HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 07-16-92
~ Centrai ~ontra Costa Sanitary Jistrict
Mo.~.1k BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
2
NO.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR e.
DATE July 7, 1992
APPROVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY WITH
ROBERT T. REIMER AND KAREN E. REIMER, JOB 3651
WALNUT CREEK AREA
TYPE OF ACTION
APPROVE REAL
PROPERTY AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Div.
ISSUE: The property owners have requested the District's approval to allow the encroachment
of a redwood deck and a hot tub over a District easement.
BACKGROUND: The proposed deck and hot tub will be constructed within a portion of an
existing easement on Mr. and Mrs. Reimer's property. An a-inch ductile iron sewer pipe was
installed within the easement at a depth of about 10 feet in 1982. The property owner has
cooperated with District staff by providing construction drawings of the deck and has paid the
District's fee for processing the subject agreement.
Staff has determined that the improvements will not interfere with the present use of our sewer.
However, if the need should arise, the agreement requires the property owner to move the deck
at his/her expense within 30 days of notice to do so.
This project (the proposed agreement) has been evaluated by staff and determined to be exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section
18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use limitations.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Agreement relating to Real Property with Robert T. Reimer
et ux, Job 3651, .and authorize the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the
District to execute the said agreement, and authorize the agreement to be recorded.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV
~~
1302A-9/85 DH
1
-y
8" OJ.P.
LAWN
I
c
o
o
3:
I I 10' S.S.E. I
HOUSE .....
~
ELEVATION VIEW
LOOKING NORTH 0
...
18" OJ.P.
o
REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT
JOB 3651
WALNUT CREEK AREA
,--
~ Central ~g~~~ ~~~~R~~~ba~~ .Jistrict
PAGE 1
OF 2
POSITION PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
NO.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR f.
DATE July 6, 1992
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 92-5 (DANVILLE AREA)
TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO
THE DISTRICT
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION FOR
PROCESSING
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Div.
Parcel
No.
92-5
Area
Danville
Owner
Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Allen E. Nugent, etux
708 Danville Blvd.
Danville, CA 94526
200-100-005 (O.78Ac.)
Remarks
Lead
Agency
CCCSD
Existing house with a
failing septic system;
must connect to the
public sewer system.
Project is exempt from
CEQA.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 92-5 to be included in a future formal annexation.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JX(
11'/i/
~
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
1302A-9/85
DH
JSM
RAB
....-...-....r...
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
P .A. 92-5
....T.
~ Central ~g~~~ g~~~R~~~ba~~ Jistricl
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
NO_
SUBJECT
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
DATE July 6, 1992
ESTABLISH AUGUST 6, 1992, AT 3:00 P.M. AS THE DATE
AND TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON ANNEXATION 120 AS
AMENDED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
(LAFCO)
TYPE OF ACTION
SET PUBLIC
HEARING
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV
Engineering Dept./lnfrastructure Div.
ISSUE: LAFCO has added properties to several of the parcels which are a part of District
Annexation 120. A public hearing must be held before this District can order the annexation of
these amended parcels.
BACKGROUND: The above-referenced annexation was sent to LAFCO as required for the formal
annexation process. LAFCO has amended the boundaries of several of the parcels as submitted
by the District. The amended parcels are designated as D.A. 120, Parcels 6, 7 and 8. As
required by law, staff will notify all affected property owners 1 5 days prior to the public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: Set a public hearing date on August 6, 1992, at 3:00 P.M. for the
annexation of the above-referenced territories as amended by LAFCO.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
RAB
4)1{
1302A-9/85 DH
0/
JSM
JII(J
INITIATING DEPT/DIV_
---.-------------------- -T--
~ Central ~g~~~ g~~~R~~~::~~ &.Iistrict
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
NO.
4. HEARINGS a.
DJU'fy 13, 1992
TEOj([df:j~ PUBLIC
HEARING TO ADOPT
REVISED ORDINANCE
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REVISED
SOURCE CONTROL ORDINANCE
SUBMITTED BY
Bart Brandenburg,
Source Control Su erintendent
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering/Planning
ISSUE: A public hearing is required prior to the adoption of a revised Source Control Ordinance.
BACKGROUND: Updates to the Source Control Ordinance were adopted on March 19, 1992.
Additional revisions now need to be made to reflect review comments by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB). These additional revisions were anticipated by staff and were
mentioned at the March 19, 1992, meeting. The RWQCB reviewed the Source Control
Ordinance to determine whether the District authorities were adequate to ensure compliance
with the Federal Pretreatment Regulations. Most of the ordinance revisions are minor technical
corrections. The two more important issues are summarized below.
10.08.060 National Pretreatment Standards
The RWQCB required the District to incorporate by reference the National Categorical
Pretreatment Standards. Although this revised paragraph reflects the requirements included
in the attachment, it is a cumbersome process because the District's ordinance as well as the
Concord and Clayton ordinances will have to be amended as pretreatment standards are
revised. It is anticipated that revisions will be infrequent. Therefore, staff considers this
requirement to be acceptable.
Permit Contracts
The RWQCB recommended deleting the permit contract provisions of the ordinance and instead
wishes permits to be the controlling document. Staff believes that it is better to issue permit
contracts where the discharger may have wastewater with unique characteristics such as from
a hazardous waste site or a refinery. Staff views a permit contract as a more stringent
document than a permit and thus protects the rights of the District. Accordingly the permit
contract provisions are not deleted in the attachment. This has received tentative approval
from the RWQCB.
Staff has also taken the opportunity to (1) revise the waste hauler sections of the ordinance
to include conditions under which a waste hauler permit may be denied, revoked, or suspended,
and (2) revised the monitoring section of the ordinance to clarify the sampling protocols.
INITIATING DEPT/DIV.
fJk'cu
ACTION
~t;!
1302A-9/85
BLB
DRW
RAB
KLA
SUBJECT
11111'llllel!
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REVISED
SOURCE CONTROL ORDINANCE
PAGE
DATE
2
OF 2
~uly 13, 1992
Recent enforcement issues with septage haulers have been dealt with under the language of
Section B, page 68. The proposed language in Section C provides additional clarity to the
District's authority when compliance issues arise.
The ordinance revisions presented in the position paper have been transmitted to the RWQCB
for their approval. Staff believes these revisions will be approved by the RWQCB. However,
the possibility of future minor changes cannot be ruled out.
The proposed ordinance has been sent to 58 existing and potentially new permitted industries.
In addition, an article was published in the Contra Costa Times which summarized the major
changes. No comments have been received to date. Staff will make a brief presentation on
the proposed changes to the Source Control Ordinance at the public hearing.
As required by law, the ordinance revisions have been on file for 15 days in the office of the
District Secretary. Copies of the ordinance revisions were previously provided to the Board
with the position paper setting the public hearing date.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing on the revised Source Control Ordinance.
Consider, revise as appropriate, and adopt the proposed changes to the Source Control
Ordinance.
