HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/6/2004 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sai..,ary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004 No.: 3.a. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ACCEPT CONTRACT WORK/AUTHORIZE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
subject: ACCEPT CONTRACT WORK FOR THE LAFAYETTE SEWER RENOVATION
PROJECT, PHASE 4, DISTRICT PROJECT 5661, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF THE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Munawar Husain, Associate Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
M. Husain ecki W. Brennan OA. Farrell *Generaslwmana tt
r
ISSUE: C onstruction has been completed on the Lafayette Sewer Renovation Project, Phase
4, District Project 5661, and the work is now ready for acceptance.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept contract work.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None related to this action.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. Filing the Notice of Completion is
required under California Civil Code Section 3093.
BACKGROUND: The Lafayette Sewer Renovation Project, Phase 4, reconstructed sewer lines
at 17 locations, 10 of which were easement sites. A total of 9,200 linear feet of 6- to 10 -inch
sewers were replaced and /or rehabilitated, of which 4,500 linear feet were in streets and 4,700
linear feet were in easements (see Attachment 1 for map). This project was similar to the
previous Lafayette Sewer Renovation Project, Phase 3B, which required a high percentage of
sewer easement work that involved close cooperation with customers for site access and
restoration.
On June 5, 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the award of a construction contract for this
work in the amount of $1,098,800 to Overmiller, Inc., dba Roto- Rooter. The contractor was
issued a Notice to Proceed which was effective June 23, 2003, with a required contract
completion date of December 24, 2003. Work was identified and implemented at several
additional sites during construction, at the request of CSO, which extended the completion date
to March 29, 2004. The District had beneficial use of the work on March 29, 2004. The
remaining items of work consist of punch list items, which do not affect the project acceptance.
It is appropriate to accept the contract work at this time. The total authorized budget for this
project is $1,540,500. An accounting of the project costs will be provided to the Board of
Directors at project close -out.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept contract work for the Lafayette Sewer Renovation
Project, Phase 4, D.P. 5661, by Overmiller, Inc., dba Roto- Rooter, and authorize the filing of the
Notice of Completion.
LAPosition Papers \HUSAIN \5661 Acceptance.doc Page 1 of 2
LAFAYETTE
HILLDALE
RD —
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
S
Prepared by Engineering Support Sectic
5
KSHIRE��
CJ
HOPE LN
McELLEN WAY
PLAN
BIRDHAVEN CT
11 &
12
3 & 4
LAFAYETTE SEWER RENOVATIONS PROJECT
PHASE 4
CCCSD PROJECT NO.5661
Attachment
1
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa San..ary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
Type of Action: DENY CLAIM
POSITION PAPER
No.: 3.b. CONSENT CALENDAR
Subject: DENY CLAIM OF TIMOTHY POTTER FOR ALLEGED DAMAGES
Submitted By: C. Freitas, Human Initiating Dept /Div.:
Resources Manager Administration /Human Resources
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
111
R. Musgraves
General
ISSUE: Timothy Potter, Source Control Program Superintendent, has filed a claim
against the District for damages he alleges he suffered due to a pending disciplinary
action.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the claim by Mr. Potter as procedurally defective and
unmeritorious. Refer to labor counsel for further action.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Attorney fees.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Accept the claim.
BACKGROUND: The claim was received by the District on April 6, 2004. It alleges that
Mr. Potter has suffered defamation of reputation, good name, character and standing,
as a result of his having received a disciplinary notice. The disciplinary action is being
arbitrated. Damages are sought in an undetermined amount.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Deny the claim by Mr. Potter. Refer to District
labor counsel for further action.
