HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 11-19-87
.
CentrQ.. Contra Costa Sanltar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 4
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
IV.
HEARINGS 1
SUBJECT
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADDING A CHAPTER
TO THE DISTRICT CODE ENTITLED "ABANDONING OF SEWERS"
DATE
November 13, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT HEARING
SUBMITTED BY
J ay McCoy
Construction Division Manager
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department
Construction Division
ISSUE: A public hearing is required when additions are made to the District Code.
BACKGROUND: A new lateral plug fee was adopted by the Board on October 29, 1987.
Proper abandoning of laterals is needed to eliminate potential infiltration from
unused sewer laterals and to protect the District's sewer system from damage. The
new approach to abandoni ng of sewers i ncl udes the payment of a fee and the
completion of the abandonment work by District forces. At the request of the
Board, cities and Contra Costa County are being notified of the new lateral
abandonment fee.
A new chapter of the Code has been prepared which contains provisions to collect
the fee and to admi ni ster the new approach for abandoni ng sewers. The chapter
establishes requirements and responsibilities for obtaining abandonment permits,
paying fees and doing abandonment work. A draft of the proposed chapter is
attached for the Board's use.
A hearing is required to amend the District Code; therefore a hearing has been
schedul ed. Legal notice of the public heari ng on the proposed addition to the
Code was published on November 9, 1987, in the Contra Costa Times. No comments
have been received to date. If any subsequent comments are received, they will be
presented at the Board meeting. The adoption of an ordinance which will add
provisions to the District Code related to abandoning of sewers is not a project
and, hence, is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION: Consider adoption of an ordinance which will add a chapter to the
District Code entitled "Abandoning of Sewers."
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JSM
RAB
JH
.(;:G.
ROGER J. DOLAN
f!IW
Sections:
9.20.010
9.20.020
9.20.030
9.20.040
9.20.050
CHAPTER 9.20
ABANDONING OF SEWERS
Permit required.
Payment of fee.
Construction.
Responsible parties.
Responsible parties - special circumstances.
9.20.010 Permit required. A permit must be obtained
before a sanitary sewer or facility which is connected to the
District collection system is abandoned, including the aban-
donment of a side sewer, lateral sewer, or house sewer.
9.20.020 Payment of fee. The District Board shall
from time to time set fees for the issuance of the abandon-
ment permit, inspections of an abandoned line, and/or the
plugging and sealing of the abandoned line or facility.
9. 20. 030 Construction. The abandoning of sewers
shall be done in accordance with the District's Standard
Specifications and other District procedures as may be devel-
oped.
- 1 -
9.20.040 ResDonsible Darties. The property owner at
the time of the abandonment is primarily responsible for
payment of the sewer abandonment fee and such other costs as
may be associated with abandoning sewers in a manner which
complies with District standard Specifications and Proce-
dures. In the event a property is redeveloped and 'the sewer
abandonment permit has not been obtained and/or the applica-
ble sewer abandonment fees have not been paid, then the owner
proposing redevelopment shall be responsible for obtaining an
abandonment permit and paYment of applicable fees and charg-
es, at such time as the redeveloping owner first submits
plans for review by the District, or connects to a District
facility, whichever comes first. If an abandonment of a
sewer facility without a permit is first discovered by the
District at a time subsequent to the plan review process and
connection to the sewer system, then the owner of the proper-
ty at the time of abandonment and/or the owner at the time of
redevelopment will be responsible for payment of the appropri-
ate abandonment fees and charges. Such fees and charges will
be due and payable at such time after discovery of abandon-
ment as notice of the fees and charges is provided to the
responsible owner.
For the purposes of this chapter, a property shall be defined
as being redeveloped when existing buildings or outbuildings
are removed or modified so as to abandon a sewer or lateral
which is directly or indirectly connected to the District
- 2 -
system, and thereafter new structures are constructed on the
property.
9.20.050 ResDonsib1e Parties - Special Circumstances.
When, due to development taking place, whether it be new
development or redevelopment, a public sewer or public sewage
facility is to be abandoned, the developer, person, or entity
seeking approval of the sewer plan incorporating such abandon-
ment shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated
with the abandonment authorized by this Chapter and such
fees shall be due at the time of plan review.
If any development causes or requires that an existing
side sewer, lateral sewer or house sewer, which services a
property not owned by the person or entity undertaking the
development to be abandoned, the person or entity undertaking
the development shall be responsible for the costs and fees
authorized by this Chapter associated with that abandonment.
- 3 -
.
Centr&.. Contra Costa Sanitar, District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 4
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
November 19, 1987
v. BIDS AND AWARDS 1
DATE
November 12, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO PlANT INSULATION FOR
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10034, DRY SCRUBBER INSULATION
AND ClADDING, AND AUTHORIZE ALLOCATION OF $10,000
FROM THE TREATMENT PlANT PROGRAM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
James L. Bel cher
Associate En ineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Plant Operations Department
ISSUE: On November 4, 1987, sealed bids for District Sewer Project No. 10034, Dry
Scrubber Insulation and Cladding, were received and opened. The Board of Directors
must award a contract or reject proposals within 60 days of the opening of sealed
bids.
BACKGROUND: This project will repair and protect the 12-inch thick insulation on
the multiple hearth furnace dry scrubbers. Sealed bids were received and opened on
November 4, 1987. The bid tabulation is attached. The lowest responsive and only
bidder is Plant Insulation with a bid of $55,323. The engineer's estimate, prepared
by District staff, was $47,000. A post-bid/preconstruction cost estimate is
attached. The total project cost is estimated at $60,000.
