HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 05-07-87
.
Centrt Contra Costa Sanitar ~ District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 8
POSITION PAPER BOARD M'M~y~~F 1987
HEARING TO CONSIDER REVOCATION OF A PERMIT TO
DUMP SEPTIC SEWAGE
NO.
IV. HEARINGS 1
Qe.TE
May 4, 1987
TpER~ItCTION
REVOCATION
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
Barton L. Brandenburg, Assoc. Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Dept./Planning Division
ISSUE: The GM-CE imposed a temporary suspension of Pioneer L iqui d Transport's
Permit to Dump Septic Sewage. Pursuant to District Code 5.12.030 the temporary
suspension is in effect pending a hearing by the Board to determine whether the
permit shoul d be revoked.
BACKGROUND:
On April 3, 1987 the District notified Pioneer Liquid Transport that their Permit
was suspended due to the repeated falsification of the sources of waste material
reported on the Septic Tank Di sposal Forms (see attached 1 etter). Pioneer was
also notified that a hearing to be held on May 7, 1987 had been scheduled before
the Board of Directors to allow Pioneer to show cause why their permit should not
be permanentl y revoked.
Pioneer Liquid Transport began hauling waste to the District in February, 1986.
They have almost exclusively reported their waste loads to be from restaurant
grease interceptors in Contra Costa County. They have averaged hauling
approximately 33 trucks per month representing a reported 67,000 gallons. From
January through March 1987, Pioneer's waste loads represented 31% of the
District's total trucked waste volume.
In April 1986, the District checked the weight of two loads of waste brought to
the treatment pl ant by Pioneer. These loads were reported to be about 1,000
gallons, while their actual volume, calculated by weight, was about 2,000
gallons. A letter was then sent to Pioneer stating that further reporting
discrepancies may lead to revocation of their permit.
In March 1987, the Source Control Section staff called each of the 26 sources
reported in the loads of septage Pioneer brought to the treatment plant (all were
reported to be restaurant grease interceptors). Seventeen of the 26 reported
sources could not be verified as reported by Pioneer and are itemized as follows:
o Ten of the sources contacted indicated that they had never dealt with Pioneer,
di d not have a grease interceptor, or had cl ean i ng contracts with other
septage haul ers.
o One reported restaurant source had been closed for over one year.
1302,..9/85
BLB
JMK
RAB
JH
'-'A
5MlL
7,f)
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
HEARING TO CONSIDER REVOCATION OF A PERMIT
TO aJMP SEPTIC SEW,llGE
PAGE 2 OF 8
DATE
May 4, 1987
o One source was reported by Pioneer to be collected on March 7, 1987, while
the District's inquiry indicated that this source did not open for
business until March 24, 1987.
o The address given on the form for another source was for a different
business and no phone listing could be found.
o One reported source indicated that they had not had their grease
interceptor cleaned for some time.
o In two other instances, forms received by the District showed that the
same grease interceptor was pumped by two different Pioneer trucks on the
same day. Each of these loads was reported to be 17S0 gallons or more.
o One source indicated that their grease interceptor was not actually pumped
until the day following the receipt of the load from Pioneer.
In addition, since Pioneer began haul ing waste to the District in February
1986, they have consistently been 30-60 days late in payment of their monthly
invoices from the District. Pioneer has been notified that immediate payment
of their existing $4,073.24 outstanding balance is required.
Staff also checked with the County Health Department to determine whether their
requi rements were bei ng met by Pioneer. The Heal th Department requi res an
annual permit, vehicle inspection, and copies of septage hauling receipts.
Pioneer's County permit has not been renewed for 1987, and a review of .County
files indicated that no receipts had been received.
From conversations with Mr. James Watterson, who is representing Pioneer, and
follow-up investigations, staff concludes the following:
o
Pioneer's administration, bookkeeping, and management
unorganized, ineffective, and under staffed.
has
been
o The repeated falsifications of sources was apparently done to take
advantage of the lower inside District rate for restaurant grease
interceptor disposal. The District charges $O.Ol/gallon for grease from
sources inside the District and $O.OS/gallon for grease from sources
outside the District.
o Pioneer's primary business is apparently cleaning restaurant grease
interceptors, mostly in the South Bay. There are very limited treatment
facilities in the South Bay which accept grease.
.....-------.
13028-9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
HEARING TO CONSIDER REVOCATION OF A PERMIT
TO [XJMP SEPTIC SEWAGE
PAGE 3 OF 8
DATE
May 4, 1987
Pioneer has not contested staff conclusions to date and has expressed a desire
to change thei r procedures and management control s to meet Di stri ct
requirements and to resume disposal at the District. The attached letters from
Pioneer indicate a stated intent to cooperate with the District.
The District relies heavily upon the truthfulness and accuracy of waste hauler
reports. The District does have a monitoring system, but constraints of staff
time and cost require that monitoring be done on a periodic basis.
Consequently, cases of del iberate fal sification must be considered extremely
serious violations of the District Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Pioneer's Permit to Dump Septic Sewage
be revoked for the following reasons:
o Repeated falsification of the Septic Tank Disposal forms after being
warned in writing of the consequences.
o Repeated failure to pay the District's billings within 30 days. As of
May 4, 1987, the balance due is $4,073.24.
o Failure to maintain a Contra Costa County Health Department Waste Hauler
Permit and to comply with County regulations for reporting.
---------..
13028-9/85
I
s
I
i
J
~
PIt.,I~EER LIQUID TRANSPOh I, INC.
H AtlD 0 ELI V ERE 0
10 Apri 1 1987
Roger J. Dolan. General Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez. CA 94553
o ear rl r. Dol 2. n :
All required permit fees due the County Health Department have
been paid to the County Treasurer and forms have been obtained
froer: the County Health Departrrent to report pumping and
disposition of grease and sewage monthly.
The check for payment of the monthly bill will be issued no later
than the h/enty-fifth of the month following thf2 month of
service. I propose that suspension of dUIT'ping privileges be
automatic and without notice to Pioneer if payment is not
received on tirre. I also propose that payment be at the rate of
five cents per gallon SUbject to review by you at some future
date.
I propose that Pioneer attach completed Pioneer v/aste manifest
forms to your Septic Tan~ Disposal form. These Pioneer forms
will provide complete inforf"C'tion on the source of all loads
disposed of in your facility including approximate gallonage. the
name and address of the source, thE:' nature of the m2.tE'rial. the
date the septic or greasE: interceptor was purr-pod and the phone
number of the source. Tre manifest will also be signed by a
responsible employee of the source. I al so suggest that the
gallonage of the trucks be determined by weighing them full at
your facility and then charging for a full load each time the
truck ccrres in to ycur facility. I hJve attacr.'2c a sc.mple
comp~ d copy of the manifest form.
Si,~ el '//
. ~./(-
Richard Cohen
p.o. BOX 1530. MOUNTAIN VIEW. CA 94042 (415) 889-7652
,-
~~'.
?,.
I'
i
i
:{,
,.;~)i.
:h,~"
t' ,',"",
.-~......... 'i?'l
....:" '"..'
.... ....
r:\'~~~: i{;
0:'~'~.~:
).'
:'~l~.
. ..}:
;,..
_:'~
r~_t
~ : ...
.,~
."J.;'-
.:-:;
f
~,
"
..,,,
:~~,
,'<ft.
<~/
";:~!
-'II
.....e.
.<i
;~.,:
. .....:.
, {~;::I"
, '
,'1,1
"
.. '. ';'i~
~.
. ~~~
,'~
:t~
.~t
.~
f
:l'"
i:~
;.f
'(.
,j'
'}~
PIONEER LIQUID TRANSPORT, INC.
P.O. BOX 1530, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94042
(408) 293-4808
WASTE MANIFEST
INVOICE
N~ 12127
SERVICE FOR
BILLING AOORESS
TREET & NO,
STATE
ZIP
CITY
STATE
IP
Ouan,
Septic Tank
Grease Tank
Car Wash
Other
Price
FINANCE CHARGES will be Charged at a PERIODIC RATE OF l'h%. ThiS is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE
0118%. If it becomes necessary to lile suit lor the collection 01 any amount. costs, Including reasonable attorney
lees shall be paid by the buyer.
.;
- l
~.
<. i
,
'1 ;, ,
:"( 1- ~
~ ..~ ,
......1; ';oj
\".
. '1" "
't~ \
.:~ '.jo~
'~ '"
' . :~
~.
:.f. 17
,j
."-{
";,
.:;~ -,
t ~.
i"
'.",
..
,
PIONEER UQUID TRANSPORT, INC.
,~
':t
.1
'j:"
..~
.~
~
't"
+.~
~
.~
~
If~
~j~
,~
~'
\4
llANO DEL I VERED
14 April 1987
Borton L. Brandenburs
Associate Engineer
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CP 94553
Dear Mr. Brandenburg:
Enclosed are copies of the waste manifests for the first part of
the month of r'~arch and copies of the waste manifests and the
disposal slips for the carwashes for the same period.
