HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/21/2005 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
No.: 3.a. CONSENT CALENDAR
subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
AND AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FROM SHAPELL INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR AN
EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE RECORDED FINAL MAP OF SUBDIVISION
NO. 8632 IN THE SAN RAMON AREA (JOB 5658), AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO
RECORD THE RESOLUTION WITH THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDER
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
John Mercurio, Management Analyst Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
J. Mercurio M. nny . Swanson A. Farrell Charles
General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept public sewer
improvements and offers of dedication, and to authorize staff to record documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution accepting public sewer improvements and
an offer of dedication, and authorizing staff to record the easement acceptances with
the Contra Costa County Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors regularly accepts easements and public
sewer improvements by resolution. The recommended resolution will accept an
easement shown on the recorded final map of Subdivision No. 8632 that is required for
a recent public sewer extension off Dougherty Road in the San Ramon area (as shown
on Attachment 1). Staff has reviewed the final subdivision map, inspected the public
sewer improvements and determined that they are in compliance with District
standards.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution accepting Job 5658 public
sewer improvements and an offer of dedication from Shapell Industries, Inc. for an
easement shown on the recorded final map of Subdivision No. 8632 in the San Ramon
area, and authorizing staff to record the easement acceptance with the Contra Costa
County Recorder.
Page 1 of 2
LIAPosition Papers \Mercurio \5658 \5658 PP.doc
R H
F Q
l�O
\� DANVILLE
CAMINO TASSAJA
DOUGHERTY RD
i
SITE
PN RD
\ SAN RAMON
LOCATION MAP
N. T. S.
Z
O
00
Central Contra Costa ACCEPTANCE O F Attachment
Sanitary District
EASEMENT DEDICATION
' SUBDIVISION 8632 JOB 5658
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 3.b. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS
Subject: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
AND OFFERS OF DEDICATION FROM KEITH AND LAURA W. HOWARD, TRE,
GLEN AND KATHY KOUTZ, MARK P. SPILKER, AND JAMES R. AND PAMELA S.
BLEDSOE, IN THE TOWN OF DANVILLE, JOB 5667 - PARCELS 4, 5, 6, AND 7,
AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO RECORD THE RESOLUTIONS WITH THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDER
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
John Mercurio, Management Analyst Engineering / Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
J. Mercurio y C. Swanson A. Farrell Charles . E
General Mane
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept public sewer
improvements and offers of dedication, and to authorize staff to record documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions accepting public sewer improvements and offers
of dedication, and authorizing staff to record the documents with the Contra Costa County
Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors regularly accepts easements and public sewer
improvements by resolution. The recommended resolutions will accept easements that are
required for a recent public sewer extension off Del Amigo Road in the Town of Danville
(as shown on Attachment 1). Staff has reviewed the easement documents, inspected the
public sewer improvements and determined that they are in compliance with District
standards.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolutions accepting offers of dedication and
public sewer improvements from Keith and Laura W. Howard, THE for the easement
offered in the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) recorded August 31, 2004 (Series
2004 - 0337722) from Glen and Kathy Koutz for the easement offered in the IOD recorded
August 31, 2004 (Series 2004 - 0337721), from Mark P. Spilker for the easement offered in
the IOD recorded August 31, 2004 (Series 2004 - 0337723), and from James R. and
Pamela S. Bledsoe for the easement offered in the IOD recorded August 31, 2004
(Series 2004 - 0337724), and accepting Job 5667 public sewer improvements, and
authorizing recording of the resolutions with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
Page 1 of 2
UAPosition Papers \Mercurio \5667 \5667 PP.doc
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 3.c. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS
subject: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
AND OFFERS OF DEDICATION FROM WINDEMERE BLC LAND COMPANY, LLC,
AND CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, IN THE SAN RAMON
AREA, JOB 5713 - PARCELS 1 AND 2, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO RECORD
THE DOCUMENTS WITH THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECORDER
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
John Mercurio, Management Analyst Engineering / Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
P1
J. Mercurio M. . Swanson
_W&
A. Farrell
General
ISSUE: A resolution of the Board of Directors is required to accept public sewer
improvements and offers of dedication, and to authorize staff to record documents.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions accepting public sewer improvements and
offers of dedication, and authorizing staff to record the documents with the Contra
Costa County Recorder.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors regularly accepts easements and public
sewer improvements by resolution. The recommended resolutions will accept
easements required for recent public sewer extensions off Bollinger Canyon Road in
the San Ramon area (as shown on Attachment 1). Staff has reviewed the easement
documents, inspected the public sewer improvements and determined that they are in
compliance with District standards.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolutions accepting offers of dedication
and public sewer improvements from Windemere BLC Land Company, LLC for the
easement offered in the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) recorded March 11, 2004
(Series 2004 - 0081841), and from Contra Costa Community College District for the
easement offered in the IOD recorded February 18, 2004 (Series 2004 - 0052288),
accepting Job 5713, public sewer improvements, and authorizing recording of the
resolutions with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
U: \Position Papers \Mercurio \5713 \5713 PP.doc Page 1 Of 2
Parcel 2
NTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
LEGEND:
—e— EXISTING SEWER
—.e— NEW SEWER
i SUB BOUNDARY
EASEMENT AREA
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
WINDEMERE BLC LAND CO.
(CITY OF SAN RAMON
\COMMUNITY CENTER)
N /
CAMINO
SAN RAMON
SITE
LOCATION MAP
N. T. S.
Parcel 1
//4700
Nch, P ..
KWy
Attachment
ACCEPTANCE OF
EASEMENT DEDICATION JOB 5713
Page 2 of 2
1
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
Type of Action: ADOPT RESOLUTION
No.: 3.d. CONSENT CALENDAR
subject: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO CONFIRM AND LEVY FINAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR ARBOR LANE CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2002 -4,
DISTRICT PROJECT 5644
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Curtis W. Swanson, Division Manager Engineering /Environmental Services Division
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION;
- �w
V
C. Swanson A. Farrell
CharWatt
General Manage
ISSUE: Work has been completed on the Arbor Lane Contractual Assessment District
No. 2002 -4 (CAD No. 2002 -4), and the final assessments can be established and
levied.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution confirming and levying final assessments
and authorizing a Notice of Assessment to be recorded in the office of the County
Recorder for Arbor Lane CAD No. 2002 -4, District Project 5644.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action will allow the District to be reimbursed for project
costs totaling $153,248.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors ordered improvements for Arbor Lane CAD
No. 2002 -4 in Alamo at its meeting held on May 8, 2003. The area is shown in
Exhibit A. The work to install the improvements has been completed, and the final
costs are known. The final costs are shown in Exhibit B. Based on these final costs,
the final assessments for each property have been determined and appear as
Exhibit C, Assessment Roll. The Board is requested to confirm and levy these final
assessments and to authorize a Notice of Assessment to be recorded. A resolution has
been prepared, which, if adopted, will confirm and levy assessments and authorize the
recording of the Notice. This resolution is included as Exhibit D.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt a resolution confirming and levying final
assessments and authorizing a Notice of Assessment to be recorded in the office of the
County Recorder for Arbor Lane CAD No. 2002 -4, District Project 5644.
