Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/20/2008 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Items Held Over From Previous Board Meeting Date: Octo- b�al`l$ -2W8 No.: Board Meetings November 20, 2008 Type of Action: subject: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO TRAVEL POLICY REGARDING BOARD MEMBER CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND TRANSPORTATION Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div,: REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: i_ Secretaehofthe !James . Kelly, r' /� Gener Manager District !i ISSUE: In May 2008, Board Members directed staff to establish a process for Board approval of Board Member conference attendance. They also directed staff to prepare revisions to the Travel Policy to prohibit the use of private limousines or chauffeured cars for transportation. RECOMMENDATION: Review the proposed revisions and determine whether or not to implement the changes. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. Funds have already been budgeted for fiscal year 2008 -09 for Board Member conference attendance at California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), California Special Districts Association (CSDA), Water Environment Federation Technical Conference (WEFTEC), and other miscellaneous conferences that may be requested and approved throughout the year. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Do not implement one or both changes. Direct staff to prepare other alternatives for Board consideration. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that, to improve transparency, a more visible process be established for approval of Board Member conference attendance. It has also been requested that a proposed revision to the Travel Policy be brought for Board consideration that would prohibit the use of private limousines or chauffeured cars for transportation. Conference Attendance Previously, Board Member conference attendance was included and approved in the District budget, presented for Board concurrence under General Manager Reports, and Board Members reported out at a Board Meeting upon their return from the conference, in compliance with AB 1234. Most recently, while this matter has been under Board consideration, Board Member conference attendance has been placed on the Consent Calendar for Board action. POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: 9e#flbef- -6-,, -2998 November 20, 2008 subject: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO TRAVEL POLICY REGARDING BOARD MEMBER CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND TRANSPORTATION $44,000 has been budgeted for Board Member conference and meeting attendance for fiscal year 2008 -09. Each conference can cost up to approximately $2,000. In order to provide transparency for the public with regard to Board Member conference attendance, the following options may be considered. (1) Place requests for Board Member conference attendance for the entire Fiscal Year on the Consent Calendar for Board approval. Any additional requests for conference attendance throughout the year would be placed on the Consent Calendar for Board consideration. Board Members would also announce their conference attendance at a Board Meeting prior to attending the conference. (2) Place requests for Board Member conference attendance on the Consent Calendar individually, conference by conference, as they arise throughout the year. Board Members would also announce their conference attendance at a Board Meeting prior to attending the conference. This would amount to approximately six additional Position Papers per year. Each Board Member will provide a report at the Board Meeting on his or her conference attendance in compliance with AB 1234 in any case. Transportation It has been suggested that it is an inappropriate use of District funds and it may cause negative public perception for Board Members or staff to use private limousines or chauffeured cars for transportation. The proposed revision to the existing Travel Policy prohibits the use of such methods of transportation. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Staff recommends revising the Travel Policy by: • adopting either Option (1) or (2) above with regard to the approval process for Board Member conference attendance, and • determine whether to approve the modification prohibiting the use of private limousines or chauffeured cars for transportation. Revised 10/31/08 - Original 10/17/08 revisions in red, new revisions in blue ' Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Effective Date: 110/74-87/0087 HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Subject: Travel and Expense Reimbursement Policy Revised by: Board of Directors POLICY Central Contra Costa Sanitary District shall reimburse elected officials, appointed officials, District Counsel and employees for travel activities that are necessary, legitimate, permissible, and actually incurred when traveling on authorized District business, provided they are itemized, fully explained and approved on the Travel Expense Reimbursement Report. RESPONSIBILITY 1. All District travel must be approved in advance, excepting urgent or emergency travel benefiting the District. Board member travel is approved by budget approval and /or public report, by the General Manager, with Board majority concurrence. The General Manager's report will allow for Board consideration and approval, or denial, as well as meet AB 1234 intent for public disclosure. General Manager, District Counsel and Secretary to the Board travel is approved by Board majority through budget approval, report, or position paper. Employee travel is approved through the budget by the appropriate Department Director. Department Directors' travel will be approved by the General Manager. 2. Travel approval is to be consistent with the budget guidelines for travel. 3. Board Members, the General Manager, and Department Directors are authorized to travel without prior approval for compelling reasons, provided reasonable effort has been made to obtain prior approval. Review of such travel will occur consistent with the approval process identified in item 67 below. 4. While traveling on District business, it is the responsibility of the elected officials, appointed officials and employees to use sound judgment to ensure reasonable expenditure of District funds. District Board members whose expenses do not fall within this policy may be submitted to the Board of Directors for approval, in a public meeting, before the expense is incurred. 5. Board Members' attendance at conferences will be approved by the Board in advance (select either "on an individual basis, as they occur, on a Board agenda" or "for the fiscal year on a Board agenda. ") 66. Travelers are responsible for the timely preparation and submission of their Travel Expense Reimbursement Reports (instructions for completion are on the reverse side of the form) to HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Sheet 2 of 6 the Accounting Office for payment. Reports must be submitted within 30 days of the event or trip completion. Travelers should retain copies of the Report and receipts for their personal records. 67. The President of the Board of Directors shall approve travel reimbursement documents for all Board Members, District Counsel, the General Manager and the Secretary of the District. The Board President Pro Tem, or in his /her absence another designated Board member, shall have authority to approve travel reimbursement for President of the Board. The General Manager shall approve all travel reimbursement documents for Department Directors. Department Directors shall approve all travel reimbursement documents of those in their charge. HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Sheet 3 of 6 PROCEDURE 1. Making Travel Arrangements: All District travel arrangements are to be booked through the District's travel service. The District's travel service will follow the approved District Travel Policy and parameters when making travel arrangements for District employees. Information on using the District's travel services is in "CCCSD Parameters /Policy Regarding Use of Travel Service ". Any arrangement not booked through the District's travel service requires approval consistent with item 6 under the Responsibility section of this policy. 2. Transportation: a. Commercial Airline Travel: Elected officials, appointed officials and District employees will travel at the lowest reasonable coach class airfare within the following guidelines: (1) In order to obtain low airfares, a two -hour window policy will be used in searching for a low fare. This window policy involves searching for fares one hour prior to and after the requested departure /arrival time. The lower fare quoted within this two - hour window must be taken unless time constraints make it impossible. (2) Direct flights (one -stop) and connections (change of planes), rather than non - stops, may represent substantial savings to the District. Non -stop flights, if more expensive, cannot be taken if lower direct/ connecting fares are available and does not place an unreasonable burden on the traveler. (3) Early departures and late returns are encouraged to avoid lodging for an additional night. Travel arrangements should allow for full attendance at the subject event. (4) Air travel arrangements should be reserved as far in advance of travel date as possible. Advance planning, rather than last- minute reservations, allow for the opportunity to obtain lower fares. Travel arrangements should be booked a minimum of seven days prior to departure. (5) Reimbursable expenses shall be limited to the actual dates of travel, which shall be as near the event as practical, allowing for timely arrival and departure and the carrier's schedule. If the extension of travel time would achieve lower airfare and would result in a net cost savings to the District, the District will pay for actual costs incurred for hotel and meals only, subject to the other limitations of this