Pioneer is primarily in the business of pumping grease traps or
interceptors. About two car\<,'ashes are pumped e3ch month. I
estimate that 4% of the revenue corres from can/ashes; 5% of the
revenue comes from seDtic tanks ane lift stations; and 91% of the
revenue comes from grease int~rccptors.
Driver Jack Tabares is no longer ~ith Pione~r. Mr. Watterson and
I have met with both of our remaining drivers and hcve explained
t~( critical importance of providing your district with co~plete
and accurate informction on Vlaste disposec of at your facility.
The arivers and ttlE: dispatcher have beE-n told that any
discrepancies in reporting will result in aismissa1. Each of the
people involvec r:lS also been given a copy of the lTIemorendum
pro v " toy 0 u ~..; t 11 t his 1 e t t cr.
S~:.:?{7:~'/ //
#4//:
,)<i c he rd t6~ n
Enclosures
p.o. BOX 1530. MOUNTAIN VIEW. CA 94042 (415) 889-7652
:~ PIONEER UQUID TAANSPORf, INC.
.~
,i;!
:~
..o!:
't#
j
I
~Ji
~
lj
.~
:~
.\t
To: Dispatcher and Drivers
From: Richard Cohen
Su~ject: Dumping at Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Under a new procedure being worked out with the management of the
Sanitary District, it is extremely important that all p~per't/ork
subrritted to the District be completely accurate. Once the
clE:tails of the procE::Curc Clrc worked out, yet.: will be brief'.::d anc!
given the opportunity to ask any questions about anything you
don't understar.d or that you need clarification on. You will be
r e qui red t 0 f 0 1 1 o~! the pro c e d u r e tot h e 1 e t t era n d f ail u r e t 0 d 0
sew i 11 res u 1 tin d i s Po: i s s a 1 .
/-----,
P.O. BOX 1530. MOUNTAIN VIEW. CA 94042 (415) 889-7652
PIO,~cEA LIQUID TAANSPOA'~, ~NC.
HAND DELIVERED
21 April 1987
Barton L. Brandenburg
Associate Engineer
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. Brandenburg:
The discrepancies in reporting referred to in /VIs. Kaduk's letter
of 17 April 1987 came about because:
1. The gallonage shown on the \o/aste manifests is an
estimate of the size of the customer's grease trap.
Pioneer does not ctarge its customers by the gallon.
2. Grease pumped on a given day is not always disposed
of on the same day. Pioneer has two pump trucks and
one 5,300 gallon trailer and 2. set of doubles which
hold 6,000 gallons. Sometimes the small trucks come
directly to the Sanitary District and other times the
sw.all trucks pump into one of the trailers. In
addition, the trailers are not always dumped the same
day the t r ail e r i s f ill e d . U n d € r the n e \oJ pro c e d u res
being worked out, this problem should be eliminated.
All of the lO:lds di sposed of at the Di strict have come from the
grease traps as shown on the Pioneer manifests. I am sorry for
the trouble that our failure to keep good records has caused.
p.o. BOX 1530, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94042 (415) 889-7652
.
Centrc..~ Contra Costa Sanltar ~ District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF May 7, 1987
SUBJECT
NO.
V. BIDS AND AWARDS 1
DATE
AU IHORIZE $21,500 IN SEWER CONSlRUCTION FUNDS AND
AUTHORIZE PURQ-lASE OF A 200 HP PUMP FROM MCl.EMORE
PUMP, INC.
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
AUTHORIZE KJKQ-lASE
SUBMITTED BY
David Reindl
INITIA TING DEPT.lDIV.
Maintenance Engineering/
ISSUE: On April 23, 1987, sealed bids for the No.3 Water High Pressure Pump
were opened. The Board of Di rectors must award a contract or rej ec~ proposals
within 60 days of ~he bid opening.
6ACKGRQ.JND: At the November 20, 1986, meeti ng, the Board or Di rectors was
informed of the need for an additional No. 3 Water High Pressure Pump to provide
backup for the two existing 100 HP pumps and supply addit10nal fu~ure utility
water req ui rements. At that time, the Board authori zed desi gn funds and tl'le
prepurchase of a 200 HP variable frequency drive from Emerson Electric Company.
The design has been completed and shipment of the Emerson dr1ve IS scheduled for
the week of May 11. The District has advertised and received Lhree bids for the
200 HP pumping unit. A bid tabulation is provided un Attachment 1. The lowest
responsive bidder is McLemore Pump of Burlingame wlth a Did of $15,717.27. The
engineer's estimate for this equipment was $20,000. A complete projec~ estimate
is provided in Attachment II. The installation contract W111 be awarded
separately. The total cost of ~his project 1S estimated at $150,000.
This project is identified in tl'le ten-year Capital Improvement Plan and is
scheduled for the 1987-1988 construction season. District s~atf has concluded
that the proposed project will have no significant environmental impact and has
filed a notice of exemption.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize purchase of the pump and driver from McLemore Pump
Company and authorize $21,500 from Sewer Construction Funds for purchase,
administrative costs, and contingency.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
~
0~
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
130:!A..9/85
DR
JB
CWB
ATTACHMENT II
PROJ ECr ESTIMATE
NO. 3 WATER HIGH PRES~URE PUMP
Engineering and design
$ 24,000
Variable Frequency Drive Prepurchase
(200 HP)
21,000
Pump and Motor (2000 GPM at 270 TDH)
16,000*
Programmable Pump Controller
3,500*
Installation (Estimated)
73,000
Contingency - 10 percent
T ota 1
u,-S.OQ
$150,000
*Requested at this time
Previously authorized funds
$ 21,500
451..000
$ 66,500
.
Centr&.._ Contra Costa Sanitar I District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR 3
SUBJECT
ACCEPT THE CONTRACT WORK FOR REMODELING OF THE WALNUT
CREEK OFFICE BUILDING (DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 20047)
AND AUTHORIZE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
DATE
ACCEPT CONTRACT
WORK
SUBMITTED BY
Henry B. Thom, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department
Cons uc 0 D
ISSUE: Construction has been completed on the Wal nut Creek Office Building
Remodeling Project and the work is now ready for acceptance.
BACKGROUND: The Wal nut Creek Office Buil ding Remodel ing Project incl uded the
work to renovate the upper floor of the Walnut Creek Building for leasing to the
American Cancer Society. The major improvements requested by the tenant included
interior painting, carpeting, removal of certain built-in cabinets, and some minor
new wall construction. Certain electrical modifications to the office building
were necessary to increase the available electrical service. Additional HVAC
ductwork was installed and District prepurchased HVAC units were mounted on the
roof. In addition, miscellaneous site work was required involving both sidewalk
and fence installation.
On January 22, 1987, the Board authorized the General Manager-Chief Engineer to
execute a contract with Malpass Construction Company to construct the project.
The Notice to Proceed was issued on January 23, 1987. The contract compl etion
date was March 30, 1987 for the interior work and April 30, 1987 for the exterior
work. The tenant occupied the building on April 1, 1987. All remaining contract
work was essentially completed by the contract completion dates. It is appropriate
to accept the contract work at this time.
A detailed accounting of the project cost will be provided to the Board at the
time of project closeout.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the contract work for remodel ing of the Wal nut Creek
Office Building (District Project 20047) and authorize the filing of the Notice of
Completion.
13021\..9/85
HBT
RSK
JSM
.
Centr,' Contra Costa Sanital District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER I BOARD M~;;G7~F 1987
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 87-17 (DANVILLE AREA) TO BE
INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 87-18 AND P.A. 87-19 TO BE INCLUDED IN
A FUTURE CONCURRENT ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer'
Parcel
No. Area
87-17
Danville
(8187)
(lOOA7)
87-18
Danville
(lOlB7)
87-19
Danville
(lOlA7)
INITIATING DEPT.fDIV.
~9
1302" .9'65
DH
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
M. H. Robertson
2016 Diablo Road
Danvi11e CA 94526
215-010-006 (6.01 AC)
C.M. Bloch & Bill Hayes
c/o Live Oak Associates II
One Market Plaza, Ste. 2210
SPEAK STREETTOWER
San Francisco CA 94105
206-020-046 (133 AC)
Tassajara Partners
100 Park Place, #250
San Ramon CA 94583
206-010-007 & 008
(223.7 AC)
Tassajara Partners III
100 Park Place #250
San Ramon CA 94583
1206-020-056 (26.91 AC)
PAGE 1 OF 4
NO.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR 4
DATE
Apri 1 29, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION FOR
PROCESSING
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
Remarks
Lead
Agency
Proposed Subdivision 6834, Town of
consisting of 10 single Danville
family lots. Town of
Danvi11e has prepared a
"Negative Dec1aration."
Proposed Subdivision 6736 Town of
consisting of 210 single Danvi11e
family homes. Development
approved 4/6/87 by the Town
of Danvi11e, covered in the
Dougherty Road Area General
Plan Amendment (E.I.R.)
