The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA BACKUP 01-06-83 .,.....: - ... c(<SD Central Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. I -(p - ~3 POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE December 27, 1982 TYPE OF ACTION SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD PURCHASE OF TRUCK MOUNTED, HIGH PRESSURE SEWER CLEANER WITH VACUUM SYSTEM AWARD OF PURCHASE SUBMITTED BY K. F. LAVERTY INITIATING DEPT./DIV. ADMINISTRATIVE/PURCHASING ISSUE: One Truck Mounted Sewer Cleaner was authorized in the 1982/1983 Equipment Budget for the CSO Department, staff work has been completed, and we hereby recommend to the Board that the purchase be approved. BACKGROUND: Formal public bidding started December 8, 1982 with Bid Opening December 21, 1982. Three bid request were issued and three bids were received. The commercial evaluation was conducted by Purchasing and the technical evaluat.ion was done by the CSO Department. This joint evaluation showed that all Bidders were responsive in their bids and met all District criteria both commercially and technically. The bid prices are all under the approved budget amount of $125,000.00. The three bids are: Hi th \-/ater Reclaiming Without \-/ater Recal iming 0 G.C.S. Co. $ 99,045.00 $ 95,850.00 0 San Rafael Co. $109,692.87 $106,468.05 0 Ricker ~1ach i nery $112,292.54 $109,440.47 Attached are the bid summary sheets that details the bids received. RECO~1MENDATION: Award Purchase Order to G.C.S. Co. for Truck Mounted High Pressure Sewer Cleaner, with Vacuum System, t10dels Valtor 8l0E and GMC C7D042 with water reclaiming, at $99,045.00. K.F.L REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION , ; ~j R.H.H. GEN. MGR./CHIEF ENG. P.M. REVISED 1/6/83 II ~ r 1 II U I I I I I I I I H ~I ~ ~ 5 ~. ~ 1:- '" \ : iq" ...0 ,,--0 ~ . a :t :J ~ ~ :"0 '" ~ . 00 '" ~ ~ 'I,: ~ ~ . ~ ~ n .~ ~ ~. I"- rr ~ " .~ y ~ I).) .. . .~ , t i< .It . I ~. ~ ~. ~ . , )' ~\~ tt' " .. l" . ~ I} a I~ " ~ IF ... ~ ~~ ~ Ii' . ~ ~I~ .. ~ ~ ~ I"~ '" ~ "' r- ~ . rc:: to.. rJ .~ i , ~ f'f' .'\ ~ C\ ~~. i" I ~)' ~ ~. ~ .~ ~ ~ .... ~ r I " :it. ~ - r--.- 1- ~ ~ ~~ l~ ~ ~ , f; ~ ~~ ) r .. ) ~ ~ ~ " .:t) . ~~t f~~ ~. , ~~ ~ , l ~~ ). C(\ ., ~ ~ 0 c,h - ~ ::- ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , ' """" ~ ).a ;: Cli lil ~ < 0 ~ 0 0 ~ < '. ~ fl;:;: pI!:l8 g g!:2 ~t--\~ 8fl~~ ~!";;I;;I~8~"~~ C 0 -t 0 Z 0 III :JJ ,. " .... 5: :v~~ ~ p~ ,..~C'\~ ~ g "'" ~R ~.~~~ ~ n ~o ~t) ~~~~,~:Z ,'l.. ~t~ " ~: r'\ ~() ~~ 7:p..~~::t Of '" It' I~ ~ ~ loa ~ ~~~~ \'~l ~~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~'~ ~-. 'i ,. ~ ~. " ~() ,;r~ B I ~ ~~~ ! . ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~6 ~, ~..~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... "'~ .. ~ ,., _ ~ 21 ~ -- z:t ~ .. p ~ ?' ~ - .. '" . z '" o ~~~ a :!c ~~ '~,1f t: , o t ~ ~ ~;:. :JJ ~ Z ~ ~ o .. c r ~~~!. ......~'\T 1~ " .... ~ ~ ~ ., ..... loa. o .. c ~ z 0- .. .. .. .. ~ ~ o ~ ..... ~ .. c ~ l!! z ... ..... ~ =t "' , ) () "c ~ z 0- ...... .. .. '" 0 - .. o ~ .. ... ~ ~~...~ ~ ::; .:1 , i ~ .... ~ :0 0 10:. n;! It: ..... .. r~ [t' r'\ ~ f' I[~ ~---# .:.. ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ... " ~ , CD ~~ ~, ~ 5 z ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~. ~. o . .. .. \ o 1 ~~ , . l:Y ~ ~tI ~ . ~~. ~ ,,~ ....a I) ~~~ ~ ... Ij, . ~ ",n '~ ~~ ,jt) ~ ~ : . , - ........1 ~ , .. I(Tl r- z :; " . ~ PI ~I - ~ 0'" " " n bl:a . ii: . ... . 