HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-16-00 AGENDA BACKUPCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 3.a. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: QUITCLAIM SEWER EASEMENT
subJect: AUTHORIZE EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE
ADLER FAMILY TRUST FOR AN EASEMENT AT #1 10 HARTZ AVENUE, DANVILLE IN
CONNECTION WITH HARTZ AVENUE SEWER RELOCATION, DP 5451
Submitted By: initiating Dept. /Div.:
Elizabeth Charlton, Land Surveyor Engineering /Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACT /ON.
94 --� — —1,)0, — —(At�r- - E. C a Iton W. Br nan A. Farrell Charles Batt ,
General Mans r
ISSUE: The Board of Directors must authorize quitclaiming of easements.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize quitclaiming of the subject Grant of Easement
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
BACKGROUND: The sewer within the subject easement will be relocated during the Hartz
Avenue Sewer Relocation (map attached). The line is being relocated away from trees and
improvements and will tie into a new trunk manhole. An easement for the new location
has been granted by the owners.
Staff has concluded that this transaction is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.6, since it involves a minor
alteration in land use limitations. Acceptance of this Grant of Easement will establish the
Board of Director's independent finding that this action is exempt from CEQA.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the President of the Board and the Secretary
of the District to execute a Quitclaim Deed to Howard L. Adler and Barbara J. Adler,
Trustees of the Howard L. Adler and Barbara J. Adler Family Trust and authorize staff to
record the Quitclaim Deed with the Contra Costa County Recorder.
11/8/00
LkPosition Pape rs \SURVEY \5451pos2.wpd Page 1 of 2
CENTRAL CONT ,,4 -, ARY DISTRICT
"Jor SEWER
RIGHT ...................
TION
N.T.S.
k
DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: THOMAS BRO.: JOB NO.:
SDC EAC/KDC 652J2/98C2 5451
SCALE: DATE: CO. ASSMT. NO.: PARCEL NO.:
1".801 10/30/00 200-190-023, 024, 028
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.:
3.b. CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: ACCEPT GRANT OF EASEMENT
subject: ACCEPT GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM THE ADLER FAMILY TRUST IN
CONNECTION WITH HARTZ AVENUE SEWER RELOCATION, DP 5451
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Elizabeth Charlton, Land Surveyor Engineering /Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION:
i
E. Ch Iton W. Brennan A. F-arrd
General
ISSUE: The Board of Directors must authorize the acceptance of grants of easenYbnt.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the subject Grant of Easement from Howard L. Adler and
Barbara J. Adler, Trustees of the Adler Family Trust.
► =► M'-!
0
s
00
0
0
0
0
z
0
N
r
a
CENTRAL
RIGHT C
TION
N.T.S.
DISTRICT
SEWER
TOWN
OF
DANVILLE
SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
Im.
I
74
RETAINING WALL
EASEMENT
\� -31
\�
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
THOMAS BRO.:
JOB NO.:
SDC
EAC /KDC
652J2/98C2
5451
SCALE:
DATE:
CO. ASSMT. NO.:
PARCEL NO.:
r.80'
10/30/00
200 - 190 -023, 024, 02
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
/J" i ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 3-c- CONSENT CALENDAR
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE GRANT OF EASEMENT
Subject: AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) AT THE FAIRVIEW PUMPING STATION
Submitted By:
Ricardo Hernandez
Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED A RECOMMEN D FOR BOARD ACT' /^O
GA v
R. Hernandez J. Miyamoto Mills C. Swanson A. arrell 94Chrls
General
ISSUE: The Board must authorize granting of easements.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize execution of a Grant of Easement to the State of
California.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Compensation to the District in the amount of $1,500 has been
negotiated for the proposed easement.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The State of California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) has
requested a utility easement from the District to install a traffic signal pole at the Fairview
Pumping Station (map attached). CalTrans is proposing to install the traffic signal pole
on a portion of the station land (outside the fenced station grounds) already encumbered
by a driveway used for access onto the adjoining property owned by Equilon Enterprises,
LLC (formerly Shell Oil Martinez Refinery).
Staff has determined that the proposed traffic signal will not impact current or future
operation of the station. A Right of Way Contract with Caltrans has been negotiated by
staff.
Staff concluded that this transaction is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.6, since it involves a minor
alteration in land use limitations. Approval of this Grant of Easement will establish the
Board of Director's independent finding that this action is exempt from CEQA.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the President of the Board and the Secretary
of the District to execute the Grant of Easement to the State of California.
11/8/00
U: \PPr \Raposa \fairview.ppr Page 1 of 2
MH
6" D
MARINA VISTA
SMELL OIL
0" FM 20" FM
REFINERY
PROPERTY
N
I ir ss
�3' SD WELL - -�� PROPOSED
UTILITY . \
EASEMENT
ELECTRICAL +/ TO CAL -TRANS '\
SERVICE
EMERGENCY STANDBY \
GENERATOR AND FUEL
TANK BUILT INTEGRAL
O PUMPING / INTO BASE OF UNIT O
ELECTRICAL O STATION + (500 GAL. CAPACITY) /
CONTROL
BUILDING O vtni /
PUMP ROOM " r EP a /
ACCESS i
EMERGENCY
a
ACCESS
WATER TANKS + \ \ EP ? j
GANTRY � FH
CRANE YY / \, \.� LP r-
OFF /CES
SHELL Olt
REFINEF
PROPERTY
Uzi ctii
��yP�09
FAIRVIEW
PUMPING
STATION
/
SITE PLAN \'>%
0 30
SHELL OIL
FEET REFINC.7Y
i
MARINA wAT£RejRD
VISTA WI,
J
1p
LOCATION MAP
Y Central Contra Costa FIGURE
Sanitary District
FAIRVIEW PUMPING STATION MAP
Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 Na.: 4.a. HEARINGS
Type of Action: CONDUCT HEARING; ADOPT ORDINANCE
subject: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED
ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF
REIMBURSEMENT FEES, TO ESTABLISH REIMBURSEMENT FEES APPLICABLE TO
PROPERTY WHICH COULD CONNECT TO PROJECT 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381
AND 5391 FACILITIES
Submitted By: Initiating Dept ✓Div.:
Jack Case, Associate Engineer Engineering /Environmental Services
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTIO
J. Case J. Mi moto -Mills C. Swanson A. Farrell Charles W
General M
ISSUE: When reimbursement fees are proposed for projects which could directly connect
to a "standard facility," the District Code requires that a public hearing be held prior to the
Board of Directors' consideration of the fees for adoption.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed
Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of Reimbursement Fees, to
establish reimbursement fees applicable to property which could directly connect to
project 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 and 5391 facilities. Adopt the Ordinance.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: An administrative charge to recover District costs is paid by the
installer for each fee collection transaction.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND: Project sewers listed in the subject are "standard facilities," as defined
in the District Code. Certain individual property owners within the boundaries of each
project area are the installers of these facilities. To fairly and equitably distribute the costs
for these facilities, the code provides for the installers to be reimbursed for the proportion
of costs allocable to other properties which connect to the sewers within 20 years of
project acceptance by the District. Staff has drafted a proposed Ordinance (Attachment
1) to establish reimbursement fees for properties which connect to these projects' sewers.
