment Districts, and
delinquent charges be collected on the Contra Costa County tax roll.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action will provide for collection of approximately
$157,000 in 2009 -10 charges from customers participating in CCCSD's Capacity Use
Program; approximately $307,000 in 2009 -10 assessments from properties that formed
Contractual Assessment Districts; and $254.00 in unpaid overtime inspection fees from
a property that connected to the sanitary sewer without payment of inspection fees.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: Certain commercial tenants and commercial property owners have
entered into written agreements to participate in CCCSD's Capacity Use Program for
payment of Capacity Fees over a fifteen -year period. These businesses are referenced
in Exhibit A attached.
Property owners who have formed Contractual Assessment Districts have agreed to
pay for sewer improvements over a ten -year period. These properties are referenced in
Exhibit B attached.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\ 2009 \PP- Hearing09- IOCap,CAD,Delinq. Final 6-4 -09 jm2.doc Page 1 of 2
0 0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON AND
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THAT THE 2009 -10
CAPACITY USE CHARGES, THE 2009 -10 ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTRACTUAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, AND DELINQUENT CHARGES BE COLLECTED ON
THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TAX ROLL
A property for which overtime inspection fees have not been paid and are delinquent is
referenced in Exhibit C attached.
Payments are to be collected by placing assessments on each property owner's tax bill.
A resolution of the Board is needed to place Capacity Use Charges, assessments for
Contractual Assessment Districts, and delinquent charges on the Contra Costa County
tax roll.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution directing that the 2009 -10
Capacity Use Charges, the 2009 -10 assessments for the Contractual Assessment
Districts, and delinquent charges be collected on the Contra Costa County tax roll.
N:\ENVRSEMPosition PapersWillier\ 2009 \PP- Hearing09- IOCap,CAD,Delinq. Final 6 -4 -09 jm2.doc Page 2 of 2
0
CUSTOMER NAME
0
1 ;*ANI:lrr_�
CAPACITY USE CUSTOMERS
TACO BELL
PHO LEE HOA PHAT
LOS PANCHOS RESTAURANT
LITTLE DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT
FORTUNE CITY RESTAURANT
MASSES SPORTS BAR & GRILL
EPHESUS KEBAB LOUNGE
MCCOVEY'S RESTAURANT
PYRAMID BREWING COMPANY
VA DE VI BISTRO & WINE BAR
XENIA BISTRO RESTAURANT
PETE'S BRASS RAIL
MASALA INDIAN FUSION
LOS PANCHOS RESTAURANT
HOME FOR JEWISH PARENTS
BO'S BARBEQUE @ THE FORGE
NUMERO LINO TAQUERIA
CHOW RESTAURANT
PATISSERIE LAFAYETTE
BURGER KING
SPONGES CAR WASH
CANYON VIEW DINING HALL
TURQUOISE MEDITERRANEAN GRILL
PAPAYA GRILL
CHOW RESTAURANT
AnnppQQ
1215 CONCORD AVE., CONCORD
508 -P CONTRA COSTA BLVD., PLEASANT HILL
5872 PACHECO BLVD., PACHECO
270 GOLF CLUB ROAD, PLEASANT HILL
6660 ALHAMBRA AVE., MARTINEZ
2721 N. MAIN ST., WALNUT CREEK
1321 LOCUST ST., WALNUT CREEK
1444 N. CALIFORNIA BLVD., WALNUT CREEK
1410 CYPRESS ST., WALNUT CREEK
1511 MT. DIABLO BLVD., WALNUT CREEK
115 -A ALAMO PLAZA, ALAMO
201 HARTZ AVE., DANVILLE
499 SAN RAMON VALLEY BLVD., DANVILLE
3104 -C & D CROW CANYON PL., SAN RAMON
4000 CAMINO TASSAJARA, DANVILLE
3422 -B MT. DIABLO BLVD., LAFAYETTE
3616 MT. DIABLO BLVD.. LAFAYETTE
53/55 LAFAYETTE CIRCLE, LAFAYETTE
35 LAFAYETTE CIRCLE, LAFAYETTE
470 MORAGA ROAD, MORAGA
2061 CAMINO RAMON, SAN RAMON
680 BOLLINGER CANYON WAY. SAN RAMON
70 MORAGA WAY, ORINDA
280 MARKETPLACE, SAN RAMON
445 RAILROAD AVENUE, DANVILLE
SHADZEE BAKERY CAFE 60 -B CRESCENT DRIVE, PLEASANT HILL
ELEVE RESTAURANT 1677 N. MAIN STREET, WALNUT CREEK
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\2009 \Exhibit A Capacity Use Etc 6- 04- 09.doc
Assessor's Pare(
260- 040 -005 -1
260 - 050 -002 -5
260- 050 -003 -3
260- 071 -003 -8
260- 071 -004 -6
260- 072 -005 -2
260- 072 -006 -0
Total 7 pai
0
(expires after 2009 -10)
Amount
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$2,159.68
$15,117.76
CAQ 9$
(expires after 2011 -12)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
172 - 061 -003 -7
$930.02
172 - 061 -010 -2
$930.02
172 - 061 -012 -8
$930.02
172- 061 -013 -6
$788.34
172 - 061 -014 -4
$930.02
172 - 061 -036 -7
$833.82
172- 061 -030 -0
$930.02
172 - 061 -031 -8
$930.02
172 - 061 -032 -6
$930.02
172- 061 -034 -2
$930.02
Total 10 parcelsl
$9,062.32
0
(expires after 2010 -11)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
162 - 242 -010 -5
$1,190.32
162 - 242 -012 -1
$1,190.32
162 - 242 -023 -8
$1,493.54
162- 242 -018 -8
$1,493.54
162 - 243 -002 -1
$1.190.32
I Total 5 parcelsl $6,558.04 1
Cq�p98w'S ,BarbeeL`�anes,� ,� y :,_x
(expires after 2012 -13)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
198 - 120 -004 -9
$2,899.48
198 - 120 -005 -6
$2,899.48
198 - 120 -008 -0
$2,899.48
198 - 120 -009 -8
$2,899.48
198 - 120 -011 -4
$2,899.48
Total 5 parcels
$14,497.40
CAD,99 t1, ._Focest,Larfe_;. «„ , h ,...
(expires after 2010 -11)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
201 - 082 -004 -7
$1,729.30
201 - 082 -006 -2
$1,729.30
201 - 082 -007 -0
$1,729.30
Total 3 parcels
$5,187.90
-Lane' r
Assessor's Parcel
198 - 160 -037 -0
198 - 160 -018 -0
198 - 160 -020 -6
198 - 160 -021 -4
198- 160 -022 -2
198- 160 -023 -0
198- 160 -024 -8
198 - 160 -025 -5
198- 160 -027 -1
198- 160 -029 -7
198- 160 -030 -5
198- 160 -026 -3
Total 12 oarc
(expires after 2010 -11)
Amount
$199.72
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$1,542.44
$17,166.56
CAD 99-3: Vine Hill Wa
(expires after 2011 -12)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
155- 060 -011 -6
$2,467.64
155- 060 -012 -4
$2,467.64
162- 030 -002 -8
$2,467.64
Total 3 parcels
$7,402.92
CAD 00 -1: Laurenita Way G
(expires after 2011 -12)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
192- 011 -013 -5
$1,438.76
192 - 011 -014 -3
$1,438.76
192- 012 -003 -5
$1,438.76
192 - 012 -004 -3
$1,438.76
192 - 012 -005 -0
$1,438.76
192- 012 -007 -6
$1,438.76
192 - 012 -008 -4
$1,438.76
Total 7 parcels
$10,071.32
0
CAD 00 -2: Regent Place
(expires after 2012 -13)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
198 - 050 -013 -4
$2,177.48
198- 050 -014 -2
$2,177.48
198- 050 -015 -9
$2,177.48
198- 050 -016 -7
$2,177.48
198- 050 -017 -5
$2,177.48
198- 050 -018 -3
$2,177.48
198- 050 -019 -1
$2,177.48
198 - 050 -021 -7
$2,177.48
198 - 050 -022 -5
$2,177.48
Total 9 parcels
$19,597.32
CAD. 00 -3: Angelo LEI Sombro '
(expires after 2012 -13)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
230 - 050 -008 -5
$2,174.88
230 - 050 -009 -3
$2,174.88
230 - 050 -011 -9
$2,174.88
230- 050 -013 -5
$2,174.88
230 - 060 -002 -6
$1,938.48
230- 060 -003 -4
$1,938.48
230 - 060 -005 -9
$1,938.48
230 - 060 -006 -7
$1,938.48
Total 8 parcels
$16,453.44
0
(expires after 2012 -13)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
198 - 131 -002 -0
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -003 -8
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -005 -3
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -006 -1
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -007 -9
$1,377.36
198 -131 -008 -7
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -010 -3
$1,399.30
198 - 131 -011 -1
$1,399.30
198 - 131 -012 -9
$1,399.30
198 - 131 -018 -6
$1,399.30
198 - 131 -020 -2
$1,399.30
198 - 131 -028 -5
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -029 -3
$1,377.36
198 - 131 -030 -1
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -004 -5
$1,399.30
198 - 140 -005 -2
$1,399.30
198 - 140 -006 -0
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -008 -6
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -009 -4
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -010 -2
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -011 -0
$1,377.36
198- 140 -013 -6
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -015 -1
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -017 -7
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -018 -5
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -019 -3
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -020 -1
$1,377.36
198 - 140 -021 -9
$1,377.36
Total 28 parcelsl
$38,719.66
CAQ t10 6 1/ra Gerrada p Ig ae '
(expires after 2011 -12)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
191 - 062 -007 -7
$3,103.86
191 - 062 -025 -9
$3,103.86
191 - 062 -026 -7
$3,103.86
Total 3 parcels
$9,311.58
is
(expires after 2011 -12)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
192 - 020 -013 -4
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -014 -2
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -016 -7
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -018 -3
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -022 -5
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -029 -0
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -032 -4
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -033 -2
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -035 -7
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -036 -5
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -039 -9
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -041 -5
$1,224.52
192 - 020 -045 -6
$1,224.52
Total 13 parcels
$15,918.76
CAD Ott 2 Echo 5prrrigs Road ', ._
(expires after 2014 -15)r
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
167 - 130 -006 -7
$8,396.46
167- 130 -014 -1
$3,370.46
167- 160 -001 -1
$3,370.46
167- 160 -007 -8
$3,370.46
167- 160 -008 -6
$3,370.46
167 - 160 -021 -9
$3,370.46
Total 6 Parcelsl
$25,248.76
GAL);02 1 'Camille Court,
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
201 - 040 -004 -8
$1,209.64
201- 040 -006 -3
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -008 -9
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -009 -7
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -010 -5
$1,209.64
201- 040 -011 -3
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -013 -9
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -014 -7
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -015 -4
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -016 -2
$1,209.64
201 - 040 -020 -4
$1,209.64
201- 040 -021 -2
$1,209.64
Total 12 Parcelsl
$14,515.68
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
197 - 130 -026 -2
$3,183.52
197 - 140 -028 -6
$3,183.52
197- 140 -035 -1
$3,183.52
197 - 140 -036 -9
$3,360.46
197 - 140 -041 -9
$3,183.52
197- 140 -043 -5
$3,006.58
197 - 140 -044 -3
$3,183.52
197 - 140 -048 -4
$1,680.24
197 - 250 -008 -4
$3,006.58
Total 9 Parcels
$26.971.46
CAD Q2 4 rArb or Lane g a FM
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
187 - 120 -014 -1
$3,371.64
187 - 120 -020 -8
$1,185.80
187 - 120 -025 -7
$3,371.64
187 - 120 -042 -2
$3,371.64
187 - 120 -041 -4
$3,371.64
Total 5 Parceisl
$14,672.36
- tin
CAD 02 5 LaSonoma f!Yaya,j RS
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
198 - 111 -003 -2
$1,553.22
198 - 111 -004 -0
$1,553.22
198 -111 -005 -7
$1,553.22
198 - 112 -008 -0
$1,553.22
198 - 112 -009 -8
$1,553.22
198- 112 -010 -6
$1,553.22
Total 6 Parcelsl
$9,319.32
0
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
192 - 041 -010 -5
$1,594.06
192 - 041 -011 -3
$1,594.06
192- 041 -012 -1
$1,594.06
192 - 041 -013 -9
$1,594.06
192- 041 -014 -7
$1,594.06
192 - 041 -015 -4
$1,594.06
192 - 041 -016 -2
$1,594.06
192- 041 -018 -8
$1,594.06
192 - 042 -002 -1
$1,594.06
192 - 042 -007 -0
$1,594.06
192- 042 -009 -6
$1,594.06
192 - 060 -011 -9
$1,594.06
192 - 060 -014 -3
$1,594.06
192 - 060 -023 -4
$1,594.06
Total 14 Parcelsl
$22.316.84
CAD 028 ElP,,,in'taa►o gar F__.
(expires after 2014 -15)
Assessor's Parcel
Amount
197- 140 -030 -2
$3,028.88
197- 150 -013 -5
$3,207.72
197 - 162 -013 -1
$3,028.88
Total 3 Parcels
$9,265.48
Total Count:1 168
Total Amount:1 $307,374.88
EXHIBIT C
DELINQUENT CHARGES
0
CUSTOMER NAME
CUSTOMER ADDRESS
DELINQUENT CHARGE
$254.00 OVERTIME
REILAND HAROLD, JR.
76 ST. ANDREWS LANE, ALAMO
INSPECTION FEES DUE FOR
INSPECTION CONDUCTED
ON JUNE 5, 2008.
TOTAL DELINQUENT CHARGES:
$254.00
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\2009 \Exhibit C Capacity Use Etc Rev. Final 6- 04- 09.doc
0
04.b. Hearings
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
FY 2009 -2010 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, DEBT SERVICE
FUND BUDGET AND SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET, AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FY 2009 -2010 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
RATES, AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE
COUNTY TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
SUGGESTED AGENDA
JUNE 4, 2009
President Nejedly will announce that two separate public hearings will be conducted:
1) Approval and adoption of the FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance
(O &M) Budget, Debt Service Fund Budget and Self- Insurance Fund
Budget, and establishment of the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer Service Charge
rates; and
2) Collection of the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer Service Charges on the County tax
roll.
Call for staff report on both public hearings.
2. Open first public hearing and call for comments.
3. Close public hearing.
4. Board deliberation, and:
Vote to approve and adopt the FY 2009 -2010 O &M Budget, Debt Service
Fund Budget and Self- Insurance Fund Budget, incorporating Sewer
Service Charge as determined by ordinance to be considered separately;
and
b. Vote to set the Sewer Service Charge for FY 2009 -2010, to be
incorporated in the FY 2009 -2010 budget:
1) Adopt an uncodified ordinance setting the Sewer Service Charge at
$321 per RUE (staff recommendation.), or
2) Adopt an uncodified ordinance setting the Sewer Service Charge
between $311 and $321 per RUE, or
3) Take no action which continues the Sewer Service Charge at the
maximum rate of $311 as set forth in Resolution 2008 -063, or
rou-
c. Request additional information from staff and continue the public hearing
to June 18, 2009.
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Public Hearing - Sewer Service Charge & O &M 2009.doc
0
5. Open second public hearing and call for comments.
Close public hearing.
Board deliberation, and:
Vote to adopt resolution allowing collection of Sewer Service Charge on the
County tax roll.
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Public Hearing - Sewer Service Charge & O &M 2009.doc
kentral Contra Costa Sanl*ry District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009 No.: 4.b. Hearings
Type of Action: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING
Subject: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
FY 2009 -2010 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, DEBT SERVICE
FUND BUDGET AND THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET, AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FY 2009 -2010 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div.:
DEBBIE RATCLIFF ADMINISTRATIVE /FINANCE &
CONTROLLER ACCOUNTING
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
�g_
D. Ratcli R. Musgr es K. AlmJames M. elly,
General M nager
ISSUE: The District Code and State law require public hearings for the establishment
of the Sewer Service Charge rates for FY 2009 -2010 and on placing the current Sewer
Service Charges on the County tax roll for collection. An uncodified ordinance passed
by four affirmative votes is needed to establish the Sewer Service Charge. A resolution
passed by four affirmative votes is needed to place the charges on the Contra Costa
County tax roll. Although not required by law, the District will hold a public hearing to
receive public comment on the FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance Budget,
Debt Service Fund Budget and the Self- Insurance Fund Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct two separate Public Hearings and upon their
respective conclusions, take the following actions, if considered appropriate:
Approve and adopt the FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance Budget
(O &M), Debt Service Fund Budget and Self- Insurance Fund Budget
Approve an uncodified ordinance increasing the Sewer Service Charge by $10
fora total Sewer Service Charge of $321 per residential unit effective beginning
FY 2009 -2010.
Approve a resolution authorizing collection of the 2009 -2010 Sewer Service
Charges on the County tax roll.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN \POSPAPER \Budget Position Paper- 06- 04- 09.doc
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
FY 2009 -2010 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, DEBT SERVICE
FUND BUDGET AND THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET, AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FY 2009 -2010 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The draft FY 2009 -2010 O &M Budget is based on a $10 rate
increase in the Sewer Service Charge for a total of $321 per residential unit equivalent,
allocating $292 to Operations and Maintenance and $29 to the Sewer Construction
Fund. The draft budget assumes that the District will receive Ad Valorem Tax for 2009-
2010. However, the Governor has proposed that Prop 1A be suspended and that up to
100% of our Ad Valorem Tax be "borrowed" this year. If the District does not receive
any property tax, the lost revenue would be about $12,000,000 next year. If 8% of local
governments' property tax revenues are borrowed by the State, it would equate to
approximately $1 million. While Prop 1A requires the State to repay funds it borrows,
based on the State's financial condition, it is uncertain if any funds that are borrowed
would be repaid. The potential tax take for this year makes it one of the more
challenging years to prepare a budget. Staff expects our revenue projections will be
revised in the late summer or early fall to reflect the State's action.
Also, a $2.4 million allocation towards the unfunded liability associated with GASB 45
post retirement benefits is included in the draft 2009 -2010 budget. This allocation will
remain unencumbered until action by the Board. The proposed $10 Sewer Service
Charge increase would generate approximately $1.7 million in new revenue for fiscal
year 2009 -2010 to be allocated between O &M and the Sewer Construction Fund. From
the total $321 Sewer Service Charge, $292 would be allocated to O &M and $29 to the
Sewer Construction Fund. This allocation was set with the goal of restoring the 10%
O &M prudent reserve. The proposed budget would result in an increase to O &M
reserves at fiscal year end of $1.9 million for a projected O &M reserve balance at June
30, 2010, of $5.5 million.
Effective with the 1982 -1983 fiscal year, Contra Costa County imposed a fee for
collecting the Sewer Service Charge on the tax roll. The County fee, which
approximates $100,000 annually, is more economical than the alternative of direct
billing by the District.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could decide not to increase the
Sewer Service Charge for FY 2009 -2010, keeping the Sewer Service Charge at the
current $311, or choose another amount of increase up to $10 which was included in
the Proposition 218 Notice sent to customers in April.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN \POSPAPER \Budget Position Paper - 06-04-09.doc
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
FY 2009 -2010 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, DEBT SERVICE
FUND BUDGET AND THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET, AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FY 2009 -2010 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
BACKGROUND: The FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance Budget was
submitted for review at the May 21, 2009, Board Meeting. A detailed presentation was
made to the Board at that meeting and a copy of the overheads used is attached (see
Attachment 1).
A Proposition 218 notice, which requires the District to provide at least a 45 day notice
to all rate paying property owners for a Sewer Service Charge rate increase, was sent
in April 2009. Approximately 105,200 Proposition 218 notices were mailed. As of
May 28, 2009, a total of 115 telephone calls, a -mails and letters have been received
(see Attachment 2). This is less than .1% of total notices mailed.
A legal notice was published in the Contra Costa Times for the June 4, 2009, Public
Hearing to receive public comment on the FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance
Budget, Debt Service Fund Budget and the Self- Insurance Fund Budget, for the
establishment of the Sewer Service Charge rate for FY 2009 -2010, and on collection of
the 2009 -2010 Sewer Service Charges on the County tax roll.
It is recommended that two separate hearings be held to consider the matters
described.
Budget and for the establishment of the Sewer Service Charge rate up to $321 for
FY 2009 -2010:
The FY 2009 -2010 O &M Budget and Debt Service Fund Budget were submitted
to the Board of Directors for initial review at the May 21, 2009, Board Meeting
and the Self- Insurance Fund Budget was presented at the April 16, 2009, Board
Meeting. All three are scheduled for approval at the June 4, 2009, Board
Meeting. Upon approval of the three budgets and determination of adequate
levels of reserves, the Board must establish the 2009 -2010 Sewer Service
Charge rates.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN \POSPAPER \Budget Position Paper - 06- 04- 09.doc
• 0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
Subject: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE
FY 2009 -2010 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET, DEBT SERVICE
FUND BUDGET AND THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET, AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FY 2009 -2010 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
Hearing to consider collection of the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer Service Charges on the
County tax roll:
The law requires that a public hearing be held each year before the Sewer
Service Charge and any delinquent Sewer Service Charges can be placed on
the County tax roll. There are no delinquent Sewer Service Charges for 2008-
2009. The Sewer Service Charge has been collected on the County tax roll
since inception of the service charge in 1976. Collection on the tax roll provides
the most economical and efficient means for the District to collect the charges for
approximately 105,000 accounts.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Conduct two separate public hearings and upon
their respective conclusions, take the following actions, if considered appropriate:
Approve and adopt the FY 2009 -2010 Operations and Maintenance Budget,
Debt Service Fund Budget and Self- Insurance Fund Budget and
Approve an uncodified ordinance increasing the Sewer Service Charge by $10
for a total Sewer Service Charge of $321 per residential unit effective beginning
FY 2009 -2010.
Approve a resolution authorizing collection of the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer Service
Charges on the County tax roll.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN \POSPAPER \Budget Position Paper - 06-04-09.doc
• 0
Attachment 1
2009 -2010 O&M BUDGET
ASSUMPTIONS
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS:
Sewer Service Charge - $321
$292 Allocated to O&M
$29 Allocated to Sewer Construction
Total Budgeted Ad Valorem Tax $12.0 million:
$3.8 Million Allocated to Debt Service Fund
$8.2 Million Allocated to Sewer Construction Fund
EXPENSE ASSUMPTIONS:
$5.0 Million allocation for GASB 45 post retirement benefits
($2.4 Million to Trust, remainder is retiree health premiums)
Retirement Expense - 2.75% decrease in rate
Increases to Healthcare costs for active employees:
➢ Healthnet- 9.5%
➢ Kaiser - 2.0%
Increases to Healthcare costs for retirees- 3.7% Weighted Average
Administrative Overhead percentage- 117%
(Of Capitalized Salary)
Vacancy Factors:
➢ 3% for Salaries
➢ 4% for Benefits
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
Revenues
Expenses
0
TOTAL DISTRICT REVENUE & EXPENSE
2009 - 2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Total District
$86,906
$99,86
Operations &
Maintenance
$61,668
$59,74
Sewer
Construction
$25,238
$40,11
Revenues Over Expenses 12 95 1 922 14 879
* Footnote: DOES NOT include reduction in Capital Projects
for favorable bid climate.
N: VADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
0. •
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE
2008 -2009 BUDGET COMPARED TO 2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Revenues
Expenses
Revenues Over Expenses
Fund Balance 06/30/10
Sewer Service Charge Rate
(O &M Portion Only)
Total Sewer Service Charge
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
Increase
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
$57,031
$61,668
8.1%
58,496
59,746
2.1%
1 465
1 923
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF \Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
$5,476
$260 $292
$311 $321
OEY LABOR COSTS - O&M
(000 Omitted)
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN\RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
- Increase
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
Salaries & Wages
$22,895
$24,557
$1,662
Salary Vacancy Factor
(640)
(682)
(42)
Retirement
8,268
8,148
(120)
Medical Insurance
5,844
6,188
344
Dental Insurance
743
716
(27)
Workers' Compensation
362
628
266
Benefit Vacancy Factor
(815)
(830)
(15)
Capitalized Adm.
Overhead
(3,784)
(3,460)
324
All Other
5,158
5,062
(96)
Total Labor Costs
38 031
40 327
2 296
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN\RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
0
KEY INCREASES 2008 -2009 BUDGET
TO 2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
Dollar Increase
(Decrease)
% Increase
2008 -2009 Budget
$58,496
Salaries (Includes 3% vacancy
1,620
7.3%
factor)
Benefits (Includes 4% vacancy
676
4.3
factor)
Chemicals
(67)
(4.0)
Utilities
(1,309)
(19.8)
Repairs & Maintenance
46
1.4
Hauling & Disposal
6
.6
Professional & Legal ,
91
15.3
Outside Services
(191)
(7.7)
Self Insurance
533
62.7
Materials & Supplies
47
2.5
All Other
(203)
(9.6)
2009 -2010 Budget
$59,745
2.1%
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
• •
DEBT SERVICE FUND
2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Revenue
Debt Service
$3,860
Interest Expense 1,321
Principal Payments 2,539
TOTAL $3,860
N: \ADMINSUPVADMIN \RATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
April 25, 2009
bear 5ecretary:
Attachment 2
REC EOV
APR 2 8 2009
cccso
SBCWARY of THE DISTR1cr
As a senior and a single occupant of my townhouse, I feel discriminated
upon because I have to pay the same amount for service as my
neighbors who have five persons in their household, three of whom are
teen- agers. Is there any way that the rates can somehow be
determined by the usage for residential customers, especially those
living alone and /or seniors ? ? ? ?? I am clearly against the rate increase.
I do not wish to attend the public hearing on June 4, 2009 nor do I
wish to have my concerns aired at a public forum using my name and
address since I do live alone and am reluctant to announce that fact.
If my concerns are addressed, please do not refer to me in any other
way but as "a very concerned elder citizen ". Thank you.
•
Suzanne K. McCreary ECOVED
4 Crown Ct.
Orinda, CA 94563 APR 27 2009
SeGWMY of TW wsrrncr
April 23, 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
RE Proposed Rate Increase
Dear Sir or Madam
Your proposed sewer rate increase for Central Contra Costa is understandable
as everyone is now scrambling for more money. However, I feel it is unfair to
charge a household with one person the same as a household with five, six or
more. I am a single person on a very low income. The other utilities have very
generously given me a low income status and a discounted rate, ie,, EBMUD,
PG & E and AT &T. Even the Orinda School District has given me an exemption
on their tax increases. If Central Contra Costa Sanitary District goes through with
this rate increase, l am requesting an exemption from this additional charge.
For even though it may seam like a small increase, for me it is a lot.
I would appreciate your consideration of my request.
Sincerely,
Suzanne K. McCreary
REC ENED
ANITA FASNAUCHT APR 2 :9 2009
2630 MEADOW GLEN DRIVE
SAN RAMON, CA 94583 CCCSD
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
April 28, 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary Dist.
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Attention: Secretary of the Dist.
I am protesting the raise in the annual Sewer Service Charge. I am a Senior Citizen and live on a
fixed income. I do not receive an increase of income of 3.2 %. Please reconsider this rate
increase on behalf of myself and other Senior Citizens.
Sincerely,
Anita Fasnaucht
0 •
REC E9V DD
Leona Huckestein APP 2 8 2009
414 Legacy Drive
cccsD
Alamo, CA 94507 SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94533
Dear Secretary of the District:
I am filing a written protest against the proposed increase in annual sewer service
charges. • We are retired and have a very limited fixed income with no ability to pay for
the proposed increases. The Federal government states that we have 0 inflation, thereby
debunking your claim that you need this service charge increase. Homeowners are
constantly required to conserve and become very creative with ways to improve their
facility so that they live within their means. I suggest that the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District do the same.
NO MORE INCREASES IN SEWER SERVICE CHARGES!
Yours truly,
Leona Huckestein
April 22, 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
RE: Proposed Increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge
This is to protest this proposed rate increase.
I'�ECEIVED
APR 27 2009
CCCSD
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
As a retiree on a fixed income I can assure you that you and everyone
else in positions to impose new fees, taxes, assessments etc. are killing
us seniors who have lost most of our retirement savings due to the
depression we are now in.
You and your ilk are starving us to death! If you must kill us, use bullets
because it would be more humane ... like shooting a horse with a
broken leg. If you don't like that suggestion, you should at least delay
your increase until the economy improves.
Incidentally, your reason for this service charge increase, INFLATION,
Is precisely what YO are creating in the first place!!!!!!
Phn A. Sallay
U.S.A. Retired
Lafayette, California
Secretary APR 2 3 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Place CCCSD
5019 Imhoff SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
Martinez
CA 94553
Art Ainscough
708 Cheyenne Drive
Walnut Creek
CA 94598
April 22, 2009
Proposed Increase in Annual Service Charee
Unfortunately I cannot be present at the Public Hearing on the above subject on June 40,
2009 but I would like you to make my comments known at the meeting.
You say that the increase is due to several factors. Some of the factors are repeated when
every increase is made - - -- almost annually!!!
You never present any attempts that have been made to keep the increases down by
reducing the costs of the Districts Overheads or Operating Expenses. Something that
appears to be alien to the Administrations Management abilities. Lets us hear of any work
done to reduce the Overheads and Operating Expenses and the Dollar amounts of those
reductions.
Sincerely
+ /2n�o9
C-01, /e.(�
Elaine Boehme - Elaine - this came in as.arWchment to an e-mail. I have already senn the standard response __ Page 1 ,�
From: Brenda Wener
To: Elaine Boehme; Kurt Darner
Date: 4/28/2009 4:23:36 PM
Subject: Elaine - this came in as an attachment to an e-mail. I have already sent him the
standard response,
Elaine - this came in as an attachment to an e-mail. 1 have already sent him the standard response, last
week. Thought you should see the letter as it's addrs to Sec of Dist. B. April 23, 2009 Central Contra
Costa Sanitary DistrictSecretary of the District5019 Imhoff PlaceMartinez, CA 94553Email:
rates @centralsan.org Subject: Comment on Notice of Proposed Increase in Annual Sewer Service
Charge In response to the notice mailed April 20, 2009 1 protest any increase in sewer service charges as
being unreasonable and unjustified. Instead of increasing rates I request that the District reduce costs by:
Rewarding managers only for reducing the costs of new construction and for operational costs below.
historic levels.. Reducing the benefits and costs of benefits paid to employees. Make retirement and
health benefits comparable to those paid in the private sector.- Challenge NPDES permit requirement
changes if they become more restrictive.- Critically screen planned facility improvements.
Demonstrate a realistic cost - benefit for any proposed project before proceeding. Reduce employee
involvement in suggesting additions to projects.- Require greater productivity from existing staff.
Seek other ways of reducing operating and capital expenses. Thank you. Scott Dittman5320 Likins
AvenueMartinez, CA 94553
---- -_ _ __ - - - -- -- -
ame oehme - Proposed increase in anr� sewer service charge Page_1
REC ENEDD
From: Sheila Roberts <redroberts @astound.net>
To: <eboehme @centralsan.dst.ca.us> APR 2 4 2009
Date: 4/24/2009 11:07:06 AM
Subject: Proposed increase in annual sewer service charge CCCSD
p 9 SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
I received a letter April 21, 2009 proposing a rate increase for
residential customers.
I am OPPOSED to any rate increases due to ADDITIONAL POLLUTION
PREVENTION PROGRAMS
TO MEET NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS,
inflation and collection system improvements to meet NEW REGULATIONS
regarding overflow reductions.
Thank you for considering my opposition to this rate increase.
Sheila. Roberts
281 Montecillo Dr., Walnut Creek, Ca., 94595
(925) 938 -2914
P
April 28, 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Attn: Secretary of the District
RECENVED
APR 3 0 2009
CCCSD
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
I am writing in protest to the proposed fee increases proposed by the District.
As a small business owner in the current economy, I know that cutting our costs and
cutting our fees is needed at this time. CCCSD should take a similar approach.
Inflation has been relatively low and is not a justification for fee increases. Any
infrastructure projects which can be deferred or delayed should be. Any regulations which are
imposed on CCCSD should likewise be protested.
In an economy where everyone is struggling to make house payments and keep their
property, it is unconscionable to increase fees.
VerTA-
Christopher ilman
1870 Poplar Drive
Walnut Creek, CA 94595
? was i" � CLoAFP ON
g �-° 7. 1 !�'4'T !1 U�' 7r�'
�NYNI ° , I3Y Coin iRi� err B144k, Tliw Z5 NEt,✓ otulyj!�Q I
Central Contrc�'sta Sanitary District
REC OVEDD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED INCREASE IN ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
APR 2 8 2009
Dear Property Owner:
CCCSD
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides sanitary sewer, household hazardous waste
collection, and recycled water services in the central county area. Sanitary sewer service includes
building, operating and maintaining public sewer pipelines, the wastewater treatment plant in
Martinez, and the pipeline that discharges clean, treated water to Suisun Bay.
To pay for these services, CCCSD collects an annual Sewer Service Charge from each property
connected to the sewer system. The service charge rates are calculated for each customer group
based on the cost to provide service, considering both the quantity of sewage discharged and other
sewage characteristics affecting the cost for treatment. For most property owners, this charge is
billed as a line item labeled "CCCSD SEWER CHG" on the property tax bill they receive from Contra
Costa County. For about 300 properties, particularly government and non - profit facilities, CCCSD
bills the property owners directly.
FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS, each single - family home, mobile home, townhouse,
condominium, apartment, and other multi - family home is charged a uniform rate for sewer service.
The current residential rate is $311 per year. The Board will be considering an increase of up to $10
per year or $321 for Fiscal Year 2009 -2010, effective July 1, 2009. This is an increase of 3.2% over
the present rate. This service charge increase is necessary to pay for increases in costs due to
inflation, additional pollution prevention programs to meet our National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, collection system improvements to meet new
regulations regarding overflow reductions, and needed pipeline and facility improvements.
FOR NONRESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ONLY, the service charge increases being considered are
shown on the reverse side of this notice.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on this matter in the CCCSD Meeting Room, 5019 Imhoff Place,
Martinez, California, on Thursday, June 4, 2009, at 2:00 p.m., at which time and place interested
persons may appear and be heard. Written comments or protests may be mailed to the Secretary of
the District at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553, or emailed to rates(a)centralsan.org and must
be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 2009 to ensure a full review.
If you have questions about the proposed Sewer Service Charges, please call CCCSD's
Environmental Services Division at (925) 335 -7739.
Notice mailed by April 20, 2009.
0
n
u
�J� 1���V- c� J.QZ,Le,cvlzi,ll- v/'ciL�e.nzJ. Vl�c�r_o.�U
Q-y�� �ch`i e_a�/�C�2pJ't_al'`�rJ- � -r-,� .c -• /�� o- n�.,C'rw1t��2i11g s�
Z'7
•
RECFIVFn
APR 2 3 2009
• D, EDEPYED
APR 2 4 2009
CCCSD
SECRETARY of THE DISTRICT
CCCSD i:rftKU'Nr1At1'\l IAL SINVICES
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
NOTICE OF PROPOSED INCREASE IN ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
e-n -�j �.�- ertC— �c -�4.� w.�..o ��4 -ad. �-,-•� c�.rr -c.¢�
Dear Property Owner: ie o, 2 a w ;, , / _ „ ace a-d..Q
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides sanitary sewer, household hazardous waste
collection, and recycled water services in the central county area. Sanitary sewer service includes
building, operating and maintaining public sewer pipelines, the wastewater treatment plant in
Martinez, and the pipeline that discharges clean, treated water to Suisun Bay.
To pay for these services, CCCSD collects an annual Sewer Service Charge from each property
connected to the sewer system. The service charge rates are calculated for each customer group
based on the cost to provide service, considering both the quantity of sewage discharged and other
sewage characteristics affecting the cost for treatment. For most property owners, this charge is
billed as a line item labeled "CCCSD SEWER CHG" on the property tax bill they receive from Contra
Costa County. For about 300 properties, particularly government and non- profit facilities, CCCSD
bills the property owners directly.
FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS, each single - family home, mobile home, townhouse,
condominium, apartment, and other multi - family home is charged a uniform rate for sewer service.
The current residential rate is $311 per year. The Board will be considering an increase of up to $10
per year or $321 for Fiscal Year 2009 -2010, effective July 1, 2009. This is an increase of 3.2% over
the present rate. This service charge increase is necessary to pay for increases in costs due to
inflation, additional pollution prevention programs to meet our National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, collection system improvements to meet new
regulations regarding overflow reductions, and needed pipeline and facility improvements.
FOR NONRESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ONLY, the service charge increases being considered are
shown on the reverse side of this notice.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on this matter in the CCCSD Meeting Room, 5019 Imhoff Place,
Martinez, California, on Thursday, June 4, 2009, at 2:00 p.m., at which time and place interested
persons may appear and be heard. Written comments or protests may be mailed to the Secretary of
the District at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553, or emailed to rates(oilcentralsan.orp and must
be received by 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 2009 to ensure a full review.
If you have questions about the proposed Sewer Service Charges, please call CCCSD's
Environmental Services Division at (925) 335 -7739.
Notice mailed by April 20, 2009.
RECoVED
AR. 2 7 2009
emso
$LnRETAFjyoFTHED19MC7 ----
d�fasi fn nv
v
Page 1 of 1
P r
RATES RATES - letter opposing sewer service charge inc ease
From: florence chan <florencefchan @yahoo.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: 5/27/2009 7:37 AM
Subject: letter opposing sewer service charge increase
CC: <florencefchan @yahoo.com>
Dear Secretary,
Attached is my letter
Florence Chan
0
Please accept it. Thanks.
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \bwener \Local Settings \Temp \GW}000... 5/27/2009
•
May 26, 2009
161 Blackstone Dr.
Danville, CA 94506
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Secretary of the District,
I am writing to oppose the Proposed Increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge in
the notice mailed to my property before April 20, 2009. These are my reasons:
1. I only have a part-time job and the certainty of keeping the job is unclear.
I simply do not have money for the increase.
2. I am trying my best to pay for all my bills including the property tax bill
from Contra Costa County. It covers the CCCSD SEWER CHG. In
today's economy, I am struggling to pay for the current bills as a
responsible citizen.
3. $311 per year for CCCSD SEWER CHG is actually a lot of money for one
item in my budget in today's poor economy.
Please do not increase the Annual Sewer Service Charge. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Florence Chan
RATES RATES - PROTEST TO PROPOSED RATE INCREASE •
Page 1 of 1
From: Ken Moyal <kenmoyal @gmail.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: 5/29/2009 2:28 PM
Subject: PROTEST TO PROPOSED RATE INCREASE
May 24, 2009
Secretary of the District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
RE: WRITTEN PROTEST TO PROPOSED RATE INCREASE
To Whom It May Concern:
My name is KENNETH MOYAL. My residence address is 16 Patricia Road, Orinda, California, 94563. I am issuing
you a written protest to the proposed rate increase scheduled for Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 2:00 P.M.
Sincerely,
KEN MOYAL, ESQ.
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \bwener \Local Settings \Temp \GW}000... 5/26/2009
From: "Vickie and David Barker" <DVBarker @astound.net>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Thu, May 21, 2009 10:15 PM
Subject: re: Proposed increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge
As a customer, I am not sure if this is the time to propose increase in
rates. I think many households are struggling to pay their current bills
and for companies to propose rate hikes would make paying bills even harder.
Is there any other avenues you could take to avoid increasing your rates ??
Sincerely,
Vickie Barker
From:
"Steven Richter" <srichter @cctg.com>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Wed, May 20, 2009 11:46 AM
Subject:
protest rate increase
To Whom it May Concern,
I'm writing this e-mail to protest the proposed rate increase. In this economic climate it will be a financial
hardship to us to have in increase at this time.
Thank you
Debbie Richter
srichter @cctg.com
Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4091
(20090520)
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http: / /www.eset.com
RATES RATES - I oppose any rate increa` Page 1
Mw
From: Tommiette Rey <tommietter @yahoo.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Wed, May 13, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: I oppose any rate increase
Secretary of the District,
I oppose any rate increase.
Tommiette Rey
330 Gilger Ave.
Martinez, CA 94553
RATES RATES - Increase in annual sewe ice Page 1
From: <Luis.Cedeno @wellsfargo.com>
To: < rates@centralsan. org >
Date: Wed, May 13, 2009 10:17 AM
Subject: Increase in annual sewer service
I disagree in the increase, I think it should be much higher for industrial customers, the increase for
industrial costumers is only 3.21%, and bakeries 3.27 %. My question is why we as residential costumers
that do not pollute as much as many other industrial customers should pay around the same amount ?.
Thankyou
Luis Lopez Cedeno / Pyra Aarden
133 Lucinda Lane
Pleasant Hill CA
94523
From: <nandtpatten @comcast.net>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 12:35 PM
Subject: Concerns and questions about proposed rate increase
Hi,
I have concerns about your proposed increase in the annual sewer service charge. In the notice I
received, one of the reasons for the increase includes inflation, as well as required system improvements.
However, I understand that the latest change in the CPI is actually a reduction in consumer costs for the
12 months ending in March 2009. Therefore I question the need for the portion of the increase based on
inflation.
Furthermore, many public agencies and private firms are not providing wage increases due to the
economic situation. What portion of the proposed increase is due to wage increases for CCCSD staff?
What is CCCSD doing to control the cost of retiree benefits?
I would appreciate a response to my questions and concerns.
Thanks
Tom Patten
724 Skyline Drive
Martinez
• Page 1 of 1
RATES RATES - rate hikes
From: Darin Michels <dmichels55 @hotmail.conn>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: 5/4/2009 1:44 PM
Subject: rate hikes
NO to rate hikes of any amount.
At a time when people are losing jobs and being foreclosed on by banks, Govt agencies screw it to you by raising
rates. You people ought to be ashamed of yourselves. How about trying to become more lean and efficient
instead of raising rates on hard working people. As a private business owner our employees have taken or been
forced to take paycuts or work less hours. This is what you all should try. Multiply the amount you are raising the
rates by the # of customers and then take that total and take a pay cut in that amount. That is what everyone
else in the real world has to do or they lose their jobs. The water district has also informed us there will be higher
rates doue to lower water consumption. This is a direct result of what govt agencies have asked us to do
CONSERVE. The problem is that we conserved too much and now there sticking it to us also. When less water is
being consumed shouldn't the cost of the sanitary district also decrease? Less water to process less costs makes
sense to me. Instead Govt agencies like this just tell us it costs more and we should accept it. Shame on you.
Shame on you.
Best regards,
D Michels
2607 Comistas Dr.
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
925- 216 -7307
Hotmail@ has a new way to see what's up with your friends. Check it out.
file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \bwener \Local Settings \Temp \GW}0000... 5/4/2009
From:
Dave Dunbar <dunbardave @hotmail.com>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Thu, Apr 30, 2009 4:45 PM
Subject:
Proposed Rate Increase
I am writing to protest the proposed rate increase for residential customers.
The increased rates are disturbing and unfair because:
These are difficult economic times. We live on a fixed income (primarily Social Security) and have a
difficult time meeting expenses for fundamental services (such as sewer).
CCCSD should be tightening its belt rather than increasing spending and passing it along to the
consumer.
Agency requirements, such as NPDES, should be relaxed or exempted during these difficult economic
times.
At some point in the future when rates are finally increased (assuming the current proposed ones are not
adopted), please consider some sort of reduction for senior citizens.
David Dunbar
1325 Martino Road
Lafayette, CA
Rediscover Hotmail ®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry
http: // windowslive. com /RediscoverHotmail ?ocid= TXT_TAGLM_W L_HM_Rediscover_Mobile2_O42009
From:
"Spinelli & Flagg" <coopcity @astound.net>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Thu, Apr 30, 2009 6:19 PM
Subject:
increased sewer rates
I am opposed to you raising sewer rates. My pay isn't increasing because of inflation. Our sales tax has
increased, our license fees are increasing, our property taxes go up every year and as far as I'm
concerned you should have to make do with what you are already getting.
Roberta Flagg
3241 Hudson Ave.
Walnut Creek, Ca 94597
From: "James Bruesewitz" <jamesbruesewitz @msn.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Thu, Apr 30, 2009 12:53 PM
Subject: Increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge
Against the rate increase. We are not having inflation at this time in our
economy. What are the following : Additional pollution prevention programs?
Permit requirements? Collection system improvements to meet new regulations
regarding overflow reductions, and needed pipeline and facility
improvements? Lots of words and no substance. Show me in detail the cost for
each of these programs. Ex. What pipeline, where does it run, how far, age
etc. What facility improvements for whom and why, WE NEED TO BE SHOWN HARD
NUMBERS RELATED TO EACH PROJECT. Rate increase is totally unjustified
without a complete and comprehensive proposal to the consumer. Thank You.
Jim Bruesewitz
Jim Bruesewitz, Realtor, DRE# 01055806
PREPARATION +PERFORMANCE= RESULTS
People & Properties Sotheby's International Realty
360 Diablo Road
Danville, Ca. 94526
Cell: 925- 683 -2402
Website: www.eastbayhomesforyou.com
RATES RATES - CCCSD SEWER CHG Page 1
From: Carl Crisp <crispc @sbcglobal.net>
To: < rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2009 6:13 PM
Subject: CCCSD SEWER CHG
DEAR SEWER SERVICE PROVIDER:
Thank you for your April 20, 2009, NOTICE OF PROPOSED INCREASE IN ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE
CHARGE.
Are you people working on another planet and not aware of what is going on with our economy? Jobs,
homes, savings, income, asset values, dividends, interest rates, etc. are all on the decline. You have a lot
of guts to propose a rate increase. Your notice should have been to tell us that the rate was going down
and that we would be getting a refund.
Please make a mark for my wife and I on the column for NO RATE INCREASE.
Thank you for giving us a chance to object. I know that you are going to increase the rate, no matter how
many of your clients object. That is the nature of a monopoly like CCCSD.
Damn the ground water, bring on the septic tank.
Property Owner,
CEC and LVC
From:
RATES RATES
To:
Dale Haukland
Date:
Tue, Apr 28, 2009 3:30 PM
Subject:
Re: Protest on raise in sewer service charges
This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April 27, 2009 concerning the proposed increase in
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the public hearing, scheduled for June 4,
2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez. CCCSD appreciates
your concern about the rising costs of services. But just as your household or business is impacted by
inflation, so is CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more stringent air and
water quality regulations; rehabilitate an aging sewer system; and maintain our treatment plant facilities.
CCCSD continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without compromising quality or safety.
Our mission remains the protection of public health and the environment. Thank you for taking the time to
respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> Dale E Haukland <haukland @sbcglobal.net> 4/27/2009 3:34 PM >>>
A 3.2% hike in service charges seems excesses, when our use of the sewer system has decreased
because their are now only 2 people in our house not 5 and we use many additional environmental friendly
products.
If a customer conserves as they are asked to, then along comes a rate increase. Every utility is raising
thier rates. The consumer is getting beat up from all sides.
Dale Haukland
148 Santiago Drive
Danville, Ca.
94526
RATES RATES - Re: Assessed Value 0 0 Page 1
From:
RATES RATES
To:
Bonnie Gonzales
Date:
Tue, Apr 28, 2009 3:28 PM
Subject:
Re: Assessed Value
Please contract the Tax Collector for Contra Costa County. I believe their phone number is on your tax bill
or(877)957 -5280.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> Bonnie Gonzales <bgonzal7 @yahoo.com> 4/27/2009 3:41 PM >>>
To whom it may concern,
I am trying to locate the appropriate person to talk about my assessed value of my home. The value is
inflated, and needs to be considered for a reduction in my tax. I am being highly overbilled both last year
and in this upcoming year. If you or anyone in this department can point me in the right direction I would
greatly appreciate it.
Thank you,
Bonnie Gonzales
925- 324 -3645
RATES RATES - Re: no sewer • • Page 1
From: RATES RATES
To: sayyesgg
Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2009 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: no sewer
We are not collecting sewer service for your parcel. We obtain the mailing addresses from Contra Costa
County and we do not have a way to filter out those parcels that are on septic. Please disgreard.
Unfortunately, you'll probably continue to receive these notices in the years to come.
Brenda
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan,dst.ca.us
>>> sayyesgg <sayyesgg @sbcglobal.net> 4/28/2009 12:26 PM >>>
you letter suggests the CCCSD collects charger from each property connected to the sewer system
well„ i am not connected to the sewer system so hopefully the fact that you sent me a letter does not
mean you intend to charge me„
if you connect me to the sewer system „ then you can charge me, but if i am not connected„ then don't
charge me.
115 Deodara
Martinez, 94553
From:
<NDeanPloss @aol.com>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Sat, Apr 25, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject:
Protest Sewer Rate increase
Recommend Directors vote against any rate increase at this time
APN 189 - 320 -069 -9 00
Norman and Gloria Ploss
* * * * ** * * * * * ** *Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http: / /tool bar. aol.com /aolrad io /down load. html ?ncid =em lcntusdown00000003)
From:
Barbara Zeller <bezeller @pacbell.net>
To:
< rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Fri, Apr 24, 2009 8:23 PM
Subject:
rate increases
To Whom It May Concern
1 would like to know what the company has done to decrease costs. Employees of small businesses are
required to take furlough days. Our employee benefits are being cut. Expense accounts are cut. Office
space is shrinking. We are fortunate to be paid the minimum number of vacation days the state allows and
no more.
Can you sacrifice as the small business private sector sacrifices? Are you willing to keep rates down to
help the average citizen of this county?
Barbara
J
RATES RATES - Proposed increase in aril sewer service charge Page 1
From: RATES RATES
To: redroberts @astound.net
Date: Fri, Apr 24, 2009 3:35 PM
Subject: Proposed increase in annual sewer service charge
This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April 24,'2009 concerning the proposed increase in
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the public hearing, scheduled for June 4,
2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez. CCCSD appreciates
your concern about the rising costs of services. But just as your household or business is impacted by
inflation, so is CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more stringent air and
water quality regulations; rehabilitate an aging sewer system; and maintain our treatment plant facilities.
CCCSD continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without compromising quality or safety.
Our mission remains the protection of public health and the environment. Thank you for taking the time to
respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not hesitate to contact us.
I received a letter April 21, 2009 proposing a rate increase for
residential customers.
I am OPPOSED to any rate increases due to ADDITIONAL POLLUTION
PREVENTION PROGRAMS
TO MEET NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS,
inflation and collection system improvements to meet NEW REGULATIONS
regarding overflow reductions.
Thank you for considering my opposition to this rate increase.
Sheila Roberts
281 Montecillo Dr., Walnut Creek, Ca., 94595
(925) 938 -2914
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
0,
From:
<sdittman @comcast.net>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Thu, Apr 23, 2009 4:14 PM
Subject:
Comments on annual service charge increase
Please see the attached letter. Thank you
0
April 23, 2009
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Secretary of the District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Email: rates centralsan.ore
0
Subject: Comment on Notice of Proposed Increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge
In response to the notice mailed April 20, 2009 1 protest any increase in sewer service charges as being
unreasonable and unjustified. Instead of increasing rates I request that the District reduce costs by:
• Rewarding managers only for reducing the costs of new construction and for operational costs
below historic levels.
• Reducing the benefits and costs of benefits paid to employees. Make retirement and health
benefits comparable to those paid in the private sector.
• Challenge NPDES permit requirement changes if they become more restrictive.
• Critically screen planned facility improvements. Demonstrate a realistic cost - benefit for any
proposed project before proceeding. Reduce employee involvement in suggesting additions to
projects.
• Require greater productivity from existing staff.
• Seek other ways of reducing operating and capital expenses.
Thank you.
Scott Dittman
5320 Likins Avenue
Martinez, CA 94553
RATES RATES - Re: Parcel Number 153.0-008 -7 00 . Page 1
From: Donna Yu <dyu @yus.com>
To: RATES RATES <RATES @centralsan.dst.ca.us>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Parcel Number 153 - 250 -008 -7 00
Brenda,
Thank you so much for your quick response. Your estimate should help
us a lot in planning for our 2009 expenses.
Sincerely,
Donna Yu
RTSF Petro Ventures, Inc.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:57 AM, RATES RATES wrote:
> Good morning Donna,
• I took a look at the 2008 water data that we received from Contra
• Costa Water Dist, which is the data that is used for billing 09/10.
• It appears that the water use was down from the year before.
> Usage 07 = 11,731 hcf CCCSD Charges $28,379.63 08/09
> Usage 08 = 9,983 hcf Proposed charges $25,000.00 approx 09/10
• Based usage, with a 16% discount for drag -out and evapration, that
• is given to all car washes, I would estimated you charges to be
• approximatey $25,000 using the proposed rate.
• Brenda Wener
• Engineering Assistant III
> Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
> Sewer Service Charge Program
> 5019 Imhoff Place
> Martinez, CA 94553
> (925) 335 -7739
> Rates @centralsan.dst.ca.us
> >>> Donna Yu <dyu @yus.com> 4/22/2009 9:28 PM >>>
> Per your April 20, 2009 notice "Notice of Proposed Increase in Annual
> Sewer Service Charge ", we would like you to calculate a property-
* specific estimate of the sewer service charge for 2009 -10.
> Parcel Number 153 - 250 -008 -7 00
> 627 Contra Costa Blvd.
> Concord, CA 94523
> 510- 417 -9288
• Thank you for your help,
• Donna Yu
• RTSF Petro Ventures, Inc.
RATES RATES - Re: INCREASE IN ANNJ& SEWER SERVICE CHARGE • Page 1
From: RATES RATES
To: I tsang
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: INCREASE IN ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April 23, 2009 concerning the proposed increase in
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the public hearing, scheduled for June 4,
2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez. CCCSD appreciates
your concern about the rising costs of services. But just as your household or business is impacted by
inflation, so is CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more stringent air and
water quality regulations; rehabilitate an aging sewer system; and maintain our treatment plant facilities.
CCCSD continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without compromising quality or safety.
Our mission remains the protection of public health and the environment. Thank you for taking the time to
respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> "I o tsang" <lol369 @netzero.net> 4/23/2009 2:55 PM >>>
To Whom It May Concern
This message is to protest the proposed rate increase of the Sewer Service Charge. We are retired and
on very limited income and don't feel we should be charged an increase of up to $10 per year! Since the
calculations are based on the quantity of sewage discharged, common sense would tell us that bakeries,
supermarkets, restaurants, etc. would create more discharged waste than two seniors in a single dwelling
home, so why are we being charged far more than the larger institutions ?I This doesn't make
sense!
As far as we're concerned, the larger institutions or businesses should be charged more, not the
residential customers with two person households!!!!!!
Your facility improvements should have been foreseeable and budgeted for. Maybe it's time to cutback on
salaries and benefits like every other company is doing. Everyone has to learn to get by with less, and
that goes for the school districts. We have all lost nearly half our portfolios in this down economy and your
proposal to increase the sewer service charge is not acceptable at this time.
Lois & Raymond Tsang
3412 Lanai Dr.
San Ramon, CA 94582
to find information on your credit score and your credit report.
From: komperda <komperda @silcon.com>
To: RATES RATES < RATES @centralsan.dst.ca.us>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: CCCSD Sewer Service Charges
Your "Boiler Plate" response to our PROTEST AGAINST ANOTHER INCREASE
does not appease us.! Here are the amounts we've PAID for a number of
years: $311, $300., $289., $280., $272., $248.
Do you ever expect it to stop? What have you done with these bigtime
dollars
that you've collected from "payers" in this County?
You speak of Inflation (the Government says there is NO inflation with this
economy in a deep recession) -It is my opinion ,monies from collections
should
have been put aside for an ageing system! Have they been?
INFLATION is caused by people that THINK their "labor & services" are
really WORTH
more THAN THEY REALLY ARE!! Some are really NEVER SATISFIED,
and if they can get more ..... they DO, or do their best to GET MORE!!!
Think of not only residential -but about businesses who are TRYING TO STAY
IN BUSINESS. Parts of California's housing are a MESS,PEOPLE ARE LEAVING
this tremendous HIGH COST STATE.... Home prices are being devastated - everyone
trying to get MORE!!!! Some people don't even consider the Taxes and
they are
the CULPRIT in this financial debacle!!
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!
komperda @silcon.com
RATES RATES wrote:
• This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April 22, 2009
• concerning the proposed increase in the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
• District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
• provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the
• public hearing, scheduled for June 4, 2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD
• Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez.
• CCCSD appreciates your concern about the rising costs of services. But
• just as your household or business is impacted by inflation, so is
• CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more
• stringent air and water quality regulations; rehabilitate an aging
• sewer system; and maintain our treatment plant facilities. CCCSD
• continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without
• compromising quality or safety. Our mission remains the protection of
• public health and the environment.
• Thank you for taking the time to respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service
• Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
• CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not
• hesitate to contact us.
> Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
> Sewer Service Charge Program
> 5019 Imhoff Place
> Martinez, CA 94553
> (925) 335 -7739
> Rates @centralsan.dst.ca.us <mailto :Rates @centralsan.dst.ca.us>
RATES RATES - Comment on proposed ncrease Page 1
From: John Lockhart <lockhartca @comcast.net>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 9:49 AM
Subject: Comment on proposed rate increase
Dear Secretary of the District:
I am writing to object to the proposed rate increase for Fiscal Year
2009 -2010 disclosed in the notice mailed 4/20/09 to CCCSD property owners.
You state as one justification for the proposed rate increase, "increases in
costs due to inflation ". I would like to remind you that since December,
2008, the national inflation rate has been virtually zero, and in March of
2009, it was negative: a DEflationary rate. With current economic
conditions, this trend is likely to continue for some time. In these times,
with California unemployment at double digits, with mortgage foreclosures,
layoffs, and financial pain at a high not seen since the Depression, it's
callous and thoughtless to propose a rate increase and use "inflation" as an
excuse! $10 per family might not seem like a lot of money, but that's a bag
of groceries for a family on hard times, trying to stay in their home, pay
their property tax and send their kids to school. Perhaps you can find a
way, as businesses, households, and responsible government agencies are
forced to do in this economy, to fund "needed pipeline and facility
improvements" through examining your income statement and your operations
for efficiencies, and make the tough choices that the rest of us have to
make, to meet your needs WITHOUT simply dumping those costs on your
customers. Please take the time to look for another way.
Sincerely,
John Lockhart
186 Woodview Terrace Dr
San Ramon
RATES RATES - Re: CCCSD Sewer Se Charges 0 Page 1
From: komperda <komperda @silcon.com>
To: RATES RATES <RATES @centralsan.dst.ca.us>
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: CCCSD Sewer Service Charges
Your "automatic" reply to our PROTEST AGAINST ANOTHER INCREASE
does not appease us.! Here are the amounts we've PAID for a number of
years: $311, $300., $289., $280., $272., $248.
Do you ever expect it to stop? What have you done with these bigtime
dollars
that you've collected from "payers" in this County?
You speak of Inflation (the Government says there is NO inflation with this
economy in a deep recession) -It is my opinion ,monies from collections
should
have been put aside for an ageing system! Have they been?
INFLATION is caused by people that THINK their "labors" are really WORTH
more THAN THEY REALLY ARE!! Some are really NEVER SATISFIED,
and if they can get more..... they DO, or do their best to GET MORE!!!
Think of not only residential -but about businesses who are TRYING TO STAY
IN BUSINESS. Parts of California's housing are a MESS,PEOPLE ARE LEAVING
this tremendous HIGH COST STATE.... Home prices are being devastated - everyone
trying to get MORE!!!! Some people don't even consider the Taxes and
they are
the CULPRIT in this debacle!!
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!
RATES RATES wrote:
• This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April 22, 2009
• concerning the proposed increase in the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
• District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
• provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the
• public hearing, scheduled for June 4, 2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD
• Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez.
• CCCSD appreciates your concern about the rising costs of services. But
• just as your household or business is impacted by inflation, so is
• CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more
• stringent air and water quality regulations, rehabilitate an aging
• sewer system, and maintain our treatment plant facilities. CCCSD
• continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without
• compromising quality or safety. Our mission remains the protection of
• public health and the environment.
• Thank you for taking the time to respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service
• Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
• CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not
• hesitate to contact us.
RATES RATES - CCCSD Sewer Service 0rges Page 1
From: RATES RATES
To: Sean Kimble
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 9:03 AM
Subject: CCCSD Sewer Service Charges
This is to acknowledge receipt of your email dated April, 22, 2009 concerning the proposed increase in
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) annual Sewer Service Charge. Your email will be
provided to the CCCSD Board of Directors for consideration at the public hearing, scheduled for June 4,
2009 at 2 p.m. in the CCCSD Board Room located at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez. CCCSD appreciates
your concern about the rising costs of services. But just as your household or business is impacted by
inflation, so is CCCSD. This modest rate increase will allow CCCSD to meet new, more stringent air and
water quality regulations; rehabilitate an aging sewer system; and maintain our treatment plant facilities.
CCCSD continues to work to keep our rates as low as possible without compromising quality or safety.
Our mission remains the protection of public health and the environment. Thank you for taking the time to
respond to the CCCSD Sewer Service Charge rate notification. If you have additional questions about
CCCSD's operations or the proposed rate increase, please do not hesitate to contact us.Central Contra
Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> Sean Kimble <seankimble @hotmail.com> 4/22/2009 6:57 PM >>>
I am a property owner and received your letter regarding the above. I do not support this $10 increase.
You state as one of your driving factors for an increase is inflation. There is no inflation so I am unclear
why this has been cited as a reason. Our rates are already too high and you are putting too much of this
burden on residential home owners. Commercial customers are not paying enough of the increase.
Industrial customers should even be higher. Why hammer the homeowner who is trying to survive? This
is the wrong time to increase any costs on a homeowner in CA espcially when sales taxes just increased.
I am surprised by this proposed action. You seem out of touch.
Sean Kimble
Homeowner
Orinda, CA
Rediscover Hotmail ®: Get e-mail storage that grows with you. Check it out
From: RATES RATES
To: Donna Yu
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Parcel Number 153 - 250 -008 -7 00
Good morning Donna,
I took a look at the 2008 water data that we received from Contra Costa Water Dist, which is the data that
is used for billing 09/10. It appears that the water use was down from the year before.
Usage 07 = 11,731 hcf CCCSD Charges $28,379.63 08/09
Usage 08 = 9,983 hcf Proposed charges $25,000.00 approx 09/10
Based usage, with a 16% discount for drag -out and evapration, that is given to all car washes, I would
estimated you charges to be approximatey $25,000 using the proposed rate.
Brenda Wener
Engineering Assistant III
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates @centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> Donna Yu <dyu @yus.com> 4/22/2009 9:28 PM >>>
Per your April 20, 2009 notice "Notice of Proposed Increase in Annual
Sewer Service Charge ", we would like you to calculate a property-
specific estimate of the sewer service charge for 2009 -10.
Parcel Number 153- 250 -008 -7 00
627 Contra Costa Blvd.
Concord, CA 94523
510 -417 -9288
Thank you for your help,
Donna Yu
RTSF Petro Ventures, Inc.
RATES RATES - Re: Parcel #112 - 101 -0200 Page 1
From: RATES RATES
To: Shelly Roy
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: Parcel #112 - 101 -025 -8 00
Good morning Shelly,
I had time this morning to take a look at the referenced parcel number. That parcel is not in our service
area. The rate increase would be for properties in our service are, mostly Central Contra Costa County.
Give me a call on my direct line, if you have additional questions.
Brenda Wener
925- 229 -7115
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Sewer Service Charge Program
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335 -7739
Rates@centralsan.dst.ca.us
>>> "Shelly Roy" <shelly @oliverandco.net> 4/22/2009 12:40 PM >>>
Hello,
I'm trying to compare information provided on the property tax bill with the information provided on rates
from the sanitary district. The increase notification letter indicates that the charge can be estimated by
multiplying the amount listed beside CCCSD SEWER CHG on the tax bill but I don't see any such label.
Please help.
Thank you,
Shelly N. Roy
Assistant Property Manager
Oliver and Company, Inc.
1300 South 51st Street
Richmond, CA 94804
510 - 439 -3235 Office
510- 439 -3275 Fax
925 - 200 -2848 Mobile
From: Jamie Pehling <jpeh ling @cal.berkeley.edu>
To: < rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2009 3:47 PM.
Subject: Index CentralSan sewer rates by use
Friends at CentralSan- -
I have no objection to the proposed rate increase, but I do object to
the flat fee structure used for residential customers.
CentralSan's costs are, I assume, tied to how much waste water it
treats and discharges. Smaller volumes should mean smaller costs.
Indeed, for commercial customers the CentralSan costs are tied to volume
of sewage produced.
It therefore makes little sense to charge each house in the district
the same fee for sewer service, since it is a near certainty that each
house produces a different volume of sewage. In particular, charging a
flat fee (and a flat rate increase) is unfair to households that produce
less sewage (e.g., through water conservation).
This unfair rate structure additionally removes any household incentive
to reduce wastewater production. With greater conservation, there would
be less sewage and less cost for sewage disposal, so there are obvious
incentives of such a rate structure for CentralSan as well.
Houses should be charged sewage fees according to how much they
produce, as is currently the case for commercial customers. I urge
CentralSan to begin measuring household sewage output and charging by
volume produced.
Yours for both sanity in waste disposal costs and environmental
responsiblity,
- -Jamie Pehling
RATES RATES - Proposed increase in ar�l CCCSD charges . Page 1
From:
<RAbbott@bart.gov>
To:
< rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Wed, Apr 22, 2009 1:31 PM
Subject:
Proposed increase in annual CCCSD charges
What concerns me about the notice is the justification for the increase,
"inflation "M The continued presentation of "upgrades" to meet new
regulations ? ?? Brochures from the district indicates "state of the art"
facilities that exceed stringent standards.
I believe that the current rate should stay in place. This state is
experiencing negative growth and the fallout from the current economic woes
will continue into 2010 or longer yet, well into 2011.
Our community and we as property owners within the CCCSD, are opposed to
any increase in rates.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Abbott
950 Kimberly Circle
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Robert W. Abbott
Planning Commissioner
City of Pleasant Hill
Robert W. Abbott
District Right of Way Surveyor
Real Estate Department
SF Bay Area Rapid Transit District
300 Lakeside Drive, 22nd Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
510.464.7544 Direct
CC: <rwa355bmx @hughes.net>
RATES RATES - Increase in annual sew�rvice charge • Page 1
From:
Janice Phu <jphu @ptsystemsinc.com>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Wed, Apr 22, 2009 11:18 AM
Subject:
Increase in annual sewer service charge
To whom it may concern:
I consider this is not a right time to have this increase. I will vote
"No" to this increase.
Regards,
Janice
RATES RATES - PROTEST THE INCRE IN SEWER SERVICE Page 1
From: komperda < komperda @silcon.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2009 11:06 AM
Subject: PROTEST THE INCREASE IN SEWER SERVICE
4/22/09
Secretary of the District
5019 Imhoff Place,Martinex, CA 94553
This is to PROTEST THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE
CHAGE:
We are seniors (ages 77 & 78) -lived in our home for 30 yrs. (only the 2
of us) .... we
have paid your steady increases and salaries. We DO NOT use your Sewer
facilities
as much as a large family of 4 to 12 persons!!! -yet we have to pay the
same $311.
per year. We also abide by East Bay's Water rules to cut down on Water!!!!
This is a very UNFAIR situation ...... and under the current HUGE downturn
in our
Economy (ie: CA almost going bankrupt) we feel you should not increase
our sewer
charge in any way or form..... We are on a fixed income (as many persons
are) and
feel this is certainly not the time to add more to our COST OF LIVING!!
SENIORS in our position and use less sewer facilities SHOULD BE EXEMPT FROM
ANY INCREASE.... even consider a DECREASE !!!!
That is the least you can do before we PASS ON!!!!!!!
Search within your organiztion for relief and more funds; We bet you can
find them
without an increase. The FUTURE dictates that if we still are
working,we will have
to take home LESS PAY and CHARGE LESS for any services given!!
komperda @silcon.com
RATES RATES - rate increase • • Page 1
From: Jesse Huang <Jesse.Huang @fmc- na.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2009 10:47 AM
Subject: rate increase
I received the notice and know that you are going to raise the Sewer
Service Charge again. 1 100% opposed it! The reason is I am going no
where, and as long as I stay in the same house, you are going to charge the
property tax again and again without any problem. I am sick and tired with
it. I am currently paying 1.375% of property assessed value for the tax.
