The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA BACKUP 04-20-89 . Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary ._'istrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS I PAGE 1 OF 2 POSITION PAPER I BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR 4 SUBJECT DATE April 12, 1989 QUITQAIM SEWER EASEMENT, JOB NO. 4589, SUBDIVISION 6870, TYPE OF ACTION PLEASANT HILL AREA APPROVE QUITQAIM OF EASEMENT SUBMIHED BY 1 1 enn1S Ha Associate Engineer INITiAliNG DEPT.lDIV. ~ngineering Department/ Construction Division ISSUE: Steve J. Furtado, etux, owner-developers of Subdivision 6870, has requested the District to quitclaim a sewer easement which lies within Lots 3, 4, and 5 of Subdivision 6870. BACKGROUND: The subject easement was dedicated to this District when the subdivision map was filed. During the District's plan review process, the al ignment of the sewer was subsequently adjusted to more efficiently serve the subdivision. A new easement has been granted for the revised sewer alignment. The subject easement is no longer needed and may now be quitclaimed. The property owner has paid our quitclaim processing fee. This project has been evaluated by staff and determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEnA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use limitations. REOO~ENDATION: Approve Quitcl aim Deed to Steve J. Furtado, etux, Job 4589, authorize the Presi dent of the Di strict Board of Di rectors and the Secretary of the District to execute said Quitclaim Deed, and authorize the Quitclaim Deed to be recorded. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION J2fO ~~~S\I\ JSM M INITIATING DEPT./DIV. 1302A-9/85 D H RAB ~ 7)':j)'(J 'Z;;:" I ROGER J. DOLAN 2 REPLACEMENT EASEMENT ~ /-[5' PRIVATE s. r?J;.;__ ~ 143'. 00 n ._-- - C. .Il' 5'''1. \ -~ C) ~ <: ~ I' KELSEY CT. 37 \ ' j'iJ CJ r-- QUITCLAIM SEWER EASEMENT Job 4589 Sub 6870 Pleasant Hill Area . Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary -istrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 3 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF A ril 20, 1989 NO. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR 5 AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 89-11 (WALNUT CREEK) AND 89-12 mANVILLE) TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT DATE A ril 12, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION ACCEPT ANNEXATION FOR PROCESSING SUBJECT SUBMITTED BY Dennis Hall Associate En ineer INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Department/ Construction Division Parcel No. Area Owner, Address Parcel No. & Acrea e Remarks Lead A enc 89-11 Wal nut Creek (50C6) D. K. Shukl a 390 North Gate Road Walnut Creek CA 94598 135-090-005 (1.97 AC) CCCSD I 89-12 Danville ( 98CD Sidney Corrie, Jr. POBox 799 Alamo CA 94507 200-151-007 (2.69 AC) Tow n of Danvill e RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 89-11 and 89-12 to be included in a future formal annexation. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT.lDIV. 'B -\o'~ 1302A-9/85 0 H @--:5 \16\"6\'\I"'0'2:!!-l~ 6 ' ,4'" (,6 ~ tl 2~ __ '!> ,0 ~ ~ '& 9'" ~ "\ \..., 4 3d2~7~ ,. 6 ~ ;,-'C' --' ~~5J.~ 20%~');g ~/ -'Ii:' ~2: ~ g ~ 18, /;::~ \ ,0 /I, ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ..... /'1 ~ ..._~~ ' \ /,~O:: ~</~; &e ~i r~~12 }~'7 ",-0'" <'~ "'~ I I ,/ _ _ I ... '" ~9 "- " , / -- = .;::0-... ~ ~t~ r.-' 19 \ .!!-: ,~~~1:;.. ~31 j' _ ..... 5~ iI -' ~s 0 ~6 15'1'" O,€Ji;i:. ?" gO 57l .;.... u., \ I ~-- 10% toL....,IIIl/1f ~ \(~.....,,,, ~ ~ ~ '~J .~ c; ;:--.,%2 tt~6~~ _ ~ 4,. ~ ~ 21 _ ~~l~OL'91.J:1- -- fJ-'/~fh" 110 - ~~\4'8" ~'&1I1 ~ I-~ 2TI.. JZJ1... u ~5~ ~\8\6"1:='~ "",\..\..E'I \1\51" \ '~'u::'l .' -; ~ 51 ~ ~S 7 s~u ~~ ~ ?> 1 ~ t:Ja-/(P(p'5 \ '" ~ ~ 3...k: Y it \ ':~. ::"';, ~'\1~4 .l~~- ~~;t~.t~ ~ \~ % S ~ ~'~ e. .,,' ':"::" \ 9 \ lV"<, 46 '" 6 \ ~ - I ql 27 z!.~~qt;~..]) -...;;;~ \ ~~~ O~ I....Y ~~ 6". }\::. :;':"{" ;>. ; 4 I' '\ ;:.'. a "'I:P 10 ~'" (.; :N'Ie' . -- VI,g _ \3 \ \ 1-"5 \2", 5uICL\!J't,A '<?,f' L_ '15ii:"t9 '1; ~ . l "" ,,0 I ,Z ';.- . f -< jC,.... ~ :i. r ~ Illa.-:;. --L-n tq 2~~ ~S' I \ \9 t" ,,17 r-- 12 C> ~4 !: 2 Z 4 /\ I~' \ ....1----1 ..... _ \ ~ .., 15 s: ____\ \\ I l-i ~ ~ 2./ 20:' oJ 1,3 la~...9 5 '" ,\~3,\~LI FF~ ~ \4 V r"", r .' 0 "4 iY::.:"'[il;< I~ ~ l""iii ~~b ~ ~ :~,'~" ~ ~i:~:-:~".z..:~.:.%.:':..5....'a...;....~..'S.f .~. C") -;;;:; 57 1~53 i'--;......W ,I 'g _Z,t11~ ~ ~ \E\..\..~''- 5"'''' ~ .~; '~o~~~~ ~ ~ ':; ~~ '; ~': ..,,6' ,"'''BOL~DO RID" ",8._Z3 3 ~y s -<>. ~ 1.0: -~li\ I\:? ~ ~ 9710 .J.. .R\BOI'-~O ~j~ ltR\~' c;. ;>. \. -1 Q \'G'~""'-!,q 7 __ ]!I- /7'B \73\74 n ~ --......... \ 9\ ~\~~~~ j,<~.J: 42 .JI' '" 5'U ~ 44 '" ~ !l'~~'>-.... ~ Zl..:..l ~~~ IIJ. ~c'l~~,[1 /;; __ Io'" diN' P. ... 'q' ^ """"~ ......... ~ .0 :...'H ",\I 'II 40.Y,'~ CffT 1""1 ~ \ ~ '. .. c-<:\ !"~)... I ,,0 ~ 5' S U g '1' -- _ 5 /ff"' 37 \ '..~ It. ~~ / ;:>' 0 _ c' . I' "Ii; c, . -r-::::: H I L!. ~\ I~ ~ 10 ~2 33 ~ .~ I ' '1 . ~'" LA AL ';&.~ . ~ " ~ ~ .. .. ~R\..~hJ~1~Ji~0' ~~~\1-~~,/;~1'Zfz . ~ I~.- ,,; ~ ~~ ~~,.(' 374 23 sJz "b>l. I~~ ..... ~l ,-.//)0 537 AC ;4t 42 ~~ ~ 54\ 57 - ~~ ':..~ ~ r~~L ClU,H 1',... 814:1 Olt .... :S-'~\I1% Cll.u ~~ '1' -I' 7."'1 'i 10 .Jdl{S9 ,~11~~!.~\\v$'~\ ~!~~~""f - II - ~:t:. . 60" .., "~"511~ ~ \~'t-7 ill '.,..;.. STdNE~AVE 165/;........... ,,'7\:. t- ~'........ 250 AC -'4~:~ ~ '~9/ NORTH N...:......:. : ~ ~14 ~~<..""--+--.".'.''&.'''.'.'.'''' I -"1iIr~ !Bl ~ Z5 '~::~::::::::j::::: ::::.........::::... i . i --.$:... _ .. '/ ~ '. >' ........ ............. ~ ~ "~ . -~>:. :CIO ~O~lL!:- 6I'I1.it.. .,....2..tG. 'ej\ :' 4>. 113\ ~ " ~t ~".~~V~' ~1," _ '"- .. . ,::~_'; L . '1i0j0~~..' .....~ jU;2lIl ~!~ ...>~t~Lj ...... ~<> ...... ~o ~ '" "'VI u It ...- ti8 .' . I -c r--- ~ .!IiI f-:.-..I &- U It I---' " . 5' ~"'c: 37 """-- 81of'. r 1 17 ~ leE 0 71 r - . ~ l,_ 72 ....... .. 1,57 58 a . r lfl ...-4/ON 1;: \ CITY ~~ waLNUT CIIEEK SR""I AC -' - J I .. ~OHII CEREGHINO 45..0 26.47 AC ....... \.}: ::.:' "" ",: :", '\\@\\\@\\\ . t .~ j{{{}r:l\:: ~....... \ :~;!.. g "'" * ... . ~ .' :)lI;:r\}\:\ ~ .----<::... .......... . ....ib.1~ \c :II .11 ~~~~~~j~~~~ 8 813 II:. I I GATE ROAD liD I .......... ..::::::r:~:~:~:~{tf 3 10 IC. .,:.:.:.:.:.......:.: n \\ \\& 10.00. 84 AC lf1D) '. 'Yl~:.:""",,, \ 42 AC ,.... PROPOSED ANNEXATION \ 1 8.1885 5? 51 ~ . ~ _ -0. 42 41 u '" OIAel C UNIFIED " I 50i! 401- SCHOOL OIST. d(~Bht~t-4~<~ "'~ 3357 4C __ >..~:j:tii:::r:~..-r!lt~.. '1 ,,,.~'..uuc P.A. 89.11 I, , I I // ~ ,,25 ~5 " , : s 2 cf'~ ','te5 I ' ~~O+"'f&'I" .,~ ':' f'". Of""" ',<, ,(/ I, c 'b.:.:.~" 'J~ MONTAIR SCHOOL :~ !'--. ./ "'" .~ ': 150AC' ~' \50AC ~~ -<..~ , '~~ c~ ,/." ~. ,,~ ~",,:" · ,l:> ,~,>~ .,~V ~Itf' ){l} 0,9 ., ~, 00~~' - a/z~ ;;& 4& I c. '" Q"- / / / / / / " / . .r "- '" ~ S '> " 3 ~~"iJ~ 4 ~ Y" C (" S UT A" c,' 5 ~... ,,);> . 5 'l"-t y' 967 ./ 1.50AC 150AC I~AC 1 45,Q,(; 150AC I 88AC 313"( : M&""'\ ". : j...,:,: .'/ !~5 ._~, 1&7AC ~ .0 ~ / 162 AC 2 50 AC ".....{~ .,,' ~ ---:. 5 . t:.: .,' . :. '~i:"',.~'~'~'>::' :,:......::.l: ,. ~7i"~39 \40 \4, ,11 i1 .~ "< I-e. '0 '\<S'} '\-Y.' '~.p '..~ ~~!::'~" . .'!Ii~, '(~';; ;to - "'0' .. S~ . 9 .j . Q"~ "" '-"""'% 6>;> ','.,:'" , ". ""''.'..~ :'-.~9/.f, ~{~ 6>~...;~~'" " Il~ /'.t "'0 ;.:~~~ s S:: / ..~ '0000 '. "~.<. )~..;~: ',;;, ......'...,",.... '.. ~ /0/ h (1'. .....;>:.::~:<..... //" // ;<~ ~ i 'Zp',? ~".s. .:"~:...C ' 7 \ 70 <1h<"";' :~.,~:~,,;~ ri;;+N0LL s \Uh .~p . ( 1--- , > PROPOSED ANNEXATION P.A. 89.12 --~- 3f--~ ~_.L:::llL...- ' L ~.,,~ ~.~~. ,,- f' . ... ",: ~~,.~~.__li? " ::;,..o!!_~!o - ._~:!.'.!-_!-'-~ ~ f:': ~\\ Q: 54 47 59 ,0 ':9' 4& &0 . ~., '" nj)".!.:.... '" ""':':'"., :<:-',:::: 73 ~V U,. , ~.~ 78 ~l'!), 80 " .J SJB "<. '.c\~ ~ 8-Z/0Z. ASHLEY 4277 'I] \ ~ I ~;~/OZ ~ \UJJ.J _0 16 18 81 ~ 37 38/ / J___ 82 WIL.LOW ....... '-~ ~O 39!1Z " ARDE~ 91; I- 42 4i e9 90 f :.... / ~ DR ./ 167 &e 88 87 Il< ':d.