HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/6/2006 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.a. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO AN OFFER OF DEDICATION
OF PUBLIC ROADS, JOB 5725, PARCELS 1 AND 2
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Michael Penny, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
v
M. P6W J. Miyamoto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell rtes
General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to consent to an offer of
dedication of public roads where the District owns an easement.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution consenting to an offer of dedication of public
roads.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors occasionally consents to offers of dedication
of public roads over existing District easements. In 2005, Job 5725 Gale Ranch
(Dougherty Valley), was constructed within easements offered by Shapell Industries,
Inc., with the intent that the easement would eventually become public roads. The
easements are shown in Attachment 1. Contra Costa County has requested that the
District consent to an offer of dedication of public roads for the easement areas shown
as Stoneleaf Road and Old Dougherty Road on the preliminary Map of Subdivision 8306
dated February 2006. The areas of the roads correspond with the areas of the
easements. Staff has reviewed the Subdivision Map and found that the road
dedications match the easement areas and the sewer was constructed within the
easements. The District prefers that public sewers be located in public roads rather
than easements where possible.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution consenting to an offer of
dedication of public roads to Contra Costa County as shown on the preliminary Map of
Subdivision 8306.
Page 1 of 2
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Penny\2006 \5725 PP Offer Ded Public Roads 7- 6- 06.doc
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.b. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS
subject: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT (DISTRICT
PROJECT 5929 — PARCEL 12) AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM
DEED TO STEVEN AND BARBARA LITTLE (2144 STEWART AVENUE, WALNUT
CREEK DISTRICT PROJECT 1589 — PARCEL 2)
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Molly Mullin, Engineering Assistant III Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
� Fo,c M• M�uiv �
M. Mullin enny C. Swanson
'II
A. Farrell
General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept or quitclaim
easements and record documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions accepting a Grant of Easement authorizing
execution of a Quitclaim Deed, and recording of the documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None
BACKGROUND: Steven and Barbara Little at 2144 Stewart Avenue, Walnut Creek,
cooperated with the District to change the alignment of the public sewer on their
property when it was replaced under District Project 5929, Walnut Creek Renovations,
Phase 3. This change is reflected in Attachment 1. The original sewer has been
abandoned, and a new easement has been granted for the new sewer.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolutions and accept a Grant of
Easement authorizing the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the
District to execute a Quitclaim Deed to Steven and Barbara Little, on behalf of the
District; and recording of the documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Mullin\2006 \1589 Little 7- 6- 06.doc Page 1 of 2
r aul-_ L U I L
81.10/
Fasevi went
eat
Fase�ent � `
Little
Property
LEGEND:
—�— EXISTING SEWER
• �} • NEW SEWER
EASEMENT AREA
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
,A�)
WALN
r-y— SITE
ALAMO 9y�
1 t�
f � _
-
N n
LOCATION MAP
N. T. S.
VALLEY
QUITCLAIM AND ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT DEDICATION
DSP 5929 LITTLE PROPERTY
Page 2 of 2
Attachment
1
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.c. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS
subject: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT (DISTRICT
PROJECT 5929 — PARCEL 13), AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM
DEED TO THE MACARTHUR GOFVON TRUST (2148 STEWART AVENUE,
WALNUT CREEK DISTRICT PROJECT 1589 — PARCEL3)
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Molly Mullin, Engineering Assistant III Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
a (k4
M. Mullin M. C. Swanson A. Farrell Charles General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept or quitclaim
easements and record documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions accepting a Grant of Easement, and
authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed, and recording of the documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None
BACKGROUND: Trustees of the MacArthur Gor on Trust cooperated with the
District's to change the alignment of the public sewer on their property at 2148 Stewart
Avenue, Walnut Creek when it was replaced under District Project 5929, Walnut Creek
Renovations, Phase 3. This change is reflected in Attachment 1. The original sewer
has been abandoned, and a new easement has been granted for the new sewer.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolutions accepting a Grant of Easement
and authorizing the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the District
to execute a Quitclaim Deed to The MacArthur Gorton Trust on behalf of the District,
and recording of the documents with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Mullin\2006 \1589 PP MacArthur Gorton 7- 6- 06.doc Page 1 Of 2
SITE
\ ALAMO 9y�
F
VALLEY RD
See
�••
•
•••• LOCATION MAP
• • N. T. S.
•.
Fase�e ent
'P/7t
Z
QU�tc /ai�Fa
\ se`nent -
LEGEND:
—�— EXISTING SEWER
• NEW SEWER
.` EASEMENT AREA
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
A0990k
.1 Lnur rUSt Proper y Go
QUITCLAIM AND ACCEPTANCE OF
EASEMENT DEDICATION DSP 5929
MACARTHUR GORTON TRUST PROPERTY
Page 2 pf 2
Attachment
1
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.d. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT A RESOLUTION; ACCEPT EASEMENT
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM
TIMOTHY F. M. BROWN AND DIANE SEABORN BROWN (DISTRICT PROJECT
5661; PARCEL 7)
Submitted By: Initiating Dept/Div.:
Molly Mullin, Engineering Assistant III Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
C�
M. Mullin M. y C. Swanson
_6iA__
A. Farrell
General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept and record Grants
of Easement.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution accepting a Grant of Easement, and
authorize recording of the easement deed with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: A nominal fee of $250 was paid to the property owners for the
easement upgrade.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: This property was included in the Lafayette Sewer Renovations
Project, Phase 4. During this project it was discovered that no original easement
existed for the Local Improvement District sewer pipeline installed under District Project
1553. That project assumed Yorkshire Court would become a public street. In fact, this
portion of the sewer alignment became located within a private roadway. As part of the
renovations project, District Project 5661, staff obtained easements from the affected
property owners.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution accepting a Grant of
Easement from Timothy and Diane Brown, and authorizing staff to record the easement
with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Mullin\2006 \5661 PP Brown 7- 6- 06.doc Page 1 Of 2
pin
971 Y _ BLVD
orkshire Ct .-
Brown _
Parcel 7
G� RO
LEGEND:
---e EXISTING SEWER
—.e- NEW SEWER
EASEMENT AREA
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
LA AYEZ'
o
DI NO / 6
MO,RB BLVD
— ITE
LOCATION MAP
1 _ -
U
W
_x
2
U
Y
o�
N. T. S.
ACCEPTANCE OF Attachment
GRANT OF EASEMENT 1
DP 5661 PARCEL 7
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.e. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT
WITH THE ASCOT HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION FOR TRACT 4122,
LOT A, COMMON AREA, JOB 2068, MORAGA, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
AND RECORDING OF THE AGREEMENT
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Michael J. Penny, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
M. ny J. Miyamoto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell Charles
General Ma
ISSUE: The Ascot Heights Homeowners' Association, the controlling authority of the
Tract 4122, Lot A, Common Area on Ascot Drive, Moraga, have requested that the
District allow parking garages to be rebuilt on a District easement.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the real property agreement;
authorize the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the District to
execute the agreement; and authorize staff to record the agreement with the Contra
Costa County Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Alternatives to the recommended action are
Board rejection of the real property agreement, and to either 1) direct staff to deny the
reconstruction of the parking garages within the easement or 2) rely on the existing
easement for future maintenance, rehabilitation or replacement access.
BACKGROUND: The Ascot Heights Homeowners' Association requested that the
District allow removal and replacement of parking garages that encroach into a District
easement. The existing parking garages and sewer were installed during development
of the parcel in 1972 with the parking garages being built partially within the sewer
easement. District staff has determined that the location of the parking garages does
not interfere with the operation and maintenance of the sewer nor would they interfere
with the replacement of the sewer in the future.
An agreement has been negotiated whereby the parking garages can be reconstructed
on the easement. The property owner accepts the liability for any damage to the
District's facilities and for additional costs to the District for maintenance and
replacement of the sewer in the area of the encroachment. The property owner holds
the District free and harmless from all claims and liability for injury to persons or to their
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Penny\2006\2068 PP Ascot Heights 7- 6- 06.doc Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT
WITH TRACT 4122, LOT A, COMMON AREA (ASCOT HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS'
ASSOCIATION), JOB 2068, MORAGA, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND
RECORDING OF THE AGREEMENT
property within the easement area. The property owner agrees not to impede the
District's access to the property. The agreement provides for the District's emergency
access, and requires that the property owner remove the encroachment upon 30 days
notice.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution approving the real property
agreement; authorizing the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the
District to execute the agreement; and authorizing staff to record the agreement with the
Contra Costa County Recorder.
N: \ENVRSEC \Position Papers \Penny\2006\2068 PP Ascot Heights 7- 6- 06.doc Page 2 of 3
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.f. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: INFORMATIONAL
subject: ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE PUMPING STATIONS
SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT
6127
Submitted By:
William E. Brennan,
Collection System Operations Division Manager
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
VV L
W. Brennan A. Farrell
Initiating Dept./Div.:
Collection System Operations
C41eBat s
Gener al Manager
ISSUE: All work has been completed on the Pumping Stations Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition Project, District Project 6127, and this project can now be closed out.
RECOMMENDATION: Close out the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This closeout will result in approximately $48,000 being
returned to the Collection System program.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: The Pumping Stations Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
Project replaced a pumping station telemetry system installed in 1989 to monitor
pumping station alarms and equipment status. The system had proven reliable but was
at the end of its useful life.
This project provided control and monitoring of pumping station sites. The system may
be accessed remotely from the treatment plant, the laptop computers issued to the
Pumping Stations staff, and desktop computers located at the Martinez, San Ramon,
Moraga, Lower Orinda and Orinda Crossroads Pumping Stations. The Lower Orinda
Pumping Station was fully integrated into this system at the conclusion of the current
upgrade project.
A system of automatically dialing the Pumping Stations operators' pagers and cell
phones with alarm information was also part of the project. This allows notification of
CSO /C: \Ppaper \6127closeout.DOC Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject. ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE PUMPING STATIONS
SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT 6127
the on -call Pumping Stations Operator of alarm situations when the pumping stations
are unattended. On October 18, 2001, the Board of Directors authorized the award of a
contract for the construction of the project to Control Manufacturing Company. The
Notice to Proceed was issued on December 17, 2001. The work was substantially
complete in February 2005 and the Board accepted the contract work at the May 5,
2005, board meeting.
The original contract amount was $1,471,628. There were 22 construction change
orders issued resulting in net cost of $136,943 or 9.3% of the bid. This resulted in a
total amount of $1,608,571. The change order cost is considered reasonable in view of
the complex nature of this project.
The total authorized budget for the project is $3,430,000. The budget includes the cost
of engineering design, District staff, testing services, contractor services, etc.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: This item is presented to the Board of Directors
for information. No action is necessary.