0 w ~ --'", ~ 0 I: r il: Z" ... . . (I... z 0 " 0 i (I.. ~ " ~~ .... < ~--I " ., .. ~ ~ c ~ .. n ... !- )> - >) ~ ~ OJ ~~ r ~ c ~ ~. 1 '. r- .~ ~ ;t 0... )>. !. I ~ ~ :! ::-- ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ 0 ~. ft . ~ 0 z ~ ~ '\ ~ ~ ! " I ~ -<. ~ ~ PI 0 ~ - ~ , () " "II I ~ !:! . ~ I t i t f l\ ~ ~ ~ 0 c , , . ? z en ~ ~ ~ ~ t' ~ ~ v , , ., s .... ~ ~ ~ ';\ " ~ . . , ~ ~ " 0 ". .~ 10... ~ ~ t\ ~ ~ n -< ." PI . '~~! ~ ~ ~ 0 ... 0 0 .. <. (\ ~ ... ~ 0 8 c o '" ~ 1,\1 ,. t' ':: .. P ~ o z ~r K -~ , '. .. ~ ~ !o ... ... >I 8 8 n ~ ... e ]I ~ ~ .r" ) )' . z 0 ~ co... p '!< Cl, ~ . .. - 0 6 ~ ... . . :0 '" z . . ) zO .~~~ l ~. 9]1 ~ ~. . ~ t ~~ ~ ....~ " ~ "c " ~~ "z ~ - :;I... ,~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~ " ... ~ S' ~ ~ " 0 & C~ "'r - ... n.. \ ~ ! ",r ~ ~ ~ )~ . . ~ . C) I " c 4~ ~z j;l... '-\~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ I n .. ~ ...r r t III " c ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~... :>I ~ .. ~ ~ ~ :J: ... ~ ~ "a ........ z " ... ~ c ~ " ~ n .. ~ ii: ",r III ~ -0 ... ~ ~ ]I ~ ~ ~ "c ~ " Z I ~ =t 0 ... ~ I " " ... \.) " 0 - ... n >- I ",r - ~ ~ "c r ~ " z ~ n - '" ... ~ .. C) ~ :"0 ~ ~I ~ ~ It ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0> CS ~ '" r ~ ~ ~ ~ I I . S\ :" ~ ) I~ , ~ I v - ~ .~ , ,. :i, '; :i ~(<SD tt Central Contra Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE December 28, 1982 TYPE OF ACTION SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR RELOCATION OF DISTRICT OFFICES AWARD OF CONTRACT SUBMITTED BY K. F. LAVERTY INITIATING DEPT./DIV. ADMINISTRATIVE/PURCHASING ISSUE: District offices require relocation to the new home office bui 1ding, staff work has been completed, and we hereby recommend to the Board that the contract award be ap- proved. BACKGROUND: Formal public bidding started December 16, 1982 with Bid Opening on December 27, 1982. A mandatory onsite walk through was conducted for all bidders on December 20 and 21, to assure both the bidder and the District of the full requirements of the move. Seven bid requests were issued and five bids were received. The evaluation was done by Purchasing. This evaluation showed that the low bidder, Metropolitan Van & Storage (Atlas Van Lines), was completely responsive to all District commercial and technical requirements. Metropo1 itan has successfully completed moves for Contra Costa County moving 225 people and 150 people on 9/30/82 and 11/29/82, respect- ively. The five bidders and their bids are: 0 Donis Van & Storage @ $22,200.00 0 Chipman - Mayflower @ $21 ,106.00 0 Campbe 11 Hoving Co. @ $ 9,905.50 0 Citrans @ $ 8,000.00 0 Metropo1 i tan Van & Storage @ $ 5,392.40 The costs for relocating the District offices will be taken from the Central Services 1982-1983 0 & M Budget. Therefore, we are not requesting additional funds from the Board. Attached is the bid summary sheet that details the bids received. RECOMMENDATION: Award Contract to Metropolitan Van & Storage Co. for relocation of the District offices to the new home office building at $5,392.40. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION " .- ~ ~)J ~ hi I I I I I I "f r d _.~... ., l ~~ i~ ,a .. ~ ~ ~ I"':"~ l~ ~ ~ t,,~ I I , '" , "1 , 2_~ ,\...-w ~ .... ~ z!,! ~ ~ :Jf r ~ rl ~ . I \I , ~ "? . " " I d 1 ~l(~ I , Q '" ~'\l:. ~~ <II ~ ~ i ~f. ... ~ ~", " ~~ ~ () .