Page 1 of 8
U: \Position Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc
0
n
nl
F PNO aEEO ES
1�t m
/ ARBOR W %o
CERVATO
DR BERNIE W
ao
o SITE
A L M O
UVORNA RD
LOCATION MAP
0 80 160
FEET
CAD AREA EXISTING CAD CAD PARTICIPANTS
SEWER SEWER
Central Contra costa ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Attachment
Sanitary District
ARBOR LANE
' CAD NO. 2002-04 A
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5644
Page 2 of 8
EXHIBIT B
ARBOR LANE CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CAD NO. 2002-4
ARBOR LANE COSTS; SIX PARCELS
FINAL COST REPORT — APRIL 7, 2005
ITEM
AMOUNT
Construction
8 -inch Sewer
Standard Manholes
4 -inch Laterals (1)
Street Overlay
Subtotal Construction Costs
$50,282
Payments by non - participants for roadwork
($5,067)
Total Construction Cost
$45,215
Private Engineering
Survey and Design
$2,935
Other Agency Fees
$2,129
Total Private Engineering Cost
$5,064
District Services
Plan Review
$640
Construction Inspection
$1,256
Administrative Charges
$750
Total District Costs
$2,646
PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION +
PRIVATE ENGINEERING + DISTRICT
$52,925
RESERVE FUND - 5% OF CONSTRUCTION COST
$2,261
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$55,186
(1) For portion of lateral sewer in street or right -of -way.
WPosition Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT B (continued)
ARBOR LANE CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CAD NO. 2002 -4
BERNIE LANE COSTS; FOUR PARCELS
FINAL COST REPORT — APRIL 7, 2005
ITEM
AMOUNT
Construction
8 -inch Sewer
Standard Manholes
4 -inch Laterals (1)
Street Overlay
Subtotal Construction Costs
$91,490
Payments by non - participants for roadwork
($6,460)
Total Construction Cost
$85,030
Private Engineering
Survey and Design
$6,159
Other Agency Fees (2)
$5,769
Total Private Engineering Cost
$11,928
District Services
Plan Review
$881
Construction Inspection
$1,734
Administrative Charges
$750
Total District Costs
$3,365
PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL (CONSTRUCTION +
PRIVATE ENGINEERING + DISTRICT)
$100,323
RESERVE FUND - 5% OF CONSTRUCTION COST
$4,252
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$104,575
(1) For portion of lateral sewer in street or right -of -way.
(2) Includes a $5,000 reserve for easement acquisition from the Flood Control District.
U: \Position Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 4 of 8
EXHIBIT C
ARBOR LANE CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CAD NO. 2002 -4
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
PARCEL
DESCRIPTION
PREPAID
AMOUNT
TAX ROLL
ASSESSMENT
AMOUNT
(10 -YR EQUAL
PAYMENTS ) (1
1
187- 120 -002 -4
$7,131.94 2
$958.76(2)
2
187- 120 -020 -8
$8,820.83
$1,185.80
3
187- 120 -018 -2
$8,820.83
$1,185.80
4
187- 120 -019
$8,820.83
$1,185.80
5
187 - 120 -021 -6
$8,820.83
$1,185.80
6
187- 120 -044 -8
$8,820.83
$1,185.80
7
187- 120 -025 -7
$25,080.75
$3,371.64
8
187- 120 -014 -1
$25,080.75
$3,371.64
9
187- 120 -042 -2
$25,080.75
$3,371.64
10
187- 120 -041 -4
$25,080.75
$3,371.64
(1) Interest rate for annual assessments is 6.00%
(2) The amount of Assessment No. 1 is less than for other properties on Arbor Lane
because the roadwork portion of the assessment was prepaid by the owner. By prior
agreement, the Assessment No. 6 owners are responsible for paying the remaining
amount of Assessment No. 1, as well as the assessment on their own parcel. The
Assessment No. 1 owners will not owe a reimbursement to the Assessment No. 6
owners.
U: \Position Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 5 of 8
EXHIBIT D
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AND LEVYING FINAL ASSESSMENTS
AND AUTHORIZING RECORDING
ARBOR LANE
CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2002 -4
The Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District resolves:
This Board has taken a series of actions preliminary to establishing final
assessments for Arbor Lane Contractual Assessment District No. 2002 -4, Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District, Contra Costa County, California, and now makes the
following findings and orders:
1. The Board adopted its Resolution of Intention (Resolution No. 2002 -050) to
order the improvement described therein under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911,
and directed Curtis W. Swanson, Engineer of Work, to prepare the report required by
Section 5989.22 of the Streets and Highways Code.
2. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2002 -051, the Board approved a map showing the
boundaries of the land benefited by the proposed improvement. A copy of the boundary
map was filed in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Contra Costa in the
Book of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts.
The improvement is generally described as follows:
Design and construction of approximately 810 linear feet of sanitary sewer line,
together with appurtenant work and facilities located along Arbor Lane and
Bernie Lane in Alamo, California.
3. The Board established May 8, 2003, as the date for a public hearing to create
the Arbor Lane Contractual Assessment District No. 2002 -4.
4. The owners of record were provided ballots 45 days before the hearing on
which owners could indicate approval of or opposition to the imposition of assessments.
WPosition Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 6 of 8
5. The Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2003, pursuant to
Section 5898.26 of the Streets and Highways Code and gave every person present an
opportunity to comment on and object to the proposed Contractual Assessment
Program, the improvement and the extent of the Assessment District.
6. The Board found that no written protests against the proposed improvement
were made by owners representing more than one half of the area of the land to be
assessed for the improvement.
7. The Board approved the Engineer's Report and each component part of it,
including each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report, one of which was a table
of estimated assessments.
8. The Board found that the Engineer's Report, fairly and properly apportioned the
cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the Assessment District in compliance
with the Agreement between the owners and District and in proportion to the special
benefits derived by each parcel, in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of the
improvement. A draft version of the Agreement, within which the owners voluntarily and
unanimously agreed to the imposition of an assessment, was attached as an exhibit to
the Engineer's Report and was incorporated by reference.
9. Lastly, the Board ordered the improvement described in paragraph 2 and as
detailed in the Engineer's Report.
10. The work on the improvement has been completed pursuant to a private
agreement entered into by the owners, and was accepted on August 14, 2003. The
final costs for the improvement have been determined; the final assessments for each
property have been determined; and a Notice of Assessment will be sent to each
property owner after the Board confirms the final assessments.
11. The final assessments for each property appear on the Assessment Roll. The
Board hereby confirms and levies each individual final assessment as stated in the
Assessment Roll.
12. Payment of all or any part of such final assessments may be made at the office
of the Controller, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez,
California 94553. The deadline for receipt of such payment by the Controller is the
close of business on June 15, 2005. Thereafter, unpaid assessments will be payable in
yearly installments of principal and interest at 6.00 percent compounded annually over
a period of ten (10) years.
U: \Position Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 7 of 8
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 2005, by the Board of Directors of
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following votes:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
President of the Board of Directors,
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa,
State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenton L. Alm
District Counsel
U: \Position Papers \Swanson\Arbor Lane Final Assessment PP.doc Page 8 of 8
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 3.e. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: HUMAN RESOURCES
subject: AUTHORIZE MEDICAL LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY FOR
MARK LAFFERTY, MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN III, MECHANICAL,
THROUGH MAY 5, 2005
Submitted By: James M. Kelly Initiating Dept /Div.: Operations/
Director of Operations Plant Operations
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for a medical leave of absence
without pay in excess of 30 days.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize medical leave of absence without pay for Mark
Lafferty, Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Minimal
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Deny medical leave of absence without pay.
BACKGROUND: Mark Lafferty, Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical, has been off
of work since March 9, 2005, due to a medical condition. Since Mr. Lafferty has not
been employed by the District for at least 12 months, he is ineligible for Family Medical
Leave. We request that Mr. Lafferty be granted a medical leave of absence without pay
until May 5, 2005. Mr. Lafferty's status will be reviewed at that time, and further Board
action will be requested if appropriate.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize medical leave of absence without pay
for Mark Lafferty, Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical, through May 5, 2005.
Page 1 of 1
SACorrespondence\Position Papers\2005 \Lafferty -Leave of Absence.doc
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 3.f. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ESTABLISH HEARING DATE
subject: ESTABLISH MAY 19, 2005 AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
RECEIVE COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2005 -06 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET /2005 TEN -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Submitted By: Initiating Dept /Div.:
Gail Chesler, PhD Engineering /Environmental Services
Associate Engineer
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
G Chesler R. Schmidt C. Swanson A. Farrell har eq
Gener
ISSUE: The District's draft Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 -06 Capital Improvement Budget/2005
Ten -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIB /CIP) has been prepared by staff. A date for a
public hearing to receive comments on the document should be established.
