HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 04-04-85
(((S
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. III. BIDS & AWARDS
1 4 4 85
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
SUBJECT AUTHORIZE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO AWARD A
CONTRACT TO PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION FOR DISTRICT
PROJECT 3816 SUBJECT TO STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
N FUNDS.
POSITION PAPER
DATE
March 29, 1985
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE CONTRACT AWARD
AUTHORIZE SEWER
CONSTRUCTION FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
Robert A. Simmons, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Dept./Construction Div.
ISSUE: The authorization by the Board to award the contract for Project 3816,
Stage 5B, Treatment Pl ant Expansion, will expedite the start of work on the
project.
BACKGRCllND: On February 7, 1985, sealed bids for District Project 3816, Stage 5B,
15MGD Hydraulic Capacity Expansion and Sludge Thickening Facilities, were opened.
A tabulation of the bids is attached. On March 21, 1985, the Board denied a
protest filed by C. W. Roen Construction Company, Inc. against award of the
Stage 5B constructi on contract to the apparent low bi dder. The protes"t is
considered formally resol ved because the protestant di d not appeal the Board's
decision within the seven (7) day period following the hearing as allowed by State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulations. It is, therefore, appropriate
to proceed with award of the contract subject to SWRCB approval.
Seven bids ranging from $5,000,000 to $6,999,000 were received (see attached
tabulation). Pacific Mechanical Corporation is the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder at $5,000,000. The Engineer's estimate for this work is
$5,897,850. An evaluation of the bid by District staff and personnel from the
design engineer, John Carollo Engineers, has determ1ned that the low bid is
reasonable and is favorable to the District.
In accordance with SWRCB grant regulations, prior to execution of the construction
contract by the Grantee, the contract must be submitted to the SWRCB to verify
conformance with grant regulations and procedures.
Staff is requesting the authorization to award the contract to Pacific Mechanical
Corporation at this time in order to expedite the project mobilization so that the
summer construction season schedule can be maintained.
The Board will be requested to authorize additional sewer construction funds for
this project including construction administration, force account, and the John
Carollo Engineers' contract at the April 18, 1985, Board meeting. A portion of
this project is grant fundable. The amount of expected grant funding will be
included in the April 18 position paper.
This project is included in the Five-Year Capital Expenditure Plan.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RAS
RIfj
RAB
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
;f;l~
RECOMMENDATIONS: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to award a contract
to Pacific Mechanical Corporation for the construction of the Stage S8, lSf1(]D
Hydraulic Capacity Expansion and Sludge Thickening Facilities Project. This award
is subject to obtaining SWRCB. approval prior to execution of the contract.
Authorize $S,OOO,OOO in Sewer Construction Funds to construct the project.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
GEN. MGR./CHIEF ENG.
Centra~ ':ontra Costa Sani'~ ,ry District
8UMMARV OF BIDS
PROJECT NO. X3816 _ STAGE 5B, 15 MGD HYDRAULIC CAPACITYOATE February 7.1985
EXPANSION AND SLUDGE THICKENING FACILITI~
LOCATION CCCSD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ENGR. EST.~ 5,897,850
a:
W
BIDDER (Name, telephone & address)
BID PRICE
1 Pacific Mechanical Corp. ( 415) 827-4940 $
2501 Annalisa Drive, Concord 94520 5,000,000.00
2 C.W. Roen Construction ( 415) 837-5501 $
P.O. Box 4, Danville 94526 5,046,700.00
3 Kaweah Construction ( 916 ) 739-6830 $
P.O. Box 28057, Sacramento 95828 5,090,000.00
~
4 DYN Construction (415) 229-3400 $
261 Arthur Road, Martinez 94553 5,450,000.00
-
5 Monterey Mechanical ( 415 ) 632-3173 $
5,488,000.00
8275 San Leandro St., Oakland 94621
6 Homer J. Olsen, Inc. ( 415 ) 489-1661 $
35500 Olsen Way, Union City 94587 6,789,000.00
7 Dalzell Corporation ( 415 ) 835-0732 $
P.O. Box 8284, Emeryville 94662 6,999,000.00
( ) $
( ) $
~
( ) $
-
( ) $
( ) $
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. VI. SOLID WASTE
1 4 4 85
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
April 1, 1985
AUTHORIZE $23,523 IN SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUNDS FOR SOLID
WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE FUNDS
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
JAMES M. KELLY, PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER ENGINEERING DEPT./PLANNING DIVISION
ISSUE: Funds are requested to print a final version of Volume I of the Solid
Waste Management Project Report; for the East County Public Participation
Workshop; and to prepare a White Paper that presents CCCSD's recommendations to
the County on solid waste management.
BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1984, the Board directed staff to "...pursue, with
diligence, the potential of the District's operating or contracting a solid waste
landfill for the public benefit..." The Board authorized the staff to conduct
preliminary planning on April 11, 1984, and on June 28, 1984, the Board
authorized funding for Phase I of the District Landfill Project. A summary of
funds authori zed and expendi tures is presented on Attachment A. The Phase I
scope of work i ncl uded preparati on of a Soli d Waste Management Pl an and a
comprehensive public landfill site screening to identify potential sites
throughout the County. The Scope of Work has been compl eted, as well as the
preparati on and pri nti ng of an Executive Summary and Vol umes I and II of the
Solid Waste Management Project Report. In addition, two central public
participation workshops, a recycling workshop, and a thi rd workshop for East
County residents that was not in the Scope of Work were held. All of the
above-mentioned tasks were completed within the budget authorized by the Board,
except for the East County Workshop. The Board authorized, in concept,
expenditure of funds for the East County Workshop (General Manager-Chief
Engineer's Report), January 17, 1985, Board meeting.
District staff did not plan to produce a draft version of Volume I; however, due
to the amount of interest generated by the public in response to the project,
Vol ume I has been made a draft. The 1 ast day to submit comments on draft
Volume I report is April 30, 1985.
There is adequate budget to respond to written comments by indicating the portion
of the report that addresses the comment; however, staff recommends that the
Volume I report be revised and reissued, as it is apparent that the study report
will be the basis for solid waste planning in the County.
The work performed to date constitutes Phase I of the Sol id Waste Management
Project. Two fundamental findings of Phase I were that the solid waste problem
is County-wide and will require a County-wide agency to conduct Phase II and that
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
..::J /f/t K-
fff
JMK
RAB
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2
further public involvement is required to help insure that a landfill will be
sited in the County. It is requested that staff be authorized to prepare two
documents: a Phase II Scope of Work (with budget) to be forwarded to the County
and Solid Waste Commission and a White Paper on CCCSD's recommendations to the
County concerning the overall solid waste management problem. This effort would
be jointly conducted by staff and the District's lead consultant on this project,
Brown, Vence and Associates (BVA).
The authorization would fund the printing of a final Volume I report, the
additional costs associated with the East County workshop, and the preparation of
a White Paper to advise the County on how to use the findings of the Solid Waste
Management Report. The total estimated cost of this work is $23,523. A cost
breakdown is attached to the Position Paper.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the expenditure of $23,523 in sewer construction funds
to print Volume I of the Solid Waste Management Project Report in final form, for
additional costs associated with the East County workshop, and to prepare a White
Paper to adv i se the County on how to use the fi nd i ngs of the Sol i d Waste
Management Report.
ATTADlENT A
CENTRAl.. CONTRA roSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT LANDFILL PROJ ECT
PROJECT NO. 20015
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
CURRENT AUTHORIZATION
Previous authorizations
Amount authorized June 28, 1984
Total amount previously authorized
Amount Expended/encumbered
through February 1985
Remaining budget
(The $11,756 is adequate to
fund staff work and to respond
to comments received through
April 30, 1985, on Volume 1)
$ 41,904
190,000
$231,904
220,148
$ 11,756
REQUESTED AUTHORIZATION
Brown, Vence and Associates*
$10,000
Urban A1ternatives*
6,523
Make additions, corrections, and/or deletions
to Volume I. Print and mail 500 copies of
final report.
7,000
TOT AI..
$23 ,523
*To be accomplished by contract change order.
srre
--
(",
4L PEAK
/ 1.-1"\
/ / c.. A
'\:P
"- ~ / ~ / \
/ "-
/ "- / /c...... \
"- / / \l"\. A \!.l
"- 'N /
/ \.C / / ~ \
/ <S\ / \
I- / >---
fl / ......
/ / ~
/
o = AMENDEO
ASSESSMENT
NUMI3EP. .