Exhibits A -1 through A -6 of Attachment 1 shows the locations of the projects and the
boundaries of properties which could directly connect to the projects' sewers. The
proposed reimbursement fees will be collected from property owners within the
11/3/00
U: \PPr \Raposa \PubHear.Reimb Fees.wpd Page 1 of 18
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
subiect: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED
ORDINANCE TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF
REIMBURSEMENT FEES, TO ESTABLISH REIMBURSEMENT FEES APPLICABLE TO
PROPERTY WHICH COULD CONNECT TO PROJECT 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381
AND 5391 FACILITIES
boundaries of these areas, if and when they connect their property to the sewer system.
The collected fees will be held in separate accounts, and disbursed to the installer of the
projects.
The calculation of the proposed reimbursement fees is summarized in Exhibits B -1 to B -6.
of Attachment 1. These fees would be charged in addition to Facilities Capacity and
Pumped Zone Fees (now $2,572 per Residential Unit Equivalent) RUE and $348 per RUE,
respectively, and other District charges, such as those for permits, inspection and sewer
service.
The District Code requires that reimbursement fees be adjusted at least annually to
account for the increase or decrease in value of the facilities due to inflation and
depreciation. These fees may also be adjusted to account for differences between
estimated and actual costs, and increases or decreases in the number of connections
which may connect to the facilities. However, once a particular property has connected
to the public sewer, and the fees have been paid, the District will not collect any
additional reimbursement fees for that connection, nor refund any excess reimbursement
fees which might otherwise be occasioned by the se adjustments.
Appropriate notices have been posted, and published in the Contra Costa Times. In
addition, individual letter notices were mailed to the owners of all affected properties, as
required by the District Code.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the
proposed Ordinance to amend District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of Reimbursement
Fees, to establish reimbursement fees applicable to property which could directly connect
to project 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 and 5391 facilities. Adopt the Ordinance.
11/3/00
U:\PPr \Raposa \PubHear.Reimb Fees.wpd Page 2 of 18
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
TO AMEND DISTRICT CODE SECTION 6.20.300 SCHEDULE OF
REIMBURSEMENT FEES TO ESTABLISH REIMBURSEMENT FEES
APPLICABLE TO PROPERTIES WHICH COULD DIRECTLY CONNECT
TO PROJECT 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 AND 5391
WHEREAS, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (District) Code Chapter 6.20
provides for reimbursement to installers of standard facilities from fees charged property
owners when they apply to connect their property to the public sewer system; and
WHEREAS, District Code Chapter 6.20 provides for the establishment of reimbursement
accounts for constructed standard facilities; and
WHEREAS, project 5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 and 5391 facilities, the location of
which are shown on Exhibits A -1 to A -6 of this Ordinance, incorporated in full herein by
reference, are standard facilities as defined in District Code Chapter 6.20; and
WHEREAS, reimbursement fees have been calculated by the method specified in District
Code Chapter 6.20, which calculation is summarized in Exhibits B -1 through B -6 of this
Ordinance, incorporated in full herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the proposed
reimbursement fees was conducted at the Board of Directors' regularly scheduled meeting
on November 16, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
does ordain as follows:
Section 1
Reimbursement fees applicable to properties which connect directly to project
5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 and 5391 facilities designated on Exhibits A -1,
11/8/00
U: \PPr \Raposa \PubHear.Reimb Fees.wpd Page 3 of 18
A -2, A -3, A -4, A -u and A -6 are hereby established. .,did reimbursement fees,
which shall be added to District Code Section 6.20.300 Schedule of
Reimbursement Fees, have been calculated in the manner set forth in District Code
Chapter 6.20 and shown in Exhibits B -1, B -2, B -3, B -4, B -5 and B -6 of this
Ordinance. Reimbursement fees for properties which directly connect to projects
5218, 5309, 5346, 5375, 5381 and 5391 shall be as follows:
a) $17,650.26 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5218, El
Gavilan, Orinda, and
b) $6,483.30 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5309, El
Pintado, Danville, and
c) $22,455.12 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5346,
Ridgewood Road, Alamo, and
d) $3,679.95 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5375,
Second Avenue, Walnut Creek, and
e) $11,666.66 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5381,
Mountain View Dr., Lafayette, and
f) $11,154.35 per Residential Unit Equivalent (RUE) for Project No. 5391,
Estates Drive, Lafayette.
Section 2
The reimbursement fees setforth herein shall be administered, adjusted and
collected to the terms of Chapter 6.20.
Section 3
Exhibits A -1 through A -6, and B -1 through B -6, hereto shall not be incorporated
into the District Code; however, copies of same shall be maintained in the District
11/8/00
UAPPr \Raposa \PubHear.Reimb Fees.wpd Page 4 of 18
offices and made available for inspection during the periods where the subject
reimbursement fees are in effect.
Section 4
This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the District and shall be published
once in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation within the
District, and shall be effective on the eighth calendar day following such
publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Sanitary District
on the 16`h day of November, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
Gerald R. Lucey
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
Joyce Murphy, Secretary
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
APPROVED as to form:
Kenton L. Alm, Counsel for the District
11/8/00
U: \PPr \Raposa \PubHear.Reimb Fees.wpd Page 5 of 18
V 90
M N EP ti
S V
SITE -
1 riGERa�N�P LOCATIO
EL
GA RDGv
_sky
\ � IZ
N
0 120
FEET
Y Central Contra Costa EXHIBIT
Sanitary District BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5218
a
N F ' EL G"ILAN, ORINDA A -1
0
Z
Page 6 of 18
I
N.T.S.