The single bid made by Plant Insulation is a collaboration between Plant Insulation,
mainly an insulation applier, and Contra Costa Metal Fabrication, Inc., who
specialize in sheet metal application. The unique circumstances of this project,
applying sheet metal over existing insulation with minimal new insulation,
apparently limited the number of insulation contractors qualified to do the work.
The need to work on the furnaces one at a time with one furnace runni ng and the
coordination requirements with Plant Operations Department personnel were reasons
cited by Plant Insulation for their bid price.
The project is incl uded in the Capital Improvement Budget, page TP-42. District
staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt under the District's
CECA guidelines. The additional allocation of $10,000 from the program contingency
fund of the Capital Improvement Budget is requi red to suppl ement the ori gi nal
authorized allocation of $50,000. Board approval of additional allocation of funds
is required when the project cost exceeds the original Budget allocation by 15
percent.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of contract to Plant Insulation, the lowest
responsive bidder, for $55,323 for District Sewer Project No. 10034, Installation of
Dry Scrubber Insulation and Cladding, and authorize allocation of $10,000 from the
Treatment Plant Contingency Account.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
DISlRICT PROJ ECT NO. 10034
DRY SCRUBBER INSULATION AND ClADDING
Expenses Incurred to Date
$ 1,581
Installation Contract
55,323
Project Management and Inspection
1,000
Contingency
2,096
Total
$60,000
Previous Capital Budget Allocation
$50,000
Additional Authorization from the
Program Contingency Fund
$10,000
~,--
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
November 6, 1987
TO: JIM BELCHER
FROM:
PAT O'CONNOR
~II'-{,
SUBJECT: BID REQUEST T0228P, DUST COLLECTOR INSULATION AND CLADDING
Formal bidding commenced with publication of Notice to Contractors on
October 15 and 21, 1987. Eight contractors completed the mandatory site
inspection and were given their formal bid package at that time.
Bids were publicly opened and read on Tuesday, November 4, 1987. Bidders
were asked to bid on both aluminum and stainless steel cladding, with the
selection of cladding to be the District's option.
Contractor
Bid Amount
Exceptions
PLANT INSULATION CO.
Aluminum
Cladding
$56,265.00
Stainless
Stee 1
Cladding
$55,323 .00
NONE
One contractor returned the bid package with a "No Bid." Six contractors
did not respond.
A technical and commercial evaluation was conducted by the Plant
Operations Department Associate Engineer and Purchasing (see Attachment
I) which shows that Plant Insulation Company is responsive to the Bid
Request and therefore the lowest responsible bidder. Since 1967 Plant
Insulation Company has successfully performed contract work for the
District. Purchasing, therefore, recommends that you prepare the
Position Paper to the Board of Directors recommending the award to Plant
Insulation Company for providing all labor, equipment and material to
install mineral wool insulation and Stainless Steel Cladding on the
District's two dust collectors for a total lump sum of $55,323.00.
POC: pj r
cc: C. Batts
K. Laverty
Attachment
-'w
... u
>--
Oa:
....
..W
Z~
;)a:
..
-'w
.cu
~f
0-
t co ..
N 0 ..w
N ZY
0 ;)a:
I- ..
S
.
:E -,w
:;) t ~~
...... Z
~ w f!f
%
.
a
z:: ,I
.j....l ex::
-J ..w
s:: ~ z!:!
a! Vl :;)11:
E z:: ..
..s:: ...... ' I~
u -J
co -J W [.r;. .
+-' ow I;:
.j....l. o I- -,w
ex:: 3: Vl lit I c::l ;!~
011:
I'" '- .. ..
'..:..J, en L '
ex:: Vl ~
0:: W V ~
W-J
z:: z: ..w
............ Vl ~ zY
::E ex:: 0:: ~ :;){
1-'0 ..-
l.J... Vll-
" 0 U
.--.. W 0 v 2
ZN-J a .
0 , -J .....; C a:
...... 0:: 0 ~.~ g .....
I-'OU c:r: co ~
ex:: ~<..... .~ j!: X +-'
-J ::E l- V.f-; l:..;: Vl
-J~Vl ....~~
ex::z~ ;: ~. ~ Ii
1-...... 0 .
Vl ::E ~~~ -i:.,.... Q. E
z~o ';;":-:=O::c :::I
...... -J 3: ....tt r-
~I- ex::
I .--.. 6
........1-
c 00
H zz w 0' ~i
D ex:: ...... ~ 0 :i. "% w .
~ ~ D ~
0 II: m 0 Z ~ 0:>
azo 8a:~~ai .. !'l ~ uS
o ex:: d
i = <i ~g;) c! .c = ~
,>..00'" 0 >
.~ Ii ~ g~
~ ~:: '31~ J
.,. ~ ~1'3 ~~ . s-
a ... .,. ... .~
- Qr~ ~ ~ @
GII J
II. 8
0 . ~ It it
~ - H
,Z l: ~ ..
ex:: !C D
0 -J 0
- ::> Q. .,.
..
'4 l/) s:::t: a.
z
...I ...... ';;.;
::J It- ~-
. GII t?: ~ t So ~:::l
7"" " 4
.. <( it~. ]E!
. c: ~~
~"J i '" ~,n:: t" :;) r:
z U ! ~ 0
..
a ~~~~..i_
2
, g 'c ~ s;: : S ~i
Y .
-~--'- ----~_."--_._-_._---- .--., ..~...-...,...,....~.,,-~. -
~
cs::
:::I a
.....