Portion of proposed Town of
Subdivision 6878, consistinl Danvi11e
of 279 single family units,
488 multiple family units,
community shopping center,
retail and offices.
Development was approved
2/3/87 by the Town of
Danvi11e, covered in the
Dougherty Road Area General
Plan Amendment (E.I.R.).
Portion of proposed
Subdivision 6878, consistin
of 73 single family units.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
f/11
1tfj
JSM
RAB
~~J#'~IEF ENG.
I,. L.A(" /J{ /11 A
II/I /1
I 'ft"OGER J. DOLAN
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 87-17 (DANVILLE AREA} TO BE .
INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 87-18 AND P.A. 87-19 TO BE INCLUDED IN
A FUTURE CONCURRENT ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF DANVILLE
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2 OF 4
DATE
April 29, 1987
Pa rce 1
No. Area
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Remarks
Lead
Agency
I
206-020-057 (15.3 AC)
Proposed development
consisting of 35 to 50
single family units.
Development has not yet
been approved.
Town of
Danville
87-19 Danville
Cont I d (lOlA?)
(lOOE?)
Estate of A. Haskins,Jr.
Tassajara Partners III
100 Park Place, #250
San Ramon CA 94583
206-020-058 (21.45 AC)
Portion of proposed
Subdivision 6878,
consisting of 50 single
family units.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 87-17 to be included in a future formal annexation and
_authorize P.A. 87-18 and 87-19 to be included in a future conc~rrent annexat~on to the
Town of Danville. -
13026.; 65
7"HIItD /
5 '~/3
I /
;1/2.
ATIIEHIAI
11.50
-
/
6l , /
,~y),..c(
\
."
r'-~.4
V
+
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
PA.
87-/7
L..J
"",..ce_,
........
...,..e..
.-
......Co
M.L'.
......c.
~l(1ST. eel: Sb
40UAJPAR.Y
65.D./.
,
-
-
. .
~A.
81-/8
DANV/LLE
f!A. 87--/9
f!:ID p. suB/). ,,678
r ",0 .
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
PAt 87-/8 ~ /9
.
CentrQ_ Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 17
POSITION PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
May 7, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 5
SUBJECT
INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO FORMALLY ANNEX TEN SEPARATE
AREAS UNDER THE TITLE OF DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
DATE
May 1, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
INITIATE
ANNEXATION
D. A. 95
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: This District must initiate the annexation proceedings with the Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) before the annexation process can be officially
completed.
BACKGROUND: The LAFCO has requested that the Di strict submit no more than 10
separate areas under anyone proceeding to avoid overloading their schedule. The
subject areas are generally located in Alamo, Danville, and Diablo. LAFCO has
indicated that they may add adjoining unannexed parcels to the separate areas we
submit to eliminate islands or straighten boundary lines. The District will have to
hold a public hearing to consider the annexation of any parcel added by LAFCO.
RECOMMENDATION: Pass a Resolution of Application for the annexation of properties to
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District under District Annexation 95.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A ..9/85
0I't
DH
j)fJfjJ
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
JSM
RAB
,;~ ). 'AiF r."- '; ~'VF/;ifk"X/'~'\'-:.;J!;~:;,~:\:~\c.fJ~ ' . . \~ - " ',:, . 5 ~i-
~'il'" ~~~;~*;r~~~4ii~{,~~'\l' ", //ST~/CT ANNEXATION
'~><;". ~'<..' r'~"':;\:0~t~;0":~~~';}i2;;\::,.;:.;~t\\F:'\t\;S~;:\';l,\\~ ", M!}'5
.', .:.. .. . . ,,,,"\',',::"~"'" "".. .,,\\~..,"j ...... ()
{~",:'~i\\;;~~~~'i;{,i1~\'\\~j\t \ .. .. '. -
\\:?{~\Vj\\~~l~<"("\\:", .\\ . ',\\\{::\,,)'i{0\}"" . ..l" ,
.\...jt.:.....:\\.~:..~>:.\;{ ..' ;..~,'-::':3~S.;;.;\;;;ny:.;::".,y~.,\.,~.... _ "} '-'~,r. - I
-~ ...:':;X\f\) .\,~~\;~ {,. " .. .@~\., """.' ,:.:,y;:X~ " .,' \'-- " -.
." :!~i:{,j\i~,.,\;;~:\;';:t';;i;j' .. ; ~ '1
'......... ~\;-<. 5 "\'~:' '.:',:" ..,',.:, .A v _
"", . y. · F" ,\1.. """",",""""''''''''''",,,,,,,..,...;',:;; ~~. . "" .'Wi;;;"" ',""""','I ~' I
..:; '. \, ~'\;\.'\V;/' .:. '. ....:.''':,:.::'.:>;:,:~'~u:::,..'.,{;,:...'.Y,/::l ~"\L>' .'\'\":;\\;;:;<''c''' ';:\'\'::"'.":,\\1 ',,-
\\":', .... '::., . ";:';:""./' .' .(:.:.... '.;~\;~y\/,\\\, l~f .tiA,' \:};\//;<>,',. ;":":\":"/:<~\\ .
. .... .,:;,!,,>""'. ~;,j\:j':>W ~&~;;-. \\\ :\\\\'\'0,\\,\\\\,,\,,\j,..\,\~~ ,..
.. ~i ...).~ ~."A~ {Ii '. ....... ..... ...... ','" ...,..,..~ :~..~. ,CD . ;:..". .,....,... . . ..;. ..".".. ~
",
-
11
!
.,..
, '\
, '--
"" --",
'~~
-
\ C-" /:-.>- - .
~ '\(~ /-,I':~"
..g..
c:
1lJ/
U'
I ,,* "
-'''' ~
I ....... ~ ..
I, -/~.. I
. " I~C
l II
~ I'
..rl'?ll
)i .._
\1 '/
''''''" · / j --~ """""""J~J\lJ~~ ~ ~ I
. .~~~:
I
J
~.
..oJ
\... ~i
)
~.
...:~\\\:
~)
~\
~ \
\
..... , '-- \ . \\ ~~
'--, \_\
DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 95
Tabulation of Parcels
Parcel P.A. No. Owner Address Date Approved by Board Lead
No. & Area Parcel No. & Acreaae and Remarks Anencv
1 85-11 G. C. Bewa11, et ux June 6, 1985 CCCSD
Diablo 1965 Diablo Road "Notice of Exemption"
Diablo, CA 94528 by District
( 1.39AC)
R.E. Sawdon, et ux
P.O. Box 350
Diablo, CA 94528
195-270-029 (O.53AC)
2 86-1 J. V. Do1sby, et ux January 16, 1986 City of
Danvi11e 950 Diablo Road "Negative Declaration" Danvill e
Danv 111 e, CA 94526 by City of Danvi11e
196-300-06 & -07
(5.05AC)
3 85-13 E. Lickiss J u 1 Y 11, 1985 CCCSD
Danv11 1 e 360 Montair Drive "Notice of Exemption"
Danv 111 e, CA 94526 by District
199-440-02 (2.80AC)
4 85-16 Shape11 Industries of August 1, 1985 City of
Danv111 e N. Ca1Horni a E.I.R. by City of Danvi11e
100 N. Mi1pitas Blvd. D a nv ill e
Mi1pitas, CA 95035
202-100-016 and
207-050-006
(248.52AC)
85-26 Shappell Industries of November 7, 1985
N. Cal Horni a
100 N. Mi1pitas Blvd.
Mil pitas, CA 95035
202-100-016 (9.22AC)
86-5 Blackhawk Corp. February 6, 1986
3820 Blackhawk Road
Danvi11e, CA 94526
202-100-022 (103.6AC)
207-050-007 (32.9AC)
5 85-22 Springbrook Assembly October 17, 1985 Contra
Alamo of God "Negative Costa
25 H111croft Way Declaration" County
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 by County
188-330-002 (6.56AC)
Parcel P.A. No. Owner Address Date Approved by Board Lead
No. & Area Parcel No. & Acreaae and Remarks Aaencv
6 85-23 R. w. Peterson~ Trust November 7~ 1985 Contra
Alamo 129 Wilshire Court "Negative Costa
Danville~ CA 94526 Declaration" County
187-330-003 (4.38AC> by County
187-330-004 (ptn.)
(0.75AC>
7 83-17 Arven R. Scott September 15~ 1983 CCCSD
Alamo 938 Danville Blvd. "Notice of
Alamo, CA 94507 Exemption"
197-090-008 by District
(0.89AC)
8 86-8 Kingdom, Inc. March 6, 1986 CCCSD
Danville 882 Diablo Road "Notice of
Danville, CA 94526 Exemption"
196-290-020 (3.03AC) bv District
9 86-19 International Church August 21, 1986 City of
Danville 34 Alamo Square "Negative Danville
Alamo, CA 94507 Declaration"
215-090-015 (6.96AC> by City of Danville
87-3 U.S. Postal Service E. I. R. U.S.A.