13028-7/91
-- - -------------.... ---- -- ---- - -- ------T ---------------------------- - ---- -- -
ORDINANCE NO. 92___
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA
COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT AMENDING
TITLE 10 OF THE DISTRICT CODE
(SOURCE CONTROL/PRETREATMENT)
WHEREAS, the existing Source Control (Pretreatment) Ordinance
found in Title 10 of the existing District Code was adopted on
April 19, 1991 and amended on March 19, 1992, which amendment
primarily implemented enforcement provisions made available to the
District through recent amendments to the California Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board has required
and/or recommended further amendments to the Source Control
Ordinance to achieve technical compliance with its uniform
standards; and
WHEREAS, the Sections of existing Title 10 which will be
amended by this Ordinance are: Sections 10.04.020, 10.08.020,
10.08.040, 10.08.060, 10.08.070, 10.12.030, 10.12.040, 10.12.050,
10.12.060, 10.12.080, 10.12.100, 10.12.110, 10.12.120, 10.16.060,
10.16.110, 10.28.020 and 10.28.030; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act requires
guidelines be adopted, said guidelines to include a list of exempt
classes of proj ects which have been determined not to have a
significant effect on the environment; and said exempt classes
-1- F:\DMS\MC.DIR\0048765.01
-----..-..--------r--
include actions taken by regulatory agencies, pursuant to state or
local ordinances, to assure the maintenance, restoration,
enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory
process involves procedures for protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, these amendments have been evaluated and the Board
finds that said amendments are a regulatory action necessary to
assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement and protection of
the environment; and
WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing on the proposed
amended Source Control Ordinance has been published in the Contra
Costa Times, and copies of the proposed amended Ordinance were
mailed to fifty-eight (58) existing and potentially permitted
industrial users; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amended Source Control Ordinance has
been available at the Office of the Secretary of the District for
the public to review for a period of fifteen (15) days or longer;
and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held on
July 6, 1992 to receive comments on the proposed amended Source
Control Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra
Costa Sanitary District does hereby ordain and enact the amendments
to Title 10 as are set forth in full text of Amended Title 10
attached as Exhibit "A" hereto, and further accordingly amends the
District Code. This Ordinance shall be a general regulation of the
-2-
F:\DMS\MC.DIR\0048765.01
-.-----r-------
District, shall be published once in the Contra Costa Times, a
newspaper of general circulation, and shall be effective as of
, 1992.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Central
Contra Costa sanitary District on the
day of
, 1992 by the following vote:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
Members:
ABSENT:
Members:
PARKE L. BONEYSTEELE, President
Board of Directors
Central Contra Costs Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa,
State of California
JOYCE MURPHY, Secretary
Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
County of Contra Costa, State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KENTON L. ALM
District Counsel
-3-
F:\DMS\MC.DIR\0048765.01
-------------,--.-.--...--.----------.------------------
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 10
Jul 16 1992
NO.
4. HEARINGS b.
DATE July 8, 1992
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A MID-YEAR
ADJUSTMENT TO THE REFUSE COLLECTION RATES OF
VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT AND ORINDA-MORAGA
DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. BASED ON AN INCREASE IN
THE ACME TRANSFER STATION FEE FROM $65.69 TO
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT PUBLIC
HEARING TO ADJUST
COLLECTION RATES
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
SUBMITTED BY
Walter Funasaki, Finance Officer
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: A public hearing is to be conducted to consider adjustments to the refuse
collection rates of Valley Waste Management and Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service, Inc.
due to an increase in the Acme Transfer Station fee.
BACKGROUND: The refuse collection rates of Valley Waste Management and Orinda-
Moraga Disposal Service, Inc. were last established by the District's Board of Directors
effective January 1, 1992 for the calendar year 1992. During the rate-setting process,
the Board of Directors was advised that the Acme Interim Transfer Station fee, which had
last been increased by the County Board of Supervisors on December 9, 1991, was likely
to be increased again during 1992. In the event an increase in the transfer station fee did
occur during 1992, the Board of Directors indicated that it would consider a mid-year
adjustment to collection rates to offset the resultant increase in the refuse collectors'
disposal expense.
In the continuing escalation of disposal fees in the County, the Board of Supervisors
approved an increase in the Acme Interim Transfer Station fee from $59.68 to $65.69
per ton effective December 9, 1991. During the fee-setting process, the Board of
Supervisors was advised by the County Solid Waste Manager that a rate application
should be obtained for the Acme Interim Transfer Station by March 1, 1992, which would
enable a "very necessary" rate review to incorporate major changes in transfer station
operations and the impending opening of the Keller Canyon landfill. However, an interim
landfill fee was established by the Board of Supervisors for the Keller Canyon landfill to
allow for its opening in early May 1992, with a final landfill fee to be established within
90 days. Without performing a rate review of the transfer station fee to include the
effect of such operational changes as the discontinuance of the use of the Altamont
landfill in December 1 991, and diverting such refuse to the Potrero Hills landfill and
available capacity in the supposedly full Acme landfill, the County approved an increase
in the transfer station fee effective May 18, 1992. The new fee was derived by re'placing
the disposal fee component in the existing transfer station fee with the interim Keller
Canyon landfill fee. The Acme Interim Transfer Station fee was thereby increased by 17
percent from $65.69 to $77.07 per ton. The components of the Acme Interim Transfer
Station fee as of December 9, 1991 and May 18, 1992 are summarized On Attachment
I. The County Solid Waste Manager has now advised the Board of Supervisors that the
transfer station rate review which will address operational changes, as well as include the
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
INITlATI.N. G. DEPT.lDIV. IC ~IE/G.
e!- ~~~v~__j ( ~
1302A-7/91 WNF PM R GER J. DOLAN
ADS/Position Paper #2/AdjColRt.PP
.-------..-.------..---r---.---.-
SUBJECCONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A MID-YEAR
ADJUSTMENT TO THE REFUSE COLLECTION RATES OF
VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT AND ORINDA-MORAGA
DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. BASED ON AN INCREASE IN
THE ACME TRANSFER STATION FEE FROM $65.69 TO
$77.07 PER TON
PAGE
DATE
2 OF 10
July 8, 1992
final Keller Canyon landfill fee, will occur in August 1992.
Valley Waste Management and Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service have requested a mid-year
adjustment to collection rates based on the May 18, 1992 increase in the transfer station
fee. The computation of the collection rate increase effective July 1, 1992 and the
resulting rate schedule are presented for Valley Waste Management on Attachments II and
III, and for Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service on Attachments IV and V. Further increases
or decreases in the transfer station fee in 1 992 which may be determined by the Board
of Supervisors will be adjusted in the normal January 1, 1 993 refuse collection rate-
setting process through the workings of the refuse collectors' Balancing Account.
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Contra Costa Times on July 6, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing to consider adjusting the refuse collection
rates of Valley Waste Management and Orinda-Moraga Disposal Service, Inc. effective
July 1, 1992, in accordance with the new collection rate schedules shown on
Attachments III and V.
1302B-7/91
.--.--'--------..-."..,-~"----_r-"----.--.---...-.-~.."""-'--'---'-'---'.--'--_._-~'-"-'-- -.-.---..-...-.---.-.---.
I-
Z
w
:E
%:
CJ
e
cr
Z
0
Q
w
i
Q
w
I-
CJ
w w
w a
""
Z a:
0 ~
t=
~
U)
a:
w ^
""
U)
Z v
~
I-
:E
a:
w
I-
!:
w
:E
CJ
cr
^
a:Z::l!
wo-
....>""
....zi
~~~
01
~~
_CJ
0::1
....0
WI-
Q
111
ell
cr~
~
~
a~;:::~:;~~ ~
N.nN.n OM (")
- (")
*
Ol'O-~COO)
0) co N co GlBO ~
CO(,,)O)I'-N-
LD .,,: .,,:~
*
Q) Q)
'" (J
c c
Q)Q) -IV
We- l!!... .~ ~
Q) c ~g
ClIQ.Q) ucr
.~ ~ S - .t:!
l!~! 0'0
~ 8:;l:a' g It
.c 0 ~ c( ~';l CD
IV "'Q)Q)IVc
.... .!!.!!! '" E.!:::I';l
t;i.5 c o.~ IV
Q)'- E 8,'- 0 ~
... .l:: la ~ )( 5- E 0.
Q><(wwcro
^^^^
IV IV.c (J
vvvv
I ~OlnO I~
~(,,)NCO
. . ~cO
^ ~U ~
co
V
I' co In NOO~ COo)-OIn~ I
~ I' (")00 COlnOCO--
(") I' .nNN .nO-iCO . 0
(") ~ ---
Q)
~
^ I~
<(
v
I' 0) In COOO~ 3 ~O)co In~
~ In r-: ~C!C!. . NNI' --
(") cxi ~NN .nON
(") (") ---
* *
I'
~
(")
(")
In In
en I'
N
M
~
-
(")
N
~
;;:
~
c-
~~
o~
~~
~c
If~
';:3c
CIV
oU
i.. ~.!i
J::!-
<(~
^^^
~~~
vvv
OOO~
Cl'!C!C!
