HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 06-01-89
.
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETI~~R~ 1~ 1989
NO.
III. HEARINGS 1
SUBJECT
1989-1990 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET AND THE saF
INSURANCE FUND BUDGET AND FOR THE ESTJl8LISHMENT OF THE
1989-1990 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE RATES~ AND ON PLACING
QJRRENT AND DELINQUENT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROlL FOR COLLECTION
DATE
May 24~ 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT PUBLIC
HEARINGS
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Walter N. Funasaki, Finance Officer
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: The Di strict Codes and State 1 aw requi re hol di ng Publ ic Heari ngs for the
establ ishment of the 1989-1990 Sewer Service Charge rates, and on pl aci ng current
and delinquent the Sewer Service Charges on the County tax roll for collection.
BACKGROUND: Notice of the June 1~ 1989 Public Hearings to consider changes to the
current schedul e of Sewer Service Charge rates for the 1989-1990 fiscal year,
coll ecti on of the 1989-1990 Sewer Service Charges on the County tax roll, and to
receive and consider protests to having delinquent Sewer Service Charges collected
on the 1989-1990 tax roll, was duly given. It is recommended that three separate
hearings be held to consider the matters described.
Hearing to receive publ ic comment on the 1989-1990 Operations and Maintenance
(O&M) BudQet~ and for the establ ishment of the 1989-1990 Sewer Service CharQe
Rates:
The 1989-1990 O&M Budget was submitted to the Board of Directors for initial
review at the May 25, 1989 Board Meeting and is scheduled for approval at the
June 1 ~ 1989 Boa rd Meeti ng.
Upon approval of the 1989-1990 O&M Budget, and consideration of appropriate
1 evel s of reserves~ the Board is requi red to annually consi der changes to the
schedule of Sewer Service Charge rates.
HearinQ to consider collection of the 1989-1990 Sewer Service CharQes on the
County tax roll:
The 1 aw requi res that a Publ ic Heari ng be hel d each year before the Sewer
Serv ice Charge can be pl aced on the County tax roll. The Sewer Serv ice Charge
has been collected on the County tax roll since inception of the service
charge in 1976. Collection on the tax roll provides the most econanical and
efficient means for the District to collect the charges for the 125,000 or so
accounts. Effective with the 1982-1983 fiscal year, Contra Costa County
initiated a fee for collecting the Sewer Service Charge on the tax roll. The
County fee, which approximates $62,000 annually, is more econanical than the
alternative of a di rect bill ing by the District.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
d.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
1302A-9/85
WNF
PM
SUBJECT
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEAAINGS TO RECEIV E PUBLIC COMMENT
1989-1990 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUOOET AND THE SaF
INSURANCE FUND BUOOET AND FOR THE ESTPBLISHMENT OF THE
1989-1990 SEWER SERVICE CHAAGE RATES, AND ON PLACING
CURRENT AND DELINQUENT SEWER SERVICE CHAAGES ON THE COUNTY
TAX ROLL FOR ml I WN
POSITION
PAPER
PAGE
DATE
2
OF
3
May 24, 1989
Hearing to consider collection of delinquent Sewer Service Charge account:
The District bills certain property owners directly. During the 1988-1989
fiscal year, one owner was delinquent in paying the Sewer Service Charge which
was billed directly. Information regarding the delinquent account is
contained on the attached report. It is proposed that the delinquent charge be
collected on the 1989-1990 County tax roll, unless there is a valid protest.
The delinquent property owner was notified of the June 1, 1989 Public Hearing
by certified mail.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct three separate Public Hearings and upon their respective
conclusions, adopt resolutions for the following actions if considered
appropriate:
1. Approve the 1989-1990 Operati ons and Mai ntenance BUdget, and establish
the 1989-1990 Sewer Service Charge rate schedule.
2. Authorize collection of the 1989-1990 Sewer Service Charge on the
County tax roll.