RECOMMENDATION: Establish May 19, 2005 as the date for a public hearing to
receive comments on the draft CIB /CIP.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None related to this action.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: The FY 2005 -06 CIB will establish near -term project priorities and
authorize budgets for the Treatment Plant, Collection System, General Improvements,
and Recycled Water Programs. Detailed information for projects that are anticipated to
be active in FY 2005 -06 is presented in the CIB document. The 2005 Ten -Year CIP will
provide the basis for policy decisions concerning the District's Capital Improvement
Program and management of the Sewer Construction Fund. The CIP also serves as
the framework for fee analysis.
On April 14, 2005, the Board of Directors met with District staff in a workshop session to
review the draft CIB /CIP.
It is appropriate to receive comments in a formal public hearing prior to consideration of
the CIB /CIP for approval. This public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for the
Board's regular meeting on May 19, 2005. A staff presentation will be made at that
time.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Establish May 19, 2005 as the date for a public
hearing to receive comments on the draft CIB /CIP.
UAPosition Papers \Chester \PublicHearing -FY 05 -06 CIB Imp Plan.DOC Page 1 Of 1
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 3.g. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: REJECT CLAIM
subject: REJECT CLAIM FOR DAMAGES BY EDWIN WOLSKE AND NANCI OBERG
REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 35 CREST ROAD, LAFAYETTE,
CALIFORNIA
submitted ay: Randall M. Musgraves Initiating Dept. /Div.:
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
7�
K. Greer R. usgr� es K. Alm
General
ISSUE: The District received a claim for alleged damages to the home located It 35
Crest Road, Lafayette, California. The Board must take action on the claim.
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no immediate financial impacts for rejection of the
claim.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The alternative to this action is to negotiate a
settlement with the claimant.
BACKGROUND: The District received a claim on March 31, 2005 for alleged damages
due to land subsidence to the home of David and Loryn Lindsey for an unspecified
amount. The Lindsey's have filed a suit against Mr. Edwin Wolske, a licensed general
building contractor, and his wife, Ms. Nanci Oberg on October 1, 2004 in Contra Costa
County Superior Court. A claim has been filed with the District by Mr. Lawrence Baker,
the attorney for Mr. Wolske and Ms. Oberg, stating that work done by the District in
December 2003, or sewer leaks, may have caused the landslide. District staff has no
information to support this claim.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Deny the claim submitted by Mr. Lawrence
Baker, representing Mr. Wolske and Ms. Oberg, and direct staff to send a rejection
letter to the claimant and attorney.
SMI)MUSECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT\Agendas \PP Reject Claim.DOC Page 1 Of 1
PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON
A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.12.090
"SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES"
SUGGESTED AGENDA
April 21, 2005
I. Request Staff Report
II. Hearing
A. Open Hearing
B. Receive comments, if any
C. Close Hearing
III. Discussion
IV. Recommended Actions:
A. Adopt proposed Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.12.090
"Schedule of Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges"
UAPosition Papers\Miyamoto -Mills \Capacity Fees, Rates\Agenda- Schedule of Cap Fees.DOC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 4.a. HEARINGS
Type of Action: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING; ADOPT ORDINANCE
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.12.090 "SCHEDULE OF
CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES "; ADOPT THE ORDINANCE
Submitted By: Jarred Miyamoto -Mills Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Principal Engineer Engineering / Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
)."I ^y
J. Miyamoto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell K. Alm
General
ISSUE: The District Code requires that a public hearing be held prior to the Board
of Director's adoption of an ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.12.090
"Schedule of Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges."
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a
proposed ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.12.090 "Schedule of
Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges." Adopt the proposed ordinance (see
Attachment 1).
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staff estimates that the recommended fees would
generate about $800,000 per year in additional Capacity Fee revenue.
BACKGROUND: In September 1998, the state enacted SB1760 that requires
sewer connection fees to be based on one of two methods: 1) a buy -in to existing
assets, or 2) the cost of future facilities expansion. This bill was enthusiastically
endorsed and supported by homebuilders' associations statewide.
The last review of the District's Capacity Fees was completed in 2003. Since 2001,
the method for determination of the fee has been a "buy -in -to -all assets" approach.
This provides a rational, practical, equitable, and defensible method to calculate the
financial burden of new connections.
The buy -in -to -all- assets approach is preferred primarily due to the "facilities- mature"
status of the District. In this context, facilities- mature means that the value of
existing assets (nearly $1.2 billion) is many times the value of future facilities
expansion needed to accommodate future customers. Stated differently, most of
the facilities needed to serve new customers have already been built and paid for.
As a consequence, most of the work envisioned in the District's Capital
Improvement Plan is for renovation, replacement, or upgrading of facilities to meet
U: \Position Papers \Miyamoto -Mills \Capacity Fees, Rates \Schedule of Capacity Fees PP.DOC
Page 1 of 12
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON AN
ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.12.090 "SCHEDULE OF
CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES "; ADOPT THE ORDINANCE
the needs of current customers. Charging a Capacity Fee based on a buy- in- to -all-
assets at the point of connection equalizes the unit investment of each, customer as
they move from being a "future" to being a "current" customer.
The proposed Capacity Fees are as follows:
Fee Category Current (2001) Proposed % change
Gravity Zone Fee
$3,983 per RUE
$4,150 per RUE
4.2%
Pumping Zone Fee
$4,971 per RUE
$5,481 per RUE
10.3%
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a
proposed ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.12.090 "Schedule of
Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges." Adopt the proposed ordinance.
U: \Position Papers \Miyamoto -Mills \Capacity Fees, Rates \Schedule of Capacity Fees PP.DOC Page 2 of 12
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.12.090
"SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES"
WHEREAS, substantial study has been conducted regarding the impacts of planned
future development within the District's service area on existing District services and
facilities, along with an analysis of new, improved, or expanded District facilities and
services required or appropriate to serve new users and current users who change the
use of their connected buildings and facilities, and said studies have set forth the
relationship between the added burden imposed by such new users and current users
who change the use of their connected buildings or facilities, and the need for and
estimated cost of District services and facilities occasioned by this added burden; and
WHEREAS, these studies were undertaken by District staff and culminated in
documents that are part of the public record, to wit: the draft "Fiscal Year 2005 -06
Capital Improvement Budget and 2005 Capital Improvement Plan," and the "Report
Regarding the Capacity Fee Proposal" dated March 2005; and
WHEREAS, it is reasonable and necessary that all users of the District's wastewater
and household hazardous waste collection, treatment, recycling, reuse and disposal
services and facilities, including those temporary users served under Special Discharge
Permits, contribute their appropriate portion of the funding for such District services and
facilities; and
WHEREAS, public meetings for District staff to informally discuss the proposed
Capacity Fee Program with interested customers were held on April 7 and April 12,
2005; and
Page 3 of 12
Ordinance No.
Page 2
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing regarding the proposed Capacity Fee
Program revisions was held on April 21, 2005, and proper notice was also given of the
availability of the documents noted above for public inspection and review prior to said
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, amendment of Chapter 6.12 of the District Code is required to provide the
enabling authority for the District to implement the proposed Capacity Fee Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District does ordain as follows:
Section 1.
Section 6.12.090 Schedule of Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges of the
District Code is hereby amended as set forth in full in Exhibit "A" to this
Ordinance, which exhibit is hereby incorporated in full herein by this
reference. As of the effective date of this Ordinance, Capacity Fees shall
be charged at such rates and for such categories of users as set forth in
said amended Section 6.12.090.
Section 2.
