HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 09-21-89
.
CentrA :ontra Costa Sanitar) .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 7
NO.
IV.
HEARINGS
1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
HOlD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON UNINHABITED DISTRICT
ANNEXATIONS 112-B, 112-C, 112-E, AND 112-F, AS
AMENDED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
(LAFCO) AND CONSIDER THE NEGATIVE DEClARATION BY LAFCO
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
HOLD HEARINGS
D.A. 112-B, 112-C,
112-E and 112-F
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall
Associate En ineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construe ion Divisio
ISSUE: LAFCO has amended the boundaries of several of the parcels included
within District Annexation 112. The District must hold a public hearing and
consi der testimony by affected property owners before acti ng on the proposed
amended annexation.
BACKGROUND: The above-referenced annexati on was sent to LAFCO as requi red for
the formal annexation process. Part of the annexation, consisting of six
parcel s, was not changed. These six unamended parcel s are submitted for Board
action on the consent calendar for today under two separate position papers as
District Annexations 112-A and 112-G. No public hearing is required for these
parcels because they had 100 percent landowner consent.
LAFCO amended the boundari es of the four remai ni ng parcel s duri ng its approval
process. These amendments were made to improve the continuity of the resulting
District boundary. The amended annexations are designated D.A. 112-B, C, E, and
F (0 was not used) and are considered to be four separate annexations. The four
amended annexations, which are uninhabited, are shown on the attached maps.
CEQA REQUIREMENTS
A Negative Declaration addressing the proposed annexations was prepared by LAFCO
pursuant to CEQA and was used by LAFCO in making its determinations and approving
this annexation. In accordance with District CEQA Guidelines Section 7.17(f),
the Board must review and consider the environmental effects of the project as
shown in the Negative Declaration which is attached as Exhibit A* before
approving the annexation. District staff has reviewed said Negative Declaration
and concurs with its findings.
ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS
District Annexation 112 as submitted to LAFCO was a single annexation. The
action by LAFCO separated District Annexation 112 into the subject four
uninhabited annexations, which requi re a publ ic hearing. Normally a separate
public hearing would be held for each of these four subject annexations. If no
members of the public appear, these annexations can be considered in one public
hearing.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
DH
JSM
RAB
INITIATING D~T./DIV.
/1/1
1302A-9/85
SUBJECT
HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON UNINHABITED DISTRICT
ANNEXATIONS 112-B, 112-C, 112-E, and 112-F, AS AMENDED
BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) AND
CONSIDER THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY LAFCO
POSITION PAPER
2
OF
7
PAGE
DATE
September 12, 1989
If a member of the publ ic wishes to testify on a particular annexation, a
separate public hearing shall be held on the annexation. The remaining
annexations will then be the subject of the second public hearing.
Legal notice was published, and the affected property owners were notified of the
public hearings as required by law. The amended annexations are uninhabited
(fewer than 12 registered voters). Factors to be considered by the Board in
deci di ng to approve or di sapprove the proposed annexati ons are set forth as
Exhibit B*.
Following its review, the Board,
conclusion of the public hearing,
appropriate action taken:
not more than th i rty (30) days after the
shall adopt a resolution reflecting the
1. Certify that the Board has reviewed and considered and concurs with the
adoption of the Negative Declaration of LAFCO.
2. Order the annexation if no written majority protest exists.
3. Disapprove the proposed annexations based upon any of the factors set forth
in Exhibit B*.
4. Terminate the annexation if the Board finds that written protests have been
filed and not withdrawn prior to the conclusion of the hearing representing
1 andowners owni ng 50 percent or more of the assessed val ue of the 1 and
within the territory proposed to be annexed.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Open the public hearing on all of the annexations or individual hearings on
D.A. 112-B, C, E, and F, as appropriate, receive any testimony, and close
the public hearing(s).
2. Adopt a Resolution certifying that the Board has reviewed the Negative
Declaration, ordering the filing of a Notice of Determination as a
responsi bl e agency stati ng that the Board consi dered the Negative
Declaration, and concurring with the adoption of the Negative Declaration of
LAFCO and taking one of the following actions:
o Order the annexation if no majority protest exists, or
o Di sapprove one or more of the proposed annexati ons that the Board
determines that the annexation is not warranted, or
Ia-..______..
13028-9/85
SUBJECT
HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON UNINHABITED DISTRICT
ANNEXATIONS 112-B, 112-C, 112-E, and 112-F, AS AMENDED
BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) AND
CONSIDER THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY LAFCO
POSITION
PAPER
PAGE
DATE
3
OF
7
Seo1:embA r 1? , QAQ
o
Di sapprove annexati on if written protests have been fil ed and not
withdrawn prior to the concl usion of the publ ic hearing representing
landowners owning 50 percent or more of the assessed valuation of the
land within the territory to be annexed.
*NOTE:
Exhibits mentioned in this Position Paper are included in a separately
bound document.
---------
13028-9/85
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
... = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGHED PETITION
~//701 = ADDED BY LAFCO
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 B
( PARCEL 1 )
WAlNUT r;::~~~~ "..AVr.
.......~ Q.I @
I ~.. P.M. ~ ~ l10iiffiM riJ,fmW I
:;;;::: :u 'e I "'Ie i:!
If 'P' * i
iff rffr!W!!/i!i!i??t?!t:::::tfittmlt eS'.77 !it
NU"e'N-W ........
I !!~
I I :ij
/ ~ij
I ,!( ~I
I;! ~
): ~
I~ ~
I
I
~
/'64
Of).
~. .
I
I
,
Page 5 of 7
@
/'7Z
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
_ = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
111//ljt = ADDED BY LAFCO
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 C
( PARCEL 3 )
Page 6 of 7
i'-
....
~
~ ~
~ ~
<: N8a-I4'IZ'WoMZ.58
~1
@D Iii
~.::::
1 !f{{tp--*Wiiiff!%iit!/JMf::x.1$#i! Ii
J
~
IB
8
CI,)
~
-.../
.s8Z..34~o'e
787. 5'5
.sT~EV;
/o~S7 _ E R... *
...."". B48
@
/ O.5r~OSKr)
{ 3161 tJ~. S/.,
;A-
18 I".M.Z9
fBj,
~
-.
. .
,...
I", "
~~
l'--
,,'?
,uti- ~~\
,lll" c;',~
I]>
\ I ~';-c1'
'i-'~" ~
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
... = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* SIGHED PETITION
YI I I I fA =ADDED BY LAFCO
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 E
( PARCEL 5 )
Page 7 of 7
.R/{)
JENSEN
I_~ ".~. ",
33
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
__ = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
_ _ = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
V / / / //A =ADDED BY LAFCO
CENTRAL CONTRA C'OSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 F
( PARCEL 9 )
.
Centr
Contra Costa Sanital District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
SUBJECT
NO.
v. BIDS AND AWARDS
DATE
1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CUSTOM CONTROlS
AND ELECTRIC FOR DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10057,
LARWIN PUMPING STATION UPGRADE
Se tember 13 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AWARD
SUBMITTED BY
Dav i d J. Rei ndl
Assistant En ineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Plant 0 erations De artment
ISSUE: On September 12, 1989, sealed bids for the furnishing of labor and material
for District Project No. 10057, Larwin Pumping Station Upgrade, were received and
opened. The Board of Di rectors must award the contract or rej ect proposal s withi n
60 days.
BACKGROUND: The Plant Operations Department Maintenance Engineering staff has
completed the installation design of replacement pumping units and variable
frequency drives for the Larwin (San Ramon) Pumping Station. The new equipment has
been prepurchased and delivered, and the installation plans and specifications are
now compl ete. Two 100-horsepower Worthington pumps and motors and two Emerson
variable frequency drives will replace the two existing 18-horsepower pumps as part
of this project. The new pumping equipment will provide additional capacity for
current increased flows and anticipated increased flows to the year 2000.