3. Consi der protest and, if appropri ate, adopt the attached report
pursuant to Section 5473, Health and Safety Code, for collection of
delinquent Sewer Service Charges on the County tax roll.
13028-9/85
~
0
4-l CO
CO
en .
Q) +J r-l
tJ1 r-l I=: r-l
~ III ~ Q) 0'\
III +J j ~
..c: 0 0 r-l
U E-< 'lIl-
Q)
U
.,-i
:>
~
Q)
en
~ +J
Q) I=: <<l
~ Q) +J
Q) ~><en 0
en t::r+J Q) CO
I=: r-l ~
0'\ .,-i III Q) (V')
CO r-l I=: +J r--
0'\ Q) Q) I=: r-l
r-l OP-< H 'lIl-
I
CO
CO
0'\
r-l
ro
E-< E-< Q)
U S U
H .,-i
~ 0 0
E-< U :>
U) u I=: +J
H rex: .,-i I=: Q) CO
0 Q) U 0
~ >< ~ I=:
~ 19 r-l t::rlll CO
~ en I=:r-l (V')
ES rex: ~ .,-i III r--
a 0 r-l~ ,
H -,-i Q) r-l
~ 0'\ :> 0 'lIl-
~ co Q)
U) U 0'\ ~
H r-l 0,
ES ~ Q) 4-l
U) ~ I=: 0
OU) ~ r-l
U ~ IJ +J III ~ 0'\
I=: u III co
~ ~ ~ en Q) I
:3: .,-i >< co
E-< ~ r... co
Z U) III
0 0,
U E-<
Z I=:
H ~ .,-i
~()l +J
E-< Z I=:
ZH Q)
tJH ~
f:3 t::r en
I=: en I=:
-,-i <<l Q) III
r-l ~ I=:
Q) ~ ro III
ro Q) ro u 0 rex:
~ rex: ~ +J U
en r... I=:
.,-i >< -,-i
+J 0 P-< Q)
~ ~ -,-i r-l
Q) Q) I=: r-lr-l
~ 0, .,-i ~ .,-i
0 +J :>
0 ~ u L[) I=:
P-< .,-i o III
>< 0 NO
+J
~ ..
Q) ><
0,+J
0 ~ en
~ Q)
0,0, ~
0 0
tJ1 ~ en ""
I=: 0, en I
.,-i Q) co
~ ro en N
0 Q) en 0
r-l +J rex: I
r-l en 0 0
o -,-i ><Z 0
4-lr-l +J r-l
I=: I
Q) en ~ r--
..c: .,-i 0 0'\
E-< ..c: u r-l
-"-"0._------'------1-"--'
.
Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary ..,istrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
June 1, 1989
NO.
IV.
CONSENT CALENDAR 3
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 89-18 (DANVILLE AREA) TO BE
INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT
DATE
Ma 25, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION
FOR PROCESSING
SUBMITTED BY
Denn1 sHall ,
Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department!
Construction Division
Parcel
No.
Area
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Remarks
Lead
Agency
89-18
anv 11 1 e I Ahmanson Developments,Inc I The subj ect property 1 s
100E 5&6 1390 Willow Pass Rd., being combined with
Suite 500 adjoining property
Concord CA 94520 presently within the
203-180-06 (7.57 AC) District (a total of 35
Portion 203-180-02 acres) and is planned for
(0.79 AC) residential development as
Tract 7299 "The Images at
Danv1lle." The plan calls
for 120 townhouses and 77
detached homes. A
Negative Declaration has
been prepared by the Town
of Danv 11 1 e.
Town
of
Danv ill e
Joe S. Anderson, et ux
3743 Old Blackhawk Rd.
Danv1lle CA 94526
Remaining Portion of
203-180-02 (1.3 AC)
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 89-18 to be included in a future formal
annexation.
1302A-9/85
DH
I JSM
RAB
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
jMI)
~ pH
.. -----------.-----.-.~.-'---..--i-..----.,.----.--.--.....--,--.-.-,-~---+.,-,.-"'-.-...-.-,-~.