SITE-
LOCA
LN
wo
P.
mom
Page 7 of 18
m
LLI
U)=
A
G)
0
DAYAKAVI
0) 1
C)
&
03
rn ASS
03
o
;
LEGEND:
SS
MANHOLE
EXISTING SEWER LINE
REIMBURSEMENT
8"-5260 SEWER LINE, PIPE SIZE,
JOB NUMBER
0 300
REIMBURSEMENT AREA
BOUNDARY
FEET
Central Contra Costa
EXHIBIT
Sanitary
District
BOUNDARY MAP PROJECT 5309
EL PINTADO, DANVILLE
A-2
Page 7 of 18
�i
N
0 300
FEET
'p0 � tri
}
LEGEND:
O MANHOLE
- - -• EXISTING SEWER LINE
REIMBURSEMENT
8" -5260 SEWER LINE, PIPE SIZE,
JOB NUMBER
REIMBURSEMENT AREA
BOUNDARY
x Central Contra Costa EXHIBIT
Sanitary District BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5346
RIDGEWOOD RD, ALAMO A -3
L
Page 8 of 18
'
2q5
Cpl`
N
0 300
FEET
'p0 � tri
}
LEGEND:
O MANHOLE
- - -• EXISTING SEWER LINE
REIMBURSEMENT
8" -5260 SEWER LINE, PIPE SIZE,
JOB NUMBER
REIMBURSEMENT AREA
BOUNDARY
x Central Contra Costa EXHIBIT
Sanitary District BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5346
RIDGEWOOD RD, ALAMO A -3
L
Page 8 of 18
N
i
N.T.S.
LEI GEND:
Central Contra Costa
0 EXHIBIT
sanitary District
BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5375
SECOND "E., WALNUT CREEK A-4
Page 9 of 18
0 MANHOLE
EXISTING SEWER LINE
N
C/)
Lu
- REIMBURSEMENT
8"-5260 SEWER LINE, PIPE SIZE,
JOB NUMBER
0 so 160
REIMBURSEMENT AREA
BOUNDARY
FEET
Central Contra Costa
0 EXHIBIT
sanitary District
BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5375
SECOND "E., WALNUT CREEK A-4
Page 9 of 18
MAIN �■
N
i
N.T.S.
�r
N
x Central Contra Costa EXHIBIT
Sanitary District BOUNDARY MAP - PROJECT 5381
z
1
MT VIEW DR, LAFAYETTE A -5
Page 10 of 18
Ott/
N.T.S. - - - -- INTERSTATE FREEWAY
v
1155 A
1145
� 30
`
2
1140
Nq
N P
11 07 //,33
A�o
co
(n
i
N
�0
'A
��i
LEGEND:
i(P
_ \ \moo
MANHOLE
d
s
,
- --
EXISTING SEWER LINE
0
O'p
8" -5280
REIMBURSEMENT
SEWER LINE, PIPE SIZE,
0 300
JOB NUMBER
FEET
__
REIMBURSEMENT AREA
BOUNDARY
e
n
N
x Central Contra Costa
EXHIBIT
Sanitary District
BOUNDARY
MAP
- PROJECT 5391
'
L
ESTATES DR, LAFAYETTE
A-6
Page 11 of 18
EXHIBIT B 1
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5218, El Gavilan, Orinda
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Orinda Fee
Number of Direct Connections
2 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement per Unit
$35,300.52 / 2 RUE = $17,650.26 / RUE
$29,809.00
2,975.00
2,366.52
150.00
$35,300.52
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Page 12 of 18
Assessor
Number of
Waive
Potential
Street Address
Parcel Nunber
RUE per
Installer
Fee
Fee
Parcel
77 El Gavilan
262 - 262 -017
One
One
85 El Gavilan
262 - 250 -022
One
One
Page 12 of 18
EXHIBIT B 2
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5309, El Pintado, Danville
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Town Fee
Number of Direct Connections
13 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement per Unit
$84,282.91 / 13 RUE = $6,483.30 / RUE
$72,059.00
7,187.00
4,286.91
750.00
$84,282.91
Page 13 of 18
EXHIBIT B 2
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Street Address
Assessor
Parcel Number
Number of
RUE per
Parcel
Installer
Waive
Fee
Potential
Fee
862 El Pintado
197- 250 -004
One
One
854 El Pintado
197 - 250 -005
One
One
836 El Pintado
197 - 140 -025
Two
Two
830 El Pintado
197 - 140 -047
One
One
828 El Pintado
197 - 140 -040
One
One
799 El Pintado
197- 150 -046
One
One
21 Udayakavi Ln.
197 -150 -047
One
One
33 Udayakavi Ln.
197 -150 -048
One
One
841 El Pintado
197 - 150 -021
One
One
853 El Pintado
197 - 150 -020
One
One
855 El Pintado
197- 150 -004
One
One
855 El Pintado
197- 150 -031
One
One
Page 14 of 18
EXHIBIT B 3
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5346, Ridgewood Rd., Alamo
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Number of Direct Connections
3 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement per Unit
$67,365.37 / 3 RUE _ $22,455.12 / RUE
$57,710.00
8,794.00
2.861.37
$67,365.37
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Street Addresss
Assessor
Parcel Number
Number of
RUE per
Parcel
Installer
Waive
Fee
Potential
Fee
2451 Ridgewood Road
191 - 100 -004
One
One
2475 Ridgewood Road
191 - 100 -005
One
One
2450 Ridgewood Road
191- 110 -002
One
One
Page 15 of 18
EXHIBIT B -4
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5375, Second Ave., Walnut Creek
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Number of Direct Connections
7 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement per
$25,759.66 / 7 RUE _ $3,679.95 / RUE
$15,875.00
7,514.00
2,370.66
$25,759.66
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Street Address
Assessor
Parcel Number
Number of
RUE per
Parcel
Installer
Waive
Fee
Potential
Fee
1897 Second Ave
171 - 170 -002
Two
One
One
171 -170 -076
One
One
171 -170 -077
One
One
171 -170 -078
One
One
171 -170 -081
One
One
1901 Second Ave
171 -170 -082
Two *
One
* The existing residential unit on this parcel connected previously to project 1554.