policy, provided they do not exceed the costs which would have been incurred without an extension, and the extension is approved in advance. Any additional time (exceeding the above) taken prior to or after the event will be at the employee's time and expense. The District will not reimburse for excess baggage fees if not related to District business. (6) Use of penalty or non - refundable airfares should be considered, depending on the nature of travel, and the certainty that the trip will take place as planned. These lower- cost fares shall be selected at the traveler's discretion. If a change results in HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Sheet 4 of 6 penalties, the Department Directors shall have the authority to include these charges as reimbursable, if appropriate. (7) If there is a significant difference between the cost of the flight used and a less expensive flight that was available, or if the traveler uses first -class or business class instead of an available coach -class airfare without approval from the appropriate supervisor, the traveler will be required to pay the difference in expense. (8) Use of a specific airline for the purpose of obtaining Frequent Flyer miles will not be authorized, unless the airfare is among the lowest available. b. Car Rentals: The use of a rental car must be authorized in advance. When a car rental is authorized, the elected official, appointed official or employee shall be limited to a compact or mid -size vehicle. A larger vehicle may be rented if for the purpose of transporting a group of District elected officials, appointed officials or employees. A rental car may be authorized only for a business necessity or if it is the most economical means of transportation available. The employee should be prepared to show a cost savings to the District by the use of a rental car as compared to other modes of transportation. When traveling in groups, sharing of cars is encouraged to minimize costs. Collision and liability insurance offered by the rental company should be accepted. Employees should refuel cars before returning them to the rental agency to avoid the large refueling mark -up, when economical. Officials and employees are required to notify the District's Safety and Risk Administrator and the employee's supervisor within 24 hours of any event, incident or accident related to the rental vehicle. C. Taxi and Other Local Transportation: The use of a taxi is authorized when more economical services are not available, or in cases when valid business reasons, such as timing limitations, warrant use of such transportation. If available and practical, public or courtesy limousine transportation to and from airports should be used. Use of private limousines or chauffeured cars hired solely to transport District Board Members and /or staff is prohibited. d. Travel in District Vehicles: District vehicles are available for local seminars. District vehicles shall not be used for personal use when attending seminars. e. Travel in Personal Vehicles: When use of a privately owned vehicle is authorized in lieu of common carrier, reimbursement will be based on the prevailing mileage rate, but will not exceed air coach rate to and from the destination plus local transportation costs. When travel is to a local seminar, mileage reimbursement will be calculated based on the shortest distance to the seminar from home or from work. Reasonable costs for parking and tolls will be reimbursed. 3. Lodging/Telephone: a. Lodging: Employees should limit their stay to a minimum number of nights. Reimbursement for the daily cost of lodging includes only the single occupancy room HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Sheet 5 of 6 rate and applicable taxes unless shared by more than one District employee. When making reservations for lodging, attempts should be made to obtain a discounted or governmental agency rate. District travelers are expected to use good quality, but reasonably priced hotels or motels wherever practical. (The conference hotel, or its equivalent, at the conference rate, is acceptable lodging for District business.) When attending conferences, a block of hotel rooms may be offered at a reduced rate. Nevertheless, travelers should check with BTM to see if a lower rate, at the same facility, is available b. Telecommunication: On authorized travel, necessary business - related telephone calls, faxes and modem connections incurred may be reimbursed. The cost of personal telephone calls made while attending a seminar will be borne by the employee. However, employees are allowed one personal call of reasonable length and cost per day at District expense. The District's Controller shall make the final determination of reasonable duration and cost on a case -by -case basis. 4. Meals: The cost of each meal is to be reported separately on a daily basis and covers the District traveler only. Receipts for all claimed meals should be included with the travel expense report. The cost of meals includes taxes and tips or service charges as applicable. Purchases of alcoholic beverages shall not be reimbursed. The maximum reimbursement for meals is $64 per day, given proper documentation by providing receipts. In cases where the individual signs up for meals that have a separate cost in addition to the conference registration, that meal would be excluded from the daily allowance. If a District traveler is accompanied by a spouse or guest and the District or a District staff person covers the cost, the District traveler will be billed for the cost of his /her spouse /guest's meal or other related costs. If the guest is a business associate, the cost may be reimbursable. See criteria and requirements in Paragraph 6, Special Expenses Paid by Employee, below. 5. Travel Advances: A request for a travel advance must be made at least two weeks prior to travel by submitting a completed Payment Authorization Request form to Accounting. There will be no travel advances for the cost of airline travel due to the District's payment for the ticket. Advances must be utilized immediately and accounted for within two weeks after completion of a trip. No additional advances will be granted before settlement of an outstanding advance. In the event an advance remains open beyond 30 days, the District may elect to deduct the amount advanced from the employee's next regular paycheck. 6. Special Expenses Paid by Employee: Report only expenses paid by cash, personal check, or credit card. Meal expenses, to be reimbursable, must be an expenditure necessary for the transaction of District business. The Internal Revenue Code requires that specific details showing names of guests and employees, cost, date and place, business purpose, and the business relationship of HUMAN RESOURCES PROCEDURE Sheet 6 of 6 individuals be supplied. Attach receipts whenever possible. Receipts for expenditures of $25 or more are required. 7. Travel Expense Reimbursement Reports: Travel Expense Reimbursement Reports must be legible and in all cases be signed in ink by both the traveler and approver. Each expense shall be clearly and accurately identified and shown on the Report on the day the expense was actually incurred. Report all expenses paid by cash, personal check, credit card, and those paid directly by the District. Auditing and control procedures of the District require that receipts substantiating travel expenses be provided by the traveler whenever possible. Original receipts, including hotel statements, airline ticket stubs, car rental invoices, credit card receipts, paid invoices, or any receipt, which shows the date, location, nature and amount of the expenditure, shall be attached to the Report. When a receipt is not available and the expense is more than $25.00, the traveler shall provide a statement detailing the expenditures and explaining the reason for the lack of a valid receipt. However, i1n accordance with Government Code 53232.3 and Assembly Bill 1234, elected and appointed officials are required to submit receipts documenting each expense claimed. All documents related to reimbursable agency expenditures are public records, subject to disclosure under California Public Records Act. In addition, AB 1234 requires Board members to provide a report, written or verbal, to the Board in open session on the event, conference, seminar or training attended, to be agendized within 30 days of the event. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER November 20, 2008 Board Meeting Date: Neyembef -&, -2998- No.: 6.b. Items Held Over From Previous Type of Action: APPROVE PROJECT REVISIONS Board Meeting subject: APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS DIVISION (CSOD) ADMINISTRATION, CREW AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (DP 8208) Submitted By: Initiating Dept✓Div.: Don Berger, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: aVrV4f'e- D. �. , 0)�4- - JJ�" - ames M elly, General anager ISSUE: On May 24, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a project description for the CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility Improvements so that staff could complete the environmental review and initiate the design process. At its December 20, 2007 meeting, the Board approved the project for submission to the City of Walnut Creek, which has since approved the project and issued a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The CUP required several revisions to meet regulatory and City requirements that increased the project cost. Additional revisions to the project are being recommended by staff related to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification and earthquake design that will also affect costs. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the project revisions for the CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility Project (DP 8208) so that staff can complete the design process. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The estimated building construction cost has increased from $11 million to $13.5 million, partially due to inflation since May 2007, and partially due to added scope items. The associated total project cost has increased from $13 million to $16 -17 million for those same reasons, depending on the amount of contingency assumed. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could decide not to approve the revisions and request staff to spend additional funds to analyze less costly alternatives. This is not recommended. This project has gone through an extensive alternative analysis over the last five years and staff believes any further reduction in size or functionality would compromise its effectiveness. In order to take advantage of the current competitive bidding climate, staff recommends that the project design be completed and the project bid as quickly as possible. N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Berger\2008 \CSO Pos Paper - Project Revisions 11 -06 -08 r1.doc Page 1 of 3 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: Neve r-6-,-2W8- November 20, 2008 subject APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS DIVISION (CSOD) ADMINISTRATION, CREW AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (DP 8208) BACKGROUND: The Board and staff began discussions about potential improvements to the Collection System Operations facilities in October 2003. At that time, there was a concern expressed by the Board that we were piecemealing individual renovation and improvement projects without taking a comprehensive look at the current and future needs of CSOD. Board and staff collaborated on a number of alternatives from that time until May 2007, when a project description was finally agreed upon and adopted. The recommended project consisted of a new approximately 22,500 square foot administration /crew /warehouse building at the location of the existing warehouse building at CSO. The project also included demolition of the existing crew /administration building and construction of site improvements, including a new parking area, a new ramp between the middle yard and the upper yard and landscaping. At that time, the estimated construction cost was $11 million and the total estimated project cost was $13 million in May 2007 dollars. Between May 2007 and August 2008, staff navigated an extensive review process by the City of Walnut Creek. In order to meet current storm water control regulations, as well as requirements of the City with respect to landscaping and parking, a number of features were added. To control storm water; bio swales, infiltration trenches and a green roof were added to the project, as well as covers on material storage areas. To meet the City of Walnut Creek parking requirements, additional parking in the middle and upper yard was added, necessitating the addition of some paving and lighting improvements. Escalating the $11 million construction cost to August 2008, and adding the cost of the improvements resulting from the City review process, brings the construction cost to approximately $12,275,000. The building, as initially designed, had many green features, due to its southern exposure and being built into a hillside. Using these features, the building should be able to achieve a Basic Certification from the LEED. This is the lowest level of LEED certification. Because it would not be that difficult for the building to achieve the Gold level of certification, staff commissioned a study to enumerate design changes and costs for achieving the higher certification level. The findings were that an added investment of $300,000 in construction costs was needed. Of this, approximately half was for improvements that would reduce energy consumption. However, the cost savings from the reduced energy consumption were not anticipated to be enough to pay back the cost of the equipment within its useful life. Conversely, the energy saving features will improve the HVAC controls and the indoor air quality, and staff believes they are a good investment on their own merits while enabling the new building to achieve Gold Certification. The additional features for LEED Gold Certification brings the construction cost to approximately $12,575,000, in August 2008 dollars. N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Berger\2008 \CSO Pos Paper - Project Revisions 11 -06 -08 r1.doc Page 2 of 3 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: November -6, 24GG - November 20, 2008 Subject. APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS DIVISION (CSOD) ADMINISTRATION, CREW AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (DP 8208) Since May 2007, staff has been investigating the seismic stability of District- occupied buildings. Unfortunately, our existing office buildings are going to require significant seismic retrofit investment over the next several years. We currently have no District facilities that meet seismic requirements for essential facilities, such that they could be returned to service immediately after a large seismic event. For this reason, and because it would be beneficial if CSOD could continue to operate out of the Walnut Creek facility without interruption in the event of a large seismic event, staff requested an estimate of the added cost to construct the new CSOD facility as an essential facility. These added costs include $250,000 for an emergency generator to power the entire building and $600,000 for additional seismic bracing. These additions bring the estimated construction cost in August 2008 dollars to $13,425,000. The total project cost includes the estimated construction cost plus the engineering and administration costs and the City permit fees. It is estimated that these additional costs will be 25% or $3,300,000 for engineering and administration and $500,000 for City permit fees, bringing the estimated total project costs to $17,725,000. The permit fees were not originally estimated to be that large, based on fees previously assessed for construction of the new parking area under the freeway and the retaining wall. These issues were presented to the Board in an oral and written report at the October 16, 2008 Board meeting. A copy of the written report provided for the October 16, 2008 meeting is attached for your convenience. At its December 20, 2007 meeting, the Board also approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project. A Notice of Determination subsequently was filed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has reviewed the recommended project description revisions and concluded that no changes are required in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, mitigation measures, and Board findings. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Approve revisions to the CSOD Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility Project (DP 8208) so that staff can complete the design process. N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Berger\2008 \CSO Pos Paper -Project Revisions 11 -06 -08 r1.doc Page 3 of 3 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District October 8, 2008 TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD VIA: JAMES M. KELLY, GENERAL MANAGER FROM: ANN E. FARRELL, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SUBJECT: STATUS UPDATE — COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS FACILITY We recently received the design development submittal for the Collection System Operations (CSO) Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility, and an updated construction cost estimate. Some representative drawings are attached for your information. These drawings represent a 35% approximate level of completion. Our last detailed discussion about the CSO facility design and cost occurred at the May 24, 2007 Board meeting. At this time, the Board approved the project description for a 22,500 square foot facility with an estimated total project cost of $13 million, and initiated the environmental review and design processes. Since that time, the environmental review and the City of Walnut Creek planning process have been completed. Staff has also done some additional work on potential green attributes of the building and the function of the facility during emergency operations. As a result of this additional work, there have been some potential cost increases. A discussion of the original cost and the cost increases is presented below. In April 2007, the Board was presented with a construction cost estimate of $11.3 million and total project cost of $13 million in April 2007 dollars. According to the Engineering News Record Index, building costs in the bay area increased 6% from April 2007 to August 2008. Therefore, the April 2007 construction cost estimate escalated to August 2008 dollars would be approximately $12 million. Since that time, a number of items have been added to the design based on requirements of storm water regulations or of the City of Walnut Creek. First, current storm water requirements required state of the art stormwater control structures to ensure that runoff quantity was not increased with the increase in impervious surfaces. The design now includes a green roof on the building as well as infiltration trenches and bioswales throughout the yard, and pervious pavement in the middle yard. Second, in order to provide adequate parking for all staff and to meet the parking requirements of the City of Walnut Creek, it was necessary to put parking in the middle and upper yards, including handicapped parking by the vehicle maintenance facility. Because this requires re- striping and the pavement was in poor condition, staff HAGeneral Manager's Directory\Board Documents\2008 \CSOD Project Board update Oct 08 web input AF.doc recommended that the entire area be slurry sealed before re- striping. In addition, the poor lighting in the area created safety issues, so the lighting will be improved since staff will be routinely parking in these areas. Third, current storm water regulations require a more sophisticated materials storage area as well as a cover for contaminated spoils and trash. In addition to required items, there are a number of elective items