0_
~~
o c:1
~
~~
~~
~.....
cs...
u
Q)V)
a! a!
Vl"O .
ie
q
'('I')
N
('I')
~
o
o
~
~
. ,
- "0
a! g
= +-'
s:: ..... . . ..
a :::I ..... s::
..... V) a! a ..
~ ..0 ..... .
-+,.) ~ .'
..... a ~ co
s... 'S:: ...,.. . '
u ..... :::I
Vl V) s.... V)
a! co a-c
0 ~ 'r-:l .....
.0 .C1j
..-- E +-'
C1j Q a
c .,...., .. c
..... a!
s... +-' V) "0
a! r- '.... s:: '.
+-' a! +-' ,C1j
C1j 4- s...
::E ~ r- t
s... C1j
a .x +-' ,
a! +-' <u a!
> u E
0 ro V)
..0 s... ..... +-'
C1j +-' ..s:: a!
s:: Q)
V) a, a ..s::
ex:: U +-' en
I- ie
0 W
-J I-
0
.-I Z
,
.-I N
. . '-
,.
"-"_.__._-~.,-._._--.'-_.__._. .-------....--.----..
.
Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitary LJistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE OF
1
3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT
ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE CLOSE-OUT OF THE SYCAMORE VALLEY
ROAD TRUNK SEWER DESIGN PROJECT (DP 3466) AND RETURN
$242 TO THE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM BUDGET
DATE
November 16, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
INFORMATIONAL
SUBMITTED BY C
Thomas . Cheng
Assistant Ertgineer
INITlA:rING. DEPT./QIV.
~nglneerlng Department
Engineering Division
ISSUE: All design work has been completed on the Sycamore Valley Road Trunk
Sewer (DP 3466), and the project can now be closed out.
BACKGROUND: This project was created to design a parallel trunk sewer in Sycamore
Valley Road between Old Orchard Road and Camino Ramon commonly known as the
"Missing Link." The design was completed and later incorporated into the Town of
Danville's Sycamore Valley Assessment District as Segment 1. The majority of the
trunk sewer construction has been completed, and this design project can be closed
out. The design was funded by Blackhawk. The construction of the trunk sewer is
a part of a Sycamore Valley Assessment District project which is being
administered by Danville. The Sanitary District has contributed $100,000 towards
the cost of the "Missing Link" for sizing the trunk sewer for areas outside of the
Assessment District. The Board will receive a report in the future on the
close-out of the construction work after the work is completed and accepted.
The total budget for this design project was $25,929. The total completed project
cost is $25,687. Staff is closing out the project which will result in $242 being
returned to the Collection System Program Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: This item is presented to the Board for information only. No
action is necessary.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
Tce
Tee
l/Af'
A!J/M
JSM
DRW
RAB
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
.
Centr&..._ Contra Costa Sanitar * District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 4
ADVISE -mE BOARD OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE STORM DAMAGE
REPAIR PROJECT (KARP SLIDE) AT 3717 HAPPY VAlLEY ROAD,
LAFAYETTE (DP 4209) AND RETURN $6,520 TO -mE
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM BUDGET
DATE
November 13, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
INFORMATIONAL
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
James R. Coe
Associate Engineer
INITIA TING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department
Construction Division
ISSUE: All work has been completed on the Storm Damage Repair (Karp Slide)
Project at 3717 Happy Valley Road in Lafayette and this project can now be closed
out.
BACKGROUND: The project was required to repair a landslide which occurred in
February, 1986, on and adjacent to the property owned by Robert B. and Lucille
Karp at 3717 Happy Valley Road, Lafayette. A District 8-inch sewer pipe traversed
the slide area, but was not damaged since it is located deeper than the slip plane
of the sl ide. In order to prevent imminent damage to the sewer 1 ine, the
landsl ide was repaired by the District pursuant to an agreement between the
Di strict and the Karps. As part of that agreement, the Karps contracted the
installation of a retain.ing wall at the top of the slide. The District monitored
the retaining wall installation work administered by Mr. Karp prior to proceeding
with the District's project.
The work performed by the Di strict's contractor consi sted of excavati ng
approximately 1060 cubic yards of material from the existing slope, placing 510
cubic yards of 1/2 ton rock in a keyway near the existing creek, installing
subdrains and placing approximately 700 cubic yards of compacted select fill
material on the slope. The project area was hydroseeded and trees and shrubs were
planted to replace the trees removed during construction.
The contractor, Tyson and Sons of El Sobrante, commenced work on August 1, 1987,
and f i ni shed the work ahead of schedul e on September 18, 1987. The contract
comp 1 eti on date was October 15, 1987. The proj ect was accepted by the Boa rd on
October 1, 1987.
The Engineer's estimate for the construction phase of the project was $152,000.
Tyson and Sons original construction contract was for $120,000. The total
contract amount paid to Tyson and Sons was $123,672. There was one change order
for $3,672 which was issued to finish essential excavation and drainage work not
completed by the Karps' retaining wall contractor according to the Karps'
agreement with the District. This cost will be backcharged to the Karps.
The total budget for the project was $210,000. The total completed project cost
was $203,480, which is $6,520 less than the budget. Staff is closing out the
project which will result in $6,520 being returned to the Collection System
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RSK
JSM
RAB
~
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
SUBJECT
ADVISE THE BOARQ OF THE CLOSEOUT OF THE STORM DAMAGE
REPAIR PROJECT (KARP SLIDE) AT 3717 HAPPY VALLEY ROAD,
LAFAYETTE (DP 4209) AND RETURN $6,520 TO THE COLLECTION
SYSTEM PROGRAM BUDGET
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2 OF 2
DATE
November 10, 1987
Program Budget. The $3,672 to be recovered f rom the Karps for the change order
work will also be returned to the Program Budget upon receipt.