850 Cherry Avenue by U.S.A.
San Bruno, CA 94099
215-090-016 (4.30AC> .
10 84-21 S11 vio Queirolo November 1, 1984 CCCSD
Danvill e 269 A West El Pintado "Notice of
Danville, CA 94526 Exemption"
215-090-14 (4.09AC) by District
86-13 Olympia Properties, Inc. April 17, 1986 City of
6000 Stoneridge Mall Rd. Da nv ill e
Room 260
Pleasanton, CA 94566
217-020-001 (144.06AC)
-2-
. "'O<.JNr "fABLo Esr",,, PA~k SUBo. UN" No , .
( 15 M 301 )
I
_-.J
----
- LA CADENA
UJ
.
10
TONEY _
(35460.R.OZ3)t
&i'\
~
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 1
MOODY
(T757 O.R. 4.5'7)
Ol
ill
0::
tn----
:J-
Q~
z.
-0::
-l (j ('..!
.J <.Il r:-
~100
<( <.I) ~
I & 0
(J') '-' ~
~
~
PARC.(L 'A'
11\ p.M.~
~
~
......... CONTRA COSTA COUNT\(
("1630 OR.364)
::::::::: NORTH LINE OF SECTION 21
.\\i\\\:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~~~[~:::::~\S.~:::~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::1 IS. R I W
~tttIIr "'-100' t../ N 69010' E 480' :t
2. .3
........
\\\\\\t[ ~
:::::::: -c:t
ff ~
........
c.
\~
.9~
9-?~
'.4-
o~
-:/
~P.O.B.
:::::::: W
jjj~~~~~ ~
:::::::: 0
?\~ z
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
........
0,
"
"-
"'-
......
......
-
---
~ ' /
~-t6 ("p l:-.\ -----
'" .,",1 0'1 __
1915 C:S?>~?- ~lO:
t::.-'~O :../:-~...
_ _ _ ..; I - ~.... _CV
\ \ _ \-r
DISTR~CT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 2
~
~
. ~ (011)">'1
d'liPo~. .
1$1)
Q~.:~~
~~~
~~
jf..~ 0;.11)'1
)~~o.
\..\O\CD
~
'@ ofP'
.~"Zl
~~" .
~f).""'o
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 3
SHUMATE
(Z-070 OR. 8 )
uJ.
~~
013"
Z~ 21 2'2.
~ 7 N aeo3Q'Z&"E 2645."1~'
N 8'10 35'50' W 81. 5e,
@
~
a'
U'I
t:
UI
"
-'f-
SYCAMORE FARM
INVESTME:NT CO.
(4G03 Q.R. 95'2.)
'I
~~:;:l:~:~:;:;:~:;:;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~
........
.., ( ~?~ ~'" )
~ ~i
~ ~I
3=~~~
z ::j ~83
~,~
~tii
~~
@
NEWBUR'i
(3'38\ O.R.4&~)
~
fOOO' !
SOUTH LINE
SECTION 1..,
S '/4 CORNER
SECiION '21
CtI5R.IW )
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 4
@\
~
~
\2\7'
...-.~
~~
~
r~
~ l'~ <
\" ~~
q~ '( 1-
.~
&Q~
j
~
~
~
~
"'^ "';
....A~
~
D~STRlCT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 5
@
1985
5UGARLOAF DEX. CORP. E.TAL
,
PARCEL- TWO
( I021f O.R.5G)
COOK
101910.R.485
~
~
I
N 1io \?>' E.
@
1911
@
19"11
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 6
BAlOCCHI ~~~.:J;<'ik%'iM'~$l
_(G'340R:~_\ \ ~ t
~......:::-...........-:::;..-- 7 z ~I
'-'",,// ~j/ I I ; ~ i~
~ riJ' ~~ scalT I I r-oq-. :~.@ @
~R-'? ~~ (\Iq4e-4q"7) - ~
~-<"'~~ N.wo9"W I I I ~-..~
~~t": ~ ri~tF@ig4M
I ~ (11'\48 oR. W ::::.:. ~ ~ I 4: 0::
I ~ 8~~~ i III~~ I ~~
I ~-, z ::::::: 0 I I ~
z N46020'W 179.94' mr C 'oJ
:~ttttt~:~:~:~:}~:~{{{~~{{t.:8:~g~:~:~~:~:~~:~~LLE BLVD.
@
19"'74
@
19
li~1
DlSTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 7
~
~
@
1%6
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 8
01.. 'lMPIA pROPERTIES
(II74~ O.R. 81G)
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 9
Iiii'
~/&
f1i ~.
00'
~I\..
~~
^
'-
~
:6~.
~.
o
-t..)>~
~:~
~
~S"I.
~.
00
1\9. /yO~
:A~ 7 .
~~
~ :s'61
~v
<>-
uJ
"
tff>
~.
O.
(1)
t3>
~
~
~
t-J
o ..
0-
::l 1> Q
W,...O \\J
:x: ::: Z
~~
-0:
~c5
'1.9
~~
g~
$tff
i~
eJ.....~
~!/)
.:::;'"
;):~
~~
Cit.tfI
o
1E90.
"'!vi- Ctb &.
. Y"V~ol<,ol)
~~
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 95
PARCEL NO. 10
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 95
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES
TO CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
WHEREAS, The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District desires to apply
for the annexation of property under the appropriate provisions of the
District Reorganization Act of 1965.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT that the following information and
findings are hereby respectfully submitted in compliance with the
requirements of said District Reorganization Act:
A. This proposal and application is made pursuant to the
aforementioned District Reorganization Act of 1965.
B. This annexation consists of 10 "single areas" (as defined by
the State Board of Equalization) generally adjacent to the existing
District boundary, as shown and described on the attached maps and
descriptions. Said annexation totals about 587.85 acres.
C. The only affected County is Contra Costa County, in the areas
generally known as Diablo, Alamo, and Danville. No other sanitary
districts are involved.
D. These properties are legally uninhabited and are planned or
used for residential purposes. This Resolution of Application is for
annexation with the request for approval under SECTION 56261 of the
Government Code without further notice or hearinQ by the Board of
Directors and without an election, for the reason that all of the owners
of land within the territory proposed to be annexed have given their
written consent to such annexation, in the form of a Petition for
Annexation, or are connected to and served by the District sewer system
after requesting such service and paying District fees and charges.
E. This annexation is undertaken by the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District pursuant to the provisions of the District Code. If
annexation is approved, all of the provisions of said Code would become
applicable to the properties annexed. Annexation fees shall be collected
at the time of connection to the public sewer system.
F. The reasons for this annexation are:
1. These properties are within the ultimate service area of
the District, as previously approved by appropriate County agencies, and
are or will be connected in the near future to the sanitary sewer system
of the District. The District is assuming responsibility, upon
annexation, for the continued maintenance and operation of the public
sewage facilities.
2. It is the requirement of the District that all served
properties annex to the District (Code Section 8-201, Refer to Sections
6511, 6522, and 6830 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of
California) .
3. Septic tank systems are inadequate for the area and will
create a public health problem.
4. The property owners have petitioned for annexation to the
District, or have requested and received sewer service subject to
District regulations including annexation.
5. No other sewering agency can logically serve these areas.
G. The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District respectfully
requests that proceedings be taken by the Local Agency Formation
Commission for the proposed annexation under the terms and conditions set
forth herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
, 1987, by
the District Board of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the
following vote:
AYES: MEMBERS:
NOES: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
President of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
of Contra Costa County, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
of Contra Costa County, State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James L. Hazard
District Counsel
.
Centra.... Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
SUBJECT
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 6
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
DATE
AUTHORIZE THE QUITCLAIM OF A SEWER EASEMENT, JOB 3215,
MISCELLANEOUS PARCEL, DANVILLE AREA
TYPE OF ACTION
APPROVE QUITCLAIM
OF EASEMENT
Dennis Hall, Associate En ineer
INITIA TING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Divisio
SUBMITTED BY
ISSUE: Kenneth L. Zillard, owner of Parcel B of Book 99 of Parcel Maps, page 50,
has requested this District to quitclaim the subject easement.
BACKGROUND: The subject easement was created in 1948 as a "5' Util ity Easement."
District records indicate that this easement was never used for sewer purposes. All
of the parcels of land in the vicinity of the subject easement are served by public
sewers located in other public sewer easements. The subject easement is not needed
for District purposes. The owner has paid the District's processing fee.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Quitclaim Deed to Kenneth L. Zillard, Job. No. 3215. Authorize
the President of the District Board of Directors and the Secretary of the District
to execute said Quitclaim Deed, and authorize the Quitclaim to be recorded.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
r(J
.(J~
1302A.9/8S D H
RAB
BlAe KHAWK
~I~-
.O)w
0):10:
rq'u,
Q
:::jVllnO
rTl .Z
o~cil~
:u rTl-l }> ITI
~Zr= 0
w -I::j () ITI
III -< 00
""-" (/'l:
~
()
o
c
Z
-I
-<
............
c I\) .....',--._. "_.