that have been added to the project which the Board may elect to delete in order to reduce project costs. First, because of the required green infrastructure and the orientation of the building with a southern exposure and nestled into the earth on the north side, we are able to obtain a large number of points toward Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification of the building. The building with no additions can achieve a silver certification. With some additions to the HVAC system to make it more energy efficient and to improve indoor air quality, we can attain the additional points to achieve gold certification. The additional costs for these features are about $300,000 and would provide the benefit of reduced energy costs and improved air quality. This is a Board policy decision. Staff believes that as an agency with an environmental mandate, it is appropriate to consider this expense in an effort to demonstrate the District's commitment to be "green ". Second, the building as originally conceived was not priced as a critical facility that could survive a major seismic event and be immediately occupied thereafter. Rather, it was designed as a typical office building for life and safety, but likely requiring some repairs after a major seismic event. In light of the recent information on the vulnerability of the Martinez administration and plant operations buildings to seismic events and the potential desirability of having a facility that can survive a major quake and be available to function as an emergency operations center, staff requested costs for added features and seismic bracing to the CSO facility. These features add approximately $850,000 to the construction costs. The CSO facility is at the geographical center of the District and as such is a logical place to dispatch staff to deal with issues throughout the District. The MPR room, which up to now has been considered the primary Emergency Operations Center, is currently being evaluated for its ability to withstand a major seismic event and is expected to require significant upgrades. In addition, ancillary plant operations facilities, such as locker rooms, lunch room, offices, are also expected to be under design for a major seismic event. Given the uncertainty associated with the District facilities in Martinez, the Board should give thoughtful consideration to designing the CSO facility for immediate occupancy after a major seismic event. At the Board meeting of October 16, 2008, staff will present additional information on the elective scope items and will ask for Board direction on whether these items should be incorporated into the design. The current cost estimate, in August 2008 dollars is shown on the following page. HAGeneral Manager's Directory\Board Documents\2008 \CSOD Project Board update Oct 08 web input AF.doc Collection System Operations Administration, Crew and Warehouse Facility Updated Cost Estimate August 2008 Item Base Cost GEBC (GEBC = Green Emergency Building Cost) Required Facilities: Basic Building Construction $11,600,000 Stormwater Management/Green Infrastructure $425,000 Vehicle Maintenance Area Additional Parking $100,000 Covered Materials Loading Area/Trash Enclosure $150,000 Subtotal Required Facilities: $12,275,000 $12,275,000 Added Costs Green Building Certification at Gold Level $300,000 - Subtotal Required & Green Building Certification Added Costs for Emergency Operations Center Seismic Bracing Emergency Generator Total Estimated Construction Costs (August 2008) Engineering and Administration (Est. @ 25 %) City Permit Fees (Estimated) Total Project Costs (August 2008) *Potential Cost Increases *Potential Cost Decreases cc: Bill Brennan Don Berger $12,575,000 $12,275,000 $600,000 - $250,000 - $13,425,000 $12,275,000 $3,300,000 $500,000 $3,075,000 $450,000 $17,725,000 * $15,800,000* Escalation to mid point of construction Unknown contingencies Impacts of recessionary economy HAGeneral Manager's Directory\Board Documents\2008 \CSOD Project Board update Oct 08 web input AF.doc a Central Ic" M)ntra Costa My@ ry NOVATO �. ao VALLEJ 7 eeo TI '. P BLO T,.., `_ ENIC #UI# N ee r BAY PITTSBURG b1 sea 4 SAN 1 MARTINEZ RAFAEL PINOLE 4 so CONCORD RICHMOND PLEASANT eeo i HILL LAFAYETTE WALNUT CREEK ORIND BERKELEY Q 34 PROJECT SAUSAUTO LOCATION O MORAGA v• w OAKLAND DANVILLE so 101 AN t ALAMEDA 680 FRANCISC SAN RAMON SAN °0 LEANDRO SOUTH SAN DUBLIN FRANCISCO _ HAYWARn SAN MATEO I VICINITY MAP 0 4 8 MILES Project Engineer Project Manager VOLUME 3 OF 3 PART VIII Project Drawings For Construction Of DISTRICT PROJECT No. 8208 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY District el 3 m YL t� 680 TOYON RD SPRING RD PLEASANTo�� uo v�Ss �r HILL g2 RD 24 LAFAYETTE�' N \U, "yPy'PO CONCORD CSOD FACILITY 680 TREAT BLvD .2 A YGNACI VALLEY 8L BLVD zg 04 OLYMPIC Ela� s BLVD 680 WAL UT CRE 5<• L RD PG �^ Ito CREE MORAGA ALAMO m 3 LOCATION MAP 0 750 FEET Recommended for Construction: Approved for Construction: Dote Ba T. Than ot-6 e Treatment Plant Program Manager Ann E. Farrell Dote James M. Kelly Date Tad PilPro ate— Director of Engineering General Mona er Capitol Projects Division Manager 9 Dro*ing No. Dote I G -1 LANDSCAPING TC PER PLAN r Y r F {f °•ap r SPRINGBROOK ROAD ff /" I EXISTING �3 /< \�"• -- I GRADE LANDSCAPE TAL ROOF s; s. rr�* 1 :"" �-- 1 CANOPY jf ° \ \ B I RETAINING WALL EXISTING REDWOOD TREES z :' 43' PARKING 18' / _ 'T�` R j TO REMAIN TO BE PROTECTED i - , - Is( y... 3 ...�....' �°,° t"�" ' PROPOSED STORAGE LOOS l ji% f r''S �iti '�',w\ (OT TO..��"' �- EXISTING GRADE ' 4:1 i'S i i�i i - ',`Mq SECTION S B-B I .5-1't f '� j� 7 �� TC PER PLAN rt T. -• C OWLINE EXISTING GRADE y BID- ,(TG 225 .0 PROJECT eoubAxr..... �- SWALE CONCRETE oR MASON1r �2.6ox GRADE.:, Tc �:�: ... l \iZ,tiiiijSlj :i�?ip,L\ RETAINING WALL 4 ' „*• "�,„„ f `" r _ 1ii �,;i\ ;' "v \� l \�1 \�'' f,,+'." ,,<` :. •• a \ _ - -_ -__ ,FS 225.5 '> - GurTER AFD w f 70 /- / `4C SECTION A -A TRENCH DRAWN k ?-�, .� � , \�� ii� i' R�' � i ", , x NTS TO SANITARY SEWER 'r .._.. .. .... <_ .. FS 236 5 -a - yl�ii\ �O .�• /,.' 5• - ..,,"u ti'. MATCFI E)f. a -zd. - 1y., \� _'. T TO N: -. CONSTRUCTION NOTES f r s N rc 225.0 9 INSTALL CONCRETE OR MASONRY RETAINING WALL - FL 224.5 TC 226.4 16 NOT USED C. FL 225 9 6' ✓ -� f T - INSTALL IN 4' WIDE INFILTRATION PLANTER PER CCCWP �'� % - r ` 40 5.3x, , s �0 a_. !- STORMWATER C.3 GUIDEBOOK. Q` ^' •p `p Inp FL 4.8 �, a. TG 240.2 •, T 21 CONSTRUCT MIN 4' WIDE B10SWALE PER CCCWP STORMWATER O , J�,MATCH IX •. _..._ N T6 �" IN c.s. GUIDEBOOK. `%� F1. 225.1 • . • /f�• _.. o ., a� F °� �.. \ e r- '�' - INSTALL 12" HOPE STORM DRAIN LINE. Q' �. TO 226.0 ° 1t ._TG 241.5) w INSTALL STORM DRAIN MANHOLE PER CITY OF WALNUT CREEK C 225.4 `T ., .,:. .5 •...T� y,:_,..- �^•`". `" '"•" „,:% S7D, DETAIL SD-5. .� •0 TC 226.2 R r "�- .,5 FS 250 8 �-y- r, r ©4 INSTALL TYPE 'C' INLET PER CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STD. PLAN CD22I. OVERFLOW INLET SHALL BE ENCIRCLED WITH 1" 1' 0.' `.. ;Y> 225. ! ' -z3 t FS 25O 0 ,, •`k•.c.,, LIP WHEN IN PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. � � •' /Xi �.s TG 223.7 ' RIM 225. _�., L 225.0,&t \ T r ,�,. •'°?"'' S-'' Gy�41 5 <"rTC 251.7...: ti �:� ^.; ® CONSTRUCT 1.0' WIDE CURB CUT FOR RUNOFF FLOW INTO - - R• / - -, b`.. x BIOSWALE /INFILTRATION PLANTER. i �'' � : .; ° I3, 7 22 ....,. C 226.6 -��# .t �`4� ��i ��. `•T� 236 9 1' •, - _ FL �., �„ 48 ADJUST EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURE TO GRADE. �:. p� ,g \; \O,t'. _ -�. .Q;'za� \,�"\ ..,., / °r "�. 3 -r G y47 2�^ L • '\ `� 1ry 49 INSTALL 6" HDPE STORM DRAIN LINEN' . 227. \ % -t - { !� •r' • , „t :... / ,._•:� 4. • .. ;., „ -. ., L�i•L.gp�t`w's�1 e, 23 l�l� ,�Z, TG� l5 N` ..� 9 .,,,,` 58 PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS �,<<�° �' ? 26.7 TC 227.4 • , 3. L \ 4 ;TY 240.7 4y' i 21 ,,. \ .. .; • . ,�• , ... 1 ��Y:.pi \\ ��T" ./ `� R 28.5': ry 4 EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL v ,.• • • ...• J •� - `. `. .- �. W 7 ,. \ , i. ,. '7 TC 227.0 TC REMOVE EXISTING INLET STRUCTURE s �-; ^' 7 L / .. ,, , _vf,� _r �.. INSTALL 2' SQUARE CHRISTY DRAIN INLET , ` ..,.• liiii_ &. 1 ti _I' ! .•! e ,,;w •.� TCF12�� INSTALL VALLEY GUTTER FROM EX. SD INLET TO EX. / : 228.0 ' :.y ' \ \�11\l�„i •�}C>'' 1..i� STORMCEPTER 4501. v ti . 'i.! ,�.✓ s !�. T "1„ TW 24 C PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES r62z6.6� VOLUE OF CUT 4400 C.Y. t . �,,\ - , ' S' �,''; �. FL 22a.a -, . ::: ....• 1T. � •i 1'rc , i� � r t i � -� � .w„•a�! r �±L 2 � IX. 3/4' GAS . F` Fj- 226.1 • . r't,;. _. TC 21 .5 Zi `1,\ i ti, W�ti ` �...".�. i "! �.. /.i ,.: (,.i�z • 1 r � . +•' T� S:AItISGN: i •; / . FL 225,7.., PROTECT IN PLACE / ..� FL 2243 ., 7 \.,, i \Oi .;:,j.,' +•a ,. �✓..___ i� a,, `\ ,\ \�.- L� � I \.." -.! � ~ I..l til- <TC 2386 � 'Yc 2 g.i• o> •� 1 , �� ' ,.. \Qt v . • _.. f� < d" ;�. TC 23fi 5� � r -� i <i f �, „€ .�.", ..\ .. ., r �r "J �. �� .• � TIC ; � r' � � - 3 .OTT•• � {� � i vi, �i .•.. 1ti! l TC -TC 238.8 FL 223.3 .,.. 0 TW 236.5- - �.;' �l ,.,. f 2 t� TC 238 i rrti, It...... ".� x FL 238. FF 218.0 •(Bw 218.0) �j Tw 236 ~ 3;. r .. ., * -. • b - 'Q' .,,,,. .. 4 .5 • FX1c ._TNh. � 1! OJ•4 � �"` TC 2 Y� I: TC 222 7 y 'f'� r C 213.65_{ TC 217 5 `..�� T 236 7 z.i.e o IFS 215 z , s T., 2Q.3 (`5 237.5)__�-- �`,,`r� j 4 #, = �"PROJECT,•�lWL1ARY� ..,., �"h� `jam' /^..,; t >�.�. _ *ex• � � / 'O 4 -yX _..,.,. (c�L36.U� .. �,•.... -^""'� \� I/�•EtST. IM..F../ '�S o5 ,BRIM 217 ��,".... - --""' EXISTING LANDSCAPING . {rn 913.8) 220:5) Tc 214 c END ~M ?Mt _ 220.0 2 4 PROPOSED SIDEWALK \i \��4' BUILDING (PROPOSED LEG `_'-----'9" ---• ti '\(TG 213, T 'fx T^ 2.6 9 T N W Y 0 AND EXISTING) / .. .. s 1 r z ^s.st �K� z+e.7) _ 6 8 O p BUI l TO a.B rc FL zzs:ryf \ >. , -.. 2 .x. A Y 1 EXISTING SIDEWALK GREEN ROOF FL 224, FL 224.e / 3' .�, ,� ;• E• E W f a 2.os 7. d' „ °3 F E� j ►max. l RIMITS OF / '� . - € r r - FREEWAY • . PROPOSED LANDSCAPING INFILTRATION TRENCH/ T 5 9 \.:°-°- r'',_, € T 2`6.s OVERPASS - -` �` ABBREVIATIONS FL 225 4 \ N PLANTER ..5. OP n `s' 8. ,9 /y�, �.,.•- �f BW BOTTOM OF WALL - PROPERTY/PARCEL LINE 4.0•° SEE IL 'B' ao e f, 2 8.0 \ �:;, A6.