Page 1 of 1
C:\My Documents\potter claim to Bd 5- 6- 04.doc
Central Contra Costa Sank.dry District
vBOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004 NO.: 3.c. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ESTABLISH HEARING DATE
subject: ESTABLISH MAY 20, 2004 AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
RECEIVE COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2004 -05 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET /2004 10 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Submitted By: Initiating Dept/Div.:
John J. Mercurio, Engineering /Environmental Services
Management Analyst
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
S Mercurio R. Sdhmidt C. Swanson A. Farrell CKarlesltii.l
General Mai
ISSUE: The District's draft Fiscal Year 2004 -05 Capital Improvement Budget/2004
Ten -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIB /CIP) has been prepared by staff. A date for a
public hearing to receive comments on the document should be established.
RECOMMENDATION: Establish May 20, 2004 as the date for a public hearing to
receive comments on the draft CIB /CIP.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None related to this action.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: The Fiscal Year 2004 -05 Capital Improvement Budget will establish
near -term project priorities and authorize budgets for the Treatment Plant, Collection
System, General Improvements, and Recycled Water Programs. Detailed information
for projects that are anticipated to be active in Fiscal Year 2004 -05 is presented in the
Capital Improvement Budget document. The 2004 Ten -Year Capital Improvement Plan
will provide the basis for policy decisions concerning the District's Capital Improvement
Program and management of the Sewer Construction Fund. The Capital Improvement
Plan also serves as the framework for fee analysis.
On April 22, 2004, the Board of Directors met with District staff in a workshop session to
review the draft Capital Improvement Budget/Capital Improvement Plan.
It is appropriate to receive comments in a formal public hearing prior to consideration of
the CIB /CIP for approval. This public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for the
Board's regular meeting on May 20, 2004. A staff presentation will be made at that
time.
U:\Position Papers\ Mercurio \PublicHearC]B- 2004.doc Page 1 Of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
subject: ESTABLISH MAY 20, 2004 AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
RECEIVE COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2004 -05 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET /2004 10 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Establish May 20, 2004 as the date for a public
hearing to receive comments on the draft CIB /CIP.
UAPosition Papers\ Mercurio \PublicHearCIB- 2004.doc Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa San..ary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004 No.: 3.d. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE
subject: SET PUBLIC HEARINGS ON JUNE 3, 2004, TO RECEIVE PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THE 2004 -2005 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET AND
THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET AND FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE 2004 -2005, 2005 -2006, AND 2006 -2007 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
Submitted By:
Initiating Dept. /Div.:
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
R. Musgraves
General Ma
ISSUE: The District Code and State of California law require holding Public Hearings
for the establishment of the Sewer Service Charge rates for fiscal year 2004 -2005, and
the following two years and for placing the 2004 -2005 Sewer Service Charges on the
County tax roll for collection. Although not required by law, the District holds a public
hearing to receive public comment on the 2004 -2005 Operations and Maintenance
Budget and the Self- Insurance Fund Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a public notice to set public hearings on June 3,
2004, to receive public comment on the establishment of the Sewer Service Charge
rates for fiscal year 2004 -2005 and the following two years and for the collection of
Sewer Service Charges by placing them on the County tax roll, and to receive public
comment on the 2004 -2005 Operations and Maintenance Budget and Self- Insurance
Fund Budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: At the June 3, 2004, Public Hearing, the Board will be asked to
consider a Sewer Service Charge rate increase of $8 for fiscal year 2004 -2005, and up
to $8 for fiscal year 2005 -2006, and up to $9 for fiscal year 2005 -2006. Total additional
revenues for fiscal year 2004 -2005 would be approximately $1,250,000.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The Board could choose not to increase the
Sewer Service Charge for 2004 -2005 and the following two years, however, this is not
recommended as was discussed at the Board Financial Planning and Policy Workshop
on January 29, 2004.
In regard to the collection of Sewer Service Charges, the Sewer Service Charge could
be collected through direct billings by the District. However, this would require
additional labor and benefit costs. The Sewer Service Charge has been collected on
SAADMIMPOSPAPER \Public Hearing 6- 3- 04.doc Page 1 of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
Subject: SET PUBLIC HEARINGS ON JUNE 3, 2004, TO RECEIVE PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THE 2004 -2005 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET AND
THE SELF - INSURANCE FUND BUDGET AND FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE 2004 -2005, 2005 -2006, AND 2006 -2007 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND ON PLACING CURRENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR COLLECTION
the County tax roll since the inception of the service charge in 1976. Staff believes that
collection on the tax roll provides the most economical and efficient means for the
District to collect these charges.