MNN
^
(")
V
~: ,I ~
Q)
CI
...
IV
.c
(JQ)Q)
"'Q)Q)
~""""
(I) ...
>5(J
....- IV
c ... Q.
~IVE
0.21_ Q)
U.t:! C Q)
IV:E 0""
t) >';l B
o .t:! ~ <<I
UCoo.
.. <<I ~ 0.(1)
~~g~i
JUU>-O
~
C
Q)O
(J'+:;
c.-
IV.!!
c~
Q)r::f
"'(J
... .5 cr
~IVQ)
E :E .t:!
0. ~ (I)
OC- Q)
cGi<<l> 5
o>cJ::!
';lQ)O<<l ~
'iij Q'+:; ~ Q) -
.- IV a: 5 U
~Q)... "'...
r::f.t:! Q) Q) 0 '"
(J (I) 0.25 - 0
<(-oIOU~
Q)'!!! Q)'~ Q) Q)
... .t:! ... - .. ...
cnScn:>cncn
...
c
... Q)
c E
Q) ... .5
E '"
... ~ ~
'" :a' Q)
:g. <( ~
IV .2 #- "G
E #- ii N .5
~ In a: co ..
~NCI -g
... . C III
- "'.- > ~
o>ii~olll
Q) ~ ... r = .t:!
...rQ)OgJ'O
10 N 0.0) ._ ...
a:NO ,OQ.
^ ^ ^
10 .c CJ
V V V
-
en
-
0)
-
N
~~
CC
10 IV
5..n
...en
- .
tj~
8*
c-
OO
.~ ~
... -
IIlE
....-
Q) Q)'"
Q) (;j ~
~ ;.5
.g := ~
IV Q)~
tj EC
... IV j
Q) III
- C
III co
C 0>
l! c
... ~ IV
o ~U
- IV'"
C .co!!
o NGi
t:: en~
1n oa-s
<3 :;:'j
. In
~.!Q c
C==~O
IV~~t:: iii
~ '" ~ ~ 1Ii.9l
c~ -Q)'"
Q)IIlEMQ)3
0.- Q) - 0
)(=="Q.Nc
w%: E* oU 0
- 0._ _'+:; 0 ~
~iQ)o~;c
c ... Q) Q).- - ~
c ~ _ Q).t:! 0 UO
<(0 -E(I)
c~'2g::~~c:!
o .-- c '"
.+:; IVii'2 10<<10
:! ... uL!! & ~ U
(l)5...~...Q)~
~E~Q)~E~
- 10 '" '2 (J _<(10 0
l!!J::!;Q)5 U
10<("'25"'--
.=_1- >00
oE'O"'''''''
E Q)1Il'- ... 3 ~ :
.~ ~ ... c 0 - -
~c~Q)ucc
c 0- e".2.2
-;~Q)B~1;1;
.. E ~ E .!! ~ .21.21
III CJ 10 (J 0. o..t:! .t:!
~<(.c<(e~:E:E
s^ ^ ^^
0... N M~
(l,v V vv
~
Q)
...
c
Q)
E
Q)
"Q.
.s
---.-.---...,...------..----...... .. ..--......-...-----.-....-. -.-.....-----..-.... ..-..-.--......
VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT
MID-YEAR RATE ADJUSTMENT CALCULATION
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1992
< 000 OMITTt;D>
Allowable Expenses:
Per Staff Analysis, including inter-company charges and
excluding closure and post-closure costs
Bi-monthly billing expense
Capital Use Charge
Total Allowable Expenses Per January 1, 1992 Rate-
Setting
Increase in Disposal Expense
Total Allowable Expenses Per Mid-Year Rate Setting
Allowable Profit
Revenue and Expense Balancing Account
Total Revenue Required
Total Revenue Provided
Required Revenue Increase
Percent Increase to obtain Revenue Required Over Six-
Month Period July 1, 1992 - December 31, 1992
ATTACHMENT II
$13,619
51
260
13,930
547 < A >
14,477
643
<118 >
15,002
14.455
$ 547
7.56%
<A> Disposal expense increase for the period May 18 through December 31,1992.
ADS/PP #lNaIWaste.Att
-----r----------
VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT ATTACHMENT III
FRANCHISE ZONES 2, 4 AND 5
SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND COMPUTED COLLECTION RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
Current Adjusted
------------------ ------------------
Regular Automated Regular Automated
---------- --------- --------- ---------
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE:
1 32-gal. can weekly * $ 17.00 15.15 18.30 16.45
2 32-gal. can weekly * 34.00 32.15 36.60 34.75
3 32-gal. can weekly * 51.00 49.15 54.90 53.05
4 32-gal. can weekly * 68.00 66.15 73.20 71.35
5 32-gal. can weekly * 85.00 83.15 91.50 89.65
6 32-gal. can weekly * 102.00 100.15 109.80 107.95
7 32-gal. can weekly * 119.00 117.15 128.10 126.25
8 32-gal. can weekly * 136.00 134.15 146.40 144.55
Each additional can--non-regular 4.85 5.20
(rr pick-up) 20.40 22.00
1 can weekly - Specia service
(hilly) areas
2 can weekly - Special service 37.40 40.25
3 can weekly - Special service 54.40 58.55
4 can weekly - Special service 71.40 76.85
1 45 ga l. can 25.50 27.45
2 can 51.00 54.90
1 supercart 51.00 49.15 54.90 53.05
1 supercart-Danville 48.00 46.15 51.90 50.05
Townhouse: 1 can 15.55 13.70 16.85 15.00
2 can 32.55 30.70 35.15 33.30
3 can 49.55 47.70 53.45 51.60
MULTI-APARTMENT SERVICE:
Each apartment weekly 17.35 18.65
Each additional can weekly 11.65 12.55
Each additional can - non re~ular 6.40 6.90
(per pic -up)
COMMERCIAL SERVICE:
One can weekly 23.95 25.75
Each editiona can weekly 9.45 10.15
Each additional can -- 6.05 6.50
non-regular
One Cubic Yard:
One time per week 90.25 97.05
Two times per week 154.25 165.90
Three times per week 218.30 234.80
Four times per week 282.30 303.65
Five times per week 344.70 370.75
Two Cubic Yards:
One time per week 154.25 165.90
Two times per week 282.30 303.65
Three times per week 410.35 441.35
Four times per week 538.55 579.25
Five times per week 666.50 716.90
Three Cubic Yards:
One time per week 212.85 228.95
Two times per week 409.05 439.95
Three times per week 615.55 662. 10
Four times per week 820.75 882.80
Five times per week 1,012.80 1,089.35
Four Cubic Yards:
One time per week 282.30 303.65
Two times per week 537.55 578.20
Three times per week 768.20 826.30
Four times per week 998.60 1,074.10
Five times per week 1,229.95 1,322.95
Six Cubic Yards:
One time per week 402.45 432.90
Two times per week 804.75 865.60
Three times per week 1,180.30 1,269.55
Four times per week 1,569.25 1,687.90
Five times per week 1,958.20 2,106.25
COMPACTED REFUSE SERVICE:
Per cubic yard 31.35 33.70
DROP BOX SERVICE:
Seven cubic yards 293.00 315.15
(dirt and rocks)
Fourteen cubic yards 204.95 220.45
Twenty cubic yards 293.00 315.15
Thirty cubic yards 439.50 4n.75
Forty cubic yards 586.15 630.45
* Includes two 32-gallon cans of garden trimmings per
week and three refuse cleanups per year.