~~
;5f36
<!> THREE AREAS ARE NOT ANNEXED TO CCCSD
AND ARE DESIGNATED AS ISLANDS 1, 2, AND 3.
ISLAND 1 IS PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION.
.....~ \\..\..E-
O~r
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
P.A. 89-18
. .'-"---~'---r--""'-" - .- ..._._...._-_._..,.~---_._._-_.~----_._._...,_.._~.,_.--.-_.-
.
Centr.. Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR 4
DATE
Ma 25, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
SET PUBLIC
HEARING DATE
SUBJECT
SET JUNE 15, 1989, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE
DEQARATION AND APPROVAL OF THE WATERSHED 23
SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, DP 20057
SUBMITTED BY
Russe 11 Leav itt
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Plannin Division
ISSUE: District practice is to hold a public hearing prior to Board
consideration of approval of a Negative Declaration.
BACKGROUND: At its June 15, 1989, meeting, the Board will be requested to
approve a Negative Declaration prior to approving the Watershed 23 Sewer
Replacement Project.
The proj ect i nvol ves repl acement of certain deteri orati ng sewer pi pes beneath
Bonni eLane, Bonni e Pl ace, Geary Bl vd., Hoover Court, Oak Park Bl vd., Oak Park
Lane, Putnam Blvd., Vessing Road, and Vicki Lane in Pleasant Hill and Camino
Verde in Walnut Creek (see Figure 1). The goals of the project are to minimize
future sewer overflows, correct hydraul ic defi ci enci es, and reduce hi gh
maintenance requirements in the project area.
It is customary to hol d a publ ic heari ng to receive publ ic comments on the
Negative Decl arati on duri ng the Board meeti ng at which the Negative Decl arati on
is presented for consideration of approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Set June 15, 1989, as the date for a publ ic heari ng to receive
public comment on the Negative Declaration for the Watershed 23 Sewer Replacement
Proj ect, DP 20057.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302.....9/85
RL
JMK
R.AB
{jZ:
ROGER J. DOLAN
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
~L
JI1Ic
M
Existing sewer
Proposed sewer replacement
~. Sewer abandonment
a)
>
c(
~
...
G>
.c
.0;: \
~ i
n
WALNUT
CREEK
Barnette Cir.
'0
a:
Creston Rd.
Dorothy Dr.
a)
L"ke'Ln] >
c(
PLEASANT HILL [
...
'"
G>
C>
L
G)
Page 2 of 2
(3
'0
]1
~
.c ..:
~ 0
'0
C
flI
-.::
G>
.D
E
:J
o
u
ffi~
C
Ln.
c:
Blvd. 0
~-o.
CD>
Innnn'll~m
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
Watershed 23
Sewer Replacement Project
Figure
1
.
Centra. Contra Costa Sanltar~ District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION PAPER BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR 5
SUBJECT
ESTABLISH DATE FOR lHE PUBLIC HEARING (}J lHE
PROPOSED FY 1989-90 SOlEDJLE OF O&M RATES AND
CHAAGES EXCEPT FOR SEWER SERV ICE OlARGES
DATE
Ma 26, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
SET PUBL IC
HEARING DATE
SUBMITTED BY
Barton L. Brandenburg
Associate En ineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Plannin Division
ISSUE: A public hearing is required by District Code prior to the adoption of a
new schedule of O&M rates and charges.
BACKGROUND: The current District schedule of O&M rates and charges has been in
effect since November 16, 1987. These rates were previously established after an
in-depth study by District staff and a public hearing which was held on October
29, 1987. This year, staff proposes that the rates and charges be revised to
coincide with the beginning of the new fiscal year. This allows more accurate
fiscal year revenue projections. As part of the rates and charges review,
District staff has analyzed the available data for the cost of providing various
District services. A proposed new schedule of rates and charges has been
developed. Only 4 of the 32 fees are proposed to be increased greater than the
cost-of-living salary increases for staff.