BACKGROUND: At the Board Financial Planning and Policy Workshop in January and
at several subsequent Board meetings, staff reviewed the financial prudence of
increasing the Sewer Service Charge by approximately 3% each year for three years to
cover inflationary increases in the budget. The Operations and Maintenance budget,
which will be submitted for initial review by the Board of Directors on May 20, 2004, will
be based on a Sewer Service Charge increase of 3% or $8.
It is required by law to hold Public Hearings to receive public comment on establishing
the Sewer Service Charge rates and collecting such charges by placing them on the
County tax roll. This hearing is typically held during the Board Meeting at which the
Operations and Maintenance Budget is presented for approval. Approval of the 2004-
2005 Operations and Maintenance Budget and Self- Insurance Fund Budget is
scheduled for the Board Meeting on June 3, 2004.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize a public notice to set public hearings
on June 3, 2004, to receive public comment on the establishment of the Sewer Service
Charge rates for fiscal year 2004 -2005 and the following two years and for the
collection of Sewer Service Charges by placing them on the County tax roll, and to
receive public comment on the 2004 -2005 Operations and Maintenance Budget and
Self- Insurance Fund Budget.
S:WDMIN \POSPAPER \Public Hearing 6- 3- 04.doc
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sank,ary District
pill'- BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004 No.: 5.a. BIDS AND AWARDS
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AWARD
Subject: AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SOARES
PIPELINE, INC. FOR THE ACACIA PARALLEL FORCEMAIN PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 5727
Submitted By: Initiating Dept./Div.:
Edgar Lopez Engineering / Capital Projects
Assistant Engineer
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
E. L T. Godse Y W. Brennan A. Farrell
General
ISSUE: On April 23, 2004, sealed bids were received and opened for the construction
of the Acacia Parallel Forcemain Project, District Project 5727. The Board of Directors
must authorize award of the contract or reject bids within 50 days of the bid opening.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of a construction contract.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $149,000 including bid price, contingency and
construction management.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: The alternative would be to reject all bids,
which is not recommended.
BACKGROUND:
The District's 1989 Pumping Station Master Plan identified the need to add a second
forcemain to the Acacia Pump Station. The Acacia Pump Station is a small, below
grade, submersible pumping facility. The station is located in Orinda and is within an
East Bay Municipal Utility District watershed. The Master Plan recommended that the
addition of another forcemain would increase station capacity. Dual forcemains would
also improve station reliability, allowing the station to remain on line in the event of a
single forcemain rupture. The project site is shown in Attachment 1.
The current project scope of work consists of the installation of a new 4 -inch forcemain
running parallel to the existing forcemain. Other improvements include complete site
paving, adequate facility drainage, bypass piping and the construction of a valve
structure that would allow operating staff to work safely outside the wetwell.
CAEngineering \5727 Acacia \5727AwPPFinal.DOC Page 1 of 5
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
subject. AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SOARES
PIPELINE, INC. FOR THE ACACIA PARALLEL FORCEMAIN PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 5727
District staff prepared the plans and specifications for the project. The Engineer's
estimate for construction is $140,000. This project was advertised on March 29 and
April 5, 2004. A total of four (4) sealed bids ranging from $89,000 to $138,000 were
received and publicly opened on April 23, 2004. A summary of bids received is shown
in Attachment 2. The Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial
evaluation of the bids and concluded that Soares Pipeline, Inc. is the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder with a bid amount of $89,000.
The District will administer the construction contract and provide contract administration,
inspection, survey, office engineering and shop drawing review. The allocation of funds
required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 3, is $149,000. This project is
included in the fiscal year 2003 -04 Capital Improvements Budget (CIB) /Capital
Improvements Plan on pages CS -82 through CS -87 under the Orinda/ Moraga Pumping
Station Reliability Improvements. Staff has determined that there are adequate funds in
the CIB for this project. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 2004 and will be
completed by September 2004.
