HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 12-17-81
Contra Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
NO. IV. Bi ds & Awards
1 12 17 81
BATE
ecember 14, 1981
SUBJECT AWARD OF THE CARPETING CONTRACT FOR THE NEW DISTRICT
OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT AND AUTHORIZATION OF $79,740 IN
FUNDS TO DP 3633
TYPE OF ACTION
AWARD CONTRACT;
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
Ron Klimczak, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Division
BACKGROUND
The Board of Directors authorized advertising for bids for carpeting in the
renovated Plant Operations Building and new District Office Building at the
November 19, 1981 Board meeting. The bid opening occurred on December 9,
1981.
The basic bid covers carpeting in all areas of the office building project
(except Alternate #1 area and areas included in W. A. Thomas' contract), a
quantity of carpeting (5%) to be placed in storage for future replacement
of any damaged carpet tiles, and a manufacturer recommended carpet cleaning
machine with cleaning supplies. Carpet for the unused portion of the
second floor is included as additional cost under Alternative #1. Reduced
plan sheets are attached showing the extent of carpeting covered by the
contract and Alternative #1.
BID ANALYSIS
The bids are presented in Table A. A review of the bids shows that the
three low bids (not including the Alternate #1 area) are within 4% of the
low bid indicating consistent interpretation of the plans and specifications
as well as confidence that the lowest cost to the District has been obtained.
The fourth bidder has numerous errors in his bid summary. The apparent low
bid is by Conklin Brothers in the amount of $69,339.30.
The additive bid costs associated with doing the Alternate #1 area (balance
of second floor) ranged between $17,500 and $19,729.52. The Conklin
Brothers' bid for this additional work was $18,509.30. The Architect's
estimate was approximately 6.9% ($4,475.30) low for the basic carpeting
area and approximately 5.9% ($1,037) low for the Alternate #1 area.
The Purchasing Division has reviewed the bid documents from the three
lowest bidders and has determined that they are complete and accurate bids.
The fourth bid is considered non-responsive due to errors that were made
ln both the quantities used a s well as the interpretation of the bid form.
The contract documents give the District until May 1, 1982 to exercise the
Alternate #1 option. Consequently, no decision is required at this time.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
(\,
JL JL e.:L.~ CL~J 'y( \ PM
A recommendation will be made at a later date as to the desirability of
installing the carpeting covered by the Alternate #1 additional cost,
once recent changes in the District organization have been incorporated in
the floor space layout.
RECOMMENDATIONS
(1) Award the carpeting contract for the new District Office Building
Project to Conklin Brothers and authorize $79,740 from Sewer Construction
Funds to DP 3633.
(2) Direct staff to make a recommendation prior to May 1, 1982 as to the
desirability of proceeding with the additional carpeting on the second
floor (Alternate #1).
Attachments
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR SOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT.(DIV.
GEN. MGR./CHIEF ENG.
TABLE A
Bidder Bid (wi 0 A 1 t #1) Alt #1 Add'l Cost Total
(1) Conklin Bros.(Oakland) $69,339.30 + $18,509.30 $87,848.60
(2) Design Performance 69,821.45 + 20,670.30 90,491 .75
(San Francisco)
(3) Superior Linoleum 72 ,451.57 + 19,729.52 92,181 .09
& Carpet (San Leandro)
(4) Professional Flooring 99,960.50 + 17,500.00 117,460.50
(Concord)
Architect's Estimate
64,864.00
+ 1 7 ,472 . 00
82,336.00
10.
POST BID - PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE OF COSTS
FOR
DISTRICT PROJECT 3633
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
%CONST.
CONTRACT
ITEM AMOUNT
TOTAL
1.
. $ 69,339.30
100.0
Construction Contract (As Bid) .
2.
3,466.96
5.0
Estimated Construction Contingencies
. . . . . . $
3. Estimated Construction Incidentals to Project Completion
Survey. . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
Inspection & .Co.ntract .Administr.ation . $ 6.933.93
Engineering . . . . . . . . . . $
Total Estimated Construction Incidentals .$ 6,933.93 $ 6,933.93 10.0
4. Street Resurfacing or Seal Coat . $ N/A -0-
5. Total Estimate Required to Complete Project . $ 79,740.19 115.0
6.