This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the District and shall be
published once in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general
circulation within the District, and shall be effective on July 1, 2005.
Page 4 of 12
Ordinance No.
Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District on the 21St day of April, 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
APPROVED as to form:
Kent Alm, Counsel for the District
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Page 5 of 12
Exhibit A
6.12.90 Schedule of Capacity Fees, Rates, and Charges
The Board of Directors has set the capacity fees, rates, and charges as
set forth below pursuant to the provisions of this chapter to ensure
adequate funding of all needed upgrades, replacements, renovations, and
improvements of existing District wastewater and household hazardous
waste collection, treatment, recycling, reuse, and disposal facilities to
maintain their capacity, additions to and expansions of the capacity of
these facilities in the future when needed or as required to meet legal and
regulatory requirements (all of which services and facilities will ultimately
be shared by current and future users), for equitable adjustment of capital
contributions as between new, current, and contractual users, and prudent
reserve requirements of the Running Expense Fund, the Self Insurance
Fund, and the Sewer Construction Fund occasioned by the added burden
on District services and facilities attributable to new users and current
users who change the use of their connected buildings or facilities; and to
provide that each new user and each current user who changes the use of
his /her connected buildings or facilities pays his /her fair share of the cost
of District services and facilities.
Page 6 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES
Capacity fees and charges computed in accordance with this chapter shall be applied to
all new connections or added burdens for which fees become due and payable on or
after October 6, 2003. 6.12.090
Gravity Capacity Fee: $ 4,150 /RUE*
Pumping Capacity Fee: $ 1,331/RUE
* A residential unit equivalent (RUE) is a measure of sewage volume and
strength equivalent to a typical residential household.
Gravity Zone Fee (Zone 1) = Gravity Capacity Fee
Pumped Zone Fee (Zone 2) = Gravity Capacity Fee + Pumping Capacity Fee
Residential Unit Equivalence (RUE) Factors(1)
Number of RUE = Unit of Measure Count Multiplied by the RUE factor
Gravity
Pumping.
Eligible for
Use
Unit of
Capacity
Capacity
Capacity
Code
User Group
Measure
Fee
Fee
Use
Charge
(1,2)
RUE
RUE
Factor
Factor
Program
* =Yes
LU
Single-family residences
Dwelling unit
1.000
1.000
LA
Multiple - family
Dwelling unit
1.000
1.000
residences, apartments
LM
Mobile homes
Dwelling unit
1.000
1.000
LC
Common areas
1,000 s . ft.
0.200
0.200
AB
Auto body/painting
1,000 s . ft.
0.432
0.467
AD
Auto dealerships
1,000 s . ft.
0.432
0.467
AL
Aircraft services
1,000 s . ft.
0.432
0.467
AR
Auto repair/
1,000 sq. ft.
0.432
0.467
maintenance
AS I
Service stations
1,000 s . ft. 10.432
0.467
(1) Fees for multi -use buildings shall be determined by considering each use
separately.
(2) "Unit -of- measure" shall mean the basic unit that quantifies the degree of
use of a particular parcel (e.g., dwelling unit, square footage). Square
footage of an improvement shall be based upon the gross exterior
dimensions of the structure.
Page 7 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES — CONTINUED
Use
Code
1 User Group
Unit of
Measure
2
Gravity
Capacity
Fee
RUE Factor
Pumping
Capacity
Fee
RUE Factor
Eligible for
Capacity
Use
Charge
Program
* =Yes
BT
Transportation services
1,000 sq. ft.
0.432
0.467.
AC
Car washes
1,000 sq. ft.
21.127
22.829
AW
Car washes, w/recycling
1,000 sq. ft.
3.522
3.805
BB
Barbers /beauty salons/
et grooming
1,000 sq. ft.
0.725
0.783
BC
Dry cleaners, no laundry
1,000 sq. ft.
0.259
0.279
BR
Retail sales
1,000 sq. ft.
0.259
0.279
BE
Equipment repair /repair
services
1,000 sq. ft.
0.228
0.247
BK
Contractors /business
services
1,000 sq. ft.
0.228
0.247
BN
Nurseries/lumberyards
1,000 sq. ft.
0.228
0.247
IL
I Light industrial
1,000 sq. ft.
0.228
0.247
BH
Meeting halls
1,000 sq. ft.
0.290
0.313
EA
Auditoriums /theaters
1,000 sq. ft.
0.290
0.313
EC
Cinemas
1,000 sq. ft.
0.290
0.313
EM
Entertainment
1,000 sq. ft.
0.290
0.313
EB
Bowling alleys
1,000 sq. ft.
0.311
0.336
BZ
Miscellaneous
commercial
1,000 sq. ft.
0.510
0.551
EG
Golf courses /country
clubs
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.391
EH
Health clubs/spas
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.391
ET
Tennis clubs
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.391
IW
Warehouses
1,000 sq. ft.
0.136
0.147
BM
Markets
1,000 sq. ft.
0.556
0.601
BS
Supermarkets
1,000 sq. ft.
0.556
0.601
(1) Fees for multi -use buildings shall be determined by considering
each use separately.
(2) "Unit -of- measure" shall mean the basic unit which quantifies the
degree of use of a particular parcel (e.g., dwelling unit, square footage).
Square footage of an improvement shall be based upon the gross exterior
dimensions of the structure.
Page 8 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES — CONTINUED
Use
Code
User Group
Unit of
Measure
2
Gravity
Capacity
Fee
RUE
Factor
Pumping
Capacity
Fee
RUE
Factor
Eligible for
Capacity
Use
Charge
Program
* =Yes
BX
Shopping centers
1,000 sq. ft.
1.057
1.142
OB
Business offices
1,000 sq. ft.
0.295
0.319
OF
Financial institutions/
banks
1,000 sq. ft.
0.295
0.319
OG
Government offices
1,000 sq. ft.
0.295
0.319
OS
Fraternal /service offices
1,000 sq. ft.
0.295
0.319
OM
Medical offices
1,000 sq. ft.
0.637
0.688
OV
Veterinary clinics
1,000 sq. ft.
0.637
0.688
RB
Bakeries retail
1,000 sq. ft.
4.061
2.178
RD
Delicatessens
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.294
RN
Bars
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.294
RI
Ice cream parlors
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.294
RY
Yogurt shops
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
1.294
RS
Restaurants dine -in
1,000 sq. ft.
4.010
2.738
RT
Restaurants take -out
1,000 sq. ft.
4.010
2.738
RC
Banquet facilities /patio
seating
1,000 sq. ft.
1.166
0.825
BL
Laundromats
1,000 sq. ft.
13.506
14.594
SF
Skilled nursing facilities
1,000 sq. ft.
2.216
2.347
FE
Residential care facilities
for the elderly
1,000 sq. ft.
0.932
0.987
HP
Hos itals
1,000 sq. ft.
2.891
3.124
LH
Hotels /motels
1,000 sq. ft.
11. 166
1.272
CH
Churches
11,000 sq. ft.
10.242
0.261
(1) Fees for multi -use buildings shall be determined by considering each use
separately.
(2) "Unit -of- measure" shall mean the basic unit that quantifies the degree of
use of a particular parcel (e.g., dwelling unit, square footage). Square
footage of an improvement shall be based upon the gross exterior
dimensions of the structure.
Page 9 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES — CONTINUED
(1) Fees for multi -use buildings shall be determined by considering
each use separately.
(2) "Unit -of- measure" shall mean the basic unit that quantifies the degree of
use of a particular parcel (e.g., dwelling unit, square footage). Square
footage of an improvement shall be based upon the gross exterior
dimensions of the structure.