~12U2~ '~~~J,~4~21~)- " . ~9 \~ 5 ._ . Centra. :ontra Costa Sanitar} .Jistrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 4 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETKpor~l 20, 1989 NO. v. SOLID WASTE 1 DATE April 12, 1989 SUBJECT NOTIFICATION BY ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY RIQ-lMOND SANITARY SERVICE AND EFFORTS TO LOCATE SUITABLE DISPOSAL SITES TYPE OF ACTION RECE IV E INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY Paul Morsen, Deputy General Manager INITIATING DEPT/DIV. Admi ni strative ISSUE: At the April 6, 1989 Board Meeti ng, Kenneth Littl e, attorney representi ng Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service, Inc. (Orinda-Moraga), notified the Board that a letter dated April 3, 1989 from Richmond Sanitary Service gave notice that no resi denti al refuse from the communiti es of Ori nda and Moraga woul d be accepted at the Richmond landfill effective April 11, 1989. As this matter was not on that meeti ng' s agenda, the Board di rected that it be pl aced on the agenda for the April 20, 1989 Board Meeting for consideration. BACKGROUND: A copy of the letter from Richmond Sanitary Service,which was provided by Mr. little, is presented as Attachment I. By that letter, Orinda-Moraga was notified that beginning April 11, 1989 no refuse would be accepted at the Richmond Sanitary Serv ice 1 andf ill unl ess Ori nda-Moraga certi fi ed that the refuse di d not include any residential refuse "collected from households under contract to a municipality or other governmental entity." Richmond Sanitary Service indicated that it took such action because of the threat of litigation over the legality of the surcharge which the City of Richmond had imposed on residential refuse from other cities in the County. Orinda-Moraga had been using the Richmond Sanitary Service landfill for residential refuse, and the Acme landfill for refuse from commercial and dropbox customers. George Navone, Vice President of Orinda-Moraga, is negotiating modifications to the 1 anguage of the certificati on requi red by Richmond Sanitary Serv ice to permit delivery of commercial and dropbox refuse. While such negotiations proceed, residential refuse has reverted to the Acme landfill, where, as of this writing, all refuse collected by Orinda-Moraga is being deposited. George Navone is actively engaged in negotiations with the owners of the East County landfill for the direct-haul of the major portion of the residential refuse for deposit in the GBF landfill. Orinda-Moraga intends to apprise the Board of the results of the negotiations with Richmond Sanitary Service and the GBF landfill at the April 20, 1989 Board Meeting. Based on the disposal site(s) obtained, an amendment to the rate application, which was submitted on March 31, 1989, is planned. RECOMMENDATION: Consider the information provided by Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service, Inc. regarding its efforts in locating suitable disposal sites and take any action the Board considers to be appropriate. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION /CHIEF ENG. ~ PM 04/03/89 13:39 . tt9441112 LITTLE & SAPUTO III 002 ATTACHMENT I -; .. .. RICHMOND SANITARY SERVICE 205 41ST STREET · RICHMOND. CALIFORNIA 94805 . 236-8000 April 3, 1989 Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service '1 Northwood Drivp., suite 4 Orinda, California 94563 Dear Sir: This letter. shall serve to notify you of the new policy to be implemented at the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill (WeCSL) effective April 11, 1989. Beginning at 12:01 a.m., on April 11, 1989, no waste will be accepted from your firm unless your firm has certified to Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS), the owner and operator of WCCSL, that the waste to be deposited at weest, does not include any residential solid wastes collected from households under contract to a municipality or other 90vernmental entity (hereinafter referred to as "precluded waste"). We are forced to establish this limitation upon wastes to be accepted at the WCCSL as a result ot the threat of l~tigation over. the legality 0' a surcharge which the city of Richmond has insisted that RSS pay in connection with receipt of the above defined preclUded waste. The purpose of the surcharge imposed by Richmond was to compensate the r..idents ot West Contra Coste County for the early closure of the WCCSL as a result ot the closure of other Contra Costa County facilities. The action here taken by RSS will, to a degree, facilitate the underlying policy of Richmond. The enclosed Cer.tJ.fication and Indemnification Agreement .. will confirm to RSS that you are not bringing precluded waste to WCCSL and will further provide that if you do bring such precluded waste to WCCSL, you will indemnify RSS and hold RSS harmless from any liability to the city of Richmond or any other person or entity which contends that it is damaged or otherwise objects to the imposition of the surcharge upon precluded waste by RSS and/or the city of Richmond. RSS will monitor waste recelvecl at WCCSL but will not and does not .ssume responsibi li.ty for checking your trucks to determine whether or not precluded waste is beinq disposed of at WCCSL. Our attorneys have advi.ed us that there could be liability of up to $56.00 tor .seh ton of precluded waste deposited at WCCSL, or Dore. . A. 04/03/89 13:39 t:f9441112 LITTLE & SAPUTO III 003 , . . .. Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service Page 2 March 31, 1989 RSS must insist that it receive an original, signed Certification and Indemnification Agreement from you prior to allowing any waste to be deposited by you after 12:01 a.m., on April 11, 1989. Please execute and return the enclosed Certification and Indemnification Aqreement to RSS.at once. Our employ... will be . instructed to turn away your trucks if we have not reeeived the signed Agreement. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, \ , l\r t., r ,;' I RICHMOND SANITARY SERVICE BY DENNIS VARNI, Partner DV/dj Enclosure 04/03/89 13:40 { '. . . . t:r944 1 112 LITTLE & SAPUTO III 004 CERTIFICATION AND lNDBKNIFICATION AGREEKBNT Orinda-Moraqa Disposal Service (hereinafter "Hauler") hereby certifies to and agrees with Richmond Sanitary Service, a general partnership (hereinafter "RSS"), as tollows. 8Bjd c:~rllficat.ion and agreement arc made by Hauler in exchange tor RSS' acceptance of certain materials for deposit at the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill (hereinafter "WCCSL"). 1. Effective at 12:01 A.M. on April 11, 19R9, Hauler shall not deposit or cause to be deposited at WCCSL any residential solid wastes collected, directly or indirectly, from households under contract to a muniCipality or other governmental entity (hereinafter "precluded waste."). Hauler hereby c~rtifies that each and every load of solid wastes of.fered for deposit at the WCCSL after 12:01 A.M. April 11, 1989 ahall contain no such precluded wastes. 2. Hauler heraby aqrees to indemnify, defend and hold RSS, its owner., partners, employees, heirs, assigns, co-venturers, SUbsidiary entities and agents har11tless Crom any and aJ.l liability, injury, damage, expense or loss caused by, stemming from or relating to the deposit by Hauler at WeCSL of precluded wastes after 12:01 A.M. on April 11, 1989. Hauler not only indemnifies RSS and the other above-named persons against loss, but shall also pay the attorney's fees, court costs and other. expenses incurred by RSS in connection with any litigation, claim or dispute relating to, stGmminq trom or cau5~d by the Hauler's deposit or alleged deposit at such precluded wastes after 12:01 A.M. on April 11, 1989. 3. This Agreement is the only agreement between the partielS her.eto pertaining to the deposit of precluded wastes at WCCSL. This Agreement can be modified only by a writinq signed by both RSS and Hauler. 4. Hauler expresGly acknowledges that this Agreement 15 made with reference to the possible liability or RSS to third parties for up to $56.00 or-mora per ton of preclu~ed waste .s . result of alleged violations of California and federal antitrust laws and otherwise. This A9reement relates solely to precluded vastes and does not a(teet the rights and duties of the parties hereto except with regard to the deposit or alleged dapoait ot precluded wastes at WeeSL. 5. Hauler expr~ssly understands and agrees that, errective after 12:01 A.M. en April 11, 1989, each time Hauler offers solid wastes for deposit at WecsL that Hauler is reaffirming this Agreement and the Certification made herein as to the absence of precluded wastes from the oCrered solid wastes. Nothing in this Agreement requires or shall require RSS to accept any wa.tes from Hauler.. Dated: .. . ....