Pre Bid Expenditures
Survey, Engineering, Printing, Advertising
Specia I Services
Right-ot-Way Acquisition. .
.$
.$
.$
7.
o
-0-
115.0
*
Total Preconstruct ion Incidentals (as ot
). . $
$
8.
79,740.19
.$
Total Estimated Project Cost
(Items 5 & 7)
9.
-0-
Funds Previously Authorized
. . . . . . . $
Total Additional Funds Required to Complete Project.
(Item 8 minus Item 9)
. $ 79.740.19
Say $79,740.
*
All prebid expenses have been
charged to DP 3000.
2050-8-78
_ -Ii
i'
!,'I.=I! ,
~ -, 'I ~
-:tJC 1
- 11--'
, I .
'-' ....-----.. ---- --
~ i
, I
: --==n]
i'
,
.
.
L___ ___ _ ____J
,. .
;;1[', iIIi Ii. II" n:
it ; :11: !
1 ;': -j~.~ :11:
u
--~
'-,' I" .
I __!; ~ .
ern
, ,Pi
'j I
._~
+--~
_--1
~ _:-~-
1--1
'~~[]II I
I: '
.---! '
r--, Ii-I! I'd
~; rt--~ 'I
i1 r; 1 - li:l:)!
1~1'
::== -.
II I:
I
'= 1r
, ~
Pi f J,
I ,
, I
! r- i
.' "
,
- d
I l
I I
I ' .
i I ,
i
I I.
I
,
I
I !! I
/.~~-
~ Ii' \
,i " I'i 'I
~ ! . I
: III i
.:; Ii, I
[j ! li,l! ~
.,&~~~==tI-:::.'_
L. .
1__ .,..=iC
~
I h
, ~
"
.,
II
:1
l
"
"
...-r___-~.
I
1---;
:J
I
I
---~
, . I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
..
I-
::)
o
~
..J
W
..J
-
l-
I-
W
G-
o:
ct
o
(!)
z
~
I-
en
w
~
I
If-iffi I i I r~ U~ 1 liT
Il- I
-..--
>. ( li\-."
___.::::J' ;; I
_ ~r= =,1
LT
i ii
+ L LL ;;;~;:
=F
,
II
,i
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ii-~-J
Ii
!
l;~~
I ~ .
'-1-
Ii
~.-:J
'1
;1
I
d
t.J
.,iii::::;lilllilm,
.........::.........
. ~i i::: ~:: ~:! ~;:
'I
.. .,.",cJ'1
I . - ,
--
---.-------------- -
-1
t-1
+~I
+l-+-
+-
Il-
=r<
; 1
11-
~
I'll
_ )>--.<1
J,
~
H' ~
'H~r"
; :I:;~ ::l
t~..
:::::..
-
P-W-+- 1
I-
H
H ~-t -l -l.11
'1
..........
,::::
.".:
i HH
:::::
j
i
i
.
I jI ,I
i=ll i'l
r I
1b\+liL
T~ I
Il- I
\' -LLLJ~ +
IJ.--I ti.
-
(..
-
[
:..
'-
~
;-1...1
"-
"-
~
------~~
-!- 1.
l-
+=+
l-..l
"'t L++
~=ft '-ri
+- i
~
I
T
+=rt!
i +-l-t-l
f --l-
1
l-
I
1
_-I L
[Ctf
, I
dtt
...L
f-t--l
.L
L
f-f- I- -l
t
~
H, .( Q
+-"
~b ~ ~
-
~ ~
T .J
T F F
r I
~
T
=+..;
T
"I
I~, :
+- I
"I
T
; r
f:
-r,
:::!
-I.
.
:i
-:
...'
I-
:)
o
>-
<(
...I
W
...I
t=
I
I-
W
C.
a:
<(
o
a:
o
o
...I
LL
I-
en
a:
u:
[
~-
~
- ~
-
_ 1-
_-1-
- ~
_.1.
_ .L
_L
-
-
.-
=
-
-
-
-
--4
,-
- -!- ~
-I-- ~
_1--1-
,-_ --l ..1
-
-
= t- L
-
...
I _-1
i- --\-
"-
,'-.J
....j-.l
.. -
I
,,;
"
,'..
ill
"
....J.--r:~~
...;.
_ -.:..":_1
I ,17
.