The Purchasing Section publicly advertised the bid request on August 26 and 31,
1989. A total of 12 bid packages were picked up or requested by contractors. Only
two bids were received and publ icly opened on September 12, 1989. A commerci al
evaluation and a listing of bids received is provided in Attachment I. The apparent
lowest responsible bidder is Custom Controls and Electric for $54,900. The
engineer's estimate for the installation of the pump and drive equipment was
$70,000.
The total project is budgeted for $216,000 in the 1988 - 1989 Capital Improvement
Budget, page CS-92. A complete project estimate is provided in Attachment II. The
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for this project have been
met since the project was addressed in the San Ramon Valley Trunk Sewer Improvements
Project envi ronmental impact report (EIR). The EIR was certi fied by the Board of
Directors in 1986, and a Notice of Determination has been filed.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of contract for District Project No. 10057, Larwin
Pumping Station Upgrade, to Custom Controls and Electric for a total of $54,900.
ECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
.......
I-
Z
W
::E:
:c
u
ct:
l-
I-
ct:
c~
~JI
~
~
~W
.. v
0- -
otIC
0- L
0- W
- U
Z -
:> a:
L
~W
.. U
~ 0- -
........ 0'"
0- L
CO ~
C>
~ ~~
........
C> o-W
- u
l- n: z -
:> '"
.; ...
II: ,.....,
w ;:
D
~ ~
:;) t a ~W
z .. u 2
0- -
~ u:;: 0'"
..L Z
.,.. ~I~ ~ ~
~ ~ o-W
g~ C -u R
~ z -
c: :l '"
o~ ...
~
'[ JW
(/) .. U
0- -
0- 0'"
::E: .. L
:::> ~
0-
Q)
Z ,- ..w
C> I.LJ zll
I- ~ :;)'"
C,!) ...
z
....... VI
:c ,...
I- ie. JW
0::: ..u W
C> ~ 0-- Z
:3 0'" C> C>
~ .....
0 C> Z
C> .
:3 E ~ Ig C>
I-
0 .!!: ..w m
I..L. -v ~
C> VI ~ r-I z- ~
:::l :;)11:
~ ~. L ~
Z ...;; :vi
z
0 C>
~ ...... ~ ~
l-
II: ct: ~
H -' ~~
-' w Z
0 ct: a g ~ ~ ~~ t W (/)
~ l- ll: B ~ 0:;) 0:: :> ~ C>
~ (/) 8 II: ~ ~ iii ... !'l ~ vS oC::i ...... C,!)
z z 0 g g 0 J .. ~ ~ 0:: Z
.. a: ~ t
i ...... ... 0 W W Cl ~ ct:
> .. 00": 0 > .. ct: ::E:
.. -' 0:: Cl ~ I-
.~ ~ ~
.. ~ W LO en
0 . W N ~ W
en 0- m :::>
~ Ie: -' ex en ~ m 8 0-
ct: W
I~ ....... ;; W ~ I- 0:::
41) w:; 0::: -' ct: ~ .......
0 I~ W :E co LO Cl
iii 0<: @ I- ct: Ci Cl C> ......
ct: ~ ....... --J W C> co
... LL ::E 0:: ~ I- ct: ........
0 v: a: I-- c ~ ct: ct: 0::: C>
f .. ~ -' :> u . I- !
z "; ~ -' C> Z C>
0 c 0 ct: Cl I- -' ct: z z ,
~ 2: a E Z ~ en C>
- ~
.. g W ct: z .t; ......
c( l, Cl ::E: C> I-
... u ....... ;: en 0- ...... W W 0-
~ - :> 0- ...... I- :> 'J W
10 E X C> 0::: ::E ~ ct: ....... C> U
;! 0 - 0::: W :::> I- 0:: 0::: . ><
+-> ti; - 0- (/) 0- W en Cl 0- W
VI ;;;~
~ t~
u ::> l-
ii ~~ ~J= C>
z ~ 20 -'
.. I
.. z . z
~ 0 c ~-
! 3 :. ri 2 . ......
. ~i
. . L t
ATTAOM:NT II
LARWIN FUPING STATION UPGRADE
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10057
PROJECT ESTIMATE
10 Percent Contingency
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$ 30,000
10,000
70,000
54,900
10,000
12,500
8,000
$ 195,400
19,600
S 215.000
Force Account - Design
Force Account - Pumping Station
Prepurchase Equipment
Construction Contract
Construction Management
Inspection - Construction
Force Account - Pumping Station (Construction)
.
Centra, ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 6
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Se tember 21, 1989
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 9
ORDER COMPLETION OF DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112-A
DATE
September 12, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
COMPLETE ANNEXATION
OF DA 112-A
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
Denni sHall
Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: A resol uti on by the Di strict's Board of Di rectors must be adopted to
finalize District Annexation 112-A.
BACKGROUND: The District previously made application to the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the annexation of ten parcels of land designated
as District Annexation 112. LAFCO has considered this request and has recommended
that Parcel s 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8, as shown on the attachments, be processed as
submitted. LAFCO has designated these parcels to be District Annexation No.
112-A. No publ ic heari ng is requi red and the annexati on of these parcel s can be
compl eted.
A Negative Declaration addressing the proposed annexations was prepared by LAFCO
pursuant to CEQA and was used by LAFCO in making its determinations and approving
this annexation. This Negative Declaration is attached as Exhibit "A" to the
position paper for the publ ic hearing on District Annexation 112-B, C, E, and F,
covered earlier in this meeting's agenda. In accordance with District CEQA
Guidelines Section 7.17(f), the Board must review and consider the environmental
effects of the project as shown in the Negative Declaration before approving the
annexation. District staff has reviewed said Negative Declaration and concurs
with its findings.
RECOt.f.1ENDATION: Adopt a resolution concurring with and adopting the Negative
Decl arati on of LAFCO, certifyi ng that the Board has rev iewed and consi dered the
Negative Decl arati on, orderi ng the fil i ng of a Notice of Determi nati on as a
Responsible Agency stating that the District considered the Negative Declaration
as prepared by LAFCO as required, and ordering the completion of District
Annexation No. 112-A.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
A26
f}.(~
~D( RAB
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
DH
JSM
. _,w__.,,~__,_,_____'______"__"___"._'_.""__"~'___~.__~__,~___.._...._,_..w_~____..____.__,...__..._____._,__"'-".----''''''-''--'--'-''-'-'--''''-'''.'--.''--'-'--'...-.------,--~
Page 2 of 6
rEo \..I"'(:.S . 1 NC..
...-..oflC. Pee)
90U"r~9'2- o.fl--
I o~~_~1
",80.IS'~ .
t"'I
\.
"Z..
~
'"
~
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
-.mi. = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
_ _ = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 A
( PARCEL 2 )
K.1NG
IOZOO OJ(. 157
Ff:1. One
~~i
s... Ut7!'E
JACO~5EN
/1-101> P.,t!. $a
'"
S ,,.55''''' "63.54
Page 3 of 6
#."55'&
691.H
~;:1.u.78
~ ~ '0.0,
,
I
~ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
\57
_ = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
CENl'RAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 A
( PARCEL 4 )
Page 4 of 6
." .."$~4.lf0t
U\
\J\
0-
~ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
~
... = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
_ _ = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* SIGNED PETITION
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 A
( PARCEL 6 )
~
~ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
_ = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
Page 5 of 6
@
1'78
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 A
(PARCEL 7 )
..J
IR.ONWOOD
Page 6 of 6
(
~
~
~
"
~
\!y = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
... = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
- - = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETIT/ON
~'" .
~~~
~
~
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112 A
( PARCEL 8 )
.
Centra.. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Se tember 21, 1989
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 10
ORDER COMPLETION OF DISTRICT ANNEXATION 112-G
DATE
September 12, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
COMPLETE ANNEXATION
OF DA 112-G
SUBJECT
SUBMITTED BY
Denni sHall
Associate Engineer
INITIA TING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: A resolution by the District's Board of Directors must be adopted to
finalize District Annexation 112-G.