My house value has been going down by 20% since the peak, and some of the
taxes are just keep going up. Some day our area will lose any attraction
because property tax is too high. This can been seen in Windemere area
already.
Regards,
JH
RATES RATES - Notice of Proposed Incr ge o Page 1
From:
Shasta Pieper <darren_shasta @yahoo.com>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Wed, Apr 22, 2009 9:44 AM
Subject:
Notice of Proposed Increase in Annual Sewer Service Charge
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
I oppse the 3.2% residential rate increase being proposed. My income did not go up 3.2% this year
therefore I do not have the means to pay the higher rate!!
Regards,
Shasta Pieper
Property Owner, Contra Costa County
CC: Darren Pieper <darren_pieper @yahoo.com>
RATES RATES - proposed increase in seAhservice charge . Page 1
From: DAN SCHOENHOLZ <dschoenholz @sbcglobal.net>
To: < rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2009 11:30 PM
Subject: proposed increase in sewer service charge
To whom it may concern: I was surprised to read in a mailer today that Central San is raising rates in part
due to inflation. The nation has seen a decrease in the consumer price index over the past year.
Commodity prices have dropped; construction projects are coming in far below engineering estimates for
most government agencies. There has been no inflation over the past year. It may be that Central
San's costs have increased because of salary and benefit increases to its employees, but that is not
inflation and should not be characterized as such.
Sincerely,
Dan Schoenholz
355 Marshall Dr.
Walnut Creek
RATES RATES - Response to your letter �d 4 -20 -09 Increase in annual sewer Page 1
From: "carol Francisco" <happytrailsccn @comcast.net>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2009 9:37 PM
Subject: Response to your letter dated 4 -20 -09 Increase in annual sewer
I will keep this really short.
This household has experienced two job salary cuts each by 10 -20 %.
` DMV rates have gone up.
State taxes have gone up.
Our home, that we take excellent care of has gone done in price by
200,000 and
NOW YOU GUYS WANT TO RAISE RATES!!
I MEAN WHAT A GREAT IDEA AND WHY NOT JUMP ON THE BAND WAGON WITH
EVERYONE ELSE!!
REALLY WHAT IS A SMALL HOUSEHOLD SUPPOSE TO DO? IT ALMOST STARTS TO BE
A LAUGH AT WHAT IS NEXT TO REALLY
PUSH PEOPLE TO THE EDGE OF WHAT THEY CAN TAKE! I GUESS MOVE IS THE NEXT
OPTION.
YOU MAY TAKE ALL YOUR FIGURES AND THINK. WELL THIS IS NOT TOO BAD OF A
RAISE, BUT IF YOU ARE A HOME OWNER AND YOU ADD UP
EVERYTHING THAT IS GOING UP ALL AT ONCE, IT STARTS TO LOOK PRETTY BAD.
IT WOULD BE SO NICE IF JUST ONCE THEY COULD LOOK AT INDIVIDUAL
HOUSEHOLDS AND RAISE IT ACCORDING TO INCOME, BUT WOW THAT
TAKES TIME AND SENSITIVITY.
LATELY, THERE IS NOT MUCH ROOM FOR THAT IN OUR WORLD THESE DAYS, JUST
EVERYONE WANTING MORE AND MORE $$$.
IT JUST AMAZES ME WHERE THESE IDEAS ARE STARTED AND THE TIMING ON THE
WHOLE PROCESS, NICE GOING!!
EOM (END OF MESSAGE)
NRN (NO RESPONSE NECESSARY)
From: Jason Tan <blessingmail @yahoo.com>
To: <rates @centralsan.org>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2009 9:19 PM
Subject: Protest of increasing the sewer service
To Whom It may Concern:
I strongly express my protests of increasing the sewer service. You, CCCSD, should act as a professional
to provide the sewer service at lowest cost to help all residents in area, especially in this economy
downturn,. In additional, we all pay much higher property tax among all areas. Where is money? I have not
seen your efforts to try to provide the quality service but keep ask for money. IT IS JUST NOT FAIR. I can
be and replace your position if money is the only solution. I STRONLY PROTEST TO INCREASE THE
SEWER SEVICE CHARGE.
Jason Tan
700 Bowen Court
San Ramon CA 94582
925/640 -6085
RATES RATES - Rate Increase Notice Page 1
From:
"BruceMuirhead" <bamu @comcast.net>
To:
<rates @centralsan.org>
Date:
Tue, Apr 21, 2009 6:46 PM
Subject:
Rate Increase Notice
I received your April 20, 2009 notice.
Raising the rate from $311 to $321 is fine with me. Seems reasonable.
Bruce Muirhead
388 Borica Drive
Danville, CA 94526 -5456
925.831.0787
CC: "'Denise Muirhead"' <kitties @comcast.net>
Addition to 4.b. Hearings
Attachment 2
Debbie Rateliff - Proposed Increase In Annual Sewer Service Charge
From: Tammy Marin <tammyharczak rbsbcglobal.nct>
TO: <rates tt centralsan.org>
Date: 5/31/2009 9:35 PM
Subject: Proposed Increase In Annual Sewer Service Charge
CC: <tammyharczakasbcglobal.net>
With all due respect at this point in time when people are losing theirjobs and their homes why would
CCCSD determine that a rate increase would be appropriate at this time?
We are in an inflationary period not a deflationary period.
I am very much against this increase. The company for whom I work had decided NOT to give raises
this year to save jobs. An increase at this time is not only wrong, but it is wrong for Californians.
Tammy Marin
1950 Rancho Verde Circle East
Danville, CA 94526
ORDINANCE NO.
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES
IN ACCORDANCE WITH DISTRICT CODE CHAPTER 6.24.030
WHEREAS, the District has previously developed and instituted a Sewer Service
Charge Program to finance the services and facilities furnished by the District, and
WHEREAS, it is reasonable and necessary that all users of the District's wastewater
and household hazardous waste collection, treatment, recycling, reuse and disposal
services and facilities, including those temporary users served under Special Discharge
Permits, contribute their appropriate portion of the funding for such District services and
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District has reviewed the current Schedule of
Sewer Service Charge Rates and has determined that the annual residential sewer
service charge rate should be increased by $10.00 per living unit to $321.00 per living
unit and that non - residential sewer service charge rates be increased proportionally
similar amounts as the residential sewer service charge rate; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 6.24.030 of the District Code provides the enabling authority for
the District to implement the proposed uncodified Schedule of Sewer Service Charge
Rates; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing to receive comments and protests and to
consider the proposed uncodified Schedule of Sewer Service Charge Rates was held
on June 4, 2009; and
WHEREAS, in adopting this Ordinance, the Board of Directors finds that:
Written notices of the proposed increase in sewer service charge rates were
sent by first class U.S. mail to every owner of property connected in the
District at least 45 days prior to the Public Hearing on the proposed increase
conducted on June 4, 2009.
b. All written protests against the proposed increase in the sewer service charge
rates, including those provided in person, by facsimile, email and U.S. mail,
were considered and tallied at the Public Hearing conducted on June 4, 2009,
and the District was not presented with protests by a majority of the owners of
the identified parcels affected by this change.
c. The amount of the charge imposed does not exceed the proportional cost of
the service attributable to the properties receiving service and the charge is
N:\ ADMINSUPWDMIN \RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
0 0-
only imposed on those properties actually receiving service or for those which
service is immediately available.
d. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273 (a) (1 -4) of the District CEQA
Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does ordain as follows:
Section 1 (To be Uncodified)
The "Schedule of Sewer Service Charge Rates" as set forth in full in Exhibit "A" to this
Ordinance, which exhibit is incorporated in full herein by this reference, is hereby
adopted in uncodified form pursuant to the provisions of District Code Section 6.24.030.
As of the effective date of this Ordinance, Sewer Service Charges shall be charged at
such rates and for such categories of users as set forth in said Schedule, and shall
remain in effect until amended or replaced by ordinance.
Section 2
All ordinances, parts of ordinances and any provision of Resolution 2008 -063 in conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance are repealed. The provisions of this ordinance,
insofar as they are substantially the same as existing provisions relating to the same
subject matter shall be construed as restatements and continuations thereof and not as
new enactments. To the extent this ordinance or any portion or section of this ordinance
is determined invalid or unconstitutional, such portions of Resolution 2008 -063 shall
remain in effect and such rates and charges due thereunder for any categories of users
shall remain due and payable as if those portions of Resolution 2008 -063 had not been
repealed.
With respect, however, to violations, rights accrued, liabilities accrued, or appeals taken,
prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, under any chapter, ordinance, or part of an
ordinance, such chapter, ordinance or part of an ordinance shall be deemed to remain
in full force for the purpose of sustaining any proper suit, action, or other proceedings,
with respect to any such violation, right, liability or appeal.
Section 3
This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the District and shall be published once
in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation within the District, and
shall be effective on July 1, 2009. This ordinance shall be kept on file with the
Secretary of the District.
N: WDMINSUP VWDMIN\RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
11
0
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District on the 4w day of June, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
- Members:
ABSENT:
Members:
James A. Nejedly
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Elaine R. Boehme
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Approved as to form:
Kenton L. Alm
District Counsel
N: VA DMINSUP \ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
• •
EXHIBIT "A"
Schedule of Sewer Service Charge Rates (Uncodified)
This schedule of Sewer Service Charges (to be effective July 1, 2009, was established
by Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Ordinance No. _, adopted June 4, 2009.
User Group
Fiscal Year
2009 - 2010
Residential (rate per living unit):
Single Family Dwellings, Mobile Homes, Townhouses, Condominium Units,
Multi-Family Units
$321.00
Commercial / Non - Industrial (rates per hundred cubic feet):
Bakeries
$8.21
Supermarkets w /garbage disposals
$6.19
Mortuaries
$5.84
Restaurants
$6.08
Others
$2.97
Minimum Annual Charge
$333.00
Industrial (rates per unit specified):
Wastewater Flow (million gallons per year)
$1,637.00
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (1,000 lbs. per year)
$682.00
Total Suspended Solids (1,000 lbs. per year)
$488.00
Peak (Demand) Flow (million gallons per day)
$196,741.00
Minimum Annual Charge
$333.00
Special Discharge Permits & Contractual Agreements:
Determined Individually
Page 1
N:\ ADMINSUP \ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
0
0
Schedule of Sewer Service Charge Rates (continued)
User Group
Fiscal Year
2009 -2010
Mixed Use (shared water meter; rates per hundred cubic feet):
Rate Group XA
$3.28
Rate Group XB
$3.59
Rate Group XC
$190
Rate Group XD
$4.21
Rate Group XE
$4.53
Rate Group XF
$4.84
Rate Group XG
$5.15
Rate Group XH
$5.46
Rate Group XI
$5.77
Rate Group XJ
$6.39
Rate Group XK
$6.70
Rate Group XL
$7.01
Rate Group XM
$7.32
Rate Group XN
$7.64
Rate Group XO
$7.95
Minimum Annual Charge
$333.00
Page 2
N:\A DMINSUPVADMIN \RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
i
Schedule of Sewer Service Charge Rates (continued)
User Group
Fiscal Year
2009 -2010
Institutional (rates per hundred cubic feet unless otherwise noted):
Churches
$2.97
Schools (Daycare, Preschool, University)
$2.97
Schools (Elementary)
$4.10 / student
Schools (Intermediate)
$4.34 / student
Schools (High School)
$4.57 / student
Fraternal & Service Organizations
$2.97
Local & State Institutions
$2.97
Other Tax Exempt (Except Federal)
$2.97
Federal Institutions
$2.97
Utilities with Special Tax Status
$2.97
Independent Living Facilities, Rest Homes, & Convalescent Hospitals
$2.97
Minimum Annual Charge
$333.00
Page 3
N:\ ADMINSUP \ADMIN \RATCLIFF\Ordinance SSC 2009- 10.DOC
i
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THAT THE FY 2009 -2010
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES BE
COLLECTED ON THE COUNTY TAX ROLL
WHEREAS, the District has previously developed and instituted a Sewer Service
Charge Program for services and facilities furnished by the District to finance yearly
Operation and Maintenance of the District; and
WHEREAS, the Sewer Service Charge is collected through a direct charge to the users:
and
WHEREAS, the District Code provides that the District may elect to collect current and
delinquent charges on the tax rolls as provided by Sections 5470 and following of the
Health & Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, it is considered to be economically and efficient to continue the existing
practice and collect the Sewer Service Charges for the 2009 -2010 fiscal year on the
county tax roll;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District, that the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer Service Charges are to be
collected on the County of Contra Costa tax roll.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June 2009, by the District Board of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
Members
ABSENT:
Members
COUNTERSIGNED:
Elaine R. Boehme
Secretary of the Central
County of Contra Costa,
Approved as to form:
James A. Nejedly
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Contra Costa Sanitary District
State of California
Kenton L. Alm
Counsel for the District
N: UDMINSUPADMIN \RATCLIFF\Resolution 2009 -2010 sewer service charges.doc
•
0
4.c. Hearings
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON
THE DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR 2009 -10
AND THE DRAFT 2009 TEN -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SUGGESTED AGENDA
JUNE 4, 2009
Request staff presentation.
II. Conduct public hearing:
A. Open public hearing.
B. Receive public comments.
C. Request staff response, as appropriate.
D. Close public hearing.
III. Board deliberation to consider approval of the 2009 Ten -Year Capital
Improvement Plan, and approval and adoption of the Capital Improvement
Budget for Fiscal Year 2009 -10 for inclusion in the overall 2009 -10 District
Budget.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position PapersWillier\2009Agenda - CIB -CIP Public Hearing Final 6- 04- 09.doc
TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS
2009 -2010 BUDGETS AND SEWER SERVICE CHARGE
CONSIDER:
Approval and adoption of the FY 2009 -2010 O&M, Debit Service and
Self - Insurance Budgets
Adoption of an ordinance establishing the FY 2009 -2010 Sewer
Service Charge at $321
Adoption of a resolution authorizing collection of FY 2009 -2010 Sewer
Service Charge on the County tax roll
N:\,1o.\ I INS UPW)MI IZA rCIHANmlic Ileaning - Seer Service Charge : OrCJI 2009 Overheadz.doc
• • �k
2009 -2010 O &M BUDGET
ASSUMPTIONS
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS:
Sewer Service Charge - $321
$292 Allocated to O &M
$29 Allocated to Sewer Construction
Total Budgeted Ad Valorem Tax $12.0 million:
$3.8 Million Allocated to Debt Service Fund
$8.2 Million Allocated to Sewer Construction Fund
EXPENSE ASSUMPTIONS:
$5.0 Million allocation for GASB 45 post retirement benefits
($2.4 Million to Trust, remainder is retiree health premiums)
Retirement Expense - 2.75% decrease in rate
Increases to Healthcare costs for active employees:
➢ Healthnet - 9.57o
➢ Kaiser - 2.07o
Increases to Healthcare costs for retirees- 3.7% Weighted Average
Administrative Overhead percentage- 117%
(Of Capitalized Salary)
Vacancy Factors:
3% for Salaries
➢ 4% for Benefits
N: \ADMINSUP\ADMINVRATCLIFF\Budget Overheads 20W2010.doc
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE
2008 -2009 BUDGET COMPARED TO 2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Revenues
Expenses
Revenues Over Expenses
Fund Balance 06/30/10
Sewer Service Charge Rate
(O&M Portion Only)
Total Sewer Service Charge
2008 -2009
2009 -2010
%
Increase
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
$57,031
$61,668
8.1%
58,496
59,746
2.1%
($1,465)
1 923
NAA,DMINSUPVADMIMRATCLIFRBudget Overheads 2009- 2010.doc
$5,476
$260 $292
$311 $321
0
DEBT SERVICE FUND
2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Revenue
Debt Service
is
$3,860
Interest Expense 1,321
Principal Payments . 2,539
TOTAL $3,860
N: WDNIINSUP \A,DNIIN\RATCLIFF\Budgel Overheads 2009.2010.doc
? • 1 •
SELF - INSURANCE FUND
2009 -2010 BUDGET
(000 Omitted)
Revenues $1,513
Expenses 1,003
Revenue Over Expense 510
Fund Balance - 06/30/09 $4,136
N \AD \I INS UPbADM INI TA I CI.II'P I'uhilc Ilearing - SeWer Sm ice (barge S O &M 2009 Overheads.doe
RESPONSES TO PROPOSED
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE INCREASE
Support 4
Opposition 40
Seniors (Want Senior Rate) 11
Questions 10
Parcels on Septic j 9
Other Issues 31
.1% of Total Notices Mailed 115
N:1AD,SIINSUPIAD \I I MRA,rcl_I FFfluhlic Iles ring - Sees Service Charge & 0Sb1 20090aerheads.doe
40central Contra Costa Santry District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
No.: 4.c. Hearings
Type of Action: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING; APPROVE AND ADOPT CIB /CIP
Subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2009 -10, AND THE 2009 TEN -YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, APPROVE THE 2009 CIP, AND APPROVE AND ADOPT
THE CIB FOR INCLUSION IN THE FY 2009 -10 DISTRICT BUDGET
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Earlene Millier, Engineering Assistant III Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
cL,►,, in t* G &L, � A6
E. Milli G. Chesler C. Swanson A. Farrell James M. elly
General Manager
ISSUE: The Board of Directors has established June 4, 2009 as the date for a public
hearing on the Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 -10 and the
2009 Ten -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Board approval of the CIP and Board
approval and adoption of the CIB for inclusion in the FY 2009 -10 District Budget is
requested.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the CIB /CIP.
Approve the 2009 CIP. Approve and adopt the CIB for inclusion in the FY 2009 -10
District Budget. Approval and adoption of the budget and plan will establish the Board of
Directors' independent finding that these documents are exempt from California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that the District either has or will produce
appropriate CEQA compliance documentation prior to undertaking any project identified
in these documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approval of the FY 2009 -10 CIB and 2009 CIP is a necessary
step prior to Board adoption. Approval will include an estimated carryover from
2008 -09 of $20,191,000 and an additional authorization of $48,331,000 from the Sewer
Construction Fund; resulting in a total FY 2009 -10 Board authorized funding level of
$68,522,000. This will allow expenditures to continue on the District's CIP.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could direct staff to modify the CIB
and /or CIP to reduce or increase the planned capital expenditures. The Board could
also defer approval to a later date. These alternatives are not recommended.
BACKGROUND: The CIP provides the basis for project prioritizing and scheduling, and
long -range financial planning. The CIP also provides the framework for analyzing
different capital program funding scenarios. The 2009 CIP covers the ten -year period
from FY 2009 -10 through FY 2018 -19. The plan includes expenditures totaling $331.5
million (2009 dollars) over ten years.
N:\ENVRSEC \Position PaperskMillier\2009 \PPP Conduct Public Hearing FY 09 -10 CIB AEF Final 6 -4 -09. DOC Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FY 2009 -10, AND THE 2009 TEN -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN, APPROVE THE 2009 CIP, AND APPROVE AND ADOPT THE CIB FOR
INCLUSION IN THE FY 2009 -10 DISTRICT BUDGET
The CIB provides a detailed presentation of the schedules and cost estimates for
projects proposed for the first year of the ten -year planning period. These estimates are
the basis of the request for the Board's authorization of funds for FY 2009 -10 from the
Sewer Construction Fund to the Treatment Plant, Collection System, General
Improvements, and Recycled Water Programs.
A draft CIB /CIP was submitted to the Board of Directors on March 6, 2009. A special
meeting of the Board to discuss the draft was held on April 9, 2009. It is appropriate for
the Board to receive comments from the public prior to considering approval of the
CIB /CIP. The Board established June 4, 2009 as the date for a public hearing to receive
these comments and appropriate notices have been posted and published.
Capital Budget Authorization
Adoption of the CIB with the FY 2009 -10 District Budget will authorize additional funds
from the Sewer Construction Fund for planning, design, and construction of capital
improvement projects. The new funding authorization will include an estimated
carryover of $20,191,000 from Board authorizations in previous years, and an estimated
additional authorization of $48,331,000 from the Sewer Construction Fund resulting in a
total Fiscal Year 2009 -10 authorized funding level of $68,522,000. If necessary, these
figures will be adjusted in early FY 2009 -10 and a revised Table 1 issued, when actual
FY 2008 -09 expenditures are known and actual FY 2008 -09 carryover can be
determined.
It should be noted that specific Board approval is required for consultant agreements
over $50,000, for award of construction contracts over $15,000, for construction change
orders over $50,000, and for project overruns in excess of 15 percent (15 %) of the final
project budget established at the time of construction contract award. The distribution of
the funding authorization to the four Capital Improvement Programs is shown on
Attachment 1. The estimated expenditures for the Capital Program in FY 2009 -10 are
also shown in Attachment 1 and total $40,117,000. These expenditures may be
reduced due to the current aggressive bid climate. Information gathered on recent bids
indicates that an assumption of 20% reduction in construction bid prices is reasonable.
Using this figure, estimated FY 2009 -10 expenditures would be reduced to $36,679,000.
Equipment Budget
Included in the Capital Improvement Budget is a separate section for the 2009 -10
Equipment Budget. The 2009 -19 Equipment Budget totals $351,500, which includes a
contingency amount of $60,000. This budget includes equipment requests of $5,000 or
more. The Equipment Budget was reviewed by the Board Capital Projects Committee
on March 18, 2009, and the full Board on April 9, 2009.
N:\ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Mi11ier\2009 \PPP Conduct Public Hearing FY 09 -10 CIB AEF Final 6- 4- 09.DOC Page 2 of 3
0 0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FY 2009 -10, AND THE 2009 TEN -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN, APPROVE THE 2009 CIP, AND APPROVE AND ADOPT THE CIB FOR
INCLUSION IN THE FY 2009 -10 DISTRICT BUDGET
Information Technology Budget
Also included in the CIB is the Information Technology (IT) Development Plan for
2009 -10. The IT Plan for 2009 -10 totals $675,000. The plan is developed to provide
funding for needed hardware and software upgrades, network security, disaster recovery
telecommunications and other needed applications. The IT Plan was reviewed by the
Board Capital Projects Committee on March 18, 2009, and the full Board on
April 9, 2009.
Ten -Year Capital Plan
The draft 2009 CIP includes $107.7 million (2009 dollars) for Treatment Plant projects
(32.5% of total expenditures), $172.3 million for Collection System projects (52% of total
expenditures), $45.9 million for General Improvements projects (13.9% of total
expenditures), and $5.5 million for Recycled Water projects (1.7% of total expenditures)
over the next ten years. A cash flow table is included in the Ten -Year Capital Plan and
indicates the revenue needed to support the planned ten -year expenditures. This table
includes the revenue from the proposed $10 rate increase. If this rate increase is not
adopted and expenditures are maintained at budgeted levels, the draw -down of the
Sewer Construction Fund will be increased. The Ten -Year Plan will be carefully re-
examined in November of 2009 to confirm that the planned rate of capital expenditures
is consistent with projected capital revenues and sustainable over the life of the Ten -
Year Plan. If significant changes in capital expenditures or revenue occur before that
time, staff will bring these issues to the attention of the Board.
Staff has evaluated the CIB and CIP and concluded that they are exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District Guidelines Section 15262
since they are planning studies for possible future actions, which the District has not
approved, adopted or funded, and the outcome of these tasks will not have a legally
binding effect on. later activities. Approval of the budget and plan will establish the Board
of Directors' independent finding that these documents are exempt from CEQA. The
Board further finds that the District either has or will produce appropriate CEQA
compliance documentation prior to undertaking any "project" identified in these
documents.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on
the CIB and CIP. Approve the 2009 CIP. Approve and adopt the FY 2009 -10 CIB for
inclusion in the FY 2009 -10 District Budget. Approval of the budget and plan will
establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that these documents are exempt
from CEQA and that the District either has or will produce appropriate CEQA compliance
documentation prior to undertaking any project identified in these documents.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\2009 \PPP Conduct Public Hearing FY 09 -10 CIB AEF Final 6- 4- 09.DOC Page 3 of 3
E
ATTACHMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SUMMARY
FY 2009 -10
1 This number represents funds that have been authorized by the Board, allocated to
projects by the General Manager, but not spent during FY 2008 -09.
` Due to the current aggressive bid climate, it is expected that expenditures may be
significantly reduced. If anticipated construction bids for FY 2009 -10 are reduced by
20 %, to reflect observed trends, expenditures would be reduced to $36,679,000.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\2009 \PP Attachment 1 to 2009 -10 CIP CIB AEF Final 6- 04- 09.doc
Estimated
Carryover
Additional
Total
Estimated
Program
from
Authorization
Proposed
FY 2009 -10
FY 2008 -09 1
Requested
Authorization
Expenditures
Treatment Plant
$12,754,000
$8,829,000
$21,583,000
$13,769,000
Collection System
$6,529,000
$19,064,000
$25,593,000
$15,161,000
General
Improvements
$720,000
$19,893,000
$20,613,000
$10,637,000
Recycled Water
$188,000
$545,000
$733,000
$550,000
Total
$20,191,000
$48,331,000
$68,522,000
$40,117,0002
1 This number represents funds that have been authorized by the Board, allocated to
projects by the General Manager, but not spent during FY 2008 -09.
` Due to the current aggressive bid climate, it is expected that expenditures may be
significantly reduced. If anticipated construction bids for FY 2009 -10 are reduced by
20 %, to reflect observed trends, expenditures would be reduced to $36,679,000.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Millier\2009 \PP Attachment 1 to 2009 -10 CIP CIB AEF Final 6- 04- 09.doc
•
Item 4.c.
2009/10 Capital Improvement Budget
and
2010 Capital Improvement Plan
Public Hearing to Consider Approval
and Adoption
June 4, 2009
Steps in COCIP Process
• April 9, 2009 Capital Improvement Program Board Workshop
• May 7, 2009 set Public Hearing for CIB /CIP
• June 4, 2009 hold Public Hearing and Approve and Adopt
CIB /CIP at same time as other budgets (new)
• June 18, 2009 Board Approves Closeout Position Paper for
completed CIB projects (hold Board briefing on closed out
projects for any interested Board members)
• June /July review results of rate setting and benefits of bond
financing for rate stabilization and contingency for loss of
property tax
• August 2009, ask Board to Reauthorize FY 2009110 CIB
with actual carryover amounts and actual SSC increase, if
different than $10, and bond financing, if approved.
0
Capital Improvement Budget Summary for
FY 2009/10
FY 2009/10 Expenditure Recommendations
EXPENDITURES
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Total
Program
FY 2009/10
Carry-over
Allocation
FY 2009/10
$13,769,000 (34 %)
Program
from Prior
FY 2009/10
Proposed
Improvements
Expenditures
Fiscal Year
Recycled Water
Authorization
Treatment Plant
$13,769,000
$12,754,000
$8,829,000
$21,583,000
Collection
$15,161,000
$6,529,000
$19,064,000
$25,593,000
System
General
$10,637,000
$720,000
$19,893,000
$20,613,000
Improvements
Recycled Water
$550,000
$188,000
$545,000.
$733,000
Total
$40,117,000
$20,191,000
$48,331,000
$68,522,000
FY 2009/10
FY 2009/10 Expenditure Recommendations
EXPENDITURES
FY 2009/10
FY 09/10 Reduced
(% Capital Program)
Expenditures*
Collection System
$15,161,000 (38 %)
$13,544,000 (37 %)
Treatment Plant
$13,769,000 (34 %)
$13,069,000 (36 %)
General
$10,637,000 (27 %)
$9,037,000 (25 %)
Improvements
Recycled Water
$550,000 (1 %)
$550,000 (2 %)
TOTAL
$40,117,000 (100 %)
$36,200,000 (100%)
EXPENDITURES
'Assumes projects bid in 2009/10 come in 20% below Engineers Estimate,
n
L
FY 2009/10 Capital Cash Flow Estimate
* Assumes beginning SCF Balance $47.6 M (7/1/2009) and $10 SSC increase
Balance reduced by additional $1.5 M if no SSC increase
Balance reduced by additional $12 M if State takes all property tax in 2009/10
Balance increased by $30 M if bonds sold
SSC Increases with No Bond Financing for CIP
And No Loss of Property Tax
SSC Increase $10 $20 $24 $8 $8 $8 $8 $6 $6 $6
80,000
70,"
FaW Avaibd
80.000 i— - - -_ _._ -
F 80.000
3!3
•$10 on SSC is $15 million over 10 year CIP
0'00°
-Loss of property tax is $12 million in first year of 10 year CIP
10."
0
700410 2010-11 20114 2012-13 N13-14 M14-15 2415.14 201617 0017AS 2013 -19
3
2009/10
Capital Program Cash Flow
2009/10
Reduced
Expenditures
Total Budgeted Revenue
$25,238,000
$ 25,238,000
Total Budgeted Expenditures
$40,117,000
$36,200,000
Negative Variance
- $14,879,000
- $10,962,000
Projected SCF Balance
$32.8 M
$36.7 M
June 30, 2009'
* Assumes beginning SCF Balance $47.6 M (7/1/2009) and $10 SSC increase
Balance reduced by additional $1.5 M if no SSC increase
Balance reduced by additional $12 M if State takes all property tax in 2009/10
Balance increased by $30 M if bonds sold
SSC Increases with No Bond Financing for CIP
And No Loss of Property Tax
SSC Increase $10 $20 $24 $8 $8 $8 $8 $6 $6 $6
80,000
70,"
FaW Avaibd
80.000 i— - - -_ _._ -
F 80.000
3!3
•$10 on SSC is $15 million over 10 year CIP
0'00°
-Loss of property tax is $12 million in first year of 10 year CIP
10."
0
700410 2010-11 20114 2012-13 N13-14 M14-15 2415.14 201617 0017AS 2013 -19
3
SSC Increases with $30M Bond Financing for CIP
And No Loss of Property Tax
SSC Increax $11 1 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 $11 610 $10 $10
i - - - - -
0555 -- - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - --
a.555 - $10 on SSC is $15 million over 10 year CIP
Loss of property tax is $12 million in flrst year of 10 year CIP
...
Projects Serving Future Rate Payers
Suitable for Bond Financing......
• Solids Handling Improvements (2009 -10)
$3,505,000
• CSOD Facility Improvements
(2009 -10)
$16,768,000
• Wet Weather Bypass Imprvnts
(2010 -11)
$2,660,000
• San Ramon Sch C Interceptor
(2010 -11)
$3,282,000
• Primary Structure Demolition
(2010 -11)
$1,474,000
• Seismic Improvements Est.
(20010 -11)
$6,000,000
• Incinerator Improvements Est.
(20010 -11)
$4,000,000
$30 + million in needed projects available
for funding in next two years.......
M
Receipt of Federal Stimulus Funding
Could Improve Revenue Stream....
• Solids Handling Improvements
(2009 -10)
$4,470,000
• Diablo Sewer Renovations, Phase 1
(2009 -10)
$1,410,000
• Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Ph 1
(2009 -10)
$1,500,000
• CSOD Facility Improvements
(2009- 10)$17,725,000
• Wet Weather Bypass Imprvnts
(2010 -11)
$3,287,000
• Primary Structure Demolition
(2010 -11)
$1,474,000
• Concord Recycled Water Project Phase 1 *
$4,200,000
* Also submided for Title 16 funding
$34 + million in budgeted projects submitted
for stimulus funding....... receipt of significant
funding appears unlikely.......
Board Role in Capital Program is Ongoing
• Authorize Program Budgets June 4, 2009
• Re- authorize Program Budgets in August with
actual carryover amounts and revisit cash flow
projections using actual SSC allocation and bond
financing, if approved.
• Create New Projects > $25,000
• Award Construction Projects > $15,000
• Authorize Construction Change Orders >$50,000
• Authorize Consultant Contracts > $50,000
• Authorize Revisions to Consultant Contracts > 15 %
• Authorize Supplemental Program Funds if needed
5
Ll
0
Capital Improvement Budget Summary for
FY 2009/10
QUESTIONS ? ? ? ? ? ??
0
Estimated
Estimated
Estimated
Total
Program
FY 2009/10
Carry-over
Allocation
FY 2009/10
Program
from Prior
FY 2009110
Proposed
Expenditures
Fiscal Year
Authorization
Treatment Plant
$13,769,000
$12,754,000
$8,829,000
$21,583,000
Collection
$15,161,000
$6,529,000
$19,064,000
$25,593,000
System
General
$10,637,000
$720,000
$19,893,000
$20,613,000
Improvements
Recycled Water
$550,000
$188,000
$545,000
$733,000
Total
$40,117,000
$20,191,000
$48,331,000
$68,522,000
FY 2009/10
QUESTIONS ? ? ? ? ? ??
0
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
FY 2009 -10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
• Summary .......................................................................................... ............................... 2
• Major Project Emphasis .................................................................... ............................... 2
• Stimulus Projects .............................................................................. ............................... 5
• Capital Improvement Budget System ................................................ ............................... 6
• Sewer Construction Fund Balance .................................................... ............................... 8
• Authorization Limits ......................................................................... ............................... 10
• CEQA Compliance .......................................................................... ............................... 12
List of Tables
Table 1
Program /Subprogram Summary for FY 2009 -10 ..................... ...............................
7
Table 2
Sewer Construction Fund Revenues and Expenditures ........... ...............................
9
Table 3
Capital Improvement Program Authorization Limits .............. ...............................
11
Table 4
CEQA Compliance Summary for 2009 -10 — Treatment Plant Program .................
13
Table 5
CEQA Compliance Summary for 2000 -10 — Collection System Program ..............
14
Table 6
CEQA Compliance Summary for 2009 -10 — General Improvements Program ......
15
Table 7
CEQA Compliance Summary for 2009 -10 — Recycled Water Program .................
15
Treatment Plant Program ......................................................... ............................... Red Tab
• Project Table of Contents
• Introductory Narrative
• Project Write -ups
Collection System Program ........................ ............................... ..........................Green Tab
• Project Table of Contents
• Introductory Narrative
• Project Write -ups
General Improvements Program ............................................ ............................... Blue Tab
• Project Table of Contents
• Introductory Narrative
• Project Write -ups
Recycled Water Program ..................................................... ............................... Purple Tab
• Project Table of Contents
• Introductory Narrative
• Project Write -ups
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 1
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 -10
SUMMARY
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) shows
planned expenditures of $40,117,000 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 -10 from the Sewer
Construction Fund for planning, design, and construction of capital projects in four CIB
programs. The total Board authorization required for projects that are active in the CIB
for FY 2009 -10 is $68,522,000. Uncertainty in the economy and a potentially favorable
bid climate may significantly impact expenditures.
The capital program is designed to meet the following goals:
Protect public health and the environment,
Maintain existing assets,
Respond to regulatory and community concerns,
Accommodate planned future growth.
By adopting the CIB, the Board of Directors authorizes staff to pursue work on
specifically identified projects in the Treatment Plant, Collection System, General
Improvements, and Recycled Water Programs.
MAJOR PROJECT EMPHASIS
Although the CIB is made up of funding estimates for many individual projects, each
year there are several major projects which together account for a majority of total
estimated capital expenditures. In FY 2009 -10, the emphasis will be on 13 large
projects, which together account for $28,067,000, or 70 percent of the total estimated
expenditures. Estimated FY 2009 -10 expenditures as well as total costs are noted.
CSOD Facility Improvements General Improvements Program
FY 2009 -10: $7,500,000 Estimated total project cost: $17,725,000
The project consists of design and construction of a new CSO administration, crew, and
warehouse building. The project also includes site improvements such as new paving
and landscaping. Prior to construction, the District must obtain permits from the City of
Walnut Creek, and address any City requirements. The project is expected to be
completed in spring 2011. Expenditures for this project may be delayed or accelerated
depending on the permitting process. Temporary relocation of CSO to Martinez may
also accelerate expenditures.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 2
Standby Power Fac. Improvements Treatment Plant Program
FY 2009 -10: $3,700,000 Estimated total project cost: $5,605,000
This project will replace two existing diesel engine generators that will not meet the new
regulations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and which have reached
the end of their useful lives. The facility building will be modified to accept the new
diesel engine generators and will also be brought up to current seismic standards.
Solids Handling Improvements Treatment Plant Program
FY 2009 -10: $3,500,000 Estimated total project cost: $4,470,000
The purpose of this project is to design and construct improvements recommended in
the Solids Handling Facilities Plan Update of September 2005 for emergency and non -
routine handling of biosolids. The improvements include a new dewatered sludge
storage and truck loading facility.
Aeration Air Renovations, Phase 2 Treatment Plant Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,950,000 Estimated total project cost: $2,135,000
To improve reliability of the above and below ground piping network, the in -tank air
delivery system, and the structural integrity of the tanks for the aeration process by
inspection, renovation, and replacement where required. This project will repair cracks
in the air plenum boxes and voids under the structures by sealing them with grout
injection and coating. Components of the air delivery system and the aeration basin will
be replaced.
South Orinda Renovations, Phase 4 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,600,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,801,000
The South Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace or rehabilitate
approximately 14,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and
easements at multiple sites in southern Orinda.
Lafayette Renovations, Phase 6 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,450,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,600,000
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 6 project will replace or rehabilitate
approximately 13,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and
easements at multiple sites in Lafayette.
Piping Renovations, Phase 4 Treatment Plant Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,400,000 Estimated total project cost: $2,568,000
This project will provide reliability in the many piping systems, both above and below
ground in the treatment plant, by renovation and replacement where required. Focus
areas are the ash piping in the Solids Conditioning Building and air supply headers and
downcomers at the aeration tanks. Also, six influent gates on the Ultraviolet
Disinfection facility will be replaced as part of this project.
Walnut Creek Renovations, Phase 7 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,200,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,400,000
The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 7 project will replace or rehabilitate
approximately 10,000± feet of 6 through 12 -inch sewer pipe at multiple sites throughout
the City of Walnut Creek, unincorporated county and other neighboring areas.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 3
Pleasant Hill Renovations, Phase 1 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,300,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,500,000
The Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 1 project will replace or rehabilitate
approximately 11,000± feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites in
Pleasant Hill in the public right of way and easements.
Diablo Renovations, Phase 1 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,200,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,410,000
The Diablo Sewer Renovations, Phase 1 project will replace or relocate approximately
12,000± feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and easements. Sites
are located in Diablo and Danville.
2009 -10 Development Sewerage Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,180,000 Estimated total project cost: $2,360,000
This project provides for appropriate capitalization of District force account labor and
other expenses for planning, design, and construction of developer installed and
contributed main sewer facilities.
TV Inspection Program, Phase 2 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $1,100,000 Estimated total project cost: $5,600,000
The TV Inspection Program is a large scale, multi -year effort to inspect the entire
CCCSD collection system using closed- circuit television (CCTV.) A publicly bid CCTV
inspection contract utilizing digital imaging and database software is awarded for each
year. The contractor's data is being integrated with existing CCTV inspection data and
existing sewer information databases. Currently sewers in Danville /Diablo are being
televised with sewers in Alamo and Moraga to follow.
Miner Road, Orinda, Tr 02 -200 Collection System Program
FY 2009 -10: $987,000 Estimated total project cost: $1,450,000
This project will renovate approximately 4,000 feet of existing 15 -inch trunk sewer line
and install passive overflows to relieve a parallel 18 -inch sewer of excess wet weather
flows. This project is located in Miner Road and Lombardy Lane. The design will
evaluate various renovation methods to minimize the construction impacts to the public.
The project is being coordinated with EBMUD water main replacement to reduce
construction impacts.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 4
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009
In response to a significant downturn in the United States economy, the Federal
Government recently passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
The intent of this act is to quickly inject Federal stimulus money into local economies
through investment in infrastructure projects, such as wastewater collection, treatment
and recycling facilities. For wastewater facilities, this reinvestment will be administered
by the State of California through its State Revolving Loan Program. The Federal and
State governments are still developing the details of how this Act will be implemented.
District staff are monitoring information as it becomes available. The District has
answered a preliminary solicitation by submitting seven candidate projects for stimulus
funding. When the criteria for submitted projects are better understood, this list may be
increased or decreased, as appropriate. The stimulus funding could be in the form of
low interest loans and /or grant funding.
The current CIB schedules and budgets for submitted projects are contained on the
pages noted. Should the District qualify for and elect to receive stimulus funding, some
of the assumptions related to the schedules and budgets for these projects may
change. Staff's intent is to move forward with bidding the four submitted projects
scheduled for 2009 -10 on their current schedules, even if stimulus funds have not yet
become available. This is recommended to take advantage of the extremely favorable
bid climate. Of the seven project listed below, three are not budgeted for construction in
2009 -10 and will be held in abeyance as "shovel ready" projects until such time as the
stimulus funding picture is defined. Those three projects are Primary Structures
Demolition, Concord Recycled Water Project, and Wet Weather Bypass
Improvements. Should stimulus funding be received for any project(s), the Board would
be informed. Should stimulus funding be received for those projects not currently
budgeted to be constructed in 2009 -10, any necessary changes in budget
authorizations outside of staff authority would be requested via a position paper.
The projects submitted for stimulus funding during the preliminary solicitation are:
Project
Program
CIB Page
Reference
Solids Handling Improvements ( Bid 2009 -10)
Treatment Plant
TP -22
Primary Structures Demolition
Treatment Plant
TP -48
Wet Weather Bypass Improvements
Treatment Plant
TP -66
Diablo Sewer Renovations, Phase 1 (Bid 2009 -10)
Collection System
CS -16
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 1
Collection System
CS -26
Bid 2009 -10
CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility
General
GI -20
Improvements Bid 2009 -10
Improvements
Concord Recycled Water Project
Recycled Water
Unbudgeted
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SYSTEM
The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) is authorized for one year, and represents the
first year of the 10 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The requirements for the CIB
are as follows:
• Board authorizations are made to the four programs in the CIB prior to the start
of the fiscal year.
• Detailed project descriptions are provided for all projects active in the first year
(CIB.)
• Abbreviated project descriptions are provided for projects in the remaining nine
years of the CIP.
As shown in Table 1, by adopting the FY 2009 -10 CIB, the Board authorizes allocations
from the Sewer Construction Fund for planning, design, and construction of capital
projects in the four programs. Approximately $20.2 M is estimated to be carried over
from previous Board - authorized - but - unspent project budgets in FY 2008 -09 and
$48.3 M is the total required new Board authorization for projects and project phases
beginning in FY 2009 -10. The total Board authorization for projects that are active in
the CIB in FY 2009 -10 is the sum of these two numbers, or $68.5 M. The estimated FY
2009 -10 expenditure total is $40.1 M, leaving an estimated $28.4 M in authorizations for
projects that carry into future years. These figures will be adjusted when actual FY
2008 -09 expenditures are known and actual FY 2008 -09 carryover can be determined.
At that time, the Board will be asked to authorize corrected figures for the four programs
in the CIB.
Under the CIB system, budgets are authorized for project work within the four budget
programs. Budgets are established by program since precise cost estimates for
individual projects are difficult when the CIB preparation often precedes project initiation
by a year or more. Projections of costs for broader categories of project work can more
reliably be made during budget preparation since positive and negative variations in
project estimates are expected to balance in a program summation. The program
contingency accounts can be used to fund new projects which are not included in the
CIB and are identified after the budget is approved, and to cover project budget
overruns within specified limits. Program authorizations are expected to exceed annual
expenditures during any particular budget year since larger planning studies,
engineering designs, and construction contracts typically span more than one fiscal year
and the budgets are authorized in full at the beginning of each phase of the projects.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 6
Table 1: Capital Improvement Budget Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
Estimated
Estimated
Total
Estimated
Allocation
Carry -over from
Proposed
FY 2009 -10
Program this FY
Previous FY
Authorization
Expenditures
Treatment Plant
Collection System
General Improvements
Recycled Water
$8,829,000 $12,754,000 $21,583,000 $13,769,000
$19,064,000
$6,529,000
$25,593,000
$15,161,000
$19,893,000
$720,000
$20,613,000
$10,637,000
$545,000 $188,000 $733,000 $550,000
Total this Fiscal Year $48,331,000 $20,191,000 $68,522,000 $40,117,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 7
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE
The Sewer Construction Fund acts as the bank to finance the Capital Program. It is
replenished each year with the Capital Program revenue. If revenue exceeds
expenditures, the balance is increased. If expenditures exceed revenues, the balance
is reduced. The 2009 -10 CIB expenditure estimates are based on data from past years
when the economy was strong. Based on recent bids, which have come in as much as
50% less than the engineers estimate, it is very likely that the budgeted expenditures
have been over estimated. In order to more accurately assess the impact on cash flow,
staff has developed a scenario that is adjusted for anticipated bid savings. It has been
assumed that all projects bid in 2009 -10 will come in an average of 20% less than the
engineers estimate. Under both full budget and adjusted budget scenarios, a negative
variance and a draw -down of the Sewer Construction Fund balance is planned, as
shown in Table 2. However, this budgeted negative variance is expected to be
significantly mitigated by the aggressive bid climate and the District is expected to
benefit by continuing its planned program and constructing needed projects at reduced
costs.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 8
Table 2: SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of projected FY 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program revenue and expenditures is
presented below:
Adjusted for
Anticipated Bid
Savings in Current
Revenues
Per CIB Budget
Economy
Facilities Capacity Fees
$ 5,298,000
$ 5,298,000
Pumped Zone Fees
825,000
825,000
Interest
556,000
556,000
Ad Valorem Taxes
8,200,000
8,200,000
Sewer Service Charges'
4,870,000
4,870,000
Reimbursements from Others:
City of Concord
4,528,000
4,528,000
Recycled Water Sales 2
175,000
175,000
Alhambra Valley
359,000
359,000
Developer Fees, Charges, Other
427,000
427,000
Total Revenues2:
$ 25,238,000
$ 25,238,000
Expenditures
Treatment Plant Program
$ 13,769,000
$ 13,069,000
Collection System Program
15,161,000
13,544,000
General Improvements Program
10,637,000
9,037,000
Recycled Water Program
550,000
550,000
Total Expenditures
$ 40,117,000
$ 36,200,000
A summary of Sewer Construction Funds Available is Presented Below:
Projected Beginning Balance (7/1/09) $ 47,641,000 $ 47,641,000
Projected Revenues 25,238,000 25,238,000
Projected Expenditures (40,117,000) (36,200,000)
Projected S/C Funds Available (6/30/10) $ 32,762,000 $ 36,679,000
More specific information regarding the revenue and expenditure categories is included in the
Capital Improvement Plan.
' Based on March 5, 2009 Board Meeting Rate Setting Scenarios recommending $10 SSC increase in
2009 -10
Z Revenue is first recorded in the O &M budget until O &M costs are offset. Any additional revenue will be
recorded in the Sewer Construction Fund.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 9
AUTHORIZATION LIMITS
Under the established CIB system, the District Board of Directors and staff have well -
defined authority limits. The Board of Directors authorizes budgets for the four CIB
programs (Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements, and Recycled
Water) from the Sewer Construction Fund at the beginning of each fiscal year. The
Capital Improvement Program Authorization Limits are detailed in Table 4, which
follows.
The Board of Directors of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District has an ongoing role
after it approves the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and authorizes the Capital
Improvement Budgets (CIB) for each of the four Capital Programs. Specific Board
approval is also required for award of construction contracts over $15,000, for
consultant agreements over $50,000 and for project overruns in excess of 15 percent of
the final project budget established at the time of construction contract award. In
addition, any new project not included in the authorized CIB that exceeds $25,000 must
be brought to the Board for authorization.
Once the CIB is authorized by the Board, the General Manager or his designee has the
authority to allocate funds to the individual projects contained in the CIB up to the total
program budget plus contingency. If a project is not contained in the CIB, the General
Manager can allocate contingency funds to new projects up to $25,000 per project. The
General Manager has also been delegated authority for allocating funds from program
contingency accounts to cover project budget overruns, with the exception of those in
excess of 15 percent of the final project budget established at the time of construction
award. Finally, the General Manager may authorize construction contracts less than
$15,000 and consultant agreements less than $50,000.
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 10
TABLE 3: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION LIMITS
ACTION
DEPARTMENT
GENERAL
BOARD OF
DIRECTOR
MANAGER
DIRECTORS
Approve Capital Plan
None
None
No limit
Authorize Capital Program
None
None
No limit
budgets
Allocate funds to individual
$25,000 Or less
Total program budget
No authorization
project budgets
plus contingency2
required
Authorize consultant
$35,000 Or less
$50,000 Or less
Greater than $50,000
contracts /amendments
Award construction contracts
None
$15,000 Or less
Greater than $15,000
Authorize
Additive
$35,000 Or less
$50,000 Or less
Greater than $50,000
construction
change orders
Deductive
More than ($50,000)
NA
NA
Allocate funds from program
$25,000 or less per
contingency accounts to
$10,000
project'
Greater than $25,000
projects not included in the CIB
Equipment contingency
None
$5,000 Or less
Greater than $5,000
Authorize supplemental funds
Sewer Construction
to program budgets/
Not applicable
Not applicable
Fund balance
contingency accounts
Allocate funds for project
5% of final project
budget4 or a
15% of final project
Greater than 15% of
budget overruns
maximum of $10,000
budget314,5
final budget
Projects which have not
Projects which have
Close out project
None
required prior Board
had prior board action
action
(informational Position
Paper required)
1 Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements, and Recycled Water Programs
2 Limited by the remaining balances of the applicable program budget and contingency account
3 Limited by the remaining balance of the applicable program contingency account
4 Final project budget is established at time of award of construction contract
5 Reduced by project overrun allocations previously made by Department Managers
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 11
CEQA COMPLIANCE
The CIB is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a planning study
(District CEQA Guidelines Section 15262). Some projects included in this CIB are designated
as exempt under CEQA. If appropriate, a Notice of Exemption may be filed for such projects
following a future action of the Board of Directors, such as an award of a construction contract.
Other projects in the CIB are designated as needing a "Negative Declaration" or
"Environmental Impact Report" to comply with CEQA. Non - exempt CEQA projects will be
considered for Board approval on a case -by -case basis after preparation and certification of
the appropriate CEQA documentation.
Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7 present the CEQA compliance status of projects for which staff is
requesting an allocation of sewer construction funds. These tables indicate the type of CEQA
documentation anticipated being required for each project. The types of documentation are:
Exemption: Staff will prepare a Notice of Exemption, if still appropriate, when each
project receives a future Board of Directors' approval.
Negative Declaration: Staff will prepare a Negative Declaration for the project. Board of
Directors' approval of the project would follow approval of the Negative Declaration.
Environmental Impact Report (EIR): Staff will direct preparation of an EIR. Board of
Directors' approval of the project would follow certification of the EIR.
CEQA Documents Completed: For these projects, CEQA compliance already has been
achieved through documents previously prepared and approved.
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 12
Table 4: CEQA Compliance Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
Treatment Plant Program
Subprogram / Project
1 Regulatory Compliance and Safety
Scrubber Water Mercury/Metals Removal
TP Safety Improvements Pgm
Grease Handling - TP
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Solids Handling Improvements
Final Effluent Flow Meter
Turbine Retrofit Project
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurb - ph 2
Clarifier Scum Pit Mods
2 One -Time Renovation
TP Elevators Replacement
Standby Power Facility Improvements
Aeration Air Renovations - ph 2
Instr & Control - PLC System Upgrades - ph 2
SCB & Chem Feed Bldg Roof Replacement
Primary Effluent Pumps Refurb
Auxiliary Boilers Improvements
Switchgear Replacement - ph 2
Outfall Inspection and Renovation
Selector Channel Condition Asmnt
Wet Weather Bypass Improvements
Plant Control Rooms Modification
Wet Scrubber Replacement
Electric Blower Repl
Furnace Renovation
SCB Mechanical Room
Sub82 Transformer Repl
Centrifuge & Cake Pump Upgrades
Aeration Air Piping
Perimeter Fencing
3 Recurring Renovation
TP Facilities Renovations Program
Piping Renovations - ph 4
TP Protective Coatings - ph 4 Study
TP Equipment Replacement
Plant Electrical and Instrumentation Repl
TP Cathodic Prot Sys Repl
Piping Renovations - ph 5
TP Asset Management
4 Expansion
Primary Treatment Expansion
5 Other Projects
TP Site Planning
TP Hydraulic Profile
TP Emergency Prep & Response
Plant Control System Improvements
Alternative Energy & Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
TP Master Plan Update
TP As -built I/E Drawings
Exemption CEQA Documentation Required or Completed
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mitigated Neg Dec 2008
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 13
Table 5: CEQA Compliance Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
Collection System Program
Subprogram / Project Exemption CEQA Documentation Required or Completed
1 Renovation
Collection System Renov Prog -Long Term X
North Orinda Renovations - ph 4 X
Lafayette Renovations - ph 5 X
Danville Sewer Renovations - ph 2 X
Pleasant Hill Renov - ph 2 X
Collection System Urgent Projects X
Collection System Renov Pgm X
Walnut Creek Renovations - ph 7 X
Spot Liner Renovations X
Pleasant Hill Renovations - ph 1 X
Hall Dr Sewer Renov - ph 2B X
South Orinda Renovations - ph 4 X
South Orinda Renovations - ph 5 X
Diablo Renovations Ph 1 X
Watershed 44 Creek Xing Stabilization X
Concrete Corrosion Misc 1 X
Manhole Rehab X
TV Inspection Program - ph 2 X
Martinez Sewer Renov - ph 3 X
Lafayette Sewer Renovation - ph 7 X
Walnut Creek Renovations - ph 8 X
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovation - ph 9 X
Diablo Renov - ph 2 X
Lafayette Renovations - ph 6 X
Martinez Sewer Renov - ph 2 X
CS Cathodic Prot Sys Repl X
Concrete Corrosion X
2006 Storm Damage Asmnt X
2 Regl Compliance/ Planning/ Safety
PS Master Plan Update X
Collection System Modeling Upgrade X
Treat Boulevard Bridge Sewer Relocations X
Collection System Planning X
CS Planning & Flow Mon X
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring X
3 Expansion
A -Line Easement Acquisition - ph 2
EIR, 1991
Miner Rd Orinda, Tr 02 -200
X
Alhambra Vly Assmt Dist
X
S Broadway WC, Tr 13- 100/200
X
Trunk Sewer Expansion Program
X
2009 -10 Development Sewerage
Pleasant Hill Rd Laf, TR 15 -100
San Ramon Sched C Interceptor - ph 2
EIR, 1986
A -Line - ph 2A
Mitigated Neg. Dec., 2007
Walnut Creek Downtown Predesign
X
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 14
Subprogram / Project
Exemption CEQA Documentation Required or Completed
4 Pumping Stations
PS Safety Improvements X
Pumping Station Corrosion X
PS SCADA O &M Manual X
San Ramon Pumping Station Upgrades X
Buchanan South PS Assessment X
Orinda Xroads /Moraga PS Upgrades X
PS Equip & Piping Repl X
Northern Pumping Station Upgrades X
PS Emergency Equipment Storage X
Bates Ave PS Abandonment X
PS Sleepy Hollow Upgrades X
Table 6: CEQA Compliance Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
General Improvements Program
Subprogram / Project
Exemption CEQA Documentation Required or Completed
1 Vehicles & Equipment
Vehicles and Equipment
X
Cap Proj Clearing
X
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition
X
2 Management Information Systems
Information Technology Development
X
GDI - Treatment Plant
X
GDI Follow On Applications
X
3 Projects
District Property Safety Improvements
X
Capital Legal Services
X
CSOD Facility Improvements
Mitigated Neg. Dec., 2007
Radio Improvements
X
Kiewit Parcel Development
Mitigated Neg. Dec., 2005
HHW Improvements
X
HOB Improvements
X
Capital Improvement Plan and Budget
X
District Easements
X
General Security Access
X
Rental Property Improvements
X
ADA Improvements
X
Martinez Easements
X
Imhoff Triangle Development
Negative Declaration needed
CSO Welding Shop Mods
X
HOB 7194Seismic Improvements
POD Office Imprvs
X
Table 7: CEQA Compliance Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
Recycled Water Program
Subprogram / Project
1 Urban Landscaping
Recycled Water Planning
RW - Cathodic Prot Sys Repl
Zone 1 Recycled Water - ph 1 C
Exemption CEQA Documentation Required or Completed
X
X
Mitigated Neg. Dec., 2007
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
Regulatory Compliance and Safety - TAB
Alternative Energy and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan ....... ...............................
10
Emerging Regulatory Initiatives ............................................... ...............................
12
Grease Handling — Treatment Plant ........................................ ...............................
14
Scrubber Water Mercury/Metals Removal ............................... ...............................
16
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurbishment— Phase 2 ................. ...............................
18
Treatment Plant Culvert Abandonment ................................... ...............................
20
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements Program ...................... ...............................
22
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade .......................................... ...............................
23
Solids Handling Improvements ................................................ ...............................
24
TurbineRetrofit ........................................................................ ...............................
26
One -Time Renovation - TAB 2
Aeration Air Renovations, Phase 2 .......................................... ...............................
28
Auxiliary Boilers Improvements ............................................... ...............................
30
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades ..................................... ...............................
32
Control Rooms Modifications ................................................... ...............................
34
Electric Blower Renovation ...................................................... ...............................
36
Electrical Renovations ............................................................. ...............................
38
Final Effluent Flow Meter ......................................................... ...............................
40
Furnace Renovation ................................................................ ...............................
41
Headworks and Mechanical Shop Roof Replacement ............. ...............................
43
Instrumentation and Control - PLC System Upgrades ............. ...............................
45
Outfall Inspection and Renovation ........................................... ...............................
47
PerimeterFencing ................................................................... ...............................
49
Primary Structures Demolition Project ..................................... ...............................
50
Primary Effluent Pumps Refurbishment ................................... ...............................
52
SCBMechanical Room ............................................................ ...............................
54
Selector Channel Condition Assessment ................................. ...............................
56
Standby Power Facility Improvements ..................................... ...............................
58
Substation 82 Transformer Replacement ................................ ...............................
60
Switchgear Replacement - Phase 2 ........................................ ...............................
62
Treatment Plant Elevator Replacement ................................... ...............................
64
Wet Scrubber Replacement ..................................................... ...............................
66
Wet Weather Bypass Improvements Project ........................... ...............................
68
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 1
Recurring Renovation - TAB 3
Pipe Renovations - Phase 4 .................................................... ............................... 70
Pipe Renovations - Phase 5 .................................................... ............................... 72
Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan ............................... ............................... 74
Cathodic Protection Systems Replacement ............................. ............................... 76
Treatment Plant Protective Coatings — Phase 4 Study ............ ............................... 78
Treatment Plant Electrical /Instrumentation Replacement Program ........................ 80
Treatment Plant Equipment Replacement Program ................ ............................... 82
Treatment Plant Facilities Renovations Program ..................... ............................... 84
Expansion - TAB 4
Primary Treatment Expansion ................................................. ............................... 86
Other Projects - TAB 5
Plant Control System Improvements ....................................... ............................... 88
Treatment Plant Hydraulics Evaluation .................................... ............................... 90
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update ...................................... ............................... 92
Treatment Plant Seismic Study and Rehabilitation .................. ............................... 93
Treatment Plant Site Planning ................................................. ............................... 95
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 2
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
This section includes detailed information for the Treatment Plant Program. Table TP -'
presents project listings and budget information. Detailed project information,
schedules, and cash flow tables are presented in individual project data sheets. These
data sheets are found at the appropriately numbered subprogram tab. The numbered
tabs represent the following:
TAB NO. SUBPROGRAM
1 Regulatory Compliance and Safety
2 One -Time Renovation
3 Recurring Renovation
4 Expansion
5 Other Projects
OVERVIEW
The Treatment Plant Program at $13.8 M comprises 34 percent of the total estimated
capital expenditures for FY 2009 -10. The Treatment Plant Program continues with
asset preservation, and there is now added effort on future regulatory compliance, wet
weather flow processing, and emergency preparation.
Regulatory Compliance and Safety
This subprogram makes up 28 percent of the FY 2009 -10 Treatment Plant Program
expenditures. The major project is the Solids Handling Improvements project, DP 7260,
which will build a new drive - through truck loading station for dewatered sludge. There is
an urgent need for the ability to efficiently load dewatered sludge in case there is a
catastrophic failure of both multiple hearth furnaces.
One -Time Renovation
This subprogram accounts for 50 percent of the Treatment Plant Program expenditures.
There are two high expenditure projects. First, the second phase of the Aeration Air
Renovations, DP 7274, is needed to significantly reduce or eliminate the loss of aeration
air and to stabilize the structural integrity of the aeration basins. The second project,
replacement of the Standby Power Facility, DP 7248, will help meet new air quality
regulations and improve reliability.
Recurring Renovation
This subprogram makes up 19 percent of the FY 2009 -10 Treatment Plant Program.
Projects in this program demonstrate the District's commitment to maintaining existing
assets. Projects in this subprogram are targeted at asset preservation. The main
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 3
project is Phase 4 of the Piping Renovations and Replacement Program. The other
major project in this group is the Treatment Plant Asset Management, DP 7269. This
project will perform condition assessments for many plant facilities. The condition
assessments will determine the remaining useful life of the facilities, replacement
schedule and replacement cost.
Expansion
This subprogram makes up 1 percent of the FY 2009 -10 Treatment Plant Program.
There is very little expansion work planned for the treatment plant this year.
Other Projects
This subprogram makes up 2 percent of the FY 2009 -10 Treatment Plant Program. The
most important projects in this subprogram are the continuation of the upgrade of the
Plant Control System, DP 7204, and the seismic analysis performed as part of the
Treatment Plant Seismic Study and Rehabilitation project, DP 7267. Completion of the
Plant Control System Improvements project will bring state -of- the -art process control to
the plant, which will help the plant meet the ever - increasing compliance requirements at
the least possible cost.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 4
Table TP -1: Treatment Plant Subprogram /Project List
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title
1Regulatory
Compliance and Safety
7256
Alternative Energy & Greenhouse Gas
7269
Reduction Plan
pTP05
Emerging Regulatory Initiatives
pTP02
Grease Handling - TP
7237
Scrubber Water Mercury/Metals Removal
pTP12
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurb - ph 2
pTP07
Treatment Plant Culvert Abandonment
none
TP Safety Improvements Pgm
8213
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
7260
Solids Handling Improvements
pTP10
Turbine Retrofit Project
Subprogram Total
20ne -Time Renovation
7274 Aeration Air Renovations - ph 2
7231 Auxiliary Boilers Improvements
none Centrifuge & Cake Pump Upgrades
7253 Plant Control Rooms Modification
7272 Electric Blower Repl
7245 Electrical Renovations
7275 Final Effluent Flow Meter
pTP15 Furnace Renovation
7211 Headworks and Mechanical Shop Roof
Replacement
6169 Instr & Control - PLC System Upgrades - ph 2
pTP03 Outfall Inspection and Renovation
pTP16 Perimeter Fencing
7255 Primary Structures Demo
7220 Primary Effluent Pumps Refurb
7277 SCB Mechanical Room
7252 Selector Channel Condition Asmnt
7248 Standby Power Facility Improvements
7257 Sub82 Transformer Repl
pTP08 Switchgear Replacement - ph 2
pTP18 TP Elevators Replacement
pTP17 Wet Scrubber Replacement
7241 Wet Weather Bypass Improvements
Subprogram Total
3Recurring Renovation
7216
Piping Renovations - ph 4
7276
Piping Renovations - ph 5
7269
TP Asset Management
7254
TP Cathodic Prot Sys Repl
7247
TP Protective Coatings - ph 4 Study
pTP06
Plant Electrical and Instrumentation Repl
7265
TP Equipment Replacement
7268
TP Facilities Renovations Program
FY 2009 -10
Subprogram Total
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP-5
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Project
Total Project
Allocations
Expenditures
Allocations
Expenditures
Manager
Expenditures
To 06/30/09
To 06/30/09
FY 2009 -10
FY 2009 -10
Mizutani
442,000
215,000
192,000
227,000
250,000
Chesler
100,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
Mizutani
50,000
0
0
50,000
50,000
Penny
1,136,000
1,225,000
1,106,000
0
10,000
Mizutani
606,000
78,000
26,000
0
10,000
Mizutani
40,000
5,000
5,000
35,000
35,000
Than
318,000
0
0
100,000
25,000
Musgraves
232,000
232,000
182,000
0
10,000
Rathunde
4,470,000
4,470,000
965,000
0
3,500,000
Mizutani
17,000
0
0
20,000
5,000
7,411,000
6,250,000
2,501,000
457,000
3,920,000
Hodges
2,100,000
2,100,000
150,000
0
1,950,000
Hodges
218,000
218,000
188,000
0
30,000
Than
3,150,000
0
0
300,000
90,000
Lopez
411,000
411,000
406,000
0
5,000
Shima
3,104,000
280,000
279,000
130,000
100,000
Shima
356,000
141,000
136,000
215,000
220,000
Williams
145,000
25,000
25,000
120,000
120,000
Shima
2,550,000
0
0
150,000
50,000
Lawson
200,000
50,000
25,000
150,000
175,000
Weer
248,000
248,000
168,000
0
80,000
Shima
840,000
25,000
15,000
0
10,000
Lawson
430,000
0
0
30,000
30,000
Shima
1,474,000
105,000
74,000
0
10,000
Mizutani
91,000
91,000
41,000
0
40,000
Rathunde
45,000
0
0
45,000
45,000
Rathunde
9,000
50,000
4,000
- 41,000
5,000
Mizutani
5,605,000
5,432,000
1,705,000
173,000
3,700,000
Shima
161,000
161,000
111,000
0
50,000
Shima
56,000
56,000
55,000
0
1,000
Penny
250,000
0
0
50,000
50,000
Hodges
4,000,000
0
0
100,000
100,000
Rathunde
3,287,000
758,000
627,000
2,529,000
10,000
28,730,000
10,151,000
4,009,000
3,951,000
6,871,000
Rathunde
2,568,000
2,568,000
1,168,000
0
1,400,000
Rathunde
2,820,000
0
0
2,820,000
100,000
Lawson
1,186,000
410,574
411,000
600,000
600,000
Antkowiak
252,000
172,000
112,000
40,000
100,000
Rathunde
55,000
55,000
5,000
0
50,000
Than
3,295,000
0
0
65,000
65,000
Than
5,716,000
1,150,000
292,000
441,000
319,000
Than
1,072,000
72,000
22,000
0
25,000
16,964,000
4,427,574
2,010,000
3,966,000
2,659,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP-5
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title
4Expansion
7264 Primary Treatment Expansion
Subprogram Total
60ther Projects
7204
Plant Control System Improvements
7270
TP Hydraulic Profile
none
TP Master Plan Update
7267
TP Seismic Study and Rehabilitation
7249
TP Site Planning
Expenditures
Subprogram Total
Program Total
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP-6
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Project
Total Project
Allocations
Expenditures
Allocations
Expenditures
Manager
Expenditures
To 06/30/09
To 06/30/09
FY 2009 -10
FY 2009 -10
Mizutani
445,000
400,000
340,000
45,000
100,000
445,000
400,000
340,000
45,000
100,000
Than
2,860,000
3,091,000
2,762,000
92,000
50,000
Penny
150,000
150,000
149,000
0
1,000
Chesler
230,000
0
0
230,000
25,000
Hodges
188,000
100,000
95,000
88,000
93,000
Penny
156,000
156,000
106,000
0
50,000
3,584,000
3,497,000
3,112,000
410,000
219,000
57,134,000
24,725,574
11,972,000
8,829,000
13,769,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP-6
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Treatment Plant Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 7
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Treatment Plant Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 8
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Treatment Plant Projects
#
Project Title
Project Number
1
Scrubber Water Mercury/Metals Removal
7237
2
Solids Handling Improvements
7260
3
Turbine Retrofit Project
P -TP -10
4
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurbishment Phase 2
P -TP -12
5
Final Effluent Flow Meter
7275
6
Aeration Air Renovations Phase 2
7274
7
SCB and Chem Feed Building Roof Replacement
7211
8
Primary Effluent Pumps Renovation
7220
9
Wet Weather Bypass Improvements
7241
10
Standby Power Facility Improvements
7248
11
Outfall Inspection and Renovation
P -TP -03
12
Electric Blower Replacement
7272
13
Clarifier Scum Pit Modifications
7262
14
Centrifuge and Cake Pumps Upgrades
P -TP -09
15
Solids Conditioning Building Mechanical Room
P -TP -14
16
Wet Scrubber Replacement
P -TP -17
17
Furnace Renovation
P -TP -15
18
Primary Treatment Expansion
7264
Additional Projects in the Treatment Plant (multiple locations)
Project Title
Project Number
Instrument & Control PLC System Upgrades Phase 2
6169
Switchgear Replacement Phase 2
P -TP -08
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
8213
Alternative Energy & Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
7256
Grease Handling
P -TP -02
Emergency Regulatory Initiatives
P -TP -05
Perimeter Fencing
P -TP -16
Elevators Replacement
P -TP -18
Treatment Plant Protective Coatings Phase 4 Study
7269
Plant Electrical and Instrumentation Replacement
7247
Treatment Plant Equipment Replacement
P -TP -06
Piping Renovations Phase 4
7265
Piping Renovations Phase 5
7216
Plant Control System Improvements
7253
Treatment Plant Emergency Preparedness and Response
7242
Treatment Plant Site Planning
7267
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update
7249
Treatment Plant Asset Management
7247
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 9
Alternative Energy and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering/ Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Evaluate renewable energy sources for the treatment plant and make recommendations
for meeting future Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction requirements. In
addition, review current energy use and make recommendations for future energy
reduction projects.