,- ..r~ ;'~ h
<"" ..~.~..: i H
", ..lTi-t
~ ~ +-1
,~; ~ -F 1:+=
If','j ~
u
+
~
. I
t-1o-4- t: ""
r-+
.... ;;;;;"':
!;~;, II
.LN
~
+-l.
-I--
, f- +- !
-t ~
.1
tl:'=t-
++
-r-
T
~
f- I -+-
I 1:H=
!
f-
i
l'
I .....
+w .1.
+ 4=' .1 +-I -1
i' 1
l' 1=i +1
l'
I
I t-
t
t-
T
"
.:::::::::::
T
+1=
+-
H
-+-l
-j;
~n
~l T
l:::jC-
J...+ ..l
1-1
-t -r ,
.1 -r
T
.1
.1
.L
~l
,J
+8=
t-~
1-
..1
...L
.L
i +- 1
~l
i
'.,
.~ l-
"'.J IT::;::
,~ I l' ~
I ~I_'.,.;, , "h~:l ~ IJ:.. cH
. ._~. =:'.J ' " I I . I I TTiT-ri ..1 ill
I 1,1 I I I II
I I 1.1 I
.
I i
~v
~..-f
~..
c"u
I-
.. .( ~
\.l ~
+= t \\.
~
-r 'lU ~
f- J
F F
r \-
i- ~ ~
T+
I
!
+-
i-
*
t l-
t
l'
H
'1
1 It
I-
::)
o
>
.<(
..J
W
...J
i=
I
I-
W
~
a:
<(
(,)
a:
o
o
..J
u..
.0
Z
o
(,)
w
en
-
.m.
....
...
-. .
-
.... 1:::......."........-
-.. :''':.:'' :..: ::,;: t:;; .::" :~1
F t~ ~'k [i
..
~ l
.-. _.. .... oL Jjc:::l
.. .- -.. ::::::,.,.
R
l" 11 T
T
~ -- - ._. ... ... .... .... .. ..... ..
... .... ... ..... ..
- - - ..~
, ... .- .. .
- m. .-
I?' .... .... ..
~
A I
Lil I
UI n 0
r ,..." LlI n
= =
.
I
..
.( ~
\1 \1
~ ~
~ ~
F f=
\) t
~ ~
D
2
~
\U
--.l
I-
::)
o
>
<a:
..J
W
..J
i=
I
I-
W
0.
a:
<a:
o
a:
o
o
..J
LL
Q
a:
-
:J:
I-
-
cc<SD
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. IV. Bids & Awards
y
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
December 17, 1981
AWARD OF PURCHASE ORDERS FOR SUPPLY OF FIVE (5) VEHICLES
TYPE OF ACTION
Award of Purchase Order
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
K. F. Laverty
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Administration/purchasing
Issue: Certain District vehicles needed replacement or new purchase, these vehicles
were approved by the District Board in the 1981-1982 Fiscal Equipment Budget. Approval
of award to Parker Robb Chevrolet and Sun Valley Ford is needed.
Background: In accordance with the Safety and Health code, formal public bids were
taken for the supply of two pick-ups, one 3/4 ton pick-up, one 1 ton cab, and one 4 Dr.
compact station wagon. Six (6) bid requests were issued and six (6) bids received.
Parker Robb was the lowest responsible bidder for all of the trucks. Their total
delivered price is $31,093.47; which is $903.56 lower than the next low bidder.
Sun Valley was the lowest responsible bidder for the compact station wagon.
Their total delivered price is $6,546.50; which is $423.18 lower than the next low bidder.
Please note that a clarification on the inclusion of power steering will be accomplished
prior to purchase order issuance. This clarification would not effect the low bidders
ranking.
Recommendation:
1. Award a purchase order to Parker Robb Chevrolet for the supply of the trucks
at $31,093.47.
2. Award a purchase order to Sun Valley Ford for the supply of the compact
station wagon at $6,546.50 and allow for further clarification.
K. F. Laverty
RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
"
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ken laverty, Purchasing & Materials Officer .
Don Gallagher, Senior Buyer cp-~ c:::::? ~~
AWARD OF VEHICLES - BID REQUEST CS-1-82
Purchasing hereby recommends award of items 1,2, and 3 totaling
$31,093.47 to Parker Robb Chevrolet, the lowest responsive bidder.