BACKGROUND: The District previously made appl ication to the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the annexation of ten parcels of land designated
as District Annexation 112. LAFCO has considered this request and has recommended
that Parcel 10, as shown on the attachment, be processed as submitted. LAFCO has
designated this parcel to be District Annexation No. 112-G. As submitted, Parcel
10 was not included within this District's Sphere of Influence (S.O.I.). During
the review process, LAFCO amended the District's S.O.I. to include the subject
parcel. No publ ic hearing is requi red and the annexation of this parcel can be
compl eted.
A Negative Decl arati on addressi ng the proposed annexati on was prepared by LAFCO
pursuant to CEQA and was used by LAFCO in making its determinations and approving
this annexation. This Negative Declaration is attached as Exhibit A to the
Position Paper for the publ ic hearing on District Annexation 112-B, C, E, and F
covered earlier in this meeting's agenda. In accordance with District CEQA
Guidelines Section 7.17(f), the Board must review and consider the environmental
effects of the project as shown in the Negative Declaration before approving the
annexation. District staff has reviewed said Negative Declaration and concurs
with its findings.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resol ution concurring with and adopting the Negative
Declaration of LAFCO, certifying that the Board has reviewed and considered the
Negative Declaration, ordering the filing of a Notice of Determination as a
Responsible Agency stating that the District considered the Negative Declaration
as prepared by LAFCO as required, and ordering the completion of District
Annexation No. 112-G.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
~~
f/;ti j~~
J SM }/( RAB
1302A-9/85
DH
~
0-
!3 ~
.. .
~ t
~
tI. 5.A.
"40 aii'. '113
1,137.38
:5 ~~I44"W
EAST AllY ~O"'At. F'J4R.X. DISTAICT
~1~rtl.t~lj~;;;lrIr~:~:\ ,
~~. ..J.. ..i
1~!~')!\;:~';A~~+~~f;'U:;;ifrt~k \,
.......~~. ........;i.}/fii.'....... -'ii ...."l1.q,-.(,/I> ~
.....,~.,.,~...,..~ '. ." '.. VI L E.
~:;~~~;~ -;(~,.+-~ _ _'~~" ,~ J
Page 2 of 2
~
V!!!J
t:;:;\.
V!!JJ
~()
i'"
~~~l~l~l:
@ = PREVIOUS ANNEXATION
,.-- = EXISTING CCCSD BOUNDARY
-- = PROPOSED ANNEXATION
* = SIGNED PETITION
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DISTRICT A...XATION 112 G
( PARCEL 10 )
.
Centra.. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF
2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Se tember 21, 1989
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR
11
QUITClAIM SEWER EASEMENT, JOB NO. 445,
LAFAYETTE AREA
DATE
September 12, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
APPROVE QUITClAIM
OF EASEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Denni sHall
Associate En ineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: Thomas E. Bi shop, etux, owners of property at No. 1115 Garden Lane,
Lafayette have requested the Di strict to qui tel aim a sewer easement which lies
within their Lot 52 of "Valley View Estates."
BACKGROUND: The subject easement was granted at no cost to this District in 1951.
In 1982, the sewer was re-aligned to permit the construction of the Bishop's
residence (then owned by G.A. Filice). A replacement easement was recorded for
this relocation on July 22, 1982.
The Bishops are selling their home, and their title company has required that the
presently unused portion of the original easement be eliminated, as the residence
was constructed over a portion of it. The property owner has paid our quitclaim
processi ng fee. The subj ect easement is no longer needed and may now be
qui tel aimed.
This project has been eval uated by staff and determined to be exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section
18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use limitations.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Quitcl aim Deed to Thomas E. Bishop, etux, Job 445,
authorize the Presi dent of the Oi strict Board of Di rectors and the Secretary of
the District to execute said Quitclaim Deed, and authorize the Quitclaim Deed to
be recorded.
DH
JSM
RAB
ENG.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
at"
11
~
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
1302A-9/85
.i:J\~
c,'t,~'J
,~
.~
r
BISHOP
^?
V)
QU\"Tc\..,,\ta E."SE.taE.t-I"T
1-
o
...;
QUITCLAIM EASEMENT
JOB 445
LAFAYETTE AREA
.
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
NO.
VI.
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
September 21, 1989
DATE
September 12, 1989
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR A P.A. 89-24 (MARTINEZ) TO BE
INQUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE
DISTRICT
SUBMIITED BY H 1
uennis al
Associate Engineer
Parcel
No. Area
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acrea e
89-24 I Martinez
I 44C1
I
I
Howard H. Reed, Jr.
640 Vine Hill Way
Martinez, CA 94553
155-070-003 (8.04 AC)
Ira & Beverly Smith
646 Vine Hill Way
Martinez, CA 94553
155-070-004 (0.25 AC)
CONSENT CALENDAR 12
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION
FOR PROCESSING
INITIA1;lNG OEPT.lDI}/. D tm t/
cnglneerlng epar en
Construction Division
Rem a rks
Lead
A enc
The Reed parcel is
being subdivided
into a IS-lot major
subdivision (Sub
7319). The City of
Ma rti nez has
approved the subdi-
vision and has
prepared a Negative
Declaration on
J ul y 11, 1989
Ci ty of
Martinez
The Smith property
adjoins the subdi-
vision and must
connect to the
public sewers as
its septic system
leach field is
located within a
new building site.
CCCSD
The District is to
prepare "Notice of
Exemption" on
Smith property.
RECOMMENDATION
annexation.
Authorize P.A. 89-24 to be included in a future formal
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
IJJf!
Ill;'
Page 2 of 2
SAN. OIST.
"'..:
.01
1t1.IlIT
.1..1 AC
'IIUIlINTI
'., SO AC
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
P.A. 89-24
'EISTEIl
.
Centra.. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Se tember 21, 1989
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 13
SUBJECT
CONFIRM "AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM" AND APPORTION
ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS AND AUTHORIZE RECORDING OF SAID
DIAGRAM, LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 56, WALNUT
CREEK AREA
DATE
September 12, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
APPORTIONMENT OF
LI D BONDS
SUBMITTED BY
Denni sHall
Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: The Placer Title Company has requested this District to apportion the
bond which is outstanding on a parcel of land in Local Improvement District (LID)
56.
BACKGROUND: The ori gi nal parcel in LID 56 assi gned assessment number 56-2 has
recently been split into two parcels. The new parcels are shown on the attached
amended assessment diagram and are assigned assessment numbers 56-23 and 56-24.
In accordance with Section 8730 of the Streets and Highways Code, the District is
requi red to apporti on the LID bond amount on the origi nal parcel to the newly
created parcels. The auditor can then prepare a tax bill for each new parcel.
The original parcel of land was assessed as two units. Since the original parcel
has been split into two new parcels, each of the new parcels can receive one unit
of assessment.
The following is a summary of the apportioned assessments:
Assessment No.
Amount
Amended
Assessment No.
Apportioned
Assessment Amount
56-2
$18,620.69
54-23
54-24
$9,310.34
$9,310.35
RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the amended assessment diagram and apportion assessment
amounts and authorize the recording of said diagram.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
Jl~
1~~
JSM tt>( RAB
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
1302A-9/85
DH
"-
'\
'\
";.-2. <~
~~ "'Y."
" \
\
\
\
~9.. C"" ~
~
"'=i.;1' \
~""" \
~'O \
.b
o:y.\
\
\
\
\
\
\V ,/
\' /'
.,../
~-------
-
.-
....... -----.
...../ ~- ----
/ ----
- -
.Y'
/'
/'
WALNUT
CREEK
OPEN
SPACE
APPORTION L.I.D. BOND
LID 56-2
WALNUT CREEK AREA
.
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitar) .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 14
SUBJECT
ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE CLOSE OUT OF THE
HOLCOM3 COURT SEWER RELOCATION PROJECT, PHASE II,
IN WAlNUT CREEK, DISTRICT PROJECT 4215
DATE
Se tember 11, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
INFORMATIONAl
SUBMITTED BY
Ronald S. Klimczak
En ineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: All work has been completed on the Holcomb Court Sewer Relocation Project,
Phase II, in Walnut Creek (DP 4215) and this project can now be closed out.