District staff is in the process of notifying the District's permitted waste
haulers, representatives from the Building Industry Association of Northern
Cal Horni a, the Underground Contractors' Associ ati on, and the Associ ati on of
General Contractors to provide copies of all appropriate background information
and to respond to preliminary questions.
RECOMMENDATION: Establ ish June 15, 1989, as the date for the publ ic hearing on
the proposed new schedul e of fees and authorize District staff to publ ish a
notice of the public hearing.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A.9/85
BLB
JMK
RJ1B
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
I!tA
J M f(...
(Itt
^.,~_~.______._".___._.____"___.__.._,."_._____~..._._,._.__.___.,.,________.___,.,__.'____m~.'.m__'....__,.___"_..__~..".__._.__._"_,,. ..~,......_....__._.___
.
Central ~ontra Costa Sanitary ..,istrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
June 1, 1989
NO.
v.
ENGINEERING
1
SUBJECT
CONSIDER A REVISION TO THE DISTRICT'S APPROACH TO
THE QUITClAIMING OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS
DATE
May 25, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
REVISE BOARD
POLICY
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy
Construction Division Manager
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department/
Construction Division
ISSUE: It is possible to generate revenue when certain easements are
qui tcl aimed.
BACKGROUND: Furman Properties, owner-developer of Subdivision 6511, has
requested the District to quitclaim the sewer easement which lies within Lot 22 of
Subdivision 6511. The subject easement was granted to the District in 1955. The
easement was used for the offsite sewer serving Subdivision 2078, located to the
south of Subdivision 6511. A portion of this offsite sewer within Subdivision
6511 has now been abandoned and rerouted to an exi sti ng sewer to the west. The
subject easement is no longer required and may now be quitclaimed.
Staff agreed to quitcl aim the easement and started the process to do so. In
reviewing this particular easement, it was noted that if the easement is
quitclaimed, the value of the lot would be more; hence, the existing easement has
a value. In future similar instances, staff could negotiate with developers and
reach agreement on the value of the existing easement. Normally, the criteria
used to set the value of easements which we acquire could be used. The easement
could then be quitclaimed after payment was made to the District. Since this
approach is different from the traditional approach towards quitclaims, change in
Board pol icy woul d be requi red. This new approach woul d be used when easements
bisect lots and the replacement easement, if there is one, does not.
With respect to the request by Furman Properties, the District pol icy of paying
the processing fee ($87) for quitclaiming the easement which lies within Lot 22
was communicated to the developer. It would not seem to be proper to require
Furman Properties to pay the District for the value of the easement within Lot 22.
Furman Properties has paid the District's processing fee. It should be noted that
the District did not actually pay for most of the easements which we own. Most
were dedicated by developers.
The quitclaiming of the easement has been evaluated by staff and determined to be
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEnA) under District CEnA
Guidelines Section 18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use
limitations.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RAB
1302A-9/85
_...,--~-----'--~.._'--~_._-'---_.._-----_.__.__..._----_.,--,~",~'--'~.'-----"-'- ......_-_.__.~---
SUBJECT
CONCUR WITH A REVISION TO THE APPROACH TO THE
QUITCLAIMING OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS
POSITION
PAPER
PAGE
DATE
2
OF
3
May 25, 1989
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Concur with the new approach outlined above to be effective July 1, 1989.
2. Approve Quitclaim Deed to Furman Properties, Job 460, authorize the President
of the Di stri ct Boa rd of Di rectors and the Secreta ry of the Di stri ct to
execute said Quitclaim Deed, and authorize the Quitclaim Deed to be recorded.
~)
1...._______.
13028-9/85
QUITCLAIM
EASEMENT
cv
I-..
o
-..J
~
~<v Gl
\~ /~ ~
~ ~) ~
~ q~~
~ ,Gl "
~)~
1\
RE-ROUTED SEWER
QUITCLAIM EASEMENT
JOB 460 PORTION PARCEL 1
LAFAYETTE AREA
SUB 2078
\
I
.