Page 16 of 18
EXHIBIT B 5
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5381, Mountain View Dr., Lafayette
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Miscellaneous
Number of Direct Connections
7 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement ep r Unit
$81,666.62 / 7 RUE _ $11,666.66 / RUE
$63,865.50
7,748.00
9,284.12
769.00
$81,666.62
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Street Addresss
Assessor
Parcel Number
Number of
RUE per
Parcel
Installer
Waive
Fee
Potential
Fee
811 Mt. View Drive
241 -140 -009
One
One
845 Mt. View Drive
241 -140 -010
One
One
809 Mt. View Drive
241 - 140 -011
One
One
810 Mt. View Drive
241 -150 -003
One
One
808 Mt. View Drive
241 -150 -013
One
One
Vacant
241 -150 -018
One
One
Vacant
241- 240 -026
One
One
Page 17 of 18
EXHIBIT B 6
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Project 5391, Estates Dr., Lafayette
Reimbursement Cost
Construction
Engineering
District Fees
Lafayette Fees
Number of Direct Connections
3 Residential Units Equivalents (RUE)
Reimbursement en r Unit
$33,463.05 / 3 RUE _ $11,154.35 / RUE
$24,810.00
4,594.00
2,257.55
1,801.50
$33,463.05
Properties to which Reimbursement Fee applies
Street Addresss
Assessor
Parcel Number
Number of
RUE per
Parcel
Installer
Waive
Fee
Potential
Fee
1121 Estates Drive
249 - 040 -001
One
One
1133 Estates Drive
249 - 040 -002
One
One
1107 Estates Drive
249 - 040 -006
One
One
Page 18 of 18
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 4.b. HEARINGS
Type of Action: CONSIDER APPEAL
Subject: CONSIDER APPEAL OF MODERN CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC. OF STAFF POSITION REGARDING PREQUALIFI CATION FOR MICROTUNNELING/
PIPE JACKING FOR THE PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PROJECT, PHASE 4,
D.P. 5170
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Tad J. Pilecki, Senior Engineer Engineering / Capital Projects
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
T'PileTVi W. Brennan A. Far II h Has . atts,
General Manager
ISSUE: It is appropriate for the Board to hear the appeal of Modern Continental
Construction, Inc. (Modern) of staff's position concerning prequalification for
microtunneling /pipe jacking for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project, Phase 4.
RECOMMENDATION: Consider appeal of Modern and determine whether Modern should
be prequalified for microtunneling /pipe jacking for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor
Project.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None related to this action.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSIDERATIONS: Either confirm disqualification of Modern or
determine Modern to be prequalified.
BACKGROUND: The Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor, Phase 4, provides wet weather relief
to existing sewers in the Pleasant Hill area. The project consists of installing
approximately 7,100 feet of 30 to 42 -inch RCP and structures by open cut, pipe jacking,
and microtunneling. Approximately 2,400 feet of 30 -, 36 -, and 42 -inch sewer is to be
installed by mandatory microtunneling. Microtunneling or open cut may be used to install
an additional 3,500 feet of 30 and 36 -inch sewer. The subsurface condition is alluvial
deposits generally consisting of silty and sandy clays interbedded with occasional silty
sand layers. It is anticipated that all of the tunneling will be below the groundwater table.
In order to stabilize the tunnel direction, control groundwater inflows, minimize surface
settlement and reduce dewatering requirements, the use of specialized advanced
technology equipment involving pressurized face microtunneling /pipe jacking equipment
with a closed face tunnel shield and positive, controllable face pressure is a requirement
11/8/00
I: \Design \PP \5170 \Consider Modern Appeal.wpd Page 1 of 8
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
subiect: CONSIDER APPEAL OF MODERN CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC. OF STAFF POSITION REGARDING PREQUALIFI CATION FOR MICROTUNNELING/
PIPE JACKING FOR THE PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PROJECT, PHASE 4,
D.P. 5170
for the project. Due to the anticipated difficult tunneling conditions and the requirement
for the use of this equipment, contractors who propose to perform the microtunneling /pipe
jacking work must have sufficient experience utilizing the specialized equipment.
Prequalification of these microtunneling /pipe jacking contractors /subcontractors is
necessary and is in the best interest of the District because of the difficulty of the work
and the need to have the work done properly and safely. Objective criteria for
prequalification was utilized including compliance with safety and environmental
regulations. A summary of these criteria is shown in Exhibit A.
• notice inviting prequalification submittals was published on August 21 and 30, 2000.
• copy of the Notice Inviting Submittals is attached as Exhibit B. Six submittals were
received and evaluated by District staff through an objective process. Five contractors
were determined to be qualified and were approved by the Board as prequalified at the
October 19, 2000, Board meeting. One contractor, Modern, was disqualified because it
did not meet the safety regulation criteria. Modern is a large national construction firm
with gross revenues of $676 million in 1999. The company, in its entirety, has numerous
OSHA violations, primarily arising from major projects in Massachusetts. Modern provided
a listing of multiple violations stemming from approximately 35 separate OSHA
inspections since 1995, including two sets of citations stemming from California projects.
However, Modern asserts that its microtunneling division is of a similar size to that of
most of the companies that prequalified and should be evaluated separately. If Modern's
microtunneling division were evaluated separately, it has only a single OSHA violation and
would, therefore, be prequalified. Modern did meet all of the other prequalification
requirements. The prequalification process provides any disqualified contractor the
opportunity to appeal the staff determination to the Board. Modern has so appealed (see
Exhibit Q.
The issue before the Board is whether Modern has met the safety regulation criteria to be
prequalified for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project, Phase 4. Modern has been
invited to present information pertinent to its appeal at the meeting of the Board.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Determine that Modern Continental Construction
Company, Inc. should be prequalified for microtunneling /pipe jacking for the Pleasant Hill
Relief Interceptor Project, Phase 4, D.P. 5170.
11/8/00 Page 2 of 8
I: \Design \PP \5170 \Consider Modern Appealmpd
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF PREQUALIFICATION CRITERIA
Contractors must meet the following criteria:
• Successful completion as a company of tunneling projects over the last five years.
• Successful completion of at least one project in geologic conditions similar to those
of the Pleasant Hill Project utilizing specialized microtunneling /pipe jacking
equipment.
• Tunneling experience of a project superintendent of at least ten years and of
microtunneling /pipe jacking machine operator(s) of at least five years. The
superintendent and operator(s) must have worked on at least two projects using
the specialized microtunneling /pipe jacking equipment required for this project.
• Provision of documentation from a bonding company certifying the contractor's
maximum bonding capacity.