RECOMMENDATION: This item is presented to the Board of Directors for information
only. No action is necessary.
13028-9/85
.
Centra:.. Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 5
SUBJECT
DATE
October 28, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE $2,225 FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE
MILLIPORE WATER DEIONIZATION SYSTEM
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
Bhup1nder S. Dhaliwal
Laborator Su er1ntendent
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Plant Operations Department
Operations Division
ISSUE: The replacement of the M1ll1pore Water De1on1zat1on System with a Barnstead
Nanopure II Water Purification System.
BACKGROUND: The District purchased a M1ll1pore Water De1on1zat1on System in early
1978. The system has aged to an extent that it no longer produces ASTM, Type I
water quality needed for atomic absorption spectrophotometric and other wet
chemistry analyses. The M1ll1pore Corporation has discontinued the manufacturing of
the subject unit and recommendeds its replacement with an upgraded one at a cost of
$3,759.
The laboratory staff has reviewed literature on the equivalent water purification
system from other manufacturers. The Barnstead Nanopure II Water Purification
System meets the ASTM water quality requirement, and the cost of $2,225 is
approximately 40 percent less than that of the M1ll1pore new replacement.
RECOMMENDATION: The laboratory requests authorization for purchase of a Barnstead
Nanopure II Water Purification System at a cost of $2,225. Funds authorized for
this purchase will be drawn from the Capital Improvement Budget's General Program
Contingency Account.
REVIEWED AND COMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A..9/85
~J)
BSD
/)J~
WEB
.
Centra. Cc)ntra Costa Sanitar~ ':>istrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
r PAGE 1
OF 2
POSITION PAPER I BOARD M~~~~~g~r 19, 1987
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 87-35 (ALAMO) TO BE INCLUDED IN A
FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT
NO.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR 6
DATE
November 12, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION FOR
PROCESSING
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
SUBMITTED BY
:
Parcel
No.
Area
Remarks
Lead
Agency
87-35 Alamo
(77E5)
Frank Volz
2695 Danville Boulevard
Alamo CA 94507
198-120-017,-0184-019
( 1. 6 Ac)
One single family home to
be built on each of the
three sites.
Contra Costa
County
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 87-35 to be included in a future formal annexation.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
130~" .9'85 D H
JSM
RAB
\. ~j ~pR.I~IEF ENG.
~ J/J~~^-
I ROGER J DOLAN
INITIATING .fEPT.lDIV.
~~
~4
~,r3
~
,,:0.',':".
.:.:..::" .
'j~~&A
JOMES
60.03 AC
BARNES
7.~OAC
UY
%1.4. ole
co .OU.OY
ZOI.I:OAC
~
"
6..01 AC
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
F! A. 87- 35
eOflDUIIOY
o
97
.
Centrc... Contra Costa Sanitar, District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 10
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VIr.
ENGINEERING
1
SUBJECT
ADOPT FINDINGS UNDER CEQA. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER -
CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXEaJTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SHAPELL
INDUSTRIES.
DATE
November 13, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT FINDINGS
AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy
Construction Division Manager
INlJlATING DEPT./DIV
tngineerlng Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: Shapell Industries has requested that the District provide sewer service
to their West Branch development.
BACKGROUND: West Branch is a proposed development of 668 houses on 400 acres of
1 and adj acent to the i ntersecti on of Crow Canyon Road Extensi on and Dougherty
Road. The sewers proposed for West Branch are at an elevation which is lower than
the nearby exi sti ng Di stri ct sewer system. Hence, the sewage from West Branch
must be pumped if this District is to serve the development. This pumping
requirement as well as the fact that the West Branch area must be annexed to be
served was brought to the attenti on of the Board of Di rectors in August, 1985.
Based upon input from the Board, the Planning Division responded to Shape"
stating that the following conditions would be required by the District for a
future West Branch annexation:
1. "In accordance with normal Di stri ct procedure, the developer must desi gn
and build to District specifications the sewers and, if required, a pump
station at the developer's cost. All plans must be reviewed and approved
by the District prior to construction. If any sewers are placed in a
hillside area, plans must be reviewed prior to design.
2. If a pump station is required, either a county service area, maintenance
district, or similar entity would have to be established to provide a
mechani sm to pay for the annual O&M costs associ ated with pumpi ng. It
would be understood that CCCSD personnel would operate and maintain the
pump station with the District being reimbursed for all associated costs.
3. The developer must pay all appropriate District fees and connection
charges.
4. The incremental cost of providing watershed trunk capacity for the West
Branch development would be an additional cost that would be paid by the
developers of West Branch. Once the method of serving West Branch is
decided, the watershed fees applicable to West Branch can be determined."
These conditions have been formulated into an agreement which, when fully
executed, will bind Shapell to the conditions. Relative to condition 4 above, it
has been determined that West Branch will be served by a pump station and force
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
;Z::G
ROGER J. DOLAN
.
Centr....lI Contra Costa San Ita. , District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 10
POSITION
P APE R BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VI!.
ENGINEERING
1
SUBJECT
ADOPT FINDINGS UNDER CEaA. AUll-lORIZE ll-lE GENERAL MANAGER -
CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXEaJTE AN AGREEtENT WIll-l SHAPELL
INOOSTRIES.