Centra.. Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION PAPER BOARDMEETINJ"?;e 1, 1989
SUBJECT
CCCSD CONTRIBUTION FOR FUNDING THE COUNTY'S
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES STRIKE FORCE
NO.
V. ENGINEERING 3
DATE
May 26, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
COMMITMENT OF
FU NDS
SUBMlITEDtBY L
~ar on . Brandenburg
Associate Engineer
INITIA~NGfEPTJDWn D tm t/
cng neerl g epar en
Planning Division
ISSUE: Contra Costa County Health Services Department has requested that the
District provide partial funding of the Environmental Crimes Strike Force.
BACKGROUND: In May 1988 the Contra Costa County Health Services Depar"bnent
submitted a proposal to the County's Hazardous Materials Council requesting that
an environmental strike force be formed. This strike force woul d be headed by a
Deputy District Attorney and woul d consist of three staff positions. The strike
force woul d al so be suppl emented by sanitary agency staff, pol ice, and fi re
departments.
The County has estimated that the first-year cost of establ ishing the strike
force is $295,000. A cooperative effort has been proposed by the County which
would involve the County, cities, and sanitary agencies in cost sharing for the
fi rst year's expenses. The formul a proposed by the County is to have the County
fund the Hazardous Materials Specialist position, overhead costs for strike force
members, and provide secretarial and clerical services. The County costs would
be approximately $45,000 for the Specialist position and $95,000 for overhead and
clerical support for a total County share of $140,000. The remaining costs
($155,000) are proposed to be funded by individual cities and sanitary agencies
who woul d benefit from increased enforcement of hazardous waste laws. Sanitary
agencies are being asked to contribute $62,000 (40 percent of the remaining costs
after the County's share) for the fi rst-year cost of the stri ke force. County
staff has stated that the Environmental Crimes Strike Force will be funded by the
County after the first year.
Attachment A shows the funding allocation for sanitary agencies based on average
sanitary flow. The County's proposal was presented to the District's Board in
July 1988. The Board expressed willingness to contribute a fair and equitable
share of the strike force funding; however, two concerns were raised and
transmitted to the County:
1. The County shoul d fi rst prov i de the sani ta ry agenci es and ci ti es with a
cl ear commi"bnent to fund the County's share and that the contri buted
funds would be dedicated solely to investigating and prosecuting
environmental crimes.
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
~vfJ
J M, iI-'
/!f1(J
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A ..9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CCCSD CONTRIBUTION FOR FUNDING THE COUNTY'S
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES STRIKE FORCE
PAGE 2
OF 3
DATE
May 26, 1989
2. A representative porti on of the activity of the stri ke force shoul d be
directed toward toxics problems that fall within the responsibility of
sanitary agencies.
County Health Services responded, in an August 1988 letter to the Board, that
they are committed to an ongoing Environmental Crimes Strike Force. This would
include a dedicated hazardous materials position, clerical, and operational
support to the stri ke force. Al so, the Di stri ct Attorney's off i ce would dedi cate
a full-time Deputy Di stri ct Attorney and hal f-time investi gator for stri ke force
activities. The County has al ready committed $50,000 to fund the Hazardous
Materials Specialist position. Also, the County committed, in a May 23,1989,
letter, that oversight of the strike force activities will be through the
Hazardous Materi al s Council along with a subcommittee of the Hazardous Materi al s
Commission. This subcommittee will consist of the two members of the Commission
representing cities and sanitary districts. The inclusion of a sanit~ry district
representative in the oversight activity represents a commitment to di rect a
representative porti on of the stri ke force activity to sani tary agency toxi cs
invest i gati ons.
The County has asked that sanitary agencies and cities commit the necessary funds
by July 1, 1989, so that the budgeting and hiring process may begin. Almost all
of the cities have contributed their share of the funds. The sanitary districts
have not contributed funds because of the delay in receiving a written commitment
from the County regarding the sanitary districts' role in oversight
responsi biliti es. It appears to staff that the County has made the necessary
commitments for the Di stri ct to commit funds to the Envi ronmental Crimes Stri ke
Force.
RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether or not the District's requested expenditure
is consistent with the Board's perceived needs for the level of protection
provi ded by the Envi ronmental Crimes Stri ke Force. If so, authorize payment of
$33,046 of O&M funds for the Di stri ct' s share of the Envi ronmental Crimes Stri ke
Force.
13028-9/85
~
0::
o
l1...
W
~
H
~
V)
>-
I-
:z:
=>
8
CD
t- ,....
10 ...,
.s:::. '"'
V)
10
~
10
t-
o
t- ,....
a...~
'"'
0::
o
l1...
:z: CD
o
H 10
I- t-
<: CD
() >
o <C
-'
ci
(!'
:z:
H
a
:z:
=>
l1...
>-
()
:z:
w
~
>-
0::
<:
I-
H
:z:
<:
V)
\D
~
o
...
(V)
(V)
(V)
.
(V)
Lt)
a
~
fj
o
.
0\
(V)
..-
l1...
-0
(1)
i:
CD
V)
III
CD
.....
~
.....
()
10
..."0
CDC~
..-..... ::J
..-t-c
~..-o..-
0> 10
.... C ... 3:
t- 10 10
+JaO)...
III 10 C
.... ... t- 0
O"OOE
t-::E I\J
>.0 0::
t- 0 ...
IUCNC
~OCDIU
....()cV)
C ..-
I'tl ...~ ...
(I) CD t-..-
"0 I\J..-
10 >.::E ..-
~..- ::c
III () ...
8 CD ~
...~ C
C~IU
1'tl0 CD III
'- ~ >. Itl
+J >. 10 CD
CI\J'+-..-
8r- I\JO-'
()--l
o
C
CD
<C
r- ... 0
IUOOU---
t-E..-CD.:>C
+J1\J.D.s:::.CD
C r- I\J U (1)
CD<C..-I\Jt-
()~aa...()
o
0\
co
...
Lt)
Lt)
.
0\
o
I"-
C
I\J
tU"l
.... ...
'--0
+Jc
III 0
..... E
O.s::.
o
~cr
10
+J ..
....(!)
C+-,
I'tl c
CI) 10
t-
I'tl.o
ta
8.-
w
I'tl
t-
+J+>
c+>
8~
u
+JO
III \...
CDO
:J:~
~
0\
~
...
co
l"-
.
(V)
r-l
o
.
o
r-l
o
r-
.D
10
0-
...
0)
t-
t~
..... III
t-~
+J~
1Il...-
....a...
c
...
c>.
o 10
.... ro
+J
I'tl>.
~t-
....CD
C >
I'tlo,....
(1)00)
III t-
o ..- ::J
r- a ~
.D III
I'tl ...~
..... .s:::. +>
00..-
OCL
I'tl..-
+J~~
r- C 1Il
(!) <: Q)
o '"' 3:
ATTACHMENT A
o
o
......
('t')
o
.
Lt'l
r-
(V)
tg
-~
t-O)
~~
- III
Cc
CD
~~
I'tl ..
~o
-~
c.....
I'tl t-
V) t-
Q)
CD()
0)
CD..-
~w
V) ~
.q-
\D
(V)
...
......
N
.
N
\0
.
r-l
"0
C
o
E
.s:::.
o
-
0::
t
-
c..
~
-
o
t'
I'tl
~
-
C
I'tl
(I)
~
CD
-,....
> N
c Q)
- C
I'tl..-
~~
C t-
::J I\J
O::E
::E~
co
\0
co
.q-
.
r-l
o
r-l
t
....
'-
~
....
C
III
CD
o
-
i:
CD
(I)
c
o
E
I'tl
0::
C C
I'tl 0
V) E
I I\J
co::
.....
r- C
~ I\J
::JV)
a
o
0\
co
...
Lt)
Lt)
.
0\
o
I"-
-0
C
o
E
.s:::.
o
.....