• Demonstration of successful completion of all public works projects entered into
since September 1, 1995.
• Possession of a valid California A License or the ability to obtain by Board award.
• Possession of sufficient and proper equipment to perform the work that meets
specific minimum requirements.
• Received no more than one "material" Notice of Violation in the same category of
any safety or environmental regulation since January 1, 1995.
Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT B
AND
Notice is hereby given that sealed prequalification Submittals for (1)
microtunneling /pipe jacking Contractors /Subcontractors and (2) conventional tunneling
Contractors /Subcontractors will be received by mail or at the receptionist area of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ( "District "), 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, California
94553, Attention: Secretary of the District, until 5 p.m. local time, September 12, 2000.
Late submittals will be considered non - responsive and returned without further evaluation.
Six (6) copies of each Submittal are required. Contractors previously prequalified for
District projects must submit a new prequalification submittal for the Pleasant Hill Relief
Interceptor Project. Contractors who were previously prequalified for the Dougherty
Sewer Project do not need to submit a new prequalification submittal for that project.
Alternatively, a Submittal may be faxed to the Secretary of the District at
(925) 676 -7211. Faxed Submittals must be timely received (regardless of transmission
delays and five additional identical copies, marked and sealed as set forth above, must be
delivered by next day (a.m. delivery) mail. No electronic mail submittals will be accepted.
The Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor, Phase 4, provides wet weather relief to existing
sewers in the Pleasant Hill area. The project consists of installing approximately 7,100
feet of 30- to 42 -inch RCP and structures by open cut, pipe jacking, and microtunneling.
Approximately 2,400 feet of 30 -, 36 -, and 42 -inch sewer is to be installed by mandatory
microtunneling. Microtunneling or open cut may be used to install an additional 3,500
feet of 30- and 36 -inch sewer. This prequalification is Phase 1 of the bid award process.
The second phase is scheduled for late 2000 with advertisement for bids in fall 2000 and
award in early winter 2000/2001. The estimated construction cost for the project is 6
to 7 million dollars.
The subsurface condition is alluvial deposits generally consisting of silty and sandy
clays interbedded with occasional silty sand layers. The consistency of the clay varies,
generally ranging from medium stiff to very stiff. The sand deposits encountered are
generally silty and range from loose to medium dense. Groundwater is expected to be
above the interceptor throughout the project.
Imesign\DP IMNotice Inviting Submittals.wpd
Page 4 of 8
The Dougherty Valley Tunnel and Trunk Sewer Project will serve a proposed
11,000 homes in the Dougherty Valley area northeast of San Ramon. The project
includes connection to an existing pumping station, construction of 5,000 feet of 60 -inch
sewer by conventional tunneling methods, and construction of 3,500 feet of 24 -inch
sewer by microtunneling /pipe jacking and open cut construction methods. This
prequalification is Phase 1 of the bid award process. The second phase is scheduled for
later in the winter /spring of 2001 with advertisements for bids in late winter 2001 with
award of the contract in late spring 2001. The project will be bid and awarded as a single
contract. Approximately one year will be allowed for construction of the trunk sewer
project including the tunneling portion. The estimated construction cost is 12 to 14
million dollars.
Construction of the trunk sewer portion will involve the construction of 3,500 feet
of 24 -inch gravity sewer, of which approximately 1,050 feet will be installed by
microtunneling /pipe jacking methods. The microtunneling portion will consist of 3 or 4
drives in silty and /or sandy clay alluvium soils, the longest being approximately 400 feet.
The depth of the microtunnel portion will be 14 to 22 feet. The remainder of the sewer
will be constructed by open cut construction methods through silty and /or sandy clay soils
at a depth of 7 to 14 feet. Alternatives for pipe materials are reinforced concrete pipe,
polymer concrete pipe, and vitrified clay pipe.
The tunnel portion of the project will be constructed by conventional tunneling
methods, either a tunnel boring machine or a roadheader. The minimum tunnel size will
be 10 feet inside diameter. The tunnel cross - section will be either circular or horseshoe -
shaped depending on the tunneling method selected by the Contractor. The tunnel is
anticipated to be constructed through weak interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and
claystone of the Orinda formation. The tunnel has been assigned an underground
classification of "Gassy." Any electrical equipment, internal combustion engines, and
other equipment used for this tunnel must be permissible, approved, and acceptable to
California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health.
The 60 -inch reinforced concrete pipe with PVC lining will be installed as a carrier pipe
inside the tunnel. In addition, two 12 -inch pipelines will be installed in the annular space
between the concrete pipe and tunnel excavation. The annular space will be filled with
low density cellular concrete.
Because of geologic conditions present at the sites, the use of pressurized face
microtunneling /pipe jacking equipment employing either earth pressure balance,
pressurized slurry, or a combination of the two methods for the tunnels is required. The
microtunneling equipment must be a closed face tunnel shield with the capability to exert
a positive, controllable pressure at the tunnel face. Line and grade is to be monitored
using laser methods and controlled within + 1 inch.
Because of the specialized nature of this work and the specific anticipated site
constraints, the District requires that all microtunneling /pipe jacking contractors and
conventional tunneling contractors must prequalify for these projects. A list of
prequalified contractors will be provided with the Bid Documents for these projects (during
Phase 2 of the Bid /Award process). The use of a non - prequalified contractor for the
IADesign\DP\5170 \Notice Inviting Submittalsmpd 2 Page 5 of 8
microtunneling /pipe jacking, or the conventional tunneling portions of the work will not
be allowed. Contractors wishing to perform any of the microtunneling /pipe jacking work
must complete a written Submittal in accordance with the District's Request for
Submittals ( "RFS" process). The "RFS" process is deemed to include the Notice Inviting
Submittals dated August 17, 2000, the Instructions to Contractors/ Subcontractors, the
Request for Submittal, the Submittal, and any addenda issued by the District.
There will be three (3) separate "RFS" packages: one for the microtunneling /pipe
jacking work for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project, one for the microtunneling /pipe
jacking portion of the Dougherty Valley Tunnel and Trunk Sewer Project, and one for the
conventional tunneling portion of the Dougherty Valley Tunnel and Trunk Sewer Project.
Contractors wishing to be prequalified for all the work must submit a separate Submittal
for each project or construction method. These Submittals will be evaluated separately.
Contractors seeking to bid on these projects as a prime contractor must be
prequalified if the prime intends to do any of the microtunneling or conventional tunneling
work.