DATE
November 13, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT FINDINGS
AUll-lORIZE AGREEtENT
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy
Construction Division Manager
INlJlATlNG DEPT./DIV
Engineerlng Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: Shapell Industries has requested that the District provide sewer service
to their West Branch development.
BACKGROUND: West Branch is a proposed development of 668 houses on 400 acres of
1 and adj acent to the i ntersecti on of Crow Canyon Road Extensi on and Dougherty
Road. The sewers proposed for West Branch are at an elevation which is lower than
the nearby exi sti ng Di stri ct sewer system. Hence, the sewage fran West Branch
must be pumped if thi s Di stri ct is to serve the development. Thi s plll'lpi ng
requirement as well as the fact that the West Branch area must be annexed to be
served was brought to the attention of the Board of Directors in August, 1985.
Based upon input fran the Board, the Planning Division responded to Shapell
stati ng that the following conditions woul d be requi red by the Di stri ct for a
future West Branch annexation:
1. "In accordance with normal Di stri ct procedure, the developer must desi gn
and build to District specifications the sewers and, if required, a plll'lp
station at the developer's cost. All plans must be reviewed and approved
by the District prior to construction. If any sewers are placed in a
hillside area, plans must be reviewed prior to design.
2. If a pump station is required, either a county service area, maintenance
district, or similar entity would have to be established to provide a
mechani sm to pay for the annual O&M costs associated with plll'lping. It
would be understood that OCCSD personnel would operate and maintain the
pump station with the District being reimbursed for all associated costs. _
3. The developer must pay all appropriate District fees and connection
charges.
4. The incremental cost of providing watershed trunk capacity for the West
Branch development would be an additional cost that would be paid by the
developers of West Branch. Once the method of serving West Branch is
decided, the watershed fees applicable to West Branch can be determined."
These conditions have been formulated into an agreement which, when fully
executed, will bind Shapell to the conditions. Relative to condition 4 above, it
has been determined that West Branch will be served by a plll'lp station and force
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
-
I
;Z::Go
ROGER J. DOLAN
SUBJECT
ADOPT FINDINGS UNDER CEaA. 1!JTHORIZE THE GENERAL. MANAGER -
()fIEF ENGINEER TO EXEQJTE AN AGREEfENT WIlli SHAPELL
INIlJSTRIES
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2 OF 10
DATE
November 13, 1987
main. The force main will discharge into Watershed 35 South. It is therefore
appropriate for the watershed fees for West Branch to be based on Watershed 35
South. Such a requirement is contained in the proposed agreement with Shapell.
The annexation of West Branch to CCCSD and other agencies is in process. The
city of San Ramon has applied to the Local Agency Formation Canm1ss1on (LAFCO)
for the annexation of West Branch to the city. Shapell has requested that San
Ramon's request be amended to include the annexation of West Branch to this
District. The action by LAFCO which is proposed for their November 18th meeting
is: 1) the approval of a boundary reorganization which wlll result in the
annexation of West Branch to San Ramon and CCCSD and 2) the concurrent approval
of the change of the spheres of influence of CCCSD and East Bay Municipal Utility
01 str1 ct (EBMJD). EBMJD has approved the annexation of West Branch and 1 s
processing a separate annexation request to LAFCO. San Ramon wlll become the
conducting authority in the finalization of the annexation of West Branch to San
Ramon and CCCSD. The agreement with Shapell will be in effect before the
annexation process is final.
West Branch is one of the developments in the Tassajara Valley which is the
subject of a suit by Tassajara Now and Tomorrow (TNT). TNT is an association of
residents of the San Ramon Valley area who are concerned about development in the
valley. TNT states that it is organized for the purpose of "ensuring the orderly
development of the San Ramon Valley area and particularly the Tassajara Valley in
conformance with the goal s and pol icies of the county-wi de and area general
plans." The suit by TNT challenges the approval by the county of the West Branch
development and the adequacy of the EIR. Shapell and TNT appear to have
successfully negotiated a settlement of the issues in the suit and it is
anticipated that, upon finalization of the settlement, the suit will be
di sm1 ssed.
CCCSD is not required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) with respect to the annexation of West Branch because CCCSD is not the
conducting authority and does not need to take any discretionary action with
regard to the annexation process. However the agreement with Shapell is
considered a project and CCCSD must comply with CEQA in approving the agreement.
Shapell has completed the processing of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
West Branch through Contra Costa County. The EIR identified Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District as the appropriate provider of sewer service for West Branch.
CCCSD is complying with CEQA as follows:
o Section 15231 of the CEQA Guidelines states "A final EIR prepared by a Lead
Agency" (Contra Costa County) "shall be concl us1vely presumed to comply with
CEQA for purposes of use by Responsible Agencies. ." (Sanitary District).
13028- 9/85
SUBJECT
AOOPT FINDINGS UNDER ~QA. AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER -
CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXEaJTE AN AGREE~NT WITH SHAPELL
INIlJSTRIES.
POSITION PAPER
3
OF
10
PAGE
DATE
November 13, 1987
o Section 15096f of the CEQA Guidelines states "Prior to reaching a decision on
the project, the Responsible Agency must consider the environmental effects
of the project as shown in the EIR . . ."
In the case of approval of the agreement, the District is the Responsible Agency.
The decision being reached by the Board in this position paper is whether or not
to enter into an agreement to provide sewer service to the West Branch
development. The Board must consi der the env i ronmental effects of the proj ect
(West Branch) as shown in the EIR which has been distributed to the Board. The
significant environmental impacts which were identified in the EIR and mitigation
measures therefore are shown on Attachment A. To complete its consideration of
the environmental effects, the Board must make findings regarding each
significant impact identified in the EIR and whether each significant impact has
been eliminated, substantially lessened, or properly mitigated.