0::
Page 3 of 3
o
.q-
N
...
......
o
.
N
Lt)
.
r-l
CD
r-
o
C
.....
a...
.q-
.q-
I"-
N
.
r-l
0\
.
o
o
(1)
-0
o
0::
\0
0\
.q-
co
.
o
\0
.
o
-0
o
o
.
oj-)
c
CD
t-
O)
co
\0
co
o
o
o
...
N
\0
...,
.q-
.
o
.
o
o
r-l
r-l
o
t :
,
(V)
.
r-l
(V)
I"-
;t
I-
~
III
CD
r-
::J
()
t-
-i
.
Centra.. Contra Costa Sanitar) District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF
POSITION
PAPER BOARD MEETING OF
June 1, 1989
NO.
VIII. BUDGET AND FINANCE 1
DATE
May 17, 1989
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT WORKSHOP
SUBJECT
CONDUCT A BOARD WORKSHOP ON THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR
1989-90 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET (CIB)
SUBMITTED BY
John J. Mercurio
Administrative Analyst
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Department
Planning Division
~: A workshop has been scheduled to facilitate the Board's review of the
draft Fiscal Year 1989-90 Capital Improvement Budget.
BACKGROUND: The draft Fiscal Year 1989-90 Capital Improvement Budget was
di stri buted to the Board on May 18, 1989. A Board workshop has been schedul ed
for the June 1,1989, Board meeting to provide an opportunity for staff to
present specific information and to facilitate review of the document in greater
detail. A proposed agenda for the workshop is presented in Attachment I.
Board adoption of the Fiscal Year 1989-90 Capital Improvement Budget will
authorize sewer construction funds to pursue projects within the Treatment Plant,
Collection System, and General Improvements Program Budgets. The program budgets
for Fiscal Year 1989-90 are presented below:
CAPITAL IMPROVEtJENT BUDGET SUMMARY
Pro!:jr am
Estimated
Ca rry Over
Additi onal
Authorizati on
ReQ ue sted
Total
Authorizati on
Treatment Plant
Collection System
General Improvements
T ota 1 FY 1989-90
Budget
$ 8,364,000
11,044,000
573,000
$19,981,000
$ 5,100,000
18,337,000
1,867,000
$25,304,000
$13 ,464,000
29,381,000
2,440,000
$45,285,000
Attachment 2 lists major projects for each of the three programs separately.
These major projects are estimated to make up 80 percent of the $45,285,000 total
authorization for Fiscal Year 1989-90.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a Board workshop on the draft Fi scal Year 1989-90
Capital Improvement Budget.
f#9B
MfIPB
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
ATTA(}i~NT 2A
lREATIENT PlANT PROGRAM
CAPITAL ItfJROVEM:NT BUDGET
MAJOR PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
PROJ ECT
Chlorine Contact Basin
Co-Composting Feasibility Project
Dewatering System Improvements
Dewatering System Improvements -
Mixing
Headworks Facilities Expansion
Near Term
Industrial Wastewater Reclamation -
Long Term
MHF Operation Improvements
Outfall Proj ect, Phase III
Secondary Clarifier Expansion
Secondary Clarifier Improvements
Sludge/Ash Handling Project
Solids Treatment Facilities
Improvements
Treatment Plant Landscaping,
Phase I
Treatment Plant Master Plan
Treatment Plant Remodel, Phase II
Treatment Plant Testing - MHF
Emission
Maj or Projects Total
Total Treatment Plant Budget
Percent Maj or Proj ects
of Treatment Plant Budget
ESTIMATED
CARRY OVER
(A)
$ 0
o
