No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/6/2003 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 4.a. CONSENT CALENDAR Type of Action: ACCEPT GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND AUTHORIZE RECORDING Subject. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND GRANTS OF EASEMENT WITHIN THE ROSSMOOR DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 7, DP 5502 Submitted By: David Baldi, Senior Initiating Dept /Div.: Engineering /Capital Projects Engineering Assistant REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: D. Baldi rFMd&i W. r nnan General ISSUE: Board of Directors action is required to transfer existing sanitary sewers from the privately maintained Rossmoor system to the District's public sewer system. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions accepting public sewer improvements and Grants of Easement for District Project No. 1001, Parcels 134, 136, 137, 141, 142, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, and 149, and authorizing staff to record the Grants of Easements with the Contra Costa County Recorder. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. AUERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not Applicable. Filing the easement documents is part of the agreement between the District and Rossmoor. BACKGROUND: The agreement between Rossmoor and the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides for the improvement and transfer of portions of the Rossmoor sanitary sewer system to CCCSD. The agreement formalizes a process by which sewers with diameters of six (6) inches and greater would become publicly maintained. To date, seven (7) phases of this project have been completed. The 10- foot wide easements being submitted represent those sewer lines that have been completed under Phase 7 work. The parcel designations and grantors of the easements that are being accepted now can be found in the following table: 134 Fourth Walnut Creek Mutual 136 Second Walnut Creek Mutual 137 Walnut Creek Mutual Number 8 141 First Walnut Creek Mutual 142 First Walnut Creek Mutual I: \Construction \Position Papers\2003 \BaldiPPDP5502.doc Page 1 of 20 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 subiect:: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS ACCEPTING PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND GRANTS OF EASEMENT WITHIN THE ROSSMOOR DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 7, DP 5502 144 Golden Rain Foundation 145 First Walnut Creek Mutual 146 First Walnut Creek Mutual 147 Golden Rain Foundation 148 Mutual 29 149 Second Walnut Creek Mutual Once the easements are accepted by the Board of Directors, staff will record them. The sewers within the easements will become part of CCCSD's public sewer system upon the Board's action. Staff has concluded that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines, Section 18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use limitations. Approval of this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that this project is exempt from CEQA. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Adopt resolutions accepting public sewer improvements and Grants of Easements for Rossmoor Development Project, Phase 7, District Project No. 1001, Parcels 134, 136, 137, 141, 142, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, and 149, and authorizing staff to record the Grants of Easement with the Contra Costa County Recorder. I: \Construction \Position Papers\2003 \BaIdiPPDP5502.doc Page 2 of 20 Central Contra Costa Attachment Sanitary District EASEMENT LOCATION MAP ' ROSSMOOR SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE 7 a 0 0 0 0 T O CENTRAL RIGHT C SUB 3979 MUT 21 M73 LOT 2 PM 15 N6 °0 ��M5 n DISTRICT SEWER i ✓i A. i ......, .. / 89, / f�> ,Z//, Ii' � 9p, i N Page 4 of 20 NI DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o MAC N DLB , 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1 "= 100' 10 -02 -02 189 -220 134 A,B , ,....:. , i ✓i A. i ......, .. / 89, / f�> ,Z//, Ii' � 9p, i N Page 4 of 20 NI DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o MAC N DLB 72D6 & E6 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1 "= 100' 10 -02 -02 189 -220 134 A,B C CENTRAL RIGHT C IF DISTRICT SEWER `. M1 \ PARCEL 32 ` M UT 12 \ \ \� O O j .- \ \ \ \ N Page -5 of �0 N DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o MAC N DLB 77A2 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: ' 1" -100' N 10 -02 -02 189- 180 -004 136 'lls ............ I , M9 o O ............. CENTRAL C0.NT 5 MARY DISTRICT . " A RIGHT 0"I N ''for SEWER Page 6 of 20 O DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: 0 MAC DLB 72E5 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: r=100, 10-02-02 189-140-016 137 A,B ... ........ EX.H1 T. CENTRAL CQNTR MARY DISTRICT RIGHT 0. SEWER .................. .. . .......... ......................... ........... it I ... ....... e 71A M4; - M5 ...... .. . ... 0,;-- . .. ' 26' EX. M Z 46' 25' ......... m i M2 ............. ........... PARCEL 19 G) 29 LSM 20 MUT 4...............:> .. rn ................. . .... ......... ............. ......... ............ ............................. l(o ........... .......... .............. .. ........ ................. . ............ . .... .................... ..... ..... .................. ........ .. ............... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... ........................................... ............. ............... . ........ :10 ................ ............. .... ...... ........... ...... ... . . .............. ............ .... ........ .................. ........... ........... . . ............... ............... ........................ o o .............. .... ............... ........... ..... .......................... . ................. . ...... .............. .......... o ............ . .............. .......... b— RD �N` GpLpEN Page 1 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o MAC DLB 72E6 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: V=160' 10-02-02 189-150-004 141 r, %ff I I i r2i 1"rui-im r% n CENTRAL CONTRF MY DISTRICT (`MV'far SEWER RIGHT PARCEL 39 6 PM 12 ............. MUT 8 : ............. /b Page 9 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 72 E5 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 111=100, 10-02-02 189-140 144A CENTRAL RIGHT C DISTRICT . SEWER . .......... .. ........................... ........ . . . ......... ............... .......... PANE ............ .......... 26' mi .......... 144 PARCEL 19 I PARCEL 22 29 LSM 20 0 30 LSM 18 ...... ...... MUT._4 MUT 5 .. ... rn .................... .......... ......... ................ ........ ............ ► .............. ............................. .......... . .............. ........ ....... ...... ............ . .... .......... ........... ................ .................................. . ............... .......... . ............................................... ......... ................ .... ............ ............... . . ............ . ............. . .......... ............. a . ............... . .......... ...... .... ........ . ........... . ......... ............. .............. ...... ............... ........... ........... ............... ....... ................................ .......... ........................ ........ . .. ...... . ....... fklD Page 10 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 72E6 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1''=160' 10-02-02 189-150 144B 0 0 CENTRAL RIGHT C ........ . ..... .............. . . . ............... ........................... ....................... ... .......... ........ w ...................... . . ...................... 1: ............ ....... ................. ....................... . ..... . ............. ................ ..................... .... . ............ . ...................... .......... .......... ............ .. .............. ............. ........... ............ . ............. ........... ..... ...... ................. ..... ..... .. . .......... .......... ............. cp, .......... ............. \ ... ......... .................... ................. . Page 11 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 72 E6 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1' =160' 10-02-02 189-150 144C a a 0 O O O w CENTRAL RIGHT C DISTRICT SEWER r N Y W W rr U W U F= Page 12 of 20 DRAWN BY: b,„ v THOMAS BRO.: DISTRICT SEWER r N Y W W rr U W U F= Page 12 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o N MAC DLB 75 A7 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: N 1" =100' 10 -02 -02 189 -160 144D a a 0 0 0 CENTRAL RIGHT C DISTRICT SEWER TILE CREEK - - -_4 DR PARCEL 6 .................. I 25 LSM 50 MUT 1 I I RO CY\V- �1 Y I I Page 13 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 77 Al 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1" -100' 10 -02 -02 189 -160 144E 0 I CENTRAL CONTR,% los- VA'- IWARY DISTRICT MIN®R RIGHT O-E,,,„d W11A. Vior SEWER C) �M4 mi 1 0, 51\3 \E r-clqu 1`-F Ul Z-V DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: o MAC DLB 77A2 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 111-100, 10-02-02 189-180 144F CENTRAL RIGHT C 6 ,d 1 DISTRICT - SEWER Page 15 of 20 DRAWN CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: SDC DLB 77 A2 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1"-100, 10-02-02 189-180 144G n 0 O O 0 CENTRAL RIGHT C DISTRICT SEWER 25 LSM 50 M UT 1 RO CKVE- i i Page 16 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 77 Al 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1" =100' 10 -02 -02 189 - 160 -005 145 CENTRAL RIGHT a ..................... I I I I \ . ..................... 