The following are proposed findings which staff recommends based on review of the
final EIR prepared by Contra Costa County as the lead agency, review of
Resolution No. 45-1984 of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission, and
review of Resolution No. 84/695 of the County Board of Supervisors:
o Envi ronmental effects of the proj ect have been consi dered. The Board finds
that each significant impact identified in the EIR and as shown in
Attachment A has been eliminated, substantially lessened, or properly
mitigated. The Board has used discretion in determinina that all significant
effects on the env ironment have been eliminated or substanti ally lessened
where feasible. The impacts and mitigations in Attachment A have been
modified to include additional findings regarding the provision of sewer
service in accordance with the agreement with Shapell and annexation of West
Branch to CCCSD by a LAFCO reorganization. With the exception of sanitary
service being provided by CCCSD, mitigation measures as shown in Attachment A
are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency
(Contra Costa County) and not the Sanitary District.
o Contra Costa County has requi red adequate miti gation of all si gnificant
environmental impacts as identified in Attachment A.
o Filing of a Notice of Determination as a Responsible Agency stating that the
District considered the EIR as prepared by Contra Costa County is required.
REOO~NDATION:
1. Adopt the findings regarding consideration of the environmental effects of
the agreement with Shapell and direct the General Manager - Chief Engineer to
file a Notice of Determination as a Responsible Agency.
13028-9/85
SUBJECT
ADOPT FINDINGS UNDER CEOA. AUlHORIZE lHE GENERAL MANAGER -
(}fIEF ENGINEER TO EXEaJTE AN ~REEtJf:NT WIlli SHAPELL
INDUSTRIES.
POSITION PAPER
4
PAGE
DATE
November 13, 1987
OF
2. Authorize the General Manager - Chief Engineer to execute an agreement with
Shapell Industries for sewer service to West Branch.
10
13028-9/85
.
5 of 10
. .
,
I .
,
'.i:::i~i:i:i:~~l:l~lf:~:lililil~l:iil!:::!i:::::i:i:i:iil!:!~1:i!i:i:i:::::::::j1~~:i::~:::::::::5
,.::::::::::::;:::::;:::::::::::::;:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.:::::::::::::=
- . '~i:::ii~iii::~i!i!:!~i!~i!i!i!i!i:T,,:!i~~1:!~:~:::~!i!i!!!!!!!
'::::;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:;:::;:::::::;=::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
::t:i:::::ii:i:::::::::::l:ilii:::::ii::::::l:::::::i:i:::i:iii!1!i!11:1:iiiii::ii:iil~iilllll:1:1:li~
i ;;!I~I~~.!1!.!;.:~!~~..1~~~IIII':.i:l~il!:I':lii;::::i::i::::::llll~II:.;::::::::::r
~ :.::::::::::::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:::::::::::::::::::::;:;::::::::::::::::::::
,.,:::;:::::::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;:;:::::;:::::::;:::;:::;:::::::::;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;.
':::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::$::::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::;:::;:::;::::::::::
.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.........$................:.:.:.;..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
. ','J ]i:iiiii:iiiI:TA~A~~~RA jIII:::Ii:i:ii:i:t
. . ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ :~:~:~:~: ~ :~:~: ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;
. . . ',: .: .::i:i::III:I:::::ili~:::i::::::::::::i::::i:i:!t:::::~:!:i:i::iiii:!::I:IiiiiiiiiiiiI::
~.~.~~.~..:-"_::~:~~:;::::;:~{.:~~tmr~tfJtffftrttt
--- - -..._.:.::~:::rtft~~@}fttt
ROAD
~.
')
MORGAN --!
PR~P~ .
EXTENSION OF
GRPW CAN.YON ROAD.
./
SYCAMORE VALLEY
+
Ex. CCCSO Sewer
11II1II1I1II1I1II1II1II1n CCCSD ANNEXED BOUNDARY
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
~
West Branch Agreement
Novem ber 19, 1987
"""
-~
'~y
';:"----
11Im 111111I1111I11I11I
FIG. 1
2523-1/87
6 of 10
ATTAOfM::NT A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
AND
MITIGATION MEASURES*
LAND USE AND PLANNING
Impacts
o The project is outside the area intended for urban expansion by the
General Pl an.
o The project would conform to the General Plan's objectives of
prov i di ng a portion of the pl anned Crow Canyon Road extensi on,
providing a range of residential densities, and expanding employment
opportuniti es.
o The proj ect woul d resul tin the permanent loss of 400 acres of
productive grazing land.
o The project's proposed land uses along the northwestern and western
project site boundaries would be incompatible with adjacent pending
and approved development.
o The proposed plan amendment could conflict with the potential need
to widen Dougherty Road in the future.
o The project would extend urban services and increase economic
incentives to convert additional agricultural lands south and east
of the site to urban use.
MitiQations
o To resolve potential land use conflicts, proposed land uses within
the plan amendment is rearranged to correspond more closely to those
of adjacent approved development.
o Upper elevations of the site are proposed to be retained as
permanent open space.
o Approvals of development projects could be delayed until properties
to the west and northwest are developed.
o The plan amendment's allowable density considerations is reduced to
approximately 960 units.
* Attachment A is a verbatim copy of the pertinent sections of
Resolution No. 45-1984 of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning
Commission.