-----,----------------------------------------
ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
MID-YEAR RATE ADJUSTMENT CALCULATION
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1992
<000 OMITTED>
Allowable Expenses:
Per Staff Analysis, including inter-company charges and
excluding closure and post-closure costs
Bi-monthly billing expense
Capital Use Charge
Total Allowable Expenses Per January 1, 1992
Rate-Setting
Increase in Disposal Expense
Total Allowable Expenses Per Mid-Year Rate
Setting
Allowable Profit
Revenue and Expense Balancing Account
Total Revenue Required
Total Revenue Provided
Required Revenue Increase
Percent Increase to obtain Revenue Required Over Six-
Month Period July 1, 1992 - December 31, 1992
ATTACHMENT IV
$ 5,319
18
78
5,415
193 <A>
$
5,608
202
<38 >
5,772
5,579
193
6.92%
<A> Disposal expense increase for the period May 18 through December 31,1992.
ADS/PP #1/0rin-Mor.Att
.-....,---
ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. ATTACHMENT V
FRANCHISE ZONE NO. 1 Page 1 of 4
SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND COMPUTED COLLECTION RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
Current Adjusted
Rates Rates
-...------.....-.. ............-...-..--..
ORINDA . FULL SERVICE
-----...-----------------------------
REGULAR SERVICE:.
1 can $ 20.35 21. 70
2 can 40.70 43.40
3 can 61.05 65.10
4 can 81.40 86.80
5 can 101. 75 108.50
6 can 122.10 130.20
One can - Senior Citizen 17.35 18.70
Extra can on route 4.95 5.30
Special pick-up - 1 can 13.95 14.90
Special pick-up - each add'l can 4.95 5.30
MINIPACKER SERVICE:
1 can 27.05 28.20
2 can 47.40 49.90
3 can 67.75 71.60
4 can 88.10 93.30
ODD SERVICE:
1-45 gal. can 30.55 32.55
1-45 gal. can and 1-32 gal. 50.90 54.25
1-45 gal. can and 2-32 gal. 71. 25 75.95
4-45 gal. can 122.20 130.20
COMMERCIAL SERVICE:
One can weekly 28.15 30.10
Each additional can weekly 11.80 12.60
MULTI-APARTMENT SERVICE:
Per lM"li t ~r week 17.75 19.00
Each additional pick-up per week 2.85 3.05
COMPACTED REFUSE SERVICE:
Per cubic yard 34.55 36.95
BULK SERVICE:
ONE YARD:
Once per week 103.85 111.05
Twice ~r week 181.90 194.50
Three times per week 259.25 277.20
Four times per week 336.65 359.95
Five times per week 414.70 443.40
TWO YARD:
Once per week 181.90 194.50
Twice ~r week 336.65 359.95
Three times per week 492.15 526.20
Four times per week 647.40 692.20
Five times per week 803.15 858.75
THREE YARD:...
Once per week 246.81 263.90
Twice ~r week 493.62 527.80
Three times per week 740.43 791.65
Four times per week 987.24 1,055.55
Five times per week 1,234.05 1,319.45
FOUR YARD:
Once per week 311. 76 333.35
Twice ~r week 623.52 666.65
Three times per week 935.28 1,000.00
Four times per week 1,247.04 1,333.35
Five times per week 1,558.80 1,666.65
SIX YARD:
Once per week 444.91 475.70
Twice ~r week 889.82 951.40
Three times per week 1,334.n 1,427.10
Four times per week 1,779.63 1,902.80
Five times per week 2,224.54 2,378.50
EIGHT YARD:
Once per week 593.21 634.25
Twice ~r week 1,186.42 1 ,268.~.lJ
Three times per week 1,779.63 1,902.80
Four times per week 2,3n.84 2,537.05
Five times per week 2,996.05 3,203.40
SPECIAL:
One yard 20.70 22.15
Two yards 41.55 44.45
------~-__r___--'---...-.------~4-----.-'_....--------------_.~.- .----.--.~~...---.--------
ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. ATTACHMENT V
FRANCHISE ZONE NO. 1 Page 2 of 4
SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND COMPUTED COLLECTION RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
Current New
Rates Rates
DROP BOX SERVICE:
Twenty cubic yards
Thirty cubic yards
Forty cubic yards
Five yards - dirt and concrete
Sixteen yard school box **
$
342.50
513.60
684.80
342.50
273.95
366.20
549.15
732.20
366.20
292.90
ORINDA - NO BRUSH SERVICE
REGULAR SERVICE:
1 can
2 can
3 can
1 can-Senior Citizen
MINI PACKER SERVICE:
1 can
2 can
3 can
4 can
1-45 gal. can
1-45 and 1-32 gal. can
17.65 19.00
38.00 40.70
58.35 62.40
16.15 17.50
24.35 25.50
44.70 47.20
65.05 68.90
85.40 90.60
36.55 38.30
60.90 63.80
*
Includes one 32-gallon can of garden trimmings per week and
three refuse cleanups per year
A charge of $27.35 per week applies for each week not serviced
RENT-A-BIN service to be available on the following terms:
three cubic yard container delivery and pickup, one dump, and
three-day rent, for $90.
**
***
...,---
ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. ATTACHMENT V
FRANCHISE ZONE NO. 1A Page 3 of 4
SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND COMPUTED COLLECTION RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
Current New
Rates Rates
------------ -----------
MORAGA - FULL SERVICE
-----------------------------------
REGULAR SERVICE:*
1 can $ 18.20 19.45
2 can 36.40 38.90
3 can 54.60 58.35
4 can 72.80 n.80
5 can 91.00 97.25
6 can 109.20 116.70
Extra can on route 4.95 5.30
special pick-up - 1 can 13.95 14.90
Special pick-up - each add' l can 4.95 5.30
MINI PACKER SERVICE:
1 can 26.45 27.45
2 can 44.65 46.90
3 can 62.85 66.35
4 can 81.05 85.80
5 can 99.25 105.25
ODD SERVICE:
One can - 45 ~al. 27.30 29.20
One can - 1/4 and 1/32 gal. cans 45.50 48.65
One can - 1/45 and 2/32 gal. cans 63.70 68.05
COMMERCIAL SERVICE:
One can weekly 28.15 30.10
Each additional can weekly 11.80 12.60
MULTI-APARTMENT SERVICE:
Per uni t ~r week 17.75 19.00
Each additional pick-up per week 2.85 3.05
COMPACTED REFUSE SERVICE:
Per cubic yard 34.55 36.95
BULK SERVICE:
ONE YARD:
once per week 103.85 111.05
Twice ~r week 181.90 194.50
Three times per week 259.25 2n.20
Four times per week 336.65 359.95
Five times per week 414.70 443.40
TWO YARD:
once per week 181.90 194.50
Twi ce ~r week 336.65 359.95
Three times per week 492.10 526.15
Four times per week 647.40 692.20
Five times per week 803.15 858.75
THREE YARD:***
once per week 246.81 263.90
Twice ~r week 493.62 527.80
Three times per week 740.43 791.65
Four times per week 987.24 1,055.55
Five times per week 1,234.05 1,319.45
FOUR YARD:
once per week 311. 76 333.35
Twi ce ~r week 623.52 666.65
Three times per week 935.28 1,000.00
Four times per week 1,247.04 1,333.35
Five times per week 1,558.80 1,666.65
SIX YARD:
Once per week 444.91 475.70
Twice ~r week 889.82 951.40
Three times per week 1,334.72 1,427.10
Four times per week 1,779.63 1,902.80
Five times per week 2,224.54 2,378.50
EIGHT YARD:
Once per week 593.21 634 . 25
Twice ~r week 1,186.42 1,268.50
Three times per week 1,779.63 1,902.80
Four times per week 2,372.84 2,537.05
Five times per week 2,996.05 3,203.40
SPECIAL
One yard 20.70 22.15
Two yards 41.55 44.45
ORINDA-MORAGA DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
FRANCHISE ZONE NO. 1A
SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND COMPUTED COLLECTION RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992
ATTACHMENT V
Page 4 of 4
Current New
Rates Rates
------------ -----------
DROP BOX SERVICE:
Twenty cubi c yards $ 342.50 366.20
Thirty cubic yards 513.60 549.15
Forty cubic yards 684.80 732.20
Five yards - dirt and concrete 342.50 366.20
Sixteen yard school box ** 273.95 292.90
MORAGA - NO BRUSH SERVICE
-----------------------------------
REGULAR SERVICE:
1 can 15.85 15.85
2 can 34.05 34.05
3 can 52.25 52.25
Extra can on route 4.95 4.95
Special pick-up - 1 can 13.95 13.95
Special pick-up - each add'l can 4.95 4.95
ODD SERVICE:
One can - 45 ~al. 21.70 21.70
One can - 1/4 and 1/32 ~al. cans 36.45 36.45
2-45 gal. can-small truc 43.40 43.40
Current New
Rates Rates
------------ ......-----.....-
LAFAYETTE SERVICE
-----------------------------------
REGULAR SERVICE:*
1 can $ 17.00 18.30
2 can 34.00 36.60
3 can 51.00 54.90
Extra can on route 4.85 5.20
1-45 gal. can 25.50 27.45
HINIPACKER SERVICE:
1 can 20.50 22.00
2 can 37.50 40.25
3 can 54.50 58.55
Extra can on route 4.85 5.20
1-45 gal. can and 1-32 gal. can 47.00 50.25
*
**
Includes one 32-gallon can of garden trimmings per week and
three refuse cleanups per year
A charge of $27.35 per week applies for each week not serviced
RENT-A-BIN service to be available on the following terms:
three cubic yard container delivery and pickup, one dump, and
three-day rent, for $90.