0 v O O O O -36' DISTRICT SEWER 440' OAKMONT DR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Y w w Cr U w Page 17 of 20 o DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: g MAC N DLB 75 A7 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 1" -100' N 10 -02 -02 189- 160 -004 146 CENTRAL Nq CONTR, -00 - - GARY DISTRICT W, 'g, RIGHT VKMVfor SEWER mi - - - - - - - -- cr" -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 323' GOLDEN OLDEN RAIN RD m2-,/// .............. ....... . .... ............. ..... ......... ............. w L w PARCEL I 25 LSM 48 ... ......... .. ...... MUT 13 ......... . ........... .. . ........ .. . ...... .... .............. .............. ................... ..................... ..................... Page 18 of 20 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: 0 MAC DLB 75 A7 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 111-100, 10-02-02 189-160-011 147 ro O O O O r-xrm morinimriow-vimri — CENTRAL CONTFW GARY DISTRICT RIGHT F.,zo 919 SEWER 01-1 141 M 28 MUT 29 ------------------- -- - --o -- 19 of 20 DRAWN CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 77 A2 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 111=100, 10-02-02 189-310 148 O O O CENTRAL RIGHT C 16' �,t!V!2 DISTRICT - SEWER n\ Page 20 of 20 DRAWN CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.: MAC DLB 77 A2 1001 SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.: 111-100, 10-02-02 189-180-004 149 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No-: 4. b. CONSENT CALENDAR Type of Action: SET HEARING DATE Subject: ESTABLISH MARCH 6, 2003, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EL PINTADO ROAD CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2002 -8 Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.: Russell B. Leavitt, Management Analyst Engineering /Environmental Services REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD A CITION. lq� 'V� U` R. Leavitt . Swanson A. Farrell Ch arles General Mai ISSUE: A public hearing is required to establish the El Pintado Road Contractual Assessment District (CAD) No. 2002 -8. A public hearing is also required to create an assessment district pursuant to the procedure adopted under Proposition 218, which amended the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4. RECOMMENDATION: Establish March 6, 2003, as the date for a public hearing regarding El Pintado Road CAD No. 2002 -1 pursuant to California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4, and Streets and Highways Code, Sections 5898.20 and 5898.24. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are minor costs for publishing a legal notice advertising the public hearing and for staff preparation and attendance. These costs eventually will be paid by the CAD participants. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Select a later date for the public meeting - This would delay the CAD proceedings since the holding of a public hearing is required by law. 2. No action by the Board - No action will delay the CAD proceedings indefinitely. BACKGROUND: On September 5, 2002, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution of intention to create El Pintado Road CAD No. 2002 -8 for the purpose of installing sewer improvements on El Pintado Road in Danville (see Attachment 1). The proposed El Pintado Road CAD No. 2002 -8 complies with the revised CAD policy approved at the February 1, 2001 Board of Directors meeting. Eight properties could be served by a El Pintado Road public sewer. As required by Proposition 218, an Engineer's Report estimating assessments for properties within the CAD is being prepared. It is now appropriate to schedule a public hearing to offer interested parties the opportunity to comment on the 4/27/01 T: \TP_Planning \Leavitt \CADS \EI Pintado \Set Hearing Date - Contract PP.wpd Page 1 of 5 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 Subject: ESTABLISH MARCH 6, 2003, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EL PINTADO ROAD CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2002 -8 proposed assessments and related issues. A resolution has been prepared and is attached, which, if adopted, will set the date of the public hearing for March 6, 2003. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Establish March 6, 2003, as the date for a public hearing regarding El Pintado Road CAD No. 2002 -8 pursuant to California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4, and Streets and Highways Code, Sections 5898.20 and 5898.24. 4/27/01 T:\TP_Planning \Leavitt\CADS \EI Pintado \Set Hearing Date - Contract PP.wpd Page 2 of 5 „ O \ ♦`♦ ors \� ♦, I, n � yy ' RLN 11 1A LOCATION MAP N.T.S. I/ I I I I I I I I I I I I l ' I ADO / / J / 3 / / /5 ti Z j I N 0 _ _ 0 E 240 160 80 0 240 o ====mod �- H FEET i O POTENTIAL EXISTING ell—elves, PLANNED PROPERTIES SERVABLE CAD AREA SEWER CAD SEWER BY CAD SEWER E n N Central Contra Costa Attachment Sanitary District PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF EL PINTADO ROAD CAD NO. 2002-8 Page 3 of 5 I I N I I c\I �1 I N I I , 1� O� LOCATION MAP N.T.S. I/ I I I I I I I I I I I I l ' I ADO / / J / 3 / / /5 ti Z j I N 0 _ _ 0 E 240 160 80 0 240 o ====mod �- H FEET i O POTENTIAL EXISTING ell—elves, PLANNED PROPERTIES SERVABLE CAD AREA SEWER CAD SEWER BY CAD SEWER E n N Central Contra Costa Attachment Sanitary District PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF EL PINTADO ROAD CAD NO. 2002-8 Page 3 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING OF PROTESTS ON EL PINTADO ROAD CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (CAD NO. 2002 -8) WHEREAS, on September 5, 2002, this Board of Directors adopted Resolution 2002 -068 expressing the intent of the District to proceed with El Pintado Road Contractual Assessment District (CAD) No. 2002 -8 for the purpose of installing sewer improvements on El Pintado Road in Danville; and WHEREAS, at the direction of this Board of Directors, Curtis W. Swanson, Environmental Services Division Manager, as Engineer of Work for improvement proceedings for El Pintado Road CAD No. 2002 -8, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Contra Costa County, California, has prepared a report described in Section 5898.22 of the Streets and Highways Code (Municipal Improvement Act of 1911); and WHEREAS owners of each affected parcel will be provided written notice of the proposed assessment and ballot to indicate approval or opposition of the assessment pursuant to the procedures required by California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4, as amended by Proposition 218; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District resolves: 1. This Board sets 2 p.m. on March 6, 2003, at the Meeting Room of the Board of Directors, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing protests to the proposed improvements and the creation of the proposed Contractual Assessment District and assessment. 4/27/01 TATP_Planning \Leavitt \CADS \EI Pintado \Set Hearing Date - Contract PP.wpd Page 4 of 5 2. The Secretary of the District is directed to publish, post, and mail the notices of improvement required by the Municipal Improvement Act of 1911, and to file an affidavit of compliance. The notice shall be published in the CONTRA COSTA TIMES not later than twenty (20) days before the date of the hearing. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 2003, by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following votes: AYES: Members: NOES: Members: ABSENT: Members: President of the Board of Directors, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa, State of California COUNTERSIGNED: Secretary, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa, State of California APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenton L. Alm District Counsel 4/27/01 T: \TP_Planning \Leavitt \CADS \EI Pintado \Set Hearing Date - Contract PP.wpd Page 5 of 5 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 4.c. CONSENT CALENDAR Type of Action: HUMAN RESOURCES Subject: DIRECT STAFF TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF AN ARBITRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISTRICT'S GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Submitted By: initiating Dept. /Div.: CATHRYN R. FREITAS, HUMAN Administration/ Human Resources RESOURCES MANAGER REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: ✓"`nor C. Freitas K KVsgraves Charles Bat , rles/ General Mangger ISSUE: When a grievance has been appealed to the Board level, the Board must employ a neutral third party to hear the matter and recommend action to the Board in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (M.O.U.) between the District and the CCCSD Employees' Association, Public Employees' Union, Local One, Article III, Section, 2.5. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to secure the services of an arbitrator in accordance with the District's grievance appeal procedures. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The District and the Union share the cost of the arbitrator and court reporter for grievances. An estimated cost of these services is $2000 per day. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None. BACKGROUND: Engineering Assistant III (Right -of -Way) Ricardo Hernandez applied for the position of Collection System Inspection Supervisor. Another employee, an Engineering Assistant III (Inspection), was promoted to the Supervisor position in March, 2002. Mr. Hernandez filed a grievance on August 5, 2002 with Engineering Department Director Ann Farrell. Ms. Farrell heard the grievance and dismissed it as being untimely since the M.O.U. requires that grievances must be filed within fifteen days of when the grievant knew or should have known of the action in question. Mr. Hernandez appealed Ms. Farrell's decision to the General Manager. He, too, found Mr. Hernandez's grievance to be untimely and without merit. Mr. Hernandez is now appealing to the Board for the services of an arbitrator. In matters that are appealed to the Board, the M.O.U. states: 1/29/03 C:\ WPDocs \hernandez.pospprgriev1.wpd Page 1 of 2 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 subject: DIRECT STAFF TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF AN ARBITRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISTRICT'S GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE "The Board shall employ a neutral third party to hear the matter and recommend action to the Board. The District and the Union shall equally share the cost. ... The Board may adopt, reject or modify the recommendation of the appointed neutral third party. The decision of the Board is the final action of the District." The Board has received background information under separate cover. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize staff to secure the services of an arbitrator in accordance with the District's grievance appeal procedures. 1/29/03 C: \WPDocs \hernandez.pospprgrievl.wpd Page 2 of 2 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 01) BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 4.d. CONSENT CALENDAR Type of Action: APPROVE MERIT INCREASE subject: REQUEST APPROVAL OF REGISTRATION DIFFERENTIAL SALARY MERIT INCREASE FOR ASSISTANT ENGINEER NATHAN W. HODGES Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.: Ba T. Than, Senior Engineer Engineering /Capital Projects REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: B. Than . Bre an A. Farrell General ISSUE: A registration differential salary merit increase requires approval by the Bo4d of Directors. RECOMMENDATION: Grant Assistant Engineer Nathan Hodges a one -step increase of his basic salary effective January 23, 2003. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: One step salary increase. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None BACKGROUND: Nathan W. Hodges is an Assistant Engineer in the Capital Projects Division of the Engineering Department. This classification does not require registration as a Professional Engineer. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Management Support /Confidential Group and Central Contra Costa Sanitary District provides for a salary merit increase for employees who achieve registration or license as Professional Engineer, Land Surveyor, or Certified Public Accountant while employed by the District in a position not requiring such registration or license. Nathan W. Hodges has provided evidence to his supervisors that he has passed all required examinations and is now licensed as a Professional Engineer in California (see Attachment 1). Nathan has consistently demonstrated his ability to assist in the accomplishment of the planning, design, and construction activities of the District requiring the professional level of judgment and skill expected of a Professional Engineer. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Grant Assistant Engineer Nathan W. Hodges a one - step increase of his basic salary effective January 23, 2003, as the registration differential salary merit increase provided for in the MOU. 1/29/03 L: \Position Papers \Hodges \PE meritincreasempd Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA -STATE AND CONSUMER SERV AGENCY GRAY DAVIS. Govemor BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 2535 Capital Oaks Drive, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95833 -2944 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 349002, Sacramento, CA 95834 -9002 . Telephone: (916) 263 -2222 Calnet: 8-435 -2222 RE �� _Q Fax: (916) 263 -2246 or(916)263-2221 Board Internet Address: http: / /www.dca.ca.gov /pels JAN 2 5 2 ^9 3 CCCSD CAPITAL PP C.IFCTS 01/23/2003 NATHAN W.HODGES 5019 IMHOFF PL MARTINEZ, CA 94553 CONGRATULATIONS! D: 3092 Branch: Civil We are pleased to inform you that you have successfully passed the recent Professional Engineer examination. This letter will serve as temporary evidence that you now hold a valid license as a Professional Engineer. A formal certificate, which will include your license number, will be prepared and mailed to you within four to six weeks. Please refer to the California Code of Regulations (Board Rules) for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors (Title 16, Division 5, Sections 400 - 474.5) for information on the following subjects that are your responsibility. These Rules can be found on our website at www.dca.ca.gov /pels /laws.htm Rule 407 - Fees Rule 411 - Seal and Signature Rule 412 - Address Change Rule 415 - Practice within Area of Competence Of particular importance is that all licenses are subject to renewal, and payment of a renewal fee is required. A renewal notice will be mailed to you several weeks before the expiration date of your Professional Engineer license. If you do not receive a renewal notice, you are still responsible for renewing your license. If you wish to order a seal or stamp, you may purchase one from any stationary store or rubber stamp company. Please note that some Engineers are required to seal, stamp and sign any plans, specifications, or reports prepared by them, or under their direction. Board Rule 411 provides specific criteria on seals. Notices and newsletters from the Board Office cannot reach you unless we have your current mailing address. Board Rule 412 requires you to advise us in writing of any address changes within 30 days after the effective date of the address change. EXAMINATION AND LICENSING STAFF Page 2 of 2 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 5.a. HEARINGS Type of Action: CONDUCT HEARING; ADOPT ORDINANCE Subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSEMENT FEES, TO ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTY WHICH COULD CONNECT TO DISTRICT PROJECT 5480 SEWERS Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.: Jack Case, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: rv,", i J. Case J. Miyamoto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell 41e atts nag ISSUE: When a reimbursement fee is proposed for a property which could directly correct to a "standard facility," the District Code requires that a public hearing be held prior to the Board of Directors' consideration of the fee for adoption. RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of Reimbursement Fees, to establish a reimbursement fee applicable to property which could directly connect to District Project 5480 sewers. Adopt the Ordinance. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: An administrative charge to recover District costs is paid by the installer for each fee collection transaction. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: Project sewers listed in the subject are "standard facilities," as defined in the District Code. Certain individual property owners within the boundary of the project area are the installers of these facilities. To fairly and equitably distribute the cost for these facilities, the District Code provides for the installers to be reimbursed for the proportion of cost allocable to other properties which connect to the sewers within 20 years of project acceptance by the District. Staff has drafted a proposed Ordinance (Attachment 1) to establish a reimbursement fee for properties which connect to this project's sewers. Exhibit A of Attachment 1 shows the location of the project and the boundaries of properties which could directly connect to the project's sewers. The proposed reimbursement fee will be collected from property owners within the boundary of this area, if and when they connect their property to the sewer system. The collected fee will be held in a separate account, and disbursed to the installers of the project. WPosition Papers \Case \PubHear -Reimb Fees.wpd Page 1 of 7 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 Subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSEMENT FEES, TO ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTY WHICH COULD CONNECT TO DISTRICT PROJECT 5480 SEWERS The calculation of the proposed reimbursement fee is summarized in Exhibit B of Attachment 1. This fee would be charged in addition to Capacity Fees (now $3,360 per Residential Unit Equivalent) and other District charges, such as those for permits, inspection and sewer service. The District Code requires that reimbursement fees be adjusted at least annually to account for the increase or decrease in value of the facilities due to inflation and depreciation. These fees may also be adjusted to account for differences between estimated and actual costs, and increases or decreases in the number of connections which may connect to the facilities. However, once a particular property has connected to the public sewer, and the fees have been paid, the District will not collect any additional reimbursement fees for that connection, nor refund any excess reimbursement fees which might otherwise be occasioned by these adjustments. Appropriate notices have been posted, and published in the Contra Costa Times. In addition, individual letter notices were mailed to the owners of all affected properties, as required by the District Code. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of Reimbursement Fees, to establish a reimbursement fee applicable to property which could directly connect to District Project 5480 sewers. Adopt the Ordinance. U: \Position Papers \Case \PubHear -Reimb Fees.wpd Page 2 of 7 ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSEMENT FEES TO ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTY WHICH COULD DIRECTLY CONNECT TO DISTRICT PROJECT 5480 SEWERS WHEREAS, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) Code Chapter 6.20 provides for reimbursement to installers of standard and special facilities from fees charged property owners when they apply to connect their property to the public sewer system; and WHEREAS, District Code Chapter 6.20 provides for the establishment of reimbursement accounts for constructed standard and special facilities; and WHEREAS, District Project 5480 sewers, the location of which are shown on Exhibit A of this Ordinance, incorporated in full herein by this reference, are standard facilities as defined in District Code Chapter 6.20; and WHEREAS, a reimbursement fee has been calculated by the method specified in District Code Chapter 6.20, which calculation is summarized in Exhibit B of this Ordinance, incorporated in full herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the proposed reimbursement fee was conducted at the Board of Directors' regularly scheduled meeting on February 6, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District does ordain as follows: Page 3 of 7 Ordinance No. Page No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSEMENT FEES TO ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTY WHICH COULD DIRECTLY CONNECT TO DISTRICT PROJECT 5480 SEWERS A reimbursement fee applicable to properties which connect directly to Project 5480 sewers designated on Exhibit A is hereby established. Said reimbursement fee, which shall be consecutively added to District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of Reimbursement Fees, has been calculated in the manner set forth in District Code Chapter 6.20 and shown in Exhibit B of this Ordinance. The reimbursement fee for properties which directly connect to Project 5480 shall be as follows: District Description of Facility Allowable Number Reimbursemen Project Actual or of t Fee Number Estimated Cost RUEs 5480 Canyon Road, $126,905.06 4 $31,726.27 Lafayette Section 2 The reimbursement fee set forth herein shall be administered, adjusted and collected according to the provisions of District Code Chapter 6.20. Section 3 Exhibits A, and B, hereto shall not be incorporated into the District Code; however, copies of same shall be maintained in the District offices and made available for inspection during the periods where the subject reimbursement fee is in effect. Page 4of7 Ordinance No. Page No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSEMENT FEES TO ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTY WHICH COULD DIRECTLY CONNECT TO DISTRICT PROJECT 5480 SEWERS Section 4 This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the District and shall be published once in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation within the District, and shall be effective on the eighth calendar day following such publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Sanitary District on the 6th day of February, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Members: NOES: Members: ABSENT: Members: President of the Board of Directors, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa, State of California Secretary of the District, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa, State of California APPROVED as to form: Kenton L. Alm, Counsel for the District Page 5of7 Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B Reimbursement Fee Calculation Project 5480, Canyon Rd, Lafayette "Standard Facilitk' Reimbursement Cost Construction Engineering District Fees Number of Potential Connections to "Standard Facility" 4 Residential Unit Equivalents (RUE) "Standard Facility" Reimbursement per Unit RUE= $126,905.06 / 4 RUE _ $31,726.27 / RUE $115,266.50 6,163.00 5.475.56 $126,905.06 Properties to which Standard Facility Reimbursement Fee may apply Street Address Assessor Parcel Number Number of RUE per Parcel Installer Waive Fee Potential Fee 4115 Canyon Rd 249 - 050 -002 One Yes 4123 Canyon Rd 249 - 080 -002 One Yes 1198 Estates Dr 247 - 120 -003 One Yes 1200 Estates Dr 247 -120 -004 One Yes Page 7of7 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District /J a i ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No 7.a. BIDS AND AWARDS Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AWARD Subject AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE COLLECTION SYSTEM RENOVATIONS - SPOT REPAIRS 2002/2003, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5622 Submitted By. Initiating Dept. /Div.: Sasha Mestetsky, Assistant Engineer Engineering Department / Capital Projects Division REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: Au,/ A. ,."�-K �m blj�— S. Me etsky A. Antkowiak W. Brennan A. Fa ar es . B General ISSUE: On January 24, 2003, sealed bids were received and opened for construction of the Collection System Renovations - Spot Repairs 2002/2003, District Project No. 5622. The Board of Directors must authorize award of the contract or reject bids within 50 days of bid opening. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of a construction contract to D'arcy & Harty Construction, Inc.. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $537,620 including design, bid price, contingency, and construction management. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Reject all bids, which is not recommended. BACKGROUND: The District's Collection System Operations Division (CSOD) has identified over 100 high priority spot repairs in streets, throughout the District's 1,500 miles of sewer mains. The goal of this project is to help CSOD to reduce the high priority repairs backlog. The Collection System Renovations - Spot Repairs 2002/2003 project will repair forty (40) critical pipe sections in seven (7) different cities throughout the District's service area (see Attachment 1 for map). Plans and specifications for this project were prepared by District staff. The engineer's estimate for construction of the Spot Repairs Project was $350,000. The project was advertised on January 3 and 9, 2003. Nine sealed bids ranging from $258,850 to $455,240 were received and publicly opened on January 24, 2002. A summary of bids received is shown in Attachment 2. The Capital Projects Division staff conducted a technical and commercial evaluation of these bids has determined that D'arcy & Harty Construction, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 258,850. 1/29/03 GA5622 - Spot RepairsWward 5622.wpd Page 1 of 5 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 Subject AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO D'ARCY & HARTY CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE COLLECTION SYSTEM RENOVATIONS - SPOT REPAIRS 2002/2003, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5622 District staff will perform construction contract administration, inspection, survey, office engineering, and shop drawing review. The funds required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 3, are $487,620. The total cost of the Spot Repairs Project is anticipated to be $537,620. The Collection System Renovations - Spot Repairs 2002/2003 Project is included in the fiscal year 2002 -2003 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) on pages CS -12 through CS -15. Staff has conducted a cash flow analysis of the Sewer Construction Fund and concluded that adequate funds are available for this project. Staff has concluded that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines, Section 18.2, since it involves only alterations of existing facilities with negligible or no expansion of capacity. Authorization of the construction contract for this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that the project is exempt from CEQA. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize award of a construction contract in the amount of $258,850 for the Collection System Renovations - Spot Repairs 2002/2003, District Project 5622, to D'arcy & Harty Construction, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder. 1/29/03 GA5622 - Spot RepairsWward 5622.wpd Page 2 of 5 MARTINEZ ALHAMBRA e� /moo m� v J o N o J N.TS 0 0 i n SITE LOCATIONS N O Y Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 0 M ' Prepared by Engineering SYPPOrt SeMia 9G T ? B(� � c� 0 PACHECO TREATMENT PLANT 404- A C`c O JO�O AVE �y 410. CNILPmciwO 9� O V 9 n BLVD PLEASANT 0 HILL e LAFAYME \ CSO YARD. RD COLLECTION SYSTEM RENOVATIONS SPOT REPAIRS (2002— 2003) k� ID ALAMO `" \\ Page 3 of Attachment 1 Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District SUMMARY OF BIDS PROJECT NO. 5622 Collection System Renovations - Spot Repairs DATE: January 24, 2003 LOCATION: Martinez, California ENGINEER EST.: $350,000 NUMBER BIDDER BID PRICE (Name & Address) I D'arcy & Harty Construction, Inc. $258,850 San Francisco, CA 2 Soares Pipeline, Inc. $312,500 Hayward, CA 3 D & D Pipelines $318,300 San Francisco, CA 4 Talus Construction, Inc. $327,621 Danville, CA 5 Roto Rooter $335,600 Concord, CA 6 K.J. Woods Construction, Inc. $378,000 San Francisco, CA 7 D.R. Lemings Construction $455,240 Concord, CA 8 Wayne G. Schlosser Bid Non - responsive Danville, CA 9 W.R. Forde Associates Bid Non - responsive L_ Richmond, CA I BIDS OPENED BY: /s/ Joyce Murphy DATE: January 24, 2003 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 COLLECTION SYSTEM RENOVATIONS - SPOT REPAIRS 2002/2003 DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5622 POST - BID /PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 1/30/03 CAAantkowi \7spotrepairs\Award 5622.wpd Page 5 of 5 PERCENT OF ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION 1. a. Construction Contract $ 258,850 b. Contingency at 20 percent $ 51,770 c. Permit Inspection Fees $ 15,000 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL: $ 325,620 100.0 2. Construction Management District Forces - Construction Management $ 15,000 - Contract Administration /Inspection $ 55,000 - Office Engineering Services $ 5,000 - Record Drawings $ 2,000 - Community Relations $ 10,000 - Surveying $ 5,000 - Collection System Operations $ 8,000 - Material Testing $ 7,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: $ 107,000 32.9 3. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE COST (1 +2): $ 432,620 132.9 4. TOTAL PRE -BID EXPENDITURES: $ 105,000 32.2 5. TOTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COST (2 +4): $ 212,000 65.1 6• TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (3 +4): $ 537,620 165.1 7. Funds Allocated to Date $ 50,000 8. Additional Allocation Required to Complete Project: $ 487,620 1/30/03 CAAantkowi \7spotrepairs\Award 5622.wpd Page 5 of 5 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District IV-, BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 7.b. BIDS AND AWARDS Type of Action: GRANT BID RELIEF /AUTHORIZE AWARD Subject APPROVE REQUEST OF RELIEF OF BID FROM BELLALANEY CONSTRUCTION, AND AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BILAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT 7213 Submitted By Initiating DeptJDiv.: Nathan Hodges, Assistant Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects Ba T. Than, Senior Engineer REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: N � — ofo 2tK N. N6dgesffi. Than W. Brennan A. Farrell k. Alm General ISSUE: On January 22, 2003, sealed bids were received and opened for construction of the Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation Project, District Project 7213. On January 24, 2003, Bellalaney Construction asked for bid relief. The Board of Directors must determine whether to grant relief of bid and make a determination whether to award the contract to the second lowest bidder within 50 days of bid opening. RECOMMENDATION: Grant bid relief to Bellalaney Construction and authorize award of a construction contract to the second lowest bidder, Biland Construction Company. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Expenditure of approximately $41,000 including construction contract, contingency and construction management, will be required to complete the project. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Alternatives include (1) reject the request for relief of bid and award a construction contract to Bellalaney Construction, (2) grant relief of bid request from Bellalaney Construction and award a construction contract to Biland Construction Company, or (3) reject all bids. Staff does not recommend rejecting all bids. BACKGROUND: The Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation, District Project 7213, is a safety improvement project for concrete and sidewalk. The work includes curb and gutter, street light base, paving replacement, pump pedestals, and sidewalk. There are six sites around the plant scheduled for work. See Attachment 1 for project sites. This project is derived from the Treatment Plant Safety Improvements Program. The design of the Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation Project was done by District staff. The Engineer's Estimate for construction cost for this project is $51,000. The project was advertised on December 28, 2002, and January 2, 2003. Nine (9) bids ranging from $29,500 to $61,167 were received and publicly opened on January 22, 2003. A summary of these bids is shown in Attachment 2. The apparent low bid is from Bellalaney Construction in the amount of $29,500. 1/29/03 L: \Position Papers \Hodges \7213 Award.wpd Page 1 of 8 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 subject: APPROVE REQUEST OF RELIEF OF BID FROM BELLALANEY CONSTRUCTION, AND AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BILAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT 7213 On Thursday, January 23, 2003, Bellalaney Construction faxed District staff to advise and explain that a clerical error was made in preparing its bid (Attachment 3). On Friday, January 24, 2003, District staff received a letter from Bellalaney Construction explaining the bid error and requesting that the bid be withdrawn (Attachment 4). As part of the bid package, an additional allowance of $15,000 was to be included in the total bid price. This money was requested in anticipation of additional minor concrete work around the plant site. Bellalaney Construction had broken down the additional $15,000 into the three bid items: (1) Mobilization /Demobilization, (2) Sheeting, Shoring, and Safety, and (3) All other work required. Portions of the $15,000 allowance that corresponded to bid items 1 and 2 were included in Bellalaney Construction's final bid price. The portion of the $15,000 allowance corresponding to bid item 3, $10,500, was not carried over to the final bid price. Under California Public Contract Code Section 5103, a bidder may request relief of bid within five (5) calendar days of bid opening in the event of a clerical or arithmetical error in preparing the bid proposal. The law is stringent with regard to relief from bids and allows relief to be granted by the awarding authority only under specific circumstances. Specifically, the law states that: "The bidder shall establish to the satisfaction of the court that: a. A mistake was made. b. He or she gave the public entity written notice within five (5) days after the opening of the bids of the mistake, specifying in the notice in detail how the mistake occured. C. The mistake made the bid materially different than he or she intended it to be. d. The mistake was made in filling out the bid, and not due to error in judgement or to carelessness in inspecting the site of the work, or in reading the plans or specifications." The documents submitted by Bellalaney Construction tend to substantiate its explanation. If the error had not been made and the $10,500 included in the total bid price, Bellalaney would have been second lowest bidder with a total bid price of $40,000. Under the Public Contract Code, it appears to staff that the error, as explained by Bellalaney Construction, is a clerical error, and that relief may be granted to Bellalaney Construction. The Board must evaluate the facts submitted and determine whether there is an adequate basis to grant Bellalaney Construction relief from its bid due to a clerical error. The Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial evaluation of the bids and concluded that, in the event that Bellalaney Construction is granted relief from its bid, the second 1/29/03 L: \Position Papers \Hodges \7213 Award.wpd Page 2 of 8 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 subject: APPROVE REQUEST OF RELIEF OF BID FROM BELLALANEY CONSTRUCTION, AND AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BILAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT 7213 low bidder, Biland Construction Company, is the lowest responsible bidder for the bid amount of $38,635. Construction management, construction contract administration, and construction inspection will be performed by District staff. The allocation of funds required to complete this project, as shown in Attachment 5, is $41,000. The Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2001 -02 and 2002 -03 Capital Improvement Budget on pages TP -50 and TP -51. Staff has determined that there are adequate funds in the Capital Improvement Budget and Plan for the project. Staff has concluded that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 since it involves minor repairs to an existing public facility. Approval of this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that this project is exempt from CEQA. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Staff recommends for the Board's approval the following: Consider and accept the request for relief of bid from Bellalaney Construction and direct staff to return Bellalaney Construction's bid bond; and, 2. Authorize award of a construction contract in the amount of $38,635 for construction of the Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation Project, District Project 7213, to Biland Construction Company, the second lowest responsible and responsive bidder. 