CSO /CAPpaper\6127doseout.DOC Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
PUMPING STATIONS SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION
PROJECT (DP 6127)
ACTIVITY
COST
Total Budget
3,430,000
Construction Contract
1,471,628
Change Orders
136,943
Change Order % of Construction
9.3%
Total Construction Amount
1,608,571
Engineering, Design, CM, Admin.
1,771,341
Engineering, Design, CM, Admin. - % of Construction
106.8
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
3,381,737
TOTAL RETURN TO THE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
48,263
CSO /CAPpaper \6127c1oseout.DOC Page 3 of 3
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.g. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: INFORMATIONAL
subject: ADVISE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE
PIPING RENOVATIONS AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT, PHASE 2,
DISTRICT PROJECT 7208
Submitted By: Initiating Dept ✓Div.:
Gary E.Rathunde, Associate Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
6441-7-,
?TT Ok-
G. Rathunde
B. ThIn
A. arre
General
ISSUE: All construction work has been completed on the Piping Renovations and
Replacement Project, Phase 2, District Project 7208, and the project can now be closed
out.
RECOMMENDATION: Closeout the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This closeout will result in $88,843 being returned to the
Treatment Plant Program. Attachment 1 shows the project expenditures by category.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable.
BACKGROUND: During the 5A project, numerous piping systems were installed
throughout the treatment plant. These pipes carry the processed wastewater, sludge,
steam, air, and other utility services between the various sections of the plant. These
pipes have been in place for almost thirty years. Some of these pipes are leaking due
to corrosion. Failure of such piping will adversely impact treatment plant operations.
Phase 1 of this project (DP 7183) renovated or replaced various piping systems
including replacement of the service air line from the compressor to the air driers,
replacement of the main service air header, modification and replacement of piping
between the grit pumps and classifiers, replacement of return activated sludge (RAS)
suction header piping, modification of the scum piping to reduce blockages, and
downsizing the recycled water meter.
This Phase 2 project renovated or replaced deficient portions of the following piping
systems: leaking and corroded valves on the centrifuge feed pumps in the Solids
Conditioning Building; piping, flow meter, and valves at the sludge grinders in the
Sludge Control Building; seal water piping in the Primary Tank west gallery area; air and
seal water piping for Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) Recycle Pumps; renovation of the
centrate pipelines in the Solids Conditioning Building; renovating sections of the
NAPESUMPosition Papers\Rathunde \7208 CloseOut.doc Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
suv/ect: ADVISE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE
PIPING RENOVATIONS AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT, PHASE 2,
DISTRICT PROJECT 7208
Standby Effluent Pump discharge piping; and replacing corroded sections of the
Northwest and South Sump Pump piping.
The contractor, Kaweah Construction Company, commenced work on June 28, 2004.
The project was completed on schedule and accepted by the Board on March 3, 2005.
The original construction contract amount was $836,638. There were three (3)
construction change orders issued in the total amount of $80,586.
The final authorized budget for the project was $1,197,000, which included a
contingency of $126,000. The total project cost was $1,108,157. The project closeout
will result in $88,843 being returned to the Treatment Plant Program.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: This item is presented to the Board of Directors
for information. No action is necessary.
NAPESUP \Position Papers \Rathunde \7208 CloseOut.doc Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
PIPING RENOVATIONS AND REPLACEMENT PROJECT, PHASE 2
DISTRICT PROJECT 7208
ACTIVITY
COST
Total Budget
$1,197,000
Construction Contract
$836,638
Change orders
$80,586
Chan eOrders % of Construction
9.6%
Total Construction Amount
$917,224
Engineering, CM, Admin
$190,933
Engineering, CM, Admin - % of Construction
21%
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES
$1,108,157
TOTAL RETURN TO TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM
$88,843
NAPESUP \Position Papers \Rathunde \7208 CloseOut.doc Page 3 of 3
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 3.h. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action' CONFIRM PUBLICATION
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING PUBLICATION OF A SUMMARY OF
DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. 240 - AN ORDINANCE (UNCODIFIED) TO
ESTABLISH REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTIES THAT
DIRECTLY CONNECT TO JOB 5738 (SOUTH AVENUE, ALAMO) STANDARD
SEWER FACILITIES
Submitted By. Initiating Dept. /Div.: Administrative Department
Elaine R. Boehme
Secretary of the District
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
r
E. Boehme har4Batt
General Manager
ISSUE: Section 6490 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California provides
that District ordinances shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation
within the District, and provides that an Order of the Board of Directors of the District to
the effect that the ordinance has been published shall constitute conclusive evidence
that publication has been properly made.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution confirming the publication of a summary of
District Ordinance No. 240.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Establishes presumption that the ordinance
was correctly published and therefore would be deemed procedurally valid by a court.
BACKGROUND: A summary of District Ordinance No. 240 (Uncodified) which was
adopted by the Board at the meeting of May 18, 2006, and which Establishes
Reimbursement Fees Applicable to Properties that Directly Connect to Job 5738 (South
Avenue, Alamo) Standard Sewer Facilities was published in the Contra Costa Times on
June 6, 2006. Proof of publication is attached.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution confirming the publication of
a summary of District Ordinance No. 240.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN\DIST- SEC \Ordinances\PP CONFIRM PUB ORD 240.doc
Page 1 of 3
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Contra Costa
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years,
and not a party to or interested in the above - entitled
matter.
SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 240
1 am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times,
AN ORDINANCE
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published
(UNCODIFIED) TO ESTAB-
at 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek,
LISH REIMBURSEMENT FEE
APPLICABLE TO PROPER -
County of Contra Costa, 94598.
TIES THAT DIRECTLY
And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of
CONNECT TO JOB 5738
(SOUTH SEWER ALAMO)
general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of
FACILITIES
Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of
ordinance No. 240 (Un-
October 22, 1934. Case Number 19764.
codified) establishes a
Reimbursement Fee of
$28,095.79 for each prop -
The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in
erty that directly con-
nects to Project 5738 in
type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in
accordance with District
each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not
Code Chapter 6.20 "Reim -
in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit:
bmbursemente5fe she set
forth by this ordinance
shall be administered, ad-
June 6,
lusted, and collected ac-
cording to the provisions
said Chapter.
all in the year of 2006
NOTE: The above is a
summary of malor high-
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the umance. A reau,ny v, u
entire ordinance may be
foregoing is true and correct. necessary to obtain a full
understanding of the fee
proposed. A certified
Exec at Walnut Creek, Calif nl . copy of the full text of the
On i Ida f June, 2006 Apropos d omay nce is in the Secretary of the
District's Office at 5019
Imhoff Place, Martinez
........ ............................... .... ............. and/or a copy mayy be ob-
ignature tained from the office.
Adopted:
Contra Costa Times May 18, 2006
P O Box 4147
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 AYES: Members: eoney-
steele, Hockett, Lucey,
(925) 935 -2525 Neiedly, Menesini
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
Proof of Publication of:
s/s Mario M. Menesini
(attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that President of the
Board published) CentraltCo Contra C sta
Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa,
State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
s/s Elaige R. Boehme
Secretary of the
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa,
State of California
Approved as to Form:
s/s Kenton L Alm
District Counsel
Legal CCT 5848
Publish June 6, 2006
Page 2 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING PUBLICATION OF
A SUMMARY OF DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. 240 (UNCODIFIED)
ESTABLISHING REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTIES
THAT DIRECTLY CONNECT TO JOB 5738 (SOUTH AVENUE, ALAMO)
STANDARD SEWER FACILITIES
WHEREAS, Section 6490 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of
California provides that District ordinances shall be published once in a newspaper of
general circulation within the District, and provides that an Order of the Board of
Directors of the District to the effect that the Ordinance has been published shall
constitute conclusive evidence that publication has been properly made.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District as follows:
THAT a summary of District Ordinance No. 240 (Uncodified) which was adopted
on May 18, 2006, and which Establishes Reimbursement Fee Applicable to Properties
that Directly Connect to Job 5738 (South Avenue, Alamo) Standard Sewer Facilities,
has been properly published once since its adoption in a newspaper of general
circulation within Contra Costa County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board of
Directors this 6th day of July, 2006 by the following vote:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
Members:
ABSENT:
Members:
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra
Costa, State of California
Approved as to Form:
President of the Board of Directors,
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Kenton L. Alm
District Counsel
Page 3 of 3
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
No.: 5.a. BIDS AND AWARDS
Type of Action: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT /AUTHORIZE EXECUTION
OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO KJ WOODS
CONSTRUCTION, THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FOR THE NORTH
ORINDA SEWER RENOVATIONS, PHASE 2, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5833
Submitted By: Initiating DeptdDiv.:
Dana Lawson, Associate Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
D.A 6k") 4�- ( Lawson A. Me etsky cki A. rrell Aharles
General
ISSUE: On June 27, 2006, three sealed bids were received and opened for the
construction of the North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 2, District Project
No. 5833. The Board of Directors must award the contract or reject bids within 50 days
of the bid opening.
RECOMMENDATION: Award a construction contract and authorize the General
Manager to execute the Contract Documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $3,567,000, including design, bid price,
contingency, and construction management.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject all bids, which is not recommended.
BACKGROUND: The District's over 1,500 -mile collection system has pipe segments
that range in age from new to over 100 years. Some of the pipe segments are at or
near the end of their useful life as evidenced by their need for frequent maintenance,
high rate of infiltration, and /or threat of structural collapse. More than 300 miles of the
small- diameter sewers in the collection system were constructed prior to 1956. The
methods and materials of construction used at that time have not performed well, and
they are currently the source of over 90 percent of the dry- weather collection system
overflows.
In 1991, the District implemented a sewer renovation program. Since that time, an
annual allowance for this program has been included in the Capital Improvement
Budget and Plan. The Collection System Renovation Program is an ongoing series of
projects. Candidate sewer line segments are identified, evaluated, and placed on a
priority list for replacement/renovation. Collection System Operations Division and
Engineering Department staff identify the candidate sewer lines.
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \July \DP5833 Award Position Paper.doc Page 1 of 5
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
Subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO KJ WOODS
CONSTRUCTION, THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FOR THE NORTH
ORINDA SEWER RENOVATIONS, PHASE 2, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5833
The North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 2, Project will renovate or replace
approximately 10,500 linear feet of 6 -, 8 -, 10 -, 12 -, and 18 -inch sewer lines in twenty
(20) locations and spot repairs in fifteen (15) locations within easements and the City of
Orinda (see Attachment 1 for map), which will involve close cooperation with customers
for site access and restoration.
District staff prepared the plans and specifications for the project. The Engineer's
estimate for construction of North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 2, is $2,300,000.