Recommend award of item 4 in the amount of $6,596.50 to Sun Valley
Ford who is the lowest responsive bidder for that item.
NOTE THE FOllOWING:
1 . Six (6) bids were publically advertized on Nov. 9,11, 1981 .
2. Six (6) bids were issure and received.
3. Don Young Ford, the lowest bidder on item 1, sma 11 pick-ups
is non-responsive since his bid is for 1981 vehicles.
Please proceed to obtain approval.
r
~
,\
'\-,
~
~
~,
&
.....,
JJ
<.
~
);)
b
n
~
.~
*
.,
......
~
~
~
.l>
:AJ
rr,
Vi
~
~
II)
~
ft,
J
tit
-
o
')
~
-
.(\
..lQ
-
~
...:.
D
t)
Itr
,....
11\
~
~
U
2':.
,
-
\
1~~
r~f:-<.
S;~
~~
IJ\~
'\
~
,
"'"
~
~
~
'-<I
'<
V'
<
I't,
:--\
~
~
.~
1;~
()
~9
'-ll ~
~~
'r'\
~~
~~
'< '-.
.VI ....,
~
::\
~
~
~
't
""
t
...,
,
\JJ
~
~
~
i,t.
I
"-
~ t)
~.~
I ~ =e
~
o
"a
~
~
~
~
~
~
'-I
~
\
,\
:tl
x
~
f\
f'
8
rr
tJ
~
\!-\
~
~
""
...'-
~,,-..;.""'~
~~~~~ ~~'-~~ ~ ~\ ~ ~
;b~ ~~::-!.l w~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ '\ ~
~ K ~\l": ~ -:. ..< \n b\ ~ ~ .: ,,-
~ I ()'- I '\ ~~ '\ ,- ~ C'>. ~ ::-..
o--~ ~ ~~ ~~I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
, ~ ~Ic
- ~ ~ z
~" ~.... -{ }>
\l, ~ Z
d ~ a 0
I ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ R-i\ \~J ~ ~ I-{~ ~
- ""1-'- ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ....~ f..~ ~ aV) Vl
~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~
~ ~ ~~w () ~ ~ ~
IAJ
IT,
~
:ij"
....
fl',
^~
~ ~
~ ~
. \ l',
'\.~.I '6'
.. ~
~.
~
~
".t:\
,~
~ ~
Of ~
a ~
I~
..
~ ~ I ~ ;~ I ~ .
-
-{
/T1
:J:
!>=" .t" \.AJ N -
)>. ..
,0
-i
-<
<:
n1
:x:
n
r
n1
)>
OJ
V)
-{
;;c
}>
n
-i
a
"
OJ
o
Vl
n
V)
I
I
co
~
co
N
...
'v
Ut~ 1 1 REC'D
December 10, 1981
MEMORANDUM TO: KEN LAVERTY, PURCHASING & MATERIALS OFFICER
FROM: RobertH. Hinkson, Manager, Collection System Operations
SUBJECT: 1981-1982 VEHICLE PURCHASE
C.S.O. has reviewed the vehicle bids for specification conformance
and compatability with the District's fleet and find the following
acceptable:
Small Pickup - Parker-Robb Chevrolet - $13,089.40
The apparent low bidder Sun Valley Ford ($13,069) is quoting
1981 Ford Courier trucks which are not acceptable.
1 Ton Truck - Parker-Robb Chevrolet - $8,863.45
3/4 Ton Pickup - Parker-Robb Chevrolet - $9,140.62
The bidder has listed an exception in his bid for tires and
wheels. We can accept this and recommend Parker-Robb be awarded
th is un it.
Small Wagon - Sun Valley Ford - $6,546.50
Sun Valley Ford indicates that they have made an error in their
bid by not including the cost of power steering in the submittal to
the District. I suggest they be awarded this unit irregardless.
~
Robert H. Hinkson
Manager, Collection System Operations
RHH :yb
Costa it~ary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO.V. Consent Calendar
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
December 10, 1981
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 81-30 (DANVILLE AREA) TO BE
INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE
DISTRICT
ANNEXATION
Jay S. McCoy
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Construction and Services
SUBMITTED BY
Parcel
No.
Area
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Remarks
Lead
A ency
A 81-30
Danv.