***
Valley Waste Management
. 1990 N. California Blvd., Suite 20
P.O. Box 4007
Walnut Creek, California 94596
510/935-8900
~
'eJ
A Waste Management Company
June 26, 1992
President Parke Boneysteele
and Members of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553-4392
fRl~~~O\'t'~lQ)
JUN 26 1992
e,,~ CCCSD
~IAAY OFllE DISTRICT
ij
Dear Members,
On January 30, 1992 the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board approved a 3.43%
rate decrease effective January 1, 1992. The Board also approved that in the event the
Acme transfer station fee was changed in 1992, the Board would consider a mid-year
collection rate adjustment.
On May 13, 1992, Valley Waste Management 0JWM) received a letter from Bart Bisio,
Secretary of the Acme Fill Corporation, notifying VWM of an increase in rates at the Acme
Transfer Station from $65.69 to $77.07 per ton, effective May 18, 1992 (see attached).
VWM is requesting an increase in rates of 8.11 % effective July 1, 1992 to recover
increased transfer and disposal costs of $585,000. These costs are projected to be
recovered over the six-month period of July 1 through December 31, 1992. This will raise
the single can rate from $17.00 per month to $18.40.
Attached to this letter is supporting documentation. Should you or your staff have
additional questions, we will be pleased to be of assistance.
Sincerely,
~::ft~JV
General Manager
(James E. Landa
Controller
sl
enc
cc: Roger Dolan
Paul Morsen
Walter Funasaki
Joe Moore
Sandy Skaggs
a division of SAWDCO
PAGE , OF 5
NO.
6. BIDS AND AWARDS q.
DATE
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CAL-NEV A
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED FOR THE
LABORATORY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT, DISTRICT PROJECT
NO. 10077
July 14, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AWARD
SUBMITTED BY
Paul A. Sciuto
n E ineer
INITIATING DEPTJOIV.
Plant Operations Department
ISSUE: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District has advertised and received bids for District Project
No. 10077, Laboratory Facilities Improvement. The District must award the construction contract
or reject all bids within 60 days of the opening of bids. When the CIB was considered for
approval, the Board directed staff to obtain an additional Board Authorization for a number of
budgeted projects prior to proceeding. The Laboratory Facilities Improvement Project is one of
those projects.
BACKGROUND: The Laboratory Facilities Improvement Project, DP No. 10077, includes many
segments. One section includes the modification of three existing laboratory fume hoods.
Because it is a safety issue, the changes to the fume hoods should be addressed now while the
remaining portion of the work can be deferred. The three laboratory hoods were installed as part
of the Stage 5A construction nearly twenty years ago. These fume hoods were adequate at the
time of installation, . but do not meet present Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) regulatory requirements. The discharge system from the hoods also fails to meet the
latest OSHA requirements for exhaust stack height. To meet these new and more stringent
requirements, the exhaust fans will be replaced so that the hoods provide a higher air flow rate,
new exhaust stacks will be installed that properly discharge into the atmosphere, and new velocity
meters and alarms will be installed as needed to conform with OSHA specifications.
The Laboratory Facilities Improvement Project was identified as one of the projects which was to
receive further Board authorization prior to an additional allocation of funds. Since this portion of
the Laboratory Facilities Improvement Project is needed to address a critical safety issue, staff
recommend that the Board authorize proceeding with this work now.
The project was advertised on June 16 and 22, 1992. Five bids were received and publicly
opened on July 1. These bids are listed on Attachment 1 - Tabulation of Bids. The lowest
responsible bidder is Cal-Neva Environmental Systems Incorporated with a bid of $20,400 for
furnishing and installing three laboratory hood fans including exhaust stacks, duct work, and
velocity meters. The initial engineer's estimate for the work was $15,000.
The reason for the variance between the engineer's estimate and the low bid is that one hood must
be active at all times. This is essential for laboratory operations and will require a significant
coordination effort between the Contractor and the District. To ensure the safety of laboratory
personnel during construction~E~/~~bEl Mw.ee,QD~rb~B'b~,95iJTfJY than originally anticipated.
INITIAT DE TJOIV. J HIEF ENG.
(~
PAS
JLB
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CAL-NEVA
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS INCORPORATED FOR THE
LABORATORY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT, DISTRICT PROJECT
NO. 10077
:::IIII."IIII:i:llilllllllllli
PAGE
2
OF 5
DATE
July 14, 1992
This project is included in the fiscal year 1992-93 Capital Improvements Budget on page TP-52.
The current balance of the sewer construction fund, minus unspent project allocations, plus
projected dependable revenue will be adequate to fund this project. A funding summary is
presented in Attachment 3. Staff has determined that this project is exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under District CEQA Guidelines Section 18.2, since it involves
a minor alteration to an existing facility involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that
previously existing. The Board of Directors' approval of this project will constitute a finding of
agreement with this determination unless otherwise indicated.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Award of Contract to Cal-Neva Environmental Systems
Incorporated, the lowest responsible bidder, for $20,400 for the Laboratory Facilities Improvement
Project, DP 10077.
13028-7/91
---.--......-.-..-.....---.-.--.--..--,------..-.--
ATTACHMENT 1
PAGE 3 of 5
~ g V)
~ z:
a
r--: .......
::E 23 - I--
........ CL
>- N
~~ l.1.J g . U
N N I-- z: ~ x-
LL.c:t: ~ N ....... ~ l.1.J
I- ---l <::t I-- Vi
~~ ........ I"- 0:: - a
I-- ~;:!5 ....... a c:t: z:
N u.
<::t 0
l"- V)
a z: ~ a z:
co 0:: a a
I~ . .......
g . C") I--
I-- l.O CL
!M ........ c:t: N U
l.1.J Cl l.1.J ~
I z: N I-- z: r-- x
~ c:t: ~ N ....... ~ l.1.J
::> tii . ---l <::t I-- ~
:z:
~ w > ~ ~ I"- 0:: a
Vj ;:!5 0 :% z:
I?"