Page 10 of 12
Eligible for
Capacity
Gravity
Pumping
Use
Capacity
Capacity
Charge
Fee
Fee
Program
Use
Unit of
RUE
RUE
Code
User Group
Measure 2
Factor
Factor
* =Yes
Private Schools SD, SE, SH, SI, SU
Schools w /cafeteria and
Classroom
0.860
1.000
gym/showers
Schools w /gym /showers
Classroom
0.774
0.900
and no cafeteria
Schools w /cafeteria and no
Classroom
0.516
0.600
gym/showers
Schools w/o cafeteria or
Classroom
0.430
0.500
gym/showers
(1) Fees for multi -use buildings shall be determined by considering
each use separately.
(2) "Unit -of- measure" shall mean the basic unit that quantifies the degree of
use of a particular parcel (e.g., dwelling unit, square footage). Square
footage of an improvement shall be based upon the gross exterior
dimensions of the structure.
Page 10 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES — CONTINUED
Special Studies
Type
IFee
Required by District 3
$0
Initiated by User
Actual Cost, $490 Minimum
The following user groups require a special study to determine the capital
improvement fee.
Use
Use
Use
Code
User Group
Code
User Group
Code
User Group
BP
Parking lots
IE
Electronic
--
Improvements
industries
w/ arba a disposals
CM
Cemeteries/
IH
Heavy industries
--
Public facilities
mortuaries
EP
Parks/
IP
Permitted industries
--
Special billings
playgrounds
ES
Swimming pools
IR
Laboratories /
-
Utilities
research facilities
EF
Large
fitness /athletic
clubs
LR
Residence hotels
Values for use in the RUE formula in Section 6.12.050(D)(2) shall be:
FLORU = 200 gpd
BODRU = 200 mg /I
TSSRU = 215 mg /I
A = 0.69
B = 0.14
C =0.17
Page 11 of 12
SCHEDULE OF CAPACITY FEES, RATES, AND CHARGES - CONTINUED
Capacity Use Charge Program
The minimum "initial payment' threshold gravity capacity fee RUE factor shall be 1.166
RUE /per 1,000 sq. ft.
Capacity Charge
Capacity Use
"Initial Payment"
Charge Rates
Gravity
Pumping
Current
Capacity Fee
Capacity Fee
Year
RUE Factor
RUE Factor
($ /Month
Use
(RUE /1,000
(RUE /1,000
1,000 Sq.
Annual
Code
User Group
S . Ft. )
S . Ft. )
Ft.
$ /HCF
AC
Car washes
1.166
22.829
$710.77
$3.83
AW
Car washes, with
1.166
3.805
$ 83.89
$2.71
recycling
BL
Laundromats
1.166
14.594
$439.40
$3.70
HP
Hospitals
1.166
3.124
$ 61.42
$2.42
RB
Bakeries
1.166
2.178
$103.09
$5.82
retail
RS
Restaurants
1.166
2.738
$101.27
$4.55
dine -in
RT
Restaurants
1.166
2.738
$101.27
$4.55
(paper service/
no dishwashers
SF
Skilled nursing
1.166
2.347
$ 37.39
$1.92
facilities
The annual interest rate for calculation of capacity use charges shall be established in
Section 6.30.010 E-4 of this Code.
Page 12 of 12
PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON
A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.30.010
"SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEVELOPMENT - RELATED
RATES AND CHARGES"
SUGGESTED AGENDA
April 21, 2005
Request Staff Report
II. Hearing
A. Open Hearing.
B. Receive comments, if any.
C. Close Hearing.
III. Discussion
IV. Recommended Actions:
A. Adopt proposed Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.30.010
"Schedule of Environmental and Development - Related Rates and
Charges."
CADOCUME -1 Vlopez .000 \LOCALS -1 \Tem p\AGENDA -1. DOC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 4.b. HEARINGS
Type of Action: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING; ADOPT ORDINANCE
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON, AND
CONSIDER ADOPTING A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO REVISE DISTRICT CODE
CHAPTER 6.30 "SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND
DEVELOPMENT- RELATED RATES AND CHARGES"
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Kurt Darner Engineering/ nvironmental Services
Supervising Engineering Assistant
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: 40L
K'
K. rner T amoto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell harles att ,
General Mana r
ISSUE: The District Code requires that a public hearing be held prior to the Board of
Director's consideration of an ordinance to revise Chapter 6.30 "Schedule of
Environmental and Development - Related Rates and Charges."
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a
proposed ordinance to revise District Code Chapter 6.30 "Schedule of Environmental
and Development - Related Rates and Charges." Adopt the ordinance.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed rates and charges are designed to recover
100 percent of the District's direct and indirect labor costs, other operating costs, and
administrative overhead costs incurred in providing environmental and
development - related services. If adopted, the additional revenue generated by these
increases in 2005 -06 would total about $150,000 to $200,000, or about 0.2 to
0.3 percent of total District revenue. This is in addition to the approximately $1.5 million
per year currently generated through application of these rates and charges.
BACKGROUND: Chapter 6.30 of the District Code includes a schedule of rates and
charges for environmental and development - related services provided to contractors,
developers, septic and grease waste haulers, and permitted industrial users. These
services include permit counter assistance, plan review, inspection of construction for
laterals and main line extensions, posting of new sewers, parcels, and permit
information to District maps, administration of Source Control permits and inspections,
and septage and grease permitting sampling and treatment.
The last comprehensive review of these rates and charges occurred in 2003. District
staff periodically reviews the rates and charges to assess whether changes are
appropriate. This year, the District has reevaluated the rates and charges for the
WPosition Papers \Darner \Rates and Charges Ch 6.30.DOC Page 1 of 13
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON, AND
CONSIDER ADOPTING A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO REVISE DISTRICT CODE
CHAPTER 6.30 "SCHEDULE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND
DEVELOPMENT- RELATED RATES AND CHARGES"
categories of Development Plan Review, Construction Inspection, Collection System
Operations services, Right -of -Way, and Miscellaneous. No changes are proposed for
the categories of Industrial Permit Fees and Septage /Grease Disposal.
The District's financial constraints and the State's mandate that revenues from these
sources not exceed the cost of providing services warranted a review of these rates and
charges at this time. Following this review, staff recommended that several rates and
charges be increased, a few be decreased or remain unchanged, some new charges
be added, and a few others eliminated. Attachment 1 presents a comparison of the
current and proposed rates and charges with indications of which are new and which
staff proposes to delete.
Factors contributing to increased rates and charges include: 1) an increase in the total
direct and indirect costs of staff labor of 15.6 percent since 2003; and 2) reevaluation of
the actual level of effort for each task as currently performed. Some rates and charges
were reduced or maintained due to this level of effort reevaluation. New rates and
charges were developed for services not previously assessed and others were added or
deleted to simplify administration.
Attachment 2 presents the effect of the proposed rates and charges on typical projects
(single - family house connection and various main line extensions). The total increases
in rates and charges for these sample projects range from a reduction of 1.8 percent to
an increase of 13.7 percent. Also shown are the fees charged by nearby agencies for
similar projects.
Notices of the public hearing were posted and published in the Contra Costa Times. In
addition, the proposed schedule of rates and charges was distributed to representatives
of the Home Builders Association of Northern California, the Engineering and Utilities
Contractors' Association, the Associated Building Contractors Golden Gate Chapter,
current permit applicants, and others who have requested notice of fee increase
proposals. This effort to invite public comment was pursued to encourage affected
customers to provide input during the rate setting process. Comments submitted by the
public during the review period will be presented to the Board of Directors at the public
hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a
proposed ordinance to revise District Code Chapter 6.30 "Schedule of Environmental
and Development - Related Rates and Charges." Adopt the ordinance.
Page 2 of 13
UAPosition Papers\Darner\Rates and Charges Ch 6.30.DOC
A I FACHMENT 1
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATES & CHARGES (2005)
Fee Category Current Fee Proposed Fee
(A) DEVELOPMENT AND PLAN REVIEW
Review of new sewer plans and related documents; review of plans for and processing of residential and
commercial permit applications; installer reimbursement of sewer construction costs from subsequent connectors;
identification of right -of -way conflicts; and interest rates for District programs.