This project was advertised on June 10 and 17. Three sealed bids ranging from
$2,484,000 to $2,693,666 were received and publicly opened on June 27. The
Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial review of the bids and
determined that KJ Woods is the lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of
$2,484,000. A summary of bids received is shown in Attachment 2.
The District will administer the construction contract and will provide contract
administration, inspection, survey, office engineering, and submittal review. The funds
required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 3, are $3,131,000. The total
cost of North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 2, is anticipated to be $3,567,000.
This project is included in the fiscal year 2006 -2007 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)
on pages CS -34 to CS -35. Staff has conducted a cash flow analysis of the Sewer
Construction Fund and concluded that adequate funds are available for this project.
At its October 20, 2005 meeting, the CCCSD Board of Directors independently found
that this project is exempt from the California Quality Act (CEQA) under CCCSD CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301 since it involves only alterations to existing sewer facilities
with negligible or no expansion of capacity. A Notice of Exemption has been filed with
the County Clerk.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Award a construction contract in the amount of
$2,484,000 for the construction of the North Orinda Sewer Renovations, Phase 2,
District Project No. 5833, to KJ Woods Construction, the lowest responsive bidder, and
authorize the General Manager to execute the Contract Documents.
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \July \DP5833 Award Position Paper.doc Page 2 of 5
Central Contra Costa Drawing No.
Sanitary District NORTH ORINDA SEWER RENOVATION
PHASE 2
40c) CCCSD DP 5833
Paae 3 of 5
File: 5833.8.3
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
SUMMARY OF BIDS
PROJECT NO. 15833 DATE: JUNE 27, 2006
PROJECT NAME: NORTH ORINDA SEWER RENOVATIONS, PHASE 2
LOCATION: MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER EST.: $2,300,000
No
BIDDER
BID PRICE
Name and address
1
KJ Woods Construction
$2,484,000
2625 Judah Street, Unit 2
San Francisco, CA 94122
415- 759 -0506
2
McNamara & Smallman Construction, Inc.
$2,529,140
1756 Holmes Street
Livermore, CA 94550
925 - 606 -7190
3
J. Howard Engineering, Inc.
$2,693,666
1325 Howard Avenue #265
Burlingame, CA 94010 -4212
650- 375 -8314
BIDS OPENED BY /s/ Elaine Boehme DATE June 27. 2006 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Design\District Projects \5833 \Bid Summary.doc
Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT 3
NORTH ORINDA SEWER RENOVATIONS, PHASE 2
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5833
POST -BID / PRE - CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers \2006 \July \DP5833 Award Position Paper.doc Page 5 of 5
Percent of Estimated
No.
Item Description
Amount
Construction Cost
1
CONSTRUCTION
a. Construction Contract
$2,484,000
b. Contingency at 15%
$373,000
c. Permits
$5,000
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$2,862,000
100%
2
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
a. District Forces
- Construction Inspection
$ 175,000
- Construction Management
$ 60,000
- Design Engineer
$ 5,000
- Public Relations
$ 25,000
- Record Drawings
$ 5,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 270,000
9%
b. Consultants
- Construction Support Services - Arborist
$5,000
- Construction Support Services - Materials Testing
$20,000
SUBTOTAL
$25,000
1%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
$295,000
10%
3
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE COST
$3,157,000
110%
4
TOTAL PREBID EXPENDITURES
$410,000
14%
5
TOTAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COST
$705,000
25%
6
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$3,567,000
125%
7
FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE
$436,000
8
ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION NEEDED TO COMPLETE PROJECT
$3,131,000
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers \2006 \July \DP5833 Award Position Paper.doc Page 5 of 5
Overview
• Scope of Project
• Project Location
• Photographs
• Bid Results
• Construction Schedule
1
Scope of Project
• 20 sites plus 15 spot repairs
• 10,500 feet
—60% Easements
—40% Roadways
• Coordination with
— Homeowners
— City of Orinda
— CalTrans (Brookwood site)
►a
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District NORTH ORINDA SEWER RENOVATION
Ara PHASE 2
CCCSD DP 5833
Drawing No.
VN
�a y
' � $4' kid 2�chL. -t,•, r {�'+4�'`
,' 7 a ! J a %' ¢`< (� d✓
k
c'
.r.
�h" fw i
wmp
I Not
y F
�..
� '� �� ,gym✓ �" �3Y �" ,r
}
p♦ i- P2 l`N'
v
r s ia, 9 rP4r
t' 1
hW F
33
11j
}
p♦ i- P2 l`N'
v
r s ia, 9 rP4r
t' 1
hW F
Bid Results
• Engineer's Estimate: $2,300,000
• Advertised: June 10 and 17
• Bids Opened: June 27
• 3 Bids Received:
1. KJ Woods Construction Inc. $2,484,000
2. McNamara & Smallman $2,529,140
3. J Howard Engineering $2,693,666
Construction Schedule
Start: Late July 2006
Complete: February 2007
2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
No.: 5.b. BIDS AND AWARDS
Type of Action: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT /AUTHORIZE EXECUTION
OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
Subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO MOUNTAIN
CASCADE, THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FOR THE ALHAMBRA VALLEY
TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5919
Submitted By: Initiating DeptJDiv.:
Alex Rozul, Associate Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
i
N. Molina z L A. Farr II
General
ISSUE: On June 20, 2006, sealed bids were received and opened for the construction
of the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, District Project No. 5919. The Board of
Directors must award the contract or reject bids within 50 days of the bid opening.
RECOMMENDATION: Award a construction contract and authorize the General
Manager to execute the Contract Documents.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $2,543,000 including design, bid price,
contingency, and construction management for Phase 1. Design, construction, and
construction management for Phase 2 are estimated at $1,475,000, bringing the
estimated total project costs for Phases 1 and 2 to $4,018,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject all bids, and bid both phases of the
project next year as one project, which is not recommended.
BACKGROUND: Alhambra Valley is an unincorporated, rural residential area south
and west of the City of Martinez. There are about 200 residentially developed parcels
using septic systems, as well as the potential for limited, low- density residential
development if sewer service were available. Land developers have expressed an
interest in receiving sewer service, as well as current residents who are experiencing
septic system failures.
In October 2003, a Facilities Plan for Wastewater Utility Service to Alhambra Valley was
completed. This report reviewed the governmental, engineering, and financial aspects
of potential sewer facilities to the unincorporated Alhambra Valley area. The Alhambra
Valley Trunk Sewer project resulted from this Facilities Plan. Preliminary planning
estimates of the total project costs for this project were $2.4 million. Over the past
several months a significant rise in construction costs and several necessary design
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Pape rs \2006 \July \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 1 of 6
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
Subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO MOUNTAIN
CASCADE, THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FOR THE ALHAMBRA VALLEY
TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5919
changes have resulted in a revised total project cost estimate of approximately $4
million. As residents hook up to the trunk sewer, they will pay the actual costs incurred
for the project.
The Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer project has been broken down into two phases.
Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, will install approximately 3,300 feet of 10 -inch
and 12 -inch PVC pipe by open -cut method, sewer laterals, manholes, and pipe
stub -outs for future users along the trunk line. The work in Phase 1 will be along
Alhambra Valley Road between Gilbert Lane and Sheridan Lane and between Wanda
Way and Reliez Valley Road. In addition, there will be work along portions of Sheridan
Lane and Strentzel Lane (see Attachment 1 for map). Phase 2 will install 10- and
12 -inch pipe in Wanda Way and across Alhambra Creek and the National Park Service
site. Phase 2 will be bid and constructed in 2007.
District staff prepared the plans and specifications for the project. The Engineer's
estimate for construction of Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, is $1,476,000.
The Engineer's estimate was recently increased to reflect the current bid climate and
design changes. Staff will present a detailed explanation of the cost increases at the
Board meeting. This project was advertised on May 31 and June 5, 2006. Three (3)
sealed bids ranging from $1,554,280 to $2,025,046 were received and publicly opened
on June 20, 2006. The Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial
review of the bids and determined that Mountain Cascade is the lowest responsive
bidder with a bid amount of $1,554,280. A summary of bids received is shown in
Attachment 2.
The District will administer the construction contract and will provide contract
administration, inspection, survey, office engineering, and submittal review. The funds
required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 3, are $1,963,000. The total
cost of Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, is anticipated to be $2,543,000. The
cost for design, construction, and construction management for Phase 2 is estimated at
$1,475,000, bringing the estimated total project costs for Phases 1 and 2 to
$4,018,000.
This project is included in the fiscal year 2005 -2006 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)
on pages CS60 through CS62. Staff has determined that there are adequate funds in
the Capital Improvement Budget and Plan for this project.
At its September 1, 2005 meeting, the District Board of Directors approved the
Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer Project. Subsequently, a Notice of Determination was
filed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \Ju1y \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 2 of 6
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO MOUNTAIN
CASCADE, THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, FOR THE ALHAMBRA VALLEY
TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5919
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Award a construction contract in the amount of
$1,554,280 for the construction of the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, District
Project No. 5919, to Mountain Cascade, the lowest responsive bidder, and authorize
the General Manager to execute the Contract Documents.
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \Ju1y \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 3 of 6
-
..............: .
........ ...
:.
....
..:.3:
is :.
.. ,
:r' C
L.. ..........
......................
1
.-4`` _ ?.� ..
..........
If
..... .........................
....
RE1.IEt
��.......
\
...............
.........:::... ::,v..
...
I� '
... ,. 1�'..
....
....w
::...... _.
LEGEND:
:i
:.... ...... ..:.......: ........:.
TRUNK SEWER :PHASE 1 '.
E
TRUNK SEWER PHASE 2
n
o+
0
800
1600
N
FEET
O
Y
Central Contra Costa
Attachment
Sanitary District
ALHAMBRA VALLEY TRUNK SEWER
N
'
CCCSD DP 5919
1
N
Page 4 of 6
ATTACHMENT 2
ALHAMBRA VALLEY TRUNK SEWER, PHASE
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5919
SUMMARY OF BIDS
Project No.: 5919 Date: June 20, 2006
Project Name: Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1
Location: Martinez, CA Engineer's Est.: $1,476,000
No
BIDDER
BID PRICE
(Name & address)
KJ Woods Construction
1
2625 Judah Street, No. 2
$1,648,000
San Francisco, CA 94122
JMB Construction
2
132 South Maple Avenue
$2,025,046
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Mountain Cascade
3
555 Exchange Court
$1,554,280
Livermore, CA 94550
4
5
6
BIDS OPENED BY Jim Warrington DATE June 20, 2006 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers \2006 \July \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 5 of 6
ATTACHMENT 3
ALHAMBRA VALLEY TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5919
POST -BID / PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \Ju1y \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 6 of 6
Percent of Estimated
No.