Project History:
In 1996, an energy usage study was prepared for the District. The study recommended
energy saving measures that have been implemented over the years. Advances in
energy saving technologies and a renewed interest to reduce energy use have occurred
since the original study was performed. A new energy study would provide the District
with information on future projects to reduce energy use.
In 2006, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) was enacted to require a
statewide reduction in GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The California Air
Resources Board (CARB) estimates that this would correspond to an approximate 25%
overall reduction statewide from current emissions. Additional legislation signed by the
governor (in an Executive Order) requires an 80% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050.
In January 2008, CARB adopted GHG emissions reporting regulations that require the
District to begin reporting GHG emissions in April 2009 (for the 2008 calendar year).
CARB is also responsible for developing regulations specifying the details of how the
AB32 emission goals will be achieved. These emission reduction regulations are
expected to be adopted by CARB in 2012 and would require compliance by 2020.
It is currently unclear what types of business will be regulated by CARB and by how
much CARB will require those business sectors to reduce their emissions. It is
anticipated that stationary sources (such as power generating facilities) will be required
to reduce more because they are easier to regulate than mobile sources, such as
automobiles, operated for personal use. Therefore, District staff will closely monitor the
developing regulations to determine their impact. District staff have already completed
a preliminary assessment of GHG emissions and determined that the District would
need to reduce GHG emissions by approximately 20% to return to 1990 levels.
Consequently, it appears that some actions will be required to reduce the District's GHG
emissions footprint.
In addition to meeting future GHG reduction requirements, the District may be required
to produce 20% or more of its energy from alternative or renewable energy sources.
Senate Bill 107 already requires that Pacific Gas and Electric (PG &E) meet this
standard, and there is a possibility that future legislation or PG &E directives could
mandate that the District also meet this requirement. Use of alternative energy sources,
such as solar power, will also help the District comply with GHG emission standards
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 10
and will be an integral part of the District's GHG emission reduction strategy.
Project Description:
The study will be prepared by a consultant who is familiar with energy and GHG
emission technologies and reduction strategies. Their effort will include performing
current baseline energy and GHG emissions audits and inventories and evaluation of
the feasibility of alternative energy technologies such as wind, solar, and biofuels. An
energy study will be prepared to identify energy conservation measures than can be
implemented and how they can be funded. Furthermore, a comprehensive GHG
management plan will be prepared that includes recommendations for alternative
energy projects; impact of alternative energy projects on GHGs; and the impacts of
future treatment processes such as ammonia /nutrient removal, solids handling,
disinfection, cogeneration system modifications, and other potential future process
technologies on GHG and other future regulations.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
07/01/2007
06/17/2010
Total Cost
$442,000
$0
$0
Total: $442,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $250,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $227,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Alternative Energy & Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7256 / alt energy
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
23,000
23,000
0 0
B. Anticipated Allocations
75,000
140,000
227,000
0 0
C. Authorized this Year
75,000
163,000
250,000
0 0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(52,000)
(140,000)
(250,000)
0 0
E. Estimated Carry -over
23,000
23,000
0
0 0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 11
Emerging Regulatory Initiatives
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to provide funding for pre- design and pilot -scale system
work that may be needed in the event that emerging regulatory initiatives require
Treatment Plant process modifications to maintain compliance.
Project History:
As wastewater regulations continue to develop at the regional, state, and national level,
there is the possibility that process modifications will be required in the Treatment Plant.
For example, there is a possibility of mandatory nutrient removal in the 10 -year plan
window. In order to provide nutrient removal for all of the future influent flow, the
Treatment Plant will need to expand secondary treatment at a cost in the tens of
millions of dollars.
This project will include:
• Evaluation of the probability of mandatory process modifications in the near future
• Performing pre- design work on needed process modifications
• Constructing pilot -scale units, as necessary
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to provide funding for pre- design and pilot -scale system
work that may be needed in the event that emerging regulatory initiatives require
Treatment Plant process modifications to maintain compliance.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 12
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008 10/01/2008 $100,000
Design - - $0
Construction 10/01/2008 06/17/2012 $0
Total: $100,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $25,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $25,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Emerging Regulatory Initiatives / 1
Project Number /Filename: pTP05 / EmergingRegs
Project Manager /% Expansion: LaBella / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000)
(25,000)
(25,000)
(25,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 13
Grease Handling — Treatment Plant
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to evaluate how fats, oil, and grease (FOG) are currently
handled at the Treatment Plant and recommend any process improvements. In addition
this project will evaluate if the fuel value of FOG can be better utilized by modifying the
FOG handling process or by alternative treatment processes
Project History:
• FOG is received at the headworks inlet manhole. As it moves through the
preliminary and primary processes, it accumulates at the front of the primary
sedimentation tanks and in the scum hoppers where it can cause odors.
Once collected from the primary sedimentation tanks, excess water is decanted
in an odorous area on the third floor of the SCB. Once dewatered, FOG is slowly
introduced into the incinerator.
• FOG - related odors from the primary sedimentation tanks and the dewatering
processes in the SCB may be reduced by a dedicated FOG receiving and
processing facility separate from the headworks.
Once isolated from the headworks, FOG could be processed into a usable fuel such as
biodiesel.
Concurrent with this project, there is a project in the Collection System Program to
develop a comprehensive FOG collection /control program that may increase FOG
deliveries to the treatment plant.
Project Description:
In this project, the existing FOG handling procedures and processes will be evaluated
for possible improvements. Plant Operations staff will be a resource, as will other
agencies with similar configurations. Third -party vendors or consultants who operate
FOG collection and treatment systems may also be utilized to recommend alternative
treatment processes and re -use options.
Other options for FOG handling at the treatment plant will be summarized in a technical
memorandum with recommendations. Subsequent tasks in this project may include
conceptual design of a dedicated FOG facility, modification /replacement of the
headworks receiving area, odor control improvements at the primary sedimentation
tanks, and modification /replacement of the third floor decant processes.
Project Location:
Headworks, Primary Sedimentation Basins, Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 14
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2009 12/31/2009 $51,000
Design 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 $0
Construction 12/31/2010 06/30/2010 $0
Total: $51,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $47,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Grease Handling - TP / 1
Project Number /Filename: pTP02 / GREH_TP
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
3,000
47,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
3,000
49,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000)
(49,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 15
Scrubber Water Mercury /Metals Removal
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Investigate the viability of using activated carbon to remove mercury, other heavy
metals, and cyanide from the furnace flue gas prior to the wet scrubber.
Project History:
Mercury and other heavy metals in the influent concentrate in the bio- solids generated
from the treatment process or pass straight through to the final effluent. The bio- solids
are processed in the sewage sludge incinerators where the mercury and other heavy
metals volatize. These constituents are removed and concentrated in the scrubber
water and recycled to the secondary process.
The Regional Board has been concerned with the impacts of mercury discharge on San
Francisco Bay and was in the process of developing a new Total Maximum Daily
Loading Limit (TMDL) for final effluent mercury. Since progress on the new TMDL was
slow and the District would be hard pressed to meet the requirements proposed for
2010 if no new TMDL was in place, the District as a precautionary measure began
looking at ways to reduce mercury in its effluent.
Removal of mercury and heavy metals in the effluent could be accomplished by
implementing a mercury source reduction program such as an amalgam separator
program for dental offices and /or removing mercury and heavy metals from the scrubber
water. This project's goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of activated carbon in
removing mercury and the other heavy metals from the exhaust gas.
In 2008, a new TMDL was passed with final mercury effluent limits that the District could
meet with its successful dental amalgam. The need for mercury removal from the
scrubber water was eliminated. Staff however is proceeding with the pilot testing of the
activated carbon system in case future regulations dealing with incineration or air quality
create a need for mercury or heavy metal removal.
Project Description:
This project will complete the pilot plant study and develop design criteria for any
potential future project.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 16
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2004 07/01/2007 $551,100
Design 07/01/2007 01/01/2009 $584,900
Construction 01/01/2009 06/30/2012 $0
Total: $1,136,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Scrubber Water Mercury/Metals Removal / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7237 / scrubber metals
Project Manager /% Expansion: Penny / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
283,000
119,000
109,000
10,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,225,000
0
0
(89,000)
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,225,000
283,000
119,000
20,000
10,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(942,000)
(164,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
283,000
119,000
109,000
10,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 17
Standby Effluent Pumps Refurbishment — Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project is the second phase of work to increase effluent discharge capacity to meet
wet weather and diurnal peak flow demands.
Project History:
The standby effluent pumps are critical elements in continuously providing discharge
capacity to meet wet weather and diurnal peak flow demands. The Standby Effluent
Pumps Refurbishment project included modifications to Standby Effluent Pump Nos. 1
and 2. This is the second phase of the project and will continue the upgrades made
during the first phase of the project to increase the reliability and improve the operability
of the standby effluent pumps.
Project Description:
This project will be a continuation of improvements made under the Standby Effluent
Pump Refurbishment Project. The project includes replacement of the electric drive
motor, variable speed clutch assembly, right angle gear drive assembly and pump
assembly for Standby Effluent Pump Nos. 1 and /or 2. It will also install new direct -
coupled motors and modernize the instrumentation and control systems for both
standby effluent pumps.
Project Location:
Pump and Blower Building
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 18
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $30,000
Construction 07/01/2008 06/17/2013 $576,000
Total: $606,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Standby Effluent Pumps Refurb - ph 2 / 1
Project Number /Filename: pTP12 / sta n d by_eff 12
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
52,000
42,000
82,000
72,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
78,000
0
50,000
0
478,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
78,000
52,000
92,000
82,000
550,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(26,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(550,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
52,000
42,000
82,000
72,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 19
Treatment Plant Culvert Abandonment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To reroute and abandon culverts and drains which convey storm water flow offsite.
Project History:
As part of the District's NPDES permit, all stormwater from the treatment plant must be
routed to the treatment process and cannot be discharge offsite. Recent projects have
been completed at Basin D and along Imhoff Drive to reroute storm drains and culverts
that previously drained offsite. While doing this work, additional drains were discovered
that also convey flow offsite.
Project Description:
This project continues the effort to prevent offsite drainage of storm water. Drains that
currently drain offsite will be rerouted to the headworks.
The scope of work includes researching the effects on plant operations and minimizing
the negative impacts; abandonment or rerouting of culverts and drains; and associated
earthwork, landscaping, paving and grading.
Additionally, the treatment plant will be surveyed to identify any other off site drainage
locations for potential inclusion in this project.
Project Location:
Storm water culverts and storm drains at the Treatment Plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 20
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008 08/01/2008 $0
Design 08/01/2008 04/01/2009 $40,000
Construction 04/01/2009 06/17/2010 $0
Total: $40,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $35,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $35,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Treatment Plant Culvert Abandonment / 1
Project Number /Filename: pTP07 / TP_culvert
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
5,000
35,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
5,000
35,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(5,000)
(35,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 21
Treatment Plant Safety Improvements Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To provide funding for safety projects.
Project History:
The District and the treatment plant have very active and aggressive safety programs
that are administered by separate committees. One of the many responsibilities of these
committees is to address safety concerns as identified by the craftsmen and /or Staff or
to respond to the ever - changing regulatory requirements. Often this response will
require construction of a capital project.
Project Description:
This project provides funding to install safety improvements.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
07/01/2009
06/17/2019
Total Cost
$0
$0
$318,000
Total: $318,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $25,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
TP Safety Improvements Pgm / 1
none / TP_SafetyPGM
Than / 0
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
75,000
160,000
250,000
220,000
190,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
100,000
100,000
118,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
100,000
175,000
278,000
250,000
220,000
190,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000)
(15,000)
(28,000)
(30,000)
(30,000)
(30,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
75,000
160,000
250,000
220,000
190,000
160,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 22
Treatment Plant Security Upgrade
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
Reduce the District's exposure to liability; reduce loss of District's property; meet
reliability /safety standards' and reduce operations and maintenance expenses.
Project History:
The District has experienced loss of property in the past and improvements to the
security system are being identified and refined. Also, the current national security
situation may require additional security measures for essential public services.
Project Description:
This project will identify and implement projects to improve the security of District
personnel and property. This project could include, but is not limited to, installation of
alarm systems at critical sites on District property, additional gates in the perimeter
security fencing to allow more efficient access for District personnel and equipment,
upgrading plant security cameras, signage, and improving general area lighting.
Project Location:
Various sites on the treatment plant property.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 03/01/2005 07/01/2007 $2,000
Construction 07/01/2007 06/30/2017 $230,000
Total: $232,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Treatment Plant Security Upgrade / 1
Project Number /Filename: 8213 / TP_Security
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
162,000
70,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
162,000
70,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(162,000)
(20,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 23
Solids Handling Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to design and construct improvements recommended in
the Solids Handling Facilities Plan Update of September 2005 for emergency and non -
routine handling of biosolids.
Project History:
The Solids Handling Facilities Plan was updated in September of 2005. One
recommendation in that update was to immediately improve the equipment for handling
biosolids during emergency (i.e. catastrophic MHF failure) or non - routine (i.e. short -term
spike in solids production) that exceeds the capacity of one MHF; regulatory changes,
such as mercury emissions requiring MHF shut -down while an alternative process or
emission controls are designed and built; or accelerated development of the Concord
Naval Weapons Station resulting in solids production exceeding the capacity of one
MHF. The existing sludge loading station was not designed for processing the entire
sludge production for any length of time. Therefore, a properly designed sludge truck
loading station is required.
Project Description:
This work will provide design improvements to the solids processing equipment to meet
the ultimate solids capacity needs (Year 2035) as recommended in the final draft of the
Solids Handling Facilities Plan. The major goal for this project is to improve dewatered
sludge handling capability to address emergency or non - routine operation.
The scope of work for this project includes design and construction of a sludge truck
loading facility with odor control facilities and with a sludge cake hopper to store sludge
cake generated in overnight hours or on holidays when hauling to landfills is not
possible. This project has been submitted by the District as a candidate for stimulus
funding.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 24
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 10/01/2006 03/31/2007 $10,900
Design 03/31/2007 05/31/2009 $217,100
Construction 05/31/2009 06/17/2011 $4,242,000
Total: $4,470,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $3,500,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Solids Handling Improvements / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7260 / TP_solids
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
464,000
312,000
3,505,000
5,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
540,000
0
3,930,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
540,000
464,000
4,242,000
3,505,000
5,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(76,000)
(152,000)
(737,000)
(3,500,000)
(5,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
464,000
312,000
3,505,000
5,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 25
Turbine Retrofit
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Evaluate feasibility of upgrading the existing cogeneration turbine to a larger, more
efficient, and lower emissions unit.
Project History:
In the mid 1990s, the District installed a 3.2MW gas turbine cogeneration system that
provides the majority of the electrical power for the treatment plant. The system
includes a waste heat recovery boiler that provides additional steam for the aeration air
turbines.
Recently, emissions standards for oxides of nitrogen have become more restrictive and
challenging to meet with the existing equipment. The existing air permit for the turbine
limits the amount of power it can produce and the amount of fuel it can use. It is
anticipated that the emissions regulations will become more stringent. In addition, there
are newer, more efficient cogeneration units now available that produce less
greenhouse gas emissions. Newer turbines could provide a higher electrical capacity
that could reduce the District's imported power costs and improve reliability during utility
power outages or periods of high electrical use.
The Greenhouse Gas and Alternative Energy project will look at how cogeneration fits
into the overall District -wide energy scheme over a planning of up to several years.
However, this project will allow the District to respond to changing emissions limits and
make modifications to the cogeneration system in the near -term.
Project Description:
Complete a feasibility study including a cost - benefit analysis and design and install new
or replacement equipment as appropriate.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 26
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2009 07/01/2010 $17,000
Design 07/01/2010 07/01/201 $0
Construction 07/01/201 01/01/2012 $0
Total: $17,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $20,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Turbine Retrofit Project / 1
Project Number /Filename: pTP10 / Turb_Retrofit
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
15,000
10,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
20,000
5,000
(8,000)
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
20,000
20,000
2,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(5,000)
(10,000)
(2,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
15,000
10,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 27
Aeration Air Renovations, Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nathan Hodges, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To improve reliability of the above- and below- ground piping network and the in -tank air
delivery system for the aeration process by inspection, renovation, and replacement
where required.
Project History:
During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment
plant. There is evidence that some of the air pipes are leaking due to age and corrosion.
District Project 6157, Aeration Air Leaks Damage Assessment, investigated the
condition of air headers and branch lines around the aeration tanks, and made
necessary repairs. DP 6157 also identified gaps and cracks in the expansion joints in
the aeration tanks. These leaks have been repaired.
Additional cracking in the bottom of the air plenum boxes is allowing compressed air to
leak out into the base rock below the structure and eventually migrate back to the
atmosphere through openings around the perimeter of the aeration tanks.
DP 7207 identified and repaired the cracks in the bottom of the air plenum boxes
located in Tank 1. The following additional items were replaced during the project: 36
hydrostatic relief valves, 9600 diffuser gaskets, and 600 new diffuser rings. The plenum
drain lines were also flushed and inspected.
Initial feedback after the completion of repairs to Tank 1 (DP 7207), suggests that the
grout injection method has been effective in improving the efficiency of the air delivery
system for the aeration process and in structurally stabilizing the tank foundations.
Project Description:
The scope of DP 7274 will be essentially the same as for DP 7207 described above,
except that the work will take place in Tank 2. Cracks in the air plenums will be sealed
with grout injection and coating. Some components of the air delivery system and the
aeration basin will be replaced. In addition, new actuators will be installed on the air
supply piping.
Airflow to the tanks will continue to be monitored after completion of the project to
determine the effectiveness of the repairs.
Project Location:
Aeration Basins, Tank 2.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 28
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 11/01/2008 05/01/2009 $0
Construction 05/01/2009 10/30/2009 $2,100,000
Total: $2,100,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,950,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Aeration Air Renovations - ph 2 / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7274 / aeration_reno_2
Project Manager /% Expansion: Hodges / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
1,950,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
2,100,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
2,100,000
1,950,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(150,000)
(1,950,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,950,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 29
Auxiliary Boilers Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Edgar Lopez, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will modify the two existing auxiliary boilers with new controls and other
improvements to increase their energy efficiency and reliability. The project also
includes modifications to boiler ancillary systems to correct operational deficiencies with
the building air intake, boiler exhaust stack, and other areas.
Project History:
The auxiliary boilers were installed with the treatment plant expansion in 1975. They
are old and have been through multiple retrofits. These retrofits have resulted in the Be-
rating of the boiler system and a loss of turndown. The loss of turndown results in
inefficient operation of the cogeneration heat recovery steam system. Modifications to
the boiler exhaust and building inlet air have caused problems with carbon monoxide
buildup in the boiler area.
Staff is performing maintenance work on the boilers monthly to deal with the effects of
age. They require frequent retuning whenever the boiler doors are opened and to meet
air emission requirements. New boiler controls will result in less maintenance, improved
turn down, and lower emissions from the boilers. It is anticipated that the improved
efficiency of the boilers will result in a net payback within one to two years.
Project Description:
This project will modify the controls of the two existing auxiliary boilers and modify the
boiler ancillary systems such as the exhaust stack, combustion air blowers, and building
intake air systems. The District has applied for a rebate from PG &E and will receive a
rebate for making the recommended modifications.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 30
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2004 05/01/2005 $600
Design 05/01/2005 07/01/2006 $137,400
Construction 07/01/2006 12/31/2009 $80,000
Total: $218,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $30,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Auxiliary Boilers Improvements / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7231 / Aux_boilers
Project Manager /% Expansion: Hodges / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
45,000
30,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
183,000
35,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
183,000
80,000
30,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(138,000)
(50,000)
(30,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
45,000
30,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 31
Centrifuge and Cake Pump Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to improve the reliability of the sludge dewatering
equipment.
Project History:
The existing centrifuges and cake pumps will have been in service for more than 20
years by 2010. The design life of rotating equipment is generally around 15 years.
While routine rotation of the operational and stand -by centrifuge helps increase the
operating lifespan, Operations can expect more frequent and extensive O &M
requirements as the centrifuges and cake pumps continue to age. In addition, as
centrifuge design and materials of construction continue to develop, the next generation
centrifuges are expecting to last longer and cost less to operate.
Project Description:
This project will:
• Evaluate the condition of the existing centrifuges and cake pumps,
• Review state -of- the -art dewatering technologies,
• Analyze if the existing centrifuges should be replaced with state -of- the -art
dewatering equipment, and
• Evaluate the state -of- the -art for the drive units for the cake pumps.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 32
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2010 01/01/2011 $180,000
Design 01/01/2011 04/01/2012 $0
Construction 04/01/2012 12/31/2013 $2,970,000
Total: $3,150,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $90,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $300,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Centrifuge & Cake Pump Upgrades / 2
Project Number /Filename: none / cent_cake_pump_upg
Project Manager /% Expansion: Than / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
210,000
120,000
30,000
1,390,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
300,000
0
0
2,850,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
300,000
210,000
120,000
2,880,000
1,390,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(90,000)
(90,000)
(90,000)
(1,490,000)
(1,390,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
210,000
120,000
30,000
1,390,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 33
Control Rooms Modifications
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Edgar J. Lopez, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To improve the architecture, lighting, electrical, fire protection, and HVAC system within
the existing control rooms and to accommodate for the new control system equipment.
Project History:
The Plant Control System Improvements Project (DP 7204) included a remodel design
of the POD and SCB control room. Past projects include a seismic retrofit and air
conditioning improvements. However, the majority of the space is still vintage 1970's
construction. Improvements to the POD control room include new workstations to suit
the latest control system equipment, expanded floor plan for additional working space,
replacement of the worn out floor tiles and ceiling, new lighting to accommodate the
computer monitors, and a new fire suppression system installed to protect the computer
room. The SCB control room will be equipped with a new control system workstation.
Project Description:
This project will modify the control rooms for functionality and aesthetics. In the POD
control room, the floor plan will be revised to improve the work space and allow for more
privacy. Replacement of the ceiling system, light fixtures, floor tiles, and HVAC will be
included. Both control rooms will add new workstations designed for the latest control
system hardware. All control room equipment and functions will be temporarily
relocated while construction is taking place.
Project Location:
Plant Operations Building and Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 34
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 07/01/2007 $127,200
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2010 $283,800
Total: $411,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Plant Control Rooms Modification / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7253 / Control_rms
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lopez / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
31,000
254,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
335,000
26,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
366,000
280,000
5,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(19,000)
(112,000)
(275,000)
(5,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
31,000
254,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 35
Electric Blower Renovation
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To renovate the existing electric blower system to ensure it will meet the treatment
plant's aeration air demands when the steam powered turbine blowers are out of
service.
Project History:
The electric blower serves as a back up to the two steam - powered turbine blowers. The
electric blower is started every two weeks to make sure that it is still operational. It has
a capacity of 45,000 scfm while each of the steam powered turbine blowers has a
capacity of 75,000 scfm. The electric blower has enough capacity to meet the treatment
plant's needs during the winter months. However, during the summer months, the
treatment plant's air demand significantly increases; specifically the demand of the air
increases in the secondary aeration process, and the electric blower does not have
enough capacity to meet the demand.
In March of 2007, the District began a study to evaluate the aeration needs for the
treatment plant's activated sludge process. Preliminary results indicate that the District
can defer the renovation of the aeration process by seven to ten years. This is possible
due to the significant air loss savings achieved by the on -going aeration basin
renovation project and the ability to upgrade the capacity of the existing electric blower
by ten percent.
In late 2008 the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), along with other
environmental interest groups, submitted a petition to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to issue generally applicable phosphorous and nitrogen removal
requirements for wastewater treatment plants. The financial exposure to the District to
provide nutrient removal (nitrogen and phosphorous) could amount to $30 to $50 million
in capital costs alone based on very preliminary estimates. HDR will analyze nutrient
removal technologies, recommend the optimal location within the treatment train, and
develop planning level cost estimates to meet the phosphorous and nitrogen
concentration limits defined in the NRDC petition. The study will identify the most cost
effective approach to provide full nutrient removal and refine the preliminary cost
estimates.
The evaluation also indicated that if full treatment plant flow nitrification is mandated by
regulations in the future, renovation of the existing aeration system would be needed to
meet the additional air demands. The District's current aeration system may not be the
best alternative to accomplish this requirement. A feasibility study is needed to
determine the most cost effective approach for providing nitrification of the entire
treatment plant flow to properly complete the electric blower study. This nitrification
feasibility study will look at a minimum of:
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 36
• Conventional nitrification
• Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
• Biofor® (or other biologically- active filter) Process
• Ammonia Stripping
• Ion Exchange
• ThermoEnergy Ammonia Recovery Process
Project Description:
This project will determine the best approach to meet potential nitrification and nutrient
removal requirements, the electric blower capacity needs, and complete the design and
construct the recommended electric blower system renovation.
Project Location:
Pump and Blower Building.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $1,124,000
Construction 01/01/2007 06/17/2014 $1,980,000
Total: $3,104,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $130,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Electric Blower Repl / 2
7272 / e_bl owe r
Shima / 0
2006 -07
2007 -08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
55,000
131,000
1,000
31,000
6,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
100,000
155,000
25,000
130,000
0
725,000
C. Authorized this Year
100,000
210,000
156,000
131,000
31,000
731,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(45,000)
(79,000)
(155,000)
(100,000)
(25,000)
(700,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
55,000
131,000
1,000
31,000
6,000
31,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 37
Electrical Renovations
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To maintain the reliability of the main electrical distribution system.
Project History:
The lifeline of the treatment plant electrical power system is the collection of feeders
from the main substations to the local area substations, and electrical
switchgears /breakers. Loss or failure of these power conveyances or transferring
switches would disrupt the plant's electrical system.
Project Description:
The scope of work for this project includes:
• Arc Flash Hazard Analysis /Add Protective Relaying to 82AB1 based on the latest
NFPA, NEC and OSHA codes. This will also include adding protective relaying to
Sub 82, breaker 82AB1 and other 12kV breakers as needed to protect the plant
from faults on PG &E's system.
• Update1998 SKM short circuit study and device coordination files. Coordinate the
plant's low voltage (480 -volt) distribution system using SKM software.
• Replace approximately 6000 feet of 12KV, 350 MCM, 3 conductor MC cable in the
tunnels.
• Conduct power monitoring of the distribution system.
• Provide remote operation for circuit breakers for real time display.
Both the Arc Flash Hazard analysis and 480 -volt electrical study /coordination using
SKM software are nearly completed. In fiscal year 09 -10, the project will proceed with
subsequent work items.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 38
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2005 07/01/2007 $135,000
Construction 07/01/2007 06/30/2010 $221,000
Total: $356,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $220,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $215,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Electrical Renovations/ 2
Project Number /Filename: 7245 / ElectRenovs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
15,000
5,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
(9,000)
215,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
6,000
220,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(135,000)
(1,000)
(220,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
15,000
5,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 39
Final Effluent Flow Meter
Project Manager and Department/Division:
David Hefflefinger, Plant Operations Department
Project Purpose:
This project will improve the accuracy of final effluent flow data. Various flow metering
technologies will be compared to determine the next steps.
Project History:
The final effluent flow is currently estimated using an empirical multiplier applied to
existing final effluent flow meter readings. A higher level of accuracy will increase the
credibility of our data.
Project Description:
Staff will investigate current conditions, and a consultant will be hired to offer their
expertise in flow meter technology and make recommendations for a replacement.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant Outfall
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2008
04/01/2009
$50,000
Design 04/01/2009
07/01/2009
$95,000
Construction 07/01/2009
06/30/2010
$0
Total: $145,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $120,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $120,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Final Effluent Flow Meter / 2
7275 / Femeter
Williams / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000 120,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000 120,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000) (120,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 40
Furnace Renovation
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will improve the existing multiple hearth furnaces (MHFs) by replacing and
modifying the fuel injection system and burners, adding a VFD to the center shaft,
upsizing the Induced Draft Fan, and modernizing the furnace control system.
Project History:
The furnaces were constructed during the early 1970s and made operational in 1985.
Preventive maintenance has kept them functioning well, however, some components
are reaching the end of their useful lives and need replacement. Additionally,
modifications will be implemented to increase the reliability of the incineration process.
Project Description:
The original fuel system piping will be replaced using welded joints, and diesel fuel will
be added as an additional fuel source. Modernizing the control system will economize
fuel consumption and realize some cost savings. A consultant will investigate the
existing furnaces and make additional recommendations for modifications. Features
that enhance operability, ease maintenance, or improve safety will be considered. The
project will span multiple years because at any given time the solids handling process
requires a furnace. The project will also require close coordination with appropriate
regulatory agencies.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 41
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 06/01/2010 $0
Design 06/01/2010 07/01/2012 $350,000
Construction 07/01/2012 06/17/2016 $2,200,000
Total: $2,550,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $150,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Furnace Renovation / 2
Project Number /Filename: pTP15 / furnace_renov
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
100,000
50,000
0
100,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
0
0
200,000
0
2,200,000
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
100,000
50,000
200,000
100,000
2,200,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(50,000)
(50,000)
(50,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(1,700,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
100,000
50,000
0
100,000
0
500,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 42
Headworks and Mechanical Shop Roof Replacement
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Dana Lawson, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will repair both the Headworks and Mechanical Shop roofs as programmed
in the Treatment Plant Facilities Renovations program.
Project History:
In the mid -1980s the treatment plant (not including HOB) buildings' roofs and paving
areas were inspected and evaluated. A priority list was developed and a replacement
program implemented. The Headworks Building's roof has been exposed to residual
hypochlorite from the Odor Control Scrubbers. This has corroded metalwork on the
roof. Additionally, the flooring has become brittle from UV exposure. Both will be
replaced to repair the roof's integrity.
The Mechanical Shop/Warehouse roof is a low slope steel panel installation. Corrosion
has occurred at the fasteners and joints due to weather and some exposure to
hypochlorite from the scrubbers. Some panels require replacement as well as the
skylights, and then the entire roof will be coated to prevent future corrosion.
Project Description:
Both the Headworks and the Mechanical Shop roofs will be repaired to extend the
service life at least another 15 years.
Project Location:
Headworks and Mechanical Shop/Warehouse
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 43
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2003 07/01/2004 $0
Design 07/01/2004 07/01/2007 $200,000
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2010 $0
Total: $200,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $175,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $150,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Headworks and Mechanical Shop Roof Replacement / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7211 / head_roof_repl
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lawson / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
35,000
25,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
0
150,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
35,000
175,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(15,000)
(10,000)
(175,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
35,000
25,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 44
Instrumentation and Control - PLC System Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Alan R. Weer /Plant Operations
Project Purpose:
Upgrade Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system to current technology for
increased performance and improved compatibility.
Project History:
The first PLCs were installed in the treatment plant in 1986. The number of PLCs has
increased from the original 2 to more than 30 in the treatment plant and additional units
in the pumping stations. Over the years several PLC models have become obsolete
and have been discontinued. The original "chassis mount" PLCs used in the Solids
Conditioning Building have been replaced on this project. The 984 Series CPUs and
800 Series 1/0 are now obsolete. Programming software for the newer PLCs no longer
runs efficiently on the older programming units. The original PLC communication
network has also been discontinued and has now been replaced.
Project Description:
This project will continue to upgrade the treatment plant's PLC system by:
• Providing Programmable Device Support (PDS) hardware and software necessary
to maintain the PLC application software. The PDS system allows PLC programs to
be stored on a server and maintains version control so that all changes made to the
PLCs are logged and a current backup is always available.
• Replacing older programming computers with newer models capable of running the
current programming software efficiently.
• Investigation of existing and new equipment to ensure that the District remains in
the mainstream of process control technology.
• Upgrading older PLC models as they become out of date to be compatible with the
newer models to increase performance and reliability. The next PLCs to be
replaced are the oldest of the 984 controllers.
• Installing a newer PLC communication network to the older PLCs to allow
communication between PLCs and programming from a central location.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 45
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $10,000
Construction 07/01/2006 06/17/2010 $238,000
Total: $248,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $80,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Instr & Control - PLC System Upgrades - ph 2 / 2
Project Number /Filename: 6169 / ic_ upgrades
Project Manager /% Expansion: Weer / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
120,000
110,000
80,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
98,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
218,000
110,000
80,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(30,000)
(108,000)
(30,000)
(80,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
120,000
110,000
80,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 46
Outfall Inspection and Renovation
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will inspect both the land and submarine portions of the treatment plant
outfall as allowed by the current NPDES Permit No. CA0037648, and will make repairs
as needed.
Project History:
The treatment plant outfall was built in 1958 in soils that are known to shift and settle
significantly over time. In 2003 as part of the Outfall Improvements - Phase 5 Project,
the outfall was bypassed to inspect its condition, and make repairs. Every joint was
tested to a specified threshold with failed joints resulting in the installation of over 300
mechanical seals. The submarine portion of the outfall was not evaluated at that time.
This project will allow inspection of both the land and submarine portions of the outfall
as allowed by the current NPDES permit, and make any additional repairs.
Project Description:
It has been over five years since the last outfall inspection, and it is nearly time to re-
evaluate its condition as allowed by the current NPDES permit. The current plan is to
retest the land portion of the outfall in a similar fashion to the work in 2003, and install
new seals as necessary. The submarine portion may need additional ballast, remote
operated vehicle (ROV) inspection, and protection from boat anchors in Suisun Bay.
The work is currently scheduled for 2011/12 following completion of the Wet Weather
Bypass Improvements Project.
Project Location:
District Outfall.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 47
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/30/2008 01/01/2009 $0
Design 01/01/2009 01/01/2010 $140,000
Construction 01/01/2010 06/17/2012 $700,000
Total: $840,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Outfall Inspection and Renovation / 2
Project Number /Filename: pTP03 / Outfall_insp
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
10,000
0
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
0
120,000
695,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
10,000
120,000
700,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(15,000)
(10,000)
(115,000)
(700,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
10,000
0
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 48
Perimeter Fencing
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Dana Lawson, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The project will evaluate the security and condition of the existing fencing around the
perimeter of the Treatment Plant and will replace deficient fencing.
Project History:
The District has over 20,000 feet of fencing, which is mostly chain -link that was installed
in the 1970s. In addition, there are several double -swing and single -swing gates.
Project Description:
Portions of the perimeter fencing have been repaired or replaced over the years, such
as the main plant entrance gate, and the portion around Basin B and next to Highway 4,
however the entire perimeter of fencing requires evaluation to ensure that plant security
is maintained. Any deficient fencing will be repaired or replaced as needed.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 07/01/2010 $30,000
Construction 07/01/2010 06/30/2011 $400,000
Total: $430,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $30,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $30,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Perimeter Fencing / 2
pTP16 / perimeter fencing
Lawson / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
30,000 400,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
30,000 400,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(30,000) (400,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 49
Primary Structures Demolition Project
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will increase safety around the abandoned primary sedimentation tanks and
allow for future expansion of the Primary Sedimentation tanks and related facilities.
Project History:
The original primary sedimentation tanks, constructed in 1948 and 1957, have been out
of service and abandoned for decades. Due to the potential for falling into the tanks,
they pose a safety hazards to District employees.
The lime storage silos, located on the east side of the HOB, were constructed in 1974 to
store lime used in the primary sedimentation process. They have not been used in over
twenty years and are no longer needed. In the future, the silos would have to be
maintained in order to keep them safe.
The abandoned sedimentation tanks and silos will interfere with the addition of future
primary sedimentation tanks and odor control facilities that are part of the Primary
Treatment Expansion Project (DP7264).
Project Description:
This project will demolish the abandoned primary sedimentation tanks and backfill the
area. It will also demolish the lime storage silos, building, and associated piping
systems. Additional obsolete facilities may be included in this project based on further
evaluations. This project has been submitted by the District as a candidate for stimulus
funding, therefore, the schedule and allocation may change pending funding status.
Project Location:
Abandoned primary sedimentation tanks.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 50
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 10/01/2007 04/01/2008 $224,000
Construction 04/01/2008 06/30/2016 $1,250,000
Total: $1,474,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Primary Structures Demo / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7255 / pri_demol
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
81,000
31,000
1,121,000
1,111,000
1,101,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
105,000
0
1,100,000
0
0
200,000
C. Authorized this Year
105,000
81,000
1,131,000
1,121,000
1,111,000
1,301,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(24,000)
(50,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
81,000
31,000
1,121,000
1,111,000
1,101,000
1,291,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 51
Primary Effluent Pumps Refurbishment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will evaluate and rehabilitate the two existing primary effluent pumps
installed in 1975.
Project History:
There are currently three primary effluent pumps. Two were originally installed as part
of the 5A treatment plant expansion in 1975. The third was installed in 1995. The
pumps installed in 1975 were rated at 85 MGD, but have never achieved that pumping
capacity. Recent wet weather events and future addition of primary treatment capacity
highlight the need to re- establish the original pumping capacity
Project Description:
This project will evaluate, design and rehabilitate the two primary effluent pumps
installed in 1975. The pumps and driving system will be refurbished. In addition to
being refurbished, these pumps will be evaluated for increasing their capacity to the
intended rating of 85 MGD.
Project Location:
Pump and Blower Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 52
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 01/01/2004 07/01/2009 $41,000
Construction 07/01/2009 06/30/2012 $50,000
Total: $91,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $40,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Primary Effluent Pumps Refurb / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7220 / pri_effl_pumps
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
9,000
50,000
10,000
5,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
66,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
75,000
50,000
10,000
5,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(16,000)
(25,000)
(40,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
9,000
50,000
10,000
5,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 53
SCB Mechanical Room
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to design and construct improvements to the Solids
Conditioning Building HVAC system to replace worn out system components.
Project History:
The mechanical room located on the first floor of the Solids Conditioning Building
contains pumps, a chiller, steam and water piping, and an air - handling unit used to
provide conditioned air to the MCC Room on the second floor and to various areas
within the Furnace Control Room on the third floor. The chiller, pumps, and some
piping were replaced during the Solids Conditioning Building Ventilations Improvements,
Phase 2 (DP 7227) to provide chilled water for new air handling units serving the
centrifuge and cake pump areas. However, the original air - handling unit that was
installed during the treatment plant expansion in the mid 1970s is still in service.
Project Description:
The planning phase of the project will evaluate the current and future HVAC demands in
the various occupied areas of the Solids Conditioning Building. The project work will
then include the design and construction of improvements to replace the aging air
handling unit.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 54
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 12/01/2009 $45,000
Construction 12/01/2009 06/30/2010 $0
Total: $45,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $45,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $45,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: SCB Mechanical Room / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7277 / scb_mech_rm
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
45,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
45,000
0
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(45,000)
0
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 55
Selector Channel Condition Assessment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to identify any corrosion or deterioration to components
within the selector channel and make necessary renovations.
Project History:
The Aeration Basin Selector Project was constructed during FY 1994 -95. Piping and
valves were installed to allow Return Activated Sludge (RAS) from the secondary
clarifiers to be mixed with Primary Effluent (PE) to form mixed liquor in the PE channel
prior to aeration. The PE channel is now referred to as a "selector" because conditions
in the channel tend to select fast - settling zoogleal organisms rather than slow - settling
filaments.
The secondary treatment system is currently being operated as four aeration basins of
two passes each in plug flow mode. This is accomplished by using only the north part
of the PE channel as the selector. The south gate in the PE inlet structure is in place,
so that no flow goes to the south. The process has been configured in this manner
since it became operational.
Project Description:
The components within the selector channel have not been inspected since the system
was put into operation. This project will investigate what temporary bypass equipment
and /or permanent modifications are necessary within the channel to redirect RAS and
PE flow to the south part of the PE channel so the components in the north part can be
inspected.
Project Location:
Aeration Basin selector channel.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 56
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 10/01/2005 04/30/2006 $2,000
Design - - $7,000
Construction 04/30/2006 12/17/2009 $0
Total: $9,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: ($41,000)
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Selector Channel Condition Asmnt / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7252 / SelChannel
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
46,000
46,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
0
(41,000)
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
46,000
5,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(4,000)
0
(5,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
46,000
46,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 57
Standby Power Facility Improvements
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to replace existing stationary diesel engine generators at
the treatment plant to comply with new air regulations, limiting particulate emissions
from diesel engines while improving standby power reliability.
Project History:
The California Air Resource Board has adopted new regulations that severely limit the
operating hours of uncontrolled stationary diesel engines over 50 horsepower in size.
Under this project, the existing diesel engines in the Standby Power Facility will be
replaced.
Project Description:
This project will replace the treatment plant standby power diesel engine generators as
required to meet the new regulations and provide enough run time to meet District
operational requirements. The new engine generators will generate at 12kv and will
simplify the standby power system by eliminating the 4160v/12kv transformer. The
facility building will be modified to accept the new engine generators and will also be
brought up to the current Building Code standards. Additionally a permanent
connection point will be constructed for connecting trailer- mounted generators that will
allow greater flexibility for providing reliable power during maintenance activities.
Changing to power generation at 12kv will improve the reliability of the plant standby
power system because it will eliminate issues related to cross current compensation,
kilovolt- ampere buildup and relay trips related to the existing transformer. Feeder
cables will be analyzed and likely replaced to improve system reliability.
Project Location:
Standby Power Facility Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 58
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2005 07/01/2006 $505,000
Construction 07/01/2006 06/17/2011 $5,100,000
Total: $5,605,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $3,700,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $173,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Standby Power Facility Improvements/ 2
Project Number /Filename: 7248 / standbyPower
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 100
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
4,927,000
3,727,000
200,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
5,432,000
0
173,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
5,432,000
4,927,000
3,900,000
200,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(505,000)
(1,200,000)
(3,700,000)
(200,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
4,927,000
3,727,000
200,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 59
Substation 82 Transformer Replacement
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will investigate and upgrade circuit breakers, conduit, protective relaying,
and other electrical equipment, as needed, for continued operation with PG &E's new
larger transformer at Substation 82 that was replaced in January 2009.
Project History:
In the summer of 2007 Pacific Gas & Electric (PG &E) informed the District about their
plans to replace the transformer serving Substation 82. This transformer feeds utility
power for the entire treatment plant, and is the only means for making up power
demand not generated onsite.
PG &E replaced the existing transformer with a larger transformer in January 2009.
Project Description:
To accommodate the larger transformer, modifications must be made to the new
equipment /cables to maintain utility power service. The plant is expected to operate
normally until the modifications are made later in 2009, but the upgrades must
eventually be implemented. The work may be done as a change order to the Standby
Power Facility Improvement Project.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant Substation 82
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 60
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $11,000
Construction 12/01/2007 06/17/2010 $150,000
Total: $161,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Sub82 Transformer Repl / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7257 / sub82xfrmr
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
14,000
50,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
136,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
150,000
50,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(11,000)
(100,000)
(50,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
14,000
50,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 61
Switchgear Replacement - Phase 2
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Clint T. Shima, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will replace deficient electrical switchgear and circuit breakers, and
enhance the electrical reliability of the treatment plant.
Project History:
The electrical switchgears throughout the plant were installed in the mid- 1970s. The
equipment has been well maintained using preventative techniques such as thermo
scan to identify potential problems and correct them prior to failures.
Testing and maintenance inspections performed in 2003 and 2004 on protective relays
and other equipment in the switchgear has shown that many of the protective relays
have failed. These failures to the old system have been repaired on an as- needed
basis. However, there continues to be several areas subject to premature failures,
which can seriously cripple the electrical system.
In the first phase of this project, the oldest circuit breakers (General Electric) located at
Substation 40 were refurbished with new copper wire and the latest digital trip units.
Project Description:
This second phase of the project will investigate and potentially replace the next series
of breakers/ switchgears (Westinghouse /Cutler- Hammer) throughout the treatment
plant.
Project Location:
Entire Treatment Plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 62
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2008 01/01/2009 $55,000
Construction 01/01/2009 06/17/2010 $1,000
Total: $56,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Switchgear Replacement - ph 2 / 2
Project Number /Filename: pTP08 / switch-2
Project Manager /% Expansion: Shima / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
1,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
56,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
56,000
1,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(55,000)
(1,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 63
Treatment Plant Elevator Replacement
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To replace the existing passenger and freight elevators on the Treatment Plant site.
Project History:
The existing elevators on the Treatment Plant site were installed in 1975. They require
extensive periodic maintenance and are nearing the end of their useful life. Failure of
any of these elevators would cause safety and Treatment Plant reliability issues.
The passenger elevator in the Headquarters Office Building was installed in 1985. It
may be nearing the end of its useful life. Failure of this elevator would cause disruption
to District operations and potential ADA compliance issues.
Project Description:
This project will replace the existing passenger and freight elevators in the Solids
Conditioning Building and the existing freight elevator in the Pump and blower Building.
The condition of the passenger elevator in the Headquarters Office Building will be
evaluated to see if it would be advisable to replace it at the same time.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building, Pump and Blower Building, and Headquarters Office
Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 64
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 07/01/2010 $50,000
Construction 07/01/2010 06/30/2011 $200,000
Total: $250,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $50,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Elevators Replacement/ 2
Project Number /Filename: pTP18 / tp_elevators_repl
Project Manager /% Expansion: Penny / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
200,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
200,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(50,000)
(200,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 65
Wet Scrubber Replacement
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nathan Hodges, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Replace the Multiple Hearth Furnace (MHF) wet scrubber based on the
recommendations from the November 2005 Solids Handling Facilities Plan Update.
Project History:
The Solids Handling Facilities Plan was updated in 2005. Incinerator Rx and Industrial
Furnace Company (IFCO) determined that the Multiple Hearth Furnaces were in
excellent condition and could last 20 or more years with current O &M practices.
Included in the recommendations was that both the dry cyclone and the wet particulate
scrubber were showing signs of wear and could use updating or replacement.
Operations staff has also reported problems with the scrubber piping.
Project Description:
This project will replace the wet and dry scrubbers, and their associated piping and
equipment on the MHFs.
Project Location:
Solids Conditioning Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 66
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 06/01/2010 $0
Design 06/01/2010 07/01/2011 $100,000
Construction 07/01/2011 06/30/2012 $3,900,000
Total: $4,000,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Wet Scrubber Replacement / 2
Project Number /Filename: pTP17 / wet_scrub_repl
Project Manager /% Expansion: Hodges / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
100,000
1,900,000
2,000,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
100,000
1,900,000
2,000,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(100,000)
(1,900,000)
(2,000,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 67
Wet Weather Bypass Improvements Project
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to make improvements to the wet weather emergency
discharge system.
Project History:
In the early 1990s, the District conducted evaluations and planning for the relocation of
the Basin C discharge point as part of the Wet Weather Overflow Project and the Basin
Discharge Hydraulics project in an effort to decrease the risk of overflows from the
basins during the wet weather season. Improvements specifically recommended from
those previous investigations included a new headworks and expanded disinfection
facilities. These improvements have already been or are being implemented. An area
of focus that has not been addressed is the wet weather bypass system.
Computer modeling predicted that storms for a 20 -year system event would produce a
peak flow of approximately 310 mgd. With the expansion of the UV Disinfection
Facilities, the peak wet weather flow capacity is approximately 130 mgd. Therefore, the
emergency wet weather bypass system needs to have sufficient capacity to convey the
remaining 180 mgd during these storm events. The present hydraulic capacity of the
District's bypass facilities to Pacheco Creek is limited to approximately 50 mgd during
20 -25 year storm events.
Project Description:
This project will design and construct necessary improvements to the wet weather
discharge system. The project will include design and construction of a gravity overflow
structure to be located near the northeastern side of Basin B and a new box culvert
under a Flood Control District access road to discharge directly to Walnut Creek. In
addition, the culvert between the two on -site bypass channels, which direct flow to
Basin B, will be replaced with larger box culverts to increase capacity. Furthermore, a
narrow section of the northern most on -site bypass channel just upstream of Basin B
will be widened to improve flow. This project has been submitted by the District as a
candidate for stimulus funding, therefore, the schedule and allocations may change
pending funding status.
A future phase of this project will evaluate and design /construct modifications to raise
the levees around Basin C to match the height of the levees around Basin B to
maximize storage capacity of the holding basins.
Project Location:
Basin B and Basin C.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 68
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 09/01/2004 09/01/2005 $2,000
Design 09/01/2005 07/01/2006 $269,400
Construction 07/01/2006 06/17/2011 $3,015,600
Total: $3,287,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Wet Weather Bypass Improvements / 2
Project Number /Filename: 7241 / wet_weather_ bypass
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
481,000
2,660,000
2,650,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
758,000
2,529,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
758,000
3,010,000
2,660,000
2,650,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(277,000)
(350,000)
(10,000)
(2,650,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
481,000
2,660,000
2,650,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 69
Pipe Renovations - Phase 4
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To improve the reliability of the many piping systems above and below ground in the
treatment plant by inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
Project History:
During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment
plant. These pipes carry the processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility
services between the various sections of the plant. These pipes have been in place for
more than 30 years. Some of these pipes are leaking due to corrosion. Failure of such
piping will adversely affect the treatment plant.
Phase 1 (DP 7183), Phase 2 (DP 7208), and Phase 3 (DP 7234) of this program
renovated or replaced various piping systems. This included the service air line from
the compressor to the air driers, the main service air header, piping between the grit
pumps and classifiers, RAS pump station suction header piping, scum piping to reduce
blockages, centrate piping in the Solids Conditioning Building, blow down piping on
auxiliary boilers, piping at various hypochlorite facilities, and diesel fuel oil supply and
return pipelines out to the fuel storage yard.
Project Description:
This phase of the Pipe Renovation Program will replace sections of the diesel fuel oil
piping not replaced in earlier phases, leaking UV Facility caustic soda piping, piping and
elbows in the ash conveyance system, corroded RAS pump station discharge piping,
and sections of floor drainage piping. In addition, the work will include replacement of
electrical conduit and wiring to the clarifier scum pits and six influent gates to the
ultraviolet channels.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 70
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2007 10/01/2007 $18,000
Design 10/01/2007 05/01/2009 $5,000
Construction 05/01/2009 12/17/2009 $2,545,000
Total: $2,568,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,400,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Piping Renovations - ph 4 / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7216 / PipeRen4
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
7,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
2,543,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
2,550,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(18,000)
(1,150,000)
(1,400,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
7,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 71
Pipe Renovations - Phase 5
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To improve the reliability of the piping systems above and below ground in the treatment
plant by inspection, renovation, and replacement where required.
Project History:
During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed throughout the treatment
plant. These pipes carry the processed wastewater, sludge, steam, air, and other utility
services between the various sections of the plant. These pipes have been in place for
more than 30 years. Some of these pipes are leaking due to corrosion. Failure of such
piping will adversely affect the treatment processes.
The first four phases of this program had renovated or replaced various piping systems.
This included the service air line from the compressor to the air driers, the main service
air header, piping between the grit pumps and classifiers, RAS pump station suction
header piping, scum piping to reduce blockages, centrate and ash conveyance system
piping in the Solids Conditioning Building, blow down piping on auxiliary boilers, piping
at various hypochlorite facilities, and fuel oil piping.
Project Description:
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Project (DP 7269) is documenting recent
renewal and replacement projects as well as nondestructive testing of existing piping
systems and will ultimately be used to provide recommendation for any additional
renewal and replacement needs of other major piping systems.
Phase 5 will renovate or replace the water and air supply pipelines at the primary
sedimentation tanks and air supply headers and downcomers at the aeration tanks.
Project Location:
Throughout the treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 72
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 12/01/2010 $0
Design 12/01/2010 03/01/2011 $0
Construction 03/01/2011 06/17/2013 $2,820,000
Total: $2,820,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $2,820,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Piping Renovations - ph 5 / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7276 / PipeRen5
Project Manager /% Expansion: Than / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
2,720,000
1,820,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
2,820,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
2,820,000
2,720,000
1,820,000
5,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(100,000)
(900,000)
(1,815,000)
(5,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
2,720,000
1,820,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 73
Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Dana Lawson, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan will continue to inventory, document, and
assess treatment plant assets, create a capital project forecasting model to replace
assets as they reach the end of their useful life, and provide management with
information to make funding decisions.
Project History:
The District previously estimated that about $6M per year in capital improvements (2001
dollars) are necessary to maintain the reliability of the treatment plant through gradual
renewal and replacement of aging equipment and facilities. These expenditures are in
addition to those required for capacity and regulatory- driven improvements.
While projects over the next few years are well defined in the Capital Budget and Plan,
additional evaluations will be used to better define the long -term needs of the District. It
is critical to understand the scope and cost of projects necessary to maintain the
treatment plant assets over the long term for proper budgeting and rate setting.
Project Description:
This project will document recent renewal and replacement projects and appropriate
institutional knowledge and will provide recommendations for additional renewal and
replacement needs within the treatment plant.
The first step is to inventory and document the assets within the treatment plant. The
existing Mainsaver database, a computer maintenance management system, has a
decent inventory of the mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, and civil assets, but is
lacking an inventory of the piping infrastructure.
The second step is to assess the current condition of critical assets.
Concurrently, this information will be used to create a capital project forecasting model
that anticipates the retirement of assets based on age or condition and can provide a
tentative summary of assets to be replaced in a given year and the cost of that
replacement. Asset management software will be evaluated and tested as part of this
project. This information can then be used to prioritize and /or define the scope of
capital projects and ensure that adequate funding is available to adequately manage the
District's assets.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 74
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2005 07/01/2006 $92,600
Design - - $1,093,400
Construction 07/01/2006 06/17/2012 $0
Total: $1,186,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $600,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $600,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Asset Management / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7269 / tp_asset_man
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lawson / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
104,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
214,000
197,000
600,000
150,000
25,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
214,000
301,000
600,000
150,000
25,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(110,000)
(301,000)
(600,000)
(150,000)
(25,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
104,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 75
Cathodic Protection Systems Replacement
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
A master plan for treatment plant cathodic protection was prepared in 2006/07. The
master plan needs to be updated. All facilities requiring cathodic protection will be
surveyed and the results incorporated in the updated master plan. Based on the master
plan, adequate cathodic protection on all underground and other facilities throughout the
treatment plant will be provided by replacing existing expended facilities and installing
new systems where required.
Project History:
To extend the useful life of the District treatment plant facilities, structures and pipelines,
cathodic protection systems need to be monitored and maintained. A comprehensive
cathodic protection survey of the treatment plant was performed and identified facilities
that needed replacement and improvements over the next five -year period. The report
also identified existing facilities requiring further investigations. The current project will
prioritize and implement urgent work recommended by the master plan.
Project Description:
Cathodic protection facilities will be surveyed and inspected and the master plan
updated. Based on the recommendations from the master plan, the cathodic protection
systems that are not providing adequate protection will be repaired and /or replaced, and
any other facilities that may require cathodic protection will be identified. It is
anticipated that several systems will require refurbishment over the next few years.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 76
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 02/01/2007 $117,000
Construction 02/01/2007 06/17/2016 $135,000
Total: $252,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $70,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Cathodic Prot Sys Repl / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7254 / TP_cathodic
Project Manager /% Expansion: Antkowiak / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
51,000
39,000
70,000
40,000
40,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
0
32,000
70,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
51,000
71,000
140,000
40,000
40,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(99,000)
(12,000)
(1,000)
(100,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
51,000
39,000
70,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 77
Treatment Plant Protective Coatings — Phase 4 Study
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gary E. Rathunde, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to extend the useful life and minimize corrosion of select
treatment plant equipment, piping, and surfaces through the application of coatings.
Project History:
The original treatment plant was built in the late 1940s. Since then, there have been
multiple additions and expansions, such as that in the late 1970s. Much of the process
infrastructure is almost 30 years old; and except as discussed below, has received
limited coating or repainting over the lifetime of the treatment plant.
The first protective coating project (DP 7212) identified structures, vessels, piping and
equipment throughout the plant with deteriorating conditions and in need of surface
rehabilitation. In Phase 1, the surfaces of two secondary clarifiers, two 24 -inch steel
aeration pipes, the denitrification channel, the sludge blending tanks, and all
non - fiberglass piping and equipment for the Solids Conditioning Building's odor control
unit were rehabilitated.
The second protective coating project (DP 7221) applied protective coatings to the steel
surfaces of four secondary clarifiers, four 24 -inch steel aeration pipes, air plenum
drainpipes in the primary effluent channel, fuel oil storage tanks, electrical MCC
enclosures, and water system air gap tanks.
Treatment Plant Protective Coating Phase 3 (DP 7233), completed during the summer
of 2005, applied protective coatings to two clarifiers in the south quad, two 24 -inch steel
aeration pipes, the drainpipes in the primary effluent channel, and the switchgear and
transformers at Substations 33, 34, 40, 52, 73, and 81.
Project Description:
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project (DP 7269) is documenting recent
renewal and replacement projects and will ultimately provide recommendations for
future renewal and /or replacement of equipment and facilities at the treatment plant due
to aging or functional obsolescence. This project will contribute to the efforts of the
Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project by providing a detailed evaluation of
the entire plant coating system to identify the critical infrastructure to be cleaned and
coated as part of Phase 4 and future phases of the long term protective coating
program.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 78
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $5,000
Design 07/01/2006 07/01/2007 $50,000
Construction 07/01/2007 12/31/2009 $0
Total: $55,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Protective Coatings - ph 4 Study / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7247 / TP_Coat4
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rathunde / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
24,000
20,000
50,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
0
30,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
24,000
50,000
50,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000)
(4,000)
0
(50,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
24,000
20,000
50,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 79
Treatment Plant Electrical /Instrumentation Replacement Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to identify deficiencies in the existing electrical and
instrumentation system components and replace them prior to failure.
Project History:
The electrical /instrumentation system throughout the plant was installed in the mid -
1970s, with significant upgrades from several major projects. However, the majority of
equipment is 35 years old. The electrical system has numerous components, including
the 12,000 -volt switchgear at the 10 high - voltage substations and 30 oil- filled
transformers that are well maintained using preventative techniques, such as thermo
scan, to identify potential problems and correct them prior to failure. The maintenance
inspections have indicated areas subject to premature failures, which could cripple the
electrical system. The instrumentation system consists of thousands of field devices
and the PLC control system. The PLC system replacement work is included in other
ongoing projects.
Project Description:
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project (DP 7269) is documenting recent
renewal and replacement projects and will ultimately be used to provide
recommendations for any additional renewal and replacement needs of equipment and
facilities at the treatment plant due to aging or functional obsolescence. This project will
replace antiquated and poor - performing field instrumentation and electrical equipment
and systems. Appropriate upgrading will also be included to meet the latest governing
codes such as National Electric Code.
Property Location:
Entire treatment plant
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 80
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2009 06/17/2017 $3,295,000
Total: $3,295,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $65,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $65,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Plant Electrical and Instrumentation Repl / 3
Project Number /Filename: pTP06 / TP_Eleclnstr
Project Manager /% Expansion: Than / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
65,000
100,000
300,000
500,000
500,000
288,000
C. Authorized this Year
65,000
100,000
300,000
500,000
500,000
288,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(65,000)
(100,000)
(300,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(288,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 81
Treatment Plant Equipment Replacement Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Reduce maintenance costs, increase reliability, and improve treatment operations
through replacement or reconditioning of technologically obsolete, worn -out,
maintenance - intensive equipment, or equipment that is no longer supported by its
manufacturer.
Project History:
The initial work on this project, then known as the "Major Equipment Replacement
Study," assembled a list of current treatment plant equipment; verified equipment name,
number, and size; acquired their design records; and estimated equipment life and
replacement cost. Equipment maintenance costs are now being tracked in the District's
Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Several major pieces of
equipment are reaching the end of their expected service life and require either
replacement or a total reconditioning to extend their useful life. Furthermore, the
Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project (DP 7269) is also documenting recent
renewal and replacement projects and will ultimately be used to provide
recommendations for any additional renewal and replacement needs of equipment and
facilities at the treatment plant due to aging or functional obsolescence. Appropriate
upgrading will also be included.
Project Description:
Specific examples of equipment upon which this project will focus include:
- Primary Sludge Pumps (4)
- Solids Conditioning Building Polymer Pumps (3)
- Bulk Polymer and Scum Pumps (2)
- Filter Plant Polymer Pumps (2)
- Lime Slurry Pump (1)
- Influent Pump Wear Rings (4)
- Headworks Air Conditioners (2)
- Recycled Water Air Conditioners (2)
- 3WLP 12" Strainer (1)
- Grit Classifiers (2)
- West Gallery Exhaust Fan (1)
- Waste Steam Exchanger Shell (1)
- Scum Tank Assembly (1)
- Grease Separator
Examples of equipment replaced to date include: scrubber water pumps, TWAS pump,
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 82
ventilations for electrical substations, flow meters for 24 -inch aeration headers, heat
exchangers, furnace equipment, and variable frequency drives for induction fans for the
furnaces.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $117,000
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2019 $5,599,000
Total: $5,716,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $319,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $441,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
TP Equipment Replacement / 3
7265 / TP_EquipRepl
Than / 0
2007 -08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
233,000
858,000
980,000
980,000
980,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
350,000
800,000
441,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
C. Authorized this Year
350,000
1,033,000
1,299,000
1,480,000
1,480,000
1,480,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(117,000)
(175,000)
(319,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(400,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
233,000
858,000
980,000
980,000
980,000
1,080,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 83
Treatment Plant Facilities Renovations Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will investigate and renovate the treatment plant facilities including
buildings, roofs, roads, HVAC, and the drainage system.
Project History:
In the mid- 1980s, the treatment plant building roofs and paved areas were inspected
and evaluated. A priority list was developed and a replacement program was
implemented. Several other facilities, such as the warehouse and mechanical
maintenance building, will also be evaluated. Heavy construction traffic also continues
to deteriorate the existing pavement within the plant site.
Project Description:
The Treatment Plant Asset Management Plan project (DP 7269) is documenting recent
renewal and replacement projects and will ultimately be used to provide
recommendations for any additional renewal and replacement needs of equipment and
facilities at the treatment plant due to aging or functional obsolescence. The pavement
will be further reevaluated and replaced as needed.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 84
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2004 07/01/2007 $10,000
Design 07/01/2007 07/01/2009 $12,000
Construction 07/01/2009 06/17/2012 $1,050,000
Total: $1,072,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $25,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Facilities Renovations Program / 3
Project Number /Filename: 7268 / TP_FacilRenov
Project Manager /% Expansion: Than / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
13,000
50,000
25,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
35,000
37,000
0
0
1,000,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
35,000
50,000
50,000
25,000
1,000,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(22,000)
0
(25,000)
(25,000)
(1,000,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
13,000
50,000
25,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 85
Primary Treatment Expansion
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Craig Mizutani, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to improve the operational flexibility and redundancy of the
primary sedimentation process and to increase the primary treatment capacity for wet
weather flows.
Project History:
The Plant Capacity Analysis completed in September 1999 found that the stand -alone
capacity of the existing primary sedimentation tanks was approximately 50 MGD, while
the secondary process was approximately 68 MGD. When working together under
operational conditions, the combined processes can accommodate at least the
53.8 MGD Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) allowed by the District's current NPDES
effluent discharge limit.
Although adequate for dry weather flows, the current number of primary sedimentation
tanks and pumps hampers the District's ability to manage wet weather flows or to take
these facilities off -line for maintenance. The need for improvements to the primary
sedimentation tanks was identified in the District's 2002 Effluent Discharge Limit
Increase Project Final Environmental Impact Report. Record wet weather flows in the
winter of 2005/2006 also showed the need for additional capacity. In 2006, a consultant
was hired to make recommendations for future facilities. Preliminary reports indicate
that an expansion would add two more primary sedimentation tanks, add new and
modify the existing grit facilities and add new odor control facilities.
Project Description:
This project will add two more primary sedimentation tanks. Addition of the tanks will
increase the wet weather capacity to approximately 270 MGD (62.5 MGD dry weather
capacity with one tank out of service). The new tanks will provide additional operational
flexibility and will reduce the amount of raw wastewater bypassed to the holding basins
during large wet weather events. With the diminished need for bypassing flows, the
associated potential for odor complaints during large wet weather events will be
reduced.
This project will also upgrade the existing primary tanks, flow conveyance, and pre -
aeration tanks and grit handling systems. New technologies have been developed that
can remove grit with increased efficiency and improve odors and handling requirements
associated with grit removal. The project will evaluate replacement of the existing grit
system. The project will evaluate current wet - weather flow routing and recommend
modifications to improve wet - weather flow routing.
Predesign work for the additional primary sedimentation tanks and modifications to the
existing grit handling facilities and primary tanks were started in 2007. The project is
current on hold and it is anticipated that the predesign work will be completed by the
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 86
end of FY 2010 -11. Design and construction of the new primary sedimentation tanks is
anticipated to begin with a new project, Primary Treatment Expansion Phase 2, in FY
2014 -15 with construction being completed by 2019.
Modifications to the existing grit handling system and existing primary sedimentation
tanks may occur separately with construction starting in FY 2009 -10.
Project Location:
Primary Sedimentation Basins. Grit Tanks, and Primary Effluent Channels and Piping.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 03/30/2006 10/31/2008 $0
Design 10/31/2008 04/01/2010 $270,000
Construction 04/01/2010 06/17/2011 $175,000
Total: $445,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $45,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Primary Treatment Expansion / 4
Project Number /Filename: 7264 / primaryExp
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mizutani / 100
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
130,000
60,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
400,000
0
45,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
400,000
130,000
105,000
5,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(270,000)
(70,000)
(100,000)
(5,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
130,000
60,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 87
Plant Control System Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Ba T. Than, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To replace the existing central control Modcomp computer system and the eight
operator interface terminals with new software and advanced microprocessors.
Project History:
The District's original Modcomp computer system was put in place more than 30 years
ago. This system was originally configured to provide all of the automatic control
algorithms for the treatment plant. During the past decade, the District has eliminated
the old telemetry support hardware. The original muxes have been replaced with
programmable logic controllers (PLCs), which have extensive capability to perform logic
and execute control algorithms. However, even though the PLCs are inherently suited
to performing the control logic, most of that functionality for the older areas of the
treatment plant is retained in the original Modcomp system. Newer areas of the plant,
such as the headworks and UV disinfection facilities, have most of their control logic in
their respective PLCs. The Modcomp system primarily provides monitoring and
command interface capability for those areas for the plant operators.
The original control system predates personal computers. Replacement components
for the obsolete system are no longer available. In the past, an extensive search was
done to find spare parts for this system. A few boards for the operator workstations
were located and purchased. Unfortunately, the District does not have all the boards
that it needs. In addition, several of the boards that the District has purchased are
being repaired. Furthermore, the operator workstation boards upon which repairs are
being attempted may not be repairable.
Project Description:
The software development and hardware purchases had been completed. The new
DYNAC control system had been successfully tested and accepted by the District. The
District beneficially uses of the new control system. The remaining work includes
enhancement to the graphical user interfaces and monitors the system performance
during the two -year warranty period.
Project Location:
Entire Treatment Plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 88
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2001 07/01/2002 $0
Design 07/01/2002 06/01/2004 $1,694,000
Construction 06/01/2004 06/17/2011 $1,166,000
Total: $2,860,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $92,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Plant Control System Improvements / 5
Project Number /Filename: 7204 / plant_control_sys_imp
Project Manager /% Expansion: Than / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
379,000
329,000
371,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
3,091,000
0
92,000
(323,000)
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
3,091,000
379,000
421,000
48,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(2,712,000)
(50,000)
(50,000)
(48,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
379,000
329,000
371,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 89
Treatment Plant Hydraulics Evaluation
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Develop a hydraulic model of the treatment plant as a whole such that hydraulic pinch
points can be identified and addressed in future projects to maximize the overall
hydraulic capacity of the treatment plant.