(A -1)
Development Review:
Mainline Plan Review (2 preliminary + 1 final plan reviews):
Base Fee
$215
$385
NEW
Per Foot Charge (in street) $3.45
NEW
$3.21
Per Foot Charge (in undeveloped land) $3.45
$2.57
Minimum Charge
$615 DELETED
Each additional plan review:
Base Fee
$70
$128
Per Foot Charge
$1.15
$1.07
Special Cut Sheet Review
$140
$163
Manhole only plan review
35
$355
NEW
Manhole only design & plan review
DE LET
LET ED
NEW
Right of Way document review - IOD / Sub Map (each):
$445
NEW
Right of Way document review - Appurtenance (initial):
$470
$445
NEW
Appurtenance (each additional)
$439
NEW
Commercial development plan check (new connections)
- - - -- $227
- -
No change of use
- -- $153
Change of use
No Charge DELETED
$95 /review DELETED
(A -2)
Application Fees
New parcel - new service
$180
Existing lot - new service
$192
$105
$109
Side sewer repair
$83
Commercial application - no change of use
$75
No Charge
Commercial application - change of use
DELETED
$170
$165
Capacity Use Program
$90
$146
(A -3)
Reimbursement Accounts:
Set -up fee
$660
$665
Transaction fee
$135
$148
(A -4)
Commercial Business Review (added square footage, food
NEW service,
Source Control Review)
--- --
$100
(A -5)
Private pumping system plan check
Pump with Outside Force Main
$670
NEW
Pump Only
- - - --
$751
$263
(A -6) Right
-of -way Research / Encroachment Resolution Fee
Actual Expense
Actual Expense
Plan review - no sewer on property
No Charge
DELETED
Plan review - sewer on property
$45
DELETED
(A -7) Special
Approvals
$168
$140
Page 3 of 13
% Change
Table 2
Table 2
5.5%
-1.4%
6.8%
4.2%
10.3%
3.3%
20.0%
0.8%
9.4%
12.1%
20.0%
ATTACHMENT 1
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATES & CHARGES (2005)
Fee Category Current Fee Proposed Fee
(B) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
Inspection of new sewer main construction and new connections and other sewer work on private property (includes
TV inspection when appropriate).
(B -1) Mainline Inspection:
Base Fee
$465
$575
Per Foot Charge (in street)
$6.05
$6.96
Per Foot Charge (in undeveloped land)
$3.70
$5.19
Minimum charge
$950
DELETED
(B -2)
NEW
Inspections by type:
Side Sewer Installation / Repair:
NEW
1 - 100 feet
$115
NEW
101 - 200 feet
$230
NEW
210 - 300 feet
$345
NEW
301 feet and over
$460
NEW
Single Inspection Charge (e.g. sewer connection;
encroachment verification; side sewer capon property; tap and
lateral (new or replacement); air test
_____
$115
NEW
Manhole tap; lateral abandonment at main; pipe bursting
_____
$230
Manhole Alteration
$305
$345
NEW New Manhole; New Rodding Inlet; Outside Pump Installation
NEW Grease / Sand / Oil Interceptor / Trap; Trash Enclosure
Single inspection charge (e.g., C/O or BW device installation;
side sewer cap; tap only or tap replacement; side sewer projects
510 feet in length)
Manhole tap; building connection; lateral abandonment
Lateral extension; side sewer repair; pipe bursting; sewer
alteration; new manhole or rodding inlet only
Full connection; complete side sewer replacement; grease
interceptor; trash enclosure
Private pump system (pump and full connection)
(B -3) Overtime inspection:
First Hour
Every hour thereafter
Weekend /Holiday (New Year's Day, Martin Luther King,
President's Day, Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day, Veteran's
Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas) - 4 hr. minimum
(B -4) Inspection of non - permitted work (+ avoided charge)
$460
1 $690
$100 REVISED (see above)
$200 REVISED (see above)
$405 REVISED (see above)
$605 REVISED (see above)
$810 DELETED
$73 $80
$50 $54
$223 1 $242
$305 1 $345
% Change
Table 2
13.1%
9.6%
8.0%
8.5%
13.1%
Page 4 of 13
ATTACHMENT1
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATES & CHARGES (2005)
Fee Category Current Fee Proposed Fee
(C) COLLECTION SYSTEM SERVICES
TV inspection of sewers conducted separate from a construction inspection activity; verification of sewer location
and sewer service connection.
(C -1) TV Inspection:
% Change
Engineering - private sewer projects
Soil evaluation - private sewer projects
Surveying
Actual Expense P
Actual Expense P
Actual Expense
Weekday, hourly rate
$165
Actual Expense
$166
0.6%
6.00%
Minimum Charge (2 hr min)
$330
$332
0.6%
Overtime - First Hour
$200
$126
-36.9%
Overtime -Each Additional Hour
- - - --
$106
Overtime - Weekend / Holiday (4 hr min)
$800
$445
- 44.3%
(C -2)
Dye test
$230
$287
20.0%
(C -3)
(C -4)
Collection system repair
Cancelled TV Inspection without prior notice
Actual Expense P
$265
$200
Actual Expense
$281
6.0%
(C -5)
Sewer locating and marking
$227
13.5%
(D) RIGHT -OF -WAY
Establishing right -of -way agreements and resolving conflicts.
(D -1) Process quitclaim deeds $100 /HR $786
(D -2) Process real property agreement, license or easement $100 /HR DELETED
NEW Base Fee (1 hour) - - - -- $314
NEW Each Additional Hour
-"" $89
(E) MISCELLANEOUS
District services provided for private sewer projects.
(E -1)
(E -2)
(E -3)
Engineering - private sewer projects
Soil evaluation - private sewer projects
Surveying
Actual Expense P
Actual Expense P
Actual Expense
Actual Expense
Actual Expense
Actual Expense
(E -4)
Minimum annual interest rate for CADs and Capacity Use
Program
6.00%
6.00%
Page 5 of 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED RATES & CHARGES (2005)
Fee Category Current Fee Proposed Fee
(F) INDUSTRIAL PERMIT FEES
Permiting and inspection of industries and other commercial dischargers to ensure availability and use of
pretreatment processes.
(F -1) I Class I Fees
(F -2) (Class II Fees ( *)
(F -3) Class III Fees ( *)
(F -4) Industrial user permit application fee ( *)
(F -5) Special discharge permit application fee ( *)
No on -site inspection
On -site inspection ( *)
(G) SEPTAGE DISPOSAL
Sampling and disposal of septic waste and grease.
(G -1) Annual permit fee
(G -2) Residential septic /toilet waste
< 2,000 gallons
> 2,000 gallons
(G -3) Restaurant grease waste ( * *)
< 2 000 II
Base permit fee of $3,256 Base permit fee of $3,2:
+ cost of District's lab + cost of District's lab
analysis analysis
Base permit fee of $3,256 Base permit fee of $3,2`
+ cost of District's lab + cost of District's lab
analysis analysis
Base fee of $351 Base fee of $351
Base fee of $225 Base fee of $225
$65 each
Base fee of $345
$1,650
$18 + $0.14/gal
$58 + $0.14/gal
$65 each
Base fee of $345
$1,650
$18+$0.1
$58+$0.1
ga ons $18 + $0.02/gal $18 + $0.02/gal
> 2,000 gallons $58 + $0.02/gal $58 + $0.02/gal
*) Additional charges to be billed separately if staff time incurred is above that included in the base fee.
* *) Other approved waste will be charged at the residential septic and portable toilet waste rate unless actual strength
haracteristics are provided.