Item Description
Amount
Construction Cost
1
CONSTRUCTION
a. Construction Contract
$1,554,280
b. Contingency at 15%
$235,720
c. Permits
$10,000
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$1,800,000
100%
2
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
a. District Forces
- Contract Administration /Design
$50,000
3%
- Construction Inspection
$100,000
6%
- Survey
$10,000
1%
- Public Relations
$15,000
1%
- Record Drawings
$2,000
0%
SUBTOTAL
$177,000
10%
b. Consultants
- Construction Support Services - Arborist
$2,000
0%
- Construction Support Services - Geotechnical
$4,000
0%
- Construction Support Services - Materials Testing
$10,000
1%
SUBTOTAL
$16,000
1%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
$193,000
11%
3
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE COST
$1,993,000
111%
4
TOTAL PREBID EXPENDITURES
- Right of Way*
$205,000
11%
- Design **
$345,000
19%
SUBTOTAL
$550,000
31%
5
TOTAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COST
$2,543,000
141%
6
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$2,543,000
141%
7
FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE
$580,000
8
ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION NEEDED TO COMPLETE
$1,963,000
CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 1 PROJECT
*Costs due to Complications with National Park Service and the acquisition of Right of Way
* *Costs includes 75% completion of design for Phase 2
N: \PESUP \Cbradley \Position Papers\2006 \Ju1y \DP5919 Award Contract PP.doc Page 6 of 6
,57
Overview
• Project Description
• Bid Results
• Cost Analysis
• Construction Schedule
• Annexation process
• Recommendations
Scope of Project
• Project split into two phases
• Phase 1
— 3200 Feet of 10 -12 Inch Trunk Sewer
—31 Lateral Extensions
• Phase 2
—2800 Feet of 10 -12 Inch Trunk Sewer
—36 Lateral Extensions
—Crossing of Alhambra Creek (Siphon)
2
4.
{J.
+� ra w w� •
Ir
AUMIUM VALLOW 1RIIIM alYY01
03C DF MIS
��
Scope of Project
• Project split into two phases
• Phase 1
— 3200 Feet of 10 -12 Inch Trunk Sewer
—31 Lateral Extensions
• Phase 2
—2800 Feet of 10 -12 Inch Trunk Sewer
—36 Lateral Extensions
—Crossing of Alhambra Creek (Siphon)
2
Bid Results
Revised Estimate $1,476,000
Mountain Cascade $1,554,280
KJ Woods Construction $1,648,000
JMB Construction $2,025,046
Cost Analysis
Phase 1 Total Project Cost $2,543,000
Phase 2 Total Project Cost $1,475,000
(estimated)
Total Project Cost $4,018,000
Planning Level Total $2,400,000
Project Cost
Cost Increase $1,618,000
3
Cost Analysis Variances
• Bid Climate (20 -40 %)
+$500,000- 1,000,000
• Aerial vs. Siphon Creek Crossing
+$250,000
• Lateral Extensions
• Right of Way /NEPA/Legal Costs
• Phasing of Project
+$310,000
+$250,000
+$225,000
$1,535,000 — 2,035,000
Future Economic Considerations
+ Continued High Oil Prices
• High Global Demand for Raw Materials
• High Demand for Pipeline Contractors
• New Regulations (SSMP) Will Increase
Demand for Pipeline Contractors
• Avoid Sewer Installation Under Storm Drain
and Road Resurfacing
- Consolidate Phases
-Bid Earlier in the Construction Season
- Rising Interest Rates May Reduce Funds
Available for Construction Projects
4
Homeowner Sewer Costs
For $2,400,000 Project
$26,000 to $32,000 per home
• For $4,000,000 Project
$30,000 to $60,000 per home
Construction Schedule
Phase 1 Trunk Sewer
Start: Mid July 2006
Complete: End of October 2006
5
Annexation Process
• CCCSD Board requests LAFCO to
begin annexation
• LAFCO conducts hearing &
considers annexation
• After LAFCO approval, request
approval by Stat
• Request is for 745 properties on
412 acres W11)
• Proposed annexation will reduce cost
by $200 per parcel
Recommendations
Adopt a resolution to begin annexation
Award Construction Contract for
Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer, Phase 1
to Mountain Cascade
M
Questions?
Item 6.a.1)
Item No. 6.a.1)
James M. Kelly
Board Meeting
July 6, 2006
MERCURY TMDL BACKGROUND
• Mercury TMDL Adopted By San Francisco Bay Water
Board in September 2004
• Considered by State Water Board and Remanded to
Water Board for Revisions in September 2005
— U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
— NGOs
• Water Board Announced Proposed Revisions on
January 31, 2006
• Water Board Held a Workshop Last Month
REMAND
• Much of Remand Directed at Treatment Plants
— Allocations Must Reflect Effective Pollution Prevention (P2)
— Require POTWs to Monitor for Methyl Mercury
— Allocations Must Reflect Effective Treatment
— Have Individual Allocations for Dischargers
— Directed State Board to Develop a Trading Program
2
ALLOCATIONS MUST REFLECT
EFFECTIVE P2
• Require Wastewater Dischargers to Implement P2 Measures for
Mercury
• Water Board Expects Benefit to be a 20- Percent Load
Reduction; This Will be in the TMDL
ALLOCATIONS MUST REFLECT EFFECTIVE
TREATMENT & HAVE INDIVIDUAL
ALLOCATIONS FOR DISCHARGERS
• Addressed by Reducing the Allowed Discharge by 20 Percent
in the First 10 Years and Another 20 Percent in the Next 10
Years
• Changing the Trigger for Investigating the Cause of Higher -
than- Average Mercury from Mass And Concentration to Mass
Or Concentration
• Enforce Only if Aggregate of POTWs' Emissions Exceed Their
Allocated Mass Emission
DIRECT STATE BOARD TO DEVELOP A
TRADING PROGRAM
• Under Development by the State
• Most Agencies Cannot Meet a 40- Percent Reduction
Without a Trading Offset Program
n
COMMENTERS
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
• BayKeeper, Clean Water Action, and Natural Resources
Defense Council
• Dischargers:
- BACWA
- EBMUD
- San Jose
- Sunnyvale
• Water Board Members
- WSPA
- BASMAA
- Santa Clara County
WATER BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
• Member Gary Wolfe, now on State Water Board
• Suggested Numerical Limits for Storm Water Agencies
• Suggested Enforceable Individual Limits for Wastewater
Agencies
• Unclear if He Can Vote on Issue at State Board
• Meeting with Regional Water Board Staff Regarding How to
Address His Comments
5
IMPACT ON CCCSD
• Should Meet the Initial Mass Limit
• Expect to Exceed the Concentration Limit
• Do Not Expect to Meet Future Requirements by Pollution
Prevention Alone
• Require Furnace Scrubber Water Treatment in 4 to 5 years
• Some Additional Scrubber Water Treatment Requirements Will
be Promulgated by the U. S. EPA in 2010 in Any Case
CCCSD MASS LIMIT VS.
CURRENT PERFORMANCE
• Mass Limit
Present — 2017 2.28 kg /year
2017-2027 1.8 kg /year
20274 1.3 kg /year
• Mass Discharge
2004 1.6 kg /year
2005 2.0 kg /year
G
NEXT STEPS
• Regional Water Board to Consider the TMDL at its August
Board Meeting
• State Water Board to Consider in 2007
• U. S. Environmental Protection Agency to Consider 2007 - 2008
• For CCCSD
— Continue to Implement Pollution Prevention
— Implement Scrubber Water Treatment Project
— Negotiate for an Interim Limit for Mercury Concentration in
the Next NPDES Permit
— Continue to Pursue a Mercury Offset for our Household
Hazardous Waste Collection Facility
7
Item 6.a.2
Tom Godsey, Associate Engineer
July 6, 2006
7/6/2006 CCCSD
December 2005, Northern California, largest
24 hour rainfall totals since 1997 EI Nino
Four inches rain recorded at plant on
December 31, 2005
-. 13 sites identified with new or worsened
slides
7/6/2006 CCCSD 2
L
e G
JU6-,.O Cil-t -L-AA.IL
* Zander Drive, Orinda
* Evergreen Court, Orinda
a Lower Orinda Pump
Station, Orinda
* La Encinal, Orinda
* Moraga Way, Orinda
Haciendas Dr, Orinda
Happy Valley Creek,
Lafayette
Los Arabis Dr, Lafayette
Pleasant Hill Road,
Lafayette
Ridge Road, Lafayette
Civic Park Bridge
Crossing, Walnut
Creek
Palmetto Dunes,
Danville
La Waterbird Way,
Martinez
7/6/2006 CCCSD 3
ARQIJit$ y WP
N/C 680
OqN� pN v 0 p
Of •
24
I Y. •
BLVD
Y
M
� r
O v
OYD RD
Y RD
680 / <y
!
F,y!
O
�p N?�--ONE
q��FY
Central Contra Costa
sanitary District CCCSD 2006 Storm Damage LEGEND
Site Locations • Storm Damage Site
7/6/2006 CCCSD 5
MH #1
Expansion Cracked and Tilted
Support Pipe Bridge Foundation J10 r
6" CLMCSP SS
6" VCP SS
w 12'
L. ,"
-a2 -3'
IF
6" CLMCSP SS
CREEK
Missing
Pipe Bridge
Foundation
6" C LF
ve
P
---- 16' 30' -- a 17'
SKETCHES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY - NOT TO SCALE.
Site Photos - Haciendas Dr, Orinda
r
C
YS
s JL
r
.a-At
7/6/2006 CCCSD 7
PIPE BRIDGE PROFILE
SOUTH GROUND
CREEK SURFACE NORTH
BANK CREEK
BANK
i
15- VCP SS 15" CLSP SS
nim
15" VCP SS
as 12'
%'3 -4'
CREEK
50'
PIPE BRIDGE
FOUNDATION (TYF
F
at;'7
Temporary stabilization complete
m Site assessments of all 13 sites
complete — action plan ready for most
sites
m Eight Sites to be repaired this year
7/6/2006 CCCSD 9
Site Name
Estimated District Cost
Action
Evergreen Dr., Orinda
$25,000
Design, Bid, Build
Haciendas Dr, Orinda
$125,000
Design, Bid, Build
Los Arabis, Lafayette
$100,000
Design, Bid, Build
Waterbird Way, Martinez
$20,000
Design, Bid, Build
Lower Orinda PLIMP Sta., Orinda
$50,000
Design, Bid, Build
Moraga Way, Orinda
$0 1
Already fixed
7/6/2006 CCCSD 10
46-
Site Name
Estimated District Cost
Action
Palmetto Dunes Lane, Alamo
$?
