Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 02-04-82 . (((sD Central Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer NO I. Bids & Awards 2b. 2/4/82 DATE February 2, 1982 SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR THE LANDFILL GAS UTILIZATION PROJECT, DSP 3639. APPROVE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE CONTRACT APPROVE FUNDS SUBMITTED BY Steve McDonald INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Division BAC KGROUND Bid advertising for construction of the Landfill Gas (LFG) Project began January 15, 1982. Four bids were received February 1, 1982. A low bid of $96,502 was submitted by Amos and Andrews, Inc. The engineer1s estimate is $148,000. A tabulation of bids is attached (Exhibit A). Unless otherwise indicated all followinq $ figures are expressed in 1,000. District staff estimates the total cost of the LFG Project at $281.0 (Exhibit B). This includes a potential maximum bonus of $10.0 to the contractor for early completion. Additional funds required for comple- tion of the LFG project, including construction management; equipment, and District forces are estimated at $105.0. However, approximately 29% of the current LFG project is work originally planned for the IISo1ids Conditioning Building (SCB) Repair - Phase II Projectll. Because the LFG project will be completed earl ier, it was determined expedient to bring forward the work that improves safety and that helps optimize boiler operations. Costs that can be directly assigned to the SCB repair work total $114.9. The SCB repair funds have been previously authorized. The original feasibility study for the LFG Project estimated a project cost of $200.0 (+40 to -30%). Based on the revised project total of $281.0 , the average yearly savings in using LFG is $140.0 /Yr (1982$). The total present worth savings are $1.4 million, based on a 10-year project life. RECOMMENDATION Award contract to Amos and Andrews, Inc. for the Landfill Gas Project DSP 3639. Authorize $105.0 to complete the LFG Project. and authorize expenditure of $114.9 from previously approved SCB funds. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. 1b/lA.- SMc (fL JL ~ CLW /.7> 00 ~ 0 0 .,-l CJ CJ .w 4-l 4-l ~ 4-l 4-l .,-l Q) Q) C1J I-J I-J p.., .w .w CJ CJ CJ Q) Q) CJ r-1 .,-l r-1 r-1 .,-l Cf) C1J H r.::l r.::l H ~ CJ .w .w 0 .,-l CJ ~ ~ CJ H H Q) 0 0 Q) ~ .w r-1 CIl CIl r-1 CJ r.::l H H r.::l Q) Q) Q) H r-1 j:Q '1:1 '1:1 j:Q Z r.::l Cf) ~ ~ Cf) 0 :3 :3 u j:Q :;:J Cf) '1:1 '1:1 '1:1 CIl r-1 r-1 r-1 ~ C1J C1J C1J 0 ~ ~ ~ .,-l 0 0 0 H .w j::l j::l j::l Q) C1J CJ CJ CJ r-1 CJ ~ ~ ~ .,-l .,-l 0 4-l j:Q .,-l . '1:1 JL< JL< JL< H 0 . U ::>:: ~ ~ ~ H ~ H N Cf) CO H 0\ N 0 N 0 j::l H ...... r-1 0 0 N 0 U C1J Lf') ..j" ("I') Lf') ~ r.::l .w .. I-J ...... 0 '-0 CO N N <11 a H 0\ 0\ ...... ..j" H ~ Z :>, ...... ...... H p.., a H <f)- ~ 0\ <11 H C1J Z ("I') ~ ;::l Cf) a '-0 H H H ("I') H S ..0 CIl <11 H =:::: j:Q Q) ~ H <11 H j:Q JL< 0 Cf) N p.., ~ <11 .,-l a H Cf) H I Cf) H .w 0 0 Lf') 0 U H j::l r.::l H Q) C1J 0 0 N 0 H j::l '1:1 S r-1 CJ 0 0 0\ Lf') ~ H H Q) .,-l .,-l :;:J j:Q ~ ~ 0 4-l 0 0 co N H Q) j:Q .,-l ("I') ("I') N ..j" Z 0 0.. '1:1 <f)- a JL< a 0 u H j::l ::>:: CIl H ~ '1:1 j:Q .,-l j:Q H ffi Q) CJ U ~ <.<:l C1J N 0 r--. 0 ~ 0 0 0\ 0 Q) Q) Lf') ..j" ("I') 0 o...w .,-l H '-0 co ("I') 0 p.., ;::l '-0 '-0 co 0 0.. ...... ~ <f)- 0.. 0 H CJ U <.<:l 0 ~ U H r-1 co H r-1 CJ 000.. co CIl .,-l I::l H CJ ~ ~ r.::l 0 .,-l Q) C1J U ~ H ..c: r-1 co '1:1 CJ co ~ ..c: ~ Q) co CJ 0 co CJ ::>:: u .,-l .,-l u Q) ~ .w ::>:: '1:1 :>, .. ..c: CJ ~ Q)'1:I CJ ;::l 0 CJ C1J H ~ Q) H .~ .,-l Q) co H .w Q) 4-l CIl .wr-1 CIl r-1 .,-l 0 ~~ ,.-I ~ ,.-I CJ ~ o C1J ,.-I 0 C1J C1J ::>::0 <11 u :> p.., EXHIBIT B POST BID - PRECONSTRUCT ION ESTIMATE OF COSTS FOR DISTRICT SEWERING PROJECT 3639 1. Equipment & Installation (Including SCB Repairs): . Construction contract (as bid) . District purchased equipment . Estimated construction contingencies . Potential contractor bonus (maximum) Subtotal Equipment and Installation 2. Engineering Design: . John Carollo Engineers . District forces (including engineering, purchasing and administration) Subtotal Engineering 3. Construction Management: . John Carollo Engineers . District forces (including inspection, administration and engineering support) Subtotal Construction Management 4. Total LFG Project Cost, (Including SCB Repairs): Less: SCB Repair Costs 5. Total LFG Project Cost: Less: Previous authorizations Less: JCE construction management (Separate Position Paper) 6. Additional Funds Required to Complete LFG Project ($ M) $96.5 183.0 10.0 10.0 $299.5 $30.0 17.7 $47.7 $22.0 26.7 $48.7 $395.9 (ll4.9) $281.0 (154.0) (22.0) $105.0 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. ngl neen ng 2/4/82 POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE February 1, 1982 SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS AGREEMENT FOR $22,000 FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE LANDFILL GAS UTILIZATION PROJECT TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT APPROVE FUNDS SUBMIT"hED BY ::>teve McDonald INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Background John Carollo Engineers (JCE) is currently under contract to provide design engineering services for the Landfill Gas Utilization Project, DSP 3639. Engineering has been completed, and bids have been received. The majority of the civil and mechanical inspection will be performed by District personnel. Amendment No.2 to the John Carollo Engineering agreement will provide electrical and instrumentation inspection, shop drawing review, O&M operational concepts, contract record drawings and a project completion report. A price not-to-exceed of $22,000 has been negotiated. Recommendation Authorize Amendment No.2 to the John Carollo Engineering Agreement to provide construction management for the Landfill Gas Utilization Project, DSP 3639. Approve funds td $22,000. This expenditure was provided for in the 5-year capital plan. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. tlulLA-- SMc ...JL- JL ~.:r~CLW Central Cont Costa BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE February 1, 1982 SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 82-2 (ALAMO AREA) TO BE IN- CLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT TYPE OF ACTION ANNEXATION Jay S. McCoy INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Construction and Services SUBMITTED BY Pa rce 1 No. Area Owne r Address Parcel No. & Acreage Remarks Lead Agency 82-2 Alamo Helen Pavlack 1630 Ramona Way Alamo, CA 94507 191-020-010 (.47Ac.) House presently connected (i 11 ega 11 y) to the pub 1 i c sanitary system. District to prepare "Notice of Exempt i onll. CCCSD RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 82-2 to be included in a future formal annexation to the District. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION CLvJ e~ ..../ C. f \ ~: ie. Centrzl Contre:. C05ta ~c.nitc..r1f DL;trE~t __ i,~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS O P I VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN POSITI N ~PER General Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT AUTHORIZE DESIGN OF THRUST BLOCKS AND VACUUM REL1EF VALVES FOR PROTECTION OF THE OUTFALL AND AUTHORIZE $30,000 FROM SEW~R CONSTRUCTION FUND, DP 3637 NO. IV. Engl neen ng 1 2/4/82 1/18/82 DATE TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE FUNDS SUBMITTED BY Lloyd Smith INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Division ISSUE Thrust Blocks and vacuum relief valves are required to protect the treatment plant outfall under pumped flow conditions. BACKGROUND The treatment plant outfall is capable of discharging up to 150 MGD under pumped flow conditons; however, the present gravity flow capacity is 60 to 70 MGD depending on tidal conditions. Presently the higher discharge rates would be used only during peak flow events after the holding basins are full. In the near future peak daily flows will require pumping to the outfall. The thrust blocks are required at each of the bends in the outfall to restrain the pipe during high flows. The vacuum relief valves are required to protect the outfall in the event of a pump/power failure under pumped flow conditions. These two requirements have resulted from work by Metcalf & Eddy. The design will be completed by the District staff. This project is not a line item in the 5-year capital expenditure plan; however, it can be accommodated using the allowance for treatment plant projects. It will be included in the next revision to the plan. RECOMMENDATION Authorize $30,000 from sewer construction funds for the design of thrust blocks and vacuum relief valves for protection of the outfall, DP 3637. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. ~rv~ DLS V.v JL ~~ CLW ~~m:. , RELIMINARY ESTIMATE DSP 3637 - THRUST BLOCKS AND AIR/VACUUM VALVES DESIGN A. OFFICE ENGINEERING 1. Office Work - Design, preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates: secretarial work and printing, etc. 400 man-hours @ $30.00 2. Field Work - Location and topographic survey work and equ i pment. 2 crew days @ $800 = 2 equipment days @ $200 = TOTAL OFFICE ENGINEERING B. CONSULTANTS 1. Soil investigation, boring, soil analyses, office work in reports, secretarial, printing, transportation and other office overhead and profit. L.S. 2. Design of piles and thrust blocks. L.S. = $12,000 1 ,600 400 $12,000 4,000 $14,000 $16,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $30,000