7 of 10
o Open space buffer zones are incorporated into the proposed land use
plan amendment to reduce land use conflicts and pressure for urban
development to the east of the plan site.
o Internal land uses proposed by the applicant are adjusted to conform
with the physical constraints of the property as well as policies of
the General Plan.
WATER SERVICE
Impact
o If the plan amendment area is annexed to EBMUD, a major supply line
and additional storage and pump1 ng fac1l1t1es woul d be requ1 red.
This area is adjacent to, but not within, East Bay Municipal Utility
District's (EBMUD's) sphere of influence. EBMUD is reviewing
possible extension of water service into the plan amendment area.
Mit1 Qat1 on
o Decision on annexation and sphere of influence modification are
those of LAFOO and EBMUD.
SANITARY SERVICE
Impacts
o The pl an area 1 s not w1th1 n the service area of any sanitary
district. The area immediately to the north of the project site is
served by Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD).
o If the pl an area 1 s annexed to the CCCSD, a pump station woul d be
needed to 11ft sewage to an existing trunk sewer on Camino
Tassaj ara. However, pump station fac1l1t1 es are d1 scouraged when
the use of the facilities wlll result in an extension of CCCSD's
service area.
M1tiQations
o The plan area should be annexed to the CCCSD.
o LAFOO, at its meeting of November 18, is considering: 1) the
approval of a boundary reorganization which w1l1 result in the
annexati on of West Branch to San Ramon and CCCSD, and 2) the
concurrent approval of the change of the spheres of infl uence of
CCCSD and East Bay Municipal Utility District.
o The agreement between CCCSD and Shapell prov i des for the
installation of a temporary pump station by Shapell and the payment
of future operation and maintenance pump station costs by the users
of the pump station.
8 of 10
POL ICE SERV ICES
Impact
o The plan area would increase demand on the Sheriff's Department for
public safety services.
MitiQation
o The Sheriff's Department would need an additional substation and
additional personnel to serve the site. Specific social or other
considerations make infeasible the mitigation measure for this
development alone. Area developments may participate in a
substation collectively.
FIRE SERV ICES
Impact
o The plan area is contiguous to, but not within, the San Ramon Valley
Fire Protection District. If the plan area was annexed to the
District and the Crow Canyon Road extension was completed through
the site, the first-due response would be from Station 14.
MitiQation
o No additional capital improvements woul d be necessary to serve the
site, so no mitigation is needed.
ruL TURAL RESOORCES
Impact
o There is a potential for prehistoric or historic deposits of
significance to be encountered during grading and excavation of the
site.
MitiQation
o Any construction would be halted if a deposit was encountered, until
the deposit could be inspected and appropriate additional measures
taken.
VISUAL AND AESTHETIC ISSUES
Impact
o The proj ect woul d change the character of the site from rural to
urban, extending urban elements farther east and south into the
existing rural landscape.
o Development is proposed for areas designated as scenic ridges on the
General Plan.
9 of 10
o The project may, depending on its design, degrade the scenic quality
of the Dougherty and Crow Canyon Roads view corri dors where they
pass through the site.
o The project would be highly visible in regional vistas extending
south from Mt. Diablo.
o The cumulative effect of the project and other approved. and proposed
development in southeastern Contra Costa County may conflict with
County policy to preserve scenic open space areas for the enjoyment
of County resi dents.
MitiQation
o The visual impact of the project was partly mitigated by
redesignating the upper slopes and ridges to General Open Space in
the proposed Plan Amendment, by designating Dougherty and Crow
Canyon Roads as scenic routes. Any subsequent development would be
subjected to detailed design review.
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Impact
o The project would generate about 23,400 daily vehicle trips.
Project traffic would require improvement of Dougherty Road.
o Cumulative anticipated development in the project area would
generate about 174,000 vehicle trips/day. This level of development
woul d requi re improvements to Crow Canyon Road, Sycamore Vall ey
Road, Bolli nger Canyon Road, Cami no Tassaj ara, and woul d req ui re
construction of a new interchange with 1-680 at Bollinger Canyon
Road.
o Construction truck traffic would be expected to have a deleterious
effect on the older, two-lane roadways in the project area (e.g.,
Dougherty Road).
o The plan area's internal circulation plan lacks secondary access to
the eastern and northwestern portions of the site until adj acent
properti es are developed. Thi s access may be necessary duri ng an
emergency.
MitiQation
o Any subsequent development would be required to post bond to
repair/replace pavement on County roadways affected by project
construction traffic.
o Any subsequent development would be required to contribute a
proportionate share towards regional roadway improvements.
10 of 10
o. Require appropriate dedication of right-of-way along Dougherty Road
through property owned by applicant.
o Require preparation of a site-specific traffic analysis.
o Density consideration allowed by the plan area is reduced to
approximately 960 units to further diminish traffic impacts.
OlliER IMPACTS
Impacts
o Those impacts mentioned in the Final EIR dealing with solid waste;
parks and recreation; hydrology and water quality; biotic resources;
geology, soils and seismicity; and energy can only be mitigated upon
review and decision of subsequent development applications.
Mitigation
o The appropriate mitigation measures can only be mitigated upon
review and decision of subsequent development applicants.
.
Centra:.. Contra Costa Sanitar7 District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
P APE R BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
VII!.
TREATMENT PLANT 1
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT FOR $50,000 WITH HARRISON-FOX FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES RELATED TO CAPITAL PROJECT NO. TP-88, THE
DESIGN OF THE TREATMENT PLANT REMODEL.
DATE
November 12, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Plant Operations Department
ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General
Manager-Chief Engineer to execute professional services agreements greater than
$50,000.