APPORTIONMENT OF L.I.D. BO~DS
LID 54-3-3-3 THROUGH -
. . . ORINDA AREA
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NO. V 1. SOLID WASTE
2 4 4 85
POSITION PAPER
VIA: ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager-Chief Engineer
DATE
SUBJECT
March 29, 1985
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT A RESOLUTION TRANSMITTING THE SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PROJECT PUBLIC PARTICIPATION WORKSHOP
MAILING LISTS TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ADOPT RESOLUTION
SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Jo ce McMillan Secretar of the Distric Administrative
ISSUE: It is requested that the Board of Directors consider adoption of a
resolution transmitting the Solid Waste Management Project public participation
workshop mailing lists to the Board of Supervisors together with the recommen-
dation that the Board of Supervisors assume responsibility for the public
notification process with regard to landfill siting activities in Contra Costa
County.
BACKGROUND: At the East County public workshop held in Antioch on January 29,
1985, the issue of public notification was raised. At that time, staff indicated
that action would be taken to try and assure that in the future adequate public
notification would take place. Recognizing the role of the County relative to
solid waste planning and siting a landfill, it is appropriate at this time that
the public participation mailing lists be forwarded to the County for their use
in this endeavor.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution transmitting the Solid Waste
Management Project public participation mailing lists to the Board of Supervisors
with the recommendation that the public notification process continue.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RAB
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
.tJrL
JMK-
JK
fIJff>
RESOLUTION NO. 85-
RESOLU'I _ j TRANSMITTING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. )JECT
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION WORKSHOP MAILING LISTS
TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District has conducted
an extensive public notification process in conjunction with the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District/Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management
Study. and
WHEREAS, in response to numerous and repeated requests from East
County residents for notification of all future meetings, workshops and
~
hearings relative to the landfill siting process, the Study Team made a
commitment that notification would be made. and
WHEREAS, in addition to the East County citizens' requests, a
significant number of Contra Costa County residents and citizens organi-
zations have requested that notification be made of all subsequent workshops
and hearings. and
WHEREAS, it is imperative for the successful siting of any landfill
in Contra Costa County that public participation be encouraged.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District hereby transmits the attached Solid
Waste Management Project Public Participation East County Workshop Mailing
List and the General Workshop Mailing List to the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Contra Costa; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Contra Costa is requested and encouraged to assume responsibility for the
public notification of East County residents who have specifically requested
notification and it is recommended that all concerned residents and citizens
organizations be included in that notification process.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1985 by the Board of
Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District on the following
vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
President of the Board of Directors,
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
March 18, 1985
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
HONORABLE BOARD OFt RECTORS
JOYCE E. MC MILLAN.
OUTLINE OF THE ST/E 56 PROTEST
MARCH 21 BOARD MEETING
DETERMINATION HEARING AT THE
A protest determination hearing will be conducted by the Board on March
21, 1985, to resolve a protest against award of the Stage 5B construc-
tion contract to the apparent low bidder. This memo will address the
hearing process and format. Background information about the protest is
included in the position paper.
All bidders on the Stage 5B Project have been notified about the protest
determination hearing. Only the apparent low bidder (Pacific Mechanical
Corp.) and the apparent second low bidder (C.W. Roen Construction Co.)
are expected to attend and make presentations.
The suggested order of presentations for the hearing is:
1. Open hearing.
2. Staff presentation.
3. C.W. Roen Construction Co. presentation (protester).
4. Pacific Mechanical Corp. presentation.
5. Presentation by other bidders (if any).
6. Close hearing.
7. Discussions and questions by the Board Members.
8. Staff conclusions and recommendations.
9. Board action to resolve the protest.
The outline of the staff presentation is:
1. Introduction
a. Stage 5B bids
b. Basis of the protest
2. Protest procedures
a. Federal requirements
b. Protest resolution
3. Minority Business/Women's Business Participation Requirements
a. Participation goals
b. Two ways to comply with goals
c. Pacific Mechanical Corp. actions to comply with goals
After the close of the hearing, District staff will present final con-
clusions and recommendations based on information presented at the hearing.
SEM:CWS:tkf
___._....'.~.H______._____,~,.__.~,~__.~_.~...."'"..,,_ ~,.._.,__'_....~_.___.,.____'____~_.....__._~___.__.,-
I