� HP 7 9 }: ,R, 0. ELEVATION PROPOSED RETAINING WALL _.._,, ON 4\ %' �'°� /,1, Y ` tcS... T x IX. () EXISTING ___ ....._... .._ ..._. EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN 213 0-, -2 B 6 `$ FL FLOW LINE PROPOSED CONTOUR °�' p FLR EXISTING CONTOUR + •'RET INING WALL "^ ``"" 8 FLOOR PROPOSED STORM DRAIN ,1� b 0 / p *,\:..` `i `•^:, ,yes: .. -: FF FINISHED FLOOR GRADING LIMITS J\ <� : r i� sx LANDSCAPI AND FS FINISH SURFACE FS XX% XX 'O�JALENTAL FENCING PREVIOUSLY -x \ , �.: %� w GRADE BREAK - SPOT ELEVATION T••�' <, - PROPOSED SS INLET .... INSTALLED IN 2007 BY CCCSD 225.4. F 228.3 E E\ �' '."i AS APPROVED BY THE CITY DF HP HIGH POINT Q PROPOSED SD MANHOLE v WALNUT CREEK '`: .` f INV INVERT ELEVATION ® PROPOSED SD TYPE 'C' SD INLET O rz n �,y� \• '/ LF LINEAR FOOT ■ PROPOSED SO INLET 24'x24 - / TO 78.2 \ may',. jr `� 5 SLOPE ¢ PROPOSED LIGHTPOLE M 7 �S 7.7 , SS SANITARY SEWER a EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN Tc TOP OF CURB �• 30 D 30 60 90 ' y EXISTING LIGHT TO REMAIN IC FS. 218.0 SCALE: 1 " =30' �� a, \ `\ref . �.'° � ' TW TG TOP OF TOP OF WALLTE EXISTING MANHOLE TELEPHONE POLE GRADING DETAIL #1 ` = ' EXISTING DRAIN INLET 1•x10' \- ` PLAN PREPARED BY: + Central Contra Costa ° ' °`°'°« ' ° ° «.r ° ° °"°« PRELIMINARYGMING PLAN y r ` � RBF JOB N0: 35- 100634 ' Sanitary District C�OPHA8E2 Wn C WWWWW� DRAWN 8Y: GP O6 /OB ■ ■ ■ �� ««i« 59D YONtCq VAl1EY ROPD, 9JRE 2J9 �� 1ta1� * CONSULTING 925"UW . Fix CREEK 9252 t � AW- pp/���W//�� ��j���� PROJECT /gyp /gyp ^ �•/ Cryll DESIGNED BY: GP 06/08 REVIEWED BY: Lf R VEIAE 1� rW7A JECI O SM) L h•�� 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, CA 94553 -4392 DATE: NO. RENSIONS APP'D DATE CHECKED BY: KB 06/00 GERRY L PARCO R.C.E N 59608 CRY OF WALNUT CREEK OF 6 a 0 0 U a CONSTRUCTION NOTES SS INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL PER CITY OF WALNUT CREEK STD. DETAIL TS -28. ® INSTALL CURB RAMP PER CURB RAMP FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET 4. 60 FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN(S) AND POST IF APPLICABLE. 81 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN(S) TO NEW POST (IF APPLICABLE) AS NOTEC 63 PROTECT EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN INSTALL PAVEMENT STRIPING IN FUELING AREA 66 INSTALL FLUSH CURB AND SIDEWALK FOR CART ACCESS. 71 INSTALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING ENTRANCE SIGN PER SPECIFICATIONS IN CBC 11278.3- SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTE 4 FOR SIGN WORDING. FOR TOTAL PA0.JECI SITE, INC. LEASE AREA) SERVILE VEHICLE SPACES: 65 EMPLOYEE VEHICLE SPACES: 60 HANDICAP SPACES: 4 TOTAL VEHICLE SPACES 129 TOTAL BICYCLE SPACES 14 TOTAL MOTORCYCLE SPACES: 6 LEGEND f C= O PROPOSED LANDSCAPING EXISTING LANDSCAPING PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT BUILDING (PROPOSED AND EXISTING) �\ GREEN ROOF `•- BIOSWALE INFILTRATION TRENCH PROPERTY /PARCEL LINE SIGN (ONE POST). DIRECTION OF VEHICULAR TRAVEL PROPOSED STREET LIGHT SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES: 1. THESE PLANS ARE ACCURATE FOR SIGNING AND STRIPING ONLY. 2. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4' THICK, WHITE TNERNOPLASTIC, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 3. SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF WALNUT CREDO STD. DETAIL TC -5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS, 4. SIGN POSTED AT ENTRANCE TO PARKING LOT SHALL READ 'UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PAWED IN DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE SPACES NOT DISPLAYING DISTINGUISHED PLACARDS OR LICENSE PLATES ISSUED FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MAY BE TOWED AWAY AT ONNER'S EXPENSE. TONED VEHICLES MAY BE RECLAIMED AT _ OR BY TELEPHONING —'* SIGN SHALL BE NO LESS THAT 17' BY 22" IN SIZE WITH LETTERING NOT LESS THAN 1 • IN HEIGHT. ff i .. ii rr , sf r . f I —PROJECT BDUR W i I-" ✓. y q' b yy :{ �`CY LI W^ i i fi t APING AND:.; Q ORNAMENTAL FENCING PREVIOUSLY ,.,�, ' INSTALLED IN*2007 �Y CC:C50, " \ AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK QRB RA1P NDTES: 1. THE RAMP SWILL HAVE A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE THAT EXTENDS THE FILL WIDTH AND 3' -0' DEPTH OF THE CURB RAMP. CURB RAMPS THAT HAVE A RAP SLOPE FLATTER THAN 6.67% SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE THAT EXTENDS THE FULL WIDTH AND DEPTH OF THE RAMP (SEE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK STD. DETAIL CC -9). 2. THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE NEAREST THE STREET SHALL BE 6• am BETWEEN 6' AND 8' FROM THE GUTTER FLOWLINE. 3' LINEAR i TRANSITION 3, THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A 12' WIDE BOW WITH Yi GROOVES APPROXIMATELY %- CN CENTER. SEE GROOVING DETAIL ON CITY OF WALNUT CRED( STD. DETAIL CC -7. r �z` _;' 30 0 30 60 90 9 F/ tx �C`w SCALE: 1 " =30' lx ;t ; x t 111 OT T ltt tttt• �i is zit� tt `�. o',pf(�_ , lll4 1tti iitili l ilex °jl �? v�vt� 7 ~,e.. 55- x l�xl til S� ililllti��iixtl 1 illlij� e Z ii \: \;t. w } m 11i 1�1' "' }llz �l t� fo Ab x �e ®O li xll l`1�1.11'i1 % q xA e'" 95'p� ji�T jN " � ♦ /` is ✓ � �' \ : r ..,_. �, � 3 y ....,, _._ _.., ..., ,._ .,... � „✓�`,".� ,r� vlii� 111� ✓ \.{ \ _.! � ✓; �" �.. a �� .J .•.. l� \lt i t 1 Z ;d i 1 Ala -: . / \ . "�r', ♦r�_ ;.: .; . , \ i ,_'. ..''\.. � ., ¢ : � .., :. ti 1 r \ 1 � _ • l \i '• .,, ,..✓ �....:.,..r ,_ >. : .. .: \.i � t,_..- _� ,:... -mot \ \r ✓ 4 \ JA 6 LIMITS OF E E W A Y I 8 TO E 10' R99 — 'I— �6" C11H8 R7-88 6" CURB R7-BB (POSTED ON FENCE) RETAINING WALL (POSTED ON FENCE) 8 iL.Jx MAX, S NOTES T SEE NOTE 3 .. 22 MAX. • ' 0.5 SEE NOTE 3I SEE NOTES 1 AND 2 - `.; 8.33Z MAX. 8.33% MAX. 6• CURB } CURB PROPOSED FC 3' LINEAR CURB 3' LINEAR CURB TRANSITION =� TRANSITION 6 CURB GTRB 6• ClM 6' CURB 2 MAX % OP PROPOSED FC PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF WALNUT CREEK STD. DETAIL TS -28. PARKING STALLS PER CITY OF WALNUT CREEK STD. DETAIL TS -28. DETAIL 'A' DETAIL 'B' �v CURB RAINP FORA •rPTRI 7 PARKING N.T.S. E PLANT LEGEND r 546 549 550 551 552 553 554 S55 S56 S57 558 S59 S60 S6� S 62 E E 546 �, 563 S64 S65 °01+I�Nr /E1^ pr m c - E55 E56 E57 E58 m E59 E6p E .. m °' ... .. 1 61 Est E63 E64 - o Y E FI IC L E I YA1N ACIL ITY P ^�• ,f sa I s 3 v c c c e v I & m m , w m m n a� w q Y / i ::: s s s V \ ....... W I r m m \ \\ E E E \\ .,....., ,:..� _._ <.:..:...... - � _.... _ .. ...... ....... o m c c Y _.. m / d m m m m inv I fq6 \ \\ E n !``\ �4 -`+ ti6' `�T% "9 S40 S4J `s4 S4 S �` ' E E ET m w OLO -a = \\ o IT 1 d M w a m E » » » » —tl1 Cal Horn & DOng °'" Sti6 ' 20 0 20 40 60 \ \ \ \\ w U Architects � • .•••• • \\ a FOR » $ . a.. .: SCALE: 1"=20' \ \ a c « Designed Drawn Checked Date yr CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, &WAREHOUSE FACILITY District Project No. » GLP JDQ KB ,�v r `b DP 8208 M M Submitted Date: a BAR IS ONE INCH a J AT FULL SCALE Central Contra Costa Drawing No. ° Z • T » ' Sanitary District PLANTING PAN 0634LS -001 „ yo° o Reviewed Dates -0 a a —a° jT Rev. Dale B Description 4` e , Sheet No. ° LS -1 of XX SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME TREES • PYRUS CALLERYANA 'BRADFORD' CORNUS NUTTALLII QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA N G . S n CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS PLATANUS RACEMOSA ' MELALEUCA NESOPHILA EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN SHRUBS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' ® CAREX ELATA 'AUREA' CEANOTHUS 'SNOW FLURRY' (a CHAENOMELES 'TEXAS SCARLET' ® FATSIA JAPONICA ® LIRIOPE MUSCARI Q MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS OX PRUNUS I. ILICIFOLIA O SALVIA APIANA O SISYRINCHIUM CALIFORNICUM GROUND COVERS AND VNES O AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS 'BLUESTORM' ® ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' / BACCHARIS PILULARIS 0 COTONEASTER HORIZONTALIS O DISTICTUS BUCCINATORIA EUONYMUS FORTUNEI HEUCHERA MICRANTHA 'PALACE PURPLE' ® LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' ® PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS RIVER ROCK COBBLE 6.p 04 4 ,e4 r f2B f2� • / f33 F4s'4 .. f3 FILTER PLANTER T PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NICE TREES PYRUS CALLERYANA 'BRADFORD' ` � � 1 ®ate QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA 'f> v:sr�y � � � / \,�� I `FSf �•,ww � i,:pO�.i�i! w � \�j , ONW PLATANUS RACEMOSA ' MELALEUCA NESOPHILA �j►Bp q iti Oo �b '�,,` ti #�� ��� EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ...._ O SHRUBS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' ® CAREX ELATA 'AUREA' CEANOTHUS 'SNOW FLURRY' B CHAENOMELES 'TEXAS SCARLET' ® FATSIA JAPONICA 0 LIRIOPE MUSCARI Q MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS PRUNUS I. ILICIFOLIA O DELIVERIES • O SISYRINCHIUM CALIFORNICUM .4 GROUND COVERS AND VIPER O '�ks� /gg0 7 rr p �� ® ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' � PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NICE TREES PYRUS CALLERYANA 'BRADFORD' CORNUS NUTTALLII QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA CERCIS OCCIDENTAUS PLATANUS RACEMOSA ' MELALEUCA NESOPHILA EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ...._ O SHRUBS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' ® CAREX ELATA 'AUREA' CEANOTHUS 'SNOW FLURRY' B CHAENOMELES 'TEXAS SCARLET' ® FATSIA JAPONICA 0 LIRIOPE MUSCARI Q MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS OX PRUNUS I. ILICIFOLIA O SALVIA APIANA O SISYRINCHIUM CALIFORNICUM GROUND COVERS AND VIPER O AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS 'BLUESTORM' ® ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' / BACCHARIS PILULARIS 0 COTONEASTER HORIZONTAUS O DISTICTUS BUCCINATORIA EUONYMUS FORTUNEI HEUCHERA MICRANTHA 'PALACE PURPLE' ® LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' ® PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS RIVER ROCK COBBLE E N a J District Project No. 