BACKGROUND: In 1986, the San Ramon Creek Bypass Channel Sewer Relocation Project,
Phase I, constructed an interim pump station at Holcomb Court in Walnut Creek.
This pump station was required to bypass the flows in the area during the period
when the new San Ramon Creek bypass channel was being constructed by the Corps of
Engineers. The new channel was completed early this year.
The relocation project converted the interim pump station to a manhole, abandoned
the force main, and provided a new eight-inch gravity sewer main across the new
San Ramon Creek Bypass Channel which ultimately tied into an existing sewer on
South Broadway. (See Attachment 1.) This project is described in more detail in
the 1988-89 Capital Improvement Budget beginning on page CS-50.
The Contractor, Andes Construction, Inc., of Oakland, commenced work on June 19,
1989, and all work was completed on June 30, 1989. The specified completion date
was August 2, 1989. The project was accepted by the Board of Di rectors on
July 20, 1989.
Andes Construction, Inc.'s construction contract was for $38,380. There was only
one change order for the project in the amount of $1,575 to del ete the unneeded
rock excavati on unit price item work. The total contract amount pai d to Andes
Construction, Inc., was $36,805. The total budget for the project was $70,000.
The total completed project cost is $59,750, which is $10,250 less than the
budget. Staff is closing out the project account which will result in $10,250
being returned to the Collection System Program. All project costs will be
reimbursed by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation Di strict
since the District was required to perform the sewer relocation work to
accommodate flood control improvements.
RECOMMENDATION: This item is presented to the Board of Directors for information
only. No action is necessary.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
~
f/If
JSM
f/JfJ
RAB
1302A-9/85 RS K
\
\'
\ \\
\ Walnut
~ Creek
HOLCOMB COURT SEWER
RELOCATION PROJECT
(PHASE II)
District Project: X4215
Attachm'ent
9/89
1
2523-9 88
.
Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
NO.
VI.
CONSENT CALENDAR 15
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
DATE
ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE CLOSE OUT OF THE CAMINO
TASSAJARA SEWER PROJECT, DANVILLE, DISTRICT
PROJ ECT 4493
TYPE OF ACTION
INFORMATIONAL
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S.
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: The District has met its financial obligations for construction of a new
30-inch sewer in Camino Tassajara and this project can now be closed out.
BACKGROUND: Tassasj ara Ranch is a combi nati on of ten developments south of
Camino Tassajara near Crow Canyon Road. The developers of Tassajara Ranch formed
the Tassaj ara Ranch Assessment Di stri ct to fi nance the install ati on of street,
sewer, and other improvements, incl uding a 30-inch di ameter sewer in Camino
Tassajara. The Assessment District is being administered by the Town of
Danvil 1 e. Attachment No. 1 shows the general 1 ocati on of the developments and
the 3D-inch sewer.
The Board previously authorized the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an
agreement with Danville for the installation of sewer facilities in conjunction
with the Assessment District. The agreement provides for the District paying the
Town of Danville for the cost of the 3D-inch sewer including design,
construction, and contract administration. The agreement has been fully executed
and the final cost of the sewer has been establ ished at $714,545. Payment of
this amount has been made to Danville and the 3D-inch sewer has been constructed.
The total budget for the project was $750,000. The total completed project cost
was $714,545, which is $35,455 less than the budget. Staff is closing out the
project account which will result in $35,455 being returned to the Collection
System Program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
information only.
This item is presented to the Board of Directors for
No action is necessary.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
JSM
AJAIV
t'\) RAB
ATTACHMENT 1
-~
New
30-inch Sewer
G
Existing
_______15-inch Sewer
-----___.:.~~NO TASSAJARA
-- -- --. --
--
--
--
---
-.--
CENTER
g
~
~
~
~
~
o
ct
o
Assessment
District Boundary
.
Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 5
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING~Jptember 21, 1989
NO.
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE 1
D~~Ptember 12, 1989
SUBJECT
RECEIVE lHE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLH-4 ADVISORY
COMMITTEE H-4NUAL REPORT FOR 1988-1989
TYPE OF ACTION
RECEIVE H-4NUAL
REPORT
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT/DIV.
Walter N. Funasaki, Finance Officer
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: The District's Deferred Compensation Plan Advisory Committee
<Committee> has prepared its annual report to the Board of Di rectors and
District participants.
BACKGRaJND: The Board of Di rectors approved the establ i shment of the
Committee in January 1982. The scope of activities of the Committee includes
the submission of an annual report to the Board of Directors and District
participants. The annual report of the Committee for 1988-1989 is submitted
herewith .
RECOMMENDATION: Receive the annual report of the Deferred Compensation Plan
Advisory Committee for 1988-1989.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
#!(
1302A-9/85
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
DEFERRED COMPENSATI~ PLAN NN ISORY aJ4MITTEE MNUAL REP<RT
FOR 1988-1989
In~roduct1on
The Deferred Compensation Plan Advisory
Board of Di rectors to faci 1 itate the
District's Deferred Compensation Plan.
activities encompass the following:
Committee was established by the
internal admi ni strati on of the
The scope of the Committee's
o Establish internal District administrative procedures within the
provisions of the Deferred Compensation Plan document.
o Educate participants regarding the Plan provisions by issuing a
handbook which summarizes the Deferred Compensation Plan, and
responding to queries from participants.
o Rev i ew accountabi 1 i ty by th e Pl an Adm i ni strators and respond to
participants' queries regarding accuracy or propriety of account
balances.
o Review participants' requests for emergency withdrawal of funds.
o Review investment performance of the Deferred Compensation Plan on
an annual basis.
ec-1ttee AccoIIp11shllenu
The following activities were completed by the Committee during July
1988 through June 1989:
o Internal District Administrative Procedures The Committee
completed a review of the renewal contract proposed by Great Western
Bank to succeed the initial three-year contract which ended on
April 30, 1989. A written report on the provisions of the proposed
contract compared with the former contract and the Hartford program
was prepared. On April 6, 1989, the Board of Directors approved the
Committee's recommendati on to renew the contract. Meeti ngs were
held with District participants on April 12 and 13, 1989, during
which Committee members and the Great Western representative
explained the changes in the renewal contract.
The Committee coordinated the notification by the Plan
Admi ni strators, Hartford Life Insurance Company and Great Western
Bank, to 25 reti red and four termi nated amployees of the Internal
Revenue Service requirement that the administrators be provided with
instructions regarding the manner and commencement date for account
distributions.
The Committee developed a common file of documents which are to be
mai ntai ned by each departmental Committee member and passed on to
the succeeding departmental representative.
1
o Education of Participants - The Deferred Compensation Plan handbook,
which is provided to each employee, includes a detachable Current
Data Sheet designed for periodic updating of information subject to
change. The Current Data Sheet was updated in January 1989 to
indicate the prevailing interest rates for the Hartford program and
current Committee members.
Representatives of Hartford Life Insurance Company and Great Western
Bank are available on-site on a designated day each month to assist
participants by providing information and responding to questions.
o Review Accountability by Plan Administrators - Monthly confirmation
statements and quarterly account statements are submitted to the
District by Hartford and Great Western. Quarterly account
statements are distributed to all participants. Notification by the
District of account errors has been satisfactorily resolved by the
Plan Administrators.
o Review Requests for Emergency Withdrawals - One emergency withdrawal
request was reviewed by the Committee and determined to be
nonqualifying at that time.
o Review Investment Performance - A summary which presents the
investment performance of the Hartford and Great Western programs
for the calendar year 1988, and the first six months of 1989 is
provided on Attachment I.