Staff has concluded that this project is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(1), since it involves
construction of a pipeline less than a mile in length in a public right -of -way. Approval of
this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that the project is
exempt from CEQA.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize award of contract for construction of
the Acacia Parallel Forcemain Project, District Project 5727, in the amount of $89,000
to Soares Pipeline, Inc., as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
CAEngineering\5727 Acacia \5727AwPPRnal.DOC Page 2 of 5
Central Contra Costa Attachment
Sanitary District ACACIA PARALLEL FORCE MAIN PROJECT
Alpat DP 5727 1
Page 3 of 5
ATTACHMENT 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
SUMMARY OF BIDS
PROJECT NO. 5727 Acacia Parallel Forcemain Proiect DATE: April 23, 2004
LOCATION: Orinda, California ENGINEER EST.: $140,000
BIDS OPENED BY: /s/ Joyce Murphy DATE: April 23, 2004 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
Page 4 of 5
BIDDER
BID PRICE
(Name & Address)
Soares Pipeline, Inc.
1
18550 Melrose Ave.
$89,000
Hayward, CA 94541
W. R. Forde Associates
2
984 Hensley Street
$118,790
Richmond, CA 94801 -2117
D. R. Lemings Construction
3
P.O. Box 2173
$137,400
Concord, CA 94521
D &D Pipelines
4
629 Divisadero
$138,000
San Francisco, CA 94117
6
7
8
9
BIDS OPENED BY: /s/ Joyce Murphy DATE: April 23, 2004 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT 3
ACACIA PARALLEL FORCEMAIN PROJECT
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5727
POST - BID /PRE- CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
PERCENT OF
ESTIMATED
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
1. Construction Contract 89,000
2. Contingency at 25 percent 23,000
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL: 112,000 100.0
3. Construction Management
• District Forces
Construction Management/ Inspection
21,000
Contract Administration/ Engineering
6,000
Community Relations
2,000
Operations Department
3,000
Record Drawings
1,000
Surveying
2,000
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT:
$35,000 31.2
4. Consultant
• Material Testing
2,000
SUBTOTAL CONSULTANT:
$2,000 1.8
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
ENGINEERING TOTAL (ITEMS 3 & 4) $37,000 33.0
5. Prebid Expenditures (Design Costs) $17,000 15.1
6. Total Estimated Project Cost $166,000 148.2
7. Funds Allocated to Date for this Portion of $17,000
Work
8. Allocation Required to Complete Project $149,000
CAEngineering \5727 Acacia \5727AwPKinal.DOC Page 5 of 5
W
O
O
\nI
V
0
0
O
3
G)
O
Q
V
(in
I
(0
\A1I�I
I�
CD
m
c�
CD
CD
olIq
n
O
cn
O
O
0
cn
0
�I
n
G)
z
-i
—
<
—
M
CD
—
C7
CD
QL
—
0
,--�
�
C
3
Q CD
0
71
CD
CD
(A
U)
CD
(D
�.
�.
cn
CD
_.
-�
O
CD
:3
o
CD
0
o
o
p
-h
O
-•
—
la)
C
—
CD
O
o
U
O
�
o
CD
u,
�.
CD
n
CD
=3
0
CD
CD
�,
o
:3
3
o
D
CD
C)
0
�I
n
tr
O
O
0
0
W
0
0 (/) * �< Cl)
CD 0
CD CD CD --%
n W
Cn < %< 3
O n CD
`< O
O Cn 100 I
<
0
0 p z0
CD _. CD
O
� CD
C �
CD
O
CD
n
O
`T
CD
n
0 C7
0 G)
CD --%
O
n <
O CD
=3 1
CD
C
Q
CD -0
CD
CD
CD
U)
CD
CD
U)
O
1
W
t"b
r~-t- •
C)
�eJ r
m
O
O
0
cn
0
Ul
_r
r—t-
C/i
■
i
O
�
O
CD
QL
(.