--- ORINOA-MOAAGA DISPOSAl" SI~RV.tCE, Hauler By -. " Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) .Jistrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 3 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. V. SOLID WASTE 2 SUBJECT DATE Apri 1 13, 1989 ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSAL UNDER THE CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACT TYPE OF ACTION ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUESTI NG GRANT FUNDS SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT.lDIV H. Heibel, Public Information Coordinato Administrative ISSUE: A formal action of the Board of Directors is required supporting the submission of a proposal to the California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, for grant funds under the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act. BACKGROUND: District staff recently became aware that grant funds are available through the California Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, for implementation of litter abatement and recycling activities. Applicants are encouraged to submit projects which include expansion or establishment of curb- side recycling programs, expansion or establishment of recycling programs in bars and restaurants, and establishment of recycling programs in the work place. It would be appropriate to apply for grant funds now, as the District moves forward with the development and implementation of recycling programs in each of its fran- chise areas. A unique proposal will be submitted combining each of the individual recycling programs in the seven communities franchised by the District. If secured, the grant funds would offset some of the initial start-up costs of the recycling programs and would fund public education efforts, thereby reducing the cost to the ratepayers. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution approving the submission of a pro- posal under the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act. If REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIA TING DEPT/DIV. fJif 1302A-9/85 HH PM RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSAL UNDER THE CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACT WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act which provides funds to certain entities for litter abatement and recycling activities; and WHEREAS, the Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program, setting up necessary procedures governing the submission of proposals by various organizations and local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the Division of Recycling require the proposer to certify by resolution local approval of the proposal prior to submission of said proposal to the state; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District: 1. Approves the submission of a proposal for funding under the Division of Recycling's Litter Abatement and Recycling Activities Contracts Program; and 2. Fully supports all projects within said proposal; and 3. Certifies that the proposed projects do not replace previous District budgeted projects; and 4. Certifies that proposed projects are compatible with the County Solid Waste Management Plan (CoSWMP); and 5. Authorizes the Deputy General Manager as agent of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including but not limited to proposals, contract agreements, amendments and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned program. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1989, by the District Board of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote: AYES: Members: NOES: Members: ABSENT: Members: President of the Board of Directors Central Contra Costa Sanitary District County of Contra Costa, State of California COUNTERSIGNED: Secretary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, County of Con'.ra Costa, State of California Approved as to Form: James L. Hazard, District Counsel . Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitary _Astrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE OF 3 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. VI. ENGINEERING 1 AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF THE MARTINEZ SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, (SUBBASIN 5-LOWER), DP 4611 DATE April 17, 1989 TYPE O~ ACTION SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT SUBMtfJifftn W. Swanson Principal Engineer INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Engineering Department Engineering Division ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a consulting engineering agreement in an amount greater than $50,000. BACKGROUND: The District annexed the City of Martinez collection system in 1968. The Martinez system is old and in need of renovation and expansion. Sewage overf lows occur during winter every 4 or 5 years when combined sewage f low and infiltration/inflow (1/1) exceed capacity of the system. Furthermore, dry weather overf~ows occur and wet weather overflows are aggravated due to root intrusion and damaged pipes. In 1987, a planning effort was initiated to determine the nature and extent of the facilities necessary. to upgrade the Martinez sewer system. The facilities planning study has recommended that one area of the Martinez system be rehabi 1 i tated to correct numerous structural problems, reduce maintenance, and determine the effectiveness of the rehabilitation techniques. The area for the proposed rehabilitation is near Martinez Junior High School (see attached map). The area is generally bounded by Brown, Ward, and Castro streets and Alhambra Creek. The proposed rehabilitation area contains approximately 7,500 feet of 6 and 8-inch main sewers, 30 manholes or rodding inlets, and 120 lateral connections. The sewers were all installed prior to 1956 and have a structural problem, on average, every 3 feet. The proposed rehabilitation will include replacement of deteriorated sewers, sliplining of leaking, but structurally sound sewers, rehabilitation of access structures, and replacement of the lower lateral sewers. The estimated construction cost of the proposed sewer rehabilitation and replacement is $875,000. In 1987 James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers (JMM) was selected to prepare the Martinez Sewer Improvement Facility Plan through a formal proposal and interview process. Based on their performance in preparing the Facilities Plan and their familiarity with the project, JMM was selected for preliminary and final design of the recommended sewer improvements. A cost reimbursement agreement has been negotiated with JMM with a cost ceiling of $93,364. This project has been evaluated by staff and determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.3, since it involves replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Cle~~VIEWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDACTlON 1302A-9/85 ~""'CWS DRW RAB f).eaJ v/tlU ?lib INITIATING DEPT./DIV. SUBJECT AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF THE MARTINEZ SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT (SUBBASIN S-LOWER), DP 4611 POSITION PAPER PAGE 2 OF 3 DATE Apri 1 17, 1989 The proposed sewer rehabilitation project was included in the 1988-1989 Capital Improvement Budget as part of the Martinez Sewer Improvement Facilities Plan (p. CS-64) . RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a cost reimbursement agreement with a cost ceiling of $93,364 with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers for the Martinez Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Subbasin S-Lower), DP 4611. 13026-9/85 .1/::::::::::::::::;:;:::;:::::::.:.:.:.:............ 6 N SHELL OIL COSTA HOSPITAL r-T--- Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Al MARTINEZ SEWER REHABiliTATION PROJECT Fig. 1 2523-9/88 . Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary .Jistrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE OF 4 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. VI. ENGINEERING 2 SUBJECT APPROVE AN ALLOCATION OF $82,805 FROM THE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR DESIGN AND EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR THE ARLENE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DATE Apri 1 17, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION APPROVE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS SUBMITTED BY Tad J. Pilecki Associate En ineer INITIATING DEPT.lDIV. Engineering Department Engineering Division ISSUE: Board authorization is required to allocate Program Contingency Funds for new projects in excess of $25,000. BACKGROUNDS: The Planning Division has completed a local capacity study for the Arlene Drive sewer main where full pipe flows were reported during the 1982 and 1986 storm events. The study determined that the capacity of the existing mains were exceeded by as much as 170 percent at current conditions and a five year storm. Collection Systems Operations has visually confirmed the planning results. Maintenance records indicate that the sewer experiences grease build-up and does not meet the District's minimum slope requirements. The Planning Division has designated the Arlene Drive Sewer Improvements a very high priority project. The project will consist of replacing approximately 3,200 feet of existing 6 and 8-inch sewer mains in Arlene Drive between Newell Avenue and Orchard Lane with new 8, 10, and 12-inch mains. In addition, an existing main which crosses under the 1-680 Freeway between Circle Drive and California Boulevard will be eliminated. Detailed plans and specifications for the project will be prepared by Larry Walker and Associates (LWA) of Davis, California. A cost reimbursement contract with a cost ceiling of $39,505 has been negotiated with LWA. LWA was selected because of its design experience, the size of the project and past performance on other District projects. Attachment 2 provides a detailed breakdown of the design budget. level total project cost is estimated to be $557,805. Design is completion in October of 1989. Construction is expected to start 1989 and last approximately 5 months. The predesign scheduled for in December of The Arlene Drive Sewer Improvements Project is included in the 1989 Capital Improvement Plan but not in the 1988-89 Capital Improvement Budget. The project schedule was accelerated in order to combine construction with several other projects in this area of Walnut Creek, thus reducing overall disruption to the public. Funds will be allocated from the Collection System Program Contingency Account. The project is being included in the 1989-90 Capital Improvement Budget. This project has been evaluated by staff and determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Statute 21080.21 since it involves a pipeline of less than one mile in length which will be located in a REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION 1302A-9/85 DRW RAB INITIATING DEPT.lDIV. SUBJECT APPROVE AN ALLOCATION OF $82,805 FROM THE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR DESIGN AND EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR THE ARLENE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS POSITION PAPER PAGE 2 OF 4 DATE April 17, 1989 public right of way. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: Approve an allocation of $82,805 from the Collection System Program Contingency Account for design and easement acquisition for the Arlene Drive Sewer Improvements Project, DP 4539. 13028-9/85 ~ ~~ 't. - . ~ Q:lsrA ~ - --.-. ~'" -,- ., VICINITY MAP Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ~ N.T.S LOCATION MAP N. T .S, ARLENE DRIVE SEWER ATTACH. IMPROVEMENTS 1 2523-9/88 ATTACHMENT 2 ARLENE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENT DESIGN BUDGET Larry Walker & Associates (Design) $39,505 DCM/Joyal Geotechnical Consultants (Soils) 5,500 American Aerial (Aerial) 4,000 Ground Survey (District Forces) 10,300 TV Inspection 5,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 20,000 District Forces (Design)(l) 23,500 Subtotal 107,805 Initial GM-CE Authorization (25,000) Budget Allocation Request S82.805 (1) District forces will direct the consultant's work, obtain and coordinate utility information, provide potholing, prepare front end specifications, provide technical review, acquire right of way, and conduct an initial alignment analysis. . Central ...;ontra Costa Sanitary _ttetrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE OF 2 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. VI. ENGINEERING 3 SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR THE DESIGN OF THE HALL DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, DP 4331 DATE April 17, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY Kyle L. Tonjes ssistant En ineer Department Division ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an agreement and/or amendment to a consulting engineering agreement when it is greater than $50,000. BACKGROUND: The Hall Drive sewer was installed in 1952 along a natural creekbank. Subsequent to its installation adjacent lots were developed resulting in decks, pools, and exotic landscaping being placed over the pipeline. The Collection Systems Operations Department has identified that the Hall Drive sewer between Donard Drive and Moraga Way is in extremely poor condition due. to structural failures and extensive root intrusion. Severe access restrictions caused by the residential improvements has compounded the problems making maintenance of the pipeline difficult and costly. In 1986, the sewer experienced an overflow to the creek resulting in a resident's complaint to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Future overflows could be subject to regulatory action since this creek is tributary to Upper San Leandro Reservoir, an EBMUD drinking water source. (Staff will provide a presentation on the project background and potential solutions to the problem.) A facilities plan has been developed which identifies various alternatives for providing service to the Hall Drive area. The recommended project shown in Figure 1 includes two phases. Phase I will divert flow from approximately 100 homes upstream of the Hall Drive sewer into a new bypass trunk sewer constructed within the Hall Drive right-of-way. Phase II will involve construction of new sewer mains to provide service to the 23 homes along the creek which cannot be served individually by the bypass sewer due to their physical location. Construction of the Phase 1 improvements is scheduled for October 1989 with Phase 2 construction following in April 1990. The Hall Drive Sewer Improvements Project is described in detail starting on Page CS-5l of the 1988-89 Capital Improvement Budget. In July 1988, the Board authorized an agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. to design Phase I and complete the facilities plan for Phase II. An amendment to this agreement has been negotiated to design the Phase II improvements at a cost of $72,000. Construction costs for both phases is estimated at $1,177,000. Total project cost is estimated at $1,650,000. This project has been evaluated by staff and determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.2, since it involves minor alterations of existing public facilities with REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION DRW INITIATING DEPT.lDIV. @ f.. teLl 1302A-9/85 KL T .,{)~ SUBJECT AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR THE DESIGN OF THE HALL DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, DP 4331 POSITION PAPER PAGE 2 OF 2 DATE April 17, 1989 negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a cost reimbursement amendment to the agreement with a cost ceiling of $72,000 with CH2M Hill to design Phase II of the Hall Drive Sewer Improvements Project. 13028-9/85 . Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary .."istrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE OF 3 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. VI. ENGINEERING 4 SUBJECT DATE April 17, 1989 AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS TO COMPLETE A PREDESIGN OF NEW HEADWORKS FACILITIES TYPE OF ACTION AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY Douglas J. Craig 'ate En ineer Department Division ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute professional service agreements greater than $50,000. BACKGROUND: The District recently completed a Headworks Facilities Plan which evaluated present and future headworks needs. The Facilities Plan considered several alternatives including rehabiiitating the existing facility, constructing all new facilities, and various combinations of rehabilitation and new facilities. The recommended alternative is to construct a new 260 mgd headworks facility and aband'on the existing headworks. This alternative is the most cost-effective and provides a high level of reliability. The use of the existing headworks was constrained by inadequate depth and high rehabilitation costs. The Headworks Facilities Plan required extensive coordination with the Contra Costa Boulevard/"A" Line Project and the Treatment Plant Master Plan. This coordination was necessary to assure that the recommended alternative was compatible with both short-term and long-term treatment plant needs. A new headworks facility will satisfy these needs by providing 260 mgd of