-10,
E';
~?;;!
~
~-I
VI'"
ITI}>
~()
rTl()
ZrTl
-I VI
VI
po
Ex/ST/NCi
JJ:.wele
?tl8l-IC S~
~I~-ri
-.- OJ '"
.. -
I ~:
~ANVILtE _~
SITe
~QUITCLAIM EASEMENT
JOB 3215 (misc.)
DANVILLE AREA
.
Centrl..w Contra Costa Sanltar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
M
NO.
VI.
DATE
CONSENT CALENDAR 7
SUBJECT
RECEIVE THE PUBLIC SEWER OVERHEAD CREEK
CROSSING DESIGN PROCEDURE
INFORMATIONAL
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy, Construction Div. Manager
ISSUE: A Creek Crossing Design Procedure for District public sewers has been
prepared and is ready for implementation.
BACKGROUND: An issue regarding a proposed creek crossing in Pleasant Hill came
before the Board in early 1986. As a result of discussions on that issue, staff
decided that it was desirable to create formal procedures and standards applicable
to the design of creek crossings. The Design Procedure has been prepared and has
been reviewed internally and by representatives of the Building Industry
Association. Comments obtained during the reviews have been incorporated into the
document. Copies of the Design Procedure will be available at the May 7 Board
meeting.
Highlights of the Desig.n Procedure are as follows:
o Creek crossings are discouraged and the project engineer is required
to evaluate other alternatives.
o Project engineers are required to investigate and evaluate all
practical gravity sewer routes and alignments which may incl ude
siphons and pump stations.
o In the case where creek crossings are unavoidable, the crossing must
be designed in accordance with Contra Costa County Flood Control
standards.
o The banks of the creek under crossings must be protected from
erosion.
o Crossings must be designed to withstand external loads from logs or
debris which may float down the creek.
This Design Procedure is proposed to be adopted by the Engineering Department in
its Department Procedures Manual. The Procedure will be used by developers'
engineers for guidance and by District staff for evaluating sewer designs.
RECOMMENDATION: This is an informational item.
the Board.
No formal action is required by
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A.9/85
JSM
RAB
.
Centria~ Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
May 7, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 8
SUBJECT
SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 4, 1987 TO CONSIDER ADOPTION
OF AN ORDINANCE UPDATING ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES
DATE
May 4, 1987
TYP'S8H~BDE~ PUBLIC
HEARING
SUBt,lITTED B1 H d
.James . azar
Counsel for the District
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Administrative
ISSUE: Revisions to the District's guidelines for the implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEM) are required to confonn to current
provisions of state law and regulations.
BACKGROUND: The District Code provides for adoption of local guidelines
implementing the purposes and provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act. It is appropriate that the guidelines be updated at this time to reflect
changes in state law and regulations.
RECOMMENDATION: Schedule a public hearing on June 4, 1987 to consider the
adoption of an ordinance updating environmental guidelines.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
R./~NG.
ROGER J. DOLAN
130211.9/8
JLH
.
Centr&..._ Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Ma 7, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 9
SUBJECT
SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 4, 1987 TO CONSIDER
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE 1987-1988 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES,
AND THE COLLECTION OF SUCH CHARGES ON THE COUNTY TAX ROLLS
DATE
A ril 29, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
SET PUBLIC HEARING
DATE
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Walter N. Funasaki, Finance Officer
Administrative/Finance and Accounting
ISSUE: The District Code and State law require holding public hearings for the
establishment of the 1987-1988 Sewer Service Charge rates, and for placing such
charges on the County tax rolls for collection.
BACKGROUND: The 1987-1988 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Budget will be submitted
for initial review by the Board of Directors at the special Board Meeting on May 28,
1987. Approval of the 1987-1988 O&M Budget is scheduled for the Board Meeting of
June 4, 1987. It is customary to hold public hearings to receive public comment on
establ ishing the Sewer Service Charge rates and collecting such charges on the
County tax rolls during the Board Meeting at which the O&M Budget is presented for
approval.
Because the interval between the May 28, 1987 Board Meeting and the June 4, 1987
publ ic hearing date is insufficient for proper notice, it is necessary to set the
public hearing at the May 7, 1987 Board Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION: Set a publ ic hearing on June 4, 1987 to receive publ ic comment on
the establishment of the 1987-1988 Sewer Service Charge rates, and the collection of
such charges on the County tax rolls.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
~-
1302A.9/85 WNF
PM
.
Centr... Contra Costa Sanitar ~ District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
May 7, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR
10
SUBJECT
SET A HEARING DATE OF MAY 28, 1987, FOR THE
PURPOSE OF INITIATING AOlUISITION OF PUBLIC SEWER
EASEMENTS BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE SAN RAMON VALLEY
INTERCEPTOR, PROJ ECT 4224
DATE
May 4, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
SET HEARING
SUBMITTED BY
Curtis W. Swanson
Principal Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDI\L
Engineering uepartment
Engineering Division
ISSUE: A hearing must be conducted prior to initiating acquisition of a public
sewer easement by eminent domain.
BACKGROUND: The District will begin construction of approximately 7.5 miles of
the San Ramon Valley Interceptor in June 1987. The proposed interceptor, ranging
in size from 42 to 60 inches, will be located in easements within the former
Southern Pacific Rail road right-of-way. Permanent sewer and temporary
construction easements were acqui red from Contra Costa County under a master
purchase agreement executed in December 1985.
To date, the County has prov i ded permanent and temporary constructi on easements
for the entire project except for a 2,357-foot section between Danville Boulevard
at Rudgear Road and Woodland Drive. This parcel is not owned by Southern Pacific.
Ownership reverted to the heirs of the original owners (approximately 80) upon
abandonment of rail operations by Southern Pacific. The County has been
negoti ati ng with the owners over the past 1-112 years, but has been unabl e to
reach agreement of a sal es pri ceo In March 1987 the County informed the Di stri ct
that negotiations were stalemated and advised the District to condemn the sewer
easement to meet the proj ect constructi on schedul e. The County is unabl e to
i niti ate condemnati on at thi s time due to the 1 ack of an approved proj ect for the
ri ght-of-way.
The District will need a permanent 20-foot wide surface and subsurface easement
for the sewer interceptor. To allow constructi on of the sewer, a temporary
easement encompassi ng the enti re property ClOO feet wide by 2,357 feet long) will
be req ui red for a peri od of one year.
Prior to initiating condemnation, the District must conduct a hearing to receive
input from the property owners and other affected interests. Property owners and
other interests must be notified at least 15 days in advance of the hearing.
After the hearing, the Board of Directors may consider adopting a resolution of
necessity authorizing the acquisition of a public sewer easement by eminent
domai n.
REroMMENDATION: Set a hearing on May 28, 1987, for the purpose of initiating
acquisition of the necessary public sewer easements by eminent domain for the San
Ramon Vall ey Interceptor, Proj ect 4224. Di rect staff to noti fy property owners
and other interests of the hearing.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INI
()~
f~
130211.9/85
CWS
DRW
RAB
NOTICE OF HEARING
The Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
hereby gives notice of its intent to adopt a resolution of necessity to
acquire by eminent domain a public sewer easement for sewer line purposes and
a temporary construction easement on the property described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated by reference. This proposed action will
be heard on May 28, 198~ at an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Board of
Directors. You have a right to appear and be heard on the matters referred
to in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030. Section 1240.030 provides:
The power of eminent domain may be exercised to acquire property for
a proposed project only if all of the following are established:
(a) The public interest and necessity require the project.
(b) The project is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and provide the
least injury.
(c) The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project.
Your failure to file a written request with the Secretary of the Sanitary
District: 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, California 94553, and be heard within
fifteen (15) days after the date of mailing of this notice (May 8, 1987) will
result in a waiver of your right to appear and be heard.
Dated: May 8, 1987
Joyce E. McMillan
Secretary of the District
,
, . .
, . .
)
')
EXHIBIT A
r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Total Property
That real property situated in the County of Contra Costa, State
of California, described as follows:
The real property described in the deed from Laura M. Harlan and
Mary H. Llewellyn to Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a
California corporation, recorded June 10, 1891 in Book 60 of
Deeds page 139, described as follows:
A strip or tract of land 100 feet wide lying equally on each
side of the located line of the San Ramon Branch of the Southern
Pacific Company's railroad where the same is located through the
Rancho x in said county of Contra ,Costa and commencing at a point
on the center line of the said railroad where said center line
intersects the Easterly boundary line of land of the said party of
the first part at or near survey station 603+90 of said center
line, being the westerly line of county road leading to Walnut
Creek and running thence southerly along said center line of said
Southern Pacific Railroad following the curvature thereof, embracing
a strip of land 50 feet wide on each side of said center line to
the Southerly boundary line of land of said party of the first part.
at or near survey station 626+97 of said center line, a distance
of 2357 feet, more or less.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM:
The interest conveyed to the State of California, by instrument
recorded April 23, 1953, Book 2110, Official Records, page 170.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Easement t~ be acquired:
For lack of a better legal. description at this time this
appraiser describes the parcel easement to be acquired as: over
A strip of land 20' in width, the center~line of which is the
center line of the above described 100' wide parcel.