Page 6 of 13
% Change
No Change
ATTACHMENT 2
COMPARISONS OF RATES AND CHARGES FOR TYPICAL PROJECTS
EXISTING PROPOSED
EXAMPLE CCCSD RATES CCCSD RATES & PERCENT
Pr CHARGES CHANGE
Single House Connection on $4,933 - $5,921 $4,844 - $6,175
Existing Lot (assumed lateral
cost: $2,500) [$3,983 - $4,971 -1.8 to 4.3%
] [$4,150 - $5,481]
[Numbers in brackets represent the Capacity Fee portion of the total fees]
300 Foot Main Extension in
Street (assumed project cost:
$45,000)
1,000 Foot Main Extension in
Street (assumed project cost:
$100,000)
3,000 Foot Main Extension in
Undeveloped Land (assumed
project cost: $200,000)
$3,530
$10,180
$22,130
$4,012
$11,133
$24,251
13.7%
9.4%
9.6%
OTHER AGENCIES I OTHER AGENCY
TOTALS
Dublin San Ramon
Services District
Mt. View SD
Delta Diablo SD
(Pittsburg)
Concord
West County SD
Dublin San Ramon
Services District
Mt. View SD
Concord
West County SD
Delta Diablo SD
(Pittsburg)
Dublin San Ramon
Services District
Mt. View SD
Concord
West County SD
Delta Diablo SD
(Pittsburg)
Dublin San Ramon
Services District
$11,512
[$11,050]
$8,333
[$7,588]
$5,727
[$4,975]
$3,928
[$3,703]
$2,143
[$1,988]
$3,030
$4,180
$4,931
$2,250
$5,568
$7,288
$9,650
$11,938
$5,000
$12,350
$20,388
Mt. View SD
$20,550
Concord
$24,780
West County SD
$10,000
Delta Diablo SD
(Pittsburg)
$25,300
Page 7 of 13
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
AMENDING DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.30
SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES FOR VARIOUS
ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEVELOPMENT - RELATED SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
( CCCSD) finds that it is necessary to charge customers of CCCSD and users of
CCCSD services for the reasonable cost of providing said services; and
WHEREAS, CCCSD staff has analyzed the cost of providing various
environmental and development - related services, such as, but not limited to, permit
counter assistance, plan review, inspection for the construction of side sewers and main
line extensions, the addition of new sewers; parcels, and permit information to CCCSD
maps, source control permits and inspections, and septic and grease hauler sampling
and treatment; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the Schedule of Rates and Charges for
environmental and development - related services, as reflected in the Exhibit to this
Ordinance, represents the reasonable cost of providing the services delineated within
said Schedule of Rates and Charges; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors finds that this action is categorically exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273 (a)(1)
and (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, in that the fees are being charged merely to
reimburse CCCSD for staff costs and expenses;
THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1.
The fee for each of the environmental and development - related services
described in the Exhibit to this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, shall be as set forth therein. The rates and charges set forth in the attached
Exhibit shall be codified in Chapter 6.30 of the District Code and said Schedule of Rates
and Charges shall supersede the preexisting Schedule of Rates and Charges contained
in the District Code on the effective date of this Ordinance. Said Schedule of Rates and
Charges contained in the Exhibit shall remain in effect until amended by ordinance.
Section 2.
This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the District and shall be published in the
Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated within
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and shall be effective as of July 1, 2005.
Page 8 of 13
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District on the 21st day of April, 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Approved as to Form:
Kenton L. Alm
District Counsel
Page 9 of 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT - RELATED RATES & CHARGES
Fee Category
Proposed Fee
(A) DEVELOPMENT AND PLAN REVIEW
Review of new sewer plans and related documents; review of plans for and processing of residential and
commercial permit applications; installer reimbursement of sewer construction costs from subsequent
connectors; identification of right -of -way conflicts; and interest rates for District programs.
(A -1)
Development Review:
Mainline Plan Review (2 preliminary + 1 final plan reviews):
Base Fee
$385
Per Foot Charge (in street)
$3,21
Per Foot Charge (in undeveloped land)
$2.57
Each additional plan review:
Base Fee
$128
Per Foot Charge
$1.07
Special Cut Sheet Review
$163
Manhole only design & plan review
$593
Right of Way document review - IOD / Sub Map (each): $470
Right of Way document review - Appurtenance (initial):
$439
Appurtenance (each additional)
$227
Commercial development plan check (new connections)
$153
(A -2)
Application Fees
New parcel - new service
$192
Existing lot - new service
$109
Side sewer repair
$83
Commercial application - change of use
$170
Capacity Use Program
$146
(A -3)
Reimbursement Accounts:
Set -up fee
$665
Transaction fee
$148
A -4
( )
Commercial Business Review (added square footage, food service, Source Control
Review)
$100
(A -5)
Private pumping system plan check
Pump with Outside Force Main
$751
Pump Only
$263
(A-6)
Right -of -way Research / Encroachment Resolution Fee
Actual Expense
(A -7)
Special Approvals
$168
Page 10 of 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT - RELATED RATES & CHARGES
Fee Category
Proposed Fee
(B) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
Inspection of new sewer main construction and new connections and other sewer work on private property
(includes TV inspection when appropriate).
(B -1)
Mainline Inspection:
Base Fee
$575
Per Foot Charge (in street)
$6.96
Per Foot Charge (in undeveloped land)
$5.19
(B -2)
Inspections by type:
Side Sewer Installation / Repair:
1 -100 feet
$115
101 -200 feet
$230
210 - 300 feet
$345
301 feet and over
$460
Single Inspection Charge (e.g. sewer connection; encroachment verification; side
sewer cap on property; tap and lateral (new or replacement); air test
$115
Manhole tap; lateral abandonment at main; pipe bursting
$230
Manhole Alteration
$345
New Manhole; New Rodding Inlet; Outside Pump Installation
$460
Grease / Sand / Oil Interceptor / Trap; Trash Enclosure
$690
(B -3)
Overtime inspection:
First Hour
$80
Every hour thereafter
$54
Weekend /Holiday (New Year's Day, Martin Luther King, President's Day,
Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas) - 4 hr.
minimum
$242
(B-4)
linspection of non - permitted work (+ avoided charge)
$345
Ir" i
Page 11 of 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT - RELATED RATES & CHARGES
Fee Category
Proposed Fee
(C) COLLECTION SYSTEM SERVICES
TV inspection of sewers conducted separate from a construction inspection activity, verification of sewer
location and sewer service connection.
(C -1)
TV Inspection:
Weekday, hourly rate
$166
Minimum Charge (2 hr min)
$332
Overtime - First Hour
$126
Overtime - Each Additional Hour
$106
Overtime - Weekend / Holiday (4 hr min)
$445
(C -2)
Dye test
$287
(C -3)
Collection system repair
Actual Expense
(C-4)
Cancelled TV Inspection without prior notice
$281
(C -5)
Sewer locating and marking
$227
(D) RIGHT -OF -WAY
Establishing right -of -way agreements and resolving conflicts.
(D -1)
Process quitclaim deeds
$786
Base Fee (1 hour)
$314
Each Additional Hour
$89
(E) MISCELLANEOUS
District services provided for private sewer projects.
(E -1)
Engineering - private sewer projects
Actual Expense
(E -2)
Soil evaluation - private sewer projects
Actual Expense
(E -3)
Surveying
Actual Expense
(E -4)
Minimum annual interest rate for CADs and Capacity Use Program
6.00%
Page 12 of 13
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT - RELATED RATES & CHARGES
Fee Category
Proposed Fee
(F) INDUSTRIAL PERMIT FEES
Permiting and inspection of industries and other commercial dischargers to ensure availability and use of
pretreatment processes.
(F -1)
Class I Fees
Base permit fee of $3,256 + cost of
District's lab analysis
(F -2)
Class II Fees ( *)
Base permit fee of
$3,256 + cost of
District's lab analysis
(F -3)
Class III Fees ( *)
Base fee of $351
(F-4)
Industrial user permit application fee ( *)
Base fee of $225
(F -5)
Special discharge permit application fee ( *)
No on-site-inspection
$65 each
On -site inspection ( *)
Base fee of $345
(G) SEPTAGE DISPOSAL
Sampling and disposal of septic waste and grease.