0-
CQ
CD
0 0W3�.
CD
^^
`
CD
(a
CD
C0D
O
'
,—t•
_.
CD
Q.
:3
CD
O
CD
�
Q_
3
_.
o
O
_
_
_.
07
CD
—0
CD
O
�
C�
CD
�
a
CD
�
0
C(D
Cl
(n
CD
CAD
(n
CD
CD
r'♦'
0
�
1
0—
Q_
�
O
�
O
�
W
N
CD
CD
_r
r—t-
C/i
■
i
O
�
O
CD
(.
-0
CQ
CD
0 0W3�.
C
<
C0D
CD
'
,—t•
_.
CD
Q.
:3
CD
O
CD
�
Q_
O
.�
p
O
_.
07
CD
—0
O
�
CD
cn
CD
_.
CD
C(D
Q.
_r
r—t-
C/i
01
O
O
n
U)
0
0
0
n
c
U)
CD
Q
C/)
SD
G
_V
_.
CD
F•
QL
CD
El
Q
CD
r--f
n
r--F
0
V
0
0
m
CD
U.
�I
5
CD
3
CD
0
rr--h
VJ
SD
G
n
CD
w
m
0
coo
CD
Q
CD
CD 0
3
CD
0
CD 0
l J �
0 n
3
0.
C
cD -0
CD
CD
3
CD
0
r-t-
0
(7�
CA
CP
O
O
V
zr
--44
r-F
CD
CL
W#-.
O.
V+
C7
0
0
v
V
O
07
I
L
m
O
rr�F
V/
5'
Cam"
C/)
G)
�-.•�
CD
O
0
r�^^
V,
W
`J
`✓
CD
♦♦�
V/
V
O
07
I
L
m
O
rr�F
V/
5'
Cam"
U�
W
i
O
cD
0
•.
9—i
�r--F
C�
O
O
QL
:'
O
r1■
07
0
ok
D
CD
3
CD
La
n�
n
(n
CD
cn
I
V J
S�
G
CD
1%
O
0
o'
m
CD
CD
CD
CD
Q
U)
-0
I" -
0
U)
m
CD
O
CD
O
U)
Ll
V
CD
0
O
O
U)
r+
O
CD
O
0
r+
O
N
cD
� V ? -P
K) -I -I -1 -I V NN N NN V -4
Mj N C) C) C:) _4 -1 -4 _4
-4 C
CD CJ� M -1 O N CD M -4 N W T Ui M N
0 000 00 rrrr -<pCn
0 0 w 0 -- 0 0 0 0 W 0 0
X, 0 ° 0= 0 0 0 n 00 n :3 0
Q m Q Q c 3 m m m m m m CD `< CD Q CD—
V) g Cn ao n w o Cl)
o 0 0 0 0
Cn 0
U) . . . m m m m .+
�n ��n�cnmm— z
so
3
-4 -4 -4 � v
D 0 D D Go
4 N V V V
K K K K K
.l
v o CO CD M
--4 -4 w
V, Y J -4 V
co
w w
CVO O
C°ooQDVwCO
j
CZ W -4
OD OD a N
N W O) W
V -I V V V V V V V V M M M M V V V
W- W W W W W co co co CD -+ W W
D 0 D D w p p p p p m m m m M O p
4 N -I V V CW -+ N j W W W W -4
� CO OD OD W N W N� N W OD OD DD N W N=
4 V M QO 4�6 W a) W O N W W W�
Wit:
N O
A 3
O Q:
O O
3
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Cl)
.