near-term peak wet weather capacity with an additional 140 mgd capacity required in approximately 15 years. The next step is to conduct a predesign on the new headworks facility. The predesign will address layout and configuration of new facilities, equipment selection, electrical and instrumentation needs, pipeline routing, odor control, and other ancillary requirements. Staff recommends that James M. Montgomery (JMM) Engineers of Walnut Creek provide predesign services. This recommendation is based on their assistance in developing the Headworks Facilities Plan and their experience in designing similar facilities. The type of contract for this work will be cost reimbursement with a ceiling of $347,000. A breakdown of the predesign cost of $527,000 is shown in Attachment I. This project is included in the 1988-89 Capital Improvement Budget under the title "Preliminary/Primary Treatment Facilities Expansion" beginning on page TP-6. A preliminary total project cost is estimated to be $27,000,000. During the predesign phase, the District will conduct an environmental evaluation of the project. Depending on the design, this project may require a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report to meet the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The appropriate CEQA documentation will be prepared by the District or an outside consultant at that time. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. 1) I. .~ te1tJ RAB 1302A-9/B5 DJC DRW SUBJECT AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS TO COMPLETE A PREDESIGN OF NEW HEADWORKS FACILITIES POSITION PAPER PAGE 2 OF 3 DATE April 17, 1989 RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a cost reimbursement agreement with a ceiling of $347,000 with James M. Mon~gomery Engineers for the predesign of new headworks facilities. 13028-9/85 ATfACHMENT I PREDESIGN COST BREAKDOWN HEADWORKS FACILITY EXPANSION DP 20069 Item District Force Account Design Division Planning Division Construction Division Plant Operations Engineering Support Survey Exploratory Digging JMM Engineers Geotechnical Consultant Value Engineering CEQA Coordination Contingency $65,000 6,000 4,000 12,000 5,000 $92,000 TOTAL Cost $ 92,000 6,000 10,000 347,000 12,000 25,000 10,000 25,000 $527.000 . Centr" Contra Costa Sanitar.. District BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 2 NO. II. TREATMENT PLANT 1 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF SUBJECT DATE JlUTHORIZE THE GENERJll MANPGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AN PGREEMENT WITH INCINERATOR R CORPORATION FOR PERFORMANCE OF THE CRITICAC PROJECTS - INCINERATOR OPTIMIZATION PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 20086 A ril 14, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION JlUTHORIZE PGREEMENT SUBMITTED BY William E. Brennan Plant 0 erations Division Mana er INITIATING DEPT.lDIV. Plant 0 erations De artment ISSUE: The Board of Directors' authorization is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a consulting engineering agreement when the cost is greater than $50,000. B/CKGROOND: The need to perform a furnace optimizati on has been identified and described in the project entitled "Critical Projects - Treatment Plant" beginning on page TP-79 in the 1988 - 1989 Capital Impr<Nement Budget. Approximatel y $100,000 was budgeted to perform this project, which consists of several small projects transferred from the Treatment Plant Master Plan projects, for early completion. The major objectives of this project are to develop an operating mode that minimizes the "yellC7tl plume" (visible at the furnace stack), develop substantial savings in fuel consumption, and minimize or el iminate the high temperature conditions under w h i ch cl i nke rs may be formed. A report will be pr<N i ded at the end of the proj ect to document the changes, pr<Nide recommendations for modifications to existing equipment so as to impr<Ne performance, revise the estimated furnace capacity for future planning purposes, and describe the impact of the new operating mode on stack emissi ons. Inci nerator R has been sel ected to perform the furnace optimizati on based on its speci al ized e~erti see It is composed of furnace speci al i sts prey i ousl y associ ated with the Indianapol is Center for Advanced Research <ICFAR), a leading firm in the field of advanced research in sludge incineration. As part of the Solids Handling Facil ities Pl an, Incinerator R performed a desk-top study of the furnace capacity as a subcontractor to JMM/CDM.x The Incinerator Optimization Project is a follC7tl-up to this work. Inci nerator R has pr<N ided many references for simil ar optimizati on programs. Those referencesx contacted have been enthusi astic about the serv ice pr<N ided. A fixed lump-sum payment contract agreement with a cost ceiling of $55,475 has been negotiated with Incinerator R. A unique feature of this contract is that Incinerator R guarantees to pr'&ide a 35 percent reduction of fuel consumption in the furnace. ~is amounts to a potential savings of $120,000 per year in an <Nerall gas budget of $1,300,000 for fiscal year 1989 - 1990. If the reduction in fuel consumption is less than that specified, the fee will be proportionately reduced. For example, if the reduction were 20 percent instead of the guaranteed 35 percent, the cost ceiling of $55,475 would be reduced by the ratio of 20/35 to $31,700. INITI~~/DIV. EVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION 1302A.9/85 WEB SUBJECT JlUTHORIZE THE GENERPL MANPGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE AN PGREEMENT WITH INCINERATOR R CORPORATION FOR PERFORMANCE OF THE CRITIC~ PROJ ECTS - INCINERATOR OPTIMIZATION PROJ ECT, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 20086 POSITION PAPER PAGE DATE 2 OF 2 April 14, 1989 This project has been eval uated by staff and determined to be categorically exempt fran the Cal ifornia Environmental Qual ity Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidel ines, Section 17.3, since it involves only a feasibility study for possible future actions. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a consulting engineering agreement with Incinerator R Corporation for the Critical Projects - Incinerator Optimization Project, Disfrict Project No. 20086, for $55,475. --------- 13028-9/85 . Centra. Contra Costa Sanitar} Jistrict BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 4 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. VII I. PERSONNEL 1 SUBJECT APPROVE PERSONNEL BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAl. YEAR 1989-90 DATE April 11, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION APPROV E BUDGET SUBMITTED BY Cathryn Fre1tas. Personnel Off1cer INITIATING DEPT./DIV. Adm 1 n1 strative/Personnel ISSUE: Staff has analyzed its personnel needs for Fi scal Year 1989-90 and is submitting its requests for Board consideration and approval at the April 20th Board meeting. BACKGROUND: Each department has reviewed its staffing requirements for Fiscal Year 1989-90. The Personnel Budget includes memoranda from each department (Attachments I, II, III, IV, V & VI) with detailed explanations on the effect of these recommended staffing changes. The attached summary sheet (Attachment I) highl ights each department's staffing requests and summarizes their effect on the number of total authorized positions in the District. As shown in the summary, the total number of authorized positions in the District would increase by four over last year; the number of newly requested new positions (ten) is partially offset by positions recommended for deletion (six). In addition to the increased number of positions, the salaries and wages in the 1989-90 0 & M Departmental Budgets will increase from the previous year due to the following: o Cost-of-living salary adjustments resulting from the negotiated Memoranda of Understanding. o Merit and longevity increases scheduled in 1989-1990; o Filling authorized positions which were vacant in 1988-1989; and o Positions authorized in 1988-1989 which were budgeted for a partial year because of the time required to fill positions. The Personnel Committee met on Tuesday, March 21, 1989, to review the proposed budget. The following authorizations and modifications to the District staffing charts were di scussed at that meeti ng. Copi es of the Personnel Budget were distributed at the meeting of April 6, 1989, at which time a brief overview was presented by the staff. Admin1strat1ve Department 1. Add one Accounti ng Technici an III, G-56, $2255-$2728. Ap r 11 21, 1989. Recruitment effective REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION INITIATING DEPT./DIV. r!M- 1302A-9/85 CRF PM SUBJECT APPROVE PERSONNa BUOOET RBWESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 POSITION PAPER PAGE DATE 2 Of 4-t Apri 1 11, 1989 2. Add one Account1 ng Supervisor, S-73, S3384-S4096. Recruitment effective Aprl1 21, 1989. Delete one Accounting Supervisor, 5-71, S3223-S3901. 