Current eo..ittee Activities
The Committee is currently involved in the following major activities:
o The District's Deferred Compensation Plan document is undergoing a
careful review by the Committee to ensure conformance with the
current governing tax codes and to improve accuracy and precision.
o Sections of the Deferred Compensation Plan handbook and Current Data
Sheet are being revised to incorporate the changes in the Great
Western Bank renewal contract.
o An information sheet is being developed for the benefit of
participants separating fram the District which will provide
information regarding distribution reqirements, payout options, and
tax considerations.
Conclusion
During the period July 1988 through June 1989, the Committee has
addressed all of the activities included in its scope of
responsibilities. This has been achieved through the conscientious
efforts of all of the Committee members.
2
The performance of Hartford and Great Western in admi ni steri ng the
Deferred Compensation Plan during this report period is considered to be
sa ti sf actory .
As shown in the fi nal two col umns of Attachment I, the investment
performance of the stock account in the Hartford program outperformed the
general market i ndi ces, as measured by the Dow Jones Industri al sand
Standard & Poors 500 for the cal endar year 1988; the bond account
underperformed the general market index in 1988, as measured by the
Shearson Lehman Bond Index. For the first six months of 1989, the
Hartford stock and bond accounts underperformed the general market
i ndi ces.
The Great Western Growth Fund of America <GFA> stock account and Bond
Fund of Ameri ca <BFA> bond account exceeded the general market i ndi ces
for the calendar year 1988; the Investment Company of America <ICA> stock
account underperformed the general market indices in 1988. For the first
six months of 1989, the ICA stock account exceeded one of the market
i ndi ces and was equival ent to the other, and the GFA stock account
outperformed the general market i ndi ces; the BFA bond account
underperformed the general market index for the six month period.
Committee Members:
~~)~~/
Walter Funasaki, Finance Officer
(~
ati ve Secretary
Helen Baumgartner, Adminis
Administrative Department
Bart Bran enburg, Associate
Engineering Department
Gi
Co
inistrative Secretary
Operations Department
i'viA..JJ",,-'/-Yl4;}..-7Ji,
Matthew Mahoney, Mainten e Technician III, Mechanical
Plant Operations Department
SSS/Deferred Compensation/Com.Ann.Rpt
3
.... ....
e 41
~ X I.. e
41
~ X 41 X X ........
41 "'CII 41 41 III '"
0 "'CII e "'CII "'CII Q)
e ... e e ."'CII .
< ... III ... ... ....$ 8,
t: III ...0 "'CII III III
C ...0 "'CII "'0 e ...0 "'CII ';8 "'CII '" '" I..
< - "'0 e .. LI\ 0 "'0 e e 41 ... ..,
c! - LtI c8 L. en .. LtI c8 .... LtI c8 I..::l.c
I.. ....111 L- I.. <.!'uu
....Ul III I.. e ....Ul ....Ul ...
Ul I.. e ::l 0 '" Ul ... C Ul ... C "'CII"'Ul
-68 Ii ... "'CII 0 E ::l 0 Ii -68 Ii cUQ)
... ... ea. .c ... "'ClIO ... .., ...
... ea. .c .... ... 41 ... ea. .c ... ea. .c e '"
- ... 41 en o(J ...J .. ... 41 - ... 41 "'CIIL.III
i en o(J ...J t!- III 'P o(J ...J en o(J ...J I.. ::l
I Ul 4I"'CII e III I III .et:~
~ Q)"'CII e e L. 0 ~ Q)"'CII e ~ Q)"'CII e
e e L- 0 >- o '" III C I.. 0 e ... 0 .......'"
... >- 0'" III '" ~"'CII L. >- 0'" III >- o '" III I..
'" ..."'CII I.. C e '" '" ..."'CII I.. '" ~"'CII L- "'......
j C e '" ~a Q) C e '" C c '" :1:"'0
!~ 41 . '" Gl . '" Gl ....
~ .c ~ .c ~ 0.... .c ~ 8~ .c GlO....
L. c<n <n <n c<n <n <n .c....u
i .... 41
41 ....
~~ "'0'"
~ N 10 ~ 0\Lt1 0\Lt1 O.cGl
10 ~~ 10 "1 N rt\ N "'Ul
~~ . . . . . . . . . . . Gl
10 1010 ,... 10 1010 .... .., ..,10 0\ .., ..,10 0\ 1II111.c
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ............
o L. - - - - ...e
'toe ::l::l....
t~ Ul 0 ::l
d? Gl U 0
............,..-- I..u.c
1:1 --- "'....
.., LI\ rt\ 10 rt\ LtI ,... N 0 co N .., LtI .., Gl ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . U"'CII .
t;1.. co ,... 10 0 rt\ co 0 .., .., 10 LtI 10 .... ,... e e
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... N '" .8 41
"e E ~
ca.. O"'CII l'lI
...e>
I.. '"
tD II Gl ....
0\ co ~I ~I .... ~I Q,~ 41
~ co LtI .... LtI ,... rt\ rt\ 2 LtI ~I 41 g :::
~ .... Si co 0 .... .... 10 LtI ,... 0 ~
1:~ 0\ LtI N 0 N .., LtI N .... LtI N .c....l'lI
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... a. ~III
LI\ C'f'l N N .., LtI rt\ 0\ 0 rt\ 10
~t ~~ .., .... N N N ,... co N 0 .... ....
rt\ N rt\ .... .... N N ....
N
cd? ...lI.l ......
>.
~I '5$!i ...
III
<n41 M ~ ! M ~ ~ M ~ M M ~
> ~C/I& LtI .... LtI LtI rt\
'" C 10 10 .., ,... 10 rt\ rt\ N rt\ rt\ "'CIIGl
....... ....Sl'll . . . . . . . . . . ~~e
III ~ e i~
8= III .
!~ Gl 0
,.. "'CII>.c
",a. celli
I.. "'....
....c: III
co ~eCll
8- ~ LtI 0 ;1 ,... co rt\ rt\ .... N .., co .., 0 rt\ 0\ \0 ~I go~
...: &~~ ~ .., .... ~ LtI rt\ co .., .., 0 0\ .., co co ,... 0 ....ee
0\ .., .... rt\ rt\ LtI N .... LtI rt\ 0 .... .., LtI N III.... I..
~l .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. a. .. .. "'CII ~:
.., I.. :J .., IS ,... 10 ,... rt\ N 0 N N ,... ~ rt\ co LtI .
I..~Jl'lI rt\ .., .., LtI co 0\ .., .., 0 N 0 co ... >-
~~ 41 ,.. .... rt\ rt\ rt\ .... .... \0 .... .., rt\ co rt\ N N O"'CII.......
~.., c! .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. "'Glee
.., .... rt\ rt\ .., .... LtI .., ....N::lO
"'CII a I..... 0
"'...UIII
f :I:"'u....
Gl '" e
I.. 8 41'" Gl
of - ~s~~
c! ~ LI\ co "': 0 0\ 0\ .... .... 0 LI\ 10 0\ 0 0\ 10 .., .... 0 1.."'CII.8 ~ _
"-'=I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o e >
B - 0 C'f'l LtI 0 & rt\ LtI 8 0\ LtI .., 0 co .., 10 8 ... "'"'CII e
I.. ,... N 0 10 N 0 co e..
ot; ... ... ... ... C"'CII ..,
. 41 e
'" - o N~ 0
,.. Cl ~;::ge
c! \0 .., 10 \0 10 .., co co "'......
co N 0 ,... rt\ 10 ,... 0 ... .., ~fUl~
1:: LtI co co N 10 0 rt\ ... N 0\ ... N rt\ 0 g ... 0\ ...
1:: ,... N ... N N ,... rt\ rt\ 10 ... 0\ \0 ,... LtI LtI 0 0\ e e
j .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. a. .. .. .. r;;. .. .. .. .0 r;;. 'I:-8il
::l LtI ~ N co co lB .., rt\ ,... ~ LtI LtI rt\ ..,
J .... .., Si 2 ... co rt\ Cl:) 2 ... rt\ N ,... 1..::l....N
N .., rt\ ... N .... 0 .., N LtI N rt\ ~ ,.,,...cn.. N
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Q)UQ)...