1/29/03 UPosition Papers \Hodges \7213 Award.wpd Page 3 of 8 0 150 Sao FEET N E Central Contra Costa co Sanitary District N O ' 0 TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION PROJECT District Project 7213 Project Location / / cs Attachment 1 Page 4 of 8 ATTACHMENT 2 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District SUMMARY OF BIDS PROJECT NO.: 7213 DATE: JANUARY 22, 2003 PROJECTS NAME: TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION LOCATION: MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER EST.: $51.000 No BIDDER BID PRICE (Name & address) 1 Bellalaney Construction Request Bid Relief 2354 Pinnacle Drive Martinez, CA 94553 2 Biland Construction Company $38,635 PO Box 2626 Walnut Creek, CA 94595 3 Silverado Contractors, Inc. $41,890 3233 Peralta St. Oakland, CA 94608 4 Pat Nelson Construction Inc. $42,450 75 Magnolia Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952 5 Hess Construction Co, Inc. $44,200 4484 Hess Drive American Canyon, CA 94503 6 Albay Construction Co. $48,900 865 Howe Road Martinez, CA 94553 7 Sposeto Engineering, Inc. $54,400 4301 Bettencourt Way Union City, CA 94587 8 Hellman Construction Company $54,605 41 N. Buchanan Circle, #17 Pacheco, CA 94553 9 Diamond Services $61,167 3860 Industrial Way Benicia, CA 94510 BIDS OPENED BY /s/ Debbie Ratcliff DATE January 22, 2003 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 Page 5 of 8 FROM BHERSH PHONE NO. : 510 335 0587 Jan. 23 2003 07:53AM P1 ATTACHMENT 3 2354 Pinnacle Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Bellalaney . • Tel 925 -229 -1270 • Fax 925 - 335-0587 Email: bellalaney @hotmail.com =4t To: CCCSD -- Nathan Hodges/Ba Than Frowm Brian Hersh Faun 925 -372 -7892 Pagess 1 Phones 925- 229 -7762 Date: 1 /23/2003 Reg Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation CC: Project Project No. 7213 0 Urgent X For Review 0 Please Convnent X Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • Convnent= Thank you for bringing to my attention an error in calculating my bid for the above project. In my bid I had included a portion of the $15,000 allowance for future work, as specified in Addendum No. 1. Please review the table below. item Original bid Portion for initial project Portion for future work Total Mobilization $5000 $2000 $3000 $5000 Sheeting $3500 $2000 $1500 $3500 All other work $21,000 $21,000 $10, 500 $31,500 TOTALS $29,500 $25,000 $15,000 $40,000 1 had included $3000 in my original bid for future mobilization's (bid item #1) and had also included $1500 in my original bid for future sheeting (bid item 02). The amount of $10,500 was Inadvertently left out of my tabulation for concrete work (bid item 113). As you can see this would bring the new total bid to $40,000 which matches the amount of my bid bond. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and look forward to hearing from you on this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me at the above fax number, email or my cell # 383 2493. Thank you Page 6 of 8 FROM : BHERSH PHONE NO. : 510 335 0587 Jan. 24 2003 07:46AM P2 ATTACMENT 4 BELLALANEY CONSTRUCTION General Engineering Contractor 2354 Pinnacle Drive Lie. # 731793 Martinez, CA 94553 Tel 925 -229 -1270 Fax 925 - 335 -0587 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 5019 Imhoff Place Martinez, CA 94553 January 16, 2003 Attn: Mr. Nathan Hodges RE: Project No. 7213 Project Manager Treatment Plant Concrete Rehabilitation On January 22, 2003 I submitted a sealed bid for the above mentioned project. I submitted a bid of $29,500, which was materially different, than I intended it to be. I made a mathematical error in the allowance for future concrete work. I had made allowances for future work in bid items one and two but inadvertently left out the additional allowance for bid item number three. As explained in a previous fax this additional allowance should have been $10,500, which would have brought our total bid to $40,000, placing us as the second lowest bidder. Please use my previous fax for reference in the calculation error. I am respectfully requesting relief from this bid and its obligations and request that our bid bond be returned. Please accept my sincere apologies for my mistake. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (925)229 -1270. Sincerely Brian Hersh Owner Bellalaney Construction Rage 7of8 ATTACHMENT TREATMENT PLANT CONCRETE REHABILITATION DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 7213 POST BID /PRECONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE No. ITEM DESCRIPTION 1. CONSTRUCTION a. Construction Contract b. Contingency at 20 percent TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 2. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT a. District Forces - Construction Management/Resident Engineering /Inspection - Project Engineering /Operations Department SUBTOTAL b. Consultants - Material and Construction Testings SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE COST 4. TOTAL PREBID EXPENDITURES 5. TOTAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COST 6. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 7. FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE 8. ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION NEEDED TO COMPLETE PROJECT PERCENT OF ESTIMATED ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION COST ($) COST 38,635 7,365 46,000 7,000 2,000 9,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 56,000 10,000 20,000 66,000 25,000 41,000 100 K61 2 22 122 22 43 c y � y 0 y m n n r O a m lot 0 m C) ti T � O W �I 0 y m n n r O a m lot 0 m C) ti 0 0 0 0 L O �' °' i c CD N N N =. C) r+ -t WOMEN O o CD _. cfl cD cD � � =, cc � � y o n 3 cD CD CL C7 o,CD CL _. v3 0 �0' Not _. SOMIN cr INOWN c n cn' CD 3 0 m CD C� C = O . O v N D n. CD �� a r* �< O m CD O = CD N 0 O O• O O O 0 rl+ •� P+ m MEMO m• 'y CL (D r+ (D Q looms (D < SEMMES 0 � t O 0 �I CD CL � N O wq r+ 0 O N CD O n -� 0 O a. cc CD O CD O � O CD M O N r+ O O � O O Ca r+ C wAulwo O (D O O 3 C� (D CD. m, CA CD O CA r+ O� O 0 m E, CD MN CD O CD -h O EN ON CD n cD CL Mt M CD r* O MO _M O� -t O CD O O r+ O O 0 O r* CD CD r+ CL O O cQ O CD m O 3 da G� U) CD O �D 0 cn G cD -t O O C7 O� n CD 0) r�v CD O O� y 0 Z O rF mq CD a CD 0 � v CL n r i �. CD v y C CD r. CD -• as cn � � N � O y O O O r. y O O Q cD c (D O co CD N 3 O _. a CL n Cl) n O n v r�v CD O O� y 0 Z O rF mq CD a CD 0 � v � n c v o o• CD r. m -• as cn O O O Cl) O O O Q cD G C _ O � CD■ P y r CL Cl) O o co CD C) D 0 00. CD 0 v � CD o CA mq CD CD CL O O CD r* CD y O � O CD 7C r�v CD O O� y 0 Z O rF mq CD a 0 0 0 0 0 CO Cl) y•Ma cn owo D O �• . CA _ 00 C.0 _. �! N M y CD O rF C (D (a rim 0 0 0 O� O C� O O MO CD 3 (A Immom v w •q O. O M 10 CD CD � -• Cr CD _. INIMMIN — �M ° �o .< go CD M 0. c M M CD y rl+ CD SOMME = _. a (A EN ° M 0. M — _ CD M N OM f M Ch tG O 0 CD C M Q (A a r 2. -- CD mm-h CD Q. h 0 O r+ S O M CL O o CQ �. O O C/) 0 0 � o 0 < O O cD Cr � (A CD U) n MINIM, Cl) v 0 0 0 0 0 0 x = o 0 n i 0 C 0 � CD v ` v �D �0- Cl) v r.+ CD r =r p ° O o �_ cD � ca o r* °- m, C o CD o r o. CD CD 0 _ <' CD C' C CD Mt ° o CA o mq CD I -� CD x mq 0 -� 4�i r+ �, -• CL co a mq o MO cc _ — n � • �'' x n MO ,♦ -m CD -• D cD o -� '" �' °� o � ° �• CD CD a Cl) o O Cp N N n' cD > CA) 0) l w X31 al ail 00 mn V 10 -t -e CD mC mq D mn mn D mn mn ' Central Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS POS /T /ON PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 No.: 9. a. TREATMENT PLANT Type of Action- ACCEPTANCE OF REPORTS Subject: BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2002 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM, COLLECTION SYSTEM OVERFLOW MONITORING PROGRAM, AND THE RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION REPORTS Submitted By: Initiating DeptJDiv.: Bhupinder S. Dhaliwal Operations /Plant Operations REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION. — 3SD B. Dhaliwal v D Craig G J. Pearl l Ch rles fr General Mana J. Kelly L ISSUE: The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD) 2002 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES), Collection System Overflow Monitoring Program, and the Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Reports have been prepared for submission to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Bay Section. These annual reports are presented for Board of Directors' information and acceptance. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 2002 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Collection System Overflow Monitoring Program, and Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Reports. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None BACKGROUND: Treatment Plant -- During 2002, the treatment plant received a total of 16,170 million gallons of wastewater, which equated to an average flow of 44.3 million gallons per day. This average flow is about 2 percent higher than in 2001. The treatment plant produced an effluent with annual average biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total- suspended solids (TSS) concentrations of 6 and 8 mg /L, respectively. These concentrations are markedly lower than our NPDES permit standards of 25 and 30 mg /L, respectively. BOD and TSS removal efficiency for the treatment plant averaged 97 percent each. Solids disposal during the year involved the incineration of dewatered sludge in the District's multiple- hearth furnaces. Approximately 5,438 tons of furnace ash were produced. The ash met regulatory requirements for final disposal throughout the year. S:\ Correspondence \POSPAPR\ 2003\ Nat'I Pollutant DischargeElim.wpd Page 1 of 2 1 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: February 6, 2003 Subject: BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2002 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM, COLLECTION SYSTEM OVERFLOW MONITORING PROGRAM, AND THE RECYCLED WATER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION REPORTS More than 15,000 NPDES permit- required tests were completed to comply with the NPDES permit requirements. The treatment plant effluent met all (100 percent) of the permit requirements throughout the year for the fifth consecutive year, and for 7 of the past 10 years, except for chlorine residual exceedances. The District's NPDES permit requires an annual update of the District's operation and maintenance procedures. A description of the updates is also included in the annual report. Collection System -- There were 39 reportable collection system overflows (overflows exceeding 100 gallons in volume), compared to 36 for the previous year. Only 4 of the 39 overflows exceeded 1,000 gallons in volume and were the subject of separate written reports submitted to the RWQCB. Most of the overflows were due to root growth, grease deposition, and other blockages in the pipes. Further details on the overflows can be found in the attached reports. Recycled Water Quality and Distribution -- CCCSD distributed more than 178 million gallons of tertiary recycled water to various customers in the District's service area. Recycled water quality met all applicable RWQCB reuse water - quality requirements, except for three low dissolved oxygen occurrences. Submittal to the RWQCB -- Upon acceptance of these reports by the District Board of Directors, the reports will be submitted to the RWQCB; the NPDES permit requires the submittal to be to the RWQCB by February 28, 2003. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Accept the 2002 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Collection System Overflow Monitoring Program, and Recycled Water Quality and Distribution Reports. S:\ Correspondence \POSPAPR\ 2003\ Nat'IPollutantDischargeElim.wpd Page 2 of 2 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT Douglas J. Craig Board Meeting February 6, 2003 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT PURPOSE • Summary of Calendar Year Performance • Compiles Data for 12 Monthly Reports • In Essence "Our Report Card" to RWQCB 1 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Treatment Plant Waste Characteristics and Loading • Influent • Treated Effluent • Receiving Water (Suisun Bay near our outfall) Sludge Disposal Practices O &M Manual Status RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS (Continued) Sewer System Overflows • Site of Occurrence • Volume • Cause Recycled Water Report • Usage • Water Quality • Annual Customer Inspections 2 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT • Total Flow Treated = 16.1 Billion Gallons • Average Daily • Peak Hourly Flow • Ash Disposal = 44.3 Million Gallons = 181 Million Gallons = 5,438 Tons (wet weight) (for soil amendment) RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT TREATMENT PLANT / RECEIVING WATER • Completed 15,000 Analytical Tests • Approximately 11,000 Hours of Laboratory Work • 100 Percent Compliance With NPDES Permit Requirements 3 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT COLLECTION SYSTEM OVERFLOWS • 39 Total Sewer Overflows • 0 Overflows Greater Than 10,000 Gallons • 4 Overflows Greater Than 1,000 Gallons Causes: Root Intrusion Grease Debris Broken Pipe No. of Overflows 30 5 3 1 RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT RECYCLED WATER • 17 Major Recycled Water Customers • 178 Million Gallons Recycled Water Delivered • Peak Month Usage — 31.8 Million Gallons in July G! RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT Special Studies Required By New Permit SPECIAL Special Studies Required By New Permit (Continued) SPECIAL STUDIES RESPONSIBILITY PURPOSE STATUS Ambient Monitoring Joint BACWA Study 126 Priority 3 sampling TMDLs Joint Multiple Agencies Pollutants events Study completed — PCB TMDL near One to go Cyanide Site- Specific Joint BACWA Study Develop Final report Study site - specific submitted to Criteria the RWQCB Mercury Analytical (local limit) Ultra low -level sampling Dioxins Method BACWA Lab Detection and On -going Development Study Committee Reporting Development Study Issues Increased emphasis on CCCSD Mandatory On -going Pollution Prevention and listing Effort Emphasis Nickel for the RWQCB Minimization RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT Special Studies Required By New Permit (Continued) SPECIAL STUDIES RESPONSIBILITY PURPOSE STATUS TMDLs Joint Multiple Agencies Define and Apportion Hg TMDL completed Study Bay Loadings PCB TMDL near completion Pesticide TMDL for creeks near completion Mercury Analytical BACWA Lab Committee Ultra low -level sampling Completed Method / analysis Development Study Copper, Nickel De- Joint Multiple Agencies De -list Copper and Completed listing Effort Study Nickel for the RWQCB 303(d) List RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RWQCB ANNUAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION Accept the 2002 Regional Water Quality Control Board Annual Report RWOCB ANNUAL REPORT OLD AND NEW PERMIT LIMITS IN RELATION TO CURRENT EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS POLLUTANT 95 PERMIT LIMIT 2001 PERMIT LIMIT CURRENT EFFLUENT CONCENTRATION Monthly Average Daily Average Monthly Average Daily Maximum Arsenic, vg /L 200 -- <0.8 Cadmium, pg /L 30 •- <0.05 Copper, Ng /L• 37 14.2 19.5 7.1 Lead, 9I1. 53 3.5 8.2 <0.8 Nickel, ,g/L- — 65 -- — <1.9 Mercury, Ng /L• 0.21 1.0 0.09 1.0 0.03 Cyanide, Ng /L• 25 18 <3 TBT, pg1L• 0.06 0.12 •- 0.06 <0.006 DOE, Ng /L• -- -- 0.00059 0.00119 <0.002 Dieldrin, pplL -- -- 0.00014 0.00029 <0.002 Bisl2- ethylhexyllphthlate. Ng /L• •- -- -- 190 <1.6 Acrylonitrile, N 911- -- -- -- 7 <1.4 On 303(d) list and /or Interim Limits Central Contra Costa Sanitary District /J a i ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: FEBRUARY 6, 2003 No.: 13.a. BUDGET AND FINANCE Type of Action: RECEIVE BUDGET REVIEW Subject: RECEIVE THE 2002 -2003 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET REVIEW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 Submitted By: Debbie Ratcliff, Controller Initiating Dept. /Div.: Administrative Department REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION: 4 ifl D. Ratcliff M raves General Mafager ISSUE: A report of the results of a comparative review of actual and budgeted Operations and Maintenance (O &M) revenues and expenses for the first six months of the 2002- 2003 fiscal year as well as full year projections are provided in this Position Paper. In addition, any significant variances from budget for the first six months and any significant full year projected variances are discussed. RECOMMENDATION: Receive the 2002 -2003 Operations and Maintenance Budget Review for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and full fiscal year projections. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: For the first six months ended December 31, 2002, total 0 &M revenues are $19,303,691 compared to a budget of $19,140,741 for a positive variance of $162,950 or 0.85 %. Total O &M expenses for the first six months are $17,499,734 compared to a budget of $19,649,086 for a positive variance of $2,149,352 or 10.94 %. The six month status reflects the financial results at a certain point in time, as of December 31, 2002, and looks overly optimistic. This is due to a lag in billings (utilities)and increased costs that will occur in the second half of the fiscal year. Total projected O &M revenues for the full year are $41,917,887 compared to a budget of $41,760,887 for a positive variance of $157,000 or 0.38 %. Total projected O &M expenses for the full year are $40,419,321 compared to a budget of $41,421,566 for a favorable variance of $1,002,245 or 2.42 %. This favorable variance is due to cost savings in labor expense of $870,000, chemicals $60,000, utilities $53,000 and outside services of $120,000. These savings reflect staff's continued focus to obtain cost reductions through their efforts to manage vacant positions, reduce travel and overtime costs, and reduce the use of outside services where possible. ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None 1/30/03 G: \FINANCE \6mopp.202.wpd Page 1 of 5 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: FEBRUARY 6, 2003 Subject: RECEIVE THE 2002 -2003 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET REVIEW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 BACKGROUND: The table on Attachment B compares actual O &M revenue and expense for the first six months of the fiscal year to the six -month budget. Significant variance explanations are included on the table. Attachment A compares full year O &M projections to budget. Anticipated significant projected variances from the annual 2002 -2003 O &M Revenue and Expense budget are listed below: Revenue: Total O &M Revenue is projected to be $157,000 higher than budgeted mainly due to higher than expected Sewer Service Charge revenue as a result of adjustments and corrections reported to the County. This favorable variance is partially offset by lower City of Concord revenues which reflects their portion of lower than anticipated expenses in Plant Operations and Administration departments. Interest income is also lower than budgeted due to a continued decline in interest rates. Expense: Salaries: Salaries and Wages expense is projected to be $870,000 or 4.82% lower than budgeted due to actively managing the filling of positions to reduce costs without reducing service. Benefits: Benefit costs are projected to be $1 15,000 over budget for the full fiscal year even though as of the six -month point benefits are under budget by $404,000 mainly due to the unbudgeted retirement cost of living component (COLA) increase beginning in January, 2003. This will cost the District $600,000 more this fiscal year. Workers' Compensation is also anticipated to be higher due to a larger than budgeted rate increase. All benefits are reduced by approximately 5% for anticipated vacancies in salaries. Chemicals: Chemicals expense is projected to be $60,000 under budget due to lower demand for hydrogen peroxide and polymer than anticipated. Utilities: Utilities expense is projected to be $52,700 lower than budgeted due to a pre - purchase of natural gas at a favorable rate offset by higher electrical expense than anticipated due to the cogeneration failure in October. 