. Vl
CL a z:
>- 0:: V- a a
0:: a l.1.J >- . .......
a u ---l c:::( . 0 I--
I-- ---l N Cl <::t CL
c:::( ---l ....... l.1.J '-'; ~ .
0:: V) ---l > N I-- z: ~ u
a 0:: l.1.J >- 0"1 N ....... C") X
co l.1.J N 0:: ....... <::t I-- N l.1.J
c:t:1-- ---l l.1.J ........ I"- 0:: tJ Q9
---l l.1.J c:t: ::E ....... 0 c:t: a
::E Cl l.1.J I"- co ::E z: z:
.--..
C") >- ---l
----- I-- c:t: V)
....... I-- 0 z:
l.1.JU l.1.J 0 a
l.1.J a ::E V1 . .......
0:: ---l >- . L{) I--
I l.1.J I-- c:t: C") CL
1--> I N N Cl U
V) l.1.J l.1.J .
---l Cl z: N I-- z: g a x
---l z: N ....... ~ N ....... : N l.1.J
c:t:c:t: z: I-- <::t I-- ~ ~
I-- I-- 0:: ~ I"- 0:: a .
V) ~ 0:: c:t: 0 c:t: z:
z: 0:: ::E ::E. I"- co I:::E z:
....... a
:3: V)
Cl 0 z:
z: I-- ~ 0 a
c:t:U . .......
=> - a I--
I Cl g 0 CL
V) c:t: N N
H<.!J > l.1.J l.1.J . U
:z: :z: l.1.J :z: N I-- :z: ~ a x
0:: ....... :z: ....... ~ N ....... ~ l.1.J
=> Cl I I-- <::t I--
lJ.... => ---l 0:: ........ I"- 0:: ~ a
---l c:t: c:t: ;::: 0 c:t: z:
:z: U U ::E co ::E
Q :z: -I--
t- .......
CL
5 ~ U
V) l.1.J
en :z: . 'J
w
0 c:t: a
-' lJ.... ~ :z: - 0::
< d :i 0 CL
a: Cl a:: 3l 0 :z: ~ 3 -
w 8 w w ~ -
!< a a:: I-- I-- .,; 0.. -< :z:
0 :z: 0 g ~ c:j rd 0( a:: ~ a
~ I ~ ~ 0 u: 0 s l!! .......
ffi ~ I--
c:t:
Cl 0 >
Cl a
....... z:
co l.1.J
- 0::
l.1.J
en ---l - >-
a co w 0::
....... !;( a
CD V) 0 - I--
U. z: c:::(
0 a 0::
CL a
5~ V) co
l.1.J c:t:
0:: ---l
~=<f I-- ~
..J-l V) I--
~5 I..LJ ~ a
:3: ---l
a Cl
~ ---l .. ~ . ........
0 >- :z:
CD w
z 5l-
'j ~
~ ~ ~ - .
w
a:: a:: IE ........
~.
:b
~
a
0"1
.......
N
--'.--'-'-'- --...-.-.--.-.---.......................--...-T-.---.-.-..--........--
ATTACHMENT 2
LABORATORY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (DP 10077)
POST BID PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
PAGE 4 OF 5
% OF
CONSTRUCTION
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL COSTS
1 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT $ 20,400.00
2 CONTINGENCY AT 20 PERCENT 4,080.00
SUBTOTAL $ 24,480.00 100%
3 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $ 5,000.00
ADMINISTRATION/INSPECTION
ENGINEERING/AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 500.00
PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 2.438.00
SUBTOTAL $ 7,938.00 32.4%
4 PRE-BID PROJECT EXPENDITURES NOT $187,582.00
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PORTION OF
THE PROJECT
5 TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS FOR THIS $220,000.00
PORTION OF THE WORK
6 FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE $195,000.00
7 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS REQUIRED TO $ 25,000.00
COMPLETE THIS PORTION OF THE
PROJECT
-----------------.------r------------------.--------.
ATTACHMENT 3
PAGE 5 OF 5
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE AS
OF JUNE 30, 1992 (ESTIMATED)
$67,984,000
- UNSPENT PRIOR ALLOCATIONS
(37,522,000)
+ DEPENDABLE REVENUE.
10.534.000
$40.996.000
$40,996,000 > $25,000 (ALLOCATION REQUIRED)
.Doe5 not include ad valorem tax.
------- -------------- ------------------,--
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF
9
BOARD MEETING OF
July 16, 1992
NO.
6. BIDS AND AWARDS b.
SUBJECT
CONSIDER THE RESPONSIVENESS OF ALLIED CRANE,
INCORPORATED, BID TO INSTALL THE SOLIDS CONDITIONING
BUILDING CRANE, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10083, AND
AUTHORIZE AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER
DATE
July 14, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT
RESPONSIVENESS
HEARING
SUBMITTED BY
Paul A. Sciuto, Assistant Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Plant Operations Department
ISSUE: The bid by Allied Crane Incorporated for District Project No. 10083, the Solids
Conditioning Building Crane Installation, included six irregularities. The District must award the
construction contract, or reject all bids within 60 days of the opening of bids.
BACKGROUND: Present access to areas of the Solids Conditioning Building (SCB) is limited by
access to the basement and to the north side of the building; such access will be necessary for the
construction of the Cogeneration Project. Furthermore, when this and other upcoming projects are
installed, Maintenance and Operations personnel will need the ability to move material and
equipment to the basement on the north side of SCB. To accomplish this requirement, the District
proposes to install a crane above the bay on the north side of the SCB. District Project No.
10083, the Solids Conditioning Building Crane Installation, includes demolition of the existing light,
construction rails and trolley, and installation of a new double girder underhung 1 5-ton crane with
operation by remote control.
Plans and Specifications for the project were prepared by Beyaz and Patel, Inc. The Engineer's
estimate for construction was $264,500. The project was advertised on June 8 and June 15,
1992. A Summary of the Bids is shown in Attachment I.
The Plant Operations Department conducted a technical and commercial evaluation of all bids. It
was found that the bid of Allied Crane, Incorporated, the apparent low bidder, contained the
following irregularities (see Attachment 2):
. Allied Crane holds a 'C-61' (Limited Specialty) contractor's license; an 'A' (General
Engineering Contractor) or 'B' (General Building Contractor) license classification was
required,
INITIATltj DEPT.lDIV.
~~.
JLB
~NG
ROGER J. DOLAN
1302A-7/91
PAS
--------.---.--.---.-.---,-----.-----------.----.---.......--.......-----.
SUBJECT
CONSIDER THE RESPONSIVENESS OF ALLIED CRANE,
INCORPORATED, BID TO INSTALL THE SOLIDS CONDITIONING
BUILDING CRANE, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10083, AND
AUTHORIZE AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER
PAGE
DATE
2 OF 9
July 14, 1992
. Allied Crane added three (3) paragraphs of text to the Schedule of bid, thereby substantially
changing the specifications. The intent of the wording appears to limit the Contractor's
liability and shift the responsibility for performance to the District (see Attachment 3),
. the bid specification addendum was not noted as required by the Contract Documents,
. the Contractor's Safety Manual was not noted as required by the Contract Documents,
. the non-collusion affidavit was not included in the bid as required by the specifications, and
. the "Certificate Regarding Inspection of Contract Documents, Site, and Reference Drawings"
was not included in the bid.
It is the staff's opinion that these items taken as a whole, or in part, comprise a material variance
from the proposal requirements.
Bid proposals may be rejected by the Board of Directors if there are any variances from the
Contract Documents, which are determined by the Board to be material variances. Prior to
considering what action to take, it is appropriate for the Board to conduct a responsiveness hearing
to receive information from interested parties. If the Board determines that the Allied Crane,
Incorporated bid is non-responsive and it is rejected, staff has evaluated the remaining bids and
determined that the second low bidder, Rigging International of Alameda, CA, is the lowest,
responsive, and responsible bidder.