The "RFS" for any of these projects may be obtained at no cost from Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District, 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553, Attention:
Ms. Marnie Scott. Telephone requests can be made to (925) 229 -7274.
The District will review the Submittals and determine which Contractors are
prequalified. Each participating Contractor will be notified in writing of the prequalification
decision made upon the Contractor's Submittal.
Contractors should note that prequalification does not exempt a Contractor from
meeting each requirement of law, such as licensing, prevailing wage, public work, and all
other applicable laws, and each requirement of the final Contract Documents.
Dated: August 17, 2000
(:\Design \DP\5170 \Notice Inviting SubmittalsmIad
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY
DISTRICT
J y + E Murphy, Secretary of Oe District
3 Page 6 of 8
ra MODERN NTINENTAL. EXHIBIT C
15801 Venmra Boulevard, Suite 301, Tarzana: Cali:ornia 91356 Tel: (818) 708 -2001 Fm(818)708-3410
16 October 00 CIN "SD -012 -W
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, Ca. 94553
Tel: (925) 229 -7336 Fax: (925) 676 -7211
Attention: Ms. Joyce Murphy
Secretary of the District
Re: Modern Continental Construction Company, Inc.
Microtunncling/Pipe Jacking Contractor /Subcontractor Prequalification
Pleasant Hill Interceptor Relief Project, District Project No. 5170
Dear Ms. Murphy:
On Friday, 13 Oct 00, we received the attached Notice of Determination from Mr. William E.
Brennan, Capital projects Division Manager. We were informed that Modern Continental had been
determined to be nonresponsive and was, therefore, not prequaiified for the above referenced project.
Please note that in accordance with the dictates of the letter, and Item 9 of the Instructions to
Contractors, Modern Continental would like to exercise its right to appeal this determination to the
AppellIate Board. This letter shall serve as Modem Continental's written notice, submitted within
five (5) days of the Notice of Determination. Please advise when the appeals hearing will be
conducted.
We look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Should you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me at (818) 708 -2001.
Sineerehy,
MODERN CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
M. J. nnell
Cc: Mr. William E. Brennan — Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Mr. Steve Harrington - Modern Continental
Mr. Cosmo Pallazola —Modem Continental
Mr. Wayne Rice — Modern Continental
Page 7 of 8
pRraiq (;i 'I-L CONTRA
COSTA SAN . .T PHONE NO. : 510 372 7635 Dot. 13 2000 03744PM P1
LCentral Contra Costa Sanitary District
Dear Mr. O'Donnell;
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION: MICROTUNNEUNG /PIPE .JACKING CONTRACTOR/
SUBCONTRACTOR PROJECT NO. FOR THE PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PROJECT, DISTRICT
Thank you for subrnirdng your prequalifioatlon package to the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary Dietric= (District). After careful review, the District has determined that your
company is nonresponsive, therefore, not prequalified for the subject project. The basis
of this determination is that your company did not meet the Notice of ViOIATtOns Criteria
listed in Part IV of the Request for Submitted. The criteria in this section does not make
allowances for large corrtractors with billions of dollars worth of work vs the typical small
microtunneling contractor. In addition, the criteria does not differentiate between a large
company and one of the divisions within the company. The District will evaluate this Issue
on future prequalifications.
As delineated in [tern 9 of the instructions to Bidders, you must notify, in writing, the
Secretary of the District (Ms. Joyce Murphy, Secretary of the District, 5019 Imhoff Place.
Martinez, CA 94553; phone 925 - 229-7303) within five (5) calendar days from receipt of
this Notice of Determination if you wish to appeal the determination.
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 926 -229 -7288.
Si ncereiy,
Vv
wlliam E. Brennan
Capital Projects Division Manager
WEBITJP:ms
co: Kent Alm, District Counsel
Ann. Farrell
Joyce Murphy
Tad pileeki
Past -W Fax Nde 7671 ►
Ta on e- Fri �� !R ✓7 G-.+-
oa.rGpc ca
• F�haw s..ges . -oa -^7 lY
Page 8 of 8
FAX: (925) 372.9635
October 13, 200
1:lul•r.F.$ W. hA77a
(`.�etwl M�r.oK+r
Mr. M. J. O'Donnell
K11WW 1, AJA(
10L11—
Modern Continental Construction Co., Inc.
(S v038 -M3o
18501 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 301
WDYMZ. vcrvor
0194a
Tarzana, CA 91356
Swrwbr •jdhe
Dear Mr. O'Donnell;
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION: MICROTUNNEUNG /PIPE .JACKING CONTRACTOR/
SUBCONTRACTOR PROJECT NO. FOR THE PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR
PROJECT, DISTRICT
Thank you for subrnirdng your prequalifioatlon package to the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary Dietric= (District). After careful review, the District has determined that your
company is nonresponsive, therefore, not prequalified for the subject project. The basis
of this determination is that your company did not meet the Notice of ViOIATtOns Criteria
listed in Part IV of the Request for Submitted. The criteria in this section does not make
allowances for large corrtractors with billions of dollars worth of work vs the typical small
microtunneling contractor. In addition, the criteria does not differentiate between a large
company and one of the divisions within the company. The District will evaluate this Issue
on future prequalifications.
As delineated in [tern 9 of the instructions to Bidders, you must notify, in writing, the
Secretary of the District (Ms. Joyce Murphy, Secretary of the District, 5019 Imhoff Place.
Martinez, CA 94553; phone 925 - 229-7303) within five (5) calendar days from receipt of
this Notice of Determination if you wish to appeal the determination.
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 926 -229 -7288.
Si ncereiy,
Vv
wlliam E. Brennan
Capital Projects Division Manager
WEBITJP:ms
co: Kent Alm, District Counsel
Ann. Farrell
Joyce Murphy
Tad pileeki
Past -W Fax Nde 7671 ►
Ta on e- Fri �� !R ✓7 G-.+-
oa.rGpc ca
• F�haw s..ges . -oa -^7 lY
Page 8 of 8
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AWARD
POSITION PAPER
No.: 6.a. BIDS AND AWARDS
Subject: AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO
D. W. NICHOLSON CORPORATION FOR THE ELEVATED WORK
PLATFORMS PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT 6132, AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO ALLOCATE $130,000 FROM THE TREATMENT
PLANT PROGRAM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Submitted By: Initiating DeptJDiv.:
James L. Belcher, Senior Engineer Plant Operations /Maintenance
RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
ISSUE: On November 1, 2000, sealed bids were received and opened for construction of
the Elevated Work Platforms Project, District Project (DP) 6132. The Board of Directors
must authorize award of the contract or reject bids within 50 days of the bid opening.