Negotiate w/HOA
$25,000
$25,000
$0
1
7/6/2006 CCCSD
..4 - J-
7/6/2006 CCCSD 12
6.b.2)
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Legal Services Update
July 6, 2006
Litigation
o Suzanne Brown Lawsuit — settled
o Merani Lawsuit — settled
o Dickerson Lawsuit — settled
• Strentzel Lane Condemnation — (Alhambra Valley Phase II)
■ Order of possession obtained
• No new lawsuits pending
Claims
o Lower Orinda Pump Station Project— Claim from Contractor pending
• Real Property
• Conco Access Agreements — Pending
• Finalization of Contra Costa Topsoil Lease — Pending Conco Resolution
Code Revision — Ongoing
• Title 1 — General Provisions — Revisions completed
• Title 2 — Administration — Revisions completed
• Title 5 — Permits and Licenses — Revisions completed
• Title 6 — Fees and Charges
• Annexation Charges
• Capacity Fee Program
• Reimbursement Fees
• Sewer Services Charges
• Industrial Permit Fees
• Operation & Maintenance Fees (Permit Counter and Developer Fees)
• Recycled Water Fees
• HHW — Commercial User Fees
• Revisions Completed
• Title 10 — Source Control July /August
• Title 9 — Sewers September
• Title 11 — Recycled Water October
• To Board — Late 2006 or Early 2007
• Other Items — Projected Activities
o NPDES Permit Revision
• SSO WDR Compliance
• Alhambra Valley Financing Issues
8428740
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
I BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 7.a. ADMINISTRATIVE
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. (MIG) FOR PROFESSIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES TO ASSIST IN COMPLETING AN AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF - EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Randall Musgraves, Director of Administration
Administration
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
\ tN
Elaine Boehme Rap6aloGsgraves Kenton Alm
Charles W. Batt ,
General Manage
ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager to
execute an Operations and Maintenance (O &M) Fund professional services agreement
in an amount greater than $25,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a professional
consulting services agreement with Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) with a cost
ceiling of $40,000 to assist the District in completing an Americans With Disabilities Act
(ADA) Self- Evaluation and Transition Plan Update.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The cost of the Self- Evaluation and Transition Plan Update will
be approximately $40,000 including conducting meetings to solicit public input. Legal
review will be provided by Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy, LLP under the
existing contract. Any required structural modifications to District facilities identified by
the consultants will be constructed under a separate capital project.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: An alternative would be to hire a different
consultant. MIG is associated with Mr. Kim R. Blackseth, Interests, Inc to ensure
compliance and acceptance within disabled community. The District is required by law
to perform and update an ADA Self- Evaluation and implement the Transition Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted July 26, 1990 to prohibit
discrimination and ensures equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in
employment, State and local government services, public accommodations,
commercial facilities, and transportation. Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act
(ADA) requires public entities to provide services, programs and activities appropriate
to accommodate the needs of individuals with disabilities in public facilities. Public
Page 1 of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. (MIG) FOR PROFESSIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES TO ASSIST IN COMPLETING AN AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF - EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE
entities must make reasonable modifications to policies, procedures and practices to
avoid discrimination based on disability. Agencies are not, however, required to make
changes that would fundamentally alter the nature of those services.
The District must conduct a Self- Evaluation and develop a Transition Plan to determine
the extent of changes necessary for ADA compliance in public areas. The Self
Evaluation and Transition Plan will specifically address public access to District
facilities and meeting rooms. While District facilities were designed for handicapped
access, they need to be evaluated to ensure compliance under the current regulations.
MIG in association with Mr. Kim R. Blackseth from Interests Inc., will review and
evaluate District policies, conduct facility evaluations, facilitate public meetings to
solicit input from individuals with disabilities, prepare the self - evaluation and develop
the transition plan. An attorney from Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy, LLP,
the District labor law firm, will review the policies and plans to ensure legal compliance.
MIG specializes in the evaluation, planning, and design of environments for people with
special needs. They have worked extensively with citizen groups, and public and
private agencies throughout the U.S. for twenty years to integrate people with and
without disabilities into typical lifestyle activities.
The final self - evaluation and transition plan will be presented for Board review by the
end of this calendar year. A capital project will be initiated to construct or modify any
District facilities needed to comply with ADA requirements for public access.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a
professional consulting services agreement with Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG)
in association with Kim R. Blackseth, Interests Inc. with a cost ceiling of $40,000 to
assist the District in completing an Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -
Evaluation and Transition Plan Update.
Page 2 of 2
=S
'iamb,
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 7.b. ADMINISTRATIVE
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE CONTRACT
subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JANITORIAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES
Submitted By:
James M. Warrington,
Purchasing and Materials Manager
Initiating Dept. /Div.: Admin /Purchasing and
Materials Svcs.
AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
Warrington
harles Ws
General Manager
ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager to enter into
annual contracts that could obligate the District to expenditures greater than $50,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a janitorial services
contract with Universal Building Services for one year. The contract will contain options to
extend the contract for one year for an additional four (4) one -year periods.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The total estimated cost of this 1 -year contract is $ 92,544. This
does not include the cost of janitorial supplies drawn out of stores for the contractor's use.
The current cost of supplies is approximately $ 22,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Alternatives to executing this contract with
Universal Building Services include 1) Awarding a different contract, or rebid the service; 2)
Extend the existing contract and 3) Hiring additional District staff to perform janitorial duties.
BACKGROUND: Janitorial services are provided for District facilities both in Walnut Creek
and Martinez. In 2000, the District awarded a contract to Enterprise Maintenance for these
janitorial services. The existing contract with Enterprise Maintenance ends on August 31,
2006. For fiscal year 2005/2006 the District have spent approximately $149,528 for janitorial
services and supplies.
A formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process was begun in May 2006. Prior to beginning
the process, purchasing staff met with major stakeholders representing both the Martinez
and Walnut Creek locations. Information gathered from these meetings was used to
prepare the proposal bid documents. The original scope of the required janitorial work was
clarified, tasks defined, and procedures established.
Page 1 of 2
CADOCUME- 1 \RMUSGR -1 \LOCALS -1 \Temp \Janitorial Services Pos Paper .doc
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JANITORIAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES
The RFP announcement was published in the Contra Costa Times on May 2nd and May 9th
2006. Four (4) vendors attended the pre - proposal bid conference. Two (2) vendors
submitted proposals for the janitorial work.
An evaluation of the proposals was conducted by purchasing staff and representatives of
Collection System Operations Division and Plant Operations Division Building & Grounds
Section. This evaluation was based on several criteria, including knowledge /expertise of the
service provider, reference checks, pricing, site visits, and the general reputation of the
vendor. Based on this evaluation, staff concluded that Universal Building Services met
District requirements at the lowest cost. The service fee proposed by each contractor was:
Universal Building Services $ 7,712/mo. $ 92,544/year
Enterprise Maintenance $13,800/mo. $165,600 /year
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a
Janitorial Services Agreement with Universal Building Services for one year with options
to extend for an additional four (4) one -year periods. Future year options would be
exercised only after staff review and determination that it would be in the District's best
interest based upon service delivery and cost.
Page 2 of 2
C:\DOCUME- 1 \RMUSGR -1 \LOCALS- 1 \Temp\Janitorial Services Pos Paper_ doc
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No -: 8.a. ENGINEERING
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION TO INITIATE FORMAL LAFCO
PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX ONE ANNEXATION PARCEL COMPRISING 205
SEPARATE PROPERTIES (DISTRICT ANNEXATION 168)
Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div.:
Michael Penny, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
1A1 . po'� — M/1--. 4
M. y . S anson A. Farrell K. Alm Char
Gen
ISSUE: A Board of Directors' Resolution of Application is required to initiate formal
Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCO) annexation proceedings.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution of Application to initiate formal LAFCO
proceedings for District Annexation 168 (see Attachment 1).
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The District pays fees to LAFCO and the State Board of
Equalization for annexation processing. Annexation costs are recovered as "annexation
charges" when property is connected to the public sewer system.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could decline to initiate annexation
for this area. Such an action would require that property owners apply directly to LAFCO
for annexation to the District.
BACKGROUND: Security Owner's Corporation, owners of 16 acres in the Alhambra
Valley submitted a petition to annex their property to the District. To serve this parcel
the District will be constructing the Alhambra Valley Trunk sewer. Staff is requesting
that all other parcels that can directly connect to the new trunk sewer or connect to main
sewer extensions from the trunk sewer be included in the annexation to prevent
piecemeal annexations of the area. LAFCO staff has indicated that additional un-
annexed properties may be included in proposed Annexation Parcels to eliminate
islands or straighten boundary lines even where no petition has been filed. All of the
properties that staff is requesting be annexed are listed in Attachment 2. The location of
the annexation is shown on the attached map.
On June 21, 2006, District staff sent letters (Attachment 3) to the owners of properties in
the Alhambra Valley, which would be tributary to the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer,
informing them of the current construction schedule and the need to have their property
annexed to the District prior to being able to connect to the sewer. A petition for
annexation was included with the letters along with a request to complete and return the
WENVRSEC \Position Papers \Penny\2006\Annexation 168 PP 7- 6- 06.doc Page 1 Of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject. ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION TO INITIATE FORMAL LAFCO
PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX ONE ANNEXATION PARCEL COMPRISING 205
SEPARATE PROPERTIES (DISTRICT ANNEXATION 168)
petition. On June 29, 2006, staff sent letters (Attachment 4) to these same property
owners informing them about the July 6th Board meeting and the consideration by the
Board of adopting a Resolution of Application to initiate formal LAFCO proceedings to
annex their properties. LAFCO will hold a public hearing to consider annexation of
District Annexation 168.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a Resolution of Application to initiate
formal LAFCO proceedings for District Annexation 168.