'a DP 8208 0 Drawing No. ° 0634 -LS -002 a Sheet No. ° LS -2 of XX s NOTE: LOCATE PLANTS SPACED EQUIDISTANT (D) FROM EACH OTHER AS SHOWN. D = AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN. • • • • • AD • • 1/2D D EDGE OF PAVING, WALK, WALL, ETC. 1 EACH 5 GRAM FERTILIZER TABLET FOR EACH ROOTED CUTTING 6 TO 8" AMENDED SOIL GROUND COVER /SHRUB F WI FINISH GRADE TO PLANTING E SR OR LESS AVER SOIL :D SUBGRADE Calpo Hom & Dong � °° • °° Architects �.�e Designed Submitted Reviewed A 1 \\ \ r 4 2 O ROOTBALL O2 DIG PLANT PR 2X THE WIDTH AND AS DEEP AS THE ROOTBALL O3 SET RDOTBALL IN PLANT PR SO THAT CROWN IS I• ABOVE FINISH GRADE ® BACKFILL MATERIAL PER SPECS OS PLANTING TABLETS PER SPECS © CONSTRUCT 4" TEMPORARY WATERING BASIN AROUND EACH SHRUB +STF NOA t spy S-IM P]'0E'J TAE i'.;f!% (7 PER $TW STAR }} xac i CaOI 90t n 4Sw T Y A WA1, RO OW5 NWS.( 'S S y rm Il 1 YQ1W.1' EAN . 9 N ) r— T^ � A 1) 3' 9 x tY L04., 'm BOY 7W y 1 LOOM "-' Pxa WU SIAM SET SYAOS T,Lkrg n Wq S A i 0. OY SOEWN.x.EaeiL SFr SI.. PNIX1E1 R3 IK& kRxtOt kis Eft,"u CRATE I 9I uooYwuL'i ' _ ro-� I I_0- _ t-Saoaav LL' li I SECTION MA � L 1.7 1vr I.'�xNC»E A Slx -W�f aSNRNk CIEIANiQ @L,a,EEN A!E SIME WA TREE BRxNL'!FZ A. IML T*C IA STW r"Lx w INIM". ME. t iFVY NNE TREC I c*w ; LUQ. iW. YEN N GNEJ Y OflAwN A T 2WY TREE STAKING IN LANDSCAPE AREAS !,PT STANOl S -3 3 R7:EK MS ND ..WSxW -xTlal 8,W I or I 0verflou Sxe per L .I Curb with rnrb myuiremmm n , irlek 12" min Cobble Lilet pipe 1•/ yy L a ' I I p �r2 ix . .,Aar mar,,, To, - - —rdr ain '"' r r:. rt e':rr, � F. c� • ` . $ , inflnatioA � F , ;W,pl•+1 ro du CiY M.111J VOI Drawn Checked Date Jg°s 0 1 : �.;•%^ BAR IS ONE INCH MCA z AT FULL SCALE O— y Date: OF Ewe PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SUE QUANTITY COMMENTS TREES PYRUS CALLERYANA 'BRADFORD' BRADFORD PEAR 24" BOX 8 CORNUS NUTTALLII PACIFIC DOGWOOD 24" BOX 20 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX 5 3� w, I> , CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 15 GAL 13 9)MELALEUCA PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX 24 36" BOX • SEE NOTE BELOW NESOPHILA PINK MELALEUCA 15 GAL 19 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN (SEE KEY TO SPECIES BELOW) • CONTAINER SIZE WILL BE INCREASED TO 36" BOX FROM 24" BOX FOR EIGHT CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE TREES PLANTED IN PARKING & PEDESTRIAN AREAS TO MITIGATE FOR THE NECESSARY REMOVAL OF ONE VALLEY OAK TREE KEY TO EXSTING TREE SPECIES AA AILANTHUS ALTISSIMA TREE OF HEAVEN BP BETULA PENDULA WHITE BIRCH JT JUNIPERUS C. 'TORULOSA' HOLLYWOOD JUNIPER LI LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE PA PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA LONDON PLANE TREE PC PYRUS CALLERYANA BRADFORD PEAR PH PINUS HALEPENSIS ALEPPO PINE PR PINUS RADIATA MONTEREY PINE QA QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK QL QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK SM SCHINUS MOLLE CALIFORNIA PEPPER SS SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS COAST REDWOOD ST SCHINUS TEREBINTHIFOLIA BRAZILIAN PEPPER SHRUBS O ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' SUNSET MAZANITA 5 GAL 58 ® CAREX ELATA ' AUREA' AUREA SEDGE i GAL 175 CEANOTHUS 'SNOW FLURRY' WILD LILAC 5 GAL 25 0 CHAENOMELES 'TEXAS SCARLET' FLOWERING QUINCE 5 GAL 88 COTONEASTER HORIZONTALIS ROCK COTONEASTER 1 GAL 39 ® FATSIA JAPONICA JAPANESE ARALIA 1 GAL 7 O MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 1 GAL 43 OPRUNUS I. ILICIFOLIA HOLLYLEAF CHERRY 5 GAL 10 GROUND COVERS AND VIBES SPACING O AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS 'BLUESTORM' LILY -OF- THE -NILE 1 GAL 232 ® ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' SUNSET MANZANTIA 1 GAL 6' - BACCHARIS PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE BUSH 1 GAL 6' / O DISTICTUS BUCCINATORIA BLOOD -RED TRUMPET VINE 5 GAL 4 EUONYMUS FORTUNEI WINTER CREEPER 1 GAL 3' .HEUCHERA MICRANTHA 'PALACE PURPLE' CORAL BELLS 1 GAL 1' 0 LIRIOPE MUSCARI CREEPING LILY TURF 1 GAL 200 ® LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE 1 GAL 2' ® PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS JAPANESE SPURGE 1 GAL 1' SALVIA APIANA CALIFORNIA WHITE SAGE 1 GAL 156 O SISYRINCHIUM CALIFORNICUM YELLOW -EYED GRASS 1 GAL 242 RIVER ROCK COBBLE Central Contra Costa Sanitary District CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, 81 WAREHOUSE FACILITY PLANTING DETAILS District Project No. DP 8208 Drawing No. 0634 -LS -003 Sheet No. LS-3 of XX EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN (SEE KEY TO SPECIES BELOW) • CONTAINER SIZE WILL BE INCREASED TO 36" BOX FROM 24" BOX FOR EIGHT CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE TREES PLANTED IN PARKING & PEDESTRIAN AREAS TO MITIGATE FOR THE NECESSARY REMOVAL OF ONE VALLEY OAK TREE KEY TO EXSTING TREE SPECIES AA AILANTHUS ALTISSIMA TREE OF HEAVEN BP BETULA PENDULA WHITE BIRCH JT JUNIPERUS C. 'TORULOSA' HOLLYWOOD JUNIPER LI LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE PA PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA LONDON PLANE TREE PC PYRUS CALLERYANA BRADFORD PEAR PH PINUS HALEPENSIS ALEPPO PINE PR PINUS RADIATA MONTEREY PINE QA QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK QL QUERCUS LOBATA VALLEY OAK SM SCHINUS MOLLE CALIFORNIA PEPPER SS SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS COAST REDWOOD ST SCHINUS TEREBINTHIFOLIA BRAZILIAN PEPPER SHRUBS O ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' SUNSET MAZANITA 5 GAL 58 ® CAREX ELATA ' AUREA' AUREA SEDGE i GAL 175 CEANOTHUS 'SNOW FLURRY' WILD LILAC 5 GAL 25 0 CHAENOMELES 'TEXAS SCARLET' FLOWERING QUINCE 5 GAL 88 COTONEASTER HORIZONTALIS ROCK COTONEASTER 1 GAL 39 ® FATSIA JAPONICA JAPANESE ARALIA 1 GAL 7 O MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 1 GAL 43 OPRUNUS I. ILICIFOLIA HOLLYLEAF CHERRY 5 GAL 10 GROUND COVERS AND VIBES SPACING O AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS 'BLUESTORM' LILY -OF- THE -NILE 1 GAL 232 ® ARCTOSTAPHYLOS 'SUNSET' SUNSET MANZANTIA 1 GAL 6' - BACCHARIS PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE BUSH 1 GAL 6' / O DISTICTUS BUCCINATORIA BLOOD -RED TRUMPET VINE 5 GAL 4 EUONYMUS FORTUNEI WINTER CREEPER 1 GAL 3' .HEUCHERA MICRANTHA 'PALACE PURPLE' CORAL BELLS 1 GAL 1' 0 LIRIOPE MUSCARI CREEPING LILY TURF 1 GAL 200 ® LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE 1 GAL 2' ® PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS JAPANESE SPURGE 1 GAL 1' SALVIA APIANA CALIFORNIA WHITE SAGE 1 GAL 156 O SISYRINCHIUM CALIFORNICUM YELLOW -EYED GRASS 1 GAL 242 RIVER ROCK COBBLE Central Contra Costa Sanitary District CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, 81 WAREHOUSE FACILITY PLANTING DETAILS District Project No. DP 8208 Drawing No. 0634 -LS -003 Sheet No. LS-3 of XX Central Contra Costa Sanitary District CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, 81 WAREHOUSE FACILITY PLANTING DETAILS District Project No. DP 8208 Drawing No. 0634 -LS -003 Sheet No. LS-3 of XX T I Ii NOTES & LEGEND NOTE: ALL NOTES AIRE TYPICAL GUN TE FNIO AT ,a T E.ACK " T'N ING WALL - — - — - — - — - — - — - -- — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - SEE STRL FOR DETAILS 1 — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - - — - — - — - FURRW. AS OCCUFM 2 ® NEW CONCRETE WALL TFL FOR DET� q __T�'_�FURRING AS IOCCURS LS Q� Pam evollaw /' �2 i i i I SEE sm NEW MAWNRY WALL ..... .. ... STRL FOR DETAILS a ® i =man Nnunewm L FURRING A O CCU RS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113111%me68p6 oil . ......... .. ............ . ........ .. ........ . . .. ........ 11 12 13 10 LEI Ir a- AS-A EFRAME WALL EXT/STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME NON-STRL WALLS; METAL FRAME SEE STRL FOR DETAILS -------- ----- ML" ACOUSTIC INSULATION AS OCCURS MEZZANINE ABOVE --- -------- -Am&= . ........... . . .. ..... � ......... .. . .. .. ........... .. . .. .......... .. .......... .. ...... FRAME WALL • El� Z FIRE-RATED MGM "4_ .. ...... ALL . ... ..... SmLIN ASSEMBLY ....................... . ......... . ..... .. .. ............ .. ....... t ------------- .... .. .... ....... .. ............ .. ........... ... i7� 7 FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET WALL-MT FIRE EXTINGUISHER L M5 T15 MARKER BOARD / TACK. BOARD SIZE AS INDICATED IN METAL. LOCKERS LOMM EXIT SIGNAGE r4 .. .... .. .... — ----- ... ....... ....... .. . KIM 19 CASEWORK 6 up ---------------- all L R APPLIANCE /FIXTURE - — - — -- — — - -- FURNITURE - NIC In C" - — - — - — - — -- n . .. .......... . . . ...... ......... .. ........ ACCESS LADDER EQUIPMENT - NIC ■AIIIIIIIII004M NOT USED 11100111L WON= INTERIOR ELEVAT ................_._..... ........k..............._.....: . ..... .. ....... .. ....... ..... SEE A&-I, A6-2, Af435 4 P 2 TYP ORIENTATION IIIIIIIALIM; METAL STAIRS SYSTEM . . ........ .. C44AIN LINK FENCING AND GATES ... ................... . . . . . . ........ i,'y TAL SHELVING SYSTEM ki AM N ...... .. ....... . NOT USED ....... .. ....... .. .... NOT USED ...... ....... .. .......... .. ....... ......... .. .. . ...... ........... in I . . .. . ... . . . . ........... .. .... ......... .. 11 ____1 i ... I­­;­ L , ....... . ... .... . ..... .. . .. ........ . ... . .... .... .. ... . .. .. .. .. .. ... . ....... . .......... . ........ . .......... . .......... ....... .. ........... ... ... .. .. ... ...... . . .... .. ............ Jut NOT USED ........... .. ...... ........... .... . .......... . ....... ......... .. . ....... ... ........... . ........... IGW CON TING SIGNAGE: . . . . .......... -APPROVED PROV DE FIRE ... .. ....... . KNOX BOX AT _V.. 4FF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NORTH ==& Dona PLO= PLM -11 IL Is T Designed: Drawn! Checked: Date: 0 1 CSOD ADMINISTRATION, CREW, III WAREHOUSE FACIL" District Project No. BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa OP-8208 Submitted: Date: AT FULL SCALE Drawing No. Sanitary District FIRST FLOOR PLAN All -1 Reviewed: Date: Sheet No. Rev. Date By Description x of Xxx . Y. _ .,_.._.._.._.,, p... 1 _ ......... ............... .._......_ 5I of - _ .._................. 11 -Ell N rence I ! Bes I , q , qq it y i b J q 9 O T= m w iMece.