�i
�D
V V -I V V V W 00 N W O OD
4 V N -I OD OD .A Ui OD -s Ui V OD A 4�6 O V W
O 01 W OD Cn W OD N -+ OD U7 N N (A) -Pi. N N W�
m m_mm_KG) nG) G) Cl) nmKmmU)
0 0 0 0 0 0 a z =`° 5 m`° B`° 3
a w <.SD a w <� Oo Qmo� co 8-
n a �� �� F bEL—aN
o W
mm" m �' m� rn m
�. z
�n 3
m
M M .i M M M-4 .i M .r v M .i .i .i .i .i 0 .i
(D co - 0 (D CD W W (D -1 W O - - W W -.& cD -L
O O O O O O W M O O W m D D W O O m W
i� � -4 -0, .P 4�-, N o v M O v N N v M V
W C7 W W W4�6 M W (n N - U1 4�6 N W M4�6 2
-► -1 N CD W - W W M -1 O - (D OD O �#
Cn
0 0 v M M M -1 -I M V -I M -I -1 -1 -1 -1 M y
to co � CD (D cD � W cD � W cD � � W W � W 1
O O O O O O w w O O W m D D W O O m W
P, 4�& v -N 4�L-N v 1-N v M M V N N V O v
-► N v - W W I- Ln N N W-N W v W J O w
N
c 3
o
W N N N _a � � -A _a � � � -A � � � � _a -L a
1? N- W W v 0 U1 .P ?����� W W W O O
4 O_ � N_ 0 Un A O_ 0 CO (D W O 4 4 W W Ul Ln
0000000000000000000 F\)
Ul
O
n
cn
0
�+
CD
n CD CD
CD
V �
C
n
0
0
C�
rf
0
0
X
�T
nJ,
CD
0
CD
CD
�rn
\V
0
r- f.
O
V
0
l< rf
0
h
O
QL
CD
CD
� a
l �
L
0
9
y
Cr
O
HE
Al,
T
N
R.I.i.
1•
CCCSD CAPACITY FEE PROGRAM
Special Study Review
Capacity Fee Program
. Provides for new users to " "buy into" the
District sewer system
. Intent of capacity fees is to equalize
investment in District capital assets between
new and existing users
• New users pay capacity fee at time of initial
connection to sewer system
• Existing users pay additional capacity fees if
there is an "added burden"
Capacity Fees
. Fees are based on anticipated wastewater
strength and volume
. Board adopts a schedule of fees
. Fees for different users based on "Residential
Unit Equivalent" or RUE
. RUE is a measure of sewage strength and
volume equivalent to a typical residential
household
• Current residential capacity fees
• Gravity capacity fee - $3,983/RUE
• Pumping capacity fee - $988 /RUE
Lcapacity Fee Special Study
MRWI
For non - residential users where the Board has not
established a RUE factor, a special study is conducted
by District staff.
A special study determines the wastewater strength and
volume for a particular business or industry.
Special studies may be reevaluated after 1 to 5 years of
operation by the business or industry.
2
Special Study Capacity
Fee Example
1. Special study determines capacity fee for a
non - residential user to be 10 RUE (or $39,830).
2. After 5 years of operation, a review determines
that the user is generating wastewater
equivalent to 15 RUE.
3. User is obligated to pay additional capacity fees
for 5 RUE (or $19,915).
Special Study Review
MW
1997 to 2003
No. of users Preliminary Resolution
7 Greater than 5 RUE difference
2 Less than 5 RUE difference
11 Needs additional analysis
8 Need additional data
92 OK
120 Total special studies
3
Additional Capacity Fee
> 5 RUE
Business Additional Fee
Oakwood Athletic Club — Lafayette $186,260
Homestead Village — San Ramon
$155,150
Extended Stay America — Pleasant Hill
$74,810
Extended Stay America — San Ramon
($25,080)
24 -Hour Fitness — San Ramon
$45,440
Round Table Pizza — Walnut Creek
$18,000
Kratzer Chapel - Danville
$15,200
Special Study Review Process
1. District staff completes draft review based on 3 to
5 years of operation.
2. Staff delivers draft report to users. A meeting will
be held with owing fees >$20,000.
3. User reviews draft report and provides comments
to District.
4. Staff reviews comments and completes report.
Final report sent to users.
5. Invoices sent to users with fees <$20,000. Refunds
sent out.