Project History:
In 1999 a capacity analysis was performed on the individual unit processes. Although
thorough, the analysis focused on the process capacities, not the hydraulic capacities.
As a result, the District is aware of the process capacities of each of the units, but does
not have a comprehensive understanding of the plant hydraulic capacity. Previous
hydraulic studies focused on individual segments of the plant's liquid train, but have not
looked at the entire plant. A comprehensive treatment plant hydraulic model was
completed in FY 2008 -2009. Some additional work will be done by staff during FY
2009 -10 to complete model documentation and training..
Project Description:
This project developed a hydraulic model and will provide training and documentation
on the model.
Project Location:
Major liquid streams in the treatment process.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 90
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2007 03/30/2008 $149,000
Design 03/30/2008 06/30/2008 $1,000
Construction 06/30/2008 03/31/2010 $0
Total: $150,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Hydraulic Profile / 5
Project Number /Filename: 7270 / TP_hydr
Project Manager /% Expansion: Penny / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
58,000
4,000
1,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
110,000
35,000
5,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
110,000
93,000
9,000
1,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(52,000)
(89,000)
(8,000)
(1,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
58,000
4,000
1,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 91
Treatment Plant Master Plan Update
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Description:
The last thorough review of each Treatment Plant process was done in 1999. There is
the potential for significant growth in the District's service area due to pending
development at the Concord Naval Weapons Station. In addition, several modifications
have been made to the Treatment Plant to optimize operations, decrease energy use,
and accommodate wet weather flow. This project will:
• Compile all the relevant changes to the Treatment Plant since 1999;
• Evaluate both the condition and capacity of each process area;
• Develop a Treatment Plant Master Plan update to address any condition or
capacity deficiencies and regulatory requirements.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 07/01/2010 $0
Design 07/01/2010 12/31/2011 $200,000
Construction 12/31/2011 06/17/2012 $30,000
Total: $230,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $25,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $230,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Master Plan Update / 5
Project Number /Filename: none / TP_mpUpdate
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 80
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
205,000
5,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
230,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
230,000
205,000
5,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000)
(200,000)
(5,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
205,000
5,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 92
Treatment Plant Seismic Study and Rehabilitation
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nathan Hodges, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
In January 2008, California adopted the 2007 California Building Code (2007 CBC).
Among the changes in the 2007 CBC were changes to seismic design. The changes
incorporate lessons learned from recent earthquakes and a move to probabilistic
models to calculate accelerations from nearby faults.
District treatment plant facilities will be studied for vulnerability to seismic events.
Recommended improvements will be developed for construction under this project or
other capital projects, as appropriate. Seismic analysis will be based upon the 2007
CBC.
Project Description:
Studies have been completed of the plant operation administrative area and Board
Room. Studies will continue to analyze Treatment Plant buildings, Laboratory,
Household Hazardous Waste Building, CSO Vehicle Maintenance Shop and the larger
pumping stations. Work done on buildings not part of the treatment plant will be
charged to District Project 8226, HOB Seismic Improvements.
Reports will be prepared presenting the seismic analysis, rehabilitation options, and
cost estimates.
At this time, no money has been included in the CIB /CIP for treatment plant facilities
seismic improvements. Upon completion of the seismic studies, a comprehensive
summary of improvement options and costs will be delivered to District management for
input on inclusion in future CIB /CIPs.
Project Location:
Entire treatment plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 93
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2006 12/01/2006 $0
Design 12/01/2006 03/01/2007 $67,000
Construction 03/01/2007 06/30/2010 $121,000
Total: $188,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $93,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $88,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Seismic Study and Rehabilitation / 5
Project Number /Filename: 7267 / tp_seismic_study
Project Manager /% Expansion: Hodges / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
37,000
33,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
50,000
0
88,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
87,000
33,000
93,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(13,000)
(54,000)
(28,000)
(93,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
37,000
33,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 94
Treatment Plant Site Planning
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To develop a plan to logically situate multiple large projects expected to be constructed
over the next ten years in order to keep operation and maintenance of the treatment
plant practical and maintain hydraulic efficiency.
Project History:
The next ten years may bring multiple large projects, each requiring a significant plot of
land, to the treatment plant. Anticipated projects include the installation of additional
primary sedimentation tanks, a new ash loading system, furnace improvements, a
nitrification treatment process, and filter plant enlargement.
The District is not short on space to the north of the plant, but the anticipated projects
are central to the operation of the treatment plant and need to be located in the denser
core area where space is limited. They will need to be logically situated to keep
operation and maintenance of the treatment plant practical, and to maintain hydraulic
efficiency.
In FY 2008 -2009 this project assessed the space and process flow in the treatment
plant area, considered potential locations for future projects and ultimately presented a
recommended plan for the usage of space.
Project Description:
This project will update the plan as future projects are constructed within the treatment
plant site.
Project Location:
Entire Treatment Plant.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 95
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2007 06/17/2010 $156,000
Design - - $0
Construction - - $0
Total: $156,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TP Site Planning / 5
Project Number /Filename: 7249 / tp_site_planning
Project Manager /% Expansion: Penny / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
75,000
24,000
50,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
105,000
0
51,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
105,000
75,000
75,000
50,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(30,000)
(51,000)
(25,000)
(50,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
75,000
24,000
50,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP TP - 96
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Renovation — TAB
Concrete Corrosion Miscellaneous .......................................... ...............................
13
Cathodic Protection Systems Replacement ............................. ...............................
14
Collection System Renovation Program .................................. ...............................
16
Danville Sewer Renovations - Phase 2 ........................................
............................... 18
Diablo Sewer Renovations - Phase 1 ...........................................
............................... 19
Diablo Sewer Renovations - Phase 2 ...........................................
............................... 20
Hall Drive Sewer Renovation — Phase 2B ....................................
............................... 21
Lafayette Renovations - Phase 5 .................................................
............................... 22
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - Phase 6 ......................................
............................... 23
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - Phase 7 ......................................
............................... 24
Manhole Rehabilitation Project ....................................................
............................... 25
Martinez Sewer Renovations — Phase 2 ......................................
............................... 26
Martinez Sewer Renovations — Phase 3 ......................................
............................... 27
North Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 4 ................................
............................... 28
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - Phase 1 .................................
............................... 29
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - Phase 2 .................................
............................... 30
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 4 ................................
............................... 31
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 5 ................................
............................... 32
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 7 ..........................................
............................... 33
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 8 ..........................................
............................... 34
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 9 ..........................................
............................... 35
2006 Storm Damage Projects ......................................................
............................... 36
Collection System Urgent Projects Program ............................ ...............................
37
TV Inspection Program — Phase 2 ........................................... ...............................
38
Watershed 44 Creek Crossing Stabilization ............................ ...............................
40
Regl Compliance/ Planning/ Safety - TAB 2
Flow Monitoring (Collection System Planning) ........................ ...............................
41
Collection System Modeling Upgrade ...................................... ...............................
42
Collection System Planning ..................................................... ...............................
44
Collection System Master Plan Update ................................... ...............................
46
Ferrous Pipe Corrosion Control ............................................... ...............................
48
Forcemain Assessment ........................................................... ...............................
50
Lafayette /Moraga Storm Drain Risk Assessment .................... ...............................
52
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring .......................................... ...............................
54
Pumping Station Master Plan Update ...................................... ...............................
55
Treat Boulevard Bridge Sewer Relocation ............................... ...............................
57
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-1
Expansion - TAB 3
Development Projects Sewerage ............................................
............................... 59
A -Line Relief Interceptor ..........................................................
............................... 61
A -Line Easement Acquisition, Phase 2 ........................................
............................... 63
Alhambra Valley Assessment Districts ....................................
............................... 65
San Ramon Valley Interceptor .................................................
............................... 67
Trunk Sewer Capacity Program ...............................................
............................... 69
Miner Road, Orinda, TR 02 -200 ..............................................
............................... 71
Walnut Creek Downtown Pre - design .......................................
............................... 72
Pumping Stations - TAB 4
Bates Avenue Pumping Station Abandonment ........................ ...............................
74
Northern Pumping Stations Upgrades ..................................... ...............................
75
Orinda Crossroads /Moraga PS Upgrades ............................... ...............................
77
Pumping Station Corrosion Control ......................................... ...............................
78
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement .......... ...............................
80
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements ............... ...............................
82
Pumping Station SCADA O &M Manual ................................... ...............................
84
Sleepy Hollow Pumping Station Upgrades .............................. ...............................
85
Pumping Stations Emergency Equipment Storage .................. ...............................
87
San Ramon Pumping Station Upgrades .................................. ...............................
89
(not used) - TAB 5
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-2
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
This section includes detailed information for the Collection System Program. Table
CS -1 presents specific project listings showing authorizations and allocations for total
project costs. The subprogram names are used to categorize the projects among the
several reasons for which the District does work. The numbered tabs for the project
groupings are as follows:
Tab Number Subprogram
1 Renovation
2 Regulatory Compliance /Planning /Safety
3 Expansion
4 Pumping Stations
OVERVIEW
The Collection System Program at $15.2 M comprises 38 percent of the total estimated
capital expenditures for FY 2009 -10. The major points of emphasis for the Collection
System Program are:
• Renovate sewers as they reach the end of their useful lives to avoid structural
failure, reduce dry- weather overflows, and control maintenance costs;
• Expand sewer and pumping facilities to accommodate approved growth in the
District's service area;
• Upgrade District sewers to relieve capacity constraints;
• Improve the reliability of pumping stations; and
• Respond to regulatory requirements related to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).
The process for project identification, prioritization, and scheduling includes six major
components:
• The Collection System Master Plan Update (2000), which identified capacity
limitations for lines that are typically 12 inches in diameter and larger;
• Results from the District's TV inspection program that identified lines in need of
rehabilitation or replacement;
• CSO maintenance records;
• The Pumping Station Inventory Update (July 2007), which identified necessary
capacity and reliability improvements;
• Collection system facility plans, which identify capacity limitations in the 6
through 10 -inch lines; and
• Coordination with capital improvement programs of other agencies /utilities.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-3
This process allows staff to establish priorities and schedules for the individual elements
of the system that are incorporated into the capital budget and plan. Assessment tools,
such as CCTV inspection, are utilized to confirm the need for projects. After priorities
and schedules are set, projects proceed to design and construction. At each step of the
process, the level of accuracy in project scope, schedule and cost improves.
Sewer Renovation
Currently, there are more than 1,500 miles of sewer in the District's Collection System.
Sewers and associated facilities have fixed useful lives. When a sewer nears the end of
its useful life, maintenance costs, infiltration /inflow rates, and the threat of structural
degradation increase. Proper management of the District's Collection System requires
a program for the renovation of sewers that have reached the end of their useful lives.
Such a program is also included in SSO control regulation, finalized in 2005 by the San
Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board and representatives of the
Collection Systems Subcommittee of the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA). A
similar program has been implemented by the State Water Resources Control Board.
In the FY 2009 -10 Capital Budget, approximately $9.9 M or 66 percent of the Collection
System budget will be spent in this subprogram. The largest renovation projects focus
on multiple sites in Orinda, Walnut Creek, Diablo, Lafayette, Danville and Pleasant Hill.
Sewers installed prior to 1956 were predominantly vitrified clay pipe with cement mortar
joints every three to five feet. With time and soil movement, typical to the San
Francisco Bay Area and the East Bay hills in particular, cracks develop in these rigid
joints. Roots are able to enter the pipe through the cracks in the joints and cause
further damage to the sewer. A recent study of historic CSO sewer maintenance
information confirms that sewers of this age, type of material, and construction have
high maintenance requirements, structural problems, and are in areas associated with
dry- weather overflows and high infiltration /inflow rates during and after rainstorms. The
FY 2001 -02 CIB initiated a District -wide TV inspection program to help identify and
prioritize renovation needs. This project continues in FY 2009 -10 with expenditures
estimated at $1.1 M.
Urgent projects may arise during a fiscal year or in the closing months of the prior fiscal
year. These projects, which cannot afford the longer timeline to be incorporated in the
year -long budget process, are included in this category of projects.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-4
Smaller collection system projects are initiated through the ongoing collection system
planning process. This planning activity evaluates capacity of sewers smaller than 12-
inches in diameter on a case -by -case basis when triggered by one of the following
situations:
• Capacity - related overflows occur.
• There is a structural failure in a pipe.
The District's Collection System Operations Department (CSO) maintenance
records indicate a persistent and continuous problem.
Collection System Facilities Planning /Regulatory Compliance/ Safety
The collection system planning process ensures timely reconstruction and replacement
of the sewer collection system as needed. In the short term, the process ensures that
developers pay their fair share for downstream improvements to provide capacity
needed within the sewer main system. In the long term, it ensures that developments
are not connected to deficient sewers, which could result in overflows. By limiting the
potential for overflows, the District ensures regulatory compliance and minimizes the
District's long -term costs of upgrading the existing sewers to provide additional capacity.
The Collection System Master Plan update process was reinitiated in FY 2007 -08 to
accommodate the changing general and specific plans of the County and the
municipalities that are served where higher densities of development are being widely
adopted.
A Pumping Station Inventory update was completed in 2007; sections of this document
are revised as major modifications are made to individual stations.
Overall, this category of collection system projects will spend $291,000 in FY 2009 -10
or approximately 2 percent of the program.
Expansion and Capacity Issues
There is increasing regulatory and citizen attention paid to sanitary sewer overflow
problems. Historically, some overflows have been directly related to flow capacity
limitations. For many years, dealing with those limitations has been a high priority for
project development.
Priorities called out in the Collection System Master Plan Update of 2000 have been
used to establish the list of projects to be included in the Capital Improvement Plan for
capacity reasons. The projects meeting these criteria have been included in the
District's Capital Plan. In FY 2009 -10 improvements will be constructed in Orinda. The
subprogram includes other capacity - related projects for a total cost of $3.8 M or 25
percent of the Collection System Program.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-5
Pumping Stations
A major emphasis of the Collection System Program has been to improve the reliability
of the District's major pumping stations.
Starting in FY 2008 -09, the focus of the subprogram shifted to the smaller pumping
stations, such as Concord Industrial, Clyde, and Sleepy Hollow, with the goal of
improving their reliability. The Capital Improvement Budget recommends the
expenditure of $1.1 M or 7 percent of the CS program to expand, upgrade, and
rehabilitate the District's pumping stations during FY 2009 -10.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-6
Table CS -1: Collection System Subprogram /Project List
Estimated Anticipated Estimated Anticipated Estimated
Project Total Project Allocations Expenditures Allocations Expenditures
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title Manager Expenditures To 06/30/09 To 06/30/09 FY 2009 -10 FY 2009 -10
1 Renovation
none
Collection System Renov Pgm
Antkowiak
40,000
40,000
40,000
0
0
none
Concrete Corrosion
Antkowiak
10,000
0
0
10,000
1,000
5987
CS Cathodic Prot Sys Repl
Antkowiak
869,000
373,000
373,000
296,000
296,000
5954
Danville Sewer Renovations - ph 2
Seitz
430,000
130,000
80,000
300,000
350,000
5953
Diablo Renovations -ph1
Mestetsky
1,410,000
210,000
210,000
1,200,000
1,200,000
5976
Diablo Renov - ph 2
Antkowiak
1,810,000
260,000
10,000
1,550,000
300,000
5932
Hall Dr Sewer Renov - ph 2B
Molina
1,474,000
274,000
174,000
1,200,000
100,000
5977
Lafayette Renovations - ph 5
Penny
1,930,000
1,930,000
1,929,000
0
1,000
5958
Lafayette Renovations - ph 6
Mestetsky
1,600,000
150,000
150,000
1,450,000
1,450,000
pCS26
Lafayette Sewer Renovation - ph 7
Antkowiak
1,620,000
0
0
220,000
20,000
5947
Manhole Rehab
Hodges
17,000
10,000
0
7,000
2,000
5979
Martinez Sewer Renov - ph 2
Penny
2,054,000
2,054,000
2,053,000
0
1,000
5952
Martinez Sewer Renov - ph 3
Rozul
1,475,000
25,000
25,000
1,450,000
250,000
5973
North Orinda Renovations - ph 4
Antkowiak
1,560,000
160,000
10,000
1,400,000
150,000
5961
Pleasant Hill Renovations - ph 1
Antkowiak
1,500,000
1,500,000
200,000
0
1,300,000
pCS18
Pleasant Hill Renov - ph 2
Antkowiak
1,601,000
160,000
1,000
1,441,000
150,000
5950
South Orinda Renovations - ph 4
Mestetsky
1,801,000
1,801,000
201,000
0
1,600,000
pCS22
South Orinda Renovations - ph 5
Antkowiak
1,860,000
260,000
10,000
1,600,000
250,000
5974
Walnut Creek Renovations - ph 7
Molina
1,400,000
1,400,000
200,000
0
1,200,000
pCS16
Walnut Creek Renovations - ph 8
Antkowiak
1,560,000
160,000
10,000
1,400,000
150,000
pCS25
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovation - ph 9
Antkowiak
1,960,000
0
0
10,000
10,000
5981
2006 Storm Damage Asmnt
Godsey
515,000
485,000
485,000
30,000
30,000
none
Collection System Urgent Projects
Antkowiak
151,000
0
0
1,000
1,000
pCS24
TV Inspection Program - ph 2
Godsey
5,600,000
0
0
1,100,000
1,100,000
pCS02
Watershed 44 Creek Crossing Stabilization
Antkowiak
159,000
0
0
159,000
32,000
Subprogram Total
97,229,000
11,382,000
6,161,000
14,829,000
9,949,000
2Regl Compliance/ Planning/ Safety
5930
CS Planning & Flow Mon
Chesler
665,000
665,000
636,000
0
29,000
5915
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Chesler
561,000
561,000
555,000
0
6,000
5965
Collection System Planning
Chesler
519,000
610,000
399,000
- 11,000
140,000
pCS03
Ferrous Pipe Corrosion Control
Chesler
25,000
0
0
15,000
15,000
pCS05
Forcemain Assessment
Chesler
25,000
0
0
15,000
15,000
5978
Collection System Master Plan Update
Chesler
237,000
375,000
212,000
- 138,000
25,000
5935
Laf /Mor Storm Drain Risk Asmnt
Mestetsky
28,000
23,000
23,000
0
5,000
5962
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Brennan
550,000
0
0
50,000
50,000
5966
PS Master Plan Update
Chesler
186,000
186,000
181,000
0
5,000
pCS12
Treat Boulevard Bridge Sewer Relocations
Penny
9,000
9,000
8,000
0
1,000
Subprogram Total
2,805,000
2,429,000
2,014,000
- 129,000
291,000
3Expansion
6463
2009 -10 Development Sewerage
Miyamoto -Mills
2,360,000
1,180,000
1,180,000
1,180,000
1,180,000
5980
A -Line - ph 2A
Rozul
22,740,000
22,740,000
22,730,000
0
10,000
5967
A -Line Easement Acquisition - ph 2
Gronlund
1,685,000
840,000
685,000
545,000
500,000
5937
Alhambra Vly Assmt Dist
Leavitt
2,200,000
2,000,000
1,030,000
100,000
800,000
5982
San Ramon Sched C Interceptor - ph 2
Mestetsky
3,332,000
125,000
50,000
80,000
300,000
none
Trunk Sewer Expansion Program
Rozul
1,000
0
0
1,000
0
5951
Miner Rd Orinda, Tr 02 -200
Seitz
1,450,000
450,000
463,000
1,000,000
987,000
5942
Walnut Creek Downtown Predesign
Wenslawski
275,000
25,000
250,000
0
24,000
Subprogram Total
36,743,000
27,360,000
26,388,000
2,906,000
3,801,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-7
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-8
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Project
Total Project
Allocations
Expenditures
Allocations
Expenditures
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title
Manager
Expenditures
To 06/30/09
To 06/30/09
FY 2009 -10
FY 2009 -10
4Pumping
Stations
pCS29
Bates Ave PS Abandonment
Antkowiak
50,000
10,000
10,000
40,000
40,000
5971
Northern Pumping Station Upgrades
Mestetsky
880,000
880,000
280,000
0
600,000
pCS19
Orinda Xroads/Moraga PS Upgrades
Antkowiak
20,000
20,000
10,000
0
10,000
5922
Pumping Station Corrosion
Chesler
431,000
431,000
426,000
0
5,000
5941
PS Equip & Piping Repl
Brennan
752,000
225,000
202,000
75,000
75,000
6162
PS Safety Improvements
Brennan
70,000
70,000
49,000
11,000
pCS13
PS SCADA O &M Manual
Brennan
20,000
0
0
10,000
10,000
5960
PS Sleepy Hollow Upgrades
Mestetsky
470,000
470,000
120,000
0
350,000
pCS28
PS Emergency Equipment Storage
Brennan
19,000
0
0
10,000
9,000
5943
San Ramon Pumping Station Upgrades
Antkowiak
285,000
285,000
275,000
0
10,000
Subprogram Total
2,997,000
2,391,000
1,372,000
1,120,000
Program Total
139,774,000
43,562,000
35,935,000
15,161,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-8
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Collection System Renovation, Urgent, and Pumping Station Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-9
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Collection System Renovation, Urgent, and Pumping Station Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-10
Project Title
Project Number
1
South Orinda Phase 4
5950
2
Lafayette Phase 6
5958
3
Danville Phase 2
5954
4
Walnut Creek Phase 7
5974
5
Pleasant Hill Phase 1
5961
6
Diablo Phase 1
5953
7
Hall Drive Phase 2
5932
8
Diablo Sewer Improvements Phase 2
5976
9
Northern Pumping Station Upgrades
5971
10
Sleepy Hollow Pumping Station Upgrades
5960
11
Pleasant Hill Phase 2
pCS18
12
Lafayette Phase 7
pCS26
13
Walnut Creek Phase 8
pCS16
14
North Orinda Phase 4
5973
15
Martinez Renovation Phase 2
5979
16
Martinez Renovation Phase 3
5952
17
Watershed 44 Creek Crossing Stabilization
pCS02
District -Wide: TV Program
pCS24
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-10
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Collection System Expansion Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-11
0
2009 -10 Capital Improvement Budget
Collection System Expansion Projects
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-12
Project Title
Project Number
1
A -Line Easement Acquisition
5967
2
Miner Road Orinda, Tr 02 -200
5951
3
Alhambra Valley Assessment District
5937
4
Walnut Creek Downtown Pre-design
5942
District -Wide: Development Sewerage
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-12
Concrete Corrosion Miscellaneous
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Identify concrete pipe that will require remedial action.
Project History:
Large diameter sewers are usually made of concrete. This project will identify and
schedule concrete sewers requiring remedial action.
Project Description:
The on -going corrosion inspection and TV inspection programs will identify additional
reaches of concrete pipe that will need some level of remedial action. This information
will be used to identify and schedule needed projects.
Project Location:
Locations throughout the District.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
01/01/2010
06/17/2019
Total Cost
$0
$10,000
$0
Total: $10,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $10,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Concrete Corrosion / 1
none / con—co
Antkowiak / 0
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-13
Cathodic Protection Systems Replacement
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will provide and maintain cathodic protection on all underground facilities,
including the pumping stations and buried metallic piping, by replacing existing spent
facilities and installing new systems where required. Work will be prioritized based on
the cathodic protection master plan. The master plan includes recommendations for
required maintenance, replacement and /or addition of new cathodic protection for
facilities requiring such protection. The master plan also includes implementation and
monitoring program recommendations.
Project History:
The District is responsible for maintenance and operation of pumping stations and
collection system pipelines. These facilities and systems along with other
miscellaneous underground structures require continuous protection and monitoring. A
comprehensive cathodic protection survey of the collection system, pumping stations
and treatment plant was prepared in 2006 and identified facilities that needed
replacement and improvements over a five -year period. The report also identified
existing facilities requiring further investigation.
Project Description:
This project will provide and maintain adequate cathodic protection on all underground
facilities, including the pumping stations, treatment plant, and buried piping, by replacing
existing spent facilities and installing new systems where required and identifying any
other facilities that require protection. Additional survey work may be performed as
necessary and the Cathodic Protection Master Plan will be updated. Work on this
project will be coordinated with similar efforts in the treatment plant and recycled water
systems.
Project Location:
Throughout the District service area.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-14
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 02/01/2007 $773,000
Construction 02/01/2007 06/17/2011 $96,000
Total: $869,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $296,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $296,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: CS Cathodic Prot Sys Repl / 1
Project Number /Filename: 5987 / CS—cathodic
Project Manager /% Expansion: Antkowiak / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
41,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
34,000
80,000
259,000
296,000
200,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
34,000
80,000
300,000
296,000
200,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(34,000)
(39,000)
(300,000)
(296,000)
(200,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
41,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-15
Collection System Renovation Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To systematically replace or renovate small- diameter sewers to control future
maintenance requirements and costs, to minimize the number of overflows, to limit the
quantity of rainfall entering the collection system, and to improve the level of service
provided (as measured by stoppages, private property damage, traffic problems, entry
onto private property) to the residents /ratepayers.
Project History:
The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments that range in age
from new to more than 100 years old. Some of the pipe segments are at or near the
end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance, high rate of
infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the small -
diameter sewers in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The methods
and materials of construction used at that time do not currently perform well, and they
are the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system overflows.
In January 2001, USEPA released a proposed regulation setting out requirements for
capacity analysis, management, operation and maintenance of sewer systems. The
proposed regulation was immediately withdrawn by the incoming administration. In the
absence of the federal program, nearly all California Regional Water Quality Control
Boards have included similar requirements in regulation, such as the General Waste
Discharge Requirement (GWDR) for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) passed in 2002
by the Santa Ana Regional Board to apply to Orange County collection systems. The
stimulus for this action was beach closures, resulting from sewage overflows. No such
stimulus exists in the SF Bay region. Nonetheless, the SF Bay RWQCB staff has
implemented a program intended to reduce SSOs. The program was developed in a
collaborative effort with Bay Area Clean Water Agencies (BACWA). Implementation
began in December 2004, including electronic reporting. A similar program was
implemented during 2005 by the State. In many regions, the State program has
replaced the Regional program, but this has not yet happened in the SF Bay region.
The District implemented a sewer renovation program in 1991. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this renovation program has been included in the Capital
Improvement Budget and Plan.
Project Description:
The Collection System Renovation Program is an ongoing series of projects. Candidate
sewer line segments are identified, evaluated, and placed on a priority list for
replacement/ renovation. Staff of the Collection System Operations Division and
Engineering Department identifies the candidate sewer lines. These line segments are
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-16
grouped by geographical area into projects totaling 5,000 to 15,000 feet of sewer
replacement or renovation. In FY 2009 -10, the renovation program will construct the
fourth phase in South Orinda, the seventh phase in Walnut Creek, sixth phase in
Lafayette, second phase in Danville, first phase in Pleasant Hill, and first phase in
Diablo. In addition, design will begin and /or continue on phase 4 in North Orinda, phase
5 and Hall Drive 2B in South Orinda, phases 8 and 9 in Walnut Creek, phase 7 in
Lafayette, phase 2 in Diablo, phases 2 and 3 in Pleasant Hill and phase 3 in Martinez.
The multi -year television inspection of the collection system is helping to develop a
comprehensive database of system condition. This information will be used in
conjunction with the renovation strategy to develop the appropriate yearly expenditure
levels. In addition, technology demonstration projects will be conducted to evaluate
various manhole rehabilitation products.
Project Location:
Locations throughout the District.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2007 07/01/2008 $40,000
Construction 07/01/2008 06/17/2018 $0
Total: $40,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $0
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Collection System Renov Pgm / 1
none / csr_
Antkowiak / 0
2007 -08
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,000
39,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,000
39,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000)
(39,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-17
Danville Sewer Renovations - Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Paul Seitz, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Danville Sewer Renovations, Phase 2 Project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 1,500 feet of 6 -inch sewers on Valle Vista and Cameo Dr in Danville.
Construction will occur in FY 200 -10. The Town of Danville will pave Valle Vista once
sewer work is complete.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 05/01/2006 07/01/2007 $80,000
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2010 $350,000
Total: $430,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $350,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $300,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Danville Sewer Renovations
5954 / csr_danville2
Seitz / 0
- ph 2 /1
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 110,000
50,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
130,000 0
300,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
130,000 110,000
350,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(20,000) (60,000)
(350,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
110,000 50,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-18
Diablo Sewer Renovations - Phase 1
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Paul Sietz, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Diablo Sewer Renovations, Phase 1 project will replace /relocate approximately
11,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and easements. The
project is scheduled for construction in FY 2009 -10. Sites are located in Diablo and
Danville. This project has been submitted by the District as a candidate for stimulus
funding.
Project History:
Diablo sewers are some of the oldest and least accessible sewers in the collection
system. They are shallow in depth and generally in poor condition.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 06/01/2008 10/01/2008 $0
Design 10/01/2008 06/01/2009 $210,000
Construction 06/01/2009 11/30/2009 $1,200,000
Total: $1,410,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,200,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,200,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Diablo Renovations - ph 1 / 1
5953 / csr_diablol
Mestetsky / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 110,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
120,000 90,000
1,200,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
120,000 200,000
1,200,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (200,000)
(1,200,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
110,000 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-19
Diablo Sewer Renovations - Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Paul Sietz, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The existing sewer running along Calle Arroyo and through #1903 to #1963 Alameda
Diablo are very shallow (as low as 1 -ft), notoriously flat and prone to overflows. Diablo
Phase 2 proposes to lower and increase fall for these lines by diverting flow into an
existing 16 -ft deep line.
Project Description:
The Diablo Sewer Renovations, Phase 2 project will replace /relocate approximately
8,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and easements. The
project is scheduled for construction in FY 2010 -11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 06/01/2008 08/01/2008 $0
Design 06/01/2008 03/01/2010 $310,000
Construction 03/01/2010 06/30/2011 $1,500,000
Total: $1,810,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $300,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,550,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Diablo Renov - ph 2 / 1
5976 / csr_diablo2
Antkowiak / 0
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
250,000
1,500,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
260,000
1,550,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
260,000
1,800,000
1,500,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000)
(300,000)
(1,500,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
250,000
1,500,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-20
Hall Drive Sewer Renovation — Phase 2B
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nancy Molina, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Hall Drive Sewer Renovations, Phase 2B project will replace approximately 2,000
feet of 6 -inch sewer that is currently in backyard easements.
In 1991, the Hall Drive Sewer Improvements, Phase 2A, DP 4331A, constructed a deep
sewer main in Hall Drive, Orinda. The second half of the project, Phase 2B, was
delayed. Staff is currently evaluating gravity versus pump alternatives for serving these
homes. If the pump alternative is considerably less expensive than the gravity option,
staff will bring the results to the Board for a policy decision. Design started in FY 2007-
08 with construction planned for the future.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2006 06/30/2009 $0
Design 06/30/2009 04/30/2010 $1,474,000
Construction 04/30/2010 12/30/2010 $0
Total: $1,474,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,200,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Hall Dr Sewer Renov - ph 213 / 1
5932 / csr_hall2b
Molina / 0
2006 -07
2007 -08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
50,000
(18,000)
100,000
1,200,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
56,000
0
218,000
1,200,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
56,000
50,000
200,000
1,300,000
1,200,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(6,000)
(68,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(1,200,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
50,000
(18,000)
100,000
1,200,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-21
Lafayette Renovations - Phase 5
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 5 project replaced or rehabilitated
approximately 11,000 feet of 6 -inch through 10 -inch sewers at ten different sites
throughout the City of Lafayette and neighboring areas. Construction was substantially
completed in in FY 2008 -09.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2007 07/01/2008 $229,000
Construction 07/01 /2008 07/17/2009 $1,701,000
Total: $1,930,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Lafayette Renovations -
5977 / csr_Iaf5
Penny / 0
ph 5 / 1
2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 1,221,000
1,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,450,000 480,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,450,000 1,701,000
1,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(229,000) (1,700,000)
(1,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,221,000 1,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-22
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - Phase 6
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 6 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 13,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and
easements at several sites in Lafayette. The project is scheduled for construction in FY
2009 -10.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008 10/01/2008
$0
Design 10/01/2008 06/01/2009
$150,000
Construction 06/01/2009 11/30/2009
$1,450,000
Total:
$1,600,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are:
$1,450,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are:
$1,450,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Lafayette Renovations - ph 6 / 1
1,450,000
Project Number /Filename: 5958 / csr_Iaf6
0
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mestetsky / 0
0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
1,450,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
1,450,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(150,000)
(1,450,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-23
Lafayette Sewer Renovations - Phase 7
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Lafayette Sewer Renovations, Phase 7 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 10,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites
throughout the City of Lafayette and neighboring areas. The design of this project will
start in FY 2009 -10 with construction scheduled for FY 2011 -12.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 06/01/2010 $100,000
Construction 06/01/2010 02/01/2012 $1,520,000
Total: $1,620,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $20,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $220,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Lafayette Sewer Renovation - ph 7 / 1
pCS26 / csr_Iaf7
Antkowiak / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0 200,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
220,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
220,000 1,600,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(20,000) (200,000)
(1,400,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
200,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-24
Manhole Rehabilitation Project
Project Manager:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The District has approximately 30,000 active manhole structures throughout the service
area. Some of these manholes are in various stages of degradation ranging from
corrosion, root intrusion, excessive infiltration, structural failure, etc.
This project will evaluate and conduct demonstration projects of the various repair
products available in the marketplace.
Project Location:
Throughout the service area.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 01/01/2009 07/01/2009 $1,000
Construction 07/01/2009 06/17/2011 $16,000
Total: $17,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $2,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $7,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Manhole Rehab/ 1
5947 / csr_manhole—rehab
Hodges / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 10,000
15,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
10,000 7,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
10,000 17,000
15,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
0 (2,000)
(15,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
10,000 15,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-25
Martinez Sewer Renovations — Phase 2
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Martinez Sewer Renovation, Phase 2 project has replaced and rehabilitated
approximately 6,000 feet of 6 -and 8 -inch sewer pipe located in the public right of way
and easements. Major construction occurred in FY 2008 -2009.
The City requested the delay of final pavement resurfacing to spring of 2009 resulting in
potential costs in FY 2009 -2010.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2007 07/01/2008 $353,000
Construction 07/01/2008 07/31/2009 $1,701,000
Total: $2,054,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Martinez Sewer Renov -
5979 / csr_mtz2
Penny / 15
ph 2 / 1
2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 (228,000)
1,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
125,000 1,929,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
125,000 1,701,000
1,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(353,000) (1,700,000)
(1,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
(228,000) 1,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-26
Martinez Sewer Renovations — Phase 3
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nancy Molina, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Martinez Sewer Renovation, Phase 3 project will replace/ rehabilitate approximately
4,000 — 5,000 feet of 6 -and 8 -inch sewer pipe located in the public right of way and
easements. Major construction will occur in FY 2010 -2011.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2008 07/01/2010 $275,000
Construction 07/01/2010 12/31/2010 $1,200,000
Total: $1,475,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $250,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,450,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Martinez Sewer Renov - ph 3 / 1
Project Number /Filename: 5952 / csr_mtz3
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rozul / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
1,200,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
1,450,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
1,450,000
1,200,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000)
(250,000)
(1,200,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
1,200,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-27
North Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 4
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 10,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewers at several different sites throughout
the city of Orinda. The design started in FY 2008 -09 with construction scheduled for FY
2010 -11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2008 04/01/2010 $10,000
Construction 04/01/2010 06/17/2011 $1,550,000
Total: $1,560,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $150,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,400,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
North Orinda Renovations
5973 / csr_no_orinda4
Antkowiak / 0
- ph 4 / 1
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 150,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
160,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
160,000 1,550,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (150,000)
(1,400,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
150,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-28
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - Phase 1
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 1 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 9,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites in
Pleasant Hill in the public right of way and easements. The project is scheduled for
construction in FY 2009 -10. This project has been submitted by the District as a
candidate for stimulus funding.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008
10/01/2008
$0
Design 10/01/2008
06/01/2009
$200,000
Construction 06/01/2009
02/01/2010
$1,300,000
Total: $1,500,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,300,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Pleasant Hill Renovations
5961 / csr_phl
Antkowiak / 0
- ph 1 / 1
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 1,300,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,500,000 0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,500,000 1,300,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(200,000) (1,300,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,300,000 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-29
Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations - Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The Pleasant Hill Sewer Renovations, Phase 2 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 12,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites in
Pleasant Hill in the public right of way and easements. The project is scheduled for
construction in FY 2010 -11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2008
03/01/2009
$0
Design 03/01/2009
07/01/2010
$151,000
Construction 07/01/2010
06/30/2011
$1,450,000
Total: $1,601,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $150,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,441,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Pleasant Hill Renov - ph 2 / 1
pCS18 / csr_ph2
Antkowiak / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 159,000
1,450,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
160,000 1,441,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
160,000 1,600,000
1,450,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000) (150,000)
(1,450,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
159,000 1,450,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-30
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 4
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The South Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 4 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 14,000 feet of 6 and 8 -inch sewer pipe in the public right of way and
easements at several sites in southern Orinda. Major construction is scheduled for FY
2009 -10.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2008
05/01/2008
$0
Design 05/01/2008
05/01/2009
$201,000
Construction 05/01/2009
12/31/2009
$1,600,000
Total: $1,801,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,600,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
South Orinda Renovations
5950 / csr_so_orinda4
Mestetsky / 0
- ph 4 / 1
2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 259,000
1,600,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
260,000 1,541,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
260,000 1,800,000
1,600,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000) (200,000)
(1,600,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
259,000 1,600,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-31
South Orinda Sewer Renovations - Phase 5
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
The South Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 5 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 10,000 feet of 6 -inch through 10 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites
in Orinda and neighboring areas. The work will be performed in both public right of way
and easements. The design of the project started in FY 2008 -09 with construction in FY
2010 -11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 05/01/2009 04/01/2010 $260,000
Construction 04/01/2010 02/01/2011 $1,600,000
Total: $1,860,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $250,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,600,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
South Orinda Renovations
pCS22 / csr_so_orinda5
Antkowiak / 0
- ph 5 / 1
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 250,000
1,600,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
260,000 1,600,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
260,000 1,850,000
1,600,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (250,000)
(1,600,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
250,000 1,600,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-32
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 7
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 7 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 12,000 feet of 6 through 12 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites
throughout the City of Walnut Creek, unincorporated county and other neighboring
areas. Spot repairs may also be added to the project. The design started in FY 2008-
09 with construction in FY 2009 -10.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2007 07/01/2009 $134,000
Construction 07/01/2009 06/30/2010 $1,266,000
Total: $1,400,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,200,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Walnut Creek Renovations
5974 / csr_wc7
Molina / 0
- ph 7 / 1
2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 170,000
1,200,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
170,000 1,230,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
170,000 1,400,000
1,200,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
0 (200,000)
(1,200,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
170,000 1,200,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-33
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 8
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 8 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 10,000 feet of 6 through 12 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites
throughout the City of Walnut Creek, unincorporated County and other neighboring
areas. The project is scheduled for design in FY 2009 -10 with construction in FY 2010-
11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2008 07/01/2010 $144,000
Construction 07/01/2010 06/30/2011 $1,416,000
Total: $1,560,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $150,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,400,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Walnut Creek Renovations
pCS16 / csr_wc8
Antkowiak / 0
- ph 8 / 1
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 150,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
160,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
160,000 1,550,000
1,400,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (150,000)
(1,400,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
150,000 1,400,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-34
Walnut Creek Renovations - Phase 9
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The Walnut Creek Sewer Renovations, Phase 9 project will replace /rehabilitate
approximately 10,000 feet of 6 and 12 -inch sewer pipe at several different sites
throughout the City of Walnut Creek, unincorporated County and other neighboring
areas. Several spot repairs may be included in the project. The project is scheduled for
construction in FY 2011 -12.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 07/01/2010 $0
Design 07/01/2010 05/01/2011 $160,000
Construction 05/01/2011 02/01/2012 $1,800,000
Total: $1,960,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $10,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Walnut Creek Sewer Renovation - ph 9 / 1
pCS25 / csr_wc9
Antkowiak / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0 0
1,800,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
10,000 1,950,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
10,000 1,950,000
1,800,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (150,000)
(1,800,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0 1,800,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-35
2006 Storm Damage Projects
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Tom Godsey, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project description:
The heavy rains during the later part of 2005 resulted in at least ten land slides/ erosion
gullies that need to be repaired before they impact District facilities.
This project will implement temporary stabilization measures, assess the likely cause of
the slide/ erosion, coordinate with affected landowners, and design and construct
repairs as necessary.
Project location:
Several sites, primarily in the Lamorinda area.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2006 02/01/2006 $0
Design 02/01/2006 06/01/2007 $222,700
Construction 06/01/2007 12/30/2009 $292,300
Total: $515,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $30,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $30,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
2006 Storm Damage Asmnt / 1
5981 / csu_2006_storm
Godsey / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0 (28,000)
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
427,000 58,000
30,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
427,000 30,000
30,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(455,000) (30,000)
(30,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
(28,000) 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-36
Collection System Urgent Projects Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will restore and protect sewers damaged or threatened during winter
storms. In addition, the program will address structurally deficient sewers identified by
CSO.
Project History:
During major storm events, sewers at various locations are typically damaged or
threatened. In some cases, landslides or soil erosion undermined the sewers. The
repair and restoration of these sewers is typically time sensitive. In addition, the District
has embarked on an extensive investigation of the condition of its sewer system.
Occasionally, sewers in very poor condition are identified and cannot wait for
incorporation into the CIB /CIP, such as the St. Stephens erosion slide. Such situations
will be addressed under this program.
Project Location:
Throughout the District.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 05/01/2010 $151,000
Construction 05/01/2010 06/17/2013 $0
Total: $151,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Collection System Urgent Projects / 1
none / csu_projects
Antkowiak / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,000 50,000
50,000
50,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,000 50,000
50,000
50,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000) (50,000)
(50,000)
(50,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-37
TV Inspection Program — Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Tom Godsey, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Inspect all existing sewers and develop a comprehensive assessment of the District's
collection system.
Project History:
Phase 1 of the TV Inspection Program has completely inspected sewers in Orinda,
Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Danville, Diablo, Pleasant Hill and a portion of Martinez.
Phase 2 of the TV inspection program will inspect all remaining sewers in District's
service area. The inspection data will be used to organize and prioritize sewer
renovation projects as well as add to the District's data regarding pipe type
performance.
Project Description:
The TV Inspection Program is a large scale, multi -year effort to CCTV inspect the entire
CCCSD collection system. A publicly -bid CCTV inspection contract utilizing digital
imaging and database software is awarded for each year. The contractor's data will be
integrated with existing CCTV inspection data and existing sewer information
databases. Phase 2 of the TV inspection Program will inspect sewers in areas not
inspected in phase 1 and small diameter sewers that require use of mini camera
equipment. Phase 2 is a 10 year program starting in FY 2009 -10.
Project Location:
The entire collection system.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-38
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2009 06/17/2019 $5,600,000
Total: $5,600,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: TV Inspection Program - ph 2 / 1
Project Number /Filename: pCS24 / TVI_2
Project Manager /% Expansion: Godsey / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,100,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
C. Authorized this Year
1,100,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,100,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-39
Watershed 44 Creek Crossing Stabilization
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
This project will provide stabilization for about 250 feet of an existing 39 -inch reinforced
concrete gravity sewer pipe crossing the Walnut Creek Channel near the District's North
Concord Metering Station, north of State Highway 4.
The design of the project will start in FY 2009 -10 with major construction in FY 2010 -11.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2010
07/01/2010
$0
Design 07/01/2010
04/01/2011
$32,000
Construction 04/01/2011
06/17/2012
$127,000
Total: $159,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $32,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $159,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Watershed 44 Creek Xing Stabilization / 1
pCS02 / wat44_creek
Antkowiak / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0 127,000
1,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
159,000 0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
159,000 127,000
1,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(32,000) (126,000)
(1,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
127,000 1,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-40
Flow Monitoring (Collection System Planning)
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Description:
Coordination of flow monitoring, sewer maintenance history, and television inspection
will be included. These monitoring services support and validate the findings of
engineering studies. They also track long -term flow rates to evaluate the rate of pipe
deterioration with time and the rate of flow increase due to growth.
Project Location:
Throughout the collection system.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Planning 08/10/2004
Design -
Construction 06/30/2006
Completion Date Total Cost
06/30/2006 $469,800
- $195,200
06/17/2010 $0
Total: $665,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $29,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
CS Planning & Flow Mon / 2
5930 / cs_flow
Chesler / 0
Prior to 7/01/08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
84,000
29,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
665,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
665,000
84,000
29,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(581,000)
(55,000)
(29,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
84,000
29,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-41
Collection System Modeling Upgrade
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
Complete the implementation of ArcSNAP (the District's Sewer Network Analysis
Program). Training will be provided for rotating staff or assistant engineers.
Project History:
At the completion of the 1985 -86 Collection System Master Plan, the District obtained
and continued to use the hydraulic modeling software used by the consultant. Over the
years, it was used frequently in the District's assessment of impacts from large
developments and to predict flows in sewers and pumping stations during design.
In 2004, the District completed the revision of the software that performs these
functions. A completed version of the ArcSNAP model has been used productively
since early in 2004. Hydraulic grade line functionality was added in FY2004 -2005, and
additional user training provided. In FY2005 -06 and again in FY07 -08, the data was
"refreshed," i.e., the pipe network was electronically extracted from the several in -house
databases' that are the primary sources of raw data used by ArcSNAP to predict and
route flows.
In FY2006 -07 Mapping migrated its pipe network data source to new software
(GeomediaTM), which has been revised several times. Changes to the HTE (land use
and sewer flow use) database software have necessitated code changes to properly
generate flow predictions.
Project Description:
An on -going task in this project is incorporation of data from the District's Flow
Monitoring Program within the ArcSNAP's flow analysis. The hydraulic model has been
exercised to confirm that flows were accurately predicted. In addition, analysis of these
results is incorporated in an allied project, the Collection System Master Plan Update.
This project has implemented a new version of the large set of sequentially linked HTE
queries that has been be recoded using revised file and field identifiers. During
FY2009 -10, minor revisions to the software will be completed in response to added
changes to the databases on which this software depends for input information.
1 Two examples are: Mapping's database that contains the locations of pipes and nodes and
Permit's database that contains flow consumption information.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-42
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2001 02/01/2002 $138,000
Design 02/01/2002 09/01/2004 $327,000
Construction 09/01/2004 06/17/2011 $96,000
Total: $561,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $6,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Collection System Modeling Upgrade / 2
Project Number /Filename: 5915 / cs_model
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 20
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
24,000
6,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
561,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
561,000
24,000
6,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(537,000)
(18,000)
(6,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
24,000
6,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-43
Collection System Planning
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To identify, evaluate, and schedule short and long -term sewer improvement projects
and to provide design flow rates for major facility plans.
Project History:
Staff performs on -going Collection System Planning and project priority analyses to
ensure that District goals for collection system performance are met.
Project Description:
Collection System Planning studies provide the basis for improvements to the District's
sewer system and flow rates for facility plans. Studies focus on five major activities:
Local Capacity Studies (LCS)
1. LCS in response to proposed developments. Upon receipt of a proposed
development plan, staff performs an LCS to determine the existing sewer system
capacity and capacity required to serve future proposed developments. If additional
sewer capacity is required to serve the proposed developments, staff takes steps to
ensure that capacity is provided.
2. LCS to identify and define existing deficiencies in the sewer main system. A
capacity analysis of the trunk sewer system was completed as part of the Collection
System Master Plan (2000) and will be included in the next such plan to be initiated
in FY2006 -07. A capacity analysis may be performed when one of the following
situations occurs:
• When there is a structural failure in a pipe.
• When there has been a wet - weather overflow from the system.
• When there has been a dry- weather overflow from the system.
• When Collection System Operations maintenance requests indicate a
persistent and continuous problem.
3. Land Use and Collection System Database Management. As new development is
connected to the District's sewerage system and sewer improvement projects are
completed, those sewers are incorporated into the Mapping database. This
information is periodically provided as downloads of data for the recently upgraded
Sewer Network Analysis Program (ArcSNAP). Computer hardware and software
may be purchased under this project to provide the capability to use County and
District records for more comprehensive updating of the land use database.
4. Flow Rates for Facility Plans. Upon receipt of a request for flow rates for a
collection system facilities plan, staff updates the land use data and the sewer
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-44
network in the computer, based upon current and proposed land use plans.
5. Special Studies. Special studies are required to assure District sewer renovation
plans and priorities are consistent with capacity, routing, and acceptable service
level guidelines. Capacity studies determine flow limits for release of water from
water district reservoirs to the District's sewer system.
Project Location:
Throughout the collection system.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2006 06/17/2009
$569,000
Design - -
$0
Construction 06/17/2009 06/17/2010
$0
Total:
$569,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $170,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: ($41,000)
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Collection System Planning/ 2
Project Number /Filename: 5965 / CS_ping
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 20
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over 0 240,000 261,000
211,000
0 0
B. Anticipated Allocations 340,000 150,000 120,000
(41,000)
0 0
C. Authorized this Year 340,000 390,000 381,000
170,000
0 0
D. Estimated Expenditures (100,000) (129,000) (170,000)
(170,000)
0 0
E. Estimated Carry -over 240,000 261,000 211,000
0
0 0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-45
Collection System Master Plan Update
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
This project is being used to identify sewer system capacity deficiencies that may result
from planned growth within the District's service area. A key tool for the analysis is the
District Sewer Network Analysis Program (ArcSNAP). This analysis is required to
ensure that projects called out in the Capital Plan for coming years are actually needed,
that they are assigned the proper priorities, and that no major needed projects are
missing.
Project History:
The most recent Collection System Master Plan Update was completed in March 2000
based on capacity analyses performed using the prior version of SNAP (1986) as well
as information conveyed by city and County planners in 1998. This master plan
analyzed the capacity of the District's interceptors and trunk sewers, 10 inches and
greater in diameter, and recommended projects based upon identified capacity
deficiencies. Projects to correct these deficiencies have been completed or
incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan in the intervening years. Since 1998,
the County and nearly all of the cities have revised either general or specific plans to
accommodate population densification and/ or new communities.
Project Description:
In this project, meetings with city and County planners have taken place to update our
understandings of the revisions to their Plans. Examples of such revisions include
several large projects that are planned for the southern part of CCCSD's service area.
These understandings are being used to modify the base data that is incorporated in the
hydraulic model of the flows from our service area. The capacity implications of these
projects is being evaluated and the projects in the current Capital Plan will be revised if
necessary. New projects will be included where needed.
During the winter of 2006, flow monitoring was completed at 35 monitoring points.
Revisions to the hydraulic model of the District's flows (ArcSNAP) have been
incorporated to reflect new understandings of infiltration and inflow (0) in the modeled
service areas and other areas, primarily as a function of the age of the laterals and
secondarily as a function of the age of the mains, interceptors, and trunk lines.
A document will be produced to capture the information gathered and analyses
conducted and to describe the new projects that may result.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-46
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2006 06/30/2008 $237,000
Design - - $0
Construction 06/30/2008 06/30/2010 $0
Total: $237,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $25,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: ($138,000)
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Collection System Master Plan Update / 2
Project Number /Filename: 5978 / CSMP_upd
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
170,000
158,000
163,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
180,000
170,000
25,000
(138,000)
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
180,000
340,000
183,000
25,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000)
(182,000)
(20,000)
(25,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
170,000
158,000
163,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-47
Ferrous Pipe Corrosion Control
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
Corrosion is a significant issue for collection systems maintenance, and this project will
focus on the District's ferrous pipes.
Project History:
A great deal of work has been done to assess corrosion issues with regard to pumping
stations.
Project Description:
During FY 2009 -10, this project will collect and review any documentation available for
the ferrous pipes in the District's network, with regard to both internal and external
damage. Field work is likely to be needed. A plan for that work will be prepared.
Some work will be conducted in concert with the District Project that has force mains
assessment as its major objective.
Project Location:
Throughout the District.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-48
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning 10/01/2009 12/31/2010
Design - -
Construction
Total:
Estimated expenditures this FY are:
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Ferrous Pipe Corrosion Control / 2
Project Number /Filename: pCS03 / FerrousPipes
Project Managerl0 Expansion: Chesler / 0
Total Cost
$25,000
$0
$0
$25,000
$15,000
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry-over
0
000
0
0
0 0
B. Additional Allocations
15,000
10,000)
0
0
0 0
C. Authorized this Year
15,000
10,000
0
0
0 0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(15,000)
(10,000)
0
0
0 0
E. Estimated Carry-over
0,000
0
0
0
0 0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-49
Forcemain Assessment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
The District has invested in approximately 19 pumping stations. This project will
document the condition and issues of the current inventory of force mains.
Project History:
In some prior collection system projects, force main condition assessments have been
conducted. Examples are the Moraga Pumping Station and Orinda Crossroads
Pumping Station.
Project Description:
In the current project, the inventory will be completed. The effort will include both large
and small pumping stations. The new ones from PS projects that have recently been
completed will be included as well as the oldest ones where the information may be
harder to access.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-50
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning 10/01/2009 12/31/2010
Design - -
Construction
Total:
Estimated expenditures this FY are:
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Forcemain Assessment / 2
Project Number /Filename: pCS05 / FM_Assessment
Project Managerl0 Expansion: Chesler / 0
Total Cost
$25,000
$0
$0
$25,000
$15,000
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry-over
0
000
0
0
0 0
B. Additional Allocations
15,000
10,000)
0
0
0 0
C. Authorized this Year
15,000
10,000
0
0
0 0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(15,000)
(10,000)
0
0
0 0
E. Estimated Carry-over
0,000
0
0
0
0 0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-51
Lafayette /Moraga Storm Drain Risk Assessment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Identify and evaluate areas within the cities of Lafayette and Moraga where storm drains
pose a risk to District sewers and make minor repairs where necessary.
Project History:
The St. Stevens landslide in Orinda was a graphic example of how a deteriorating storm
drain can expose District sewers to potential damage and a possible sewage spill.
The storm drains in the Orinda, Lafayette, and Moraga, and particularly storm drains in
easement areas, pose a significant potential risk to District sewers. An evaluation of the
storm drains in Orinda was completed in FY 2004 -05. Lafayette and Moraga remain to
be done.
Project Description:
The first component of the project is an evaluation study, where sites are identified,
visited, and evaluated based on risk potential. A technical memorandum assessing
potential exposure / remediation costs will be developed for Management and Board
discussion.
As problems are encountered, professional geotechnical investigations and minor
construction work will be performed as a part of this project.
Project Location:
Lafayette and Moraga.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-52
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2005 12/31/2006 $0
Design - - $22,000
Construction 12/31/2006 12/31/2009 $6,000
Total: $28,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Laf /Mor Storm Drain Risk Asmnt / 2
Project Number /Filename: 5935 / LAF_stormDrain
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mestetsky / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
28,000
27,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
51,000
0
22,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
51,000
28,000
5,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(22,000)
(1,000)
(5,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
29,000
27,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-53
Manhole Remote Level Monitoring
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Brennan, Collection System Operations Department
Project Description:
The District has approximately 30,000 active manhole structures throughout the service
area. Some of these manholes are in remote areas where an overflow may not be
detected for weeks, or in environmentally sensitive areas where an overflow would
cause significant harm to creeks or reservoirs.
This project will include the identification and modification of manholes with the
installation of remote level monitoring products. The remote monitoring product will alert
dispatch or on -call crewmembers via cell phone of a potential overflow or stoppage
event. The early notification will allow crews to respond more quickly, reducing impacts
to the environment, potential fines, and District liability.
Project Location:
Throughout the service area.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 11/01/2009 $0
Design 11/01/2009 07/01/2010 $0
Construction 07/01/2010 06/30/2015 $550,000
Total: $550,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $50,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $50,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Manhole Remote Level Monitoring / 2
Project Number /Filename: 5962 / manhole_rem_mon
Project Manager /% Expansion: Brennan / 0
A. Current Carry -over
B. Anticipated Allocations
C. Authorized this Year
D. Estimated Expenditures
E. Estimated Carry -over
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
0
0
0
0
50,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
50,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
(50,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-54
0 0
100,000 100,000
100,000 100,000
(100,000) (100,000)
0 0
Pumping Station Master Plan Update
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
This project will assess the operation and maintenance of each pumping station. The
Pumping Station Master Plan (2000) will be revised to reflect the current needs of each
pumping station, the state of each pumping station, and any reordering of priorities
regarding projects on the pumping stations. The Master Plan Update will include
recommendations on implementation and monitoring.
Project History:
The District is responsible for maintenance and operation of pumping stations. These
facilities require continuous protection and monitoring. The District conducted an
inventory of its pumping stations and updated its Pumping Station Master Plan in 1989
and 1990. During FY 2007 -08, a thorough revision to the Pumping Station Inventory
was prepared by Planning Group staff. This revision was widely distributed and posted
to the OTIS website in November 2007.
Project Description:
A new survey and an update to the master plan, including implementation strategy, will
be developed to cover projects for the next several years. This update will ensure that
existing structures are functioning effectively and will identify facilities that require work.
During the coming fiscal year, a determination will be made to determine the need for
an update to the Master Plan. This project will provide the survey and evaluations of
the existing pumping stations, and recommend repair, replacement and /or addition of
new pumping stations as necessary. Based on the survey, the master plan, including
implementation and monitoring strategy, will be updated. It may be determined that the
recently revised Pumping Station Inventory will suffice.
Project Location:
The evaluations will occur at each District pumping station.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-55
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 06/01/2007 03/30/2009 $186,000
Design 03/30/2009 03/30/2010 $0
Construction - - $0
Total: $186,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS Master Plan Update / 2
Project Number /Filename: 5966 / PS_MPUpdate
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
(8,000)
59,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
0
120,000
66,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
0
112,000
125,000
5,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(8,000)
(53,000)
(120,000)
(5,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
(8,000)
59,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-56
Treat Boulevard Bridge Sewer Relocation
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Michael Penny, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To relocate /protect District sewers to facilitate construction of a pedestrian bridge over
Treat Boulevard in the vicinity of the Pleasant Hill Bart Station.
Project History:
The County is proceeding with the design /construction of a pedestrian bridge over
Treat Boulevard in the old Southern Pacific Right of Way. The only viable location for
the bridge, acceptable to the public, necessitates that the bridge landing on the north
side of Treat Boulevard be placed over an existing 30 -inch sewer trunk. In addition,
some of the easements for future sewers acquired by the District in 1986 from the
County may need to be relocated.
Project Description:
District staff is working with the County to protect approximately 200 feet of 30 -inch
sewer line that will be affected by the bridge landing. A passive overflow to the parallel
60 -inch sewer will be installed upstream of the bridge landing to prevent any spills if the
30 -inch line should fail. Revised locations for future District lines are also being worked
out with the County. The County will be assuming all costs associated with the
protection of the 30 -inch sewer and the passive overflow.
Project Location:
Treat Boulevard near the Pleasant Hill BART Station.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-57
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 12/01/2008 02/01/2009 $9,000
Construction 02/01/2009 06/17/2010 $0
Total: $9,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Treat Boulevard Bridge Sewer Relocations / 2
Project Number /Filename: pCS12 / TreatBlvd
Project Manager /% Expansion: Penny / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
1,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
9,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
9,000
1,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(8,000)
(1,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-58
Development Projects Sewerage
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Jarred Miyamoto - Mills, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
This project provides for appropriate capitalization of District force account labor and
other expenses for planning, design, and construction of developer installed and
contributed main sewer facilities. Occasionally, a new manhole is installed, an existing
main sewer is renovated, or an easement is obtained under this project when the
Development Services Section manages the work.
Project History:
The District, since its formation in 1946, has required property owners to pay for the
main sewers needed to serve their property. Where sewers are designed and installed
by developers or other private parties, District planning, plan review, right -of -way,
inspection and record drawing /mapping effort is required to ensure that contributed
sewers meet the District's Standard Specification for Design and Construction. Prior to
1991 -92, the cost of this staff effort was not capitalized. However, since 1992 -93, this
work has been funded from the Sewer Construction Fund, since it results directly in
District capital assets (completed main sewers, easements and permanent records).
Project Description:
Several District staff activities are directly involved when developer- contributed sewer
projects are designed and constructed. These activities are:
• Development Review by the Planning Section;
• Plan Review, Easement Acquisition /Documentation, Permitting and Main Line
Inspection by the Development Services Section;
• Mapping and preparation of Record Drawings by the Engineering Support Group;
and
• Television Inspection by the Collection System Operations Department staff.
A District project is established each year to properly account for the cost of these
activities.
Project Location:
Wherever development occurs.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-59
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $242,000
Design - - $554,000
Construction 07/01/2008 06/30/2010 $1,564,000
Total: $2,360,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,180,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,180,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: 2009 -10 Development Sewerage / 3
Project Number /Filename: 6463 / 0910 DevSwr
Project Manager /% Expansion: Miyamoto -Mills / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,180,000
1,180,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,180,000
1,180,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,180,000)
(1,180,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-60
A -Line Relief Interceptor
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Alex Rozul, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
These improvements will provide additional peak wet - weather relief capacity for the
existing A -Line interceptor and reduce the potential for overflows.
Project History:
A facilities plan effort for the A -Line interceptors was started in fall 1986. The facilities
plan effort included the preparation of a routing study to identify a recommended
project, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and other technical investigations
(geologic field work, TV inspection, and flow monitoring).
To date, the Facilities Plan Report, including the routing study and technical
investigation, has been completed. The EIR for the A -Line Project was certified on
October 2, 1991. Detailed design for Phase 1 was completed in April 1993. Pre - design
for Right -of -Way acquisition for subsequent phases was completed in 2003. Right of
Way Acquisition continues.
Project Description (components that are budgeted for FY 2009 -10 appear in bold
type on these two pages):
Several components of the A -Line Relief Interceptor have been completed.
The proposed A -Line interceptor will extend from Ygnacio Valley Road in Walnut Creek
to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) treatment plant. The preferred
route was refined during pre- design and coordinated with the Headworks Project and
Caltrans' proposed widening of 1 -680. The various project components are described
below.
A -Line Relief Interceptor, Phase 2A - This phase of the interceptor, began
construction in FY 2007 -08, to extend the relief interceptor to Meridian Park Boulevard
and Galaxy Way. The District entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of
Concord and the design and construction of a gravity trunk sewer to replace their
pumping station and force main are included in this project. The City is reimbursing the
District the full costs for design and construction of their sewer line connection.
A -Line Relief Interceptor, Phases 2B, 2C, 2D, and Rehabilitation of the 39 -inch Old
Main Trunk 1 project descriptions are included in the Capital Improvement Plan. The
earliest of these remaining projects is tentatively scheduled for FY 2016 -17
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-61
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 01/01/2006 05/01/2007 $1,357,600
Construction 05/01/2007 06/17/2010 $21,382,400
Total: $22,740,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: A -Line - ph 2A / 3
Project Number /Filename: 5980 / A- Line_2A
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rozul / 10
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
11,660,000
10,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
21,590,000
1,150,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
21,590,000
12,810,000
10,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(9,930,000)
(12,800,000)
(10,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
11,660,000
10,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-62
A -Line Easement Acquisition, Phase 2
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Stephanie Gronlund, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
Secure property rights for existing and future segments of the A -Line Relief Interceptor,
the Walnut Creek Bypass, the existing A -Line and Main Trunk No. 1, and the San
Ramon Valley Trunk Sewer from the Buchanan Field Golf Course in Concord to the City
of San Ramon along the Walnut Creek Channel and the Ironhorse Trail, formerly known
as the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor.
Project History:
Right of way was acquired for the A -Line Relief Interceptor and San Ramon Trunk
Sewer along the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor in 1985 from Contra Costa County.
At that time the exact locations of existing sewers along this alignment were not known
and the alignments of the future A -Line Relief Interceptor and San Ramon Trunk Sewer
were not determined. The easement documents were written so that the property
descriptions could be modified when the locations of existing facilities were determined
and sufficient engineer had been done to determine the locations of the future sewers.
Pre - design of the A -Line Relief Interceptor for right of way acquisition was completed in
2003. The current project work includes physically locating the existing sewers along
the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor and creating new legal descriptions for the
amended grants of easements.
Project Description:
This project will complete the amended grants of easements for the Southern Pacific
Railroad corridor purchased form the County in 1985, acquire the Buchanan Field Golf
Course easements, and acquire the Walnut Creek Channel easements from Meridian
Park Boulevard to Monument Boulevard in Concord.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-63
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 12/31/2008 $1,545,000
Construction 12/31/2008 12/31/2010 $140,000
Total: $1,685,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $500,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $545,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: A -Line Easement Acquisition - ph 2 / 3
Project Number /Filename: 5967 / A- Line_ease_acg2
Project Manager /% Expansion: Gronlund / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
278,000
75,000
155,000
200,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
340,000
0
500,000
545,000
300,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
340,000
278,000
575,000
700,000
500,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(62,000)
(203,000)
(420,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
278,000
75,000
155,000
200,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-64
Alhambra Valley Assessment Districts
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Curtis Swanson, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To provide a financing mechanism for the extension of public sewers into areas of
Alhambra Valley currently served by septic tanks.
Project History:
In 2008, the District completed construction of the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer
project, which not only serves as the backbone of a future wastewater collection system
in Alhambra Valley, but also directly serve more than 65 residential parcels situated
along its alignment. In a late 2006 meeting, the Board of Directors approved an
Alhambra Valley Sewer Financing Program to assist direct and indirect connectors to
the CCCSD- constructed Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer project to connect to the trunk
sewer and build main extension from it into their adjoining neighborhoods. The
financing program was based on CCCSD's successful Contractual Assessment District
(CAD) program, which allows for the formation of voluntary sewer construction
assessment districts. In 2007, 243 Alhambra Valley parcels tributary to the trunk sewer
were annexed into CCCSD's service area. Approximately 16,000 linear feet of sewer
main extensions from the trunk sewer will be needed to serve the potential near -term,
indirect customers. Through 2008, the Board of Directors has approved six Alhambra
Valley Assessment Districts (AVADs): one is financing direct connections to the trunk
sewer and five are financing construction of more than 7,700 linear feet of sewer main
extensions.
Project Description:
The goals of the Alhambra Valley Assessment District (AVAD) Program are to assist
property owners with septic tanks to finance the cost of extending and connecting to the
public sewer; to avoid future use of septic systems and sewage pumping systems in
Alhambra Valley; and to facilitate direct and indirect connections to the Alhambra Valley
trunk sewer so that CCCSD can be reimbursed more quickly for its planning, design,
and construction expenditures associated with the trunk sewer extension. In many
instances, the cost to extend public sewers into an area serviced by septic tanks can be
an extreme financial burden for one owner or even a group of owners, especially when
compounded by the need to reimburse CCCSD for construction of the Alhambra Valley
trunk sewer. The AVAD process provides property owners a means to finance the cost
of sewer improvements over time at a fixed interest rate. Each property owner's share
of the cost of a sewer extension, trunk sewer reimbursement and /or capacity fee can be
spread over time instead of requiring a lump -sum payment following construction.
Project Location:
Throughout Alhambra Valley, unincorporated Martinez
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-65
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $37,400
Design 11/01/2007 02/01/2008 $0
Construction 02/01/2008 06/17/2011 $2,162,600
Total: $2,200,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $800,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Alhambra My Assmt Dist / 3
Project Number /Filename: 5937 / AVAD
Project Manager /% Expansion: Leavitt / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
960,000
970,000
270,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,000,000
1,000,000
100,000
100,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,000,000
1,960,000
1,070,000
370,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(40,000)
(990,000)
(800,000)
(370,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
960,000
970,000
270,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-66
San Ramon Valley Interceptor
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To provide additional sewage conveyance capacity from the San Ramon Valley in
response to commercial and residential growth and infiltration during wet weather.
Project History:
The District undertook planning and engineering studies of a new interceptor sewer in
late 1983. The District negotiated and purchased easements for the new interceptor
sewer within the former Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way from Contra Costa
County. The Board of Directors approved an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
project on October 28, 1986.