� A Done 'O q 1� I I i or' L1 !!''Al Y supir : \,l J \1% Wt . ............................... ...... ... . . ... ... ... ... . I � vow N � BABAcan= i a V i i I_i'f7 ®y-r I- ='MIR 5 11 n n, LE3 W.—m __ I ;i] �i0� ■��Monosson �1 NO TBS do UMMEND NOTE: ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL FMISH AT �`�, TIEBACK RETAINING WALL {.. DEL FU IN�G AS OCCURS NEW IZ SAL CONCRETE WALL 9EE S FOR DETAILS rUR L FURRING AS OCCURS � NEW MASONRY WALL �. `— SEE 6TRL FOR DETAILS 8- L FURRING AS OCCURS 3 6 11 12 13 IV 15 B_ ......... I4 FRAME WALL ❑ £Xi /STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME NON -STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME SEE STRL FOR DETAILS ..........__ .... . ................ ............................... ACOUSTIC INSULATION AS OCCURS INTERIOR FRAME WALL ONE -HOUR FIRE -RATED WALL ASSEMBLY 15 FE�G FE FEC: FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET • FE: WALL -MT FIRE EXTINGUISHER A ®MB / TB MARKER BOARD / TACK BOARD SIZE AS INDICATED —_ - -- _ -.\l 11 METAL LOCKERS ^ - ❑ �A EXIT SKeNAGE n 19 CASEWORK — --- - --`�! ® APPLIANCE /FIXTURE 21 FURNITURE - NIC 22 ACCESS LADDER r EQUIPMENT - NIC NOT USED ®5 INTERIOR ELEVATIONB 4 TYP 2 •... SEE A6 -I, A6 -2, Ab -3 Ty f. ORIENTATION METAL STAIRS SYSTEM 3 AIN LINK FACING AND GATES © LVING SY&7VM YI ... .......................... _ .... . ........... .. .... - ..... ........ ..........._.. .... ... ..... ..._� �) Q y; NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx I � I li !�1 i ,a i ......... ............. i it I O OMNI ammom _.._....__._ _ __..__ ... t ... ._ .. _ I I S -- -- - J- 11 -Ell N rence I ! Bes I , q , qq it y i b J q 9 O T= m w iMece.� A Done 'O q 1� I I i or' L1 !!''Al Y supir : \,l J \1% Wt . ............................... ...... ... . . ... ... ... ... . I � vow N � BABAcan= i a V i i I_i'f7 ®y-r I- ='MIR 5 11 n n, LE3 W.—m __ I ;i] �i0� ■��Monosson �1 NO TBS do UMMEND NOTE: ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL FMISH AT �`�, TIEBACK RETAINING WALL {.. DEL FU IN�G AS OCCURS NEW IZ SAL CONCRETE WALL 9EE S FOR DETAILS rUR L FURRING AS OCCURS � NEW MASONRY WALL �. `— SEE 6TRL FOR DETAILS 8- L FURRING AS OCCURS 3 6 11 12 13 IV 15 B_ ......... I4 FRAME WALL ❑ £Xi /STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME NON -STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME SEE STRL FOR DETAILS ..........__ .... . ................ ............................... ACOUSTIC INSULATION AS OCCURS INTERIOR FRAME WALL ONE -HOUR FIRE -RATED WALL ASSEMBLY 15 FE�G FE FEC: FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET • FE: WALL -MT FIRE EXTINGUISHER A ®MB / TB MARKER BOARD / TACK BOARD SIZE AS INDICATED —_ - -- _ -.\l 11 METAL LOCKERS ^ - ❑ �A EXIT SKeNAGE n 19 CASEWORK — --- - --`�! ® APPLIANCE /FIXTURE 21 FURNITURE - NIC 22 ACCESS LADDER r EQUIPMENT - NIC NOT USED ®5 INTERIOR ELEVATIONB 4 TYP 2 •... SEE A6 -I, A6 -2, Ab -3 Ty f. ORIENTATION METAL STAIRS SYSTEM 3 AIN LINK FACING AND GATES © LVING SY&7VM YI ... .......................... _ .... . ........... .. .... - ..... ........ ..........._.. .... ... ..... ..._� �) Q y; NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx I_i'f7 ®y-r I- ='MIR 5 11 n n, LE3 W.—m __ I ;i] �i0� ■��Monosson �1 NO TBS do UMMEND NOTE: ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL FMISH AT �`�, TIEBACK RETAINING WALL {.. DEL FU IN�G AS OCCURS NEW IZ SAL CONCRETE WALL 9EE S FOR DETAILS rUR L FURRING AS OCCURS � NEW MASONRY WALL �. `— SEE 6TRL FOR DETAILS 8- L FURRING AS OCCURS 3 6 11 12 13 IV 15 B_ ......... I4 FRAME WALL ❑ £Xi /STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME NON -STRL WALLS: METAL FRAME SEE STRL FOR DETAILS ..........__ .... . ................ ............................... ACOUSTIC INSULATION AS OCCURS INTERIOR FRAME WALL ONE -HOUR FIRE -RATED WALL ASSEMBLY 15 FE�G FE FEC: FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET • FE: WALL -MT FIRE EXTINGUISHER A ®MB / TB MARKER BOARD / TACK BOARD SIZE AS INDICATED —_ - -- _ -.\l 11 METAL LOCKERS ^ - ❑ �A EXIT SKeNAGE n 19 CASEWORK — --- - --`�! ® APPLIANCE /FIXTURE 21 FURNITURE - NIC 22 ACCESS LADDER r EQUIPMENT - NIC NOT USED ®5 INTERIOR ELEVATIONB 4 TYP 2 •... SEE A6 -I, A6 -2, Ab -3 Ty f. ORIENTATION METAL STAIRS SYSTEM 3 AIN LINK FACING AND GATES © LVING SY&7VM YI ... .......................... _ .... . ........... .. .... - ..... ........ ..........._.. .... ... ..... ..._� �) Q y; NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx NOT USED ®5 INTERIOR ELEVATIONB 4 TYP 2 •... SEE A6 -I, A6 -2, Ab -3 Ty f. ORIENTATION METAL STAIRS SYSTEM 3 AIN LINK FACING AND GATES © LVING SY&7VM YI ... .......................... _ .... . ........... .. .... - ..... ........ ..........._.. .... ... ..... ..._� �) Q y; NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx YI ... .......................... _ .... . ........... .. .... - ..... ........ ..........._.. .... ... ..... ..._� �) Q y; NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx NOT USED -_ ............... .............. .: >:.::::::.::�:: NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED 3" HIGH NG SIGNAGE: PROVIDE FIRE D - APPROVED KNOX BOX AT .6 " AFF NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED MOOS lL001II PLAN LTJ SC ��:1-4)' Designed Drawn Checked Date D 1 CREW, istrict Project No. CSOD ADMINISTRATION, , 8 WAREHOUSE FACILITY DP -8208 BAR IS ONE INCH Central Contra Costa Submitted Date Drawing No. AT FULL SCALE SECOND FLOOR PLAN A11-2 Reviewed Date ' Sanitary District Sheet No. 5019 11111'Off Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 X of Xx E E o m U U C N y N d N 0 L L N_ �_ _O N � O N E E E 0 0 0 c c c v � d U C d d d d N N d t t L d E E E 0 0 � C C d d d d d N U � d d d N d d N d N E o c c c c V U d � d d N � 9 � � M N � h N � [Reference Files N « « « w « w q M q d M M M q O N q q M M d 01 « E « o c c h � m « � V N ` q N � M » � N q o M � a N M N N p M M M M M M M O d d O EO m � Z m -� d 4 i d E 0 0 d d d � � w U U U N d N N d � N N � O N � O E E E E E E 0 0 0 ml �I nl m m n E E E o � o c c U U U C C C N d N � N d E E c d d d U U V d N � N d M N r1 N e erence Files w w M w w M d M E " o N w "! «I wl E N o � " o a� w M w V N E N N � M w M � N M p M M M « N N N M N N M w N � O O h 0 = Z Item No. 7.a.1 LAFCO Update Alhambra Valley Properties Curtis Swanson November 20, 21 Alhambra Valley Properties Outside Urban Limit Line *19 properties totaling 121 acres. 17 properties in an "island "; surrounded by lands within ULL. 2 properties at edge, between ULL and Briones Regional Park. 11 properties are developed and 8 are undeveloped (vacant). #9 properties interested in sewer service. i Approach for Properties Outside the Urban Limit Line * Presented approach to Board in July 2008. Seek Board approval to request Out of Agency Service Agreements for 5 properties. y Apply to LAFCO for 3 developed parcels. ➢ If approved, apply for 2 undeveloped properties. ®If successful, prepare an EIR for annexation of all 19 properties. Recent LAFCO Action ® LAFCO approved service agreements for 3 developed properties. ® LAFCO conditions: ,/Only 4 -inch sewer lateral for each dwelling. ✓CCCSD needs to apply for annexation within 12 months. ✓ CCCSD can't provide service before applying for annexation. Can complete EIR after application. 2 Next Steps *Seek Board approval in December for annexation of 3 to 9 properties. *Submit initial application to LAFCO. *Connect 3 properties to sewer. *Complete EIR & pursue annexation of up to 9 properties in Spring 2009. Annexation Backlog Status *During 2008, the Board has approved four applications for 436 properties. +Two applications planned for Board approval in December & January. 3 J v a �n �c it it v � d � a C N N L C` w d 1v u M i3 O Y Y Y O � N N M Reference Fileso, v 1N■NI i E z 1 E r •� s '0 .s v o e m E 0 c°v E 7 V M 0 H N Y G v E G � LEGEND: TRUNK SEWER 8' MAIN EXTENSIONS CCCSD COLLECTION SYSTEM ■� ANNEXATIONS 168A & 168B - AVAD PROPOSED AVAD INITIATED OAVAD NO. 2007- # DEVELOPER SEWER O OUTSIDE URBAN LIMIT LINE W N <0 DA 1688 IJ �, \W4- 7v! ' Central Contra Costa MARTINEZ - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Sanitary District 0 800 ' ALHAMBRA VALLEY SEWER PROVIDERS FEET 1 FIGUI Agenda Item 7.a.3) Board Meeting of November 20, 2008 Written Announcements: Events a) Re- elected Board Member Reception There will be a short, informal reception to recognize re- elected Board Members Hockett, Menesini and Nejedly. The reception will be held in the Multi- Purpose Room immediately following the swearing -in ceremony at the December 4, 2008 Board Meeting. Light refreshments will be served. The Board will then reconvene for the remainder of the meeting, which includes the appointment of a new Board President and President Pro Tern for the 2009 calendar year. Claims Update b) Lancaster Road CalTrans Claim Payment The Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board voted on August 26, 2008 to accept the Lancaster Road claim against CalTrans for $122,738.76. The District received the check on Friday, November 14, 2008. Customer Service c) St. Mary's College Candidate Comparison of District's Customer Service Last month, an MBA candidate from St. Mary's College contacted Communication Services Manager Michael Scahill about doing a case study comparing the District's customer service and related community outreach to other businesses. The District was chosen based on positive experience with the District's Collection System Operations Department following a sewage backup into the student's home in 2006. Two members of the project interviewed Michael and left with an extremely positive image of the District's emphasis on customer service. A week later, one of the students left a message stating that after the entire group had reviewed the notes, it was decided that to use the District in a case study comparing it to other companies would skew any bell curve because of the District's high level of service. He noted that everyone hoped to return to the District for another project sometime in the future. The attached thank you card was delivered