(G -1)
Annual permit fee
$1,650
(G -2)
Residential septic /toilet waste
< 2,000 gallons
$18 + $0.14/gal
> 2,000 gallons $58 + $0.14/gal
(G -3)
Restaurant grease waste ( * *)
< 2,000 gallons
$18 + $0.02 /gal
> 2,000 gallons $58 + $0.02/gal
( *) Additional charges to be billed separately if staff time incurred is above that included in the base fee.
( * *) Other approved waste will be charged at the residential septic and portable toilet waste rate unless actual strength
characteristics are provided.
Page 13 of 13
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005 No.: 7.a. ENGINEERING
Type of Action: INFORMATIONAL
Subject: PROVIDE BOARD WITH INFORMATION REGARDING THE COST OF
MAINTAINING THE SHELL PIPELINE AND POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES AND
RECEIVE BOARD DIRECTION
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Melody LaBella, Assistant Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
U
M. LaBella D. erger /R. Schmidt C. Swanson
A. Farr II
General
ISSUE: When the District purchased the Shell Pipeline in 1994, the exact physical
location of the Shell Pipeline had not been surveyed or mapped. Because the exact
location is not known, the District's Collection Systems Operation Division (CSOD)
locating crews have difficulty marking the Shell Pipeline, when USA utility - locating
requests are made, risking potential damage to the pipeline. The cost to locate and
map the entire pipeline, most of which is in East Bay Municipal Utility District's
( EBMUD) jurisdiction, is significant.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: If the District desires to retain the pipeline and maintain it for
future use, some investment will be required to properly locate the pipeline.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The District could elect to do the following:
1) Continue with current practice of providing limited information when
utility - locating requests are received. Over time, the pipeline may be
compromised by damage due to conflicting utility projects.
2) Locate, survey, and map only the portion of the pipeline within the Contra Costa
Water District (CCWD) service area that could potentially be used as part of a
future District recycled water project.
3) Locate, survey, and map the entire pipeline, including the portion in the EBMUD
service area.
4) Consider sale of the portion in the EBMUD service area to EBMUD for recycled
water use only.
5) If EBMUD is not interested in purchasing the pipeline, obtain consent from Shell
to investigate sale of the Shell Pipeline to another party.
Paqe 1 of 3
U: \Position Papers \LaBella \Shell Pipeline PP.DOC v
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
subject: PROVIDE BOARD WITH INFORMATION REGARDING THE COST OF
MAINTAINING THE SHELL PIPELINE AND POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES AND
RECEIVE BOARD DIRECTION
Three of the possible alternative courses of action involve keeping all or a portion of the
pipeline as a District asset, and are described in the following table.
Alternative I Estimated Associated
Financial Impact
1. Retain ownership of the entire pipeline, receive
utility - locating request calls but continue current $0
practice of furnishing available inaccurate data and
allow possible damage to the pipeline
2. Retain ownership of and locate the portion of the $48,000
pipeline in CCWD's jurisdiction and offer the (Minus any funds gained from
remainder of the pipeline first to EBMUD or then the sale of the pipeline)
to another agency /utility for purchase
3. Retain ownership of the entire pipeline and invest
in locating, surveying, and mapping the entire line
$444,000
BACKGROUND: In 1994, the District purchased a 15 -mile portion of the Shell Pipeline
for $1, with the vision of eventually using it to deliver recycled water to the Lamorinda
area and Martinez zones. Because of the high cost of bringing the Shell Pipeline into
operation for the distribution of recycled water, the Shell Pipeline has not been
physically connected to the active recycled water distribution system; it is not currently
being used to convey recycled water.
The current problem facing the District is the inability to physically locate the pipeline.
Most of the test stations used by Shell to energize and locate the pipeline have been
lost (buried or paved over) or destroyed over the years. As a result, our CSOD pipe
locating crews are unable to physically locate the pipeline for USA utility- locating
requests. This situation leaves the pipeline vulnerable to construction activities near the
pipeline. Construction drawings provided by Shell at the time of purchase only provide
a general idea of the location, and they reference surface features from the early
1960's that, in many cases, are no longer accurate. As a result, the actual location of
the Shell Pipeline has not been mapped on the District's 200 -foot scale base maps.
In 1999, an agreement was drafted to sell a portion of the Shell Pipeline to EBMUD for
$93,129 (District's actual acquisition cost) in order to facilitate delivery of recycled water
to the Lamorinda area. The economic viability of this project was driven by two large
projects in Orinda. These projects have not materialized, and the Lamorinda project is
not currently under consideration. Furthermore, EBMUD has been investigating new,
less expensive ways to provide recycled water to their customers. For example, the
Palos Colorados development, originally designated as being served by the Shell
Pipeline, has been investigating the cost of a satellite recycled water plant for
production of recycled water on site to serve the proposed golf course and residential
development. Therefore, while EBMUD is a potential purchaser of the pipeline, they
LIAPosition Papers \LaBella \Shell Pipeline PP.DOC Page 2 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
Subject: PROVIDE BOARD WITH INFORMATION REGARDING THE COST OF
MAINTAINING THE SHELL PIPELINE AND POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES AND
RECEIVE BOARD DIRECTION
may no longer be interested. Legally, the District could choose to purvey recycled
water within the EBMUD service area using the Shell Pipeline, but would have to
negotiate with EBMUD. If EBMUD is not interested in purchasing the pipeline, another
alternative that could be more financially feasible would be to obtain consent from Shell
to look for other willing buyers who could use the pipeline for some other purpose. This
alternative would require written consent from Shell for a new public use, and some
additional investment from the District.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Staff recommends that the Board provide
direction to do one of the following:
1) Continue with current practice.
2) Locate a portion or all of the Shell Pipeline and maintain it as a District asset.
3) Authorize staff to offer the portion of the Shell Pipeline in the East Bay Municipal
Utility District's jurisdiction for purchase to EBMUD for the distribution of recycled
water at a fair price. If EBMUD is not interested, further authorize staff to obtain
consent from Shell to pursue other potential buyers.
4) Request additional information for further discussion.
Page 3 of 3
UAPosition PapersTaBella \Shell Pipeline PP.DOC
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: April 21, 2005
No.: 8.a. BUDGET AND FINANCE
Type of Action: APPROVE EQUIPMENT BUDGET
Subject: APPROVE THE 2005 -2006 EQUIPMENT BUDGET FOR INCLUSION IN
THE 2005 -2006 DISTRICT BUDGET
Submitted By: Initiating Dept✓Div.:
Debbie Ratcliff, Controller Administrative /Finance & Accounting
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
D. Ratcl'�
u aves
General
ISSUE: The District's 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget is submitted for approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget for inclusion in the
2005 -2006 District Budget to be adopted at the June 16, 2005, Board Meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget totals $734,125, which
includes a contingency amount of $60,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could decide not to approve the
Equipment Budget.
BACKGROUND: The 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget was submitted for review at a
Board Capital Projects Committee Meeting /Board Workshop on March 24, 2005 and is
scheduled for approval by the Board on April 21, 2005. The Committee did not suggest
any changes to the submitted Equipment Budget
The approved 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget will be scheduled for adoption with the
2005 -2006 Staffing Plan, Operations and Maintenance, Self- Insurance Fund, and
Capital Improvement Budgets at the June 16, 2005, Board Meeting.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Approve the 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget for
inclusion in the 2005 -2006 District Budget to be adopted at the June 16, 2005, Board
Meeting.
SADMIMPOSPAPERApprove 2005 -2006 Equipment Budget 04- 21- 05.doc Page 1 of 1