~ ... LtI rt\ .., .., ... LtI ~ LtI e. '" Cll
.... .... .... .... .... .... ........ Gl Q,
e ....1..
Gl III '" a.
~~f-8 ~
.. III ::l <.!' ::l (.)
)~ tS LE 0\ tS LE GlO ...
,.. LE ~ LE >UGlU ...
'" ... .... t ... ... ... " eu.cc c!
... ~ f I a:l .... '" l'lI ~ a:l MIG~'"
41 g "'CII ~ oJ, ... ~ I.. ~ I
e e Gl g g .. Gl g "'CII Gl g g "'CII U
41 .... c8 e e 0 c: e e e .... Q)
<.!' <n Gl .... .... c8 C'f'l ~ .... dl Gl .... .... dl .... ~
<.!' <n <n <n <.!' <n <n ...... "-
Q) ...
c:
.. :;, ~
; ...
Q)
1 Q,
.... '"
"'CII a.
I.. "'CII c: c: "'CII E
'" I.. I.. lI.l I.. e
: oe 41 oe ~ ~
i III
t .c t ....
I.. .... :: ..
'" '" :. i '" III
"'CII :I: :I: 0
c: ~ j a.
41 )( "-
,.. f <n
~ - <n
(!l <n (!l <n
....-.-...-..--..-.-.- _...~- .---~--.-.
.
Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary w~strict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE
OF 3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
September 21, 1989
NO.
IX.
ENGINEERING
1
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE GM-CE TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH DODSON &
YOUNG FOR DESIGN OF WATERSHED 23, PHASE II (THIRD AVENUE
AREA, WALNUT CREEK) SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, DP 4615
DATE
September 18, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE
AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Kyle L. Tonjes
Assistant En ineer
Department
Division
ISSUE: Authorization from the Board of Directors is
Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an agreement and/or
engineering agreement when it is greater than $50,000.
required for the General
amendment to a consulting
BACKGROUND: Watershed 23 contains a large number of deficient sewers. These
sewers are unable to convey peak flows resulting in frequent overflows during wet
weather periods. The District has completed preliminary sewer capacity studies
and identified deficient sewers throughout the watershed. Subsequent to the
completion of the capacity studies, the watershed was divided into four subareas
and ~rioritized for improvements. The Third Avenue subarea in north Walnut Creek
was ranked as the second highest priority behind the Country Gardens subarea which
is nearing design completion. The sewers in the Third Avenue subarea are
approximately 30 to 50 years old.
In March 1989, the Board authorized a consulting agreement with Dodson & Young to
conduct a Facilities Plan of the Third Avenue subarea. The Facilities Plan made
several recommendations for relieving hydraulic restrictions and repa1r1ng
deteriorated sewers. Specific recommendations include replacement and upsizing of
approximately 4,700 lineal feet of existing sewer and construction of a 4,400 foot
relief sewer along Buena Vista Avenue. The relief sewer will connect to sewer
improvements being designed under the Country Gardens Project. The estimated
construction cost for this project is $1,332,000.
Due to their satisfactory performance on the Facility Plan and familiarity with
the project, Dodson & Young is the engineering firm recommended to complete the
detailed design of the improvements. An amendment to the original consulting
engineering agreement with Dodson & Young has been negotiated with a cost ceiling
of $99,900. The scope of services includes preparation of plans and
specifications, permit assistance, and mapping services. Funding for the Third
Avenue Area Sewer Improvements Project was authorized in the 1989-1990 Capital
Improvement Budget (Page CS-50). Total project cost is estimated at $1,609,000.
The design of this project has been determined by staff to be exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines,
Section 17.3, since it involves a continuation of the planning study for the Third
Avenue Area Sewer Improvements Project. The District's Planning staff will review
the resulting design and prepare the appropriate CEQA documentation for the
construction project.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
KLT
f7~.~
DJC
(J/V
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
DRW
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE GM-CE TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH DODSON &
YOUNG FOR DESIGN OF WATERSHED 23, PHASE II (THIRD AVENUE
AREA, WALNUT CREEK) SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, DP 4615
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2
DATE
September 18, 1989
OF
3
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an
amendment to an agreement for professional engineering services with Dodson &
Young with a cost ceiling of $99,900.
1302B-9/85
THIRD AVE. ~?!/< .
STUDY AREA
x
r
r
::u
o
TO
SAN
FRANCISCO
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
.
TO SACRA MEN TO
"'\J
r
....
..
en
,.
Z
....
,
(
\Cl
~
\~
IP
I
\ OAK
\
"
'\
\
"
"
"Q
C
-i
Z
..
J:
~
..
z
PARK
GEARY
TREAT BLVD
r
,.
::u
"
....
-<
C/i.N/i.L _ __/
---
':"_..:-:.-;;::..
':.,;:"
.~..:@~~~;~-
~).
.-..... {ASAN -..-
.. >:;q~{%:i;:T::::::;:'.~':.:.
TO SAN JOSE
Watershed 23
District Project No. 4615
THIRD AVENUE AREA, WALNUT CREEK
FIG. 1
2513-1/87
- __^.....,.,._..__"'"__~___....____.__"____m._~___._.____...~_.~_."_.,_______'".~_.____~,_.___~._.__~~_."'.____._._~_.n..__.___,____....______ _"~_.._."..__,____._.,__~_~_.___,_
.
Centra. Contra Costa Sanitar) .listrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETIN~ OF
~eptember 21. 1989
NO.
X. PERSONNEL 1
SUBJECT
DATE
September 18. 1989
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARBITRATOR'S RE<XM4ENDATION, DENY THE
APPEAL OF TERMINATION BY ROB RAMSAY, MAINTENANCE CREW
lEADER
TYPE OF ACTION
PERSONNEL
SUBMITTED BY
Paul Morsen. Deputy General Manager
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Admfnfstratfve/Personnel
ISSUE: In accordance with the Grievance Procedure in the current Memorandum of
Understanding between the District and the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Employees' Association. Public Employees' Local No.1. the Board of Directors may
adopt. reject. or modi fy the recommendation of an appoi nted neutral thi rd party
(arbitrator) in appealed disciplinary matters.
BACKGROUND: Following progressive discipline. Mr. Rob Ramsay. Maintenance Crew
Leader. was terminated from his position for refusing to shave and be fit tested
.for respirator use as required by the District's Safety Policy <District Safety
Directive 7.1. Respiratory Protection Policy/Program). Mr. Ramsay appealed his
termination to the Board in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between
the parties. The Board authorized the selection process for securing the services
of an arbitrator to hear the appeal and make a recommendation to the Board for
their consideration.
The District chose Mr. Franklin Silver. Esq., as the arbitrator from a list
submitted by the State of California Mediation and Conciliation Service. The
arbitrator's decision has been distributed to the Board under separate cover. He
ruled on the issue of whether the District had just cause for discharging Mr.
Ramsay. and if not. what the remedy should be. In his Opinion. Mr. Silver states
his award as: 1.) deny the grievance; and 2.) the District had just cause for
termination.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny and dismiss the appeal of Mr. Rob Ramsay. Maintenance Crew
leader. as the final action of the District.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/~
.
POSITION
SUBJECT
Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 9
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
PERSONNEL
x.
2
1
1989
DATE
Septembe r 18, 1989
ADOPT CHANGES TO CLASS DESCRIPTIONS REGARDING RESPIRATORY
PROTECTION PROGRAM
TYPE OF ACTION
PERSONNEL
SUBMITTED BY
Paul Morsen. Deputy General Manager
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Administrative/Personnel
ISSUE: Changes to classification descriptions must be adopted by the Board of
Directors. Staff is requesting that language be added to the class description
to comply with the District's respiratory protection program.