- e -
.
Centrl Contra Costa Sanitar'. ~istrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Ma 7, 1987
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR
11
SUBJECT
1986 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS
DATE
A ril 29, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
INFORMATION
SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Barton L. Brandenburg, Assoc. Engi neer Div.
ISSUE: The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Pretreatment Program Annual
Report for 1986 has been prepared and submitted to the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB). The highlights
of this report are presented to the Board for its information.
BACKGRQPNJ:>: RWQCB Order No. 84-60 requi res that all di schargers with NPDES
permits which have approved pretreatment programs, submit an annual report
summarizing all pretreatment program activities over the previous calendar
year.
The 1986 Pretreatment Program Annual Report summarizes the District's
pretreatment program activities which occurred during that year. Program
functions presented in the report include industrial compliance activities,
sampling and inspections, enforcement actions, and treatment plant sampling and
analysis.
The report al so presents the pretreatment program activities conducted by the
City of Concord during 1986. RWQCB requires a combined program report from the
District since the District is the NPDES permit holder. (This should be the
last year in which a combined report is provided based on the District's
upcoming administrative assumption of the City's pretreatment program.)
Below is a summary of the highlights of the 1986 Pretreatment Program Annual
Report:
o
There are
District's
program.
industries
currently nine permitted industrial users subject to the
pretreatment program and four within the City of Concord's
A high degree of compliance was achieved by these permitted
duri ng 1986.
o ADL Ci rcuits, Inc., a pri nted ci rcuit board manufacturer withi n the City
of Concord's juri sdicti on, was consi dered a si gnificant viol ator due to
continued violations of Federal and District discharge limitations. The
City has been working with this discharger since 1984 to bring them into
compliance with these limitations. In early 1986, ADL Circuits, Inc.
completed construction of a pretreatment package plant to reduce levels of
heavy metals in their discharge. Fine tuning of their pretreatment system
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
-
130211.9/85
JMK
RAe
ENG.
D
b~6
BLB
:J/^ LC
/lHP
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
1986 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT
HIGH. IGHTS
PAGE ?
DATE
OF ':2
Anril ?O 10Rt
was needed to ensure adequate removal. This industry is now approaching
full compliance with applicable standards. There were only a few minor
di scharge and reporti ng viol ati ons from other i ndustri al di schargers,
which were subsequently corrected in a timely manner.
o The District and the City of Concord started proceedings to assume the
administration of the City's source control program. A draft memorandum
of understanding which delineates specific areas of responsibility is in
the final stages of negotiation.
o The District began a comprehensive review of the existing source control
ordi nance in order to strengthen enforcement procedures and rev i ew the
adequacy of the local discharge limitations. The first draft of a
revised ordinance has been developed. CA finalized revised ordinance is
expected to be submitted for Board approval in May of 1987.)
o The District's source control program was audited by the RWQCS, SWRCS and
EPA in December of 1986. All initial recommendations to improve the
program such as a review of the District's local limitations are being
impl emented now or as soon as possibl e and shoul d be in pl ace by
December, 1987.
o The Di stri ct and the City of Concord worked together with the Contra
Costa County Environmental Health Department to investigate a printed
circuit board manufacturer CAME) who was suspected of illegally
di schargi ng untreated waste to the sanitary and storm sewer systems.
This manufacturer was immediately ordered to cease all wastewater
discharges, and a short time later ceased all operations at the site.
o The District's Source Control Section responded to a call from pump
stati on personnel, who observed petrol eum odors and a hydrocarbon sheen
in the Maltby pump station wet well in October of 1986. Source Control
staff investigated this notification and traced the odors and hydrocarbon
discharge to the Landsea Terminals in Martinez. This user was ordered to
immedi ately cease all di scharges to the sanitary sewer system until the
District could be satisfied that the cause of the discharge violations
had been corrected. Foll ow ing an inspection by Source Control personnel
of the Landsea site, it was determined that gasoline-contaminated
groundwater was leaking into this user's private sewer system. Landsea
subsequently repaired the leaking sewer system and is now following RWQCS
orders to decontaminate the groundwater. Subsequent sampling and
analysis of Landsea's discharge shows no further hydrocarbon violations.
o The District conducted a total of ten unannounced industrial sampl ings
and eight compliance inspections during 1986.
-..------..
13028- 9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
1986 PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ANNUAl REPORT
HIG I-L IG HTS
PAGE 3
OF 3
DATE
April 29, 1987
o The District's trucked-in waste program, conducted jointly by the Source
Control Section and the Plant Operations Department, provides for the
testing of septage haulers with loads greater than 2,000 gallons before
di scharge. Waste 1 cad sampl es are vi sually inspected for color, odor,
and other unusual characteristics (hydrocarbon sheen, reactions, etc.>
and are also tested for pH and toxicity. The toxicity analysis measures
the effect of the septage load on the plant's biological population. In
addition, a sample is taken once each month from a random septage load.
A full priority pollutant analysis is conducted on this sample, in
addition to the tests previously mentioned, to hel p ensure agai nst the
possible receipt of toxic wastes.
o The District purchased a zero head space extractor to measure the toxic
leaching potential of the ash and sludge. Initial analysis results
indicated that the District's ash and sludge is not hazardous.
The 1986 Pretreatment Annual Report is a public document and available to the
general public upon request. Envi ronmental organizati ons such as Citizens for
a Better Envi ronment, Green peace, etc. typically request thi s report from the
District for their information. This year the report was 46 pages long
excl udi ng attachments representi ng the City of Concord's annual report, CCCSD
Pretreatment/Source Control Ordinance, and Wastewater Discharge Permit
Application Questionnai re. The report goes into extensive detail regarding
industry compliance, sampling, and enforcement activities.
REOOMME~DATION: This is an information item.
--------..
13028-9/85
.
Centr... Contra Costa Sanltar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
P APE R BOARD MEETING OF
May 7, 1987
NO.
VII.
ADMINISTRATIVE 1
SUBJECT
MODIFY AN EXISTING OPTION IN THE BENEFIT OPTION PlAN TO
INClUDE REIMBURSEMENT OF DENTAL EXPENSES IN EXCESS OF
THE ANNUAL MAXIMUM LIMIT OF THE DISTRICT'S DENTAL PLAN
DATE
April 29, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
REV ISE BENEFIT
OPTION PlAN
SUBMITTED BY
Walter N. Funasaki, Finance Officer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Administrative/Finance and Accounting
ISSUE: Modification to an existing option in the District's Benefit Option Plan,
without increasing Plan expense, is requested.
BACKGROUND: The Board of Directors approved the establishment of the District's
Benefit Option Plan for Management and Management Support/Confidential personnel as
of November 1, 1981. The following benefit options are currently available to Plan
participants:
o Individual Term Life Insurance Program
o Deferred Compensation Plan Program
o Annual Physical Examination
o Increased Dental Orthodontic Reimbursement
o Family Visual Eye Care Reimbursement
o Medical Deductible Reimbursement
o Physical Fitness Program
o Purchase Prior Military and Public Service Time
o Tuition Reimbursement in Pursuit of a College Degree
o Hearing Aid Reimbursement
Prudenti al Insurance Company is the Di stri ct' s dental pl an provi der. The dental
plan limits orthodontic coverage to $1,500 per family member in a lifetime, and
1 imits coverage for regul ar dental services to $2,000 per employee and covered
dependent per year.
The current Increased Dental Orthodontic Reimbursement option provides reimbursement
for actual expenses related to orthodontic care above the present Prudential limit
of $1,500 for the participant and each dependent covered under the District's group
dental plan. The modification requested would expand this option to include
reimbursement for expenses for regul ar dental services which exceed the present
annual maximum limit of $2,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve modifying the Increased Dental Orthodontic Reimbursement
opti on to incl ude reimbursement for expenses for regul ar dental services which
exceed the annual 1 imit of $2,000, and retitl ing this option, Increased Dental
Services and Orthodontic Reimbursement.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
#~.
1302....9/85 WNF
.
Centr~_ Contra Costa Sanitar~ ~istrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 1 OF 4
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DEClARATION AND
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANJlGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
EXECUTE A WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CONTRACT WITH
GSF ENERGY, INC.
NO.
VIII. ENGINEERING 1
DATE
May 1, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT NEGATIV E
DECLARATION AND
AUTHORIZ E CONTRACT
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Barton L. Brandenburg, Assoc. Engineer
Engineering Dept./Planning Division
ISSUE: GSF Energy, Inc. (GSF) has appl ied for a permit to di scharge
wastewater to District facilities. The Board is requested to adopt the
Negative Decl arati on for a di scharge contract with GSF. If the Negative
Declaration is adopted, the Board is further requested to authorize the General
Manager-Chief Engineer to execute the discharge contract.