two days later. Traini� d) Water/Wastewater Plant Operator Training Program Update The Water/Wastewater Plant Operator Training Program will begin a fourth semester in January. Early registration has almost filled all five scheduled classes without advertising or press coverage. Courses are expected to be taught at the District, Dublin -San Ramon Services District, West County Sanitation District, and possibly the Veolia Treatment Plant in Richmond. General Updates /Project Updates e) Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Disposition Letter On July 3, 2008, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) staff reported a multiple -hearth furnace opacity excursion to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The excursion occurred on July 2 and lasted for 4 minutes and 42 seconds and was caused by a sudden increase in scum to the furnace. The increased scum load occurred while operators were clearing a plugged scum line. On October 17, 2008, BAAQMD informed CCCSD that no enforcement action would result from the excursion. f) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Fee The State Water Resources Control Board ( SWRCB) evaluated three options to increase the 2008 — 2009 Waste Discharge Permit Fund. In order to address a $12.2 million deficit, SWRCB selected the option that increases fees to very large dischargers (greater than 100 MGD) and to general permit holders, i.e., storm water, collection system waste discharge requirement (WDR) permits, etc. The selected option addresses the SWRCB deficit but also reallocates fees to reflect a "polluter pays" approach. Under this option, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD) NPDES Permit fee will be reduced ($19,000) to $31,000 per year. CCCSD's collection system WDR fee will increase by 40 percent ($1,300) to approximately $4,400 per year. g) Phase 2 Aeration Air Renovation Project Re -Bid While NCCI, Inc. did an excellent job on Phase 1 of the Aeration Air Renovation Project, staff plans to rebid Phase 2 because the expected change orders could exceed $700,000, and there is a favorable bid climate. NCCI's bid for Phase 2 was $1,566,448. Agenda Item 7.a.3) Board Meeting of November 20, 2008 Additional Written Announcements: Financial Update h) Standard and Poor's Rating for CCCSD Standard and Poor's Rating Services has raised the ratings from an AA+ to AAA on the District's and 129 other municipal waterworks and sanitary sewer revenue bonds. The rating changes are primarily based on recent criteria revisions. These issuers demonstrate one or more of the following credit characteristics: • Strong financial metrics, including debt service coverage and cash reserves; • Good economic fundamentals to be able to handle pressures such as the housing market vulnerabilities, increasing unemployment and inflation for goods and services; and • Solid management, which includes a willingness to raise rates, long -term planning to fund regulatory- driven capital expenditures, and the ability to serve the needs of a growing community. These ratings help to provide consumer confidence and also help to reduce the interest rates the District would have to pay on a future bond issuance. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board Meeting November 20, 2008 Board Member McGill Item 7.d.1) Will attend the Mayors' Conference December 4, 2008, Brentwood Item 7.d.3) Mayors' Conference November 6, 2008 The presentation was regarding SB375 which is transportation -land use linkage legislation (this is intended to help implement AB32). Specifically SB375 requires the adoption of a "Sustainable Communities Strategy" (SCS) on a regional basis. Local communities must conform to the SCS to receive benefits otherwise there are negative consequences (for example more frequent adoption of Housing Elements). The local proposal by ABAG (MTC) for the SCS is to reduce future growth in outlying areas like east Contra Costa County and north Bay) and increase growth in existing urban areas near mass transit like Walnut Creek. Generally this was not well received by the elected officials at the meeting, with some exceptions. Item7.d.4) Contra Council Water Task Force Meeting November 18, 2008 There was a presentation on CCWD's plans for the Los Vaqueros Expansion Project for -fish protection programs, -water supply reliability including industries and South Bay and -water quality improvement. We need to carefully evaluate, and integrate this into our water reuse efforts. OCTOBER 20, 2008 7 Z a� CONTRA COSTA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION MEETING The Contra Costa Special Districts Association met on October 20. Dr. John Toth, Director, Mt. Diablo Health Care District and Marilyn Condit, Director, Los Medanos Community Healthcare District, spoke on the history, formation, and services of their health care districts. Jeffrey Kasper of, President of The Service Quality Department, spoke on the topic of customer service. Also discussed was the way salary and benefit information is reported by agencies in the Contra Costa Special Districts Association and the requirements of GASB 45. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: November 20, 2008 No.: 8,a. Administrative Type of Action: AUTHORIZE CONTRACT Subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH DMS FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS Submitted By: Initiating Dept/Div.: Admin /Purchasing and Anthony Holt Material Services Senior Buyer REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: 61&6� A. Holt R. Mus v s mes M. K Ily, eneral Maplager ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager to enter into annual contracts that obligate the District to expenditures greater than $50,000. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a janitorial services contract with DMS Facility Services (DMS). The contract contains options to extend the annual contract for four (4) additional one -year periods, totaling a maximum of five years. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total estimated cost of this one -year contract is $148,000, not including the janitorial supplies drawn out of the warehouse for the contractor's use. The current annual cost of supplies is approximately $22,000. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Alternatives to executing this contract with DMS include 1) award to a different proposer, 2) solicit new proposals, 3) extend the existing contract, or 4) hire additional District staff to perform the janitorial duties. None of these alternatives are recommended. BACKGROUND: Janitorial services are provided for District facilities both in Walnut Creek and Martinez by Universal Building Services (UBS). The existing contract with UBS ends October 31, 2008. For fiscal year 2007/2008 the District spent approximately $116,601 for janitorial services and supplies. District staff determined it was in the best interest of the District to seek proposals for janitorial services rather than extend UBS's contract. A formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process was initiated and publicized on March 17, 2008. Prior to beginning the RFP process, Purchasing, Buildings and Grounds and CSO formed a janitorial committee. The committee analyzed the current scope of work and the former janitorial service providers to identify the needs of the District. When analyzing the past and present service providers along with the current and upcoming District needs, the committee used the following criteria for evaluation: 1) merit of H: \Executive Assistant Directory\Position PapersWanitorial Services Contract 8 7 08.doc POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: November 20, 2008 AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH DMS FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS proposal /presentation, 2) knowledge and expertise, 3) overall strategy in providing required services, 4) record of past performance, 5) pricing, and 6) financial stability. The four proposals submitted to the District were from: Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay $124,425 annually Enterprise Maintenance $138,000 annually Building Services Maintenance (BSM) $141,000 annually DMS Facility Services (DMS) $148,000 annually Based upon the committee's evaluation how the proposals met the criteria, DMS was ranked the most cost effective provider of janitorial services to the District. Goodwill Industries and Enterprise Maintenance were ranked third. Staff interviewed the BSM and DMS vendors to clarification their proposals. While BSM had a lower price, they showed a lack of confidence that resources and the amount quoted would sufficiently comply with the District's expectations. BSM had more workers' compensation claims, raising concerns about their safety record. DMS clearly demonstrated the ability to ensure quality of service with minimal oversight of the contract. DMS had the strongest financial statements, most comparable experience (from industrial sites to clean rooms in micro chip manufacturing plants and laboratories), lowest workers compensation claims, and gave the best solution for a quality control program of its employees. DMS was also the only service provider that proposed use of a company -owned vehicle to ensure consistent service delivery to cover Martinez and Walnut Creek facilities as needed. DMS has monthly training in safety, employee protocol and cleaning procedures, which gave DMS the highest employee retention plan. The contract contains options to extend the annual contract for four (4) additional one - year periods, totaling a maximum of five years. Staff is requesting the Board to authorize the General Manager to extend the contract if there has been acceptable service. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a janitorial services contract with DMS. The contract will contain options to extend the annual contract for an additional four (4) one -year periods, totaling a maximum of five years. K \Executive Assistant Directory\Position Papers\Janitorial Services Contract 8 7 08.doc