The overall San Ramon Valley Interceptor Sewer Improvement Project consists of the
installation of approximately 10 miles of large- diameter gravity interceptor sewer
constructed in three phases and two miles of force main.
Project Description:
San Ramon Interceptor Schedule "A ": This project covered the six -mile section from
Sycamore Valley Road in Danville north to a point near Rudgear Road in southern
Walnut Creek. The construction contract was awarded at a cost of $7,541,000 on May
19, 1987, and completed October 1988.
San Ramon Interceptor Schedule "B ": Schedule "B" covered the one and one half -
mile section from Sycamore Valley Road south to St. James Court in Danville. The
construction contract was awarded at a cost of $1.9 million and was completed July
1988.
San Ramon Force Main Schedule "C "— Phase I. Two miles of 24 -inch force main was
constructed from the San Ramon Pumping Station to a point approximately 700 feet
north of Norris Canyon Road. The construction contract was awarded at a cost of $2.75
million in May 2002 and completed in October 2002.
Project Description:
San Ramon Interceptor Schedule "C" — Phase 2: The final phase of the San Ramon
Interceptor project will involve construction of approximately two miles of 36 -inch gravity
line from Norris Canyon Road to St. James Court. 50% design of this phase was
completed in 2003. The design will be finalized in FY 09 -10 and construction will start in
FY 10 -11.
Project Location:
Iron Horse Trail between Norris Canyon Road and St. James Court.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-67
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008 01/01/2009 $0
Design 01/01/2009 07/01/2010 $350,000
Construction 07/01/2010 06/17/2012 $2,982,000
Total: $3,332,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $300,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $80,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: San Ramon Sched C Interceptor - ph 2 / 3
Project Number /Filename: 5982 / sr_sched_c2
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mestetsky / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
75,000
(145,000)
(1,815,000)
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
125,000
80,000
1,310,000
1,817,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
125,000
155,000
1,165,000
2,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(50,000)
(300,000)
(2,980,000)
(2,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
75,000
(145,000)
(1,815,000)
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-68
Trunk Sewer Capacity Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Alex Rozul, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To achieve the Collection System Program goal of reducing sanitary sewer overflows by
increasing the capacity of trunk sewers to accommodate planned growth by the
municipalities served by CCCSD and repairing any structural deficiencies in the
District's trunk sewer system (pipelines between 12- inches and 24- inches in diameter).
Project History:
In 1986, the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan identified and prioritized trunk
sewer capacity deficiencies. Since then, a significant investment in the highest priority
projects, particularly in Martinez, Lafayette, Walnut Creek and Orinda have been
completed. At many locations where overflows had been routine during wet weather,
wastewater and infiltration /inflow is conveyed without overflow even during severe
storms.
An update of the Collection System Master Plan was completed in March 2000 and the
program was modified to reflect the new priorities established by the Master Plan
Update. The Collection system Master Plan is currently undergoing another update and
the project scope may change based on information from that revision.
Project Description:
Project work is projected to take place in several areas during fiscal year 2009 -10, as
described on the following pages.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-69
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2009 06/17/2010 $0
Construction 06/17/2010 06/17/2019 $1,000
Total: $1,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $0
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Trunk Sewer Expansion Program / 3
Project Number /Filename: none / trunk
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rozul / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-70
Miner Road, Orinda, TR 02 -200
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Tom Godsey, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Description:
Renovate approximately 4,000 feet of existing 15 -inch trunk sewer line and install
passive overflows to relieve a parallel 18 -inch sewer of wet weather capacity. This
project is located in Miner Road and Lombardy Lane. The design will evaluate various
renovation methods to minimize the construction impacts to the public. Construction is
expected to start in FY 2008 -09 and be completed in FY 09 -10.
Project Location:
Miner Road and Lombardy Lane, Orinda
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 05/01/2009 $463,000
Construction 05/01/2009 12/31/2009 $987,000
Total: $1,450,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $987,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,000,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Miner Rd Orinda, Tr 02 -200 / 3
5951 /trunk miner
Seitz / 10
2006 -07 2007 -08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0 439,000
287,000
(13,000)
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
450,000 0
0
1,000,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
450,000 439,000
287,000
987,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(11,000) (152,000)
(300,000)
(987,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
439,000 287,000
(13,000)
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-71
Walnut Creek Downtown Pre - design
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Mark Wenslawski, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to evaluate sewers in the downtown area of Walnut Creek
that are structurally deficient and require frequent maintenance.
Project History:
A significant portion of the sewers serving downtown Walnut Creek were constructed
before 1960. These sewers are deficient by today's standards and perform poorly. The
existing sewers in downtown Walnut Creek are difficult to maintain because of the
densification and the traffic congestion in the area. Maintenance working hours are
severely restricted for excavation activities and discouraged for cleaning activities. A
Facility Plan for the Walnut Creek Downtown Area was completed in 2000 and identified
$8M to $10M in recommended improvements.
Project Description:
The City of Walnut Creek is in the process of revitalizing the Downtown area. This will
result in a significant increase in wastewater flows and needed maintenance. This
project will review and update the findings of the Facility Plan, identify deficient sewers
and incorporate sewer TV inspection data results. Staff will prepare a pre- design report
that evaluates relocation options and renovation methods for use in the downtown
Walnut Creek area. The report will include input from Operations staff, City of Walnut
Creek staff, and Capital Projects staff. A phased sewer replacement schedule that
incorporates the input of commercial enterprises in the downtown Walnut Creek area
will also be developed.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-72
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 12/01/2008 03/15/2009 $275,000
Design 03/15/2009 06/30/2009 $0
Construction 06/30/2009 10/17/2010 $0
Total: $275,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $24,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Walnut Creek Downtown Predesign / 3
Project Number /Filename: 5942 / WC—downtown
Project Manager /% Expansion: Wenslawski / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
(225,000)
(249,000)
(225,000)
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
0
25,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
(225,000)
(224,000)
(225,000)
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(250,000)
(24,000)
(1,000)
225,000
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
(225,000)
(249,000)
(225,000)
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-73
Bates Avenue Pumping Station Abandonment
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to abandon the existing package pumping station.
Project History:
The Bates Avenue Pumping Station was constructed in 1968. The pump station was
originally constructed to receive flows from the now abandoned Port Chicago Pumping
Station. Current flows to this pumping station can be diverted to Concord Industrial
Pumping Station via existing gravity sewers and the existing station can be abandoned.
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to abandon the existing pumping station. Flows will be
permanently diverted to the Concord Industrial Pumping Station via existing gravity
sewers. Bypassing additional flows to Concord Industrial will free up pumping station
operations staff time. Abandonment of the existing pumping station will save future
capital expenditures, such as replacing the pumping units, which were installed in 1968.
The station will not be maintained for backup.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 05/01/2009 08/01/2009 $10,000
Construction 08/01/2009 11/30/2009 $40,000
Total: $50,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $40,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $40,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Bates Ave PS Abandonment / 4
pCS29 / bates _abandon
Antkowiak / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
10,000 40,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
10,000 40,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000) (40,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0 0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-74
Northern Pumping Stations Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to replace and modify various Concord Industrial, Clyde
and Martinez pumping station components in order to prevent sewage overflows,
reduce maintenance and increase operating efficiency.
Project History:
Pumping Station Operations staff has identified deficiencies at the Concord Industrial
Pumping Station. Upgrades need to be evaluated in light of the future Concord Naval
Weapons Center development. In FY 2005 -06, the pumps and check valves were
replaced due to excessive wear.
Pumping Station Operations Staff needs to transport a portable standby generator to
the Clyde Pumping Station in the event of a power outage. The response time is very
close to the time required to use up the storage capacity of the wet well and associated
collection system. Inclement weather can significantly impact Operations Staff's ability
to reach the site.
The Martinez Pumping Station is the first of three pumping station in series that
transport raw wastewater from the Martinez area to the treatment plant. The station
currently does not have an emergency bypass pumping connection and has only limited
storage in the event of a pumping system failure.
Project Description:
At the Concord Industrial Pump Station the project will permanently install the newer/
larger standby generator taken from the Lawrence Road Station and VFDs on the
pumps. To protect the station from large debris plugging the existing pumps, a new
grinder will be installed in the existing wet well. In addition, the fence line will be
modified to accommodate storage of a portable pump. A rain/ shade cover will be
installed to cover the control cabinets. Various safety improvements and operational
changes such as a man -lift for the dry well will be installed.
At the Clyde Pumping Station, the project will add a permanent standby generator and
concrete pad. Measures to protect the station from potential flooding will also be
evaluated and implemented.
At the Martinez Pumping Station the project will add an emergency bypass pumping
connection at the front of the site. The existing bypass to a creek sewer line will be
abandoned. In addition, the entrance gate will be relocated and some minor paving
improvements will be performed.
At the Maltby Pumping Station, a new valve vault and cover will be installed to provide
better access to piping and valves.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-75
At the Moraga Pumping Station and the Orinda Crossroads Pumping Station, bar
screens will be modified.
Project Location:
Concord Industrial Pumping Station, Clyde Pumping Station, Martinez Pumping Station,
Maltby Pumping Station, Orinda Crossroads Pumping Station and Moraga Pumping
Station.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 01/01/2006 05/01/2008 $180,000
Construction 05/01/2008 12/31/2009 $700,000
Total: $880,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $600,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Northern Pumping Station Upgrades/ 4
5971 / northern_ps_up
Mestetsky / 0
Prior to 7/01/08
2008 -09
2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
257,000
600,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
437,000
443,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
437,000
700,000
600,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(180,000)
(100,000)
(600,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
257,000
600,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-76
Orinda Crossroads /Moraga PS Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will improve the reliability and maintainability of the pumping stations.
Project Description:
This project will install minor upgrades, and other miscellaneous improvements at the
Orinda Crossroads and Moraga Pumping stations. Additional minor improvements at
other pumping stations in the Orinda and Moraga area may be included in this project.
Project Location:
Orinda Crossroads, Moraga and other pumping stations in the EBMUD watershed area.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2008 07/01/2009 $0
Construction 07/01/2009 12/31/2009 $20,000
Total: $20,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Orinda Xroads /Moraga PS Upgrades / 4
Project Number /Filename: pCS19 / orimoraga_upg
Project Manager /% Expansion: Antkowiak / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
10,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
20,000
10,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000)
(10,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-77
Pumping Station Corrosion Control
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
Corrosion is a significant issue for collection systems maintenance, and this project
concludes the documentation of corrosion control methods at the District pumping
stations. Condition assessment of the gravity lines downstream from each pumping
stations has been a necessary component of each segment of the project.
Project History:
In earlier years of the project, consultant services have been used to evaluate the
processes needed and the processes in place to control corrosion in the pumping
stations and in the gravity lines downstream of these pumping stations. Beginning in
2002, reports have been completed for the following five systems: (1) The Lower
Orinda pumping station, (2) the San Ramon pumping station, (3) the Martinez PS
series, which included Martinez, Fairview, and Maltby, (4) the Concord Industrial and
Clyde pumping stations and (5) the Moraga pumping station. In 2006, investigations
were begun for the Orinda Crossroads pumping station, but it was determined that
corrosion was not an issue at this station because there was no evidence of its
occurrence. No work occurred on this project in since FY 2007 due to staffing
limitations.
Project Description:
During FY 2009 -10, the results of all of these projects will be reviewed and the District
strategy documented. This comparison and fine - tuning of the District plan has been a
component of each project. The concluding document will compile the findings of these
projects.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-78
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 10/01/2002 12/31/2004 $431,000
Design - - $0
Construction 12/31/2004 12/17/2009 $0
Total: $431,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Pumping Station Corrosion / 4
Project Number /Filename: 5922 / PS—Corrosion
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
10,000
5,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
431,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
431,000
10,000
5,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(421,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
10,000
5,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-79
Pumping Stations Equipment and Piping Replacement
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Brennan, Collection System Operations
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to replace or recondition failed and obsolete pumps,
piping, valves, electrical and instrumentation equipment, and other support equipment,
to provide for proper emergency response at District pumping stations, purchase major
spare assemblies for various pieces of pumping stations equipment, meeting new
regulatory requirements.
Project History:
In the summer of 1997, a header at the Maltby Pumping Station failed due to external
corrosion. Bypass pumping was required to maintain system flow, and the repair was
made under an emergency declaration. Bypass pumping capability was added during
the repairs. Similar repairs and modifications were made on a planned basis at a sister
station, Fairview. In 2005/06 the main pumps at the Concord Industrial Pumping Station
were replaced because the pumps were badly worn.
Project Description:
The scope of work for this project includes, as examples, the following:
• Addition of control and isolation valves for shutdown and protection of the
stations
• Revisions to control strategies and equipment response times
• Possible protections for pumping stations and equipment, if flooded
• Investigation and installation of "pump around" capabilities
• Development of emergency response procedures and purchasing equipment,
such as "pump- around" pumps and reliability test equipment
• Reconditioning of major pieces of equipment to original factory specifications
• Purchase of large- dollar spare assemblies for major PS equipment
• Other work or equipment requirements that might be defined by the regulating
community, such as the outgrowth of the upcoming Sewer System Management
Plan (SSMP), potential federal CMOM regulations, or as promulgated by the
BAAQMD or the California Air Resources Board
Project Location:
All pumping stations.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-80
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2007 06/30/2017 $752,000
Total: $752,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $75,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $75,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS Equip & Piping Repl / 4
Project Number /Filename: 5941 / PS_Equip
Project Manager /% Expansion: Brennan / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
23,000
23,000
23,000
23,000
23,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
185,000
40,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
65,000
C. Authorized this Year
185,000
63,000
98,000
98,000
98,000
88,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(162,000)
(40,000)
(75,000)
(75,000)
(75,000)
(65,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
23,000
23,000
23,000
23,000
23,000
23,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-81
Pumping Station Safety and Security Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Brennan, Collection Systems Operations
Project Purpose:
This project will provide funding for safety and security - related projects at the District's
pumping stations.
Project History:
The District has very active and aggressive safety programs that are administered by
both department /division committees and a District committee. One of the many
responsibilities of these committees is to address and support solutions for safety and
security concerns as identified by operations or maintenance personnel, and to respond
to changes mandated by ever - changing regulatory requirements in both these sectors.
Recent local and global security and compliance concerns have caused the District to
identify projects that will increase security at pumping station facilities.
Project Description:
This project provides funding to install safety and security improvements in the District's
pumping stations. These projects include miscellaneous upgrades at all pumping
stations.
Project Location:
Potential locations are at all pumping stations.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-82
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning - -
Design 07/01/2001 07/01/2004
Construction 07/01/2004 06/17/2011
Total:
Estimated expenditures this FY are:
Anticipated Allocations this FY are:
Total Cost
$0
$10,000
$60,000
$70,000
$11,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS Safety Improvements / 4
Project Number /Filename: 6162 / PS_Safetylmprvs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Brennan / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over 0 26,000
B. Anticipated Allocations 70,000 0
C. Authorized this Year 70,000
D. Estimated Expenditures (44,000) (5,000) (11,000) (10,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over 26,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-83
0 0
0 0
Pumping Station SCADA O &M Manual
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Bill Brennan, Collection Systems Operation Dept.
Project Purpose:
This project will provide an operations manual for use by the pumping station staff for
SCADA.
Project History:
The Pumping Station SCADA project is complete. Pumping Station staff has been
trained in the use of the system. It is appropriate that, as experience is gained with the
system, an operations manual be prepared to document the operation of the system,
particularly for future staff members.
Project Description:
A consultant will be retained to prepare an operations manual.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
07/01/2009
06/17/2011
Total Cost
$0
$0
$20,000
Total: $20,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $10,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS SCADA O &M Manual / 4
Project Number /Filename: pCS13 / PS_SCADAMan
Project Manager /% Expansion: Brennan / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over 0 0 0
B. Anticipated Allocations 10,000 10,000 0 0 0
C. Authorized this Year 10,000 10,000
D. Estimated Expenditures (10,000) (10,000) 0 0 0 0
E. Estimated Carry -over 0 0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-84
Sleepy Hollow Pumping Station Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Sasha Mestetsky, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to upgrade mechanical and electrical equipment at the
Sleepy Hollow Pumping station in order to prevent sewage overflows, reduce
maintenance, and increase operating efficiency.
Project History:
Sleepy Hollow is a package pumping station. The Pumping Station Master Plan in 1989
identified that this station has antiquated electrical systems that are difficult to maintain.
The mechanical equipment at Sleepy Hollow is over fifty years old and has surpassed
its useful life. The station is located in EBMUD Drinking Watersheds and reliable
operation is critical.
Project Description:
This project will evaluate needed improvements and alternatives for upgrading the
electrical and mechanical equipment at the station. The selected alternative will be
designed and constructed in fiscal year 2009/10. As part of this project, new electrical
and water services will be provided.
Project Location:
Orinda
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-85
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 10/01/2007 06/01/2009 $40,000
Construction 06/01/2009 12/30/2009 $430,000
Total: $470,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $350,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS Sleepy Hollow Upgrades / 4
Project Number /Filename: 5960 / PS_sleepy_hollow
Project Manager /% Expansion: Mestetsky / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
30,000
350,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
50,000
420,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
50,000
450,000
350,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(20,000)
(100,000)
(350,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
30,000
350,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-86
Pumping Stations Emergency Equipment Storage
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Brennan, Operations /Collection System Operations
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to provide storage of emergency equipment
Project History:
As part of the 2006 -2007 equipment budget, the District purchased a six inch trailer
mounted pump and a 40 kilowatt trailer mounted engine generator. These two pieces of
equipment are used for emergency response for PS North. It was originally envisioned
that the hoses and fittings would be stored at each PS. However, the smaller pumping
stations do not have any indoor storage and the hoses degrade when exposed to the
weather.
When this project was originally developed, the PS North staff was headquartered at the
Martinez PS and access to the equipment was impacted by the railroad. Since that time,
the staff has been relocated to the Annex near the HOB.
Project Description:
The scope of work for this project originally included the construction of a shed type
building to store the pump, associated hoses and engine generator. At this time, this
will be reevaluated. Possibly a roof would be sufficient since security is provided by the
guards at the treatment plant and HOB.
Project Location:
The project location is proposed to be at the Annex.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-87
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2009 10/01/2009 $0
Design 10/01/2009 06/01/2010 $0
Construction 06/01/2010 12/17/2010 $19,000
Total: $19,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $9,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $10,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: PS Emergency Equipment Storage / 4
Project Number /Filename: pCS28 / PSEmerg_Equipt
Project Manager /% Expansion: Brennan / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
1,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
10,000
9,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
10,000
10,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(9,000)
(10,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-88
San Ramon Pumping Station Upgrades
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to provide the station and associated force mains with
minor upgrades to facilitate operation and maintenance and to provide emergency
bypass pumps to allow for pumping of dry weather flow during catastrophic pumping
station failure.
Project History:
The San Ramon Pumping Station was constructed in the mid- 1970s. The pump station
underwent a major renovation that included new pumps, refurbishment of existing
pumps, a new standby generator, odor and noise control, a supervisory control and data
acquisition system, architectural and landscape improvements and the installation of a
new 24 -inch force main. Construction on the renovation project was completed in
December of 2004.
Project Description:
• San Ramon Force Main Upgrades - This project will replace the existing cover on
the junction structure at Executive Parkway with a safer, more ergonomic cover.
• San Ramon Portal Upgrades - This project will evaluate the feasibility of
replacing the existing hydraulic gate at the portal with an electric operator.
• Emergency Bypass Pumps - Emergency bypass pumps will be purchased and
connection piping modified to accept these pumps.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-89
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vehicles & Equipment - TAB 1
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2009- 10 ......................... ............................... 4
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2008- 09 ......................... ............................... 5
Management Information Systems - TAB 2
Geographic Data Integration (GDI) Follow -On Applications ...... ............................... 6
GDI—Treatment Plant ............................................................... ............................... 8
Information Technology Development ..................................... ............................... 10
Projects - TAB 3
ADAImprovements ................................................................. ...............................
13
CapitalLegal Services ............................................................. ...............................
15
Capital Improvement Plan and Budget .................................... ...............................
17
CSO Welding Shop Modifications ............................................ ...............................
19
CSOD Administration, Crew, and Warehouse Facility Improvements ...................
21
District Property Safety Improvements .................................... ...............................
23
District Easement Acquisition .................................................. ...............................
25
General Security Access ......................................................... ...............................
27
HHWCF Improvements Program ............................................. ...............................
29
HOBImprovements ................................................................. ...............................
31
Imhoff Triangle Development ................................................... ...............................
33
Kiewit Clean Fill Operation ...................................................... ...............................
35
Martinez Easement Acquisition ............................................... ...............................
37
POD Office Improvements Project ........................................... ...............................
39
Radio System Improvements ................................................... ...............................
41
District Rental Property Improvements .................................... ...............................
43
HOB Seismic Improvements .................................................... ...............................
45
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-1
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
This section includes detailed information for the General Improvements Program.
Table GI -1 presents project listings and detailed budget information. Detailed project
information, schedules, and cash flow tables are presented in individual project data
sheets. These data sheets are found at the appropriately numbered subprogram tab
and are arranged in the same order in which they appear in Table GI -1. The numbered
tabs represent the following:
TAB NO. SUBPROGRAM
1 Vehicles and Equipment
2 Information Systems
3 Projects
OVERVIEW
The General Improvements Program at $10.6 M comprises 26 percent of the total
estimated capital expenditures for FY 2009 -10. The General Improvements Program is
primarily concerned with the property, administrative buildings, and equipment needs of
the District. The Vehicles and Equipment subprogram comprises the items budgeted
and purchased under the annual District Equipment Budget. The Capital Improvement
Budget includes an allowance for the equipment budget. Specific equipment items are
approved through the annual budget process.
The Information Systems subprogram reflects the importance of information technology
in daily operation of the District. The District has developed an Information Technology
Master Plan which envisions implementing specific improvements and extends five
years into the future. In the Capital Improvement Plan, the implementation schedule for
technology improvements has been extended over ten years to meet annual
expenditure targets. An allowance to meet anticipated future information technology
needs has been included in the last five years of the 10 -year Capital Improvement Plan.
The Projects subprogram of the General Improvements Program includes
improvements to the Headquarters Office Building (HOB) and CSOD Facilities, CIB
preparation, easement and right -of -way acquisition, and projects related to District
property improvements.
In FY 2009 -10 and 2010 -11, significant funds are proposed to be spent for the new
facility and yard improvements at CSOD. The Capital Improvement Budget also
includes an estimate for the installation of heaters and other improvements at the
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility. Replacement of worn or outdated
carpeting and furniture in the HOB will also continue through 2009 -10.
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-2
Table GI -1: General Improvements Subprogram /Project List
Management Information Systems
8211
GDI Follow On Applications
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
42,000
Project
Total Project
Allocations
Expenditures
Allocations
Expenditures
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title
Manager
Expenditures
To 06/30/09
To 06/30/09
FY 2009 -10
FY 2009 -10
1Vehicies & Equipment
640,000
675,000
Subprogram Total
5,745,000
9999 Cap Proj Clearing
Vassallo
10,000
0
0
2,000
1,000
8510 Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition
Vassallo
1,000,000
0
0
1,000,000
1,000,000
8509 Vehicles and Equipment
Vassallo
728,000
728,000
727,000
0
1,000
Subprogram Total
Leavitt
1,738,000
728,000
727,000
1,002,000
1,002,000
Management Information Systems
8211
GDI Follow On Applications
Clement
94,000
167,000
52,000
- 73,000
42,000
8227
GDI - Treatment Plant
Clement
500,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
8195
Information Technology Development
Greenawalt
5,151,000
2,517,000
2,476,000
640,000
675,000
Subprogram Total
5,745,000
2,784,000
2,628,000
667,000
817,000
3Projects
8214
ADA Improvements
Lawson
816,000
134,000
115,000
1,000
1,000
8192
Capital Legal Services
Leavitt
643,000
643,000
563,000
0
80,000
8217
Capital Improvement Plan and Budget
Chesler
1,118,000
403,000
348,000
140,000
110,000
pG105
CSO Welding Shop Mods
Lopez
25,000
25,000
17,000
0
8,000
8208
CSOD Facility Improvements
Seitz
18,506,000
1,805,000
1,738,000
16,701,000
7,500,000
8223
District Property Safety Improvements
Musgraves
88,000
30,000
28,000
45,000
15,000
pG106
District Easements
Gronlund
300,000
0
0
75,000
75,000
8207
General Security Access
Musgraves
155,000
60,000
65,000
65,000
45,000
8216
HHW Improvements
Lopez
600,000
125,000
76,000
475,000
500,000
8219
HOB Improvements
Musgraves
855,000
660,000
565,000
195,000
145,000
8225
Imhoff Triangle Development
Musgraves
181,000
181,000
141,000
0
10,000
8210
Kiewit Parcel Development
Musgraves
296,000
209,000
146,000
87,000
30,000
pG104
Martinez Easements
Gronlund
185,000
25,000
25,000
40,000
40,000
8221
POD Office Imprvs
Musgraves
496,000
310,000
306,000
186,000
95,000
8222
Radio Improvements
Rhoads
71,000
91,000
69,000
- 20,000
2,000
8224
Rental Property Improvements
Musgraves
134,000
100,000
61,000
34,000
52,000
8226
HOB Seismic Improvements
Hodges
6,020,000
25,000
0
200,000
110,000
Subprogram Total
30,489,000
4,826,000
4,263,000
18,224,000
8,818,000
Program Total
37,972,000
8,338,000
7,618,000
19,893,000
10,637,000
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-3
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2009 -10
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Thea Vassallo, Administrative /Finance and Accounting
Project Purpose:
To provide the District with safe and cost - effective vehicles and equipment.
Project Description:
This is the District's 2009 -10 capital project for purchase of vehicles and equipment.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
07/01/2009
06/30/2010
Total Cost
$0
$0
$1,000,000
Total: $1,000,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,000,000
Actual expenditures are anticipated to be significantly lower due to reductions
late in the budget process.
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition / 1
Project Number /Filename: 8510 / veh_equipl0
Project Manager /% Expansion: Vassallo / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000,000)
0
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-4
Vehicles and Equipment Acquisition — 2008 -09
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Thea Vassallo, Administrative /Finance and Accounting
Project Purpose:
To provide the District with safe and cost - effective vehicles and equipment.
Project Description:
This is the District's 2008 -09 capital project for purchase of vehicles and equipment.
This project is included in the 2009 -10 Capital Budget in case of late delivery of any
vehicles purchased under this project.
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date
Planning
Design
Construction
07/01/2008
10/17/2009
Total:
Total Cost
$0
$0
$728,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
$728,000
Project Title /Subprogram:
Project Number /Filename:
Project Manager /% Expansion:
Vehicles and Equipment / 1
8509 / veheq_09
Vassallo / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10
2010 -11
2011 -12
2012 -13
2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0 1,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
728,000 0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
728,000 1,000
0
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(727,000) (1,000)
0
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
1,000 0
0
0
0
0
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-5
Geographic Data Integration (GDI) Follow -On Applications
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Clement, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will improve the effectiveness of the GDI program, which integrates data
from Engineering and CSOD by reducing geographic data redundancy and conflicts and
improving data accuracy.
Project History:
The GDI project (DP 8189) integrated and linked databases throughout the District in
such a way that users could more efficiently access and utilize available data.
Databases integrated included a multitude of distinct work group databases that have a
locational component, that is, they can be mapped. These included permit records
(HTE and hard -copy files), Sewer Service Charge (HTE and hard -copy files), Land Base
(HTE), Sewer Maintenance Management System (SMMS), Automated
Mapping /Computer Aided Design /Drafting (AM /CADD), and others. This project has
provided up -to -date 3" aerial photography and 2' contour data for the whole District, and
the ground work for several more specific GDI related capital projects such as GDI -TP
and the GDI /SMMS upgrade.
Project Description:
There are many identified potential application areas, and efforts to enhance the value
of GDI to the District have been ongoing. Creation of standardized data input screens
allow users to become familiar with only one software package with one interface for
both data access and data entry to different applications. Storm sewer data from cities
and the County have been added to GDI as they becomes available. Recorder's office
parcel maps, subdivision maps, and Land Survey maps are currently being readied for
inclusion in GDI to reduce Survey section records research time.
Field crews will find it beneficial to access GDI on a laptop computer in their vehicles.
Potential users include CSO and pumping station maintenance crews, Inspection,
Source Control, and Survey. CSO crew use of GDI has been found to have the biggest
return on investment and the shortest payback time. A pilot project to provide GDI to
CSO field crews has been completed. The pilot project included identifying which data
would be useful to field crews, and programming to put GDI onto field laptops.
Staff will also be evaluating a replacement to GDI's mapguide software and will
concurrently evaluate software replacements for ACCELLA. ACCELLA is the
maintenance scheduling software for the Collection System Operations Department.
The goal is to acquire software that is compatible with GDI. Other ancillary software,
such as hydraulic modeling and Global Positioning, may also be investigated.
Project Location:
District wide.
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-6
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2005 06/30/2010 $94,000
Total: $94,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $42,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: ($73,000)
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: GDI Follow On Applications / 2
Project Number /Filename: 8211 / GDI_follow
Project Manager /% Expansion: Clement / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
157,000
115,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
167,000
0
(73,000)
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
167,000
157,000
42,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(10,000)
(42,000)
(42,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
157,000
115,000
0
0
0
0
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-7
GDI — Treatment Plant
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Bill Clement, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
To improve the effectiveness of Treatment Plant operations and maintenance and
facilitate design of treatment plant projects by providing an interactive map of treatment
plant facilities linked to various existing and proposed data sets. This tool will provide
easier access to varied data sets, reducing geographic data redundancy and conflicts,
and by improving data accuracy. This will improve productivity, reduce costs, and
improve internal and external customer service.
Project History:
The successful implementation of the collection system GDI has indicated that a similar
implementation of a GDI for the treatment plant could provide faster and more efficient
access to existing and /or hard to access asset data. A treatment plant GDI concept has
been developed that can link most of these existing and proposed datasets and allow
user access through a common GDI like interface.
Project Description:
The GDI — Treatment Plant project will implement a geographically based asset
management tool for the treatment plant. The GDI — Treatment Plant will be modeled on
the collection system GDI; mirroring the graphic interface and functionality but
accessing and delivering treatment plant related data sets.
The District currently maintains a multitude of treatment plant work group databases
that have a locational component, that is, they can be mapped. There are a number of
data sets related to the Treatment Plant that are distinct work group databases, are
geographically oriented, and are not currently integrated or linked. These data sets
include Mainsaver, DARS, LIMS, PIMS, PCS, and TP orthophotography.
These databases are not currently integrated or linked in such a way that users can
efficiently share data or have knowledge of the information that is available. As a result,
individual users are maintaining duplicate datasets which contain various levels of
accuracy and completeness. The accuracy and availability of data have a direct impact
on the efficiency and effectiveness of the District and its ability to serve its customers.
Implementation tasks and schedule will be based on linking and /or creating the easiest
data sets first balanced by consideration of biggest ROI. Integration of additional
treatment plant data sets is expected to occur in subsequent phases.
Project Location:
Treatment Plant
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-8
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2008 09/01/2008 $50,000
Design 09/01/2008 07/01/2009 $175,000
Construction 07/01/2009 06/17/2013 $275,000
Total: $500,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $100,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $100,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: GDI - Treatment Plant/ 2
Project Number /Filename: 8227 / GDI_tp
Project Manager /% Expansion: Clement / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(100,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-9
Information Technology Development
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Mark Greenawalt, Administration / Information Technology Administrator
Project Purpose:
An Information Technology Development Plan has been developed by Information
Technology Staff to centralize efforts and funding in the development of computer and
telecommunication technology within the District.
Project History:
Input for the development plan was gathered through information technology survey
results, management project lists, and Information Technology staff, along with
management and staff focus groups. The original master plan, created in 2001,
contained over 50 various projects and policies that were determined by District staff.
Each year, information on technology projects are gathered and updated from District
staff by the Information Technology Administrator, and reviewed by District
Management and the Board of Directors for approval.
Project Description:
Due to competing funding and staffing priorities, the Information Technology
Development Plan expenditure requests are being spread over greater than a 5 -year
time frame. The prioritization of these expenditures will be revisited on an ongoing
basis and some adjustments may be made to allow funding of higher priority projects.
The Information Technology Development project will provide funding for the
development of the following areas:
• PC hardware and software
• District and specialized networks, systems and software applications
• Network infrastructure & security
• Data storage, backups and disaster recovery
• Internet and Intranet development
• Remote access
• Telecommunications improvements
• Information Technology customer service and support
Project Location:
District wide.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-10
2009 -2010 IT Development CIB - Proposed Projects
1.
PC Replacement - Replace approximately 60 PCs /Laptops (4
150,000
yrs old), LCD display screens, network & desktop printers.
2.
Software upgrades — SQL Server & Windows Server 2008
50,000
software upgrades.
3.
Server Replacement — 4 network servers (5 yrs old).
35,000
4.
Virtual Server / SQL Server Redundancy
40,000
5.
SAN Expansion
60,000
6.
Engineering Support Upgrades — Workstations, SQL 2008
license & training, Migration to AutoCad, (2) GDI standalone
100,000
laptops, Mirrored GDI Server
7.
EOC Updates — 12 laptops
25,000
8.
Material Services — Inventory scanning software & wireless
15,000
scanners.
9.
CSO Upgrades - Accela CMMS Improvements, update
35,000
WinCan Video Viewing software
10.
Purchasing — Online Bidding Service — such as Planet Bids, for
25,000
Engineering & Purchasing
11.
Presentation Systems —
• 2nd Conference Room
15,000
• POD Training Room
12.
Engineering Asset Management — NexGen application (runs
25,000
on SQL) and integration with MainSaver
13. Click2Gov Permit Planning Review
20,000
14. Electronic Records & Email Retention policies consultant
10,000
15. Contingency & Project Management
70,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
$675,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-11
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2004 06/30/2014 $5,151,000
Total: $5,151,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $675,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $640,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Information Technology Development/ 2
Project Number /Filename: 8195 / INF_Tech
Project Manager /% Expansion: Greenawalt / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
11,000
41,000
6,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,797,000
720,000
640,000
494,000
500,000
500,000
C. Authorized this Year
1,797,000
731,000
681,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,786,000)
(690,000)
(675,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
(500,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
11,000
41,000
6,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-12
ADA Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Dana Lawson, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
This project will make improvements to District facilities accessed by the general public
to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Project History:
The ADA requires those District facilities open to the public to be accessible. District
facilities accessed by the public include specific areas in the HOB, POB, Laboratory,
HHWCF, and Outdoor Park adjacent to HHWCF. These facilities were constructed at
various times over the last 30 years. While they may have met any accessibility
requirements at the time of their construction, accessibility standards have continued to
change.
In January 2007 an accessibility review was conducted of District facilities and provided
recommended improvements. Improvements were recommended to the interior and
exterior of HOB, POB, Laboratory, HHWCF, and to the Outdoor Park.
Improvements to the exterior of District facilities were made during fiscal year 2007 -08.
Those facilities include HOB visitor parking area, HHWCF and Outdoor Park parking
areas, and Laboratory parking area.
Project Description:
The project will design and construct accessibility to the interiors and exteriors of District
facilities accessed by the public. Scope items include mostly improvements to the
interior of HOB and POB:
• Providing an accessible path of travel to the Multi- Purpose Room in POB
• Accessibility improvements to the Board Room
• Improvements to the HOB first floor restrooms to meet current standards
• Improvements to the reception and permit counters
The exterior improvements have been completed. The interior improvements have been
designed, and need to be bid and constructed. The interior remodels will include
recycled steel bathroom partitions and recycled glass countertops for Reception and
Permit areas. In addition, updated shower and locker facilities will be provided in the
Annex (the old animal control facility) and the exterior of the HOB will be caulked to
prevent intrusion of rainwater. Construction of this project may be accelerated.
Project Location:
Headquarters Office Building, Plant Operations Building, Annex (old Animal Control
facility), Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility, Laboratory, Outdoor Park
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-13
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $116,000
Construction 01/01/2007 01/01/2011 $700,000
Total: $816,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $1,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $1,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: ADA Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8214 / ADA_Imprvs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lawson / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
(5,000)
19,000
19,000
19,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
0
115,000
19,000
1,000
681,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
0
110,000
38,000
20,000
700,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(5,000)
(91,000)
(19,000)
(1,000)
(700,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
(5,000)
19,000
19,000
19,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-14
Capital Legal Services
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Russell Leavitt, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To streamline the processing of legal bills.
Project History:
In the past, legal expenses were charged to individual capital projects. This required
extra staff time each month to review legal bills and get approvals from several different
project managers.
Project Description:
Capital legal service expenses are no longer charged to individual capital projects.
Instead, one capital account with four charge numbers is being used for capital legal
expenses from Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements, and
Recycled Water Program projects. This change has relieved the Engineering
Department's project managers from having to code the legal bill with project account
numbers each month. This process also reduces the amount of time all parties must
spend processing the legal bill.
Projects for which the District will receive reimbursement still have legal expense
charges coded directly to those projects. Examples of such projects are HHW and any
future Caltrans- related projects.
Engineering Department Operations and Maintenance legal expenses are charged to
Environmental Services Division accounts, since this division generates most of these
expenses.
Project Location:
Not applicable.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-15
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 11/20/2000 06/30/2011 $643,000
Design - - $0
Construction 06/30/2011 06/17/2010 $0
Total: $643,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $80,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Capital Legal Services / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8192 / CapLegal
Project Manager /% Expansion: Leavitt / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
94,000
80,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
577,000
66,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
577,000
160,000
80,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(483,000)
(80,000)
(80,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
94,000
80,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-16
Capital Improvement Plan and Budget
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Gail Chesler, PhD, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
This project provides for the capitalization of a portion of the staff time necessary for the
data gathering and production of the District's Capital Improvement Budget and Capital
Improvement Plan document.
Project History:
Custom software is used to create and maintain a project database to hold budget
information on the District's present and planned capital projects and produce the
annual budget and plan. A number of interim reports are also produced.
Project Description:
Facility planning and master planning have traditionally been capital activities. It is
appropriate that the resources required to produce the District's overarching planning
document, the CIB /CIP, also be classified as capital expenditures. Staff time charged to
this capital project will be mainly from the capital improvement budget coordinator.
Other costs include printing of the actual CIP /CIB documents.
Opportunities to streamline the process will be identified and implemented, as well as
new ways sought to present the information through the year to increase its clarity and
usefulness to staff and management in capital planning processes.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-17
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2006 06/30/2015 $1,118,000
Design 06/30/2015 01/30/2016 $0
Construction 01/30/2016 06/30/2016 $0
Total: $1,118,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $110,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $140,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Capital Improvement Plan and Budget/ 3
Project Number /Filename: 8217 / CIB_CIP
Project Manager /% Expansion: Chesler / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
27,000
12,000
55,000
85,000
95,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
150,000
100,000
153,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
C. Authorized this Year
150,000
127,000
165,000
195,000
205,000
195,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(123,000)
(115,000)
(110,000)
(110,000)
(110,000)
(110,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
27,000
12,000
55,000
85,000
95,000
85,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-18
CSO Welding Shop Modifications
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Edgar Lopez, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to upgrade the welding facilities at the CSO Vehicle Shop
in Walnut Creek. This project will investigate the aging heating and ventilation
equipment within the shop area, especially as it relates to indoor welding code
compliance. Adding fire sprinklers to the building shall also be included under this
project.
Project History:
This project was originally part of the CSOD Facility Modifications Project. The existing
welding shop is located within the outdoor bays adjacent to the Vehicle Maintenance
building. Although the existing facility is adequate for welding during the summer time,
high winds and rainfall contribute to difficult or non - workable conditions during the winter
months. Modifying the Vehicle Maintenance shop to allow for indoor welding will
improve working conditions.
Project Description:
The preliminary design will start immediately. The project is anticipated to be designed
in 2009 depending on building or fire code requirements. Miscellaneous minor
improvements to the Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility may also be
coordinated and pursued with this project.
Project Location:
CSO Facility, Walnut Creek
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-19
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 03/01/2008 07/01/2008 $10,000
Design - - $15,000
Construction 07/01/2008 10/17/2009 $0
Total: $25,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $8,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: CSO Welding Shop Mods / 3
Project Number /Filename: pG105 / CSO_Weld
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lopez / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
16,000
8,000
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
16,000
8,000
0
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(9,000)
(8,000)
(8,000)
0
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
16,000
8,000
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-20
CSOD Administration, Crew, and Warehouse
Facility Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Paul Seitz, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
The project will make improvements to the Collection Systems Operations Department
(CSOD) corporation yard structures to accommodate current and future needs.
Project History:
The CSOD administration and crew building was originally constructed as the District's
headquarters office building and was not designed for its current use as a collection
systems operations building. The administration and crew building, warehouse, and
corporation yard facilities have reached an age and condition where significant
rehabilitation, upgrading, and replacement are needed. In addition, CSOD staffing has
increased to meet District growth and increasing regulatory demands and additional
space is needed. Overall, the existing CSO facilities do not meet the current and future
needs of the District.
In 2006, the District completed a comprehensive evaluation of alternatives to address
deficiencies. The best alternative was found to be construction of a new administration,
crew, and warehouse building at the location of the existing warehouse. This alternative
allows the existing administration and crew building to remain in operation until the new
facilities are constructed, which minimizes impacts to operations. A supplementary
project was completed during fiscal year 2006/07 that expanded the crew vehicle
parking area under the freeway overpass adjacent to the CSOD yard and replaced the
failing retaining wall. The old Ducca house was also removed at that time.
Project Description:
The District approved the mitigated negative declaration in December 2007. The
project consists of design and construction of a new CSO administration, crew, and
warehouse building. The project also includes site improvements such as new paving
and landscaping. Prior to construction, the District must obtain permits from the City of
Walnut Creek, and address any City requirements. The project is expected to be
completed in spring 2011. This project has been submitted by the District as a
candidate for stimulus funding.
Project Location:
CSOD Facility, Walnut Creek.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-21
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date
Completion Date
Total Cost
Planning 01/01/2004
02/01/2007
$995,600
Design 02/01/2007
07/01/2009
$1,929,400
Construction 07/01/2009
04/30/2012
$14,800,000
Total: $17,725,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $7,500,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $16,701,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: CSOD Facility Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8208 / csoFaclmpry
Project Manager /% Expansion: Seitz / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
287,000
67,000
9,268,000
50,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
1,305,000
500,000
15,920,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
1,305,000
787,000
15,987,000
9,268,000
50,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,018,000)
(720,000)
(7,500,000)
(8,437,000)
(50,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
287,000
67,000
9,268,000
50,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-22
District Property Safety Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
To implement projects necessary to meet worker health and safety requirements.
Project History:
Each year a number of urgent safety improvements are made to District facilities and
equipment. These improvements generally are triggered by equipment failures,
accidents and near misses. Improvements also are made based on results of safety
audits and suggestions received by the District's Safety Committee and the various
department -level safety teams. The issues addressed in any given year vary widely in
scope and location.
Project Description:
This project is a multi -year program to install safety improvements. The project
encompasses safety improvements to the District's buildings, surrounding parking lots
and grounds, District -owned buffer properties, general use vehicles and equipment, and
other safety improvements that are not included in treatment plant or collection system
projects. Studies of workstation ergonomics may require the purchase of furniture
and /or equipment to address identified issues.
Project Location:
Improvements could be made on any of the District -owned properties or easements
including the treatment plant, CSO office and yard, pumping stations or buffer
properties. The specific locations will be determined throughout the course of the
project.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-23
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2013 $88,000
Total: $88,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $15,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $45,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: District Property Safety Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8223 / DistPropSafety
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
17,000
2,000
32,000
17,000
2,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
30,000
0
45,000
0
0
13,000
C. Authorized this Year
30,000
17,000
47,000
32,000
17,000
15,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(13,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
17,000
2,000
32,000
17,000
2,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-24
District Easement Acquisition
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Stephanie Gronlund, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To perfect or acquire new property land rights for existing or new sanitary sewers that
are located on private properties and are not associated with a current capital project for
sewer renovation work.
Project History:
As capital projects are designed, sanitary sewer easements may have to be acquired
through budgets for those specific projects. This project provides funds for the
acquisition of easements for projects where specific funds are not identified in the
Capital Improvement Budget (CIB).
Project Description:
Easements that may be acquired through this project are:
• Locations where easements need to be purchased for existing sewers
• Sewers that need upgraded easement rights or access rights
• Sewers relocated through other public agency projects
• Outfall Easement Upgrade Project
• Recycled Water Program
Projects included in the Collection System Renovation Program have funds budgeted
specifically for right of way acquisition.
Project Location:
District -wide.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-25
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $300,000
Construction 01/01/2010 06/17/2013 $0
Total: $300,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $75,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $75,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: District Easements / 3
Project Number /Filename: pG106 / distr_ easements
Project Manager /% Expansion: Gronlund / 0
2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(75,000)
(75,000)
(75,000)
(75,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-26
General Security Access
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
Improve public and employee safety, meet reliability /safety standards, reduce the
District's exposure to liability, reduce loss of District's property, and reduce Operations
and Maintenance expenses.
Project History:
The District has experienced property losses in the past and improvements to the
security system are continually identified and refined. Also, the current national security
situation may soon require additional security measures for essential public services.
Project Description:
This project will improve the security of the public and District personnel and property.
This project could include, but would not be limited to installing alarm systems at critical
sites on District property, adding gates in the perimeter security fencing to allow more
efficient access for District personnel and equipment, upgrading security cameras,
improving general area lighting, fencing and signage. This project focuses on non -
Treatment Plant (including Collection System Operation facilities) security
improvements. Treatment Plant security projects are budgeted under the Treatment
Plant Program to clarify billing for reimbursement by the City of Concord.
Project Location:
District properties.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-27
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2013 $155,000
Total: $155,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $45,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $65,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: General Security Access / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8207 / GenSec
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
(25,000)
(5,000)
15,000
30,000
15,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
20,000
40,000
65,000
30,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
20,000
15,000
60,000
45,000
30,000
15,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(45,000)
(20,000)
(45,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
(25,000)
(5,000)
15,000
30,000
15,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-28
HHWCF Improvements Program
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Edgar J. Lopez, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
The project purpose is to make improvements to the interior and exterior of the
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility (HHWCF) that will increase efficiency
and utilization of the facility.
Project History:
The HHWCF was completed in 1997. There is an ongoing need to renovate or
reconfigure operational and storage space to match evolving needs, to replace outdated
or worn -out furniture, and to incorporate new technologies and processes to improve
safety and efficiencies.
Project Description:
This multi -year program will provide an allowance over the next ten years to renovate
and upgrade the interior and exterior of the HHWCF. Anticipated interior and exterior
projects include installing radiant heaters in the laboratory area, paving and re- striping
the parking lot, installing a dust collection system, expanding the west storage area to
accommodate increased participation. When specific projects are identified, separate
project budgets, including labor, equipment, and materials will be established in the CIB.
Phase 1 of this program, Project No. 8216, will include several interior improvements to
accommodate safety concerns and the increase in staff. This project will expand the
interior office space, reconstruct the service counter to met ADA compliance, install
security cameras, replace railings, improve the flooring conditions, and add heaters.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-29
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 06/01/2007 07/01/2007 $26,000
Design 07/01/2007 10/01/2007 $50,000
Construction 10/01/2007 06/17/2011 $524,000
Total: $600,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $500,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $475,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: HHW Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8216 / HHWIMP
Project Manager /% Expansion: Lopez / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
19,000
49,000
49,000
24,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
50,000
50,000
475,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
69,000
99,000
524,000
24,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(6,000)
(20,000)
(50,000)
(500,000)
(24,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
19,000
49,000
49,000
24,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-30
HOB Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
This project will renovate portions of the interior and exterior of the Headquarters Office
Building (HOB).
Project History:
The HOB was completed in 1983. After 26 years of use, the interior needs upgrading.
This multi -year project will provide an allowance to renovate and upgrade the interior
and exterior of the HOB offices. Anticipated projects include conditioning and painting
of the exterior, renovation of interior wall finishes and ceilings, replacement of the
flooring and carpeting, upgrading of electrical and lighting systems, reconfigurations of
offices and workstations, and upgrading of kitchens and lunch areas. Changes are
needed to bring the building's interior and exterior into compliance with the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. In addition, structural improvements may
need to be made to accommodate interior office changes or comply with seismic
building codes.
Project Description:
Under this project, the HOB interior walls will be painted, repaired or replaced, along
with the replacement of damaged ceiling tiles, and carpeting. Interior and exterior
changes will be made to bring the building into compliance with ADA requirements.
Improvements will also be made to resist inclement weather.
Project Location:
Headquarters Office Building.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-31
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 07/01/2006 10/01/2006 $150,000
Design 10/01/2006 03/01/2007 $135,000
Construction 03/01/2007 06/17/2011 $570,000
Total: $855,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $145,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $195,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: HOB Improvements/ 3
Project Number /Filename: 8219 / HOB_imprvs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
190,000
80,000
95,000
145,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
225,000
275,000
160,000
195,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
225,000
465,000
240,000
290,000
145,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(35,000)
(385,000)
(145,000)
(145,000)
(145,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
190,000
80,000
95,000
145,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-32
Imhoff Triangle Development
Project Manager, Department/Division:
Randy Musgraves /Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to develop the District's buffer property located on Imhoff
Drive.
Project History:
The District declared this land surplus on August 9, 2007. Prospective lessees have
shown interest, but before the land can be leased, various surveys and permitting will
be required along with culverting a seasonal channel that bisects the property. This
property serves as a buffer zone between the treatment plant /Household Hazardous
Waste Collection Facility and nearby residential and commercial neighborhoods.
Project Description:
This project will be a multi -year program for initial development costs associated with
the triangular property located off of Imhoff Drive. The scope of work that will be
accomplished with this allocation includes: a) engineering services connected with the
rerouting or relocation of the seasonal creek bed, b) other in -house engineering
services, and c) in -house survey services.
Project Location:
The triangular property is approximately 1.1 acres and is located south of Imhoff Drive
and northwest of the District's Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-33
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $1,000
Design - - $140,000
Construction 12/15/2007 06/17/2013 $40,000
Total: $181,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Imhoff Triangle Development/ 3
Project Number /Filename: 8225 / Imhoff_tri
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
114,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
115,000
66,000
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
115,000
180,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(1,000)
(140,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
114,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-34
Kiewit Clean Fill Operation
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
This project will bring clean fill to the Kiewit parcel and will raise the elevation
approximately five feet.
Project History:
The Kiewit property was purchased by CCCSD from the Kiewit Construction Group in
1981. It lies to the east of the CCCSD treatment plant site. The site is approximately a
33 -acre, polygon shaped piece of land bounded by Imhoff Drive on the north, Highway 4
on the south, Walnut Creek Flood Control Channel on the east and Grayson Creek on
the west. The site has been used as a buffer zone around the treatment plant.
Project Description:
As available sites for disposal of clean fill within central Contra Costa County have
diminished, the District has an opportunity to use the Kiewit property as a source of
revenue by leasing it as a clean fill site. County Quarry was contracted with to oversee
the leasing agreement and operate the clean fill for an anticipated net revenue of
$1,000,000 over five years. During the operation, staff, and possibly the District's
environmental consultants, will be required to review, analyze and /or validate County
Quarry's data for permits, hazardous materials testing, grading, drainage or compaction.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-35
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 09/01/2004 07/01/2005 $206,000
Construction 07/01/2005 06/17/2013 $90,000
Total: $296,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $30,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $87,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Kiewit Parcel Development / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8210 / Kiewit
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
Prior to 7/01/08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
93,000
63,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
209,000
0
87,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
209,000
93,000
150,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(116,000)
(30,000)
(30,000)
(30,000)
(30,000)
(60,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
93,000
63,000
120,000
90,000
60,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-36
Martinez Easement Acquisition
Project Manager and Department/Division:
Stephanie Gronlund, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
Over the next ten ten years the District will be renovating or replacing many of the older
sewer pipes within the City of Martinez. This project will acquire approximately 125
missing or insufficient sewer easements required to support this planned renovation
work. The City of Martinez will reimburse CCCSD for the costs associated with
acquisition of these easements.
Project History:
CCCSD became responsible for the City of Martinez sewers pursuant to an Annexation
Agreement dated September 13, 1967. Under this agreement, the City agreed to the
annexation and to transfer ownership and responsibility for existing sewer facilities to
CCCSD. One of the conditions is that the City would convey adequate easements, fee
title or other property rights for the sewers and other facilities that were transferred to
CCCSD. Also the agreement further stated that in the event that it later appeared that
the City did not possess all such necessary easements, the District will acquire the
same and that all cost for acquisition will be paid for by the City of Martinez.
Project Description:
Easements that may be acquired through this project are:
• Locations where easements need to be purchased for existing sewers
• Sewers that need upgraded easement rights or access rights
Project Location:
City of Martinez
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-37
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $185,000
Design - - $0
Construction 12/01/2008 06/17/2013 $0
Total: $185,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $40,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $40,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Martinez Easements / 3
Project Number /Filename: pG104 / mtz_easements
Project Manager /% Expansion: Gronlund / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(25,000)
(40,000)
(40,000)
(40,000)
(40,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-38
POD Office Improvements Project
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves, Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
The project purpose is to make improvements to the interior and exterior of the Plant
Operations Department (POD) Administration offices.
Project History:
The POD Administration building and offices are over 30 years old. There is an ongoing
need to renovate or reconfigure office and workstation space to match employee needs
and duties, to replace outdated or worn out furniture, and to incorporate new office
technologies.
Project Description:
This multi -year project will provide an allowance to renovate and upgrade the interior
and exterior of the POD Administration offices. Anticipated projects include conditioning
and painting of the exterior, renovation of interior wall finishes and ceilings, replacement
of the flooring and carpeting, upgrading of electrical and lighting systems,
reconfigurations of offices and workstations, and upgrading of kitchens and lunch areas.
Exterior improvements that may be undertaken include replacement of sidewalks,
retaining walls, light fixtures, and landscaping. When specific projects are identified,
separate project budgets, including labor, equipment, and materials for small office
renovations, will be established in the CIB.
Project Location:
The location of the proposed improvements will be in the POD Administration and POD
Maintenance and Reliability Center.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-39
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $150,000
Design 10/01/2006 11/01/2006 $135,000
Construction 11/01/2006 06/17/2011 $211,000
Total: $496,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $95,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $186,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: POD Office Imprvs / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8221 / POD_imprvs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
6,000
199,000
4,000
95,000
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
20,000
290,000
0
186,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
20,000
296,000
199,000
190,000
95,000
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(14,000)
(97,000)
(195,000)
(95,000)
(95,000)
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
6,000
199,000
4,000
95,000
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-40
Radio System Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Don Rhoads, Operations /Collection System Operations
Project Purpose:
To enhance the District's emergency communications system by converting to the new
Contra Costa County vendor supported UHF radio system.
Project History:
Several years ago the District adopted Nextel as its primary means of communication.
At that time the existing radio system, which uses some Contra Costa County owned
sites for repeaters, was relegated to backup status for use in an emergency event. The
decision to move to Nextel was prompted by the poor coverage area of the District's
radio system, which made it unreliable for the daily operation. The current system,
which is a low -band system, has become less reliable since the changeover to Nextel,
with no upgrades to its technology or improvements to its coverage area.
It has been projected that Nextel communications will be unavailable during a major
emergency.
Contra Costa County has been pursuing various options to create a countywide radio
system that would allow public agencies, including police and fire, to interact with each
other during emergencies. The County has thus far been unable to implement a full
countywide system and there is nothing on the immediate horizon. Instead they have
contracted with an outside vendor (Fisher Wireless) to provide a reliable UHF radio
system for the County or other agencies within the County to use. The funds have been
used to purchase the radios needed to work on this system and to install those mounted
in buildings and vehicles. Thus far the District has purchased 65 handheld, 24 vehicle -
mounted, and 5 base station radios. Once the District has conducted drills of their
emergency management plan additional radio needs might come to light requiring the
purchase of more radios or enhancement of those already owned.
Project Description:
This project has been used to migrate from the District's antiquated low -band radio
system to a vendor supplied UHF T -Band technology radio system in concert with the
County.
Project Location:
Handheld radios for distribution during and emergency event and various locations
throughout the District's service area in buildings and vehicles.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-41
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 06/11/2007 04/30/2008 $0
Construction 04/30/2008 06/17/2010 $71,000
Total: $71,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $2,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: ($20,000)
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Radio Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8222 / Radiolmprovs
Project Manager /% Expansion: Rhoads / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
91,000
90,000
22,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
91,000
0
0
(20,000)
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
91,000
91,000
90,000
2,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
0
(1,000)
(68,000)
(2,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
91,000
90,000
22,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-42
District Rental Property Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Randy Musgraves /Administrative Department
Project Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to protect and enhance the District's rental property
through additions, improvements, betterments, replacements, and extraordinary repairs.
Project History:
The District has owned the property at 4849 Imhoff Place since November 1999. The
property was leased to Contra Costa County for the Animal Services operation for many
years, and is currently used to house District employees displaced by the work being
done in the HOB, and will be used as rental property when that work is complete. The
District has owned the property at 4737 Imhoff Place since May 1991. This property is
currently rented to several commercial tenants. Both properties serve as a buffer zone
between the treatment plant and nearby residential and commercial neighborhoods.
Project Description:
This will be a multi -year project to install needed improvements to the District's rental
properties, surrounding parking lots and grounds. These improvements would
commonly be triggered by equipment or building failure, or a need to improve the
property. A five -year improvement plan has been developed and will be reviewed at
least annually identifying future needed projects.
Project Location:
Improvements could be made on any of the District -owned rental properties including
4737 Imhoff Place and 4849 Imhoff Place.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-43
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2013 $134,000
Total: $134,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $52,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $34,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Rental Property Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8224 / RentalProp
Project Manager /% Expansion: Musgraves / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
59,000
39,000
21,000
14,000
7,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
100,000
0
34,000
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
100,000
59,000
73,000
21,000
14,000
7,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(41,000)
(20,000)
(52,000)
(7,000)
(7,000)
(7,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
59,000
39,000
21,000
14,000
7,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-44
District Building Seismic Improvements
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Nathan Hodges, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
Evaluate District buildings for conformance to the latest seismic design codes and
develop improvement options.
Project History:
Since the construction of the treatment plant facilities in the 5A project there have been
a number of seismic projects to maintain treatment plant structures with the latest
building codes. In January 2008, a new California building code was adopted that
includes significant changes to seismic design standards. In 2008 -09, structural
evaluations on the HOB, 4737 warehouse building, and the plant operations building
were completed.
Project Description:
This project will review most major treatment plant structures, all major pumping
stations, the HHW facility, and the CSO vehicle shop. Feasibility of improvements and
options for rehabilitation will be developed. Work will include detailed structural analysis
to assess each building's current expected performance and to model rehabilitation
options. The scope of work may range from minor structural modifications to substantial
modifications to a building's structure.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-45
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/16/2008 08/01/2009 $220,000
Construction 08/01/2009 06/17/2012 $5,800,000
Total: $6,020,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $110,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $200,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: HOB Seismic Improvements / 3
Project Number /Filename: 8226 / seismic_improv
Project Manager /% Expansion: Hodges / 0
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14
A. Current Carry -over
0
25,000
115,000
5,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
200,000
0
5,795,000
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
225,000
115,000
5,800,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
0
(110,000)
(110,000)
(5,800,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
25,000
115,000
5,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP GI-46
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 06/01/2009 $18,000
Construction 06/01/2009 09/30/2009 $267,000
Total: $285,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $10,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: San Ramon Pumping Station Upgrades / 4
Project Number /Filename: 5943 / SRPS_Up
Project Manager /% Expansion: Antkowiak / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
283,000
267,000
10,000
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
285,000
0
0
0
0
0
C. Authorized this Year
285,000
283,000
267,000
10,000
0
0
D. Estimated Expenditures
(2,000)
(16,000)
(257,000)
(10,000)
0
0
E. Estimated Carry -over
283,000
267,000
10,000
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP CS-90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Urban Landscaping - TAB 1
Zone1 Recycled Water ............................................................. ............................... 5
Recycled Water Planning .......................................................... ............................... 7
Cathodic Protection System Replacement - ReW ..................... ............................... 9
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 1
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
This section includes detailed information for the Recycled Water Program.
Table RW -1 presents project listings and detailed budget information. Detailed project
information, schedules, and cash flow tables are presented in individual project data
sheets.
OVERVIEW
The District purveys over 200 million gallons per year of recycled water to about 30
customers located within the Zone One service area for landscape irrigation and
commercial uses. These customers are located along the Interstate 680 corridor in
Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez. The District also uses about 400 million gallons
per year at the treatment plant for process water and landscape irrigation. The
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) encourages the District to expand its
recycled water program, and activities must be reported annually to the RWQCB.
The Recycled Water Program, at $550,000, represents 1.4 percent of the total
estimated capital expenditures for FY 2009 -10. The major emphasis of the Recycled
Water Program for the next fiscal year will be pursuing development of a large industrial
re -use project. The District will also continue efforts to add new cost - effective
customers in the District's Zone One service area, and pursue outside funding
assistance, such as federal and state grants.
URBAN LANDSCAPING
In FY2008 -09, the District continued efforts to develop new cost - effective recycled water
customers in the Zone 1 Project area and initiated a pre- design study to add nine new
landscape irrigation customers. In response to the current drought, the District also
began a truck fill program to make recycled water available to contractors through a
recycled water hydrant located near the Buchanan Field Airport. In January 2009, the
District completed a joint study with EBMUD to evaluate construction of a satellite
recycled water treatment plant in Moraga to supply recycled water to the Moraga
Country Club and several nearby parks and schools. The District is pursuing federal
grant funding for the Concord Recycled Water Project (formerly the "A -Line Recycled
Water Project ") to connect approximately forty landscape irrigation customers in the
Diamond /Meridian Boulevard area near the 1 -680 freeway. In addition, the District has
submitted the project for stimulus funding. No expenditures are currently budgeted for
this project.
INDUSTRIAL
In FY 2008 -09, the District renewed efforts to develop a large -scale industrial recycled
water project that would provide a year -round demand for recycled water. In
partnership with east county agencies, the District completed a study to evaluate using
recycled water for cooling towers at new power plants proposed for Antioch and
Pittsburg. Due to the limited availability of recycled water supplies from east county
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 2
agencies, these potential projects could provide opportunities for the District to supply
recycled water for industrial use if new base load power plants were constructed
requiring large quantities of cooling water. The District independently completed a
feasibility study to evaluate locating a new power plant at the District's treatment plant
site, which appeared to be a promising location when the need for additional power
arises.
The continuing drought in California and concerns about the long -term reliability of Delta
water supplies prompted the District to begin discussions with the Shell and Tesoro
refineries about providing recycled water for cooling towers and boiler feedwater. The
refineries are an ideal application for recycled water because of their continuous, year -
round need for water and because recycled water pipelines from the District's treatment
plant already exist. During FY 2009 -10, the District will focus efforts on obtaining
legislative support for the refinery project to help address the duplication of services
charges by the Contra Costa Water District and to obtain outside funding assistance.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RIN - 3
Table RW -1: Recycled Water Subprogram /Project List
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 4
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Anticipated
Estimated
Project
Total Project
Allocations
Expenditures
Allocations
Expenditures
Subprogram / Project No. / Project Title
Manager
Expenditures
To 06/30/09
To 06/30/09
FY 2009 -10
FY 2009 -10
1Urban Landscaping
7194 Zone 1 Recycled Water- ph 1C
Berger
1,546,000
699,000
526,000
340,000
340,000
7259 Recycled Water Planning
Berger
1,644,000
83,000
83,000
205,000
205,000
7261 RW - Cathodic Prot Sys Repl
Antkowiak
45,000
25,000
10,000
0
5,000
Subprogram Total
3,235,000
807,000
619,000
545,000
550,000
Program Total
3,235,000
807,000
619,000
545,000
550,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 4
Zone 1 Recycled Water
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Don Berger, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To develop and implement a project to provide recycled water for landscape irrigation
and other identified uses in the Zone 1 Project area, which includes Pleasant Hill and
portions of Concord and Martinez near the 1 -680 freeway.
Project History:
In October 2001, the District completed the Zone 1 Implementation Plan that provided
estimated connection costs and revenues for customers identified in the CCWD Zone 1
Project Agreement. Depending on the extent of use, demand for recycled water in
Zone 1 for landscape irrigation and commercial uses could be up to 400 million gallons
per year. A recycled water distribution main for the Zone 1 area was constructed as
part of the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor project to take advantage of cost - saving
opportunities. The District currently operates about 11 miles of recycled water
distribution pipelines and supplies over 200 million gallons per year to about thirty
recycled water customers. New customers will continue to be added to the system
where technically and economically feasible.
Project Description:
This project provides funds for the planning, design, and construction of recycled water
facilities for landscape irrigation customers and other identified uses in the Zone 1
Project area.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 5
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning 06/01/2007 07/01/2007 $136,600
Design - - $0
Construction 07/01/2007 06/17/2012 $1,409,400
Total: $1,546,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $340,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $340,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Zone 1 Recycled Water - ph 1 C / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7194 / RECWAZ
Project Manager /% Expansion: Berger / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
0
173,000
173,000
173,000
173,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
52,000
307,000
340,000
340,000
340,000
167,000
C. Authorized this Year
52,000
307,000
513,000
513,000
513,000
340,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(52,000)
(134,000)
(340,000)
(340,000)
(340,000)
(340,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
0
173,000
173,000
173,000
173,000
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RIN - 6
Recycled Water Planning
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Don Berger, Engineering /Environmental Services
Project Purpose:
To develop and implement a comprehensive long -term Recycled Water Program that
provides recycled water for landscape irrigation, industrial reuse, and other feasible
applications.
Project History:
The District has worked with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) and the East Bay
Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) on various recycled water feasibility studies over the
years. In 2000, the District's Recycled Water Master Plan was completed. It identified
potential recycled water customers and demands for irrigation and industrial uses
throughout the District. Costs and benefits were developed for various recycled water
projects.
Recent planning efforts have focused on evaluating the use of recycled water at
potential new power plants in the area; developing a refinery recycled water project; and
evaluating use of a satellite treatment facility to provide recycled water to landscape
irrigation customers in Moraga.
The proposed development of the Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS) property
provides an excellent opportunity to expand recycled water use. A master planning
study will be completed to quantify potential recycled water demands at CNWS and
determine how recycled water service could best be provided, either via satellite
treatment facilities or a new distribution pipeline from the District's treatment plant in
Martinez.
Project Description:
This project provides funds for planning studies related to the development of the
District's recycled water program with particular emphasis on developing a project to
provide recycled water to the Shell and Tesoro refineries. This year's planning will
focus on evaluating ways to remove the institutional and financial barriers to an
industrial recycled water project. This project will also address implementation issues
such as funding, State and Federal regulations, public education, and gaining political
support from federal, state, and local agencies.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 7
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $1,644,000
Design - - $0
Construction 01/01/2008 06/17/2017 $0
Total: $1,644,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $205,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $205,000
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: Recycled Water Planning / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7259 / REW_Planning
Project Manager /% Expansion: Berger / 0
2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13
A. Current Carry -over
0
37,000
0
0
0
0
B. Anticipated Allocations
60,000
23,000
205,000
205,000
205,000
205,000
C. Authorized this Year
60,000
60,000
205,000
205,000
205,000
205,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(23,000)
(60,000)
(205,000)
(205,000)
(205,000)
(205,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
37,000
0
0
0
0
0
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RIN - 8
Cathodic Protection System Replacement - ReW
Project Manager, Department /Division:
Andrew Antkowiak, Engineering /Capital Projects
Project Purpose:
A master plan for treatment plant, reclaimed water and collection systems cathodic
protection was prepared in 2006/07. Based on the master plan, adequate cathodic
protection on all reclaimed water facilities will be provided by replacing existing
expended facilities and installing new systems where required.
Project History:
To extend the useful life of the District reclaimed water facilities, structures and
pipelines, cathodic protection systems need to be monitored and maintained. Recently
a cathodic protection survey of the reclaimed water system was performed and
identified facilities that needed replacement and improvements over next five -year
period. The report also identified existing facilities requiring further investigations. The
current project will implement high priority recommendations from the master plan.
Other less urgent improvements will be scheduled for renovation in the future years.