The Board of Directors has the following three options to consider:
1. Declare the bid of Allied Crane, Incorporated to be non-responsive and award the
construction contract to Rigging International as the lowest responsive and responsible
bidder,
2. Declare the bid of Allied Crane, Incorporated to be responsive, and authorize award of the
construction contract to Allied Crane, Incorporated as the lowest responsive and responsible
bidder, or
3. Reject all bids.
1302B-7/91
,..----.----...-.- ---~---.-.--'_..-.----..t-.,~~.-.---.
CONSIDER THE RESPONSIVENESS OF ALLIED CRANE,
INCORPORATED, BID TO INSTALL THE SOLIDS CONDITIONING
BUILDING CRANE, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 10083, AND
AUTHORIZE AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER
SUBJECT
PAGE
DATE
3
OF
9
July 14, 1992
The total project cost for this project was estimated in the 1992-93 Capital Improvement Budget
to be $374,000 (pages TP-66 to TP-67). The total cost of this project is estimated to be
$350,000 (see Attachment 4). The current balance of the sewer construction fund, minus
unspent project allocations, plus projected dependable revenue will be adequate to fund this
project. A funding summary is presented in Attachment 5. Staff has determined that this project
is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) under District CEOA Guidelines,
Section 18.2, since it involves a minor alteration to an existing facility involving negligible or no
expansion of use beyond that previously existing. The Board of Director's approval of this project
will constitute a finding of agreement with this determination unless otherwise indicated.
District staff will inspect the work and administer the construction contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Conduct a responsiveness hearing on the bid proposal submitted by
Allied Crane, Incorporated; and
2. Reject the bid of Allied Crane, Incorporated, as being non-
responsive; and
3. Authorize Award of Contract for construction of District Project No.
10083, Solids Conditioning Building Crane Installation Project, to
Rigging International in the amount of $233,353, as the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder.
1302B-7/91
---..........--.-. ..---------,--.....-------....--------------...---......-.---------_..
PROJECT NO.
Attachment 1 Page 4 of 9
Central .Jontra Costa Sanit....'y District
SUMMARY DF BIDS
Solids Conditioning Building
Crane Installation
10083
DATE June 30, 1992
ENGR. EST.~ 264,500
LOCA TI ON
Martinez, California
oc
W
BIDDER (Name, telephone & address)
BID PRICE
All i ed Crane, Inc. ( 510 ) 430-0543 $
1 9131 San Leandro Street, Oakland, CA 94603 195,350
Rigging International ( 510 ) 865-2400 $ _233,353
2 ,).0. Box 4013, Alameda, CA 94501
Dalzell Corporation ( 510 ) 835-0732 $
3 264,226
2434 Chestnut Street, Oakland, CA 94607
-
( ) $
~
( ) $
-
~
( ) $
- -- ---.----
-------.
~
( ) $ _______n
- .----- - _._.._---_._-_..._-~-_._~
-
( ) -_.._.._-_._---~ $ ---------
---------- ~----
-..--. ----~~
~
--------- --_.'.-..- ---------~~ l_~______ $
~--_..---- --------_.~-----_._-~--- ----
----- ---------..-.----- - ----- --- L~_ -----.--.---.- $--
- - - -
----..-----..--------------.. ---- -- -------- --...------
( ) --------- $
-----_._-- -
L_ ) $
----------.-- .. -- .n_ ------------ ---
PREPARED BY Joyce Murphy
DATE 06/30/92
SHEET NO. 1
OF 1
2503-9/84
0'1
,
4- N
0 0'1
0'1
L.l") ....
Q) 0
en M
ItS Q)
0... c::
~
OJ
III
iU
0
...
(1)
(1)
~ .......
fA
c
N 0
.-
+> ...
s:: CO
Q)
E =
..s::
u -
ItS CO
+> >
+>
c:( W
""C
.-
m
M
co
0
0
....
C-
O
~
+->
u
Q)
....,
0
~
Cl..
c::
0
.....
+->
10
.....
.....
10
+->
Vl
c:: ce
..... u
Q) ~
c:: N
10 CIJ
~ c::
u .....
+->
a:l ~
U 10
Vl ~
III
E
'" c:
z .2
"" iU
0 u
0
Z -l
() ()
CIl CIl
'0 '0
... ct
~
"'
Vl Vl
VlO 0 UJ UJ
c.... :z: >- >-
0
.....
+->
u
QJ 0 Vl Vl
VlO'l Z UJ UJ
>- >-
i
is
z
>- 0 Vl Vl
i z UJ UJ
>- >-
~
'O
C
dl Vl Vl Vl
'O UJ UJ UJ
m >- >- >-
~"ii
~c
'02
't;~
::;C1.
I r;
Q)
c.. C Q) Vl Vl Vl
UJ UJ UJ
EOE >- >- >-
0.,....,...
U +>I-
~"
-.- u
'Q:E ~ Vl Vl Vl
c C'':;
~~ G.I UJ UJ UJ
q:~ >- >- >-
....w
..
~
.bu UJ Vl Vl
~l! z UJ UJ
tIl- 0 >- >-
c z
8
~f
.! .!? Vl Vl Vl
1i'C. UJ UJ UJ
-0. >- >- >-
.. ~
~tIl
,,- ....
_to
~-
i~ Vl Vl Vl
J:oe
tA.. UJ UJ UJ
>- >- >-
'OE
.- "
al~
II>m
~c71 Vl Vl Vl
iiioe UJ UJ UJ
&" >- >- >-
(ii1O
0
ig M
....N ~
&Ii! ....0'1
......... a:l....
....... .... q- u.... ol:l~
~'Q.O 1.0 0'1 M
" " I ...... ~...... N
:JW U In ceco ce....
0
E N
~'O 0 Vl Vl
'O",
c_ Z UJ UJ
'" 0 >- >-
:gz
<(
.....
10
C c::
0 0 0
0 u ..... .....
c +-> +->
() ..... 10 10
~ c:: ~
~ 0
'E Q) Q) 0-
0 c:: +-> l-
t) 10 c:: 0
~ ..... U
U
C> .....
-c c ~
Q) .....
..... C> N
..... C> .....
~ ..... 10
0:: 0
0:
"-
'"
'"
'"
0
+->
~ N
..... 0'1
U 0'1
Vl ....
0
ce ....
..... >,
~ .....
10 ~
Cl.. OJ
>-
CD
~
CIl
;0
Q. CIl
CIl iU
ct 0
Q)
.....
~
-c
Q)
.s=
u
Vl~
Q)
-0.0
..... E-C
.o~Q)
c+->
CIJ 0
-CItlC
+>-0
c+>
OQ)O
+>-cc
-c
-cItlVl
~Q)~
-c +> -c
100
c::.....
Vl 0
Itl+->
~o~
C::Q)
+> .c
x -c E
QJ.,... :5
t-oz
....NM
..~.._~_._~~.,._..._._-~..,_._---_.__._--------'-'-_..----.--.,---- ---.-.---------
Attachment 3
PART III
PROPOSAL FORMS
Page 6 of 9
SECTION Z - SCHEDULE OF BID
~ su. Schedule of Prices for Construction of Solids Conditioning
Crane Installation Project in accordance with the Contract Documents.
It.. Unit
~ DescriDtion Ouantity ~ Price
1 Demolition of existing facilities, I LS
furnish and install one IS-ton
crane in working order
Building
Mount
$195,350.00
Price includes shoring of the concrete access ramp to support loads imposed
by the bridge crane system components rolled in on carts, and to support a
mobile crane to facilitate installation of the system.
Shoring methods and materials used shall be reviewed and approved by the
District. The District shall inspeet completed shoring and provide approval to
use the ramp as necessary, to bring system components into the crane bay and
position the mobile crane for lifting them into place safely.