Board authorization is required for contingency allocations of more than $25,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of a construction contract to D. W. Nicholson
Corporation.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approximately $120,000, including bid price, contingency, and
construction management.
BACKGROUND: Each year a number of safety improvement ideas are generated during
safety audit and from employee suggestions. The District Safety Committee reviews
and evaluates these ideas for priority and appropriateness. Some of these ideas lead to
work that is best performed as a capital project.
The Plant Operations Department (POD) Safety Team recommended three safety projects
(see Attachment 1) for immediate implementation. They are:
• Medusa access platform (furnace flue gas wet scrubber)
• Super vacuum access platform (ash vacuum filter housing)
• Ash unloading conveyor access platform
11/8/00
G: \Belcher \6132Award. PP. wpd Page 1 of 5
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
Subject: AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO
D. W. NICHOLSON CORPORATION FOR THE ELEVATED WORK
PLATFORMS PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT 6132, AND AUTHORIZE THE
GENERAL MANAGER TO ALLOCATE $130,000 FROM THE TREATMENT
PLANT PROGRAM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR CONSTRUCTION
These safety improvements are being made to improve employee working conditions by
providing safe access to properly maintain critical equipment.
The project was advertised on October 11 and October 16, 2000. Five bids, ranging from
a low of $89,000 to a high of $157,000, were received and publicly opened on
November 1, 2000. The engineer's estimate for the construction cost was $150,000.
A summary of these bids is shown in Attachment 2. POD staff conducted a commercial
and technical evaluation of the bids, and it has been determined that D. W. Nicholson
Corporation is the lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $89,000.
D. W. Nicholson has successfully performed other District projects.
The additional allocation of funds required to complete this project is $130,000, as shown
in Attachment 3. The current total estimated project cost is $179,000. This project is
not included in the Fiscal Year 2000 -2001 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB). Staff has
conducted a cash -flow evaluation of the Sewer Construction Fund and concluded that
adequate funds are available for this project.
Staff has determined that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines, Section 18.2, since it involves minor
alterations to existing treatment plant facilities with no increase in capacity. Approval of
this project will establish the Board of Directors' independent finding that this project is
exempt from CEQA.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize award of a construction contract in the
amount of $89,000 for the construction of the Elevated Work Platforms Project, DP 6132,
to D. W. Nicholson Corporation, the lowest responsible bidder. Authorize the General
Manager to allocate $130,000 from the Treatment Plant Program Contingency
Account for construction of DP 6132.
11/8/00
Page 2of5
E
q6
0 150 300
FEET
CT
i
4"
/l
Central Contra Costa Attachment
Sanitary District ELEVATED WORK ACCESS PLATFORM
District Project 6132 1
" 1 Project Location
Page 3 of 5
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
ATTACHMENT 2
SUMMARY OF BIDS
Project: ELEVATED WORK PLATFORM Date: November 1. 2000
PROJECT DP 6132
Location: Martinez, California Engr. Est. $150.000
1 1 D. W. Nicholson Corporation $89,000
24747 Clawiter Road
Hayward, CA 94540
2 Kaweah Construction Company $96,839
P. O. Box 7780
Fresno, CA 93747
3 Pacific Mechanical Corporation $136,000
P.O. Box 4041
Concord, CA 94524
4 Arntz Builders $149,847
19 Pamaron Way
Novato, CA 94949
5 Monterey Mechanical Company $157,000
8275 San Leandro Street
Oakland, CA 94621
Bids Opened by: /s/ Joyce Murphy Date: November 1. 2000
Sheet No. 4 of 5
S:\Contracts\6132\SUMB1DR.WPD
ATTACHMENT 3
ELEVATED WORK PLATFORMS PROJECT
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 6132
POST - BID /PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
11/8/00
G: \Belcher \6132Award.PP.wpd Page 5 of 5
Percent of
Item Description
Total
Estimated
Construction Cost
1 CONSTRUCTION
Construction Contract
$ 89,000
Contingency at 17%
$ 15,000
Total Construction
$104,000
100
2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
$ 16,000
15.38
3 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE
$120,000
115.38
COST
4 TOTAL PREBID EXPENDITURES
$ 12,000
11.54
5 TOTAL PHASE ESTIMATED
$132,000
126.92
PROJECT COST
6 OTHER WORK FUNDED BY THIS
$ 48,000
PROJECT
7 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
$180,000
COST
8 FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE
$ 50,000
9 ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION
$130,000
NEEDED TO COMPLETE PROJECT
11/8/00
G: \Belcher \6132Award.PP.wpd Page 5 of 5
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
/4"�k BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 8.a. ENGINEERING
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
Subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
BRIAN KANGAS FOULK FOR CONSULTING SURVEY SERVICES
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
Elizabeth Charlton, Land Surveyor Engineering /Capital Projects _
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
__(M� "I , (& - 04b\--
E. Cha I on W. Bren n A. rell Charles
General Mt
ISSUE: Authorization of the Board of Directors is required for the General Marhager to
execute a professional services agreement in an amount greater than $50,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a professional services
agreement with a cost ceiling not to exceed $100,000 with Brian Kangas Foulk for survey
support services for a period of one year.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Costs of survey services provided through this agreement will be
charged to various capital projects and Operations and Maintenance accounts.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Additional District staff could be hired to meet this
need.
BACKGROUND: The District Survey Section provides support services for Engineering,
Plant Operations, and Collection System Operations in facilities location, predesign, design,
construction, and right -of -way. Survey gathers both new data and researches, compiles
and interprets archival data for these projects. Survey contracts with, and supervises the
work of private surveyors when on -going work exceeds the section's capacity. Survey
consultants also provide field personnel to form the District survey crew. The Board had
last authorized an agreement on November 6, 1997, for $92,000 with Brian Kangas Foulk
to provide consulting surveying services. The contract was extended in time via contract
revision to January 31, 2001, and the contract amount was increased to $35,000. In the
last twelve months, a consultant surveyor has worked an average of fifty percent of the
time. Most of these services were provided for capital projects. We are currently
evaluating the need for a full -time District position to perform this and other tasks. It is
anticipated that Survey will require these outside survey support services over the next
one year period in order to continue to provide timely service to District departments.