3. Add one Senior Accountant/Internal Auditor, 5-71, S3223-S3901. 4. Rec1 ass1fy steve E1 sberry, Account1 ng Supervisor, 5-71, S3223-$3901, to Senior Accountant/Internal Auditor, 5-71, S3223-S3901. 5. Add one Graphics Technician III, G-64, $2718-$3290. Technician III, G-64, $2718-$3290. Del ete one Engi need ng 6. Reclassify Ken Grubbs, Engineering Technician III, G-64, $2718-$3290 to Graphics Technician III, G-64, $2718-$3290. (, 7. Adopt revised class description for Graphics Technician 1/11, G-52, $2044-$2470 and G60, $2470-$2989. Collection System Operations Depart.errt 8. Delete one Vehicle & Equipment Service Worker, G-45, S1736 - $2093. 9. Add one Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic, G-62, $2593 - $3136. 10. Add three positions of Maintenance Crew Leader, 6-65, $2780-$3369, on a temporary basis for the period June 15, 1989 to October 15, 1989. Current empl~ees will be provisionally appointed to these positions. 11. Add one Construction Equipment.Operator, G-62, $2593 - $3136, effective April 21, 1989 for the duration of the drought-related water use restrictions in the EBKJO serv ice area. - Pl arrt Operat1ons Depar1:lRerrt 12. Delete one Laboratory Technician, G-59, $2413 - $2918. 13. Add one Junior Engineer, G-67, $2918 - S3532. 14. Add one Laboratory Superintendent, 5-80, $3999-$4845. Delete one Laboratory Superintendent, 5-77, S3720-$4506. 15. Add one Senior Chemist, 5-73, S3384-S4096. Delete one Senior Chemist, 5-71, $3223-$3901. 16. Add one Chemist IIH, G-62, S2593 - S313f. and G-67, S2918. S3532. Delete the previous salary of Chemist II, G-65, $2780-$3369. 13028-8115 SUBJECT APPROVE PERSONNEL BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAl YEAR 1988-89 POSITION PAPER PAGE DATE 3 OF 4 April 11, 1989 Engfneerfng Oepartmen~ 17. Delete one Wastewater Control Technician, G-60, $2470 - $2989. 18. Add two Source Control Inspectors, G-60, $2470-$2989. 19. Recl assify Lesl ie Kaduk, Wastewater Control Technici an, G-60, $2470-$2989, to Source Control Inspector, G-60, $2470-$2989. Co-OP Program 20. Authorize the hiring of students to fill ~ positions in the Co-op Program. RECOMoENDATION: Approve the Personnel Budget for Fiscal Year 1989 - 1990 herein identified by items one through twenty. 13028-9/85 C LU V) ...... >- LU 0::: ~ z: "" ~ ~ t- t- e: i I " I '-"i ." .at NC iE ~~ < ! ~ ... i .... ~ a N ... .... ,... ... ... I . ~ . . ... .... 0- ~ ... ... i .... ... .... ... 0- ... ; ~ .... 0 ~ 0 ... .... ... . I 0 0 .... 00 0 ... 10 ... S ... 8 8 tR 00 00 .oN ... S 00 ~ N 0- ~ N 8 8 ::l .... ~m 8 0 m 410 ~ ~ N N ~ ... ~ .... 410 0- 0- .... .... ~ .... .... .... ........ .... ... ... .... N N .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. . . ~ . tL tL . . . ItL . ~ ~ d. tL ~ ~ I .... fi! fi! 00 tR tR tR... fi! is 410 ... ... .... 410 g: S c; c; .... ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~g: .... .... 0 ~ .... .... ... .... .... .... .... N N N ... .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ex: - - - - - .. .; .; .. N N ~..: - - .. 0 0 .0 .... .... ... .... ... .... ,... 2 ,... .... .. :;; :;; .0 .0 ... .0 .0 .0.0 :;; ,... :;; ~ .0 'f J, c!, c!, J, c!, c!, c!,c!, ~ I J, en en Cl ... ~ c ... .... .... .: ... . i: I- .... I- ~ I. ....0 I. I- ~ .... . ..... .. . '0 . ::0 C ..... ~ ::0 . ::0 ! C .... en .'" r:r .... .. CI) I- 0 "::0 .., .... I a .. - at 0 c< .... .... r.- c. 0 .. C C ::0 oj! ... 6 C 8~ - ~ ~ 8. . U ~ .., i ~ ... .. 8t; C C ~f .....c .. l- . I- ::0 ::0 ~ U" .. 0 I- 0 8 8 . 0. .. 0&: I .. .8 ..... 1-1. ... . o&:U C C ::0. ~ ~ I-C l- .. 0&: . . ::0 oc en ... Cl >-::E 0 en -I ~ CI) ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... N -- .... C ... . ... .. u c C '0 .: . . 'C i: ..&: l- I- I. ~ ! I. .. ..... I- .. C :J .... ::0. . ::0 8 g en r:r~ .. en 0 ..,... I Ct C 0 r.- r.- ...c 0 - C - ... 6 .. .. ~ ... ~ 0 .. .. - . .. .. ..u i C . .....u .. ~ . I'C ::0 C U.. l- I- B ..... ~~ .8 .. .8 1:ii 01 C C .. . . . .. .., >- en -I CI) -I ..... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... .- I 0 1: C ..... l;'i: .I.. ... . i~ ..> d ! c.. .. .... ..; C ..... ...Q ! ~~ . Ct ci~ d ..... C <.. Go .., -- ." .at NC -- ...~ O~ is t Ii 1: .. ! l:' .. i .- .. g - .. - ." ." < " ! a ...... tl ...... rJ4D .. C U4D "410 .. .. CD 0&:0\ C4D 0&:0\ 0. ... 4lCD 0.... .. . ..0- .. t ...." C... ...." 01" .. I Ol- E ..." E "'c ::E" "'c E ~.. ~ 00-- 0 OC 0 c'i C c'i OC 0... Oc ..C .. ... ..c "0 ...... ~~ ... .. ... ."... . ." ........ -:1. ...... .ax. ..0 .. .0 .. .Cll i~ i~ i~ ..... C ..... ... .....c ~.. ....0 ....- ; .... ~8 ..... a:: 0. a:: 0. i . . . . .' . .... o ~ 8 0\ .... ... . I 00 0\ lQ8 ... ~... 410. 0... ...... i! 0-. ... a:: 0000. .... 0 Cll cc .. ..... ~~ ... ... ... .... CI) en ." ." .. NN .......... ...... 00 ~..&: 1;1; << ~~ 00 ....t- . CentrA.. Contra Costa Sanitar) District BOARD OF DIRECTORS PAGE 1 OF 11 POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF April 20, 1989 NO. XI. BUDGET AND FINANCE 1 SUBJECT RECEIVE THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MID-YEAR STATUS REPORT DATE April 12, 1989 TYPE OF ACTION RECEIVE REPORT SUBMIITE;D BY.M i J onn ercur 0 Administrative Analyst INITIAUNG OEPT./DI)f. D t t/ cnglneerlng epar men Planning Division ISSUE: The Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) system established by the Board of Directors in 1987 provides for a mid-year report to the Board of Directors on the status of the District's Capital Improvement Program. BACKGROUND: A summary of Capital Improvement Program revenue and expenditures for the first six months of the fiscal year and current year-end projections is presented below. Six Months Ended December 31, 1988 Actual Fiscal Year Endi nQ June 30, 1989 Capital Mid- Variance Improvement Year Over Pl an Proj ect i on ( Under) $19,153,000 $20,152,000 5% 24,292,000 20,216,000 ( 17%) Revenues Expenditures $10,607,303 8,432,873 Revenues over (under) Ex enditures $ 2,174,430 ($ 5,13 9,000) ($ 64,000) 99% Attachment 1 provides a detailed analysis of the mid-year status of the District's Capital Improvement Program. Highlights are summarized below. Capital Improvement Revenues: District revenues received for fiscal year 1988/89 from all sources credited to the Sewer Construction Fund for the six months ended December 31, 1988, total $10,607,303. Thi s represents 55 percent of the $19,153,000 revenue for the entire year estimated in the Capital Improvement Plan. Table 1 of Attachment 1 presents the six-month status and the current year-end projection for the capital revenue accounts. It is projected that total capital improvement revenue by the end of the fiscal year will be 5 percent greater than the 1988 Capital Improvement Plan estimate. REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION 1302A.9/85 SUBJECT POSITION PAPER RECEIVE THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MID-YEAR STATUS REPORT PAGE DATE 2 OF 11 April 12. 1989 Expenditures for Capital Improvement Projects: Di stri ct expenditures for capital improvement projects for the fi rst six months of the fiscal year total $8,432,873, which represents 35 percent of the $24,292,000 estimated for expenditure this fiscal year in the 1988 Capital Improvement Plan. It is projected that total capital improvement expenditures by the end of the fi scal year will be approximatel y 17 percent 1 ess than the amount estimated in the 1988 Capital Improvement Plan. Table 4 of Attachment 1 presents a summary of actual 6-month and projected 12-month expenditures in each budget program (treatment plant, collection system, general improvements). Allocations to Capital Improvement Projects: Allocations of funds from program budgets to capital improvement projects for the first six months of the fiscal year total $4,624,607, which represents 19 percent of $24,007,000 authorized by the Board for the entire fiscal year. Table 2 of Attachment 1 p resents a proj ect i on of est imated all ocat ions f rom program budgets to specific projects for the second six months of the fiscal year compared to estimates for these allocations made at the time the CIB was prepared. Overall, it is projected that total allocations for the fiscal year will be 31 percent less than the total estimated in the FY 1988/89 CIB. Current program budget authorizations should be adequate to fund anticipated allocations for the remainder of the fiscal year. Table 3 of Attachment 1 presents a listing of allocations made from program contingency accounts between July 1, 1988, and December 31, 1988. A total of $415,227 was allocated from program contingency accounts during the first six months of the fiscal year. This amount represents 27 percent of the $1,535,000 authorized by the Board for these accounts. RECOMMENDATION: Receive the fi scal year 1988-89 Capital Improvement Program Mid-Year Status Report. 