Page 2 of 2
NAENVRSEMPosition PapersTenny\20MAnnexation 168 PP 7- 6- 06.doc
CCCSD ANNEXATION LOCATION
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
Attachment
CCCSD ANNEXATION NO. 168 1 MAP
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 —
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA
SANITARY DISTRICT REQUESTING THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR A
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION (DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 168)
WHEREAS, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) wishes to
initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000 for a change of organization; and
WHEREAS, this resolution of application for annexation shall be submitted to the
Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) who will conduct a
public hearing and will notify all affected property owners inside the proposed
annexation. LAFCO will also furnish to CCCSD a list of registered voters residing within
300 feet of each proposed annexation. Upon receipt of the list of registered voters,
CCCSD will complete a notification mailing and submit proof of mailing to LAFCO; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed change of organization are that: 1)
Contra Costa County has approved subdivision of a 16 acre property into 23 residential
lots, subject to the Environmental Impact Report filed October 28, 2004 with Contra
Costa County, and has required annexation to CCCSD as a condition of its approval,
and the property owner has completed a Petition for Annexation; 2) all the properties
are within the CCCSD Sphere of Influence (SOI), as previously approved by LAFCO; 3)
the area has been planned for residential use by Contra Costa County; 4) the density
and proximity of this use to Alhambra Creek, in the long term, will necessitate sewer
service as septic systems fail over time; 5) CCCSD has sufficient collection, treatment,
and disposal capacity; 6) CCCSD has the nearest, existing collection facilities, at the
northern edge of Alhambra Valley; 7) wastewater from Alhambra Valley can flow by
gravity to CCCSD's existing collection system; 8) CCCSD will assume responsibility,
upon annexation, for the continued maintenance and operation of the public sewage
facilities; 9) CCCSD requires that all served properties annex to the CCCSD (CCCSD
Standard Specifications Section 3 -07); 10) two hundred and forty five properties have
been included as "fill -in" parcels to streamline staff work and avoid the creation of new
islands inside CCCSD boundaries; 11) no other sewering agency can logically serve
these areas; and
WHEREAS, extensive development has already taken place in Alhambra Valley,
and there is additional development potential allowed by the Alhambra Valley Specific
Plan; and
WHEREAS, this annexation consists of one annexation parcel adjacent to the
existing CCCSD boundary, as shown on Exhibit A (map), pages 1 to 4, attached hereto
and by this reference incorporated herein, for a total of 412 acres; and
WHEREAS, the only affected county is Contra Costa, in the unincorporated area
generally known as Martinez, and no other sanitary districts are involved; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed to CCCSD is inhabited (12 or
more registered voters); and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is subject to the provisions of the CCCSD
Code, and if the annexation is approved, all of the provisions of said Code would
become applicable to the properties annexed. Annexation charges will be collected at
the time of connection to the public sewer system; and
WHEREAS, staff has concluded that the environmental effects of annexing the
parcels included in this application were addressed in Contra Costa County's 2004
Alhambra Valley Estates EIR, along with its 2005 addendum prepared by CCCSD and
used for approval of the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer Project. A Notice of
Determination for the trunk sewer approval was filed with the Contra Costa County
Clerk on September 2, 2005.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) as follows:
THAT adoption of this resolution
will establish the
Board of
Directors'
independent finding that the environmental
effects of annexing
the parcels
shown in
Exhibit 1 have been addressed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
THAT the Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby
requested to initiate proceedings for the change of organization as authorized and in the
manner provided by the Cortese- Knox - Hertzberg Reorganization Act of 2000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July 2006, by the Board of Directors of
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
COUNTERSIGNED:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Secretary of Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa
State of California
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa
State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenton L. Alm
District Counsel
/
\
I I
H
N
a
LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
113
1989
f , /� / \� \� /\
DATE - PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
- EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
MMWM - PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Q
DISCLAIMER:
FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS
DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN
THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT
BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER
FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
* POC: Mt. Diablo Base & Meridian
"Principal Point"
CCS 83 Zone 3 Coordinates:
X: 6,153,547.81
Y: 2,146,592.22
EXHIBIT A PG. 1
ANNEXATION 168
cENR1AL CONTRA COSTA SANRARY DISTRICT
5018 IMHOFF PUCE
MARTINEZ. G 945539
ww 2269600
PARCEL NO.. 1 412 _ ACRES
DRAWN BY! M. ww CHECKED: MJP
DATE: 0"179! ___
0
0 a
E
FEET
o°
0
E
Y
0
0
/
\
I I
H
N
a
LOCATION MAP
N.T.S.
113
1989
f , /� / \� \� /\
DATE - PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
- EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
MMWM - PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Q
DISCLAIMER:
FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS
DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN
THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT
BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER
FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
* POC: Mt. Diablo Base & Meridian
"Principal Point"
CCS 83 Zone 3 Coordinates:
X: 6,153,547.81
Y: 2,146,592.22
EXHIBIT A PG. 1
ANNEXATION 168
cENR1AL CONTRA COSTA SANRARY DISTRICT
5018 IMHOFF PUCE
MARTINEZ. G 945539
ww 2269600
PARCEL NO.. 1 412 _ ACRES
DRAWN BY! M. ww CHECKED: MJP
DATE: 0"179! ___
E
0
0
0
� tb
4 \ \
i
24
AVE �L
SITE
°EOpO tP'� LOCATION MAP
Jii l N.T.S.
113 \ \
1989
DLAIMER:
1 I _ _ _ _ FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS
N DI�SCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL
AOSPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN
I QQ THE SUBDMSION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT
_ — Be USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER
r _ FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
0 400 90o
/ " POC: Mt. Diablo Base & Meridian
FEET
"Principal Point"
CCS 83 Zone 3 Coordinates:
X: 6,153,547.81
Y: 2,146,592.22
No.
DATE PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
• EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
MMM PROPOSED ANNEXATION
i _ MAUen -1
EXHIBIT A PG.2
ANNEXATION 168
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANRARY DISTRICT
5M SAHOFF PLACE
MARTNEZ, CA 94569
WW 2N -9599
PARCEL NO.: 1 412
DRAWN BY; M WALT CHECKEO:. MJP
113
Y
I�
G t
4
242
Alf
SITE _ "r
D.
k/ rro \ _A
LOCATION MAP
II \// N.T.S.
/
j7-�
DISCLAIMER:
�" FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS
N `l _ DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL
vy PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN
THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT
a — BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER
I ` FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
a
/ POC: Mt. Diablo Base & Meridian
"Principal
FEET CCS 83 Zone 3 Coordinates:
C?
X: 6,153,547.81
Y: 2,146,592.22
E
EXHIBIT A PG.3
No. PREVIOUS ANNEXATION ANNEXATION 168
DATE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTWCT
_ 5019 IMHOFF PLACE
• EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY MARTINEZ, ca 91553
0
(925)0 ua-85W
= PROPOSED ANNEXATION PARCEL NO.: T —_ -- 412 _ ACRES
DRAWN BY: M. WM1 CHECKED : -WP__
MARS : IIA2 DATE:2B =0B
0
Attachment 2
Page 1 of 5
Assessor's
Area in
Petition
Parcel No.
Acres
Received
Reason for Annexation
367 - 130 -033
15.98
Yes
Environmental effects of annexing the parcels included in this application
365 - 100 -014
0.95
No
were addressed in Contra Costa County's 2004 Alhambra Valley Estates
365 - 100 -015
0.93
No
EIR, along with its 2005 addendum prepared by CCCSD and used for
365 - 110 -003
4.69
No
approval of the Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer Project. A Notice of
365 - 110 -007
1.02
No
Determination for the trunk sewer approval was filed with the Contra Costa
365 - 110 -008
0.99
No
County Clerk on September 2, 2005.
365 - 110 -013
1.00
No
365 - 110 -014
1.16
No
365 - 110 -016
5.49
No
365- 110 -017
4.98
No
365 - 110 -021
5.00
No
365 - 110 -022
5.00
No
365 - 110 -023
1.01
No
365 - 110 -024
0.92
No
365 - 110 -025
2.28
No
365 - 120 -003
1.75
No
365 - 120 -004
2.07
No
365- 140 -002
1.84
No
365 - 140 -003
0.68
No
365 - 140 -004
1.16
No
365 - 140 -006
1.02
No
365 - 140 -007
0.96
No
365 - 150 -005
2.61
No
365 - 150 -006
1.60
No
365 - 150 -008
3.60
No
365- 150 -013
1.25
No
365 - 150 -015
0.72
No
365 - 150 -018
0.50
No
365 - 150 -034
1.12
No
365 - 150 -075
1.65
No
365 - 150 -080
0.62
No
365 - 150 -081
3.59
No
366- 010 -001
0.60
No
366 - 010 -003
0.48
No
366 - 010 -005
0.61
No
366 - 010 -008
33.03
No
366 - 020 -001
1.54
No
366 - 020 -002
0.64
No
366 - 020 -003
0.90
No
366 - 020 -004
0.48
No
366 - 020 -005
0.57
No
366- 020 -006
0.55
No
366 - 020 -007
0.62
No
366 - 020 -008
0.60
No
366 - 020 -009
0.64
No
366 - 020 -010
0.52
No
366 - 020 -011
0.52
No
366 - 020 -012
0.54
No
366 - 020 -013
0.61
No
366 - 020 -014
0.54
No
366 - 020 -015
0.52
No
366 - 020 -016
0.52
No
366 - 020 -017
0.52
No
366 - 030 -007
0.51
No
366- 030 -008
0.52
No
366 - 030 -009
0.92
No
Alhambra Valley Annexation 168.xis
Attachment 2
Assessor's
Area in
Petition
Parcel No.
Acres
Received
366 - 030 -011
0.43
No
366 - 030 -012
0.46
No
366- 030 -013
3.74
No
366 - 030 -014
0.56
No
366 - 030 -017
1.05
No
366 - 030 -018
0.43
No
366 - 030 -019
0.52
No
366 - 040 -003
0.37
No
366 - 040 -004
0.62
No
366 - 040 -007
0.45
No
366 - 040 -009
0.55
No
366 - 040 -011
3.65
No
366 - 040 -012
3.23
No
366 - 040 -014
0.55
No
366 - 040 -015
2.78
No
366- 051 -001
0.55
No
366 - 051 -003
0.41
No
366 - 051 -002
0.45
No
366 - 051 -006
0.55
No
366- 051 -007
0.59
No
366 - 051 -010
0.66
No
366 - 051 -011
0.80
No
366- 051 -012
0.86
No
366 - 051 -013
0.70
No
366 - 051 -014
0.53
No
366 - 051 -015
1.04
No
366 - 051 -016
0.80
366 - 052 -002
1.03
No
366 - 052 -003
0.78
No
366 - 052 -004
0.69
No
366 - 052 -005
0.68
No
366 - 052 -006
0.82
No
366 - 052 -008
1.19
No
366- 060 -003
1.47
No
366- 060 -008
2.98
No
366 - 060 -009
0.96
No
366 - 060 -011
1.03
No
366- 070 -001
0.86
No
366 - 070 -002
0.49
No
366- 070 -003
0.51
No
366 - 070 -004
0.58
Yes
366 - 070 -005
0.58
Yes
366 - 070 -006
0.97
No
366 - 080 -001
0.63
Yes
366 - 080 -002
0.46
Yes
366- 080 -003
0.42
No
366 - 080 -004
0.40
No
366 - 080 -005
0.38
No
366 - 080 -006
0.63
No
366- 080 -007
0.50
No
366 - 080 -009
0.53
No
366 - 080 -010
0.50
No
366- 080 -011
0.50
No
366 - 080 -013
0.62
No
366 - 080 -015
0.75
No
366 - 080 -016
0.59
No
Page 2 of 5
Reason for Annexation
Alhambra Valley Annexation 168.xis
Attachment 2
Page 3 of 5
Assessor's
Area in
Petition
Parcel No.