Glenn R. Maynard
17 Sky Terrace
Danvi11e, CA 94526
208-120-001 (1.5) ac.)
One existing house with a
failing septic tank.
District to prepare "Notice
of Exemption'l.
CCCSD
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 81-30 to be included in a future formal annexation
to the District.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
HIEF ENG.
~~LW
<<I
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. VIr. Eng.
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
December 11, 1981
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE $80,000 FROM THE SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND
TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT FOR THE LANDFILL GAS PROJECT
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT.!DIV.
Steve McDonald, Associate Engineer Engineering Div.
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 1981 the Board authorized the execution of the Gas Sales
Agreement between Getty Synthetic Fuels, Inc., and Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District to purchase fuel gases processed from the Acme Landfill
by Getty.
John Carollo Engineers (JCE) was selected to do the required engineering
design to utilize the landfill gas in the District's boilers. JCE
developed three alternatives to utilize the landfill gas (LFG), and the
recommendation to use the dedicated boiler/burner method has been
selected for implementation. A rough piping and instrumentation diagram,
and major equipment list has been developed.
There are long-lead times associated with the purchase of much of the
equipment and instrumentation. It is necessary to expedite equipment
purchase at this time to assure meeting the May 1,1982 deadline in the
Gas Sales Agreement with Getty.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the expenditure of $80,000 from the Sewer Construction Fund
for the purchase of equipment and instrumentation for the Landfill Gas
Project; DSP No. 3469. This expenditure was included in the Capital
Expenditure Plan.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT.!DIV.
~MC
JL
~~CLW
cc(sD
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO'VIII. Col System
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
SUBJECT
Dec. 11, 1981
TYPE OF ACTION
REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO PAY $13,617.00 FOR ~ENDOR SERVICES
IN THE DAVID HORNE CLAIM - 27 RHEEM BLVD., ORINDA
Authorization
SUBMITTED BY
Robert H. Hinkson
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Collection System Operations
ISSUE: A sewage overflow, the result of a stoppage in the main line sewer
serving the Horne residence, took place on September 23, 1981 causing substantial
property damage.
BACKGROUND: The settlement of this claim is being negotiated by George Hills
Company, representing the District, and Mr. Horne. A full and final settlement
figure and agreement has not been achieved yet. In the interim, we have con-
tracted for certain work to be done at the Horne residence that should be paid
for now.
1. Aeor-Space Heating & Cooling Company
2. Design Center Interiors
3. Service Master, Inc.
4. Master Construction Company
$ 2,000.00
3,374.17
2,310.50
5,932.33
$13,617.00
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize $13,617.00 in vendor payments in the David Horne
claim, 27 Rheem Blvd., Orinda.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RHH
.)
i....
" . \
Costa itary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
N~ IV. Consent Cal.
2 12 3 81
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 25, 1981
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 81-27 (DANVILLE AREA), P.A. 81 TYPEOFACTION
28 (SAN RAMON AREA) AND P.A. 81-29 (WALNUT CREEK AREA,
TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE ANNEXATION
D I STR I CT.
SUBMITTED BY
Parcel
No Area
81 - 2 7 Da n v .
81-28
San
Ramon
81-291 W.C.
Ja
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Construction and Services
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Remarks
Lead
A enc
Norman E. Holden
708 El Pintado
Danvi lIe, CA
197-161-022 & 025
5.7 Acres
Sub 6065 - Containing 5 lots
Tentative plan and "Negative
Declaration'l by County.
County
Ma r t h a Far i a
4685 Richmond Ave.
Fremont, CA
208-260-035
14.6 Acres
Minor Subdivision 67-81 - Three County
lots are zoned Administrative
Offi~e District. Tentative
Map and plans approved by County.
I'Negative Declaration" by County.
James K. Wittkop, etux
766 Hutchinson Rd.
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
139-090-006
0.61 Acres.
Failing Septic Tank -
District to prepare "Notice
of Exemption".
CCCSD
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 81-27, P.A. 81-28 and P.A. 81-29 to be included
in a future formal annexation to the District.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
'-
ex.W
JSM
CLW
Sanitary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. IV. Consent Calendar
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 25, 1981
SUBJECT TYPE OF ACTION
QUITCLAIM EASEMENTS TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA JOB 1616 -
ORINDA AREA. RIGHT OF WAY
Ja
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Construction and Services
SUBMITTED BY
ISSUE: The State of California has requested the District to quit
claim the subject easements.