6. Meet with users owing more than $20,000 to
explain payment options. Invoices sent based upon
agreed payment terms.
0
Proposed Board Actions
. Modify District Code to expand capacity
use charge program to include users
with an additional capacity fee greater
than 5 RUE.
. Allows payment of additional fee over
15 years at 6% interest.
5
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004 No.: 7.a. HUMAN RESOURCES
Type of Action: APPROVE STAFFING PLAN
subject: APPROVE STAFFING PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005
Submitted By: Cathryn Freitas, Human Initiating Dept. /Div.: Administrative /Human
Resources Manager Resources
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
C401
. Musgraves
Charles . atts, oe
General Manage
ISSUE: The Board reviewed the personnel needs of the District for Fiscal Year 2004-
2005 at its April 1, 2004, meeting. Accordingly, staff its submitting the Staffing Plan for
Board approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Staffing Plan for Fiscal Year 2004 -2005.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed Staffing Plan would increase annual salary
costs by $11,658.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS:
Do not approve this Staffing Plan; or modify this staffing plan.
BACKGROUND: Each department has reviewed its staffing requirements for Fiscal
Year 2004 -2005. The Staffing Plan was provided to the Board at its April 1, 2004,
meeting which included departmental overviews, personnel actions taken during Fiscal
Year 2003 -2004 to -date, requested changes and their justifications, new job
classification descriptions, and organizational charts reflecting current staffing and
proposed changes. There were sixty -five personnel actions during Fiscal Year 2003-
2004; twenty -eight of these resulted from labor negotiations.
The attached summary sheet highlights the effect of each department's staffing
requests on the number of total authorized positions in the District and the costs in
salaries and benefits. As shown in the summary, the total number of authorized regular
positions in the District will be the same as last year. Seven Co -op student positions
are requested which is one less than Spring 2004 and the same number as Fall of
2003.
The salaries and wages in the 2004 -2005 0 & M Departmental Budgets will increase
from the previous year due to cost -of- living salary adjustments and any merit and
longevity increases scheduled in 2004 -2005. Staff is recommending the salaries for
Co -ops remain at $18.00 an hour.
H: \BUDGET\Approve Staffing Plan PP 2004.doc Page 1 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
Subject: APPROVE STAFFING PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005
The Staffing Plan was referred to Local One. They have reviewed it without comment.
Administrative
None
Operations
Collection System Operations
None
Plant Operations
1. Delete one Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical (G -65, $4,653.90 -
$5,640.04) position.
2. Add one Maintenance Planner (G -71, $5,371.31 - $6,503.90) position and
reclassify Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical, Randy Covey to
Maintenance Planner.
3. Delete one Secretary 1 /11 (1: G -45, $2,905.95 - $3,503.86; II: G -49,
$3,189.46 - $3,854.47) position.
4. Add one Secretary III (G -52, $3,421.90 - $4,133.90) position.
Engineering
5. Delete one Engineering Assistant I (G -60, $4,133.90 - $5,003.18) position.
6. Delete two Engineering Assistant II (G -65, $4,653.90 - $5,640.04)
positions.
7. Delete one Construction Inspector /Designer (G -67, $4,887.62 - $5,914. 06)
position.
8. Add four Engineering Assistant 1 /11 (1: G -60, $4,133.90 - $5,003.18;
II: G -65, $4,653.90 - $5,640.04) positions; adopt the job classification
description; and reclassify the two Engineering Assistant II's and the two
Engineering Assistant I's.
HABUDGETWpprove Staffing Plan PP 2004.doc Page 2 of 3
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: May 6, 2004
Subject: APPROVE STAFFING PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2004 -2005
Secretary of the District
co-op
None
9. Authorize the hiring of students to fill seven Co -op positions in 2004 -2005.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION:
Approve the Staffing Plan for Fiscal Year 2004 -2005 herein identified by items 1 - 9.
Page 3 of 3
HABUDGET\Approve Staffing Plan PP 2004.doc