~ ..c., ,~ Q ~, ~. JJ" u . roIt1 ~ IJt ~ ~u o ~J, ~ ~I..: rs ~ <SI~ ~ ~ ~ \J' ~ () ~ ~ ~~ L.;:... .. ~ HI .. ~ g~ .- ... Q "'11'- " .-W " Z !,! ~ :>l,: I ,'" til ~ , j g~ ~ to ... I '" !\ - I l't I tI;j I , ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ :>l,: '! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I L- " ~ lti''''' I " ~ ~ .... \I :> II: ~ ... ... '" ,,'"' -' W ... I~ ~ ~ jS 0 II: I Q to ... I I: ' ~ I I \.. ~~ .... " :>~ ~ w a: 6 !<6 . zOz a:!!loz ti oWO: 8wWW a: ,,0- z~btoaiL l!I~85 wo:>go"J ~..c: w .> co' w -<< a:1 v 0'" 0 > ~Il:l . .. .. .. o en 'cI,.. c ,. Cii 4. o ~.. ~ . Z .~ ':'t 2 t \\ .:( ~ I ~ :: "":.,l! I ~ - , .,~, . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' " ~ % ..~" :f I. ~.." ;:,~~l: w. V c:l,,:::J - ~~ ~) 2 ~ 0 to ~~ ~~ I I I ~ ~ :- . .. t- W 0 1:C to Z I Z ~ r5~ ~ o ~ a .~ 1'\ \ 1~.1 -.- ~ ~ ~ . a Q t( l' ~ ~ ~ . \8 ~ . ~ ~ " ~ ~ . . a ~ ~ ~ .....: 'i ~ ...... ~ ...:. ~ )I. ~ "' ~. .:;j & . " ~ ~ , .. .! 4' ~~ a ~ .:'~ .t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ J ~ ~ ... ....... ~ ~ \.... o ~ ~ ~ ~I I I c... ~ III ~ ~ . 8 co ~ ~ e: i : ~ ~ . '" ~ -..; d ~ ~ . & to( ~ \; ~ 'I~ Jl ~ 'f .~ " ~ l ..:0 " \,' t ~. ~ J... c: -. ~ :: rl ~ , I . I ! I I I ! , i I .\ I .1 I I I I T T jf 1 ~ . t1 - ~ ~ Vi 'b9.. < = a a ~ ~ ~ ~ . e ~ ~ 0...: 'b,... () ~ . " ~ ~~ "blf. () () cl ~\ ~ ~ - -I-- -I BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. V. :CQlls~ntG,aJ_. SUBJECT POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE December 1 82 TYPE OF ACTION SUBMITTED BY EXECUTE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR SEWER CROSSING TlCE VALLEY PARK - ROSSMOOR AREA - JOB 3419 - PARCEL 1 APPROVE AND EXECUTE EASEMENT Dennis Hall INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Construction and Services Division ISSUE: An 8-inch sewer main has been installed across a portion of the above referenced public park in County Service Area R-8. An ease- ment must be created to permit the operation and maintenance of the sewer in its present location. BACKGROUND: The subject sewer is the downstream portion of a system which wi 11 provide servi.ce to Subdivision 5619. The sewer was con- structed under a I'Right of Entryll i.ssued by the County in March 1981. The County has prepared the subject Grant of Easement which will create permanent easement rights for the District. The terms and conditions of the easement are similar to those that the County and District have agreed to in the past. Most of the conditions are the same as those in our 'IStandard Specifications'l regarding work in easement areas. RECOMMENDATION: Approval, execute easement and authorize acceptance of easement, and forward to County for their execution. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. "N--' #1 e.llW DH JSM CLW BOARD OF DIRECTORS N~V. Consent Calendar 3 POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer December 2 1 82 TYPE OF ACTION DATE SUBJECT AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 83-1 (ORINDA AREA) AND P.A. 83- 2 (ALAMO AREA) TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY Jay S. McCoy Parcel No. Owner Address Parcel No. & Acreage Area 83-1 Orinda Dieter Scholz 227 El Toyonal Orinda, CA 264-102-27 (Por.) 0.26 Ac. 83-2 Alamo Owen C. Dickson 39 Muth Dr. Orinda, CA 94563 198-040-016 1.37 Ac. ACCEPT FOR PROCESSING INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Construction and Services Remarks ILead Agency Existing house, owner wants to connect to public sewer. District to prepare "Notice of Exempt i on". CCCSD Parcel to be split into two parcels. One existing house, one new house to be constructed. District to prepare "Notice of Exemption". C:CCSD RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 83-1 and 83-2 to be included in a future formal annexation. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION ~~ CLW itary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS NO. Consent Calendar 4 1 6 83 POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer ACCEPT DISTRICT PROJECT 3023, OAK PARK BOULEVARD - TREAT BOULEVARD SEWER MODIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION DATE December 27, 1982 SUBJECT TYPE OF ACTION ACCEPT PROJECT SUBMITTED BY Jay S. McCoy INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Construction and Services Division ISSUE: Project 3023 is ready for acceptance by the District. BACKGROUND: In August of 1980, the District awarded a contract to Mountain Construction for relocation of existing sewer facilities in Pleasant Hill. The work was necessary to accommodate the widening of Interstate 680 between North Main Street and Oak Park Boulevard. Work has been completed and the project can be accepted. The District will be reimbursed by the State of California for the cost of the work which totals $120,000. RECOMMENDATION: Accept Project 3023, Oak Park Boulevard - Treat Boulevard sewer modifications and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INliltTI7:iJ;., JSM ~~ CLW ENG. Central Costa Sanitary District BOARD OF DIRECTORS POSITION PAPER VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN General Manager-Chief Engineer DATE December 29, 1982 SUBJECT TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE $2,731 TO COMPLETE THE HOLDING BASIN FLOOD PROTECTION STUDY AUTHORIZE FUNDS Curtis Swanson INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Division SUBMITTED BY ISSUE: Additional funds must be authorized to complete the treatment plant Holding Basin Flood Protection Study. BACKGROUND: In July, 1980, the Board authorized $9,980 for an engineering study to determine the existing level of flood protection for the District's holding basins and recommend improvements to the holding basins to withstand 20-and lOa-year storm events. This study was required by the District's NPDES permit. The District retained Camp, Dresser and McKee to perform the study. The initial results of the study were that drainage culvert enlargement or additional storage basins would be required for protection during a 100-year storm. The estimated cost of these improvements was $60,000 to $80,000. However, it was pointed out that by conducting a detailed flood routing evaluation, it possibly could be demonstrated that smaller or no culvert enlargements would be required. The District proceeded with the additional evaluation because of the possible significant cost savings. The results of the evaluation demonstrated that the existing facil ities were adequately protected for 20- and laO-year storms, and that no additional improvements were required. Authorization of an additional $2,731 is necessary to complete the study and close out the account. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize an additional $2,731 to complete the Holding Basin Flood Protection Study. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INle~~DEPT./DIV. CS