Acres
Received Reason for Annexation
366 - 080 -018
0.48
No
366 - 080 -019
0.93
No
366- 090 -001
0.45
No
366 - 090 -002
1.60
No
366 - 090 -003
1.81
No
366 - 090 -004
0.49
No
366 - 090 -005
0.45
No
366- 090 -007
0.45
No
366- 090 -008
0.38
No
366 - 090 -009
0.50
No
366 - 090 -019
0.64
No
366- 090 -020
1.98
No
366 - 090 -021
1.27
No
366 - 101 -001
0.69
No
366 - 101 -002
0.46
No
366 - 101 -003
0.56
No
366 - 101 -004
0.39
No
366 - 102 -001
0.58
No
366- 102 -002
0.80
No
366- 102 -003
0.69
No
366- 102 -004
0.75
No
366- 102 -005
0.50
No
366 - 102 -006
0.52
No
366 - 102 -007
0.46
No
366- 102 -008
1.34
No
366 - 102 -009
1.33
No
366 - 102 -010
1.39
No
366 - 102 -011
0.55
No
366 - 102 -012
0.80
No
366 - 102 -015
0.53
No
366 -102 -020
9.16
No
366 - 111 -002
0.50
No
366- 111 -003
0.60
No
366- 112 -002
0.50
No
366 - 112 -003
0.50
No
366 - 112 -004
0.99
No
366 - 113 -002
0.57
No
366 - 113 -004
1.18
No
366 - 113 -005
0.27
No
366- 113 -008
0.08
No
366 - 113 -009
0.05
No
366- 113 -010
0.85
No
366 - 113 -013
0.47
No
366- 113 -014
0.85
No
366 - 113 -015
0.55
No
366- 113 -016
0.54
No
366 - 140 -003
7.99
No
367- 060 -003
1.21
No
367 - 060 -017
3.80
No
367 - 080 - 001
44.36
No
367 - 090 -005
6.20
No
367 - 090 -011
5.89
No
367 - 090 -012
9.83
No
367 - 100 -001
0.55
No
367- 100 -002
0.92
No
367 - 100 -003
0.83
No
Alhambra Valley Annexation 168.xis
Attachment 2
Page 4 of 5
Assessor's
Area in
Petition
Parcel No.
Acres
Received Reason for Annexation
367 - 100 -004
0.71
No
367 - 100 -005
0.71
No
367 - 100 -006
0.56
No
367 - 100 -007
0.50
No
367- 100 -008
0.55
No
367 - 100 -009
0.74
No
367 - 100 -010
0.55
No
367 - 100 -011
0.65
No
367 - 100 -012
0.57
No
367 - 100 -013
0.59
No
367 - 100 -014
0.15
No
367- 100 -015
0.30
No
367- 100 -016
0.34
No
367 - 100 -017
0.63
No
367 - 100 -018
0.57
No
367 - 100 -019
0.53
No
367 - 100 -020
0.54
No
367 - 111 -001
0.49
No
367 - 111 -002
0.65
No
367 - 111 -003
0.61
No
367 - 111 -005
0.46
No
367 - 111 -007
0.52
No
367 - 111 -008
0.13
No
367 - 111 -010
0.59
No
367 - 112 -001
0.68
No
367 - 112 -002
0.66
No
367 - 112 -003
0.51
No
367 - 112 -004
0.49
No
367 - 121 -001
0.41
No
367 - 121 -002
0.70
No
367 - 121 -003
0.65
No
367 - 121 -004
0.83
No
367 - 121 -005
0.73
No
367 - 121 -006
0.53
No
367 - 122 -001
0.51
No
367 - 123 -001
0.43
No
367 - 123 -002
0.57
No
367 - 123 -003
0.41
No
367 -123 -004
0.48
No
367 -123 -005
0.78
No
367 - 123 -006
0.57
No
367 - 123 -007
0.66
No
367 - 130 -001
0.55
No
367 - 130 -002
0.55
No
367 - 130 -003
0.55
No
367 - 130 -004
0.55
No
367 - 130 -007
0.50
No
367 - 130 -009
0.59
No
367 - 130 -010
0.63
Yes
367 - 130 -012
1.07
No
367 - 130 -013
8.72
Yes
367 - 130 -019
0.50
No
367- 130 -020
0.47
No
367 - 130 -021
1.01
No
367 - 130 -022
0.03
No
367 - 130 -023
1.06
No
Alhambra Valley Annexation 168.xls
Attachment 2
Page 5 of 5
Assessor's
Area in
Petition
Parcel No.
Acres
Received Reason for Annexation
367- 130 -024
0.47
No
367- 130 -025
0.38
No
367 - 130 -027
0.84
No
367 - 130 -028
0.86
Yes
367- 130 -030
0.50
Yes
367 - 130 -032
1.68
Yes
367 - 130 -034
0.50
No
367 - 130 -035
0.46
No
367 - 130 -036
1.04
No
367 - 140 -003
1.36
No
367 - 140 -004
0.96
No
367 - 140 -005
1.27
No
367 - 140 -006
1.23
No
367- 140 -007
1.29
No
367 - 140 -008
1.27
No
367 - 140 -009
0.03
No
367- 140 -010
7.01
No
367 - 140 -011
0.96
No
367 - 140 -012
1.48
No
367 - 140 -013
5.62
No
367- 140 -014
5.21
No
367 - 140 -015
1.14
No
367 - 140 -016
1.37
No
367 - 140 -017
1.55
No
367 - 150 -001
2.50
No
367- 150 -007
0.20
No
367 - 150 -010
0.83
No
367 - 150 -013
1.25
No
367 - 150 -031
10.45
No
Alhambra Valley Annexation 168.xls
ATTACHMENT 3
COPY
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
1 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 (925) 228-9500 - www.centralsan.org
FAX: (925) 228 -4624
CHARLES W. BATTS
June 21, 2006 General Manager
KENTON L. ALM
Counsel for the District
(510) 808 -2000
Dear Alhambra Valley Property Owner: ELAINE R. BOEHME
Secretary of the District
STATUS OF ALHAMBRA VALLEY TRUNK SEWER PROJECT, DP 5919
This letter provides an update about the construction schedule for the Alhambra Valley Trunk
Sewer Project.
CCCSD intends to construct a trunk sewer to provide sewer service for the residents of the
Alhambra Valley. The preferred sewer alignment is south along Alhambra Valley Road
beginning at Gilbert Lane, east along Sheridan Lane, and south along Strentzel Lane. From
Strentzel, the sewer would cross property now owned by the National Park Service (NPS) and
pass under Alhambra Creek to the north end of Wanda Way. The sewer route continues south
along Wanda Way to Alhambra Valley Road, then south to the Reliez Valley Road intersection.
As the preferred sewer alignment is along an old road through NPS property, CCCSD needs to
obtain a NPS right -of -way permit. The process of obtaining a permit across the NPS property
will take longer than anticipated. Before the NPS can grant a permit for the trunk sewer, they
have to conduct an environmental review to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). The review process will take the remainder of 2006 to complete. The earliest date that
the NPS could grant a permit to CCCSD is early 2007.
To expedite the project, CCCSD has decided to construct the trunk sewer in two phases (see
attached map). The first phase will consist of the two Alhambra Valley Road sewer segments
(Gilbert Lane to Strentzel Lane and Wanda Way to Reliez Valley Road) and will be constructed
from August to November 2006. The second phase, from Strentzel Lane across Alhambra
Creek and south along Wanda Way, will be constructed from April to August 2007.
CCCSD will receive bids from contractors for construction of the first phase of the Trunk Sewer
Project on June 20, 2006 and expects the Board of Directors to award the construction contract
on July 6, 2006. Once the contract is awarded, it will take approximately one month for the
contractor to mobilize and begin construction. Before construction begins, you will be notified of
the actual construction schedule and whom to contact regarding construction - related questions
or concerns.
Constructing the sewer in two phases will affect the availability of the sewer connections for
individual houses. The sewer segment between Gilbert Lane and Strentzel Lane will be
operational by approximately November 2006. At that time, residents may connect to this
portion of the trunk sewer or extend a public collector sewer from it to their neighborhood;
however, the sewer segment along Alhambra Valley Road between Wanda Way and Reliez
Valley Road will not be operational until late summer 2007.
N : \ENVRSEC\Admin \Swanson\Alhambra Valley \5919 Alhambra Valley Sewer Project Update 6- 06.doe « Recycled Paper
Alhambra Valley Property Owners
June 21, 2006
Page 2
Many residents of the valley have inquired about the possibility of a CCCSD- sponsored program
to finance each resident's share of the trunk sewer and the extension of public sewers to their
neighborhoods. The District does not have any current financing programs. However,
considering the number of Alhambra Valley residents who have expressed interest, staff will be
discussing the potential for District sponsored financing with the Board over the next several
months.
Alhambra Valley is not currently within the boundaries of CCCSD. To receive sewer service,
your property must be annexed to CCCSD. Enclosed are forms for you to complete to petition
for annexation to CCCSD. These forms must be signed and returned so that we can commence
the annexation process. Please fill in as much of the requested information about your property
as you know. There is no initial cost for submitting an annexation petition. You will not be
charged an annexation fee ($509 as of 7/1/06) until you connect your property to a new public
sewer. Annexing to CCCSD does not trigger a property tax increase nor any other special
assessment, fee, charge or levy.
If you have any questions or need additional information about the trunk sewer construction,
please contact Jackie Zayac at 925 - 229 -7200. If you have any questions about sewer main
extensions, annexations or potential financing, please contact Russell Leavitt at 925 - 229 -7255 or
Curtis Swanson at 925 - 229 -7336.
-- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
CWB /cws /mvp
Enclosures
cc: Board of Directors
Supervisor Gayle Uilkema
Sherman Quinlan, Director of Env. Health, Contra Costa County Environmental Health
N: \ENVRSEC\Admin \Swanson\Alhambra Valley \5919 Alhambra Valley Sewer Project Update 6- 06.doc
PHASE 1 SEWER
I START - AUGUST 2006
IA COMPLETE - NOV. 2006
N 198% /
: N
U
1
� l
i r h /'
LN
r"
CREEK CROSSING
(c' vI
-""f
� PH 2 SEWER
y START -APRIL 2007
COMPU =1E - JULY 2007
" J
\
z
v
FtC
i
a
PHASE 1 SEWER
START - AUGUST 2006
COMPLETE - NOV. 2006
`aC9
\1
-�R-\)A
\ \ \\ r
LEGEND:
0 B00 16D0 Proposed Sewer Alignment - Construction 2006
FEET Proposed Sewer Alignment - Construction 2007
Y Central Contra Costa
N Sanitary District
A a
0
0
N
O
ALHAMBRA VALLEY TRUNK SEWER
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
CCCSD DP 5919
Drawing No.