Project Description:
Based on the recommendations from the master plan, cathodic protection systems that
are not providing adequate protection will be repaired and /or replaced, and any other
facilities that may require cathodic protection will be identified. It is anticipated that
some systems may require refurbishment in the near future.
Project Location:
Throughout the recycled water distribution system.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 9
Project Schedule and Cost:
Start Date Completion Date Total Cost
Planning - - $0
Design 07/01/2006 02/01/2007 $45,000
Construction 02/01/2007 06/01/2016 $0
Total: $45,000
Estimated expenditures this FY are: $5,000
Anticipated Allocations this FY are: $0
Project Fiscal Year Allocation /Expenditure Table:
Project Title /Subprogram: RW - Cathodic Prot Sys Repl / 1
Project Number /Filename: 7261 / RW_ cathodic
Project Manager /% Expansion: Antkowiak / 0
2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12
A. Current Carry -over
0
21,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
15,000
B. Anticipated Allocations
25,000
0
0
0
10,000
0
C. Authorized this Year
25,000
21,000
20,000
15,000
20,000
15,000
D. Estimated Expenditures
(4,000)
(1,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
E. Estimated Carry -over
21,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
15,000
10,000
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP RW - 10
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TEN YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Purpose
A -2
General Description
Table A -2
Capital Improvement Program Goals
A -3
Programs
A -3
Potential Future Projects Not Included in 2009 CIP
A -6
Cash Flow Analysis
A -13
Capital Improvement Revenue Sources
A -8
Financial Principles
A -9
Cash Flow Projection
A -9
Sewer Construction Fund Balance
A -11
Summary
A -12
Compliance with CEQA
A -15
Specific Projects Over Ten -Year Plan
A -15
List of Tables
Table A -1
Ten -Year Program /Subprogram Summary
A -5
Table A -2
Potential Future Projects Not Included in 2009 CIP
A -6
Table A -3
Capital Improvement Program Revenue Sources
A -8
Table A -4
Sewer Construction Fund Cash Flow
A -13
Table A -5
Cash Flow Assumptions
A -14
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -1
2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TEN YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2019
PURPOSE
The District is responsible for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater for a
population of approximately 451,900 in central Contra Costa County. The District has
developed a ten -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the District's capital facilities
and financing needs. The CIP is updated every year. Specifically, the plan identifies
and prioritizes capital projects needed to accomplish the District's mission'. It also
includes cost estimates for proposed project work and projections for the various
sources of revenue needed to meet the cash flow requirements of the CIP.
The principal purpose of the CIP is to provide the District's Board of Directors with the
information needed to formulate long -range policy regarding:
Priority and Schedule — identify, prioritize, and schedule the projects necessary
to accomplish the District's mission.
• Financing — plan sufficient financial resources for completion of the projects
proposed in the CIP.
The following discussion provides: 1) a general description of the plan, 2) a discussion
of possible, but uncertain future projects, and 3) a cash flow analysis.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This plan covers the ten -year period from Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 -10 through FY 2018-
19. The plan includes projected expenditures totaling $331,454,000 (2009 dollars).
In addition to providing the basis for policy decisions concerning the District's long -range
Capital Improvement Program and management of the Sewer Construction Fund, the
CIP also serves as the framework for fee analysis and is the basis for the FY 2009 -10
CIB (the first year of the CIP).
The following discussion gives an overview of the plan's goals and the programs
proposed to meet these goals. A description of the District's guiding financial principles
and a brief summary of the CIP's cash flow are also presented.
'District Mission Statement: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District exists to protect
the public health and the environment by:
- Collecting and treating wastewater
- Recycling high quality water
- Promoting pollution prevention
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -2
Capital Improvement Program Goals
The District has identified three principal goals for its Capital Improvement Program:
Protect public health and the environment by:
- improving treatment /collection system reliability and safety
- meeting regulatory agency requirements
- reducing sewage overflows /bypasses
• Accommodate future growth in the service area as approved by the city and
county planning agencies responsible for land use policy decisions.
Respond to issues of community concern by:
- managing the cost of operating and maintaining facilities
- reducing objectionable odors
- cooperating with other public agencies to avoid duplication of effort
and improve service delivery
- recycling water
- reducing power consumption through energy management.
Programs
Capital improvement projects are grouped into four programs: Treatment Plant,
Collection System, General Improvements, and Recycled Water. A summary of the ten
years of planned expenditures by program, without inflation, is contained in Table A -1.
Below is a brief discussion of each ten -year program:
Treatment Plant
The Treatment Plant Program includes projects that will meet changing regulatory
mandates, address recurring renovation needs, and upgrade the wastewater treatment
plant in areas such as hydraulic /process capacity, and solids handling. The Treatment
Plant Program will require $107.7 M (2009 dollars), comprising 33 percent of the
District's capital improvements over the next ten years. The emphasis of the Treatment
Plant Program will be on the renovation needs of the aging infrastructure of our complex
treatment facility and on meeting increasingly stringent regulatory requirements.
Capacity improvements will be primarily limited to those needed for the solids handling
processes and to handle wet weather flows.
Collection System
The Collection System Program includes projects needed to reduce sewage overflows
during wet weather and to serve new development in the District's service area.
Specific near -term and long -term goals include upgrading the system where necessary
to address capacity needs and reduce overflows, improving the reliability of the District's
pumping stations, and implementing projects to address renovation needs. At $172.3 M
(2009 dollars), the Collection System Program comprises 52 percent of the District's
capital improvements over the next ten years. Several capital projects have been used
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -3
to identify and prioritize the collection system projects. The Collection System
Renovation Project has been used for many years to collect and prioritize collection
system renovation of line segments and spot repairs referred to engineering by
Collection System Operations or more recently, through the District -wide TV Inspection
Program, initiated in FY 2002 -03. The areas of concern are then grouped
geographically and bid as District projects. The Collection System Master Plan is
updated periodically District -wide and is revisited on a routine basis when changes in
development patterns occur. This plan documents the sewers which will need to be
upsized to increase capacity over the next approximately 30 years. As this capacity is
needed, these lines are added to the capital program. The Collection System Program
also provides for pumping station and force main improvements to increase station
capacity, provide emergency power, and upgrade old equipment to increase capacity
and improve reliability.
General Improvements
This program is mainly concerned with the property and equipment needs of the District.
Specific projects include property acquisition, improvements to facilities at the Collection
System Operations Corporation Yard, the Headquarters Office Building and other
District properties, information system and data management upgrades (computer
hardware and software) and other miscellaneous equipment, including primarily
vehicles. The General Improvements Program will require $45.9 M (2009 dollars),
representing 14 percent of the District's anticipated capital expenditures over the next
ten years.
Recycled Water
The District's Recycled Water Program includes projects which will require $5.5 M (2009
dollars), comprising 1.7 percent of the District's capital improvements over the next ten
years. The District will continue to expand its urban landscaping projects in a cost -
effective way by linking recycled water pipeline projects with sewer construction
projects. The District will also continue to investigate opportunities for industrial water
recycling. Large -scale industrial recycling projects are not currently budgeted.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -4
r
Q
B
LM
r
W
O
0
y
U) 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
O O O O
O O O
O O O O O p
f0
O O O O p
O O O O
O O O
O O O O O p
0 N r O N
O O O O p
0 (O (O M
O O O O
M
O O
O
~ 0�1 t ooc O V N
r M .0
I� (O N
LQ— O
V 00 V d) n
V N (M N M
d) N O Q1
N O
N V N
O
0) (O — N
)-
CO )C)
La r
M
�
�
M
Q)
O
O
N
O
O
N
(O
O
N
(O
O
O
N
O
a
0
N
a
M
O
N
M
N
0
N
N
r
O
N
r
O
O
N
O
r
Q)
O
O
N
O O O O 0 p
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
LO O O O
(O 00 00 n
00
Q)
O O O O 0 p
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
(00 000
0000 O
V O La
V r-
N
O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
�
000 O O
M � M
CO
r
O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
�
OM O N
00 V lf1 n
O
O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
0000 0
c 00 0) 0
00 co
Cl) Cl) n
0 0 0 0 0 0
00 O 0 p
O O O O p
0 0 co ° o0
N d) r
Cl) N (G
(O
O O O O 0 p
0 0 0 0 p
O O O O p
00) 000 0 O O
LO (O N 00
N N La
O
O O O O O O
O O O O 0 p
O O O O O p
0 00 co O O
(O l0 co
M l0 M
Q)
O O O O O O
O O O O 0 p
O O O O O p
LO LO LO LO OC)
00 N V O
r N N
LO N
co
O O O O O O
O O O O O p
O O O O O p
ON , N O Q)
d) 00 (0 N n
M (0 N
M
o O
`U
a 7
m y
0)
U
- m '
pE >0 >o
L 'E� o w
C U
CO d
c?), E o 'o
w d
H C
0 N
N 0 U N
`p1 U w�
O L
aL I
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
O O I- O
00 r 00 l0 n
LO N (O N n
co
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
O O V (0
O N r N
C\l It
N
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
l0 O O 0 G
N
N r N
0) (0
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
N O O 00
O r- V N O
N M 01 N
I- (0 N
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
X0000
r N N O N
00 (O N
r
O O O O O
O O O 0 p
O O O O p
In 0 In 0
O I- 0) r- O
M N N C'� N
d) �
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
I- O N
N N 00 00
N N
t-
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
O (D O
N 00 00
d)
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
LO O O O O p
M O- O 0 r
N N o0 V
N
r n
r
O O O O O
O O O O p
O O O O p
0) d)
O
V O N
0) N 00 (O
O
r
o O`U
cm
� y
C
(4
a
a) o
N � N
ao o
C/) .o
p> U Q cm
V 0 0 Q E
d w a
O
U
O O O °
O O O CD
O N {i
O l0 l0 O
O
N
O O O
°
O O O G
O I: Cj
O l00 0)
N
O O O O
O O O p
O I: C6
O l00 l0
N
O O O O
O O O p
O I- C6
0 C14
O l0 l0 G
N
O O O O
O O O p
O I- C6
$LOLOo
N
00 00 00 °
O O O G
O N {i
O l00 N
O
N
O O O
°
O O O G
O I- O
O (O O O
w
N
00 O O
O O O p
O N
M
O (00 N N
r (0
co
O O 0 °
O O O p
O V )CJ
O O O O
O °
N
r
O O O ° CD
O O O
N I- 00
O o0 00
r DD
O
r
E
o O
U
y
y O
y E E
Q `o
aE)
O W
L
Q 0 �
U �p )
i L N O
c >�a
N
cD
O
°
O °
O
N O
N O
N O
O
°
O °
O
N O
N O
N O
O O
O p
O p
N )CJ
LO
N La
O O
O p
O p
O G
N
La
O O
O p
O p
00
LO
N La
00 °
O °
O
O O
N O
N O
O
°
O °
O
O O
L °
N O
O O
O p
O p
O G
LO
N La
O O O
0 O O
O O O
0 O a La
O O
O
M
O
O O
0 O O
O O
0 O 1�
LO O r
LO u)
O
R R
O H
7
y
Q
L �
d N
� a
m
J
d N
V 7
LO
Q
CL
U
0)
Q)
Q)
N
m
U
0
0)
Q)
Q)
\N
l
Potential Future Projects Not Included in 2009 CIP
The projects listed in this CIP are those that are reasonably certain to be undertaken by
the District. However, when evaluating project priority and cash flow impacts,
consideration must be given to potential projects that are uncertain and not currently
included in the plan. If some or all of these potential projects are required to be
undertaken, there could be a significant impact on the financial forecasts contained in
the plan. These potential but unbudgeted projects are summarized in Table A -2:
Potential Projects not in the 2009 CIP.
TABLE A -2: POTENTIAL PROJECTS NOT IN 2009 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Description
time
estimated total
Estimated
frame
project cost
probability
Treatment Plant Hydraulic / Process Capacity
Filter Plant Expansion - Provide facilities to filter all
secondary effluent during dry and wet - weather to meet
3 -15 rs
y
$135-$150
Low
new regulations such as metals reduction or provide
million
additional effluent for water recycling.
Nutrient Removal — Provide facility for nutrient removal
(nitrogen and phosphorus).
10 — 20 yrs
$50 million
Low
Nitrification — Provide facilities for nitrification (ammonia to
nitrate).
5 —10 yrs
$50 million
Medium
Treatment Plant
Solids Handling
Sludge Treatment Renovation and /or Expansion -
$30-$50
Implement anaerobic digestion or thermal drying if future
3 -15 yrs
million
Low
regulations prohibit incineration.
Treatment Plant Other Projects
Air Emissions Projects — Provide processes to control air
$25-$30
toxics and odors and construct tank covers (primary and /or
5 -10 yrs
million
Low
secondary).
Greenhouse Gas Reduction — Construct alternative energy
$25-$50
projects to reduce or provide offsetting credits for emissions
5 yrs
High
of greenhouse gases.
million
Collection System Regulatory Response
Sewer System Management Plan Projects — The SF Bay
Regional Water Quality Control Board and the State Water
Resources Control Board have put in place requirements
1 -5 yrs
$5 - $10 million
Moderate
for a Sewer Maintenance Management Plan. The
per year
requirements may lead to the need for an escalated capital
program to televise and renovate sewers.
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -6
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
This section presents the cash flow analysis for each year of the CIP, assuming that the
staff - recommended ten -year expenditure scenario of $331.5 M (2009 dollars) is
pursued. A review of the sources of current capital improvement revenues, a
discussion of cash flow assumptions, and a projection of the Sewer Construction Funds
Available balance for the next ten years is also presented.
Occasionally revenue from new development exceeds the current ratio of spending, and
the Funds Available balance grows. As the needed capacity improvement to
accommodate this growth is constructed, Funds Available will be drawn down. In
addition, this fund is used in conjunction with the O &M Fund balance to meet the cash
flow needs of the District.
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -7
Capital Improvement Revenue Sources
Current revenue sources for funding capital improvements have been identified for the
four programs of capital improvement projects and are shown in Table A -3.
TABLE A -3: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVENUE SOURCES
PROGRAM
SUBFUND
REVENUE SOURCE
Expansion - Additional capacity to
- Capacity Fees
serve new customers
- City of Concord
Treatment
Upgrading /Replacement -
° Property Taxes
Plant
Improvement of existing facilities to
- City of Concord
o Sewer Service Charge(d)
serve current customers
o Debt Financing
Expansion - Additional capacity to
° Capacity Fees
° Pumped Zone Fees
Collection
serve new customers
- Developer Fees
System (a)
Upgrading /Replacement -
- Property Taxes
Improvement of existing facilities to
- Sewer Service Charged)
serve current customers
- Debt Financing
General
- Property Taxes
Improvements
- Sewer Service Charge
Property Taxes °
Recycled
- City of Concord
Water
--------------- - - - - --
- Sewer Service Charge(d)
- Customer Revenue
Loans (e)
(a) Includes pumping station facilities.
(b) Includes improvements to administrative facilities (Headquarters Office Building and CSO
yard), land purchases, vehicles, equipment, and furniture.
(c) Ad valorem taxes may be used for any District purpose at the discretion of the Board of
Directors within Proposition 4 limits and Clean Water Grant regulations; however, the uses
indicated are recommended as the most equitable.
(d) A capital improvements increment was added to the annual sewer service charge in 1992 to
supplement ad valorem taxes for upgrading /replacement of District capital facilities.
(e) State Water Reclamation Loan Program
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 ClP A -8
Financial Principles
The District has developed and maintained a capital fee system, which equitably
divides the cost obligations of the capital program between the existing customers of
District facilities and new customers of these facilities. Under this "fair share" approach,
existing customers, primarily through property taxes and a capital component of the
annual Sewer Service Charge, and new users through capacity fees based on a
proportional "buy -in" to the current value of all existing capital assets, fund facilities
upgrade, renovation and replacement costs as well as expansion projects needed to
accommodate growth.
The Board of Directors has established a long- standing preference for pay -as- you -go
financing. The pay -as- you -go approach is implemented through a "sinking fund"
financing program where reserves for planned future project work are accumulated over
time in the Sewer Construction Funds Available from capacity fees, sewer service
charges capital component, and interest on temporary investment. Occasionally, the
District has bond financed capital projects given special circumstances.
Going forward, the only truly discretionary source of revenue for the District Board is the
sewer service charge. Thus, any reduction in capital revenue from other sources, such
as capacity fees, would have to be made up by an increase in the sewer service
charge, by a like reduction in expenditures on the capital program, or by borrowing.
Currently there is one large project within the ten -year window of the Capital Plan which
may require bond financing to mitigate the impact on rates.
Cash Flow Projection
A cash flow projection has been prepared for the staff - recommended ten -year
expenditure scenario of the CIP ($331.5 M in 2009 dollars). Results of the analysis are
presented in Table A -4. Assumptions used for interest on Funds Available, inflation,
numbers of new connections, Ad Valorem Tax Escalation and Sewer Service Charge
are presented in Table A -5. The economic assumptions used in this plan are reviewed
annually as the Plan is updated.
Each program's annual projected expenditures has been reduced by 5% to account for
unplanned delays in project delivery performance. Thus, this document assumes a
project delivery performance of 95 %. This allows for a 5% contingency account for
each program. The cash flow analysis contains both the 5% deferral and the 5%
contingency for a net zero impact on the projected program expenditure figures.
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 ClP A -9
Property Tax Revenue
Beginning in FY 1992 -93, the State of California reduced District's historic property tax
revenues by 40% to help meet the state's educational funding obligations. As a result,
property tax revenue that would have been received in the 11 years from FY 1992 -93
through FY 2002 -03 was reduced by about $38,000,000. The 40 percent decrease in
property tax is now considered permanent and is not considered in any projections of
future property tax revenues. Proposition 1A, passed by the California voters in
November 2004, allowed the State of California to divert property tax revenues from
local government for two years, 2004 -05 and 2005 -06. Effective 2006 -07, Proposition
1A dictates that no additional property tax diversion will occur. The State can, however,
borrow a portion of the tax revenue twice in the next ten years, but must pay it back,
with interest, within three years. Due to the housing slump, it has been assumed that
there will be no increase in revenue through 2009 -10. An annual escalation of 4% has
been assumed beginning in 2010 -11 to cover increases in property tax revenue due to
added housing stock and increases in valuation.
Sewer Service Charge Revenue (SSC)
The Sewer Service Charge is the District's only completely discretionary source of
revenue. It has traditionally been used to supplement all other sources of revenue as
needed to fund Operations and Maintenance. When the District lost 40% of the
property tax revenue in 1992 -93, it compensated by adding a capital project component
to the Sewer Service Charge. Until 2000 -01, $31 per RUE of the SSC was for capital
projects. In 2000 -01, the capital component of the SSC was reduced from $31 per
RUE to $15 per RUE. The $16 per RUE was diverted to the operations and
maintenance budget leaving $15 per RUE for capital projects. This resulted in a
significant shortage of revenue as compared to expenditures in the capital program and
the Sewer Construction Fund was used to cover the shortfall. In 2001 -02, 2002 -03,
2003 -04 and 2004 -05, the capital component of the SSC was gradually increased and
more recently it has been varied each year, depending on the capital revenue available
from other sources and the planned expenditures.
Interest on Investments
A projection of the rate of return on the invested Sewer Construction Funds Available is
needed to predict interest revenues in the future. The investment strategy of the
District is designed to attain a market - average rate of return while exercising a
minimum of risk. The District's current areas of investment are United States Treasury
Bills and Notes and the Local Agency Investment Fund of the State of California. The
weighted average of interest on investments for the sewer construction investment
portfolio for 2009 -10 is projected at 3 % per cent. It is anticipated that interest rates will
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -10
begin to climb again in the future. Rates range from 3.5 per cent to 6.0 per cent during
the ten year period described in this document.
Inflation
During the preparation of this document, economic conditions have been highly
variable. The average annual inflation in both the Engineering News Record
Construction Cost Index and Building Cost Index for the last ten years has been less
than 3 %. For the purposes of this document, we have used a 3% inflation figure and
will revisit it at each annual update.
Capacity Fee Revenue/Number of New Connections
A capacity fee is paid by each new connector to the District. This fee is recalculated
each year and represents the cost of buying into the existing assets of the District.
Capacity fee revenue projections from new connections have been adjusted downward
from the figures reported in the last several years to account for the continuing and
worsening downturn in the housing market. Unfortunately, the housing market is
difficult to predict and can have a substantial impact on the available revenues for the
capital program. The housing market also drives revenue from direct reimbursements
by developers, rates and charges for developer services, and Sewer Service Charges
from new connections. All these revenues are reduced along with capacity fee
revenues when the housing market cools.
Debt Financing
The District has on occasion used debt financing to fund projects. In December of
1994, $25,000,000 in long -term (20 years) debt financing was completed to fund
several large projects including the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor and Outfall
Improvement projects. The 1994 debt was refunded with 1998 refunding Revenue
Bonds to achieve significant savings in debt service costs through lower interest rates.
In 1998 -1999 the District received a total of $2,916,872 in loans for the recycled water
program from the State of California. In 2002 an additional $16,600,000 million in long
term (20 years) debt financing was completed to allow escalation of schedules for
several major projects needed to serve the Dougherty Valley in San Ramon. The cash
flow analysis assumes bond funding of one $30+ million project over the next ten years.
A separate Debt Fund has been established to collect revenue and repay debt,
therefore debt repayment is not reflected in the Capital Program Cash Flow Projection.
Sewer Construction Fund Cash Flow
District investments are recorded in the Sewer Construction Fund. Sewer Construction
Funds are utilized during the year as the District bank to meet short -term cash flow
needs created by the receipt of revenue from the County only twice per year. The
minimum balance required to meet cash flow needs over a six month period ranges
from $30 to $40 million over the ten year period. As of July 1, 2008 the Sewer
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -11
Construction Funds Available balance had risen to approximately $53.2 million. This
increase over the minimum required balance was due to a series of events as follows.
First, approximately $16,600,000 was borrowed in 2002 to fund acceleration of a
number of projects in the San Ramon Valley. Subsequently, due to concerns about
losing ad valorem tax revenue, the District slowed down its Capital Improvement
Program and deferred a number of high priority projects. Over the following two years
more than $16.5 million in capital projects were deferred. During this same period, the
State did not take ad valorem taxes, and in fact ad valorem tax receipts rose at a much
higher than historical rate due to the number of reassessments brought on by the
aggressive housing market. At the same time, the Dougherty Valley development
began in earnest and new connections rose to a level not previously predicted due to
the rapid build out of the Valley. The net result was an increase in Sewer Construction
Funds Available from a low of $37,600,000 on July 1 of 2001 to $55,900,000 on July 1
of 2006, an increase of about $18.3 million over a five year period. Of this,
$16,600,000 was due directly to the 2002 bond proceeds. The cash flow projections
assume that capital spending will exceed capital revenues over the next ten years so
that Sewer Construction Funds Available is gradually brought closer to funds required.
The projections for fiscal year 2008 -09 are to spend down Sewer Construction Funds
Available to approximately $47.6 M by June 30, 2009. The planned budget for 2009 -10
will also generate a deficit and spend the balance down further. This will be
accomplished by constructing needed projects while not raising the sewer service
charge capital component to match expenditures.
Summary
This CIP assumes that the capital component of the SSC will be adjusted as needed to
maintain Sewer Construction Funds Available at prudent but not excessive levels and
fund the recommended plan. This document is for planning purposes only. The District
Board has not voted to increase revenues to fund this planned program. The plan is
funded on a year -by -year basis when the Capital Improvement Budget for the upcoming
fiscal year is formally authorized and adopted by the Board. Changes in capital
revenue forecasts or changes in recommended expenditures may result in changes to
this ten -year plan.
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -12
Z
OJ
�a
F-
LU Z
W
02
W W
CL 0
Oa
J
LL 2
CL
Q
Q
�U
Q
W W
J
m }
LW
r
Q
M
M
O
r
O
O
11')
O
�
11')
r
�
00
N
11')
00
11')
00
11')
O
M
r
M
r
�
N
O
r
00
3
11')
N
N
CC
1�
CC
1-
M
O
11')
w
1-
M
M
M
'a
N
M
r
N
M
N
N
C
.�...
CV)
N
O
�
C
R
Co
11')
co
O
O
co
N
O
M
M
O
O
M
M
^
r
r
N
r
CC
'-T
N
00
r
N
M
CC
O
M
M
N
O
CC
CC
1-
11')
r
O
N
M
00
CC
O
O
1-
C
LO
M
1•
M
1-
r
M
M LO
N M
N
IC
N
11')
d
O
C)
11')
r
11')
N
1-
N
O
O
r
O
M
N
M
M
N
d
r
O
N
11')
CC
r
1-
1-
1-
CC
1�
O
11')
O
O
I-T
1--
CC
N
M
M
O
N
00
�
co
w
a)
CC
11')
00
(D
N
1-
11')
N
M
N
N
N
W
3
CCD
N
TO
N
i
CD
11')
O
CC
CC
CC
CC
O
N
CC
11')
N
ti
O
N
O
3
r
w
r
O
r
O
r
w
00
N
00
I-T
11')
1•
11')
r
1-
O
CA
O
I-T
O
11')
N
11')
W
11')
r
11')
1-
r
a)
LO
N
1-
r
Cv)
1--
M
M
O
N
N
M
N
M
d
r
d
r
LO
1-
N
M
CC
00
00
N
C)
CC
r
00
00
1-
r
O
CC
w
CC
1•
11')
O
CC
I-T
00
1•
11')
O
11')
11')
C)
CC
I*
r
C)
11')
00
C)
11')
M
M
w
1-
11')
CC
11')
CC
r
r
N
r
W
r
M
1-
N
11')
00
M
N
r
M
r
M
r
M
M
R
O
r
N
O
M
1-
r
P-
r
00
O
O
le
O
O
r
00
O
C
r
O
1-
O
O
1C')
11')
r
r
C)
11')
1*
11')
1•
CC
N
CC
�
O
O
N
r
CC
1-
11')
00
C)
11')
N
CO)
r
CO
r
O
M
N
N
1•
M
N
M
N
O
y
r
M
r
N
M
S
o°
r O
(y
N
M
11')
M
M
CC
00
I
ti
O
O
r
CC
M
r
11')
C)
CC
00
00
O
O
N
N
11')
11')
CC
00
00
O
O
M
00
11')
00
O
CC
00
M
O
O M
CV
r
CO
M
O
N
r
CO
00
N
00
M
1z
N
r
M
r
N
N
C M
E9 Q-
N
R U
i
N
CC
O
r
O
r
O
N
11')
CC
11')
-T
O
r
O
M
CC
M
11')
M
CC
11')
00
r
M
O
N
M
CC
t O
0 r O
r
11')
00
C)
M
M
CC
11')
CC
1-
M
r
W
11')
N
LO
N
.0 p N
r
r
11')
M
O
M
M
M
00
00
M
N
m
r
O
iN U
L
L) w O
N �
r
O
M
1-
O
1-
r
O
r
sF
d'
LC')
1-
O
O
Or R p
11')
w
11')
w
00
O
CC
1•
N
CC
O
1-
I*
N
CC
O
r
N
C)
N
O
v
W
W)
00
C"
O
o0
Q
16
M
M
M
N
^
O
co
co
6q O N
R O i-
r
O� LL
C r
CD
d
Q
CC
11')
00
O
11')
N
O
O
O
1-
00
N
O
11')
N
O
00
M
C)
(.0
d'
q*
ti
M
O
1t')
O
O
N
O
1•
E
r
11')
N
00
N
00
11')
M
CC
N
0
LO
O
LO
C14
�
C0
i
Q
11')
00
q*
q*
11')
M
M
M
w
O
CO
O M
Q
N
r
r
C.)
M
C) O
C C
N
0
0
C 0
7
cA
7
cn
W
J
R (D
3
a
O
0°
J
O C
N
cn
cn
K
y
z
N
Iri
LL
N
w
N
Z
ti d
R >�
Z
W
(D
O
L�
O
cn
�
O
O
w
m
z
+�
Z
W
W
_
U
�=
cn
W
H
E 0
U
W
W
LL
(')
CD
O
p
O
w
a
H
Z
(9
0
cn
Q
U
p
0 ~
ti~
w=
a
a
W
w
a
v
E
W
cwi�
cn
H
cn
E O
Cl)
Z
CL
LL
F-
U
J
p
W
Q
O
H
0
O
V p
`Z
m
W
"'
a
U
d
O
Z
(aj
Z
>
0>
W
w
M
d
W
0
U
O
W
N
�'
W
w�
0
w
Z
O
p
W
LU
W
cn
W
O
0
0
v
N L
W
W
J
W
m
Q
W
p
m
a
p
H
W
U
v
LU
H v
w
LU
Q
w
w
v-1
0
w
M
w
O
C-)
Z
Z
w
a
p
Q
cn
w
w
w
p
0
C9
w
�
~
z
z$
M
F-
z
� J
za
OF-
z
aW
�w
�>
aCL
O�LL
=a
as
UV
Q LU
W }
M W
Q H
H M
0
LU
J
Q
F-
0
LL
LU
U
F-
Q
J
U
J
Q
O
0
LU
O
F-
Q
a)
r
c
O
o
O
O
*°
LO
Lo
CO
ao
O
O
(Ci
O
Cl)
p
O
d
6
�}
N
O
c
p
g
°
O
\
°
O
O
�
(D
ti
N
Q
O
cm
`�
6ck
U
N
()
rl-
co
O
O
"o
M
O
°
O
_
°
�
fi}
U)
O
N
r
�
4—
_0
O
c
p
o
O
O
\°
0,
ti
L
co
a)
70
T-
O
0
O
c�
p
O
m
�
Ef3
Eq�
N
(D
r)
r
c
LO
o
0,
O
O
"o
0',
O
co
L
co
p
O
p
(�
�
Qq
o
LO
6ck
06
N
0
I�r
o
LO
°
o
O
°
ao
"'
c o
&
D
C:
T-
ti
L6
°
(�
O
°
m
N
N
a)
M
N
o
O
°
O
O
�
°
c�
ti
rn
co
m
D
0-
r
LO
°
O
°
C7
Ef}
N
m
a)
N
jo
0
p
m
0
p,
m
6c>
O
�
N
6c>
(D
0)
N
LO
O
o
O
°
O
\
O
O
a)
-0
a)
O
C�
0
-
p
(�
6c>
�
6c}
N
�}
N
Q
O
0
0
0
N
T-
o
N
O
O
(N
6c}
6c}
6c>
N
}
N
c
O H
C
'� cn
cn
c
M
v
i
E
Q
U
>
U
Q
cn
z
C
cv
U
a)
Q
c�
U
U)
4
X
c6
N
Q
O
Q
0)
a)
L
a)
a)
U
a)
Q
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA)
The CIP is exempt from CEQA as a planning study (District Guidelines Section 15262).
Projects included in this plan could have construction - related, air quality, water quality, land
use, and growth- inducing impacts. The impacts of projects not exempt from CEQA will be
addressed in the appropriate CEQA documentation after each project is initiated but prior to
project approval.
SPECIFIC PROJECTS OVER 10 YEAR PLAN
A brief description of each program and a list of projects for the ten years of this plan are
provided in the Capital Plan sections for each of the four programs.
FY 2007 -08 CIB /2007 CIP A -15
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
This section is a listing of the projects in the 10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP),
that pertain to the District's wastewater treatment plant. The CIP is based on the
recognition that plant facilities require on -going renovations and replacement.
Environmental regulations will become more stringent, and the District is on a gradual
but steady pace towards build -out over the next twenty years. Major emphasis is on
maintaining existing assets, improving processes when cost effective, and ensuring
regulatory compliance.
The treatment plant program for the CIP is broken down into five areas: 1) Regulatory
Compliance and Safety, 2) One -Time Renovation, 3) Recurring Renovation,
4) Expansion, and 5) Other Projects.
Regulatory Compliance and Safety
The goals of the Regulatory Compliance and Safety projects are to insure that existing
and future facilities meet safety and regulatory requirements. These projects cover a
wide variety of subjects to optimize energy use and reduce emissions of pollutants to
the environment, various solids handling system improvements for emergency /non-
routine operations, and projects to reduce metals emission in the final effluent. Projects
include Solids Handling Improvements and Nitrification Modifications. The CIP estimate
for Regulatory Compliance and Safety projects is $5.0 M or 5 percent of the Treatment
Plant Program budget over the next ten years.
One -Time Renovation
One -Time Renovation Projects address major renovation needs that are well defined
and expected to occur infrequently. These projects include the Standby Power Facility
Improvements, Wet Scrubber Replacement, Electric Blower Replacement, and
Centrifuge Upgrades. The CIP estimates that one -time renovations will cost
approximately $28.4 M or 26 percent of the total ten -year program budget.
Recurring Renovation
The goals of the Recurring Renovation Program are to provide for on -going or future
renovation activities. This subprogram provides capital funds for replacement or
rehabilitation of aging treatment plant infrastructure. The categories include Protective
Coating Rehabilitation, Equipment Replacement, Piping Renovations and Replacement,
Electrical and Instrumentation Replacement, and the development of an Asset
Management Plan. Projects in these areas will cost approximately $44.8 M or about 42
percent of the Treatment Plant Program budget over the next ten years.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -TP - 1
Expansion
The goals of the Expansion projects are to upgrade and improve existing facilities to
meet increasing flow due to in -fill, new development and wet weather flows. There are
two wet weather capacity issues that will be addressed in the next several years, i.e.,
addition of increased primary Treatment capacity and the installation of a new bar
screen. Projects in the Expansion Program are approximately $29.0 M or about 27
percent of the Treatment Plant Program budget.
Other Projects
Other projects are those that do not clearly fit in one of the other subprograms. Projects
included in this subprogram include Plant Control System Improvements, Plant
Emergency Preparedness, and the Alternative Energy Study. The CIP estimate for
these projects is approximately $472,000 or about 0.4 percent of the ten -year Treatment
Plant Program.
Summary
The Treatment Plant Program of the 2009 Capital Improvement Plan will require
approximately $107,725,000 over the next 10 years, which comprises 33 percent of the
total CIP budget. The projects proposed in the CIP are required to meet regulatory
mandates, reliability needs, safety concerns, and capacity needs.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -TP - 2
a
CL
Q
CL
U
0)
O
O
N
m
U
O
0)
0
0
N
O O = ,
ca
� �O
N��
0
O(a (a
0
O
E U
+ O
— N L
%r-.
OE >+�
N a) =
U E
(Q (
a)
CZ U� i�
� N U
L�
�— a) cz E>
U O (Q N
O N
L >+
a) a)
>,
N
N a) ca
O� a) N N
N CD- N N
ca y
Q�
O
�z a) N
(ate
cm
s �70
�
U
Y
U.0
>>,� ?�
�
O
�� (a � �
U O ca 'C
~.ate
am
a) X
ca
L U O
(D L
E
L
_�
(Q U a) (Q 3
•N a) N
_
•i
ca ca
N
U
0.-
CZ CD-
LL
i a) N
�0—. N N NFL. �_�
Q0 ca
��N.
QE
(D
'U a) U
a)
CZ
U N a) p
cz
a) (D
O
Z
Q
Q
4-0
?� („)
>.�
�
- •L > (Q L L (D
C= a"_ Qcz CD- (D cz E
� (Q N
� �
ca Q
0
ca
o om
CL
~
_ cz
.N U U •N
00
a)
-
�O Q > >
+ N ca
Z
N CD
�~ ca a) O
"J
00 a) a) O a) ca
a) 0� L �_
N ca
., Y E
O
U E-
L
a) � �
W
a) Um i
E
O
�� U% O� �O
�� c O ��
U) L
N�
� .
N X
a�
N N
O� 0 0
",
D
>
Q L
U L� �p
�--.
j,
�--. N >- N N
0 N— O U
O N
O
� p
N
O
+�-
>+a)UO
N
�--' LLEOa)N�
CZ
� E
ca=
L�O
N a) E b L
a)
1 ca > CO U
a) L
U p
CZ
L
a) -
U —
'X O-
i
E� U N OD N
EW
C-') O N
N N
a) o
J
Q
00'tE
p QN >
N
y
Nw0E
N N N N U E O
QCO
N 2-- cz
Via)
(� c
(D
ON
��._oQ
FL
cu >
o
§Qo
o
-°
—
��
Q
Q >�
a) U Y
�--. a) N s C-')
cz,— cz � ca
a) (a
Q
ca N O
�0.
�0.
O
(� a) ca N
ca
N N ca E t a- N L-a
O
> �"'' ,L
-z
>+
N
>
O
O
cz o �U
L N�
i
N
° (' aD
(a 0) a) O
=•
N O�
> �
a) ca
O >
N O
N
0�
� - p
O
—_
0 .N
—_ O N E O ._ N
— .
—_ —_
—_ ca E
N
W
a) N U ca
�m
> �� ��� cam
��
-'Q�
+�+
�(j 0 L
U� V
U N p
a)
Z
>
ca O
�Om�
O ._
O
O ca 70 N ca ca a) (a
O LO a) (S 2E a)
N +'
a)
a) ca
��
a) a)
Q� > U.� U
�U cz
0�
�N N (a —. a) cz�' N
LO
��Q
tea) �
C��
~
ca (a,�
DU
: N
N
� O O Q� N �� ��
0 a)76 cz
N tea)
a)�
N
p
N N�
��
U
H� (amp
H
H LO LO N Q L ca Q ca
L �.
U a)
ca
W
CL
cz
cz
c
Z
o
m
J
E
E
E
o
CL
c
cz
cz
cz
U
a)
a)
a)
m
W
m
H
H
H
06
v
2
2
2
�
J
H
m
COm
W
W
W
0-
Q
W
L
O
O
N
}
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
cz
O
cz
N
0
W
>
cz
cz cz
L
H
�_ a)
a�
[if
U
O a�
(
a) >
a)
a) N E
a)
� Lo
a) .? a)
°� a)
U
Q
.�
O
U U
CO (Q
O a)
N
U
U
i (a
0
L
�, L
a)�
�, Q
a)N
cz — O
N�LO
�_
�_ -
CZ � O
NLOO
U Q
a)N
C
E
��
HILL
��
H0- J
W['
a
CL
Q
CL
U
0)
O
O
N
m
U
O
0)
0
0
N
CL
Q
CL
U
CA
O
O
N
m
U
C>
C�
0
0
N
>'
N
(Q 0
N
Y
0
N O
L
LO Q L
(Q o) 0) -r-
N
0�,=U N 0 (a
(a
��
(a
QOM.
p��.�.
N
L
U
N N •' m O. U uj
�O
N
(a N
N E U p (a
L L N (Q Q N p
O O E Q
,�
,� N
N
m�> m
N• — �
N O O D
N C)
>+ 0 �N. — N E (D
N
O N
L ==
N (a N N
�O - N (a — Q N N
E
N O
N
N N O
a) -m E N
U N N O �' U
L
x N
N
N
�'
(a LO'�
N U
O O N
•Q ti
,—
S
Q
N (a L ��--'
N
N E
a) D b
E
E
°i °i a�i
°� E °i
CL
�� N�.2� U) ED- N
Q
>`Fz0O
>a =U
0
O
+
N
N
0.— N
O
L
Z
W
N O S O
) 0
— (Do a)
N
Cc
U _
> N N .
'E
�_
O p
•
> •—
W
U0
NQ
2
(D 21)
N —,ENQL
>
— N �+ N
O
m
C-') C-
>'
2-1
N O N (a
N 0) N
NCD U
X p ) O
N— N
(a �--�
O
N
N�
(a N
� +' N=
C- TO
�--� Q (a (a
N= f U)
CL
— a O
a� ca o °i o
,- ca
N
—
�_ - — ._
L
0 >.2 C
O O N O
�O� N— � 7o cz
O
_
a) a
p
gym_
ca N "J
(a�M
�� 'O N O
N 0��
Q
0 U
N N
N�=
_
U
�Q
M M OO CU C
U p�� m M Oq ,
N
N�
Q
U?`
�.L N
�O �D
U) N Ca N
N �O > CU—_ N O,
E
0
,�
O U
O
N U U E
L �._
E a)
(c
0 0 N O -a N
(a E �� x Q�
-
N O
N
N
O O
U -D ._
N m
V
N 0-
(D 0� �O 0— OOaN
O
N
N�
>N
C
�o�a�
°a)a)� =N
C7
O N O N O N O
= N�
� .N
-a
O=
N s L
U O
��L E
N N
0
0
!x.0)2 �O �+� O-
N
,�
N
O
N
(D
N
N
N C O N N a� •i N.
o —a0�CD a�N.2m
=�
m
= )
CZ
%r -- =��
� caoa�
0 M
W
-ow
Ua�a�UEUNp�N>%m�
ca
.§
o
NNOE
—
a) a) E
N �0� > N >
U
U �L
U
U 0 E 5
N
~
O N W W'Q W
N
N:� O
N
N+ 0
U O N M
Z
p
x °0M
00
�N_'
��N(a
A
N N M (D U) 0')
N Q
N N
N L
N 0
F-
20 m 0 U
HU
L
H m m
HLL
H N 0Pm
N N QN
W
CL
Q
m
m
m
Z
•E
�,
J
E
E
CL
C
m
0
0
N
N
U �
C-6
U �
H
J
CA co Ci
CO m
Ci
W
W
Q
W
w
L
N
M
LO
CO
CO
}
O
O
O
O
O
O
CN
C14
C14
C14
C14
CN
E N
0
Y
U)
3 �
O
N
m
-a
N
O
U
M.0
>
r•+
C,6 (a
L
r E
L
U
L
N
�+
Q
W
�
CO p
N N E
N
i
U
i
W E U
L
U
��_�
O
�E
E4
m
L
m O
EE
�� �
C
U�
a_ Of
Li
a- 0
=�
0-[if
CL
Q
CL
U
CA
O
O
N
m
U
C>
C�
0
0
N
VJ
CL
Q
CL
U
0)
O
O
N
m
U
O
0)
O
O
N
_
O
L -
O E
Y O Off+'
CDL O) to (D
E OU
U Q
y,0 � N
Y
O N
per' =
cz
0
a)
=
(a Q L
N (D .0
O LO M
(D
-a (D
(D
1
Na)
CO N
DLO=
Q�
UFO
Z
Q
L �
¢U��
x
a)
a) CZ
J
-a °.�
Y�
CL
=� � �Y
� � M
° o = m
~
O
a)
Z
Y
CV (a a) a) >,
N
E u)
W
N��
.— M
! m
2-0��
--_• 0
W
�O
U).- —
E �_ m"
N
�
(a (a
O a) L E
(D (D
_
•x = -a .L �
p
y
y a) (Q
QO N
O +
O
-50 0) !: 0 = E
=C L
Q
cam —
Q
CL
N Q� N N
4- �
(a O � X
(D o o
N
a� aD
U E —
.
.=
0 .— a)
N
ca cz N -t:f
> 0 �--
L U
L i z
Q
Q (a N E 040-5 U
a)
L>
>'
N
CL
Q
ocz °(D'o
��
p
�'E
Q
(�
L �� L p L
o�O (D a)LQ
.c..-) p
camp
M .E O
Oo
U
Y 0
— E O
_ —
0
W� O
O a)
0
N �--. O
0 M U O
> a) =
N
_N
=0
=_tea)— __��
—_
N
U (a
Z
0
2'=
2'- — ui 0
0 a) a)
L N�5 E
(/�
CD- _
N C =
'i y
_ LD ,�
=
N N O 's
X .N
-a um)
.N
�
H.�
VH.E
c��
�.�
a)
W
CL
Q
m
z
J
a)
m
a
c
p
N
o
w
J
2
W
Q
W
L
co
ti
ao
>-
0
C14
0
CN
0
C14
L
0
�
a)
J
E
L
I
m
4-O
�+
~ p
N=
.�
m
CO
Q M
CL
0-w
co
�wO�
VJ
CL
Q
CL
U
0)
O
O
N
m
U
O
0)
O
O
N
t/1
L
i
d
Q
K
W
d
E
W
P
L
cm
0
CL
i
m
0
O
N
R
O
H
Q)
r
O
r
O
N
co
r
r
O
N
r-
r
(O
r
O
N
w
r
O
N
La
r
O
N
r
M
O
N
M
r
N
O
N
N
O
N
0
0
N
O
O
O
N
d
R
C
R
r- L
w �
y }
w
V
.d
O
CL`
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O n O N N O O o0 O O N
N O O O O O N O N N 0 0- 0 0 n O O O O N
M n O N M I- 0 N 0 LO
In N to Cl) N_
I- to (O Cl) O N 00 N O LO n N M n N O V
— (O d) N 00 N 01 00 V In N O
Cl)
N M N— — N V
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O 00
O O O O
O O O In
In O
to
LO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O O
In O
QZ
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O O
M O �
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O
O
O O O
O O
Cl) O
In
In O
N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O
O
O O O
O O
Cl) 0
Cl)
O O
r-
000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
O O O
0 0
O O O
O O
O
N
O O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O
oO O 0
N
In
0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 O O O O
q q q q q q
O O O O O 0
q q q q q 0
O O In O 00 N
to O O O O O
N— N
0— O LO O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 O O O O O
q q q q q q q
00 O O O 00 00 O
q O q q q g q q q O
O O In to O to O
to O 0 LO O In O 00 O
N
In O N 0 LO O O
(O N V N 01
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O g q O O O O O q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
g O O O q q q O q q O O q q q O O O O q O
O O O O In N O O N N
N O O O O O N O N 0 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In
0 In CO N In N
In N
I- V Cl) O N 00 0 In to N CO In to O V
r N — d)
Cl)
Cl)
a) _ _ _ _ _
C C C C E > -0
C L 7 7 7 7 7 E
IL Of 22022 :�u�)�in
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0000 0 0 0
s
N N 7 N - N
B o)- O (D w E `o)
yd N O- � a) O Q
IL N
(o E a) Of
Co O > E a °� a) '� °
(o a) ° 5 0 3 H E .o m U IL �gcn E 0U ma >a'�U C:
Q�a�waOfw�E— IL
a) w
r m H
C m> C 0) 2 > -
�O
to V E n E m o E m
EL- ) m a) ' (u U m E
c �2 Z .� 2 2
U) U)<HLuU) Hz�IL
a� z
N O
O O N O
N �a�i�(oou(Oiaa L �d
H 1- 00 1- 1- Q Q Q Q c Q c c c
_ N -0
N 7 O N 7 N N (6 (6 (6 O) (6 N N O C O)
3 3 E a) o E E E E�- E C G
N (6 O N s M >0 0 L L L L 0 > L M L N O M
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0
0 0 0 00 00 o 00000
Q c c c c
a) E o
s° E N N N N
U) O C Q (6 L L
C w Q Q O C
.V Q .� N -O O N a) N
m Q n U E a) a) o- E a) E
aoi f N CL — E m '0 U � N cL (D m� m 0 m o
If u) E o n a) o> rn .� Q
U w> a) a °o a E m� o 0 a)
U) m
O�
CO O � `p aa)) a) LL 0 >� o
n E =2 o s ° o aa) Q w a) o-
p o W an d U o Un m m Q 5 N = o
N � O m N
w C N > i
� °� E .� O D 06 U .0 N .o w= (D v a) o
E Z= m aoi .� m w E w m
�=a�Qi
d
L
i
d
Q
K
W
d
E
W
E
P
cm
0
CL
i
Q)
0
N o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O
O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O
w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O q O
O O O O O n O O V O n O O O O O O 00 Cl) O- O N N
In O N r 0 N O m O O M N 0) 0) In Cl) r N
r- O O N
N
Cl) Cl) - In - Cl) N (O Cl) (O - N Cl)
N O O_
0) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 O O O O
O O 00 00 O O O
M O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O C\l G N OO O r LO
N co 00 00
r r r 0) 0)
CO O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 O O
O O O O O O O O O O
n O O 00 O O O O O O
00 O 0 0— 0 O O In N
CD N N Cl) N N O O N N
LO N
N N
r - O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 O O
r O O O O 00 O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O
co O O O O O O O O O O O
00 O O O 0 0— O O Cl) Cl)
CD N O O O N r O In N
O (O (O
CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 00 O O
O O O O O 00 O O O
00 (00 V O O O O 00 00
N M N O N N N r- r-
00 00
LO O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 00 O O
00 O O O O 00 O O O
4 O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O 00 O O O O o0 00
G 00 O O 00 O O O O
N O 00 N (O N 0)
N r rl
O 00 O 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O
r O 00 O O O 00 00 O O O
O 00 O O O O O O O O O O
M O O O O In O O 00 O O N 00 00
0) o0 O - V O N � 0 0
NM O N N N N V (O (O (p
r r C6 C6
M O 00 O 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O
r O O O O 00 00 O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
G O
0) oo
r
0 N N ON N
N N
N to LO
N O O O O O 00 O O 00 O O 00 00 O O O O 00 O O O O
r O O O O O 00 00 O O O O
0 0 q q q 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 0
O O O LO O O In O O O LO In N
0) o0 O N O O 00 O (O (O
O N co o0 r N M M
N
0) 0)
0 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O O O 00 O 0 0 0 00 O O
O O O O O 00 O O O O O O
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 LO 00 0 00 00
G d) 00 N O O O O V O Cl) Cl)
N N 0) In N N N
00 00
4 O 00 O 0 0 0 00 00 O O O O O O 00 O 0 0 0 00 0 0
O O 0 0 0 00 00 O 0 0 0 00
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 q q
0 In O 0 0 d) O N O O 0 Cl) 0 In (010
G 0) N 0 O In (h O (0 O O N N
0) In
N r M M
a3 O O a3
a) E C C C C N .. ..
a3 0 3 3 a3 a3 a) �, �, R R
f0 O a) N a) 2i a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 N N a3 a3 -6 C C a3 H H
t t (0 C a3 t a3 L L L L L L C L t L O a) a) s
Q� ��� �xILIL
CL
O O M V v) (O (O I- r— 0) 0) O N M I� W (0 O (O (O I- r- 0) p1 y
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a) I r 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L
N� o 0 0 0 � 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 a
N N C:
O O
a) O � '
'6 N O_ a) (0
N L O M O H J E
O- C J 0 C >
D a) ' d E O J~ ' N .N a) i L
Q N-0 C Q a) v u) J E 1 J aci a) c c- Q a)
> w c E a) E E as CL CL as >a)
EL U� m� ) 0) m � c Q� Q a a) U) 0 u) X E
J Q o E U '� Q U U) '� a) > U Q a) a) °) Q
CL a) a) a) N
Y E C: rn o O .0 as .0 0 a) C c 0 a) a) H > rn
U 0 a U m m U w as a E E
0 a a) > O > a) > 0 iq 'E
08 as > a) O .� O > () U) O a) as as 0 .� a
w a� o' E c c U a) c =o E �6
rn U w � = a) s a0i .� � � � as =mss ~ ~ h 0 E IL as a)
06 m u)i 6° a o) w rn° .E m 0) i6 a m m) T U a) L- � m
N E LL Q U IL W e .c IL U LL U W E E U (n U) 2
a) N Maaaaa - as 0 a)a �-IL IL p `m (u IL 111111
U =a ������IL IL LU a�� �aam aa����
a
W
T (1) (1) (1) 00 rn v I- u) (o O m (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) W v a) a) p v 0) O a)
c c c co co LO v co a r- c c c c c m c c o co v I- c
CL O O O N N N N N N H N O O O O O O N O O N N N N O
it C C C M I� I- I- r- O_ I- C C C C C C R I- C C I- C
CL
Q
U
0)
Q)
Q)
N
m
U
0
0)
0
0
\N
l
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
The Collection System Program includes projects to provide renovation of the collection
system infrastructure and to serve new development in the District's service area.
Projects also provide improvements to pumping stations and force mains. These
improvements provide capacity and renovation to reduce the likelihood of sewage
overflows during dry and wet weather.
Renovation and Urgent
The renovation program goal is to address recurring renovation needs and is budgeted
at $94.1 M for the next ten years or 55 percent of the collection system CIP. In prior
years, renovation needs were identified by CSOD through their critical line segments
list. This information has recently been augmented by a comprehensive TV inspection
program of the entire collection system that is proceeding within the Plan years at an
approximate cost of $5.6 M. This information is being utilized to develop improved
estimates of the short and long term recurring renovation needs. The District's
collection system contains pipe reaches of many soil types, ages, materials, and other
conditions that must be evaluated and replaced on an appropriate cycle. This cycle is
determined by the condition of the pipe and the expectation that poor pipe condition is
not an acceptable reason for sanitary sewer overflows.
Regulatory Compliance/ Planning/ Safety
For the past few years, the District has anticipated more stringent regulations with
respect to the operation and maintenance of the collection system to reduce overflows.
The local Regional Water Quality Control Board staff implemented such a program in
2005, and the State Board implemented a similar requirement in 2006. Both regulatory
bodies require each collection system agency to prepare a Sewer System Management
Plan (SSMP). These plans will share information about the strategies being employed
to reduce sewer overflows. They require careful review and documentation of the
District's continuing evaluation and planning for the collection system in the areas of
capacity management, operation, and maintenance. Many of the projects in this
subprogram will contribute to the accomplishment of the SSMP. A revision of the
Collection System Master Plan was conducted in fiscal years 2007 and 2008 to
incorporate changes in planned development and also make use of the District's
updated sewer system hydraulic model. This subprogram is budgeted at $2.7 M over
the next ten years or 2 percent of the collection system CIP.
Expansion
The Collection System Master Plan Update (2000) utilized the District sewer system
hydraulic model to identify capacity needs in four priority rankings. Implementation of
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -CS - 1
the full set of recommendations had a projected cost of $112 million (2000 dollars).
Timing for construction of the remaining projects is contained in the 2007 Plan. Large
capacity projects that have been initiated recently and are planned over the next ten
years include the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, the A -Line Relief Interceptor Phase 2A,
the San Ramon Schedule C Interceptor, the Miner Road Trunk Sewer, trunks in
downtown Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, and Martinez. Projects to be implemented in the
ten year window will change as a result of the Collection System Master Plan to be
completed during FY 2008 -09. Developer Sewers and other projects throughout the
District relieve and expand capacity limited pipe sections.
Expansion needs will require an investment of $63.3 M or 37 percent of the collection
system CIP over the next ten years.
Pumping Stations
Significant funds have been invested in the pumping stations over the last several
years. Starting in FY 2006 -07, the focus of this subprogram shifted to the smaller
pumping stations, such as Sleepy Hollow and Acacia, and to the force mains leaving the
various pumping stations. Expenditures of $12.1 M are budgeted for pumping stations
and force mains over the next ten years, approximately 7 percent of the total collection
system CIP.
At $172 M (2009 dollars), the Collection System Program represents approximately
52 percent of the anticipated capital funding needs of the District over the next ten
years.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -CS - 2
Z
Q
J
La
r
Z
W
W
O
Ca
G
CL
U
O
O
N
W
2
H
'Z
VL!
r
U
W
w
CL
LU
LU
Z
O
N
U N
O
N
70
N (6
N �
O U
Z
O O
70
O .O
O
N N
N
U
O
. N U 70'
W �
7
E O
U
(6 O
U .E O
N
N —0 O LL
^� 0)
W
O O
L
O a (1)
N
0 Q
O
-0 O
U
O
a (D .
L
a
cA M
N L
a
N E 0
o .�
>s -4-- E
QC/) N N
.� O N C/)
O
C1 O U U
�U a)
L
O L O
aH o
M
CO
U
Q
�
L
N
,
�
>
N
1
O
LO
(a
N
(a
Q N
O
(a
(a
p
Y N
Y
Y
O
Y
Y
Y
Y
A2
S2
N
S2
O
x
x
1G
Y
Xc-
N
N
N
N
N
E
N
o i+
N .�
V
N
N
C-
s
s
—
s
s
s
O
O
L
O
O
O—
O
O
N
N
Q
N
N N>
N
N O
N
(D
N
N
(Q
) x L
�N (V
N
N
N
CO
O
O
O
M
L
O
O
O O +N
O O
O
O E
O
O E
O
O
O
O
(a
CO N
O
C. 5 O
M
00
L6
L6
r
L(7 O N L
N
M
N
Q
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N 'y
N
•N
N
N
N
U
O
O
O=
O
O
O
O=
O
Q
CD-
N L
Q
Q
W
Q .�
Q U
Q
Q cz
Q
Q .�
—
L
>
0
E
m
CO
+0
�
� M y �
p
O
U
N
LL.
U
N O
(a
O
o
oC- CO
s
O
o a�
U
ch
o
= o L
CO
[if
Cl
i
U
N a z
N
>
M
L
Y _
N
•L
N
CO
Z
2
(Q
cQ
L ) L
O
��
[if
�
Q �
� �)
� �H •N L Q
� >
O
m
� •�
•a%
m
= (Q
N 2
U O �� N
= •L
�
m
2
L
N
N
N
N O
L
cN
G i
L(7 0
o 0
Q
L
_N
�'
0
m
N
�+
�'
U
N
Z
N
i
N
N
ca N
VN
E O
z
N
N N
O m
O
_N
0
J
O
LO
N O N O N
N
O
LL
[if [if
CO
O
O
O
N
N
L
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
(�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Y
aS
(D
�
o
�
L
O
�
cr)
U
°O
L
~
ca
O
L
o Fz=
N
m
p
U
U
N 0
U,
0
LL
co
1
O
[if
N
N
N Y
O
=
N
>
O L
—
O
Q O
N O
L E U
J
N
2
�.
N ~
'
'
>
^
N
(a N
U)
O
2 F4
M
(a
OU N
LO '0')
0
>
(a
U)
a
(a
EL
m O
N
=�
v��
o
_
-1 c)
-j
cam°
c�
[if
-j
a-
M
CO
U
Q
0
CO
U
Q
U
0)
0
O
N
m
U
O
N-
0
O
N
N
N
Y
OCR')
ca
O
O
i
L
0
7FD
�
2
E
CH
L
N
L
O
O
S?
a)
E-
a)
N
Y
L
()
N
Y
a)
�g:
U
.E
'
-:I-
a)
U)
o
U
L
C-
r
U
N
om
N
x
0
N
x
C)
L�"'
N
U
Co
a)
a)
�O
O
r—
Ch
C-
C-
S?
N
co
N
y.
C9
O
0
O
O
O
0
O
0
L-
N
4
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
42
O
O
I`
O
'ZI
O
O
C9
LO
L
ti
M
OO
N
a)
N
Q
m
ca
(a
(a
(a
(a
(a
(a LO
CD-
Q
O U
O
O N
O
O
O
O N
O U
S?
CD
S?
S?
S?
S? C
L.2-.2
Q N
Q
Q
Q
Q .�
Q
Y
a)
O
Y
U
>
Fz
O U
�_
0
U
Q
O
L
U
ca
N
(a
o
O
-
Y
z
>.
(a
ca
a)
N
m
O
a)
�
CC)
>%
o
N
ca
a)
>
Q
O
ca
�
2
•�
0
2
[if
�
o
aN)
0
E
O
>
7 FD
Cl
O Y
= a)
�+ O
m
U
O
() cam)
N
2 O
E
ca
_
o U
o
a) U
L .L
N
ca
_o
L Y
a)
L.L
Q
N O
N
0
U
a) 5
>
�
(
O L
O
t=
>+
M O
Fn
U
0
a)
?.
ca ca
z
c) Q
Ur =
N > %
E
cQ
C1
M
s
U
m
E
ca
>,
a)
L
Z
w
m
N a) C�
O
J
s= j
Z Q
o
Q of
Li
Z
Q
J
CL
L
r
Z
W
LU
0
w
CL
J
F-
0
0
N
W
2
H
Z
F-
U
W
i
0
w
CL
Z
0
U)
Z
CL
w
2
W
H
Z
0
W
J
J
0
m
CO
U
Q
CL
U
C»
O
0
co
U
O
0)
O
0
N
>
O
06 L
o
00 L
go
L
o
>>
CE
N
0
N N
Q
N N
70 Q
U
N
N
Q
O
O
O m
c
U (a N
E •E
C-) m N
—E—E —
.�
m
N
E-
L V
0
c0 -a a)
O
c0 -a a)
O
D a)
O
�O
N O
�_'
a) N
a) N
U)
N-a
M
O
N
� —_ N
N_
_ —_ N
_
N =
_
N
C
Q'Q
CDL
L
O
N� O
N N� O
N
N
N O
Q L N
x � N
x �
O
O
N=
O
N
O N 70
O N 70
O
N (D -a
_
y N O
L
N
N (a
N
N (a
Q E
(a
O
N
(a - N 0
>O >
(a Q N N
>O � U) -a
Q N N
0� U) -a
0
Q N N
N
O
O�
N-a
O
N
N 00 (D
N
N
O
(a
N
O
.�
O O U
.�
O U
,�
N U
C/) .�
�
� .�_ N
�O ,�_ N
�O
:�_
N
�•
Q Q
Q Q
Q
Q
L
m
=
N O
=
N O
O
-a N
O
O O
O O �_
O O E
(Q O �_
N
N
•(�
L
•(�
L
•(�
L
N O
— L
U
-
(Q
O
(Q
O
L
N O
E
N
0
U N
j
i
N
i
N
N
U
N 1G (a
N N
N
N
N N c
O N
N
N
N
p
N
L
N
N
iv
N
N
O
N
N ca
N
L
Q
N
Q O
Q
N
Q
N
�
N
N
N
N (a
N (a
N
(a
W
H OU N
H 4
N
N
O
H N
O
H
N 0
N
O
-�
ON
s�
00
O a)
Y
Y
—
C
�U
-a C/)
m
m
O
m�
0
U
U
U)
J
ZN[if
�U
L
(�
O
N
M
CO
0
N
CD
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
a)
N
m
C-
Q
N
N
N
N
N
+N
�
N
N
C-
E >
LO
CDL
a)
OQ
E
IL
>
2
O
CDL
Q
E
E
L
(D
U
(a
(a
N
CO
L
N
>
U
Q
>
U
>
O
U
O
!E
Q
N
v
>_
U
Q
N
oOp
CO
O
L
L
r
0
(�
V
E
D
U
CO
•Q
ca
[
0
U
CL
U
U m
CO
m
CO
U
Q
CL
U
C»
O
0
co
U
O
0)
O
0
N
z
J
CL
F-
z
W
W
O
a
J
H
CL
U
O
O
N
LU
2
F-
z
U)
H
W
O
w
CL
z
O
O
z
W
W
F-
z
O
LU
J
J
O
U
no
CO
U
Q
U
0)
O
C>
N
m
U
O
N-
C�
C>
C>
N
L
�
_
O
>
>
(a
LL N L N
= L U
N
Y
N
>
N
>
N
N
uN (a N
�--�
U
N
N
�--�
N
O
Q
�N.
N
Q
0 a,
(Q
(Q
ca
Q
L
m
a
L
Q
U CD- N N
L
`_
�_
�_
O
Q
L
N
N
O
Q
N
N 070
Q
0 (�
O
N
N
N
N
N�� 0
O
L
�
�
N
U
•U
N
U
0 •
(a N N
>
N
U
N
r
r
C-
E N o
N
N
c-
U
p'
c
U
0
O
-a
0')
0
O
0
m -tf
p U
N
00
00
m
(a
o
O
L
`� E
•a
L
00 �"'
C-
�"'
N Q
(a
N O N 0 0
cz N
CO
Co N
Co N
CO
CO N
>j Q
p
N
N
Co
Co
,-
4--
,�
,�
N O N
N
N
>%
O
O
�N.
N (a
o — > E
s
,2
4 a�
,2 a�
42
� a�
oL
tea,
U
C:) 70
C:) 70
C:) -a
U) CD- +�--�
N
O 0
O 0
O 0
O
O
O 0
O
N N N
0�
O U
O�
N�
O >'
(a
° >'
(a
°�
° >'
(a
U
M 0
(a
C.0
LC) N
�-a
LC) N
0
0
O
1
O m
O
O U
0-
N
C13
0 o > m o
o
E
0'L
0'L
0,.L
0 c,
0 C')
°,�
° C')
- a� Q
o
O
O aD
O
o
Q0
Qo
CD- C?
Q
Q
Q0
Q•
L cm
C
(Q
� O
N
O O
O O
O O
N
N
O O
N
a) a? > maU�
aim
2
>.
��,
��,
��,
��
��
M�
U o CD Q
�
N
> _
0-a
> —
0-a
> —
0-a
> N
0
> N
0
> —
0�
> N
o
ca
0
0
0
•x
/
70 m
0
L L
Q,�
O
L �_
0'
L �_
0'
L �_
0'
L
O
L
O
L �_
0'
L
O
Q
=
M cz E O
�O
L
Q
N
� N
— N
� N
— N
� N
— N
-a N
N
� N
—
-a N
m
-r- o N 70 '0
N -
M +'
ca N
M ,N
ca N
ca •-
m •-
ca N
m-
>
m >+ N >'
O C
>0
U
U�
U�
U�
U
U
U�
C.,—
C
. C,) N 0
,U
ca N
ca N
m N
m N
m
m
m
m
4%
>, �= 0�
N�
N M
4_
N�
N
N N
N N
4_
N N
CO cr m Q�
� Q
� N
�-M
M-M
M 70
� N
� N
��
[if N
O
N
U
N
(a
0
NO
0
0
0
J
0
O
U
0
O
C-')
ca
U
U
0
D
0
C
0
0
_
=
N
Uo
aS
(jo
OT E
C- (15
ca
ca
m
m
(D Z_
0
o.2
o
m
N
C
J
C- >
N
0
O
:E
O
_
O
�N
CO)
- p
�U
p
�U
L
(�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
m
O
N
M
N
LO
00
ti
L N
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
U)
>j
2 0
�0
N�
L�
�L
CD-
C/5
N L
m
��
Na-
0-
0-
0-
I
co �
COQ
N�
CO
��
=
��
��
L
N�
��
L
�+
O
N
N •O
O
,� O
O
•L •0
O
0
O
O
Q
'^
U >
p 0 0
_o N
N
L >
0 0
>
0
>
� 0
M >
N O
>
o
>
0
N >
>'0
>
0
a)
o0-
(D
a
C) [if
_�
��
z�
c°�
��
��
[if
no
CO
U
Q
U
0)
O
C>
N
m
U
O
N-
C�
C>
C>
N
2
«
�
CL
F-
2
W
2
W
>
O
w
CL
�
�
F-
CL
«
U
�
0
0
C4
w
2
F-
2
F-
U
w
�
O
w
CL
2
O
F-
�
m
O
2
�
�
�
CL
2
W
F-
m
�
m
2
O
F-
L)
w
�
�
O
U
w
CO
U
�
ƒ
U
@
0
0
�
9
U
2
@
0
0
a
W
LL.
2
o
—
'E
k
7
E H o
E
E
% 3 =
U) o
'k
.E
<
E
3 ®
�
2
E '-
2 •%
�_ n
E
2 e
k
3 .$
� E
�R 2
k 2
5� 2
� o
E
/
2 2
§
g
°
%
cz 22
-a
�2
22
2�
$�
2 2
3 0
e§
o
o�
2 0 2
E R
2
°
m
.$
/$ .2
m o
2
� U o
2
®
n n._
R m
=
2E o
2= E
5
CO C b
R R
o� Fu
R C
�-
7
2 I�
_g
m
=
E%
$
C-2k
\
-t:f
> 0
_k
0
:E
2 0 -a
2
8 3
%%
n o G
2 A%
m �.�
2
0 E
•
�•-
o
\��
e/
CO
2��7
(D
=
R o
U)
E m
n
= E
_
k
a
E
$
®°
8 2
2
m $.2 0
2
$(
3 E
2 2 0
n
0 0
U
2
o n
O$ C-
o
o
cm e
R2
G(D
R 0�
: o o
'0 2 m n
E
O E
R
2
0 2 R
0 0 0
0 70
o:
� E= 7
C- o (D
__
R
o-L--
C14
CV)
LO
%
0
7
0
7
�
2
R
m
3
CO
0
CO
E
2
E
U)
CO
0
@
U)
a
�2
2.=
E
u
�.E
�
�
O �
U
w
CO
U
�
ƒ
U
@
0
0
�
9
U
2
@
0
0
a
W
LL.