2,172,000
419,000
383,000
170,000
1,000
o
o
o
310,000
190,000
361,000
310,000
o
40,000
ESTIMATED
ALLOCATION
TH IS FY
(B)
$ 275,000
250,000
o
o
1,700,000
750,000
205,000
433,000
1,100,000
550,000
514,000
130,000
o
o
310,000
150,000
Page 2 of 4
TOTAL
AUTHORIZATION
(A + B)
$ 275,000
250,000
2,172,000
419,000
2,083,000
920,000
206,000
433,000
1,100,000
550,000
824,000
320,000
361,000
310,000
310,000
190,000
$4,356,000
$10,723,000
$6,367,000
$4,795,000
$13 ,464,000
91%
$8,669,000
73%
80%
Page 3 of 4
ATTAa-ttvENT 2B
OOLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
CAPIT 1L IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
MAJOR PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ALLOCATION TOTAL
CARRY OVER 11-1 IS FY AU 11-1 OR IZ AT ION
PROJ ECT (A) ( B) (A + B)
Arlene Drive Sewer Improvements $ 51,000 $ 450,000 $ 501,000
Camino Tassajara Trunk Sewer 0 750,000 750,000
Extension
Contra Costa Boulevard/A-Line 253,000 294,000 547,000
Facil iti es Pl an
Contra Costa Boulevard, Phase IA 0 962,000 962,000
Orinda/Moraga Pump Station Reliability 0 480,000 480,000
Improvements, Phase I
Orinda/Moraga Pumping Stations Standby 60,000 577,000 637,000
Power
Flow Control Structure/Olympic and 40,000 443,000 483,000
Newell
Hall Drive Sewer Improvements 58,000 1,309,000 1,367,000
1-680/ SR-24 Sewer Rel ocati ons, 120,000 1,000,000 1,120,000
Phase II
1-680/ SR-24 Sewer Rel ocati ons, 0 400,000 400,000
Phase III
M-2/M-4 Force Main Parallel 294,000 2,600,000 2,894,000
Martinez Early Start Sewer 1,247,000 0 1,247,000
Improvements
Martinez/Fairview/Maltby PS Upgrade 0 404,000 404,000
Martinez Sewer Improvements 130,000 1,069,000 1,199,000
Rehabilitation Area 5L, Phase I
Orinda Crossroads/Moraga Pump 0 789,000 789,000
PS Rehabilitation - Near Term
Pipe Bursting Projects 0 425,000 425,000
Sewer Rehabilitation Demonstrations 0 609,000 609,000
Third Avenue Area Sewer Improvements 25,000 2,484,000 2,509,000
Walnut Creek Downtown Bypass, 4,471,000 0 4,471,000
Ph ase II
Watershed 23 Sewer Improvements, 1,711,000 0 1 ,711 ,000
Phase I
Maj or Proj ects Total $8,460,000 $15,045,000 $23 ,505,000
T ota 1 Collection System Budget $9,577,000 $19,804,000 $29,381 ,000
Percent Maj or Proj ects
of Collection System Budget 88% 76% 80%
-------,-"'_..~-----"-"_..,---~"--'_._..._'_.,-_.- ,-".._,,---_._._-_._~-_._._-,..,..---_......., . -,._._...._-_.,._-,."._-,_.,.._.~--~,.._.,-_.. ......-.._._.~,._._---_.-~._-,._.- .. - .._.__..-.--,.._._.._---,_.._.....~--"..._,,-,_._.--_. .....".....,..,.---.-.--
Page 4 of 4
ATTAOitvENT 2C
GENERAl ItfJROVEtENTS PROGRAM
CAPITAl ItfJROVEtENT BUDGET
MAJOR mOJECTS IN FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED ALLOCATION TOTAL
CARRY OVER TH IS FY AUTHORIZATION
PROJ ECT (A) (B) (A + B)
Computer Aided Mapping and $ 201,000 $ 400,000 $ 601,000
Drafting System
Property Acquisition - Future 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
Vehicles, Equipment and Furniture 0 548,0.00 548,000
Acqui siti on
Major Projects Total $ 201,000 $ 1,948,000 $ 2,149,000
Total General Improvements Budget $ 221,000 $ 2,219,000 $ 2,440,000
Percent Maj or Proj ects
of General Improvements Budget 91% 88% 88%