With the District1s approval of all phases of the shoring, it assumes all responsi-
bility for the structural integrity of the concrete ramp, upon completion of
the project..
,;
Total Bid:
(Enter Bid Numerically) $195.350.00
Total Bid 1n Words: One Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty
dollars and no cents
In case of discrepancy between words and figures, the words shall prevail.
Signed: f?c4 IuJ~z-'
Bidder
DPIl0083- II 1-4
Attachment 4
Page 7 of 9
SCB CRANE INSTAllATION PROJECT (D.P. 10083)
POST BID PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL
1 Construction Contract $233,353.00
2 Contingency @ 20% $ 46.700.00
Subtotal $280,053.00
3 Construction Management
Ad m i nistration/l nspection $ 18,000.00
legal $ 1,000.00
Engineeringl As-Built Drawings $ 500.00
Plant Operations Department $ 5.147.00
Subtotal $ 24,647.00
4 Consulta nts/Contractors
Weld Inspection $ 2,500.00
Construction Support Service $ 6.800.00
Subtotal $ 9,300.00
5 Prebid Expenditures $ 36,000.00
6 Total Project Costs $350,000.00
7 Funds Authorized to Date $ 25,000.00
8 Total Project Costs Required to
Complete Project $325.000.00
% OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS
100.00%
8.80%
3.32%
12.8%
124.98%
---"---"-"---"--"----""-----"----------"------r-"""-----------------"----------------"------------ -----
Attachment 5
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE AS
OF JUNE 30, 1992 (ESTIMATED)
- UNSPENT PRIOR ALLOCATIONS
+ DEPENDABLE REVENUE *
$67,984,000
(37,522,000)
10.534.000
$40.996.000
$40,996,000 > $25,000 (ALLOCATION REQUIRED)
* Does not include ad valorem tax
-.----.-------------........--......-...------------....-,....-'-'---'
Page 8 of 9
rigging intet~ national
.
P. O. Box 4013
.
965 Atlantic Avenue
.
Alameda, CA 94501
.
U.S.A.
July 1, 1992
~~c~nv~1Q)
JUN 6 1992
Mr. Parke L. Boneysteele
President, Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
CCCSD
SEORETARY OF ThE ClSTRICT
Subj: District Project No. 10083, Solids Conditioning Building
Crane Installation Project, Letter of Protest
RI File No. A92-137
Dear Mr. Boneysteele:
Rigging International, as one of three bidders on the above
referenced project, herewith formally tenders this letter of )
protest in opposition to any proposed award of this work to the
apparent low bidder, Allied Crane Company.
Our protest is rendered on the basis of Allied Crane Company's
non-compliance with the bid documents, Volume 1 of 3, Project
Manual Bidding Conditions and Requirements, wherein on page
DP#10083-I-2, paragraph 1, it states that "The valid licensees)
required for the work are as follows 'A' and 'B'."
It is our contention that Allied Crane Company's contractors
license No. 456362 as stated in their bid submitted is in fact a
C-61 classification, not the 'A' or 'B' as required by the bid
document.
Therefore, we contend that Rigging International, as the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder, should be awarded this work.
Your consideration of these facts is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~-~~~
R. W. Wheeler
District Manager
RWW/lv
Telephone (510) 865-2400
.
Telefax (510) 865-9450
PAGE 1 OF 2
July 16, 1992
NO.
7. ENGINEERING a.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH G.S. DODSON AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR DESIGN OF THE SECONDARY
CLARIFIER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 20089
DATE
July 13, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE
AGREEMENT
Assistant
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department/
Plant Engineering Division
ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief
Engineer to execute a professional services agreement in an amount greater than $50,000.
BACKGROUND: Proper performance of the treatment plant's eight secondary clarifiers is critical
to meet effluent permit requirements. Although the clarifiers perform adequately during normal,
dry weather operations, wet weather events or operating in the nitrification mode stresses the
capacity of the units.
The key deficiencies of the secondary clarifiers include inadequate structural bracing and
inefficient scum removal. Floating sludge is not removed by the clarifiers, degrading effluent
quality and restricting the capacity of the secondary clarifiers. The structural bracing does not
properly support the weirs in the clarifiers; this condition causes irregular performance of the
weirs, makes maintenance difficult, and could result in complete structural failure.
A predesign report was recently completed by G. S. Dodson and Associates, Inc. that
recommends improvements to the secondary clarifiers. The recommended improvements will
replace the weirs, launders, and structural supports; increase the capacity and effectiveness of
the scum handling system; and upgrade the return sludge pumping system to improve operational
control. These improvements are necessary to maximize the existing clarifier capacity for current
and future wet weather flows.
The estimated construction cost of these improvements to the existing eight secondary clarifiers
is $5,344,000. A cost-reimbursement agreement with a cost ceiling of $498,000 has been
negotiated with G. S. Dodson and Associates, Inc. to provide the necessary design services and
prepare contract documents. Staff recommends that the Secondary Clarifier Improvements
Project be completed by G. S. Dodson and Associates, Inc. due to their previous successful
performance on this and other District projects.
The Secondary Clarifier Improvements Project is included in the 1992-93 Capital Improvement
Budget (CIB) on pages TP-21 and TP-22. The estimated total project cost, as listed in the CIB,
is $7,094,000.
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
1302A-7/91
KVA
DJC
WEB
RAB
KvA-
J)f~
Wl.~
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
--------T--...---------------..----....----..----.------------ -----....--.-------.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH G.S. DODSON AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR DESIGN OF THE SECONDARY
CLARIFIER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 20089
BI_ililllllliB
PAGE
DATE
2
OF
2
July 13, 1992
The Environmental Impact Report for the Stage 58 Project, prepared in 1982, considered
improvements to the secondary clarifiers. This document, prepared in accordance with District
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, was previously certified.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a Cost
Reimbursement Agreement with a cost ceiling of $498,000 with G. S. Dodson and Associates,
Inc. for design of the Secondary Clarifier Improvements Project, District Project 20089.
13028-7/91
----~----r---..._-.-.-..---------.-.--.--..------------
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF
1
Jul 16, 1992
NO.
8. LEGAL/LITIGATION a.
BOARD MEETING OF
SUBJECT
DATE
DENY CLAIM FROM VALLEY DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC., AND
FRANCISE FIORENTINO CONCERNING THE ACME LANDFILL
LAWSUIT CROSS-CLAIMS
TYPE OF ACTION
DENY CLAIM
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.IDIV.
Bonnie Allen, Risk Manager
Administrative/Risk Management
ISSUE: A claim has been presented by Valley Disposal Service, Inc., and Francise Fiorentino,
herein referred to as Claimants, for damages in an unspecified amount. Claim denials require
action by the Board of Directors.
BACKGROUND: Acme Fill Corporation filed a Complaint in Federal Court, under the name Acme
Landfill Corporation, against Claimants, and others including the District, seeking damages for
response and clean-up costs related to alleged hazardous waste releases. Several of the
defendants have subsequently filed cross-claims naming, among others, Claimants as cross-
defendants. Claimants allege that the District is obligated to reimburse them for any costs
incurred in defending the lawsuit filed by Acme and for any liability that may result from the
lawsuit. The District has been named as a cross-defendant by Claimants and contests all liability
to all parties including the Claimants. The filing of this claim is a legal prerequisite to these
Claimants pursuing contribution from the District. For this reason Valley Disposal Service, Inc.,
a dissolved California corporation and Francise Fiorentino have submitted this claim. Due to the
District's denial of responsibility, staff recommends this claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the claim by Valley Disposal Service, Inc. and Francise Fiorentino
associated with the Acme Landfill lawsuit and refer it to District counsel for further action as
needed.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
R7:G
ROGER J. DOLAN
INITIATI,NG DEPT.lDIV.
1302A-7/91
BA
PM
KLA
-----.----.-.---------......1-....