BACKGROUND: Since 1982 the District has been using landfill gas from GSF's gas
recovery operation at the Acme landfill to fuel the treatment plant's
incinerators and auxiliary boilers. Prior to conveying the gas to the
District, it is chilled to remove water vapor. This forms a condensate which
must be disposed.
In order to reduce costs, and to provide for long-term disposal, GSF has been
negotiating with the District to discharge the condensate to the District's
sewer system. GSF proposes to discharge the condensate to the District's
treatment plant at a rate not to exceed 6 gallons per minute via an existing
36-inch diameter sewer line which receives domestic wastewater from Martinez.
(The current estimated dry weather flow rate in the 36-inch line is 750 gallons
per minute.)
Di strict staff has worked with GSF to insure that if the Di strict accepts the
condensate for disposal, proper environmental controls will be implemented to
enable the District to comply with all state and federal laws and regulations
and to protect the District against potential future liability. The following
controls and protection measures have been agreed upon by GSF.
o A contract has been negoti ated (see Appendi x A of the attached Negative
Declaration), which contains provisions for stringent administrative
oversight and noncompliance penalties.
o Since the contract provisions are discretionary, an initial study was
performed to determine if a Negative Decl arati on or EIR was requi red by
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
o Stringent discharge limits (see Exhibit A of the contract), particularly
for toxic organics, will require GSF to construct a pretreatment facility.
Ii! 2~ DEPT./DIV.
1302,0.9/85 BLB
)"MJc
JMI<
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DEQARATION AND
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MAN,l'{JER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
EXEOJTE A WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CONTRACT WITH
r.:~F TNr..
PAGE? OF 4
DATE
M;tv 1. 1 QR7
o The District requested that GSF submit analyses of their wastewater to the
State Department of Heal th Serv ices for concurrence that it is
nonhazardous. This concurrence has been received.
A discharge contract is a unique approach for the District and may be used for
other significant industries where due to the particular characteristics of
their operation and/or discharge will potentially require a greater level of
administrative oversight than could be achieved by permit.
Some of the unique provisions of the GSF contract are as follows:
o Monthly sampling and reporting of the discharge quality to include 129
toxic compounds. (The required monthly analyses typically cost about
$2,000.)
o Fees for noncompliance with the discharge limits may range up to $5,000
for each specified time period. Fees are also based on pounds of
pollutants discharged above contract limits.
o A 1 i st of 13 specif i c pretreatment facil ity des i gn and operati on
requirements include requiring GSF personnel to be on site during
pretreatment facility operational discharge and spill containment devices
for all pretreatment systems.
o GSF must obtain a $5,000,000 comprehensive general 1 iabil ity insurance
policy with the District being co-insured.
o GSF must indemnify the District against all claims or damage as a result
of their discharge.
o GSF will provide the District with $100,000 cash bond or other security.
o The District has unilateral authority to suspend or terminate the contract
if the wastewater becomes defined as a hazardous waste by state or federal
regul ati ons.
The District's CEQA guidelines require the Board to consider the Initial Study
prepared for the contract and any publ ic comments received on the Negative
Declaration prior to approving the Negative Declaration for the contract. The
Initial Study for the project was prepared by Earth Metrics, Inc., an
environmental and planning consulting firm. District staff concludes that the
Initial Study for the contract adequately, accurately, and objectively
evaluates the environmental impact of the GSF proposal. Based on the Initial
Study, Earth Metrics, Inc. determined that a Negative Declaration is the
appropriate document to address the environmental effects of the project. The
--------..
13028-9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DEClARATION AND
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANN3ER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
EXEOJTE A WASTEWATER DISa-lARGE CONTRACT WITH
GSF ENERGY, INC.
PAGE 3 OF 4
DATE
May 1, 1987
Negative Declaration finds that the proposed contract will not have a
significant effect on the environment, and that no mitigation measures are
needed beyond those already incorporated into the contract.
In compliance with the GEQA requirements, District staff has arranged for a
legal notice to be published which solicited comments and has provided notice
of the District's intent to adopt the Negative Declaration for the proposed
contract. Any comments which are received will be given to the Board at its
May 7, 1987, meeting. If the Board adopts the Negative Declaration, approval
of the contract will be requi red to compl ete the CEQA requi rements and all ChI
staff to file a Notice of Determination in the County Clerk's office.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Negative Decl aration and authorize the General
Manager-Chief Engineer to execute the contract with GSF.
.....-------.
13028-9/85
RESOlUTION NO. 87-
A Resolution Adopting a Negative Declaration
for the
Wastewater Discharge Contract with GSF Energy, Inc.
WHEREAS, the project upon which this determination is made is described as
follows:
The proposed proj ect consi sts of a contract between the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District and GSF Energy, Inc. to discharge landfill gas condensate to
the District's treatment plant.
WHEREAS, an initi al study of the proposed proj ect has been conducted by Earth
Metrics, Inc., an environmental and planning consulting firm.
WHEREAS, District staff finds that the initial study adequately, accurately,
and objectively evaluated the proposed effect on the environment.
WHEREAS, adequate public notice was given to receive comments on the project.
WHEREAS, the District Board of Directors has reviewed the results of the
initial study and determined that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resol ved that the Board of Di rectors of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District does hereby adopt the Negative Decl aration for
the wastewater discharge contract with GSF Energy, Inc.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary Di strict Board of
Directors this 7th day of May, 1987, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
N3 SENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
President of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
James L. Hazard, District Counsel
.
Centra.. Contra Costa Sanitar District
..
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 1 OF 2
SUBJECT
lHORIZE $17,800 FROM lHE SEWER CONS1RUCTION FUND FOR
E DESIGN OF PHASE I OF lliE DIS1RICT LANDSCAPING
OJ ECT
NO.
IX. TREATMENT PLANT 1
DATE
April 27, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
PUlHORIZE FUNDS
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
De artment Manager
Plant Operations Department
ue: Board of Directors authorization is required to expend Sewer Construction
Funds for the design of Phase I of the District's Landscaping Project, District
Project No. 10031.
Back o.od: On August 21, 1986, the Board of Directors authorized the execution
of a consulting agreement with the firm of Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey for the
conceptual design of the Treatment Plant Landscape Master Plan. The scope of this
agreement was to work in concert with the Di stri ct' s Landscape Committee to
develop an idea for the landscape design of the Imhoff Place facil ities. The
Landscape Master Plan is to incorporate the District's existing landscape, allow
for future Plant expansion, present an aesthetic image, and use low-maintenance/
drought tolerant plants for additional landscaping. The installation of the
Landscapi ng Master Pl an is to be done as capi tal proj ects to spread the cost of
the total projected Master Plan design over a period of time, and to allow the
Plant Operations Department to establish and maintain these new areas in
economical increments.
The firm of Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey with input from the District's Landscape
Committee has completed the Landscape Master Plan and the initial design concept
for Phase I. The area chosen for this phase was the entry way to the facil ities
off Imhoff Place, i.e., the main entry to the Trea1rnent Plant and the District's
Headquarters Office Building. This area is the most visible to the public and
creates the initial impression one has of the District. The Phase I design will
incorporate appropriate signing and will use reclaimed water through the
constructi on of a small pond as a theme of water trea1rnent. A pl an of the
entrance area is attached as Attachment 1. The architect's estimate for the cost
of this Phase I project is $250,000 including design and force account. The
project is tentatively scheduled for late summer of 1987. The project is part of
the 1987-1988 Capital Budget and, if approved, would not be before the Board until
award of contract.
Beco.mmendatiol): Authorize $17,800 from the Sewer Construction Fund for the design
of Phase I of the District Landscape Project.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
./DIV.
ILTTACHMENT I
DISTRICl LANDSCAPE PROJECl
~~
Ul
I
.(\1
I
I
;
~I J
~
I ~
Ci
>-
a:
I 4(
~ ~
it ~
~ ~
~ :
fi ~
o
H U
i i
a U
I 1
t I II
fltf) Ifl'
hI II .
dh
u.
o
(\I
w
~
<t
a.
i
i
Ie
1
11
~~
.
Centr,.. Contra Costa Sanltar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 4
POSITION
PAPER BOARD MEETING OF
Ma 7, 1987
NO.
XI.
BUDGET AND FINANCE 1
SUBJECT
REVIEW A FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTION FOR THE SELF-
INSURANCE FUND AND APPROVE THE INClUSION OF $500,000 FOR
THE FUND IN THE 1987-1988 0 & M BUDGET
DATE
Ma 4, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
REV IEW FINANCIAL
PROJ ECTION & APPROVE
A BUDGET INClUSION
SUBMITTED BY
Jack Campbell
Administrative Operations Manager
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Administrative/Risk Management
ISSUE: On May 1, 1986, the Board of Directors established the District's
Self-Insurance Program and provided funding in the amount of $3,567,124 for the
1986-1987 fiscal year. It was understood that the staff wou1 d return to the Board
each year with a re-funding recommendation. It is proposed that $500,000 be budgeted
in the 0 & M fund to provide a portion of the 1987-1988 re-funding.