11/8/00
L:\Position Papers \SURVEY \rfp2pos.wpd Page 1 of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
subject: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
BRIAN KANGAS FOULK FOR CONSULTING SURVEY SERVICES
Proposals were solicited from survey consulting firms with experience in providing contract
services to municipalities and special districts. Two surveying firms Brian Kangas Foulk
and Psomas submitted proposals. These firms participated in an informal interview
process to ascertain the notice required for provision of survey personnel and the
qualifications of chiefs of party assigned to District work. Brian Kangas Foulk was
selected for this work on the basis of availability, experience, and projected costs. A
professional services agreement not to exceed the amount of $ 100,000 was negotiated
with Brian Kangas Foulk.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to execute a
professional services agreement with a cost ceiling not to exceed $ 100,000 with Brian
Kangas Foulk for survey support services for a period of one year.
11/8/00
L: \Position Papers \SURVEY \rfp2pos.wpd Page 2 of 2
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 9.a. TREATMENT PLANT
Type of Action: AUTHORIZE AWARD
Subject: AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A COGENERATION PACKAGE MAINTENANCE
CONTRACT TO SOLAR TURBINES FOR $164,040 PER YEAR FOR A
TERM OF FIVE YEARS
Submitted By: Initiating Dept. /Div.:
David J. Reindl, Associate Engineer Plant Operations /Maintenance
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED F BOARD ACTION.
i �ruc�
D. Reindl . Be J. K Lamica Char s o.ag
General
ISSUE: Board approval is required for agreements that exceed $50,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Renew the maintenance agreement with Solar Turbines for five
years at 5164,040 per year plus an adjustment for inflation.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The five -year value of the contract is approximately $875,000,
including an inflation adjustment of 3 percent per year.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: Alternatives to this contract would be to use Solar
Turbines on an as- needed basis.
BACKGROUND: The installation of the cogeneration system for the treatment plant was
completed mid -1995 and commissioned for full -time operation in November 1995. The
cogeneration system provides between 85 and 90 percent of the treatment plant's
electrical energy and 30 percent of the steam needed for the treatment plant aeration
process. By utilizing natural gas (NG) to produce both electrical power and steam, the
District has saved between $800,000 and $1 million per year over the cost of utility -
provided power. For each of the last five years, the cogeneration system has exceeded
the on -line availability goal of 95 percent, due in part to the comprehensive maintenance
program with Solar Turbines. A maintenance agreement with the manufacturer was
included in the original evaluated bid for the turbine generator equipment when it was
purchased in 1994. Solar Turbines, the manufacturer, was authorized the award to
supply our turbine and provide five years of maintenance.
The maintenance agreement covers the entire power generating package for all parts and
labor and any emergency service calls. The agreement also contains provisions for end -of-
contract replacement of the combustion turbine, a value of $250,000, plus a yearly
11 /8/00 Page 1 of 2
S: \Correspondence \POS PAPR \2000 \SolaWaintenance.DJR. wpd
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
subject: AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A COGENERATION PACKAGE MAINTENANCE
CONTRACT TO SOLAR TURBINES FOR $164,040 PER YEAR FOR A TERM OF
FIVE YEARS
payment for performance bonus or penalty. Solar Turbines has earned a performance
bonus all five years of the first contract because the turbine exceeded the specified
uptime. Solar Turbines also replaced a turbine in April 2000 at no additional cost; the
replacement turbine is producing more power than our original turbine.
The term of the existing maintenance agreement ends in November 2000. The District
has negotiated an extension of the original agreement with Solar Turbines for an additional
five years. District staff recommends the agreement be extended with Solar Turbines
because of their excellent past performance, and it is in the best interest of the District
as no other source can provide the current factory level of support that Solar Turbines has
provided. The cost for the renewed agreement is $13,670 per month, or a total of
$164,040 per year, and includes an allowance for inflation in future years.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Renew the maintenance agreement with Solar
Turbines for up to five years at $164,040 per year, plus an adjustment for inflation.
11/8/00 Page 2 of 2
S:\ Correspondence \POSPAPR \2000 \SolarMaintenance.DJR.wpd
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
' BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000 No.: 13.a. BUDGET AND FINANCE
Type of Action: APPROVE FINANCIAL REPORT
Subject: APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AS OF JUNE
30, 2000 FOR SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION.
Submitted By: Initiating Dept ✓Div.:
Colette Curtis -Brown Finance & Accounting
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION.
C. Curtis Brown D. Rat f.' Morsen harles W B ts,
General Ma ger
ISSUE: Board approval is requested to submit a Comprehensive Annual Financial' Report
(CAFR) to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for review. I
RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the June 30, 2000 CAFR for GFOA submission.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There is an application fee for submission of a CAFR for review based
on total revenues of the entity applying. The District fee is $415 based on this sliding fee
schedule.
ALTERNATIVES /CONSIDERATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND: The GFOA is a professional association of state /provincial and local finance
officers in the United States and Canada, and has served the public finance profession since
1906. The association's 14,100 members are dedicated to the sound management of
government financial resources. The GFOA also provides input to the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB). This is an important function as the GASB imposes
the rules that govern how we account for the financial operations of the District.
Publishing a CAFR addresses the Little Hoover Commission's concern that public agencies be
more forthcoming with their financial information to their constituents. This report provides
ten years of pertinent data in one easy -to -read document. The CAFR is a comprehensive tool
for internal management use as well as external use for evaluating the creditworthiness of the
District should the District consider outside financing in the future. Publishing a CAFR is an
industry standard and several of our neighboring agencies currently produce the document.
The GFOA sponsors a Certificate of Achievement of Excellence in Financial Reporting
Program. To participate in this program, the District has to comply with the strict
requirements of the GFOA in regards to format and content of the CAFR. The report includes
an introduction, financial and statistical section that presents ten years of data.
11/8/00
G: \FINANCE \cafrpp.wpd Page 1 of 2
POSITION PAPER
Board Meeting Date: November 16, 2000
subject: APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
FOR SUBMISSION TO THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION.
The Board Finance Committee reviewed the CAFR in detail at the Board Budget and
Finance Committee meeting on November 8, 2000. Suggestions for improvement have
been imbedded in the final document.
RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION: Approve the CAFR for submission to the GFOA.
11/8/00
Page 2 of 2