13028-9/85 Page 3 of 11 ATT ACHt.ENT 1 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT Fiscal Year 1988-89 Capital Improvement Program Mid-Year Status Report Detailed Analysis INTRODUCTION A new system for capital improvements planning/budgeting was established at Central Contra Costa Sanitary District in June 1987. The District's monthly Financial Management Information System (FMIS) financial statements were revised to provide specific information on the operation of the budget system, and a mi d-year report on the status of the Capital Improvement Program was pl anned. Thi s is the second mi d-year report under the new system. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVENUES Specific information on the status of each of the revenue categories is presented below. Table 1 presents the distribution of actual versus projected amounts among the capital revenue accounts. Interest on Investments Interest income on temporary investment of the Sewer Constructi on Fund for the first six months of the fiscal year totals $2,476,999, which represents 70 percent of the $3,512,000 estimated revenue for the entire year. It is anticipated that interest rates will remain hi gher than the assumed rates used in prepari ng the 1988 CIP. A favorable variance in Interest Income of approximately 51 percent at the end of the fiscal year is projected. Fixture Fees Fixture Fees collected during the first six months of the fiscal year total $1,303,615, which represents 52 percent of the $2,467,000 estimated revenue for the entire year. The original projections for development rates were slightly underestimated, resulting in a higher than anticipated revenue. It is anticipated that current trends will continue in the short term and that a favorable variance in Fixture Fee revenue of approximately 2 percent will exist at the end of the fiscal year. Watershed Fees Watershed Fees collected during the first six months of the fiscal year total $756,860, which represents 48 percent of the $1,556,000 revenue estimated in the CIP for the entire year. It is anticipated that an unfavorabl e vari ance in Watershed Fee revenue of approximately 1 percent will exist at the end of the fiscal year. Page 4 of 11 Annexation Charges Annexation Charges collected during the first six months of the fi scal year total $411 ,157, whi ch represents 107 percent of the $400,000 revenue estimated for the entire year. This favorable vari ance refl ects a hi gher than anti ci pated rate of connecti on in areas where annexation charges are higher than average, primarily in the Danville-San Ramon area. It is anticipated that the current trend will continue and that a favorable variance in Annexation Charge revenue of approximately 113 percent will exist at the end of the fiscal year for an anticipated total annual revenue of $852,000. Ad Valorem Taxes Tax revenue for the fi rst six months of the fi scal year total s $2,579,765, which represents 47 percent of the $5,460,000 estimated revenue for the entire year. Historically, the District's income from property tax has not been received in equal installments, and it is currently projected that actual tax revenue for the fiscal year will be $6,105,000, or 12 percent greater than that originally estimated. The reason for this difference is that the CIP estimate of $5,460,000 was based on an incorrect assumption for the second installment of FY 1987/88 tax revenue. The current projection was provided by the Contra Costa County Assessor's Office. Funds from Government AQencies Thi s revenue category ("Other" in Tabl e 1) is compri sed of funds received from the City of Concord and from Caltrans. The 1988 CIP estimated that revenue from this category would total $5,426,000. Each agency's contribution will be addressed separately. City of Concord The city has been billed $3,073,087 and payment has been received for its contribution to the fiscal year 1988-89 Capital Improvement Program. This billing reflects actual expenditures for the first six months of the fiscal year and a projection of expenditures for the remainder of the year. The billed amount will be the only payment from Concord this fiscal year and represents 81 percent of the $3,802,000 estimated revenue for the entire year. The 19 percent unfavorable vari ance from the CIP estimated amount is due to a lower than estimated level of expenditures in the Treatment Plant Program, an adjustment for actual FY 1987/88 expenditures, and a reducti on in Concord's share of the Treatment Pl ant Program from 32 percent to 31 percent, based on their actual monitored flow. Caltrans It was expected that payment of $1,624,000 would be received from Caltrans this fiscal year for the I-680/SR-24 relocations project necessitated by freeway widening in Walnut Creek. Page 5 of 11 However, both the District's and Caltrans' projects are behind schedul e. To date, no reimbursement has been received from Caltrans, but it is probable that approximately $756,000 will be received during this fiscal year, based on payment requests currently in process. The payment from the City of Concord ($3,073,087), and the anticipated $756,000 reimbursement from Caltrans total s $3,829,087. Thus, an unfavorabl e vari ance in Funds from Government Agenci es' revenue from the CIP estimate of approximately 30 percent will exist at the end of the fiscal year. Miscellaneous Income Income estimated in the CIP under this category incl udes revenue from cash discounts earned, rebates, and water recl amation revenue from the Demonstration Project. Miscellaneous Income for the first six months of the fiscal year total $5,820, which represents 2 percent of the $332,000 revenue estimated for the entire year. It is anticipated that an unfavorable variance in Miscellaneous Income of approximately 97 percent will exist at the end of the fiscal year. The CIP assumed that the capital costs associated with the Industri al Wastewater Recl amation Demonstration woul d be recovered from water sales revenue. The variance is due to this assumption not being realized. ALLOCATIONS TO PROJECTS FROM PROGRAM BUDGETS Allocations of funds from program budgets to specific capital improvement projects during the first six months of the fiscal year total $4,624,607, which represents 19 percent of the $24,007,000 authorized by the Board. Allocations are not expected to be uniformly distributed throughout the fiscal year. For example, the next allocation for the Walnut Creek Downtown Bypass II Project, which is currently estimated to be $4,650,000, will not occur until later this fiscal year. This allocation alone will account for 19 percent of the allocations projected for the entire year. A summary of actual and projected allocations for each budget program is presented in Table 2. Allocations from ProQram Unallocated Authorizations Under the CIB system, the Board of Directors authorizes budgets for the three Capital Improvement Budget Programs (Treatment Plant, Collection System, and General Improvements) from the Sewer Construction Fund at the beginning of the fiscal year. The General Manager-Chief Engineer is delegated the authority to allocate these funds to projects 1 isted in the CIB to establ ish specific project budgets. Page 6 of 11 Allocations during the first six months of the fiscal year are summarized below: ProQram Amount Allocated 7/1/88-12/31/88 Treatment Plant Collection System General Improvements $ 899,581 3,139,026 586,000 TOTAL: $4,624,607 Allocations from ProQram ContinQencies Under the CIB system, the General Manager-Chief Engineer is delegated authority to allocate funds from Program Contingency accounts to establish budgets for new projects not listed in the CIB and to cover project budget overruns