N
L
i
Q
x
w
d
E
4+
w
w
E
P
cm
O
CL
d
m
O
O
N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
00 00 O 00000000000000000000000000
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O O (O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O N O M O O N 00
(O
Is
Cl) In 0) O O O O In N O N N O O In N (O N N O N O N O
co V M N (O N N N M In N o0 (O o0 01 (O o0 Q N It 00 Cl)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
r r r N In r
Q)
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
00 O 00
O O O O O
r
O
� 0 O N
N
O
pp
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O 00 00 00 O
O
00 O 00
n
0) O 00
O
Cl) O O l()
V L
N
-
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
CL
O O O O O
O
V O 00
CD
O
In O O N
O to
N
�
co
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
ICJ
00 O 00
O O O O O
r
O
N O O N
O to
N
r`
La
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
00 O O 00
r
O
(MO O O N Lo
to
N
r
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
00 O O 00
M
Cl) O 0 0
O
In O O N
(0 to
N
00
M
000000000000000000000000000000000
O
C4
O O O O O O O
N
O In O O O
CD
N
In N 0 O O
N N V
M �
N
00 00 O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 00 O O O O O 00
O
r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O M O — — — 0 0 O
In O O N O O In
N
00 N d) N N
V
000000000000000000000000000000000
O
c
00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g q q q
O
O O O O O O O l( 0 0 0 0 co 0 (O O O
O O O O O O In O l() In O V O N d)
N
N� Nt Nt � LQ Nt Q N In r r
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
O
O
O O (O O O O 00 00 O O 00 N O 0 0 In O N
(O
O
Cl) In 0) O O O O In N O N N O N N N O Cl)
N
Cl) N— N (O N V (M N co N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
�
OS OS Y Y OS Y OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS
i�
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 § 3:
OS N
0N )
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y
_ O O O O 0
y Y Y Y -O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
O 0) C O 0 C O 0 O O C O C C O C C O C C C C C O C C C C C C C C C
N
L
(7(n Q 2 a Q 2 a 2 2 Q 2 Q Q� Q Q x 0 0 0 Q Q 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
U
0)
w R
- 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 W
co >-
1-[- 00 1-[-[- 1-0
000-000000000000-0000000-0000-000
0
0)
N Ul I- C 00 Ul
N
L V 00 l!i V L J L U
O)
Q L L 0) O- 6) Q J 0)
Q
C C CO N 0) N Q Q M Q O Q C O L O U d
L d L L L a I O d O O
QN N N U) Ul C N U
E .O O L O- > C Q C Q Ul Ul Q N C > Q O)'2
m
C
y
U Q' O .0 , O L .3 . C o L O O N m .� N a)
Q; , >C Q -6 Q 0, >CE X >Q Q��
a�
U) U)
O O T> O 0) > C 0) i > C� 0) O i OS � 0) (0 � 0 � 0) 2) L
� O
Y
O) C U O O .0 0 N O .2 > O N> 0 0) 0) O C C 0) 0) (n C�� U
o o E 0) O C O 0) (O C C Q C E E 0 .2 .2 0) �� ,O T E S
i E
E a�i
NO O- O O N i 0) Q 0) U N N a 0 0 U N 0 (n 0) O)
0)
C 0) > Y C 2i > L 0) >+ Y w C V 3 U p >+ `�
a T
E N 2i 0) (n 0) � 0 C N _ 0) 0- 0) 70 (n N (n � U C U d U .�
(n U) a
y (n
(n 0 0 C N C O= ,E C C U 0) (p C 0)
U C
(n
C O O T N O C O N O N >'
> U O C T C N U U 0) >� L U o 0) �_
Q 0)
w
C O C -
(p O 2 �p N O (6 (6 N (6 O O (p O i O O (p O O (6 O J
O
>(U >O >>O
>>O
>J(n� >JILz20 (nU�JUHUU >JU) 0
0
H
;ON�U2�U
VU
(D
O
V (fl 00 N (f) (O V I-
� V I- N O) 0) V I- O (`") � 00 � M N (o � r N 0) N N 0) N 0) 0) 0) N N 0) 0) 0) 0)
� Lo
O 'rnrnrnrnrn ornrnrnrnUrnrnrnrn1— 0) oUU oU o o oU0) o o o o
'rn
CL
it
U (!i (!i (!i (!i (!i C (!i (!i (!i Lr) !? (!i (!i (!i (!i (!i O_ Lr) O_ C Q Q C Q C C C Q N C C C C
N (!i
co
U
Q
U
0)
Q)
Q)
co
U
0
N-
0
0
N
N
L
i
Q
x
w
d
E
4+
w
w
E
P
cm
O
a
i
d
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0000000000000000000000000000
O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O
0000000000000000000000000000
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Q 0) I O N t — 0 0 0
O I- O O N N— O I- O O O V O N O O O O O O O N r V
N N to M O
In to V
0 00 00 00 N O O O O N N O I- O to O to (O O (O
O 0) N r- N (O N (O (O (O (O N V 0) Nt O O _ r- 0) N
Cl) N — Cl) Cl) O — — — — — N Cl) V — V — N
0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00
O O
O O O
O O O
O
O0
O
O
000 O
N
) 0
co O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O
� O O O
n O
00
O (O
O
d)
N
r - O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O O
CL O O
O O O O
O O O
O O N 00
N
O O (O
to (O N
� M �
CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O O
00
O O
O 00 00
O O O O O
ICJ
�
O
O
000 O O O (00
N
to 0) co
� �
LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O 00 00 00 O O 00
O O
O O
O 00 00
O O O O O
.4
�
O
O
000 O O O O
N
r (O (O N
- N
O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O
O O
O O O 00 00
M O O
O O In 00 00
O
O 00 O to O to
In O (O N co V
N
M O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O
r O O
O O
O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O
N O O
O O O O V I- O O O
N
O O O 00 N to O O O
O (O (O — to N N co N
N N
N O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r O O
O O
O 0 00 00 00 0 O
O O O O O O O O O O
O O
N O 1-0 O O O 0 N Cl)
O I�
N
O O O O 00 00 r
_ N
M N to to IM V
N
O O O O O O O 00
00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
q q
O O 00 O 00 O O
q q O q q q O q q
c
�
O
O
O - 00 O O 00 N N
N
to Cl) d) V N
N
O O O O O O O O 00
O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O g q O q q O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 01 In O to to — 0
O O I- 0 0 0 V
O N I— N In
O 00 O 00 O N
N
to 0) 00 Cl)
R t a)ttt a) t
V Lo (O (O I- 00 O) O Lo
a) 00 I- 1- 1- (O N I- I- I-
>-00000 000
rn rn
c
E 0 0
N as a) .
Q O) d O O
o N
as M i
L
i
d
Q
K
w
d
N
w
P
cm
O
L
CL
i
d
N
o 00 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 O
0
w
O 00 O O
O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O O
V �_ O N O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 O N O O O O r O co O (O O O
co M
r- r O N
In r V N N
N 0 In to t N In to 00 co In V In O 0) I- M If)
(O to Cl) N N V In M N M 00 (O
O O
M M
N
N N
r N
r
O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00
O O
O 00 O O
O O O O O
O O 00
O O O O
O O
O O
M
O- ON
r r
(MO V O
(00 r ((O N
00 00
NIn
V N N
r r r
DD DD
00
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O O O O
O O
O O
O O O
O O
n
- r
O to
O O
C
NO
� (O
In
(O (O
V V
N N
r
I- I-
r -
O O O 00 O
0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 O O 00
O O
CL
O O O
O O
In O O
O O
NIn
(O (O 0)
V V
N N
r r
(O
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O 00
O O
O O 00 O
O O O O O
O O
O O
ICJ
LO 0 Cl)
G
(O (O O O
� IT
N
M I
N
r �
4i
O O O O O O
0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00
O O
O O O 00
O O O O O
O O
O O
.4
N
G
((O 0 O
O �
It It
N
O V
N
r �
O O O O O O
0 0 0 00 O O O O O O O 00 00 O O O O O O
O
0 0 0 0
O O O O
0
O O
M
to O 00 r
O O
CD
N
(O (O 0) V
0) N
V V
N
N
r r
M
O O O O O O
0 0 0 00 O O O O O O O 00 00 O O O O O O
O 00 O
O O
N
G
(D M M
It It
N N
N
N
O O O O O O
0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O
O O 00
O O
In O O to
V V
O
O (O I-
In
N
O O O O O O
0 0 0 00 O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O
O 0
O O 00 00
0 0 0000
O 0
0 0
0
CD
��LOLO
00 00
N
N
O
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 O O 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00
0 O
000 00 00 0 0 0
0
CD
X00 °00 0m°
G
N
(O M
�
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
-le
i�
(U a) +.-' 2 cu ..-' 2 2 O (0 3: a3 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: a3 3:
R R
Y! Y Y! Y! Y Y Y Y Y Y Y! Y
c
(0
N N N N N N
a) N N !
N
O O
~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0
t a) C O C C L C C C C C C C C C
mU�¢ Q¢ < <<<<<<< <
E t'
(0 I- 1—
00
y CL
� 7
O
a
I- I- 1- 00 1- 1-
1- O I- r- O r- N r- r- r- r- I- I-
i
N>-
000000
O- 0 00 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
N U) c
00 o
as ° m
v o 0 Q Q °
M H O O Z:) U) Q o H
m c .2 Cl) a) olig c m�
� � °- o as a E a) m > � C: LL L
o N o' U) Q °� E Q Q a) O E (� Q Q a)
H
H E o U) C� j 0)-o (6 ) J `O a as m a a) � a m
0 Q � m o U 0) .Q rn o M Cr U a li N U) a 0 rn
CL
m N E CL =; >- 3: U) 2a o nLL 'Q
v a) a) �� ° Eaa O�U oO oa Qas N Q° a) oaU
s as a o Q Q o a) rn U > ° IL
m Q
rn� E. > as as.
Na >a m "Vw E oXQ oQa mw0U as 2 �m a) m
a) c c O yU E �w(n �_ aa))wU -�U a) (� rn��sw aNi
w O J J N 01 (n 7 O m (n (n 13 (n (n (0 a3 (n p .- O (0 p >' 7 (n a3
�Q(nQ -i m caaZCnaa0maa2c IL -102 UUmam
Q
d E rnrnaoc')
O a) a) a) a) a) a) a N N M O a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a)
i C C C C C C (O N I� V V (O C C C C C C C C C C C C
d o o o o 0 0 rn rn rn rn rn U U U U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�t er (o In In In In In Q Q Q Q c c c c c c c c c c c c
Q)
COV J
U
Q
CL
U
Q)
Q)
MN
U
0
Q)
Q)
N
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
This General Improvements Program is dedicated to funding purchase of property and
equipment, office and corporation yard improvements, map production, and information
technology needs of the District. At $45.9 M, the General Improvements Program
represents about 14 percent of the total 2009 ten year Capital Improvement Plan.
The focus of General Improvements Program over the next ten years will be for the
Equipment Budget, improvements in the District's management information systems,
and renovations of the District Headquarters Office Building in Martinez and the
Collection System Operations Division (CSOD) Facilities and Yard in Walnut Creek.
While consistent investment in our treatment and collection systems has occurred over
the last thirty years, the District office and other buildings have not had consistent
capital improvements. With most of these buildings over 25 years of age, the CIP
includes more projects for renovations of the interiors and exteriors of the buildings,
such as upgrading kitchen and lunch rooms, painting or sealing walls, replacing ceiling
tiles, upgrading lighting fixtures and replacing worn or outdated flooring and furniture. A
major expenditure over the next few years will be design and construction of the new
CSOD facility and yard in Walnut Creek. The General Improvements Program
expenditures have been increased to address these planned building renovations.
FY2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -GI - 1
z
J
CL
F-
z
LU
W
0
w
CL
J
CL
U
O
O
O
N
W
F-
z
H
LU
w
CL
Q
0
0
w
CL
U)
F-
z
W
2
W
0
Ca
G
J
W
z
W
0
N
Q
CL
U
C)
O
O
N
CC)
U
C>
N-
C�
O
O
N
N
(a
O o
o E
�
�O
O.O
��
a) o N
N
OU O j U
y NU N N
N U
O O
.2 LO .E
.2 U)
.0
N L
-a�o 0
— •0 �
Nm i U
(a
(a N m o U
m �+�0. N
0 N
>j
- O V U
77-
Q N N •� N
O
U-
�cn
o >
a) o
�� o
L
o
H
U U
O Q
U N o O
N U��
C N
Q (a N N N
(a
N
�_-.
= Q •�
o)"
N y 0
N j,-� x O
U) -a
•E
L >j + U
N
,=-4-
N Q=
O '�
O m N o�
N
(a
�O N
o U �
U O L
o
CZ N N
O N - N >
OU Q L N
�
o .0
(a
O
0=' X O N
`�� N �_
N QO L
N o-a O
0 0 0
N N 0�� U�
CO �_
U>
N (a
0) s O 0
N �_ U LL
U N(/) j
O M O O
�V N� N E
Q
U
o N U o
L LO
N
N
�
_a N N o
x �����_
�' U i
Q��
N o
��_ N L N Q
0 m
0 N
4-- , N
OU
M Nom-- — o
�N
0s
U
�_ >,O
Q� o=3ca•��0 E
0� >
C-)
o� L 2
�
�N �
U i
N
E
o
N N Qi
CO o -
H �L O
U) �
N
ti N N 0�
o~ U)
� --:I O
�N O N
� ti >, U
O
C) E
I` N O
U D U �
(a U) N om--.
>O
(a
N N U
m > Q�
NQ 0
�N
o-
0 �
>QE
0) N
� C�
N _
.o .cz
E N
O
N U
Q
.- .Ni
.
-.
•- (a N
-Fn CU
o U)
�c)Oca
��
N
-a
m N_ U) -a
N L O N
U)
N N
0
�
E 0 0 (a
�_ O N N
0 --
U
N O—O
U U N
om N
- NO N
(a N .� =_
E E L
0 2�
O
(1) ' N
o
(D U)
(,�•L,��
C)�QE= a) >�
p�� (a
p (ate O N
:E N O 0
U O
=.2-
Q,-
L (Q N— .V
L U >G L
Q•i Q).2
N N E L (Q E
> N U N Q N
�
0
E q �m
N
N�
N
N� L
-E
Q (a .- i U
OM N
U r m N M .-
L
iv
O
O
O
�O
Q
O
O
O
O
}
N
N
N
N
�
E
�
N
N
N
(a
Q
>
O
N
E
E
N
(a
V
E
p
U
�+
LL
�
Q
E
a
.�
0
CO
>
O
D
m0
0
CO
0
a.
U
2
Q
U
N
Q
CL
U
C)
O
O
N
CC)
U
C>
N-
C�
O
O
N
L
i
d
Q
x
w
d
E
ch
w
E
P
cm
0
CL
i
d
m
O
Q)
w
N
00 00
00 00
000000000000000000000000 o
00 00
C O O O
00 00
O O O O
000000000000000000000000 o
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C
0 0 0
LO N O O
O M O O O O V N O M O O M O O O N O O O O N O r
O O
O r-
r V O O
QZ V Ln
00 (O to 0) r d) O N (O r 0) V N (O O r N 00 (O O V LO
r N r r r LO O- Cl) V r 00 r V Cl) V a
00
N N
(O (O LO
r �
C A
00 00
00 00
O 00 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 00 00 O o
M
00
O O
O
O
O 00 00 O o
O O O O O O O
o
O
O
o0 M N to r Cl)
N
O
N
C
N
pp
00 O O
00 O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o
�
O O
O
O O O O O O C
n
O
O
0 00 01- N 00
O
O
o0 N m N N r
N
O
to
V
N
00 O O
00 O O
O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 O o
CL
O O
O
O O O O O O C
CL
O
O
O O In O r N 00
o
O
O
w N m N N r
N
O
LO
C
N
co
00 O O
00 O O
O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o
ICJ
00
O O
O
O
O O O O O O O o
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
0
O
O
O
O
O O 00 O r N 00
00 (O d) to to r N
N
O
LO
C
N
La
00 O O
O O O O
O 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o
00
O
O O O O O O O o
0
O
O
O
O
O O 00 O r N 00
00 (O d) to to r N
N
O
LO
C
N
00 00
00 00
O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
00
O O
O
O
O O O O O O O o
O O O O O O O C
M
O
O
O O In N O r N Cl)
0
O
O
00 r- m 0 0 r- v
N
0
Ln
— o
N
M
00 00
00 00
O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o
r
00
O O
O O
O O
O O O 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
O O O O O O O O O O O O O C
N
O
O O
O O lf) r to O O to to O to to O 00
0
04
O
O O
(O t I- r 00 r 0) LO o
N
O
LO -
Cl) cc
N
N
00 O O
O O O O
O 00 O O O 00 O O 00 O O 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O o
r
00
O O
O O
O O
00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C
O
O O
00 O 0 r N O O 00 00 00 O Cl)
0
O
O O
LO CO - -- O V r r w r m N N
N
0
LO
00
N 00
00 00
00 00
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 00 00 O o
c
00
q q
O O
q q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
o g q q q q q g q q q g q q q q q
0
O
O
O O
O O
I- O LO O LO O V Ln r to O d) O In 00 In
M M V m O N t r Cl) 00 O
N
r
to
V r 00 O
00 N
o
00 00
00 00
O 00 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 00 00 00 O o
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
0
O
In N O
O O O to O to O N In N to O M O O N r
0
0
r V O
00 O Cl) V 0) O LO V V I- Cl)
N
O
(O -
to to cc
�
r O
a)
O O O O
2i 2i
> > > > > > > > > >
m m m m
N a)
."-. -• m M" � m O m m m m 3 3 L6 L6 L6 3
C
N N N N
C C
a) E E a)
N N(
> O) O) N O N a) m 0) 0) 0) O a) O C C O) > O 0).N O C R
N O N"
�N•
m (n
N .FD 7 7 1 7 M 0 = = == 0 p 7 7 '� 7 2
m m m m
>>>>
(7 U U (7
=°
a)
F
J (n U J J J x CJ CJ m J U) CJ
E
00 0) 0) O
V LO 00 V
O V V (O (O (O I- I- I- I- I- I- 1- 00 00 00 O O N V V R
R
N
0000
O O O O
0 000 0 00000 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
N
O O
a) m
E
N N
J C
a)
0 0
N
> N
>
u! C 0 C J u!
U U
0 0
- o
N
C O Q a) N ' U
y �
a) E E tl) vl a) (�
E m °' Q °' J E
a�i aci
�' rn rn
a) E a >> a) O O E a N a) a) H
E E E
y O. 0
> ° n ° a) > m > a) J
m O w 0> - 0 w
CL
m
Q
o N N N Q -0— N O O
Q> a) (n '� Q
0)
C a c
u) E Q a) o Q o T
+N
a s a
v Q v
a) E a) a) Q °) E> E m a) Q a) E
c
.�
m w w w
aEi > E a�i
E> E a) a)
a) a) a)
H O H
> E a) rn o a) E E aa)) T m E
a) O_ a) a) rn u)
a)
a E
>> a)
m - a) > > O Q U cn a) m — > — (q a)
m m U m
N N 'p N
.0 o .o
-
m m Q ° Q Q° o c� .� N w m.2 a�i ° m a m
J -„ Q E d d a) N w J w w
0
a.
W v TIL
Z E
LL d E Z O E LL
E m��� E > v
Q
co)
ca
EL0~
°D
��._ m0 O.V m 00 �.
O m .Q Q o O m-E '� 0 .Q m 0
d
Q
Q
mcq m0 m0�2 m.N a) a) c/) 0 m.Nc/) m00c/) .5.N
N >> U>
U` U`
v U U Y 2 U d Q 2 0 af U` E U 2 U U d 2 U Y
V
O
C
d
O) O 0) a)
LO a)
a N 0 O 0� N M V r- 0 O 0 O O a) a) a) a) a) a) a)
i
CL
O O) C
O) C
0 O C C C C C C C
k
C9
t�00
00c
W 00 c
QQ c c c c c c
0000 00 00 00 00 00 00 c
000000 Q0
00)
M
Q
CL
U
0)
Q)
Q)
MN
U
0
0)
Q)
Q)
N
RECYCLED WATER PROGRAM
The Recycled Water Program includes projects to meet the District's goal of developing
additional cost - effective recycled water customers.
Capital expenditures over the next 10 years are primarily focused on planning to
develop a large -scale industrial reuse project (such as the refineries or power plant use)
and on completing the remaining connections to landscape irrigation customers in the
Zone 1 Project Area located in Pleasant Hill, Concord, and Martinez near the 1 -680
freeway.
Budget is also included for recycled water master planning and pursuing outside funding
assistance. Funding for implementation of a large -scale industrial reuse project is not
included.
At $5,515,000 the Recycled Water Program represents about 1.7 percent of the total
2009 Capital Improvement Plan expenditures over the next ten years.
FY 2009 -10 CIB /2009 CIP A -RIN - 1
Z
Q
J
CL
F-
Z
W
2
LU
O
w
CL
J
Q
H
CL
U
O
O
N
LU
2
H
Z
F-
U
LU
i
w
CL
Q
0
O
w
CL
w
W
F-
Q
0
W
J
U
U
LU
w
O O
N N
o
o
E N
L U
�L
C- N_
� N
(u
O 0
o U
U U
N
O �
U �
� N
cz E
r L
N ai
N
(a U
C-
2
cz
2 �
N
ca
a
O
O
c C
o =
+�
Q o
O N cz
�L U
:.: (a U
.0
CZ 0 +' CZ CZ
+� m
v o � �
O N U Q
a N E
� N
Q O
} N
cz
N
(a
_N
Q
cu
� � U
4% 75 N
O � cz
CL
o�
N
Q
CL
U
0)
0
0
N
m
U
O
N-
O
O
N
L
i
d
Q
x
w
d
E
N
w
E
so
cm
O
L
a
i
m
O
O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
O
R
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
-
DN
�_ In
F-
M (O 000 O O
O In M M N
N
N
N N
Q)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
O 00 O
O O O O
O O
O O
M
0
G
� O 0
Cl)
0
LO N
N
pp
00 0 0 00 0
O O
O O O O O
O
n
O O 0 O
N N
N
V (O N
Cl)
0 0
N N
r-
00 0 0 00 0
O O
CL
O O O O O
O
CL
00 O N In
N N
�
N
(O t V
Cl)
In N
N N
(o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
O 00 O
O O O O
O O
O O
ICJ
G
r V
Cl)
N N
N
La
0 0 0 0 00 0
O O
O 00
O O O
O O
O O
.4
In N O
0 N
CD
0 M
0 LO
N N
0 0 00 0
r
0 0
O O O
O O
O O
M
N N O
O O
r
N
DN M
N N
M
00 00 00 O
O O O O
O
N
N N O
G
0 M
N N
N LO
N
N
00 0 0 00 0
O O
�
O O O O
O
In O N
O O
�
V O
In N
N
Cl) N
N N
00 00 00 0
O
000
00
0 0
0
In 0 In
O 0
CD
M °
LO LO
N
O
00 00 00 0
O O
00 0
o00
00_ 00_
G
N 0 In
N
M 0
N N
Y Y
a3 a3
O 0
R R
m
a) a) a)
R
C a) a) a) s C a)
Q m m m Q m
E
7 7 �_
R
O_ O_ 0
C
1- I- I\ I-
L
Nd
O O o 0 0 0 0
d
c
s O
fl'U) a)
— aS J a3
a) Q W a)
O) N af O)
N N N
.1)
�+ 'C a3 'E
U j a) U
O > a3 a 0 0 a3
U O O O O U O
01— U
ccMZ
r U U U U
H
'a
J�Naf af af��
N
t0
= 0)
d
it
N N 0 0 0 0
I I- C C C C
CL
U
0)
Q)
Q)
N
CC)
U
0
0)
Q)
Q)
N
2009 - 2010 EQUIPMENT BUDGET
Introduction /Routine Procedures: The following tables show items anticipated to be
purchased via the 2007 - 2008 Equipment Budget. In addition to the specific purchases, a
$60,000 contingency is budgeted for unanticipated needs. When the contingency budget is
utilized, a memo is sent to the General Manager who can approve purchases up to
$10,000. Equipment purchased over $10,000 will be submitted for Board approval.
Equipment Item Overrun: When the actual cost of an equipment budget item is more than
the budgeted amount, the following guidelines should be observed:
• If the overrun does not exceed $5,000 or 10 %, whichever is greater, and
there are sufficient funds in the department's Equipment Budget line account
to cover the overrun, then the purchase can proceed. An informational
memo should be sent to the General Manager in these cases, to keep him
aware of budget variances. When Purchasing receives their copy of the
• memo, the purchase may proceed.
• If the overrun exceeds the above criteria, a contingency memo, or position
paper will be required. If the dollar overrun is less than $10,000, the
additional funds may be requested through contingency. If the dollar overrun
is more than $10,000, a position paper is required.
Substitutions: Occasionally, the need to substitute a functionally different equipment item
for a previously authorized Equipment Budgeted item arises. The following procedure
should be followed in these instances:
• Situation One: Where a substitution is necessary, but the total does not
exceed the authorized Equipment Budgeted amount, a memo will be sent to
the General Manager detailing the need for the substitution.
• Situation Two: If the substitution, or an unanticipated cost increase will result
in the purchase exceeding the authorized Equipment Budgeted amount, a
contingency memo (up to $10,000) should be sent to the General Manager
outlining the need for substitution and /or the additional amount from
contingency that is required for purchase.
In both situations, if the substitution is warranted, the General Manager will
• approve the memo, and Purchasing can then proceed with the procurement
process after their copy of the memo is received. Changes to authorized
Equipment Budgeted purchases exceeding $10,000 additional cost must be
requested by position paper to the Board.
H1Equipment Budget\2009 -2010 O&M Budget cover page.doc S Recycled Paper
•
•
Summarized below is a comparison of the 2009 -2010 Equipment Budget with the approved budgets of the four prior years:
Contingency as a % of Total Budget 20.52% 8.99% 5.37% 5.49% 8.90%
2009 -2010
2008 -2009
2007 -2008
2006 -2007
2005 -2006
Administrative
9,000
0
0
7,500
5,000
En in ering
0
0
69,865
40,660
14,300
Collection System Operations
57,500
329,000
245,000
53,200
200,375
Plant Operations
84,400
44,650
37,500
240,000
59,450
Pump Stations
0
0
0
115,266
0
Subtotal
150,900
373,650
352,365
456,626
279,125
Vehicles
New
0
0
0
0
18,000
Replacement
141,500
294,000
764,500
637,000
377,000
Subtotal
141,500
294,000
764,500
637,000
395,000
Equipment Re uestTotal
292,400
667,650
1,116,865
1,093,626
674,125
Contingency
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
District Total
$352,400
$727,650
$1,176,865
$1,153,626
$734,125
Contingency as a % of Total Budget 20.52% 8.99% 5.37% 5.49% 8.90%
•
•
•
w
OW
F-
m Q
�a
Zw
W 0
2w
a>
C~
W
O F-
O N
N Z
O 2
N Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
rn
rn
rn
0
F-
T
N
w
f0
T
.j
U �
7 ._
O
a
O
O
O
o
w
0
0
m
rn
U_
7
-0 0
O
U)
a`
w
U
Q'
w
C5
fn
�
N
J
m
F-
a
a)
Z
U
O
F-
c
c
a>
_o
CL
a
N
CL
D
O
E
N
m
N
>
—
>
N
n
�
m
L
(l)
N
U)
C_
N
E
Q
U)
>1
C
N
(0
7
Q
•
0
0
' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
DEPARTMENT /DIVISION /COST CENTER
2009 -2010
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
12
Steel Shelving Units,
PO
$9,000
42x36x12'3 "H
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity-Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: September 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
In 2007 -2008, the Record Center in Bay 3 at 4737 Imhoff Place was expanded to include Bay 10 (immediately
behind Bay 3). Additional shelving is required for Bay 10. The shelving requested is designed and sized to
accommodate the standard record storage boxes in a manner that allows easy retrieval, protection from damage,
and maximum utilization. Installation will be performed by Material Services.
See attached quote from California Storage System.
SUBMITTED BY
DATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
Departmenty6ireXor
General Mana er
FROM :CAL STORAGE
0
0
Central
5019 I111
Martini
Att: Chi
FAX NO. :9253715321 Nov. 21 200e 12:46PM PI
California Storage System
432 Franklin Lane
Livermore, Ca. 94551
Phone: (925)371 -0490 Fax: (925)371 -5321
tntra Costa Sanitary District
'f Pl.
Ca. 94553
Gee
Below is y r quote for your Shelving Units for your archieval
storage. l2' x 42" x 36" with 6 adjustable shelves. Layout to be
As follows: 9 units back to back all triple braced back and sides.
( Total of 1 units)
$7,969
Borroughs teel Shelving Quote ( 4 -6 week leadtinne )
Net Materia Price for the Borroughs Shelving $6,977.85
Insl allation 1,(195.00
Frei ht
Sub-Total $8,786.23
Western Pa ific Shelving to match your existing ( 2.3 week leadtime )
Net Materia Price for the Western Pacific $6,385
Installation 1,095
Freiel�t — 488
Sub Total
This quote is firm for 15 days
Note: The proil mts furnished by California Storage Systems arc. consistent with good .
engineering Pr, dices, but unless stated above, we have not retained a civil engineer for plan
certification, no have we obtained a building permit. Should either of these steps be required,
our net cost wil be added to the quotation, payment terms arc as noted above. Title does not
change hands u itil paid in full. Should action be required for collection, those costs will be
added to pnnci al and finance charge's then due. HnanCe charges are computed at 1.5'/u per
month after the initial 30 days. �_ . • ,
Acceph,d ey:. .. —... _ _ — Date:..
Signature and Position Chuck Davies
90
80
90
This quote is firm for 15 days
Note: The proil mts furnished by California Storage Systems arc. consistent with good .
engineering Pr, dices, but unless stated above, we have not retained a civil engineer for plan
certification, no have we obtained a building permit. Should either of these steps be required,
our net cost wil be added to the quotation, payment terms arc as noted above. Title does not
change hands u itil paid in full. Should action be required for collection, those costs will be
added to pnnci al and finance charge's then due. HnanCe charges are computed at 1.5'/u per
month after the initial 30 days. �_ . • ,
Acceph,d ey:. .. —... _ _ — Date:..
Signature and Position Chuck Davies
0
C
0
H Z
U
H H
N w
oWa
woo
FQ_ -o0Z
z�0
y W
a(�(L
Daa LU
U LLI
o W
Z N }
O 1 N
Urnz
�NO
U
Z W
W J
U 0
O
U
O
O 0
0
0
_
o
o
LO
LO
LO
"O
UO
N
N
r-
F
V
V
�—
l0
O
O
O
T
O
O
O
�
V
V
f6
CO
w
0
O
O
>
to
tO
Vi
U
N
N
N
"O U-
0
a
�? m
00
p
U)
Z
IL
a
O
a
N
N
y
W
z
CL
0
O
aai
W
W
a
O
L L
1
O
U
(U
y
>,
c
a
U
`o
O
@
C
0
E
y
M
co
N
dj
C_
E
c co
E
O
w
U
m
0
m
o
0
a
L)
@
U)
N
(n
0
0
F0
0
O
m
�
U
[c(=z);,
E
SDI
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
2009 -2010
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS /FLEET SERVICES 0300 -610
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Bridge -type crane, 3 -ton
S
$45,000
$ 45,000
capacity, complete
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity -Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: July 1, 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
This crane system is needed to provide a safer way to perform routine maintenance and
unexpected repairs on District vehicles. Currently, lifting and removal of various vehicle parts
is performed manually. The amount of effort required is greatly dependent on the part's size,
weight and location on the vehicle. These manual - lifting jobs of heavy parts can be stressful,
often requires more than one person, and subjects staff to potential strains and injury.
Removal and reinstallation of bulky and heavy parts such as rodding- machine shrouds has
required the use of a backhoe combined with extensive rigging to complete. Use of such
construction equipment also requires that the work be performed outside the maintenance
bays; this is not a best management practice for a certified Green Business and the Vehicle
Shop has been a certified Green Business for many years now. These activities occur 2 -3
times /week so we believe that the crane system will make a significant improvement in shop
safety. It will also allow staff to complete vehicle maintenance and repairs more efficiently.
SUBMITTED BY
DATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
Department Director
G eral Manager
CSO /H: \Executive Assistant Directory\Miscellaneous\CSO\2009 \crane system final.doc
a,
a c�aa °a po•°
CL4:1LL`C y�/�CL•J
• 1 ��'_ CS•/CIJ D
l
CL4:1LL`C y�/�CL•J
• 1 ��'_ CS•/CIJ D
' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
• EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
9
FISCAL YEAR
2009 -2010
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATION /FIELD OPERATIONS /CCTV & LOCATING 0310 -600
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Wireless color mini - camera
PF
$12,500
$12,500
system
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity- Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: July 1, 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
The Construction Section purchased a new Perma- Liner /CCTV van in the 2008 /2009 fiscal
year. This van is fully equipped to perform installation of Perma -Liner repair sleeves using the
mainline CCTV equipment in this van to place the Perma -Liner sleeves precisely upon
damaged areas of the pipe. It is also fully outfitted to serve as a backup to our CCTV
inspection trucks.
While the camera and transporters in this and our other CCTV trucks perform much of the
assigned work, they cannot be used in every application, especially in easement locations.
Our crews use this tool in their operation on almost a daily basis. Therefore, the District has
already purchased three of these color mini - camera systems. The two newest units (two years
old) are carried aboard each of the CCTV inspection trucks. The third unit (four years old) is
used every day by one of the construction crews to verify repair work or to look at segments of
pipe downstream of identified repairs where prior inspection attempts had failed due to "no
pass" situations. The other crew is then required to call out a CCTV inspection crew when
they need a mini - camera, which affects the productivity of that section.
Purchase of another mini - camera unit will allow us to assign another unit to the Construction
section for use in the Perma -Liner operation.
SUBMITTED BY
DATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
j
Department Director
deneral Manager
CSO /H: \Executive Assistant Directory\Miscellaneous \CSO\2009 \mini - cameras final.doc
E
"The Standard of the Industry'
Portable Mini- mainline
The CUES Mini -Push 20/20 is an all- inclusive, ready -to -use, portable, color
video inspection system. The Mini -Push 20/20 uses proven video technology
to view and record pipelines from 2" in diameter and larger and can operate
with existing CUES PS2, PS3 and self - upright cameras. The 6.4" color LCD
monitor is`adjustable with a fold down position for protection during transport
and includes a sun shield for optimal viewing in sunlight. This lightweight
system includes wheels for easy portability and a balanced footprint for stability.,
Manufactured for rugged, reliability and designed to handle rigorous field use;
the Mini -Push 20/20 is a versatile tool for any portable system`user.
Lightweight
system for easy portability!_-
]Features & j3enefits:
• Alphanumeric video titling for on- screen footage display and comments
• 6.4" color LCD monitor with adjustable 3 -axis display angle
• Universal AC power input of 85 -264 VAC at 50/60 Hz
• The system operates using an internal 12 -volt battery with battery
charger
• Weather /water resistant aluminum electronics enclosure
• Operating instructions included on front of electronics enclosure
• Built -in connections for optional VCR
• Over voltage protection for built in camera lightring
• Reel assembly includes a footage counter on the basket hub and
cable contact is not required
• 100' push cable (standard)
• PS3 standard 1.5" diameter color camera for 2" - 8" pipe
• High resolution - 450+ lines ; high sensitivity - 0.3 lux
• Long life LED light head with light intensity control
• Operates with a PS3, PS2, and self- upright camera
• Operates with PS2 mini /mainline camera for 3" - 15" pipes
• Operates with any constant tone, 512 Hz locator /receiver
Optional MP 20/20 Equipment:
• Two optional mobile digital video recorders, housed in a protective case, are
available to digitally record the video inspection and audio from the included
microphone. Options: 80GB hard drive or 16GB SD card
• Pneumatic tires are available to transport the MP2020 across the rough terrain
• Mainline translator module and interface cable for operation with
a standard multi- conductor truck
• VCR housed in a transport case, AC or DC option
• High- brightness, 700 nit sunlight - readable, LCD display
• Keyboard to create defect and commentary entry
. • push cable
Buil
• Built -in locator /receiver for accurate camera location in metallic
and non - metallic pipes
• PS2 or self- upright camera
ao
� h
o
�i
•w
A distance counter ana Hoer, ouut mt 'the
PCU, displays distance and comments on
the video monitor!
Specifications subject to change without prior notice. Visit our web site at www.cuesinc.com
0
F
Q
�ww
It
as
m
a
azw
N W o
F- a. Z
_m
050
V
�o -
zNa
O O
V p Z
N J
IL
z
w
0
m
F�-
m
m
a
w
CD
E
E
n
Q
w
0
°o
°o
°0
00
00
0
M
V
IT
(D
p
r
M
I—
.>'
N
co
>1
U �
J
LL
O
Y_
CD
U U
-0O
0
a
y
w
V
z
O
z
c
o
o¢
o
0
0
0
N
E
O
O
Z
M
V
IT
W
M
'T
M
7
H
Z
—
O
M
,
7
IL
¢
CD
O
N
fA
7
_U
o
v
g
°
a
Q
m
U
t
w,
a
Q
3
m
E
N
D_
E
ca
c
Q
o
�
3
o
m
m
F
m
o
O
U
a_
CL
w
m
r
8
�
—1
0
m
F�-
m
m
a
w
CD
E
E
n
Q
w
0
C
0
' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
DEPARTMENT /DIVISION /COST CENTER
2009 -2010
0420 -720
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Mercury Analyzer with Auto Dilute
R, PF
$43,000
$43,000
TOTAL
$43,000
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity - Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: July 1. 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD) Environmental Laboratory currently has two mercury
analyzers, one dedicated for low- concentration samples (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]
Method 1631), and one for high- concentration samples (EPA Methods 245.2 and 7471). The Leeman
PS200 is dedicated to analysis of high- concentration mercury samples. The Leeman PS200 is almost
20 years old, and is no longer supported by Leeman Labs for parts or service. The instrument requires
frequent maintenance for continued operation. For low- concentration mercury samples, such as final
effluent monitoring, Laboratory staff use a Leeman Hydro AF analyzer. This analyzer is dedicated to
only low mercury concentration samples to avoid contamination and inaccurate results. This
instrument continues to provide reliable service to the lab.
Mercury is the number one priority pollutant for the District. We analyze on average approximately 10
to 12 high -level samples per month, along with additional quality assurance /quality control runs. The
cost of outsourcing these analyses would be approximately $650 per month. Thus, the instrument
payback period would be approximately five years, and less when our samples for special studies are
included.
We are requesting to replace the current analyzer (Leeman PS200) with a unit similar to the Cetac
M -7500. The new analyzer would provide a lower detection limit of 0.2 ppb (about 20 times better than
the current analyzer), while using 1 milliliter of sample for analysis. The decreased sample size will
decrease reagent use, will minimize waste produced by the Laboratory, and will save money on
reagents. The optional auto - diluter unit allows the unit to be used without an operator constantly
overseeing operation for over -range samples.
SUBMIT D B
ATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
3 0
3
3- `t
Department Director
Gen ral Manager
N:\POSUP\ Financial \Budget\2009 - 2010 \Equipment \Mercury Analyzer.dot
M • 7500
Reliable and Easy to Use — These are the two thoughts tha tmost come to mind when
users are asked about their experience with the OuickTracem M -7500. It is a Cold -Vapor
Atomic Absorption (CVAAI instrument and easily meets the requirements of EPA Methods
245.1, SW845 -7470, 7471 and 3052.
The M -7500 is excellent for highly productive labs needing a sensitive ans stable answer
for unattended Mercury analysis. The large autosampler will accommodate the analysis of
360 samples without intervention. The optional autodilutor will automatically dilute samples
measured above the highest calibrated standard. When configured for high throughput
operation, the system uses less than 1 ml of sample and complete a samle in less than one
minute, while easily maintaining normal reporting requirements of 0.2 ppb. By adjusting gas
flow and pump speed, the user can lower the sensitivity all the .vay to 1 pot.
I
TEchnical SpECifications
puickTraceT° M -7500 Mercury Analtjzer
Carrier Gas (N2 or Ar): 30 -350 ml /mm
Sample uptake rate:
0-10 ml /min
Gas - liquid separator:
Non - foaming, thin film
Optics:
Double beam, sample and reference cells
Lamp:
Ozone free Hg vapor lamp
Detectors: Dual, deep well photovoltaic
Detection range:
< 1 opt —175 ppb
Power requirements:
100 -240 VAC +/ -10° -0 50 / 60 Ftz
Dimensions (HxWxD):
20 x 46 x 60 cm
Weight:
272 kg
A5X -520 Autosampler
Standards Tray Size:
10 standards
4 sample racks
5 rack sizes
90 x 7 ml
60x14 ml
40x20 m1
1
24 x30 ml
21x50 ml
Computer interface:
RS -232 or USB
Power requirements:
100 — 240 VAC +/- 10% 50/60 Hz
Dimensions (HxWxD)
53 x 52 x 47 cm (ASX sits atop analyzer)
f
Computer Requirements [minimum)
Pentium i:eieron 46o MHz processor
128 MS RAM
4.3 G8 HO
Microsoft Windowst - NT4, 2000, or XP
One available serial port
One available USB port
CETACredmdogies
14306 Industrial Rd
Omaha, NE 68144 USA
Tel. 402.733.2829
Fax.402.733.5292
www.cetac.com
E*AC \I; I RY ANALYSIS
arrow's Lab
A
EASY TO USE
RELIABLE
PRODUCTIVE
EPA COMPLIANT
High —
Throughput
. • Mercury
Analysis
System
U
l
4
I
C ETA C Quick Trace TM M -7500 Mercury Analyzer
I_]
•
Zdad ' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
DEPARTMENT /DIVISION /COST CENTER
2009 -2010
0440 -820
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Calibrator, multifunction
R
$7,575
$7,575
1
Pressure module, 0 to 30 psig
R
$1,763
$1,763
1
Pressure module, 0 to 300 psig
R
$1,762
$1,762
TOTAL
$11,100
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity- Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: JUI 1 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
The Plant Operations Department uses the calibrator for differential pressure transmitters used
to monitor most of the flows in the plant (gas flows, influent flows, steam flows, etc.) We also
use the calibrators to set pressure switches in the field. The gas flows, differential pressures,
and influent flows are regulatory requirements, which specify annual calibrations and
documentation.
The current Druck calibrators have been unreliable, and both calibrators have been returned to
the manufacturer twice due to failure. The repair costs have been over $1,000 per repair for a
total cost of approximately $4,500. The original cost of the two calibrators was $6,055.
General Electric has purchased Druck, and the support for these calibrators and their reliability
has diminished.
Due to increased regulatory requirements, it is critical that we have a reliable, accurate, and
dependable calibrator. A calibrator similar to the Transmation 190 would have a built -in,
microprocessor - controlled, compressor to automatically generate and control pressure. This is
the only manufacturer that provides an automatic internal pressure source. Hand pumps are
currently used to control the pressure necessary for various tests and calibrations. The
automatic, built -in, microprocessor - controlled compressor would eliminate leaks, and the time
spent performing calibrations would be reduced.
SUBMI D Y
DATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
3 3 o`j
3 -3- 01
Department DI r
G feral Manager
N:\POSU P \Financia I \Budget\2009 -2010 \Equipment \Ca I i bra tor.dol
TRANSMATION 190: QuikCal 190 Multifunction & Pressure Calibrator, 0.025% Accuracy
Page 1 of 2
1.800.800.5001 TRANSMATION 190
. SNOP FOR PRODUCr5 QuikCal 190 Multifunction Et Pressure Calibrator, 0.025% Accuracy
0
•
eyword Search
GOI
Shop by Category Q, 1
Shop by Manufacturer FT
New Search j
i
Enter Promo Code' r Antivate I © I
QUICK LINKS
Shopping Cart Security
Our No- Hassle Return Policy
We Respect Your Privacy
Tax & U.S. Shipping Info
` " _ �� wrf
Transcat Order #: 190P
Model: TRANSMATION 190
Mfg Part#: 190P
Our Price: $6,891.00 USD
Availability: Usually ships within 3 -5 business d+
Calibration services may extend delivery
Add Calibration Options:
Transcat Accredited Calibration
TLansca AccrgditedCalibra[ion with Qata
Tran�cat Accredited Callbration_with Uncertaintie
No calibration selected
Product Highlights
Field hardened - temperature characterized from 00 to 50° C
Portable /weighs less than 15 Ibs
Built -in mrocroprossor controlled compressor to automatically generate and control presses
Modular design- choose the option you need
Unsurpassed accuracy to 0.025% of pressure reading or 0.01% of full scale electrical value
Pressure control stability up to 0.002 inches of water column (Quick Cal 191/196) or 0.02 i
column (Quick Cal 190/15)
Monitor up to three parameters simultaneously
Bright, sunlight readable high resolution, backlit paperwhite display
Documenting models interface with leading CMS packages, including Blue Mountain, AMS a
Each Unit Includes
Batteries and Charger
Test Leads
Ittt):Hv;ww.transcat.com /Catalog /nrodtictdetai 1.nsnx ?itemnum =190P 1/22/2009
1.800.800.5001 TRANSMATION 90 -30G
SHOP waveooucrs Isolated QuikCal Pressure Module, 30 PSI
Keyword Search
GOI
Shop by Category
Shop by Manufacturer (]
New Search
Enter Promo Code Activate
QUICK LINKS
Shopping Cart Security
Our No- Hassle Return Policy
We Respect Your Privacy
Tax & U.S. Shipping Info
VeriSign
Secured
_' - -- q
0
Transcat Order #: 90-
TRANSMATION 90 -30OG: Isolated QuikCal Pressure Module, 300 PSI
0
u
Page 1 of 2
1.800.800.5001 TRANSMATION 90 -30OG
940P FOR PRODl1CM Isolated QuikCal Pressure Module, 300 PSI
Keyword Search
GOI
Shop by Category
!Shop by Manufacturer
New Search
Enter_0omoCode] uACtvate
i
QUICK LINKS
Shopping Cart Security
Our No- Hassle Return Policy
We Respect Your Privacy
Tax & U.S. Shipping Info
Transcat Order #: 90 -30OG
Model: TRANSMATION 90 -30OG
Mfg Part#: 90 -30OG
Our Price: $1,605.00 USD
Availability: In Stock - Usually ships within or
Calibration services may extend delivery
Add Calibration Options
Transcat Accred1ted Calibration
Transcat-Accredited C- IitLratlon with Data
Transcat Accredited Calibration with Uncertain
No calibration selected
Product Highlights
0 to 300 PSIG Range
Highest Accuracy in an Interchangeable Module: ±0.025% Rdg ± 0.03 PSI
Compatible with Transmation 190 & 390 Series Calibrators
Uses 316 SS- Compatible Pressure Media
2.875 x 2.375 x 2 "/3 oz.
Each Unit Includes
3ttp://www.transcat.com/ Catalog /productdetail.aspx ?itemnum= 90 -300G 1/22/2009
P'
0
0
' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
DEPARTMENT /DIVISION /COST CENTER
2009 -2010
1 0440 -850
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Pump, sewage, portable,
R
$30,300
$30,300
4 -inch, self - priming, diesel -
powered (3 cylinder), including
fittings and battery
TOTAL
$30,300
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity- Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: July 10 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
In order to empty any of the District's 20 tanks and basins, the use of a portable pump is required. To
take these tanks and basins off -line in a minimal amount of time and return them to service following
repairs without generating odor requires adequate and dependable portable pumps. The standard
procedure for Buildings and Grounds (B &G) requires a minimum of two pumps to remove most tanks
and basins from service.
B &G currently has three 4 -inch, diesel- driven pumps for this procedure; however, one of the pumps has
now been inoperable for over five years. In addition the two diesel- driven pumps that are operable
were purchased in 1994 and 1995. By purchasing a new pump now, we would have the ability to rotate
the new pump into service to extend the life of our current operating pumps.
Another consideration is if there is an emergency or a pump failure during a tank/basin removal from
service, there could be a situation where we would be unable to accommodate the emergency or the
tank/basin removal. In order to prevent such a situation and maintain our ability to respond to
emergencies, to utilize equipment on a rotational basis, to remain timely in the service of District tanks
and basins, and to have reliable equipment that provides for optimal customer service opportunities, we
request the replacement of the inoperable 4 -inch pump with a pump similar to a Gorman Rupp, Model
T4A3- F3L1011, portable, 4 -inch, self - priming, diesel - powered (3 cylinder) sewer pump (including
fittings and battery).
SUBMI D Y
ATE
E OM ENDED APPROVAL
DATE
3 0
3 -3 -01
Department Dire for
G neral Manager
N: \POSUP \Financial\Budget\2009- 2010 \Equipment \Sewage Pump.dot
•
•
•
Specification Data I Sec. 45
Diesel Engine Driven
ACDEU
Self Priming Centrifugal Pump
w /Autostart
�s Model T4ANS -F3L
T SERUM Size 4" x 4"
Total Head
Capacity of Pump in U.S. Gallons
per Minute (GPM) at Continuous
Performance
psi7FFeet
56.4
130
180
180
180
180
180
52.0
120
310
350
350
350
350
43.3
100
372
505
595
670
670
34.7
80
385
515
615
725
790
26.0
60
390
520
622
735
800
17.3
40
392
528
628
745
810
Suction Lift
25'
1 20'
15
10
5'
PUMP SPECIFICATIONS
Size: 4"x4" (101 mm x 101 mm) NPT - Female.
Casing: Gray Iron No. 30.
Maximum Operating Pressure 95 psi (655 kPa).'
Semi -Open Type, Two Vane Impeller: Ductile Iron No. 65- 45 -12.
Handles 3" (76,2 mm) Diameter Spherical Solids.
Impeller Shaft: Stain!ess Steel Type 17 -4 PH.
Replaceable Wear Plate: Carbon Steel No. 1015.
Removable Adjustable Cover Plate: Gray Iron No. 30; 37 Ibs. (17 kg).
Seal Plate: Gray Iron No. 30.
Seal: Cartridge Type, Mechanical, -Oil- Lubricated, Double Floating, Self -
Aligning Silicon Carbide Rotating and Stationary Faces. Stainless Steel
No. 316 Stationary Seat. Fluorocarbon Elastomers (DuPont VitonO or
Equivalent). Stainless Steel No. 18 -8 Cage and Spring. Maximum
Temperature of Liquid Pumped 160 °F (71 °C).'
Flap Valve: Neoprene w /Steel Reinforcing.
Shaft Sleeve: Alloy Steel No. 4130.
Intermediate: Gray Iron No. 30. -
Radial Bearing: Open Single Ball.
Thrust Bearing: Open Double Ball.
Bearing and Seal Cavity Lubrication: SAE No. 30 Non - Detergent Oil.
Flanges: 125# Gray Iron No. 30.
Gaskets: Buna -N, Compressed Synthetic Fibers, PTFE, Vegetable Fiber,
Cork and Red Rubber.
0- Rings: Buna -N.
Hardware: Standard Plated Steel.
Brass Pressure Relief Valve.
Bearing and Seal Cavity Oil Level Sight Gauges.
Standard Equipment: Hoisting Bail. 90° Discharge Elbow. Strainer.
Single Ball Type Float Switch."
`fto Ft. 05 m) Staidard Length; Dual Switches aiii Alt - :n-,!o Cable
Lengths Available From the Factory.
Optional Equipment: Battery. G -R Hard Iron Impeller and Seal Plate.
Hardened Steel Wear Plate. High Speed (55 MPH /89 KM /H) Wheel Kit with
ST205/75R14 Pneumatic Tires. Over- the -Road Trailer (Meets D.O.T. and
Transport Canada Requirements) Available w /Either Electric or Hydraulic
Surge Brakes, Running Lights, Two Trailer Jack Stands and Safety Chains.
EPS W /Submersible Transducer Liquid Level Sensor (50 Ft. 115 MI Cable
Standard, Alternate Lengths Available).
'Cottstult Factory for Applications Escecdrng errd'or
Temoerature Indicated.
ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 1244
MARCH 2006
W,
Model: Deutz F3L.
Type: Three Cylinder, Four Cycle, Air Cooled Diesel
Engine.
Displacerne ❑t: 197.4 Cu. In. (3,24 Liters).
Governor: Mechanical,
Lubrication: Forced Circulation.
Air Cleaner: Oil Bath.
Oil Reservoir: 10 U.S. Ots (9,6 Liters) Dry
9.5 U.S. Ots (9.0 Liters) Refill.
Fuel Tank: 61 U.S. Gallons (231 Liters).
Full Load Operating Time: 31.2 Hours.
Starter: 12 Volt Electric.
Standard Features: High Oil Temperature, Low Oil
Pressure, V -Belt, Alternator and Start Failure Safety
Shut Down Switches /Indicators. Fuel Level Gauge.
Throttle Control. Autostart Instrument Panel with
Temperature Gauge, Oil Pressure Gauge, Amme-
ter, Hourmeter, Tachometer, Manual /Stop /Auto
Key Switch, 15 Amp Fuse, Audible Startup Wain -
ing Delay. Muffler `v /Guard and Weather Cap.
DEUTZ PUBLISHED PERFORMANCE:
Maximum Continuous B.H.P. 50.3 (37 kW) @ 2300 RPM
Maximum Dynamic B.H.P 55.8 (41 k'W) @ 23CO RPM
THE GORMAN -RUPP COMPANY • MANSFIELD, OHIO
www.gormanrupp.com
GORMAN -RUPP OF CANADA LIMITED e ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO, CANADA
Specifications Subject to Change Without Notice
* Copyright by the Gorman -Rupp Company 2006
ertntnn W a S
Specification Data
I
SECTION 45, PAGE.1244
2.75
4.00 -8 N
4[ +t .00 -8 PT —, 6918] � '
tK
—.I[ __ 5.50
19.37 1139,73
[492.01
29.49
[749.03
22.12
[561,83
44.25
[!124,0]
51.64
PIlBRIPS
3 I _I .51 J,, 259, 8 FLACES
i
t— 7.38 2.75 —�I _ 25.;'5 _�, 14.74
[187.41 169.3; C64L41 E374,47 I
TYP
APPR'�): - -" "— -- —
GuhE.SI ,Y.
_— [2235.7 OY =R:L-
INi,,I - -S `; 8.0.,/,_ '_1.27 CO YE NE'ED
(101LIMETERS] 1050/[26.0.73 REOUIP.EO FOR REMOVAL 0:= aACK CCV_R P[.ATE
SK117 BASE
2-WHEEL
APPROXIMATE
NET WEIGHT: 2390 LBS. (1084 KG.)
2845 LBS. (1290 KG.)
ISIONS a•.1tl WEIGHTS
SHIPPING WEIGHT: 2575 LBS. (1168 KG.)
2845 LBS. (1290 KG.)
EXPORT CRATE SIZE: 196 CU. FT. (5,5 CU. M.)
3 I _I .51 J,, 259, 8 FLACES
i
t— 7.38 2.75 —�I _ 25.;'5 _�, 14.74
[187.41 169.3; C64L41 E374,47 I
TYP
APPR'�): - -" "— -- —
GuhE.SI ,Y.
_— [2235.7 OY =R:L-
INi,,I - -S `; 8.0.,/,_ '_1.27 CO YE NE'ED
(101LIMETERS] 1050/[26.0.73 REOUIP.EO FOR REMOVAL 0:= aACK CCV_R P[.ATE
-
i�
PERFORMANCE
8.9: HUT" :31 FNGI'VF
f 156T.5
VOLUTE • 1
gg
IMPELLER ..
j 34-1A
g� ®� gg�•
imilimim� '
j !2.(10 ,-„
1
•,
1 1304.81
3 I _I .51 J,, 259, 8 FLACES
i
t— 7.38 2.75 —�I _ 25.;'5 _�, 14.74
[187.41 169.3; C64L41 E374,47 I
TYP
APPR'�): - -" "— -- —
GuhE.SI ,Y.
_— [2235.7 OY =R:L-
INi,,I - -S `; 8.0.,/,_ '_1.27 CO YE NE'ED
(101LIMETERS] 1050/[26.0.73 REOUIP.EO FOR REMOVAL 0:= aACK CCV_R P[.ATE
THE GORMAN -RUPP COMPANY e MANSFIELD, OHIO
GORMAN -RUPP OF CANADA LIMITED • ST THOMAS, ONTARIO, CANADA
Stoecilinations Subject to Change Without Notice
© Copyright by the Gorman -Rupp Company 2006
Fronted in J.S.A.
-
PERFORMANCE
VOLUTE • 1
1
IMPELLER ..
g� ®� gg�•
imilimim� '
•,
F =ir
• '- a a
�iEe?�E
eE'�eiEE
rE:E�E�E
iE E
.-.E
F
s
:EEE::�s� 3Es3ctlEE�
E aa::eE�E:ee:I.
iiee
�E^ira
°�aa
E�
i€
iMai'
EeE
EieE::Eeee�
EE.v_ro
H
UEieii
ii
ei�
eiF:ee
Eei!E:irE
eiie
^E�'
i
me
E':r3i5Y3
111!
1:1
.
..
[is
IHEJ
a.�E��.Ee�
e
�
EE�:E
=
r.
E.se
.ag
•
:.
:,
•.
Etisil
t�
g�iE-
:: °:
Is.
Lei°
G
E:'
3
�E:siE
�
isJilEEIiR
s:. us
s
s
E�i��
'
.
.,
• :
°
iii:�
mlliiuipiiidriummimmump
.ail=
.ya�li54ELfi
I:*
IcHibi
hiss
1EEyati•
ns:
a:...
:
"',
'"
...
aEx?E�ERits
= =o
u:qq
EC
ii
3 E
EE°aE
se:
°res:e
ail:a36GEEeeeE�:•
:s:
a
°a9
@Egg
iEoE®
i
.fie —e?EE
.
'•t':i
EE
11jusislIEN111
11 if
i
Ei;
viii
°ii
'E
�►
�E
t
i
ea
E
a
c'"
'aEa'¢
r:
EFs
E
is
..E...
�E°
eE
°E
E?EEEEB
s
fix:
:: se
Eac::EEEEEE
lii
EE
,Tai
��a.i�
e'EEGEaaaa�
aWaE:
€
i=
iE3�1a�
Is::.
:::
i"E
::a
i-3�a
:. _a....
ii�Eigi?
:
.:i
..�.
�..
e.......
•
6E9ic
�F
ii2�EeaEeUS
.E,a`
:
"
-
-
MR MV&.rF
PER SECOND
CLSC METRES c, T-12-03-11'
PER NOLM X 10
THE GORMAN -RUPP COMPANY e MANSFIELD, OHIO
GORMAN -RUPP OF CANADA LIMITED • ST THOMAS, ONTARIO, CANADA
Stoecilinations Subject to Change Without Notice
© Copyright by the Gorman -Rupp Company 2006
Fronted in J.S.A.
•
u
H
U
F-
U)
oLU
} W
aD
z(a
aF-
cn z
awU)
�ZW
9: -j
U
UC'J2
�W W
o>
H G
ON
U 0
rn
J O
O
N
H
Z
11J
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LO
CD
0
0
U')
m
(D
n
co
o
0
N
N
N
CD
;I-
1
w
C9
U)
.T
U
7 ._
'o U-
2
CL
_T
> CU
U U
=3 4--
°0
w
CL
U
wo
0
0
0
0
co
�
0
0
0
LO
Q)
~
L)
N
N
N
(D
V
W
a
J
L
L
'a
co
C
C
U
N
N
p
x
N
N
N
C
�
c
�
c
o
a
a
>
>
x
X
C
U_
U_
N
(U
co
co
U
E
E
U
'a
E
w
en
a
C0
c
N
N N
N
-,t
O
H
U
0
�
o
g 3
0
Z
w
L
w
L
w
w
L
2 v
2 v
2
2
>
_w
C
co
r
r
N
In
•
9
' CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
EQUIPMENT BUDGET REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
2009 -2010
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS /FLEET SERVICES 0300 -610
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORY (1)
PER UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Half -ton 2WD small pickup,
R, V
$26,500
$ 26,500
extended cab
1
Half- ton 2WD small pickup,
R, V
$27,000
$ 27,000
extended cab, w/ crane
1
Half -ton 2WD pickup, extended
R, V
$28,000
$28,000
cab
2
Half -ton 4WD pickup, extended
R, V
$30,000
$60,000
cab
$141,500
(1) R Replacement, PO Productivity- Office, PF Productivity Field, S Safety, V Vehicle
ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION DATE: July 1, 2009
STATEMENT OF NECESSITY AND COST
The District has established an ongoing vehicle replacement plan that takes into account
expected lifecycles for each vehicle based on years of service and mileage. This plan is
updated every year and is used as the basis for vehicle replacement requests.
The pickup trucks will replace vehicles that have reached the end of their useful lives based on
their age and /or condition.
District personnel, in their attempt to best utilize the fleet, must transfer some vehicles from
one use to another. This may require that ancillary equipment, such as cranes, that are
requested for new vehicles must be mounted to vehicles already owned by the District in order
to facilitate the replacement plan.
SUBMITTED BY
DATE
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
DATE
'' ,,11
INYN f &'?""
3 '- U
3 -S"
Department Director
eneral Manager
CSO /C: \DOCU M E -1 \jking \LOCALS -1 \Temp \MXLibDir \vehicles.doc
0
i
I•
-all
r
J��
0
0
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER,
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
No.: 6.a. Bids and Awards
Type or Action: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT /AUTHORIZE EXECUTION
OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS /AUTHORIZE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS
subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA TRENCHLESS,
INC.; AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTHERN PUMPING STATION UPGRADES,
DISTRICT PROJECT 5971
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Alexandr Mestetsky, Associate Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED -FOR BOARD ACTION:
1M/1% \�1
!A Mest lsky A. Antkowiak T.'PitcCki A. Farrell James M Kelly,
General anager
ISSUE: On May 8, 2009, nine (9) sealed bids were received and opened for the
construction of the Northern Pumping Station Upgrades, District Project 5971. The
Board of Directors must award the contract or reject bids within 50 days of the bid
opening. Authorize the General Manager to execute the contract documents subject to
SUBMITTAL requirements and agreement amendments for professional engineering
services.
RECOMMENDATION: Find that the project is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), award a construction contract to California
Trenchless, Inc.; authorize the General Manager to execute the Contract Documents
subject to favorable review of insurance certificates, bond submittals, appropriate
Contractor license, and any other required submittals (SUBMITTALS); and authorize
the General Manager to execute amendments to the Professional Engineering Services
Agreements with Lee & Ro, Inc. and Dodson Psomas.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $1,361,000, including design, bid price,
contingency, and construction management.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject all bids, which is not recommended.
NAPESUP \Cbradley\POSITION PAPERS \Mestetsky \5971- AwardContract,Sasha.doc Page 1, of 6
0 0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA TRENCHLESS,
INC.; AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTHERN PUMPING STATION UPGRADES,
DISTRICT PROJECT 5971
BACKGROUND: Pumping Station Operations staff has identified a number of
improvements needed at the Concord Industrial, Clyde, Orinda Crossroads, Maltby, and
Martinez Pumping Stations (see Location Map in Attachment 1). The improvements at
the Concord Industrial Pumping Station include installing a District - supplied standby
generator, replacement of obsolete variable frequency drives, installing a new grinder,
and other operational and safety improvements. Improvements to the Concord
Industrial Pumping Station will be limited to those that are necessary to maintain
operational integrity of the existing pumping station in light of the potential future
impacts to the pumping station if the Concord Naval Weapons Station should be
developed. The Clyde Pumping Station will be equipped with a new standby generator
and flood protection measures. An emergency bypass vault and pump connections will
be installed at the Martinez Pumping Station. A replacement bar screen will be installed
at Orinda Crossroads, and a new valve vault cover will be placed at Maltby.
In September 2006, the District executed a Professional Engineering Services
Agreement with Lee & Ro, Inc. for the design of improvements at the Concord
Industrial, Clyde, and Martinez Pumping Stations. Dodson Psomas was retained to
design a new grinder installation at Concord Industrial.
Lee & Ro, Inc., Dodson Psomas, and District staff prepared the plans and specifications
for the project. The Engineer's estimate for construction of the Northern Pumping
Station Upgrades, District Project 5971, is $650,000. This project was advertised on
April 13 and 20, 2009. Nine (9) sealed bids ranging from $619,000 to $808,000 were
received and publicly opened on May 8, 2009.
The Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial review of the bids
and determined that California Trenchless, Inc. is the lowest responsive bidder with a
bid amount of $619,000. A summary of bids received is shown in Attachment 2.
The District will perform construction management and will provide contract
administration, inspection, surveying, office engineering, and submittal review. Staff
recommends retaining Lee & Ro, Inc. and Dodson Psomas to provide support services
during construction for this project because Lee & Ro, Inc. and Dodson Psomas helped
prepare the plans and specifications and, therefore, have a solid understanding of the
project design. The construction support services include reviewing shop drawings and
submittals, responding to design questions, evaluating change order requests,
performing site visits to verify compliance with the design intent, and other related
activities. A construction support services agreement amendment with a cost ceiling of
$25,000 has been negotiated with Lee & Ro, Inc., bringing the total agreement amount
NAPESUP \Cbradley \POSITION PAPERS \Mestetsky \5971- AwardContract,Sasha.doc Page 2 of 6
0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA TRENCHLESS,
INC.; AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTHERN PUMPING STATION UPGRADES,
DISTRICT PROJECT 5971
to $85,000. A construction support services agreement amendment for $35,000 has
been negotiated with Dodson Psomas, bringing the total agreement amount to $83,000.
The funds required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 3, are $991,000.
The total cost of the Northern Pumping Station Upgrades, District Project 5971, is
anticipated to be $1,361,000.
This project is included in the fiscal year (FY) 2008 -09 Capital Improvement Budget
(CIB) on pages CS -87 to CS -89. Staff has conducted a cash -flow analysis of the
Collection System Program budget and concluded that adequate funds are available for
this project.
Staff has concluded that this project is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 since it involves
minor alterations to an existing public facility involving negligible or no expansion of use.
Approval of this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that
this project is exempt from CEQA.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Staff recommends the following
1. Find that the project is exempt from CEQA,
2. Award a construction contract in the amount of $619,000 for the construction of
the Northern Pumping Station Upgrades, District Project 5971, to California
Trenchless, Inc., the lowest responsive bidder,
Authorize the General Manager to execute the Contract Documents subject to
SUBMITTAL requirements, and
4. Authorize the General Manager to execute agreement amendments with Lee &
Ro., Inc. and Dodson Psomas for $25,000 and $35,000, respectively, to review
shop drawings and submittals, respond to design questions, evaluate change
order requests, and perform site visits to verify compliance with the design intent..
N:\PESUP \Cbradley \POSITION PAPERS \Mestetsky \5971- AwardContract,Sasha.doc Page 3 of 6
0 0
Central Contra Costa ATTACHMENT 1 Drawing No.
Sanitary District I NORTHERN PUMPING STATIONS
UPGRADES PROJECT, DP 5971
PROJECT LOCATIONS
Page 4 of 6
0
ATTACHMENT 2
NORTHERN PUMPING STATION UPGRADES
DISTRICT PROJECT 5971
SUMMARY OF BIDS
PROJECT NO.: 5971 DATE: MAY 8, 2009
PROJECT NAME: NORTHERN PUMPING STATION UPGRADES
PROJECT LOCATION: MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER EST.: $650,000
BIDDER
BID PRICE
California Trenchless Inc.
$619,000
2283 Dunn Road
Hayward, CA 94545
510 - 782 -5335
Spiess Construction Co. Inc
$667,820
1110 E. Clark Avenue
Santa Maria, CA 93455
805 - 937 -5859
NCCI, Inc.
$674,680
Pier 26 The Embarcadero
San Francisco, CA 94105 -1248
415 - 974 -0947
Valentine Corporation
$681,369
111 Pelican Way
San Rafael, CA 94901
415- 453 -3732
Aztec Consultants
$705,000
2021 Omega Road, Suite 200
San Ramon, CA 94583
925- 837 -1050
D. W. Nicholson Corporation
$736,000
24747 Clawiter Road
Hayward, CA 94540
510 -887 -0900
Manito Construction, Inc.
$761,700
1043 Serpentine Lane, Suite I
Pleasanton CA 94566 _
925- 600 -0220
Water Works Construction, Inc.