U
Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553 -4392
Gentlemen:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO,:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
At the present time, the above -noted Contra Costa County Assessor's Parcels) are outside the
boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. Attached is a petition for annexation of said
Parcel(s) to the Sanitary District.
It is understood that any annexation to the Sanitary District is subject to the prior approval of the
Board of Directors of the District. Please consider this petition and advise the signatories of the action.
Sincerely,
Mailing Address
OWNER
OWNERS AGENT
Proposed:
D.A.
Parcel
Phone No. (
FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY
Board Meeting
Action Taken
Atlas Owner Notified
2329 -12/97
Petition for Annexation
To Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
I, the undersigned, owner of real property, petition and assent that the territory, the exterior boundary of which is
delineated on map hereto attached, be annexed to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District when timely and
convenient. Said territory is not within any other sanitary district.
I accept the annexation charge In the amount of S 5c")
per parcel (lot), payable at the time of connection.
I further certify that I am the owner of the property petitioned below.
OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED
Print Name
Street
City
REASON FOR ANNEXATION REQUEST
❑ Existing House—Fe" Seplie Gys�-_m
0 New Construction —One Single- Family Home
❑ Other (If Subdivision, Include Tract No. and No. of lots)
Location
Acreage
Assessor's Parcel No.
PRIOR CEQA DOCUMENT ADDRESSING ANNEXATION(copy attached)
❑ EIR ❑ Negative Declaration 0 Exemption
Preparing Agency and Document Date —N A
The undersigned petitioner hereby declares, under penalty of perjury, that he /she has read the foregoing Petition
and knows the contents thereof and that all of the facts stated and set forth therein are true to his /her own
knowledge.
Dated 19 at
(STATE)
NOTE:
(PRINT NAME)
(SIGNATURE)
Government Code Section 84308 requires that a LAFCO Commissioner disqualify himself /herself from acting
upon an annexation or sphere of influence change if during the 12 months prior to the date the matter is to be
considered, the property owner, his agent. or anyone financially connected with the matter has made $250 or
more in campaign contributions to said commissioner.
It you have contributed $250 or more within the past 12 months to any LAFCO Commissioner's campaign fund,
please provide the name of the commissioner(s) so that he /she /they may be so informed and can comply
with provisions of the law.
Commissioner Date of Contrbution
Proposed Annex No. Map Atlas Final Annex No.
2301 -12/97
ATTACHMENT 4
Jl Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Irnhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553 -4392 (925) 228-9500 • www.centralsan.org
FAX: (925) 228-4624
CHARLES W. BATTS
General Manager
KENTON L. ALM
Counsel for the District
(510) 808 -2000
ELAINE R. BOEHME
June 29, 2006 Secretary of the District
Dear Alhambra Valley Property Owner:
ANNEXATION OF YOUR PROPERTY TO CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
As was mentioned in the June 21, 2006, letter from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
(CCCSD), your property is not currently within the boundaries of CCCSD. The CCCSD Board of
Directors will be considering annexation of your property to CCCSD at its July 6, 2006, Board
Meeting. You are invited to attend this meeting and provide your input. Also being considered at
this meeting will be the award of the construction of Phase One of the Alhambra Valley Trunk
Sewer.
Included with the June 21St letter were forms for you to complete to petition for annexation to
CCCSD. Unfortunately, those forms are out of date. Enclosed is the current Petition for
Annexation from. Please fill in as much of the requested information as �rou can and return the
Petition to me. If you have already returned the forms from the June 21S letter, please fill out this
form and return it. I apologize for any inconvenience.
Please call me at 925 - 229 -7120 with any questions concerning annexation to CCCSD.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Penny
Associate Engineer
MR /mvp
Enclosure
File: ANX 44 A2
N:\ ENVRSEC \Admin \Penny\2006\Alhambra Valley Trunk Sewer Petition Request 6- 06.doc « Recycled Paper
Petition for Annexation
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Attn: Permit Section
For District Use Only:
Atlas: LCID:
DAM Job#:
App#: LX Note D
I, the owner of the real property described below, hereby petition and assent that said property be annexed to the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District (District). Said real property is not within the boundaries of any other wastewater utility service agency. It is understood that
any annexation is subject to the approval of the District's Board of Directors.
OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY AND MAILING ADDRESS:
Name:
Street:
City/State /Zip:
PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED:
Street Address:
City:
Acreage:
Assessor's Parcel Number (APN):
REASON FOR ANNEXATION REQUEST:
[ ] Existing Building / Septic Tank Conversion
[ ] New Construction
[ ] New Subdivision
[ ] CCCSD Request / Orphaned Property
(] Other (describe):
PRIOR CEQA DOCUMENT ADDRESSING ANNEXATION:
[ ] EIR
[ ] Negative Declaration
[) Exemption (annexation of single properties typically do not require prior CEQA documents).
Preparing Agency:
Document Date:
I, the undersigned owner of the real property described above, hereby declare under penalty of perjury, that I have read the foregoing Petition
and know the contents thereof and that all of the facts stated and set forth therein are true to the best of my knowledge.
Dated:
print name
signature
at
print name
signature
California
Note: Government Code Section 84308 requires that a LAFCO Commissioner disqualify himself /herself from acting upon an annexation or
sphere of influence change if during the 12 months prior to the date the matter is to be considered, the property owner, his agent, or
anyone financially connected with the matter has made $250 or more in campaign contributions to said commissioner.
If you have contributed $250 or more within the past 12 months to any LAFCO Commissioner's campaign fund, please provide the
name of the commissioner(s) so that he /she /they may be so informed and can comply with provision of the law.
Commissioner:
Date of Contribution:
Commissioner: Date of Contribution:
Annexation 168
Az-
\ I %
d R7r 3 )k b w *N
ff ,1
NtlV' r
I�+
'' !�-� f I I {y 1`"•,, yy 9 :� # { ��' of N'' 4 ~ ,
IX
n
_ L i
".
dr �1
Legend:
D { 4
4" k� Trunk Sewer
t p
Tributary Main Sewers
a�
° Can Connect to Trunk
Can Connect to Main
�,� ; Petition for Annexation Received
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
I;A' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006 No.: 9.a. HUMAN RESOURCES
Type of Action: APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT
Subject: AMENDMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT,
REVISING PARAGRAPH IX, "TERMINAL COMPENSATION"
Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div.:
Elaine R. Boehme Administration
Secretary of the District
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
Elaine R. Boehme, *General
Secretary of the r
District
ISSUE: Board approval is required to amend the employment contract with the General
Manager.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve an amendment to Paragraph IX, Terminal
Compensation, of the employment contract with General Manager Charles W. Batts.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. The amount of the terminal compensation payout will
remain the same. The only change is that it will be paid out upon termination of
employment rather than spread out over a five -year period.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could decide not to amend the
contract.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors and the General Manager have requested
that the General Manager's employment contract be reviewed prior to his retirement.
This review was recently completed by the District's counsel, Hanson Bridgett.
When the employment contract was negotiated in 1999, Mr. Batts offered to receive his
terminal compensation over a five -year period rather than the traditional lump sum. At
that time, that arrangement was agreeable to both Mr. Batts and the District.
In reviewing the contract, it was discovered that the terms set forth in Paragraph IX,
Terminal Compensation, are no longer in compliance with Internal Revenue Code (IRC)
457. That Code does not permit deferral of vested income, which means that, unless
the agreement is modified, Mr. Batts would be taxed this year on the entire amount of
his terminal compensation, without having received the full amount.
The employment contract permits modification if agreed to by both parties. In order to
avoid an unintended tax consequence for Mr. Batts, it is proposed that the contract be
amended to provide for a lump sum payment at the time of termination of employment.
N:\ADMINSUP\ADMIN\DIST- SEC \Board Meeting Date.doc Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: July 6, 2006
subject. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL MANAGER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT,
REVISING PARAGRAPH IX, "TERMINAL COMPENSATION"
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Approve an amendment to the employment
contract with General Manager Charles W. Batts, revising Paragraph IX to allow for a
lump sum payment of terminal compensation rather than disbursement over a five -year
period.
N:WDMINSUPWDMIN \DIST- SEC \Board Meeting Date.doc Page 2 of 3
Proposed Revision to Paragraph IX of General Manager Employment Contract
Compensation. IX Terminal - lump sum outlay at the tiFne Of
tA-t;-4I-RFn9-I-IRt SUbjert to O%tallrneRt payment at the time of te4ninatien shall
be the value of arrumulated YaGation plus 85 pement of the value of a%F
aGGFued r-,;Gk leave, plus seveFaRGe pay, Of any. The ();StFoGt shall make a
payment of whiGh shall be due on the anniveFsaFy date of the Gen
aqFeemeRt. These ameuRts wall FepFesent a final resolution of all finanGial
The final payment shall be the balanGe plue, interest. in the event 9
The General Manager shall receive his vested terminal compensation,
which includes the value of accumulated vacation, plus 85 percent (85916)
of the value of any accrued sick leave, at the time of his separation from
employment. These amounts will represent a final resolution of all
financial obligations under this agreement.
Page 3 of 3
June 26, 2006
10.a. CORRESPONDENCE
Page 1 of 2
Receive letter dated June 19, 2006 from Contra Costa County Grand Jury
Foreperson Bob Kennedy thanking General Manager Charles W. Batts for
his orientation presentation to the Grand Jury.
Grand Jury Contra
725 Court Street
P.O. Box 911
Costa
Martinez, CA 94553 -0091
County
�_ 4a
v
JUN 2 2 2006
COON
CCCSD
SECRETAP,Y OF Ty If: rnc7'%1+?77
June 19, 2006
Charles W. Batts, General Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, California 94553
Re: Orientation Presentation 2006/2007 Contra Costa Civil Grand Jury
Dear Sir:
Thank you for the informative talk and tour you gave to the 2006/2007 Contra Costa
Grand Jury. The 2005/2006 Contra Costa Grand Jury greatly appreciates the time you
took out of your busy schedule to meet with the incoming Grand Jury members.
Thank you for your help in making our orientation a success.
Sinc el
1 o ,.
y, Foreperson
2005/2006 ntra Costa Grand Jury