1/30/03 G: \FINANCE \6mopp.202.wpd Page 2 of 5 POSITION PAPER Board Meeting Date: FEBRUARY 6, 2003 Subject: RECEIVE THE 2002 -2003 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET REVIEW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 Repairs & Maintenance: Repairs & Maintenance expense is projected to be $75,500 over budget due to expenditures for parts for the influent pumps and steam turbine that were not anticipated. Outside Services: Outside Services expense is projected to be $120,245 lower than budgeted due to the active management of staff resources and reducing the use of consultants. These full year O &M projections are not substantially different from the projections that were shown to the Board at the Financial Planning Workshop on January 30, 2003. The full year O &M expense projections for fiscal year 2002 -2003 indicate that the District's O &M expenses will be under budget by approximately $1.0 million. As discussed at the Board Workshop, this is primarily due to savings in labor and outside services. The Revenue over Expense results for the 2002 -2003 O &M budget anticipated an increase to the O &M Fund balance of $339,000. Based on favorable revenue results and significantly reduced 0 &M expenses the full year projections indicate that the O &M Fund balance will increase by $1,498,000. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Receive the 2002 -2003 Operations and Maintenance Budget Review for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and projections for the full fiscal year. 1/30/03 G: \FINANCE \6mopp.202.wpd Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT A Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Revenue & Expense Account Summary Projected for the Year Ending June 30, 2003 Variance Variance Projected Budget Amount % REVENUES: Sewer Service Charge 32,104,000 31,640,200 463,800 1.47% City of Concord 6,737,000 6,850,000 (113,000) -1.65% Other 3,076,887 3,270,687 193,800 -5.93% Total Revenues 41,917,887 41,760,887 157,000 0.38% EXPENSES: Total Labor Charges 17,179,589 18,049,589 870,000 4.82% Employee Benefits 8,262,216 8,147,216 (115,000) - 1.41% Directors Fees & Expenses 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Chemicals 1,058,000 1,118,000 60,000 5.37% Utilities 3,760,096 3,812,796 52,700 1.38% Repairs & Maintenance 2,766,287 2,690,787 (75,500) -2.81% Hauling & Disposal 1,159,460 1,190,460 31,000 2.60% Professional & Legal 319,400 327,200 7,800 2.38% Outside Services 1,904,887 2,025,132 120,245 5.94% Self- Insurance 225,000 225,000 0 0.00% Materials & Supplies 1,406,470 1,455,070 48,600 3.34% Other Expenses 2,327,916 2,330,316 2,400 0.10% Total Expenses 40,419,321 41,421,566 1 1,002,245 2.42% To/(From) Reserves 1,498,5661 339,321 1,159,245 S ixMoS u m m a ryAtta ch me ntA Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 N N N U m L N m a O :3 N ca C7 D C T a c CD L T O m C m 7 m U c 7 a C'p - m c o icy c Z c ca in c ca a) C C «• m m w N T O) L T100 N' U ` r N ? c o 0 - oaci a m E>. >, rn (O m 1N 7 O a ca (O m U V) O Co NL U dN c C C y T m T ) O w N o a0� C E c o N 'y cC a O cu C M @ U E N a) U m L O U m • p (O ' CL" C N C N 3 f` IOC m m N O N m _O c '0 a O 3 C 0) pU U 7 a C N m O) -p _0 !T cL 'c m 12 o a E -- Ya N ._ dm w C U .O m -p a F- E N C C U N m C N Y1 C p O) N c m 0 y a) m U C N .L-• m .p N a a o U C w > m > L p ¢gym U C E� W Oa 7 E O O m 7 m o> N �o L p 0) E o N; r d a m �_ c w o ~ V a U) °c O c m o C m - O) LO) L� O O) 0)L O C C N C > 4) U N C C c0 N c m )n N 7 'O �+ 'O� L O U 7 N U' U C C m N U N N O m a �) N L O O U N c T N N L N c U U N- w 7 `-° O N _- - Q L m E L pa' N U N N N m 'O ) ' 2- U v c 0 y 'O n a) c 7 a� 3 F- o- U n 7 c N a a - N O) C m 'p m N 0) am3c 0 0) C N a w a N C w O O m I 7 U -oa d' E(") U m m o a�� mE 3N OU E T T S LO ca D o 1 X 'O o 00 a = E m Ap n 0 0 a c 1 a m 7 ° aN Z N0O O L E a 0) (n N L' Q O 0 n 3: N L M0 a f0 a O a E y c0i0 E �0 2) d wLy� -VS L E 3° O F � N O 7n (U) +�+ Q •Q N N N L U ~ U T t '� YO m rr21 a7 7 7 C OtJ W N m a N d C O N W 0) c O c N c U C a� ' a U c j m a p N m N O) W N w V O) N L > > > O °) c 7` C N N U N m m 7 c m d N N N (E a j J a N U !n f0 CO O w L CO O N _N 3 W 2 0) 0) w w m 2 o J D N 7 L X> O N O C W V 062 N) e o ( e 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 10 7 •- � r O aD OR 00 to ^ V O0 V r C N 7 C d (D N d 0 I� O r to N N O 00 r O w � M N 0) do N O) (n N cp N cp Oi O) C O)_+ U�IL m e N > O (O O In V O 7 O O 0) O 0 U) (D n O O N O 7 O N 0 01 a+ W N h 0) (n O O O 0 M U C C 7 fV N O V N !9 r-- to '7 (D 1� t l') Q) (D T m O O V N `E > N 0 O a) m N N M I` N 00 to 00 00 O O 1` 0) M O (O (O O O O) V O y W (N cD (n O O f- M 0) O (n O 0) 0 (O (O O (0 h O N O 00 Cl) 0) 01 O .0 M W M In 7 I� M a O r O) h Oi 00 m N V 03 (D p- 01 00 (D (n m (D 00 0) 0 1� P 00 N N M U') M Cl N ee�� M m y3, M U) (O to h (O V (O M O In O 00 0 O M 00 f- (O (n Ui 0) )f) 00 O V 00 I` I: O c0 n W 0) O O) h Qi T (� 7 00 M fD M (O O M (O 00 N U m m m N C C m 0) N j- Z U 'O YI d m L w O) Y) c NO m a N N W N V O p C y U N m m N O o21 m U Z 7 U N c N C _ aZi U o U d h a° °1 as 06 o U X x V Q Z O> Z a () Ln y C W W > 3 _ (° o a E - °� ° m L Q w a a� U U o F- X W o F- w L U m m x a O i o Page 5 of 5 2002 -2003 OPERATIONS &MAINTENANCE SIX MONTH BUDGET REVIEW S ABUDGE1l02- 030 &MREV.OH.doc U O 0 W O m N W 0 D m w oI co 0 'w^ V) ^ 0 V ) m <W Q w w w w o F-> J >wa OI O-w ly0w 0 co Q LL O wQ I— zZ Q v �- Z) O O LO N M N M V OC N Of Q > 2 T- M C Q C141 csi Co LU N Vi M Z HX w Z w Q 00 w H d- o ao j It QQ w w p ti o o0 w o LO O vZ w c �w Z w w s _j ca O p Q co ti rn ti ZCO U M coo w v Q rn ti �= U O 0 W O m N W 0 D m w w w 'w^ V) ^ 0 V ) Q Q w w w w o F-> F- CL >wa OI O-w ly0w U O 0 W O m N W 0 D m co W �U) Z Q W t-- a zX W co C QZ CO Cl) �a OW UZ Q W W Z U� Q � H W U LL J 10A m (Y W o J LL O W Q Q ? z Z — v Q O Q M ICT N 0 LO LO W F- W co O N N 1-: 64 T- ° `r M M 6 R o 6 d' F- W W O W 0 W F- W co LO M 06 It 0 Q 1-: 64 0 Ccoo r- � N M M 6 R m 6 d' F- W W O W 0 W W t-: rn C6 Ict 06 It 0 Q C It 64 Q W Q W W W F— > U O O W of atS O 4 N O W U' m ?t W W W W 0 (n 0 U ft Q W Q W W W F— > F— M > W W F- W F- W W O W U O O W of atS O 4 N O W U' m ?t FISCAL YEAR 2002 — 2003 Expense Savings at 6- Months Projected Expense Savings for Full Year Difference DIFFERENCE Employee Benefits Unbudgeted Retirement COLA Chemicals Higher Usage Second Half of Year Utilities Delayed Billings for Electricity and Natural Gas Repairs and Maintenance Major Maintenance Activities Scheduled for Spring Hauling and Disposal Delayed Billings for Services All Other TOTAL DIFFERENCE SABU DGET\02- 030 &MREV.OH.doc $2,149,352 $1,002,245 $1,147,107 $520,000 $60,000 $100,000 $372,000 ':• 111 $6,107 $1,147,107 N O O N N O F--� w -n O CD rn -o C' � D --I C: UO r � CD > Ln ---I CD C N r-r O O rn rn O r-r w � 0 0 =3 �z vo C 0 G) rn D � 3 D � r m m x D m Z U) DH C rn 0 0 PINJ O C) D D 70 O 3 Z C G) n H D N m o --q o r, — c = rn m o< a rt o cn o rn o ° `° o 0 3 -, c o o � O � v o � m rn ui N ko rt O Oi O -Al. � O O N O p O °0 w C) o 0 C) � N V1 ��-+ � W �D■ � w N �► v cn p � 4 � Ni N Ln CO fl' O O N N O O O O O O v � o /1 V■ ^4 N 00 m Ln 3 w � 0 V V N m O O O O O Cl O Cl O O co O O O C D � 3 D � r m m x D m Z U) DH C rn 0 0 PINJ O C) D D 70 O 3 Z C G) n H O r rn q 0 z rn 3 X C) or, 0 A Ln C 3 r D y X •O ono n O 3 N �o O 70 � vo 03 v p rn �rn rn D rn z� °c C � rn rn (O ow 1% %D u, v M. w w -All o u, � O rt N N c n rt D o o c 0) o 00) rt ° 0 0 U:) 3 3 O (D n � a rt 0 0 0 po; 0 o c o O -tea ccn o 0 3 n 7 O O 3 ni (D � 0 n Q 3 LO v c 3 -D 3 :3 o n -� 77 ,. (� m O Q 4 - � Uo d : (D m Ln 3 ° °'*. o cp O 0 cu o CD C ` 3 O �- fD cv :3 o cr :r o m sr IA Ln rn w kn W C O CD : w o O m cwn Lq o N O O G C) O o O o °o 0 0 0 0 �"� o v r � T� W 4 1 in �, N Nv m Q N V Ln (n 00 w O ;D v w rn w A r° a o 4n fl, CD o0 °o o °O °O °O °O °O CD C) co V N u• v U1 W F'' O CO m N O U7 �- + t� O (It w i-` Q7 GI tD p O O O O O O O O co O C. O O O u O O O O O O O O r rn q 0 z rn 3 X C) or, 0 A Ln C 3 r D y X •O ono n O 3 N �o O 70 � vo 03 v p rn �rn rn D rn z� °c C � rn rn (O ow X D 3 z O r t P C � r �rn X Oo n p 3 N O O �Z O� L.J p m �m M m z--j C C X ;° m rn-0 O t Jo.. Ul v L, CO a > rt a 3 D 6 27 Ln LA D (D f+ _0 T 3 S. 3 m O c CL m rr � � 3 rt rt 3 m rt o cr 0 o. o Im 4 N w -co N W O WO N o m O \--► O H N O O O O c:) '* O O O O o o W V N N N F N V O A m O `O � V N W Q O O O O y O O O O O �v J.5 N � V o v 3 o :° V ° � a O O 0 p °O o c0D o O o O W X D 3 z O r t P C � r �rn X Oo n p 3 N O O �Z O� L.J p m �m M m z--j C C X ;° m rn-0 O t o E ID 7 O N � o n i--L 00 00 ::3 n �- O O O �' (D O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O -Ph F• O Q -Z �. cD fD O N � 00 F" i--L 00 00 m I'D O O O O O O O O O �1-"0)a) � �I O N i--L O N m N O � 00 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Cl N � I--� Crl ko 0) -p �I O O O O O O O O O O O O O -Ph O O O� O� W I-+ � O Ift 1% O O O O w c CL U2 rt c� C. Ma O V. A rF C. N O O W C� D D r m C m Z C m V) O O N 0 O 0 0 0 0 N N N �V 6 6 6 N 0 Z o nO o O a w � wo --I n � X m O � r m m m rn x :K rn rn m � m a rn z v D c Z m D m D z r M -n m C Z ' w � ;--` 3 I'D V Ul N 3 N w C) 0 0 0 0 ° °o °o C) C) A -� Z co CD O ( (D C� "Q � � C_Q O a) CL O :3 O -n O c O O Lo O O cam. O C O m N � i � Ul � L O FA, = O O O rn O O CD ON O O O ' O cD O i O w C � -� w � � N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N � i � Ul O O O O O O O CD ON O O O ' O O O i O w D r C Z v vo D Z rn