BACKGROUND: The subject easements are located within State Highway
24. The sanitary sewer facilities which were in these easements
were relocated outside the freeway area when the freeway was widened
in conjunction with the B.A.R.T. construction. The subject easements
are not needed for District use and should be quit claimed to clear
the States title to the freeway area.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval, execute Quit Claim Deed and forward same
to the State of Cal ifornia for recording.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JSM
e~CLH
Sanitary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. IV. Consent Calendar
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 25, 1981
SUBJECT
TYPE OF ACTION
EXCUTE AGREEMENT RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY WITH REX E. RIGHT OF WAY
DOHERTY, ET UX, JOB 1798 (LOT 44, SUB. 3833) ORINDA
AREA.
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy
.JNITIATING Dj::PT./DIVd
Lonstructlon an Services
ISSUE: The property owner desires to construct a wooden deck and a
portion of a concrete pool deck within an existing District sewer
easement.
BACKGROUND: The property owner and his architect have cooperated with
District staff in altertng . their plans to minimize the impact upon
the existing sewer easement.
Staff has determined that the improvements do not interfere with the
present use of our sewer, however, if they should become an interference,
the agreement requires the property owner to remedy any harm within
30 days of notice to do so.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval, execute "Agreement" (in triplicate) and
authorize the recording.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
ENG.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
.., L~JSM
~~
CLW
itary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Nqv. Consent Calendar
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
SUBJECT
ACCEPT AND AUTHORIZE FILING NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR
JOB 3429,3430,3435, INSTALLATION OF CHEMICAL INJECT-
ION FACILITIES AT VARIOUS DISTRICT PUMP STATIONS.
DATE
November 24, ]98]
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT JOB AS COMPLETE
SUBMITTED BY
Jay McCoy
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Construction and Services
BACKGROUND: On 6-]8-8] a contract was awarded to Wilson Pacific
Construction for installing Chemica] Injection Systems, for installing
Odor and Corrosion Contro], at Moraga, Fairview and Ma]tby Pump Stations.
AI] work has been satisfactorily completed and it is necessary to file
a Notice of Completion.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept project as complete and authorize filing of
Notice of Completion.
INIT T'~'JMC
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
~CL\4
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO.
V. Eng.
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 30, 1981
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT STAGE 5B
FACILITIES PLAN AND EIR AMENDMENT
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE REPORT
DISTRIBUTION
SCHEDULE HEARING
SUBMITTED BY
Curtis Swanson, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.!DIV.
Engineering Div.
POLICY ISSUE: Should the Draft Stage 5B Facilities Plan and EIR Amendment
be distributed for review by interested local citizens and government
agencies? When should the public hearing on the Draft Facilities Plan and
EIR Amendment be scheduled?
BACKGROUND: Earlier this year, the Board authorized Metcalf & Eddy (M&E)
to prepare a Facilities Plan Amendment for the Stage 5B treatment plant
expansion project. This Amendment includes a Project Report, EIR, and
Revenue Program/Financial Plan.
M&E has evaluated several project alternatives which comply with the
District's Waste Discharge Permit and the Reclaimed Water Supply Contract
including the project recommended in the 1977 Stage 5B Facilities Plan.
These alternatives were discussed with the Board at the September 17
meeting.
M&E is recommending a project which provides for conventional secondary
treatment of wastewater flows up to 45 MGD (average dry weather flow), and
sludge thickening and dewatering. The dewatered sludge will be incinerated
in the existing multiple hearth furnaces. The treated effluent will be
discharged to Suisun Bay via the existing outfall.
The recommended project will not produce an effluent that satisfies consti-
tuent limits of the Reclaimed Water Supply Contract with CCCWD. However,
there are provisions for incorporating separate nitrification and
phosphorus removal facilities for future water reclamation.
The estimated cost to design and construct the recommended project is
$13,300,000. The estimated annual operating cost for 1985 (first full
year of operation) is $10,200,000.
To comply with CEQA and Clean Water Grant Program Requirements, the District
must distribute the Draft Facilities Plan and EIR Amendment for public
review. A hearing must also be conducted to receive public comments
on the proposed project. Because of hearing notice requirements, the
earliest that this hearing can be held is January 21,1982.