within specific limitations. Of the funds all ocated duri ng the fi rst six months of the fi scal year, $415,227 was allocated to fund unanticipated new projects. This represents 27 percent of the $1,535,000 authorized by the Board for the contingency accounts. A 1 isting of these allocations is presented in Table 3. EXPENDITURES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS A summary of actual expenditures for the fi rst six months of the fi scal year and current projections of expenditures for the remaining six months of the fiscal year are presented in Table 4. District expenditures for capital improvement projects for the first six months of the fiscal year were $8,432,873, which represents 35 percent of the $24,291,585 estimated expenditures for the entire year. FORCE ACCOUNT BUDGET Force Account labor hours expended for capital improvement projects for the first six months of the fiscal year total 36,711 hours, which represents 49 percent of the 74,458 hours projected in the CIS for the entire fiscal year. It is anticipated that a similar District Force Account labor effort will be required in the remaining six months of the fiscal year. SUMMARY The CIB system successful 1 y provi des the Board with a "bi g-picture" overview of the Capital Improvement Program while improving staff accountabil ity and streaml ining program administration. Actual versus Page 7 of 11 projected performance in capital improvement revenues collected, funding all ocati on from program authorizati ons by staff, and expenditures for capital improvement projects has improved as staff has become increasingly familiar with the CIS system. With the establ ishment of the proposed Capital Improvement Fee System this spring, the new CIS system, first presented to the Board in conceptual form in February 1987, will be complete. Page 8 of 11 TABLE 1 Capital Improvement Revenue Summary Note: All amounts in thousands VARIANCE CIP REVENUE ESTIMATED CU RRENT CU RRENT ESTIMATED 7/01/88 REVENUE PROJECTED PROJECTED REV ENU E TO FOR REMAINDER FY 1988/89 TO FY 1988/89 12/31/88 FY 1988/89 REV ENU E CIP ESTIMATE INTEREST $ 3,512 $ 2,477 $2,836 $ 5,313 51% FIXTURE 2,467 1,304 1,205 2,509 2% WATERSHED 1,556 757 778 1,535 1%) ANNEXATION 400 411 441 852 113% TAXES 5,460 2,580 3,525 6 ,105 12% OTHER CONCORD 3,802 3,073 0 3,073 ( 18%) CALTRANS 1,624 0 756 756 ( 53%) MISCELLANEOUS 332 6 3 9 97%) TOTALS: $19,153 $10,608 $9,544 $20,152 5% Page 9 of 11 0 0 ~I-~~~ ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ZZ 1-< ~ ~ ~ ~ <UJUJO:E ..-i U') ..-i Ha::,...,F-H U') N cY"l a::a::0 I- <Ba::O(/) > Q..F-LU (/) OIZ OCOO ....... 0 ....... U') I-~'H ....... U') '<t ....... Z COI- 01 cY"l ..-i '<t LU co< .. .. .. .. a::UJOIU N N r-l '" a::1J..-i0 r-l r-l BO -I ~ ~ 8:t~ a:: (/) LU OZOOl ~OZCO U') ..-i ..-i ....... HH, U') ..-i \0 N <I-<CO 0 N U') co :E<:ECO .. .. .. HOl:l:!OI N 01 r-l 1-0 ..-i r-l (/) -I ~ ~ LU~a::>- OLL. E LL. ta L- V) Z OCO co 01 \0 Lt'l HCO co 0 cY"l co N 1-, , 0 ..-i U') '" <r-l0..-i 01 .. .. UOI-cY"l cY"l '<t .0 0, , -I ....... N ~ ~ Ul -I ..-i C < N 0 ..... UJ +I OI(/) -I ta OCO~ co U UJ, '<t ..-i N ....... < 0 ~I-COH U') Lt'l 0 0 I- r- <COI- N U') N 0 r- I-:EOI< .. .. .. .. < OHr-lO ....... Lt'l r-l '<t 1-1- 0 r-l N 4- (/)>--1 ~ ~ 0 LULL.-I < L- ta (/) E Z E 01 0 ::l co H (/) , ti: 0 ....... 01 '" co 01 ....... co Lt'l COCON '<t cY"l 01 co OIHH .. .. .. ..-iUa:: U') cY"l 01 0 ..-i ..-i >- ~ ~ ~ Ul LL. "C ~ C ta Ul V) ::l OZ 0 a:: COUJO '<t '<t cY"l r-l .c LU COI-H '" ....... ..-i U') +I ~~~C3~ ....... r-l N r-l .. .. .. C I a:: COON ..-i N '<t ...... >-LL.OI-IH a:: r-l-la:: ~ ~ Ul a:: <0 +I < >-Z~ C 0 LL.=> ::l ::l 0 < Ul fa +I C Q) ,.... C ~ ,.... ~ 0 < C ......E > a> +I +I a> r- 0 E C U+I ta L- V) .. +Ita Q) Ul L- 0.. -I Q) tar- r->. Q) E < ~ a>Q.. r- V) CH I- L- 0 a> ~ Z I- 0 (!l ~ Z :=) o 8 cCco co >-........ u...... Cl)ZM zw........ MOCJN HZ...... WI-H -IcCI-O 52UZ~ 1-~8co ...J CO CC::E........ CC...... 0::........ 81' a: ::E o 0:: I.L. Ol C Q) or-O C C or-'" "'r- E '" Q)CO 0:: "0 Q) .f.l.f.l C '" ::J 0 o 0 ~~ cC Q) r- .f.l or- .sl- .f.l "00 Q) Q) .f.l '" 0 o S- Oa.. r- r- cC C o or- .f.l o Q) "'.f.l Ul '" co '" S- I- Ul "0 C ::J I.L. '+- o Q) Ul :=) . o Z a.. o 00e.. O'<t'<tM U"lU"lNNN............N r--r--'<t'<t'<t............U"l ... .. ... .. ... ... .. ... O\............"'......Nr--r-- "'MMNOOOM M\O\O\OI.O\OU"l'<t 4o't 4o't 000 '<t 0""" MOOO\OO\ MOO\OOU"l .... .... U"lU"l U"l0\ N 0\\0 4o't .f.l .f.l ::J ::J o 0 Q) Q) Ul UlC o 0 0 r-CCr-or- U Ol OlU .f.l o or-or- 0 O.f.lUlUl.f.l::J OOQ)Q)OS-C ... Q) 0 0 Q).f.l Ol N..-, I I..-,Ulor- 1.00Q)Q)OCUl NS-S-S-S-SQ) 4o'ta..a..a..a.. 0 co co ........ I' co 0\ ...... Q) "0 '" S- Ol c.. ::l E Q) .f.l Ul >. CI) >. S- .f.l Q) m r- Q) I- ::E ~ 8 a: I- ~ c: I- Z ~ !;c W ~ E S- E c.. Q)Q)Q) CE .f.l.f.l.f.l >-O::J UlQ)Ul I.L. ..... a.. >. ::E >. .f.l (/) CI) E '" "0 Q) ONQ) >.::J>. S- or- Q) .0 C ..c '+-S-I.L. "OQ)"O o C > C S-..c: Q) Ol'" Q) '" Ol Q).f.l OlC.f.lO::.f.l C >::J::Jor-(/) (/)or- OcC,+-X "0 X I or-or-UlS-Ulor- >."0 s-::E '" 0 "'::E S-S-.f.lICJOCJI S-"'CH C H ",OQ)(/)a..oa..(/) UCOUO-lU...JO NOO\I.OO\O MCO'<tr--'<tCO 000000 000000 ......N......N......N COCO CO CO CO CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO CO CO CO ................................................................ ............MNO\O\............ OOO............NNN ................................................................ r--r--CO CO co...... NN 00000.................. I' N N ... C1. ...... 4o't -I cC I- ~ co :::l (/) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... -l MMMMMMMM U"lU"lU"lU"lU"lU"lU"lU"l ... .. .. .. .. ... .. ... CO U"lON r--N'<tO\ o '<tM...... CO 1.OU"l I' NCOCOCOr--r--r--l.O 000000 000000 000000 .. ... .. .. .. ... U"lCOU"lU"lCOU"l ............NN I' >. S- C 0 Q) or- C .f.lS- "'Q) ~ ';U ::E g> c.. ~or- ~Q) Q).f.l 00:: ZC C r- 0 0l1.L. C .f.l C'.) Oor- or- 0 OUl.-'" ::J.f.l OQ).-ECS-O ... 0 '" Q) Ol.f.l Q) r--l.f.lOor-Ul..-, MQ)UlS-UlCO l.Os-cOQ)OS- 4o'ta..HI.L.OUa.. S- ::E ~ 8 g: ::E ~ CI) >- CI) e H b W -I ...J o U or- '" c.. Q) . 0::~6 C C Ul or-Q).f.l C '" E Ul o EQ)Q) or- Q)>Z .f.l 00 Ul '" S- S- Q) C o 0 c...- 0 C 0 I.L. E Ol..... >-0.- H"'.f.l l.L.or-Q)S-Ul W'" .f.lO::Q)"OS- 0 E'" .f.l",Q)CO ON"OQ)O~Or- S- or- r-::E S- Q) or- Q) '+- S- Q) Ul CI) Ul 0:: Oor-Q)Ul C S- ..c: I.L. ::J 0 . Q) '<t Q).f.l CS-S-.f.lN >::JCQ)uoxo:: occ",> W(/) I CQ)"'Q) ........ >."0 ",0::"0 C s-o s-S-..c: CQ)Q)CO S-"'OCl)or-'-~\O "'O::J~S-S-Q)I UCOCOZOcC(/)1-I co co ........ I' co 0\ ...... r--O\COO\NCO Mr--'<tMO\N U"l00U"lU"l'<t '<to O'<t'<t '<t N...... CO coco co CO coco co CO COCO co CO co co co ................................................................ ............l.O......CO\O............ OONMO......NN ................................................................ r--r--r--r--COo\......N 000000............ Page 10 of 11 o o o ... \0 \0 ...... 4o't -I cc I- ~ co :=) (/) .............................. ...... 1.01.0\01.0\01.0 COCOOCOlXlCO ... .. .. .. .. .. Or--OLnr--N ...... U"l '<t ...... 0000 0 0000 0 COONO 0 .. -. .... ... I' U"l I' U"l U"l ...... N U"l 4o't I' N N ... Ln ...... '<t 4o't ~ I- ~ co :=) (/) ~ I- ~ o :E 0:: CJ Q) Q) s- 0 '" or- Q)~Ul> "O.f.l.f.lS- "''+-CQ) S-OQ)(/) Ol CI) E c.. Q)Ul ::lQ)0'" NCCJ Q) or- '" os-.-..c:r- o "''''c.- o~.f.lUJ'" ... .f.l or- .f.l I' '+- c.. co Ul '<to"'HC 4o't(/)C'.)UH ::E cc 0:: 8 a: Q) "0 '" s- Ol co c.. co ::lQ) ........ s- I' E '" co Q)~Q) 0\ .f.l.f.l"O ...... Ul'+-"'.f.l c>.os-c >- 0 (/) (/) Ol Q) l.L.or- c..E .f.lS-S-::lQ) E"'Q)Q) 0 ON.f.l.f.lE'" S-or-::J::JQ)r- '+- s- c.. c...f.l c.. OEEUlQ) s-..c: 00>.0:: Q).f.lUUCI) > ::J Q) occcococo C I HHl-lor- >."0 U U U -I s-s-........................ s- '" a.. a.. a.. Ul '" OHHH '" ucouuUCJ ~ Z ~ W > o 0:: a.. ::E H CO......CO'<t r--COr--CO 0000 0000 NNNN ...J cc 0:: UJ Z UJ CJ COCO CO coco co CO co co coco co ........................................ ........ ............U"l00...... OON............N ........................................ ........ I' I' I' ...... ...... ...... 000.................. Page 11 of 11 TABLE 4 Summary of Expenditures by Program Note: All amounts in thousands VARIANCE CIP EXPENDITURES ESTIMATED CURRENT CU RRENT ESTIMATED 7/01/88 EXPENDITURES PROJECTED PROJECTED EXPENDITURES TO FOR REMAINDER FY 1988/89 TO FY 1988/89 12/31/88 FY 1988/89 EXPENDITURES CIP ESTIMATE Treatment $11,126 $3 ,744 $ 6,437 $10,181 8% Pl ant Collection 11 ,586 3,919 4,502 8,421 27% Sy stem General 1,579 769 845 1,614 ( 2%) Improvements TOTALS: $24,292 $8,432 $11,784 $20,216 17%