BAa<GRaJND: The fi rst year of the Se1 f-Insurance Program operati on has a1 most
conc1 uded and this is the time to consider re-funding for the 1987-1988 year. The
staff has developed a financial projection designed to achieve a $6,000,000 se1f-
insurance fund reserve by June 30, 1991, assuming that the District's loss experience
conti nues to be favorab1 e. The $6,000,000 reserve is based on the 1 eve1 recommended
by David Warren in his February 1986 Risk Management Study and also is the figure used
in the staff's presentati on to the Board at the time the program was imp1 emented.
Until now no speci f ic recommendati on has been made as to an appropri ate date for
reaching this amount; this projection uses the five-year operational span from program
inception on July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1991.
The Board provided the initial funding for the Self-Insurance Program from three
sources: a provision in the O&M fund for Self-Insurance Expense ($567,124), Ad
Valorem Tax Revenue from the Sewer Constructi on Fund ($1,000,000), and a speci a1
allocation from the District's O&M reserves ($2,000,000). The Board also directed
that these funds be invested with the interest earnings accruing to the Self-Insurance
Fund, and this has become a fourth source of funding. For 1987-1988 the recommenda-
tion is that a total of $1,000,000 in new funding be provided for the fund with
$500,000 coming from the 0 & M fund and the remaining $500,000 either from the 0 & M
reserves or the Ad Valorem Tax revenues. Interest accrual is anticipated to provide
an additional $216,000 for a total 1987-1988 fund revenue of $1,216,000.
Because the open case reserves are currently under $200,000 for c1 aims against the
District, and there are no known major 1 iabil ity incidents invo1 ving the District,
the staff is proposing to lower the level of re-funding for the 1987-1988 fiscal
year based on the assumption that the Self-Insurance Fund's low experience will
remain stable with no major losses occurring through 1991.
The financial projection, along with the assumptions used to develop it, is
detailed on Exhibit A. The projection proposes that $500,000 of 0 & M funding be
provided in 1987-1988 with the amount from this source decreasing over time if the
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
A ~([PT.lDIV.
130:!A.9! J EC
.I~.
ROGER J. DOLAN
SUBJECT
REVIEW A FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PROJECTION FOR THE SELF-
INSURANCE FUND AND APPROVE THE INCLUSION OF $500,000 FOR
THE FUND IN THE 1987-1988 0 & M BUDGET
POSITION
PAPER
PAGE 2 OF
DATE
May 4, 1987
4
loss experience permits. The funding from the Ad Valorem taxes or District reserves
could also decrease over time with a favorable loss experience.
There is considerable flexibility as to how the Self-Insurance Program can be funded,
especially since the loss experience is low and the District has adequate reserve
funds. This plan represents one approach, and the staff is submitting a plan at this
time in order to get preliminary approval for including $500,000 of re-funding in the
1987-1988 0 & M budget. The 0 & M increment is consi dered to be equival ent to an
insurance premium which is paid from operating funds to the Self-Insurance Program
instead of to a commercial insurance carrier. The additional $500,000 proposed for
1987-1988 by the financi al pl an coul d be provided from other sources such as the Ad
Valorem taxes, 0 & M reserves, or by increasing the portion from the 0 & M operating
fund. The Board will be making decisions regarding the overall District finances for
1987-1988 at the May 28 and June 4 meetings; the total funding for the Self-Insurance
Program should be considered at that time. The staff recognizes that any plan for the
Self-Insurance Fund will require an annual review or even more frequently should the
loss experience deteriorate. The budget for the Self-Insurance Fund will be submitted
with the 1987-1988 O&M Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Review the five-year financial projection for the Self-Insurance Fund
and approve the inclusion of $500,000 for the fund in the 1987-1988 0 & M Budget.
1..-_______..
13028-9/85
Page 3 of 4
Exhibit A
CENTRAl CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SELF-INSURANCE FUND FINANCIAL PlAN PROJECTION
Five-Years Endi ng June 30, 1991
proj ected
1986-87 1987 -88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91
Revenue
Self-Insurance Expense
(fran O&M Fund) $ 567,000 500,000 250,000 250,000 100,000
Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
or transfer fran 0 & M
Reserves * 1,000,000 500,000 250,000 250,000 100,000
Interest Income 190,000 216,000 271,000 301,000 339,000
Total Revenue $1,757,000 1,216,000 771,000 801,000 539,000
Expenses
Cl aims Adj usti ng $ 10,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Insurance Consulting 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Loss Payments 28,500 31,000 35,000 40,000 45,000
Legal Services 102,000 176,000 150,000 100,000 100,000
Insurance Premiums 6,000 6,000 12,000 9,000 9,000
Technical Services 15,000 60,000 63,000 10,000 12,000
Total Expenses $ 164,000 286,000 273,000 172,000 179,000
GAIN $1,593,000 930,000 498,000 629,000 360,000
~
Reserves
Gain
$1,593,000
930,000
498,000
629,000
360,000
2,000,000
3,593,000
4,523,000
5,021,000
5,650,000
Reserve
Total Reserve
$3,593,000
4,523,000
5,021,000
5,650,000
6,010,000
* The Ad Valorem tax was used as a revenue source for 1986-1987; the O&M reserves could be
substituted to provide sufficient re-funding for 1987-1988.
5/1187
Page 4 of 4
SELF-INSURANCE FUND FIVE-YEAR PROJECTION ASSUMPTIONS
1. The fund goal is to produce a $6.000.000 self-insurance reserve by
June 30. 1991.
2. There will be no liability or property cases with a paid loss of
$50.000 or more.
3. There will be no new cases involving major litigation expense.
4. The interest rate on District investments will be at least 6 percent
during this period.
5. The District will continue to be self-insured for liability and
property risks during this period and will not purchase catastrophic
coverage or pay any risk pool expenses from the Self-Insurance Fund.
6. Fund usage will be limited to losses which could be insured through
commercial policies and to external expenses directly related to
loss control for specific cases.
4-29-87
.
Centri._ Contra Costa Sanltar) Olstrlct
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
May 7, 1987
NO.
XI.
BUDGET AND FINANCE 2
SUBJECT
RECEIVE THE 1987-1988 EQUIPMENT BUDGET FOR REVIEW
DATE
April 30, 1987
TYPE OF ACTION
RECEIVE EQUIPMENT
BUDGET
SUBMITTED BY
INITIA TING DEPT./DIV.
Wal ter N. Funasaki, Fi nance Officer
Administrative/Finance and Accounting
ISSUE: The District's 1987-1988 Equipment Budget is submitted for review.
BACKGROUND: The 1987-1988 Equipment Budget is transmitted herewith. The
Equipment Budget is summarized by department for 1987-1988 and each of the
four prior fiscal years. A list of all equi pment items requested by department,
categorized by functional classification, and a descriptive sheet which describes
and justifies each item, are provided.
On April 30, 1987, the Capital Projects Committee met with District staff to
review the proposed Equipment Budget requests. The Equipment Budget is submitted
for initial review by the full Board at this time and is scheduled for approval at
the next Board Meeting on May 19, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive the 1987-1988 Equipment Budget for review, and provide
District staff with comments and guidance.
~
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
WNF
PM
1302A..9/85
.
CentrL_ Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Ma 7, 1987
NO.
XI I.
DATE
Ma 1, 1987
LEGAL/LITIGATION
1
SUBJECT
TYPE OF ACTION
DENY CLAIM FROM PEGGY LEE BAXTER AND STEPHANIE BAXTER
DENY CLAIM
SUBMITTED BY
Jack Campbell
Administrative Operations Manager
INITtA TING DEPT./DIV.
Administrative/Risk Management
ISSUE: A claim for $10,000 for vehicle property damage and personal injuries has been
received from Peggy Lee Baxter and Stephanie Baxter alleging a January 13, 1987,
vehicle accident at 31 Crestview Drive, Orinda, involving ice on the roadway.
BAa<GRWNO: On February 5, 1987, the Board rej ected a cl aim from Davi d Hammond and
Barbara Mitchell for damage resulting from their vehicle hitting a telephone pole
allegedly because of ice on Crestview Drive supposedly originating from a water leak.
This claim from the Baxters is from the same alleged occurrence at 7:30 a.m. on
January 13, 1987, but involving their vehicle going into a ditch. The claim is being
presented through the same attorney, Mr. Hammond.
As reported to the Board on February 5, 1987, an initial investigation by staff does
not indicate any CCCSD responsibility for any ice on the roadway; therefore, the
recommendation is that this claim also be denied.
REC<NENDATION: Deny cl aim from Peggy Lee Baxter and Stephanie Baxter for all eged
damages and injuries resulting from a January 13, 1987, vehicle accident at 31
Crestview Drive, Orinda.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
PM
Tr ~/DIV.
JEC
~