BACKGROUND: The issue of shaving is sensitive among our employees and has been
an important subject of labor rel ations during the past year (Attachment A). As
a result staff has engaged an outside safety consul ant, Mr. Stanley Strizver, to
review our respiratory program in general and the list of positions required to
be covered under the program. The consultant's list of recommended positions are
attached for your reference (Attachment B). Staff is in the process of
implementing the consultant's recommendations as follows:
o
Co-op students, summer help, and temporary employees - respirator
use shall be determined by the individual department managers in
consultation with the District safety office.
o
New positions or existing positions established in different
departments - assessments shoul d be made by the District safety
office as to respiratory requirements and added to the District's
job description and employment notices.
o
Supervisor training - training should provide supervisors with the
knowledge evaluate employees' duties and exposures. Supervisors
shoul d be responsi bl e for the development of departmental safety
directives on the use of respirators for specific tasks. Employees
will be trained in respiratory requirements and potentially
hazardous conditions.
o
Cl ass descri ptions - all appropri ate cl ass descri ptions shoul d be amended to
include language on respiratory requirements.
In order to make sure job appl icants, new employees, and current employees
understand that compliance with the respiratory program is mandatory, staff is
proposing to include language recommended by the consultant in the class
descriptions.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
ADOPT (}IANGES TO CLASS DESaUPTIONS REGARDING RESPIRATORY
PROTECTION PROGRAM PAGE
DATE
2 OF
9
September 18. 1989
o
Employees who are in the Shave on Demand (SO) Category
''The use of respiratory equipment (including S.C.B.A.) may be
required for the position. Therefore. (insert position title) will
be requi red to be cl ean shaven for annual fit tests and for any
occasion which requires the use of respiratory equipment".
o
Employees who are in the Shave (5) Category must be Clean Shaven At
All Times
''The use of respiratory equipment (including S.C.B.A.) will be
requi red for thi s position. Therefore. (i nsert position titl e)
will be required to be clean shaven to comply with the District's
respiratory program and CAL/OSHA standards".
Staff has met and conferred with the Employees Association. Public Employees'
Local One. and the Management Support/Confidential Group on this issue. Attached
are 1 etters from each of these groups (Attachments C and D). Mr. Dav i d Pl att.
Assistant General Manager of Local One. disagrees with the consultant's
recommendation regardi ng the 1 aboratory personnel and has requested ti me to
address the Board when this item is calendared. Notwithstanding the Union's
position in this matter. staff recommends adopting the recommended language on
"shave" and "shave on demand" cl ass descri ptions in accordance with the
consultant's recommendation. (Attachment E.)
The Management Support/Confi denti al Group and staff have met and conferred in
good faith. Although Mr. Wayne Miner. Past President of Management
Support/Confi denti al Group. has not requested to make a presentati on to the
Board. it shoul d be noted for the record that Management Support/Confi denti al
Group would like to have all Instrument Shop personnel to be clean shaven at all
times. The consultant did not find this requirement to be necessary and staff
has supported his position.
This matter has been reviewed by the Board Personnel Committee.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board authorize modifications of the
appropriate class descriptions as delineated in the Strizver report. Attachment
A. to include language requiring incumbents to be clean shaven at all times or
shave on demand.
1302B-9/85
ATTACHMENT A
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL ONE
Mailing Address - P.O. Box 222, Martinez, CA 94553
Union Hall - 5034 Blum Road, Martinez, CA 94553
Phone (415) 228-1600
....-
O~G~nt'7~ill
'PI 3 lv~:)
",-. "'_ Iv-'
June 28, 1989
Mr. Paul Morsen
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, California 94553
r- 1';- -,
I>~; ;1. .'. .. . -.,-.'t
Dear Paul:
Subject: Beard Policy
At the Membersnip Meeting on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, the Union
voted to reject the modified beard policy. It is the Union's
position that the beard policy is discriminatory, in as much as
it deals differently with the Management than it does with the
workers, working under the same circumstances.
We recognize that the District has met and conferred with the
Union, but we do not believe that the outcome of these
negotiations were, in fact, appropriate. We recognize further
that the Board of Directors may act to implement the new policy.
By this letter I am requesting that I be placed on the agenda of
the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District in order to present the Union's view of the new policy
at the appropriate meeting.
Further, the Union wishes to state formally that we believe the
adoption of any procedures, as outlined in your letter to the
Union in regards to the implementation of the Beard POlicy, is a
new subject and must be negotiated with the Union.
Sincerely,
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL #1
~ 2/ .H--r~
David V. Platt
Assistant General Manager
DVP:omm
DP0009
cc: Russell Leavitt, President
All Executive Board Members
ATTACHMENT B,
CHANGES TO RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM
OF
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
(Barnes & Associates May 1989 Report by Stanley Strizver)
Legend:
S - Shave: must be clean shaven at all times
SD - Shave on Demand: shaving will be required for annual fit test and
training or specific assignments requiring respirator use
NS - No Shave: cannot be exposed to condi ti on req ui ri ng respi ratory
protection until training, testing, and certification is complete
Changes
Recommended
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT
Current
Accountant
Accounting Supervisor
Accounting Technician 1/11
Administrative Aide
Administrative Operations Manager
Administrative Secretary
Affirmative Action Compliance Officer
Building Maitenance Technician
Buyer III!
Deputy General Manager
Executive Secretary
Finance Officer
General Manager-Chief Engineer
Graphics Technician 1/11
Graphics Technician III
Materials Coordinator 1/11
Personnel Analyst 1/11
Personnel Assistant
Personnel Officer
Printer
Public Information Coordinator
Purchasing and Materials Officer
Receptionist
Safety and Loss Control Specialist
Secretary III!
Secreta ry I I I
Secretary of the District
Senior Accountant/Internal Auditor
Senior Building Maintenance Technician
Seni or Buyer
Senior Materials Coordinator
NS
NS
NS
NS
SO
NS
NS
SO
NS
SO
NS
NS
SO
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
SO
NS
NS
NS
NS
Revised 6-8-89
COLLECTION SYSTEM OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (CSO) Current
Administrative Secretary NS
Associate Engineer SD
Collection System Operations Department Manager SD
Construction Equipment Operator SD
Field Operations Superintendent SD
Junior Engineer SD
Maintenance Coordinator 1/11 NS,
Maintenance Crew Leader SD
Maintenance Crew Member 1/11, Trainee SD
Maintenance Supervisor SD
Operations Support Supervisor SD
Secretary 1/11 NS
Senior Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic NS
Vehicle & Equipment Maintenance Supervisor NS
Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic NS
Vehicle & Equipment Service Worker NS
Revised 6-8-89
Changes
Recommended
S
S
S
S
PlANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (POD) Current
Associate Engineer SO
Administrative Secretary NS
Assistant Engineer SO
Building and Grounds Supervisor S
Chemist 1/11 NS
Control Systems Engineer SO
Computer Systems Technician SO
Electrical Shop Supervisor SO
Electrical Technician SO
Instrument Shop Supervisor SO
Instrument Technician SO
Junior Engineer SO
Laboratory Superintendent NS
Laboratory Technician NS
Landscape Specialist SO
Machine Shop Supervisor SO
Machinist SO
Maintenance Coordinator IIII NS
Maintenance Crew Leader S
Maintenance Safety Specialist S
Maintenance Technician IIII S
Maintenance Technician II, Machinist, Trainee SO
Maintenance Technician III, Mechanical S
Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor S
Painter S
Plant Maintenance Superintendent S
Plant Operations Department Manager SO
Plant Operations Division Manager SO
Plant Operations Superintendent S
Plant Operator IIII, Trainee S
Plant Operator III S
Pumping Stations Superintendent SO
Pumping Stations Supervisor SO
Pumping Stations Operator IIII, Trainee SO
Secretary III I NS
Senior Chemist NS
Senior Engineer SO
Shift Supervisor S
Training and Resource Technician NS
Utility Worker S
Revised 8-8-89
Changes
Recommended
SO
SO
SO
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Current
Admi ni strative Analyst (Pl anni ng) NS
Assistant Engineer SO
Assistant Engineer (Watershed/Planning) SO
Associate Engineer SD
Associate Engineer (Pretreatment) SD
Collection System Inspection Supervisor SD
Construction Division Manager SD
Construction Inspector SD
Deputy Chief Engineer SD
Engineering Assistant (Contract Management) SD
Engineering Assistant (Permit,R.W.,Plan Review) SD
Engineering Assistant (Watershed/Planning) SD
Engineering Division Manager SD
Engineering Support Supervisor SD
Engineering Technician 1/11 SD
Engineering Technician III SD
Inspection Coordinator SD
Junior Engineer (Rotation) SD
Permit and Services Technician NS
Planning Assistant NS
Planning Division Manager SD
Principal Engineer SD
Real Property Specialist NS
Secretary 1/11 NS
Secretary III NS
Senior Construction Inspector SD
Senior Engineer SD
Senior Engineer (Capitol Budget & Watershed Plan) SD
Senior Engineering Assistant SD
Senior Survey Technician SD
Source Control Inspector (Pretreat-Plan) SD
Source Control Specialist (Pretreatment-Plan) NS
Survey Assistant SD
Survey Party Chief SD
Survey Supervisor SD
Revised 6-14-89
Changes
Recommended
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
S
NS
NS
NS
:. . :~:
-l
ATTACHMENT C
"
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT/CONFIDENTIAL GROUP
5019 IMHOFF PLACE
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
June 19, 1989
,
Mr. Paul Morsen
Deputy General Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place .