BAa<GROUND: Capital Project No. TP-88, The Treatment Pl ant Remodel, project
description outlines current deficiencies in the treatment plant area and proposes
specific corrective actions to be accomplished in three phases. Phase I will
address the acute, immediate requirement for a women's locker room and includes
facilities for the new gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer CGC/MS). The scope of
Phases II and III includes improvements to the Primary Building area for the Plant
Operations Department Maintenance Division, as well as general building
improvements.
A study was undertaken in response to the anticipated facility improvements needed
by the Plant Operations Department. The study was started in March 1987 to develop
costs and confirm the necessity for the project in time for its inclusion in the
Capital Improvement Budget. The study is now complete with specific prel iminary
desi gns and associ ated construction cost estimates. The total project cost, as
indicated in the Capital Improvement Budget, is $550,000. A breakdown is shown on
Attachment A. The contract with Harrison-Fox is a fixed lump sum contract.
Harrison-Fox, an architectural and space planning consultant firm, was retained to
perform this feasibility, evaluation, and cost study. Harrison-Fox will be used on
the final design project because of their familiarity with the District and this
proj ect and thei r sati sf actory performance on past Di stri ct proj ects. Prev i ousl y,
Harrison-Fox successfully completed the plans and specifications for the Training
Room Remodeling Project and the reroofing at the Lower Orinda Pumping Station.
Harrison-Fox will use Max Horn for the cost estimating, and ESI for mechanical,
electrical, and structural engineering services. Both of these firms have
considerable commercial and industrial construction experience and are highly
respected in this field.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an
agreement for $50,000 with Harrison-Fox for professional services related to Capital
Project No. TP-88, The Design of the Treatment Plant Remodel.
REWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
ATTAOiM:NT A
TREATMENT PLANT REMODEL PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN
Activity
Cost
Desi gn
Study
Design - Phase I, II, III
Construction
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Di stri ct Force Account
Contingency
Totals
$17,000
$50,000
$129,000
240,000
75,000
$444,000
$ 39,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Cost Authorized by this Board Action
*The next Board Action required will be to award
a contract for construction of Phase I
..~-------,--~... ..~--~._-,._-_.~-~-,.~-^_.._.._----.'"._~_.._,--_.-----
$ 67,000
$444,000
$15,000
24,000
$ 39,000
$550,000
$ 67,000
.
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitary .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19. 1987
NO.
XI.
SOLID WASTE
1
SUBJECT
CONSIDER THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE ASSIGNMENT
OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH VALLEY DISPOSAL SERVICE.
INC. TO SAWDCO. A SUBSIDIARY OF WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
DATE
November 12. 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ASSIGNMENT OF
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
SU~YtgflYN. Funasaki
Finance Officer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Finance and Accounting/Administrative
ISSUE: Valley Disposal Service. Inc. has requested approval of the assignment of its
franchise agreement with the District to another company.
BACKGROUND: Vall ey Di sposal Serv ice requested the approval of the Central Contra
Costa Sanitary District to the assignment of its refuse collection franchise agreement
to SAWDCO. a subsidiary of Waste Management. Inc. Valley Disposal Service and SAWDCO
have entered into an "Agreement and Plan of Reorganization" under which SAWDCO intends
to acquire certain assets of Valley Disposal Service. subject to the District's
approval of the assignment of the franchise agreement.
To enable a review of the requested assignment by the District's Board of Directors.
information on SAWDCO and its intended acquisition of the assets of Valley Disposal
Service was requested.. On November 10. 1987. documents comprising the responses by
SAWDCO to the information request were received. These documents are being
transmitted to the Board at this time without staff review. A review by staff is now
in progress. and a report of its results will be provided at the December 3. 1987
Boa rd meeti ng.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive additional information provided by SAWDCO in response to the
District's request. and provide staff with comments and guidance.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIA T1NG DEPT.lDIV.
./ .., :
.?~-~
1302A-9/85
WF
PM
.
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitary .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
November 19, 1987
NO.
XII. LEGAL/LITIGATION
1
SUBJECT
DATE
DENY ClAIM FROM LOUISA CAMEZON IN THE AMOUNT OF
$216,763 ALLEGING INJURIES SUSTAINED IN A FALL ON
A JOB SITE AT A PROJ ECT BEING CONSTRUCTED BY WESTCON
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
November 10, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
DENY CLAIM
SUBMITTED BY
INITIA TING DEPT./DIV.
Jack E. Campbell
Administrative Operations Manager
ISSUE: A cl aim in the amount of $216,763 has been received from Louisa Camezon
alleging injuries sustained in a fall at the San Ramon Valley Project, Phase A,
construction site. Denia'j of a claim requires Board action.
BACKGROUND: The Westcon Construction Company was installing the new San Ramon Valley
Inteceptor "line on the Southern Pacific right-of-way through Alamo. On July 28,1987,
Ms. Camezon, who was jogging with another person, entered the construction site
closed secti on between La Serena and Hemme Road. She di sregarded the warni ng and
danger- signs which had been posted, and then, apparently, she fell near where the
equipment was working, breaking her ankle. Because the claimant entered a posted
construction site and the District is indemnified under its contrct with Westcon
Construction Company, the staff recommends that this claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny claim from Louisa Camezon in the amount of $216,763 aneging
injuries sustained in a fall on July 28, 1987, and refer to staff for further action.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-
JEC
PM
INI IAf~PT./DIV. '~
-.-.-..-----.-.-..-.,----. - "- ~.........._'---.--'--_.._,_._---_._--,--~--,------,._.,"-_..---~-".,---~-----