INlcY);
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
CWS
V~ JL e~ CLW
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to distribute
the Draft Stage 58 Facilities Plan and EIR Amendment for review by the
public and government agencies. Authorize the District Secretary to
schedule a-public hearing on the Draft Facilities Plan and EIR Amendment
for January 21,1982.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR SOARD ACTION
1~f?SPT'/OIVCWS
VL JL ~~ CLW
CHIEF ENG.
Central itary
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. v.
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 2 1 81
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE $15,000 FOR DESIGN OF DISTRICT PROJECT 3622
ROAD AND GROUND DRAINAGE REHABILITATION AT TREATMENT
PLANT.
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
Lloyd Smith
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Division
BACKGROUND: Thi~ project consists of correcting a number of flooding
and drainage problems throughout the main Treatment Plant area that
remain from the Stage 5A Project. Originally this design work was in-
cluded in the scope of work for Metcalf & Eddy; however, the project
can be completed at a much lower cost using District staff. The
preliminary construction cost estimate is $190,000.00. The State
Water Resources Control Board has approved the design of this project
for qrant fundinq.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize $15,000 for design of Project 3622, Road
and Ground Drainage Rehabilitation at Treatment Plant.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
~'-"~LS
e~
CLW
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. V I.
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
November 24, 1981
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
+
TRANSFER OF $6600- FROM CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICES
DIVISION 0 & M BUDGET TO EQUIPMENT BUDGET. AND
AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF ONE E.O.M. 6100 MICROFILM
AUTHORIZE TRANSFER
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy
ICNITIATING DE;.PT.!DIV.
onstructlon and Services
BACKGROUND: The District has actively pursued a microfilm program for
its Permanent Records. Updateable equipment previously proposed by
staff costs approximately $30,000. Recently, with advancement in
silver fi~m technology, equipment is now available at an initial cost
of $6,600-. (See Attached Flyer). The system is compatable with
existing microfiche systems in the Permit and Right of Way Sections,
and could be used in the proposed District wide system.
Attached is a cost analysis for use of this Ilinhouse" program versus
a service bureau. As you will note, an initial cost savings of 2~
per frame is possible, including amortization of purchased equipment
and the expense of one personto perform the filming. It is antici-
pated that existing staff will perform the labor for the filming.
With an estimated 550,000 frames to be filmed, an overall savings of
$11 ,000 will be rea 1 i zed.
The filming of paper records will coincide well with the move to the new
office building. It is desirable to move as little paper as possible
from the Springbrook site. The filming of over 3600 files in the Permit
vault will eliminate the need to move the majority of papers in these
files and conserve space in the new building.
There is $13,800 in Construction and Services Div. 0 & M budget for out-
side microfilming services. $6600~ could be transferred from this
account to the equi~ment budget for the purchase of the E.O.M. 6100.
The remaining $7200- should be appl ied towards the operation and
maintenance of the microfilm/filing system.
RECOMMENDATION:
camera processor.
Authorize $6600 for the purchase of a microfilm
Attachment
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JSM
t: ~ CLW
..
"J
Cost Comparison
Based On
Filming 400 Documents Per Hour
Costs ustng microfilming s,ervi,ce
Each frame
Fi lming 18.90 1m equals $ .0189 EA
Jackets .20/EA equals .0029 EA
La bo r 15.50/HR equals .0326 EA
Total $ .0544 EA
I
,
Co~ts p~rchasing microfilm equipment
Equipment
Labor
@ R45E including benefits
= lO.30Hr ~r
$ .0019 EA
.0023 EA
.0030 EA
.0021 EA
.0258 EA
Total $ . 035 1 lEA
Chemicals
Fi 1m
Jackets
550,000 documents @ $.0544 per document $29,920
550,000 documents @ $.0304 per document = '$19,305*
Savings $10,615
* tncludes purchase of machine and salary of one clerk.
"_'''I\Oo9;.",,'t,.','__ " ,.".~".. ..........;'...... Mol .._
._",._.......,..,.........,._,'..._...-_._~,,_v._ "._.~~__.._.____~._.__...____~____,___.__~.___ _~..__~.__ _.'__'___,_~_ _~ ._.~_~_ ____,_ __._.______ ___ __.~__...