$779,797
4989 -C Noonan Lane
Fairfield, CA 94533
707 - 437 -0991
Anderson Pacific
$808,000
1390 Norman Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95054
408 - 970 -9900
BIDS OPENED BY /s /Julie Lopez DATE 5/8/09 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
NAPESUMCbradley \POSITION PAPERS \Mestetsky \5971 -Award Contract,Sasha.doc Page 5 of 6
In W
p Q
U F
W
Z Z
O
ZO Z
U
LLI U�
� F
U Z ly Z
Qaa0
U
QjU�
a�a
Z �-•
x D
W p m
P r
af h
0z a
0
Y
y
O
U
c
0
c
N
R
M
?
Y
Vi
C
O
U
0
O
O
O
O
r
O
m
r
M
Cl)
11:
M
y
O
O
O
O
1
O
C-4
O
M
O
69
E
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
O
O
o
T
It
CO
N
11c;
O
M
O
�'-
N
N
O
LO
N
to
M
M
M
N
M
r
N
N
tD
r
W
44
to
to
to
to
to
M
w
w
w
rn
C
.N
W
H
F
H
W
J
a
2
W
y
O
O
o
O
y
W
r
0
o
Z
O
F-
d
E
Z
O
]
F
W
o
U
Y
U
Z
W
N
A
U
Z
W
~
W
Z
d
y
C
2
C
m
W
a
Z
E
C
N
O
2
"
y
W
O
O in
Q
O
W
F
H
F N
_
O
Q
c
°o
m
m
O
O
O
G
UJ
o
Q
°
CL
O
Z
u
N
Z
�
A
o
R
p
X
U
Q'
v
J
co
t
'o
d
0
"
U
Q
O
y
O
0
O
~
O
C
J J
y
O
U
n
a
c
a
2
O
O
O
A
U
N
~
7
N
O
''
~
W
W
p
Fa-
Q
Z F-
U
U
a
m
a
m
o
o
U
m
a
c
0
O
a
OU
Z
o
a
ci
ti
di
N
Z
@
a
N
W�
Q
m
F
Z
o 0
0
IX
7
U UU
IL
y
LL
Q a
O
Z
N
M
R
ui
fD
co
O
tU
(0
a
z
O
H
0
a
T
N
a
U
d
ui
w
CL
Agenda Item 7.a.1)
Board Meeting of June 4, 2009
Written Announcements:
Recycled Water
a) Concord Recycled Water Project Update
In September 2008, the District joined the Bay Area Recycled Water
Coalition to pursue federal grant funding for this project through the United
States Bureau of Reclamation's Title XVI Program. Since then, the
Coalition has worked with federal legislators to draft and submit bills to
both the House of Representatives and the Senate to provide grant
funding for Coalition recycled water projects including the Concord
Recycled Water Project. If the Coalition receives federal authorization for
their proposed recycled water projects, the District could receive up to
$1.8 million in federal grant funding for the project, or 25% of the total
estimated project cost ($7.2M). This project is currently not budgeted in
the District's Capital Improvement Budget. However, if Title XVI grant
funding is obtained, staff will request that the Board approve the additional
funding necessary to construct the project. Staff will keep the Board
updated. The attached flyer describes the proposed project in more detail.
Awards /Recognition
b) Northern California Pipe Users Group Recognition
In 1992, the District was one of the founding charter members of the
Northern California Pipe Users Group (PUG). PUG is a Forum of Public
Agencies, Engineers, and Industry Professionals dedicated to improving
the design construction and operation of sewer and water systems. Since
its inception, PUG has been instrumental in promoting the development of
numerous underground trenchless technologies. A major component of
its charter was the education and training of end users in these
technologies. District staff has attended /participated in these training
programs. PUG's accomplishments include standardized specifications
for various technologies such as micro - tunneling, cured in place pipe, pipe
bursting, etc, as well as enhancements to materials such as double gasket
concrete pipe. Through PUG's efforts, the availability /use of trenchless
technologies throughout Northern California has dramatically increased
with a corresponding reduction in costs. At the June 18, 2009 Board
Meeting, representatives of PUG will recognize the District's support and
participation.
0 0
General Updates
c) Injury on District Property
On May 22, 2009, employees from SC Fields Technical Services were on
site to inspect and repair diesel tanks. At approximately 7:50 a.m., one of
the employees twisted at the waist to grab a tool from his tool box and his
leg slipped out from under him resulting in a serious knee injury. Since
the injured man was on the top of the tank, the Control Room was
contacted and they called 911. Contra Costa County Fire responded
within five minutes, provided medical assistance, and transported the
injured man via ambulance to John Muir Hospital in Concord.
Plant Operations Director Doug Craig convened a meeting around 9:30
a.m. to discuss the incident, identify causes, and review communication
processes. Given what we know thus far, it was an unpreventable
incident. Although the injured man is not a District employee and it was
not our primary responsibility to do so, the injury was reported to
CalOSHA.
0
Agenda Item 7.a.1)
Board Meeting of June 4, 2009
Additional Written Announcements:
Awards /Recognitions
d) National Association of Clean Water Agencies Platinum 11
Award
On May 27, 2009, the National Association of Clean Water Agencies
( NACWA) notified the District that we will receive a Platinum 11 Peak
Performance Award at the NACWA Summer Conference in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin to be held from July 14 to July 17, 2009. The award is for
100% compliance with our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Permit for 11 consecutive years. We should receive the actual
award in August 2009.
• • 7. at, t
r� s
.CCCSD/Concord Recycled Water Project (� ��
Project area shown in map above
and in detail map at right.
Project Information
The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) proposes to
expand its recycled water distribution system to provide recycled
water to irrigation users in the City of Concord near the 1-680
freeway south of the Buchanan Fields Airport. CCCSD will extend its
recycled water pipelines from the Buchanan Fields Golf Course (an
existing recycled water customer) to provide a drought proof water
supply for landscape irrigation at local businesses, office parks, and
landscape medians in Concord.
The project is estimated to cost approximately $7.2 million to
complete and will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 has
already been designed and will be constructed as soon as Federal
grant funding is obtained. The design of Phase 2 will commence
upon Federal grant funding authorization. CCCSD, in coordination
with the City of Concord, is aggressively pursuing outside funding to
make this project a reality.
Project Schedule
caftieolftcosta5anitaryDistdct - ", `
5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 1925 .228.9500'www.centralsan.org
O
00
D
�D
p1
�D
Ci
n
M
SQ
G
2)
CD
'S
0
O
0)
rF
O'
O
M
n
0
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Board Meeting
June 4, 2009
Board Member McGill
17.
Item $ d.1)
FUTURE MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES WITH PAID
EXPENSES AND /OR STIPEND
Will attend the Mayors' Conference in Orinda, CA,
June 4, 2009
Will attend the Mayors' Conference
July 2, 2009
Future Committee Meetings:
None scheduled
R
MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES THAT EXPENSES
AND /OR STIPEND WAS PAID
Committee Meetings
None
Attended the Contra Costa Council Installation Dinner
June 3, 2009
I.
Item ,8:d.2 Announcements
Will attend Contra Costa Council Land Use Task Force
Meeting June 10, 2009 with Bill Lindsey, Manager Richmond
regarding.the economic down turns impacts on the City' s
budget
Will attend Contra Costa Council Water Task Force Meeting
June 16, 2009
Obentral Contra Costa Sanisr District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009 No.: 8.a. Engineering
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
REQUIRE MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION, AND RELIEF FROM APPLICATION OF
DISTRICT CODE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE TIME FOR PAYMENT OF
CONNECTION FEES; AND APPROVING A ONE -YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR
DEFERRED PAYMENT OF CONNECTION FEES FOR HOMES AND BUILDINGS
CONSTRUCTED ON VACANT PARCELS
Submitted By:
Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Jarred Miyamoto - Mills, Principal Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
J.J. iy C. Swanson A. Farrell K. Alm ames M. Ky , ly,
eneral Marlager
ISSUE: District Code Section 1.24.010 states that "The Board may... modify, suspend
or relieve the application of an ordinance or regulation if it finds that the ordinance or
regulation is unjust or inequitable because of special circumstances..."
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution finding that special circumstances require
suspension, modification and relief from application of District Code Section 6.08.040
and Subsection 6.12.030D, pertaining to the time for payment of connection fees; and
approving a one -year pilot program allowing deferred payment of annexation and
capacity fees for homes and buildings constructed on vacant parcels.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Development of agreements with other agencies and builders
will require staff and District Counsel effort. Administering the pilot program including
processing, recording and enforcement of agreements, and billing and accounting for
payments received in escrow are estimated to require between 1/4 to 1/2 FTE (full -time
equivalent) in additional staff effort for the one -year program at a cost of $60,000 to
$100,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could elect to rescind its motion to
establish the fee deferral pilot program. On the other hand, if the proposed program is
implemented, it would allow deferred payment of annexation and capacity fees only.
The Board could direct staff to allow deferred payment of other fees, such as those for
reimbursements to others, as well. This is not recommended since reimbursement fees
are collected on behalf of, and are disbursed to, private parties (including some of the
same homebuilders seeking relief under the pilot program) who incurred costs to install
sewer facilities to serve their own property and the properties of others.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Miyamoto- Mills\2009 \PP Deferral of Fees (Moved to 6 -4 -2009) Final jm2 rev 2.doc Page 1 of 3
0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
REQUIRE MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION, AND RELIEF FROM APPLICATION OF
DISTRICT CODE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE TIME FOR PAYMENT OF
CONNECTION FEES; AND APPROVING A ONE -YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR
DEFERRED PAYMENT OF CONNECTION FEES FOR HOMES AND BUILDINGS
CONSTRUCTED ON VACANT PARCELS
BACKGROUND: The homebuilding community has contacted counties, cities and
special districts requesting that each agency consider allowing deferred payment of
impact and utility connection fees at the close of escrow for new homes as allowed by
recent legislation, rather than continuing the current practice of collecting these fees
when a building permit is issued or utility service connections are made. The
homebuilders believe that the current economic recession, specifically the credit and
cash flow crisis, has resulted in an inequitable and unjust situation for builders. If the
Board concludes that this is in fact the case, it may find that the situation constitutes a
"special circumstance" requiring suspension, modification and relief from application of
District Code provisions pertaining to the time for payment of fees.
At its meeting on May 7, 2009, the Board passed a motion that directed staff to develop
a one -year pilot program to allow deferred payment of connection fees at the close of
escrow, rather than requiring payment of these fees when a connection permit is issued
just prior to actual physical connection of house plumbing to the public sewer.
The proposed pilot program would operate by applying the following conditions:
• Only homes and buildings being built on vacant parcels would be eligible for the
fee deferral program;
• Only annexation and capacity fees could be deferrable to the close of escrow.
Other fees including those for reimbursements, application, plan review and
inspection would continue to be collected at the time of Connection Permit
issuance;
• The annexation and capacity fee amounts assessed would be those applicable
on the date of payment. That is, if a fee increase or decrease occurs between
the time of Connection Permit issuance and close of escrow, the new fees would
be charged.
• Participating in the fee deferral program would be at the builder's option. That is,
the builder would choose between paying applicable fees at the time of
Connection Permit issuance, or signing a promissory note and recordable
agreement calling for payment of fees either upon, 1) close of escrow, 2) first
occupancy, or 3) after expiration of a two -year period from the issuance of the
Connection Permit, whichever event occurs first.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Miyamoto- Mills\2009 \PP Deferral of Fees (Moved to 6 -4 -2009) Final jm2 rev 2.doc Page 2 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
REQUIRE MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION, AND RELIEF FROM APPLICATION OF
DISTRICT CODE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE TIME FOR PAYMENT OF
CONNECTION FEES; AND APPROVING A ONE -YEAR PILOT PROGRAM FOR
DEFERRED PAYMENT OF CONNECTION FEES FOR HOMES AND BUILDINGS
CONSTRUCTED ON VACANT PARCELS
On June 20, 2009, staff met with Homebuilders Association and other builders'
representatives to discuss the proposed pilot program. These representatives
expressed a willingness to work with the District to ensure successful implementation of
the program as proposed.
During the coming year, staff will collect and evaluate information on the cost and
effectiveness of the pilot program and will periodically report this information to the
Board. In May 2010, staff will recommend continuation or termination of the program.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution finding that special
circumstances require suspension, modification and relief from application of District
Code Section 6.08.040 and Subsection 6.12.030D, pertaining to the time for payment
of connection fees; and approving a one -year pilot program allowing deferred payment
of annexation and capacity fees for homes and buildings constructed on vacant parcels.
N:\ENVRSEC \Position Papers\Miyamoto- Mills\2009 \PP Deferral of Fees (Moved to 6 -4 -2009) Final jm2 rev 2.doc Page 3 of 3
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
FINDING THAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRE MODIFICATION,
SUSPENSION, AND RELIEF FROM APPLICATION OF DISTRICT CODE
PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CONNECTION FEES;
AND APPROVING A ONE -YEAR PILOT PROGRAM ALLOWING DEFERRED
PAYMENT OF CONNECTION FEES FOR HOMES AND BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED
ON VACANT PARCELS
WHEREAS, representatives of the homebuilding community have requested that public
agencies, including the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) consider
allowing deferred payment of impact or connection fees at the close of escrow for new
homes, as allowed by California Government Code Section 66007; and
WHEREAS, the District Board of Directors finds that the impacts of the current
economic recession, specifically the credit and cash flow crisis, has resulted in an
inequitable and unjust situation for builders, which constitutes a special circumstance
requiring suspension, modification and relief from application of District Code Section
6.08.040 and Subsection 6.12.030D, pertaining to the time for payment of connection
fees; and
WHEREAS, the District Board of Directors passed a motion at its regular meeting on
May 7, 2009, that directed staff to develop a one -year pilot program allowing builders to
defer payment of connection fees to the close of escrow, rather than requiring payment
of these fees when a connection permit is issued just prior to actual physical connection
of house plumbing to the public sewer; and
WHEREAS, staff developed a pilot program that will allow deferred payment of
annexation and capacity fees at close of escrow, and presented the proposal to the
Board of Directors of the District at its regular meeting on June 4, 2009.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the District as
follows:
THAT the proposed one -year pilot program for deferred payment of annexation and
capacity fees is hereby approved; and
THAT staff is directed to implement the pilot program as soon as possible, by applying
the following conditions:
(1) Only homes or buildings being built on vacant parcels shall be eligible for the
fee deferral program;
(2) Only annexation and capacity fees may be deferred. Other fees including
those for reimbursements, application, plan review and inspection shall
continue to be collected at the time of Connection Permit issuance;
0
Resolution 2009 -
Page 2 of 2
0
(3) The annexation and capacity fee amounts assessed shall be those applicable
on the date of payment. That is, if a fee increase or decrease occurs between
the time of Connection Permit issuance and the time of payment, the new fees
shall be charged.
(4) Participation in the fee deferral program shall be at the builder's option. That is,
the builder may choose between paying applicable fees at the time of
Connection Permit issuance, or signing a promissory note and recordable
agreement calling for payment of fees either upon close of escrow, first
occupancy, or after expiration of a two -year period from the issuance of the
Connection Permit, whichever event occurs first.
(5) Unless extended by the Board of Directors, the pilot program will terminate on
June 4, 2010.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June 2009, by the Board of Directors of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
Members:
ABSENT:
Members:
James A. Nejedly
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Elaine R. Boehme
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Approved as to form:
Kenton L. Alm
Counsel for the District
n
Scentral Contra Costa Sanay District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009 No.: 9.a. Human Resources
Type of Action: ADOPT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Subject: ADOPT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT
AND THE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP EFFECTIVE JUNE
4, 2009 -APRIL 17, 2012
Submitted By: Cathryn R. Freitas, Initiating Dept ✓Div.: Administration /Human
Human Resources Manager Resources
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.,
l
C. Freitas R. Mu§qFr6vbY A. J/JOOdall, Esq.
James M. Xelly,
General Manager
ISSUE: The Management Support/Confidential Group ratified a successor
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the District on May 15, 2009. Formal
adoption of the MOU by the Board of Directors is required.
Adopt the MOU with MS /CG effective June 4, 2009 through
April 17, 2012.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The cost of the additional salary and benefit adjustments for
negotiated changes in the first year of the agreement is approximately $435,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: Board representatives and the MS /CG bargaining team met and
conferred over several months to discuss changes to the expiring agreement. The
parties worked to achieve a tentative agreement that balanced the needs of the District
and the employees. Agreement was reached on the following:
Wages: First Year - -3 %, Second and Third Years —CPI of 2% to 4 %.
Tier III benefits for new employees hired after July 1, 2009
1. Enrollees in a PPO will pay the difference in premiums between the PPO
and highest cost HMO.
2. Rule of 70 with minimum of 55 years of age and 10 years of service as
eligibility for retiree and spouse medical and dental after retirement.
3. District contribution to medical plans for retirees is set to the lowest cost
HMO. The District shall pay 50% of the premium cost for the lowest cost
HMO (includes pre- Medicare and Medicare supplement plans) for the
retiree and spouse. The retiree shall pay full cost to cover other eligible
dependents.
4. Eliminate Medicare reimbursement.
C: \Documents and Settings \cfreitas \My Documents \mscg pos ppr adopting mou 5- 8- 09.doc
0 0
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: June 4, 2009
subject. ADOPT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT
AND THE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP EFFECTIVE JUNE
4, 2009 -APRIL 17, 2012
5. Eliminate retiree life insurance.
Changes to safety shoe allowance, educational incentive reimbursement,
orthodontia, registration differential criteria, discipline, grievances, and substance
abuse language, and medical waiver.
Various language modifications that make the MOU in compliance with state and
federal laws.
The MS /CG are to be commended for meeting and conferring in good faith. The end
result of the negotiation process provides a modest increase in salaries and benefits
and recognizes the excellent work of our employees.
Attached is the draft Memorandum of Understanding between the District and MS /CG.
Additions to the document are printed in red. Deletions to the language are denoted by
strikeouts.
The MOU between the District and MS /CG expired on April 17, 2009. A new pay period
began on April 18 and ended on May 17, 2009. Members of the bargaining unit ratified
the agreement on May 15, 2009. In accordance with Board authority permitting the
wage increase to go into effect the first day of the pay period in which the tentative
agreement is ratified by MS /CG, MS /CG members will receive a three percent wage
increase effective April 18, 2009.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt the Memorandum of Understanding
between the District and the MS /CG effective June 4, 2009 through April 17, 2012.
C: \Documents and SettingsUreitasNy Documents \mscg pos ppr adopting mou 5- 8- 09.doc
0 0
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
PREAMBLE
RECOGNITION AND COVERAGE
The Management Support/Confidential Group, hereafter known as the MS /CG, is the
formally recognized exclusive employee representative for all employees other than
General Employees, Management Employees, and Executive Management Employees.
The MS /CG shall represent all regular employees currently designated by Resolution of
the Board of Directors.
The determination for new and reclassified positions shall be in accordance with the
District's Employer /Employee Relations Ordinance.
RIGHTS
The Board of Directors' Representatives and duly appointed Representatives of the
MS /CG will meet and confer in good faith. The Board of Directors, or any agent thereof,
agrees that there will be no interference, restraint, or coercion against the MS /CG or
against any employee because of his /her group membership or group activity.
It is the intent and purpose of the parties hereto to promote harmonious, economic, and
industrial relationships between the District and MS /CG and to effect the best possible
service at the most effective cost to the customers of the District. The District and
MS /CG jointly agree to perform faithfully the obligations imposed by this Memorandum of
Understanding, and furthermore, agree that the provisions contained herein shall be
recognized as the sole statement of contractual rights and obligations between the two
parties, except however, that all rights, privileges, and benefits secured prior to this
agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except as may be provided herein.
The District has the sole and exclusive right to determine the consideration of the merits,
necessity, or organization of any service or activity provided by law or Executive Order.
Additionally, the rights of the District include, but are not limited to, the exclusive right to
determine the missions of its constituent departments and divisions; set standards of
services; determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and
promotion; direct, classify, and assign its employees; require overtime, when necessary,
for operations of the District; take disciplinary action; relieve its employees from duty
because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons; maintain the efficiency of District
operations, including, but not limited to, the contracting or subcontracting of production,
service, maintenance, or other type of work performed by the District; determine the
methods, means, and personnel by which District operations are to be conducted;
determine the content of job classifications; take all necessary actions to carry out its
mission in emergencies; and exercise complete control and discretion over its
organization and the technology of performing its work; provided, however, that the
CADocuments and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0
exercise of such District rights shall not conflict with the express provisions of this
Memorandum.
ARTICLE 1 -- PAYROLL DEDUCTION OF DUES
The District shall provide payroll deduction of dues for the MS /CG employees, provided
however, that a signed payroll deduction form is executed by the employee specifying
the amount to be deducted and is in the Accounting Office by the fifteenth of the month
prior to its effective date. The monies withheld shall be turned over to the treasurer of
the MS /CG by the fifteenth of the following month.
ARTICLE 11- -PAY
Paycheck Distribution: The District shall distribute paychecks directly to the employee
on the last regular District working day of each month. However, if the employee so
elects, distribution may take place at the employee's written request by direct deposit to
any financial institution accepting electronic wire transfer from the Federal Reserve
Bank.
Uniform Pay Periods: Employees shall be paid based on a pay period from the 18th to
17th of each month.
Minimum Call Back Pay: An employee not on Standby but who is called back to work
shall be compensated at time and one -half for a three (3) hours' minimum for each call
or time and one -half for the actual time worked.
Out -of -Class Pay: Employees assigned to work in a higher classification in the
absence of their supervisor shall receive a minimum of one salary step after two
continuous weeks in the higher classification. When a supervisor is absent for two or
more continuous weeks (ten work days) and where more than one employee is assigned
the supervisor's responsibilities at different times during the absence, which may be less
than two weeks per employee, then those employees shall receive a minimum of one
salary step for the actual hours worked in the higher classification.
Meal Allowance: Those called in who are not on stand -bv, other than Operations
the meal allowance, but not the paid meal break.
cleanup time. Receipts will not be required for meal allowances.
Terminal compensation: X411- pertien-ef-tThe employee's terminal compensation will be
contributed by the District to the 401(a) plan at termination, retirement or resignation at
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0 0
b). or the Internal Revenue Service maximum contribution limit, whichever is lower.. as
509/6.
tAFMiRal GGMPGR6atiGR q6 betW9eR $5,000 and $10,009, 0
0
In no case will the total 401(a) contribution be in excess of Internal Revenue Code
mandated limits in force at the time of termination, retirement or resignation.
Any other outstanding vacation or sick leave and earned overtime due the employee at
the time of termination, retirement, or resignation will be calculated and issued to the
employee with the final paycheck. All unused accumulated sick leave at the time of
retirement is credited as longevity upon retirement.
ARTICLE III -- GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
It shall be the policy of the District and the MS /CG to develop and practice reasonable
and effective means of resolving difficulties which may arise among employees, to
reduce potential problems, and to establish channels of communication.
The grievant may elect, in writing, to represent himself /herself rather than have the
MS /CG provide representation. If the grievant elects to represent himself /herself at this
step, or at any later step, the MS /CG shall be relieved of any further obligation of
representation and shall be relieved of any obligation to share in any further expense of
the grievance procedure. No resolution shall be inconsistent with the terms of this
Agreement.
Matters Subject to Grievance: Any complaint an employee has concerning the
interpretation or application of rules, regulations, policies, or procedures governing
personnel practices, working conditions, wages, hours, and other terms and conditions
of employment.
Matters Not Subject to Grievance: The District's policies, rules, and regulations as
such; a rating as given in an Employee Performance Appraisal; the Disciplinary and
Termination Actions as outlined in the District's Discipline Policy and Procedures;
classification; and contractual changes in health plans initiated by and at the sole
discretion of the health plan providers.
PROCEDURE
Step One: The grievant shall, within fifteen (15) working days, from when the employee
knew of the occurrence, present and discuss any difference or grievance with his /her
immediate supervisor. Both the grievant and his /her supervisor shall make a bona fide
effort to amicably settle such differences. The supervisor shall respond within We (5)
fifteen (15) working days after the final meeting with the grievant. If, after this response,
the grievant does not believe the problem has been satisfactorily resolved, then the
grievant shall have the right to proceed to Step Two of this procedure within five (5)
working days after receipt of the supervisor's written response.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0 0
Step Two: In the event such differences are not settled and the grievant desires the
grievance to be considered further, it shall be presented, in writing, within five (5)
working days by the employee involved, and /or his /her representatives to the grievant's
Department Manager. A meeting shall be arranged by the Department Manager within
five (5) working days of receipt of the written grievance. The grievance shall be
discussed with the grievant and pertinent facts brought to light. The Department
Manager shall respond, in writing, within five (5) fifteen (15) working days after the final
meeting rendering the decision.
Failure of the grievant to take further action within five (5) working days after receipt of
the decision will constitute withdrawal of the grievance.
Step Three: In the event such differences are not settled at Step Two and the grievant
desires the grievance to be considered further, it shall be presented, in writing, within
five (5) working days to the General Manager or his designated representative who will
discuss the grievance with the grievant, his representative or representatives, and with
other appropriate persons within ten (10) days of receipt of the grievance. The General
Manager may designate a person, not in the grievant's normal line of supervision, to
advise him concerning the grievance. A record may be maintained of information
presented. The General Manager shall render a decision, in writing, to the grievant
within fea (19) twenty (20) working days after hearing the grievance.
Failure of the grievant to take further action within ten (10) working days after receipt of
the General Manager's decision will constitute withdrawal of the grievance.
Step Four: In the event such differences are not settled and the grievant desires the
grievance to be considered further, it shall be presented, in writing, to the Secretary of
the Board within five (5) days of receipt of the General Manager's decision. The
Secretary shall calendar the agenda item at the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting
in keeping with established guidelines for calendaring an agenda item.
The Board may employ a neutral third party to hear the matter and recommend action to
the Board. The Board may adopt, reject, or modify the recommendation of the
Board - appointed neutral third party. The decision of the Board is the final action of the
District.
Miscellaneous Provisions: No grievant shall, at any stage of the grievance procedure,
be required to meet regarding the grievance with any supervisor or manager without
organizational representation, nor shall any supervisor or manager be required to meet
with the grievant regarding the grievance without benefit of counsel or representation.
No waiver of time lines must be granted either party due to the lack of available counsel.
In certain grievances, the first and/or second steps may be deleted if the grievance
arises out of an action by an authority above the level of the grievant's supervisor.
However, such grievances will begin at a level no higher than Step 3 of this grievance
procedure.
Failure at any step of this procedure to communicate the decision on a grievance within
the specified time limits shall permit the lodging of an appeal at the next step of the
C:\Documents and Settings \cfrreitasNy Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 4
0 0
procedure within the time allotted, had the decision been given. Failure to appeal a
decision within the specified time limits shall be deemed a withdrawal of the grievance
The time limits specified in this procedure may be extended, in any specific instance, by
mutual agreements, in writing.
The cost of the grievance arbitration shall be shared equally between the District and the
MS /CG, including the fees of the neutral third party, a court reporter or stenographer.
Cancellation fees shall be the responsibility of the moving party.
Group Grievances: If the grievance involves employees with different immediate
supervisors, the grievance may be filed at the appropriate step of the grievance
procedure. However, such grievance will begin no higher than Step 3 of this grievance
procedure.
Employee- Processed Grievance: An employee covered by this Agreement may
present a grievance directly and have such grievance adjusted without intervention of
the MS /CG as long as the adjustment is not inconsistent with the terms of this
Agreement.
Grievance Witnesses: The District shall endeavor to make available for testimony in
connection with the grievance procedure reasonable requests for District employees to
appear when requested by the grievant, the MS /CG, or the District. Any employee
witnesses required to appear in connection with this Article shall suffer no loss of normal
pay but will not receive any form of overtime compensation in connection with his /her
appearance.
Grievance Processing During Regular Working Hours: The grievant and his /her
representative(s) shall normally be entitled reasonable time to process a grievance
during normal working hours with no loss of pay or benefits, provided the grievant has
the permission of his /her supervisor. Such permission shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Separate Grievance File: All materials concerning an employee's grievance shall be
kept in a file separate from the employee's personnel file, which file shall be available for
inspection only by the grievant, his /her representative, with approval by the grievant and
management, supervisory, and confidential employees who can demonstrate a need to
review the file.
ARTICLE IV-- DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE RECORBS
The District and MS /CG agree to follow the following disciplinary procedures unless the
parties agree to other procedures as determined on a case by case basis.
A.1. Disciplinary Action:
a. General
The District's disciplinary procedure is intended to advise the employee of less
than satisfactory behavior or actions on the iob and it is intended to be used as a
corrective measure for improvement. The District shall use progressive steps in
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas \My DocumentArnscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0 0
b. Grounds for Discipline
District.
2. Drinking of intoxicating beverages or use or possession of illegal or
unprescribed drugs on the iob: or arriving on the job under the influence
of such beverages or drugs; or providing or soliciting intoxicating
treatment program as agreed to by the District and the employee in lieu of
Abuse.
3. Habitual absence or tardiness
4. Abuse of sick leave
5. Disorderly conduct
6. Incompetency or inefficiency
7. Violation of any lawful or reasonable regulation or order made and given
by an employee's supervisor: insubordination
8. Dishonesty
9. Violation of District safety rules and regulations
10. Failure to perform duties
11. Misconduct
12. Storage carrying or use of firearms or other items traditionally considered
lethal weapons on District property.
13. Loss of required valid California Driver's License in accordance with
Article ?, Section ?
14. Driving a District vehicle without a valid California Driver's License.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 6
0 0
C. Written Notice
All acts of discipline will be documented by a written notice to the employee
stating the reasons and grounds for such discipline.
All records of discipline above a
shall remain a part of the employee's personnel file for a period
of three years, assuming no continuation of a similar offense. All disciplinary
records which are removed from the employee's personnel file after three years
shall be maintained in a separate file by the District Human Resources Manager
to be used only in matters involving discrimination, litigation complaints or
charges, and grievances alleging disparate treatment.
d. Human Resources Manager
Any offense warranting disciplinary action, with the exception of suspension with
e. Content of Notice
in writing to the employee at least five (5) working days before the proposed
following:
1. A description of the proposed action and its effective date or dates, and
the ordinance, regulation, or rule violated.
additional information if the matter should be appealed to the Board.
4. A statement advising the employee of the right to seek representation and
to request a hearing as provided herein.
A.2. Dismissal of An Employee
a. General
During his/her probationary period, an employee may be dismissed without
cause by the Board the General Manager, or his /her Department Director with
CADocuments and Settings \cfreitas \My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0 0
the approval of the General Manager. This discharge is at the sole discretion of
the District with no recourse under the grievance or appeals provision.
A regular employee maV be dismissed at anV time bV the Board of Directors. the
General Manager, or his /her Department Director for cause with the approval of
the General Manager as stated herein.
If a promoted, regular employee is found to be unable to adequately perform
under the increased responsibility of the new position during the probationary
period, the employee shall be demoted back to the previously held position. No
other employee in a permanent position shall be displaced by this action.
b. Sufficient Cause for Dismissal
1. Conviction of a felony. (The District will consider the felonV conviction in
light of the employee's lob duties performed.)
2. Fraud or misstatement of qualifications in securing employment.
3. Misappropriation of District funds or property.
4. Intentional or gross misconduct.
5. Failure to respond or improve as specified in Article IV, Section A. 1.b. (1-
14) nr cnntinued hehavior as specified in Article IV. Section A.1.b. (1 -14)
improvement in the workers' performance.
6. IncapacitV due to mental or permanent physical disability.
7. Gross violation of District safety rules and regulations.
show satisfactory cause for such action.
C. Notice of Dismissal
After review and discussion with the Human Resources Manager, all regular
employees shall be provided with a notice of dismissal at least five (5) working
shall contain the following:
1 A description of the proposed action and its effective date and the
ordinance(s) regulation(s). or rule(s) violated.
2. A statement of the acts or omissions upon which the action is based.
C: \Documents and Settings \cfreitas \My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0 •
3. A statement that a copy of any available materials upon which the action
is based is attached. This does not preclude either party from utilizing
additional information if the matter should be appealed to the Board.
However, this additional material shall be exchange between the parties
related to the original charges and it shall not be based on events more
than three (3) years old, in accordance with Article IV, Section A. 1.c.,
Written Notice.
4. A statement advising the employee of the right to seek representation and
to file an appeal as provided herein.
A.3 Fair and Impartial Hearing For Disciplinary Action and Dismissal of Employees
a. Procedure
A regular employee upon receipt of a notice of dismissal, demotion, or
suspension may appeal in writing, to the General Manager within ten (10)
working days of the date of the notification. The General Manager may overturn,
Administration to act as the Hearing Officer or, if it has been determined that a
conflict of interest exists, or in his absence, another Department Director may be
him /her, present any mitigating evidence or otherwise respond to the Notice of
Dismissal. The Hearing Officer shall issue his /her opinion and decision within
twenty (20) working days of the hearing. The Hearing Officer may, based upon
the evidence presented at the hearing, concur with the Department Director's
b. Appeal to Board of Directors
to the Board of Directors pursuant to the procedures set forth herein.
A.4. Appeal
a. General
ro
appealing to the Board via filing a written request for hearing with the Secretary
of the District within ten (10) working days of receipt of the Hearing Officer's
decision The Secretary shall calendar the matter at the next regularly scheduled
Board meeting in keeping with established guidelines for calendaring an agenda
item.
C:ADocuments and Settings \cfreitas \My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc
0
•
b. Board Shall Designate A Representative to Hear Appeal
The Board shall employ a neutral third partV to hear the appeal and to
recommend action to the Board. Except in cases where MS /CG is not involved
in the appeal the cost of the hearing shall be shared equally between the District
and MS /CG. including the fees of the neutral third partV and a court reporter or
stenographer. Cancellation fees shall be the responsibilitV of the moving partV.
C. Adopt or Modify Recommendation
The Board may adopt reject or modify the recommendation of the Board -
appointed neutral third partV. The decision of the Board is the final action of the
District.
ARTICLE V-- APPOINTMENT OF RELATIVES
Members of immediate family of elected or appointed officials shall not be appointed to
District employment.
Members of the immediate family of employees shall not be employed by the District.
Those relatives appointed before July 1, 1982, shall not be appointed to the same
division, nor shall be transferred, promoted, or demoted into the same division, nor be
placed in such a position as to evaluate a relative or be in the same line of supervision.
Immediate family members are defined as mother, father, brother, sister, son, daughter,
in -laws, or grandparents.
This provision shall apply to all types of employment status.
ARTICLE VI -- VACATION
General: All employees, with the exception of Temporary status employees, earn paid
vacation time from the first month of employment. However, a new employee without
District tenure may not use any accumulated vacation time until after completion of six
(6) months service. Thereafter, accumulated vacation time may generally be used as
desired, subject to the approval of the appropriate supervisor, subject to two (2) weeks
notice in advance. The schedule of vacation days and the maximum number of vacation
days which may be accumulated and deferred are shown in the following tables:
Vacation Earnings:
A. Current regular or probationary employees hired by the District prior to May 1,
1985, earn ten (10) hours of vacation per month worked plus additional
allowance for longevity after five (5) years.
Maximum Number of
Vacation Days Which
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\rttscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 10
B. Regular or probationary employees hired by the District after May 1, 1985, earn
6.67 hours of vacation per month worked, 0 -3 years; and ten (10) hours of
vacation per month worked, 3 -5 years; plus additional allowance for longevity
after five (5) years worked.
Maximum Number of
Vacation Days Which
Years of Annual Vacation Can Be Accumulated
Service Allowance and Deferred
0 -3 Years
10 Days
20 Days
Years of
Annual Vacation
Can Be Accumulated
Service
Allowance
and Deferred
0 -5 Years
15 Days
30 Days
5 -10 Years
16 Days
32 Days
10 -15 Years
17 Days
34 Days
15 -20 Years
20 Days
40 Days
20 -25 Years
25 Days
50 Days
25 -30 Years
30 Days
60 Days
30 & Over
35 Days
70 Days
B. Regular or probationary employees hired by the District after May 1, 1985, earn
6.67 hours of vacation per month worked, 0 -3 years; and ten (10) hours of
vacation per month worked, 3 -5 years; plus additional allowance for longevity
after five (5) years worked.
Maximum Number of
Vacation Days Which
Years of Annual Vacation Can Be Accumulated
Service Allowance and Deferred
0 -3 Years
10 Days
20 Days
3 -5 Years
15 Days
30 Days
5 -10 Years
16 Days
32 Days
10 -15 Years
17 Days
34 Days
15 -20 Years
20 Days
40 Days
20 -25 Years
25 Days
50 Days
25 & Over
30 Days
60 Days
Use of Vacation Accumulation: All employees shall be afforded (1) one calendar year
from the anniversary date to use such extra vacation days to or below the permitted
maximum limits
Accrual Credit: The extra days accrued due to service of over five (5) years are
credited to each employee's account on his /her anniversary date. Employees are
notified as they reach the maximum accrual limit.
Termination: If an employee leaves the District for any reason, he /she will be paid for
any earned vacation time not used.
Payment of Accumulated Vacation Time:
A. Employees may request payoff of accumulated vacation time.
B. Employees must have either taken ten (10) days of vacation time within the
calendar year of application or have accrued sufficient vacation time to take a
mandatory ten (10) days of vacation time off within the calendar year of
application.
C. The maximum number of days which will be considered for payment in any one
calendar year shall be twenty (20) days.
C:ADocuments and Settings \efreitas \My Document~ \mscg muu 2009- 2012.doc I I
L
L
D. The employee shall submit a letter of request for payment of accumulated
vacation to his/her Department Manager, which shall include the number of days
pay requested. The request will then be submitted to the General Manager. If all
of the conditions specified above are satisfied, the request will be considered.
E. Note the following exception to the above: payment of accumulated vacation time
above the maximum annual accrual shall occur automatically on the anniversary
date on which the time would be lost provided that an employee has used at
least ten (10) vacation days during the last twelve (12) months.
The above policies do not apply to termination of employment or retirement.
ARTICLE VII -- HOLIDAYS
Holiday Schedule: There are thirteen (13) paid holidays.
New Year's Day
(January 1)
Martin Luther King, Jr.' s Birthday
(Third Monday in January)
Lincoln's Birthday
(February 12)
Washington's Birthday
(Third Monday in February)
Memorial Day
(Last Monday in May)
Independence Day
(July 4)
Labor Day
(First Monday in September)
Veteran's Day
(November 11)
Thanksgiving Day
(Fourth Thursday in November)
Day after Thanksgiving
December 24
December 25
December 31
Weekend- Designated Holidays: If a designated holiday falls on a Saturday, the
preceding workday not a holiday shall be deemed to be the holiday, and if the holiday
falls on a Sunday, the following workday not a holiday shall be deemed to be that
holiday.
Holiday Compensation: All employees, with the exception of Temporary status
employees who are required or authorized to work on a holiday listed above, will be paid
at the rate of time and one -half the normal regularly assigned basic pay rate in addition
to the normal monthly pay except for New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas
Day, which will be paid at a double -time rate in addition to the normal monthly pay.
Employees required to work on a Friday immediately preceding a holiday or Monday
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 12
0 0
immediately following will receive pay at time and one -half the normal basic pay rate or
receive time and one -half off at a later date.
Employees who earn holiday compensatory time may accumulate a maximum of what
can be earned in a one -year period (currently 104 hours). Any employee with more than
104 hours of Holiday Compensatory Time accumulated as of June 17, 2000, may keep
those accruals but will not accumulate more Holiday Compensatory Time until his /her
accumulated Holiday Compensatory Time falls below the maximum.
ARTICLE VIII — LEAVES
Sick Leave: Current regular or probationary employees hired by the District prior to May
1, 1985, earn fifteen (15) days sick leave per year. Regular or probationary employees
hired by the District after May 1, 1985, earn twelve (12) days sick leave per year. Sick
leave is to be used only in case of real sickness, disability, medical, or dental care for the
employee, or up to ten (10) days annually may be used to attend to health needs of an
immediate family member. If all accumulated sick leave is used, earned vacation time
may be used as sick leave in order to receive full regular pay. Probationary employees
are eligible to use earned sick leave as required.
Sick Leave Accumulation: Unused sick leave accumulates from one year to the next.
There is no maximum limitation. All unused accumulated sick leave at the time of
retirement is credited as longevity upon retirement.
Sick Leave Incentive Benefit: For current regular or probationary employees hired by
the District prior to May 1, 1985, the District shall augment the regular sick leave policy
with an incentive benefit using a formula crediting eighty -five (85 %) percent of the
employee's yearly unused sick leave to an accumulating account for that person. For
regular or probationary employees hired by the District after May 1, 1985, the following
schedule shall apply:
Years of
Service
0 - 5 Years
5 - 10 Years
10 - 25 Years
25 and Over
Payoff Credit
at Termination
0 Percent
25 Percent
25 Percent
25 Percent
Pay off Credit
at Retirement
0 Percent
25 Percent
35 Percent
40 Percent
Payment for all credited sick leave will be made upon retirement or termination of
employment only if the employee provides the District with a minimum of two (2) weeks
notice.
Salary Continuance Plan: It shall be the general policy of the District to continue pay to
an employee under the Salary Continuance Plan when an employee incurs a
work - related injury or illness. This plan commences if the employee qualifies for
temporary disability payments from Worker's Compensation for the disability and, if in
the opinion of the District, the disability is work - related. If the injury or illness is
determined legitimate, all of the employee's regular benefits will continue during the time
this plan is in effect.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 13
0
0
The salary continuance will be equivalent to seventy (70 %) percent of gross
compensation less any Worker's Compensation payments.
The maximum period for which this plan could be used by an employee will be six (6)
months or until a stable level of disability is reached, whichever occurs first.
The District's policy for charging sick leave for work - incurred injuries or illnesses shall be
as follows:
An employee requiring medical attention for a work- incurred injury or illness will not be
required to charge the portion of time spent on the day of the injury receiving medical
care to his/her sick leave record. After the doctor has released the employee from his
office, any additional time off on that day will be charged to the employee's sick leave
account.
The first day of the three -day waiting period required by the State Compensation
Insurance Fund begins the day following the date on which the injury or illness occurred.
District Salary Continuance Plan benefits shall begin on the same day as State
Compensation benefits commence. However, if the injury or illness causes disability of
more than fourteen (14) days or necessitates hospitalization, the Salary Continuance
Plan will become effective from the first day the injured employee leaves work as a result
of the injury or illness.
The employee may use vacation or sick leave accrual or earned overtime during this
waiting period.
Death in Family: In the event of a death in the immediate family of an employee, the
employee may, after notifying his /her supervisor, be absent up to a maximum of ten (10)
days and have the time off charged to his /her sick leave account. Accrued vacation time
may be used if additional time is required. Death in the family leave must be taken within
thirty days of the occurrence of the death. "Immediate Family" consists of the following
persons: mother, father, husband, wife, brother, sister, son, daughter, in -laws, or
grandparents. Verification may be required.
Jury Duty: If an employee is called for jury duty, he /she may either take the time off
with pay and may not receive furor pay from the court.
employee. Mileage allowances and meal expense reimbursements shall be kept by the
employee under any circumstances.
Court Appearances: All employees who need time off work to attend legal proceedings
must give advance notice of the need for such time off.
A. The District will compensate an employee as if the employee was at work for
time spent attending legal proceedings under the following circumstances:
1. Attendance at arbitrations held pursuant to this MOU;
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 14
0
0
2. Responding to a subpoena or notice of deposition except as noted below
in section B;
3. Attendance at a legal proceeding at the instruction of District
management.
B. The District will not compensate an employee as if the employee was at work for
attending a legal proceeding under the following circumstances:
If the employee is an expert witness;
2. If the legal proceeding is against the District and the employee is a
plaintiff in that action;
3. If the employee participates in a legal proceeding and the proceeding
does not involve the District.
Such employee must apply for vacation leave, earned overtime, or leave of
absence without pay.
Military Leave: Employees who are assigned to military duty are entitled to military
leave in accordance with the provisions of applicable state laws (California Military and
Veterans Code, Section 395 et seq.).
Pregnancy Disability: For the purposes of the State Disability Insurance, Pregnancy
Disability Leave is effective the first date the employee is disabled. The District will
require verification from the employee's physician. E.g., if an employee's last day of
work is 9/1 and the baby is delivered on 10/1, then the effective date of Pregnancy
Disability Leave will be 9/1.
Upon termination of the disability, (generally six weeks following a regular delivery, eight
weeks following a Caesarean Section, or the length of the disability whichever is longer),
the employee will no longer be able to use sick leave but will be allowed to use any
accrued vacation, earned overtime, or leave without pay. The combination of time off for
approved Pregnancy Disability Leave and Family Medical Leave may not total more than
seven months per occasion. This requires approval of the Department Manager.
Family and Medical Leave: The District will comply with the provisions of the Family
and Medical Leave Act and the California Family Rights Act. The District will require an
employee to exhaust his /her sick leave prior to considering a leave of absence without
pay for the purposes of family and medical leave.
Leave of Absence Without Pay: Employees may request a leave of absence without
pay through his /her supervisor. A leave of absence without pay for up to thirty (30)
working days may be approved by the Department Manager and the General Manager.
Longer leave shall require the approval of the Board of Directors and may be made if
there is a compelling reason and the employee's work unit will not be unduly affected by
the employee's absence. During an extended leave, the employee's employment status
and seniority will remain unchanged. Health plan insurance benefits will be continued
for only medically - related leaves. However, all other rights, privileges, and benefits of
employment are suspended until the employee's return to active employment.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas \My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 15
0 0
Administrative Leave: Administrative leave shall be granted for all employees covered
under this Agreement at three (3) days per year effective April 18 of each year.
Administrative leave must be used by April 17 of each year or it will be forfeited.
ARTICLE IX -- CAFETERIA PLAN
The District shall contribute $170 per month for each employee to the Cafeteria Plan.
Effective January 1, 2004, the District shall contribute an additional $50 per month for
each employee to the Cafeteria Plan provided that this additional amount must be used
to reimburse eligible cafeteria plan expenses. The additional $50 per month may not be
taken as cash.
ARTICLE X -- GENERAL INCREASES
Effective April 18, 20093, the District shall continue to contribute the employee's current
basic retirement contribution. Additionally, a three percent (3` ),,)
general increase shall be provided to all employees covered by this Memorandum of
Understanding.
payGhGGk-
Effective April 18, 200410, the wage adjustment shall be based on changes in the
Consumers Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers (San Francisco /Oakland/San
Jose) during the February 20039 to February 200410 base period. Depending on the
CPI, the salary adjustment shall be at least two percent (2 %), but no more than five four
percent (54 %).
Effective April 18, 200511, the wage adjustment shall be based on changes in the
Consumers Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers (San Francisco /Oakland /San
Jose) during the February 2004 -10 to February 2005-11 base period. Depending on the
CPI, the salary adjustment shall be at least two percent (2 %), but no more than five four
percent (54 %).
E#94ve APF41 18, 2006, the wage aGlju6trnent shall be based OR GhaRge6 ip. th8-
jG6e) GlWiRg the FebF�,iaFy 2005 to February 2006 base period. [)GPGRdiRg GR the Gpl,
the salaFy adjustment shall -he at least tWG p8FGent (20%), bUt Re mere thaR Six peFGeRt
EffBGtive ApFil 18, 2007, the wage aGljustmeRt shall be based OR GhangeG in the
jese) duFing the FebF6iaFy 2006 te February 2007 base peried. PepeRdliRg 9R the Gpl,
the salary aGqwstrnA-.nt shall hp at Itzas! twe percent EffGGt;ve Apr 1 18, 2908, the wage adjustment shall be ba6ed OR Gl;aRges;R the
C;GRSYFRBFG Price index (GPI) feF all Urban GAn,;umRr,; (San FraRG GGG4)aklaAd,1S Pin
0
C:ADocuments and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 16
# i
(During the period of this Memorandum of Understanding, the employee will continue to
contribute to the employee cost -of- living (COL) share of the retirement system as
required by the Contra Costa County Retirement System.)
ARTICLE XI -- RECLASSIFICATION
Reclassification Requests: The District is responsible for determining the methods,
means, and personnel by which District operations are conducted including, but not
limited to, classifying and reclassifying personnel. If an employee has reason to believe
that his /her duties and responsibilities are being performed outside of the employee's
class description so as to justify a reclassification, the employee may submit that
evidence in writing, through his /her Department Manager to the Human Resources
Manager. Upon receipt of the request, the Human Resources Manager shall evaluate
the written request with the Department Manager and render an appropriate
recommendation. If the recommendation is that a reclassification is appropriate, then
that recommendation shall be submitted to the Board of Directors for consideration.
However, if the recommendation is that further information is needed or the
reclassification is not clearly justified, the Human Resources Manager will set up a three
to five member panel comprised of management team members to consider the
reclassification request. The employee shall be able to make a written and verbal
justification to the panel. A consultant, specializing in classification studies shall be
retained to evaluate the reclassification request and advise the panel. The panel shall
be overseen by the Human Resources Manager. If the determination of the panel is that
reclassification is inappropriate, that determination shall be final and not subject to
grievance. If the recommendation of the panel is that reclassification is appropriate, then
that recommendation shall be submitted to the Board of Directors for consideration.
Probationary Period: The probationary period for members of Management
Support/Confidential Group who are reclassified for any reason is six months.
ARTICLE XII- -MERIT INCREASES
Employees normally receive a salary range increase upon satisfactory completion of
their Probationary Period and a merit increase of one salary step every twelve (12)
months from the date they achieve permanent status until they reach the top of their
range. This merit increase shall only be withheld based upon an unacceptable overall
evaluation rating as noted in an Employee Performance Appraisal Form. During the term
of this Memorandum of Understanding, the District shall use the Employee Performance
Appraisal Form.
ARTICLE XIII -- PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
The District shall pay the registration and renewal fees for all professional registered
engineers, licensed land surveyors, and those employees who hold a current California
CADocuments and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 17
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator's Certificate. The registration and/or certificate
must be a requirement of the employee's classification.
Some employees are required by law or job classification to hold a license, certificate, or
professional registration. If an employee does not possess the required license,
certificate, or professional registration at the time of hire or promotion, the employee may
be given two (2) or more opportunities to take and pass the necessary examinations to
meet the requirements of the job. The maximum time allowed to obtain the license
certificate or professional registration shall be two (2) years from the employee's date of
hire or promotion. During this period, the employee shall remain in a probationary status
and shall be ineligible for any merit pay increases.
ARTICLE XIV— REGISTRATION OR CERTIFICATION DIFFERENTIAL
The District shall grant a one step salary increase to full -time, regular employees while
employed at the District as a Professional Engineer, Land Surveyor, Certified Public
Accountant or Certified Management Accountant who, while eMpleyeel by the 9i6tFiGt,
have achieved their registration or a license in positions where the registration or license
is not required. Such an increase shall be limited to one registration or certification per
employee and be subject to the employee's demonstrated ability to assist in the
accomplishment of District activities requiring a level of skills and importance normally
expected from a person with such registration or license.
ARTICLE XV -- EDUCATION - TUITION REFUND POLICY
The District will reimburse employees (with the exception of those in a temporary status
or on a Leave of Absence) desiring to further their education for the purpose of
improving their on- the -job performance. Approval will be given only for courses within
the scope of the employee's employment field and District job responsibilities. Class and
study time must be outside of the employee's working hours, and the completion of the
course must result in at least a C grade or its equivalent. The maximum tuition refund to
an eligible employee shall not exceed $4-2000 per fiscal year. An employee may elect to
apply part of the tuition refund toward the purchase of course - required textbook(s),
which will then be retained by the District at the completion of the course. Requests for
the budgeting of education tuition refunds must be submitted to the employee's
Department Manager by March 15 of each year.
ARTICLE XVI-- LONGEVITY COMPENSATION
Career Service Pay: A two and one -half (21/2%) percent career service pay increase will
be granted to employees after ten (10) years of employment with the District.
ARTICLE XVII - -SHIFT DIFFERENTIALS
Night Shift Differential: Night Shift Differential applies only to employees who are
regularly scheduled to work night shift. The rate of pay for the Night Shift Differential is
C:\Documents and Settings\cfreitasVvIy Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 18
0 0
determined by increasing the basic hourly salary for the job by seven and one -half (7
1/z %o) percent.
Em
Swing Shift Differential: Swing Shift Differential applies only to employees who are
regularly scheduled to work Swing Shift. The rate of pay for the Swing Shift Differential
is determined by increasing the basic hourly salary for the job by five (5 %) percent—.#
ARTICLE XVIII- -WORK HOURS
Work Week: The normal workweek for full time nonshift employees is eight (8) hours
per day. Although most employees are scheduled to work Monday through Friday,
some services and operations are currently scheduled on a 24 -hour basis, seven (7)
days a week.
Reduced Work Week: An individual may submit a written request for a reduced
workweek of up to thirty-two (32) hours to his /her supervisor, who will give the request
full, prompt, and responsible consideration. The request may be for a period not to
exceed three months and such request will be forwarded by the supervisor to the
appropriate department or division manager with a recommendation. Department
manager approval is required to implement a reduced workweek. The decision of the
department manager is final and not subject to the grievance procedure. Should the
individual wish to extend the three -month period, he /she must submit an additional
request(s). All benefits will remain in effect with the exception that pay and vacation and
sick leave accumulations will be prorated according to the amount of time worked.
Alternative Work Schedules: An individual or group of employees within a work unit
may request the District to adopt an alternative work schedule, with a written request to
their supervisor, who will give full, prompt, and responsible consideration to such request
and forward such request to the appropriate department or division manager with a
recommendation. Department manager approval is required to implement an alternative
work schedule. The decision of the department manager is final and not subject to the
grievance procedure.
ARTICLE XIX -- FILLING OF VACANT POSITIONS
When an opening occurs for a position that is not included in the Personnel
Advancement Policy, employees may compete on an open /promotional basis.
Employees must meet the minimum qualifications of the open position to apply.
At the conclusion of the recruitment and testing process, an eligibility list of candidates
will be prepared. A District manager or his /her designated representative will interview
and select from the candidates on the eligibility list in the following manner: the four -
highest ranking District employees shall be interviewed, and any outside candidates who
place among the top four candidates on the eligibility list shall be interviewed.
C:\Documents and Settings \efreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 19
In the event that a vacancy occurs or exists and the possibility of layoffs exists due to the
elimination of a position or positions, management may limit recruitment. The District
agrees to notify the Management Support/Confidential Group of this occurrence, and the
parties agree to meet and confer.
ARTICLE XX— LATERAL TRANSFERS
All individuals eligible (in the same classification), who are not on probation, and who
submit applications to the Personnel Office will be interviewed by the Department
Manager or his /her designated representatives when a vacancy exists and will be
considered prior to any other recruitment activity.
ARTICLE XXI— OVERTIME ACCUMULATION
Compensation for overtime work shall be paid at the next pay period, or the time and
one -half hours may be accumulated as "Earned Overtime," to a maximum of forty (40)
hours with an - eighty (80) hour limit on Earned Overtime taken off per year. Exceptions
to this limit for bona fide family emergencies shall be considered by the District on a
case -by -case basis. When required to maintain the operations of the District, the District
may require Overtime.
ARTICLE XXII -- EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Health Plans: Current regular or probationary employees shall be provided with a
choice of three health plans. As of the date of this Agreement, those plans are Kaiser, a
Health Net HMO and a Health Net PPO. In the event these plans become unavailable
due to unforeseen circumstances, the parties agree to meet and confer as soon as
possible to negotiate the effects of any such change. The premium cost of the plans
shall be borne by the District. However, employees hired after June 30, 2009 who select
the PPO plan shall pay through payroll deduction the difference in premiums between
the PPO plan and the highest cost HMO plan.
The parties agree that in the event that federal health care reform legislation becomes
effective during the term of this Agreement, which calls for health and other benefits
different, or under different terms than those provided for in the Agreement, the parties
will immediately meet and confer for appropriate modifications.
The District's health plans are subject to contractual changes initiated by and at the sole
discretion of the health plan provider(s). Changes initiated by the provider(s) are not
subject to the District's grievance procedure. Complaints regarding these changes are
to be directed to the health plan provider(s). The District agrees to meet and confer with
representatives of MS /CG with regard to any major changes initiated by the provider(s).
Dual Health Coverage: Those employees having dual coverage under a health
insurance program may withdraw from the District's health insurance coverage and, in
lieu of such coverage, receive additional monthly compensation in the amount of $4-56
200. Continuation of this program is subject to Health Plan carrier acceptance.
Retirement: The District shall provide a retirement program for all employees covered
under this Memorandum of Understanding.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 20
District employees who were members of the Retirement Association on or prior to
March 1, 1973, and who have vested thirty (30) years service in the Retirement Plan are
not required to make any further contributions to the Retirement Plan.
Those District employees so qualifying shall be entitled to receive a cash supplement to
their compensation equivalent to, and in lieu of, any District payment as may be granted
and made as a portion of employee retirement contributions to the retirement program.
Deferred Compensation: The District offers a Deferred Compensation Plan to
employees, who may defer up to the amount allowed by law. Employee participation in
the Deferred Compensation plan is voluntary.
401(a) Money Purchase Plan: The District contributes to each employee's 401(a)
Money Purchase Plan an amount equal to that which the District would otherwise
contribute to the Social Security system, but not including the employee's contribution to
Medicare or FICA. If, during the term of this Memorandum of Understanding, the District
is required by law to participate in the Social Security system, the District will stop
contributing to the 401(a) Money Purchase Plan and will meet and confer on the change.
Dental Plan: The District shall provide a dental care program for all employees covered
under this Memorandum of Understanding. Delta Dental shall be the dental plan
provider.
Disability Plan: The District shall provide a Long Term Disability program for all
employees covered under this Memorandum of Understanding. There shall be a ninety -
day waiting period.
Term Life Insurance Plan: For current regular or probationary employees hired by the
District prior to May 1, 1985, the District shall provide a term life insurance policy equal
to two (2) times the employee's annual salary at Step E to a maximum of $75,000. For
regular or probationary employees hired by the District after May 1, 1985, the District
shall provide a term life insurance policy equal to one (1) times the employee's annual
salary at Step E to a maximum of $75,000.
Continuance of Benefit Plan: The District shall have a program which provides a
continued degree of responsibility to the employee upon retirement and to the
dependents of a deceased employee.
Tier I: Employees hired by the District prior to May 1, 1985 shall be covered by medical,
dental, and reduced life insurance plans (one -half of the life insurance provided at time
of retirement for employees hired before May 1, 1985) when they retire from District
employment provided that they meet the "Rule of 65:' Under the "Rule of 65" an
employee's age plus years of service with the District at the time of retirement must total
65, with a minimum requirement that the employee must be at least age 50 and have at
least ten (10) years of continuous service with the District at the time of retirement.
Eligible employees' qualified dependents (as defined by the plan provider) who were
covered as dependents at the time of retirement also shall be covered by medical and
dental plans.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\Mly Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 21
0 0
Tier II: Employees hired after May 1, 1985 but before April 19, 2003 shall be covered by
medical and dental plans when they retire from District employment provided that they
meet the "Rule of 65." Under the "Rule of 65" an employee's age plus years of service
with the District at the time of retirement must total 65, with a minimum requirement that
the employee must be at least age 50 and have at least ten (10) years of continuous
service with the District at the time of retirement. Employees hired after April 18, 2003,
who have reached age 55 and have a minimum of ten (10) years of continuous service
with the District at the time of retirement shall be covered by medical and dental plans
when they retire from District employment. The District shall only pay for the full cost of
an eligible retired employee's medical and dental plan premiums until the retired
employee's 65th birthday. At age 65, the retired employee shall pay the District fifty
(50 %) percent of the cost to the District for the employee's medical and dental coverage.
Eligible employees shall be provided with reduced life insurance ($10,000) when they
retire from District employment. Eligible employees' qualified dependents (as defined by
the plan provider) who were covered as dependents at the time of retirement also shall
be covered by medical and dental plans with the exception that the District shall only pay
for the full cost of an eligible dependent's medical and dental plan premiums until the
eligible dependent's 651 birthday. At age 65, the eligible dependent shall pay the District
fifty percent (50 %) of the cost to the District for the eligible dependent's medical and
dental coverage.
cost for the lowest cost medical and dental plan for the retiree and spouse. Eligible
employees' qualified dependents (as defined by the plan provider) other than the
employee's spouse who were covered as dependents at the time of retirement also shall
be covered by medical and dental plans with the exception that the employee shall pay
the full cost of coverage for those dependents.
Common to All Retirees: At the time of an eligible employee's retirement, all qualified
dependents (as defined by the plan provider) who already were dependents at the time
of retirement, shall continue to be covered by the District's medical and dental plans in
accordance with the Tier I and Tier II benefits as stated above. The District shall have
no obligation to pay for coverage for more than two -party (retiree plus one) coverage for
any new and different dependent added after the date of retirement age (50 years).
The medical coverage for eligible retirees after age 65 will be integrated with Medicare
for all eligible retirees regardless of when they they were hired befeize OF a#9F Ma
INS and eligible dependents upon their 65th birthday. If the retiree's /dependent's
health plan requires enrollment at age 65 in Medicare Part 8, the retiree and /or
dependent shall be responsible for paying for the Medicare premiums. For Tier I and
Tier 11, uUpon submission of evidence of payment to Medicare, the District will reimburse
the retiree and /or dependent for the cost of the Medicare premiums. For Tier 111 r
District shall not reimburse any Medicare premiums. However, the District will not be
responsible for any penalties or increased costs in the Medicare premium should the
employee and /or eligible dependent not enroll in Medicare during the enrollment period
surrounding his /her 65th birthday.
C:\Documents and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 22
The program for dependents of a deceased employee shall provide for health and dental
benefits for the length of that employee's total service with the District (in other than
temporary status), or until such time that the spouse remarries, or until such time that the
dependents no longer qualify for benefits as stated by the District's policies.
ARTICLE XXIII -- EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
An Employee Assistance Program shall be provided MS /CG at District cost
ARTICLE XXIV -- SAFETY EQUIPMENT
The District will provide safety glasses from a District - designated supplier for those
employees required to wear them.
Employees regularly exposed to foot injuries are required to wear safety shoes.
Employees who are periodically exposed to foot injuries are advised to wear safety
shoes. Employees will be informed by their immediate supervisor whether or not they
are required to wear safety shoes.
Employees who are either required or advised to wear safety shoes shall be provided
one (1) pair of safety shoes by the District from a District- designated supplier at a cost
not to exceed $4:7-5 200 per pair of safety shoes plus replacement if shoes become
unusable while performing District business.
ARTICLE XXV -- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
The District -wide mileage allowance for the use of personal vehicles on District business
shall be paid as allowed by IRS without tax consequences.
ARTICLE XXVI -- PERSONAL AND DISTRICT PROPERTY
The District discourages the use or display of personal property not required to perform
an employee's job by an employee at work.
The storage, carrying, or use of firearms or other lethal weapons on District property is
strictly prohibited.
Most employees required to wear uniforms during working hours are provided lockers by
the District. Lockers are District property and may be searched by management at any
time without advance notice. If a locker is to be inspected, and the employee is on the
job -site, the employee will be allowed to be present when the locker is inspected. The
District will be responsible for replacing damaged locks.
Any and all electronically - produced documents, including faxes, E -mail or other forms of
electronic communication, which are maintained, kept, received or transmitted on District
property are not confidential, and are subject to disclosure and review at any time. Any
matters generated or received on District computers, and any documents duplicated on
C:ADocuments and Settings \cfreiws \My Documents \mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 23
0
District copiers or other equipment, also are subject to search at any time whenever
there is a reasonable justification for search.
ARTICLE XXVII — SUBSTANCE ABUSE
substance abuse ieags to oiscipiinary or worK- reiateo prooiems. in cases
where an employee's alcohol or drag abuse controlled substances leads to
disciplinary or work - related problems " iRteFfEIF96 With FegulaF W9Fk duties, the
District agrees to discuss and, in its sole discretion. consider holding
proposed disciplinary action in abeyance and referring the employee to
appropriate counseling or treatment. The District further agrees that the
employee will not be dismissed for the conduct that led to his or her referral to
treatment or counseling while actively and successfully participating in such
treatment or counseling programs, subject to his /her compliance with District
and departmental rules and maintenance of acceptable job performance.
However, an employee who fails to successfully complete treatment or
counseling or who subsequently suffers a relapse shall be subject to
disciplinary action.. An employee may have proposed disciplinary action held
in abeyance to participate in treatment or counseling only once during his or
her employment.
ARTICLE XXVIII-- DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
Employees required by their classification to possess a valid Class A, B, or C driver's
license must report the suspension or revocation of the driver's license to Personnel
within 24 hours of a conviction or the next working day.
In positions where possession of a valid California driver's license is mandatory, the
revocation or suspension of that employee's license may result in disciplinary action up
to and including suspension, demotion, or termination.
Employees must report all citations received in a District vehicle before the end of the
workday or at the start of the following workday for citations received outside of the
District's regular work hours. Parking tickets are excepted.
ARTICLE XXIX -- NONDISCRIMINATION
There will be no discrimination by the MS /CG or the District or any agent of either of
them because of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or political
beliefs.
Discourteous treatment of the public or fellow employees including discrimination and /or
harassment that is detrimental to the function of the District will not be tolerated. The
offenders) shall be subject to disciplinary action as considered appropriate by the
Department Manager.
Management Support/Confidential Group and the District agree to comply with all
provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act including reasonable accommodations
CADocuments and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 24
0 0
for individuals protected under the Act. The District shall meet and confer with the
Management Support/Confidential Group prior to any accommodation which might
require an exemption from the Memorandum of Understanding. Any specific
accommodation by the Americans with Disabilities Act shall not establish a past practice,
nor shall it be cited as evidence of a past practice in the grievance procedure.
ARTICLE XXX— LAYOFF
If the Board of Directors deems layoffs to be necessary, they will be done in accordance
with the layoff provisions in the District Ordinance Code, Chapter 4. The District agrees
to meet and confer with the Management Support/Confidential Group on the effects of
such layoff.
ARTICLE XXXI -- SAVINGS
If any provision of this Memorandum of Understanding should be held invalid or outside
the scope of bargaining by operation of law or by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Memorandum of Understanding shall not be
affected thereby.
ARTICLE XXXII - -PAST PRACTICES
Should the District take action to change its practices in subjects within the scope of
meet and confer as specified in Government Code Section 3500 et seq. which is not a
part of this Agreement, the District agrees to meet and confer before taking such action.
ARTICLE XXXIII - -TERM
This Memorandum of Understanding shall remain in full force and effect from June 4,
20093 through April 17, 2085 -12.
Signatures to Agreement
Signed and entered into this _day of May, 20039, subject to the approval of the
respective parties.
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
Allison M. Woodall
Chief Negotiator
C:ADocuments and Settings \cfreitas\My Documents\mscg mou 2009- 2012.doc 25
•
Cathryn R a6n Freitas
Randall Musgraves
0
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT /CONFIDENTIAL GROUP
Paul Louis
Chief Negotiator
Alex Rozul
Frank Favalora
Deborah Hill
Andy Baker, Esq.
C:ADocuments and Settings \cl'reitas\My Documents\mscc mou 2009- 2012.doc 26
0
0
Agenda Item 10a
GRAYSON CREEK REW
EMERGENCY REPAIR
BOARD UPDATE
DP 7278
June 4, 2009
K -RAIL PROTECTION
1
•
F
WHAT WENT WRONG
• Primary Cause — High Temperature
Resulted in Epoxy Failure
• Secondary Causes:
- Vibration of Vehicles — Large Trucks
- Differential Motion Response
- Micro - cracking of Concrete
- Inadequate Installation
Use of adhesive anchors in an overhead
application is not recommended due to
susceptibility to elevated temperatures.
STATUS OF PERMANENT REPAIR
• County reviewing proposed solution —
expect response by end of this week
• Prepared design of replacement pipe
alignment
• Requested quote for pipe /delivery
schedule from JIFFCO — expect response
today
• Found supplier /schedule for fabrication of
hanger support rollers — 10 days
2
•
•
STATUS OF PERMANENT REPAIR
• Plan to either request quotes from several
current District contractors or continue with
C. Overra — function of pipe and hanger
availability
• Permanent repair will be completed in 4 to
6 weeks pending approval of County
RECOMMENDATION
• Authorize the General Manager under
Public Contract Code 22050 (b) to
continue with emergency repairs on the
recycled water pipeline at Grayson Creek
in Martinez
3
s
QUESTIONS
0