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. Morsen:
Regarding your letter dated June 8, 1989 about our Meet and Confer
session, the Management Support/Confidential Group has agreed to the
changes in the "shave, no shave," and "shave on demand" designation
except for the Instrument Shop.
The. rating of the emp10yee-;as to level of re$pirator usage was
introduced but was not a part of the Meet and Confer. The lists
8.1 and 8.2 do not reflect any prior restrictions.
We are looking forward to more training for the employees and
supervisors.
New policies for the shops seem like a good idea, but ninety
days in conjunction with the normal workload may be too con-
strictive. It was the Management Support/Confidential Group's
understanding that the employees in the affected areas would
be consulted regarding the new policies, not a Union representa-
tive.
:iM~C r:~~~
Way Mlner
Pres'dent
WGM:mg
/
cc: C. Freitas~
J. LePage
J. Miyamoto-Mills
B-o~
C & 0
0- A.-/
Safety and Health Consultants
August 17, 1989
MR. BRUCE LEPORE
Safety Director
Central Contra Costa Sanitary Dist.
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94533-4392
RE: Re-Evaluation of Respiratory Requirement of Lab Personnel
Dear Mr. Lepore:
At your request another inspection of the Lab was made on
August 1, 1989. This survey revealed that for personnel working
in the Lab and it's associated rooms the need for respiratory
protection was virtually non-exentant.
Our original conclusion was based primarily on information
taken from the Lab Safety Manual.
If the revised manual including both of our comment is
implemented, I feel we could support the No Shave category in the
Lab and storerooms proper.
During our meetings you mentioned that Management wishes to
retain the possibility of using Lab personnel to take field
samples. The only way that this could be handled would be to
designate Lab personnel that would be used and put them in the
Shave On Demand category or go back to our original decision for
the Lab.
We remain available for any further Health & Safety problems
that you may need assistances in.
Sincerely,
~
Stan Str'
P.E
7700 Edgewater Drive, Suite 651 . Oakland, California 94621 415-562-8822
/
.
Centra. Contra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF September 21, 1989
NO.
x.
PERSONNEL 3
SUBJECT
DATE
September 14, 1989
MODIfY Q.ASSIFlCATION DESaUPTIONS TO INQ.UDE DOT /I>>4V
REQIJ I RBENTS
TYPE OF ACTION
PERSONNEL
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Paul Morsen. Deputy General Manager
Administrative/Personnel
ISSUE: The Board of Directors must adopt any' changes to classification
'd'e'S'Criptions.
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Department of Transportation <D.O. T.) and the State of
California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) have imposed stringent new vehicle
licensing and testing requirements on driver's of heavy vehicles. These
requirements will affect a number of employees at Central San.
Effective January 1, 1991, or upon license renewal prior to January 1, 1991,
persons who drive vehicles with three or more axles, a gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR) of 26,001 pounds or more, or drive a trailer with a GVWR of 10,001
pounds or more, must have a valid Class B California Drivers License. This is a
new category of driver. Employees who previously carried a Class 1 license must
now have a Class A license. Nearly all employee classifications in the
Collection System Operations Department and one classification of employees in
the Plant Operations Department drive vehicles over 26,001 GVWR, depending on
their job assignment. Also, a special endorsement is required for tank vehicle
operators or for those driving heavy equipment to a construction site.
Accordi ng to the DMV requi rements, each affected driver must obtain a vali d
California Class A or B license by the date of his/her current license renewal or
no later than 1991. In order to obtain a Class A or B California Driver's
License, the employee must pass a physical examination, written test, a
practical examination given by DMV, meet a number of requirements as follows:
1) Must be physically examined by a U.S. licensed doctor of medici ne or
osteopathy every two years and carry a signed medical certificate;
2) Notify the Cal i forni a DMV of any convictions in other states within
thirty days of the conviction;
3) Notify the employer of any convictions within thirty days of the
conviction;
4) Notify the employer of any revocation, suspension, cancellation or
disqualification before the end of the business day following the
action;
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
\V2"
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
MODIFY QASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS TO INQUDE DOT /rI4V
REWIREMENTS
PAGE
DATE
2 OF
3
September 14, 1989
5) Provide the employer with a ten year commercial driving history;
6) Turn in all licenses issued by other states to the California DMV;
7)
Obtai n speci al endorsements as requi red, i.e. Speci al
Equipment Certificate, or Tank Combination/Bulk
Certificate.
Construction
Liquid Load
Upon an initial review, the following class descriptions would be affected.
Collection System Operations Department
Construction Equipment Operator
Maintenance Crew Member 1/11
Maintenance Crew Leader
Senior Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic
Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic
Vehicle & Equipment Service Worker
Vehicle & Equipment Supervisor
Plant Operations Department
Pumping Stations Operator 1/11
In order to compl y with the D.O. T. and DMV requi rements, the Di strict wi 11 be
taking the following actions:
1) Meeting with our occupational physician to provide physicals which meet
federal and state standards;
2) Requiring current employees to obtain the necessary licenses and
endorsements by the date of thei r 1 i cense renewal or no 1 ater than
January 1, 1991;
3) Requiring affected newly hired or promoted employees to possess the
necessary licenses and endorsements prior to successful completion of
probationary status and
4) Modifying all affected class descriptions to include the Class A or B
requi rements.
13028-9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
MODIFY a.ASSIFICATION DESmIPTIONS TO INa.UDE DOT/IJ4V
REWIREMENTS
PAGE
DATE
3
OF
3
September 14. 1989
Pursuant to Board direction. District staff will revise the aforementioned class
descriptions to include a valid California Class A or Class B Driver's license
with the necessary speci al endorsements for Construction Equipment or Tank
Combination/Bulk Liquid Loads. The language will read as follows:
"lICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
Possession of a valid California Class A (or B. dependent on job
description) driver's license. Must meet all written. physical.
testing and notification requirements established by the Department of
Motor Vehicles. Newly hired or promoted employees must meet this
requirement prior to successful completion of probationary status.
Possession of valid special endorsement to Class
Driver's License to operate heavy construction
combination/bulk liquid loads. as required."
A (or B)
equi pment
Cali forni a
or tank
Meet and Confer sessions have been held and concluded with Employees'
Association. Public Employees' Local One and the Management Support/Confidential
G ro up.
This matter has been reviewed and discussed with the Board Personnel Committee.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board authorize modification of the
class descriptions referred to in this position paper to include the requirement
for a valid California Class A or Class B Driver's License and necessary
endorsements.
13028-9/85
---_._..,----~..,---------~--~--_._,~--"----_."-_._~.-------_..._._.._-"'-_.._--_.._."._-_.~._-_.__.__.~.__._._.-.~.,._.-